Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 94-04; Poinsettia Shores PA 1; Tentative Map (CT) (14)3 FEBRUARY 1,1995 TO: ASSOCIATE PLANNER, ERIC MUNOZ FROM: Associate Engineer, Davis VIA PRINCIPAL CIVIL ENGINEER FOR LAND USE CT 94-04, PUD 94-03, POINSETTIA SHORES PLANNING AREA A-1 we have reviewed the revised tentative map submitted January 31,1995. There is a major issue with the project. The issue is that a two to one slope is being proposed on a City drainage easement. The City cannot allow its drainage easements to be encumbered with steep slopes, steepness in this case is a function of the ability to repair and maintain an active drain line between proposed residential structures using standard construction methods and equipment. This slope is located along the entire westerly line of the lot. in a recent meeting with Doug Avis, Brian Murphy, George 0"Day you and myself this issue was discussed, in discussing the issue I explained that the slope could be on this Planning Area, A-1, or on the unencumbered portion of Planning Area B-1, CT 94-08 but not on the drainage easement, we also discussed that alternatively a retaining wall could be proposed. Engineering would not be opposed to a wall if planning approves it This map would be ready for a recommendation of approval accept for this issue. A draft of conditions and an engineering staff report have been prepared, if the applicant wishes to proceed with their map in a timely manner I am prepared to submit the report and conditions for review by my supervisor but I cannot proceed until this issue is resolved.