HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 97-14; Mariano; Tentative Map (CT) (4)STANDARD PACIF ic
HOMES
August 23, 2000
Mr. Gary Wayne
Assistant Planning Director
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
Subject: Shorepointe (Mariano) Phase 3 building permits
Dear Gary:
Thank you for taking the time to meet with Jack, Marty and myself last week. I
appreciated the opportunity to discuss some of the pending issues with Standard Pacific
and convey our commitment to work diligently with the City of Carlsbad.
I also wanted to follow up with you regarding the status of the conditions we discussed
relating to the release of Shorepointe's Phase 2 building permits (copy of 7/24/00 letter
attached). Tom Farrar, our project manager, met with Larry Black at the Shorepointe
project this week and performed a field inspection of the conditions (copy of letter
attached). I believe Larry was comfortable that the conditions identified in the July letter
have been met.
We have submitted Shorepoint Phase 3 for plan check to the building department. We
sincerely hope that the Planning Department will be comfortable releasing Phase 3
Permits.
Thank you again for your availability last week. I appreciated your feedback and we look
forward to working with the City of Carlsbad in the future.
Very Truly Yours,
STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES
cc: AnneHysong
Enc.
San Diego Division
9335 Chesapeake Dr., San Diego, CA 92123-1010
TEL (858) 292-2200 FAX (858) 292-2260
STANDARD PACIFICHOMES
August 17, 2000
Mr. Larry Black r
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314
RE: Shorepointe; Landscaping Progress Report
Dear Larry:
We would like to thank you for meeting with us on August 15, 2000 to review the
progress of our landscaping for the Shorepointe Project.
The following is the status of the 4 landscaping items listed on the attached agreement
letter dated July 14, 2000 ( Letter of Agreement).
• 1. The installation of all plants within the San Diego Gas & Electric area has been
completed . As you stated, you believe the plants seem to be taking hold with the
proper coverage and should become well established. Per our discussion, we will
seed the minor planting areas that were disturbed during the installation of the
sycamore trees along the easterly slope. This will be accomplished within two (2)
weeks (8-29-00).
• 2. The planting on the slope behind lots 47-53 will begin on or before September 1,
2000 subject to passing water bacteria tests for the irrigation lines. The relocation of
this irrigation line has been completed and the plan amended per your request. The
amended plan was submitted to you on August 14, 2000 and ready for your
signature. The planting for this slope will take approximately two (2) weeks to
complete.
• 3. The landscape plans have been amended to remove the solar power irrigation
controller. The electric controllers are now installed.
San Dwgo Division
9335 Chesapeake Dr., San Diego, CA 92123-1010
TEL (858) 292-2200 FAX (858) 292-2260
• 4. As you are aware the power pole has been removed from lot 133. Once the last
power pole is removed (behind lot 41) by San Diego Gas & Electric, we will initiate
the necessary fine grading for the entire area that encompassed the power lines.
Subsequent to the fine grading, the planting of the minor slope on lot 133 will be
initiated. Per your request, our landscaping team will focus on item 2 above to its
completion prior to completing this item.
At this time, we feel that we have shown you our commitment to completing all items
within our agreement by evidence of substantial progress. Not only are we very pleased
with a rapid progress that has been made but also with the health of the plants and trees.
Given this accomplishment, we request that Phase 3 building permits be released as
Phase 3 Plot Plans have been submitted and are currently being reviewed at the City.
In closing, I would like to reassure you that Standard Pacific is committed to addressing
these issues through completion as well as any additional concerns that may arise
throughout the duration of this project.
Thank you again for your understanding and confidence in our development team. Please
feel free to call me directly at 858-292-2299 office, cell 760-420-5254.
Sincerely,
STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES
Tom Farrar
Project Manager
cc: Gary Wayne, City of Carlsbad, Planning Department
Jack Henthorn, Jack Henthom & Associates
Anne Hysong, City of Carlsbad, Planning Department
Mike Shirey, City of Carlsbad, Engineering Department
STANDARD PACIF icHOMES
July 14, 2000
Mr. Gary Wayne
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314
Subject: Letter of Agreement: The Shorepointe Project; Phase 2 Building Permits
Dear Gary:
On behalf of Standard Pacific Homes, I would like to like to thank you for your prompt response to our
request for the release of Phase 2 building permits.
As owners of the "Mariano" property (APN 212-040-41) and builder of the Shorepointe Development
(CT 97-14), Standard Pacific Homes hereby agrees to initiate the following actions immediately upon the
City's release of the Phase 2 Building Permits for the Shorepointe project:
1. The installation of all container plants, as indicated on the approved Landscape Plan, on the
valley floor within the SDG&E easement area. This area is located east of Aviara Parkway
and is identified as Lot 137 on the Final Map;
2. The initiation of landscaping, as indicated on the approved Landscape Plan, on the slopes
behind Lots 47 through 53;
3. Amending the approved Landscape Plans to remove the solar powered irrigation controller
valve to a standard City approved electronic controller device, and
4. Immediately following SDG&E's completion of the required work involved with energzing
the underground electrical system for the area, the existing temporary power pole located on
Lot 133 will be removed, fine grading will be completed in accordance to the approved
Grading Plan, and the landscaping will be initiated.
In addition to the above conditions, prior to requesting the issuance of building permits for the Phase 3
homes, Standard Pacific agrees to provide the City with an updated report on the progress of all items
listed above including a request for an on-site field inspection by the City's landscape consultant to
determine whether landscaping installation progress has been proceeding in a satisfactory manner.
San Die go Division
9335 Chesapeake Dr., San Diego, CA 92123-1010
TEL (358; 292-22(?d-FAX (858) 292-2260
In closing, to reiterate the salient points from our conversation, I'd like to reassure you that Standard
Pacific is committed to addressing these issues as well as any additional concerns that may arise
throughout the duration of this project. We are dedicated to providing quality housing and will address all
requirements outlined.
Thank you again for your understanding and confidence in Standard Pacific Homes. Please feel free to
call me directly or the Project Manager, Tom Farrar, at 858-292-2299.
Sincerely,
STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES
todd Palmaer, President
cc: Tom Farrar, Project Manager
Jack Henthom, Jack Henthom and Associates
Anne Hysong, City of Carlsbad, Planning Department
Mike Shirey, City of Carlsbad, Engineering Department
-2-
MEMORANDUM
To: Associate Engineer, Mike Shirey
CC: Chris DeCerbo, Gary Wayne
From: Associate Plann
Date: June 12,2000
Subj: Mariano Subdivision (CT 97-14) Construction Revision
The subject construction revision is approved by the Planning Department
and building permits for the first phase have been released. The revised
landscape plan has been approved and mylars will be submitted by the
applicant for signature. I have informed the applicant that revegetation of
the canyon will be required prior to final inspection approval of the first phase
of homes.
I am also forwarding the Site Development Plan Substantial Conformance
mylars which I requested for Lots 138-151 for your signature. This exhibit
was requested because the buildings footprint on these lots were altered on
building plans. The revised grading is not reflected on these plans; we
probably should have them add it to the mylars before we sign to make all
plans consistent.
MEMORANDUM
To: Associate Engineer, Mike Shirey
CC: Chris DeCerbo, Gary Wayne
From: Associate Planner, Anne Hysong
Date: June 5, 2000
Re: Mariano Subdivision (CT 97-14) Construction Revision
I have attached the landscape plan check print completed by myself and
Larry Black. The applicant should return the check print with the revised
landscape plan. I have also advised Jack Henthorn that we need
correspondence from the Coastal Commission staff that they have approved
the revegetation plan. I have also attached the Substantial Conformance
(SCE) mylar submitted by the applicant. This is being returned because I
would like the fire suppression zones shown on this exhibit. I have asked for
assurance that the fire suppression zones shown on the landscape plan
have not been changed from the approved plan and now see the need for
the zones to be added to the site plan for future reference.
I am in receipt of a letter from Sempra Energy approving the grading in the
SDG&E easement. There is still a question regarding the revegetation
proposed within the easement, however, this is a separate issue that the
City will negotiate with SDG&E. A limited number of building permits will be
issued prior to resolution of this issue.
Upon revision of the landscape plan and SCE exhibit as requested, the
Planning Department will approve the construction revision.
06/02/2060 08:17 7604380981 HENTHORN PAGE 01
JACK H DNTHORN & ASSOCIATES
LE [TER OF TRANSMITTAL
To: Anne Hysong
Of: Cityof Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Ave.
Carlsbad, Ca. 92008
Phone: 602 4622
Fax: 6028559
Date: 6/2/00
RE: Mariano Coastal Deed
FORWARDED BY:
O HAND DELIVERY Q U.S. MAIlJ
Pages Description
1 Transmittal
2 Letter to Ponder (witfiout attachments)
COMMENTS:
This is a copy of a tetter that I sent to
small encroachment into the deed resfricted
think this was a big deal and simply asljjed
It is my understanding from Ray Martir
final release of the major construction
to contact Ponder this morning to aga i
response that is consistent with his ear er comments
I am really not sure at this point why th
non issue on an 11 year old
has not responded to a detailed descrif
I will call you after I give Ponder a call.
Copies to: File
Lloyd Hubbs
Tom Farrar
From: Jack E, Henthorn
Of: Jack Henthorn & Associates
5375 Avenida Encinas, Suite D
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Phone: (760) 438-4090
Fax: (760)438-0981
Time: 7:44 AM
strlcted area encroachment
S FAX COURIER D PRINTER
'onder in follow up to earlier conversations with him regarding the
area. In conversation with me, he indicated that he did not
ed that I document what he and I had discussed earlier.
that Ray was told that the Coastal response is now holding up the
hange that you and Mike Shirey are processing. I am going to try
ask for a response. I think the lack of a response is, in fact, a
i City would want to hold up this project over what appears to be a
easement hat the City is not a party to, when the party holding the easement
ion of the situation.
86/02/2000 08:17 7604380981 HENTHORN PAGE 02
JackK enthorn & Associates
5 \75 Avenida Entinas, Suite D
Carlsbad, California 92008
(760) 438-4090
Fax (760) 438-0981
May 5,2000
Mr. William Ponder
California Coastal Commission
3111 Cammo del Rio North
San Diego, California 92108
Subject: Encroachment into deed
Dear Mr. Ponder:
estricted area - Mariano
In the course of routine City Inspection of construction activity on the Mariano site it was
discovered that a minor amount of Encroachment had occurred in a 0.635 acre deed restricted,
area near the southeastern corner ofthe subject site. This restriction was granted to the. Coastal
Commission as a part of the. Laurel 1
of 1989
The encroachment is approx
restricted area (Enclosure 1). It is i
speculated that since the area was h
opecSfbr may have misjudged th
reveaetauon/restoration.
Vee financial parcel map approval (CDP 6-88-531) in March
mately 25 feet in width along the northern boundary of the
nclear as to how the encroachment occurred, although it is
ghly degraded from illegal dumping activity, the equipment
limits when he was preparing the adjacent area for
The total amount of encroac|ment into the easement area is 4150 square feet. Since there
is no detailed biological survey information for the deed restricted area, we were required to rely
on historic photographs to establish the amount of vegetation impacted. It is estimated that
approximately 2280 square feet of legetation was disturbed. The biological analysis conducted
by Anita Hay worth in 1995 (En;
approximately 30%. A revised la
shows the revegation/restoration p
approved by the California Departr ient of Fish and Game and United States Fish and Wildlife
Service. The revegetation plan wi
mitigation ratio in excess of 6 to 1.
blosure 2) indicated that the coverage in this area was
dscape plan has been filed with the City of Carlsbad that
an for the area incorporated into the revegetation plan as
1 result in the entire disturbed area being revegetated for a
-1-
86/02/2088 08:17 7604380981 HENTHORN PAGE 03
If you need additional ii
at your earliest convenience.
information or would like to discuss this matter, please contact me
—'encl. Map of encroachment area
Biological Study dated Januaj
cc: file
y10, 1995
-2-
F:\MARJANO\Grading encroachmenLdoc
06/01/2000 11:31 7604380981
JUH-01-00 QIM1AM FRONTWARD PACIFIC
SempraEnergy
June 1,2000
MrTboaasFarrar
Standard Pacific Homes
9335 C
HENTHORN
Sin Diego, CA 92123
RE: Mariano, letter of Apjrfoval
DearMr.F«i»r
Thank you fox informing us of the |equiied w-gradlng that was necesaary vrifliin our easemwt «
the Shorepoint project site. We Unttkaail that the easement area had several severe erosion and
stability Issues that required these!
Aftcf reviewing your engmaeitd
droimge imjaownuwts, we
id required to perfbrm proper
included site/spot elevations and installed
that the changes will enhance our ability to gain access that
lance to our wasting power tines and associated structures.
"We, ibarefijTB, approve of the change* noted on the submitted plans.
PAGE 02
Mil/01 F-319
If you have any questions please cfll me at (858) 654-1235.
Sincerely,
TOTflL P.01
fSTANDARD PACIFICHOMES
April 28, 2000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
City Of
V</. Carlsbad ,; y
Debbie Fountain \ ,-y
Director of Housing and Redevelopment v— - - -- >-x
City of Carlsbad "--—L:.-.-"
2965 Roosevelt Street, Suite B
Carlsbad, California 92008
Subject: Mariano Affordable Housing
Dear Debbie:
Standard Pacific Homes entered into an affordable housing agreement with the City of Carlsbad
on July 21, 1999. The agreement restricts development of housing units on the ShorePoint
(formerly Mariano) subdivision in relationship to construction phasing of the required
inclusionary units. This agreement was entered into in anticipation that Standard pacific would
diligently pursue the funding and construction of a 27 unit affordable housing project and that
the City would assist in this effort.
At this point, Standard pacific has entered into a relationship with the non profit organization,
Wakeland Housing to pursue tax credit and other sources of funding. Wakeland has successfully
obtained $135,000 in funding from the Federal Affordable Housing Program and has expended
significant predevelopment funding ($75,000) while pursuing a minor amendment to the
originally approved site plan.
Wakeland has now filed two tax credit applications. Standard Pacific has transferred ownership
of the fully graded property to Wakeland to assist them in maximizing the number of points used
to evaluate tax credit applications. The first application, filed in June of 1999, was not
successful due to the fact that they were not awarded readiness points since the amended site
plan has not been approved by the City. The second application was filed in March of this year
and it now appears as though they will not be successful due to the inability to obtain rediness
points because the amendment was not completed prior to the filing date. At this point there is
still no formally established hearing date for this staff "supported" amendment. It is rumored
that it could be before the Planning Commission on June 7. However, since staff indicates that
the Coastal Development Permit amendment must be heard by the City Council, this may not be
early enough to insure a successful application.
The next opportunity to file for tax credit funding will be June 15, 2000. We are now at the point
where delays in obtaining approvals will impact our production schedule and could begin to
jeopardize our funding.
San Diego Division
9335 Chesapeake Dr., San Diego, CA 92123-1010
TEL (858) 292-22(30- FAX (858) 292-2260
Standard Pacific has models under construction and is approaching the point where we will be
pulling building permits for production units. It is anticipated that we will pull the permits
allocated in the existing agreement by mid July. In order to maintain our production while the
next tax credit application is being processed it will be necessary to pull an additional 46 permits.
This will leave 51 permits remaining to be pulled.
Therefore we are requesting that the limit on permit issuance be modified to allow the issuance
of up to 97 residential building permits prior to the start of construction of the affordable units in
the Vista las Flores project.
Sincerely,
Thomas C. Farrar
Project Manager
cc: file
C. Ruiz, Housing and Redevelopment
A. Hysong, Planning Department
G. Wayne, Planning Department
M. Orenyak, Community Development Director
K. Sauder, Wakeland Housing
J. Henthorn
-2-
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 24, 2000
TO: Landscape Consultant, Larry Black
FROM: Associate Planner, Anne Hysong ^
cc: Chris DeCerbo
SUBJECT: MARIANO REVEGETATION PLAN
Thank you for your inquiry regarding the revegetation of the Coastal Deed Restricted open space. The
landscape proposal within the Coastal Deed Restricted open space must be reviewed and approved by
Coastal Commission staff. I have asked the applicant to submit a letter from the Coastal Commission
indicating what action they will take regarding the encroachment, and if revegetation is acceptable, their
agreed upon revegetation plan. This is all part of their "construction revision" that as far as I know has not
yet been submitted to the Engineering Department. When you have completed your plan check, please
submit your comments and check print to me. I will return it to the Engineering Department as part of the
Planning Department's response to the construction revision request so that the applicant will receive one
comprehensive response from the City.
I was unable to ascertain the boundaries of the proposed revegetation on the attached map. Would you
please ask the applicant to identify the entir-e area of unauthorized grading on this map. The area within
the canyon "floor" proposed to be planted with unirrigated Seed Mix B should be revegetated with the
same plant mix they are proposing in other areas. Is there a reason why they can't provide temporary
irrigation? They basically graded the entire canyon, so in my opinion, they should have to revegetate all
areas they disturbed with a combination of native plant species.
If you have any questions, let me know (extension 4622).
|ck Henthorn & Associa^s
5375 Avenida Enemas, Suite D
Carlsbad, California 92008
(760)438-4090
Fax (760) 438-0981
April 13, 2000
Anne Hysong
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Ave.
Carlsbad, Ca. 92008
Subject: Aviara Parkway wall/landscape treatment - Shore Pointe (Mariano)
Dear Anne:
I have reviewed the plans for the noise walls along Aviara Parkway, through the Shore
Pointe development. The wall along the west side of Aviara Parkway is at the top of the adjacent
slope. It is doubtful that the wall will be noticeable from the roadway due to the horizontal
separation and the elevation differential.
The wall is potentially more noticeable on the east side due to the fact that there is less
horizontal separation and it is at grade with the road. However, the landscape plans show that the
wall will be screened with a combination of shrubs and trees. The plan indicates that the
foreground will be planted with Yellow Trailing Gazania, the next planting zone will consist of a
combination of dense low growing shrubs (Carmel Creeper - to 2.5 feet) and screening material
(Strawberry Tree - pruned to take shrub form to 8 feet and Oleander - dense at 4 to 5 feet). In
addition, both of these areas will contain Liquid Amber and Canary Island Pine trees.
In summary, it would appear that the noise walls along Aviara Parkway will not be
perceived as creating a stark barrier due to the horizontal (average in excess of 100 feet) and
vertical (average 35 feet) separation from the roadway on the west side and the soft visual edge
created by the landscape treatment on the east side.
Please call me if you have questions or need additional information.
cc: Tom Farrar
Bob Wilkinson
file
-1-
April 13,2000
Anne Hysong
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Ave.
Carlsbad, Ca. 92008
Henthorn &
5375 Avenida Encinas, Suite D
• Carlsbad, California 92008
(760) 438-4090
Fax (760) 438-0981
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING DEPT.
4
Subject: Shore Pointe (Mariano) Architecture - Minor Product Adjustments
Dear Anne:
Enclosed are the following items requested during our meeting on Tuesday, April 11,
2000, relating to minor product adjustments: .
1. One mylar of the approved substantial conformity lot layout plotted
with the adjusted product
2. Three blue line prints of item 1
3. Three sets of blue line prints of the adjusted floor plans and elevations
4. Three sets of tables confirming that the footprint of the adjusted units is
consistent with the approved yards
5. Three sets of exhibits with the adjusted areas hi - lited in yellow
Standard Pacific is anxious to move forward with the plan check process so that they can
pull their model home permits and start phase one of their production units. I will check with
you the first of next week to discuss the timing for getting their building plans into the plan
check process.
We have broken the items discussed during our meeting into three packages. The first of
these packages is forwarded with this transmittal. The second package will relate to the
encroachment into the deed restricted open space area and will consist of the impact analysis,
revegetation plan and Coastal Commission response. It is anticipated that this package will be
submitted late next week, dependent upon availability of Coastal staff. • The final package will
consist of grading related issues and will be addressed through the submittal of the Major
Construction Change package requested by the Engineering Department
There are three miscellaneous issues that were discussed that will be addressed
independently. The sales trailer issue will be addressed in a letter directly from Standard Pacific.
If will address the relocation of the trailer and will include a site plan for the existing temporary
location along with pictures of the existing facility.
Retaining wall plans will be modified to include the finished grade elevation and the wall
height above finished grade. This will be done by Hunsaker as a part of their standard plan
check process.
-1-
The Aviara Parkway wall issue is addressed in a letter accompanying this transmittal.
This approach should result in the resolution of all outstanding issues related to the Shore
Pointe project. If you have any comments regarding this approach, please contact me at your
convenience. . , . •
The new team at Standard Pacific is committed to resolving these issues in a timely
manner and looks forward to working with you toward that end.
encl.
cc: Tom Farrar
Lex Williman
.file
-2-
04/11/2080 09:07 7604380981 HENTHORN PAGE 02
DATE:
TIME:
LOCATION:
Attendees:
Aprill 1,2000
1:30 P.M.
City of Carlsbad- 1
City of Carlsbad
Chris DeCe
Skip Hamtr
Anne Hyso
Mike Shire
3.
4.
5.
Standard Pacific
Todd Palm
Tom Farrar
Lex Willim^n
Jack Henth
lntroduction
Grading Issues
a. Slope Remediation
b. Field modifications
Biological Issues
a. Open space disturba
b. Revegetation of ope
Miscellaneous
a. Noise wall modifica
b. Basin access ~~
c. Retaining Walls •—
d. Sales trailer
Architecture
a. ^Plan check status -
b. Minor second story
AGENDA
OREPOINTE PROJECT
(Mariano)
35 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad California
bo,
ond
g
er, President, San Diego Division
Project Manager, San Diego Division
, Hunsaker & Associates (Consultant)
rn, Jack Henthom & Associates (Consultant)
As-built plans)
ce
space disturbed area
ons
sfmements
MAH9-00 02:38PM
DUDEK
& ASSOCIATES, INC.
FROM-STANDARD PACIFIC S,D,
Engineering, Planning,
Environmental Sciences and
Management Services
858-292-2250
Corporate Office:
605 Third Straat
Encinitas, California 92024
T-700 P.02/02 F-606
560.942.5147
Fax 780.632.0164
24 March 2000 .400000-300
TomFarrar ['.'..-'•"! c: $ ?vc;~
Standard Pacific Homes
9335 Chesapeake Dr. ' -,^, - ~
San Diego, Ca 92123
Re: Mariano Revegetation Plant Materials
Dear Mr. Farrar:
As requested by you, I have reviewed the revised revegetation plans prepared by Wilkinson
Design Group for the Mariano Property in Carlsbad. On 14 January 1998,1 had prepared a
recommend container and seedmix plant list for the property that included native plants that are
typical of coastal sage scrub and are found within the region and this location in particular.
Since that time, the construction design has changed somewhat, however the plant list is
identical to what was used previously and to what I had recommended initially. The slope
revegetation should result in restoration of the graded slopes to coastal sage scrub upon
completion of the implementation.
If you have any questions regarding this letter report, please feel free to contact me at (760)
942-5147.
Very truly yours,
DUDEK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Anita M. Hay wo,
Ecologist/Senior
i.D.
6ject Manager
GEOCON
INCORPORATED
GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS
Project No. 06195-12-03
March 20, 2000
Standard Pacific Homes
9335 Chesapeake Drive
San Diego, California 92123
Attention: Mr. Thomas C. Farrar
Subject: MARIANO
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
SLOPE REMEDIAL GRADING: LOTS 125 THROUGH 133
Reference: Interim Report of Testing and Observation Services During Site Grading, Mariano,
Lots 1 Through 14, 19 Through 41, 43, 44, 75 Through 86, 88 Through 103, 105
Through 136 and 138 Through 151, Carlsbad, California, prepared by Geocon
Incorporated, dated February 25, 2000.
Gentlemen:
In accordance with the request of Ms. Anne Hysong, City of Carlsbad Planning Department, this
letter has been prepared to present a discussion of the reasons for grading within the slope area
located at the rear of Lots 125 through 133 within the Mariano residential development.
During the early phases of planned lot grading along the east side of the SDG&E easement, it became
apparent that the slope, originally to remain natural, should be remediated for the reasons as
discussed below.
Lots 125-129
The landslide originally mapped along this slope and to the north of these lots was observed during
grading to extend further to the south. The landslide was relatively shallow in depth in the area of
Lots 125 through 129. The slope was severely eroded with gullies of up to 10 feet deep. In our
opinion, the landslide debris presented a serious potential long-term stability issue regarding these
lots. For this reason, the slope required regrading to remove the landslide debris to reconstruct a
stable slope. The slope was regraded to essentially the original inclination of approximately 3:1
(horizontal: vertical).
Lots 130-133
Within this area it was evident that previous grading (agricultural?) had denuded the natural
vegetation. Hence, the slope had experienced severe erosion, with gullies of up to 6 feet deep. This
condition presented a serious potential erosion/stability issue with respect to the bordering residential
lots. For this reason, it was evident that some form of remedial grading would be required to infill the
6960 Flanders Drive • San Diego, California 92121-2974 • Telephone (858) 558-6900 • Fax (858) 558-6159
deeper erosional features at a minimum. The concern was that on a long-term basis, the erosion
would progress up slope and adversely impact the residential improvements within the lots.
Ultimately, the slope was regraded, including infilling all the gullies and track-walking the finish
slope with a D-8 bulldozer. Final slope inclination essentially remained at the original 3:1
(horizontahvertical).
Details of the grading as discussed above are presented in the referenced report, copy attached, in the
section entitled Slopes, (page 3).
If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, or if we may be of further service, please
contact the undersigned at your convenience.
Very truly yours,
GEOCONINCORPORA'
.eake'
RCE 22527
enclosure: Referenced report dated February 25, 2000.
DFL:lek
(1) Addressee
(1) Jack Henthom & Associates
Attention: Mr. Jack Henthorn
Project No. 06195-12-03 -2-March 20, 2000
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
February 1, 2000
Jack Henthorn & Associates
Ste D
5375 Avenida Encinas
Carlsbad CA 92008
SUBJECT: PRE 99-77 - MARIANO SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE REVIEW
The Planning Director has completed a review of your application for substantial
conformance, (APN: 212-040-41). After careful consideration of the circumstances
surrounding this request, the Planning Director has determined that the application qualifies
for substantial conformance with the approved permit and therefore, approves the changes
to the project based on Planning Director Administrative Policy No. 35.
I am enclosing the mylar copy of the amended site plan that was included with the last
plan submittal. Please add the "Substantial Conformance" stamp to the mylar and submit
for signature by the Planning Director prior to issuance of any building permits for the
projects.
CITY OF CARLSBAD
MICHAEL J.THOL2
Planning Director
ILLER
MJH:AH:cs
Attachments
c: Principal Planner, Chris DeCerbo
Project Engineer, Mike Shirey
File Copy
Data Entry
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-46OO • FAX (760) 602-8559
MARIANO
SETBACK SUMMARY
(Comparison between Sub. Conf. Exhibit of 2/11/00 and Sub. Conf. Exhibit of 4/6/00)
New
Lot
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
Old
Lot
4
3
2
1
54
55
56
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
101
102
103
104
105
106
New
Plan
1
4
3
2
1
4
1
2
3
1
2
4
1
3
4
3
2
1
4
3
1
3
4
1
4
2
3
2
1
3
4
1
3
2
4
-
Old
Plan
1
4
3
2
1
4
1
2
3
1
2
4
1
3
4
3
4
3
1
3
1
2
4
1
4
2
3
2
1
3
4
1
3
2
4
-
Front Setback
Approved
20
20
25
20
20
30
38.7
25
20
25
20
24.5
20
20.9
30
21.5
23
25
25.9
25
24
28.2
30
20
27
15
22
20
20.4
20
20.3
20
20
20
20
Proposed
20
20
25
20
20
30
38.7
25
20
25
20
24.5
20
20.9
30
21.5
23
25
25.9
25
24
28.2
30
20
27
15
22
20
20.4
20
20.3
20
20
20
20
% Change
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Rear Setback
Approved
116
123.3
105.6
96.1
73.1
62.6
43.4
72.5
83
96.3
16.1
10
21.4
20
19.7
41.8
33.2
29.3
31.8
19.5
73.7
54.8
37.4
30.9
28.8
50.5
48.1
33.2
44.6
20.2
15
17.7
25
28
25
Proposed
116
123.3
105.6
96.1
73.1
62.6
43.4
72.3
83
96.3
16.1
10
19.5
20
19.7
41.8
33.2
29.3
31.5
19.5
73.7
54.8
37.2
30.9
29.4
50.5
48.1
33.2
44.6
20.2
15
17.7
25
28
25
% Change
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-8.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-0.5%
0.0%
2.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Left Side Setback
Approved
10
8.3
12
8
8
10
9.7
8
8
8
10
7.2
7.5
10.3
6.6
10
9.9
7
6.4
10.6
6.5
7
7
6.8
9
23.1
22
7
7
6.9
7
7
10
13
13
Proposed
10
8.3
12
8
8
10
9.7
8
8
8
10
7.2
7.5
10.3
6.6
10
9.9
7
6.4
10.6
6.5
7
7
6.8
9
23.1
22
7
7
6.9
7
7
10
13
13
% Change
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Right Side Setback
Approved
54.1
5
7
8
7.1
7.3
5
9.4
7.2
7.3
19
9
8.3
8
7.2
12.9
10
7.5
7.3
8
6.5
7.3
13.5
7.3
8.1
14
24.2
10.6
10
8
5.5
8
8
5
7
Proposed
54.1
5
7
8
7.1
7.3
5
9.4
7.2
7.3
19
9
8.3
8
7.2
12.9
10
7.5
7.3
8
6.5
7.3
13.5
7.3
7.8
14
24.2
10.6
10
8
5.5
8
8
5
7
% Change
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-3.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
COMMqN RECREATION LOT
PLANNING:\Miscellaneous\2240 Standard Pacific\Mariano\2240-3 SCE Sum Tbl.v11a.xls.xls
TAB: Revsd Format -New*
Updated on 4/9/00 MM
Printed on 4/9/00
MARIANO
SETBACK SUMMARY
(Comparison between Sub. Conf. Exhibit of 2/11/00 and Sub. Conf. Exhibit of 4/6/00)
New
Lot
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
Old
Lot
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
134
133
132
131
130
129
128
127
126
125
124
123
100
99
98
97
136
135
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
96
95
New
Plan
3
2
4
1
3
4
3
3
1
4
3
2
3
1
3
1
2
4
3
1
4
1
3
1
4
3
2
1
1
2
2
3
4
1
4
Old
Plan
3
2
4
1
3
4
3
3
1
4
3
2
3
1
3
1
2
4
3
1
4
1
3
1
4
1
2
1
1
2
1
3
1
1
4
Front Setback
Approved
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
26
25.5
28.7
20
20
20
20
20.2
23.2
24.8
20.6
20.2
24
20
20
35
20
20
25.2
28
20
21.1
25
20
20
20
20
20
Proposed
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
26
25.5
28.7
20
20
20
20
20.2
23.2
24.8
20.6
20.2
24
20
20
35
20
20
25.2
28
20
21.1
25
20
20
20
20
20
% Change
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Rear Setback
Approved
25
28
25
17.7
25
25
25
63.4 *
33.4
24.5
25.7
36.6
36.8
40
49.5
46
50.5
53.5
27.3
24.7
36
28.7
39.5
15.1
15.3
14.8
18.7
17.6
15.2
20
21.2
17.3
19.8
24.2
26.2
Proposed
fiagjyfffij^PPIff^O
25
28
25
17.7
25
25
25
63.4
33.4
24.5
25.7
36.6
36.8
40
49.5
46
50.5
53.5
27.3
24.7
36
28.7
39.5
15.1
15.3
14.8
18.7
17.6
15.2
20
21.2
17.3
19.8
24.2
26.2
% Change
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
' 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Left Side Setback
Approved
KHiftOWi
10
13
10
10
10
10
25.9
7
6.5
7
7
10
9.1
8
10.1
8.9
12
7
5
5
7
7
16
7.5
7.5
7.3
8
5
7.2
10
7.8
8
5
5
7
Proposed
10
13
10
10
10
10
25.9
7
6.5
7
7
10
9.1
8
10.1
8.9
12
7
5
5
7
7
16
7.5
7.5
7.3
8
5
7.2
10
7.8
8
5
5
7
% Change
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Right Side Setback
Approved
5
5
7
5
5
5
10
10
7.6
8
8.4
12.8
10
10.8
9
6.7
7.1
5.1
9.5
11.7
10
8
8
6.4
6.5
6.4
7
5.9
5
7
6.5
7
7
15.5
10
Proposed
5
5
7
5
5
5
10
10
7.6
8
8.4
12.8
10
10.8
9
6.7
7.1
5.1
9.5
11.7
10
8
8
6.4
6.5
6.4
7
5.9
5
7
6.5
7
7
15.5
10
% Change
!f|pIO}0,%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
PLANNING:\Miscellaneous\2240 Standard Pacific\Mariano\2240-3 SCE Sum Tbl.v11a.xls.xls
TAB: Revsd Format -New*
Updated on 4/9/00 MM
Printed on 4/9/00
MARIANO
SETBACK SUMMARY
(Comparison between Sub. Conf. Exhibit of 2/11/00 and Sub. Conf. Exhibit of 4/6/00)
New
Lot
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
Old
Lot
94
93
92
91
90
89
88
87
76
75
74
73
72
71
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
47
46
45
44
New
Plan
1
2
3
1
3
1
4
1
3
1
3
1
3
2
1
2
3
2
1
4
2
1
2
4
1
3
4
2
4
1
3
1
1
3
4
3
Old
Plan
1
2
3
1
3
1
4
1
3
1
3
1
3
2
1
2
3
2
1
4
2
1
2
4
1
3
4
2
4
1
3
1
1
3
4
3
Front Setback
Approved
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
28.3
20.8
20
20
20.2
28.7
20
26
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
22.5
20
20
20
20
20
20
Proposed
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
28.3
20.8
20
20
20.2
28.7
20
26
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
22.5
20
20
20
20
20
20
% Change
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Rear Setback
Approved
16.6
14.7
39.2
34.5
45.8
41.9
64.3
66.8
80.9
75.7
86.4
76.5
83.8
84.1
136.4
142.2
146.9
151.9
211.7
138 *
139.4
132.6
135.2
127.7
114.4
117.7
112.5
110
105.9
106.6
125
136.3
79.4
87
78
70.3
Proposed
16.6
14.5
39.2
34.5
45.8
41.9
63.9
66.8
80.9
75.7
86.4
76.5
83.8
84.1
136.4
142.2
146.9
151.9
211.7
138
139.4
132.6
135.2
127.7
114.4
117.7
112.5
110
105.9
106.6
125
136.3
79.4
87
78
70.3
% Change
0.0%
-1.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
• 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%— I— 1
Left Side Setback
Approved
6.8
17.3
8
8
8
7.7
7.5
8.3
7.3
6
5
5.9
5
64.6 *
8
7
10
13
8
5.6
10
8
13
13
5
7
7
8
7.3
9.1
8.2
7
11.5
10
15
15
Proposed
6.8
17.3
8
8
8
7.7
7.5
8.3
7.3
6
5
5.9
5
64.6
8
7
10
13
8
5.6
10
8
13
13
5
7
7
8
7.3
9.1
8.2
7
11.5
10
15
15
% Change
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Right Side Setback
Approved
8.2
L_ 8
10
7
7
7
8
8
7.6
7.9
10
10
10
31
9.1
10
7
7
6.2
10
7
7
7
10
8
13
12
13
5
7.9
8
10
5
5
7
10.1
Proposed
8.2
8
10
7
7
7
8
8
7.6
7.9
10
10
10
31
9.1
10
7
7
6.2
10
7
7
7
10
8
13
12
13
5
7.9
8
10
5
5
7
10.1
% Change
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
KANNING:\Miscellaneous\2240 Standard Pacific\Mariano\2240-3 SCE Sum Tbl.v11a.xls.xls
TAB: Revsd Formal -New*
Updated on 4/9/00 MM
Printed on 4/9/00
MARIANO
SETBACK SUMMARY
(Comparison between Sub. Conf. Exhibit of 2/11/00 and Sub. Conf. Exhibit of 4/6/00)
New
Lot
Old
Lot
New
Plan
Old
Plan
Front Setback
Approved Proposed Change
Rear Setback
Approved Proposed % Change
Left Side Setback
Approved Proposed % Change
Right Side Setback
Approved Proposed % Change
109 43 25 25 0.0%60.4 60.4 0.0%10 10 0.0%6.9 6.9 0.0%
110 42 20 20 0.0%59 59 0.0%0.0%5.1 5.1 0.0%
111 34 20 20 0.0%66.4 66.4 0.0%10 10 0.0%0.0%
112 33 20 20 0.0%69.3 69.3 0.0%13 13 0.0%0.0%
113 32 20 20 0.0%66.3 66.3 0.0%15 15 0.0%0.0%
114 31 20 20 0.0%69.2 69.2 0.0%15 15 0.0%0.0%
115 30 25 25 0.0%61.3 61.3 0.0%15 15 0.0%7.4 7.4 0.0%
116 29 20.5 20.5 0.0%63.6 63.6 0.0%12.9 12.9 0.0%9.1 9.1 0.0%
117 28 30 30 0.0%75.9 75.7 -0.3%10 10 0.0%6.8 6.8 0.0%
118 27 25.7 25.7 0.0%95.8 95.8 0.0%0.0%0.0%
119 26 20 20 0.0%15 15 0.0%10 10 0.0%0.0%
120 25 20 20 0.0%22 22 0.0%15 15 0.0%0.0%
121 35 20 20 0.0%13.5 13.5 0.0%9.9 9.9 0.0%16 16 0.0%
122 36 20 20 0.0%26.5 26.5 0.0%0.0%15 15 0.0%
123 37 20 20 0.0%23.8 23.8 0.0%0.0%0.0%
124 38 20 20 0.0%13.8 13.8 0.0%0.0%10 10 0.0%
125 39 20 20 0.0%20.2 20.2 0.0%0.0%13 13 0.0%
126 40 20 20 0.0%34 34 0.0%0.0%10 10 0.0%
127 41 20 20 0.0%71.7 71.7 0.0%0.0%10 10 0.0%
128 48 20 20 0.0%92.6 92.4 -0.2%0.0%10 10 0.0%
129 49 20 20 0.0%72.2 72.2 0.0%5.3 5.3 0.0%10 10 0.0%
130 50 20 20 0.0%44.7 44.4 -0.7%0.0%10 10 0.0%
131 51 22 22 0.0%25.6 25.6 0.0%10 10 0.0%13 13 0.0%
132 52 23 23 0.0%19.1 19.1 0.0%0.0%13 13 0.0%
133 53 20 20 0.0%34.6 34.6 0.0%0.0%43.8 43.8 0.0%
134 MULTI-FAMILY
135 57 PRIVATE STREET "A"
PLANNING:\Miscellaneous\2240 Standard Pacific\Mariano\2240-3 SCE Sum Tbl.v11a.xls.xls
TAB: Revsd Format -New*
Updated on 4/9/00 MM
Printed on 4/9/00
MARIANO
SETBACK SUMMARY
(Comparison between Sub. Conf. Exhibit of 2/11/00 and Sub. Conf. Exhibit of 4/6/00)
New
Lot
v147%
V,148~:fu&,.
150V
1511.
—
—
—
—
~
Old
Lot
15
16,,
17^'"X,
1 19^
20
21
22
23
24
Old
Plan
'2,
,'4V•A2 ;•
t .3,'.-w
New
Plan
,.,2,*
v4
c'2 . ,
•M
,M*
Front Setback
Approved
V , -20 .
>- .^20
.,^<I0.7"'
,^4«;35,5s
,f r.20f
Proposed
*,' 20
>::<"^2Q
v. '.:*•;! 0.7
V« *35.5
- * t*. ;. 20
% Change
• 0.0%
„' . 0.0%
.T~ 0-0%
' '0.0%
0.0%
Rear Setback
Approved
. 31.3
19.7
" 5
> 32,2
• 15.2
Proposed
' 31 3
1 -'19.7
- ' " 5
, 32.2
14.8
% Change
0.0%
00%
, 0 0%
0.0%
-2.6%
Left Side Setback
Approved
11
10
184
• 5
8.5
Proposed
11
10
18.4
• 5
6.3
% Change
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
,-259%
Right Side Setback
Approved
10
• ' .,18
24
8.7
178
Proposed
10
18
24
8.7
20
% Change
0.0%
00%
0.0%
00%
124%
LOTS ELIMINATED - SEE NOTE 1
LOTS ELIMINATED - SEE NOTE 1
LOTS ELIMINATED - SEE NOTE 1
LOTS ELIMINATED - SEE NOTE 1
LOTS ELIMINATED - SEE NOTE 1
Setback either not denoted or incorrectly denoted on Approved February 2000 Site Plan Sub. Conf. Exh. Setbacks shown here
reflects what the corrected dimension is.
MARIANO
SETBACK SUMMARY
New
Lot
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
Old
Lot
4
3
2
1
54
55
56
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
101
102
103
104
105
New
Plan
1
4
3
2
1
4
1
2
3
1
2
4
1
3
4
3
2
1
4
3
1
3
4
1
4
2
3
2
1
3
4
1
3
2
4
Old
Plan
1
4
3
2
1
4
1
2
3
1
2
4
1
3
4
3
4
3
1
3
1
2
4
1
4
2
3
2
1
3
4
1
3
2
4
Front Setback
Approved
20
20
25
20
20
30 *
35
25
20
25
20
20
20
20
30
20
23
25
20
25
20
28
30
20
27
15
24
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
Proposed
20
20
25
20
20
30
38.7
25
20
25
20
24.5
20
20.9
30
21.5
23
25
25.9
25
24
28.2
30
20
27
15
22
20
20.4
20
20.3
20
20
20
20
% Change
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
10.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
22.5%
0.0%
4.5%
0.0%
7.5%
0.0%
0.0%
29.5%
0.0%
20.0%
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-8.3%
0.0%
2.0%
0.0%
1.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Rear Setback
Approved
117*
124*
107
97
74
60
48
73
83
98
17
12
13
21
21
46
31
40 *
31
19
76
58
37
33
29
54
45
33
43
21
15
20
25
28
25
Proposed
116
123.3
105.6
97
74
62.7
43.4
73
84
92
16.1
10
21.4
20
19.7
41.8
33.2
29.3
31.8
19.5
74
54.8
37
30.9
28.8
50.5
48.1
33.2
44.6
20.2
15
17.7
25
28
25
% Change
-0.9%
-0.6%
-1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
4.5%
-9.6%
0.0%
1 .2%
-6.1%
-5.3%
-16.7%
64.6%
-4.8%
-6.2%
-9.1%
7.1%
-26.8%
2.6%
2.6%
-2.6%
-5.5%
0.0%
-6.4%
-0.7%
-6.5%
6.9%
0.6%
3.7%
-3.8%
0.0%
-11.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Left Side Setback
Approved
10
8
12
8
8
10
10
8
8
8
10
8
7
9
5
10
9
7
7
10
7
7
7
7
9
23
22
7
7
6
7
7
10
13
13
Proposed
10
8.3
12
8
8
10
9.7
8
8
8
10
7.2
7.5
10.3
6.6
10
9.9
7
6.4
10.6
6.5
7
7
6.8
9
23.1
22
7
7
6.9
7
7
10
13
13
% Change
0.0%
3.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-3.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-10.0%
7.1%
14.4%
32.0%
0.0%
10.0%
0.0%
-8.6%
6.0%
-7.1%
0.0%
0.0%
-2.9%
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1 5.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Right Side Setback
Approved
50
5
7
8
7
7
5
10
7
7
20
10
7
8
8
10
10
6
8
8
7
8
13
8
8
15
24
10
8
8
6
8
8
5
7
Proposed
54.1
5
7
8
7.1
7.3
5
9.4
7.2
7.3
19
9
8.3
8
7.2
12.9
10
7.5
7.3
8
6.5
7.3
13.5
7.3
8.1
14
24.2
10.6
10
8
5.5
8
8
5
7
% Change
8.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
4.3%
0.0%
-6.0%
2.9%
4.3%
-5.0%
-10.0%
18.6%
0.0%
-10.0%
29.0%
0.0%
25.0%
-8.8%
0.0%
-7.1%
-8.8%
3.8%
-8.8%
1.3%
-6.7%
0.8%
6.0%
25.0%
0.0%
-8.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
PLANNING:\Miscellaneous\1758 Ayres Land Co\1758-007 SCE Summary Tbl.v9.xls
TAB: Revsd Format -New*
Updated on 1/14/00 MM
Printed on 1/26/00
MARIANO
SETBACK SUMMARY
36 n°6 - - COMMON RECREATION LOT
PLANNING:\Miscellaneous\1758 Ayres Land Co\1758-007 SCE Summary Tbl.v9.xls Updated on 1/14/00 MM
TAB: Revsd Format -New* Printed on 1/26/00
MARIANO
SETBACK SUMMARY
New
Lot
ic37 A
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
Old
Lot
*«ic
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
134
133
132
131
130
129
128
127
126
125
124
123
100
99
98
97
136
135
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
96
95
New
Plan
2.,
3
2
4
1
3
4
3
3
1
4
3
2
3
1
3
1
2
4
3
1
4
1
3
1
4
3
2
1
1
2
2
3
4
1
4
Old
Plan
I"**2J,
3
2
4
1
3
4
3
3
1
4
3
2
3
1
3
1
2
4
3
1
4
1
3
1
4
1
2
1
1
2
1
3
1
1
4
Front Setback
Approved
> 20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
26
25
27
20
20
20
20
20
20
24
20
20
24
20
20
35
20
20
20
28
20
20
25
20
20
20
20
20
Proposed
-li ,20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
26
25.5
28.7
20
20
20
20
20.2
23.2
24.8
20.6
20.2
24
20
20
35
20
20
25.2
28
20
21.1
25
20
20
20
20
20
% Change
-^ 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
6.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1 .0%
16.0%
3.3%
3.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
26.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Rear Setback
Approved
'If 28.;,
25
28
25
20
25
25
25
67
37
25
26
34
37
40 *
50
51
50
54
22 *
27
36
31
40
16
15
15
18
20
18
18
15
16
15
26
26
Proposed
•It- 128
25
28
25
17.7
25
25
25
65
33.4
24.5
25.7
36.6
36.3
40
49.5
46
50.5
53.5
22
24.7
36
28.7
40
15.1
15.3
14.8
18.7
17.6
15.2
20
21.2
17.3
19.8
24.2
26.2
% Change
T"Q.p$>
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-11.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-3.0%
-9.7%
-2.0%
-1.2%
7.6%
-1.9%
0.0%
-1.0%
-9.8%
1 .0%
-0.9%
0.0%
-8.5%
0.0%
-7.4%
0.0%
-5.6%
2.0%
-1.3%
3.9%
-12.0%
-15.6%
11.1%
4,1.3%
8.1%
32.0%
-6.9%
0.8%
Left Side Setback
Approved
••ft* '10
10
13
10
10
10
10
26
7
7
7
7
10
8
8
9
9
13
7
5
5
7
7
16
8
8
8
8
5
8
10
8
8
5
5
7
Proposed
T ,f?' 10
10
13
10
10
10
10
25.9
7
6.5
7
7
10
9.1
8
10.1
8.9
12
7
5
5
7
7
16
7.5
7.5
7.3
8
5
7.2
10
7.8
8
5
5
7
% Change
* »p:o%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-0.4%
0.0%
-7.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
13.8%
0.0%
12.2%
-1.1%
-7.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-6.3%
-6.3%
-8.8%
0.0%
0.0%
-10.0%
0.0%
-2.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Right Side Setback
Approved
¥' -51*
5
5
7
5
5
5
10
10
8
8
8
13
10
9
9
7
7
5
8
12
10
8
8
7
7
7
7
5 *
5
7
7
7
7
15
10
Proposed
*5
5
7
5
5
5
10
10
7.6
8
8.4
12.8
10
10.8
9
6.7
7.1
5.1
9.5
11.7
10
8
8
6.4
6.5
6.4
7
5.9
5
7
6.5
7
7
15.5
10
% Change
*r 'oro%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
-1.5%
0.0%
20.0%
0.0%
-4.3%
1 .4%
2.0%
18.8%
-2.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-8.6%
-7.1%
-8.6%
0.0%
18.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-7.1%
0.0%
0.0%
3.3%
0.0%
PLANNING:\Miscellaneous\1758 Ayres Land Co\1758-007 SCE Summary Tbl.v9.xls
TAB: Revsd Format -New*
Updated on 1/14/00 MM
Printed on 1/26/00
MARIANO
SETBACK SUMMARY
New
Lot
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
Old
Lot
94
93
92
91
90
89
88
87
76
75
74
73
72
71
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
47
46
45
44
New
Plan
1
2
3
1
3
1
4
1
3
1
3
1
3
2
1
2
3
2
1
4
2
1
2
4
1
3
4
2
4
1
3
1
1
3
4
3
Old
Plan
v
2
3
7
3
f
4
1
3
1
3
1
3
2
1
2
3
2
1
4
2
1
2
4
1
3
4
2
4
1
3
1
1
3
4
3
Front Setback
Approved
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
28
20
20
20
20
28
20
27
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
Proposed
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
21.5
20
28.3
20.8
20
20
20.2
28.7
20
26
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
22.5
20
20
20
20.6
20
20
% Change
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
7.5%
0.0%
1.1%
4.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1 .0%
2.5%
0.0%
-3.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
12.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Rear Setback
Approved
19
15
40
35
45
43
64 *
66
80
76
86
80
84 *
84
138
143
142
152
210
144 *
138
134
135
127
115
118
111
110
106
105
122
138
82
86
78
69
Proposed
16.6
14.7
39.2
34.5
45.8
43
64
66.8
80.9
75.7
88
76.5
83.8
84.1
136.4
142.2
146.9
150
211.7
144
139.4
132.6
135.2
127.7
115
118
112
110
105.9
106.6
126
137
79.4
87
78
70.3
% Change
-12.6%
-2.0%
-2.0%
-1 .4%
1.8%
0.0%
0.0%
1 .2%
1.1%
-0.4%
2.3%
-4.4%
-0.2%
0.1%
-1.2%
-0.6%
3.5%
-1 .3%
0.8%
0.0%
1 .0%
-1 .0%
0.1%
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
-0.1%
1 .5%
3.3%
-0.7%
-3.2%
1.2%
0.0%
1 .9%
Left Side Setback
Approved
7
18
8
8
8
7
7
7
7
5
10
5
5
66
8
7
10
13
8
6
10
8
13
13
5
7
7
8
7
10
7
7
10
10
15
15
Proposed
6.8
17.3
8
8
8
7.7
7.5
8.3
7.3
6
10
5.9
5
66.5
8
7
10
13
8
5.6
10
8
13
13
5
7
7
8
7.3
9.1
8.2
7
11.5
10
15
15
% Change
-2.9%
-3.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
10.0%
7.1%
18.6%
4.3%
20.0%
0.0%
18.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-6.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.3%
-9.0%
17.1%
0.0%
15.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Right Side Setback
Approved
8
8
10
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
5
10
10
31
10
10
7
7
6
10
7
7
7
10
8
13
12
13
5
8
8
10
5
5
7
10
Proposed
8.2
8
10
7
7
7
8
8
7.6
7.9
5
10
10
31
9.1
10
7
7
6.2
10
7
7
7
10
8
13
12
13
5
7.9
8
10
5
5
7
10.1
% Change
2.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-5.0%
-1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-9.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-1 .3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
PLANNING:\Miscellaneous\1758 Ayres Land Co\1758-007 SCE Summary Tbl.v9.xls
TAB: Revsd Format -New*
Updated on 1/14/00 MM
Printed on 1/26/00
MARIANO
SETBACK SUMMARY
PLANNING:\Miscellaneous\1758 Ayres Land Co\1758-007 SCE Summary Tbl.v9.xls
TAB: Revsd Format -New*
Updated on 1/14/00 MM
Printed on 1/26/00
MARIANO
SETBACK SUMMARY
New
Lot
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
138
139
140;
: 141
142
143
144 .
.145
Old
Lot
43
42
34
33
32
31
30
29
28
27
26
25
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
48
49
50
51
52
53
5
57
6
7
8
9
10
. .11
12',
"13"'
New
Plan
4
1
3
2
4
2
4
1
4
1
2
3
4
3
4
1
4
3
1
4
1
4
3
4
3
1
2
1
2
4
3
2
" '4' .-
Old
Plan
4
1
3
2
4
2
4
1
4
1
2
3
4
3
4
1
4
3
1
4
1
4
3
4
3
1
2
1
2
4 ',
3
2
'4' '
Front Setback
Approved
25
20
20
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
22
25
20
Proposed
25
20
20
20
20
20
25
20.5
30
25.7
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
22
23
20
% Change
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.5%
0.0%
28.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-8.0%
0.0%
Rear Setback
Approved
60
61
66
69
66
69
61
65
76
102 *
15
22
12
25
23
15
20
37
73
92
75
48
26
17
33
Proposed
60.3
59
66.4
69.3
66.3
69.2
61.3
63.6
75.9
95.8
15
22
13.5
26.5
23.8
13.8
20.2
37
79
92.6
79.2
44.7
25.6
22
41
% Change
0.5%
-3.3%
0.6%
0.4%
0.5%
0.3%
0.5%
-2.2%
-0.1%
-6.1%
0.0%
0.0%
12.5%
6.0%
3.5%
-8.0%
1.0%
0.0%
8.2%
0.7%
5.6%
-6.9%
-1.5%
29.4%
24.2%
Left Side Setback
Approved
10
8
10
13
15
15
15
13
10
8
10
15
10
5
5
7
5
7
5
5
5
5
10
7
7
Proposed
10
8
10
13
15
15
15
12.9
10
8
10
15
9.9
5
5
7
5
7
5
5
5.3
5
10
7
7
% Change
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
6.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Right Side Setback
Approved
7
5
7
5
5
5
7
10
1
5
5
7
16
15
8
10
13
10
10
10
10
10
13
13
44
Proposed
7
5.1
7
5
5
5
7.4
9.1
6.8
5
5
7
16
15
8
10
13
10
10
10
10
10
13
13
43.8
% Change
0.0%
2.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.7%
-9.0%
-2.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-0.5%
MULTI-FAMILY
PRIVATE STREET "A"
s I 20
20
20
20
. 20
20
20
• 20
. ;20
20
20,4
, i 20;1
: 20
20
20
• 20
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
0,5%
0.0%
,'" 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
38
39
23
29
.25 •'
25
29
26
43.2
50!7
35
, : 40;g
36
34.5
. 35,9
31,4
13.7%
30.0%
52.2%
41.0%
.44,0%
38.0%
23.8%
20.8%
16
; .8
I 12
\ 9
,1 .10
10
: , 10
10
19.1
8.9
8,7
7.9
.. 11:5
11
11
11
19.4%
-13.8%
-27.5%
-12.2%
15.0%
•• 10.0%
10.0%
10.0%
8
10
8
. : 10
" 1.0 ""
10.
to
10
8
9.1
7,3
9.1
, 10
10
10
10
0;0%
-9.0%
-8.8%
;, ,-9.0%
O.OP/o
0.0%
0,0%
i 0.0%
PLANNING:\Miscellaneous\1758 Ayres Land Co\1758-007 SCE Summary Tbl.v9.xls
TAB: Revsd Format -New*
Updated on 1/14/00 MM
Printed on 1/26/00
MARIANO
SETBACK SUMMARY
3 |r '-20 I-. r. 20| ' 0.0%| ' 26'- | r^ Ig29| • .'
PLANNING:\Miscellaneous\1758 Ayres Land Co\1758-007 SCE Summary Tbl.v9.xls Updated on 1/14/00 MM
TAB: Revsd Format -New# Printed on 1/26/00
MARIANO
SETBACK SUMMARY
New
Lot
147-
. ,148
149
150
.,,:i5,i.-v
...
—
...
—
—
Old
Lot
- 15
"16
17 ..
18 .
' .f9,,i
20
21
22
23
24
Old
Plan
: 2
... 4i,:...
2
3
..,,1 ' .
New
Plan
2 •
.-4 ,•
; 2
\ 3.
!.
Front Setback
Approved
20
20
;, 10
45.*
20
Proposed
: . ' 20
20
i . 10.7
35,5
; 20
% Change
0.0%
, 0.0%
;:• 7.0%
-21.1%
0.0%
Rear Setback
Approved
•l . 29
15 ;;
5 \
' , - ,'22
• ' : - 12 i
Proposed
,. 31.3, .,;, ; 19.7
..,'"• -,5
32.2
15.2
% Change
7.9%
31.3%
•• 0.0%
4614%
, 26.7%
Left Side Setback
Approved
10
10
'- :"""•> 14
•' - --. 5
.: " , .6
Proposed
'•\ 11
, ;: .10
:,,; 18,4
'.. -5
8.5
% Change
' 10.0%
0.0%
31,4%
, 0.0%
41.7%
Right Side Setback
Approved
10 ''
17
: . ' • 33
91
. :• 21 r
Proposed
10
n
- 24
6.7,
17.8
% Change
.. - 1 o;o%
5,9%
';"-273%
'-3,3%
:: -15.2%
LOTS ELIMINATED - SEE NOTE 1
LOTS ELIMINATED - SEE NOTE 1
LOTS ELIMINATED - SEE NOTE 1
LOTS ELIMINATED - SEE NOTE 1
LOTS ELIMINATED - SEE NOTE 1
* Setback either not denoted or incorrectly denoted on original Approved October 1998 Site Plan/Approved 1999 Sub. Conf. Exh. Setback shown here
reflects what the corrected dimension is.
NOTE 1: Old or original Lot numbers 20 through 24 have been eliminated due to lots lost in the process of addressing environmental concerns on the
eastern portion of the site. The revision that caused the elimination of these 4 lots was approved by the City of Carlsbad by Substantial Conformance
Exhibit "A' in April 1999.
fp/ease; a/so note th'at the shaded rows for the purpose of this summary table, compare new lot nos. 1*38 through I1513othe April 1999 Approved
;Substantial Conformance Exhibit and not the original[Approved October 1998 TM. Every{other lot, however, is being compared to the Approved
October 1998 Tentative Map. 1 ; •""]' '"."
PI_ANNING:\Miscellaneous\1758 Ayres Land Co\1758-007 SCE Summary Tbl.v9.xls
TAB: Revsd Format -New#
Updated on 1/14/00 MM
Printed on 1/26/00
ack Henthorn & Associates
5375 Avenida Encinas, Suite D
Carlsbad, CA 92008
(760) 438-4090
Fax (760) 438-0981
Memorandum
To: Anne Hysong
FROM: Jack E. Henthorn"
c
SUBJECT: MARIANO SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMITY TABLE
DATE: JANUARY 27,2000
The substantial conformity table was inadvertently left out of the materials submitted yesterday.
The attached 8 page table reflects the changes as shown on the substantial conformity prints and
mylars as submitted previously.
If you have any questions, or need additional information please contact me at your convenience.
JEH:wpc
Attachment: Substantial conformity tables
Page 1 of 1
Henthorn & Associat^P
5375 Avenida Encinas, Suite D
Carlsbad, CA 92008
(760) 438-4090
Fax (760) 438-0981
Memorandum
To: Anne Hysong
FROM: Jack E. Henthorn
SUBJECT: MARIANO SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMITY
DATE: JANUARY 26,2000
RECEIVED
, JAN 2 6 2000
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING DEPT.
Enclosed please find 3 blue line sets of the Mariano Site Development Plan along with a mylar
prepared for approval stamps and signature. The Site Development Plan has been modified to
reflect the changes discussed during our meeting last week. All modifications are now fully
within identified parameters.
Also enclosed is and architectural package consisting of three sets of blue line architectural
elevations and floor plans that have been revised per our meeting; one full set of 8.5"xl 1"
reductions and one photo set of sample colors and materials. An actual color and material board
can be provided upon request.
The architectural plans reflect the addition of the items discussed during our meeting of last
week and now reflect the itemsthat you requested. In addition, for clarification, the roofing
material is a concrete '(S^tyjpe_tIJg>yith a variegated color pattern, which is consistent with the
Zone 20 Specific Plan architectural guidelines.
If you have any questions or needadditional information please contact me at your convenience:
JEH:wpc
Encl: As noted
Cc: Gregg Linhoff, Standard Pacific
Page 1 of i
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
January 5, 2000
Jack Henthorn & Associates
Suite D
5375 Avenida Encinas
Carlsbad CA 92008
SUBJECT: PRE 99-77 - MARIANO SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE REVIEW
APN: 212-040-41
A preliminary review of your request for substantial conformance review of the
subject project was conducted by the Planning and Engineering staffs. Listed
below are the issues raised by staff.
Planning:
1. Increases to rear yards exceed the 10% permitted by Planning Department
Administrative Policy. The Planning Department has determined that reduced
rear yard setbacks will be permitted for yards that currently exceed 1 5 feet,
however, if existing rear yards are 1 5 feet or less, they may not be reduced as
part of a substantial conformance approval. Therefore, the proposed reduced
rear yard setbacks are approved for the following lots: 32, 41, 65, 73. Lot 12
is also approved since ttiefront yard setback is increased to offset the reduction
^__injgar yard. Lots ^f^C^T^rahd 7-$-db not satisfy the above criteria and are
not approved. The reduced side yard setback on Lot oEf exceeds the 10% and
cannot be administratively approved. Is it possible to move the structure further
to the rear of the lot to increase the setback to 8 feet. It appears that a 1 5 x 15
foot rear yard could still be accomplished if the plan were reversed.
2. The reduced setbacks on lots located east of "F" Street are acceptable in
consideration of the redesign necessitated by the widening of the habitat
corridor.
3. Please provide color and materials board for comparison. (Condition No. 54 of
Planning Commission Resolution 4186 prohibits Spanish barrel tiles). In some
instances, it appears that the quality of architectural elements and detailing has
been reduced. Specifically:
2O75 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 438-0894
PRE 99-77 MARIANO SUBSTA^AL CONFORMANCE REVIEW
January 5, 2000 ^^
Page 2
Plan 2: It appears that arches, shutters and wainscots haye^been deleted from
second floor elevations.
Plan 3: Detailing on front is lost - loss of shutters and recessed arched
windows; less window variation.
4: Reduced building planes and detailing on front elevations, less window
variation.
Please review the above comments and submit revised plans for further review.
If the applicant wishes to proceed with the plans as submitted, it will be
necessary to process a Planned Development Permit amendment.
If you have questions regarding the above comments, please contact me at
(760) 438-11 61 at your convenience.
Sincerely,
ANNE HYSON(
Associate Planner
AH:cs
c: Chris DeCerbo
File
MARIANO
SDP SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE MODIFICATIONS
(1/14/00)
Sheet 1 : Bldg. Cov. Summary was updated. Three Plan 1's were eliminated and
one each of a Plan 2, 3, & 4 were added. Bldg Cov. went down slightly.
Sheet 2: Lot 1 3 - Bldg 1 was flipped to fix rear setback. All other setbacks went up
as well.
Lot 63 - Plan 1 eliminated & replaced with a Plan 3r to fix rear setback.
Sheet 3: No changes
Sheet 4: Lot 66 - Bldg pushed back to increase side yard setback. Left Setback is
right -10% and rear setback went up to a -15.6% (16.6' setback to 15.2')
in order to accommodate change. Front yard setback did go up by a
+5.5%. When we checked on flipping the plan as suggested by the City
keeping the side setbacks @ 5' & 7.2' we ended up with a rear yard
setback of only 15.6' which would have still been over the -10%. So we
left the unit the same way & only pushed it back.
Lot 68 - A Plan 1 was replaced by a Plan 2 to fix the rear yard setback.
Lot 70 - A Plan 1 was replaced by a Plan 4 to fix the rear yard setback.
Overall - All Plan type callouts were doublechecked and corrected where
necessary.