Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 97-14; Mariano; Tentative Map (CT) (4)STANDARD PACIF ic HOMES August 23, 2000 Mr. Gary Wayne Assistant Planning Director City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Subject: Shorepointe (Mariano) Phase 3 building permits Dear Gary: Thank you for taking the time to meet with Jack, Marty and myself last week. I appreciated the opportunity to discuss some of the pending issues with Standard Pacific and convey our commitment to work diligently with the City of Carlsbad. I also wanted to follow up with you regarding the status of the conditions we discussed relating to the release of Shorepointe's Phase 2 building permits (copy of 7/24/00 letter attached). Tom Farrar, our project manager, met with Larry Black at the Shorepointe project this week and performed a field inspection of the conditions (copy of letter attached). I believe Larry was comfortable that the conditions identified in the July letter have been met. We have submitted Shorepoint Phase 3 for plan check to the building department. We sincerely hope that the Planning Department will be comfortable releasing Phase 3 Permits. Thank you again for your availability last week. I appreciated your feedback and we look forward to working with the City of Carlsbad in the future. Very Truly Yours, STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES cc: AnneHysong Enc. San Diego Division 9335 Chesapeake Dr., San Diego, CA 92123-1010 TEL (858) 292-2200 FAX (858) 292-2260 STANDARD PACIFICHOMES August 17, 2000 Mr. Larry Black r City of Carlsbad Planning Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 RE: Shorepointe; Landscaping Progress Report Dear Larry: We would like to thank you for meeting with us on August 15, 2000 to review the progress of our landscaping for the Shorepointe Project. The following is the status of the 4 landscaping items listed on the attached agreement letter dated July 14, 2000 ( Letter of Agreement). • 1. The installation of all plants within the San Diego Gas & Electric area has been completed . As you stated, you believe the plants seem to be taking hold with the proper coverage and should become well established. Per our discussion, we will seed the minor planting areas that were disturbed during the installation of the sycamore trees along the easterly slope. This will be accomplished within two (2) weeks (8-29-00). • 2. The planting on the slope behind lots 47-53 will begin on or before September 1, 2000 subject to passing water bacteria tests for the irrigation lines. The relocation of this irrigation line has been completed and the plan amended per your request. The amended plan was submitted to you on August 14, 2000 and ready for your signature. The planting for this slope will take approximately two (2) weeks to complete. • 3. The landscape plans have been amended to remove the solar power irrigation controller. The electric controllers are now installed. San Dwgo Division 9335 Chesapeake Dr., San Diego, CA 92123-1010 TEL (858) 292-2200 FAX (858) 292-2260 • 4. As you are aware the power pole has been removed from lot 133. Once the last power pole is removed (behind lot 41) by San Diego Gas & Electric, we will initiate the necessary fine grading for the entire area that encompassed the power lines. Subsequent to the fine grading, the planting of the minor slope on lot 133 will be initiated. Per your request, our landscaping team will focus on item 2 above to its completion prior to completing this item. At this time, we feel that we have shown you our commitment to completing all items within our agreement by evidence of substantial progress. Not only are we very pleased with a rapid progress that has been made but also with the health of the plants and trees. Given this accomplishment, we request that Phase 3 building permits be released as Phase 3 Plot Plans have been submitted and are currently being reviewed at the City. In closing, I would like to reassure you that Standard Pacific is committed to addressing these issues through completion as well as any additional concerns that may arise throughout the duration of this project. Thank you again for your understanding and confidence in our development team. Please feel free to call me directly at 858-292-2299 office, cell 760-420-5254. Sincerely, STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES Tom Farrar Project Manager cc: Gary Wayne, City of Carlsbad, Planning Department Jack Henthorn, Jack Henthom & Associates Anne Hysong, City of Carlsbad, Planning Department Mike Shirey, City of Carlsbad, Engineering Department STANDARD PACIF icHOMES July 14, 2000 Mr. Gary Wayne City of Carlsbad Planning Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 Subject: Letter of Agreement: The Shorepointe Project; Phase 2 Building Permits Dear Gary: On behalf of Standard Pacific Homes, I would like to like to thank you for your prompt response to our request for the release of Phase 2 building permits. As owners of the "Mariano" property (APN 212-040-41) and builder of the Shorepointe Development (CT 97-14), Standard Pacific Homes hereby agrees to initiate the following actions immediately upon the City's release of the Phase 2 Building Permits for the Shorepointe project: 1. The installation of all container plants, as indicated on the approved Landscape Plan, on the valley floor within the SDG&E easement area. This area is located east of Aviara Parkway and is identified as Lot 137 on the Final Map; 2. The initiation of landscaping, as indicated on the approved Landscape Plan, on the slopes behind Lots 47 through 53; 3. Amending the approved Landscape Plans to remove the solar powered irrigation controller valve to a standard City approved electronic controller device, and 4. Immediately following SDG&E's completion of the required work involved with energzing the underground electrical system for the area, the existing temporary power pole located on Lot 133 will be removed, fine grading will be completed in accordance to the approved Grading Plan, and the landscaping will be initiated. In addition to the above conditions, prior to requesting the issuance of building permits for the Phase 3 homes, Standard Pacific agrees to provide the City with an updated report on the progress of all items listed above including a request for an on-site field inspection by the City's landscape consultant to determine whether landscaping installation progress has been proceeding in a satisfactory manner. San Die go Division 9335 Chesapeake Dr., San Diego, CA 92123-1010 TEL (358; 292-22(?d-FAX (858) 292-2260 In closing, to reiterate the salient points from our conversation, I'd like to reassure you that Standard Pacific is committed to addressing these issues as well as any additional concerns that may arise throughout the duration of this project. We are dedicated to providing quality housing and will address all requirements outlined. Thank you again for your understanding and confidence in Standard Pacific Homes. Please feel free to call me directly or the Project Manager, Tom Farrar, at 858-292-2299. Sincerely, STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES todd Palmaer, President cc: Tom Farrar, Project Manager Jack Henthom, Jack Henthom and Associates Anne Hysong, City of Carlsbad, Planning Department Mike Shirey, City of Carlsbad, Engineering Department -2- MEMORANDUM To: Associate Engineer, Mike Shirey CC: Chris DeCerbo, Gary Wayne From: Associate Plann Date: June 12,2000 Subj: Mariano Subdivision (CT 97-14) Construction Revision The subject construction revision is approved by the Planning Department and building permits for the first phase have been released. The revised landscape plan has been approved and mylars will be submitted by the applicant for signature. I have informed the applicant that revegetation of the canyon will be required prior to final inspection approval of the first phase of homes. I am also forwarding the Site Development Plan Substantial Conformance mylars which I requested for Lots 138-151 for your signature. This exhibit was requested because the buildings footprint on these lots were altered on building plans. The revised grading is not reflected on these plans; we probably should have them add it to the mylars before we sign to make all plans consistent. MEMORANDUM To: Associate Engineer, Mike Shirey CC: Chris DeCerbo, Gary Wayne From: Associate Planner, Anne Hysong Date: June 5, 2000 Re: Mariano Subdivision (CT 97-14) Construction Revision I have attached the landscape plan check print completed by myself and Larry Black. The applicant should return the check print with the revised landscape plan. I have also advised Jack Henthorn that we need correspondence from the Coastal Commission staff that they have approved the revegetation plan. I have also attached the Substantial Conformance (SCE) mylar submitted by the applicant. This is being returned because I would like the fire suppression zones shown on this exhibit. I have asked for assurance that the fire suppression zones shown on the landscape plan have not been changed from the approved plan and now see the need for the zones to be added to the site plan for future reference. I am in receipt of a letter from Sempra Energy approving the grading in the SDG&E easement. There is still a question regarding the revegetation proposed within the easement, however, this is a separate issue that the City will negotiate with SDG&E. A limited number of building permits will be issued prior to resolution of this issue. Upon revision of the landscape plan and SCE exhibit as requested, the Planning Department will approve the construction revision. 06/02/2060 08:17 7604380981 HENTHORN PAGE 01 JACK H DNTHORN & ASSOCIATES LE [TER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Anne Hysong Of: Cityof Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 Phone: 602 4622 Fax: 6028559 Date: 6/2/00 RE: Mariano Coastal Deed FORWARDED BY: O HAND DELIVERY Q U.S. MAIlJ Pages Description 1 Transmittal 2 Letter to Ponder (witfiout attachments) COMMENTS: This is a copy of a tetter that I sent to small encroachment into the deed resfricted think this was a big deal and simply asljjed It is my understanding from Ray Martir final release of the major construction to contact Ponder this morning to aga i response that is consistent with his ear er comments I am really not sure at this point why th non issue on an 11 year old has not responded to a detailed descrif I will call you after I give Ponder a call. Copies to: File Lloyd Hubbs Tom Farrar From: Jack E, Henthorn Of: Jack Henthorn & Associates 5375 Avenida Encinas, Suite D Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone: (760) 438-4090 Fax: (760)438-0981 Time: 7:44 AM strlcted area encroachment S FAX COURIER D PRINTER 'onder in follow up to earlier conversations with him regarding the area. In conversation with me, he indicated that he did not ed that I document what he and I had discussed earlier. that Ray was told that the Coastal response is now holding up the hange that you and Mike Shirey are processing. I am going to try ask for a response. I think the lack of a response is, in fact, a i City would want to hold up this project over what appears to be a easement hat the City is not a party to, when the party holding the easement ion of the situation. 86/02/2000 08:17 7604380981 HENTHORN PAGE 02 JackK enthorn & Associates 5 \75 Avenida Entinas, Suite D Carlsbad, California 92008 (760) 438-4090 Fax (760) 438-0981 May 5,2000 Mr. William Ponder California Coastal Commission 3111 Cammo del Rio North San Diego, California 92108 Subject: Encroachment into deed Dear Mr. Ponder: estricted area - Mariano In the course of routine City Inspection of construction activity on the Mariano site it was discovered that a minor amount of Encroachment had occurred in a 0.635 acre deed restricted, area near the southeastern corner ofthe subject site. This restriction was granted to the. Coastal Commission as a part of the. Laurel 1 of 1989 The encroachment is approx restricted area (Enclosure 1). It is i speculated that since the area was h opecSfbr may have misjudged th reveaetauon/restoration. Vee financial parcel map approval (CDP 6-88-531) in March mately 25 feet in width along the northern boundary of the nclear as to how the encroachment occurred, although it is ghly degraded from illegal dumping activity, the equipment limits when he was preparing the adjacent area for The total amount of encroac|ment into the easement area is 4150 square feet. Since there is no detailed biological survey information for the deed restricted area, we were required to rely on historic photographs to establish the amount of vegetation impacted. It is estimated that approximately 2280 square feet of legetation was disturbed. The biological analysis conducted by Anita Hay worth in 1995 (En; approximately 30%. A revised la shows the revegation/restoration p approved by the California Departr ient of Fish and Game and United States Fish and Wildlife Service. The revegetation plan wi mitigation ratio in excess of 6 to 1. blosure 2) indicated that the coverage in this area was dscape plan has been filed with the City of Carlsbad that an for the area incorporated into the revegetation plan as 1 result in the entire disturbed area being revegetated for a -1- 86/02/2088 08:17 7604380981 HENTHORN PAGE 03 If you need additional ii at your earliest convenience. information or would like to discuss this matter, please contact me —'encl. Map of encroachment area Biological Study dated Januaj cc: file y10, 1995 -2- F:\MARJANO\Grading encroachmenLdoc 06/01/2000 11:31 7604380981 JUH-01-00 QIM1AM FRONTWARD PACIFIC SempraEnergy June 1,2000 MrTboaasFarrar Standard Pacific Homes 9335 C HENTHORN Sin Diego, CA 92123 RE: Mariano, letter of Apjrfoval DearMr.F«i»r Thank you fox informing us of the |equiied w-gradlng that was necesaary vrifliin our easemwt « the Shorepoint project site. We Unttkaail that the easement area had several severe erosion and stability Issues that required these! Aftcf reviewing your engmaeitd droimge imjaownuwts, we id required to perfbrm proper included site/spot elevations and installed that the changes will enhance our ability to gain access that lance to our wasting power tines and associated structures. "We, ibarefijTB, approve of the change* noted on the submitted plans. PAGE 02 Mil/01 F-319 If you have any questions please cfll me at (858) 654-1235. Sincerely, TOTflL P.01 fSTANDARD PACIFICHOMES April 28, 2000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT City Of V</. Carlsbad ,; y Debbie Fountain \ ,-y Director of Housing and Redevelopment v— - - -- >-x City of Carlsbad "--—L:.-.-" 2965 Roosevelt Street, Suite B Carlsbad, California 92008 Subject: Mariano Affordable Housing Dear Debbie: Standard Pacific Homes entered into an affordable housing agreement with the City of Carlsbad on July 21, 1999. The agreement restricts development of housing units on the ShorePoint (formerly Mariano) subdivision in relationship to construction phasing of the required inclusionary units. This agreement was entered into in anticipation that Standard pacific would diligently pursue the funding and construction of a 27 unit affordable housing project and that the City would assist in this effort. At this point, Standard pacific has entered into a relationship with the non profit organization, Wakeland Housing to pursue tax credit and other sources of funding. Wakeland has successfully obtained $135,000 in funding from the Federal Affordable Housing Program and has expended significant predevelopment funding ($75,000) while pursuing a minor amendment to the originally approved site plan. Wakeland has now filed two tax credit applications. Standard Pacific has transferred ownership of the fully graded property to Wakeland to assist them in maximizing the number of points used to evaluate tax credit applications. The first application, filed in June of 1999, was not successful due to the fact that they were not awarded readiness points since the amended site plan has not been approved by the City. The second application was filed in March of this year and it now appears as though they will not be successful due to the inability to obtain rediness points because the amendment was not completed prior to the filing date. At this point there is still no formally established hearing date for this staff "supported" amendment. It is rumored that it could be before the Planning Commission on June 7. However, since staff indicates that the Coastal Development Permit amendment must be heard by the City Council, this may not be early enough to insure a successful application. The next opportunity to file for tax credit funding will be June 15, 2000. We are now at the point where delays in obtaining approvals will impact our production schedule and could begin to jeopardize our funding. San Diego Division 9335 Chesapeake Dr., San Diego, CA 92123-1010 TEL (858) 292-22(30- FAX (858) 292-2260 Standard Pacific has models under construction and is approaching the point where we will be pulling building permits for production units. It is anticipated that we will pull the permits allocated in the existing agreement by mid July. In order to maintain our production while the next tax credit application is being processed it will be necessary to pull an additional 46 permits. This will leave 51 permits remaining to be pulled. Therefore we are requesting that the limit on permit issuance be modified to allow the issuance of up to 97 residential building permits prior to the start of construction of the affordable units in the Vista las Flores project. Sincerely, Thomas C. Farrar Project Manager cc: file C. Ruiz, Housing and Redevelopment A. Hysong, Planning Department G. Wayne, Planning Department M. Orenyak, Community Development Director K. Sauder, Wakeland Housing J. Henthorn -2- MEMORANDUM DATE: April 24, 2000 TO: Landscape Consultant, Larry Black FROM: Associate Planner, Anne Hysong ^ cc: Chris DeCerbo SUBJECT: MARIANO REVEGETATION PLAN Thank you for your inquiry regarding the revegetation of the Coastal Deed Restricted open space. The landscape proposal within the Coastal Deed Restricted open space must be reviewed and approved by Coastal Commission staff. I have asked the applicant to submit a letter from the Coastal Commission indicating what action they will take regarding the encroachment, and if revegetation is acceptable, their agreed upon revegetation plan. This is all part of their "construction revision" that as far as I know has not yet been submitted to the Engineering Department. When you have completed your plan check, please submit your comments and check print to me. I will return it to the Engineering Department as part of the Planning Department's response to the construction revision request so that the applicant will receive one comprehensive response from the City. I was unable to ascertain the boundaries of the proposed revegetation on the attached map. Would you please ask the applicant to identify the entir-e area of unauthorized grading on this map. The area within the canyon "floor" proposed to be planted with unirrigated Seed Mix B should be revegetated with the same plant mix they are proposing in other areas. Is there a reason why they can't provide temporary irrigation? They basically graded the entire canyon, so in my opinion, they should have to revegetate all areas they disturbed with a combination of native plant species. If you have any questions, let me know (extension 4622). |ck Henthorn & Associa^s 5375 Avenida Enemas, Suite D Carlsbad, California 92008 (760)438-4090 Fax (760) 438-0981 April 13, 2000 Anne Hysong City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 Subject: Aviara Parkway wall/landscape treatment - Shore Pointe (Mariano) Dear Anne: I have reviewed the plans for the noise walls along Aviara Parkway, through the Shore Pointe development. The wall along the west side of Aviara Parkway is at the top of the adjacent slope. It is doubtful that the wall will be noticeable from the roadway due to the horizontal separation and the elevation differential. The wall is potentially more noticeable on the east side due to the fact that there is less horizontal separation and it is at grade with the road. However, the landscape plans show that the wall will be screened with a combination of shrubs and trees. The plan indicates that the foreground will be planted with Yellow Trailing Gazania, the next planting zone will consist of a combination of dense low growing shrubs (Carmel Creeper - to 2.5 feet) and screening material (Strawberry Tree - pruned to take shrub form to 8 feet and Oleander - dense at 4 to 5 feet). In addition, both of these areas will contain Liquid Amber and Canary Island Pine trees. In summary, it would appear that the noise walls along Aviara Parkway will not be perceived as creating a stark barrier due to the horizontal (average in excess of 100 feet) and vertical (average 35 feet) separation from the roadway on the west side and the soft visual edge created by the landscape treatment on the east side. Please call me if you have questions or need additional information. cc: Tom Farrar Bob Wilkinson file -1- April 13,2000 Anne Hysong City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 Henthorn & 5375 Avenida Encinas, Suite D • Carlsbad, California 92008 (760) 438-4090 Fax (760) 438-0981 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPT. 4 Subject: Shore Pointe (Mariano) Architecture - Minor Product Adjustments Dear Anne: Enclosed are the following items requested during our meeting on Tuesday, April 11, 2000, relating to minor product adjustments: . 1. One mylar of the approved substantial conformity lot layout plotted with the adjusted product 2. Three blue line prints of item 1 3. Three sets of blue line prints of the adjusted floor plans and elevations 4. Three sets of tables confirming that the footprint of the adjusted units is consistent with the approved yards 5. Three sets of exhibits with the adjusted areas hi - lited in yellow Standard Pacific is anxious to move forward with the plan check process so that they can pull their model home permits and start phase one of their production units. I will check with you the first of next week to discuss the timing for getting their building plans into the plan check process. We have broken the items discussed during our meeting into three packages. The first of these packages is forwarded with this transmittal. The second package will relate to the encroachment into the deed restricted open space area and will consist of the impact analysis, revegetation plan and Coastal Commission response. It is anticipated that this package will be submitted late next week, dependent upon availability of Coastal staff. • The final package will consist of grading related issues and will be addressed through the submittal of the Major Construction Change package requested by the Engineering Department There are three miscellaneous issues that were discussed that will be addressed independently. The sales trailer issue will be addressed in a letter directly from Standard Pacific. If will address the relocation of the trailer and will include a site plan for the existing temporary location along with pictures of the existing facility. Retaining wall plans will be modified to include the finished grade elevation and the wall height above finished grade. This will be done by Hunsaker as a part of their standard plan check process. -1- The Aviara Parkway wall issue is addressed in a letter accompanying this transmittal. This approach should result in the resolution of all outstanding issues related to the Shore Pointe project. If you have any comments regarding this approach, please contact me at your convenience. . , . • The new team at Standard Pacific is committed to resolving these issues in a timely manner and looks forward to working with you toward that end. encl. cc: Tom Farrar Lex Williman .file -2- 04/11/2080 09:07 7604380981 HENTHORN PAGE 02 DATE: TIME: LOCATION: Attendees: Aprill 1,2000 1:30 P.M. City of Carlsbad- 1 City of Carlsbad Chris DeCe Skip Hamtr Anne Hyso Mike Shire 3. 4. 5. Standard Pacific Todd Palm Tom Farrar Lex Willim^n Jack Henth lntroduction Grading Issues a. Slope Remediation b. Field modifications Biological Issues a. Open space disturba b. Revegetation of ope Miscellaneous a. Noise wall modifica b. Basin access ~~ c. Retaining Walls •— d. Sales trailer Architecture a. ^Plan check status - b. Minor second story AGENDA OREPOINTE PROJECT (Mariano) 35 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad California bo, ond g er, President, San Diego Division Project Manager, San Diego Division , Hunsaker & Associates (Consultant) rn, Jack Henthom & Associates (Consultant) As-built plans) ce space disturbed area ons sfmements MAH9-00 02:38PM DUDEK & ASSOCIATES, INC. FROM-STANDARD PACIFIC S,D, Engineering, Planning, Environmental Sciences and Management Services 858-292-2250 Corporate Office: 605 Third Straat Encinitas, California 92024 T-700 P.02/02 F-606 560.942.5147 Fax 780.632.0164 24 March 2000 .400000-300 TomFarrar ['.'..-'•"! c: $ ?vc;~ Standard Pacific Homes 9335 Chesapeake Dr. ' -,^, - ~ San Diego, Ca 92123 Re: Mariano Revegetation Plant Materials Dear Mr. Farrar: As requested by you, I have reviewed the revised revegetation plans prepared by Wilkinson Design Group for the Mariano Property in Carlsbad. On 14 January 1998,1 had prepared a recommend container and seedmix plant list for the property that included native plants that are typical of coastal sage scrub and are found within the region and this location in particular. Since that time, the construction design has changed somewhat, however the plant list is identical to what was used previously and to what I had recommended initially. The slope revegetation should result in restoration of the graded slopes to coastal sage scrub upon completion of the implementation. If you have any questions regarding this letter report, please feel free to contact me at (760) 942-5147. Very truly yours, DUDEK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Anita M. Hay wo, Ecologist/Senior i.D. 6ject Manager GEOCON INCORPORATED GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS Project No. 06195-12-03 March 20, 2000 Standard Pacific Homes 9335 Chesapeake Drive San Diego, California 92123 Attention: Mr. Thomas C. Farrar Subject: MARIANO CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA SLOPE REMEDIAL GRADING: LOTS 125 THROUGH 133 Reference: Interim Report of Testing and Observation Services During Site Grading, Mariano, Lots 1 Through 14, 19 Through 41, 43, 44, 75 Through 86, 88 Through 103, 105 Through 136 and 138 Through 151, Carlsbad, California, prepared by Geocon Incorporated, dated February 25, 2000. Gentlemen: In accordance with the request of Ms. Anne Hysong, City of Carlsbad Planning Department, this letter has been prepared to present a discussion of the reasons for grading within the slope area located at the rear of Lots 125 through 133 within the Mariano residential development. During the early phases of planned lot grading along the east side of the SDG&E easement, it became apparent that the slope, originally to remain natural, should be remediated for the reasons as discussed below. Lots 125-129 The landslide originally mapped along this slope and to the north of these lots was observed during grading to extend further to the south. The landslide was relatively shallow in depth in the area of Lots 125 through 129. The slope was severely eroded with gullies of up to 10 feet deep. In our opinion, the landslide debris presented a serious potential long-term stability issue regarding these lots. For this reason, the slope required regrading to remove the landslide debris to reconstruct a stable slope. The slope was regraded to essentially the original inclination of approximately 3:1 (horizontal: vertical). Lots 130-133 Within this area it was evident that previous grading (agricultural?) had denuded the natural vegetation. Hence, the slope had experienced severe erosion, with gullies of up to 6 feet deep. This condition presented a serious potential erosion/stability issue with respect to the bordering residential lots. For this reason, it was evident that some form of remedial grading would be required to infill the 6960 Flanders Drive • San Diego, California 92121-2974 • Telephone (858) 558-6900 • Fax (858) 558-6159 deeper erosional features at a minimum. The concern was that on a long-term basis, the erosion would progress up slope and adversely impact the residential improvements within the lots. Ultimately, the slope was regraded, including infilling all the gullies and track-walking the finish slope with a D-8 bulldozer. Final slope inclination essentially remained at the original 3:1 (horizontahvertical). Details of the grading as discussed above are presented in the referenced report, copy attached, in the section entitled Slopes, (page 3). If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, or if we may be of further service, please contact the undersigned at your convenience. Very truly yours, GEOCONINCORPORA' .eake' RCE 22527 enclosure: Referenced report dated February 25, 2000. DFL:lek (1) Addressee (1) Jack Henthom & Associates Attention: Mr. Jack Henthorn Project No. 06195-12-03 -2-March 20, 2000 City of Carlsbad Planning Department February 1, 2000 Jack Henthorn & Associates Ste D 5375 Avenida Encinas Carlsbad CA 92008 SUBJECT: PRE 99-77 - MARIANO SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE REVIEW The Planning Director has completed a review of your application for substantial conformance, (APN: 212-040-41). After careful consideration of the circumstances surrounding this request, the Planning Director has determined that the application qualifies for substantial conformance with the approved permit and therefore, approves the changes to the project based on Planning Director Administrative Policy No. 35. I am enclosing the mylar copy of the amended site plan that was included with the last plan submittal. Please add the "Substantial Conformance" stamp to the mylar and submit for signature by the Planning Director prior to issuance of any building permits for the projects. CITY OF CARLSBAD MICHAEL J.THOL2 Planning Director ILLER MJH:AH:cs Attachments c: Principal Planner, Chris DeCerbo Project Engineer, Mike Shirey File Copy Data Entry 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-46OO • FAX (760) 602-8559 MARIANO SETBACK SUMMARY (Comparison between Sub. Conf. Exhibit of 2/11/00 and Sub. Conf. Exhibit of 4/6/00) New Lot 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 Old Lot 4 3 2 1 54 55 56 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 101 102 103 104 105 106 New Plan 1 4 3 2 1 4 1 2 3 1 2 4 1 3 4 3 2 1 4 3 1 3 4 1 4 2 3 2 1 3 4 1 3 2 4 - Old Plan 1 4 3 2 1 4 1 2 3 1 2 4 1 3 4 3 4 3 1 3 1 2 4 1 4 2 3 2 1 3 4 1 3 2 4 - Front Setback Approved 20 20 25 20 20 30 38.7 25 20 25 20 24.5 20 20.9 30 21.5 23 25 25.9 25 24 28.2 30 20 27 15 22 20 20.4 20 20.3 20 20 20 20 Proposed 20 20 25 20 20 30 38.7 25 20 25 20 24.5 20 20.9 30 21.5 23 25 25.9 25 24 28.2 30 20 27 15 22 20 20.4 20 20.3 20 20 20 20 % Change 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Rear Setback Approved 116 123.3 105.6 96.1 73.1 62.6 43.4 72.5 83 96.3 16.1 10 21.4 20 19.7 41.8 33.2 29.3 31.8 19.5 73.7 54.8 37.4 30.9 28.8 50.5 48.1 33.2 44.6 20.2 15 17.7 25 28 25 Proposed 116 123.3 105.6 96.1 73.1 62.6 43.4 72.3 83 96.3 16.1 10 19.5 20 19.7 41.8 33.2 29.3 31.5 19.5 73.7 54.8 37.2 30.9 29.4 50.5 48.1 33.2 44.6 20.2 15 17.7 25 28 25 % Change 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -8.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -0.5% 0.0% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Left Side Setback Approved 10 8.3 12 8 8 10 9.7 8 8 8 10 7.2 7.5 10.3 6.6 10 9.9 7 6.4 10.6 6.5 7 7 6.8 9 23.1 22 7 7 6.9 7 7 10 13 13 Proposed 10 8.3 12 8 8 10 9.7 8 8 8 10 7.2 7.5 10.3 6.6 10 9.9 7 6.4 10.6 6.5 7 7 6.8 9 23.1 22 7 7 6.9 7 7 10 13 13 % Change 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Right Side Setback Approved 54.1 5 7 8 7.1 7.3 5 9.4 7.2 7.3 19 9 8.3 8 7.2 12.9 10 7.5 7.3 8 6.5 7.3 13.5 7.3 8.1 14 24.2 10.6 10 8 5.5 8 8 5 7 Proposed 54.1 5 7 8 7.1 7.3 5 9.4 7.2 7.3 19 9 8.3 8 7.2 12.9 10 7.5 7.3 8 6.5 7.3 13.5 7.3 7.8 14 24.2 10.6 10 8 5.5 8 8 5 7 % Change 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -3.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% COMMqN RECREATION LOT PLANNING:\Miscellaneous\2240 Standard Pacific\Mariano\2240-3 SCE Sum Tbl.v11a.xls.xls TAB: Revsd Format -New* Updated on 4/9/00 MM Printed on 4/9/00 MARIANO SETBACK SUMMARY (Comparison between Sub. Conf. Exhibit of 2/11/00 and Sub. Conf. Exhibit of 4/6/00) New Lot 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 Old Lot 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 134 133 132 131 130 129 128 127 126 125 124 123 100 99 98 97 136 135 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 96 95 New Plan 3 2 4 1 3 4 3 3 1 4 3 2 3 1 3 1 2 4 3 1 4 1 3 1 4 3 2 1 1 2 2 3 4 1 4 Old Plan 3 2 4 1 3 4 3 3 1 4 3 2 3 1 3 1 2 4 3 1 4 1 3 1 4 1 2 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 4 Front Setback Approved 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 26 25.5 28.7 20 20 20 20 20.2 23.2 24.8 20.6 20.2 24 20 20 35 20 20 25.2 28 20 21.1 25 20 20 20 20 20 Proposed 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 26 25.5 28.7 20 20 20 20 20.2 23.2 24.8 20.6 20.2 24 20 20 35 20 20 25.2 28 20 21.1 25 20 20 20 20 20 % Change 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Rear Setback Approved 25 28 25 17.7 25 25 25 63.4 * 33.4 24.5 25.7 36.6 36.8 40 49.5 46 50.5 53.5 27.3 24.7 36 28.7 39.5 15.1 15.3 14.8 18.7 17.6 15.2 20 21.2 17.3 19.8 24.2 26.2 Proposed fiagjyfffij^PPIff^O 25 28 25 17.7 25 25 25 63.4 33.4 24.5 25.7 36.6 36.8 40 49.5 46 50.5 53.5 27.3 24.7 36 28.7 39.5 15.1 15.3 14.8 18.7 17.6 15.2 20 21.2 17.3 19.8 24.2 26.2 % Change 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% ' 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Left Side Setback Approved KHiftOWi 10 13 10 10 10 10 25.9 7 6.5 7 7 10 9.1 8 10.1 8.9 12 7 5 5 7 7 16 7.5 7.5 7.3 8 5 7.2 10 7.8 8 5 5 7 Proposed 10 13 10 10 10 10 25.9 7 6.5 7 7 10 9.1 8 10.1 8.9 12 7 5 5 7 7 16 7.5 7.5 7.3 8 5 7.2 10 7.8 8 5 5 7 % Change 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Right Side Setback Approved 5 5 7 5 5 5 10 10 7.6 8 8.4 12.8 10 10.8 9 6.7 7.1 5.1 9.5 11.7 10 8 8 6.4 6.5 6.4 7 5.9 5 7 6.5 7 7 15.5 10 Proposed 5 5 7 5 5 5 10 10 7.6 8 8.4 12.8 10 10.8 9 6.7 7.1 5.1 9.5 11.7 10 8 8 6.4 6.5 6.4 7 5.9 5 7 6.5 7 7 15.5 10 % Change !f|pIO}0,% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% PLANNING:\Miscellaneous\2240 Standard Pacific\Mariano\2240-3 SCE Sum Tbl.v11a.xls.xls TAB: Revsd Format -New* Updated on 4/9/00 MM Printed on 4/9/00 MARIANO SETBACK SUMMARY (Comparison between Sub. Conf. Exhibit of 2/11/00 and Sub. Conf. Exhibit of 4/6/00) New Lot 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 Old Lot 94 93 92 91 90 89 88 87 76 75 74 73 72 71 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 47 46 45 44 New Plan 1 2 3 1 3 1 4 1 3 1 3 1 3 2 1 2 3 2 1 4 2 1 2 4 1 3 4 2 4 1 3 1 1 3 4 3 Old Plan 1 2 3 1 3 1 4 1 3 1 3 1 3 2 1 2 3 2 1 4 2 1 2 4 1 3 4 2 4 1 3 1 1 3 4 3 Front Setback Approved 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 28.3 20.8 20 20 20.2 28.7 20 26 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 22.5 20 20 20 20 20 20 Proposed 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 28.3 20.8 20 20 20.2 28.7 20 26 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 22.5 20 20 20 20 20 20 % Change 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Rear Setback Approved 16.6 14.7 39.2 34.5 45.8 41.9 64.3 66.8 80.9 75.7 86.4 76.5 83.8 84.1 136.4 142.2 146.9 151.9 211.7 138 * 139.4 132.6 135.2 127.7 114.4 117.7 112.5 110 105.9 106.6 125 136.3 79.4 87 78 70.3 Proposed 16.6 14.5 39.2 34.5 45.8 41.9 63.9 66.8 80.9 75.7 86.4 76.5 83.8 84.1 136.4 142.2 146.9 151.9 211.7 138 139.4 132.6 135.2 127.7 114.4 117.7 112.5 110 105.9 106.6 125 136.3 79.4 87 78 70.3 % Change 0.0% -1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% • 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%— I— 1 Left Side Setback Approved 6.8 17.3 8 8 8 7.7 7.5 8.3 7.3 6 5 5.9 5 64.6 * 8 7 10 13 8 5.6 10 8 13 13 5 7 7 8 7.3 9.1 8.2 7 11.5 10 15 15 Proposed 6.8 17.3 8 8 8 7.7 7.5 8.3 7.3 6 5 5.9 5 64.6 8 7 10 13 8 5.6 10 8 13 13 5 7 7 8 7.3 9.1 8.2 7 11.5 10 15 15 % Change 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Right Side Setback Approved 8.2 L_ 8 10 7 7 7 8 8 7.6 7.9 10 10 10 31 9.1 10 7 7 6.2 10 7 7 7 10 8 13 12 13 5 7.9 8 10 5 5 7 10.1 Proposed 8.2 8 10 7 7 7 8 8 7.6 7.9 10 10 10 31 9.1 10 7 7 6.2 10 7 7 7 10 8 13 12 13 5 7.9 8 10 5 5 7 10.1 % Change 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% KANNING:\Miscellaneous\2240 Standard Pacific\Mariano\2240-3 SCE Sum Tbl.v11a.xls.xls TAB: Revsd Formal -New* Updated on 4/9/00 MM Printed on 4/9/00 MARIANO SETBACK SUMMARY (Comparison between Sub. Conf. Exhibit of 2/11/00 and Sub. Conf. Exhibit of 4/6/00) New Lot Old Lot New Plan Old Plan Front Setback Approved Proposed Change Rear Setback Approved Proposed % Change Left Side Setback Approved Proposed % Change Right Side Setback Approved Proposed % Change 109 43 25 25 0.0%60.4 60.4 0.0%10 10 0.0%6.9 6.9 0.0% 110 42 20 20 0.0%59 59 0.0%0.0%5.1 5.1 0.0% 111 34 20 20 0.0%66.4 66.4 0.0%10 10 0.0%0.0% 112 33 20 20 0.0%69.3 69.3 0.0%13 13 0.0%0.0% 113 32 20 20 0.0%66.3 66.3 0.0%15 15 0.0%0.0% 114 31 20 20 0.0%69.2 69.2 0.0%15 15 0.0%0.0% 115 30 25 25 0.0%61.3 61.3 0.0%15 15 0.0%7.4 7.4 0.0% 116 29 20.5 20.5 0.0%63.6 63.6 0.0%12.9 12.9 0.0%9.1 9.1 0.0% 117 28 30 30 0.0%75.9 75.7 -0.3%10 10 0.0%6.8 6.8 0.0% 118 27 25.7 25.7 0.0%95.8 95.8 0.0%0.0%0.0% 119 26 20 20 0.0%15 15 0.0%10 10 0.0%0.0% 120 25 20 20 0.0%22 22 0.0%15 15 0.0%0.0% 121 35 20 20 0.0%13.5 13.5 0.0%9.9 9.9 0.0%16 16 0.0% 122 36 20 20 0.0%26.5 26.5 0.0%0.0%15 15 0.0% 123 37 20 20 0.0%23.8 23.8 0.0%0.0%0.0% 124 38 20 20 0.0%13.8 13.8 0.0%0.0%10 10 0.0% 125 39 20 20 0.0%20.2 20.2 0.0%0.0%13 13 0.0% 126 40 20 20 0.0%34 34 0.0%0.0%10 10 0.0% 127 41 20 20 0.0%71.7 71.7 0.0%0.0%10 10 0.0% 128 48 20 20 0.0%92.6 92.4 -0.2%0.0%10 10 0.0% 129 49 20 20 0.0%72.2 72.2 0.0%5.3 5.3 0.0%10 10 0.0% 130 50 20 20 0.0%44.7 44.4 -0.7%0.0%10 10 0.0% 131 51 22 22 0.0%25.6 25.6 0.0%10 10 0.0%13 13 0.0% 132 52 23 23 0.0%19.1 19.1 0.0%0.0%13 13 0.0% 133 53 20 20 0.0%34.6 34.6 0.0%0.0%43.8 43.8 0.0% 134 MULTI-FAMILY 135 57 PRIVATE STREET "A" PLANNING:\Miscellaneous\2240 Standard Pacific\Mariano\2240-3 SCE Sum Tbl.v11a.xls.xls TAB: Revsd Format -New* Updated on 4/9/00 MM Printed on 4/9/00 MARIANO SETBACK SUMMARY (Comparison between Sub. Conf. Exhibit of 2/11/00 and Sub. Conf. Exhibit of 4/6/00) New Lot v147% V,148~:fu&,. 150V 1511. — — — — ~ Old Lot 15 16,, 17^'"X, 1 19^ 20 21 22 23 24 Old Plan '2, ,'4V•A2 ;• t .3,'.-w New Plan ,.,2,* v4 c'2 . , •M ,M* Front Setback Approved V , -20 . >- .^20 .,^<I0.7"' ,^4«;35,5s ,f r.20f Proposed *,' 20 >::<"^2Q v. '.:*•;! 0.7 V« *35.5 - * t*. ;. 20 % Change • 0.0% „' . 0.0% .T~ 0-0% ' '0.0% 0.0% Rear Setback Approved . 31.3 19.7 " 5 > 32,2 • 15.2 Proposed ' 31 3 1 -'19.7 - ' " 5 , 32.2 14.8 % Change 0.0% 00% , 0 0% 0.0% -2.6% Left Side Setback Approved 11 10 184 • 5 8.5 Proposed 11 10 18.4 • 5 6.3 % Change 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% ,-259% Right Side Setback Approved 10 • ' .,18 24 8.7 178 Proposed 10 18 24 8.7 20 % Change 0.0% 00% 0.0% 00% 124% LOTS ELIMINATED - SEE NOTE 1 LOTS ELIMINATED - SEE NOTE 1 LOTS ELIMINATED - SEE NOTE 1 LOTS ELIMINATED - SEE NOTE 1 LOTS ELIMINATED - SEE NOTE 1 Setback either not denoted or incorrectly denoted on Approved February 2000 Site Plan Sub. Conf. Exh. Setbacks shown here reflects what the corrected dimension is. MARIANO SETBACK SUMMARY New Lot 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 Old Lot 4 3 2 1 54 55 56 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 101 102 103 104 105 New Plan 1 4 3 2 1 4 1 2 3 1 2 4 1 3 4 3 2 1 4 3 1 3 4 1 4 2 3 2 1 3 4 1 3 2 4 Old Plan 1 4 3 2 1 4 1 2 3 1 2 4 1 3 4 3 4 3 1 3 1 2 4 1 4 2 3 2 1 3 4 1 3 2 4 Front Setback Approved 20 20 25 20 20 30 * 35 25 20 25 20 20 20 20 30 20 23 25 20 25 20 28 30 20 27 15 24 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Proposed 20 20 25 20 20 30 38.7 25 20 25 20 24.5 20 20.9 30 21.5 23 25 25.9 25 24 28.2 30 20 27 15 22 20 20.4 20 20.3 20 20 20 20 % Change 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 22.5% 0.0% 4.5% 0.0% 7.5% 0.0% 0.0% 29.5% 0.0% 20.0% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -8.3% 0.0% 2.0% 0.0% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Rear Setback Approved 117* 124* 107 97 74 60 48 73 83 98 17 12 13 21 21 46 31 40 * 31 19 76 58 37 33 29 54 45 33 43 21 15 20 25 28 25 Proposed 116 123.3 105.6 97 74 62.7 43.4 73 84 92 16.1 10 21.4 20 19.7 41.8 33.2 29.3 31.8 19.5 74 54.8 37 30.9 28.8 50.5 48.1 33.2 44.6 20.2 15 17.7 25 28 25 % Change -0.9% -0.6% -1.3% 0.0% 0.0% 4.5% -9.6% 0.0% 1 .2% -6.1% -5.3% -16.7% 64.6% -4.8% -6.2% -9.1% 7.1% -26.8% 2.6% 2.6% -2.6% -5.5% 0.0% -6.4% -0.7% -6.5% 6.9% 0.6% 3.7% -3.8% 0.0% -11.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Left Side Setback Approved 10 8 12 8 8 10 10 8 8 8 10 8 7 9 5 10 9 7 7 10 7 7 7 7 9 23 22 7 7 6 7 7 10 13 13 Proposed 10 8.3 12 8 8 10 9.7 8 8 8 10 7.2 7.5 10.3 6.6 10 9.9 7 6.4 10.6 6.5 7 7 6.8 9 23.1 22 7 7 6.9 7 7 10 13 13 % Change 0.0% 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -3.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -10.0% 7.1% 14.4% 32.0% 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% -8.6% 6.0% -7.1% 0.0% 0.0% -2.9% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1 5.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Right Side Setback Approved 50 5 7 8 7 7 5 10 7 7 20 10 7 8 8 10 10 6 8 8 7 8 13 8 8 15 24 10 8 8 6 8 8 5 7 Proposed 54.1 5 7 8 7.1 7.3 5 9.4 7.2 7.3 19 9 8.3 8 7.2 12.9 10 7.5 7.3 8 6.5 7.3 13.5 7.3 8.1 14 24.2 10.6 10 8 5.5 8 8 5 7 % Change 8.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.4% 4.3% 0.0% -6.0% 2.9% 4.3% -5.0% -10.0% 18.6% 0.0% -10.0% 29.0% 0.0% 25.0% -8.8% 0.0% -7.1% -8.8% 3.8% -8.8% 1.3% -6.7% 0.8% 6.0% 25.0% 0.0% -8.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% PLANNING:\Miscellaneous\1758 Ayres Land Co\1758-007 SCE Summary Tbl.v9.xls TAB: Revsd Format -New* Updated on 1/14/00 MM Printed on 1/26/00 MARIANO SETBACK SUMMARY 36 n°6 - - COMMON RECREATION LOT PLANNING:\Miscellaneous\1758 Ayres Land Co\1758-007 SCE Summary Tbl.v9.xls Updated on 1/14/00 MM TAB: Revsd Format -New* Printed on 1/26/00 MARIANO SETBACK SUMMARY New Lot ic37 A 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 Old Lot *«ic 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 134 133 132 131 130 129 128 127 126 125 124 123 100 99 98 97 136 135 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 96 95 New Plan 2., 3 2 4 1 3 4 3 3 1 4 3 2 3 1 3 1 2 4 3 1 4 1 3 1 4 3 2 1 1 2 2 3 4 1 4 Old Plan I"**2J, 3 2 4 1 3 4 3 3 1 4 3 2 3 1 3 1 2 4 3 1 4 1 3 1 4 1 2 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 4 Front Setback Approved > 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 26 25 27 20 20 20 20 20 20 24 20 20 24 20 20 35 20 20 20 28 20 20 25 20 20 20 20 20 Proposed -li ,20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 26 25.5 28.7 20 20 20 20 20.2 23.2 24.8 20.6 20.2 24 20 20 35 20 20 25.2 28 20 21.1 25 20 20 20 20 20 % Change -^ 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.0% 6.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1 .0% 16.0% 3.3% 3.0% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 26.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Rear Setback Approved 'If 28.;, 25 28 25 20 25 25 25 67 37 25 26 34 37 40 * 50 51 50 54 22 * 27 36 31 40 16 15 15 18 20 18 18 15 16 15 26 26 Proposed •It- 128 25 28 25 17.7 25 25 25 65 33.4 24.5 25.7 36.6 36.3 40 49.5 46 50.5 53.5 22 24.7 36 28.7 40 15.1 15.3 14.8 18.7 17.6 15.2 20 21.2 17.3 19.8 24.2 26.2 % Change T"Q.p$> 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -11.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -3.0% -9.7% -2.0% -1.2% 7.6% -1.9% 0.0% -1.0% -9.8% 1 .0% -0.9% 0.0% -8.5% 0.0% -7.4% 0.0% -5.6% 2.0% -1.3% 3.9% -12.0% -15.6% 11.1% 4,1.3% 8.1% 32.0% -6.9% 0.8% Left Side Setback Approved ••ft* '10 10 13 10 10 10 10 26 7 7 7 7 10 8 8 9 9 13 7 5 5 7 7 16 8 8 8 8 5 8 10 8 8 5 5 7 Proposed T ,f?' 10 10 13 10 10 10 10 25.9 7 6.5 7 7 10 9.1 8 10.1 8.9 12 7 5 5 7 7 16 7.5 7.5 7.3 8 5 7.2 10 7.8 8 5 5 7 % Change * »p:o% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -0.4% 0.0% -7.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 13.8% 0.0% 12.2% -1.1% -7.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -6.3% -6.3% -8.8% 0.0% 0.0% -10.0% 0.0% -2.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Right Side Setback Approved ¥' -51* 5 5 7 5 5 5 10 10 8 8 8 13 10 9 9 7 7 5 8 12 10 8 8 7 7 7 7 5 * 5 7 7 7 7 15 10 Proposed *5 5 7 5 5 5 10 10 7.6 8 8.4 12.8 10 10.8 9 6.7 7.1 5.1 9.5 11.7 10 8 8 6.4 6.5 6.4 7 5.9 5 7 6.5 7 7 15.5 10 % Change *r 'oro% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -5.0% 0.0% 5.0% -1.5% 0.0% 20.0% 0.0% -4.3% 1 .4% 2.0% 18.8% -2.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -8.6% -7.1% -8.6% 0.0% 18.0% 0.0% 0.0% -7.1% 0.0% 0.0% 3.3% 0.0% PLANNING:\Miscellaneous\1758 Ayres Land Co\1758-007 SCE Summary Tbl.v9.xls TAB: Revsd Format -New* Updated on 1/14/00 MM Printed on 1/26/00 MARIANO SETBACK SUMMARY New Lot 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 Old Lot 94 93 92 91 90 89 88 87 76 75 74 73 72 71 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 47 46 45 44 New Plan 1 2 3 1 3 1 4 1 3 1 3 1 3 2 1 2 3 2 1 4 2 1 2 4 1 3 4 2 4 1 3 1 1 3 4 3 Old Plan v 2 3 7 3 f 4 1 3 1 3 1 3 2 1 2 3 2 1 4 2 1 2 4 1 3 4 2 4 1 3 1 1 3 4 3 Front Setback Approved 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 28 20 20 20 20 28 20 27 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Proposed 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 21.5 20 28.3 20.8 20 20 20.2 28.7 20 26 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 22.5 20 20 20 20.6 20 20 % Change 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.5% 0.0% 1.1% 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1 .0% 2.5% 0.0% -3.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.0% 0.0% 0.0% Rear Setback Approved 19 15 40 35 45 43 64 * 66 80 76 86 80 84 * 84 138 143 142 152 210 144 * 138 134 135 127 115 118 111 110 106 105 122 138 82 86 78 69 Proposed 16.6 14.7 39.2 34.5 45.8 43 64 66.8 80.9 75.7 88 76.5 83.8 84.1 136.4 142.2 146.9 150 211.7 144 139.4 132.6 135.2 127.7 115 118 112 110 105.9 106.6 126 137 79.4 87 78 70.3 % Change -12.6% -2.0% -2.0% -1 .4% 1.8% 0.0% 0.0% 1 .2% 1.1% -0.4% 2.3% -4.4% -0.2% 0.1% -1.2% -0.6% 3.5% -1 .3% 0.8% 0.0% 1 .0% -1 .0% 0.1% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% -0.1% 1 .5% 3.3% -0.7% -3.2% 1.2% 0.0% 1 .9% Left Side Setback Approved 7 18 8 8 8 7 7 7 7 5 10 5 5 66 8 7 10 13 8 6 10 8 13 13 5 7 7 8 7 10 7 7 10 10 15 15 Proposed 6.8 17.3 8 8 8 7.7 7.5 8.3 7.3 6 10 5.9 5 66.5 8 7 10 13 8 5.6 10 8 13 13 5 7 7 8 7.3 9.1 8.2 7 11.5 10 15 15 % Change -2.9% -3.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10.0% 7.1% 18.6% 4.3% 20.0% 0.0% 18.0% 0.0% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -6.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.3% -9.0% 17.1% 0.0% 15.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Right Side Setback Approved 8 8 10 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 5 10 10 31 10 10 7 7 6 10 7 7 7 10 8 13 12 13 5 8 8 10 5 5 7 10 Proposed 8.2 8 10 7 7 7 8 8 7.6 7.9 5 10 10 31 9.1 10 7 7 6.2 10 7 7 7 10 8 13 12 13 5 7.9 8 10 5 5 7 10.1 % Change 2.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -5.0% -1.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -9.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -1 .3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% PLANNING:\Miscellaneous\1758 Ayres Land Co\1758-007 SCE Summary Tbl.v9.xls TAB: Revsd Format -New* Updated on 1/14/00 MM Printed on 1/26/00 MARIANO SETBACK SUMMARY PLANNING:\Miscellaneous\1758 Ayres Land Co\1758-007 SCE Summary Tbl.v9.xls TAB: Revsd Format -New* Updated on 1/14/00 MM Printed on 1/26/00 MARIANO SETBACK SUMMARY New Lot 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 138 139 140; : 141 142 143 144 . .145 Old Lot 43 42 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 48 49 50 51 52 53 5 57 6 7 8 9 10 . .11 12', "13"' New Plan 4 1 3 2 4 2 4 1 4 1 2 3 4 3 4 1 4 3 1 4 1 4 3 4 3 1 2 1 2 4 3 2 " '4' .- Old Plan 4 1 3 2 4 2 4 1 4 1 2 3 4 3 4 1 4 3 1 4 1 4 3 4 3 1 2 1 2 4 ', 3 2 '4' ' Front Setback Approved 25 20 20 20 20 20 25 20 30 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 22 25 20 Proposed 25 20 20 20 20 20 25 20.5 30 25.7 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 22 23 20 % Change 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.5% 0.0% 28.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -8.0% 0.0% Rear Setback Approved 60 61 66 69 66 69 61 65 76 102 * 15 22 12 25 23 15 20 37 73 92 75 48 26 17 33 Proposed 60.3 59 66.4 69.3 66.3 69.2 61.3 63.6 75.9 95.8 15 22 13.5 26.5 23.8 13.8 20.2 37 79 92.6 79.2 44.7 25.6 22 41 % Change 0.5% -3.3% 0.6% 0.4% 0.5% 0.3% 0.5% -2.2% -0.1% -6.1% 0.0% 0.0% 12.5% 6.0% 3.5% -8.0% 1.0% 0.0% 8.2% 0.7% 5.6% -6.9% -1.5% 29.4% 24.2% Left Side Setback Approved 10 8 10 13 15 15 15 13 10 8 10 15 10 5 5 7 5 7 5 5 5 5 10 7 7 Proposed 10 8 10 13 15 15 15 12.9 10 8 10 15 9.9 5 5 7 5 7 5 5 5.3 5 10 7 7 % Change 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Right Side Setback Approved 7 5 7 5 5 5 7 10 1 5 5 7 16 15 8 10 13 10 10 10 10 10 13 13 44 Proposed 7 5.1 7 5 5 5 7.4 9.1 6.8 5 5 7 16 15 8 10 13 10 10 10 10 10 13 13 43.8 % Change 0.0% 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.7% -9.0% -2.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -0.5% MULTI-FAMILY PRIVATE STREET "A" s I 20 20 20 20 . 20 20 20 • 20 . ;20 20 20,4 , i 20;1 : 20 20 20 • 20 0.0% 0.0% 2.0% 0,5% 0.0% ,'" 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 38 39 23 29 .25 •' 25 29 26 43.2 50!7 35 , : 40;g 36 34.5 . 35,9 31,4 13.7% 30.0% 52.2% 41.0% .44,0% 38.0% 23.8% 20.8% 16 ; .8 I 12 \ 9 ,1 .10 10 : , 10 10 19.1 8.9 8,7 7.9 .. 11:5 11 11 11 19.4% -13.8% -27.5% -12.2% 15.0% •• 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 8 10 8 . : 10 " 1.0 "" 10. to 10 8 9.1 7,3 9.1 , 10 10 10 10 0;0% -9.0% -8.8% ;, ,-9.0% O.OP/o 0.0% 0,0% i 0.0% PLANNING:\Miscellaneous\1758 Ayres Land Co\1758-007 SCE Summary Tbl.v9.xls TAB: Revsd Format -New* Updated on 1/14/00 MM Printed on 1/26/00 MARIANO SETBACK SUMMARY 3 |r '-20 I-. r. 20| ' 0.0%| ' 26'- | r^ Ig29| • .' PLANNING:\Miscellaneous\1758 Ayres Land Co\1758-007 SCE Summary Tbl.v9.xls Updated on 1/14/00 MM TAB: Revsd Format -New# Printed on 1/26/00 MARIANO SETBACK SUMMARY New Lot 147- . ,148 149 150 .,,:i5,i.-v ... — ... — — Old Lot - 15 "16 17 .. 18 . ' .f9,,i 20 21 22 23 24 Old Plan : 2 ... 4i,:... 2 3 ..,,1 ' . New Plan 2 • .-4 ,• ; 2 \ 3. !. Front Setback Approved 20 20 ;, 10 45.* 20 Proposed : . ' 20 20 i . 10.7 35,5 ; 20 % Change 0.0% , 0.0% ;:• 7.0% -21.1% 0.0% Rear Setback Approved •l . 29 15 ;; 5 \ ' , - ,'22 • ' : - 12 i Proposed ,. 31.3, .,;, ; 19.7 ..,'"• -,5 32.2 15.2 % Change 7.9% 31.3% •• 0.0% 4614% , 26.7% Left Side Setback Approved 10 10 '- :"""•> 14 •' - --. 5 .: " , .6 Proposed '•\ 11 , ;: .10 :,,; 18,4 '.. -5 8.5 % Change ' 10.0% 0.0% 31,4% , 0.0% 41.7% Right Side Setback Approved 10 '' 17 : . ' • 33 91 . :• 21 r Proposed 10 n - 24 6.7, 17.8 % Change .. - 1 o;o% 5,9% ';"-273% '-3,3% :: -15.2% LOTS ELIMINATED - SEE NOTE 1 LOTS ELIMINATED - SEE NOTE 1 LOTS ELIMINATED - SEE NOTE 1 LOTS ELIMINATED - SEE NOTE 1 LOTS ELIMINATED - SEE NOTE 1 * Setback either not denoted or incorrectly denoted on original Approved October 1998 Site Plan/Approved 1999 Sub. Conf. Exh. Setback shown here reflects what the corrected dimension is. NOTE 1: Old or original Lot numbers 20 through 24 have been eliminated due to lots lost in the process of addressing environmental concerns on the eastern portion of the site. The revision that caused the elimination of these 4 lots was approved by the City of Carlsbad by Substantial Conformance Exhibit "A' in April 1999. fp/ease; a/so note th'at the shaded rows for the purpose of this summary table, compare new lot nos. 1*38 through I1513othe April 1999 Approved ;Substantial Conformance Exhibit and not the original[Approved October 1998 TM. Every{other lot, however, is being compared to the Approved October 1998 Tentative Map. 1 ; •""]' '"." PI_ANNING:\Miscellaneous\1758 Ayres Land Co\1758-007 SCE Summary Tbl.v9.xls TAB: Revsd Format -New# Updated on 1/14/00 MM Printed on 1/26/00 ack Henthorn & Associates 5375 Avenida Encinas, Suite D Carlsbad, CA 92008 (760) 438-4090 Fax (760) 438-0981 Memorandum To: Anne Hysong FROM: Jack E. Henthorn" c SUBJECT: MARIANO SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMITY TABLE DATE: JANUARY 27,2000 The substantial conformity table was inadvertently left out of the materials submitted yesterday. The attached 8 page table reflects the changes as shown on the substantial conformity prints and mylars as submitted previously. If you have any questions, or need additional information please contact me at your convenience. JEH:wpc Attachment: Substantial conformity tables Page 1 of 1 Henthorn & Associat^P 5375 Avenida Encinas, Suite D Carlsbad, CA 92008 (760) 438-4090 Fax (760) 438-0981 Memorandum To: Anne Hysong FROM: Jack E. Henthorn SUBJECT: MARIANO SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMITY DATE: JANUARY 26,2000 RECEIVED , JAN 2 6 2000 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPT. Enclosed please find 3 blue line sets of the Mariano Site Development Plan along with a mylar prepared for approval stamps and signature. The Site Development Plan has been modified to reflect the changes discussed during our meeting last week. All modifications are now fully within identified parameters. Also enclosed is and architectural package consisting of three sets of blue line architectural elevations and floor plans that have been revised per our meeting; one full set of 8.5"xl 1" reductions and one photo set of sample colors and materials. An actual color and material board can be provided upon request. The architectural plans reflect the addition of the items discussed during our meeting of last week and now reflect the itemsthat you requested. In addition, for clarification, the roofing material is a concrete '(S^tyjpe_tIJg>yith a variegated color pattern, which is consistent with the Zone 20 Specific Plan architectural guidelines. If you have any questions or needadditional information please contact me at your convenience: JEH:wpc Encl: As noted Cc: Gregg Linhoff, Standard Pacific Page 1 of i City of Carlsbad Planning Department January 5, 2000 Jack Henthorn & Associates Suite D 5375 Avenida Encinas Carlsbad CA 92008 SUBJECT: PRE 99-77 - MARIANO SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE REVIEW APN: 212-040-41 A preliminary review of your request for substantial conformance review of the subject project was conducted by the Planning and Engineering staffs. Listed below are the issues raised by staff. Planning: 1. Increases to rear yards exceed the 10% permitted by Planning Department Administrative Policy. The Planning Department has determined that reduced rear yard setbacks will be permitted for yards that currently exceed 1 5 feet, however, if existing rear yards are 1 5 feet or less, they may not be reduced as part of a substantial conformance approval. Therefore, the proposed reduced rear yard setbacks are approved for the following lots: 32, 41, 65, 73. Lot 12 is also approved since ttiefront yard setback is increased to offset the reduction ^__injgar yard. Lots ^f^C^T^rahd 7-$-db not satisfy the above criteria and are not approved. The reduced side yard setback on Lot oEf exceeds the 10% and cannot be administratively approved. Is it possible to move the structure further to the rear of the lot to increase the setback to 8 feet. It appears that a 1 5 x 15 foot rear yard could still be accomplished if the plan were reversed. 2. The reduced setbacks on lots located east of "F" Street are acceptable in consideration of the redesign necessitated by the widening of the habitat corridor. 3. Please provide color and materials board for comparison. (Condition No. 54 of Planning Commission Resolution 4186 prohibits Spanish barrel tiles). In some instances, it appears that the quality of architectural elements and detailing has been reduced. Specifically: 2O75 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 438-0894 PRE 99-77 MARIANO SUBSTA^AL CONFORMANCE REVIEW January 5, 2000 ^^ Page 2 Plan 2: It appears that arches, shutters and wainscots haye^been deleted from second floor elevations. Plan 3: Detailing on front is lost - loss of shutters and recessed arched windows; less window variation. 4: Reduced building planes and detailing on front elevations, less window variation. Please review the above comments and submit revised plans for further review. If the applicant wishes to proceed with the plans as submitted, it will be necessary to process a Planned Development Permit amendment. If you have questions regarding the above comments, please contact me at (760) 438-11 61 at your convenience. Sincerely, ANNE HYSON( Associate Planner AH:cs c: Chris DeCerbo File MARIANO SDP SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE MODIFICATIONS (1/14/00) Sheet 1 : Bldg. Cov. Summary was updated. Three Plan 1's were eliminated and one each of a Plan 2, 3, & 4 were added. Bldg Cov. went down slightly. Sheet 2: Lot 1 3 - Bldg 1 was flipped to fix rear setback. All other setbacks went up as well. Lot 63 - Plan 1 eliminated & replaced with a Plan 3r to fix rear setback. Sheet 3: No changes Sheet 4: Lot 66 - Bldg pushed back to increase side yard setback. Left Setback is right -10% and rear setback went up to a -15.6% (16.6' setback to 15.2') in order to accommodate change. Front yard setback did go up by a +5.5%. When we checked on flipping the plan as suggested by the City keeping the side setbacks @ 5' & 7.2' we ended up with a rear yard setback of only 15.6' which would have still been over the -10%. So we left the unit the same way & only pushed it back. Lot 68 - A Plan 1 was replaced by a Plan 2 to fix the rear yard setback. Lot 70 - A Plan 1 was replaced by a Plan 4 to fix the rear yard setback. Overall - All Plan type callouts were doublechecked and corrected where necessary.