HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 96-03; Pacific View Estates; Tentative Map (CT) (8)Cultural Resource Survey
And Evaluation of
Pacific View Estates
San Diego County, California
Prepared for:
Pacific View Estates
P.O. Box 2198
Carlsbad, California 92018
Prepared by:
ASM Affiliates Inc.
543 Encinitas Boulevard, Suite 114
Encinitas, California 92024
John R. Cook, SOPA
Principal
April 1996
Key Words: Survey and Test, CA-SDI-14,259, Prehistoric Shell Midden,
Radiocarbon Date, San Luis Rey 7.5' USGS Quadrangle
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
Abstract ii
Project Description 1
Background Information 3
Cultural Resource Survey 8
Cultural Resource Evaluation 10
Recommendations 18
References 20
FIGURES
Figure Pag
1. Project Vicinity iii
2. Project Location 2
3. SDI-14,259 Location within Project 9
4. Test Unit Shell Distribution 15
TABLES
Table Page
1. Unit 1 Shell Distribution by Level 14
Appendices - (Confidential)
A Record Searches
B Site Record for SDI-14,259
C Report of Radiocarbon Dating Analysis
D Catalog
E Figure 3. - Site Location within Project
Pacific View Estates
Abstract
ABSTRACT
This report documents the results of a cultural resource survey and significance evaluation conducted
by ASM Affiliates of the Pacific View Estates project located within the City of Carlsbad, California
(Figure 1). The proposed project consists of a subdivision of 8.5 acres of currently undeveloped
property situated north of Carlsbad Village Drive between Interstate 5 and El Camino Real. Record
searches obtained for the project indicated that the property had not been previously studied, but that
six prehistoric sites occur within a mile radius vicinity. An intensive survey of the project property
resulted in the identification of an isolated artifact, remnants of a disturbed shell scatter and a small
shell and lithic deposit. Neither the isolate nor disturbed shell scatter were considered potentially
important cultural resources, and no further investigation was deemed warranted. The shell and
lithic deposit was, however, subjected to significance evaluation in accordance with City of Carlsbad
Cultural Resource Guidelines (1990). Recorded with the South Coastal Information Center at San
Diego State University as SDI-14,259, the evaluation consisted of subsurface testing involving the
excavation of six shovel test pits and one 1x1 meter test unit to determine the horizontal and vertical
extent of the deposit, its integrity, and potential to yield important archaeological data pursuant to
the California Environmental Quality Act. Testing revealed the presence of a small shellfish
resource processing locale approximately 10 by 5 meters in area with a depth of 110 centimeters.
Analysis of recovered cultural material, which included over 8,000 grams of shell but very few
artifacts, indicates that SDI-12,259 is not considered an important resource given its integrity and
research value, and therefore mitigation is not recommended.
Pacific View Estates
LAKESIDE
TEE / •
8s
EL CAJON
i63> §v- LA MESA
Figure 1
PROJECT VICINITY
Fi:VK\j>rojecte\3.110\figp2.cdr_
Sewage
Disposalf
—-*.-* — Jr-,—,
Source: USGS 7.5' Quadrangle San Luis Rey, CA 1967
Project Location: NW1/4 of the SW1/4 of Sec. 32 T. 11 S. R. 4 W.
1000 Figure 2
PROJECT LOCATION
feet
Project Description
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Pacific View Estates project is a proposed subdivision of 8.5 acres that will create 24 residential
lots. Access will be taken from Carlsbad Village Drive via an extension of Donna Court into the
western area of the property. The project parcel is located in the northwest quarter of the southwest
quarter of Section 32, Range 4 West, Township 11 South on the San Luis Rey 7.5' U.S.G.S.
topographic quadrangle (Figure 2). It is partially bounded on the south by Carlsbad Village Drive,
on the west by Hosp Way, on the north by Wintergreen and Doreet Ways, and on the east by Arroyo
Way. The Elm Reservoir water tower is located in the south-central area of the property.
The project property consists of a moderate-sized central knoll and its eastern and western side
slopes. The Elm Reservoir and a residential parcel on the top of the knoll are not part of the
property. Much of the area has been disturbed during construction of the water tank, residence, and
surrounding development. Eucalyptus trees line the western edge of the property, and introduced
weeds and grasses cover the lower slopes. From about mid-point to the top of the knoll, the slope
increases and native vegetation replaces the grasses. The eastern side of the knoll is more heavily
vegetated; mature manzanita and other shrubs of the coastal sage community cover the low ridges
and small drainages. The far eastern perimeter of the property is disturbed by grading from the
adjacent development, and a ten meter bladed road has been graded from the knoll top of the eastern
edge of the property.
Pacific View Estates
Background
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Over 60 years of archaeological investigations along the Southern California coast have yielded a
long sequence of rich and diverse prehistoric occupation (Moratto 1984). This occupation is
particularly well-documented in western San Diego County, and extends from the early Holocene
into the ethnohistoric period (e.g., Hines 1991; Meighan 1954; True 1958; Vanderpot et al. 1993;
Warren 1964). The prehistory of the general project region is summarized below as background
information to the current investigation.
Beginning with Rogers (1939), a variety of regional chronologies have been proposed for southern
coastal California. Indeed, a proliferation of named "cultures," "complexes," "traditions," "stages,"
and "periods" characterize previous research (Meighan 1959; Moriarty 1966; Rogers 1945; True
1958, 1966, 1970; Wallace 1955, 1978; Warren 1968). Despite this apparent terminological
confusion, there is general agreement on the major temporal units for the region. The prehistory of
San Diego County can be divided into three temporal periods: Paleoindian, Archaic, and Late
Prehistoric (Bull 1987; Ezell 1987; Moriarty 1966; Warren 1987).
The antiquity of human occupation in the New World has been the subject of considerable
hemisphere-wide debate over the last few decades and a number of sites have been suggested to
represent very early occupation of the Americas. The currently accepted model is that humans first
entered the western hemisphere between 12,000 and 15,000 B.P. While there is no firm evidence
of human occupation in the southern coastal California prior to 12,000 B.P., the possibility has
intrigued a number of investigators, and dates of 48,000 B.P. and 23,000 B.P. have been reported
(Bada et al. 1974; Carter 1980; Rogers 1974). The technique employed to date these sites (amino
acid racemization), however, has been largely discredited by recent ASM radiocarbon dating of early
human remains found along the California coast (Taylor et al. 1985). Despite such intensive interest
and a long history of research into the early occupation of North America, no firm, widely accepted
evidence dating prior to 15,000 B.P. has emerged. This state of knowledge stands in stark contrast
to Australia where 30 years of less intensive research has yielded an extensive body of evidence for
occupation dating back to pre-40,000 B.P. Strong evidence that objects recovered from possible
very early sites are manufactured by humans and that these objects indeed date prior to 15,000 B.P.,
or are directly associated with such Pleistocene deposits, is currently lacking (e.g., Haynes 1969;
Jelinek 1992).
The Paleoindian period, dating from 12,000 to 8,000 B.P., is typified by artifact assemblages termed
the San Dieguito complex (Moratto 1984; Warren et al. 1993). Malcolm Rogers (1966), who first
described the San Dieguito complex, felt it extended from Oregon to mid-Baja California. The San
Dieguito complex is considered to represent generalized hunter-gatherers and is primarily
characterized by flaked lithic tools such as scrapers, scraper planes, choppers, and large projectile
points (Davis et al. 1969; Warren 1987). Sites are documented in inland and coastal areas of San
Diego County that were occupied during a climatic period of cooler and moister conditions than
presently exist. Pifion-juniper forests and riparian communities along watercourses and lake shores
were more widespread, and the hunting of deer and smaller game is considered central to the San
Pacific View Estates
Background
Dieguito economy, although undoubtedly many plant foods were also gathered. The absence of a
milling technology was, until recently, seen as the major differentiation between the Paleoindian and
Archaic periods.
The Archaic period (also referred to as the Millingstone horizon or La Jolla complex) persisted at
least 7,000 years ago, possibly beginning as early as 9,000 B.P. (Rogers 1966). Archaic shell
middens are well documented all along the northern San Diego County coast (Moratto 1984:146-
151). Traditionally, the Archaic adaptation is considered to have differed from the previous San
Dieguito adaptation by being more focussed on gathering activities that emphasized marine
mollusks, fish, and plant resources, along with small to large mammals. Occupation was heaviest
along the coast and major drainage systems extending inland. The coastal Archaic sites (often
termed the La Jolla complex) are characterized by shell middens, cobble tools, basin nictates, manos,
discoidals, a small number of Pinto and Elko series points, and flexed burials. Early Archaic
occupations have burials dispersed within the occupation areas, while later occupations have separate
cemetery areas.
In the inland area of northern San Diego County, True identified a number of Archaic period sites
with artifact assemblages distinct from coastal Archaic sites (True 1958, 1980; True and Beemer
1982). These sites, termed the Pauma complex, are typically on small saddles and hills overlooking
drainages, and are characterized by basin and slab metates, manos, scraper planes, and debitage.
Recently, the Pauma complex has been characterized as an inland counterpart of the coastal La Jolla
complex (Cardenas and Van Wormer 1984; Gallegos 1987; True and Beemer 1982). Given the
limited distance between these two different environmental contexts (coastal and inland) and
possible contemporaneity in occupation, these sites may represent seasonal manifestations of a single
Archaic settlement system. Similar exploitation of different environmental zones is documented
during the Archaic in the Southwest (Bayham et al. 1986; Sayles 1983; Sayles and Antevs 1941).
Recently, the definition of the San Dieguito complex (consisting solely of flaked lithic tools and
lacking milling technology) has been questioned. San Dieguito and La Jolla sites have been
hypothesized as reflecting functional differences within one cultural complex, rather than temporally
distinct adaptive strategies (Bull 1987; Gallegos 1987; Wade 1986). Gallegos (1987) has proposed
that the San Dieguito, La Jolla, and Pauma complexes are manifestations of the same culture. The
differing site types can be "explained by site location, resources exploited, influence, innovation and
adaptation to a rich coastal region over a long period of time" (Gallegos 1987:30). This hypothesis,
however, has been strongly challenged by Warren et al. (1993).
The subsequent Late Prehistoric period in San Diego County differs from the Archaic period in the
presence of small, pressure flaked projectile points, the replacement of flexed inhumations with
cremations, the introduction of ceramics, and an emphasis on inland plant food collection,
processing, and storage (especially of acorns). Around 2,000 B.P., Yuman-speaking people from
the eastern Colorado River region may have begun migrating into southern California (Rogers 1945),
although few Late Prehistoric sites dating to this period have been found. An intrusion of
Shoshonean-speakers occurred in the northern part of San Diego County after 1,500 B.P. Inland
Pacific View Estates 4
Background
semi-sedentary villages were established along major water courses, and mountain areas were
seasonally occupied to exploit acorns and pinon nuts, where settlements are associated with milling
stations at bedrock outcrops.
The Late Prehistoric period is represented by the San Luis Rey complex in the northern part of San
Diego County (Meighan 1954; True et al. 1974) and the Cuyamaca complex in the southern portion
of the county (True 1970). The San Luis Rey complex is considered to represent the Shoshonean
predecessors of the ethnohistoric Luiseno, and the Cuyamaca complex reflects occupation by Yuman
ancestors of the Kumeyaay (also known as Diegueno).
The San Luis Rey complex is divided into two phases. San Luis Rey I is a preceramic phase dating
from approximately 800 B.P. to 500 B.P. (Meighan 1954; True et al. 1974). The material culture
of this phase includes small, triangular pressure flaked projectile points, manos, portable metates,
mortars, pestles, olivella beads, and drilled stone ornaments. The San Luis Rey II phase differs only
in the additional use of ceramics and pictographs. Dates for the introduction of ceramics have not
been satisfactorily documented.
The Cuyamaca complex, according to True (1970) is similar to the San Luis Rey complex but is
differentiated by having greater frequencies of side-notched points, flaked stone tools, ceramics, and
milling stone implements; a wider range of ceramic vessel forms; a steatite industry; and cremations
placed in urns. Recent investigations at San Luis Rey complex sites, however, have suggested that
milling stone implements occur in very similar frequencies and may not serve as indicators of
cultural affiliation, and some of these differences may be due to different levels of organization
(Gross etal. 1989).
The Shoshonean inhabitants of northern San Diego County were called Luisenos by Franciscan friars
who named the San Luis Rey River and established the San Luis Rey Mission in the heart of Luiseno
territory. Their territory encompassed an area from roughly Agua Hedionda on the coast, east to
Lake Henshaw, north into Riverside County, and west through San Juan Capistrano to the coast
(Bean and Shipek 1978). The Luiseno shared boundaries with the Gabrielino and Serrano to the
west and northwest, the Cahuilla from the deserts to the east, the Cupeno to the southeast, and the
Kumeyaay to the south. All but the Kumeyaay (Ipai or Northern Diegueno) are linguistically similar
to the Luiseno, belonging to the Takic subfamily of Uto-Aztecan (Bean and Shipek 1978). The
Yuman Ipai have a different language and cultural background but shared certain aspects of social
structure and technology, and some Kumeyaay incorporated Luiseno religious practices into their
cosmology.
The Luiseno were divided into several autonomous lineages or kin groups based on a patrilineal and
patrilocal social system. The lineage represented the basic political unit among most southern
California Indians. According to Bean and Shipek (1978), ethnohistorically each Luiseno lineage
possessed two permanent base camps, or villages, in the San Luis Rey Valley and another in the
mountain region. A wide range of resources were exploited by the Luiseno in a bi-modal seasonal
system. Each lineage had exclusive hunting and gathering rights in their procurement ranges and
violation of trespass was seriously punished (Bean and Shipek 1978).
Pacific View Estates 5
Background
Acorns, gathered in upland areas, were the most important food source for the Luiseno. Seeds from
grasses, manzanita, sage, sunflowers, lemonade berry, chia, and other plants were also used, along
with various wild greens and fruits. Deer, antelope, small game, birds, fish, and marine shellfish
were also intensively exploited. Rigid sexual division of labor did not exist, although generally
women collected plant resources and the men hunted (Bean and Shipek 1978). Houses were
dispersed throughout villages. Lowland village houses were conical structures covered with tule
bundles. The floors were set below the ground surface with central hearths. Other structures
included sweathouses, ceremonial enclosures, ramadas, and acorn granaries. Domestic implements
included wooden utensils, baskets, ceramic cooking and storage vessels, and stone milling
equipment. Hunting implements included the bow and arrow, curved throwing sticks, nets, and
snares. Nets, and hooks made of shell and bone, were used for fishing.
Religious leaders and elaborate ceremonies characterized Luiseno religion (White 1963). Ritual and
ceremonial specialists maintained ceremonial knowledge in secrecy, and passed on the knowledge
to only one heir. The decimation of the population after European contact undoubtedly caused the
loss of some religious specialists, resulting in abbreviated versions of ceremonies (Winterrowd and
Shipek 1986). Surviving ceremonies include initiation for cult candidates, installation of religious
chiefs, and funerals (Bean and Shipek 1978).
Spanish explorers first encountered coastal villages of Native Americans in 1769 with the
establishment of Mission San Diego de Alcala. The Mission of San Juan Capistrano, which had
jurisdiction over the study area, was subsequently established in 1776, and later San Luis Rey de
Franciscan was founded in 1798. The missions "recruited" the Native Americans to use as laborers
and convert them to Catholicism. The inland Luiseno groups were not as heavily affected by
Spanish influence until 1816, when an outpost of the mission was established 20 miles further inland
at Pala (Sparkman 1908).
By the early 1820s, California came under Mexico's rule, and in 1834 the missions were secularized.
This resulted in political imbalance and Indian uprisings against the Mexican rancheros. Many of
the Kumeyaay and Luisenos left the missions and ranchos and returned to their original village
settlements (Cuero 1970). When California became a sovereign state in 1849, the Luiseno and
Kumeyaay were heavily recruited as laborers, and experienced even harsher treatment. Conflicts
between Indians and encroaching Anglos finally led to the establishment of reservations for some
villages. Other Mission groups were displaced from their homes, moving to nearby towns or
ranches. The reservation system interrupted the social organization and settlement patterns, yet
many aspects of the original culture still persist today. Certain rituals and religious practices are
maintained and traditional games, songs, and dances continue.
Site record and literature searches were obtained from the South Coastal Information Center at San
Diego State University and the San Diego Museum of Man covering an area within a mile of the
project (Appendix A). Both institutions indicated that no sites had been previously recorded within
the project, and both had records for the same six sites within the mile area. All are prehistoric sites
ranging from Luiseno villages to Early Archaic shell scatters. A brief description of the sites is as
follows:
Pacific View Estates 6
Background
SDI-630: this is a large slough terrace midden originally recorded by Malcolm Rogers of the
Museum of Man (as SDM-W-141). According to Rogers' notes, it is multicornponent with
evidence of San Dieguito, La Jolla and Luiseno occupation. Over 2 acres in area and with
a maximum depth of 2.5 feet, the midden is primary composed of Donax shell; sherds,
metates, mortar fragments and cobble hearths were observed.
SDI-5077: this site is described as an extensive shell deposit consisting ofChione, Pecten, Donax
andAstrea recorded by Bull and Hatley. Deflated hearths were observed on the surface, as
were cores and flakes. A single posthole was excavated indicating a depth of 75cm. In the
absence of diagnostic artifacts, no cultural affiliation was assigned.
SDI-5213: this is a large Luiseno village that was subjected to a data recovery mitigation program
by Cardenas and Wade in 1985. The site was originally recorded by Rogers as SDM-W-143
and 146, who described it as a highland accretion midden of La Jolla age overlain by an
intense Luiseno occupation. Five separate loci were identified by Cardenas and Wade
covering an area of 140,000 square meters. Three of the loci consisted of extensive shell
middens nearly two meters in depth. A wide range of artifacts were recovered including
flaked stone unifacial and bifacial tools, flakes and debitage, ceramics, bone tools, shell
beads, groundstone, and terrestrial and marine faunal remains.
SDI-6139: this site is a 38,000 square meter shell and lithic scatter of probable Luiseno affiliation.
Situated on a large knoll-mesa, midden of unknown depth was observed at numerous areas
throughout the site. Artifacts recorded include projectile points, ceramics, flaked stone tools,
groundstone and flakes.
SDI-10,746: according to Cardenas and Wade, this site was possibly an extension of SDI-5213. It
is described as a light to moderate shell and artifact scatter consisting of four loci. Artifacts
observed include manos, hammers, scraper planes, scrapers, cores and flakes. The site record
states that this site was destroyed by grading for the Elm Avenue extension in October and
November of 1986. The artifacts were collected during grading monitoring, but no other
systematic investigations were undertaken.
SDM-W-3030: this site consists of a light shell and lithic scatter situated on a drainage saddle above
Buena Vista Creek. Dense vegetation hampered surface visibility, but small quantities of
Chione and Tivel shells were noted; artifacts observed include a basalt core, quartzite core
tools, basalt and quartzite flakes, and a bifacial mano.
Pacific View Estates
Cultural Resource Survey
CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY
This section describes the survey methods and results. In that the results were positive, a subsurface
testing and evaluation was undertaken which is discussed in the next section.
Survey Methods
An intensive cultural resource survey of the project was conducted January 11,1996, by John Cook
and Carol Schultze of ASM Affiliates. During this survey the entire 8.5-acre property was examined
using systematic transects with ten meter average spacing between archaeologists. Due to the
landform and shape of the parcel, north/south transects were traversed on the western side of the
knoll and water reservoir. Ground surface visibility in this area was generally excellent to adequate
given the presence of erosional exposures and numerous dirt paths and roads. Surface visibility on
the central knoll itself was excellent in that it was nearly devoid of vegetation cover. This area,
however, also evidences considerable disturbance including varying degrees of grading and other
landform modifications. Most of the area east of the knoll is densely vegetated and precluded strict
adherence to transect survey methods. Surface visibility was nevertheless adequate for the detection
of archaeological material by thorough examination of clearings, bladed areas and trails.
Survey Results
The survey resulted in the identification of three archaeological resources: 1) a small, partially buried
shell midden on the far eastern edge of the property; 2) a light scatter of shell in the slope cut by
Carlsbad Village Drive; and 3) and isolated flaked stone tool on the far western edge of the property.
The isolate is a unifacially flaked cobble core tool of quartzite that measured 9 cm x 9 cm by 1.5 cm.
Five flakes had been removed from half its lateral circumference, and crushing and micro-stepping
edge damage was evident on the central flake scar. The light shell scatter above Carlsbad Village
Drive consisted of approximately 20 fragments of Chione and Pecten within a 5 meter by one meter
band just below the knoll. No artifacts were observed, nor was there any indication of depth. What
remains is highly eroded and extremely disturbed, the latter most probably by recent construction
of the road. Given the amount of disturbance, it is quite possible that the material is a secondary
deposit from elsewhere and is therefore considered suspect. Both it and the isolate are insignificant
resources that warrant no further study.
The shell midden near the eastern edge of the property consisted of a surface scatter of 40+ whole
and fragmented Chione and Pecten shell (Figure 3). Chione shell was also observed eroding from
the wall of a rodent burrow at an approximate depth of 20 cm. A recently bladed dirt road
terminated on the western edge of the site, resulting in disturbance to a third or half the site. Based
on surface shell, the site measures roughly 10 meters north/south by 5 meters east/west. Site soil
was a dark brown loam similar to that of the surrounding area, no artifacts were observed. This site
was recorded with the South Coastal Information Center as SDI-14,259.
Pacific View Estates
Cultural Resource Survey
Figure 3. - Confidential - See Appendix E
This page intentionally left blank.
Pacific View Estates
Cultural Resource Evaluation
CULTURAL RESOURCE EVALUATION
In accordance with the City of Carlsbad's Cultural Resource Guidelines (1990), ASM
conducted a subsurface test of SDI-14,259 to evaluate its importance as defined in Appendix K of
the California Environmental Quality Act. Given the small size of the archaeological site, the
objectives of the test were limited and no formal work plan was deemed necessary. As such, the test
was designed to resolve basic issues related to: the presence or absence of a subsurface deposit; the
horizontal and vertical extent of the deposit; its integrity and condition; the nature of the site; data
yield and variability; and potential to address regionally important research questions. The following
section describes the testing methods and results.
Field Methods
Fieldwork on the subsurface testing program was conducted February 9 and 11, 1996. John
Cook, SOP A, was the Project Manager and Supervisory Archaeologist, and Pam Wilson and Steve
Harvey served as Associate Archaeologists. A total of six shovel test pits (STPs) and one 1x1 meter
test unit were excavated to assess the potential subsurface deposit. The results of the STPs were
used to determine the location for the 1x1 test unit.
Shovel test pits were used to determine deposit presence or absence, horizontal and vertical
extent, and acquire a general idea of site stratigraphy. The STPs measured approximately 35 cm
square and were excavated in 25 cm levels until sterile, i.e., devoid of archaeological material.
Excavated soil was dry screened through 1/8" hardware mesh and field sorted. Sorting removed all
cultural remains including both artifacts and ecofacts. The term artifact refers to all materials
identified as culturally modified by direct human activity; ecofact relates to items modified through
secondary use or associated with subsistence activities such as fire affected rock, bone and shell.
All artifacts and ecofacts were enclosed in plastic bags and labeled as to provenience. Observations
regarding site sediment, stratigraphy, disturbance and relative artifact yield were recorded on ASM
Affiliates STP forms.
The placement of STPs was based on surface indications, which at SDI-14,259 consisted
only of a very localized, low density shell scatter; no artifacts were observed. A datum was
established in what appeared to be the center of the site in close proximity to the property boundary,
and a series of STPs were excavated to the north, south, east and west (see site form sketch map).
STPs 1,2, 3 and 5 were located in an area that had been recently brushed, STP 4 was placed adjacent
to the edge of the grade for the adjacent development, and STP 6 to the south of the datum in an area
that appeared relatively undisturbed.
A single 1x1 meter square test unit was excavated to acquire a larger, more controlled sample
of the cultural material. Excavation proceeded in arbitrary ten centimeter levels. A unit datum was
established in the NE corner and used to take absolute measurements of the ground surface and to
point provenience features and/or artifacts recovered within the deposit. Excavated soil was passed
Pacific View Estates 10
Cultural Resource Evaluation
through a 1/8" mesh hardware cloth screen and the residue was examined for cultural debris. All
artifacts were collected in plastic baggies enclosed in paper bags and labeled as to provenience.
Observations of site sediment, stratigraphy, disturbance and artifact yield were recorded on ASM
Affiliates Unit Level Record Forms. A Unit Summary Form and Sidewall Profile of the completed
unit were also recorded, and photographs taken of the completed unit. All artifacts and ecofacts were
transported to ASM's cultural resource laboratory for processing and analysis.
Laboratory Methods
All recovered artifacts and ecofacts were washed and air dried. The collection was then
sorted into artifact class and type. Each artifact or group of artifacts was further analyzed for
attributes relevant to that class. This data included measurements, weights and condition of the
artifact. Each artifact or group was then separately bagged and labeled with an individual catalogue
number. All relevant data was entered onto a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. These data were sorted
into tables and examined for both horizontal and vertical patterning. Although this is a limited
testing effort, a single sample was submitted for radiocarbon dating.
Subsurface Testing Results
Five of the six STPs (nos. 1 through 5) were positive yielding small to moderate amounts of
shell and three artifacts. Of the material remains, Chione predominates, followed by Argopecten,
Saxidomus and Ostrea in substantially less quantities. Otherwise, only one utilized flake, one flake
and one piece of debitage were recovered from the STPs. A brief summary of the STP results is as
follows:
STP No. 1: Located 2.5 meters north of the datum, this STP was excavated to 66 cm but
yielded material only in the upper 35 cm. This consisted on 32.74 grams of Chione and 7.3
grams of Argopecten; no artifacts were recovered.
STP No. 2: Located 5.0 meters north of the datum, this STP was excavated to 55 cm of
which only the upper 25 yielded cultural material. Recovery consisted of 9.02 grams of
Chione and 1.86 grams of Argopecten, but no artifacts.
STP No. 3: Located 2.5 meters south of the datum, this STP was excavated to 65 cm and
yielded material to 55 cm including a moderate amount of shell and a utilized flake made of
locally available metavolcanic stone. A total of 186.28 grams of Chione and 24.19 grams
of Argopecten were recovered, followed by small amount of Ostrea and Saxidomus.
STP No. 4: Located 2.5 meters east of the datum, this STP was excavated to 55cm yielding
shell in the upper 45 cm though no artifacts. Recovered were 75.39 grams of Chione, 2.99
grams of Argopecten, and less than one gram each of Ostrea and an unidentifiable gastropod.
STP No. 5: Located 2.5 meters west of the datum, this STP was excavated to 63 cm and
produced artifacts and shell to a depth of approximately 50 cm. One flake and one piece of
Pacific View Estates 11
Cultural Resource Evaluation
debitage were recovered, along with 181.19 grams ofChione, 19.33 grams ofArgopecten
and less than a gram of Ostrea.
STP No. 6: Located 6.0 meters south and 2.5 meters east of the datum, this STP was
excavated to 48 cm, yielding only a few pieces of unidentifiable shell that were smaller than
the screen mesh; no artifacts were recovered.
The soil encountered in the STPs was a dark brown sandy loam similar to that of the surrounding
area. Its color and composition is a function of natural conditions, and as such the site's soil is not
considered midden per se. As previously mentioned, the site is situated within roughly 10 meters
of the property eastern boundary, where a large slope has been cut for the existing development
below. The upper margin of this cut slope, including portions of the project property, have been
considerably disturbed by grading and landscaping. For this reason further testing east of STP No.
4 was not considered warranted. STP Nos. 1,2 and 5 were also situated in areas evidencing recent
disturbance that appeared to be brush clearing (possibly for soil testing equipment).
The 1x1 meter test unit was placed 2.5 meters south and 2.5 meters east of the datum in an area of
the site that appeared least disturbed and where STP results indicated the highest potential for
subsurface cultural material. Excavation proceeded in 10 cm levels to a depth of 110 cm, resulting
in the recovery of material similar to that from the STPs. The upper 40 cm contained the
aforementioned dark brown loam of loose compaction with numerous roots. Between 40 and 70 cm
the soil consisted of a light brown, dry sandy loam with evidence of considerable rodent disturbance.
Below 70 cm the soil turned to a reddish clayey sand, mottled with pockets of loam from rodent
intrusion. No cultural features were identified during the excavation. Three pieces of fire affected
rock were recovered in the 70-80 cm level and five pieces in the 80-90 cm level. Also, two metal
fragments were recovered in the 40-50 cm level; undoubtedly the result of rodent bioturbation.
Overall, artifact recovery from the unit was very low consisting of a total of 13 items. These
included 9 flakes, 3 utilized flakes and one core fragment made of locally available metavolcanic
material and quartz. No formal tools or diagnostic artifacts were recovered which would be of utility
for interpreting the chronology and function of the site. A summary listing of artifact recovery is
as follows:
Level 0-10 cm: None
Level 10-20 cm: One metavolcanic flake
Level 20-30 cm: None
Level 30-40 cm: One quartz flake and one metavolcanic utilized flake
Level 40-50 cm: Two quartz flakes
Level 50-60 cm: None
Pacific View Estates 12
Cultural Resource Evaluation
Level 60-70 cm: One metavolcanic core fragment
Level 70-80 cm: One metavolcanic flake and one quartzite flake
Level 80-90 cm: One metavolcanic flake
Level 90-100 cm: One quartz utilized flake
Level 100-110 cm: One metavolcanic flake, one metavolcanic utilized flake, and one quartz
flake
Although an extremely small sample number from which to generalize, the vertical distribution of
artifacts seems relatively uniform except for a possible tendency for increased frequency in the lower
levels. There is no discernable variability in the frequency of types with regards to depth, but only
four types represented, and most are waste by-products from tool manufacture and maintenance. The
production of simple flakes for expedient on-site use and discard is a common at coastal prehistoric
sites such as SDI-14,259, and from this and other data it can be inferred that the activities
represented were very limited.
Based on the sample, shellfish processing was the predominant activity. Only 1.44 grams of small
mammal faunal remains were recovered, all from level 60-70cm, and these are all rodent and most
likely the result of natural mortality and not cultural exploitation. All of the other ecofacts consisted
of marine fauna, and a total of 8,360.81 grams were recovered from the unit to a depth of 110 cm.
Table 1 provides the frequency distribution by level.
As regards total yield, Chione accounts for 6,671.27 grams or 80% of all shellfish. This is followed
byArgopecten with 1,358.35 grams or 16%, Ostrea with 193.77 grams or 2% and Saxidomus with
83.10 grams or roughly 1%; all others combined account for less than 1%. Vertical distribution by
weight is bimodal with peaks at 40-50 and 60-70 cm, though this is predominately a function of
variation in Chione weight (Figure 4).
In the absence of temporally diagnostic artifacts and other indicators, a sample of Chione from the
50-60 cm level of the unit was submitted to obtain a radiocarbon date. The results of this analysis,
conducted by Beta Analytic, indicates the deposit dates to 1015+/-70 BP. This would date the
archaeological site to just prior to the Late Prehistoric Horizon occupation of the region by the
ancestral Luiseno.
Pacific View Estates 13
co
'id
IUJ
8
1<2
23
J§
C/3W eH .2
H|05 S~_ w i5». .21 s ==
(J Cfl
0.
S-J£
Oi-H
S
Oo
^^oOs
oOS1o00
oood,t""
/^*\I ^1 -
A! s
oV)
o
o
o2CO
o
1
«s
s
1o
o
T"H
O
*O ^^ t^* ^- C? 'O »*H ^^ v^ i/^ f<*irncNt^oo^-^o (NOsvoo l^-
od >— ' rn 06 r*"l ^ vSoorn o</~i t^ ON oo m
^H VO ^
OS t — so t*^ t** Osos o Tt oo <s «in so P-^ r»S O o
(N
o o oo m >n i> (Nro o o so CN os ~Hos Tt so CN o "n o
00 •— —^
o o — r~ — o soos os os <n oo oo o
Tf (S -- — < K O "<m (N <N
Os O so SO O f-
so t — t — in o *!}•P~ so m —
-H SO
t^OP~OSOSO OOOS so mOsoqsDr^Ttoo ooro O P-;
oosdfn^sooj ^HSO ^H ooo r~ m(S O
t — ^f ^f Os oo ^* ^^
oo -H so in rn O — 'oo in — — H— i 00
oom mso c-)"*sor^(S^-os soo somso^j-fnom' O-H o-^-o— 'o o r4 «cs m
<N o m ol> 00 (-- O
^O ON **O f^
— 00 ^
o o fo m^- Os OO (N
in so nS soso m
"*
p- 0 r- mm os r-- o .os —^ rj —
— OS
00 O 00 «^ ~* _ ; °°CT\ ^f F^(S p~
<N
c/}
« So§ o 3 a.a g ;- > & o^3 -~ ^ -3 ^ *-S s a > -s «P? f* *« . -- rs ra| , -s ! s 5 ! a "s-P.'?-<3&aoj Ctn <L)•Sg-aSSG ^« IBSii r ~ -i S -0 IS *> £ -X wr)S<3^OC -O-SSC S
lj^-1^ 3 1 ! 3 11 S a 4: 1 § 6 ^ 3 § 6
00
100
VI00
N
$06
V)
osoOSV)
3
0
V)
OS
*•*
OS00
o^H
o
00
^H
t-
o
OS
sf^i^Hw
^oi/is
I—I
f'l
rn
f^
«E
CQ
&£e
Total Weight i"
>
o
"I
PJ
oPi
"2
"3O
co
*CD _
= 1C33 ^
w0
u
33
>
o
Cultural Resource Evaluation
Discussion
The recovered data suggest that SDI-14,259 represents a limited use locale related primarily to the
processing of collected shellfish. It is very small in size and lacks evidence of habitation and other
related activities which undoubtedly occurred elsewhere in the near vicinity. The muddy flats
shellfish species represented suggest collection probably occurred at Buena Vista Lagoon one
kilometer north of the site. The deposit may represent a single episode of processing by a small
group or extended family whose residential base was situated elsewhere.
A possible residential site associated with SDI-14,259 is SDI-5213 located approximately one
kilometer to the southeast. Subjected to an extensive data recovery program by Cardenas and Wade
(1985) who described it as a major coastal Luiseno habitation site, SDI-5213 yielded an abundance
of tools, food remains and other archaeological data. Faunal analysis indicated that the site was
occupied by at least a few people year-round; terrestrial and marine mammals were hunted, fishing
occurred during the summer and fall, and, of course, shellfish were collected. Regarding the latter,
Cardenas and Wade (1985) reported that an average of 11,086 grams of shell per cubic meter were
recovered at SDI-5213; only W-1256B and 1256C excavated by Flower, Ike and Roth had a higher
yield (approximately 15,000 grams per cubic meter), whereas nine other sites in the vicinity
averaged only 2,600 grams per cubic meter. All of these sites were, however, larger and more
complex than SDI-14,259.
The early periods of occupation (prior to 8000 B.P.) in the littoral area of Southern California are
typically considered to be characterized by a foraging settlement strategy (Erlandson and Colten
1991; Glassow et al. 1988), while the development of the La Jolla complex is interpreted as
representing the onset of a collector's strategy, with strong emphasis on resources associated with
coastal lagoons (Gallegos 1987,1992; Warren 1964). La Jollan sites during the middle Holocene
were often large and intensively occupied sites, and were probably semi-sedentary. By 4000 B.P.,
the normative interpretation is that populations expanded from the coast, as a result of depletion of
coastal/lagoon resources, into a much broader range of landforms and environmental zones than
before (Byrd 1996),
Generally, interpretations assert a shift inland with a major focus on terrestrial resources, particularly
rabbits and acorns during the late Holocene (Jones 1992; Moratto 1984; True 1993; Warren 1968).
The extent of coastal occupation declined associated with a decrease in littoral productivity,
necessitating a focus on inland resource and perhaps initially a seasonal round between the coast and
inland area (Moratto 1984:152; Warren 1968). The most notable aspect for the southern coast of
California entailed the gradual sedimentation of resource rich estuaries and lagoons, and the decline
of rocky coastlines.
Localized prehistoric reconstructions have focussed on the end of the prehistoric sequence and in
inland areas—relatively little is known of the time period from 2000-500 B.P., particularly on the
coast such as where this site is located. For example, True and Waugh's (1982) diachronic model
of Late Prehistoric settlement in the nearby San Luis Rey drainage begins with a foraging pattern,
characterized by small camps and several residential shifts each year during the San Luis Rey I
Pacific View Estates 16
Cultural Resource Evaluation
period (A.D. 1400-1750). During the subsequent period, ethnohistoric (A.D. 1750-1850), settlement
configuration became more territorial, strongly correlated with particular river drainage systems and
shifted to a classic collector strategy. This new configuration was bipolar—with permanent winter
villages\camps in the western foothills with associated permanent summer camps in the mountains.
True (1993:17) hypothesized that the lower portions of the valley had sedentary villages with limited
use of marine resources.
Thus, this site is noteworthy for it documents the presence of a small coastal site dated to the second
millennium BP. The invertebrate sample dominated by Chione, along with considerable amounts
of Argopecten and lessor quantities of other species, is indicative of exploitation of a viable
estuary/lagoon setting during the late Holocene. Thus, the results of this project indicate that Buena
Vista lagoon maintained an exploitable shellfish ecology at the end of the Archaic period (contra
Gallegos 1992).
Pacific View Estates 17
Recommendations
RECOMMENDATIONS
SDI-14,259 is located on the far eastern edge of the project property within an area that will
be effected by earthwork for two lots; and vegetation clearing, grading and other construction related
activities will undoubtedly disturb the archaeological deposit. An assessment of whether or not this
constitutes an adverse impact, however, depends on the evaluation resource importance. According
to the City of Carlsbad guidelines:
Cultural resources may have importance for a variety of reasons. The importance of cultural
resources for non-federally funded projects must be evaluated with respect to the criteria established
in CEQA, Appendix K and the General Plan and Historic Preservation Ordinance of the City of
Carlsbad which establishes local goals, criteria, and requirements for evaluating cultural resources
within the City. Criteria of significance presented in Section 21083.2 Appendix K of CEQA and in
Section 22.06.020 City Ordinance 9776 are presented below.
As defined in CEQA, a cultural resource is important when the resource:
1. Is associated with an event or person of:
a. Recognized significance in California or American history; or
b. Recognized scientific importance in prehistory; or
2. Can provide information which is of both demonstrable public interest and useful in
addressing scientifically consequential and reasonable or archaeological research
questions; or
3. Has a special or particular quality such as oldest, best example, largest, or last
surviving example of its kind; or
4. Is at least 100 years old and possesses substantial stratigraphic integrity; or
5. Involves important research questions that historical research has shown can be
answered only with archaeological methods.
In the City of Carlsbad, a cultural resource is also considered important when:
1. It exemplifies or reflects special elements of the city's cultural, social, economic,
political, aesthetic, engineering, or architectural history; or
2. It is identified with persons or events significant in local, state, or national history;
or
Pacific View Estates 18
Recommendations
3. It embodies distinctive characteristics of a style, type, or period, or method of
construction, is a valuable example of the use of indigenous materials or
craftsmanship, or is representative of a notable work of an acclaimed builder,
designer, or architect; or
4. It is an archaeological, paleontological, botanical, geological, topographical,
ecological, or geographical site which has the potential of yielding information of
scientific value; or
5. It is a geographically definable area possessing concentration of sites, buildings;
structures, improvements, or objects linked historically through location, design,
setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and/or association, in which the collective
value of the improvements may be greater than the value of each individual
improvement.
Based on these criteria, SDI-14,259 is not evaluated as an important resource. A small site
with limited variability, its function in the settlement system has been ascertained to the extent
possible and a radiocarbon date obtained to assess chronological placement. Moreover, the integrity
of the site has been compromised by disturbances within the project property and from the adjacent
development. As such, the research potential of SDI-14,259 is considered exhausted by the current
investigation. It is therefore concluded that implementation of the proposed project will not result
in adverse impact to the resource and no mitigation is recommended.
Pacific View Estates 19
References
REFERENCES
Bada Jeffrey L., Roy A. Schroeder, and George F. Carter
1974 New Evidence for the Antiquity of Man in North America Deduced from Aspartic
Acid Racemization. Science 184:791-793.
Bayham, Frank E., Donald H. Morris, and M. Steven Shackley
1986 Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherers of South Central Arizona: The Picacho Reservoir
Archaic Project. Anthropological Field Studies No. 13, Arizona State University,
Tempe.
Bean, Lowell J., and Florence C. Shipek
1978 Luiseno. In California, edited by Robert F. Heizer, pp 550-563. Handbook of North
American Indians, vol. 8, W. C. Sturtevant, general editor. Smithsonian Institution,
Washington, D.C.
Bull, Charles S.
1987 A New Proposal: Some Suggestions for San Diego Prehistory. In San Dieguito-La
Jolla: Chronology and Controversy, edited by Dennis Gallegos, pp. 35-42. San
Diego County Archaeological Society Research Paper No. 1.
Byrd, Brian F.
1996 Coastal Archaeology of Las Flores Creek and Homo Canyon, Camp Pendleton,
California.
Cardenas, D. Sean and Mary Robbins Wade
1985 An Archaeological Investigation ofSDM-W-143/146: An Unique Coastal Luiseno
Occupation Site In Carlsbad, California.
Cardenas, D. Sean, and Stephen R. Van Worrner
1984 Archaeological Investigation ofSDI-4648 and SDM-W-348. RBR & Associates,
Inc., San Diego.
Carter, George F.
1980 Earlier Than You Think: A Personal Vie\v of Man in the Americas. Texas A&M
University, College Station.
Cuero, Delfina
1970 The Autobiography of Delfina Cuero, A Diegueno Indian, As Told to Florence C.
Shipek. Malki Museum Press, Morongo Indian Reservation.
Pacific View Estates 20
__^ References
Davis, Emma L., C.W. Broth, and D.L. Weide
1969 The Western Lithic Co-Tradition. San Diego Museum of Man Papers 6. San Diego
Museum of Man, San Diego.
Erlandson, Jon M., and Roger H. Colten
1991 An Archaeological Context for Early Holocene Studies on the California Coast. In
Hunter-Gatherers of Early Holocene Coastal California, edited by J.M. Erlandson
and R.H. Colten, pp. 1-10. Perspectives in California Archaeology, vol. 1, Jeanne
E. Arnold, series editor. Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los
Angeles.
Ezell, Paul H.
1987 The Harris Site - An Atypical San Dieguito Site or Am I Beating A Dead Horse? In
San Dieguito - La Jolla: Chronology and Controversy, edited by Dennis R. Gallegos
pp. 15-22. San Diego County Archaeological Society Research Paper, No. 1.
Gallegos, Dennis R.
1987 A Review and Synthesis of Environmental and Cultural Material for the Batiquitos
Lagoon Region. In San Dieguito-La Jolla: Chronology and Controversy, edited by
Dennis Gallegos, pp. 23-34. San Diego County Archaeological Society Research
Paper No. 1.
1992 Patterns and Implications of Coastal Settlement in San Diego County: 9000 to 1300
Years Ago. In Essays on the Prehistory of Maritime California, edited by T. Jones,
pp. 205-216. Center for Archaeological Research at Davis Publications No. 10.
Glassow, M.A., L. Wilcoxon, J.M. Erlandson
1988 Cultural and Environmental Change During the Early Period of Santa Barbara
Channel Prehistory. In Bailey, G., and Parkington, J. (Eds) The Archaeology of
Prehistoric Coastlines. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 64-77.
Gross, G, Timothy, M. Steven Shackley, and Constance Cameron
1989 Archaeological Investigations at CA-Ora-910A: A Late Prehistoric Hunting Field
Camp in Southern Orange County, California. Brian F. Mooney Associates, San
Diego.
Haynes, C. Vance
1969 The Earliest Americans. Science 166:709-715.
Hines, Philip
1991 A Re-evaluation of the Prehistoric Archaeological Sites within the Pendleton Coast
District. In The Cultural Resources of the Pendleton Coast District. On file at the
South Coast Information Center, San Diego State University (MS# 1122426).
Pacific View Estates 21
References
Jelinek, Arthur J.
1992 Perspectives from the Old World on the Habitation of the New. American Antiquity
57(2):345-347.
Jones, Terry L.
1992 Settlement Trends Along the California Coast. In Essays on the Prehistory of
Maritime California, edited by T. Jones, pp. 1-38. Center for Archaeological
Research at Davis Publications No. 10.
Meighan, Clement W.
1954 A Late Complex in Southern California Prehistory. Southwestern Journal of
Anthropology 10:215-227.
1959 California Cultures and the Concept of an Archaic Stage. American Antiquity
24:289-305.
Moratto, M.
1984 California Archaeology. Academic Press. New York.
Moriarty III, James R.
1966 Cultural Phase Divisions Suggested by Typological Change Coordinated with
Stratigraphically Controlled Radiocarbon Dating at San Diego. Anthropological
Journal of Canada 4:20-30.
Sayles, E.B.
1983 The Cochise Cultural Sequence in Southeastern Arizona. Anthropological Papers
of the University of Arizona No. 42. Tucson.
Sayles, E.B., and Ernst Antevs
1941 The Cochise Culture. Medallion Papers 29. Gila Pueblo, Globe, Arizona.
Rogers, Malcolm J.
1939 Early Lithic Industries of the Lower Basin of the Colorado River and Adjacent
Desert Areas. San Diego Museum Papers No. 3.
1945 An Outline of Yuman Prehistory. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 1:167-198.
1966 Ancient Hunters of the Far West. Union-Tribune Publishing, San Diego.
Rogers, Spencer L.
1974 An Ancient Human Skeleton Found at Del Mar, California. San Diego Museum
Papers 1.
Sparkman, Philip S.
1908 The Culture of the Luiseno Indians. University of California Publications in
American Archaeology and Ethnology 8(4): 187-234.
Pacific View Estates 22
References
Taylor, R.E., L.A. Payen, C.A. Prior, P.J. Slota, Jr., R. Gillespie, J.A.J. Gowlett, and R.E.M. Hedges,
A.J.T. Ml, T.H. Zabel, D.J. Donahue, and R. Berger
1985 Major Revisions in the Pleistocene Age Assignments for North American Human
Skeletons by C-14 Accelerator Mass Spectrometry. American Antiquity 50:136-140.
True, D.L.
1958 An Early Complex in San Diego County, California. American Antiquity 23:255-
263.
1966 Archaeological Differentiation of Shoshonean and Yuman Speaking Groups in
Southern California. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology,
University of California, Los Angeles.
1970 Investigation of a Late Prehistoric Complex in Cuyamaca Rancho State Park, San
Diego County, California. Archaeological Survey Monographs No. 1. University
of California, Los Angeles.
1980 The Pauma Complex in Northern San Diego County: 1978. Journal of New World
Archaeology 2:1-39.
1993 Bedrock Milling Elements as Indicators of Subsistence and Settlement Patterns in
Northern San Diego County, California. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society
Quarterly 29(2): 1-26.
True, D.L., and Eleanor Beemer
1982 Two Milling Stone Inventories from Northern San Diego County, California.
Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 4:233-261.
True, D.L., Clement W. Meighan, and Harvey Crew
1974 Archaeological Investigations at Molpa, San Diego County, California. University
of California Publications in Anthropology No. 11. Berkeley.
True, D.L., and Georgie Waugh
1982 Proposed Settlement Shifts During San Luis Rey Times, Northern San Diego
County. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 4(l):34-54.
Vanderpot, Rein, Jeffrey H. Altschul, and Donn R. Grenda
1993 Whelan Lake (CA-SDI-6010): A La Jollan Campsite on the Lower San Luis Rey
River, San Diego County, California. Statistical Research, Inc. Technical Series No.
40, Tucson, Arizona.
Wade, Sue A.
1986 Archaeological Testing Program at SDi-10185, Loci A-C, and SDi-10186. Otay
Mesa, City of San Diego, California. RECON, San Diego.
Wallace, William J.
1955 A Suggested Chronology for Southern California Coastal Archaeology.
Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 11:214-230.
Pacific View Estates 23
References
1978 Trial Excavations at Two Prehistoric Sites in the Saratoga Area, Death Valley
National Monument, California. Submitted to National Park Service Western
Archaeological Center, Tucson, Arizona.
Warren, Claude N.
1964 Cultural Change and Continuity on the San Diego Coast. Unpublished Ph.D.
dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles.
1968 Cultural Tradition and Ecological Adaptation on the Southern California Coast. In
Archaic Prehistory in the Western United States, edited by Cynthia Irwin-Williams,
pp. 1-14. Eastern New Mexico University Contributions in Anthropology No. 1.
Portales.
1987 The San Dieguito and La Jolla: Some Comments. In San Dieguito-La Jolla:
Chronology and Controversy, edited by Dennis Gallegos, San Diego County
Archaeological Society, Research Paper No. 1, pp. 73-85.
Warren, Claude N., Gretchen Siegler, and Frank Dittner
1993 Paleoindian and Early Archaic Periods. In Historic Properties Background Study for
the City of San Diego Clean Water Program. Brian F. Mooney Associates. Prepared
for the Clean Water Program for Greater San Diego.
White, Raymond
1963 Luiseno Social Organization. University of California Press, Berkeley.
Winterrowd, Cathy L., and Florence C. Shipek
1986 Ethnographic Investigation: Pala Sand and Gravel Extraction Project. RBR and
Associates, Inc. San Diego.
Pacific View Estates 24
Appendices
Appendix A
Record Searches
Pacific View Estates
OT MOH 96/80/rO
South Coastal Information Center
Social Science Research Laboratory
College of Arts and Letters
San Diego State University
5500 Campanile Drive
San Diego CA 92182-4537
(619)594-5682
CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL RESOURCES
INFORMATION SYSTEM
SITE FILES RECORD SEARCH
Source of Request: ASM Affiliates
Date of Request: January 8, 1996
Date Request Received: Januarys, 1996
Project Identification: San Luis Rey Quad Project
() The South Coastal Information Center historical files show NO recorded sites
within the project area nor within one mile of the project boundaries.
(X) The South Coastal Information Center historical files show recorded site
location(s) with the projected area and/or within one mile of the project.
Project maps have been reviewed. The bibliographic material for reports in your project area
and/or within one mile have been included.
The historic maps on file at the South Coastal Information Center have been reviewed as have
the National Register, State Landmarks, and Points of Historic Interest. If there are historic
properties noted in those materials, in your area, the information has been included.
Archaeological/Historic Site check: CLM Date: 1/9/96
Project Map/Bibliographic check: CLM Date: 1/9/96
Historic check: CLM Date: 1/9/96
THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY
'"••"•S"-^''V-^5:'.J£?;Uhiversity:of California' •••••^,-V.'--iV-'-'"-''• -"." •', "if .- :':;•",""" ,',. v^-t^;•"••"':'../' '^.'"';'^"~"7 <c/)Y V-'«^S|C^|g^'.
'•'-i:^r^t|SM^r-^^-i^; -_-':V-;^--:.UARCHAEOLOG!.CAL SJTE SURVEY RECORD __.--./ ^^-^^f^:^y^ij^
'in y-ds J/Jof''""'l.'.'Camino -Real / 200 ydsV'NTbf' 7Buena :VistaT-CreekT No
^_^.^ ,.»^!!^3^^,.^d!™—j.1--• f *^~~~^TJ. ^T"*^^^^^ ",~" ,
/y^^^y^pge-'-^' •v\*T'P^l" IV-J I •^>T' I-^OO '•'•-••=-•• ^•'-•-•?l-'->.^^;-- nn;>onfnnr plpvafinn' ' "'•.'•.":'.200 •^'-SP*?.^.*.-?:?-.;
--_•''•".>-»5'C"1'^'i.-£-"II7.'-~;— ":_JT,"jC. :----— •- ™ -.» -^fev.-----,— ;-'----',''" "it;:"li;f";i'r':L pn in-. -: -n\nj ;-jr5'5'r": J' '••--••.-#=•• - •--'•=• - •-•• •?-..:£=*-!. -_>i u- -'p-^-'-'Jf.i.'"?_•'-t>'J-•:r-^'/V-:rry:?-i^-":Prpv'n"s/-"e^1g"-:-'':-"'^^'^ .""" "" •'• ~-^-J~~--—-"-
'"•^fy.'.'','.. •-'• '-7 l^iAttituHe'
;• v^i.;_-,i.'IM-: '•P^?liip,cAP5'""^g^ :'^L^e °^PS^'bS ' ^"'''' "*'''" '
^n'^Sp^a1^t|^:-;-^
gfjffe^^^^^
^V/V '.; ":;"...:22.'rfow'' ^'-. c:- v ;plbired and-d
:^-^r/.r^-^ftnrt?^^
^>• .V;>;-;^v 25^'Possibility;ofcdestruction^-
••'>;';.V-'. •-';'.'•' }-- 26.". Hfiiigg- pitg. •':- -.-'•
• ;27.r: Other featufes
J. Burials
-l •'":''-..: -29. Artifflt-fg ' -'• mano. li'hamners,7"chopper -'•. /'
'>vJ'';..'-..oSb-: Remaps ^avy/shell concentration
V 3L p^KcK^..^^.- see Wallace ms.on file ASUGIA
''.-•• 32. ": ' ' Accessioo No,'^il^___-i_ ;— 33. Sketch map., • • • ' ,. - •' • ' - •'. :~': •••:-.- - • ' - . • • • . ' *
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVKt FIELD OBSERVATIONS
srru~DATA
Organization:
roject:
Supervisor:
Recorder:
RECON
Hosp Grove
i- 50*77
Tentative
Site No. : SDM-W-1172
C. S. Bull
M. J. Hatlev Date: 1-12-77
Describe Location: This site is located due ...south., of the very large erosion
canyon located at the center of^the proiect^area. The site is situated
on a gentle slope_that trends south.
Elevation Contour: 174'
Reference Bearings:
B: C:
.N/A
D:
Reference Coordinates : UTM coord .
\ 367350N 469024E
Site Dimensions and Description: This site is 17 m. N/S by 35 m. E/W consisting
_pf a very extensive shell deposit_with associated deflated hearths.
A pesthole indicated continuous shell to a depth of 15 cm.
Evidence of subsurface cultural materials? shell and other material _to +75 cm.
Otner site(s) in vicinity: This .is__the_ first site encountered during this
_investiqation.
Previous Excavation, Vandalism, or Disturbance: Jlhe site is located in an Eucalyptus
grove and has had some rooj: disturbance. No pothuntinq was observed. The
_area has had a recent burn over the entijre__ji.te surface.
Surface Evidence: indicate presence by "approximate" count
Artifacts:
Hainmer stone
X "core (frag(s)loci B
B_X Flake/Debitage loci
Scraper
Blade
Projectile Point
Portable Metate (frag(y)
Mano (frag(s)
Pestle (frag(s)
fractured rockThermal
Potsherds
Undesignated Shell*
Osteological Remains
Charcoal/Ash Traces
__ Retouched
Others :
*Chione
Pecten
Donax
Astrea
possibly some
deflated hearths ?
features:
XXX33J4XX XB&Ot
dearth * *
Cache/Storage
kock Shelter
Undifferentiated
i-lound/Pit
Rock Art
Burial
packed Rock:
_enclosure
wall
ilignjnent
rc-lo
Stone:
(round)
(oval)
Cultural Horizon:
Historic
_ Late Pre-histori:
J> __l';arly Hill ing
^ I'uleo-Indian
Unknown
Non-Diagnostic
Possible Cultural
Affiliation:
_Unknown at this
time.
Photo Inf.:
Film Typ- •
plus K -
125
_Blacr,/White
_Colcr Print
_Color Slide
None
Photographer:
C. S . Eull
X
Type:
Village
Camp
Ceremonial.
n tiling St. at ion
vjorksliop
Others:
Deposition of film:
RECON files
List subjects of
photo(s) on reverse:
least
two observed
Rationale for conclusions; The sparoity of diagnostic cultural materials J.imits
....establishment _qf_ cultu r a 1 afj ilia t ion res pp n s ible for the creation of the site
Research Potential 'This site wilT ^lendf infp.rmation. towards lagoon and ecotone
.exploitation practices_^^_human_pc^uEat_ion _in this region relative to similar
~> t e s : areas . . A_se cpnd loci _is J.ocated _A4 ._m_. S E . f rom^the; main site area. It
_ls composed of a modejrate amount of _ she 1JL^material covering an area of _m.
x . m. There is a larg_e hole dug into the site as .a.._re_su.lt.of kids making
fl fort which \inrnvprprl much shpl 1 material.
Additional observations. niuasiireiMenl.;;, flrawimi:. .mil . «iiuin:iits on Yes X No
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY FIELD OBSERVATIONS
ENVIRONMENT
ganization; RECON
reject:Hosp Grove
Supervisor; C ._ S . Bull
Recorder; M. J. Hatley
Life Zone: (San Diego County)
X Coastal
Inland Valleys and Mesas
Foothills (Western Slope)
Plant Communities: (San Diego County)
Coastal Strand
Coastal Salt Marsh
Freshwater Marsh
X Coastal Sage Scrub*
Chaparral
Valley Grassland
Tentative
Site No.: SDM-W-1172
Date: 1-12-77
fountains
Foothills (Eastern Slope)
Southern Oak Woodland
Montane Coniferous Forest
rush Scrub
_Pinon-}t*i3>jiper Woodland
_Creosote Brthss^Scrub
Alkali Sink
Weather Observations; cool, partly cloudy, moderate^ breeze from the southwest
Wind from: SW
Animals observed: assorted birds
Dominate Plants Observed: *npte the whole area has been planted in Eucalyptus r: re.es
with no natural conditions present.
Specimens collected: None
Local Water Sources: Unknown at this time
Soil Description:
composition: Fine to coarse grained subangular sand.
soil color: Medium brown
deposition: jn place_ development on site.
Munsell color code: IQ yr 4/2
soil samples taken: Attached tp_ pos thole test data <
Possible environmental factors contributing to site presence: Availability to lagoon
environments as well as coastal sage scrub vegetation.
-ditional Notes: None
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY FIELD OBSERVATIONS
SITE SKETCH MAP
-ganization: RE CON
-oject:Hosp Grove
Supervisor: C. S. Bull^
Recorder:M. J... Hatley
Tentative
Site No, ; S_DM-W-117J_
Date: 1-12-77
Indicate cultural and physiographic features below:
Indicate scale used:
2cm. = 5 m.
270
240
210
List Symbols Used;
, Extent of
/ / cultural
material onv- J
180
surface
/ approx. contou
'v_X
003"
\
suspected
hearth
/sharp drop-off
Additional observations, sketches, and comments .on reverse:
MJHrnjh RECON-76
Yes X No
^ i\; Countfy CluO •^.•...••-i>^>. '•',
UNIT
(DEVELOPED)
Figure 3. This map illustrates the general configuration of
the project site and designates the specific location of
cultural resource SDM-W-1172, located during the archaeological
survey. Map based on the U.S.G.S. Topographic Series, a portion
of the San Luis Rey Quadrangle. Scale: 1" = 2000'.
POSTHOLI2 TEST DATA SHEET
Organization: RECON
Project: Hosp Grove
Recorder: M. J. Hatley and C. S. Bull
Date: 1-12-77 Elevation: unknown
Soil Information (stratigraphy, make up, etc.):
Homogeneous medium brown, fine to coarse
grained sand
Cultural Material in Side Wall: none observed
Cultural Material Recovered from Screen: this soil
was not screened. However, each bit of soil was
gone thru and shell was observed throughout
Screen Size: NA.
Hole Diameter: NAMaximum Depth: 75+ cm.
Abandonment due to: Digger became inoperative
Additional Notes: continuous deposit throughout.
Shell material covers entire area.
Indicate cultural and physiographic information below:
Scale 1 cm. = .5 meters.
330 ••.. 3O
300 ;.6O
270
SDM-W-1172
Site No.
Random 1
Hole Ho.
Cultural Debris collected? no
Indicate approximate strata jnd
position of any side wall cultur.i
material:
10- :soil
sample on
original
90'
IOO
cm'-
Murisell color code
10 cm. 10 YR 3/2
50 cm. 10 YR 4/2
J
List Symbols Used
v. /approx. contour
ra^ corrugated tin
XJTX trunk of large
Eucalyptus trees
210 . • ^ 750.
180
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD
Continuation Sheet
Page 1 of o .
Permanent Trinomial:
Temporary Number:
Agency Designation:
SD1-5213CSD /
10.
SDM-1I-143M46
yr.
Site Record Update
Monitoring of grading activities at SDM-W-143/146 by a qualified archaeologist was a condition
of approval of the Rising Glen subdivision. Brushing and grading of the site occurred between
15 August and 14 October 1986. Monitoring was conducted by Mary Robbins-Wade and Carol Serr
of RBR & Associates, Inc. Nothing was found to alter the interpretation of the site as a
major habitation area. One pit feature was noted, as were a few hearths and a variety of
artifacts and ecofact material.
; r t i f a c t types noted include: one mortar fragment collected by construction personnel
(probably from Locus E); one basin metate fragment collected just south of Locus E, on
Norwood's SDi-5213C (W-1330C), in dirt pushed over from Locus E; two metate fragments {Locus
A); manos; hammers t o ne s ; scraper planes; scrapers; cores; flakes; and ceramic sherds.
Numerous cobble-based tools were found. Material types noted include: fine-grained
metavolcanic (felsite), medium- to coarse-grained metavolcanic, chert, chalcedony, obsidian,
and quartz.
An unusual find was made on Locus 0, in a road cut close to the western property boundary. A
whole abalone shell filled with pitch was found and collected. Nothing else unusual was noted
near the abalone shell; midden soil, shell, lithics, and mano fragments were found nearby.
A total of eight artifacts were collected. Locus A: one felsite flake. Locus D: one ceramic
sherd and the abalone shell with pitch. Locus E: one basin metate fragment. Uncertain locus
provenience: one chert flake, one ceramic sherd, one basin metate fragment, and one piece of
fossilized coral (which does not occur in San Diego waters).
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD
Continuation Sheet
Page 2 of o.
Permanent Trinomial:
Temporary Number:
Agency Designation:
SD1-5213C&D /
SDH-W-143/146
Site Record Update continued
A vast amount of shell was noted, species include: C hione s p., Argopecte n a e q u i s u 1I c a t u s ,
do nax sp., 0 s t r e a Lur i da , ftstraea u ndosa , Laev icardium sp., Pol i nices sp., Bur sa ca 1 ifornica,
jj a 1 i o t i s sp., M y t i 1 u s s p., a nd Crucibulum s p i nosum. One fish vertebra was collected at Locus
E. One extremely large tooth was collected which weighed 53.1 g. A few fragments of abalone
were also collected.
Several features were uncovered in grading. One feature, noted in a road cut on Locus D near
the western property boundary, was a pit. This pit was heavily packed with she! 1, mostly
large C h i o n e sp. (clam) and large Argo pecten sp. (scallop) shells, but also 0 s t r e a s p.
(oyster), My t i1 us sp. (mussel), and Crucibulum sp i no sum (cup and saucer). The pit appears to
be dug into the soil just below the midden.
On Locus E, two concentrations of fire-affected rock and charcoal were noted. They appeared
to have been hearths which were scattered by the bulldozer. Another hearth found on Locus E
was more intact. It appeared to be between 50 cm and 70 cm below the ground surface (before
grading). The first pass of the bulldozer exposed the hearth as 10 to 12 fire-affected rocks
and a cupful of charcoal. Two photographs were taken (RGM:1,2). The second pass of the
bulldozer removed the entire feature.
Material collected during monitoring is curated together with the material recovered during
the data recovery mitigation program.
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
ARCHAEOLOGICAL PHOTOGRAPHIC Permanent Trinomial:SD1-5213C&D
RECORD
Page ^ of 7 .
Camera and Lens Types
Canon AE-1 Program
Mo. Day Time Exp. /Frame
10 1 1/S
10 1 2/1
Temporary Number:
Agency Designation:
Film Type and
ASA 100 color
Subject/Descriptio
SDM-W-143/146
Speed
pr i nt
n View Tow.
Hearth exposed by bulldozer SW
Hearth exposed by bulldozer SW
mo . y r .
Year
1986
Access ion
Number
RGM: 1
RGM:2
<*Tl>\ <") I * <V ./ P\ I I- —' *"* ' "O"</.J \— V- U Supplement | |
State of California — The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION Permanent Trinomial:
ARCHEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD Tamporary „..,,_ SDM-W-143/146
Page__l__ of ID . Agency Designation:.
i. cnuntv. San Diego
2.
3.
4.
iisrscn.,,... San Luis Key
UTM Coordinates: Zone 11
110 4W
(7J5'» 68 (15-)
/
unsectioned
% of K nf 1
/
Phntoravicad
Eastina /
1975
Northing ()( )
B«ifM-jSBM ,Yl
E
5. Map Coordinates: mmS mmN (from NW corner of map) 6. Elevation 1RO-300 ft. ( V)
7. Location:Rising Glen subdivision/on broad northeast-trending ridges dis-
sected by deep drainages/El Camino Real along eastern boundary
8. Prehistoric _X Historic Protohistorie 9. Site Description: large heavy density
habitation site comprising three loci (Ar Dr EWhearths. groundstone.
flaked stone tools and debitage. ceramics, bone tools, shell beads,
animal bone, fishbone and shell/deep midden deposit
10. Area: 730 mtlengthlx 245 m(wirithlMOf47Q m2 Method of Determination: Scaled topographic map( )
11. Depth- 190+ cm M«th«,«ntp«t«min.finn: test excavation ( )
12. Features: Feature 1 - rock feature, Locus D, Unit 3, 65-90 cm.
Feature 2 - hearth. Locus D. Unit 15. 65-90 cm. See pages &
13. Artifacts: T.nrns A; 2 scraper planes, 2 choppers. 3 scrapers. 194 flakes.
12 (-p-r^mics/Locus D: 26 manos. 5 unclassified groundstone, 2 pestle
frags, 7 metate frags, 1 mortar, 1 groundstone ball, 1 groundstone(x)
14. Non-Artifactual Coi«tituti«nt«: T.nrna a? 53. Ig hone, 1Q,777.0g shell, 7.7g charcoal/
T.nr^ic; n? 14ft6.Qg hnnp>_ 7qfi_4fiS Og gb^ll^ ?15 7g.r-harrina1/ ^ (X)
15. DateReenrded:D(-;tohpr 29. 1QR5 16. Recorded By: M. Robbins Wade ( )
17. Affiliation and Addren: PRR R Assnn., Tno ?^^ A Sti-ftflt. .qt^-Qn4 S. P.. CA. ( )
92101
DPR 422A (Rev. 8/82)
State of California — The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION I
ARCHEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD
Page 2 of 10 . /
18. Human Remains: None Observed
>ern»nent Trinomial: S~*2- / 3 <- ^ ^ Imo.
remoorarv Number: SDM-W-143/146
Agency Designation: ,
yr.
( )
19. site intenritv: Generally good; area
intact .
has been plowed, but midden remains
( ,
20. Nearest water (type, distance and direction): unnamed seasonal drainage / 76 5m/south ( )
21. Largest Body of Water within 1 km (type, distance and direction) : Buen a Vista Creek/seasonal drainf- )
22. Vegetation Community (site vicinity): COaStal Sage SCrub & non-native [Plant Lirt ( )]
23. Vegetation Community (on site): non-native
References for above:
24. SiteSoii.- sandy loam/clay ( )
26. Geology: sedement ary/ volcaniq: )
28. siope: 4%-25% to southwest ( )
grasses
grasses [Plant List ( )]
25. Surroundino Soil: S aipe
27. Landform: Ridge finger s
29. Exposure: Open
30. Landowner («) (and/or tenant.) and Addrest: Mult it 6Ch Properties. InC . , 5820 Miramar
Suite 200, San Diego, CA 921
31. Remarks: Twenty Ix2m units were
21.
excavated. The site is legally
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
Road,
( )
mitigated; however, it retains scientific significance. ( )
32. References: Cardenas and Robbins Wade 1985; An archaeological investigation
of SDM-W-143/146: an unique coastal Luiseno site in Carlsbad,CA ( )
33. Name of Project: Ri s ing G1 p n
( )
34. Type of Investioation: data recovery
35. Site Accession Number: SDM-W-143/146
36. Photo*: 35 mm color prints
37. Photo Accession Number: RG~lil-3fi
CuratedAt: RBR fa Ass oe. Inc. (fe>mp
Taken By: Crew
On File At: RBR K, Assoc.. Inc.
( )
praifyl
( I
( )
RG-2:l-38
RG-3:l-25
DPR 422A (Rev. 8/82)
State of California - The Resource* Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
ARCHEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD
Continuation Sheet
p^. 3 of 10 .
Permanent Trinomial: ,5-2/3 C.~/J> /
mo.yr.
SDM-W-143/146
Kern No.Continuation
3.
4.
13
14
21
A.
B.
C.
D.
A.
B.
C.
D.
469720 Easting
470120 Easting
469960 Easting
469600 Easting
3670070 Northing
3669680 Northing
3669560 Northing
3669980 Northing
365 mmS
381 .mmS
387 mmS
369 mmS
195 mmE
212 mmE
205 mmE
189 mmE
pendant, 4 scraper planes, 3 scraper plane/scrapers, 10 choppers,
3 chopper/hammers, 2 hammers, 29 scrapers, 2 projectile points,
2 knives, 2 preforms, 11 cores, 3675 flakes, 28 ceramics, 8 bone
artifacts, 6 shell beads/Locus E: 4 unclassified groundstone,
15 manos, 3 metate frags, 2 scraper plane/scrapers, 3 choppers,
1 chopper/hammer, 17 scrapers, 1 scraper/perforator, 1 knife,
1 tool fragment, 3 cores, 2352 flakes, 84 ceramics, 7 bone arti-
facts, 4 shell beads/Non-locus: 1 mano, 1 preform, 1 core, 150
flakes, 15 ceramics.
Locus E: 1111.Ig bone, 58,775.0g shell, 116.8g charcoal/
Non-locus: 37.2g bone,. 32,427.0g shell, 110.5g charcoal.
age/lOOOm/north.
DPR 422C (Rev. 8/82)
State of California — The Resource* Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
FEATURE RECORD
of 1Q .
: JT-2/ 3 C /•Permanent Trfnomie*
Temporwv Number: 9HM-U-
mo..yr.
Agency Oe»iyn>tlon:.
TVP* ot Feetura:
S 230 E 68
Feature 1
Unit 3
70-80 cm
S230 E69
<O Rock
Sand Stone
0 1O 20 30cm
Of»R 422O <Re«. 3/871
Stats of California — Th« Rajouron Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
FEATURE RECORD
o> in .
Permanent Trinomial:.
Temporary Number: SDM-W-143 /146
Typ« of
TN
S302 E 114
303 E 114
1088
Feature 2
Unit 15
65-90 cm
O Rock
(H3 Mano
(3 Flake
<£s$ Grounds
CD Scraper
3 cm
OPR 422O (R<nr. 8/82)
State of California — The Resource* Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
ARCHEOLOGICAL PHOTOGRAPHIC
RECORD
Paoa 6 of 10 .
RG-1
Camara md Lena Typaa
Canon 35mm lens
Mo.
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
Day
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
10
10
10
10
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
LI
LI
LI
LI
LI
.2
Tima
2:14
2:45
2:46
2:47
2:48
1:30
1:30
1:30
1:30
2:00
2:00
2:00
2:00
3:00
3:00
3:00
3:00
PM
PM
PM
PM
2:00
2:00
2:00
2:00
9:00
9:00
9:00
9:00
10:30
.0:30
LO:3C
L0:30
L2:00
L2:OC
L2:OC
.2:OC
.2:00
1:30
1:30
1.-3C
1:30
.0:00
ExpVFrama
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
0/1
1/2
2/3
3/4
4/5
5/6
6/7
P*rnun«it Trinomial: _-^2/ 3 £-V £> /
mo. yr.
T«,-»-v Numh.: SDM-W- 14 3/146
Aoancv Daahination:
Film Typa and Spaad
ASA 100 Color print
Subjact/Daacription
View N from unit #2
Locus B,ii
ii
"
Locus A,11
ii
n
Locus E,ti
11
n
Locus D,
II
n
ti
Locus A,n
ii
n
Locus C,ii
11
M
Locus E,it
n
n
Locus C,ti
11
n
Locus A,n
11
Locus A,ii
Unit 2 30cm
tl II
II II
II II
Unit 1 90cm
(l fl
fl ll
n il
Unit 5 30cm
II H
II II
II tl
Unit 4 90cm
11 II
II ll
II II
Unit 7 70cm
ll ll
M H
tl ll
Unit 3 190cmn M
n n
n ii
Unit 18 120cm
II H
n n
n ii
Unit D 80cmM n
n H
n n
Unit 6 60cmn n
n n
Unit 6 60cm
II H
View toward El Camino Real from
Unit 15
Locus D,11
n
Locus C,
Unit 15 Feature 2 65-90cnn ii
n n
Unit 11 20cm
Vlaw Tow.
N
N
E
S
w
N
E
S
W
N
E
S
W
N
E
S
W
N
E
S
W
N
S
W
E
N
E
S
W
N
E
S
W
N
E
S
W
w
NE
W
S
E
N
Yaar
1984
Accaaslon
Numbar
RG-1: 1
RG-1: 2
RG-1: 3
RG-1: 4
RG-1: 5
RG-1: 6
RG-1: 7
RG-1: 8
RG=1:9
RG-1: 10
RG-1: 11
RG-1:12
RG-1: 13
RG-1: 14
RG-1: 15
RG-1: 16
RG-1: 17
RG-1: 18
RG-1: 19
RG-1: 20
RG-1: 21
RG-1: 22
RG-1: 23
RG-1: 24
RG-1: 25
RG-1: 26
RG-1: 27
RG-1: 28
RG-1: 29
RG-1: 30
RG-1: 31
RG-1: 32
RG-1: 33
RG-1:34
RG-1: 35
RG-1: 36
RG-2:1
RG-2:2
RG-2:3
RG-2:4
RG-2:5
RG-2:6
RG-2.-7
DPR 422E (Ray. 8/82)
State of California — The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION IWm.n«,« Trinomial: ^2 / ^? C_V-b> /
mo. yr.
ARCHEOLOGICAL PHOTOGRAPHIC T^-^^V Nu«h_- SDM-W- 143/146
RECORD
Paoe 7 of "I Q_ . Aoencv Dedonatton:
RG-2
Camera and Lena Type* Film Type and Speed
Canon 35mm lens ASA 100 Color print
Mo.
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
Day
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
2
3
13
13
3
3
13
13
13
13
13
13
3
3
3
3
3
3
13
13
13
14
L4
14
14
L4
L4
L4
L4
.4
.4
L4
L4
L4
Time
10:0
10:0'
10:01
. 1 : 0(
. 1 : 0(
.1:01
11:0(
2:1!
2:1!
2:11
2:1!
AM
AM
AM
AM
9:4f
9:4 =
9:4 =
9:4 =
11:3C
J.1: 3C
L 1 : 3 C
L1:3C
3:OC
3:OC
3:OC
3:OC
3:4C
3:40
3:40
3:40
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
Exp ./Frame
7/8
8/9
9/10
10/11
11/12
12/13
13/14
14/15
15/16
16/17
17/18
18/19
19/20
20/21
21/22
22/23
23/24
24/25
25/26
26/27
27/28
28/29
29/30
30/31
31/32
32/33
33/34
34/35
35/36
36/37
37/38
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Subjeet/Deaeriptlon
Locus C, Unit 11 20cm'
II it tt
It tl M
Locus C, Unit 12 20cmn n it
n ti it
u n n
Locus A, Unit 8 60cmti n ii
H n H
n ti u
Locus D, Unit 15 140cm
II H I*
ft M 11
II II 11
Locus E, Unit 17 100cmii n ii
n M M
u n n
View from unit 19 toward locus C
Locus F, Unit 19 20cm
II M H
II H it
Locus D, Unit 13 60cmu n n
n n n
u n ii
Locus B, Unit 9 20cm
tl H it
It tl H
n n H
W-143E crew shotit n
n ti
M it
n n
W-143E Unit 16 sid^walls
II II H
II M II
II II II
W-143E Unit 20 120cm sidewallsu n ii n
n n u u
n n n n
View Tow.
E
S
W
N
E
S
W
N
E
S
W
N
S
E
W
N
E
S
W
W
W
E
E
N
E
S
W
N
E
S
W
E
N
E
S
S
N
E
S
W
N
E
S
W
Year
1984
Accession
Number
RG-2: 8
RG-2: 9
RG-2: 10
RG-2: 11
RG-2: 12
RG-2: 13
RG-2: 14
RG-2: 15
RG-2: 16
RG-2: 17
RG-2: 18
RG-2: 19
RG-2:20
RG-2: 21
RG-2:22
RG-2: 23
RG-2:24
RG-2: 25
RG-2: 26
RG-2: 27
RG-2: 28
RG-2:29
RG-2:30
RG-2:31
RG-2: 32
RG-2: 33
RG-2: 34
RG-2: 35
RG-2: 36
RG-3: 3 7
RG-3:38
RG-3:1
RG-3: 2
RG-3: 3
RG-3: 4
RG-3: 5
RG-3: 6
RG-3: 7
RG-3: 8
RG-3: 9
RG-3: 10
RG-3: 11
RG-3: 12
RG-3: 13
DPR 422E (Rev. 8/82)
State of California — Th« Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
ARCHEOLOGICAL PHOTOGRAPHIC
RECORD
Pane 8 of 10 . pG 3x
Camera and Lena Typea
Canon 35mm Lens
Mo.
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
Day
17
17
17
18
18
18
18
18
18
19
19
19
Time
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
AM
AM
AM
Exp ./Frame
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Pwnunant Trinomial: .^-2/3 C. +~t> /
mo. yr.
T™,«vMUml-r: SDM-W-143/146
Aoencv Designation:
Film Type and Speed
ASA 100 Color print
Subject/Deeeriptlon
Crew shotn n
n M
W-143D, Unit 14 140cm sidewalls11
11
"
n ii n
n n ti
n n n
View toward Loci C, D, E from
northern edge of Locus C
Crew shot
Lab crew shotn n
n ii
n
View Tow.
NW
NE
S
N
E
S
w
S
Veer
1984
Accession
Number
RG-3: 14
RG-3: 15
RG-3:16
RG-3:17
RG-3:18
RG-3:19
RG-3:20
RG-3:21
RG-3:22
RG-3:23
RG-3: 24
RG-3: 25
DPR422E (Rev. 8/82)
Sun of California — Th« RnoUrcai Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
ARCHEOLOGICAL SITE
MAP
10
PwmMWt TrinomW:/ 3
SDM-W- 1 43/ 146
Agency D«tignrtiofi:
^~ Site Boundary
"• Locus Boundary
2 Excavation Unit
® Primary Datum
OPR422f>(R«v.8/82)
State of California — The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
ARCHEOLOGICAL SITE LOCATION
MAP
of
Permanent Trinomiali.l:~5"l2/ 3 C.
yr.
Temporary Number: SDM-W-1
Agency Designation:
roj^qt .Location
A
St Pitrirka'••• v \\ ^. ^.-h - ' ; •
UNITED STATES SAN LUIS REY QUADRANGLE
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO CO.
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 7.5. MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
•. • ' SCALE 1 24000
:OCO iOOO 2000 3CCC 4000 5000 6000 '000 FEE"
1 KILOMETER
OPR422G (R*v.S/82)
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY FIELD OBSERVATIONS
SITE DATA
Organization; RECON
Projectsheffler
TetvfcgHrive
"sTTe No.:SDM-W-1330
*f
Supervisor; R.H.Norwood /,-,. »i
Recorder: R.H.NoYWOod v_ Date:
Describe Location :This extensive site near ~he intersection of Chestnut and El Gamino Real
7/lV?7
is on a large strip of land north and northwest of the water tank in the north central area
the subject property and runs from the tcp of the ridge to the road, encompassing about 1/5"
the subject property.Elevation Contour:235-333 feet
A: None possibleReference Bearings:
B: C:
Site Dimensions and Description; This site measures 900 feet by ^-00 feet~and is an extensive
DSee attached map
Reference Coordinates:UTM Coord:
^70,036 E 3,669,^-26 N
shell midden with Chione, Aequipecten, Donax, Ostrea, and Astraea as well as cobbles and
lithics consisting of flakes and cores. Dark soil is present. Site boundaries are indistim
and patchy as a result of plowing and clearing activities. The site consists of three loci.
Evidence of subsurface deposit:!'_Minimumcf 30 cm. subsurface deposition.
Other site(s) in vicinity; SDM-W-1331, SDM-W-13V to the east. ________
Previous Excavation, Vandalism, or Disturbance; There has been some possible pot hunting oft
the property in the creekbed to the northeast. The land has been impacted by the water tank
construction, clearing and agriculture. Drainage from the tank has cut a cross section
through the central portion of the site.
Surface Evidence: indicate presence by "approximate" count
Artifacts:
- 10 Hammerstone
Core (frag(s)
Flake/Debitage
- Scraper
Blade
Projectile Point
Portable Metate (frag(s)
' (frag(spr cobbles
-Pestle ( frag ( s )
Thermal fractured rock
- Potsherds
- 10, OOP Undesignated Shell
Osteological Remains
X Charcoal/Ash Traces
Retouched Tools
Others:
Features:
JRoasting Pit/
Heart:;
_Cache/Stcrage
Rock Shelter
Undifferentiated
Mound/Pit
Rock Art
Burial
Stacked Rock:
j enclosure
_\ wall
\ alignment
circle
ca ir n
Bedrock Ground Stone:
\, basin (round)
J basin (oval)
\ mortar
\ slick
Others:
Cultural Horizon:
Historic
X Late Pre-historic
Early Milling
Paleo-Indian
Unknown
Non-Diagnostic
Possible Cultural
Affiliation:
Unknown
Site Type:
X Village
X Camp
Ceremonial
X Milling Station
X Lithic Workshop
Photo Information:
Film Type/ASA:
Photos not taken
Black/White
_Color Print
_Color Slida
None
Quarry
Photographer:
Deposition of film.
List subjects of
photo(s) on reverse
Others:
Rationale for conclusions:Previous research
Research Potential'Settlement pattern, social organization, economic exchange systems,
temporal variation, and seasonality data nay be derived from this site. ^^^
Notes:
Additional observations, measurements, drawings and comments on reverse:Yes XX NO
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY FIELD OBSERVATIONS
ENVIRONMENT
Organization;_ RECON
Project: Sheffler
Supervisor: R.H.Norwood
order; R.H.Norwood
Life Zone: (San Diego County)
X Coastal
Inland Valleys and Mesas
Foothills (Western Slope)
Plant Communities: (San Diego County)
Coastal Strand
Coastal Salt Marsh
Freshwater Marsh
_Coastal Sage Scrub
_Chaparral
Valley Grassland
Tentative
Site No.: SDM-W-1330
Date: 7/1 V?7
Mountains
Desert Foothills (Eastern Slope)
Desert
Southern Oak Woodland
Montane Coniferous Forest
Sagebrush Scrub
Pinon-juniper Woodland
Creosote Brush Scrub
Alkali Sink
Weather Observations; Weather is clear and "bright with a light haze present.
-Wind from:
Animals Observed; Rodents, birds, and lizards.
Dominate Plants Observed: Eucalyptus, field crops, foxtails, mustard noted.
Specimens collected: None
Local Water Sources: Unnamed drainage to the the east.
Soil Description:
composition: Sandy loam
soil color:
deposition:
Variable dark gray brown Munsell color code:
In place
soil samples taken; None
Possible environmental factors contributing to site presence: The site is near Agua
Hedionda Lagood. Abundant shellfish would have been available for subsistence.
Additional Notes:
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY FIELD OBSERVATIONS
SITU SKETCH MAP
Organization: RECON
) 'reject: Sheffler
"••->ervisor:R .H.Norwood
.order: R.H.Norwood
indicate cultural and physiographic features below:
Tentative-
Site Ho.; SDM-W-1330
Date: 7/W66
Indicate scale used:
1 ,cm.= 25 nu
o
330
/ /
300..
30
'70
240
'. 60
List Symbols Used:
2/0
180
150
-I—I —l —Extent of site area
• Extent of concentrated
cultural deposit
— Approximate contour line^
Additional observations, sketches, and comments on reverse:Yes X No
PROJECT LOCATION >:
./••> ,'•<* JV-' x. *»' vn* **rr^
Locus A
• . -- .- * '. ^ a, ; \
.-—, 'v ,-- \^-^; VrHi-'hs<:h' '• SDM-T-J-133]
. .,o^.-. \-:V,.'^v ^1\-« »\ • \ •-.-.
Figure 1. This map illustrates the project location in relation
to its environs. Based on portion of U.S.G.S. 7.5 minute topo-
graphic map. San Luis Key Quadrangle. Scale: 1" = 2000'.
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
Permanent Tri nomial : ^f\ t — J O*7*JC. Supplement ( )
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD ^*£ /
Temporary Number: SDM-W-2038
Page 1 of 5 . Agency Designation:
1. County: San Diego
2.
3.
4.
USGS Qu
UTM Coo
Tow ns h i
ad
rd
P
: San
i nates
IIS
Luis Rey (7 .5 ' ) '68
: Zone 11 /
Range 4W . 1/4 of
(151
469480
1/4 of
}
Eas t i ng
1/4
Photorevised
/
of
3670260
Section
Ho
BasetMer
1975
r t h i ng
.) SBM
( )
(X)
5. Map Coord i nates : 357 mmS 185 mmE (from NW corner of map) 6. Elevation: 240-260 ft ( }
7. Location: Elm Avenue extens1on/adjacent to Rising Glen subdivision/on undeveloped portion
of ridge tops/eastern portion overlooks El Camino Rea1/southeast of Buena Vista Lagoon
8. Prehistoric X Historic Protohis toric
9. Site Descriptio n Light to moderate shell and artifact scatter comprising four loci -
possibly extension of W-143/146 village complex/groundstone, flaked stone tools, cores,
debitage/m1dden deposits
o
10. Area: 125 m(length)x 60 m(width) 5890 m. Method of Determination scaled topo map
11. Pepth;approx. 100 cm Method of Determination; visual inspection of cuts
12. Features: None observed
13. Artifacts: Collected during monitoring: 2 manos. 3 hammers, 2 scraper planes, 6 scrapers,
3 cores, 16 f1akes/materia 1 types noted: fine-grained metavo1canic (felsite), medium- to
to coasre-grainedmetavolcanic, granitic, quartz ( )
14. Non-Artifactua 1 Constitutients: Shell: Chione. Aequipecten, Polinices, Laevicardium,
Hal iotis ; ( )
15. Date Recorded: 10/14/86 16. Recorded By: Garde nas/Robbi ns-Wade/Serr( )
17. Affiliation and Address:RBR S Associates, Inc. 233 A Street, Ste. 804. San Diego 921Ql( )
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
Permanent Trinomial: /o
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD -* BeT: JT.
Temporary Number: SDM-W-2038
Page _2 of 5 . Agency Designation:
18. Hunan Remains: None observed
19. Site Integrity: Poor. Old, deep (up to 20 feet) road cut runs through site. Areas have
been destroyed by cutting and grading for water tank and road.
(
20. Nearest Water (type, distance and direction): Buena Vista Creek/seasonal/840m/northwest
Springs in vicinity of W-143, not mapped ( )
21. Largest Body of Water within 1 km (type , dista nee and direction): s ame
22. Vegetation Community (site vicinity): disturbed grasses / scrub [Plant List ( )] ( )
23. Vegetation Community (on site): same [Plant List ( )] ( )
References for above: ( )
24. Site Soil: loamy coarse sand 25. Surrounding Soil: same ( )
26. Geology: sedimentary/volcanic 27. La nd form: ridges ( )
28. Slope: 6-20% 29. Exposure: open ( )
30. Landowner(s) (and/or tenants) and Address:
31. Remarks: Site was destroyed by grading for Elm Avenue extension in October and November
1986. Probably once was very large, meeting W-143/146 and W-145, but residences now (X)
32. References^:
33. Names of Project: Rising Glen - off-site Elm Avenue
34. Type of Investigation: intensive survey and monitor grading
35. Site Accession Number: W-2038 Curated At: RBR & Assoc. (temporary) ( )
36. Photos: 35mm color prints Taken By: D. Sean Carde nas ( )
37. Photo Access ion Number: OnFileAt: RBR& Associates, Inc. ( )
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD Permanent Trinomial: /^ 7 </6
'mo.yr.
Continuation Sheet Temporary Number: SDH-W-2038
Page 3 of 5 . Agency Designation:
It em No. Continuation
4. NW 1/4 of SW 1/4 of Section 32
NE 1/4 of SW 1/4 of Section 32
SW 1/4 of SW 1/4 of Section 32
31. stand on several sides of the site. Originally mapped by Rogers, but no
notes. Site was surveyed in April 1985. No environmental review was
required by City of Carlsbad. Grading was monitored as part of monitoring
program for Rising Glen subdivision, August through October 1986.
SUM of California — Tlw R**otirc*s Agtncy
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
ARCHEOLOGICAL SITE
MAP
Parmamait TrinemM: Sfi "7 (/&
SDM-W-2038
0 10 10 » «
SUM of California — The Resourcei Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
ARCHEOLOGICAL SITE LOCATION
MAP
Permanent Trinomial:
mo.yr.
Temporary Number: S DM-W-2 03 8
Agency Designation:
O'lCT
3 MILS I
13V
/240 MILS
SCALE 1:24000
,000 o looo zooo SAN LUIS REY QUADRANGLE
^ CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO CO.
7.5, MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
NE/4 OCEANS1DE 15' QUADRANGLE
FEET
OPH 422G (Rev. 3/32)
01002
•Ciw«C- .•>Cl/08/96 MON 10:09
!•';•-'.• iVvr^'^^va
^>^»i-. '• I V / . •i~f\41
|ALL-INFORMATION LISTING NADB/Report|
|Ptd 01/09/96 CALIFORNIA SOUTH COASTAL INFORMATION CENTER Pg 003|
Document No.: 1121255 Unpublished Report
Johnson, Melissa J. and Martin D. Rosen
1981 Archaeological Survey Report for A Proposed Auxiliary
Lane Extension in Oceanside 11-SD-78 P.M. 0.0-3.1
11206-086121. CALTRANS. SUBMITTED TO CALTRANS. UNPUBLISHED
REPORT ON FILE AT SCIC, SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY, SAN DIEGO,
CA 9218
Last Update: 01/18/95 Cataloged by: WRO-CA-06 on 11/06/90
Fed.Agcy: STATE, COUNTY, AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT (STA)
On File : SCIC, SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY, SAN DIEGO, CA 92
SHPO-ID: Johnson 17 Source: Report
Location: [OCEANSIDE] SAN DIEGO (CA)
Worktype: Archeological Identification Study
Keywords: JOHNSON17 (7), SAN LUIS REY 7.5' QUAD (4), SOUTHERN
PENINSULAR RANGES (4), COASTAL AREAS (4), PREHISTORIC (0),
FLAKED LITHICS (3), GROUND STONE (3), CA-SDI-00630 (8), 00630
BVW 33 (8), 00630 ELEVATION 200 FT (8), 00630 LITHIC SCATTER
(8), 00630 NATIVE AMERICAN (8), 00630 PARTLY DISTURBED (8),
00630 PREHISTORIC (8), 00630 SAN LUIS REY 7.5' 1948 QUAD (8),
00630 SURFACE SURVEY (8), 00630 SURFACE COLLECTION (8), 00630
T11S R4U (8)
Township: 27-0110S-0040W
I ALL-INFORMATION LISTING NADB/Report|
|Ptd 01/09/96 CALIFORNIA SOUTH COASTAL INFORMATION CENTER Pg 001|
Document No.: 1120645 Unpublished Report
Bull, Charles
1979 A Test of SDM-W-1172, An Archaeological Site in Buena
Woods. RECON. SUBMITTED TO KAMAR CONSTRUCTION CO.
UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT SCIC, SAN DIEGO STATE
UNIVERSITY, SAN DIEGO, CA 92182
Last Update: 08/31/90 Cataloged by: WRO-CA-06 on 08/31/90
Fed.Agcy: PRIVATE (PRI)
On File : SCIC, SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY, SAN DIEGO, CA 92
SHPO-ID: Bull 14a Source: Report
Location: [CARLSBAD] SAN DIEGO (CA)
Worktype: Archeological Identification Study
Keywords: BULL 14A (7), SAN LUIS REY 7.5' QUAD (4), 44 ACRES (4),
SOUTHERN PENINSULAR RANGES (4), COASTAL AREAS (4), PREHISTORIC
(0), SHELL (3), SDM-W-1172 A&B (8), HEARTH (0)
Document No.: 1120454 Unpublished Report
Corum, Joyce M.
1982 First Addendum Archaeological Survey Report for a
Proposed Auxiliary Lane Extension in Oceanside 11-SD-78
0.0/3.1 11206-086121. CALTRANS. SUBMITTED TO CALTRANS.
CONTRACT NO. 11206-086121. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT SCIC,
SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY, SAN DIEGO, CA 9218
Last Update: 08/03/90 Cataloged by: WRO-CA-06 on 07/25/90
Fed.Agcy: STATE, COUNTY, AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT (STA)
On File : SCIC, SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY, SAN DIEGO, CA 92
SHPO-ID: Corum 36 Source: Report
Location: SAN DIEGO (CA)
Worktype: Archeological Identification Study
Keywords: CA-SDI-09472 (8), CA-SDI-09473 (8), CORUM 36 (7), SAN
LUIS REY 7.5' QUAD (4), COASTAL AREAS (4), SOUTHERN PENINSULAR
RANGES (4), PREHISTORIC (0), FLAKED LITHICS (3), BASALT (3),
SHELL MIDDEN (0), CHIONE (3), ARGOPECTEN (3), MYTILUS (3), LA
JOLLAN (2), FELSITE (3), TESHOA FLAKE (3), TIZON BROWN WARE
SHERDS (3), FIRE-AFFECTED ROCK (3), CAMPSITE (0), SAN LUIS REY
II (2)
Document No.: 1121154 Unpublished Report
Laylander, Don
1988 An Archaeological Survey Report for a Widening of State
Route 78 (1-5 to East of College Boulevard) Oceanside,
California. CALTRANS. SUBMITTED TO CAtTRANS. UNPUBLISHED
REPORT ON FILE AT SCIC, SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY, SAN DIEGO,
CA 9218
Last Update: 01/18/95 Cataloged by: WRO-CA-06 on 10/24/90
Fed.Agcy: STATE, COUNTY, AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT (STA)
On File : SCIC, SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY, SAN DIEGO, CA 92
SHPO-ID: Laylande22 Source: Report
Location: [OCEANSIDE] SAN DIEGO (CA)
Worktype: Archeological Identification Study
Keywords: LAYLANDE22 (7), SAN LUIS REY 7.5' QUAD (4), 3.6 MILES
(4), SOUTHERN PENINSULAR RANGES (4), COASTAL AREAS (4),
PREHISTORIC (0), PREHISTORIC HABITATION SITE (0), ARCHAIC (2),
FLAKED LITHIC (3), SHELL (3), AGUA HEDIONDA LAND GRANT (6),
LUISENO (2), CA-SDI-00630 (8), CA-SDI-09473 (8), 00630 BVU 33
(8), 00630 ELEVATION 200 FT (8), 00630 LITHIC SCATTER (8), 00630
NATIVE AMERICAN (8), 00630 PARTLY DISTURBED (8), 00630
PREHISTORIC (8), 00630 SAN LUIS REY 7.5' 1948 QUAD (8), 00630
SURFACE SURVEY (8), 00630 SURFACE COLLECTION (8), 00630 T11S R4U
(8)
Township: 27-0110S-0050W, 27-0110S-0040W
Document No.: 1122053 Unpublished Report
Mas Iand Engineering
1983 Draft Environmental Impact Report Alanda Project.
NASLAND ENGINEERING. SUBMITTED TO CITY OF CARLSBAD.
UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT SCIC, SAN DIEGO STATE
UNIVERSITY, SAN DIEGO, CA 92182.
Last Update: 05/22/91 Cataloged by: WRO-CA-06 on 05/22/91
Fed.Agcy: STATE, COUNTY, AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT (STA)
On File : SCIC, SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY, SAN DIEGO, CA 92
SHPO-ID: Nasland 1 Source: Report
Location: SAN DIEGO (CA)
Worktype: Cultural Resources Management Plan, Archeological
Identification Study, Other
Keywords: NASLAND 1 (7), SAN LUIS REY 7.5' QUAD (7), 47 ACRES (4),
SOUTHERN PENINSULAR RANGES (4), COASTAL AREAS (4), PREHISTORIC
(0), PREHISTORIC HABITATION SITE (0), HISTORIC (0), ARCHAIC (3),
KUMEYAAY (2), FLAKED LITHICS (3), PROJECTILE POINTS (3), FAUNAL
MATERIAL (3), GROUND STONE (3), PREHISTORIC POTTERY (3),
THERMALLY-FRACTURED ROCK (3), EIR (7), DIEGUANO CURING STONE
(3), BIOLOGICAL INVENTORY (7), SDM-W-143 (8), SDM-w-145 (8),
CA-SDI-5213 (8)
IALL-INFORMATION LISTING NADB/Report|
|Ptd 01/09/96 CALIFORNIA SOUTH COASTAL INFORMATION CENTER Pg 004|
Document No.: 1121698 Unpublished Report
Polan, H. Keith
1983 An Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Alanda Project,
Carlsbad, California. HERITAGE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES.
SUBMITTED TO NASLANO ENGINEERING. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE
AT SCIC, SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY, SAN DIEGO, CA 92182
Last Update: 01/30/91 Cataloged by: WRO-CA-06 on 01/12/91
Fed.Agcy: PRIVATE (PRI)
On File : SCIC, SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY, SAN DIEGO, CA 92
SHPO-ID: Polan 31 Source: Report
Location: [CARLSBAD] SAN DIEGO (CA)
Worktype: Archeological Identification Study
Keywords: POLAN 31 (7), SAN LUIS REY 7.5' 1975 QUAD (4), 47 ACRES
(4), SOUTHERN PENINSULAR RANGES (4), COASTAL AREAS (4),
PREHISTORIC (0), FLAKED LITHICS (3), GROUND STONE (3), SHELL
(3), SDM-W-143 (8), SDM-W-146 (8), THERMALLY FRACTURED ROCK (3)
Document No.: 1121431 Unpublished Report
Smith, Brian F.
1989 An Archaeological Survey of the Spyglass Subdivision
Project. BRIAN F. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES. SUBMITTED TO CEP
ASSOCIATED. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT SCIC, SAN DIEGO
STATE UNIVERSITY, SAN DIEGO, CA 92182
Last Update: 12/08/92 Cataloged by: WRO-CA-06 on 12/10/90
Fed.Agcy: PRIVATE (PRI)
On File : SCIC, SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY, SAN DIEGO, CA 92
SHPO-ID: SmithB 27 Source: Report
Location: [CARLSBAD] SAN DIEGO (CA)
Worktype: Archeological Identification Study
Keywords: SMITHS 27 (7), SAN LUIS REY 7.5' QUAD (4), 10.4 ACRES
(4), SOUTHERN PENINSULAR RANGES (4), COASTAL AREAS (4), NO
RESOURCES (0)
Document No.: 1121984 Unpublished Report
UESTEC Services, Inc.
1980 Regional Historic Preservation Study. WESTEC
SERVICES,INC. SUBMITTED TO COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING ORGANIZATION
OF THE SAN DIEGO REGION. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT SCIC,
SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY, SAN DIEGO, CA 92182.
Last Update: 03/12/93 Cataloged by: WRO-CA-06 on 02/06/91
Fed.Agcy: STATE, COUNTY, AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT (STA)
On File : SCIC, SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY, SAN DIEGO, CA 92
SHPO-ID: WESTEC 07 Source: Report
Location: SAN DIEGO (CA)
Worktype: Archeological Identification Study, Archeological
Evaluation Study, Archeological Data Recovery Study
Keywords: UESTEC 07 (7), NO MAPS (4), 20 SQUARE MILES (4),
SOUTHERN PENINSULAR RANGES (4), COASTAL AREAS (4), PREHISTORIC
(0), PREHISTORIC HABITATION SITE (0), FOOD
PROCESSING/PROCUREMENT SITE (0), MANUFACTURING SITE (0), QUARRY
(0), TRAIL (0), BEDROCK MILLING FEATURES (0), HISTORIC (0),
HISTORIC HABITATION SITE (0), SERVICE INDUSTRY SITE (0),
RELIGIOUS SITE (0), HOSTELRY (0), MERCANTILE SITE (0), ARCHAIC
(2), KUMEYAAY (2), FLAKED LITHICS (3), SHELL (3), SDM-w-87 (8),
SDM-W-85 (8), SDM-W-86 (8), SDM-W-105 (8), SDM-W-84 (8),
SDM-U-88 (8), SDM-W-89 (8), SDM-W-97 (8), SDM-U-125 (8),
SDM-W-1670 (8), SDM-U-101 (8), SDM-U-102 (8), SDM-U-108 (8),
SDM-W-109 (8), SDM-W-112 (8), SDM-W-113 (8), SDM-W-114 (8),
SDM-W-115 (8), SDM-U-116 (8), SDM-W-117 (8), SDM-W-118 (8),
SDM-W-119 (8), SDM-U-120 (8), SDM-W-121 (8), SDM-U-122 (8),
SDM-U-123 (8), SDM-W-124 (8), SDM-W-129 (8), SDM-W-468 (8),
SDM-U-128 (8), SDM-W-601 (8), SDM-W-126 (8), SDM-W-558 (8),
SDM-U-130 (8), SDM-U-131 (8), SDM-W-132 (8), SDM-W-133 (8),
SDM-W-469 (8), SDM-W-127 (8), HISTORIC RESOURCES OF CARLSBAD
(0), CA-SDI-00603 (8), CA-SDI-00608 (8), CA-SDI-00211 (8),
CA-SDI-00690 (8), CA-SDI-00695 (8), CA-SDI-04358 (8),
CA-SDI-00760 (8), CA-SDI-01014 (8), CA-SDI-00210 (8),
CA-SDI-05353 (8), CA-SDI-00209 (8), CA-SDI-00626 (8),
CA-SDI-00627 (8), CA-SDI-00628 (8), CA-SDI-00629 (8),
CA-SDI-00600 (8), CA-SDI-00601 (8), CA-SDI-00691 (8),
CA-SDI-05077 (8), CA-SDI-05214 (8), CA-SDI-05213 LOCI A-C (8),
CA-SDI-00630 (8), CA-SDI-00212 (8), CA-SDI-00693 (8),
CA-SDI-00692 <8), CA-SDI-00694 (8), CA-SDI-00610 (8), ,
CA-SDI-00696 (8), CA-SDI-00602 (8)
y •£$*?•.
:. ••: v-""i?"'
--
--^ .%••-;/:•,¥•' "!''•-.•>••
I
I
CnrutoTtrmtecrval*4pO fool.
Dttfaim. is tn&an a fa 1
Kv\>ywjJK\ i^v !wQte*^n /4«(f(^
^^•:-'\'*»vy
^
y^
>-r*
rzu
v
San Diego Museum of Man
REPORT ON ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FILES RECORD SEARCH
Source of Request: ASM Affiliates, Inc. - Carol Schultze
Name of Project: Carlsbad 85330
Date of Request: 11 January 1996
Date Request Received: 15 January 1996
The Record Search for the above referenced project has been completed.
Archaeological site file information is enclosed for the following
sites located within or in the vicinity of the project area:
W-141 W-143 W-146 W-1172 W-1781
W-2037 W-2038 W-3030
Bibliographic information is enclosed for the following reports on
archaeological environmental impact studies conducted within or in the
vicinity of the project area:
EIS-118 EIS-121 EIS-240 EIS-488 EIS-626
This Record Search is based only on information contained in the files
of the San Diego Museum of Man. Archaeological site records and/or
environmental impact studies pertaining to the project area may exist
in other repositories.
Record Search prepared by:
Grace Johnson
Date of Record Search: 16 January 1996
1350ElPrado, Balboa Park, San Diego, California 92101, 619-239-2001, FAX 619-239-2749
An educational, non-profit corporation founded in 1915 collecting for posterity and displaying the life and history of mankind.
0
\
\r.
Wl4l;LOT3STIW: ';corner : of :Sbutb
•'"'
^CULTURES: 'Trace of SD-?II-at;
tW-i41»'' '
-B may
north-.margin of Carlsbad
Slough;'!' W-141 -Elev. 50'
to .75''. - W-141-B Elev. 25»
down to high !:tide level or
below.;
CONDITIONS: ;
;Noneyexcept;when NAMEt.y,? :...:'.: '• ] '
Vista^Creek discliargeVin ithd : ;; • Y ,, •.'•-•_,, _ ._winter and.spring as far ;as:this> A AREA:^-W-141 equals.lt acres. W-141-B
g,^:..-r ;:, '.v,:-\-5: V. .: y • ;.•; "•?;!• •'; '^v-,-};":' • '-;. .. - .;., : •.",• v.;.-';'>equ&ls 2/3 acre. ;. -. . ...." ''
ARCHITECTURE: Scatter ed ?icobble hearths ; , ; v'
encountered in the Lit I II horizon. , TYPE: Slough terrace midden of concen-
.;.'••'-. • . :"v-: '• '• •.••' :- -^:' '.•'.•' •;•' '••;•'. / I r • ;trated type. ' ~' -
;IJJTRUSIVES: d pi eguerio perforated curing stone from Lulseno midden,
: \ The midden is; in the^ main Lit; lvbeginning on a wavy .surface
: a; drab-colored, sandy ;.'ad'6beV - and ; lfl:.5 V;.-.thlek . - On this, is a .Luiseno
On the talus;iWas •• f :Qiihd . ;,ar$race~ ^pf SD-II wprk as if they
the ridge before
'" ' ' '' ' "
,>• .
-he ''undeisring" ; Lit^.rlrmidden ;t o ;;;pracavy^f a'de.^out7 near Ithis: ba'se • Sherds found mostly in suirf ace but, one ;was f ouhd as 'deep as 18n -
could hay e>been carried down a rodent hole. Site produced, a few ring stones
f or''. us , and collectors in the Luiseno';levelii' vMetates all granite. Bird bone
common but mammal scarce. Pish bones found in the top: 18" ^ only, pne whole
Olivella bead at depth of 3 feet. One abalone -ring at 18wi Bottom inf il-
tra:ted with lime without cementing. Land farmed' and midden was once thicker.
W-141-B is practically all donax with high charcoal content but stiff with
.ji&dobeV Rests on drag adobe. Max. depth1 2^ feet. Joins with W-141 at top
"\jand is covered with 10? "'of outwash at slough level which -would increase
^grSatly if ,, the midden goes out under the slough far. This is probably a
ypure.Lit. II site with a trace of Luiseno^on top. No sherds. Fragments
"of granit'e'.mortar on surface. ' '- •
®
•-' I
TT:
W-143 LOCATION: ^Central LjiprtheaaV'side..of
the Carlsbad Block* Elev.
:, ; 175' to 250«.
-CULTURES: Lit. ir scattered areas NAME: ?
overlain by an intense Luiseno .
occupation. .AREA: 3 acres.
WATER CONDITIONS: Canyon to'east TYPE: Highland accretion midden
has a small discharge after winter, ?A developing into permanent,occu-
raina but no summer and fallwater pation during later times,
now. " -; ••/.'-•.' ' ' " . '••-:'•••. . '--•• • •
ARCHITECTURE: Lit. II levels have characteristic cobble hearths.but the
fire broken rock which is scarce in the Luiseno midden is scattered.
BURIALS: :None. ' ;
PETROS: "None. ! ,.-•. .
INTRUSIVES: Collectors have found Channel Island artifacts here.
HISTORY: First occupied intermittently by Lit. II people and afterward
intensively by Luiseno. . '. •
' ; ' • - .'•;.•' ' '•-":' '• •
REMARKS:, : Beside the main midden there are small middens all about/being
strvmg put on the steep sided benches above and the .saddles in between
for-|a^
traces o"f shell inbetween. The Luiseno middens are sandy, black and
fluffy. Max. depth 18" of which only several basal miles are of Lit. II
origin. Sherds occur on the surface of the donax patches which run up
almost to 100$ of the species. Animal and fish bone scarce. Shell content
medium. Arrowpoints, metates, manos and a few mortars occur on and near
the surface. Luiseno arrowpolnts are always triangular without notches.
State of California — The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
ARCHEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD
Page 1_ of. 10 .
1. r...^. San Diego
Permanent Trinomial:
Temporary Number: .
Agency Designation: _
SDM-W-143/146
Supplement D
2. uses Quad: San Luis Key
3. UTM Coordinates: Zone 1 1
'68 (15'»Photorevised .1975
Easting Northing
4. Township_JJJL Range - - 4W •
unsectioned
of - X of _ X ot X of Section Base
S. Map Coordinates:mmS . mm» (from NW corner of map) 6. Elevation 1RQ-300 ft.
7. Location: Rising Glen subdivision/on broad northeast-trending ridges dis-
sected by deep drainages/El Camino Real along eastern boundary
8. Prehistoric X Historic Protohistoric 9. Site Description: large heavy density
habitation site comprising three loci (A. D. El/hearths, aroundstone.
flaked stone tools and debitage. ceramics, bone tools, shell beads,
animal bone, fishbone and shell/deep midden deposit
10. Ar^-730 m(i«ngthi« 245 f«<«,irftT.i!140f470 m2. Method of Determination: scaled t opo gr aphic mapi )
11. Depth :__JJLP_± cm Method of Determination: test excavation ( )
12. Features: Feature 1 - rock feature. Locus D, Unit 3, 65-90 cm.
Feature 2 - hearth. Locus D. Unit 15. 65-90 cm. See pages &
13. Artifacts: . T.nrns A: 2 scrappr planes,. 2 choppers, 3 scrapers. 194 flakes.
12 nerarpics /Locus D: 26 manos. 5 unclassified qroundstone, 2 pestle
frags, 7 mptate fragSj 1 mortar,. 1 groundstone ballr 1 Cjroundstone(X)
14. Non-Artifactoai Comtitutients: T.Qnns A: 5 "\. 1 g bonp, 19f777.0g shell, 7.7g charcoal/
T.nc.ua H- 14Rft.Qg hnn^^ 9QP> 4ftS.Qg ghg.11 71^. 7g—r.harrnnl / , (Xl
15. D««e Reeorded:nrtnhpr 79, 1985 16. Recorded By: M. RobbinS Wade ( )
17. Affiliation and Addreo: RBR K. As^or . Tnr. , ?TT A SlTPPt, .StP.904,—S. P., CA. I )
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTHENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD
Continuation Sheet
Page 1 of -3 .
Permanent Trinomial:
Temporary Number:
Agency Designation:
SD1-5213C&D /
SDM-V-143/146
Site Record Update
Monitoring of grading activities at SDM-W-143/146 by a qualified archaeologist was a condition
of approval of the Rising Glen subdivision. Brushing and grading of the site occurred between'<\ •.
15 August and 14 October 1986. Monitoring was conducted by Mary Robbins-Wade and Carol Serr
of R8R & Associates, Inc. Nothing was found to alter the interpretation ofthe site as a
major habitation area. One pit feature was noted, as were a few hearths and a variety of
artifacts and ecofact material.
Artifact types noted include: one mortar fragment collected by construction personnel
(probably from Locus E); one basinmetate fragment collected just south of Locus E, on
Norwood's SDi-5213C (W-1330C), in dirt pushed over from Locus E; two metate fragments (Locus
A); manos; hammerstones; scraper planes; scrapers; cores; flakes; and ceramic sherds.
Numerous cobble-based tools were found. Material types noted include: fine-grained
met a'volcanic (felsite), medium- to coarse-grained metavolcanic, chert, chalcedony, obsidian,
a nd quartz.
An unusual find was made on Locus D, in a road cut close to the western property boundary. A
whole abalone shell filled with pitch was found and collected. Nothing else unusual was noted
near the abalone shell; midden soil, shell, lithics, and ma no fragments were found nearby.
A total of eight artifacts were collected. Locus A: one felsite flake. Locus D: one ceramic
sherd and the abalone shell with pitch. Locus E: one basin metate fragment. Uncertain locus
provenience: one chert flake, one ceramic sherd, one basin metate fragment, and one piece of
fossilized coral (which does not occur in San Diego waters).
rv. •;•'.'.. '"•'.";'".. Set e/5
>> . W-146 4 f v'T/"^ LOCATION: Lles-.ih saddle Between
$'•>*•:*.•< -: .•••' .: ' •'-'.•.--••-:••"•' :;-..' •:. -.:•-'.V-•''.-. '.• ' W-144lahd~W-^135~northeast^ " u • : end--Carlsbad Block. Elev,
CULTURES.: Lit. II and Luilseno NAME: ?
WATER CONDITIONS: Same as " AREA: 1 acre and"connected to the
W-143 only"farther: removed. , east with W-143 by a Luiseno
'-r'' ..''.. •:. ' :"''-.'. . '•' '";••".". ;"stra^rcoii." -"' ' "'" ' . . .
ARCHITECTURE? :Scattered Lit. JI \ . ;
cobble hearths in situ but ' TYPE: Highland accretion type for
Luiseno stratum has only diffused both periods,
fire cracked rock in it.
BURIALS: "None.
PETROS: 'Nonev -.,-..." . r s:
INTRUSIVES: "None. -; /\ - r : . .
HISTORY: -Begins with an 18*1 stratum of Lit. it midden with a weak
shell content;in,yellowish sand. This,occupation was immediately
followed by,a Luiseno occupation which produced an overlying midden
3• thick. On this 6n of, aeoiian sand has accumulated. A few sherds
were found in !and under this sand stratum which is churned up at the
base by,rodents. ;
REMARKS: The'Lit. II produced most of the "stone•fiaking but,the
Luiseno midden has some and, as noticed at other sites, is identical
with Lit. II. No arrowpoints but this is almost universal with all
Luiseno camps until toward the end of'their occupation. Metates and
manos scarce. One broken large granite mortar present in Luiseno
level but they are not as large as the Yuman mortars.
State of California — The Resources Agency | 1
DEPARTMENT OF PAFKS AND RECREATION Permanent Trinomial: . Supplement | J
ARCHEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD Temporary Number: SDM-W-14 3 / 14 6 Myy
Page__l_ of ID . Agency Designation:
1. county: _§an_Diego
2.,. San Luis Key
linates: Zone 1 1
ns-\
I
68 (IBM Photoreviud
Eastina /
1975
Northing (y )
ii«j 4W unsectioned4. T«w^AiP 1 I b R.no. 4 W . x of x of x pf x of section Base (Mar J^SiLlX )
5. Map Coordinates: mmS mmN (from NW corner of map) 6. Elevation 180-3QQ—ft . Qr
7. Location: Rising Glen subdivision/on broad northeast-trending ridges dis-
sected by deep drainaqes/El Camino Real along eastern boundary
8. Prehistoric X Historic Protohistorie 9. Site Description: large heavy density
habitation site comprising three loci fA. Df E)/hearths, groundstone,
flaked stone tools and debitage. ceramics, bone tools, shell beads,
animal bone, fishbone and shell/deep midden deposit
10. A,-.-730 m».ngth)» 245 m(~irtthi 140,4 7 0 m2 Method of Determination: scaled t opographi c mapi >
11. Depth:___L9_0+ cm Motion«ft>«t«rmin««ion: test excavation ( )
12. Features: Feature 1 - rock feature. Locus D. Unit 3, 65-90 cm.
Feature 2 - hearth. Locus D. Unit 15, 65-90 cm. See pages &
13. Artifacts: T.nrns &• 2 scrappr planeSj 2 choppers, 3 scrapers. 194 flakes.
12 ceramics/Locus D; 26 manos. 5 unclassified qroundstone, 2 pestle
frags, 7 mutate frags, 1 mortar. 1 9ronnr!stone ball. 1 qroundstone(X)
14. Non-Artifactuai Con«titutient«: T.nnn.c; A: 51.1g hone, lQJ777.0g shell, 7. 7g charcoal /
r.or-n^ n? 14ftft,Qg hon^ 7Q^ afiS Og qhpll,—? TS 7g. rharrnal / «X)
15. O«t. Recorded:nrtohpr ?Qf 19R5 16. Recorded By: M. Bobbins Wade ( )
17. Affii..tiBn ,nn Add,^.- RRR K, &fisnr._ Tnr.r ? ^H A StTPPt, SrP.904,—S . P., CA.l )
DPR 422A (Rev. 8/82)
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AMD RECREATION
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD
Continuation Sheet
Page 1 of -3 .
Permanent THnoilal:
Temporary Number:
Agency Designation:
SD1-5213C4D /
SDM-lT-143/146
10.
Site Record Update
Monitoring of grading activities at SDM-W-143/146 by a qualified archaeologist was a condition
of approval of the Rising Glen subdivision. Brushing and grading of the site occurred between
15 August and 14 October 1986. Monitoring was conducted by Mary Robbins-Wade and Carol Serr
of RBR & Associates, Inc. Nothing was found to alter the interpretation of the site as a
major habitation area. One pit feature was noted, as were a few hearths and a variety of
artifacts and ecofact material.
Artifact types noted Include: one mortar fragment collected by construction personnel
(probably from Locus E); one basin metate fragment collected just south of Locus E, on
Norwood's SD1-5213C (W-1330C), in dirt pushed over from Locus E; two metate fragments (Locus
A); manos; hammerstones; scraper planes; scrapers; cores; flakes; and ceramic sherds.
Numerous cobble-based tools were found. Material types noted include: fine-grained
metavolcanic (felsite), medium- to coarse-grained metavolcanic, chert, chalcedony, obsidian,
and quartz. - .
An unusual fin.d was made on Locus 0, in a road cut close to the western property boundary. A
whole abalone shell filled with pitch was found and collected. Nothing else unusual was noted
near the abalone shell; midden soil, shell, lithics, and ma no fragments were found nearby.
A total of eight artifacts were collected. Locus A: one felsite flake. Locus D: one ceram'c
sherd and the abalone shell with pitch. Locus E: one basin metate fragment. Uncertain locus
provenience: one chert flake, one ceramic sherd, one basin metate fragment, and one piece of
fossilized coral (which does not occur in San Diego waters).
Slat* of CaMorni> — The Itcsourr.iii Ai/»ney
DEIWnTMCNT OF PARKS AND nECncATION
ARCHEOLOGICAL SITE SURVEY UECOHU
5ie SITE Mn W-1781
1.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Previous Site Designation
USGS Quad San
UtM Coordinates
T.,_ ' 11 southIWD.
Location
Luis Key
Zone HE
Range ^
Hi-oa.1
west
7
tc
••
East /Southeast
• 2.
K* X
> N3fo-
Temporary
15'
=?-o?-bo
%of
Field Mo. "p&T
Year |^b&
• .
V, of Sec.
q
unsectioned
of Wlarrnn TRnnrt 7^ TTIP+PT'C!
7. Contour 1 nn ft. 8. Chvner & Address
9. Prehistoric X • Ethnographic^ Historic _10. Site Description Pi ^o-o
line ^-- shell and lithic .scatter.
11. Area 50 X 300 meters.l^QQQ square meters. 12. Depth of Midden . unknown
13. She Vegetation ruderal grasses Surrounding Vegetation Datura, na'tivp
14. Location & Proximity of Water Buena Vista Creek'north 150 meters
15. Site Soil day type Surrounding Soil ' same
unknown1G. Previous Excavation
17. Site Disturbance Former house foundation,actii-ity, reservoi
18. Destruction Possibiii^ same as above
19. Features none
20. Burials none 'observprl
21. Artifacts 2 quartz projectile 'points,,
• 1 unifacial mano, 1 bifacial mano; ( = 10+)
scraper,
2 potsherds; chopping tools; bifacial blade frag., historic
porcelain. -
22. Fcunal Remains Shellfish remains: Ohinnp
Numerous butchered mammal -bones
"rlnnax< oyster,
23. Commants prcvioujly recorded.more or less continuous
along ridge. Shell concentration thickest at either end os site.
2-1. Accession T3o.
2D. Dot- Hccorv-k;c!
25.
7-10-78'
20. Photo Roll f-So. Frame No.
Sketch M;»j«
27. FIf.-corr!^
Fi!rv> Typp(.;)
by where
T n and Thesken
Token Evy -
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY FIELD OBSERVATIONS
SITE DATA (sex-
Hosp Grove
Tentative
Site No. : SDM-W-1172
C. S. Bull
Organization; RECON
Project:
Supervisor:
Recorder:
Describe Location: This site is located due south of the very large erosion
canyon located at the center of the project area. The site is situated
on a gentle slope that trends south.
M. J. Hatlev Date: 1-12-77
Elevation Contour: 174'
Reference Bearings:
B: C:
N/A
D:
Reference Coordinates; UTM coord.
367350N 469024E
Site Dimensions and Description: This site is 17 m. N/S by 35 m. E/W consisting
of a very extensive shell deposit with associated deflated hearths.
A posthole indicated continuous shell to a depth of 75 cm.
Evidence of subsurface cultural ma/terials? shell and other material to +75 cm.
ocner site(s) in vicinity: This is the first site encountered during this
J.nvestigation.
Previous Excavation, Vandalism, or Disturbance: The site is located in an Eucalyptus
grove and has had some root disturbance. No pothunting was observed. The
area has had a recent burn over the entire site surface.
Surface Evidence: Indicate presence by "approximate" count
Artifacts:
Hammer stone
X Core (frag(s) loci B
X Flake/Debitage loci B
Scraper
Blade
Projectile Point
Portable Metate (frag(s)
_Mano (frag(s)
Pestle (frag(s)
X Thermal fractured rock
Potsherds
Y Undesignated Shell*
psteological Remains
Charcoal/Ash Traces
Retouched Toolu
Others:
*Chione
Pecten
Donax
Astrea
Features:
ilearth**
Cache/Storage
Rock Shelter
Uiulif ferentiatt-it
Mound/Pit
Rock Art
burial
drock Grour
bai;in (round)
basin (oval)possibly some
deflated hearths JN°rtar
Lck
Cultural Horizon:
Historic
Late Pre-historic
?_ Early Milling
•p i'gleo-Indian
Unknown
. Non-Diagnostic
Possible Cultural
Atfiliation:
Unknown at this
time.
Site Type:
Village'
_.._>L_Camt>
Ceremonial
_ nilling Station
i,itni<j workshop
_ Ouarry'Others:
**At least
two observed
Photo Information:
Film Type/ASA:
plus x pan
125
_Black/White
_Color Print
_Color Slide
None
Photographer:
C. S. Bull
Deposition of film:
RECON files
List subjects of
photo(s) on reverse:
Rationale for conclusions.- The sparcity^_qf__d.iagnqstic cultural materials limits
establishment of cultural affiliatipn^responsible for 'the creation of the site
Research Potential'This site will_lend_ _inf p.rma,tion.__ towards fagoon and ecotone
exploitation practices by Jiuman^occupation^J.n this region relative to similar
NOtes: areas . _A second loci is _located ,44_m_._.SE from the main site area. It
is composed of a moderate ^amount of shell__material covering an area of... m.
x m. There is a large hole dug intQ__th.e...site as a ^result of kids making
a fort which uncovered much sh^ljl material.
•_ .State of California — The Resource* Agency •..-•• -• " - --
. , DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
ARCHEOLOGICAL SITE SURVEY RECORD
University of California. Los Angeles Regional Office '„A __. ... ,,-n—. _^_ ..4.. .,. SITE NO. CA" SDi-000-6139
County San Diego •
1.
3.
4.'
5.
6.
Previous Site Designation W-1781 2. temporary Field No.
USGS Quad -~ San Luis Rey ' 7%' 'X 15' "Year 1968 [Photorevised
UTM Coordinates ' ' Zone ll 3670800N/470140E
Two. US Ranqe 4¥ ; SW % Of . NE % Of Sec. 32
Location ' "On a major southeast to "northwest trending knoll-mesa top.
19751
• .
Approximately 350 meters south : of Highway 78 and 340 meters "east of El Camino
Real. . Extensive site overlooking Buena'v Vista Creek. "...'.
7. Contour 100' 8. Owner & Address Unknown
9. Prehistoric X Ethnographic _X Historic X 10. Site Description A very large >
shell and lithic scatter with apparent depth occupying an large mesa-knoll. .
Darken soil zone observed In different areas on knoll-mesa. :
11. Area 450 x 85 meters, 38.250 square meters. -;. 12. i:; Depth of Midden Unknown
13. Site Vegetation Dense -grasses -sage Surrounding Vegetation Same +. Datura and Indian tobacco
14. Location & Proximity "of Water Buena Vista Creek 120 meters to the north and northeast. •
15. Site Soil Dark 'grey sandy-caly Surrounding Soil light brown clay loam" 'r :
16. Previous Excavation^" Unknown _ ' _ ' _
17. Site Disturbance Dirt roads, former 'house foundation, trash scatters and agricultural
activities.18. Destruction Possibility Potential' for portion of site to be impacted by proposed development.
19. Features None observed. _ •;_' _ __ _ ; _ \ _ VO
20. Burials None observed. . _ ; _ . _ ;•_. _ _
21. Artifacts Recorded in IgyS-Quartzite projectile points; Felsite flakes; Domed scraper;
Unifacial mano; Bifacial mano; JO+Hammers /founders; 2 potsherds; Chopping tools;
and Historic porcelain. In 1981-Several guartzite flakes; Quartzite mano.
22 Faunal Remains Shellfish .included! Ghione sp.? Pecten sp.; Donax sp.;. Oyster; ,
and butchered and saw" cut 'bone. . ' ' .. v. _ •-.-•:;•'. -,- _ •;."•"'
... /»,, ' :•.'.'.,, • '•,...'•. . ' - ' .
23 comments Majority of the site are did not lie on the project property and .'•
was under dense vegetation cover. The non-project area was only perused. " 7 :;
24. Accession No. _ • 25. Sketch Map 52 - _ by - where J__ — i -
26. Date Recorded _8/12^___ 27. P^^QH RV Gwen Romani and Janice Hawthorne
28. Photocell No. _ Frame No. ...' '•- ' Film Type(s) - ^ - Taken By — '. - _ -
- '(- '
DPR 422 (Rev. 9/76) -— ,-
W-2037 thru ¥-2057
Site location only, recorded from M. J. Rogers' 192U archaeological
site map; no site data available.
W-2037 thru W-20U3 TT:l5/2
W-20UU thru ¥-20^7 TTt
**See notes below.
U/-2.052 +ZOS3 - Acto<LOi»J^ TONis
Site locations transferred from 1921;
map and assigned numbers, 26 January 1979.
Ken Hedges,
Curator
**Notes: ..;
W-2045: See also V-1878 for site data pertaining
to area immediately adjacent to W-2045.
Tnis si-te also recorded as W-1879.
KHedges 11 FeTa 80
. -: -i
' " ' 3«1-
>'\-t- - -
.( d €.»- ,
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD
Page 1 of 5 .
Permanent Trinomial:
Temporary Number:
Agency Designation:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
7.
County: San Diego
USGS Quad: San Luis Rey (7.5') '68
UTH Coordinates: Zone 11
(15' )
Supplement (
SDM-W-2038 JJL
Phntorevised 1975
/ 469480 Easting / 3670260 Horthing ( )
Township US Range 4W . 1/4 of 1/4 of 1/4 of Section BasefMer.) SBM (X)
Map Coord i nates : 357 mmS 185 mmE (from NW corner of map) 6. Elevation: 240-260 ft { )
Locat io n: Elm Avenue extension/adjacent to Rising Glen subdivision/on undeveloped portion
of ridge tops/eastern portion overlooks El Camino Rea1/southeast of Buena Vista Lagoon
8.
9.
Prehistoric Historic Protonistoric
Site Descriptio n Light to moderate shell and artifact scatter comprising four loci -
possibly extension of W-143/146 village complex/groundstone, flaked stone tools, cores,
deb i t age/m i dd e n deposits •
10. Area: 125 m(1ength)x 60 m(width) 5890 m . Method of Determination scaled topo map
11. Depth : approx . 100 cm Method of Determination: visual inspection of cuts
12. Features:No ne observed
13,
14,
15.
17.
Artifacts : Collected during monitoring: 2 manos. 3 hammers, 2 scraper planes. 6 scrapers,
3 cores, 16 f1akes/materia 1 types noted: fine-grained metavolcanic (felsite), medium- to
to coasre-gra i ned metavol ca nic , granitic, quartz ( )
Non-Artifactual Constitutients: Shell: Chione, Aequipecten. Polinices, Laevicardiurn ,
H a 1 i o t i s ( )
Date Recorded: 10/14/86 16. Recorded By:Cardenas/Robbins-Wade/Serr( )
Affiliation and Address:RBR J Associates, Inc. 233 A Street, Ste. 804, San Diego 921Ql( )
State of California — The Resource* Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
ARCHEOLOGICAL SITE SURVEY RECORD
University of California. Los Angeles Regional Office „.
SITE NO. -^= =22£_County San Diego
1.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Previous Site Designation 2. Temporary Field No.- RH-2 .
USGS Quad
UTM Coordinates
Two! US
Location
road along a
San Luis Bey . . 71/,' X 15' Year 1968 (pho tore vised 1975)
Zone 11 36?0660NA70^60E
Ranqe ^. ; SE % of NE %ofSec. 32
A light shell and lithic scatter exposed by a lightly graded
south to north trending saddle and drainage area emptying into
•Buena Vista Creek to the north. Approximately ?80 meters east of El Gamino
Real and 450 meters south of Highway 78. . •
7. Contour 65' 8. Owner & Address Unknown ''"'. '. .''' ''' '.' .
9. Prehistoric _X__ . Ethnographic Historic 10. Site Description " ~ A light shell
and lithic'scatter in a drainage-saddle area. A Dirt road exposed artifactual
and ecofactual materials and a darkened soil zone. ..'..',/. l':
11. Area 1^0 x 30: meters, /j-200 square meters. 12. Depth of Midden Unknown-
13. ' Site Vegetation grasses and sage Surrounding Vegetation Same ' ' • '•
14. Location & Proximity of Water' l4o meters to the northeast and Buena-.Vista Greek .to north.
J. " " '.'
15. Site Soil Dark clay-sand matrix Surrounding Soil Light tan sandy-clay alluvium
16. Previous Excavation . Unknown but doubtful.
17. Site Disturbance Lightly graded road run along western edge of site exposing artifacts.
18. Destruction Possibility' Potential for development and contained ORV use and erosion. .-
19. Features None observed • ..•'••• • -'':-
20. Burials None observed
21. Artifacts Basalt core; Quartzite core tools; Basalt and Quartzite flakes;
Bifacial vesicular mano (Classic form) . - . -
22 Faunal Remains Ecofactual material consisted of Chione sp. and Tivel sp. in
small quantities. . '
23 c Dense vegetation hampered a more complete inventory of artifacts
and in better defining the site boundaries. Possible small, seasonal base camp?
24. Accession No. ' 25. Sketch Map Yes by ^^"^^ where On back
26. Date Recorded 8/17/81 27. Recorded By Gwen Romani and Janice Hawthorne
28. Photo Roll No Frame No Film Type(s) Taken By None
DPR 422 (Rev. 9/76)
W-3030
ISOLATED ARCHAEOLOGICAL OCCURRENCE
1. Map San Luis Rey 7.5' .1968 2. County San Diego
3. Twp. US Range 4W ; NE j of SW j of Stf j of NE j of Sec. J2
A. Location Northern edge of small north trending knoll which was graded for
a Transmission Line tower and road. Approx. ?00 meters east of El Camino Real
and 460 meters south of Highway 78. 5. Contour elevation 75'
6. Owner. Unknown 7. Address
8. Present tenant Unknown - •
9. Present land use Transmission Line Tower and ORV use
10. Description of occurrence A single large basalt flake in an area of.
extensive ground . disturbance in the form of road and knoll grading.
11. Area Isolate 12. Dimensions ?cm x *k:m x 3cm
13. Vegetation Dense grasses and sage in areas.
1ft. Nearest water Buena Vista Creek to north 15. Distance l*t-0 meters to north
16. Sol 1 Light tan' clay loam
17. Previous alteration/disturbance/intrusion Dirt road and graded knoll area
l8._PossibMlty of destruction Probable development on knolls and ridges
19. Explanation or interpretation Hay have been carried onto the ridge "by native
inhabitants or by construction men, or a site may have existed on the knoll and
was graded away leaving very few artifacts of which only this one was located.
20.• Remarks/suggestions More intensive surface collection and reconnaissance
of knoll with the clearing of vegetation in conjunction with this program.
21. Accession No. Not collected 22. Sketch map Map attached
23. Date 8/17/81 24. Photos None
25. Recorded by Gwen Romani and Janice Hawthorne .
26. Project or report An Evaluation of the Impacts Upon Cultural Resources Located
On 95 Acres, Buena Vista. Creek, City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego,
California. 1981 by Robert L. Pence and Robert J. .Wlodarski
How
SITE STATUS:
% Destroyed
National Register Status; Listed
State Historical Landmark (No.)_
j ionlins_
SUe N
Test Excavated Unknown 3^ jf kn0wn.
Potential X NO Determination Nominated Ineligible.
Point of Historical Interest
SPECIAL ATTRIBUTES (Place an X in only those spaces which pertain to the site)
Midden/Habitation Debris XX Lithic and/or Ceramic Scatter X
Bedrock Mortars/Milling Surfaces _
Burials '. , Caches
Underwater : , Open Air.
, Petroglyphs/Pictographs .Stone Features
Hearths/Roasting Pits _. Housepits ______ Structure Remains.
X Rockshelter fauo Quarry . Trails.
REMARKS Potential relationship with RH-1, SDi-565i, and SDi-6139 as well as other
sites Iving in close -proximity. Cultural affiliation and chronological placement is
TuoTTSTie<r References An Evaluation of the Impacts Upon Cultural Resources Located on 95
Acres, Buena Vista Creek, City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, California.1981 by
SKETCH LOCATION MAP (Include permanent reference markers. North Arrow, and Scale) Robert L . Pence and
(sketch details from U.S.6.S. map or provide copy of topo) Robert J. Wlodarski
' "=k -V*3V VT»V (J^^^1 1/!V vHi'f10""^/^*" 11 ' ~ •'!SAN LUIS REY, CALIF.TS>«SUfF^ V ^Ai ^*»»™by&iJJ A ; --.L
NE/4 OCEAKSIDE 1ST QUADRANOLE
N3307.5—W11715/7.5
,->.'. 1968
PHOTOREVISED 1975
AMS 2550 III HE-SEMES VMS
SKETCH SITE MAP (Same criteria as above)
Carlsbad J
Corporate
Boundary .
EIS-118 .TT:15/2
Bull, Charles S.
1978 A Test of SDM-1172 : An Archaeological
Site in Buena Woods. San Diego: RSCCN.
For: Kamar Construction Co.
W-1172.
EIS-121 . TT:15/2
Bull, Charles S.
1977 Excerpt from: "Draft: Environmental
Impact Report for Buena Woods 3-4".
San Diego: RECON.
For: Kamar Construction Co.
W-1172.
EIS-240 (Volume 1 and 3) TT:15/2
Carrico, Richard, W. Malcolm Barksdale, and Louis
Alexander
1978 Regional Historical Preservation Study.
San Diego: WESTEC Services, Inc.
For: Comprehensive Planning Organization of San
Diego Region.
W-84 thru W-89; W-95; W-97; W-100 thru W-102; W-105
W-lOSj W-109; W-112 thru V-135; W-138; W-141; W-142
W-468j W-469; W-558; W-601; W-954; W-1172; W-1430;
^"1670
EIS-488 TT:15/2
Wlodarski, Robert and Gewn Roman! and Robert Pence
198l Cultural Resource Evaluation: Buena Vista
Creek, City of Carlsbad, San Diego County.
Simi Valley, CA: Pence Archaeological
Consulting.
For: Envicom Corporation
W-1539; W-l?8l; W-3029; W-3030A,B
EIS-626 TT:15/2
Cardenas, D. and Wade, M.
1985 An Archaeological Investigation of
SDM-W-143/146: An Unique Coastal
Luiseno Occupation Site in Carlsbad,
California. RBR and Associates, Inc.
for: Multitech Properties
W-143; W-144; V-145; W-146; W-1330; W-1331
Appendices
Appendix B
Site Record for SDI-14,259
Pacific View Estates
South Coastal Information Center
Social Science Research Laboratory
College of Arts and Letters
San Diego State University
5500 Campanile Drive
San Diego CA 92182-4537
(619)594-5682
April 1, 1996
John Cook
ASM Affiliates, Inc.
543 Encinitas Blvd. Suite 114
Encinitas CA 92024
RECEIVED
APR 0 3 1996
BY:
Dear Mr. Cook,
Thank you for submitting your site forms to this office. Your site(s) have been assigned the
following Trinomials and/or "P" numbers. The corrected UTMs have been noted where
necessary.
Field #
PV-1
CA-SDI-
14259
P-37-
014646
Corrected UTM
According to the new Instructions for Recording Historical Resources (March 1995) from
the Office of Historic Preservation, archaeological sites should be recorded on both a
primary form and an archaeological form. Because we are in a transition period primary
forms that are not accompanied by an archaeology form will still be given both a trinomial
and a "P" number. Beginning January 1, 1996, however, to record a site with the SCIC
every archaeological site must have a primary form and an archaeological form.
Sincerely,
Christina Mirsky
Assistant Coordinator
South Coastal Information Center
THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT 61= PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer
Page 1 of 4
'Resource Name or #: PV-1
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Date / /
P1. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location: EJ Not for Publication D Unrestricted
b. USGS 7.5' Quad San Luis Rev Date 1967 T
c. Address
d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear feature)
a. County San DiegO
1 IS ; R 04W; NWl/4 of S\M/4 of Sec 32 ; SBM
City Zip
Zone 11 , 469420 me/ 3670480
B.M.
mN
The site is located on the eastern sideslope of a medium sized knoll. It is atop a heavily vegetated cut bank
overlooking Arroyo Way to the east. The area is an undeveloped parcel of land surrounded by suburban
houses.
*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries.)
PV-1 is a small prehistoric shell midden consisting primarily of Chione and Argopecten. The deposit appears
to be a partially buried pocket located in a small erosional swale. No surface artifacts were noted.
*P3b. Resources Attributes: (List attributes and codes) AP16. Other-Shell Midden
*P4. Resources Present: Q Building D Structure D Object HSite D District
P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures, and objects)
D Element of District D Other (Isolates, etc.)
P5b. Description of Photo: (View, date, etc.)
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources:
H Prehistoric D Historic D Both
*P7. Owner and Address:
Pacific View Estates
P.O. Box 2198
Carlsbad. C A 92081
P-Private
*P8. Recorded by:(Name, affiliation, address)
ASM Affiliates
543 Encinitas Blvd.. Suite 114
Encinitas. CA 92024
*P9. Date Recorded: 03/28/1996
*P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
15 meter interval transects
*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report/other sources or
Cook and Schultze 1996
C--Comprehensive Survey
"none") Pacific View Estates Cultural Resource Survey and Evaluatio,
"Attachments: DNONE H Location Map E3 Sketch Map D Continuation Sheet D Building, Structure and Object Record
m Archaeological Record D District Record D Linear Feature Record D Milling Station Record D Rock Art Record D Artifact Record
D Photograph Record D Other: (List)
DPR 523A (1/95)'Required information
State of California -- The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION Trinomial
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD
Page 2 of 4
Resource Name or #: PV-1
*A1. Dimensions: a. Length 10 meters ( North - South ) x b. width 5 meters ( East - West )
Method of Measurement D Paced H Taped D Visual estimate D Other:
Method of Determination (Check any that apply.): D Artifacts D Features a Soil D Vegetation D Topography
D Cut bank D Animal burrow H Excavation D Property boundary H Other (Explain): EcofactS
Reliability of Determination E3 High D Medium D Low Explain:
Limitations (Check any that apply.): D Restricted access D Paved/built over D Site Limits incompletely defined
H Disturbances D Vegetation D Other (Explain): Eastern edge of site JS graded slope
A2. Depth: 110 cm QNone D Unknown Method of Determination: Test excavation
*A3. Human Remains: D Present £3 Absent D Possible D Unknown (Explain):
*A4 Features (Number, briefly describe, indicate size, list associated cultural constituents, and show location of each feature on sketch map.):
None
*A5. Cultural Constituents (Describe and quantify artifacts, ecofacts, cultural residues, etc., not associated with features.):
Six shovel test pits and one 1x1 meter unit were excavated yielding a total of 16 artfacts (a core, 12 flakes and
3 utilized flakes) and 8.000 grams of shell (80% Chione and 16% Argopecten). A single radiocarbon date on
chione from 50-60 cm level was 1015 BP.
*A6. Were Specimens Collected? DNo HYes (If yes, attach Artifact Record or catalog and identify where specimens are curated.)
*A7. Site Condition: DGood HFair D Poor (Describe disturbances): Much of site disturbed by COnstrUC-
tion of adjacent housing development
*A8. Nearest Water (Type, distance, and direction): Buena Vista LagOOn 1 km tO the W6St
*A9. Elevation: 200 ft.
A10. Environmental Setting: (Describe culturally relevant variables such as vegetation, fauna, soils, geology, landform, slope, aspect, exposure, etc.):
Low coastal foothills. This knoll has been heavily impacted by modern development, with suburban
development encircling a 8.5 acre undeveloped parcel.
A11. Historical Information:
*A12. Age: 0 Prehistoric D Protohistoric D1542-1769 O1769-1848 D1848-1880 D1880-1914 D1914-1945
D Post 1 945 D Undetermined Describe position in regional prehistoric chronology or factual historic dates, if known:
Radiocarbon date places site just prior to Late Prehistoric Horizon
A13. Interpretations (Discuss data potential, function(s), ethnic affiliation, and other interpretations.):
PV-1 is a small shell processing site; no habitation or other uses are indicated.
A14. Remarks:
The east side of the knoll has been used to dump modern trash. A mechanical scrape runs from the top of the
knoll down to the site.
A1 5. References (Documents, informants, maps, and other references.):
Pacific View Estates Cultural Resource Survey and Evaluation, Cook and Schultze 1996.
A16. Photographs (List subjects, direction of view, and accession numbers or attach a Photograph Record.): None
Original media/negatives kept at:
A17. Form Prepared By: Carol A. Schultze Date: 1/12/96
Affiliation and address: ASM Affiliates, Inc. 543 Encinitas Blvd.. Suite 114
Encinitas. Ca 92024
DPR 523C-Test (1/95) 'Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
LOCATION MAP
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Page 4 of 4
*Resource Name or #: PV-1
*Map Name: San Luis Rev 7.5 min USGS •Scale: 1:24000 •Date of Map: 1967
DPR 523J (1/95)'Required information
State of California -» The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
SKETCH MAP
Primary #
HRI#
Trinomial
Page 4 of 4
'Resource Name or #: PV-1
* Drawn By: ASM Affiliates 'Date: 03/28/1996
o
NOTE: Include bar scale and north arrow.
DPR 523K (1/95)•Required information
Appendices
Appendix C
Radiocarbon Dating Analysis
Pacific View Estates
BETA ANALYTIC INC.
DR. J.J. STIPP and DR. M.A. TAMERS
UNIVERSITY BRANCH
4985 S.W. 74 COURT
MIAMI, FLORIDA, USA 33155
PH: 305/667-5167 FAX: 305/663-0964
E-mail: beta@analytic.win.net
REPORT OF RADIOCARBON DATING ANALYSES
FOR;Dr. Seetha N. Reddy
ASM Affi1iates, Inc.
DATE RECEIVED: Februa^ 21» 1996
DATE REPORTED: March 14, 1996
Sample Data Measured
C14 Age
C13/C12
Ratio
Convent ional
C14 Age (*)
Beta-90840 820 +/- 50 BP +0.1 o/oo 1240 +/- 60 BP
SAMPLE #: PVE/TU-1/60
ANALYSIS: radiometric-standard
MATERIAL/PRETREATMENT:(shell): acid etch
NOTE: It is important to read the calendar calibration information
and to use the calendar calibrated results (reported separately) when
interpreting these results in AD/BC terms.
Dates are reported as RCYBP (radiocarbon years before present,
"present" = 1950A.D.). By International convention, the modern
reference standard was 95% of the C14 content of the National
Bureau of Standards' Oxalic Acid & calculated using the Libby C14
half life (5568 years). Quoted errors represent 1 standard deviation
statistics (68% probability) & are based on combined measurements
of the sample, background, and modern reference standards.
Measured C13/C12 ratios were calculated relative to the PDB-1
international standard and the RCYBP ages were normalized to
-25 per mil. If the ratio and age are accompanied by an (*), then the
C13/C12 value was estimated, based on values typical of the
material type. The quoted results are NOT calibrated to calendar
years. Calibration to calendar years should be calculated using
the Conventional C14 age.
CALIBRATION OF RADIOCARBON AGE TO CALENDAR YEARS
(Variables: C13/C12=0.1:Delta-R=225±35:Glob res=-200 to 500:lab. mult=l)
Laboratory Number: Beta-90840
Conventional radiocarbon age: 1240 +/- 60 BP
(1015 +/- 70 adjusted for local reservoir correction)
Calibrated results:
(2 sigma, 95% probability)
cal AD 1270 to 1460
Intercept data:
Intercept of radiocarbon age
with calibration curve:cal AD 1370
1 sigma calibrated results:
(68% probability)
cal AD 1305 to 1425
1240 +/- 60 BP (1015 +/•- 70 Adjusted)shell
1200 -
1200
References:
Pretoria Calibration Curve for Short Lived Samples
Vogel, J. C., Fttls, A., Visser, E. and Becker, B., 1993, Radiocarbon 35(1), p73-86
A Simplified Approach to Calibrating C14 Dates
Talma, A. S. and Vogel, J. C., 1993, Radiocarbon 35(2), p317-322
Calibration -1993
Stuiver, M., Long, A., Kra, R. S. andDevine, J. M., 1993, Radiocarbon 35(1)
1600
Beta Analytic Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory
4985 S. W. 74th Court, Miami, Florida 33155 • Tel: (305)667-5167 • Fax: (305)663-0964 • E-mail: beta@analytic.win.net
Appendices
Appendix D
Catalog
Pacific View Estates
CO
3CO-I-J(/)LU
I
>
o4='o(0
Q.
E
E.
H
E
£
F"
E.
h-
o0
"5/r
S
H
LU
<nw
_io
j
OLIII
S
in
LU
Q
O
OO
Z
Z>
*H
O
CO
Argopecten>
CO
.O
75
in
5
LO
CM
n
CO
^
£
CMCO
CD
g
6
CD00
ArgopectenCD
CO
-Q
75
^LO
CM
n,h-co
CM
CMO
0)
CD
g
6
O)ArgopectenCD
ro
-Q
75
to
<D
LO
CM
co
CL1-co
co
ooCM
CDoo
ChioneCM
0
co
iso
S
CM
SaxidomusLOr^
T
COr-
U5
T—
CD
CM
LOCM
CM
CO
LL
-aCDN
3
E
CDr
CO
CO
LL
o
(-m<>
o>S<D
^J-
O)O)
CM
ArgopectenCD
03
-Q
75
(O
c
LO
CM
t
CL
1-co
LO
0)
CO
LO
CD
g
0
CO
0
CO
2toO
CMCO
0
Unidentifiable2
ma>
CO
CO
0)ArgopectenCD
CO
-Q
to
(0
LO
CM
LO
CLHco
CD
0)
co
0)cg
6
CO
o
CO
•sO
LO
CM
S
CM
CD
cri
"
CO
DebitageE
CDro
CO
CD
CO
LL
M
03
cr
r-
CO
T
!^LO
LOoo
COCM
^
O)oo
03
LL
£
CDro
CO
cu
03
LL
o
rm(i
o•>
3
1
oo
oo
CM
Argopectencu
03
JD
75
to
0
6
T3u>
F
1~31-
O)
T
CM
ChioneCMoo
T-
03
"mO
oo
Saxidomusco
O)Argopecten>
CO
X)
75
C/J
oCM
0
0
cn
05
Chione£
CM
CO
toO
COo
SaxidomusCO0
CO
COCM
00
CM
criCM
^
00
COLL
E
CDc~
CO
CD
03
LL
O
rmo
o•>
c3
E
^
LO
CD
Argopecten>
CO
-Q
75
to
0
CO
0
CM
CM
T~
CD
CDCO
0)
Cg
6
COco
co
CO
•4— •
6
coCM
CD
SaxidomusCM
CDo
ArgopectenCD
co
.a
75
to
o
oCO
CO
oo
CT>
OO
Chione
C?
eo
SaxidomusCO
oo
OCO
S"0)
— j
OT
O
o'
CD
t£cno
COcn
ocp*«^o
CO
CD
CT
CD
Argopectencncn
CD
CD
COcn
-Q
C0)
R
Flaked/Sto^CD
CD"3
c
CDCL
T|
01
%D
cn
cn
_».
coro
Kooo
MN)
bco
CD!_x
CD | UnidentifiabCD
o
M Polinices01
CD gastropodCrucibulum0
Men SaxidomusNJ
cnco
0
^CDQ>
_,.
O>
Ooo
O
o'3CD
ft
4^
OO
CO
CD
0
OO
CO
<p_bivalveArgopectenoo
CD
CO
O
CO
CO
32-Q>
O
OQ)
o'Flaked/Sto^0
CD*
3
^
cn
CO
3
CD3"
0oQ>
o'Flaked/Sto^CD
jir3
T|
0)
CD
O
cn
_x
oo
cnen
-*bo
to
ho-1-
S"
3
CO
Q)
cp_
x'
o
4^gastropodCrucibulum—X§UnidentifiabCD
0
boo Saxidomus->i
bo Protothaca—x
en
O
SI
3
Q)
N>
CD ChioneN>
CDo
CO
CD
0i
CD0
CO
cp_bivalve| ArgopectenCO
CD0
CO
O
SQ.o'
O
Q)
CT
O
charcoalcharcoal^j
cncn
N)
CD
3CD
<— I-Q)
O
§
o'Flaked/Sto3
CD
CD"3
Tl
CO
ho
00
3CD1— t-Q)
§
OQ)
o'Flaked/Sto3
CD
JD*
3
as
Q)
—i.
COen
-j.
co
i.oo
^i
ooen
co
b
*•
ro
_a
d0)
st\"CD
Flaked/Sto3
CD
CD"3
Q.CDCT
5TCO
CD
OO
bo
-».
CO
cn
en
encn
0!_x
cn
TJo_
5'
o'CDCO
_A
4^k>gastropodCrucibulumo
o
O
0)
CO
bcn
O
o"
CD
O)cn
COo
Nicn
cp
ooo
cn
CD
bivalveArgopecten^cnk)
CD
Men
3Q.o'8
CT
O
charcoalcharcoalcnen
M
CT
§
CD
CO
9L
Q)
3
Q)
Q)c
DJ_
3Q>
3'
CO
—X
£
K>CO
3CD
•— ^Q)
g
OO)3
O'Flaked/Sto3CD
cF3
Oo3
Tl3
CQ
3
CD
2.
^CO
CD
-i
cn
cn
oo
^cn
5£
enen
0
^H
C
Z
H
O
Oo7Jp
m
mr~
5>
HmTJ
i-CLASSm
H
to"
OJ
3•Z.
oOCZH
~
3.
|
3,
H
"3
3*""
TJ0)O
(D
mv>
(/)
O
o"
O
o
-vlCO UnidentifiabCD
_j.
oO)
TIO.
5'
o'CDcn
cn
COco
COQ>
%
<fl
Crucibulum— i
COCO UnidentifiabCD
bo SaxidomusO)
co Protothaca_^
COco
Ocnsm
01co
cn
O3-o'
CD
O
UJ
bo
N)
cn
0
o
cn
cp_bivalveArgopectenoooo
CO UnidentifiabCD
_i
^
CQ
Q)cn
3TJOQ.Crucibulumo
CO Saxidomusco
00 Protothacacn
CO
Ocn
3so
a>
§Chione00Ol
±
ho
Ol0
A>0
cn
IP-bivalveArgopectenoooo
CO
MO
o
Q)— i
0
radiocaCT0
3
charcoal_^
0co
^
CO
3
m
1o'
o
Ni
Ni
^OO
.n
Q)
Ki
Flaked/CO
0-ICD
CD"3
-n
Q)
CD
0
cn
-».
->Jrnoo
-^oN)
CO
COco
V
JD
C
K!
-n
Q)
CDQ.
CO
0-ICD
CD"3
-n
0)7?
CD
^oo
-».
CO0
^cn
N)
j^oo
00
~^l
-t^UnidentifiabCD
_^
*i
r;
Icn
O
O5O)Polinices^CO
caQ)cn
3
TI
O
Q.Crucibulumo01 UnidentifiabCD
_^
g SaxidomusocnCO
Ocn
SQ)
r-oOl
COcn ChioneOJo
^
Xcn
0
Aio
CO
cp_bivalveArgopectenNJ
O
CO
^cn
I
o_
3
O
Flaked/cT-iCD
CD
3
c
CDQ.
-n
Q)
CD
CO
oo
-».
COoo
0co
to
boCO
[\.
CD
i.
JDC
Q>
Ki
Flaked/COcT
^3CD
sr
3
-n
Q)
cf
Mro
-».
CO
co05
co
— ^O)
oo
cn^J Saxidomus-vl
O52-3Q)
cn
cn
O
^>H
C
Z
H
OOo
7)
0
m<mi-
3
Hm
r
o
£(Ar»
m
H
£"
a!
^2.
oOc
r-
3•***"
|
3
"•*"
H
3"^
T>Q]OiiO
Im
CO
CO
(Q
•55
UJ
cy
>ojt'oen0_
"p"
E,
H
__ ^
£
£
3
^^E
£
H
oo
*wT
E
S
i-
LUH
(O
fj
O
1
^zianuiH
5
vjLLJ
UJ
d
QL
O0
0
tt
z13
tt
h-
o
1^
CM
O
rucibulumo
to
0Q.
S
"toCO0)
T—m
o
cenebra0
O)
T—
O
nidentifiableD
I —r^-
co
""
CD
OJ
CO
T^-CO
oCO
inoo
ooco
cu
CO
LL
cu.N
D
E
.2
cuc.
CO1XL
CO
LL
O
'c
COoo>ro
<DE
i^_
co
oo
T-^
T—
OO
COCM
COCD
CMCO
T—
05
CO
O)
CO
LL
E
S
~<uc.
W
co
LL
o'c
COoo>CO-t— •
E
OO
CO
CDCD
^
S
csi
mi^i^;
CDCM
0)
CO
LL
E
Si
0)co
i
co
LL
|sj
"t_
CO
CT
O)co
COTf
CM
rgopecten<
0
1!Q
—0
(O
oCM
T—
o
T—
T—
H21-
0
O
OQ_
O^~
COr^
CM
0
O
6
1^
T—
o
CO
^o
m
T—
O
rgopecten<
0
"co
15
—0
"w
oCOt—1oCM
T-
^J"
oor^
o
0
o
6
!
Appendices
Appendix E
FigureS.
Site Location within Project.
Pacific View Estates
rp^ ^ ^
^ KJ *N
•l| 5"^^ L^ . ^.