The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCT 94-05; Poinsettia Shores PA A-2; Tentative Map (CT) (2)City of Carlsbad Planning Department January 17, 1994 Brian Murphy Kaiza Poinsettia Corporation 7220 Avenida Encinas, Suite 200 Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: KAIZA DEPOSIT On May 5, 1993, applications were received from Kaiza Poinsettia Corp for CT 93-06, CP 93-03, PUD 93-05, HDP 93-06, an EIA, Notice Deposit and PFF. The total amount of your check number 3083 was 531,967.00. These applications were subsequently withdrawn and all monies except the S50.00 for PFF were available for refund. It was decided to leave the money on deposit and draw against it as new applications for the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan were submitted. On January 17, 1994, the following applications were submitted: CT 94-01, HDP 94-03, an EIA, Notice Deposit and PFF - totaling 54,570.00 in fees. Following is the recap and remaining balance available: Original payment 531,917.00 January 17, 1994 - 4.570.00 BALANCE AVAILABLE S 27,347.00. If you have any questions regarding the applications or related fees, please contact me at (619) 438- 1 1.61, extension 4441. Sincerely, / ' ERIC MUNOZ Associate Planner KM:vd 2O75 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92OO9-1576 • (619)438-1161 CITY OF CARLSBAD " -1200 CARLSBALr VILLAGE DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 438-5621 rROM..DATE. ACCOUNT NO.DESCRIPTION 0001 7 4-// tlA- fl^rtrr ?TNO. 1138 ydcd p*per. TOTAL 31, TO: FINANCE DEPARTMENT FROM: ENGINEERING/PLANNING/BUILDING DATE:.n ITEM(S)CHARGE oo ^WBM o U X> P oo 50 TOTAL CHARGES \ \ 3*101 CITY OF CARLSBAD 1200 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 ; 434-2867 REC'D FROM r\ /71f \ C^Qi-I DATE ACCOUNT NO. o n ('- iJ£unuJt i RECEIPT NO. 9964 DESCRIPTION 1 : - ' ,v *• y / / .//J/J /y^6 (//^/^ 6-'U <^6/ 0/-66 04/2?/94 TOT PL -jfX'gjj^^-^e-^z- NOT VALID UNLESS VALIDATED BY,'j£7W ^ TOTAL r»Aou Dtrr^icTco AI-. iLP- _ AMOUNT 102.1 3 **) 6V 31. 3**"^ 0: f 0-001 01 02 C-PRMT 7AE,j. ..-/. 74X ?V^/-v CITY OF CARLSBAD 1200 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 434-2867 REC'D FROM DATE ACCOUNT NO.DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 6767 ic ,E DEPARTMENT •/GlNEERINGyPLANNINd/BUILDING" Jtf(r TO: FINANCE DEP^BTMENT FROM: ENGINEERTOG/P/ DATE:_ ITEM(S) I ^2 TOTAL CHARGES CHARGE Z-2& /BUILDING V ITEM(S) ±L 2, fcl TOTAL CHARGES CHARGE io, (no a .300 fro FINANCE DEPARTMENT : ENGINEERING/PL^TMNIMG/BUILDING ITEM(S)r ^ TOTAL CHARGES CHARGE llOi-Z. TO: FINANCE DEPARTMENT FROM: ENGINEERING/P>TANN1flG/BUILDING DATE:. ITEM(S) TOTAL CHARGES CHARGE .JE DEPARTMENT^ AlGINEERING/PtfANNlrtG/BUILDIN* ITEM(S) TO: FINANCE FROM: ENGINEERTNG/PpCNN'jNG/BUILDING DATE:. TOTAL CHARGES CHARGE lozeo 500 ITEM(S) TOTAL CHARGES CHARGE FINANCE DEPARTMENT iM: ENGINEERING/PI^NJJNG/BUILDING '>* ITEM(S) & X TOTAL CHARGES tit TO: FINANCE DEPARTMENT- r\FROM: ENGINEERING/PiANNJNG/BUILDING DATE:.!± CHARGE ITEM(S) u TOTAL CHARGES CHARGE Woo 7ZQ TO: FINANCE DEPARTMENT FROM: ENGINEEWG/I DATE: G/BUILDING ITEM(S)CHARGE 4^4 "7 i?e TOTAL CHARGES r ~i MAY 23,1994 TO: ASSOCIATE PLANNER, Eric Munoz FROM: ASSOCIATE ENGINEER, Jim Davis VIA ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER CT 94-05, POINSETTIA SHORES PLANNING AREA A-2 This submittal is incomplete. A list of items needed to make the application complete follows: 1. It appears that two different directions of processing are being sought,. I. Some items appear to indicate that the Master Tentative Map, CT 94-01 will become final before this map and this map will then become a subdivision upon Lot 2 of that final map. Examples are lack of off site streets and sewers needed for this map to stand alone. II. Other items appear to indicate that this map is intended to not depend on CT 94- 01 becoming final first. Examples are the legal description, the listing of all easements over the master tentative map without an explanation which easements apply to this map. The applicant must choose one direction of processing and make all items consistent with that choice. We believe that having each planning area capable of becoming a final map on it's own merits will require a lot of duplication of requirements for the offsite improvements for Avenida Encinas, the drainage west of the railroad, grading and sewer improvements. 2. Footprints of structures are not plotted. 3. Offsite sewer and water which is needed to serve the project is not clearly shown. We suggest that the overall systems be shown on the "key map". 4. All drainage is not shown. A drain is needed from the cul-de-sac to the existing 66 inch S. D. How this project will drain into the offsite Windrose Circle drainage system is not shown. 5. State the traffic generation for this map alone. 6. Sight distances are not plotted at the site exits. We continued the review on the assumption that this map is not intended to stand alone but will H:\LIBRARY\ENO\WPDATA\DAVIS\944PSAR.TWO depends on CT 94-01 becoming final first. Under this assumption there a few issues, as follows: i. A complete realignment of the entrance so that it is opposite Navigator Circle is needed. ii. Verify and identify on the map that the only existing easements on this map are Items 21, 39, 42 and 43 on the easement list. These easements will most likely be quitclaimed on final map for CT 94-01 and if so, should be shown only in reference to CT 94-01 iii. The grading analysis as presented is likely to be confusing to one not familiar with the processing of the overall project. Please clearly show the grading needed for this map alone. A reference to the sheet grading done on the Master Tentative Map CT 94-01 may be needed for a complete explanation. A statement such as "this map proposes minimum grading upon the sheet grading for Master Tentative Map sufficient only to establish streets, drainage and lot pads. Whether the map will balance onsite or needs to export or barrow offsite needs to be addressed. iv. Driveway grades and vertical curves, if needed, needs to be looked at. v. The exit-only onto Avenida Encinas needs to be a minimum of 24 feet wide. The City Council has asked if this exit might also be used for entry. In the case that it does become an entry, the minimum width will need to be 30 feet. If the project is to be gated, additional area for turn around will be needed. Do a warrant analysis as a full intersection and as exit only, accounting for Street "A" including pedestrian demand to the recreation area. vi. If the project is to sewer to the proposed pump plant in Area-4, approval from CMWD will required prior to approving the tentative map. vii. A letter from a soils engineer is needed to allow less than the standard 5 foot distance from structure to the swale. viii. Street "R" has a sump drainage condition on the west end. Providing a fail-safe overflow will be a requirement. ix. Be consistent in labeling open space lots on key map and tentative map. H:\LffiRARY\ENG\WPDATA\DAVIS\944PSAR.TWO MAY 23,1994 TO: ASSOCIATE PLANNER, Eric Munoz FROM: ASSOCIATE ENGINEER, Jim Davis VIA ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER CT 94-05, POEVSETTIA SHORES PLANNING AREA A-2 This submittal is incomplete. A list of items needed to make the application complete follows: 1. It appears that two different directions of processing are being sought,. I. Some items appear to indicate that the Master Tentative Map, CT 94-01 will become final before this map and this map will then become a subdivision upon Lot 2 of that final map. Examples are lack of offsite streets and sewers needed for this map to stand alone. II. Other items appear to indicate that this map is intended to not depend on CT 94- 01 becoming final first. Examples are the legal description, the listing of all easements over the master tentative map without an explanation which easements apply to this map. The applicant must choose one direction of processing and make all items consistent with that choice. We believe that having each planning area capable of becoming a final map on it's own merits will require a lot of duplication of requirements for the offsite improvements for Avenida Encinas, the drainage west of the railroad, grading and sewer improvements. 2. Footprints of structures are not plotted. 3. Offsite sewer and water which is needed to serve the project is not clearly shown. We suggest that the overall systems be shown on the "key map". 4. All drainage is not shown. A drain is needed from the cul-de-sac to the existing 66 inch S. D. How this project will drain into the offsite Windrose Circle drainage system is not shown. 5. State the traffic generation for this map alone. 6. Sight distances are not plotted at the site exits. We continued the review on the assumption that this map is not intended to stand alone but will H:\LfflRARY\ENG\WPDATA\DAVIS\944PSAR.TWO depends on CT 94-01 becoming final first. Under this assumption there a few issues, as follows: i. A complete realignment of the entrance so that it is opposite Navigator Circle is needed. ii. Verify and identify on the map that the only existing easements on this map are Items 21, 39, 42 and 43 on the easement list. These easements will most likely be quitclaimed on final map for CT 94-01 and if so, should be shown only in reference to CT 94-01 iii. The grading analysis as presented is likely to be confusing to one not familiar with the processing of the overall project. Please clearly show the grading needed for this map alone. A reference to the sheet grading done on the Master Tentative Map CT 94-01 may be needed for a complete explanation. A statement such as "this map proposes minimum grading upon the sheet grading for Master Tentative Map sufficient only to establish streets, drainage and lot pads. Whether the map will balance onsite or needs to export or barrow off site needs to be addressed. iv. Driveway grades and vertical curves, if needed, needs to be looked at. v. The exit-only onto Avenida Encinas needs to be a minimum of 24 feet wide. The City Council has asked if this exit might also be used for entry. In the case that it does become an entry, the minimum width will need to be 30 feet. If the project is to be gated, as proposed additional area for turn around will be needed. vi. If the project is to sewer to the proposed pump plant in Area-4, approval from CMWD will required prior to approving the tenetative map. H:\LffiRARY\ENG\WPDATA\DAVIS\944PSAR.TWO City of Carlsbad Planning Department May 27, 1994 Brian Murphy Kaiza Poinsettia Corporation 7220 Avenida Encinas, Suite 200 Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: CT 94-05/PUD 94-04 - POINSETTIA SHORES PLANNING AREA A-2 Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department has reviewed your Tentative Tract Map/Planned Unit Development, application no. CT 94-05/PUD 94-04, as to its completeness for processing. The application is incomplete, as submitted. Attached are two lists. The first list is information which must be submitted to complete your application. This list of items must be submitted directly to your staff planner by appointment All list items must be submitted simultaneously and a copy of this list must be included with your submittals. No processing of your application can occur until the application is determined to be complete. The second list is a list of initial project issues of concern to staff. More project design issues will likely be identified and require resolution after the application is deemed complete. When all required materials are submitted the City has 30 days to make a determination of completeness. If the application is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the application will be initiated. In addition, please note that you have six months from the date the application was initially filed, April 29, 1994, to either resubmit the application or submit the required information. Failure to resubmit the application or to submit the materials necessary to determine your application complete shall be deemed to constitute withdrawal of the application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new application must be submitted. Please contact your staff planner, Eric Munoz, at (619) 438-1161 extension 4441, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director c: Gary Wayne Don Neu Bob Wojcik Jim Davis File Copy Data Entry Marjorie/Rich 2075 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92OO9-1576 • (619)438-1161 LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE APPLICATION: No. CT 94-05/PUD 94-04 - PLANNING AREA A-2 PLANNING: 1. A complete application for an affordable housing project Site Development Plan (SDP) is required for either on-site or off-site affordable units; unless off-site affordable housing units are existing in which case a draft affordable housing agreement must be submitted to make the individual tentative map applications complete. 2. As proposed, this map requires the final map approval of the master tentative map currently under review (CT 94-01). Otherwise, this map must be a "stand alone" map with all offsite improvements shown, etc. On the cover sheet for this map, eliminate all lot and footprints shown for areas outside this specific planning area. Show the lots created by the master tentative map (CT 94-01) and label area outside this planning area as "not a part". List only the easements relevant to this planning area. The grading summary needs to reflect minor finished grading beyond the mass grading associated with CT 94-01. The amount of finished grading beyond the mass grading will be the basis for determining if additional environmental review specific to this planning area is required; or if the grading is minor enough so that it was covered with the master tentative's mass grading. 3. Show information such as easements, lot areas and street cross sections that are relevant to this planning area and not on a master tentative map level. Sheets cannot be missing from exhibits packages for application completeness. 4. Plotting of units/footprints on lots and pads; and full architectural exhibits for all proposed plan types, all elevations and all floor plans. These exhibits must reflect items a-e as shown under #17 on the application checklist. 5. Landscape plans at 40 scale including trail and any noise wall landscaping. Provide items a-f as shown under #16 on the application checklist. 6. Trail plans for the trail system required for this planning area consistent with the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan. 7. Noise study with attenuation/mitigation measures to comply with City's noise policy. 8. List the Average Daily Traffic amount specific to this planning area. 9. Provide percent of landscaping for this planning area. 10. Provide number of parking spaces required/provided for this planning area. Distinguish between resident parking and guest parking. 11. Provide location, height and materials of all walls and fences. Indicate top, bottom and highest condition elevations at both ends and in the middle of walls/fences. 12. One copy of 8 1/2 x 11" reduced site plan and building elevations. 13. Provide an Environmental Impact Assessment form. The environmental assessment needs to, at a minimum, address the proposed project and the environmental issues specific to this planning area as outlined in the master plan. 14. Public Facility Fee Agreement: Two (2) copies: one (1) notarized original and one (1) reproduced copy. 15. Three copies of the Preliminary Title Report (current within the last six (6) months). 16. The SDP for Planning Areas E and M must be deemed complete for this application to be deemed complete. ENGINEERING: 1. It appears that two different directions of processing are being sought. a. Some items appear to indicate that the Master Tentative Map, CT 94-01 will become final before this map and this map will then become a subdivision upon Lot 2 of that final map. Examples are lack of offsite streets and sewers needed for this map to stand alone. b. Other items appear to indicate that this map is intended to not depend on CT 94-01 becoming final first. Examples are the legal description, the listing of all easements over the master tentative map without an explanation which easements apply to this map. The applicant must choose one direction of processing and make all items consistent with that choice. We believe that having each planning area capable of becoming a final map on it's own merits will require a lot of duplication of requirements for the offsite improvements for Avenida Encinas, the drainage west of the railroad, grading and sewer improvements. 2. Footprints of structures are not plotted. 3. Offsite sewer and water which is needed to serve the project is not clearly shown. We suggest that the overall systems be shown on the "key map". 4. All drainage is not shown. A drain is needed from the cul-de-sac to the existing 66 inch S. D. How this project will drain into the offsite Windrose Circle drainage system is not shown. 5. State the traffic generation for this map alone. 6. Sight distances are not plotted at the site exits. INITIAL ISSUES OF CONCERN PLANNING: 1. Please add the project application numbers (CT 94-05/PUD 94-04) to the upper right corners of plans for future resubmittals. 2. Follow all development standards and design criteria for this planning area as outlined in the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan. ENGINEERING: 1. A complete realignment of the entrance so that it is opposite Navigator Circle is needed. 2. Verify and identify on the map that the only existing easements on this map are Items 21, 39, 42 and 43 on the easement list. These easements will most likely be quitclaimed on final map for CT 94-01 and if so, should be shown only in reference to CT 94-01. 3. The grading analysis as presented is likely to be confusing to one not familiar with the processing of the overall project. Please clearly show the grading needed for this map alone. A reference to the sheet grading done on the Master Tentative Map CT 94-01 may be needed for a complete explanation. A statement such as "this map proposes minimum grading upon the sheet grading for Master Tentative Map sufficient only to establish streets, drainage and lot pads. Whether the map will balance onsite or needs to export or barrow offsite needs to be addressed. 4. Driveway grades and vertical curves, if needed, needs to be looked at. 5. The exit-only onto Avenida Encinas needs to be a minimum of 24 feet wide. The City Council has asked if this exit might also be used for entry. In the case that it does become an entry, the minimum width will need to be 30 feet. If the project is to be gated, as proposed additional area for turn around will be needed. 6. proposed additional area ror turn around will oe needed. If the project is to sewer to the proposed pump plant in Area-4, approval from CMWD will required prior to approving the tentative map. KAIZA TOINSETTIA CORPORATION 7220 Avenida Encinas. Suite 200, Carlsbad, CA 92009 Telephone: (619) 931-9100 Fax: (619) 931-8386 October 25, 1994 Mr. Eric Munoz City of Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 La Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 Dear Eric: This letter represents Kaiza's waiver of any and all required timelines for the processing of pending incomplete applications (CT 94.04, CT 94.05, CT 94.06, CT 94.07, CT 94.08, and CP 94.02) so that Planning Area D (CT 94.10) may first be deemed complete by either an on-site or off-site project. The pending applications referenced above may be re-submitted for a new 30 day completeness review but will not be deemed complete until Planning Area D is deemed complete. Because the re-submittals will be made under the original pending applications, no fees will be required with the re-submittals and all fees previously paid are applicable to the re- submittal. As we have discussed, both the City and Kaiza will work as diligently as possible to process and approve the above referenced maps. Please do not hesitate to call with any questions that you may have. Sincerely, Noriko President December 12, 1994 TO: ERIC MUNOZ, ASSOCIATE PLANNER FROM: Associate Engineer VIA: Principal Land Use Engineer PROJECT ISSUES STATEMENT ^ POINSETTIA SHORES PLANNING AREA A-2, CT 94-05/PUD 94-04 The Engineering Department has completed its review of the resubmitted project application for completeness and engineering issues. The application and plans submitted for this project are now complete for the purpose of continued engineering review. The project does contain some engineering issues or concerns which remain to be resolved by the applicant. All engineering issues should be fully resolved or addressed prior to resubmittal of the project for our review. The outstanding engineering issues or concerns are as follows: 1. Driveways for all lots must be plotted on the tentative map. 2. We are in receipt of an updated title report, dated December 5, 1994. The easement numbers listed on the tentative map should match the item numbers in this new title report. 3. Stopping sight distance of 300' is to be plotted, as opposed to the 200' stopping sight distance presently shown on the tentative map. 4. Please provide a signal warrant analysis for the intersection of Windrose Circle and Avenida Encinas. 5. Please show the proposed locations for call boxes at the gates. If no call boxes are shown, this project may have a condition of approval disallowing call boxes. 6. The street lot has been designated as 'Lot A'. Please note that lots should have consecutive lot numbers. If the final map for CT 94-01 has been recorded, and each map thereafter is to be recorded separately, then the lot numbers for this and all other tentative maps can begin with 'Lot 1'. However, a scheme for lot numbering of this and other maps for other planning areas has never been satisfactorily presented. 7. The typical lot drainage detail should show a sideyard distance of 5' from the face of building to the toe of slope, as opposed to the top of slope currently shown on the plans. Additionally, several lots show the proposed sideyard drainage swales located less than 5' from the buildings. The City requires that finish grading provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from a building. This issue may be resolved by having the Soils Engineer prepare a letter that indicates their approval of the proposed drainage design. 8. As this project is to "stand alone", this tentative map will have conditions of approval requiring installation of improvements including drainage, sewer, utilities, and street improvements. Attached is a redlined check print set of the project. Please forward this plan set to the applicant for corrections and changes as noted. The applicant must return this plan set with the corrected plans to assist us in our continued review. If you have questions regarding any of the comments above, please contact me at extension 4380. KENNETH W. QUON Associate Engineer c: Jim Davis, Associate Engineer H:\LIBRARY\ENG\WPDATA\QUON\PSHOREA2.MEM City of Carisbad Planning Department December 16, 1994 Brian Murphy Kaiza Poinsettia Corporation 7220 Avenida Encinas, Suite 200 Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: CT 94-05/PUD 94-04 - PLANNING AREA A- 2 Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning and Engineering Departments have reviewed your resubmitted Tentative Tract Map and Planned Development Permit, application nos. CT 94-05/PUD 94-04, as to its completeness for processing. The items requested from you earlier to make your application complete have been received and reviewed by the Planning and Engineering Departments. It has been determined that the application is now complete for processing. Although the initial processing of your application may have already begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by the date of this communication . Please note that although the application is now considered complete, there may be issues that could be discovered during project review and/or environmental review in addition to those already identified. Attached is a list of additional issues identified during the resubmittal review. All issues need to be resolved prior to work commencing on the project's staff report and scheduling for public hearing. In addition, the City may request in the course of processing the application, that you clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise, supplement the basic information required for the application. Please contact your staff planner, Eric Munoz, at (619) 438-1161 extension 4441, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, MICHAEL". HOLZMILLER Planning Director MJH:EH:vd c: Gary Wayne Ken Quon Don Neu File Copy Bob Wojcik Data Entry Jim Davis Marjorie/Rich 2O75 Las Palmas Drive - Carlsbad, California 92OO9-1576• (619) 438-1161 INITIAL PROJECT ISSUES Project No. CT 94-05/PUD 94-04 - Planning Area A-2 PLANNING 1. Please provide a legend for the floor plans explaining any symbols and abbreviations as shown on the plans. 2. Per item #26 of the CT/PD checklists please provide a materials board with color samples that will correspond with the colors and materials noted on the architectural/elevations exhibit (roofing, exterior walls, pavement, glass, wood, etc.) 3. Please verify that no roof top equipment is proposed or will be required with the project; otherwise provide roof plans that depict all roof top equipment, etc. 4. The landscape plan will be reviewed in detail by the City's landscape consultant now that a complete application has been achieved. 5. Only provide wall and fence details that correspond and pertain to the walls and fences involved in this project as noted on the plans. Use the same terminology between the plans and details when referencing walls/fences. For example, "noise barrier wall" is called out on the plans but not given a corresponding detail with the same name. All wall heights, materials and colors need to be indicated. Noise wall details need to specify the materials and thickness proposed consistent with the requirements of the noise study in order to achieve adequate noise attenuation. The landscape plan and site plan must be consistent with each other including wall/fence information. On the plans, the noise wall height appears to be called out; however, please call out all wall heights (noise, retaining, etc.) throughout the length of the walls including endpoints, midpoints and highest elevation. Noise wall heights must be in compliance with the project's noise study. The tentative map exhibits and landscape plans must be consistent with each other. 6. As part of the landscape plans, please provide an exhibit clearing showing the details (materials, copy, colors, height and length dimensions) of all proposed signage consistent with master plan provisions. Also indicate sign illumination styles and techniques consistent with the master plan (Exhibit 30, etc). 7. On the project's floor plans, please indicate a minimum of 5' foot sideyard setbacks. 8. Maximum encroachment of fireplaces into sideyard setback areas is 2 feet. Please dimension this on the plans. Some of the fireplaces appear to scale out to 2 1/2 feet of encroachment; 2 feet of encroachment is the maximum. Also, please label all fireplaces on the project's floor plans and give a corresponding symbol for the floor plans' legend. 9. On the sheet 3 of the tentative map, lot numbers are in circles with the floor plan type underneath; please use the same label on the map exhibits as the floor plan exhibits (either plan types A, B, C or 1,2,3). 10. For plan type 1 on the floor plans, provide a second floor/loft floor plan. 11. Label what plan type the second floor plans correspond to on the floor plan exhibits. 12. On the project's architectural elevation exhibits, please note the typical building materials and colors consistent with the materials/colors board. 13. The project's noise study does not appear to require any noise attenuation along Windrose Circle. Please provide a letter or amendment to the noise study with the noise consultant specifically not requiring noise attenuation there. In addition, the landscape plan is not consistent with the tentative map exhibits with regards to Windrose Circle and the proposed walls. Distinguish between noise walls per the noise study and other proposed walls. The master plan provides guidelines for walls and standards for noise walls. Lastly, the noise study on page 5 refers to a 5.5' high wall but a 6.5' high wall is referenced for the same location on page 1. Please clarify/correct. 14. The master plan's design guidelines require landscaping along walls to reduce visual impacts. There appears to be inadequate or a lack of landscaping along wall segments adjacent to streets. The maintenance statement on the landscape plans appears to be in need of clarification. In addition, please provide the percentage of landscaping for this planning area on the landscape plans and as an item under General Notes on the cover sheet of the tentative map exhibits. Please also provide the percentage of landscaping for Planning Area A-l on that project's exhibits; and on the exhibits of all other planning areas being processed with the City. 15. Both the tentative and landscape plan exhibits need to show the trail required with this planing area by the master plan. Please provide typical details/cross sections of the trail and depict all trail amenities. At the ends of the trail, indicate the trail's continue onto another planning area/trail segment consistent with the master plan's trail system. The tentative map and landscape plans must be consistent with each other. For A-2, the master plan requires construction and completion of the trail prior to the granting of occupancy. Please indicate this as a note on the trail plans or on a corresponding trail detail. In addition, also please indicate the following: (1) that the Homeowners Association shall assume all trail maintenance and liability responsibilities; and (2) prior to final map approval, an open space easement shall be dedicated to the property owner/Homeowners Association for trail purposes. 16. On the cover sheet of the tentative map, under Grading Analysis, please insert the following wording above the cut, fill and import quantities given: This site was mass graded under the approval of Master Tentative Map, CT 94-01. Final grading for this Planning Area involves: cut fill import 17. On the cover sheet of the tentative map under the Parking Summary, please place in parentheses (on-street parking) underneath visitor parking. Parking spaces for guests are allowed to be located on both sides of the 36 foot wide private street per the PD ordinance. Please plot these onstreet parking spaces on the tentative map exhibit to clearly show the guest spaces provided; and to verify the number of guest spaces present. 18. A check will be made for compliance with the Small Lot Architectural Guidelines. 19. Please provide entry gate/call box details for all planning areas proposing gated entries. ENGINEERING 1. Driveways for all lots must be plotted on the tentative map. 2. The easement numbers listed on the tentative map must match the item numbers in the new title report dated December 5, 1994. 3. Stopping sight distance of 300' is to be plotted, as opposed to the 200' stopping sight distance presently shown on the tentative map. 4. Please provide a signal warrant analysis for the intersection of Windrose Circle and Avenida Encinas. 5. Please show the proposed locations for call boxes at the gates. If no call boxes are shown, this project may have a condition of approval disallowing call boxes in the future. 6. The street lot has been designated as 'Lot A'. Please note that lots should have consecutive numbers. If the final map for CT 94-01 has been recorded, and each map thereafter is to be recorded separately, then the lot numbers for this and all other tentative maps can begin with 'Lot 1'. However, a scheme for lot numbering of this and other maps for other master plan planning areas has never been satisfactorily presented nor approved. 7. The typical lot drainage detail should show a sideyard distance of 5' from the face of building to the toe of slope, as opposed to the top of slope currently shown on the plans. Additionally, several lots show the proposed sideyard drainage swales located less than 5' from the buildings. The City requires that finish grading provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from a building. This issue may be resolved by having the Soils Engineer prepare a letter that indicates their approval of the proposed drainage design. 8. As this project is to "stand alone", this tentative map will have conditions of approval requiring installation of improvements including drainage, sewer, utilities and street improvements. 9. A redlined checkprint of the project has already been received by you; it must be returned with the next resubmittal to assist staff with its continued review. CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: DECEMBER 16, 1994 REVISED PLAN TO: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT * POLICE DEPARTMENT - ATTN: J. SASWAY * FIRE DEPARTMENT - MIKE SMITH v-^ * BUILDING DEPARTMENT - PAT KELLEY _ ££/ ' , , * COMMUNITY SERVICES - MARK STEYAERT l^ I i4 H ' * COMMUNITY SERVICES - VIRGINIA McCOY " ' l^ * CMWD WATER DISTRICT LANDSCAPE PLANCHECK CONSULTANT - LARRY BLACK CARLSBAD __SCHOOL DISTRICT * NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT - THOMAS LIGHTERMAN SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC - BICH TRAN (Memo Only) * ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON APPLICATION NO. CT 94-05 Note: Please use this number on all correspondence. PUD 94-04 PROJECT TITLE: CT 94-05/PUD 94-04 - Poinsettia Shores PA "A-2" APPLICANT, KAIZA POINSETT,A CORP PROPOSAL: 49 detached single family homes on 5,000 sq. ft. min. lots consistent with the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan. Please note that the arrhifprtnral pxhihitt; fnr A-7 aro tpp 53m6 as A~1 Tease review and submit written comments and/or conditions to: Eric Munoz ^/ __, the Project Planner in the Planning Dept. is Palmas Drive, by January u IQQE; • If not received by that date, it will be asumed that you have no comment and the proposal has your endorsement as submitted. If you have any questions, please contact Eric Munoz at 438-1161, THANK YOU COMMENTS: PLANS ATTACHED FRM0020 5/94 Date: 12-19-94 To: Planning Department From: Police Department/Crime Prevention Subject: Plan Review CT 94-5/PUD 94-04 The area of concern to the Police Department with this plan is: General building security. General security for residents. Keying- Upon occupancy by the owner or proprietor, each single unit in a tract, or construction under the same general plan, shall have locks using combinations which are interchange-free from locks, used in all other separate dwellings, proprietorships or similar distinct occupancies. Lighting- Aisles, passageways, and recesses related to and within the building complex shall be illuminated with an intensity of at least twenty-five one hundredths (.25) footcandles at the ground level during the hours of darkness. A lamp other than Incandescent is best used in this application. They shall be installed with a timer so as to go on when it starts to get dark and go off when it starts to get light. Porch lights and balcony or deck lights shall also be installed with timers or sensors. Recreation and common areas shall be provided with a maintained minimum of one (1) footcandle of light on the parking surface during the hours of darkness. A good choices for lighting in parking areas are high and low pressure sodium lights. There shall be surveillance from individual units into common or recreation areas. Lighting devices shall be protected by weather and vandalism covers. Walkway and entrance way lighting shall be designed with landscaping in mind. One should not deter from he other. Landscaping- The exterior landscaping should be kept at a minimal height and fullness giving police, security services and the general public surveillance capabilities of the area. There shall be vision through trees and scrubs to buildings, walkways, carports and parking areas from the street. Trees shall be designed as to not provide access to the roof or balcony areas. Walkways and entrance ways shall be keep clear and free from clutter. Fences shall be see through to provide surveillance. It is recommended that the perimeter of the properties be enclosed with a see through fence. Gates shall have locking devices. Addressing- All residential dwellings shall display a street number in a prominent location on the street side of the residence in such a position that the number is easily visible to approaching emergency vehicles. The numerals shall be no less than four (4) inches in height and shall be of a contrasting color to the background to which they are attached. It is recommended that house numbers be displayed in illuminated fixtures on the front of residences, clearly visible from the street. Doors-Dead-bolt locks shall be installed on all access doors of any residential building and attached garages, including the door leading from the garage area into the dwelling. Dead-bolts shall have a minimum protection of one inch and be constructed so as to repel cutting tool attacks. The dead-bolt shall have an embedment of at least three-fourths inch into the strike plate area. Strike Plate and dead-bolt are to be installed with wood screws that are three inches in length. It is not recommended to install double cylinder dead-bolt locks on a residential dwelling. The Fire Department considers them a hazard in an emergency situation. All entry and exit doors to dwelling units should be arranged so that the occupant has a view of the area immediately outside the door without opening the door. Except for doors requiring a fire protection rating which prohibits them, such view may be provided by a door viewer having a field of view of not less than 190 degrees. Mounting height shall not exceed fifty-four inches from the floor. It is not recommended to place glass panels within forty inches of a locking device.. The inactive leaf of a double door shall be equipped with metal flush bolts have a minimum embedment of five-eights inch into the head and threshold or the door frame. Horizontal sliding doors shall be equipped with a metal guide track at top and bottom. The bottom track shall be so designed that the door cannot be lifted from the track when the door is in the locked position. Security hardware such as a pin shall be installed on a sliding glass door. Hinges for out-swinging doors shall be equipped with non-removable hinge pins or a mechanical interlock to preclude removal of the door from the exterior by removing the hinge pins. Garage Doors-Doors that exceed sixteen feet in width shall have two lock receiving points; or, if the door does not exceed nineteen feet, a single bolt may be used if placed in the center of the door with the locking point located either at the floor or door frame header; or, torsion spring counter balance type hardware may be used. Windows-Security hardware shall be installed in all windows to prevent them from being lifted from their frame or forced open. Recreation and Common Areas- There shall be vision into all recreation areas. Landscaping or fencing shall not deter from surveillance capabilities. See lighting for proper illumination levels. By, Jodeene R. Sasway Crime Prevention Specialist (619)931-2195 CITY'OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: DECEMBER 16, 1994 REVISED PLAN TO: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT * POLICE DEPARTMENT - ATTN: J. SASWAY * FIRE DEPARTMENT - MIKE SMITH ->, * BUILDING DEPARTMENT - PAT KELLEY Vt& \ U * COMMUNITY SERVICES - MARK STEYAERT r" l-pH * COMMUNITY SERVICES - VIRGINIA McCOY \~" \ * CMWD WATER DISTRICT LANDSCAPE PLANCHECK CONSULTANT - LARRY BLACK CARLSBAD __SCHOOL DISTRICT * NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT - THOMAS LIGHTERMAN SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC - BICH TRAN (Memo Only) * ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON APPLICATION Note: Please use this number on all correspondence. NO. CT 94-05 PUD 94-04 PROJECT TITLE: CT 94-05/PUD 94-04 - Poinsettia Shores PA "A-2" APPLICANT: KA'ZA P°'NSETT1A CORP PROPOSAL: 49 detached single family homes on 5,000 sq. ft. min. lots consistent with the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan. Please note that the arrhitprtiiral pxhihitg for- A-7 a<* p - Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to: Eric Munoz _, the Project Planner in the Planning Dept. at 2075 Las Palmas Drive, by January uj IQQC; • If not received by that date, it will be asumed that you have no comment and the proposal has your endorsement as submitted. If you have any questions, please contact Eric Munoz at 438-1161, ext.. THANK YOU COMMENTS: PLANS ATTACHED FRM0020 5/94 December 20, 1994 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT, SPECIAL PROJECTS SECTION PLAN CHECK OF POINSETTIA SHORES - PLANNING AREAS A-1 AND A-2 Will utilities on private streets be maintained by homeowners associations? (street lighting, sewers, storm drains) We will do a more extensive plan check at improvement plan submittal stage. CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: DECEMBER 16y 1994 REVISED PLAN TO: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT * POLICE DEPARTMENT - ATTN: J. SASWAY * FIRE DEPARTMENT - MIKE SMITH * BUILDING DEPARTMENT - PAT KELLEY * COMMUNITY SERVICES - MARK STEYAERT * COMMUNITY SERVICES - VIRGINIA McCOY * CMWD WATER DISTRICT LANDSCAPE PLANCHECK CONSULTANT - LARRY BLACK CARLSBAD SCHOOL DISTRICT * NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT - THOMAS LIGHTERMAN SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC - BICH TRAN (Memo Only) * ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON APPLICATION NO. CT 94-05 Note: Please use this number on all correspondence. PROJECT TITLE: CT 94-05/PUD 94-04 - Poinsettia Shores PA "A-2" KAIZA POINSETTIA CORPAPPLICANT: PROPOSAL: 49 detached single family homes on 5,000 sq. ft. min. lots consistent with the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan. Please note that the arrhitprtiiral pxhihitg fnr A-7 af° t^p sam A~ Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to: Eric Munoz _ __, the Project Planner in the Planning Dept. at 2075 Las Palmas Drive, by January a IPQ^ _ • If not received by that date, it will be asumed that you have no comment and the proposal has your endorsement as submitted. If you have any questions, please contact EHC Munoz _ at 438-1161, ext. THANK YOU COMMENTS:L-^^^-^-^-^TS PLANS ATTACHED FRM0020 5/94 CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: DECEMBER 16, 1994 REVISED PLAN TO:ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT * POLICE DEPARTMENT - ATTN: J. SASWAY *• FIRE DEPARTMENT - MIKE SMITH * BUILDING DEPARTMENT - PAT KELLEY * COMMUNITY SERVICES - MARK STEYAERT * COMMUNITY SERVICES - VIRGINIA McCOY * CMWD WATER DISTRICT LANDSCAPE PLANCHECK CONSULTANT - LARRY BLACK CARLSBAD SCHOOL DISTRICT * NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT - THOMAS LIGHTERMAN SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC - BICH TRAN (Memo Only) '* ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT v ^ - , REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON APPLICATION NO. CT 94-05 Note: Please use this number on all correspondence. pyD 94-04 PROJECT TITLE: CT 9U-05/PUD 94-04 - Poinsettia Shores PA "A-2" APPLICANT:KAIZA POINSETTIA CORP PROPOSAL: 49 detached single family homes on 5,000 sq. ft. min. lots consistent with the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan. Please note that the architectural pyhihit<; fnr A-7 tho A-1 Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to: Eric Munoz __, the Project Planner in the Planning Dept. at 2075 Las Palmas Drive, by January UJ iqgg • If not received by that date, it will be asumed that you have no comment and the proposal has your endorsement as submitted. If you have any questions, please contact EricMunoz at ,38.n61f ext. THANK YOU COMMENTS: PLANS ATTACHED FRM0020 5/94 Carlsbad 0 Municipal Water District 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Engineering: (619) 438-3367 Administration: (619) 438-2722 Fax: (619) 431-1601 Date: "ecc~^ 6-^ 7-3 City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, California 92009 TO: FROM: a-x- c^^rt^j _ CMWD NO. c\<+-'5t'3 SUBJECT: In response to your inquiry of iPe^L^/v-^ag^ / (o , I q °i *•/ ,the District has reviewed subject project and the Carlsbad Municipal Water District conditions for potable water, reclaimed water and sewer systems are as follows: 1. The entire potable water system, reclaimed water system and sewer system shall be evaluated in detail to insure that adequate capacity, pressure and flow demands can be met. 2. The Developer shall be responsible for all fees, deposits and charges which will be collected before and/or at the time of issuance of the building permit. The San Diego County Water Authority capacity charge will be collected at issuance of application for meter installation. "Serving Carlsbad for over 35 years" Page 2 City of Carlsbad Date 3. Sequentially, the Developers Engineer shall do the following: A. Meet with the City Fire Marshall and establish the fire protection requirements. Also obtain G.P.M. demand for domestic and irrigational needs from appropriate parties. B. Prepare a colored reclaimed water use area map and submit to the Planning Department for processing and approval. C. Prior to the preparation of sewer, water and reclaimed water improvement plans, a meeting must be scheduled with the District Engineer for review, comment and approval of the preliminary system layouts and usages (ie - GPM - EDU). 4. This project is approved upon the expressed condition that building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless the water district serving the development determines that adequate water service and sewer facilities are available at the time of application for such water service and sewer permits will continue to be available until time of occupancy. This note shall be placed on the final map. 5. 77»g ^feuft/a-eg^- SAc./) Qj^e^e. -/p eil) C&rdihosrt Oh a If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned. F. Jerry Whitley Associate Engineer FJW:jm Citv of Carlsbad 94307 Fire Department • Bureau of Prevention Plan Review: Requirements Category: Fire Conditions Date of Report: Wednesday. December 28.1994 Reviewed bv: Contact Name Eric Munoz Address City, State CA Bldg. Dept. No. Planning No. CT94-05 Job Name Poinsettia Shores-A2 Job Address Carlsbad Ste. or Bldg. No. E3 Approved - The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans; information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifica- tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. D Disapproved - Please see the attached report of deficiencies. Please make corrections to plans or specifications necessary to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. For Fire Department Use Only Review 1st 2nd 3rd Other Agency ID CFD Jobff 94307 Filetf 2560 Orion Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (619) 931-2121 Requirements Category: W*e Conditions 94307 Deficiency Item: Satisfied 01 Building Permits Prior to the issuance of building permits, complete building plans shall be approved by the Fire Department. Deficiency Item: Satisfied 02 Hydrants Additional on-site public water mains and fire hydrants are required. Deficiency Item: Satisfied 03 Site Plan/Hydrants Applicant shall submit a site plan to the Fire Department for approval, which depicts location of required, proposed and existing public water mains and fire hydrants. The plan should include off-site fire hydrants within 200 feet of the project. Deficiency Item: Satisfied 04 Site plan/access Applicant shall submit a site plan depicting emergency access routes, driveways and traffic circulation for Fire Department approval. Deficiency Item: Satisfied 05 Access during construction An all weather, unobstructed access road suitable for emergency service vehicles shall be provided and maintained during construction. When in the opinion of the Fire Chief, the access road has become unserviceable due to inclement weather or other reasons, he may, in the interest of public safety, require that construction operations cease until the condition is corrected. Deficiency Item: Satisfied 06 Combustible construction materials on site All required water mains, fire hydrants and appurtenances shall be operational before combustible building materials are located on the construction site. Deficiency Item: Satisfied 07 Security gate systems All security gate systems controlling vehicular access shall be equipped with a "Knox", key-operated emergency entry device. Applicant shall contact the Fire Prevention Bureau for specifications and approvals prior to installation. Deficiency Item: Satisfied 08 Fire lanes Private roads and driveways which serve as required access for emergency service vehicles shall be posted as fire lanes in accordance with the requirements of section 17.04.020 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Deficiency Item: Satisfied 09 Brush clearance Native vegetation which presents a fire hazard to structures shall be modified or removed in accordance with the specifications contained in the City of Carlsbad Landscape Guidelines Manual. Applicant shall submit a Fire Suppression plan to the Fire Department for approval. Deficiency Item: Satisfied 10 Fire protection systems-sprinklers, alarms, standpipes Plans and/or specifications for fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, automatic fire sprinkler systems and other fire protection systems shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to construction. Page 2 12/28/94 Requirements Category: re Conditions 94307 Deficiency Item: Satisfied 11 Sprinklers required for buildings over 10,000 sq ft in area An approved automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed in buildings having an aggregate floor area exceeding 10,000 square feet. Deficiency Item: Satisfied 12 Emergency response maps The applicant shall provide a street map which conforms to the following requirements: A 400 scale photo-reduction mylar, depicting proposed improvements and at least two existing intersections or streets. The map shall also clearly depict street centerlines, hydrant locations and street names. Deficiency Item: Satisfied 13 Monument sign A monument sign shall be installed at the entrance to the driveway or private street indicating the addresses of the buildings on site. Page 3 12/28/94 N C T D January 4, 1995 Mr. Eric Munoz City of Carlsbad Planning Department 2975 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA Re: Poinsettia Shores Site Development Plans LOT 1 - CT 94-04/PUC 04-03 - Poinsettia Shores PA "A-l" LOT 2 - CT 94-05/PUD 94-04 - Poinsettia Shores PA "A-2" Dear Mr. Munoz: In our letter dated December 15, 1994, NCTD requested that the residential development of Poinsettia Shores be designed in a manner which emphasizes pedestrian and transit access to local amenities, such as the beaches, bicycle facilities, retail shopping and the Poinsettia commuter rail station. In the same letter, NCTD also requested that the recreational center at Lot 6 act as a focal point for fixed-route coastal service and rail station shuttle service along Avenida Encinas. We recommended that the street designs of the Poinsettia housing developments be in grid or radial patterns which create direct access to Avenida Encinas and help to develop a pedestrian and transit- oriented community. NCTD requests that these same concepts be applied to the development of Ix>ts 1 and 2. NCTD asks that the Carlsbad Planning department review the proposed street design for Lots 1 and 2 with regard to transit access improvments. At a minimum, NCTD recommends that pedestrian pathways be integrated into the lot design to increase access Avenida Encinas, transit facilities, bike lanes and the recreational center. In Lot 1, the circular street pattern is designed with two private drives to Avenida Encinas so that those lots located on Street "H" and Street "F" do have sufficient access. However, those lots located along Street "G" do not. By integrating a narrow pathway along the south side of Lot 185, and between Lots 191 and Lot 189 and out to Street "H", the walking distance to Avenida Encinas from Street "G" would be significantly reduced. In the plans for Lot 2, it appears that the residents of Lots 141-146 and Lots 167-169 are within access of Avenida Encinas via Street "0", the entryway to the development. However, residents located along Street "R" in Lots 150-158 and Lots 121-133 would walk up to 1,000 feet through NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT 311 South Tremont Street, Oceanside, CA 92054 61 9-967-2828 the development to Street "O" and out to Avenida Encinas to reach transit facilities, bike lanes and the recreational center. NCTD recommends, at a minimum, that this distance be significantly shortened by creating pedestrian walkways at either end of the housing development. According to the landscaping plans for Lot 2, there appears to be a narrow strip of open space on the far west side of the devlopment that extends from the entry at Street "O", back along the west side noise barrier wall to the southwest portion of Lot 2. NCTD asks that this strip be used as a pedestrian pathway which would reduce the walking distance for residents on the backside of the development to approximately 600 feet. Similarly, in the northeast portion of Lot 2, between lots 141 and 140, a pedestrian pathway should be implemented from the end of Street "R", through a gate in the noise barrier wall and out to Avenida Encinas. NCTD planning staff would be happy to answer any questions regarding our requests for improved transit access. Staff would gladly meet with city staff to discuss any of the transit-oriented design concepts discussed in this letter and in our letter of December 15. Sincerely, Paul W. Price Director Service Development cc: Julieann Nygaard, Carsbad City Council George Frank, SANDAG George O'Day, O'Day Consultants JANUARY 25, 1995 TO: ASSOCIATE PLANNER, ERIC MUNOZ FROM: Associate Engineer, Davis VIA: ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER CT 94-05, PUD 94-04, POINSETTIA SHORES PLANNING AREA A-2 ENGINEERING REPORT AND CONDITIONS TRANSMITTAL The Engineering Department has completed it's review of the project and recommends approval under the attached conditions. An engineering report was prepared to assist you in the preparation of the Staff Report to the Planning Commission as follows: I. TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Projected ADT: 490 Traffic and circulation were reviewed and all their issues were resolved with the Master Plan. cul-de-sac standards require that Avenida Encinas be extended across the railroad and connected to Carlsbad Boulevard before any unit within the Master Plan area can be occupied. Construction of the needed facilities was guaranteed with the final map for CT 94-01. II. SEWER Projected EDU'S 49 Both sewer and water issues were resolved with the review of the master plan and master tentative map CT 94-01 . District: CMWD III. WATER Projected use 10,780 CPD District: CMWD IV. GRADING Cut 22,000 Cubic Yards Fill 18,800 cubic yards Export 3,200 cubic Yards The grading quantities shown above are the additional grading needed to create lot pads and streets for this project. This site was a part of the mass grading for CT 94-01 and basic sheet grading is in the procees of being done as this report is being written. The export will be to other planning areas in the Master Plan area. V. DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL H:\LIBRARY\ENC\WPDATA\DAVIS\CT942CND.RPT Drainage Basin D, Batiquitos Lagoon. The preliminary hydrology study was prepared by George O'Day of O'Day consultants, dated April 30,1993. There are no drainage issues within this Planning Area A-1. There were major issues within the Master Plan area but these were resolved with CT 94-01. Construction of the needed facilities were guaranteed with that final map. The project is conditioned to meet NPDES to reduce pollutants in the runoff with best management practices. VI. LAND TITLE The parcel boundaries for this project were established by the recording of the final map for CT 94-01. There are no major land title issues with this project. Coordinating of utilities with the construction of the extension Avenida Encinas may necessitate certain utility easements being removed by the final map for this project or separate quitclaim action may be required. VII. IMPROVEMENTS The project does not require any public improvemensts except the offsite completion of Avenida Encinas in order to meet cul-de-sac standards. These improvements will consist of the extension of Avenida Encinas to connect with Carlsbad Boulevard. The construction of Avenida Encinas has been guaranteed with the final map for CT 94-01. No occupancy will be granted in this project until the improvements are constructed. To insure that the extension of Avenida Encinas will be availible prior to occupancy, the project a has condition that these improvements be constructed to the city Engineer's satisfaction prior to issuing a building permit. H:\LIBRARY\ENC\WPDATA\DAVIS\CT942CND.RPT ENGINEERING CONDITIONS FOR CT 94-05 33. This project is located within the West Batiquitos Lagoon Local Coastal Plan. All development design shall comply with the requirements of that plan. 34. Unless a standards variance has been issued, no variance from City Standards is authorized by virtue of approval of this tentative map. 35. The applicant shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirements of the respective sewer and water agencies regarding services to the project. 36. The applicant shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G.&E., Pacific Bell Telephone, and Cable TV authorities. 37. This project is approved specifically as 1 (single) unit for recordation. 38. If the applicant chooses to construct out of phase, the new phasing must be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and Planning Director. 39. The applicant shall provide an acceptable means for maintaining the private easements within the subdivision and all the private: streets, sidewalks, street lights, storm drain facilities and sewer facilities located therein and to distribute the costs of such maintenance in an equitable manner among the owners of the properties within the subdivision. Adequate provision for such maintenance shall be included with the CC&R's subject to the approval of the City Engineer prior to approval of the final map. 40. A note to the effect of the following shall be placed on a non-mapping data sheet of the final map.x Improvements designated on the improvement plans for this subdivision are private and are to be privately maintained?" A note shall be placed on the improvement plans stating which utilities are public and which are private. 41. All concrete terrace drains shall be maintained by the homeowner's association (if on commonly owned property) or the individual property owner (if on an individually owned lot). An appropriately worded statement clearly identifying the responsibility shall be placed in the CC&R's. 43. Approval of this tentative tract map shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the date of Planning Commission approval unless a final map is recorded. An extension may be requested by the applicant. Said extension shall be approved or denied at the discretion of the Planning Commission. In approving an extension, the Planning Commission may impose new conditions and may revise existing conditions pursuant to Section 20.12.110(a)(2) Carlsbad Municipal Code. 44. The applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or null an approval of the City, the Planning Commission H:\LIBRARY\ENC\WPDATA\DAVIS\CT942CND.RPT or City Engineer which has been brought against the City within the time period provided for by Section 66499.37 of the Subdivision Map Act. 45. Prior to approval of the final map, the applicant shall pay the current Planned Local Drainage Area fee nr Khnll r^fHnirt ^rninngo 'lystgms in {ronformanrp with Master Drainage Plan and City of Carlsbad Standaids as required by the City Engineer..-^ 45A. Prior to approvaKf-die-final map, the applicant shall pay all current fees and deposits required. 47. Prior to approval of the final map, the owner of the subject property shall execute an agreement holding the City harmless regarding drainage across the adjacent property. 54. Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the tentative map, a grading permit for this project is required. Prior to approval of the final map, the applicant must submit and recieve approval for grading plans in accordance with City codes and standards. 56. No grading shall occur outside the limits of the subdivision unless a grading or slope easement is obtained from the owners of the affected properties. If the applicant is unable to obtain the grading or slope easement, no grading permit will be issued. In that case the applicant must either amend the tentative map or modify the plans so grading will not occur outside the project site in a manner which substantially conforms to the approved tentative map as determined by the City Engineer and Planning Director. 57. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site within this project, the applicant shall submit to and receive approval from the City Engineer for the proposed haul route. The applicant shall comply with all conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the hauling operation. 58. The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to prevent off site siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in accordance with the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the City Engineer. Reference Chapter 11.06. 60. Rain gutters must be provided to convey roof drainage to an approved drainage course or street to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 61. Additional drainage easements may be required. Drainage structures shall be provided or installed prior to or concurrent with any grading or building permit as may be required by the City Engineer. 63. The owner shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all public streets and easements required by these conditions or shown on the tentative map. The offer shall be made by a certificate on the final map. All land so offered shall be granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the City. Streets that are already public are not required to be rededicated. 65. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall underground all existing overhead utilities within the subdivision boundary. 66. Direct access rights for all lots abutting Avenida Encinas and Windrose Circle shall be H:\LIBRARY\ENC\WPDATA\DAVIS\CT942CND.RPT 71. The applicant shall comply with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to approval of the final map, issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. 77. Prior to approval of the final map, the design of all private streets and drainage systems shall be approved by the City Engineer. The structural section of all private streets shall conform to City of Carlsbad Standards based on R-value tests. All private streets and drainage systems shall be inspected by the City. The standard improvement plan check and inspection fees shall be paid prior to approval of the final map for this project. < > Prior to occupancy of any unit within this project, the public improvements of Avenida Encinas shown on/D-337-9 shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.- < > Street "O" at Avenida Encinas shall be gated for egress and emergency access only. < > Prior to final map approval, the design and functional operation of the gate in Street "O" shall be approveed by the City Engineer. The City shall have the right but not the obligation to enforce access restriction via Street "O". Wording, to this effect, shall be approved by the City Engineer and placed in the project's C.C.& R.'s. A note to this effect shall be placed on the final map. < > F rior toapproval of the final n eededxto\determine cated on map r qiuremei lyironmefrtal •ector in C Alifornia QC.&R.'s Planning I necessary the developer shall preparesuch engineering studi modifications to the existing Barranca Canyon meet urban pomitant/de dilation/retention tisfactioi of the /City Engine er. Addtttio 1 be done to th/ satisfaction of the/Planni t ofTrequirt ^mitigation prognim. If require Coastal Development Permit snail/be obtain documentatk n Acceptable to the City Enginee the Project and Wed prior to alpproval of the final/map to provide for all itenance and liability responsibitiies of the basin. // ; the establi i Commissi other mechani H:\LIBRARY\ENC\WPDATA\DAVIS\CT942CND.RPT JANUARY 26, 1995 TO: BOB WOJCIK FROM: Jim Davis BARRANCA CANYON BASIN AS RELATES TO POINSETTIA SHORES Poinsettia Village, CT 85-29, built the basin, D-232-3, sht.lOA. No basin maintenance agreement is in the files. The plans were substantially changed on as-built. sammis, BLEP, CT 85-14, was required to construct an all weather access road per D 265- 2B. The road is not there and appears that it was never built. No maintenance agreement is in the files although Clyde believes there was one. Sammis's obligation probably should be passed on to Kaiza-Poinsettia. But since Sammis apparently got away with not doing the road I will omit any condition concerning the the basin maintenance or road. A condition is added conecerning modifying the basin to me NPDES/retention/desiltation requirements. City of Carlsbad Planning Department February 23, 1995 Brian Murphy Kaiza Poinsettia Corporation 7220 Avenida Encinas Suite 200 Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: CT 94-05/PUD 94-03 - POINSETTIA SHORES PLANNING AREA "A-2" The preliminary staff report for the above referenced project will be available for you to pick up on Monday, February 27, 1995 after 8:00 a.m. This preliminary report will be discussed by staff at the Development Coordinating Committee (D.C.C.) meeting which will be held on Monday, March 6,1995. A twenty (20) minute appointment has been set aside for you at 9:30 a.m. If you have any questions concerning your project, you should attend the D.C.C. meeting. It is necessary that you bring your required unmounted colored exhibits(s) with you to this meeting in order for your project to go forward to the Planning Commission. If you do not plan to attend this meeting, please make arrangements to have your colored exhibit(s) here by the scheduled time above. If you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact Eric Munoz, at (619) 438-1161, extension 4441. AD GARX E. WAYNE Assistant Planning Director 2O75 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92OO9-1576 • (619)438-1161 City of Carlsbad Planning Department PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF DECISION April 3, 1995 Kaiza Poinsettia Corporation 7220 Avenida Encinas, Suite 200 Carlsbad, CA 92009 Attention: Brian Murphy RE: CT 94-04/PUD 94-03 POINSETTIA SHORES PA "A-1" CT 94-05/PUD 94-04 POINSETTIA SHORES PA "A-2" At the Planning Commission meeting of March 15, 1995, your application was considered. The Commission voted 7-0 to APPROVE AS AMENDED your request. Some decisions are final at Planning Commission, and others automatically go forward to City Council. If you have any questions regarding the final dispositions of your application, please call the Planning Department at (619) 438-1161. Sincerely, MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director MJH:EM:vd Enclosed: Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3751 and 3752. Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3753 and 3754. 2O75 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92OO9-1 576 • (619)438-1161 May 29, 1997 TO: BOBBIE HODER PLANNING DEPARTMENT - GRAPHICS TRAFFIC ENGINEER RAENETTE ABBEY, BUILDING DEPARTMENT STEVE RUGGLES, STATION #6 FIRE DEPARTMENT GREG CLAVIER, COMMUNITY SERVICES PAT ZAVALA, POLICE DEPARTMENT KARL VON SCHLIEDER - GIS FROM: Planning Director STREET NAMES FOR CT 94-05 - POINSETTIA SHORE A-2 The following street names have been approved as a part of the final map processing for CT 94-05. A map delineating street locations is attached. Private Streets: Marlin Lane Sundial Place Capstan Drive Attachment H:\Admin\Streets4 0' CITY OF OCEANSIDE 400' SCALE: 1" = 400' NOT TO SCALE CITY OF VISTA CITY OF SAN MARCOS CITY OF ENCINITAS VICINITY MAP NO SCALE 800' MARLIN LANE CAPSTAN DRIVE EXISTINGMMGATORCIRCLE j LEGEND: EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT STREET NAMES: 1, CAPSTAN DRIVE 2, MARLIN LANE 3, SUNDIAL PLACE STREET MAP ft FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS FOR SAN SEBASTIAN C.T. 94-05 CONSULT VN T S mo»»Mt ( CMtW. &**~* Xn<c »«I99U*P 3-27-97 ll>44.43 an PSD: ZSTFIU} Hofman Planning Associates •0$ Planning Project Management Fiscal Analysis April 13, 2000 Anne Hysong City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: Poinsettia Shores Master Plan - Planning Area A-2 Fencing Additions Dear Anne: Thank you for meeting with Matt Howe and me on April 3, 2000 to discuss the possibility of constructing additional fencing within Planning Area A-2 adjacent to the private trail between Planning Areas A-2 and A-3 of the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan. As requested, I have prepared this letter is to document our discussions and the additional fencing proposal. Since Planning Area A-2 was approved as a gated community, Greystone Homes is obligated to the homeowners now living within this planning area to complete the fencing as proposed in order to establish a true gated neighborhood. Attached to this letter are two exhibits. One exhibit provides the locations of the additional fencing while the second exhibit provides an elevation view of the tubular fencing to be provided. There are three separate areas where the proposed fencing will be constructed. All fencing will be no taller than six feet in height per City standards and will consist of tubular metal posts. The fencing will be fastened to the existing community block walls or gates and will be compatible in design and appearance to the existing development. All fencing will be setback five feet from existing sidewalks. With regards to the fencing location at the end of Sundial Place, Matt Howe contacted the homeowner at 7454 Sundial Place (Lot 39) to seek permission to place a portion of this fence along the top of this homeowner's existing low block wall. The homeowner did not agree with adding a fence on top of his block wall nor did he agree with locating a five to six-foot fence adjacent to his low block wall. It is this homeowner's preference that the fence be located along the planning area boundary between Planning Areas A-2 and A-3. Pursuant to my discussion with you, it is the city's current position that the best location for the fencing would be consistent with that shown on the exhibit provided. This location would create a more open and usable area along the private trail. If you are in agreement with the proposed fencing additions, please sign below. Thank you again for taking the time to consider this proposal. If you have any questions, feel free to contact either Matt Howe at Greystone Homes or me. Sincerely, I am in agreement with the proposed fencing additions as described above. Stan Weiler Anne Hysong v / / Date Attachments 5900 Pasteur Court • Suite 150 • Carlsbad • CA 92008 • (760)438-1465 • Fax: (760)438-2443 RECREATION AREA IE WALL BEIGE IE PILASTER .3EIGE iCLAY \BLE THRU -4727 [ING TO iNDATlONS DS WALL A2- CONCRETE CUR I GUTTER NOTE: LOOP DEI PRIOR TO OR ASP1-V .INSTALL 5TGP SIGN PER ClTT STDS - - - • \ L-i X£ ^ ^ _ .. . _ _ . . . cyTpvin |.j 1 £r\~V F »TD _<XKn?a. TTPICAL ? EACH SIDE ST.TO. C=J ' nfTER PANEL \ f-0' HIDE • >, TTPICAL Of 2 . \ "XT M.H. ^ LO ^ , ' ^ ; CON * G r "~ CONCRETE CURB GUTTER . DETECTORS, PAINTED STRIPING 'BOTT5' MARKERS 2 ROWS OF 20 EACH NOTE: LOOP PRIOR OR AS TTPIC A O K I