The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCT 98-02; Colina Roble; Tentative Map (CT)Sent by: CONCORDIA HOMES OF CALIF LLC 760 804 1577;03/30/01 10:37; JfitfiH-#473;Page 1/2 fONCORDIA|V> ^7*^7~^7*>s^ 1m. March 29,2001 Mr. Mark Tucker Department of the Army Los Angeles District Corps of Engineers San Diego Field Office 16855 West Bernardo Drive, Suite 300A San Diego, CA 92127 RE: ARMY CORP AGREEMENT #2000-00-472; STREAMBED ALTERATION AGREEMENT #5-348-99 Dear Mr. Tucker: Pursuant to the above-referenced agreement, this letter is to notify the department that the planting activities are to be completed by Friday, March 31, 2001. Mr. Thomas M. Cherry, Senior Planner/Biologist of Mooney and Associates will perform a site inspection, and will write a report that will be forwarded to you. If you have any questions, please contact our superintendent at (760) 633-3870 (construction site) or (760) 802-9374 (mobile phone) or by written correspondence. Sincerely, LB/L.CONCORDIA CARLSBAD 28 LLC Michael C. Ugar Manager MCUxea cc: Mr, Christer Westman, City of Carlsbad via fax (760) 602-8559 Mr. Robert C. Ladwig, LDG via fax (760) 438-0173 Mr. Phil Buccola Engineering, via fax (760) 721-2046 Mr. Bob Huber, Concordia Homes Mr. Ken Howe, Concordia Homes 71,-iO Avi'MiJa Emilias* Suik1 .201 * Carlsbad. CA 9.»00'j-4oS7 Telephone No.: (76(1) S04-lS"d* Fas No.: (7(iO) 804-1577 Sent by: CONCORDIA HOMES OF CALIF LLC 760 804 1577;03/30/01 10:37; ;fiifi«_#473;Page 2/2 If ONCORDIA IIV> ^^^"v51^-^ i VI March 29,2001 Ms. Tamara Spear Department of Fish and Game South Coast Region 4949 Viewridge Avenue San Diego, CA 92123 RE: STREAMBED ALTERATION AGREEMENT #5-348-99 Dear Ms. Spear: Pursuant to the above-referenced agreement, and in particular paragraph #27, this letter is to notify the department that construction activities will be completed by Friday, March 30,2001. Mr, Thomas M. Cherry, Senior Planner/Biologist of Mooney and Associates will conduct a final inspection and issue a written report, If you have any questions, please contact our superintendent Bob Huber at (760) 633-3870 (construction site) or (760) 802-9374 (mobile phone) or by written correspondence. Sincerely, LB/L CONCORDIA CARLSBAD 28 LLC Michael C. Ugar Manager MCU:cea cc: Mr. Christer Westman, City of Carlsbad via fax (760) 602-8559 Mr. Robert C. Ladwig, LDG via fax (760) 438-0173 Mr. Phil Buccola Engineering, via fax (760) 721-2046 Mr. Bob Huber, Concordia Homes Mr. Ken Howe, Concordia Homes 7)30 Telephone ,\u Siiiic 201 » O.arbbad, CA 92009-465? (760) 8<H-J>7<> * Kax No.; (760) 804-1577 Uiduiig Design Group, Inc. August 18, 2000 Skip Hanunann City of Carlsbad 163 5 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Reference: COLINA ROBLE(CT98-02)/LAND SLIDE (LADWIG DESIGN GROUP JOB. NO. L-1060) Dear Skip: To follow up on our discussion this morning, enclosed are some graphics that show the approximate limits of the land slide behind lots 24, 25, and 28 as identified by Randy Wagner at Leighton & Associates this morning. I have also identified on the graphic the two test sites where we would like to get a drill rig in tomorrow morning if possible. The next step would be for the geologist to calculate the buttress size and to determine the limits of removals that we need to do to build the buttress. This will define the areas that we do need to mitigate. One of the exhibits that I have attached is the biology resources map put together by Mooney & Associates back in '97 for the project. I have identified on the biology map the approximate limits of the slide area also. Mooney will be providing a letter to me today relative to the impacts of the two tests sites. We met out there with a representative from Mooney this morning and picked two spots that are very accessible that are openings in the brush areas. There should be minimal impacts. Our request again is to receive permission to do the test borings tomorrow, Saturday, so that the extent of the slide can be determined and a adequate buffer designed which will also indicate for us the area that will be impacted that needs to be mitigated. 703 Polomar flirport Road 4 Suite 300 + Carlsbad, California 92009 (760)438-3182 FfiX (760) 438-0173 Skip Hammann August 18,2000 Page 2 Thank you for your help on this. I have left a message with Clyde, and Christer Westman and also with Tim Fennesy and you have been the only individual that I have talked to so far. The letter from the biologist will be here later on today and I will bring that to your office as soon as it is available. Sincerely, LADWIG DESIGN GROUP, INC. > Robert C. Ladwig, President RCL:lb.012 Enclosure cc: Phil Buccola Michael Ugar Randy Wagner Christer Westman Clyde Wickman Tim Fennesy Brian Mooney 703 Polomor flirport Road 4 Suite 300 4 Carlsbad, California 92009 (760) 438-3182 FflX (760) 438-0173 HABITATS. Coast Live Oak Woodland ;||||;|N Southern Mixed Chaparral Coastal Salt Marsh/ Freshwater Marsh Southern Willow Scrub Disturbed Chaparral Disturbed Arroyo Willow S^^j^^Jj ' CLO Coast Live Oak ?fC Southwestern Spiny Rush ® Wetland Delineation Test Pits ACOE and CDFG Jurisdictional Wetlands o 50' 100' Biological Resources. RECEIVED DEC 0 2 1997 UDWIG DESIGN GR I-m-*-^.,:-W:'V^^-ffir'^m- \;:\!v-^~r''«; - ..•;'.£{ f* • -...far,f^*V^'v' fer^' "i& • >'^tf !--^':I^WT l^^:fe::3- |l^r_ j.ll/ flfe>-Ife^^s*^^^ ni^l/i '"" /}/ -'i>®^^^^a^^^lS^;^¥rtf v, ///< -•- i^j::;-:;- 'fr^GF^^M ^^:'::*M-r'/~ •'• *'' ' *'-''\OT*l is»y%: . -V- • Jm&--«i£%*Q•".•:••$.$.&i,.\*,*z*.-£"'2~t • r^"fl »>-;r£fe#B.-W1 ,«.'.«! ,*.'• .-'. Mooney &L&SS&d<Xt£S COMMUNITY PLANNING & ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Mr. Roben C. Ladwig Ladwig Design Group, Inc. 703 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 300 Carlsbad, CA 92009 Re: Biological assessment of emergency slope procedures for Colina Roble/CT98-02 in the City of Carlsbad August 18, 2000. Dear Mr. Ladwig; Mooney &. Associates was retained by Michael Ugar of Concordia Homes to conduct construction monitoring for the Colina Roble/CT98-02 project. The 35-acre property is located along the western side of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Olivenhain Road, and north of Avienda La Posta. During the construction process an area of potential slope instability was identified by the geotechnical monitors Leighton and Associates. Inc. This area occurs immediately south of Lots 24, 25, and 28. Drilling of holes approximately 30 inches in diameter and 40 feet in depth, is proposed to determine optimal methods for stabilization of this slope. This letter reports on the biological effects of the immediate area where drilling has been proposed. Prior to any clearing, a biological survey was conducted for active bird nests and sensitive plants on the 0.027-acre area that will be impacted. The survey was conducted on August 18, 2000, between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m., by Mooney & Associates biologist Ana Gaisiner. Survey conditions included temperatures ranging from approximately 75-80°F, clear sunny skies, and winds less than 10 mph. Photo documentation of the site was taken. One habitat type was detected during the survey: Coast Live Oak Woodland. Previous biological surveys describe this habitat in detail. One drill site will impact approximately 750 square feet of habitat. Species in this area include Mohave Yucca (Yucca schidigera), scrub oak (Quercus burberidifolki), white sage (Salvia apiana), coyote brush (Baccharis pilularis), flat-top buckwheat (kriogomtrnfascicitlatiim), and southern honeysuckle (Lonicera subspicata). The second drill she will impact approximately 375 square feet of habitat. Vegetation in this area is dominated by scrub oak. flat-top buckwheat, chamisc (Adenostumafasciculatd) and several non- native grasses. F.xtcnsive surveys were conducted throughout the area to be impacted for birds nests, and included inspecting vegetation from both below and above the canopy layers. Broad surveys were also conducted from several vantage points. No bird nests were detected within the 0.027-acre . RECEIVED 9903 HusJuesspork Avenue San Diego, California 92131-1120 AUG 1 8 2030 v ww.bfma. cum (858) 578-8964 FAX (858) 578-0573 Z9V-d ED/70'd 066-1 E1S08/S8S8+ 2 eBed £ONIH33NION3 NOS1IM < - B.Z.SO8/.S8S8 + b1o \ OO/SU/S area during the surveys. Furthermore, no birds were flushed from the brush during inspection suggesting that no nests are likely to be present on the grading site. The proposed clearing of this area of vegetation will not affect any nesting birds. Coast live oak woodland habitats are considered important resources due to their diminishing loss to development. A no net loss would be required as mitigation. Mitigation may include revegetation on-site or purchase of credit in an oak woodland mitigation bank. ; / I The results of surveys for state or federally listed plants and birds, conducted on August 18, 2000, indicate that there are no resources present which would prevent clearing and drilling activities from proceeding. Previous surveys on other parts of the property found similar results. Mooney & Associates is continuing to monitor the process of the construction and will be on site during the clearing of this additional vegetation. ' If you have any questions or comments regarding the above information, please call me at (858) 578-8964. : Brian F. Mooney, AIGP Senior Principal \ Mooney & Associates 9903 Businesspark Avenue San Diego, CA 92131-1120 Phone: (858) 578-8964 FAX(858)578-0573 99tH ZO/ZO'd & i WS08.JS898+ fONIU33NIONH NOSHIM <- 00-8i-'nV OO/B1./S Sent By: WILSON ENGINEERING; AuHHO Or^Tpin Fr«- 7604380173;Sep-12-00 8:53;Page 5/7 '«« • I P.04/oi F-S82 Revegetation P ant List Species Qmrcus agrifotia Overctts berberictifofia Raccharis pilvtaris Kibes speciosum Latvia apiana Salvia ntellljera Hetaromeles arbutlfolla Lonicera suhspicalu Rfnix in/egrrjblia Toxicodendron diver$Hobnm' Yucca M/hippl*i Total plums per acre Num/Acrc 80 160 25 25 25. 1 10 25 125 25 25 25 550 Size Jin gallons To be alfinied in Ui< U.1K »creilv>p« MubilkMiwi iiren only. 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 ] 1 Spacing (feet) on center ' 2S 1 is ; random i 5-8 I random random \ random i 8-10 : random \ random To be plfinied in Ui< U.1K »creilv>p« Mttbilkxiwi iiren only, Hydroseed List Species Annmiakt txjlifornica Saccharin saroihroides Mimutus auramiacus Eri"gormmfasciculalnm Exchxcholziu calif or nica SiayrirKhivm helium DicrHs/ostemma capitaivm Minimum % Pur/Germ 15/50 4/40 5/70 10/65 98/75 95/75 95/50 LBS/ACRE \ \ 2 \ 2 2 3 5 1 1 Total Founds per Acre 16 Sent By: WILSON ENGINEERING;7604380173;Sep-12-00 8:53;Page 6/7 • - . Floral Compendium for C< Scientific Nairn FERNS AND FERN-ALLIES Selagincllaecufi Selaginella btgeloyii Selagflttlla cineraSCtm ANCIOSPERMS DICOTVLSDONS Aizoacoac Aptvnta cordljblla* Corpobroiu.i edvllx* Anncardinccite Rhu.v tntegrifolta Toxicodendron diversitobuin Aaioraccac Artemisia cplifarntca Bacchorh pitularls Saccharis xarothroides Liursmtliaftlaginifolia Caprifoltaccnc Lonicera subsplcaia var. thnHCfata Crassulactae Dudltya lanceotata EricACeac ArctosMphyhs glanduldifa ssp. giandvlota I Xylococcus bicolw FM^WVCMC Quercus agfifalia var. agrifolia Qutrcuf berberMtfolta Gnivwlariuccuc /</A«»- specioaini Lamioccuc .S'o/V/o dpi ana Latvia mal/ifern Ro*accac /I denattoma foscicv/aiiini JJeittromeles arbuiifnlia ScrophulariMCciie Spike-Mo Bigelow's : Ashy spikt Fig-Man? Baby sun r Houciuol»r Swmn« or LcnioiiadC) Western p< Sunflower California Coyote bru broom Broom bnc California. HOHcysucI Chaparral Siimecrop Lancc-lcaf Heath Fait Eastwood r Mission-mi Qttk Fulfill CouSI live ( Scrub oak Gooiclicrr Fiichsia-flo Mint Fami While Klge Bl/ick $age Rose Fnml Cliainise To/on, Clu1 Figwun Fa «mmm \W r-057 P. 05/fl(( F-632 Una Roble/CT98-02 \ s Family pikc-raOSS -moss old FumMy 3Se e Cashew Family (Crry i son oak Family sagebrush sh, Cluiparral laris ister Ic Family lOncysuCklC Family live-forever ily lanzanira nzanira Y ok. Cncina ' Family vered gooseberry y y Stmas berry mily PH \ PH PH i PH i s ]- S \ S ! s \ S ; PH, Ss i S i PH i S ; S I T i S ; S \ Ss ; S : s S.T i Sent By: WILSON ENGINEERING; 1 Fra»- 7604380173; Scientific Name Common Mlrtiulun aurantiacus ANCIOSFERMS MONOCOTYLEDONS IrldHccae SisyrlncJilvm be/lum Bush moiil eyflower Mchelasiitmmo capltaiiim Yucea Blue-cyed- LUy Fami Blue dicks Our Lord's Punniaetum yelattum *Fountain Scientific and common names are from flickman (1993) an</.$ /jaw/e.v ore idknn frvm Abrama (1923, i944j. Abrattts an (1996). Mum (1974), Rovtn (19M). Rabw ft 989). and Gnwh Fofrit; ACi- Annual Grass; All " Annual Herb; A V » fftrh; P(i " Perennial Grays; Pti - Perennial Herb; PV Hibltai; All" Species occurs in all on-sire habitats; & « S Maritime .Vuccutcni Scrub, Non-native plant species Possible non-nathe plant specify Sep-12-00 8:53; t>; r-age a Page 7/7 T-057 P.fle/flfl F-632 Wn«Growth Form 'Habitat candle ISS Ss,S PH PH S; PO niter andPavtik 0994), Addirlonal coma\on plant Ferris (195), I960), ^eauchamp (]986), awyer end Wolf (1995>. Annual Vine; BG " Biennial Grass; BH Perennial Vine; $t - Svbshrvb; S - .Svt*; and T /.- MSS-D « DisturbedAfaritimtt Svcculeiit Scrub; Sent By: WILSON ENGINEERING;7604380173;Aug-29-00 11:29;Page 1/1 Uiduiig Design Group, Inc. TO: File FROM: Robert C. Ladwig DATE: August 29,2000 SUBJECT: COLINA ROBLE - (CT98-02) LOTS 23-25 STABILITY BUTTRESS/REVEGETATION PLAN RE: Notes from conversations this morning (8/29/00) • Cbrister Westman - Need to replace oak trees per May 97 Mooney letter at 1 0: 1 • Tom Cherry - Mooney - Will contact Anna (Field Biologist) to count trees and understory plants in 0. 1 8 acre impact area. Tom also asked that 1 Vi to 2* of top soil to be set aside and replaced. He will prepare letter on plant replacement requirements. • Skip Hammann - Red line plans look okay - will contact Buccola to change mylars. Skip also wants to see something from the soils engineer [Leighton] on work to be done, • John Duewel - Buccola - will contact Skip on details of how to make changes. Per John, plans will be picked up, changed and re-submitted to the City today. • Christer Westman - Wants revegetation plan prepared and will decide if work can be proceed while revegetation plan is being prepared. As a minimum Christer wants a written plan from the biologists and may release the project for construction, subject to his review of the biologist letter. Bob Huber - Concordia - Talked to the City inspector - Tim Fennesy - who is concerned about timing of construction. Tim wants the repair work completed as soon as possible. Bob will also contact Mike Stewart at Leighton for a brief letter specifying work to be done for the stability buttress. The above are conversations with individuals noted prior to 10:00 on Tuesday, August 29*. Robert C. Ladwig RCL:lb.6-2000 Copy to: Christer Westman Skip Hammann John Duewel Tom Cherry 602-8559 Fax 602-8562 Fax 721-2046 Fax (858) 578-0573 Fax Bob Huber [Michael Ugar] 804-1577 Fax Tim Fennesy 438-4178 Fax TonyLawson 729*8324 Fax Mike Stewart (858) 292-0771 Fax 703 Polomor flirport Road + Suite 300 + Carlsbad, California 92009 (760) 438-3182 fflX (760) 436XN 73 09/13/2000 15:25 FAX 760 729 8324 ADL PLANNING Colina Roble Slope Restoration Exhibit By: ADL Planning Associates Date: September, 13,2000 Approximate Impacted Area: 14,840 sf. Proposed Irrigation: Proposed Trees*: Proposed Shrubs": Proposed Hydroseed Mix: Temporary service from HOA maintained areas (16) - 24* box Quercus agrifolias (Coast Live Oak) (1) 1 -gallon container sized shrub per 100 sf, Approximately 150 shrubs such as: • Arctosaphylps refugioensis (Refugio Manzanita) • Baccharis pilularis (Dwarf Coyote Bush) • Ceanothus 'Ray Hartman' (California Lilac) • Heteromeles arbutifotia (Toyon) • Lonicera subspicata (Chaparral Honeysuckle) • Mimulus aurantiacus (Bush Monkey Rower) • Salvia leucantha (Mexican Sage) 6 Ibs/acre Artemisia callfomica (California Sage Brush) 4 Ibs/acre Salvia apiana (White Sage) 8 Ibs/acre Salvia leucophylla (Purple sage) 10 Ibs/acre Quercus Dumosa (Scrub Oak) 10 Ibs/acre Rhu& integnfolia (Lemonade Berry) All proposed trees shall be multMrunked or natural shaped. All proposed shrubs are available through: Tree of Ufe Nursery* (949) 728-0685 09/13/2000 15:25 FAX 760 729 8324 ADL PLANNING ca \ Sent By: WILSON ENGINEERING; S1 'ATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY._ 7604380173;May-16-00 1:12PM;Page 2/7 GRAY DAVIS. Governor .DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME S »uth Coast Region 4' 149 Viewridge Avenue S in Diego, California 92123 (6 58} 467-4201 FAX (858) 467-4235 May 08, 2000 LB/L Concordia Carlsbad-28 LLC Attn: Michael Ugar 7130 Avenida Encinas #200 Carlsbad, CA 92009 Dear Mr. Ugar: Enclosed is Streambed Alteration Agreement #5-348-99 that authorizes work on the Colina Roble project impacting Encinitas Creek in San Diego County. This action is authorized under Section 1600 of the Fish and Game Code and has been approved by the California Department of Fish and Game. Pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Department filed a Notice of Determination (NOD) on the project on file* 6 ,l-l)[}i) Under CEQA regulations, the project has a 30-day statute of limilalions dn court challenges of the Department's approval under CEQA. The Department believes that the project fully meets the requirements of the Fish and Game Code and CEQA. However, if court challenges on the NOD are received during the 30- day period, then an additional review or even modification of the project may be required. If no comments are received during the 30-day period, then any subsequent comments need not be responded to. This information is provided to you so that if you choose to undertake the project prior to the close of the 30-day period, you do so with the knowledge that additional actions may be required based on the results of any court challenges that are filed during mat period. Please contact Tamara Spear at (858) 467-4223 if you have any questions regarding the Streambed Alteration Agreement. Sincerely, ISA/C.F, Raysbrook Regional Manager Enclosure cc: Tamara Spear RECEIVED MAY • * m DESIGN 6ft li0% Sent By: WILSON ENGINEERING; 7604380173; Page 1 of 5 May-16-00 1:12PM;Page 3/7 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME 4949 Viewridge Avenue San Diego, California 92123 Notification No.5-348-99 AGREEMENT REGARDING PROPOSED STREAM OR LAKE ALTERATION THIS AGREEMENT, entered into between the State of California, Department of Fish and Game, hereinafter called the Department, and Michael Uoar of LB/L Concordia Carisbad-28 LLC . State of California. hereinafter called the Operator, is as follows: WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 1603 of California Fish and Game Code, the Operator, on the 18th day of November. 1999. notified the Department that they intend to divert or obstruct the natural flow of, or change the bed, channel, or bank of, or use material from the streambed(s) of, the following waterfs): Encinitas Creek, tributary to Batiauitos Lagoon . San Diego County, California, Section _ Township _ Range _. WHEREAS, the Department (represented by Tamara Spear through a site visit on the 21st day of December. 1999) has determined that such operations may substantially adversely affect those existing fish and wildlife resources within Encinitas Creek. specifically identified as follows: Southern mixed chaparral, one Coast Live Oak and a mosaic of wetland habitat including freshwater marsh, coastal salt marsh, and southern willow scrub. THEREFORE, the Department hereby proposes measures to protect fish and wildlife resources during the Operator's work. The Operator hereby agrees to accept the following measures/conditions as part of the proposed work. If the Operator's work changes from that stated in the notification specified above, this Agreement is no longer valid and a new notification shall be submitted to the Department of Fish and Game. Failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement and with other pertinent code sections, including but not limited to Fish and Game Code Sections 5650, 5652, 5937, and 5948, may result in prosecution. Nothing in this Agreement authorizes the Operator to trespass on any land or property, nor does it relieve the Operator of responsibility for compliance with applicable federal, state, or local laws or ordinances. A consummated Agreement does not constitute Department of Fish and Game endorsement of the proposed operation, or assure the Department's concurrence with permits required from other agencies. This Agreement becomes effective the date of Department's signature and terminates January 31. 2002 for protect construction only. This Agreement shall remain in effect for that time necessary to satisfy the terms/conditions of this Agreement. Sent By: WILSON ENGINEERING; page 2 of 5 7604380173;May-16-00 1:13PM;Page 4/7 STREAMBED ALTERATION CONDITIONS FOR NOTIFICATION NUMBER: _5i34fr99 1. The following provisions constitute the limit of activities agreed to and resolved by this Agreement. The signing of this Agreement does not imply that the Operator is precluded from doing other activities at the site. However, activities not specifically agreed to and resolved by this Agreement shall be subject to separate notification pursuant to Fish and Game Code Sections 1 600 etseq. 2. The Operator proposes to alter the streambed of Encinitas Creek to accomodate the development of 28 residential units on 35 acres located south of the southwest corner of Rancho Santa Fe Road and Olivenhain Road impacting 0.47 acres of streambed, 0.04 acres of southern mixed chapparal, and one coast live oak. 3. The agreed work includes activities associated with No. 2 above. The project area is located in Encinitas Creek, San Diego County. Specific work areas and mitigation measures are described on/in the plans and documents submitted by the Operator, including a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and shall be implemented as proposed unless directed differently by this agreement. 4. The Operator shall not impact more than .47 acres of streambed and one coast live oak tree. All impacts are permanent. 10.8 acres of wetlands will be preserved and 1,0 acres of wetland habitat will be restored on site. Impacts to the southern mixed chapparal will be offset by the preservation of remaining chaparral habitat in the 8.4 acre open space lot (Lot #29). 5. The Operator shall submit a plant palette and long-term maintenance provision for the 1.00 acre restoration area identified on-site. The Operator shall receive Department approval prior to project initiation/impacts. Revegetation shall use only native species. All mitigation shall be installed no iater than March 31. - 6. The Operator shall not remove vegetation within the stream from March 15 to July 15 to avoid impacts to nesting birds, 7. No equipment shall be operated in ponded or flowing areas. 8. Disturbance or removal of vegetation shall not exceed the limits approved by the Department. The disturbed portions of any stream channel shall be restored. Restoration shall include the revegetation of stripped or exposed areas with vegetation native to the area. 9. Installation of bridges, culverts, or other structures shall be such that water flow is not impaired. Bottoms of temporary culverts shall be placed at stream channel grade; bottoms of permanent culverts shall be placed at or below stream channel grade, 10. Preparation shall be made so that runoff from steep, erodible surfaces will be diverted into stable areas with little erosion potential. Frequent water checks shall be placed on dirt roads, cat tracks, or other work trails to control erosion. 11. Water containing mud, silt or other pollutants from aggregate washing or other activities shall not be allowed to enter a lake or flowing stream or placed in locations that may be subjected to high storm flows. 12. Structures and associated materials not designed to withstand high seasonal flows shall Sent By: WILSON ENGINEERING; 7604380173; May-16-00 1:13PM; Page 5/7 Page 3 of 5 be removed to areas above the high water mark before such flows occur. 13. The perimeter of the work site shall be adequately flagged to prevent damage to adjacent riparian habitat. 14. Staging/storage areas for equipment and materials shall be located outside of the stream. 15. The Operator shall comply with all litter arid pollution laws. All contractors, subcontractors and employees shall also obey these laws and it shall be the responsibility of the operator to ensure compliance. 16. If a stream's low flow channel, bed or banks/lake bed or banks have been altered, these shall be returned: as nearly as possible to their original configuration and width, without creating future erosion problems. 17. All planting shall have a minimum of 80% survival the first year and 100% survival thereafter and/or shall attain 75% cover after 3 years and 90% cover after 5 years for the life of the project. If the survival and cover requirements have not been met, the Operator is responsible for replacement planting to achieve these requirements. Replacement plants shall be monitored with the same survival and growth requirements for 5 years after planting. •y/o^igao 18. All planting shall be done between October 1 and March 31,2069 to take advantage of the winter rainy season. 19. An annual report shall be submitted to the Department by Jan. 1 of each year for 5 years after planting. This report shall include the survival, 80% cover, and height of both tree and shrub species. The number by species of plants replaced, an overview of the revegetation effort, and the method used to assess these parameters shall also be included. Photos from designated photo stations shall be included. 20. Access to the work site shall be via existing roads and access ramps. 21. Spoil sites shall not be located within a stream/lake, where spoil shall be washed back into a stream/lake, or where it will cover aquatic or riparian vegetation. 22. Raw cement/concrete or washings thereof, asphalt, paint or other coating material, oil or other petroleum products, or any other substances which could be hazardous to aquatic life, resulting from project related activities, shall be prevented from contaminating the soil and/or entering the waters of the state. These materials, placed within or where they may enter a stream/lake, by Operator or any party working under contract, or with the permission of the Operator, shall be removed immediately. 23. No debris, soil, silt, sand, bark, slash, sawdust, rubbish, cement or concrete or washings thereof, oil or petroleum products or other organic or earthen material from any construction, or associated activity of whatever nature shall be allowed to enter into or placed where it may be washed by rainfall or runoff into, waters of the State. When operations are completed, any excess materials or debris shall be removed from the work area. No rubbish shall be deposited within 150 feet of the high water mark of any stream or lake. 24. No equipment maintenance shall be done within or near any stream channel where petroleum products or other pollutants from the equipment may enter these areas under any fiow, 25. The Operator shall provide a copy of this Agreement to ail contractors, Sent By: WILSON ENGINEERING; 7604380173; May-16-00 1:14PM; Page 6/7 Page 4 of 5 subcontractors, and the Operator's project supervisors. Copies of the Agreement shall be readily available at work sites at all times during periods of active work and must be presented to any Department personnel, or personnel from another agency upon demand. 26. The Department reserves the right to enter the project site at any time to ensure compliance with terms/conditions of this Agreement. 27. The Operator shall notify the Department, in writing, at least five (5) days prior to Initiation of construction (project) activities and at least five (5) days prior to completion of construction (project) activities. Notification shall be sent to the Department at 4949 Viewridge Avenue, San Diego, CA92123 Attn: Tamara A. Spear It is understood the Department has entered into this Streambed Alteration Agreement for purposes of establishing protective features for fish and wildlife. The decision to proceed with the project is the sole responsibility of the Operator, and is not required by this agreement It is further agreed all liability and/or incurred cost related to or arising out of the Operator's project and the fish and wildlife protective conditions of this agreement, remain the sole responsibility of the Operator. The Operator agrees to hold harmless the State of California and the Department of Fish and Game against any related claim made by any party or parties for personal injury or any other damages. The Department reserves the right to suspend or cancel this Agreement for other reasons, including but not limited to the following: a. The Department determines that the information provided by the Operator in support of the Notification/Agreement is incomplete or inaccurate; b. The Department obtains new information that was not known to it in preparing the terms and conditions of the Agreement; c. The project or project activities as described in the Notification/Agreement have changed; d. The conditions affecting fish and wildlife resources change or the Department determines that project activities will result in a substantial adverse effect on the environment. Before any suspension or cancellation of the Agreement, the Department will notify the Operator in writing of the circumstances which the Department believes warrant suspension or cancellation. The Operator will have seven (7) working days from the date of receipt of this notification to respond in writing to the circumstances described in the Department's notification. During the seven (7) day response period, the Operator shall immediately cease any project activities which the Department specified in its notification. The Operator shall not continue the specified activities until that time when the Department notifies the Operator in writing that adequate methods and/or measures have been identified and agreed upon to mitigate or eliminate the significant adverse effect. CONCURRENCE Sent By: WILSON ENGINEERING; Page 5 of 5 (Operator'sAname) 7604380173; May-16-00 1:14PM; Page 7/7 California Dept. of Fish and Game x \*v* (title (date) (signature) v7 (dale) ^ Reaiona! Manager (title) Prepared by; Tamara Spear, ES Hi October 4, 1999 TO: BOBBIE HODER PLANNING DEPARTMENT - GRAPHICS TRAFFIC ENGINEER RAENETTE ABBEY, BUILDING DEPARTMENT RONNA STICKROD, BUILDING DEPARTMENT STEVE RUGGLES, STATION #3 FIRE DEPARTMENT GREG WOODS, PUBLIC WORKS - OAK ST OFFICE LORI ALLEN, POLICE DEPARTMENT KARL VON SCHLIEDER - CIS FROM: Planning Director STREET NAME FOR CT 98-02, COLINA ROBLE The following street name has been approved as a part of the final map processing for CT 98-02, Colina Roble. A map delineating street locations is attached. Public Street: Las Olas Court PG:eh Attachment PACIFIC NOISE-CONTROL-. 219 Woodland Drive • Vista, CA 92083 • (760) 758-11.98 • Fax (760) 758-4761 January 7, 1998 Mr. David Bentley 3573 East Sunrise Drive, Suite 221 Tucson, AZ 85718 • PROJECT: Colina Roble Tentative Map RE: Environmental Noise Assessment Dear Mr. Bentley: Pacific Noise Control has completed this environmental noise assessment for the Colina Roble project located in the City of Carlsbad. The assessment has been conducted in conformance with the City of Carlsbad Planning Department's requirement that exterior noise levels not exceed 60 dB CNEL at the backyards of the homes. To mitigate the exterior noise impact to the City's noise standard, noise barriers would be required to be constructed along the rear yards of Lots 1 through 6 adjacent to Rancho Santa Fe Road. To comply with City's interior rtoise standard, an interior noise study will be required if two story homes are proposed to be located on Lots 1 through 6. The interior noise study will be required prior to issuance of building permits to ensure that the interior CNEL would not exceed 45 dB. : 1.0 BACKGROUND Project Setting The Colina Roble project site is located in the southeast quadrant of the City of Carlsbad, west of Rancho, Santa Fe Road and adjacent to the northern boundary of the City of Encinitas. The project would develop the site with 28 single family homes. This noise analysis evaluates the exterior noise level resulting from traffic along Rancho Santa Fe Road. The analysis is based on the tentative map (Ladwig Design Group 12/8/97). . • ' ." ...,•••-. "'•••:•''•.•'••;•'• ' • The primary noise source at the site is vehicular traffic along Rancho Santa Fe Road. Rancho Santa Fe Road is currently constructed as a two-lane road adjacent to the site. The existing traffic volume is RECEIVED JAN 08 1B98 DESIGN 6R Mr. David Bentley January 7, 1998 Page 2 approximately 11,260 average daily traffic (ADT) (City of Carlsbad, 1997); ,City Noise Criteria The City of Carlsbad requires that exterior noise levels shall not exceed a Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) of 60 dB at 20-feet from the rear/side of the structure, unless the rear/side yard is less than 20-feet deep. Where the useable rear/side yard is less than 20-feet deep, the location may be taken at the back of the useable rear/side yard, as may be approved by the Planning Director. AH sound levels discussed in this report are A-weighted. Methodology The noise analysis methodology is based on the City's noise assessment methodology documented in the City's Noise Guidelines Manual (City of Carlsbad, 1995). The future noise level along Rancho Santa Fe Road was determined based on an ambient noise measurement and using Caltrans' SOUND32 Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model (Caltrans, 1983) with California noise emission factors (Caltrans, 1987). The noise model is based on the Federal Highway Administration's traffic noise prediction model (FHWA, 1978). Input used in the noise model included the buildout traffic volume of 24,900 ADT (City of Carlsbad, 1997) with vehicle speeds of 45 rriph along Rancho Santa Fe Road. The truck mix used was 1.83 percent medium trucks and 0.28 percent heavy trucks. The traffic mix is based on vehicle mix surveys conducted by the City. The lots would typically be located above Rancho Santa Fe Road and the intervening ground, therefore, a hard site noise propagation factor was used. 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS Ambient Noise Monitoring A noise measurement was conducted at the site on December 16, 1997 ,to determine the existing noise level. The measurement was made using a calibrated Larson-Davis Laboratories Model 700 (S.N. 2132) digital integrating sound level meter. The sound level meter meets the current American National Standards Institute standard for a Type 1 precision sound level meter. • . r '.'.'_• The traffic noise measurement location was selected to provide an unobstructed view to Rancho Santa Fe Road and is depicted as Site 1 on Figure 1. Site 1 is approximately 40 feet from the existing center line of Rancho Santa Fe Road. The sound level meter was positioned at a height of approximately five feet above the ground. Concurrent traffic counts were made during the noise measurement. The measured average noise level was 67 dB. Table 1 shows the measured noise levels and the concurrent traffic volumes. - . . " . '..• ' •..<'••_..' ' . '.. Mr. David Bentley January 7, 1998 Page 4 Table! Measured Noise Level And Traffic Volumes Site 1 Description , 40 feet to center line of Rancho Santa Fe Road Date Time 12/16/97 10:30 to 10:50 AM C 67 dB Cars 162 WIT2 3 HT3 3 Notes: ' Equivalent Continuous Sound Level (Time-Average Sound Level) 2 Medium Trucks - 3 Heavy Trucks " . • • ' , • General Notes: Temperature 70 degrees, light wind, partly cloudy. Noise Modeling The existing CNEL was calculated for the noise measurement location based on the current traffic volume along Rancho Santa Fe Road using Caltrans' SOUND32 noise model. To verify the input used in the noise model, the same traffic volume and vehicle composition ratios counted during the noise measurements were used. The modeled hourly average noise level was within one dB of the average noise level measured at the site, thereby, confirming the assumptions used in the noise model. The CNEL at the measurement site was calculated by adjusting the traffic volume and truck percentage to a set of normalized conditions (i.e., the City traffic mix and existing ADT). The existing traffic generated CNEL at Site 1 is calculated to be 70 dB. . , ; 3.0 ANALYSIS Exterior Noise Levels Rancho Santa Fe Road would be the primary noise source in the future. Residences on Lots 1 through 6 adjacent to Rancho Santa Fe Road would be exposed to a future CNEL greater than 60 dB. The closest residence adjacent to Rancho Santa Fe Road would be located on Lot 1. The first floor CNEL would be approximately 68 dB, at this lot. The noise level would exceed the City's noise guideline by up to eight dB, and would result in a significant noise impact unless mitigation measures are incorporated into Mr. David Bentley January 7, 1998 PageS the project. The backyards of Lots 7 through 28 would be exposed to a future CNEL of 60 dB or less. Figure 2 depicts the future first floor noise level at the backyards of several representative lots. Interior Noise Levels The City requires that interior noise levels not exceed a CNEL 45 dB. Typically, with the windows open, and using standard California construction materials and methods, the building shells provide approximately 15 dB of noise reduction. Therefore, homes exposed to an exterior CNEL greater than 60 dB could result in an interior CNEL greater than 45 dB. The exterior CNEL at Lots 1 through 6 would exceed 60 dB CNEL. 4.0 MITIGATION Exterior Noise Mitigation Measures To mitigate the exterior noise impact at the homes on Lots 1 through 6 would require noise barriers ranging from five to seven-feet in height. Lots 1 and 2 would require a minimum seven-foot high noise barrier; Lots 3 and 4 would require a minimum six-foot high noise barrier; and Lots 5 and 6 would require a minimum five-foot high noise barrier to mitigate the noise impact. The noise barriers should be constructed alongthe top-of-slope of the lots as depicted in Figure 3. The noise barriers may be constructed as a wall, berm or combination of both. The noise barriers must have a surface density of at least 3.5 pounds per square foot; and have ho openings or cracks. The wall may be constructed of 5/8-inch plexiglas, any masonry material or a combination of these materials. The mitigation, measures are based on a review of the tentative map. If changes are made to the proposed building pad elevations or lot setbacks as shown in the tentative map dated December 8, 1997, a noise study will be required to determine whether the proposed barrier heights and locations will mitigate the noise level. , - .: -• . , " . < - Interior Noise Mitigation Measures To comply with the City's interior noise standard, an interior noise analysis will be required for the project if two story homes are proposed on Lots 1 through 6. This assumes that the exterior noise mitigation measures are implemented. If two story homes are proposed on these lots, the interior acoustical analysis will be required for the homes on these lots prior to issuance of building permits to ensure that the interior CNEL would not exceed 45 dB. To mitigate the interior noise impact, the homes on these lots would most likely require air-conditioning and/or mechanical ventilation, and could require sound-rated windows. . , \ ( V'j. "•;• • V; \ \ \ ' /'•'.' ) •>; ) V.-T - . i^Av/ ^ ••' fs "•-' v^ N02'56'3ff>W ' N Mr. David Bentley January 7, 1998 Page'8 This concludes our noise assessment. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, • . ; . ' : • ; Mike Komula Acoustician cc: Mr. Bob Ladwig, Ladwig Design Group REFERENCES California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), / June 1983. User's Instructions for SOUND32 (FHWA/CA-83/06). : V ; California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), 1987. California Vehicle Noise Emission Levels, : (FHWA/CA/TL-87/03). : - • ; '•.' V ; ; > \ '•;• ._-•_';;.: Carlsbad, City of, September, 1995. City of Carlsbad Noise Guidelines Manual. •; Carlsbad, City of, October 16, 1997. Personal Communication with Mr. Bob Johnson Traffic Engineering Department. ; '.>' '•'' • .. . , Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), 1978. FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model (FHWA-RD-77-108). ATTACHMENT! DEFINITIONS Term Definition Ambient Noise Level A-Weighted Sound Level, dBA Community Noise Equivalent Level, CNEL Decibel, dB Time-Average Sound Level The composite of noise from all sources near and far. The normal or existing level of environmental noise at a given location. v . . -. The sound pressure level in decibels as measured on a sound level meter using the A-weighted filter .network. The A- weighting filter de-emphasizes the very low and .very high frequency components of the sound in a manner similar to the frequency response of the human ear and correlates well with subjective reactions to noise. CNEL is the A-weighted equivalent continuous sound exposure level for a 24-hour period with a ten dB .adjustment added to sound levels, occurring during nighttime hours (10 pm to 7 am) and a five dB adjustment added to the sound levels occurring during the evening hours (7 pm to 10 pm), A unit for measuring sound pressure level and is equal to 10 times the logarithm to the base 10 of the ratio of the measured sound .pressure squared .to a reference pressure, which is 20 micropascals. •- • ' The sound level, corresponding to a steady state sound (Equivalent Sound Level), L^, level containing the same total energy as a time varying signal over a given sample period. Leq is designed to. average all of the loud and quiet sound levels occurring over a time period. .. : ;• . ATTACHMENT ;2; ;'• ;. SOUND32 TRAFFIC NOISE MODEL INPUT/OUTPUT Colina Roble -- Future Mitigated T-Rancho Santa Fe Road, 1 1219 , 45 , 23 , 45 , 4 , 45 T-Rancho Santa Fe Road, 2 1219 , 45 , 23 , 45 , 3 , 45 L-Northbound, 1 N,7452.,8198,147,NB8 N,7372.,8333,143,NB9 N,7230.,8515,132,NB10 N,7124.,8642,125,NB11 N,6993.,8825,121,NB12 N,6882. ,9078,118,NB13 N, 6828. ,9249,116,NB14 N, 6765. , 9440,114,NB15 N, 6642.,9812,114,NB16 L-Southbound, 2 N, 7432.,8186,147,SB8 N,7352.,8320,143,SB9 N,7212.,8499,132,SB10 N, 7105.,8628,125,SB11 N,6972.,8813,121,SB12 N,6859.,9070,118,SB13 N,6805.,9241,116,SB14 N, 6742.,9432,114,SB15 N, 6620. ,9805,114,SB16 B-Cut, 1 , 1 , 0 ,0 7057.,8571,130,130,Bl 7116.,8564,130,130,B2 7128.,8524,140,140,B3 7148.,8474,150,150,B4 7180.,8415,160,160,65 7202.,8384,162,162,B6 7189. , 8358,170,170,B7 B-Wall, 2 , 2 , 0 ,0 6983.,8595,130,137,Wl 7018.,8630,130,137,W2 6941.,8687,130,137,W3 6939.,8691,129,136,W4 6881. , 8734,129,136,W5 6878.,8742,126,132,W6 6807.,8777,126,132,W7 6803. ,8785,123,128,W8 6723. , 8814, 123,128,W9 6719.,8818,121,126,W10 B-Wall, 3 , 2 , 0 ,0 6719.,8818,121,126,W10 6634.,8832,121,126,W11 6624.,8843,116,121,W12 6545.,8834,116,121,W13 R, 1 , 67 ,500 6971,8651,135.,Rl R, 2 , 67 ,500 6910,8699,134.,R2 R, 3 , 67 ,500 6839,8749,131.,R3 R, 4 , 67 ,500 6764,8788,128.,R4 R, 5 , 67 ,500 6681,8814,126.,R5 R, 6 , 67 ,500 6589,8829,121.,R6 R, .7 , 67 ,500 6498,8812,120.,R7 R, 8 , 67 ,500 6422,8798,119.,R8 R, 9 , 67 ,500 6343,8781,118.,R9 R, 10 , 67 ,500 6285,8773,118.,RIO R, 11 , 67 ,500 6207,8762,117.,R11 R, 12 , 67 ,500 6009, 8806,119.,R14 R, 13 , 67 ,500 5873,8881,118.,R16 VC,C PC output option: 0 ,C:\SOUND32\CR.INP 17. 18 5.* 5.* Wll W12 15.7 MASONRY 79.5 MASONRY REC REC ID DNL PEOPLE LEQ(CAL) 1 Rl 2 R2 3 R3 4 R4 5 R5 6 R6 7 R7 8 R8 9 R9 10 RIO 11 Rll 12 R14 13 R16 BARRIER TYPE BERM MASONRY MASONRY/JERSEY CONCRETE 67. 67. 67. 67. 67. 67. 67. 67. 67. 67. 67. 67. 67. 500. 500. 500. 500. 500. 500. 500. 500. 500. 500. 500. 500. 500. 0 30752 0 0 59.6 58.8 59.4 59.1 57.7 55.8 58.2 57.6 56.8 56.2 55.5 54.4 53.7 COST . . • TOTAL COST = $31000. BARRIER HEIGHT INDEX FOR EACH BARRIER SECTION 111111111111111111 CORRESPONDING BARRIER HEIGHTS FOR EACH SECTION 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 7. 7. 7. 7. 7. 6. 6. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Sent By: WILSON ENGINEERING; 7604380173; May-19-OQ 11:29AM; Page 2/3 e/19/00 10IZ3AM; ^^ TBOHjcir»Wor3 -» wii-aum emaimysH*r»s»j I-BB- ^ 0 11;U«i From- W +856S780573 9 M51 P OZ/03 F'226 \looiiev May 19, 2000 comnmv PIANNIM A Mr. Mark Tucker U.S Army Corps of Engineers San Diego Field Office 16885 W. Bernardo Drive, Ste. 3 00A San Diego, CA 92127 Reference: Sensitive plant and bird nest surveys'. Concordia Homes property (Colina Robfe); File #2000-00-427 Dear Mr. Tucker: Mooney & Associates was retained by Concordia Homes to conduct surveys for sensitive plant species and bird nests within the grading limit lines on the future she of Concordia Homes, This property is located along the western side of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Olivenhain Road, and north of Avenida La Posta. Plant surveys were performed as a precautionary measure prior to grading the site. Surveys were conducted on May IS, 2000., between 9-11 a,m by Ana Gaisner and myself. Survey conditions included temperatures ranging from approximately 70-75 "F, 0-50% cloud cover, and winds less than 10 mph. The vegetation within the survey area was comprised of three distinct communities: non-native grassland, chaparral, and oak woodland. Non-native grassland habitat was dominated by ripgut grass (Bromtts diandns) and several species of mustard (Brassica spp.) Native species in the habitat included checker bloom (SMatea matveflora) and tarweed (Hemitoniafasciculala). The chaparral community was typical of this region ami consisted of a range of species including toyon (Meteromeles arbttftfolia), coyote brush (Boccharis pilvlarisi), aawtooth goJdenbush (Hazardia squarrosa), and lemonade beny (Rhus tntegrtfoKa), The oak woodland was dominated by coast live oak (Quercus agri/olia) and scrub oak (Quercvs dumosa) with honeysuckle (Lwicera subspicata) in the undentory. Ail vegetation within the area was surveyed thoroughly for sensitive plant species. No sensitive species were observed on site and therefore will not be impacted by the proposed construction activities, The property was also surveyed for bird nests on May 17,, 2000 between 12-3 p.m. by Erin Robbins and Ted Lee. Mooney & Associates staff biologists conducted extensive surveys throughout the chaparral and oak woodland habitats inspecting vegetation for birds nests from both below and above the canopy layers. Broad surveys were also conducted from several vantage points using binoculars. No bird nests were detected during the surveys. Furthermore, no birds were flushed from the brush during inspection suggesting that no nests are likely to be present on the grading site. RECEIVED 9903 San Oieso, CaKfot-nia 921 $1-1120 www.hftntt.eom «j (019) ,78.896* FAX <619> 57«M>57S UOH, fi DEg , 6H 6R ^ Sent By: WILSON ENGINEERING; 7604380173; ^ ^^^S^,1^30^,. . ^ 3/3 Reeaivea: S/IB/OO 1OJ2OAM; __^ +ssa6reoe 0 ^i^_w.._ __, ..„_ -*-SSa&7iBOB7'*9 ^^ Vf*l.awn is^MlN'EERRepoa.v«a: sns/oo lOsaeAM; ^^ +BS»oreoo^a 3^ / Tu-ti on 11 i«« Fro*- • +8SS5WD5r3 V T-461 P.03/M MM< May-iB-OO liMfiM rroup ^^ MttfcTwkerpg.2 Reference: Sensitive plant and bird nest surveys: Coacordia Homes property (Colinn Roble); File #2000-00-427 The results of the sensitive plant and bird nest surveys conducted on May 15 and 17, 2000 indicate that there are no sensitive plants or birds on site Mid therefore should not prevent grading activities from proceeding. Bob Ladwig of Ladwig Design Group, Inc. will notify us prior to grading so we can schedule monitoring activities during vegetation removal. If you have any questions or comments please do not hesitate to contact this office. Thomas M. Cherry Principal Landscape Architect #3660 CC: Bob Ladwig, Ladwig Design Group Tamara Spear, California Department of Fish and Game (Streambed Alteration Agreement #5-348-99) Sent By: Gallagher & Moore;949 955 2875;May-1-00 3:25PM;Page 1 GALLAGHER & MOORE ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2 Paris. Plaza, Suite 300 Irvine, California 92614 Telephone: (949) 955-9121 Facsimile; (949) 955-2875 E-mail: fcmlaw@pacbell.net TIME: 3: 12pm TO: Christer Westman Planning CUJSNT: Colina Roble/Carlsbad Tract No, FAX: 760-602-8559 FROM: Frederick C. Moore, Total number of pages, including this form: iSMlTTAL FORM DATE: May 1, 2000 If all pages are not received or there is difficulty wilh this transmission, please call me at (949) 955- 9121. Our FAX number is (949) 955-2875. ORIGINAL MAILED NOT MAILED X Description of material transmitted or message: ' ^6 &nA Per our conversation and your transmittal, attached are three red-lined pages from we project CC&R's reflecting compliance with Condition of Approval Item 13A-D (i.e., Page>67 - 13D; pages 85,86, 87 and 88 - 13A, B, and C). Please call me if you have any questions or comments. If I do not hear from you, I will assume the CC&R's now fully comply with the City's conditions of approval and that the City's approval will be forthcoming in the immediate future. CAUTION; CONFIDENTIAL: THE DOCUMENT BEING TELECOP1ED TO YOU MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION PROTECTED BY THE ATTORNEY- CLIENT/WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGE. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or their agent, then this is notice to you that dissemination, distribution or copying of this document is prohibited. If this was received in error, please call us at once and destroy the document. Sent By: Gallagher & Moore;949 955 2875;May-1-00 3:25PM;Page 2 DECLARATION OP COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS, AND RESERVATION OF EASEMENTS FOR COLINA ROBLE THIS DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRIC- TIONS, AND RESERVATION OF EASEMENTS is made this day of , 2000, by LB/L - Concordia Carlsbad - 28, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Declarant"). E!TS£S_S.ETH: A. Declarant is the owner of that certain real property located in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, more particularly described as follows: Lots 1 through , inclusive, of Carlsbad Tract No. 98-02 {Colina Roble), as per Map thereof No. , filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County (hereinafter referred to sometimes as the "Lots"). B. Declarant is also the owner of that certain real property located in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, more particularly described as follows: Lots 29 and 30 of Carlsbad Tract No. 90-02 (Colina Roble), in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No, , filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, and nonexclusive easements for maintenance, repair, landscape, irriga- tion, use, ingress, egress, and access purpos- es in, on, over, across, under and through those certain portions of the Lots, as more particularly described herein and depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (hereinafter referred to as the "Common Area"). The Lots and the Common Area are hereinafter sometimes collectively referred to as the "Property." C. Declarant is also the owner of that certain real property located in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, state of California, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto ("Annexation Property"), which may, from time to time, be annexed to and become part of the Project (as hereinafter GOQC8.007-4357,FCM OE0100 Sent By: Gallagher & Moore; 949 955 2675; May-1-00 3:25PM; Page 3 expenses incurred to repair or reconstruct that portion of the Common Area damaged by such Lot Owner. Section 18. public Right-of-Way. No Owner shall construct any improvement in the public right-of-way or public utility easement adjacent to or within the Project, if applicable, unless the Owner obtains all necessary permits from the City, public utility company, and approval from the Board, as necessary. Section 19. Perimeter Wall. In the event that the Architectural Control Committee determines that it is reasonably necessary for an Owner to temporarily remove a perimeter wall maintained by the Association in order to install a pool, spa or other Improvement in his or her rear yard, the Architectural Control Committee may authorize such temporary removal subject to the conditions, including but not limited to: (1) the Owner, at his or her sole cost, shall reconstruct such wall with substantially the same types of materials as originally used by Declarant and restore any damaged Common Area landscaping to substantially the same condition as existed prior to such work; (2) if applicable, the Owner shall re-stucco and/or repair an extended portion of the wall as reasonable necessary to avoid a patched appearance; and (3) obtain all approvals and permits as provided in this Declaration. ARTICLE X REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE Section 1. Repair and Maintenance bv Association. Without limiting the generality of the Article herein entitled "Powers and Duties of the Association," the Association shall have the duty to maintain, in a neat, clean, safe, sanitary, attractive and orderly condition at all times, the Common Area designated in this Declaration, or in any subsequent Notice (s) of Annexation, as generally indicated hereinbelows (a) The Common Area (and all Improvements thereon, including the sidewalks) to be maintained, landscaped, repaired, improved, restored and replaced in a neat, clean, safe, attractive and orderly condition at all times shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Trimming, fertilizing and cutting all landscaped areas, including those landscaped areas to keep such areas free of weeds, dead vegetation and debris; (2) Biological mitigation plan, if any, required by the City and applicable to the Common Area; 50068,097-4357,PC"-66- Sent By: Gallagher & Moore; 949 955 2875; May-1-00 3:26PM; Page 4/8 (3) Any private trail described on the Carlsbad Tract: No. 98-02 and located within the Common Area until such time as the dedication of the trail and twenty-foot (20') easement (i.e., within Lots 1 through 19 and Lot 30) are accepted by the City and such trail becomes a pubic trail, if ever; (4) Cleaning any debris from drainage swales, concrete terrace drains, devices, or water pollution interceptors and conducting regular inspections of all Common Area drainage devices located within the Common Area (which does not: include any drainage swale, concrete terrace drains, devices, etc. on individual Lots); (5) Unless otherwise maintained, parkways and exterior surfaces (defined to mean the side fronting any public right-of-way or the Common Area) and the top portion of all Project perimeter block walls, retaining walls, and landscaping areas (See Exhibit "C") originally constructed by Declarant and approved by the City; (6) The slope areas along the rear portions of Lots 1 through 19, inclusive, generally depicted on Exhibit "B;" (7) All other areas, facilities, equipment, services, aesthetic components or other Improvements of whatever nature as may, from time to time, be set forth in any Notice of Annexation; and (8) Performing all necessary tasks required to conform with applicable City, County and/or State regula- t ions. (b) Maintain all other areas, facilities, furni- ture, equipment, services or aesthetic components of whatso- ever nature as may, from time to time, be requested by the vote or written consent of three-fourths (3/4) of the voting power of the Members,- and (c) Except as otherwise herein specified as being paid by individual Owners, the costs of maintenance, repair, restoration and replacement as provided in this Article shall be Common Expenses and shall be paid out of the general fund of the Association. Section 2. Re^>a.ir...flnd...Ma.lntgajanc.e by Owner. Except ae the Association shall be obligated to maintain and repair as may be provided in this Declaration, separate agreement, or a recorded tract map for the Project every Owner shall: osnioo -67- Sent By: Gallagher & Moore; 949 955 2875; May-1-00 3:26PM; Page 5/8 same 'manner as the applicable Notice of Annexation, (3) the Declarant has not exercised any vote with respect to any Residence in such property, (4) no assessments have commenced on any portion of the property subject to the de~annexation, and (5) a draft of the revocation of Notice of Annexation has been submitted to and approved by the VA/FHA, if applicable. Section 7. Amendments to Notice of Annexation. Not- withstanding any other provisions in this Declaration to the con- trary, a Notice of Annexation may be amended by the requisite affirmative vote of Members (and first Mortgagees, if applicable), as set forth in the Article herein entitled "General Provisions," in only the annexed property described in said Notice of Annex- ation, rather than all Members (and first Mortgagees, if applica- ble) in the Project, on the following conditions: (a) Such amendment applies only to the annexed property described in said Notice of Annexation; and (b) Such amendment shall in no way contradict, revoke or otherwise alter any of the Protective Covenants set forth in this Declaration. ARTICLE XVIII GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 1. Enforcement. (a) The Association, the City.^ or the Owner of any Lot in the Project, including the Declarant, shall have the right (but not the obligation) to enforce, by proceedings at law or in equity, all of the Protective Covenants now or hereafter imposed by this Declaration and the Ey-Laws, respectively (and the Rules and Regulations duly adopted by the Association), including, without limitation, the right to record a notice of noncompliance or violation, to prosecute a proceeding at law or in equity against the person or persons who have violated, or are attempting to violate, any of said Protective Covenants, to enjoin or prevent them from doing so, to cause said violation to be remedied and/or to recover damages for said violation; provided, however, that with respect to Assessment liens, the Association shall have the exclusive right to the enforcement thereof. (b) The result of every act or omission whereby any of the Protective Covenants contained in this Declaration or the provisions of the By-Laws are violated, in whole or in part, is hereby declared to be and constitutes a nuisance, and every remedy allowed by law or equity against a nuisance shall be applicable against every such result and may be exercised GOOGO.007-4357.FCM OS0100 -85- Sent By: Gallagher & Moore; 949 955 2875; May-1-00 3:26PM; Page 6/8 by any Owner, by the City, by the Association, or by its suc- cessors in interest. (c) The remedies herein provided for breach of the Protective Covenants contained in this Declaration or the provisions of the By-Laws shall be deemed cumulative, and none of such remedies shall be deemed exclusive. (d) The failure of the Association, the Citv. or any Owner to enforce any of the Protective Covenants contained in this Declaration or the provisions of the By-Laws shall not constitute a waiver of the right to enforce the same thereaf- ter. (e) Prior to filing a civil action by the Associa- tion, Jihe Citv. or by an Owner solely for declaratory relief or injunctive relief, or for declaratory relief or injunctive relief in conjunction with a claim for monetary damages other than Association Assessments, related to the enforcement of the Association governing documents, the parties may be required to comply with Civil Code Section 1354, if applica- ble. Failure to comply with the prefiling requirements of Section 1354 of the Civil Code may result in the loss of the right to sue regarding enforcement of the Association govern- ing documents. Upon motion by any party for attorneys' fees and coats as the prevailing party, the court, in determining the amount of the award, may consider a party's refusal to participate in alternative dispute resolution prior to the filing of the action. (f) A breach of the Protective Covenants contained in this Declaration or of the provisions of the By-Laws shall not affect or impair the lien or charge of any bona fide Mort- gage or deed of trust made in good faith and for value on any Lot; provided/ however, that any subsequent Owner of such property shall be bound by said Protective Covenants, whether or not such Owner's title was acquired by foreclosure, a trus- tee's sale or otherwise. (g) The Board, for and on behalf of the Associa- tion, may assess monetary penalties against an Owner as a Compliance Assessment and/or temporarily suspend said Owner's voting rights for the period during which any Assessment against said Owner's Lot remains unpaid; provided, however, the requirements for Notice and Hearing set forth in the By- Laws shall be followed with respect to the accused Owner before a decision to impose discipline is reached. (h) The Board, for and on behalf of the Associa- tion, may, after Notice and Hearing, temporarily suspend an Owner's voting rights for a period not to exceed thirty (30) days for any infraction of the Association's published Rules 50068,007-435?.PfM 050100 -86- Sent By: Gallagher & Moore;949 955 2875;May-1-00 3:27PM;Page 7/8 and Regulations; provided, however, the requirements for Notice and Hearing set forth in the By-Laws shall foe followed with respect to the accused Owner before a decision to impose discipline is reached. (i) In addition to the above general rights of enforcement, the City and any other governmental entity with appropriate jurisdiction shall have the right, through its agents and employees, to enter upon any part of the Project for the purpose of enforcing all applicable codes and/or local ordinances, including, but not limited to, the California Vehicle Code, and is hereby granted an easement over the Project for such purpose. (j) The rights of City to compel performance shall include the following: (1) Failure of Association to Maintain Common Area. In the event that the Association fails to maintain the Common Area (including the easements shown on Exhibit "B"), as required in this Declaration, the City shall have the right, but not the duty, to perform the necessary maintenance. If the City elects to perform such maintenance, the City shall give written notice to the Association, with a copy thereof to the Owners in the Project, setting forth with particularity the maintenance which the City finds to be required and requesting the same be carried out by the Association within a period of thirty (30) days from the giving of such notice. In the event that the Association fails to carry out such maintenance of the Common Area with the period specified by the City's notice, the City shall be entitled to cause such work to be completed and shall be entitled to reimbursement with respect thereto from the Owners as provided herein. (2) Special Assessments Levied by the City. In the event the City has performed the necessary maintenance to the Common Area, the City shall submit a written invoice to the Association for all costs incurred by the City to perform such maintenance of the Common Area (including the easements shown on Exhibit "B") . The City shall provide a copy of such invoice to each Owner in the Project, together with a statement that if the Association fails to pay such invoice in full within the time specified, the City will pursue collection against the Owners in the Project pursuant to the provisions of this Section. Said invoice shall be due and payable by the Association within twenty (20) days of receipt by the Association, if the Association shall fail to pay such invoice in full within the period specified, payment shall be deemed delinquent and shall be subject to a late 50068,007 4357.fCM OE0100 -87- Sent By: Gallagher & Moore;949 955 2875;May-1-00 3:27PM;Page 8/8 charge in an amount equal to six percent (6%) of the amount of the invoice. Thereafter, the City may pursue collection from the Association by means of any remedies available at law or in equity. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, in addition to all other rights and remedies available to the City, the City may levy a special assessment against the Owners of each Lot in the Project for an equal prorata share of the invoice, plus the late charge. Such Special Assessment shall constitute a charge on the land and shall be a continuing lien upon each Lot against which the Special Assessment is levied. Each Owner in the Project hereby vests the City with the right and power to levy such special assessment, to impose a lien upon their respective Lot and to bring all legal actions and/or to pursue lien foreclosure procedures against any Owner and his/her respective Lot for purposes of collecting such Special Assessment in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Declaration. Section 2. Severability. Invalidation of any one of these Protective Covenants by judgment or court order shall in no way affect any other provisions hereof, which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 3. Term. The Protective Covenants set forth in this Declaration shall run with and bind the Project, and shall inure to the benefit of the Association and be enforceable by the Board, the Citv. or the Owner of any land subject to this Declara- tion, their respective legal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, for a term of fifty (50) years from the date this Declaration is recorded, after which time said Protective Covenants shall be automatically extended for successive periods of ten (10) years, unless an instrument, signed by a majority of the then Owners agreeing to terminate said Protective Covenants, in whole or in part, has been recorded within one (l) year prior to the termination of the initial fifty (50) year term, or within one (1) year prior to the termination of any successive ten (10) year period. Section 4. Construction.. The provisions of this Dec- laration shall be liberally construed to effectuate its purpose o£ creating a uniform plan for the development and maintenance of the Project. The Article and Section headings have been inserted for convenience only and shall not be considered or referred to in resolving questions of interpretation or construction. Section 5. Singular Includes Plural. Whenever the context of this Declaration may so require, the singular shall in- clude the plural, and the masculine shall include the feminine and neuter. 50068.007-4357.FCM 050100 -88- @ I z,fy* <ix ^Huw rifi fiE5 liitl?«nB^ IRIS SWB10 10id*"1" <-*a>£ w<SSsSsiS KfEP |»@ © ©^^fe%: NOZ'SB'JO'W / (•inftO / ••••C* '! P"*" '^P* i' . ii " • IxMifin' ^ A^ Sent By: WILSON ENGINEERING;7604380173;Mar-10-00 4:04PM;Page 1/2 loduiig Design Group, Inc. Faxmittal TO: ITTENTTON: ITW'JfJ&VKiA. Date:Time: FAX#: PROJECT: JOB PHONE#:FROM:_ TOTAL NO. OF SHEETS (INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET):, Z_- REMARKS: cc; - til LOOFAX.001 703 Palonrar ftirport Road, Suite 300, Carlsbad. California 92009 (760)438-3182 fax (760) 438-0173 X XX CITY OF CARLSBAD Inter-office Correspondence DATE: TO:PLANNING DEPARTMENT/SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST FROM: Engineering Department SUBJECT: Review of FINAL/PARCEL MAP Project ID M Plancheck No. Attached is one Final/Parcel Map. Please Engineering Plancheck Division, attention _ within one week. Thank you for your cooperation. d return your comments to the SIGNATURE DATE BUCCQLA ENGINEERING, inc. March 31,2000 JN 145-1 Mr. Christer Westman City of Carlsbad, Planning Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 M&H 3 » riTY OF CARLSBAD Subject: Final map, Carlsbad Tract No. 98-02 MKllNG DEPT. Dear Mr. Westman, This is in response to your second plan check memorandum for the final map dated 1-4- 00; I never received your second or third check prints of the map. Enclosed for your use and approval are the following: • Your plan check memorandum dated 1-4-00. • A print of the final map as submitted to the Engineering Department for fourth check on 3-21 -00. The language used in the third paragraph of Engineer's note No. 3 on sheet 2 as well as the language used to identify the purpose of Lots 29 and 30 on sheet 3 met with your approval as we processed the third plan check on 3-7-00. • A draft of the Colina Roble Homeowner's Association CCR's as submitted to the Engineering Department on 2-18-00 • A copy of the Grant Deed which will convey Lots 29 and 30 in fee together with easements for open space, drainage and landscape maintenance to the Colina Roble Homeowner's Association. I believe you have already found that this document satisfies condition 25 of PC Resolution No. 4342. The document will record after final project approvals are acquired from the ORE and concurrent with the HOA CCR's. • A copy of the executed Noise Form as required by condition No. 2 of PC Resolution No. 4341 3142 Vista Way, Suite 301 D Oceanside, California 92056 n 760/721-2000 Westman, Christer 3/31/00 City of Carlsbad, Planning Dept. Page 2 • A copy of the Deed Restriction required by condition No. 26 of PC Resolution No. 4342. The mitigation plan required by condition No. 1 of PC Resolution No. 4341 has been prepared by Tony Lawson at ADL Planning (729-8637), has gone through three plan checks with Larry Black representing the City and final approval is forthcoming. As mentioned in my faxed memorandum to you dated 3-20-00 and our subsequent telephone conversation on 3-30-00, the city's contract plan checker for the Final Map questioned why the trail, north facing slope and open space easement are shown only to affect lots 1-18 rather than lots 1-19 as discussed in conditions 13D, 24, 25 and 26 of PC Resolution No. 4342. The reason for the difference is that the size of the existing detension berm to the north of lots 18 and 19, and therefore the illustration of the trail and associated transitional grading, is incorrectly shown on the conforming Tentative Map approved on 10-7-1999. The top of the berm, at an elevation of 112.6 feet, is approximately 62 feet wide and Lot 19 is not affected by the 8 foot wide trail, grading or open space easement. The detension berm, trail and slope are correctly shown on the grading plan for the project, city drawing no. 384-3. The Final Map is in agreement with the grading plan. If you find it necessary, please respond to this issue in your interdepartmental clearance letter to the Engineering Department. I have enclosed a copy of my memorandum dated 3-20-00 and associated exhibits for your convenience. Sincerely, Dennis Brown enclosures Cc: Cathy Cablay-Aguirre, Concordia Homes Mike McCusker, Concordia Homes Bob Ladwig, Ladwig Design Group, Inc. Fred Moore, Gallagher and Moore DAB: 145-1 Final Map.doc 03/20/00 MON 10:32 FAX 760 7212046 g]001 BUCCOLA ENGINEERING, inc 3142 Vista Way, Suite 301 Fax (760) 721-2046 Oceanside,CA 92056 (760)721-2000 | FAX COVER SHEET | Date: Trw<>- •2-o^i£>oo Number of Pages (including cover sheet): 4 Please Deliver To: Name: C.VNrvfcW/ ^^-OeyV/y^A^J yvJoMe > (oQ"i.- Company: C.-t^ Op FAX Number: (*&?- -a Sent By;^ E^'fT>xifx If you do not receive all of the pages in this FAX, please call (760) 721-2000. Thank you. Message: nv-; At,. gl ft.vvat/-v ~« Vs. »\ Vov'r c. 03/20/00 MON 10:34 FAX 760 7212046~004 03/20/00 MON 10:33 FAX 760 7212046WI/TO;El 003 03/20/00 MON 10:33 FAX 760 7212046 . - '. -vi:- • •:, —' —• •• ~ -'. • CITf; OEl-.r,-<- !.'. .• i*. ' I1 U .' '' . • I '•. • ri n, • •i :. • .. •: .. r : .flllh. Design Groupitlnc. March 1, 2000 Christer Westman City of Carlsbad Planning Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Reference: COLINA ROBLE/CT98-02/PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT (LADWIG DESIGN GROUP JOB. NO. L-1060) Dear Christer: Enclosed is a walkover survey prepared by Dr. Tom Demere at the San Diego Natural History Museum in San Diego. Dr. Demere has concluded that there is a high potential for significant paleontological resources that could be found during the grading for Colina Roble. He has provided in his report mitigating measures to be carried out that would ensure proper mitigation of the grading impacts. Please review the enclosed report and if you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, LADWIG DESIGN GROUP, INC. Robert C. Ladwig, President RCL:lb.013 Enclosure cc: Michael Ugar, w/enclosure Phil Buccola, w/enclosure 703 Palomar flirport Road + Suite 300 + Carlsbad, California 92009 (760) 438-3182 FfiX (760) 438-0173 -> WILSON ENGINEERING; Thomas A, Demere J^^ San Diego Natural History Museum Dept. JApntological ServicesJ^femto PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT/ COLINAROBLE PROJECT SITE / CITY OF CARLSBAD for CONCORDIA HOMES 7130 Avenida Encinas, Suite 200 Carlsbad, California 92009 by Department of Paleontological Services San Diego Natural History Museum P.O. Box 121390 San Diego, CA 92112 Thomas A. Demere, Ph.D. Director 29 February 2000 RECEIVED ; "' f> * or^'pi DESiSN 6R V Received: 2/29/OO 5:53PM; S D Nat. Hist. Mus. -> WILSON ENGINEERING; Page 2 Thomas A. Demere ^^ft San Diego Natural History Museum Dept. Mhpntological Services PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT COLINA ROBLE PROJECT SITE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA x INTRODUCTION / This report provides a summary of findings concerning the paleontological resource potential of the Colina Roble project site, Carlsbad, California. The project site is located on the south side of Encinitas Creek, immediately west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Olivenhain Road, and north of Avenida La Posta. As defined here, paleontological resources (i.e., fossils) are the remains and/or traces of prehistoric plant and animal life exclusive of man. Fossil remains such as bones, teeth, shells, and leaves are found in the geologic deposits (rock formations) within which they were originally buried. For the purposes of this report paleontological resources can be thought of as including not only the actual fossil remains, but also the collecting localities and the geologic formations containing those localities. It is important to point out that many fossil sites presently on record in San Diego County have been discovered only during residential development activities, during highway and freeway construction projects, or during pipeline and other utility construction projects. This close correlation between fossil sites and construction is related to the fact that surface weathering quickly destroys most fossil materials and it is not until fresh unweathered exposures are created by grading that well-preserved fossils can often be recovered. In addition, because of the amount of grading proposed for some sites, the chances are increased that grading will unearth rich fossil horizons. METHODS Because of the direct relationship between fossils and the geologic formations within which they are entombed, knowing the geology of a particular area and the fossil productivity of particular rock formations, one can reasonably predict where fossils will (or will not) be encountered. Paleontological resource assessment of the project site is based upon a review of existing published geological literature (Eisenberg, 1985), a review of museum paleontological records (San Diego Natural History Museum), and a walkover of the project site to field check the results of the literature and record reviews. Received: 2/2Q/OO 5:S4PM; S D Na-t . Hist. Mus. -> WILSON ENGINEERING; Page 3 Thomas A. Demere ^A San Diego Natural History Museum Dept J^kontological Services RESULTS The project site is located on the south side of the Encinitas Creek drainage and extends from the valley floor up onto the lower portion of the adjacent, north-facing slope. Bedrock exposures are limited due to a heavy cover of native vegetation and occur in a/ few isolated erosional amphitheaters and in a low roadcut on Rancho Santa Fe Road. General Geology- As summarized on the Rancho Santa Fe, CA, 7.5' USGS quadrangle geologic map Eisenberg (1985) and observed during the field walkover, the geology of the project site consists of Eocene-aged (45-48 million years old) sedimentary rocks along southern (hillside) portion of the site overlain by Recent colluvial and alluvial deposits along the valley.floor. Eisenberg (1985) refers the Eocene rocks to the Delmar Formation and Torrey Sandstone. Recent Colluvium & Alluvium Introduction- The Recent colluvial and alluvial deposits exposed on the project site are the products of modem erosion and stream transportation. Paleontology- The Recent age of the colluvial and alluvial deposits on the project site indicates that these deposits are too young to contain fossil remains. Resource Sensitivity- The colluvial and alluvial deposits exposed on the project site are assigned a low paleontological sensitivity. Eocene Sedimentary Rocks Introduction- The Eocene sedimentary rocks exposed on the project site consist of light colored, massive arkosic sandstones (Torrey Sandstone) underlain by an interbedded sequence of greenish-gray siltstones and sandstones (Delmar Formation). Paleontology- Previous mass grading projects (Arroyo La Costa) in the immediate vicinity of the project site have resulted in the discovery of several fossil-producing localities. These localities were discovered in the same deposits as those exposed on the project site. Fossils recovered from these localities include shells of estuarine molluscs (clams and snails), teeth and bones of aquatic vertebrates (rays), and leaves and stems of terrestrial plants. Resource Sensitivity- The Eocene sedimentary rocks exposed on the project site are assigned a moderate paleontological sensitivity based upon the recovery of estuarine molluscan invertebrate and vertebrate fossils and terrestrial plant fossils from adjacent properties. Received: 2/2S/OO S:S5PM; S D Nat. Hist. Mus. -> WILSON ENGINEERING; Page 4 Thomas A. Demere ^^B San Diego Natural History Museum Dept.JBfcontological Servicesept.JBfcpnto IMPACT ANALYSIS /' Direct impacts to paleontological resources occur when earthwork activities, such as mass grading , cut into the geologic deposits (formations) within which fossils are buried. These direct impacts are in the form of physical destruction of fossil remains. Grading plans for me Colina Roble project site indicate that cuts will be made during construction to accommodate the various streets and building pads planned for Ihis site. The proposed mass excavation work will encounter the Eocene sedimentary rock units discussed above. Any grading in these rock units will have a high potential for encountering significant paleontological resources. SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACTS Fossils are the remains of prehistoric animal and plant life and are considered to be nonrenewable. Direct impacts to high and moderate sensitivity formations are significant and, under CEQA guidelines, require mitigation. MITIGATION MEASURES Mitigation of the impacts discussed above can be ensured by implementing the following measures: [1] Prior to initiation of construction activities the project developer shall retain a qualified paleontologist to carry out the mitigation program outlined here. (A qualified paleontologist is defined as an individual with a MS or Ph.D. in paleontology or geology who is experienced in paleontological procedures and techniques.) [2] A qualified paleontologist shall be at the pre-construction meeting to consult with the grading and excavation contractors. [3] A paleontological monitor shall be onsite at all times during the original cutting of previously undisturbed deposits of moderate sensitivity formations (Eocene sedimentary rocks) to inspect exposures for contained fossils. (A paleontological monitor is defined as an individual .who has experience in the collection and salvage of fossil materials. The paleontological monitor shall work under the direction of a qualified paleontologist.) [4] When fossils are discovered, the paleontologist (or paleontological monitor) shall recover them. In most cases this fossil salvage can be completed in a short period of time. Received: 2/29/OO 5:SBPM; S D Nat. H±st . Mus. -> WILSON ENGINEERING; Page 5 TrTomas A. Demere ^^^ San Diego Natural History Museum Dept. floteontological Servicesit.at^oi However, some fossil specimens (such as a complete skeleton) may require an extended salvage period. In these instances the paleontologist (or paleontological monitor) shall be allowed to temporarily direct, divert, or halt grading to allow recovery of fossil-remains in a timely manner. Because of the potential for the recovering of small fossil remains, such as rodent and primate teeth, it may be necessary to set up a screen-washing operation on the site. 7 [5] Fossil remains collected during the monitoring and salvage portion of the mitigation program shall be cleaned, repaired, sorted, and cataloged. [6] Prepared fossils, ,along with copies of all pertinent field notes, photos, and maps, shall be deposited (as a donation) in a scientific institution with permanent paleontological collections such as the San Diego Natural History Museum. Donation of the fossils shall be accompanied by financial support for initial specimen storage. [7] A final summary report shall be completed that outlines the results of the mitigation program. This report shall include discussions of the methods used, stratigraphic section(s) exposed, fossils collected, and significance of recovered fossils. In summary, tiie project site possesses a high potential for producing significant paleontological resources. Development of tiie Colina Roble project site may result in impacts to these resources. The measures proposed above will ensure proper mitigation of Ihese impacts. Thomas A. Demere, Ph.D. Department of Paleontological Services REFERENCES Eisenberg, L~I. 1985. Pleistocene faults and marine terraces, northern San Diego County. In, P.L. Abbott (ed.), On the Manner of Deposition of the Eocene Strata in Northern San Diego County. San Diego Association of Geologists, fieldtrip guidebook, pp. 87-91. BUCCOLA ENGINEERING, inc. 3142 Vista Way, Suite 301 Fax (760) 721-2046 Oceariside, CA 92056 (760)721-2000 FAX COVER SHEET Date: TVwa-. •Z.O^T-OQO Number of Pages (including cover sheet): Please Deliver To: Name: Company: C'.-^ ot< C/QuWk , '-Vu^^-vy \>c,p*-. FAX Number: Sent By: If you do not receive all of the pages in this FAX, please call (760) 721-2000. Thank you. Message: Hy, cry \-\<\ 13 ^ -J ^ Oxrt. v^Jri^ew V IA .Accor <^p^(.<- "^> OW. ^^. " AS^i- OJo -t v~-^v- -^^^ <-j> 9 r > ^ «i OeSi O S^o^^ o-y) A^^ q/£^a puAy A, ^ U>P^i 4 'V-v C, ^ C Av ^«Sco^5 J N02'50'3ti"W i CITY '4 OCTOBER 3, 2005 TO: ASSISTANT PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: Senior Planner LAS OLAS COURT LANDSLIDE I have reviewed the proposal prepared by Anthony-Taylor Consultants and it seems reasonable. I suggest the addition of documentation, both with digital photos and text, of what plant materials will need to be removed to accommodate the reconstruction of the slope. Generally replacements of those same plant materials should be used on the slope after it's reconstruction. CHRISTER WESTMAN ANTHONY-TAYLOR CONSULTANTS 304 Enterprise Street • Escondido, CA 92029 • (760) 738-8800 • (760) 738-8232 fax September 30, 2005 Project No. 05-2544 City of Carlsbad Planning Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Attention: Mr. Don Neu/Mr. Christer Westman Subject: General Scope and Sequence of Interim Measures Slope Failure-Common Area Slope South of Lots 8 through 12, Las Olas Court, Villagio Development Carlsbad, California 92024 References: 1. "Rough Grading Plans for Colina Roble/CT 98-02, Sheets 1 through 6 of 6, Drawing No. 384-3A, City of Carlsbad, California," prepared by Buccola Engineering, Inc., As-Built, April 4, 2002. Dear Mr. Neu/Mr. Westman: In accordance with our telephone discussion with Mr. Neu on Thursday, September 29, 2004, we have prepared the attached discussion of proposed initial interim mitigative measures, to address the conditions of the existing landslide, and the significant seepage present around the slide mass. The purpose of the measures is to reduce the intrusion of storm water into the slide mass during the winter months, and help de-water the slide mass prior to the winter months, and prior to formal repairs perhaps in Spring, 2006. As you are aware, in around early 2005, a portion of a man-made fill slope experienced failure within the project development. This failure occurred in the southerly project slope, and within the designated open space (Lot 29) of the site. During the failure, a portion of the slide has involved designated open space. As mentioned, we request assistance in obtaining any necessary permits and approvals from the City of Carlsbad, prior to commencing the proposed interim measures outlined below. As of this writing, we have had several discussions with Mr. Marshall Plantz, (City of Carlsbad Engineering Department), and he has indicated the need for an roadway encroachment permit, and traffic control plan through the Engineering Department. Based on our discussions yesterday, you indicated that some permitting and planning approvals may also be require. Therefore, we request that you confirm the scope of any project permits you may required, prior to commencing these interim mitigative measures, and indicate in writing the next steps we should take to complete the necessary project permits. We should again note that the planned interim work is mainly expected to be performed within the active slide areas, and that it is the desire of the affected property owners and their representatives that the interim measures be commenced soon as possible, and preferably by approximately Tuesday or Wednesday (October 4, or 5, 2005). Architects • Engineers • Planners • Construction Managers General Scope and Sequence of Interim Measures Project NO. 05-2544 Slope Failure-Common Area Slope South of Lots 8 through 12, Villagio Development Las Olas Court, Carlsbad, California 92024 September 30, 2005 Page 2 Provided below is a general discussion of the general sequence of proposed interim mitigative measures. The actual sequence and scope of the mitigative measures may change, as site conditions are exposed and the effectiveness of the initial efforts are monitored. In effort to hold down costs, we have proposed sequencing what we consider the most practical and cost effective measures first, along with measures considered to be the greatest priority (maintaining reasonable roadway access, and reducing the groundwater elevation beneath portions of the slide, reducing surface water infiltration, in an effort and thereby reducing the potential for movement of the existing slide mass), until formal slide repairs can be implemented. At present, the slide mass is visibly saturated, and therefore the focus will be to lower the standing water conditions beneath portions of the slide. It is our preference (for engineering, costs, and other reasons) to install a gravity flow dewatering system, without the excavation into the existing road, curbs and gutters. Therefore, we have proposed a sequenced effort, with the initial efforts intended to dewater the toe of the slide, and as these measures become effective and reduce instability, expand the dewatering system into broader areas. As of this writing, it is anticipated that deep, slot-cut excavations in the slide mass as previous proposed by the original soil consultants, may not be feasible because of caving, sloughing and in-filling of the excavation. However, after a period of dewatering, it may be possible to branch, lengthen or enlarge the gravity flow dewatering system. In an attempt to achieve this, we anticipate that portions of the initial efforts will require a pump driven system. Additionally, to maintain reasonable roadway access, it is also anticipated that some degree of unloading or shifting of the slide mass from the back of the slide to the front of the slide will be required. This limited re-grading will also be used to construct improved surface drainage on the slide mass, and assist in the creation an access area for future soil drilling equipment. The generally anticipated sequence of repairs is listed below from first to last. The actual sequence may differ. See the attached Figure I, for the general area of the proposed interim mitigative measures. Interim Mitigative Measures 1. Temporary Repairs to Existing Fence-Gillis Property-Lot 28. ( Provide temporary fence to close-off access into rearyard where original fence has been damage by slide movement). 2. Initial Monitoring of Topographic Survey Points Along Swale For Monitoring of Slope Failure and Adjacent Area (Perform initial set-up and surveying of existing land survey points present along the concrete drainage swale in the affected and adjacent slope areas). General Scope and Sequence of Interim Measures Project NO. 05-2544 Slope Failure-Common Area Slope South of Lots 8 through 12, Villagio Development Las Olas Court, Carlsbad, California 92024 September 30, 2005 Page3 3. Installation of Additional De-watering At Slide Corners (The excavation of two pump driven de-watering points located at the northeasterly and northwesterly corners of the slide toe, See attached Figure I). 4. Documentation and Interim Dewatering (The excavation of soil and debris behind the existing buried storm drain, and installation of one gravity flow dewatering point consisting of gravel and filter fabric. This measure is intended to allow the standing water within the fill slope key to drain through the filter fabric and gravel, and into the existing pipe opening present in the back of the existing storm drain box.). 5. Cleaning of Existing Storm Drain Pipe North of Slide (The cleaning of the storm drain pipe extending across the street and out to the creek. We have been informed by Mr. Marshall Plantz, that City of Carlsbad will assist with this process). 6. Limited Surface Clearing and Re-Grading for Improved Surface Drainage and Access For Future Equipment. (In order reduce surface water infiltration and clear the slide mass for storm water control [sand bags, berms, and visqueen cover] we recommend that the surface of the slide mass be cleared of the existing vegetative cover and debris. Following vegetative removals, the slide shall be surface re-graded and re-compacted, in order to allow for the future placement of storm water control measures, improved channeling of surface water in the slide mass, and for future equipment access). 7. Removal of Roadway Area Soils and Install Temporary K-Rails. (Improve soil stability along the toe of the slide, and install K-Rails for improved roadway access). 8. Install Interim Surface Drainage Improvements Within and Immediately Adjacent To The Slide Mass Area. (To perform interim surface water and storm water runoff and control). It should be noted that given the significant area of native hillside adjoining and above the failure area, and the concern that the upper hillside areas could contribute significant surface runoff into the impacted slope, we recommend that the implementation of controls to surface water from these areas be considered upon first likelihood of sustained/significant rainfall. Additionally, we recommend that an aerial topographic survey of slope be performed to assess the actual surface drainage patterns, and as a basis for the longer tenn surface water and erosion control measures in and adjacent to the failure area. We recommend that following the completion of a land and aerial survey topographic surveys, (to assess the surface drainage patterns and contributing watershed areas), that a civil design firm be retained to develop a longer-term storm water and surface water control measures, which can also be used to assess surface water contribution into the slope and slide area. It should be noted that the topographic information collected will also be used for the development of formal slope General Scope and Sequence of Interim Measures Project NO. 05-2544 Slope Failure-Common Area Slope South of Lots 8 through 12, Villagio Development Las Olas Court, Carlsbad, California 92024 September 30, 2005 Page 4 repairs, and used for final engineering design, planning the proposed construction, and help project estimating. 9. Retain Landscape Contractor To Perform On-Call, First Response Erosion Control Measures. (Retain a local landscape contractor to provide a first response capability for the performance of follow-up surface erosion control measures, and attend to corrective erosion control repairs). 10. Installation of Additional Interim De-Watering Measures (Following surface regrading and the installation of toe area de-watering drains, the need for additional de-watering measures will be accessed. Additional, interim de-watering measures could include the installation of three pump driven de-watering wells constructed in soil boring located in the upper slide mass, or the possible installation of a expanded system of gravity or pump drained de-watering trenches extending from the toe of the slide towards the middle of the slide. The application and selection of additional interim de-watering measures will be determined as site conditions require and site constraints allow. The information outlined above, is based on our preliminary review of project conditions. It should be noted that once ground water information is obtained, it may be determined that other mitigative measures are required to properly control the significant water seepage observed emanating from the failure area. The need for additional mitigative measures or alterations in the interim measures outlined above, will be based on further studies, exposures, and monitoring. As of this writing, as part of the interim measures we do not foresee the need for significant constructive activities/repairs in the undisturbed areas of the natural open space hillside beyond the failure area, besides general storm water control measures (i.e., temporary sand bagging, berms, plastic lined channels, downpipes, and surface channeling). Our conclusions and recommendations have been based on all available data obtained from our limited observations and information collected to-date. It is therefore necessary that all observations, conclusions and recommendations be verified at the time interim measures begin. In the event discrepancies are noted, additional recommendations may be issued (if required). General Scope and Sequence of Interim Measures Slope Failure-Common Area Slope South of Lots 8 through 12, Villagio Development Las Olas Court, Carlsbad, California 92024 September 30,2005 PageS Project NO. 05-2544 We appreciate your prompt review of the above outlined interim repairs, and your assistance in obtaining all the needed permits and approvals which may be required to commence the proposed mitigative measures. Once again, should any questions arise concerning this report, or the proposed work, please contact the undersigned (Mr. Gregory Karen). Referencing our Project No. 05-2544, will help to expedite a reply to your inquiries. Respectfully Submitted, Anthony-Taylor Consultants Bruce President" C.E.GNo. 1960 lerry L. fyljchal Senior Project Engineering R.C.E. No. 42590 Gregory M. J«raren Project Engineering Geologist Copy to: Villagio Homeowner's Association c/o Fiore, Racobs, and Powers 6670 Alessandro, Suite B Riverside, California 92506-5334 Attention: Mr. Dennis M. Burke, Esq. c/o Law Office of Thorsnes Bartolla McGuire 2550 Fifth Avenue, Eleventh Floor San Diego, California 92103 Attention: Mr. John F. McGuire, Esq. LEGEND APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF ACTIVE LANDSLIDE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF GRAVEL/FILTER FABRIC EXCAVATION w/ VERTICAL PERFORATE RISER (SUMP). WHERE SHOWN. APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF TEMPORARY K-RAI'..- APPROXIMATE AREA OF SOIL REMOVALS BERM/BLOCK EXISTING BROW-DITCH AND NAT DRAINAGE AREAS AND ROUTE THROUGH PIPE THE STREET. ANTHONY-TAYLOR CONSL ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • CONSTRl 304 ENTERPRISE STREET • ESCONDIDO, CA 92029 • (760) 738-880C ViLLAGIO SLOPE FAILURE LAS OLAS COURT SAN DIEGO, CA. 05-2564 FIG. CHECKED BY IDATE GMK/JLH/BT 9/23/05 I CO OF SAN DIEGO-RECORDER/CL P.O. NO. DESCRIPTION V1750 ACCOUNT NO.INVOICE NO. Check # 025630 DATE INVOICE AMOUNT FISH & GAME FEE FOR CT 98 C^f&-*-**-' A^^C- 00132107555 082498 08/25/98 TOTAL 1,275.00 1,275.00 11-24 :1210(8) Wells Fargo Bank 1200 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR.CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 :DATE 08/27/98 No. 025630 AMOUNT *****$!, 275.00 NOT VALID AFTER SIX MONTHS FROM DATE One thousand two hundred seventy five and 00/100 Dollars PAY TO THE ORDER OF CO OF SAN DIEGO-RECORDER/CLERK P.O. BOX 1750SAN DIEGO, CA 92112-4147 il IE 100021*81: iil5R2ai7iE.il1 NOT E OF PUBLIC HEARING COUNTy ^LERK Mail to: County Clerk, County of San I-'k Mailstop 833, PO Box 1750, San Diego, Cgfcl 12 pwIK Public Hearing Date: AUGUSTS. 1998 RespwRfc must be received by: AUGUSTS. 1998 Public Hearing Place: 1200 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA. 92008 Public Hearing Time: 6:00 p.m. - F fl fj, Project Title: CT 98-02/SUP 98-01 /HDP 98-01 - COL1NA ROBLE SnUft. RMorter/rJounty 65* Lead Agency: CITY OF CARLSBAD - PLANNING Contact Person: Street Address: 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE Phone: (760) 438-1161, extension City: CARLSBAD Zip: 92009 County: JAN DIEGO COUNTY" PROJECT LOCATION: County: SAN DIEGO COUNTY City/Nearest Community: CITY OF CARLSBAD Cross Streets: OL1VENHAIN ROAD Total Acres: 35 255-040-55Assessor's Parcel No. Within 2 Miles: State Hwy #: Airports: McCLELLAN/PALOMAR Section: N/A Twp. N/A Range: N/A Base: N/A Waterways: N/A Railways: NCTD Schools: N/A ENVIRONMENTAL DOC CEQA: rj NOP [ Q Eariy Cons [ [X] NegDec [ (Mitigated) Q Draft EIR UMENT: ^] Supplement/Subsequent \ ' /,/ j EIR (Prior SCH No.) x ; ' - •• ':-'' ^ Other: • LOCAL ACTION TYPE: QGeneral Plan Update Q fJGeneral Plan Amendment fj QGeneral Plan Element fj QZone Code Amendment fj Specific Plan Master Plan Planned Unit Development Site Plan Rezone Use Permit Land Division (Subdivision, Parcel Map, Tract Map, etc.) [~] Annexation |~~| Redevelopment fj Coastal Permit f Other: DEVELOPMENT TYPE: [53 Residential: Units 28 rjOffice: Sq. Ft. [^Commercial: Sq. Ft. [^Industrial: Sq. Ft. riRecreational: Acres Acres Acres Acres 35 PROJECT ISSUES DISCUSSED IN DOCUMENT: QAesthetic/Visual [^Agricultural Land g]Air Quality ^Archaeological/Historical QCoastal Zone fj Drainage/Absorption QBconomic/Jobs QFiscnl Flood Plain/Flooding Forest Land/Fire Hazard Geological/Seismic Minerals Noise Population/Housing Balance Public Services/Facilities Recreation/Parks fj Schools/Universities ^ fj Septic Systems fj f_] Sewer Capacity g] [3 Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading [H fj Solid Waste fj fj Toxic/Hazardous g| g| Traffic/Circulation fj] g) Vegetation fj Water Quality Water Supply/Ground Water Wetland/Riparian Wildlife Growth Inducing Land Use Cumulative Effect Other: Present Land Use/Zoning/General Plan Use Vacant/R-1-10 Zone/RLM/OS General Plan Project Description: Proposed 30 Lot/28 Unit residential subdivision with minimum lol sizes of 10,000 sq. ft., public trail, and a 14.8 acre and 8.8 acre open space lots. Where documents are located for Public Review. Community Development Center, 2075 Las Palmas Drive. Carlsbad, CA 92009 July 1994 City of Carlsbad Planning Department July 28, 1998 Colina Roble LLC 3573 East Sunrise Dr. #221 Tucson AZ 85718 SUBJECT:SUP 98-01 - COLINA ROBLE The preliminary staff report for the above referenced project will be available for you to pick up on Friday, July 31, 1998, after 8:00 a.m. This preliminary report will be discussed by staff at the Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) meeting which will be held on August 10, 1998. A twenty (20) minute appointment has been set aside for you at 9:00 am. If you have any questions concerning your project you should attend the DCC meeting. If you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact your Planner, Jeff Gibson at (760) 438-1161, extension 4455. CITY Qti CARLSBAD GARY/ Assistant Planning Director GEW:JG:dch c: Robert Ladwig File Copy 2075 La Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92OO9-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-O894 JUN 11 '98 04: 20PM WION ENGINEERING 4) Ldduiig Design Group, Inc. June 10,1998 i*\$i«m\ Tof Mr. Steve Deering Dudek & Associates 605 Third Street Encinitas, CA 92024 RE: COLINAROBLE -CARLSBAD TRACT CT 98-02 (LAD WIG DESIGN GROUP, INC, JOB NO. L-1039) Dear Steve: Jeff Gibson, the City's project planner for this project asked that I send you a tentative map to comment on prior to this project going to public hearing. Jeff said that he would call you next weekto discuss the project with you, ' * Colina Roble is a 28 unit single family subdivision lying on the west side of Rancho Santa Fe Road ° 'e wd f ** ^ °f Carlsbad' *'" aprOJ6Ct *at has a sin*le -tra.ee offthe west side of Rancho Santa Fe Road and the minimum lot size is 10,000 square feet. Jeff Gibson indicated that he would call you next week to discuss the project. If you would like to contact hm, *us number is 438-1 1 61 ext 4455. If you have any questions for me, please give me a Sincerely, LADWIG DESIGN GROUP, INC. Robert C. Ladwig, President RCL:ad.069 Attached: two copies of CT 98-02 cc: Jeff Gibson, City of Carlsbad 703 Pcilomcir ftirport Road + Suite 300 4 Carlsbad, California 92009 (760)438-3182 FflX (760) 438-0173 Lciduiig Design Group, Inc. June 10, 1998 Mr. Frank Fontanesi Olivenhain Municipal Water District 1966 Olivenhain Road Encinitas, CA 92024 RE: COLINA ROBLE - CARLSBAD TRACT CT 98-02 (LADWIG DESIGN GROUP, INC. JOB NO. L-1039) Cfc910-ii :>. Ao»Ao . .A.-> / ^ l!i!\! «r'"CV uUft ,^-;() V~'i rL'."""'?!::;,.;.!! 1 \ ,':•../• -\^> ' l '• • %> " ' X^X5^?--vr.'?'/ 'V?A' "A\A-A*«ftC^••'-•' 3 .«//^yxv''K/' .x^1^ Dear Frank: Jeff Gibson, the City's project planner for this project asked that I send you a tentative map to comment on prior to this project going to public hearing. Jeff said that he would call you next week to discuss the project with you. Colina Roble is a 28 unit single family subdivision lying on the west side of Rancho Santa Fe Road just south of Encinitas Creek within the City of Carlsbad. It's a project that has a single entrance off the west side of Rancho Santa Fe Road and the minimum lot size is 10,000 square feet. Jeff Gibson indicated that he would call you next week to discuss the project. If you would like to contact him, his number is 438-1161 ext 4455. If you have any questions for me, please give me a call. Sincerely, LAD WIG DESIGN GROUP, INC. Robert C. Ladwig, President RCL:ad.070 Attached: two copies of CT 98-02 cc: Jeff Gibson, City of Carlsbad 703 PQlomar Rirport Road + Suite 300 *• Carlsbad, California 92009 (760) 438-3182 FRX (760) 438-0173 Uidwig Design Group, Inc. My 15, 1998 Mr. Clyde Wickham City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 RE: COLINA ROBLE (CT 98-02/SUP 98-01/HDP 98-01) (LADWIG DESIGN GROUP, INC. JOB NO. L-1039) Dear Clyde: I have obtained some information from the City of Encinitas reference Rancho Santa Fe Road that I thought I should pass on to you. I am still concerned about the requirement to do full major arterial grading through the flood plain area of Encinitas Creek within the Wiegand Property/Colina Roble. As I have indicated before, we have no problem showing the dedication of the 102 foot right-of-way within the property but would prefer to grade the road as a secondary arterial. The information that I received from Encinitas does support a position for a roadway narrower than the Carlsbad standard for a major arterial. Please find attached to this letter two items that I have obtained from the City of Encinitas. The first is a series of items from Rob Blough, who is their traffic engineer. The items that he sent is the copy of the circulation element, their roadway classifications and a description of their various roadway levels as well as examples of augmented roadways. The second item is from Gary Barbaric, who is their Advanced Planner. What he had sent me was the minutes from the City Council meeting in Encinitas of July 10, 1996. Item No. 7 on the top of the last page was the Staff recommendation to upgrade Rancho Santa Fe Road immediately south of Carlsbad from an augmented local street (2 lane to a collector road) to a four lane divided road. According to Gary, there was considerable opposition from the people along the roadway and the Council tabled the matter. In addition, according to Gary, whom I have mentioned is their Advanced Planner, there are no plans to bring this back up to the Council or to change the classification. The current classification of the roadway is an augmented local street. The existing road classification, the augmented local road, is a two lane road with one lane in each direction. The augmented status allows the City to add additional turning lanes at intersections to help traffic mitigation. 703 Palomor Rirport Road 4 Suit© 300 + Carlsbad, California 92009 (760)438-3182 FflX (760) 438-0173 Mr. Clyde Wickham July 15, 1998 Page 2 I think this information supports our request to dedicate the full 102 foot right-of-way, to grade and improve the road based on a secondary arterial which is 84 feet wide. I understand that the current circulation element does show Rancho Santa Fe Road in this area as the 102 foot road and again, we would support reserving the right-of-way for this type of roadway. Based on what the City of Encinitas has adopted immediately to the south of this area along with what the City of Carlsbad has done in estimating the cost for Rancho Santa Fe Road (CFD #2) in this area based on a secondary collector. I would request that you allow us to grade the Rancho Santa Fe Road within our ownership to secondary arterial standards. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, LADWIG DESIGN GROUP, INC. Robert C. Ladwig, President RCL:baw.074 Attachments cc: Jeff Gibson, City of Carlsbad (With attachments) Bob Johnson, City of Carlsbad (With attachments) Bob Wojcik, City of Carlsbad (With attachments) Doug Helming, Helming Engineering (With attachments) David Bentley (With attachments) 703 PQlomar flirport Road 4 Suite 300 4- Carlsbad, California 92009 (760)438-3182 FRX (760) 438-0173 JUL 14 '98 09:58flM CITY 0^ ENCINITAS P.1/5T ^E t.n<-±n± ii-i3 City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Ave. Encinitas, CA 92024-3633 Facsimile Cover Sheet To: Bob Ladwig | Company: Phone: Fax: 438-0173 From: Rob Blough, Traffic Engineer Department: Engineering Services Department Phone: (760)633-2705 Fax: (760)633-2818 Date: 7/14/98 Pages including this cover page: Comments: RECEIVED .!UL 1 4 1908 i!C [EtuN 6R JUL 14 '98 09:58AM CITY ££ ENCINITPS I 2 ycr P. 2/5 3n I* IB)!!] HUB | o nc5T f3 a to iSS 3«tt," 5w 3 H111 f n i s5, r C3 g; o> S8 JUL 14 '98 09:59flM CITY OF ENCINITflS•ycf P. 3/5Iff*iffliSi oo !Si TJffiIBL f§ • CDcn_ 1"31 O S-- _j ^ MMWMK H ^d^MdJ ^•^•^^ j s n s•"•«* & o> ••• % 3» 2."i^±!Q. u C . ft* i n 2 1 << -J wo u JUL 14 '98 10:00AM CITY IF ENCINITflS ^ P-4/5fY^f ENCINITflS ^^ Collector Road - A four-lane undivided (no median) roadway, with a typical right-of-way width of 70-84 feet and a curb to curb pavement width of around 64 feet. Its function is to distribute traffic between local streets and major and prime arterials. Although some collectors serve as through routes, their primary function is to provide access from surrounding land uses. Local Street - This category of roadway is designed to provide access to individual parcels in the City. Local streets consist of two lanes with a typical right-of-way width of 50-70 feet and a pavement width of 40 feet. The Circulation Plan described in Figure 2 designates only those local roadways that provide an additional function beyond that normally expected for a local roadway. For example, a "designated local" may function as a collector in certain areas of the City. An undesignated local roadway refers to those facilities that are not indicated on the Circulation Plan described in Figure 2. For planning purposes, the closing of a designated local roadway will require a General Plan Amendment while the closing of an undesignated local roadway wiHl not. i Each of the last four classifications above may be further described based upon improvement refinements necessary where physical constraints exist and to insure the preservation of community character. Augmented Roadway - Any of the last four roadway categories (not Freeways) can have an augmented designation. The intent is to provide a means of Increasing the capacity of a given type of arterial by maximizing the utilization of the basic laneconfiguration. Such augmentation can range from simply adding lanes at intersections to adding or expanding a median and/or other midblock measures to Improve traffic flow and reduce side friction. The augmented local may in its simplest form be just a two-lane local street with special intersection treatments such as signalization and/or added lanes as shown in Figure 5. A more highly augmented form would have a central median for turn movements and would restrict access to the extent possible. Augmentation of a prime arterial may vary from added lanes at intersections to access control strategies such as 'provision of local frontage roads. An augmented form of a local street is more important as far as the circulation system is concerned, for example, since this roadway may function as a collector roadway while it is developed to local roadway standards. C-18 ; 3/29/89 JUL 14 'y« lUstfltfHTl UJ.IT Utr \ V .01 '.SI .92 .11 /» 01 l|,9l|.0l| <T6T! I !i \t U> I .9? • U.O ( 9 Qt .dt.u. !! ','| L i I ' < "5 <D (d X LU wim^^r Uc C-28 City of Carlsbad Planning Department July 2, 1998 Robert C. Ladwig Ladwig Design Group, Inc. 703 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 300 Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: CT 98-02/SUP 98-01/HDP 98-01 - COLINA ROBLE Your application has been tentatively scheduled for a hearing by the Planning Commission on August 1 9, 1 998. However, for this to occur, you must submit the additional items listed below. If the required items are not received by July 24, 1998, your project will be rescheduled for a later hearing. In the event the scheduled hearing date is the last available date for the City to comply with the Permit Streamlining Act, and the required items listed below have not been submitted, the project will be scheduled for denial. 1. Please submit the following plans: A) 13 copies of your (site plans, landscape plans, building elevation plans, floor plans) on 24" x 36" sheets of paper, stapled in complete sets folded into 81/2' x 11" size. B) One SVz" x 11" copy of your reduced site plan, building elevation and floor plans. These copies must be of a quality which is photographically reproducible. Only essential data should be included on plans. 2. As required by Section 65091 of the California Government Code, please submit the following information needed for noticing and sign the enclosed form: A) 600' Owners List - a typewritten list of names and addresses of all property owners within a 600 foot radius of the subject property, including the applicant and/or owner. The list shall include the San Diego County Assessor's parcel number from the latest equalized assessment rolls. B) 100' Occupant List - (Coastal Development Permits Only) a typewritten list of names and addresses of all occupants within a 100 2O75 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 438-O894 CT 98-02/SUP 98-01/HDW8-01- COLINA ROBLE JULY 2, 1998 PAGE 2 foot radius of the subject property, including the applicant and/or owner. C) Mailing Labels - two (2) separate sets of mailing labels of the property owners within a 600 foot radius of the subject property. The list must be typed in all CAPITAL LETTERS, left justified, void of any punctuation. For any address other than a single family residence, an apartment or suite number must be included but the Apartment, Suite and/or Building Number must NOT appear in the street address line. DO NOT type assessor's parcel number on labels. DO NOT provide addressed envelopes - PROVIDE LABELS ONLY. Acceptable fonts are: Arial 1.1 pt, Airal Rounded MT Bold 9 pt .Courier 14 pt, Courier New 11 pt,), and MS Line Draw 11 pt. Sample labels are as follows: UNACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE Mrs. Jane Smith Mrs. Jane Smith MRS JANE SMITH 1 23 Magnolia Ave., Apt #3 1 23 Magnolia Ave. APT 3 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Apt. #3 123 MAGNOLIA AVE Carlsbad, CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008 C) Radius Map - a map to scale, not less than 1" = 200', showing all lots entirely and partially within 600 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property. Each of these lots should be consecutively numbered and correspond with the property owner's list. The scale of the map may be reduced to a scale acceptable to the Planning Director if the required scale is impractical. D) Fee - a fee (check payable to the City of Carlsbad) shall be paid for covering the cost of mailing notices. Such fee shall equal the current postage rate times the total number of labels. Cash and credit cards are also accepted. Sincerely, JEFF GIBSON Associate Planner JG:mh Attachment I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS LIST AND LABELS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ON THIS DATE REPRESENT THE LATEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION FROM THE EQUALIZED ASSESSOR'S ROLES. APPLICATION NAME AND NUMBER APPLICANT OR APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE BY: DATE: RECEIVED BY DATE: Locluiig Design Group, Inc. May 19, 1998 Mr. Jeff Gibson City of Carlsbad Planning Department ^*£/l/£/l 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 MAV i 0 SUBJECT: COLINA ROBLE (CT 98-02) - RE-SUBMITTAL (LADWIG DESIGN GROUP, INC. -J/N L-1039) Dear Jeff:: This re-submittal is in response to your letter to David Bentley dated April 14, 1998. I will respond to the issues of concern in the order in your letter: Planning 1. The School letter from San Dieguito Union High School District is attached. 2. We have added the trail and easement as requested. The 8' D.G. portion is at the toe of slope adjacent to the wetlands. The easement is within the adjacent lots. We have added the trails to the toe of slope to minimize drainage maintenance that would be a concern if the trail was on a bench on the face of the slope. Also, the pedestrians are further from the rear yards. 3. All the panhandle lots have been eliminated. 4. I have attached an update/amended biological report to reflect the future widening of Rancho Santa Fe Road across the wetlands area as requested. The grading reflects a secondary (84!) right of way and not a major arterial (102') as suggested in you letter. We discussed this with Bob Wojcik and you. The width for Rancho Santa Fe Road as estimated for CFD-2 is 84' and is designed to tie into what the City of Encinitas is proposing immediately south of Carlsbad. The right of way will be dedicated to the major arterial standards (102'). Engineering 1. The corner sight distance sight lines have been added. 2. We have amended the cul-de-sac cross section per a meeting with Clyde Wickham, Bob Wojcik, Doug Helming and myself. We have also submitted earlier a separate Engineering Variance (98-02) for the cul-de-sac as requested. 703 Palomar Rirport Road + Suite 300 + Carlsbad, California 92009 (760) 438-3182 FRX (760) 438-0173 Mr. Jeff Gibson May 19, 1998 Page 2 3. The street cross section for Rancho Santa Fe Road has been amended as requested. We have also removed the note reference "future" improvement. 4. Street 'A' has been amended per 2 above. Sewer & Water 5. The water main sizes and requirements have been indicated. Miscellaneous 6. Changes have been made. In addition to the above, we are attaching the City check prints, 3 prints of the revised Tentative Map (full size and reduced) and 3 prints of the revised Landscape Concept Plan.. Please review all items and call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Ladwig Design Group, Inc. Robert C. Ladwig RCL:ad.066 Attachments cc: Clyde Wickham, City of Carlsbad David Bentley, with attachments Doug Helming, Helming Engineering, Inc. Tony Lawson, ADL & Associates 703 Palomar Rirport Road 4 Suite 300 4 Carlsbad, California 92009 (760) 438-3182 FfiX (760) 438-0173 *Loduiig Design Group, Inc. April 21, 1998 Mr. Clyde Wickham City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: COLINA ROBLE (CT 98-02/SUP 98-01/HDP 98-01) - ENGINEERING STANDARD VARIANCE - CUL-DE-SAC LENGTH (LADWIG DESIGN GROUP, INC. -J/N L-1039) Dear Clyde: Per your request, please accept the attached application form and fee for an Engineering Standard Variance request for cul-de-sac length for Colina Roble. We have previously submitted a variance request for intersection spacing on Rancho Santa Fe Road (Variance 98-01). You have indicated that we also need a variance for the cul-de-sac length. I had included both requests on the same form with our original submittal. Along with our completed form and fee ($450.00 - $100.00 credit = $350.00 - check attached) I am enclosing three copies of the justification for the variance, three copies of the reduced tentative map (CT 98-02) and a copy of City Receipt No. 47064 showing a $100.00 credit from our original application. Please add this request to the application package for Colina Roble. Thank you. Sincerely, Ladwig Design Group, Inc. Robert C. Ladwig RCL:baw.065 Attachments cc: Jeff Gibson, City of Carlsbad (With attachments) David Bentley (With attachments) Doug Helming, Helming Engineering (With attachments) 703 Polomar Rirport Road 4 Suite 300 + Carlsbad, California 92009 (760) 438-31 82 FflX (760) 438-01 73 -^r City of Carlsbad Planning Department April 14, 1998 David Bentley Colina Roble, LLC 3573 East Sunrise Drive, Suite #221 Tucson, AZ 85718 SUBJECT: Colina Roble - CT 98-02 Thank you for your development application resubmittal. The Planning and Engineering Departments have reviewed your tentative map, special use permit, and hillside development permit, application no. CT 98-02/ SDP 98-01 / HDP 98-01, as to its remaining issues of concern and have the following comments: ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. The Planning Department has not yet received a school letter from the San Diegiuto Union High School District. 2. The Planning Department recommends that the Citywide trail segment in this area be aligned and constructed within the riparian buffer area to eventually connect with the proposed City of Encinitas trail system. See the attached marked plans for a more detailed description and location. The tentative map must show the 20 foot trail easement and the grading to accommodate the 8 foot wide trail/path. Consider benching the trail into the manufactured slope and enhancing the upslope landscaping to provide screening of the trail from the building pads. 3. The Planning Department does not support the panhandle design for Lot No. 25, based on the long access portion of the panhandle and the fact that Lot No 24 has panhandle driveways along both sides. Consider a more standard cul-de-sac frontage design in this area. 4. The Engineering Department is requiring that you show, on the tentative map, full width dedication (Major Arterial -102 feet) and future grading for the widening of Rancho Santa Fe Road along your frontage. In addition, any future associated biological impacts to the wetland area under the future widened section of the road must be quantified and mitigated. The project's biological analysis must be updated and amended to reflect this requirement and the analysis in the Mitigated Negative Declaration must also be revised before it is sent out for public review. 2075 La Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 438-1161 - FAX (76O) 438-O894 CT 98-02 - COLINA April 14, 1998 Page 2 Engineering: Traffic and Circulation: 1. Please indicate Corner Sight Distance sight lines, in accordance with City criteria, for both directions at the proposed entrance to this project. If a monument sign is proposed, it should be shown and pulled back, clear of this vehicle visibility corridor. Indicate the sight lines on the tentative map, the site plan and the landscape plan. 2. The proposed cul de sac street width does not meet current City Standards. Look at page 6 and 7 of Engineering Standards for additional information. As mentioned above, submit a separate variance request and application for the excessive length. I understand the variance length has been increased because of cul-de-sac changes. Please revise note #1 on sheet 2 to reflect the correct length. 3. Please indicate the proposed cross section is to improve this roadway as a secondary arterial within the reserved corridor of a major arterial. The request to improve this road by others or as a "future" project has been acknowledged. As mentioned on the 1st review, we understand your position but the note to this regard on sheet 2 should be removed. 4. The proposed Street "A" should be 60' R/W and 40' curb to curb from the entrance to around lot 4 as shown on the tentative map. This width will improve the access and support the intent of the Cul De Sac policy. Sewer and Water: 5. Please indicate the existing water main size and requirements to connect to main line in Rancho Santa Fe Rd. Miscellaneous: 6. We understand that the proposed lot design at the end of street "A" has changed to delete the panhandles. The tentative map should be revised to include this change. In concept the proposed change sounds fine. The length of cul de sac, variance request will need to reflect the increased length of cul de sac length. Attached is a red-lined check print of the proposed project for the applicants use in making the requested revisions. This check print must be returned with the project revisions to facilitate continued staff review. CT 98-02 - COLINA R April 14, 1998 Page 3 Please contact your staff planner, Jeff Gibson, at (760) 438-1 161, extension 4455, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, JEFF GIBSON Associate Planner JG:mh Clyde Wickham File Copy Locluiig Design Group, Inc. April?, 1998 Mr. Craig Ruiz Housing & Redevelopment 2965 Roosevelt Street, Suite B Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: COLINA ROBLE - CT 98-02 SUP 98-01 HDP 98-01 (LADWIG DESIGN GROUP, INC. -J/N L-1039) Dear Craig: Enclosed per our discussion today are copies of exhibits that were submitted to the City including Debbie Fountain on January 20, 1998. The exhibits enclosed are: • Cover letter addressed to the Planning Department, dated January 20,1998 and copied to Debbie Fountain. • Land Use Review Application form. • Disclosure Statement. • Off-site and Combined Inclusionary Housing Project Assessment worksheet which includes the letter from Evan Becker dated June 6, 1997 where Evan states that he is prepared to recommend this project for the purchase of affordable housing credits or participation in some other combined project per the inclusionary housing ordinance. • ColinaRoble Project Description. • Copy of the reduced Colina Roble tentative map. 703 Palomcir flirport Road + Suite 300 + Carlsbad, California 92009 (760) 438-3182 FRX (760) 438-0173 Mr. Craig Ruiz April 7, 1998 Page 2 To follow up on our discussion the other day, Jeff Gibson is the planner. The project has been deemed complete and as we speak the owner is signing the conditions for the mitigated negative declaration. Please review the attached information and call if you have any questions or need additional materials. Also we request to be before the Housing and Redevelopment Commission on your next meeting, May 14,1998. This project is ready to go to the Planning Commission so it is important to us that we remain on that schedule. Thank you for your help. Again if you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Ladwig Design Group, Inc. Robert C. Ladwig RCL:ad.062 Enclosures cc: Jeff Gibson, City Planning Department, without enclosures David Bentley, without enclosures 703 Pcilomar flirport Road 4 Suite 300 4 Carlsbad, California 92009 (760) 438-3182 FfiX (760) 438-0173 Iciduiig Design Group, Inc. March 25, 1998 Clyde Wickham City of Carlsbad Engineering Dept. 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: COLINA ROBLE CT 98-02 (LAD WIG DESIGN GROUP J/N L-1039) Dear Clyde, Enclosed is a marked-up print revising Lots 1 8 through 27 on the Colina Roble project. Jeff Gibson indicated a problem with the design for the pan handle for Lot 25. The attached print eliminates all of the pan handle lots and provides the same number of standard R-l- 10,000 lots. The knuckle and cul-de-sac lots have more than 33 feet of frontage. Please look over the attached revisions, and I ask that you give me a call to give me your thoughts on these changes. If they are acceptable, I will go ahead and make the changes on the tentative map and resubmit the exhibits to you for your final review. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, LADWIG DESIGN GROUP Robert C. Ladwig MAR 9 ^ T»«~IT r\/-r\ ' '"•' £. JRCL:mcn.060 ENGINEERING Enclosures DEPARTMENT cc: Jeff Gibson (with enclosures) Doug Helming, Helming Engineering (with enclosures) David Bentley (with enclosures) 703 Palomcir flirport Rood 4 Suite 300 4 Carlsbad, California 92009 (760) 438-31 82 FRX (760) 438-01 73 Uidwig Design Group, Inc. March 9, 1998 Mr. Jeff Gibson City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 M? 0 9 1998CITY ne ^ „,SUBJECT: Colina Roble CT 98-02/ Re- Submittal Dear Jeff: Thank you for your "complete" letter and list of issues dated 2/19/98. We have made the changes requested or addressed your comments as follows: Issues of Concern: Planning 1. Lot 25 panhandle access- Code sections 21.10.080 3c was followed to design this lot. The buildable portion of a lot is described as more than 35' in width so the panhandle length would meet code. 2. City trail- Per your suggestion, we did not add the trail link 55-A to the plan. You indicated that you had sent the tentative map to the City of Encinitas for comments and that they had not responded to date. If a trail segment is to be added, we would prefer it follow our Northerly property line or Olivenhain Road as suggested in the City trail Plan document. 3. Hillside Ordinance- The changes you suggested have been made. 4. Noise wall- A small berm has been added so the wall height will not be exceeded. 5. Rear yard slope- We identified these slopes as requested. Engineering: 1. Plan clarity- The changes requested have been made. 2. Proposed intersections- We've added them as requested. Traffic and Circulation: 3. Sight distance lines- These have been added as requested., 4. Cul-de-sac standards- A standards variance request was submitted along with the initial 703 Palomar Rirport Road 4 Suite 300 + Carlsbad, California 92009 (760)438-3182 FRX (760) 438-0173 laduiig Design Group, Inc. Mr. Jeff Gibson March 9, 1998 Page 2 application. I used the City form and included both variance requests on one form. (Intersection spacing and cul-de-sac length.) Our cul-de-sac length variance request would be to the 3C1 standard on page 6 of the Engineering Standards. Our number of dwelling units is 28 when 50 are allowed, the ADT is 280 when 500 is allowed and the variance request is for length where 1200 may be approved where 1500 is requested. The reason for our request stem mainly from the following: A. Our entrance section has 36' curb to curb within a 56' right of way. B. From lots 1-12 we are requesting a Hillside street. (36' curb to curb in a 52' right of way with sidewalk only on the north side.) This section of roadway is 900 feet long and only has lots on one side. We also have a section of Crib wall opposite lots 3-6 as requested by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, State Fish & Game and Corps of Engineers. "A" street was pulled south to pull the lots out of the wetlands and reduce impacts. 5. Rancho Santa Fe Road- We have shown your request on the cross section on sheet 1 to indicate the Road as a major arterial with improvements to secondary standards. We have re-worded the note reference future improvements and would prefer to leave the note on the plan. Clyde Wickham said he would work with us on the re-wording if the change is not acceptable. Sewer and Water: 6. Sewer and water laterals- These have been shown on the plan. 7. Drainage study-1 have attached the study "Interim Detention Study for Basin "D" on Encinitas Creek" by Howard Chang Ph.D., P.E. dated February 1992 along with a letter from Howard Chang dated February 27, 1998 stating that he has reviewed our plan and that the lots are free from flooding and that our fill has not impacted the storage volume of Basin "D." He also states that no rip-rap protection will be required adjacent to the basin. In addition to the concerns addressed in your letter, we have also made the revisions requested on the enclosed City checkpoints. 703 PQlomar flirport Road 4- Suite 300 * Carlsbad, California 92009 (760) 438-3182 FflX (760) 438-0173 ^^^ ^^ Lcicluiig Design Group, Inc. Mr. Jeff Gibson March 9, 1998 Page 3 About one and one half weeks ago you called reference a concern for the setbacks on lots 20 and 21. On the re-submittal, you will notice that we have added the front yard setbacks on these two lots to address your concern. Please look everything over and call if you have any further questions. Sincerely, Robert C. Ladwig RCL:ad.059 Enclosures cc: Clyde Wickham, City of Carlsbad w/ enclosure David Bentley w/ enclosure Ron Paul w/enclosure Doug Helming w/out enclosure 703 Palomctr flirport Road *• Suit© 300 + Carlsbad, California 92009 (760) 438-3182 FflX (760) 438-0173 ROBLE,uP DAVID M. BENTLEY, MANAGER 3573 E. SUNRISE DRIVE, SUITE 221 * TUCSON, AZ 85718 52O299-2179 * 52O-52&61 22 (FAX) March 3, 1998 Mr. Michael J. Holzmiller, Planning Director v-Mr. Jeff Gibson, Senior Planner City of Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 Re: Colina Roble - CT 98-02 Gentlemen: Thank you for your February 19 letter response to our Tentative Map application. I appreciate the opportunity to work with you in developing a uniquely attractive residential subdivision on this property. Thanks to Bob Ladwig's involvement as lead consultant I'm confident the project will get the high degree of professional attention required to satisfy Carlsbad's quality development standards. Nevertheless, if there is any additional information or assistance I can provide to ensure an efficient review and successful application, please don't hesitate to call. Very truly yours, David M. Bentley cc: Bob Ladwig Uicluiig Design Group, Inc. February 27,1998 Mr. Jeff Gibson City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 SUBJECT: Colina Roble CT 98-027 Special Setbacks For Lots 20 & 21 Dear Jeff: » Enclosed is a marked up enlargement of a portion of the Colina Roble project. As we discussed your concern for setbacks around the end of the cul de sac, I have the following to offer: Lots 20 & 21: I have modified the front yard setback as indicated. This could be shown on the tentative and final map for these lots to indicate clear public notice for the individuals who will later build on these two lots. In addition, I think your concern was accurate in that we do need to clearly show the setbacks for the cul de sac area so that we don't create conflicts for the planning and building departments in the future. What I've done is rather than continue the 20 foot setback completely around the cul de sac I have added the additional 20 foot setback parallel with the portions of the panhandle lot. This will clearly keep the area around the cul de sac open so that homes do not encroach into what appears to be the normal setback area. Again, I think it was a good concern of yours and hopefully my suggestion to show these setbacks on these two lots on the tentative map will satisfy that concern. I know you will be gone this next week and I look forward to your response upon your return. Sincerely, Robert C. Ladwig RCL:ad.058 Enclosure cc: David Bentley w/ enclosure Doug Helming w/ enclosure 703 Pcilomcir flirport Road + Suite 300 4 Carlsbad, California 92009 (760) 438-3182 FRX (760) 438-0173 Feb 26 98 03:10p Houiard H. Chang (619) 756-9460 p. 1 Howard H. Chang Consultants Hydraulic, Hydrologic and Sedimentation Engineering P.O. Box 9492 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 (619)756-9050, 594-6380, FAX: (619)756-9460 February 27,1998 Mr. Robert Ladwig Ladwig Design Group 703 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 300 Carlsbad, CA 92009 Dear Bob: Subject: ColinaRoble Pursuant to your request, I have reviewed the grading plan for the Cotina Roble development in the City of Carlsbad. This development is along the south bank of the east branch of Encinitas Creek. The fioodplain of Encinitas Creek adjacent to the development is within a floodgate detention basin, designated as Basin "D". A hydrology study for the basin is given in the technical report "Drainage Study for Encinitas Creek" by H. Chang, dated September 1990. According to the report, basin D has the peak water-surface elevation of 110 feet for the 100-yr flood. Since the building lots are above this elevation by at least 1 foot, they are therefore outside the 100-yr fioodplain. It is noted that the proposed development involves landfill in the fioodplain of the stream channel. Such landfill is out side the floodway boundary and it does not impact the storage volume of the floodgate detention basin. In the hydrologic design for the detention basin, the storage volume of the basin only includes the area within the floodway boundaries. The proposed development is outside the floodway boundary, this area was not included as a part of the detention basin volume calculation. The proposed development is located along the south bank of the detention basin. The bank itself will require no riprap protection since the flow velocities are very small in the basin during the 100-yr flood. Because of such small velocities, the bank requires no riprap protection. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions. Sincerely Howard H. Chang PH.D..P.E. RECEIVED CC. Doug Helming ppg 07 WQg LADWIG DESIGN GR City of Carlsbad Planning Department February 19, 1998 David Bentley Colina Roble, LLC 3573 East Sunrise Drive, Suite #221 Tucson, AZ 85718 SUBJECT: Colina Roble - CT 98-02 I Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department has reviewed your tentative map, special use permit, and hillside development permit, application no. CT 98-02/SDP 98-01/HDP 98-01, as to its completeness for processing. COMPLETE The application is complete, as submitted. Although the initial processing of your application may have already begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by the date of this communication. The City may, in the course of processing the application, request that you clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise, supplement the basic information required for the application. In addition, you should also be aware that various design issues may exist. These issues must be addressed before this application can be scheduled for a hearing. The Planning Department will begin processing your application as of the date of this communication. Please contact your staff planner, Jeff Gibson, at (760) 438-1161, extension 4455, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, MICHAEL J. HOLS Planning Director MJH:JG:mh Gary Wayne Clyde Wickham Bobbie Hoder File Copy Data Entry Planning Aide ILLER 2075 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 - (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-0894 ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. The panhandle access portion of Lot 25 exceeds the R-1 standard of 200 feet. 2. The City's adopted trail plan requires a trail connection (Link 55A) through the project to connect to the City of Encinitas just north of Orchard Wood Road and along Encinitas Creek. 3. To accurately reflect the Hillside Development Ordinance's slope analysis requirements, the project's slope analysis must be corrected to state the following; "0% to less than 1 5%, 15% to less than 25%, 25% to less than 40%, and 40% and over". 4. The noise wall along the street side of Lot 1 exceeds the zoning's maximum wall height requirement of 6 feet for a wall located in a street side setback. Consider using a combination of a berm and wall to achieve the desired noise attenuation, while keeping the wall to 6 feet or less in height. 5. The Planning Department recommends that the rear yard fill slopes facing Encinitas Creek and Rancho Santa Fe Road be placed under Homeowners Association maintenance via a maintenance easement shown on the tentative map. Engineering: Engineering Department staff has completed a review of the above-referenced project for application completeness. The application and plans submitted for this proposed project are considered complete. Additionally, staff has conducted a review of the project for engineering issues of concern. Engineering issues which need to be resolved or adequately addressed prior to staff making a determination on the proposed project are as follows: 1. The existing topography should be a screened base. The proposed grading plan, easements, and open space combined make clarity on sheet 2 an issue. Different width or weight of lines would improve a lot. For example: Lot 9 has a 2:1 slope (?) That encroaches into a floodplain (?) With a flood elevation of (?) Over an existing (?) And proposed (?) open space easement. 2. Please show any existing or proposed intersections which are located near the proposed project. The requested variance (SV 98-01) for Avenida Aragon should be identified with distance provided. These notes and information could be shown on sheet 1 for clarity. Traffic and Circulation: 3. Please indicate Corner Sight Distance sight lines, in accordance with City criteria, for both directions at the proposed entrance to this project. If a monument sign is proposed, it should be shown and pulled back, clear of this vehicle visibility corridor. Indicate the sight lines on the tentative map, the site plan and the landscape plan. 4. The proposed cul de sac street width does not meet current City Standards. Look at page 6&7 of Engineering Standards for additional information. As mentioned above, submit variance request for the excessive length. 5. Please indicate Rancho Santa Fe Road as a Major Arterial (102' wide) corridor in compliance with the City's General Plan. I understand the proposed cross section is to improve this roadway as a secondary arterial within the reserved corridor of a major arterial. The request to improve this road by others or as a "future" project has been acknowledged. The note to this regard on sheet 2 should be removed. Sewer and Water: 6. Please indicate sewer laterals from the proposed lots to the proposed public sewer facilities. Show or note that sewer clean outs and laterals are not located in driveways. Show water laterals and meter locations similar to sewer services with the same restrictions. 7. Submit required drainage studies to validate grading within the floodplain or floodway. Attached is a red-lined check print of the proposed project for the applicants use in making the requested revisions. This check print must be returned with the project revisions to facilitate continued staff review. If you or the applicant have any questions, please either see or contact me at extension 4353. * t City of Carlsbad Public Works — Engineering Robert C. Ladwig June 24,1998 Ladwig Design Group, Inc. 703 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 300 Carlsbad, Ca. 92009 STANDARD VARIANCE REQUEST - SV 98 - 01 (Colina Roble) Your request for a variance from the City Design Standards to develop a street intersection less than the required spacing for Rancho Santa :Fe Road, a major arterial is hereby approved, subject to certain findings and conditions. Background: To allow a variance from standard intersection spacing on Rancho Santa Fe Road from 1200' (Standard) to 500' / 900' as a "T" intersection between two other intersections. "A" street as proposed intersects Rancho Santa Fe Road as a "T" intersection 500' south of Avenida Aragon and also located 900' north of Avenida Leon. The subdivision (CT 98-02) property is located south of Encinitas Creek and north of a steep hillside which prohibits alignment or adequate spacing of these intersections. The proposed "A" street is as far south as possible to provide visibility and access. The "T" aspect of "A" street will be maintained by the construction of a median when Rancho Santa Fe Road is developed. The approval of this variance is conditioned on this median. Findings: • The project location and conditions of this area are extraordinary and unusual and necessitates the variance to provide access. Because of the geographical and topographical setting there are no other feasible points of access. • The granting of this variance will not cause substantial drainage problems, because the proposed design complies with City Standards regarding drainage. • The granting of this variance will not conflict with existing or future traffic and parking demands or pedestrian or bicycle use. Because this project and this variance has been conditioned to construct a median along the subdivision frontage of Rancho Santa Fe Road that prohibits right turns into and out of this subdivision. 2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 431-5769 Standard Variance Request - SV98-01 COLINA ROBLE • The granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or be injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity in which the variance is granted, because the proposed design complies with all other City Codes. • The granting of this variance will not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan, because the project as designed complies with the General Plan. Conditions: 1. SV 98-01 is approved subject to approval of Carlsbad Tract 98-02 Colina Roble. 2. SV 98-01 is approved subject to the construction of a median in Rancho Santa Fe Road prohibiting left turns into or out of this project. BobWojcik Principal Civil Engineer Land Development Division City of Carlsbad Public Works — Engineering Robert C. Ladwig June 24,1998 Ladwig Design Group, Inc. 703 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 300 Carlsbad, Ca. 92009 STANDARD VARIANCE REQUEST - SV 98 - 02 (Colina Roble) Your request for a variance from the City Design Standards to develop a cul de sac street longer than the standard length, is hereby approved, subject to certain findings and conditions. Background: To allow a variance from standard cul de sac length from 600' (Standard) to a maximum 1700' length. "A" street is proposed as a 1700' cul de sac that intersects Rancho Santa Fe Road as a "T" intersection and serves as a single point access to a 28 lot subdivision. The subdivision (CT 98- 02 Colina Roble) property is located south of Encinitas Creek and north of a steep hillside. The project design is a long and linear, mostly single loaded, subdivision that fits the terrain and existing landform very well. Findings: • The project location and conditions of this area are extraordinary and unusual and necessitates the variance to support the proposed design. Because of the geographical and topographical setting there are no other feasible points of access and the longer cul de sac serves only this project. • The granting of this variance will not cause substantial drainage problems, because the proposed design complies with City Standards regarding drainage. • The granting of this variance will not conflict with existing or future traffic and parking demands or pedestrian or bicycle use, because this cul de sac only serves this subdivision. • The granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or be injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity in which the variance is granted, because the proposed design complies with all other City Codes. • The granting of this variance will not adversely affect the comprehensive general plan, because the project as designed complies with the General Plan. Conditions: 1. SV 98-02 is approved subject to approval of Carlsbad Tract 98-02 Colina Roble. Bob Wojcik Principal Civil Engineer Land Development Division 2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 431-5769 'V _*_ IOLIVENHAIN Municipal Water District 1966 Olivenhain Road • Encinitas, CA 92024 • Tel: 760-753-6466 • Fax:760-753-1578 January 12, 1998 City of Carlsbad Dept. of Planning & Land Use 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA, 92009-1576 Re: Tax Assessors Parcel Nr. 255-040-55-00 Subject: Water Availability Letter Supplement to County Form 399W The fee owner, Colina Roble L.L.C. , have requested the District to provide a Water Availability Letter for the property identified above for a proposed project described as: Major subdivision of 28 DU's. This property is in the District and eligible to receive domestic service at this time. The District has or will have adequate facilities in this area. There is or will be capacity in these facilities to serve the proposed project at the time requested. Water service is or will be available at the time requested at a minimum of 25 psi pressure at the District's main under normal operating conditions and upon completion of all necessary facilities, including any required on-site and off-site water lines, appurtenances, or facilities as required and noted below, in the District's sole discretion. However, all water received by the District is imported from other agencies. Accordingly, there is no guarantee that water will be available when service is requested. The District has been requested to furnish a staff estimate, based on current conditions, of the availability of water service in this area. This letter is issued for planning purposes and is not a representation, express or implied, that the District will provide service at a future date. Commitments to provide water service are made only by the Districts' Board of Directors and are subject to the applicants compliance with the District fees, charges, rules and regulations, the Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the applicants' agreement to construct any required on-site and off-site facilities together with the applicant's providing security as required by the District for construction. The issuance of this Water Availability Letter does not grant the applicant any water rights. The applicant does not secure a right to water until application for service is made and approved by the District, and the applicant has complied with all requirements of the District. The failure of the applicant to pay any fee or charge of the District when due, or to comply with other requirements of the District, shall entitle the District to unilaterally terminate this Water Availability Letter, and all further rights of the applicant to water service. Board of Directors General Manager RFPEIVED A Pu^ic aSency proudly serving Ann L. Peay, President David C. McCollom portions of Leucadia, Cardiff, Harold L. Gano, Vice President LeRai Counsel 4 0 <QQQ Solana Beach, Rancho Santa Fe, Harley L. Denk Secretary p^ JAN I J 1^0 Encinitas, Carlsbad, San Diego andThelma M. Miller, Treasurer . „,. , . ,, „„ , ,, „.. the Ohvennain Valley. SusanJ.Varty,Dlrect0r LADW I 6 DES I 6N 6R Water Availability Lette I~*' Capacity fees, when applicable, are paid to the District to reserve future water service for the project contingent upon the applicant paying all fees and charges and complying with all requirements of the District. The payment of all capacity fees by the date they are due is an express condition precedent to any right of .the applicant to receive future water service. The failure of applicant to make any capacity fee payment by the date it is due shall automatically terminate the right of applicant to receive future water service and no previous capacity fee payments paid by the applicant shall be refunded. Reinstatement of the water commitment requires the repayment of all applicable capacity fees and other fees and charges of the District and compliance with all requirements of the District. This commitment to availability is conditioned on the following requirements and/or limitations: 1. Payment of all capacity fees, as appropriate, when due in accordance with District Ordinance 241, or successor Ordinance, not attached hereto, but included here by reference. 2. Proponent is required to provide all fee and easements as required for construction of on-site and off-site facilities as required by District, in its sole discretion. 3. Proponent is required to construct all on-site and off-site facilities to provide water service to this project as directed by the District, in its sole discretion. Said water facilities to be shown in the water system analysis to be provided by the District's consulting engineer. This letter of availability pertains solely to the proposed project as described by applicant, is not transferable to any other project, and is not transferable to any other owner or developer without written permission of the Board of Directors of the District. Any purported transfer, sale, or assignment of this Water Availability Letter without the prior written consent of the District renders this letter null and void. This letter automatically terminates, and is of no further force or effect, on the occurrence of (1): January 12, 2000 (without an approved Tentative Map); (2) termination of any tentative map; (3) termination of any final map; or (4) five years from the date of recordation of final map. OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT By: F.D.Fontanesi Project Administrator 710 Encinitas Blvd. Encinitas, CA 92024-3357 (760) 753-6491 Union High School District February 18, 1998 Weigand Properties Partnership c/o Robert Ladwig Ladwig Design Group, Inc. 703 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 300 Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Colina Roble A proposed 28-Lot Subdivision Dear Mr. Ladwig: This letter is to inform you, on behalf of the San Dieguito Union High School District, the District will serve the residents of the homes to be constructed in the proposed development. The San Dieguito Union High School District is experiencing growth, and as a general policy, assigns students to schools according to the enclosed attendance boundary policy. However, the District cannot guarantee attendance of students to a specific school within the District from this new development. Students who reside in this development may be reassigned from their original school of enrollment to another school within the District at the beginning of a new school year if student enrollment at the original school exceeds the school's capacity. This policy has been ratified by the Governing Board on March 15, 1990. A copy of this resolution "School Assignments for New Residential Development" is enclosed. We are pleased that the owner has agreed to annex the referenced property into our Community Facilities District No. 95-2. Annexation into our CFD will give our district the means to fully mitigate the impact of the proposed development on our school facilities. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office at (760) 753-6491, ext. 5518. Sincerely, Stephen G. Ma Director of Facilities Planning RECEIVES AOMI6 DESIGN GR Diegueno JH • Earl Warren JH « La Costa Canyon HS * North Coast Alternative HS • Oak Crest JH San Dieguito Adult Education • San Dieguito HS Academy • Sunset HS • Torrey Pines HS by the Governing Boor* SAN OIEGUITO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. /89-90 School Assignments for New Residential Development WHEREAS, the San Dlegulto Union High School District 1s experiencing growth 1n student enrollment, and WHEREAS, the majority of the enrollment growth results from new families, occupying homes 1n new residential housing developments, and WHEREAS, Individual school assignments for students 1n these subdivisions may need to change from year to year, or within a year, at the discretion of the superintendent, and WHEREAS, the San Dlegulto Union High School District Board of Trustees adopted a policy on attendance boundaries for each school, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the policy of the San Dlegulto Union High School District that students enrolling from new residential housing development will be assigned to a specific school, at the time of enrollment, subject U change as school capacity and availability requires. BOARD OF TRUSTEES lember rch 15. 1990 option Date STUDENTS 5116.2 ATTENDANCE BOUNDARIES In order to maintain an equitable balance in the enrollment at each campus, the Board shall establish attendance boundaries for each school in the San.Dieguito Union High School District. Boundaries of school attendance areas in the district shall be as follows: 1. La Costa Canyon High School shall include the boundaries of the Encinitas and Cardiff Elementary Districts and the Questhaven area of the Rancho Santa Fe District. 2. San Dieguito High School Academy shall be open to a limited number of 9-12 grade students within district boundaries through an open enrollment application process approved by the Board of Trustees. 3. Torrey Pines High School shall include the boundaries of the Del Mar, Solana Beach, and, with the exception of the Questhaven area, the Rancho Santa Fe Elementary School Districts for grades 9-12. 4. Diegueno Junior High School shall include the following portions of the Encinitas Elementary District for grades 7-8: a. East of El Camino Real; south of Olivenhain Road and north of Encinitas Boulevard. b. La Costa east of Rancho Santa Fe Road. c. Leucadia - South of La Costa Avenue; west of El Camino Real; north of Union Street; west of Saxony Road; north of Encinitas Boulevard to the coast; south to Cardiff State Beach and west-of Highway 101. 5. Oak Crest Junior High School shall include the boundaries of the Cardiff Elementary District and the remainder of the Encinitas Elementary District for grades 7-8. 6. Earl Warren Junior High School shall include the boundaries of Del Mar and Solana Beach Elementary School Districts for grades 7-8. SAN DIEGUITO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Policy Adopted: May 23, 1974 Policy Revised: February 21, 1985 Policy Revised: April 5, 1990 Policy Revised: September 6, 1990 Policy Revised: January 16, 1997 1/2 iJ '.crfiatT^ —V"t v -'-^ ^%6jffiV^^i^r*?iw-^^K^Sr^^1" '<^f ^"'^O^ ~v"'"••V^-^1'-^!,^2'-5^ ' * • P&irW '••«<YCwr'A A —JTL-t w i— : ^Asr-*"1*'!--*^. '/'~ -'«=V—-•VW,'"'1 V* > V — : ' ".ss^^ifiEgS^^ • v»Bm*Hk!.s:«o.;-WM«f r-- •V-.t ••*,-.-_fl iiilii i If .---r" '• ^~^¥ ' • p i :. DisTTii4r OFFICE*&> jNTBAt^ELEMiNTARV 1,001. • ^ JjO- ' / " ' . ' • V *t^ <?'-- *"">•'..«- . ' ' • •-'-"'% •I •:": -is • • • ' i.- I '• : "",^--4-. - !-1 : '•- ii 1= — PACIFIC VIEW ELEMENTARY I'fc-Cfr. S^^V^diSSiF*^^?*-—''^*y " • -r-LJ !- ^&4£w G^^<£^E"i-^ T*?* M^TAPV S"D>"TA5 ! Ln i^^H»c^.»t»cjj^-^:3^vr3^.'A4i"" ; -'- ^^SL'NSBT '';i J'1^'-i**~«=2«'i^«!t:>-3«-^^-?'*?.../?^ i ' ~<*!& Ms 'r*&*I—44*^-, 'i=:?i«i«^^/'^^s^^i^%^S^%^^ . v-*r "' 4. - EP^F'A^Jfel ^^S*^' "^^^^^^^^^'/"V' ;r*—^.y :^^w. " Cardiff By The SiCARD!OlSTWCT-O CARDIFF ELEMENTAR' .<f;^S8Hi Sf*ji~3«^-ta' Union High School District .^^[lE^U-^S5®rl^it DISTRICT OFFICE LOCATION • SAN DIEGUITO UNION HIGH SCHOOL BOUNDARY •• ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT. BOUNDARY • ELEI€NTARY SCHOOL LOCATION A JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL LOCATION • HIGH SCHOOL LOCATION » FUTURE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LOCATION A FUTURE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL LOCATION B- FUTURE HIGH SCHOOL LOCATION ;:. -„£,, -K^iirT3^;^ -^ iX5" - o1 ' * ^-"" .'\ '• < *, ' ' Locluiig Design Group, Inc. October 19, 1998 Mr. Jeff Gibson Planning Department City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 RE: COLINA ROBLE - CT-98-02 - ANNEXATION TO CFD #1 PER CONDITION #15, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION #4342 (LADWIG DESIGN GROUP, INC. JOB NO. L-1039) Dear Jeff: Enclosed are the following items required by the City for annexation to CFD #1: A. Consent and election form signed by owner, with appropriate Notary, and Owner resolution form. B. A current preliminary title report - First American Title Insurance Co. - Order #1151497-22, dated October 2, 1998 for proof of ownership. C. Legal description (attached to above preliminary title report) and assessor parcel map showing subject parcel (AP#255-040-55) and reduced tentative map. D. Annexation fee - (Check #1120 - Colina Roble LLC) in the amount of $820.00 made payable to the City of Carlsbad. Please process the above as required by the Conditions of Approval for Colina Roble. Sincerely, LADWIG DESIGN GROUP, INC. Robert C. Ladwig, President RCL:lb.084 Attachments cc: Barbara Hale Carter, w/attachments David Bentley, w/attachments 703 Palomar Rirport Road 4 Suit© 300 + Carlsbad, California 92009 (760) 438-3182 FflX (760) 438-0173