HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 93-09; Ocean Bluff; Tentative Map (CT) (9)JUNE 2, 1995
TO: ANNE HYSONG
FROM: Jim Davis
CT 93-09, OCEANBLUFF, FILE
I agree that the letter from George Bolton, dated 21 May, 1995 does not require a
direct answer from us especially in light of your recent meetings with him at the
counter and the January 25th, 1995 letter from Robert Wojcik to Mr Bolton. That
letter gave the basic City position that we will do what we can to see that access
is maintained. However, so the record will show that his letter was considered and
the concerns he expressed have been addressed, I write this memo to the file.
Mr Bolton expressed four concerns in three paragraphs that have the following
resolutions or explanations:
1. His first concern is that the Oceahbluff maps are not detailed to cover the
problems of ingress/egress for three properties. I believe this is his
misinterpretation of what is shown. The tenative map shows that two
connections to the existing dirt road that presently provides access to all the
properties in the area and shown as"La Costa Boulevard" on the Thomas
Brothers Maps will be made. One connection will be from Blackrail Court.
The other connection will be from the Poinsettia Lane partial improvements
going to the west from the Oceanbluff site.
When Poinsettia Lane and Blackrail Court have the partial improvements that
are being required constructed, the three properties will be better served by
two paved roads up to a much smaller portion of dirt road than before.
2. Mr Bolton's second expressed concern is that the grading for Blackrail Court
will leave two "impassable deep cuts" that will block egress both east and
west. This is basically the same concern already covered in 1, above. The
only cut banks in this area are not at the presently most used access points
to the properties. The roadways have been planned to have a nearly at grade
intersection with the existing access points.
3. The third concern of Mr. Bolton is that water meters will have to be
relocated. This is probably true. It is usual to relocate the utilities that
interfere with roadway improvements at the developer's expense.
4. The fourth concern of Mr Bolton is that all expenses for these
"problems" be born by the developer. This is the usual way to finance
construction for development and entirely within the control of the
property owners.
flfap