HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 97-15; Lohf Property; Tentative Map (CT) (4)City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
September 15, 1999
Darren Warren
Western Pacific Housing
2385 Camino Vida Roble, Suite 107
Carlsbad CA 92009
SUBJECT: SDP 99-01/CDP 99-01 - LOHF PROPERTY
The. Planning Department has received and reviewed your proposed construction
phasing plan for the Lohf Property (Viadana). As you know, the Site Development Plan
was conditioned to require approval of a construction phasing plan prior to issuance of
any building permits (Condition No. 18 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 4610).
The proposed phasing appears to reduce the amount of traffic conflicts between future
residents and construction activities while accommodating the concerns of Pavoreal
residents regarding development of the southern portion in the first phase. Therefore,
the proposed phasing plan, as shown in the attached letter and diagram, dated
September 1, 1999, is hereby APPROVED and condition no. 18 of Resolution No. 4610
is considered satisfied.
Please contact your project planner, Mike Grim, at (760) 438-1161, extension 4499 if
you have any questions.
MICHAEL JT HOCZMILLER
Planning Director
MJH:MG: mh
/Attachment
Gary Wayne
Bob Wojcik
Chris DeCerbo
Mike Peterson
/File Copy
2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 438-0894
12)002^mI Western
] Pacific
M Housing
61180 B I » I I I 0 N ^
September 9, 1999
Lloyd Hubbs
City Engineer
City of Carlsbad
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, CA 29009
Subject: Lohf project - CT 98-15
Poinsettia Lane Reimbursement Agreement
Dear Lloyd:
At the request of the City staff, Western Pacific Housing agreed to a condition < "project
approval requiring construction of the portion of off site Poinsettia Lane between , ic Lohf
property and El Camino Real. The basis for the City request was the City's desire tc ;xpedite
this connection although it was not necessary to serve the proposed subdivision. The C I / agreed
that certain on site and off site costs would be reimbursed subject to the execu: on of a
reimbursement agreement prior to construction. These provisions are contained in fanning
Commission Resolution 4427 conditions 47, 53 - ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS - A,,' • - OFF-
SITE IMPROVMENTS - A and 53 REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENTS.
At the City Council meeting, additional language was added requiring the imp :< vements
to be constructed within one year of final map recordation.
Western Pacific submitted a reimbursement agreement draft nearly one year ag j [October
1, 1998), Comments were provided by David Hauser in February of 1999 and 1i>, revised
document was resubmitted following several redrafts'in June of 1999. We have conl s. tied with
design, acquisition and construction activities as demonstration of good faith in antic p ttion that
the agreement would be expeditiously processed and put into place.
Recent discussions with Mr. Hauser indicate that the agreement is not a high f ri> dry item
du$ to the on going evaluation of the financial status of Bridge and Thoroughfare Ben tf t District
#2. Western Pacific is well into the process of grading and installing infrastructure < »n the Lohf
project. We have cleared Poinsettia Lane and need to begin grading and improver IB its in the
roadway immediately. Furthermore, we have been negotiating the acquisition of ri jh s of way
from the Steiner, Levatino and Saska ownerships as a part of the required off site Poi \s< ttia Lane
construction.
Given the timing of our construction activity, it is now necessary to have ht required
reimbursement agreement in place. We feel that we have been diligently pursuing tf e i greement
and that we have met the intent of conditions 47 and 53 arid demonstrated our co; on itment to
comply with the City Council's direction to have Poinsettia connected within one yi ar following
the recordation of our final map.
-1-
2385 Camino VitU Roble, Suite lOV.CarUbud, California 92009 7*0.929.1600 Fax 760.929.16 H
»./»/_.. _WH,_ie:10 PAIjr.0 43! r«2 WESTERN PACIFIC
i)003
However, we are unable to incur additional costs for the construction of Poinserl a in the
absence of an executed agreement since the condition is clear that the agreement must be in place
prior to construction of the improvements. Therefore, we are revesting that all require nents as
set forth in conditions of approval associated with the construction of Poinsettia be set z Hde and
that all time frames be extended on a day for day basis from th'j date of the recordatio \ of our
final map until a reimbursement agreement is in place.
I am available to meet with you to discuss this matter at your convenient , In the
meantime, we have placed all Poinsettia Lane activities, including negotiations for right of way,
in abeyance pending completion of the reimbursement agreement.
Sincerely,
ianflstrony
Pr/sidept'of Development
cc: file
David Hauser, Deputy City Engineer
Bob Wojcik, Deputy City Engineer
Marty Orenyak, Community Development Director
Ray Patchett, City Manager
F:\LOHF\Poins slay.dou
-2-
IWestern
PacificHousing
* * rt u i c v, rt i% t w i « i ft u *—
September 1, 1999 ECO DIVISION
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92009
Attn: Mike Grim
Re: Lohf Property (Viadana), CT 97-15
Proposed Construction Phasing Plan
Dear Mike:
As you are aware, our Site Development Plan (SDP 99-01 and CDP 99-01) for the Lohf
Property was approved by the Planning Commission on August 18, 1999, subject to
approval of our phasing plan by the Planning Director. In response to this requirement we
are hereby submitting the attached phasing for your review and approval.
At the meeting of August 18, 1999, the Planning Commissioners expressed concerns about
how the surrounding community and new homebuyers would be affected by construction
nuisance, on-going construction operations, construction traffic, and sales traffic. The
phasing plan we are proposing offers the best solution for addressing those concerns.
The phasing concept is to complete the homes in the southeasterly portion of the property
first, adjacent the Pavoreal subdivision, the new City Library, Mimosa Drive and Dove
Lane. We have modified our original plan, switching Phases 2 and 3. This was proposed
by the Planning Commission and we are in agreement with the logic of this change. Under
our currently proposed phasing, we minimize the impact on the adjacent homeowners, new
homeowners and on the City Library patrons by decreasing the duration of the construction
nuisance in these sensitive areas. In addition, Phases 1 and 2 are now at the subdivision
access points (Mimosa Drive and Dove Lane) allowing sales and homeowner traffic to
enter the subdivision without passing through a construction zone (another concern of the
Planning Commission). It is likely that Phase 1 homeowners will use Mimosa Drive,
while Phases 2 and 3 and our models will be accessed via Dove Lane.
Please keep in mind that not all of the Planning Commissions concerns can be addressed at
all times. There are situations in the early phases when sales traffic will pass through
construction zones or construction traffic may pass by new homes. However, the strength
of this plan is that once Poinsettia Lane is graded, all construction traffic can access via
Poinsettia Lane. Phases 4, 5 and 6 will progress without homeowners passing through
construction areas or construction traffic passing homeowner sites.
2385 Camino Vicla Roble, Suite 107,Carlsbad, California 92009 760.929.1600 Fax 760.929.1601
Mike Grim
Page 2
Given the concerns of the Planning Commission, the adjacent property owners and the
City of Carlsbad staff, we believe that we have proposed the most efficient and effective
phasing solution, and are respectfully requesting Planning Director approval.
Since:
Darren Warren, PE
Land Development Manager
Cc: Scot Sandstrom, Vice-President of Development
Encl: Reduced Phasing Exhibit
2385 Camino Vida Roble, Suite 107,Carlsbad, California 92009 760.929.1600 Fax 760.929.1601
SITE PLAN/PHASING EXHIBIT
"VIADANA" - LOHF PROPERTY
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
TOTAL UNIT SUMMARY
PLAN 1 = 20
PLAN 2 = 25
PLAN 3 = 28
TOTAL = 73
* LOT NUMBERING SHOWN HEREON
REFLECTS THE NUMBERING AS ON
THE FINAL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS
AND FINAL MAP AND NOT ON THE
APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP.
HUNSAKER
& ASSOCIATES
SAN D I E C O, INC
PLANNING 10179 Huenwten St Sute 200
ENONfflUNC Sar Diego, Ca 92121
SURVEYING PH(619)55MSOO • R(619)S5a-MM
1751-13 DATE: 3/19/99
Hie: R: \0025\0025X021.dwg Desc. &X21-Colored Site Plan Reduced
September 1, 1999
Western
Pacific
Housing
SAN DIEGO DIVISION
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92009
Attn: Mike Grim
Re: Lohf Property (Viadana), CT 97-15
Proposed Plotting Revision
Dear Mike:
Per our recent telephone conversation, I am requesting your approval of a revision to our
plotting plan for the above referenced project. The approved plot plan (SDP 99-01) indicated
Plan 3 homes on adjacent lots 16 & 17 and 64 & 65. In order to eliminate this redundancy,
we are proposing an exchange of plan types between lots 15 & 16 and lots 63 & 64. The
exchange is best illustrated in the table below:
Lot
15
16
63
64
Current Plotting
Plan 2
Plan3R
Plan 1R
Plan3R
Proposed Plotting
Plan 3
Plan2R
Plan3R
Plan 1R
Attached is the revised plotting for the affected lots indicating compliance with setback and
driveway slope requirements. Please note that the intent of this change is solely to provide a
more varied streetscape. The change does not effect the product mix, the phasing, or any other
elements of the SDP.
Please review the attached information and provide direction on the process to finalize this
requested change. Once again, thank you for your assistance.
Respectfully,
Darren Warren, PE
Land Development Manager
Cc: Scot Sandstrom, Vice-President of Development
Ray Martin, Hunsaker & Associates
2385 Camino Vida Roble, Suite 107,Carlsbad, California 92009 760.929.1600 Fax 760.929.1601
76
P=241.J
FF=241.8
P=240.7
FF=241.2
enm-
<s
UD
i-»I\J
Scn
c
inT>
enon
men
P=265.0
FF=265.5
P=263.1
FF=263.6
IB
m73
tn
AUGUST 19, 1999
WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING
2385 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE, STE 107
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
ATTN: DARREN WARREN
DEAR DARREN,
CONFIRMING RECEIPT OF YOUH LETTER DATED AUGUST 11, 1999.
I HEREWITH REQUEST AN EXTENSION FROM AUGUST 23, 1999(NOT
MARCH 23, 1999, AS WAS STATED IN YOUR LETTER), TO SEPTEMBER
06, 1999, TO REVIEW YOUR DETAILED EXPLANATION.
I WOULD JUST LIKE TO MENTION THAT $10,600. FOR 0.127 ACRES
OF MY PROPERTY IS AN INSULT! AFTER ALL, YOU WILL ACTUALLY
NEED 0.5145 ACRES OF MY LAND TO COMPLETE POINSETTIA LANE!!
IN ADDITION , WE SEE NO SIGN OF THE PROMISED SAFE ENTRY/
EXIT TO MY PROPERTY?!
RESPECTFULLY YOURS/,
ISABEL R. SASKA
MAXOK BUD LEWIS
GALEN PETERSON
YMIKE GRIM
CLYDE WICKHAM
HUN SAKE R
^ASSOCIATES
SAN DIEGO, INC.
PLANNING
ENGINEERING
SURVEYING
IRVINE
LAS VEGAS
RIVERSIDE
SAN DIEGO
July 12, 1999
Mr. Mike Grim
Planning Department
City of Carlsbad
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92009
Dear Mr. Grim:
The stakes provided the week of June 28, 1999, for the Lohf property delineated
the limits of grading and environmental habitat areas to be preserved as shown
on the approved grading plans. As of this date, we certify that the grading
completed on the Lohf property falls within the aforementioned limits of grading.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
Hunsaker & Associates
San Diego, Inc.
David A. Hammar, R.C.E.
President
DAVE HAMMAR
JACK HILL
LEX WILLIMAN
10179 Huennekens St.
Suite 200
San Diego, CA 92121
(619) 558-4500 PH
(619)558-1414 FX
www.hunsaker.com
lnfo@HunsnkerSD.com Rm:kd k:\1751\1999\d92.doc
w.o. 1751-19
Pacific
Housing
2385 Camino Vida Roble, Suite 107, Carlsbad, CA 92009 (760)929-1600 FAX (760) 431-7842
Memo
To: Clyde Wickham
City of Carlsbad
From: Darren Warren \
Land Development Manager
CC: Mike Grim, City of Carlsbad
Scot Sandstrom, WPH
Ray Martin, Hunsaker& Assoc.
Jeff Fulton, Berryman & Henigar
Date: 06/08/99
Re: Lohf/Viadana - Meeting of 6/8/99 attended by Clyde Wickham, Mike Grim, Ray Martin, Scot
Sandstrom and Darren Warren
Our understanding of the issues and resolutions discussed at this morning's meeting are as follows:
Grading and Improvement Plans for the above referenced project were submitted to the City for final
plan check the week of 5/24/99. The plans were rejected as incomplete by the City's consultant,
Berryman & Henigar. The outstanding issues cited by B&H and the resolution to those issues are
described below.
1) Comment: Planning department approval must be obtained before proceeding.
Resolution: Mike Grim has signed off on Planning Department issues. Outstanding
conditions are in process for completion and will be completed prior final map recording.
2) Comment: Complete the design of improvements for Skimmer Court and Oriole Court
extensions; provide cost estimates for bonding purposes.
Resolution: Grading design is complete and on grading plans. Centeriine precise alignment
has been established, which is all that is necessary to complete road design. ROW will be
dedicated on the final map. Water has been stubbed to the existing ROW line. Sewer is not
relevant, as the project is upgrade from adjacent parcels. Cost estimates will be provided.
3) Comment: Design and bond for traffic signal at Poinsettia Lane and El Camino Real
intersection.
Resolution: Signal is not a condition of development for this project and should be omitted.
All other minor comments have been addressed.
Based on these understandings, you agreed that final plan check shall commence immediately, and
you will direct B&H to proceed. Please contact me if you have questions or comments regarding this
memorandum of understanding. Thank you.
Pavoreal Homeowner's Association
c/o Don Holmes, President
6943 Mimosa D1WINDA nm
Carlsbad, CA 92009
February 4, 1999s
Honorable Mayor Bud Lewis
Councilmember Ramona Finnila gjj
Councilmember Matt Hall
Councilmember AnnKulchin
Councilmember Julie Nygaard
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive,
Carlsbad, CA 92008
RE: Lohf Subdivision - Request for" Emergency Access Gate" Only at
North Terminus of Mimosa Drive in the "Pavoreal" Community
We want to thank each of you for meeting with us prior to the February 9, 1999
City Council meeting regarding the Lohf Development and the proposed extension of
Mimosa Drive. We hope that you have had an opportunity to visit our community and
drive Mimosa Drive from top to bottom.
During our meetings, we became aware of the need to correct mis-stated facts and
clarify information regarding the application of City Planning and Engineering
Standards and "Policies" to the Pavoreal development. Also, we have become aware of
the recent City Council" Approval "of The Terraces At Sunny Creek development
which by precedence supports our request for an"Emergency Access Only" at the
North terminus of Mimosa Drive.
Regarding the design of Mimosa Drive and its designation on the City of Carlsbad
General Plan as a "Residential" (Local) Street.
A. In accordance with the "Approved" Map CT 85-34 for Pavoreal:
1. Mimosa Drive has a 60 foot right-of-way and 40 foot curb-to-curb distance.
2. Mimosa Drive slopes from an elevation of 246 feet at the North (top) end to
178 feet at the South (bottom) end of the street. The slope of the straight street
has a grade of 12%.
3. Blue Orchid Lane, a loop street, intersects Mimosa Drive twice, 244 feet
North of the intersection of Mimosa Drive & Aviara Parkway and 130 feet
South of the terminus of Mimosa Drive.
4. All "Pavoreal" neighborhood streets are Residential (Local) Streets nol designated
in anyway as future Collector or Arterial Streets.
B. In accordance with the City of Carlsbad Circulation Element of the General Plan :
1. Local Streets: ( page 3, Table l:Street Classifications)
* provide immediate access to adjoining properties
* are designed to discourage through-traffic
* carry a minimum amount of traffic (estimated average daily trips: 500 maximum)
2. Goals, Objectives, and Implementing Policies and Action Programs (page 4)
a. Goals:
a.l "A City with an integrated transportation network serving local and
regional needs which accommodated a balance of different travel modes based
on safety, convenience, attractiveness, costs, environmental and social impacts."
b.Objectives!
b.2. "To design streets for the safe and efficient movement ofjzeopk, goods
and services within and through the City in the most environmentally sound
and aesthetically pleasing manner possible."
C. In accordance with The City of Carlsbad Department of Engineering
Street Design Criteria, Table A:
1. Local Streets:
*ADT Ranges (Limits) = 1200 ADT
*Design Speed = 25 MPH
*Maximum Centerline Grade = 12%
D. In accordance with the City of Carlsbad Engineering Department Street
Alignment Standards:
1. Mimosa Drive does not fall under the "Cul-De-Sac" Standards because it is
intersected twice by Blue Orchid Lane, a loop street.
E. In accordance with the City's new Concern that all developments have two
accesses for emergency situations such as a reoccurrence of a "Santa Ana wind
fueled La Costa Fire":
1. Pavoreal has a Primary access off of Aviara Parkway and will have a Secondary
Emergency Access when connected to the Lohf development with a" 20 foot
Emergency Access Easement with 16 foot paved and gated access road".
2. Pavoreal should not be likened to the areas of La Costa which burned because:
a. Pavoreal is or soon will be surrounded to the North, South and East with major
roads and residential & commercial development (not grassy hills).
b. Pavoreal homes and all new neighboring developments are constructed of stucco
and have concrete tile roofs.
The Pavoreal Map CT 85-34 was approved by the City of Carlsbad without any
requirements for a "secondary access". Also, there were not any contingency
requirements for any future connection of Mimosa to any future development or
future road system. The residents of Pavoreal (90 homes) have lived without incident
for almost 8 years.
Although there is no mention of our community's interaction with the City of Carlsbad
Planning and Engineering Departments and the Developer of the Lohf property prior to
the Planning Commission Meeting, we want you to know that our Homeowner
Association/Neighborhood has been in communication with The City Departments and
the Developer via letters, petitions and numerous personal meetings ever since we
became aware of the proposed development in July 1997! We have 90 homeowners
who do not want the road opened as a throughfare for health and safety issues
( consider the configuration and the slope (12% grade) of the road) . The Lohf
development will have three Primary road access points and does not need to utilize
our portion of Mimosa Drive as a fourth "access". At the Planning Commission
meeting on December 2, 1998, the Pavoreal neighborhood, the Developer of the Lohf
property and the City Planning and Engineering Departments agreed, that an Emergency
Access would be very acceptable between Pavoreal and the Lohf Development. The
Planning Commission's 3-3 vote was perplexing because all parties involved were in
agreement with the "Emergency Access only" decision.
On November 17, 1998 the City Council Approved the Terraces at Sunny Creek,
CT 96-02 & SDP 97-02 ( hi addition to appropriate Zone Changes and General Plan
Amendments). This development is designed with 172 single-family dwelling units
with 28 attached secondary dwelling units and a development of 50 affordable housing
apartment units. All of these dwelling units are being constructed off of one primary
access and a secondary emergency access with a street configuration consisting of a
number of loop streets and cul-de-sacs. In our conversations with the Engineering
Department, the design of the project is similar to Pavoreal only on a much greater
scale (3 tunes larger). With the use of the loop streets and emergency access road, the
development qualifies to have two accesses and does not fall under the Department of
Engineering's restrictive "Cul-De-Sac" Standards.
Our request of a "Emergency Access Only" at the North terminus of Mimosa Drive
is not only consistent with all City of Carlsbad Planning and Engineering Department
Standards and Policies but also consistent with past and most recent City Council
precedence setting decisions.
If you have any questions regarding the information presented by our Pavoreal
committee or in this letter, please contact me or the Committee Members at the
following numbers: Don Holmes (760) 431-3737, Jams Libuse (760) 931-1057
or Kelly Cox (619) 692-1800.
Sincerely,
Don Holmes
President,
Pavoreal Homeowner's Association
cc City of Carlsbad, City Manager
LEGEND
Symbol Descriplion
10' private drainage case men I over portions on lots 67,(>H. W m |x>
maintained by community as,vocialum
100' access casement over a pod ion of loi 91 to San Uic^iK.ai &
Electric and the city of Carlsbad. ,ind A p.itril arcvi% laid iruiMlainrd
by SDC& E.
15' drainage easement to tiV cily ol Orlshjd. in be mamljincd by
community association.
Portion of Lot 2011 x 60') reserved lor possible luiuu- r*ii mum ol
Mimosa to Dove Lane, to be maintained by rnnumimi) a-.sno.Hion
'•'!'-,', ''^ I l'riv.ileO|ieMS|M«vF.wiiii-nl ni.uiil. -.1 by ininiiiunily .i-.-.u, 1.1
(7*;i*i'" • i Easement fur lit i IK: const) iirliun JIK| iiijniicnjiu e JUKI HIM-:, tu City
|*»;t;^I; j of CatIsbad and Avura l^ii.d Associates.
;•• t| Uil 91-Owned and maintained by tntnmiiiniy a>s>ciJiiuii .is
***!!!it!;l pcnnancnl ojx-n space. (Aiva within the %ymU>l line-. Duly )
Prior lo issuance of a building JH-IIHJI there sltjll IK* a detxl resiiicinm
placed on Ihedeed lo lots l-l9.ind 44 49 subft-<i tc* the satisfaction of
the n.tnning Director nolifymj', .ill intcn-slnt ii-ulir.s .iml • ••-•-ui-.
In lull H •-( lh.it (AirJ within tin -.ymt^.l Inn" Ij I
A. IV distance between the original siniiiuicsdcpuiod on
Exhibits "A" - "CC" 9/28/90, and side pioperty line shall
become (he established side yard set back for each lot and
supersede Uie existing underlying R I Zone's side yard setback
standard. No Further development is permitted in this side yard
setback.
B. All room additions and add ons shall maintain a rear yard
minimum distance of IS feel from the lop of any tear y.ird slope,
except patio covers and detached accessory structures which
must maintain a minimum distance ol five Icrt from the tup of
any rear yard slope. Fences <md walls are excluded ft inn this
ri^quttenienl.
Maintenance
Responsibility
and Easement
Locations
;8TEIIN NATIONAL HOMES
V O R E NOT TO SCALE
June 1941 PA«li 1
C (
Element
t IKL 11. I Tlt>.\ /:7.0/fc\T
TABLE 1: STREET CLASSIFICATIONS
Local Streets:
* provide immediate access to adjoining properties
* are designed to discourage through-traffic
* carry a minimum amount of traffic (estimated average daily tnps: 500 maximum)
Collector Streets;
* provide immediate access to adjoining properties
* serve as the connecting link for traffic between local and arterial streets
* generally carry light to moderate traffic volumes (estimated average daily trips: 500 to 5,000)
Controlled Collectors:
* provide no access or United access to adjacent properties
* serve as a major connecung link for traffic between local and arterial streets
* carry moderate traffic volumes (estimated average daily trips: 5,000 to 10,000)
Secondary Arterials;
* provide limited access to adjacent properties
* serve to move traffic between collector streets and larger anerials or the freeways
* have two traffic lanes in each direction with a painted median
* carry moderate traffic volumes (estimated average daily trips: 10,000 to 20,000)
Major Arterials;
* prohibit access to adjacent properties unless no other alternative exists
* provide intra-city circuiadon and connections to freeways and regional roads
* have a minimum of two ^affic lanes in each direction with a raised median
* carry moderate to heavy traffic volumes (estimated average daily trips: 20,000 to 40,000)
Prime Arterials;
* prohibit access to adjacent properties unless no other alternative exists
* provide for regional anc intra-city circulation and connections to freeways and other regional roads
* carry very heavy traffic volumes (estimated average daily trips: 40,000 or more)
CIRCULATION PLAN
S 5
CFTY OF CARLSBAD
CIRCULATION PLAN
RAILROAD
FREEWAY
PRIME ARTERIAL
MAJOR ARTERIAL
SECONDARY ARTErJAL
COLLECTOR STREET MAPI
Page 11 M
TABLE A
CITY OF CARLSBAD
STREET DESIGN CRITERIA
DCSIGN CLASSIFlCftTIDH
ADT RANGES {LIMITS)
Design Speed
Hinimin Spacing of Intersections
(including right-turn in/out)
(in feet)
Right-Of-UBy Width (in feet)
Access to Adjoining Property
Curb-to-Curb Distance (in feet)
Minimum Traffic Index
Minimum Structural Section '
(in inches)
Stopping Sight Distance45' (in feet)
Minimum Centerline Radius (in feet)
Maximum Cepterllne Grade (not thru
Intersec.r*'
Minimum Moulin* Crad«(0>
PRIMEARTERIAL
40.00008
MORE
60 MPH
2600
126
NONE
106
(18' median)
9
6 AC
6 AB
580
2400(6>
7X
1.0X
MAJOR
ARTERIAL .
29,000 TO
40.000
50 MPH
1200
102
NONE
82
(181 median)
8.5
5 AC
6 AB
430
1400<6)
7X
1.0X
SECONDARY
ARTERIAL
tO.OOOTO
20,000
40 MPH
600
84
Where no
other
access Is
possible
64
8.0
4 AC
6 AB
300
670
10X
1.0X
COLLECTOR
STREET .
1,20070
10,000
30 MPH
300
60 or 68
Limited
subject to
approval
40 or 48
6.0
4 AC
6 AB
200
300
12X<3)
1.0X
INDUSTRIAL
STREET
*»**.
30 MPH
300
72
Limited
subject to
approval
52
7.0
4 AC
6 AB
200
300
ex
1.0X
LOCAL
STREET
1,200 MAX,
25 MPH
150 T's
others
200
60
O.K.
40
5.0
4 AC
4 AB
150
200
12X
1.0X
CUL-DE-SAC
STREET
500 MAX*
25 MPH
150 T's
others
200.
56
O.K.
36
4.5
4 AC
4 AB
150
200
12X
1.0X
ALLEY
to**.*.
....
24
O.K.
24
4.0
5-1/2"
PCC*B)
....
1.0X
HILLSIDE I
STREET 1
1
20 MPH
150 1
46-56 1
Limited 1
subject to
approval
32(D
5.0
4 AC
4 AB
125(2>
200
15X
1.0X A-™~— — ^a_ v-ij— — ^g^B
MOTES;
Parking limited to one side.
Reduction to 100* with approval of City Engineer.
Grades greater than 10X will require specific approval, chip seal, etc.
Not to exceed 6X thru Intersections. Local, cul-de-sac and hillside may
increase grade through Intersections up to 8X, provided that CALTRANS
guidelines for sight distance and vertical curves are complied with.
REVISED 11/90
(5)
(6)
(8)
This is based upon less than 2X grades. Intersection stopping
sight distance per CALTRANS guidelines and Section 8 on Page 8.
Assumes no superelevations; includes standard crossfall.
Minimum grade of 2.OX is encouraged. If 1.0X mininun is not possible,
special construction may be used with City Engineer approval. Gutter
line of cul-de-sac bulbs and knuckles shall have Minium grade of 1.0X.
Typical centerline grades at the upper reach of cul-de-sacs shall
be 2X minimum.
'Alley sections shall conform to SDRSD G-21.
F. All street widening plans shall include working copies of cross-sections not to
exceed 50* on center. Additional cross-sections may be required where design
situations develop.
3. ALIGNMENT
A. Streets shall normally intersect at right angles. Local streets shall have at least 50'
of tangent adjacent to an intersection, measured from extension of the curb face.
Collectors shall have at least 100'. Arterials will require special design. An angle of
intersection more than 10° from a right angle requires special approval and design.
Hillside terrain will require special design.
B. The centerline of streets entering upon opposite sides of any given street shall
normally be offset by at least 200' for local residential streets measured from
centerline to centerline. Cul-de-sac streets shall normally be designated as'T type
intersections, and may be offset at 150'.
C. Cul-de-sacs shall be permitted when the cul-de-sac street meets the following
standards:
"1) A 30-foot or 32-foot curb-to-curb private street, a 36-foot or 40-foot
curb-to-curb residential street and all the following conditions are met:
a) Length of street does not exceed 600 feet.*
b) Traffic volume at entrance does not exceed 500 ADT.
c) Number of dwelling units does not exceed 50.
'Length may be increased to a maximum of 1200 feet with special permission
of the City Engineer under the following conditions:
2) A 40-foot curb-to-curb local street and ajl of the following conditions are met:
a) Driveway and street intersections are spaced 150 feet or more apart.
b) The length along streets from entrance to most remote point does not
exceed one-half mile(i^°o JA^
c) Traffic volume at entrance does not exceed 1200 ADT.
d) Number of dwelling units does not exceed 120.
3) A 4-iane secondary or major arterial with a raised median and all of the
following conditions are met:
a) The length of street does not exceed one-half mile.
b) Traffic volume at entrance does not exceed 3000 ADT.
c) The net buildable lot area served by the street does not exceed 25 acres.
(H UNIT
iriniCAIES SHEET NUMBER
INDICA1ES UNir BOUNDARf
INDICATES SHEET BOUNDARY
INDICA1ES AFrORDAOLE DWElLinC UNIt
I'MINIMK HH'»lllUtHT AHt'lKI.
•• 'III IIV ol (.V,|(|;;|IAII|| •;.•
1 FM II 'A' II II VI!HII!: CAI! W Bl! IAI)'II1UAC:'II'INIC I.,! M i 4!;
PJIJ1, 9CM1?!
CCNtRAL NOUS:
AT SUNNY CFIEHK
I tOAl DCSCRIPHOH:
VICINITY MAP
DWHIR/SUBDIVIOCR:
- ..-.,»„ tzzsi'l. ,i
• t (««e -, f .. . V . J ',,^.7*'^.,..,.„>.., ,| ,., 1 ,„ ,IX ^' '-
.^..j?—': ••--^" ''*<•(.•*'*! • r>.n '. *• n*«
.SIBlll.ilCIIOM
OWNER:
.3IBIU StCIIOIC
INCINttR Or WORK:
ICCtMO:
|m/b ?i| 'in. >.,,
v v I I'
t !•
"f"
. f l'» .»."t i-—.-
im
Western
Pacific
Housing
IAN DIIGO DIVISION
January 28, 1999
City of Carlsbad
ATTN: Jordan
Planning Department
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576
Re: Proposed Street Names for Lohf Project (SDP 99-01).
Jordan,
We are hereby requesting street name approvals for our Lohf property (CT 97-15/SDP 99-01) located in
the City of Carlbad west of El Camino Real and northwest of Dove Lane. Please find attached two
reduced copies of our site plan which indicate all proposed street names. The existing Dove Lane will
extend into and terminate in the project site. Additionally, Poinsettia Lane will extend westerly from El
Camino Real through the site to provide access. A series of four public residential streets will provide
access to the individual lots. The proposed names for these streets are indicated below along with
alternative names.
Proposed Street Names (4)
Shoveler Court (Street A)
Mallard Avenue (Street B)
Brant View (Street C)
Whimbrel Way (Street D)
Alternative Street Names
Skimmer Court
Dunlin Court
Heron Lane
Moorhen Avenue
Turnstone Drive
Siskin Drive
Stilt View
Oriole Way
Phoebe Lane
Sora Drive
Please contact me at 760-929-1600 if you need any additional information or have questions.
Sincerely
WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING
Sondra Harris
Assistant Forward Planner
cc: Ryan Green, WPH
2385 Camino Vida Roble, Suite 107,Carlsbad, California 92009 760.929.1600 Fax 760.929.1601
Mike Grim, City of Carlsbad
Clyde Wickham, City of Carlsbad
Ray Martin, Hunsaker and Associates
Melissa Allen, Jack Henthorn & Associates
2385 Camino Vida Roble, Suite 107,Carlsbad, California 92009 760.929.1600 Fax 760.929.1601
H.CLA. aw s>Mf
Q
a!
JANUARY 13, 1999
TO: CITY MANAGER
VIA: Planning Director
FROM: Associate Planner
CIRCULATION MAPS FOR COUNCILMEMBER HALL'S MEETING ON LOHF
PROJECT
Councilmember Hall will be meeting this Friday afternoon, January 15, 1999, with
citizens from the Pavoreal neighborhood concerning the Lohf Subdivision. The Lohf
Subdivision was recently approved by the Planning Commission and is pending
scheduling for the City Council hearing. Since the topic of the meeting will be traffic
circulation and roadway connections, Councilmember Hall requested maps that
would show the existing and future circulation in and around the Lohf project site.
Attached are four maps. These maps are as follows:
» A composite map showing existing and future roadways in the area of
Pavoreal and the Lohf project site;
» A copy of the Tentative Tract Map for the Lohf Subdivision showing the
proposed roadway layout;
» A copy of the Viewpoint subdivision map (now known as Pavoreal)
showing the existing roadway layout and indicating the future extension
of Mimosa Drive;
» A copy of the proposed Kevane subdivision (currently in process with
the Planning Department) showing the proposed roadway layout.
I am available to attend the Friday afternoon meeting with Councilmember Hall and
the citizens from Pavoreal should he want staff assistance. Please feel free to
contact me at extension 4499 if you have any questions or require additional
information. Thank you.
MICHAEL GRI
Attachments