HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 94-02; Pacific Pointe; Tentative Map (CT) (25)c
*-*^ ' • **' " '^-'' ROD BRADLEY, Urban Planner
land planning, civil engineering, surveying RONALD L. HOLLOWAY, CMI Engineer
March 18, 1994
W.O. 438-0611-400 ^ ^. _ .__
ri£iOt-»-j * !t»'J
Mr. Michael J. Holzmiller
Planning Director .,... . R
CITY OF CARLSBAD ' '"" ' °
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576
RE: CT 94-02/PUD 94-01 - PACIFIC POINTE
Dear Mr. Holzmiller:
Pursuant to your letter dated March 2, 1994 regarding the completeness for processing, we have made the
necessary changes to the map and additionally have provided explanations to each of your items:
PLANNING:
1. Please find attached, our check for $9.00 payable to the County Recorders Office.
2. The size of the lots are now reflected on the map.
3. We have contracted with Gordon Bricken & Associates to prepare the required Noise Study. We
are estimating ten (10) days to complete.
4. The proposed zoning designation on the map has been deleted.
5. Attached please find our colored renderings. We are in hopes that this is adequate for your review.
6. Attached is our Architectural Guideline Compliance Summary.
ENGINEERING:
1. Lot areas have been placed on the map.
2. Top and bottom elevations of fences, wall and retaining walls have been added.
3. We have added additional topo, also refer to Hydrology Study.
4. We have added more flowline grades to the plans.
5. No recreational areas are proposed.
ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING ISSUES:
1. Bob Coates from Carlsbad Municipal Water District has agreed to a 12.5 foot sewer easement. We
have attached his correspondence confirming this.
2. The yard drains were only shown to prevent water from flowing over the public sidewalk.
3. Please refer to our Soils Engineer's letter.
5115 Avenida Encinas, Suite L o Carlsbad, California 92008-4387 o (619)931-8700 o FAX (619) 931-7780
March 18, 1994
Re: CT 94-02/PUD 94-01 - Pacific Pointe
Page 2
4. No comment.
5. No comment.
PLANNING ISSUES OF CONCERN:
1. So Noted.
2. So Noted.
3. Attached is a solution to the required 200 sq. ft/unit of open space. However, since we are
proposing single family dwellings with adequate rear yards, it is our feeling that this type of open
space is more desirable and satisfying, than the 200 sq. ft/unit of common area. We would
therefore request your consideration of this.
4. Attached please find our Landscape Plan with its proposed fence details shown.
5. We are providing the three off-street parking spaces as required. We would like you to consider
the use of turf block or concrete wheel strips for these parking spaces to help cut down on the
amount of concrete that will be required in the front yard.
Thank you for your help in this matter. If you should have any questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
BHA, INC
idley
ident
RB:pjh
Enclosure
(a:comments.cty)
PACIFIC POINTE
ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINE COMPLIANCE SUMMARY
GUIDELINE
1 . WHERE (3) TWO-STORY UNITS OCCUR IN A ROW AND THEY ARE
SITUATED LESS THAN 15 FEET APART, AT LEAST(l) UNIT MUST
HAVE A SINGLE STORY BUILDING EDGE NOT LESS THAN 10
FEET IN DEPTH.
2 . WHERE (3) TWO-STORY UNITS OCCUR IN A ROW AND THEY ARE
SITUATED 1 5 TO 20 FEET APART, AT LEAST (1) UNIT MUST HAVE A
SINGLE STORY BUILDING EDGE NOT LESS THAN 5 FEET IN DEPTH.
3. PER PROJECT. 33% OF ALL UNITS SHALL HAVE A SINGLE STORY
EDGE A MINIMUM OF 40% OF THE TOTAL PERIMETER.
4. PER PROJECT, 50% OF ALL UNITS WITH A LOT FRONTAGE OF
45 FEET OR LESS MUST HAVE (3) SEPARATE BUILDING PLANES
ON THE FRONT ELEVATION.
5. PER PROJECT, 50% OF ALL UNITS WITH A LOT FRONTAGE OF
45 FEET OR LESS MUST HAVE (3) SEPARATE BUILDING PLANES ON
THE REAR ELEVATION.
6. PER PROJECT, 50% OF ALL UNITS SHALL HAVE ONE SIDE
ELEVATION WITH A 7 FEET AVERAGE SIDEYARD SETBACK.
7. THREE-CAR GARAGES LIMITED TO 75% OF THE TOTAL UNITS
WHERE AVERAGE LOT SIZE IS 5,000 SF OR LESS.
8 . 50% OF EXTERIOR DOOR AND WINDOW OPENINGS SHALL BE
PROJECTED OR RECESSED A MINIMUM OF 2 INCHES.
9 . EACH PRODUCT SHALL EXHIBIT DIRECTIONAL VARIETY
IN ITS ROOF FRAMING.
MINIMUM
STANDARD
1OF3
10F3
33%
50%
50%
50%
75%
50%
100%
PRODUCT
1
1OF3
N/A
N/A
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
PRODUCT
2
N/A
N/A
66%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
COMMENT
WE ONLY HAVE 3 UNITS IN A ROW AND PLAN 1 IS THE
UNIT THAT HAS A SINGLE STORY ELEMENT. THE
ELEMENT IS 14' AT THE PLATE LINE VS. 12'.
THE GUIDELINE DOES NOT APPLY.
ALL OF OUR UNITS ARE LESS THAN 1 5 FEET APART.
/
WE HAVE FOUR OF THE NO. 2 UNITS PLOTTED. |
ALL OF OUR UNITS SATISFY THIS GUIDELINE
ALL OF OUR UNITS SATISFY THIS GUIDELINE
EACH UNIT HAS ONE SIDE ELEVATION WITH OFFSETS SO
THAT WE MAINTAIN AT LEAST A 7 FOOT AVERAGE
SETBACK.
i
WE ARE NOT PROPOSING ANY THREE-CAR GARAGES. 1
ALL OF THE EXTERIOR DOORS AND WINDOWS HAVE
PROJECTIONS.
ALL OF THE ROOFS EXHIBIT DIRECTIONAL VARIETY.