HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 97-09; La Costa Lucky Sav-On Shopping Center; Tentative Map (CT) (8)December 14, 1995
TO: CHRISTER WESTMAN, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
FROM: Associate Engineer Quon
VIA: Principal Civil Engineer y^,2< ^ ^
LA COSTA PLAZA RENOVATION, PRE 95-46
We offer the following comments:
1. Any discretionary application for this site would include conditions of approval to provide
the following frontage improvements:
4 Sidewalk, curb, and gutter along El Camino Real and La Costa Avenue;
4- Raised concrete landscaped median on El Camino Real;
4 Dedication of right-of-way and installation of a deceleration lane on El Camino
Real;
4 Dedication of 13' of right-of-way and installation of a dedicated right-turn lane on
La Costa Avenue.
2. A traffic study may be required to determine if additional improvements are warranted on
La Costa Avenue. These improvements could consist of a traffic signal and/or a
dedicated right turn lane for the driveway entrance, and median improvements.
3. We recommend removal of the westernmost driveway entrance to the site on La Costa
Avenue.
4. We recommend removal of the two existing driveway entrances to the site on El Camino
Real, and replace them with a deceleration lane leading to a single driveway entrance
with right-in/right-out access only.
5. Renovation of the site should include a review of the existing site circulation to eliminate
one-way parking lot aisles, and to assure that the site layout is in compliance with current
City engineering standards.
Please forward the red-lined check print to the applicant. If you have questions regarding any
of the comments above, please contact me at extension 4380.
KENNETH W. QUON
Associate Engineer
RECORD
2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859
Office of the City Engineer By
of (Earls bail (619) 433-1161TELEPHONE Project
Date »/<=>'Time H >
Project Title
.(amnpm),
Individual Title
Organization.Location
Phone No. (
Subject
ITEMS DISCUSSED LA
OP-g>P»gnr ID
LOCArbn -TH6"
ar-
U5VQ
COMMENTS OR ACTION REQUIRED
Wilay-Fisk Form 4-7
June 27, 1994
TO: CHRISTER WESTMAN, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
FROM: Associate Engineer
VIA: Principal Land Use Engineer
LA COSTA PLAZA, PRE 94-20
We offer the following comments:
1. High volume traffic areas such as the major parking lot aisles and the areas in front of
the proposed market and retail sites should be free of parking stalls to avoid conflicts
between through traffic and vehicles backing out.
2. Truck turning radii should be plotted on the site plan to demonstrate that trucks can
safely access delivery areas.
3. The alignment of the driving aisle in front of the Water District offices appears awkward
and could be confusing to drivers.
4. Because of sight distance concerns and limited horizontal curve radii, the City is
considering limiting left turns out of the proposed driveway on La Costa Avenue, or
widening the roadway in this area to improve sight distance.
5. Please note that the City is in the process of obtaining the following documents, in
accordance with the conditions of approval for the Los Ninos Preschool:
• A Future Improvement Agreement for sidewalks and half median along the
frontage of this property on El Camino Real and for sidewalks along the frontage
of this property on La Costa Avenue.
• An irrevocable offer of dedication for 13 feet of additional right-of-way along La
Costa Avenue.
6. Please note that City standards limit driveway access on prime arterial roads, such as El
Camino Real, to right in/out only.
7. A traffic study may be required of this project to determine if additional improvements
are required, such as a traffic signal and dedicated right turn lane at the entrance on La
Costa Avenue, or a dedicated right turn lane for the entrance on El Camino Real.
8. As this property is located within the 100-year flood plain, any proposed development
will require an application for a Special Use Permit.
Please forward the red-lined check print to the applicant. If you have questions regarding any
of the comments above, please contact me at extension 4380.
KENNETH W. QUON
Associate Engineer
H:\LffiRARY\ENG\WPDATA\QUON\LCPPRERV.MEM
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
June 24, 1994
Michael LaBarre
517 Fourth Avenue
Suite 102-B
San Diego, CA 92101
SUBJECT: PRE 94-02 - LA COST* PLAZA
APN: 216-124-01, 02, & 18
Preliminary review of your project was conducted on June 23,1994. Listed below are the
issues raised by staff. Please note that the purpose of a preliminary review is to provide
you with direction and comments on the overall concept of your project. The preliminary
review does not represent an in-depth analysis of vour project. Additional issues of
concern may be raised after your application is submitted and processed for a more specific
and detailed review.
Planning:
1. Development of parcel 216-124-18 is subject to the issuance of a Hillside
Development Permit (HDP). Associated with an HDP will be the submittal and
review of an Environmental Impact Assessment Part I.
2. Development of parcels 216-124-01 & 02 are subject to the approval of a Special
Use Permit (SUP). Associated with the application will be the submittal and review
of an Environmental Impact Assessment Part I.
3. The La Costa community is very sensitive to development in and around La Costa.
If you choose to pursue development approvals for this site, staff strongly
recommends that a community outreach and information program be included in the
process.
4. Parcels 216-124-01 & 02 are subject to the El Camino Real Corridor Development
Standards. All buildings and other structures, trellises, must maintain a 30 foot
setback from the El Camino Real right-of-way. Screen walls up to six feet in height
and parking may be allowed up to 25 feet from the right-of-way.
Building height is limited to 35 feet from pad grade. However, protrusions per
Section 21.46.020 (Yards) of the Zoning Ordinance are allowed up to 45 feet. Per
Section 21.28T030 (C-2), building height is allowed up to 45 feet with the approval
of a Site Development Plan (SDP) by City Council. Specified protrusions may then
be permitted up to a maximum of 55 feet above pad grade.
2O75 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92OO9-1576 - (619) 438-1161
Michael LaBarre
June 24, 1994
Page 2
5. Per numbers 3 and 4 above all building elevations visible from the public right-of-
way should be well detailed, any sense of mass should be tempered by the use of
landscaping and variation in building wall height and depth, and service and loading
areas should also be well screened.
Staff recommends that the architectural detailing and general theme be carried over
with any formal submittals.
6. Setbacks are not required along the property's La Costa Avenue frontage per Chapter
21.28 (C-2) of the Zoning Ordinance, but setbacks can be required per Chapter
21.40 (S-P).
7. Staff encourages that the existing center's community uses such as Los Ninos and
P.A.T.H. be accommodated within the new center.
8. Gear pedestrian links should be provided within the parking lot.
Engineering
1. High volume traffic areas such as the major parking lot aisles and the areas in front
of the proposed market and retail sites should be free of parking stalls to avoid
conflicts between through traffic and vehicles backing out.
2. Truck turning radii should be plotted on the site plan to demonstrate that trucks can
safely access delivery areas.
•>"
3. The alignment of the driving aisle in front of the Water District offices appears
awkward and could be confusing to drivers.
4. Because of site distance concerns and limited horizontal curve radii, the City is
considering limiting left turns out of the proposed driveway on La Costa Avenue, or
widening the roadway in this area to improve site distance.
5. Please note that the City is in the process of obtaining the following documents, in
accordance with the conditions of approval for the Los Ninos Preschool:
A future improvement agreement for sidewalks and half median along the
frontage of this property on El Camino Real and for sidewalks along the
frontage of this property on La Costa Avenue.
An_irrevocable offer of dedication for 13 feet of additional right-of-way along
La Cdsta Avenue.
6. Please note that City Standards limit driveway access on prime arterial roads, such
as El Camino Real, to right-in/right-out only.
Michael LaBarre
June 24, 1994
Page 3
7. A traffic study may be required of this project to determine if additional
improvements are required, such as a traffic signal and dedicated right turn lane at
the entrance on La Costa Avenue, or a dedicated right turn lane for the entrance on
El Camino Real.
8. As this property is located within the 100-year flood plain, any proposed
development will require an application for a Special Use Permit (Floodplain).
Refer to the redlined checkprint for Engineering comments—The checkprint should also be
submitted with any formal permit applications.
Please contact Christer Westman at (619) 438-1161, extension 4448 if you have any
questions.
Sinc
IY JL WAYNE /
Assistant Planning Director
GEW:CW:lh
c: Bobbie Hoder
Ken Quon
File Copy
Data Entry
June 24, 1994
Michael LaBarre
517 Fourth Avenue
Suite 102B
San Diego, CA. 92101
SUBJECT: PRE 94-02 - LA COSTA PLAZA
APN: 216-124-01,02, & 18
Preliminary review of your project was conducted on June 23, 1994. Listed below are the issues
raised by staff. Please note that the purpose of a preliminary review is to provide you with
direction and comments on the overall concept of your project. The preliminary review does not
represent an in-depth analysis of your project. Additional issues of concern may be raised after your
application is submitted and processed for a more specific and detailed review.
1. Development of parcel 216-124-18 is subject to the issuance of a Hillside Dveleopment
Permit (HDP). Associated with an HDP will be the submittal and review of an
Environmental Impact Assessment Part I.
2. Development of parcels 216-124-01 & 02 are subject to the approval of a Special Use Permit
(SUP). Associated with the application will be the submittal and review of an
Environmental Impact Assessment Part I.
3. The La Costa community is very sensitive to development in and around La Costa. If you
choose to pursue development approvals for this site, staff stongly recommends that a
community outreach and information program be included in the process.
4. Parcels 216-124-01 & 02 are subject to the El Camino Real Corridor Development Standards.
All buildings and other structures, trellises, must maintain a 30 foot setback from the El
Camino Real right-of-way. Screen walls up to six feet in height and parking may be
allowed up to 25 feet from the right-of-way.
Building height is limited to 35 feet from pad grade. However, protrusions per Section
21.46.020 (Yards) of the Zoning Ordinance are allowed up to 45 feet. Per Section
21.28.030 (C-2), building height is allowed up to 45 feet with the approval of a Site
Development Plan (SDP) by City Council. Specified protrusions may then be permitted up
to a maximum of 55 feet above pad grade.
5. Per numbers 3 and 4 above all building elevations visible from the public right-of-way
should be well detailed, any sense of mass should be tempered by the use of landscaping
and variation in building wall height and depth, and service and loading areas should also
be \vell screened.
Staff recommends that the architectural detailing and general theme be carried over with
any formal submittals.
6. Setbacks are not required along the property's La Costa Avenue frontage per Chapter 21.28
(C-2) of the Zoning Ordinance, but setbacks can be required per Chapter 21.40 (S-P).
7. Staff encourages that the existing center's community uses such as Los Nifios and P.A.T.H.
be accomodated within the new center.
8. Clear pedestrian links should be provided within the parking lot.
ENGINEERING
1. Circulation vs. parking in front of market.
2. Stacking vs. parking in front of 10.6 com. and 7.2 pad.
3. Median break in ECR.
4. Encroachment into the floodplain.
5. Truck turning radii at loading locations.
Please contact Christer Westman at (619) 438-1161, extension 4448 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
GARY E. WAYNE
Assistant Planning Director
GW:cw
Bobbie Hoder
File Copy
Data Entry
ARCHITECTURE
PLANNING
517 Fourth Avenue
Suite 102B
San Diego, CA 92101
Tel [619] 234-0789
Fax [619] 234-8136
CONFERENCE REPORT
Project:
Conference Place:
Date of Conference:
Present:
Report Preparer:
Date of Report:
La Costa Plaza
94009
City of Carlsbad
Wednesday, June 8, 1994
Christer Westman — Planning Department
Bob Wojcik — Engineering Department
Mark Fehlman — Fehlman LaBarre
Mike LaBarre — Fehlman LaBarre
Mike LaBarre
June 14, 1994
The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the project development and
processing issues as outlined in the June 7, letter to Mr. Gary Wayne.
1. The submittal package information was obtained from the City of
Carlsbad. Specific drawing requirements included site plan, building
elevations, landscape plan, preliminary grading plan. Submittal of the
sign program is optional; the sign program can be processed at a later
date.
2. Processing fees were identified in a fee schedule distributed by
Christer. We briefly discussed the fee requirements for a Site
Development Permit, Special Use Permit for the flood plain, and
Environmental Assessment. All other fees are described in the Fee
Schedule.
3. We briefly discussed the development impact fees required by the
City including traffic fees, public facilities fees, as outlined in the Fee
Schedule.
Conference Report
City of Carlsbad
La Costa Plaza - 94009
June 8, 1994
Page 2
4. Christer and Bob confirmed that we can build within the flood plain
area provided that the building is elevated out of the flood plain,
consistent with the daycare facility occupying the site.
5. The timeline for processing these permits is approximately 6 months
(8 months is more realistic).
6. An Environmental Assessment Study will be required. It is
anticipated that traffic, and biological impacts on the flood plain will
be issues and therefore a traffic study and a biological study will be
necessary. Staff did anticipate however that a negative declaration
or a mitigated negative declaration could be anticipated.
7. We obtained a copy of the El Camino Real corridor design guidelines.
8. The only public hearing required for the project is a Planning
Commission upon completion of the staff analysis and
recommendations.
9. We discussed the possibility of excluding the office building site from
the Site Development and Special Use Permit process, recognizing
that the office building would be outside the El Camino Real corridor
as a separate parcel. A lot line adjustment process, taking
approximately 2 months, will be required.
cc: Jack Naliboff.
RCU BY:XEROX TELECOPIER 7010 ; 6- 7-94 11:55«M ; 6192348136^ . 6194380894;» 1
r;JUN-=- -J---34 TUE 1 1 :5^ REHLMAM L_ A B A R R E ^ l= c* 1•-••>••>.& ^^^ r^ . 13 1
CJFI2
F £ H LMll
L AB A R R E
ARCHITECTURE 51 / Fourth Awnuo
PLANNING $uitnl02B
!ki(Dici]u,r.A9?ioi
loi [619] 234'U/89
i..,'""' Fux 1619) 234-813A
June 7, 1994 ,,.A;
v
Mr.
Planning Director
CITY OF CARLSBAD
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92009
Re: La Costa Plaza
94009
Dear Gary:
you for the opportunity to meet with you on Wednesday. To make
-p/7* ^.^this meeting more effective, I am sending to you a list of issues that we
would like to address in the meeting. In addition, I have included a sketch
site plan showing the site layout as well as square footage of various
that are proposed.
3700.0^ As I related to you on the phone, out Client has received a very positive
response from various tenants in the marketplace and is ready to proceed
i6Tp£forwarcj we are intending to develop a package for him to take to his
"^*" company on June 15, for final approval to proceed forward with
processing of this site plan. Answers to following questions will allow us
to provide a complete package for him.
As you may note from the site plan, we are proposing a complete
demolition in redevelopment of the site. In addition, we have noted a
thirteen foot additional street dedication on La Costa Avenue per Bob
Wojcik's recommendation.
In our meeting we would like to have the following questions answered:
What elements are required for complete submittal package for
planning review? ^0(sct^&r\/&\^^.^l'fFf^l^vPlCtTi-Pindiuidwil
2. What fees are required for the processing of this planning approval?
RCU BY:XEROX TELECOPIER 7010 ; 6- 7-94 11:55PM ; 6192348136^ ' 6194380894;* 2
JUN- T-3.4 TUE li:u REHLMrtN l_,
Mr, Gary Wayne
City of Carlsbad
June 7, 1994
Page 2
3. What fees are required for the development of this project?
4. It is our understanding that a flood plain area currently exists around
the former daycare center in the northeast side of our property. We
have been told that if the elevation in this area is raised, we will no
longer be restricted from construction because of the flood plain, Is
this true? If-ino or.
b. What is the typical schedule for processing a project of this sort?
'jtfts>miffct~ <?<ynifter& Fnv/Pem
6. What environmental review is required?
"?fe*&fty fa^vrtied. ~frt>jP>C' <&wvk<w ^]tv&t A »-AmV;i( r> fl^ v&c-
7. May we get a copy of the El Camino Real design guidelines?
J£e.
8. What hearings are required for planning approval?
9. Certain office tenants that currently lease space on site would like to
relocate in the proposed office building. Is there a way to build the
office building on site "by right", without going through the planning
approval process? This is of concern primarily because of the
timeline. The current center is largely vacant. The Client would like
to proceed with an office building as soon as possible to
accommodate these tenants.
If there is any additional information you would like from me prior to the
meeting, please do not hesitate to call.
Thank you again for your quick response. 1 look forward to meeting with
you on Wednesday regarding this project.
Sincerely,
Mark Fehlman, AIA
Principal
Enclosures
en u\co ™
€0n
5
0W
III
<rj
z<r
E
J
I
111
in
ui -•e
TOfAt
PARXHG REDUCED
PARKMG PROVIDED
PARKNG RATIO
SfTE AREA
45.000 Sf
27.900 Sf
16.000 SF
17.800 SF
106.70CSF
MS SPACES
535 SPACES
1/200
1026 ACHES
LA COSTA PLAZA -- LA COSTA
SHOPPING CENTER. INC.
(«1«1 <5Z-6WO
City of Carlsbad
AEngineering Department
November 17, 1993
Fehlman LaBarre
517 4th Avenue, Ste 102B
San Diego GA 92101
ATTN: Michael LaBarre
LA COSTA PLAZA ADT
In response to our phone conversation today, I have researched the assigned ADT for your site
that is currently being used in SANDAG calculations. Because the SANDAG calculation area is
larger than just your site, I have had to interpolate some of the numbers. The best figures I
could come up with for your site would be 5990 ADT. This number was used in the Green
Valley Traffic Report. I am enclosing portions of that Traffic Report showing existing and
buildout conditions for intersection and road segments that would be impacted.
As I told you over the phone, a traffic report would most likely be required for redevelopment
of your project. The report would address any impacts to circulation elements, any mitigations
to those impacts and what the true maximum ADT for your site would be.
One comment I have received from our Traffic Engineer regarding the redevelopment of your
site is that we would be very interested in trying to relocate and/or remove the driveways at the
ARCO site. We have currently a history of accidents at the ARGO site and we will be working
with you on ways to mitigate that situation.
I hope this answers your questions. If you do have any other questions, please call me
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. WOJCIK
Principal Civil Engineer
RJW.Tz
2O75 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 - (619) 438-1161 • FAX (619) 438-0894
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
August 11, 1992
La Costa Plaza Retail Center
Allegis Development Services, Inc.
427 "C" Street #210
San Diego, CA 92101 ,f <
§U
SUBJECT: LA COSTA PLAZA RETAIL CENTER *
APN: 216-124-02
Preliminary review of your project was conducted on July 31 , 1 992. Listed below are the
issues raised by staff. Please note that the purpose of a preliminary review is to provide
you with direction and comments on the overall concept of your project. The preliminary
review does not represent an in-depth analysis of vour project. Additional Issues
of concern may be raised after vour application is submitted and processed for a
more specific and detailed review.
Planning:
1. The project would require a Special Use Permit for the flood plain and El Camino
Real Scenic Corridor, and a Hillside Development Permit due to grading of slopes
greater than 1 5% with an elevation differential greater than 1 5 feet.
2. Eliminate the parking along the front of the major tenant to create less auto and
pedestrian conflicts and to enhance the entryway to the store. To mitigate the visual
impacts created by large areas of parking, add several more fully landscaped
medians between rows of parking spaces.
3. The 6K retail pad at the corner encroaches into the 30 foot building setback along
El Camino Real. This setback is required by the El Camino Real Corridor Standards.
4. Walls are not permitted to exceed a height of 6 feet when located within 25 feet of
El Camino Real per the requirements of the El Camino Real Corridor Standards.
5. Loading areas for the individual stores should not face the scenic corridor. The
architecture along El Camino Real should be enhanced to create visual interest along
the scenic corridor, by providing adequate visual relief, and quality materials and
detailing.
2O75 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92OO9-1576 • (619) 438-1161
La Costa Plaza Retail Center
August 11, 1992
Page 2 ~
Engineering:
1. A review of traffic circulation on La Costa Ave and ECR will be needed. The review
will need to be made in sufficient depth to produce a detailed striping plan and
determine how much additional right-of-way will be needed. At this time some of the
needs may be:
A. 88 foot right-of-way width, going easterly from the main entrance on La Costa
Ave. (2-12 ft. through lanes each direction , 1-10 ft. left turn lane, 2-5 ft. bike lanes
and 2-10 ft. parkway & sidewalk lanes.
B. Dual left turn lanes from LCA going West to ECR going South.
C. A free right turn lane from LC-west to ECR-north.
D. LCA may need to be realigned to flatten the horizontal curve at the easterly end
of the site.
C. A traffic signal may be needed on LCA at the entrance to the site which also
aligns with the entrance to the southerly shopping center.
D. In lieu of the traffic signal a median may be needed.
E. Additional widening of LCA near the intersection with ECR for the needed lanes.
The length of the widening will have to be determined from the traffic review.
F. Traffic signal modifications may needed at LCA and ECR.
2. The site access locations are in question at this time. Some of these questions follow:
A. The most easterly access as shown on this preliminary site plan from LCA will not
be supported by engineering.
B. The access (from ECR) that is the first one northerly of LCA needs to be
relocated farther North of LCA.
3. The internal access to the Leucadia County Water District Facility presents potential
conflicts.
4. Backing out from parking spaces into the main aisle coming from LCA cannot be
supported.
5. Truck turns into or out of the "service drive" will not work.
6. Traffic conflicts between the "service drive" and the main aisle may cause incoming
traffic to wait in the street. This is at both entrances from ECR.
7. Parking in front of the "Anchor Retail Tenant1 is not supported. This aisle should
remain clear for fire and emergency access.
La Costa Plaza Retail Center
August 11, 1992
Page 3 -
8. As acknowledged in the proposal the site is partially in the 100 year flood plain. All
development will have to conform CMC Chapter 21.110, the Floodplain Management
Regulations.
A. The filing of an SUP is required.
B. Certifications by a professional engineer will be required.
C. A HEC 1 and 2 analysis will be required to show the pre- and post- development
water surface elevations during the 100 year flood event
D. Any grading or construction that may effect the back-water elevations upstream
will have to be carefully reviewed.
E. Site drainage will need close attention. The northeast portion of the site is
presently a low point with an existing drainage inlet that conducts drainage to the
San Marcos Creek. This inlet will be inundated during the 100 year flood event.
The inlet will probably not accept drainage during this inundation.
9. Full median construction in El Camino Real will be required.
Please contact me at (619) 438-1161, extension 4455 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
JEFF GIBSON
Associate Planner
JG:km
c: File Copy
TO; JEFF GIBSON JULY 30, 1992
FROM Jim Davis
VIA LAND USE PRINCIPAL ENGINEER (Authorized verbally by RJW 7-31-92)
PRELIMINARY REVIEW APN 216-124-1,2 & 3 LA COSTA PLAZA
1. A review of traffic circulation on La Costa Ave and ECR will be needed. The review will
need to be made in sufficient depth to produce a detailed striping plan and determine how much
additional right-of-way will be needed. At this time some of the needs may be:
A. 88 foot right-of-way width, going easterly from the main entrance on La Costa Ave. (2-12
ft. through lanes each direction , 1-10 ft. left turn lane, 2-5 ft. bike lanes and 2-10 ft. parkway
& sidewalk lanes.
B. Dual left turn lanes from LCA going West to ECR going South.
C. A free right turn lane from LC-west to ECR-north.
D. LCA may need to be realigned to flatten the horizontal curve at the easterly end of the site.
C. A traffic signal may be needed on LCA at the entrance to the site which also aligns with the
entrance to the southerly shopping center.
D. In lieu of the traffic signal a median may be needed.
E. Additional widening of LCA near the intersection with ECR for the needed lanes. The length
of the widening will have to be determined from the traffic review.
F. Traffic signal modifications may needed at LCA and ECR.
2. The site access locations are in question at this time. Some of these questions follow:
A. The most easterly access as shown on this preliminary site plan from LCA will not be
supported by engineering.
B. The access (from ECR) that is the first one northerly of LCA needs to be relocated farther
North of LCA.
3. The internal access to the Leucadia County Water District Facility presents potential conflicts.
4. Backing out from parking spaces into the main aisle coming from LCA cannot be supported.
5. Truck turns into or out of the "service drive" will not work.
6. Traffic conflicts between the "service drive" and the main aisle may cause incoming traffic
to wait in the street. This is at both entrances from ECR.
7. Parking in front of the "Anchor Retail Tenant" is not supported. This aisle should remain
clear for fire and emergency access.
8. As acknowledged in the proposal the site is partially in the 100 year flood plain. All
development will have to conform CMC Chapter 21.110, the Floodplain Management
Regulations.
A. The filing of an SUP is required.
B. Certifications by a professional engineer will be required.
C. A HEC 1 and 2 analysis will be required to show the pre- and post- development water
surface elevations during the 100 year flood event.
D. Any grading or construction that may effect the back-water elevations upstream will have
to be carefully reviewed.
E. Site drainage will need close attention. The northeast portion of the site is presently a low
point with an existing drainage inlet that conducts drainage to the San Marcos Creek. This inlet
will be inundated during the 100 year flood event. The inlet will probably not accept drainage
during this inundation.
9. Full median construction in El Camino Real will be required.
ALLEGIS
Development Services, Inc.
427 "C" Street, Suite 210
San Diego, CA 92101
(619)238-5466
FAX (619) 232-0703
July 24, 1992
Mr. Van W. Lynch
City of Carlsbad
Community Development
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, California 92009-1576
RE: La Costa Shopping Center
Dear Van:
Consistent with your recent meeting with Kip Howard of this company and your recommendation
during that meeting, enclosed please find the preliminary review application for the La Costa
Shopping Center, and the appropriate accompanying documents.
The enclosures, in addition to the application, are as follows:
1. Two (2) copies of the conceptual site plan
2. Our check in the amount of $100.00
3. Exhibit A, which is the project description
We would appreciate it if you would submit this preliminary review application and its
attachments for review by the Planning Department staff and Engineering Department staff at
their next regularly scheduled staff meeting, which will be Friday, July 30, 1992.
If you have any questions concerning the enclosed information, or need anything else in order
to submit this application and documentation for review, please give me a call.
Sincerely,
JEVELOPxIviENT SERVICES, INC.
irdoc|
Project Administration
Enclosures