Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 98-14; Thompson/Tabata; Tentative Map (CT) (80)o Investigative Science and Engineering 3511 Camino Dtl Rio South, Suite 302 Phone/Fax: 619-640-9379 / 619-640-0763 San Diego, CA 92108-4003 wwwJso-advantage.com March 14,1999 (Revised) Mr. Gregg Linhoff Standard Pacific Homes 9355 Chesapeake Drive San Diego, CA 92123-1010 Re: Standard Pacific Poinsettia Property Acoustical Study (ISE Report #98-017) Dear Mr. Linhoff: At the request of Standard Pacific Properties, Investigative Science and Engineering (ISE) was directed to investigate potential noise impacts to the proposed Poinsettia Properties residential development located in Carlsbad, California. An acoustical survey of the site was performed on August 27, 1998. The results of that survey, as well as predicted future sound levels at the site, are presented in this letter report. Introduction and Definitions Existing Site Characterization The project site consists of 74.9 acres located in the central portion of the City of Carlsbad in San Diego County, California (refer to Figure 1). The site resides on both sides of Poinsettia Lane, approximately 1 mile east of Interstate 5. The lots are bound by Aviara Parkway to the east single-family residential housing to the north, and high density single-family housing to the west and south. The project site appears to have been rough graded for existing agricultural and nonagricultural operations. Existing land uses on the property include tomato fields on the eastern terraced side of the property, and undeveloped open space. The property contains two structures, both of which are single family homes. In addition, two access roads are located on the project site to the south of Poinsettia Lane. The first road parallels the western boundary of the project site connecting Poinsettia Lane to the existing nursery, while the second connects Poinsettia Lane to the upper portion of the property. The site is currently zoned L-C and R-1-10000 with a proposed zoning of R-1-7500 and RD-M-Q. The eastern portion of the project site contains moderate westward facing slopes while the western half of the site contains gentle slopes with minor relief (refer to Figure 2). Elevations on the site range from approximately 308 feet above mean sea level (MSL) at the northeastern portion of the property to approximately 195 feet MSL at the southwestern comer of the property. Mr. Gregg Linhoff Standard Pacific Poinsettia Property Acoustical Study ISE Report #98-017 March 14, 1999 (Revised) Page 2 426' fl« ve<.•-* X I P/Wf «.\ is& & f t, .-* *v 5 1 %£, FE%';•«!»!. OWING Df i/iS 81200 tf\b f ^ s \ % \%cu^ J>-? f -<, VT ^ •*>£v* v ^ J*3 ,*& , V- ^*e_ k. . t^ lit ITA iia 71 . ?; ':H l-'.'.v- v» s /;, -- - .-,-" Cn fe. k J,0 * >• j ' f Figure 1: Project Vicinity Map (Thomas Guide Page 1127, Grid BS) '- Kx-^ 1 ^ - sr ^•. • vjy- -,21rr s fex ? >8 Trailer , - FN1 1000 1000 / , ^ J 20OO 5000 0 ft. / Figure 2: Project Area Topography (USGS 7.5 Encinitas Quadrangle 1:12000) Mr. Gregg Linhoff Standard Pacific Poinsettia Property Acoustical Study ISE Report #98-017 March 14,1999 (Revised) Pages Acoustical Definitions Noise is generally defined as unwanted or annoying sound that is typically associated with human activity and which interferes with or disrupts normal activities. Although exposure to high noise levels has been demonstrated to cause hearing loss, the principal human response to environmental noise is annoyance. The response of individuals to similar noise events is diverse and influenced by the type of noise, the perceived importance of the noise and its appropriateness in the setting, the time of day, and the sensitivity of the individual hearing the sound. Airborne sound is a rapid fluctuation of air pressure above and below atmospheric levels. The loudest sounds the human ear can hear conformably is approximately one trillion (a one with 12 zeros following it) times the acoustic energy that the ear can barely detect. Because of this vast range, any attempt to represent the acoustic intensity of a particular sound on a linear scale becomes unwieldy. As a result of this, a logarithmic ratio known as the decibel (dB) is commonly employed. A sound level of zero "0" dB is scaled such that it is defined as the threshold of human hearing and would be barely audible to a human of normal hearing under extremely quiet listening conditions and would correspond to a sound pressure level equal to the reference level. Most of the sounds we hear in the environment do not consist of a single frequency, but rather a broad band of frequencies differing in sound level. The intensities of each frequency add to generate the sound we hear. The method commonly used to quantify environmental sounds consists of determining all of the frequencies of a sound according to a weighting system that reflects the nonlinear response characteristics of the human ear. This is called "A" weighting, and the decibel level measured is called the A-weighted sound level (or dBA). In practice, the level of a noise source is conveniently measured using a sound level meter that includes a filter corresponding to the dBA curve. Although the A-weighted sound level may adequately indicate the level of environmental noise at any instant in time, community noise levels vary continuously. Most environmental noise includes a conglomeration of sounds from distant sources that create a relatively steady background noise in which no particular source is identifiable. For this type of noise a single descriptor called the Leq (or equivalent sound level) is used. Leq is the energy-mean A-weighted sound level during a measured time interval. It is the 'equivalent* constant sound level that would have to be produced by a given source to equal the fluctuating level measured. To describe time-varying character of environmental noise, the statistical noise descriptors L10, L50, and L90 are commonly used. They are the noise levels equaled or exceeded during 10 percent, 50 percent, and 90 percent of a stated time. Sound levels associated with the L10 typically describe transient or short-term events, while levels associated with the L90 describe the steady state (or most prevalent) noise conditions. In addition, it is often desirable to know the acoustic range of the noise Mr. Gregg Linhoff Standard Pacific Poinsettia Property Acoustical Study ISE Report #98-017 March 14,1999 (Revised) Page 4 source being measured. This is accomplished through the maximum and minimum measured sound level (Lmax and Lmin) indicators. The Lmin value obtained for a particular monitoring location is often called the acoustic floor tor that location. Another sound measure employed by the State of California is known as the Community Noise Equivalence Level (or CNEL) is defined as the "A" weighted average sound level for a 24-hour day. It is calculated by adding a 5 decibel penalty to sound levels in the evening (7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.), and a 10 decibel penalty to sound levels in the night (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) to compensate for the increased sensitivity to noise during the quieter evening and nighttime hours. Applicable Significance Criteria City of Carlsbad The Noise Element of the City of Carlsbad identifies sound levels that are compatible with various land uses. According to the City of Carlsbad Draft Noise Guidelines Manual, sound levels up to 60 dBA CNEL are compatible with residential land uses. Sound levels up to 65 dBA CNEL are compatible with recreational areas such as parks and playgrounds. The City also requires an interior noise study (compliant with State of California CCR Title 24 standards) where exterior exposure is in excess of the above land use criteria. Rear and side yard areas of the proposed Poinsettia Property development would be classified as usable exterior living space; thus, the City's guidelines will be applied in this report to determine the requirement of exterior and interior mitigation at all proposed units within the development adjacent to Poinsettia Lane and Aviara Parkway. State of California CCR Title 24 The California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 24, Noise Insulation Standards, states that multi-family dwellings, hotels, and motels located where the CNEL exceeds 60 dBA, must obtain an acoustical analysis showing that the proposed design will limit interior noise to less than 45 dBA CNEL. Worst case noise levels, either existing or future, must be used for this determination. Future noise levels must be predicted at least ten years from the time of building permit application. The City of Carlsbad has accepted the CCR Title 24 standards. Analysis Methodology Existing Conditions Field Survey A Larson Davis Model 700 ANSI Type 2 integrating sound level meter was used as the data collection device. The meter was placed at the following locations: along Poinsettia Lane at the southwestern comer of Lot #94 (ML 1); along Poinsettia Lane Mr. Gregg Linhoff Standard Pacific Poinsettia Property Acoustical Study ISE Report #98-017 March 14,1999 (Revised) PageS Opposite from proposed 'A' Street intersection (ML 2); and, overlooking intersection of Aviara and Poinsettia on Lot #7 (ML 3). The meter was mounted on a tripod roughly 5 feet above the ground in order to simulate the average height of the human ear above ground. The measurements were performed on August 27, 1998. The sound level meter was calibrated before and after each set of measurements. Future Acoustical Environment Modeling The Caltrans Sound 32 Traffic Noise Prediction Model with California (CALVENO) noise emission factors (based on FHWA RD-77-108 and FHWA/CA/TL- 87/03 standards) was used to calculate future onsite vehicular traffic noise levels. Model input included a digitized representation of the alignment of Poinsettia Lane and Aviara Parkway, as well as any local site topography, future ADT volume, vehicle mix, and receptor elevations. The roadway and site topography elevations were obtained from the project site plan (Source: Standard Pacific Poinsettia Property TM - Buccola Engineering - 3/3/99). Model output consisted of peak hour energy-mean A-weighted sound levels (or Leq-h) for each receptor examined. Receptor elevations were considered to be 5 feet above the appropriate floor (pad) elevation. The model assumed a "hard" site sound propagation rule (i.e., a 3-dBA loss per doubling of distance from roadway to receiver) in accordance with Caltrans practices. The model also considered the attenuation due to the slope adjacent to the project site. Future noise levels were calculated for the first and second floor elevations (assumed to be five and 20 feet respectively above the building pad). Findings Ambient Sound Measurement Results Testing conditions during the monitoring period were partly cloudy with an average barometric pressure reading of 29.85 in-Hg, an average northerly wind speed of 3 to 5 miles per hour (MPH), and an approximate mean temperature of 68 degrees Fahrenheit. The results of the sound level monitoring are shown below in Table 1. The values for the energy equivalent sound level (Leq), the maximum and minimum measured sound levels (Lmax and Lmin), and the statistical indicators L10, L50, and L90, are given for each monitoring location. Measurements collected at monitoring locations ML 1 through ML 3 reflect typical sound levels associated with the community setting observed and the topography of the surrounding terrain. The onsite hourly energy average sound levels (or Leq-h) recorded at 50 foot setback points along the edge of Poinsettia Lane was fairly constant over the three consecutive hours monitored. As indicated by the monitoring equipment, at least 90 percent of the time the onsite sound level averaged between 44 and 52 dBA. The difference between the Leq and L90 metrics was directly attributable to the intermittent nature of automobile traffic along Poinsettia Lane during morning peak hour conditions. The acoustic floor for the site, as seen by the Lmin Mr. Gregg Linhoff W Standard Pacific Poinsettia Property Acoustical Study ISE Report #98-017 March 14,1999 (Revised) Page 6 indicator was low (between 38 and 46 dBA for all locations monitored) and reflects the semi-rural community noise environment of the project site. Table 1: Measured Ambient Sound Levels - Standard Pacific Poinsettia Property Site ML ML ML 1 2 3 Start Time 6:00 a.m. 7:00 a.m. 8:00 a.m. 1-Hour Noise Level Descriptors in dBA Leq Lmax 57.3 67 57.4 70 58.3 72 .5 .0 .0 Lmin 38.0 41.0 45.5 L10 61 60 61 .0 .5 .0 L50 54.5 55.0 56.5 L90 43.5 46.0 51.5 Monitoring Locations: * ML 1: Meter positioned along Poinsettia Lane at the southwestern comer of Lot #94 * ML 2: Meter positioned along Poinsettia Lane opposite from proposed 'A' Street intersection * ML 3: Meter positioned overlooking intersection of Aviara and Poinsettia on Lot #7 All positions taken at an approximate 50 foot setback from the edge of Poinsettia Lane Measurements performed by ISE on August 27,1998. Future Traffic Noise Impacts The primary source of future traffic noise in the vicinity of the project would be from Poinsettia Lane. Future year 2010 volume along this roadway alignment is projected to be 36,000 ADT traveling at the posted speed of 40 MPH (Source: Urban Systems Associates, ISE, 7998). The projected year 2010 ADT for adjacent Aviara Parkway is 19,000 with a posted speed of 40 MPH. Peak hour traffic values are calculated for an 8% traffic flow pattern and a 98/1/1 (automobiles/medium/heavy vehicles) percent mix in accordance with Caltrans traffic forecasting practices. For peak hour traffic percentages between approximately 8 and 12 percent (and a Level of Service, or LOS, between A through C) the energy-mean A-weighted sound level is equivalent to the 24-hour Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). Outside this range, a maximum variance of up to 2 dBA occurs between Leq-h and CNEL. The results of the acoustical modeling are shown below in Table 2. Values for selected pad locations adjacent to Poinsettia Lane and Aviary Parkway are given. Also shown are the predicted noise levels for 1) unmitigated ground floor areas, 2) mitigated ground floor areas, and 3) mitigated second floor levels. Based on the model results, some lots adjacent to Poinsettia Lane and Aviara Parkway were found to be above the 60 dBA CNEL threshold criteria established by the City. Mr. Gregg Linhoff Standard Pacific Poinsettia Property Acoustical Study ISE Report #98-017 March 14,1999 (Revised) Page? Table 2: Acoustical Modeling Results of Representative Lots - Standard Pacific Poinsettia Property Receptor Location R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R8 R9 R13 R17 R60 R88 R89 R90 R92 R93 R94 R213 R214 Ground Level (Unmit.) 56.1 57.2 60.5 58.3 61.3 60.2 60.8 59.3 57.4 55.3 68.1 59.9 65.3 65.4 59.5 57.3 57.4 65.5 66.8 Ground Level (Mit.) 52.2 53.6 56.0 54.5 56.9 58.1 56.7 56.6 57.3 55.1 56.9 56.5 60.0 60.0 55.2 52.4 53.8 59.5 59.1 Second Floor Areas 59.4 62.2(1) 67.7(1) 63.2(1) 67.9(1) 67.6(1) 63.9(1) 59.9 57.3 55.1 65.4(1) 58.4 65.7(1) 69.1(1) 60.0(1) 58.5 57.7 66.5(1) 67.5(1) ' Receptor Location R223 R224 R225 R226 R227 R228 R229 R235 R236 R237 R238 R240 R241 R242 R243 R244 R245 R246 Illllfll Ground Level (Unmit.) 63.3 67.0 67.4 67.3 66.6 65.6 63.2 57.2 55.8 55.3 55.5 58.4 58.3 58.1 60.2 62.4 61.6 52.8 XXXXXXX/XXXXXX Ground Level (Mit) 57.6 58.9 59.4 59.2 58.4 59.1 58.0 57.2 55.8 55.2 55.4 54.7 54.3 54.1 55.3 56.5 56.8 50.2 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX.* Second Floor Areas 66.0(1) 67.2(1) 67.6(1) 67.4(1) 66.7(1) 65.7(1) 63.6(1) 64.1(1) 63.8(1) 63.2(1) 63.6(1) 63.2(1) 62.0(1) 62.0(1) 65.2(1) 65.6(1) 64.3(1) 56.0 '/////S// ////// Notes: * Values represent a sampling of potentially impacted lots along Poinsettia Lane and Aviara Parkway. Lots 'sandwiched' between the lots shown above would also require the same treatment. * Modeled using the Caltrans Sound 32 Traffic Noise Prediction Model with California (CALVENO) noise emission factors (based on FHWA RD-77-108 and FHWA/CA/TL-87/03 standards). * Levels denoted with (I) indicates the requirement (or potential for requirement) of interior noise mitigation. <« All sound levels given in dBA CNEL. Lots numbered 3 though 8, 61, 61, 89 through 92, 213, 214, 223 through 229, and 243 though 245 were found to have projected future (ground level) traffic-related noise levels in excess of the 60 dBA CNEL threshold established by the City. These lots would require noise walls ranging from five to seven feet to be located along the rear property line between Poinsettia Lane and the residential receptor. A schematic of Mr. Gregg Linhoff Standard Pacific Poinsettia Property Acoustical Study ISE Report #98-017 March 14.1999 (Revised) PageS the proposed wall design is shown in Figure 3 as an attachment to this report. Projected traffic volumes along Aviara Parkway combined with site topography negated the need for mitigation along this roadway. In addition, second floor receptor areas denoted with an (I) in Table 2 would require an interior acoustical analysis to determine acceptable construction materials and design measures to lower interior noise levels to 45 dBA CNEL per California CCR Title 24 Noise Insulation Standards. Any lots 'sandwiched' between these lots (or having a line-of-sight to the roadway) would also require interior noise control measures. Thus, for completeness, the identified lots requiring interior mitigation would be: 2 through 8, 60, 61, 89 through 92, 213, 214, 223 through 230, and 235 through 245 inclusive. The interior acoustical analysis should be completed prior to submission of final architectural designs for the proposed units situated on the affected pads. Aircraft Transportation Noise Sources Identified The project site lies outside the influence areas of McClellan-Palomar Airport and associated industrial uses. The airport is currently operating at full capacity (maximum typical number of flight operations per day) and no appreciable increase in the contours is expected within the project analysis horizon. Thus, no significant impacts to the project site due to aircraft operations are expected. Conclusions Future noise levels for units located along Poinsettia Lane and Aviara Parkway were found to be in excess the 60 dBA CNEL threshold established by the City. Exterior and interior mitigation measures were deemed necessary to reduce impacts to below a level of significance. The following mitigation measures are required: 1. Lots numbered 3 though 8, 61, 61, 89 through 92, 213, 214, 223 through 229, and 243 though 245 were found to have projected future (ground level) traffic- related noise levels in excess of the 60 dBA CNEL threshold established by the City. 2. Noise mitigation would require noise walls ranging from five to seven feet to be located along the rear property line between Poinsettia Lane and the residential receptor. A schematic of the proposed wall design is shown in Figure 3. 3. Projected traffic volumes along Aviara Parkway combined with site topography negated the need for mitigation along this roadway. 4. Second floor receptor areas denoted with an (I) in Table 2 would require an interior acoustical analysis to determine acceptable construction materials and design measures to lower interior noise levels to 45 dBA CNEL per California CCR Title 24 Noise Insulation Standards. Any lots 'sandwiched' between these Mr. Gregg Linhoff Standard Pacific Poinsettia Property Acoustical Study ISE Report #98-017 March 14,1999 (Revised) Page 9 lots (or having a line-of-sight to the roadway) would also require interior noise control measures. 5. The identified lots requiring interior noise mitigation would be: 2 through 8, 60, 61, 89 through 92, 213, 214, 223 through 230, and 235 through 245 inclusive. Should you have any questions regarding the above conclusion, please do not hesitate to contact me at (619) 640-9379. Sincei lickTavares, EIT, REA, INGE Project Principal Investigative Science and Engineering Cc: Glen Laube, ISE Attachments: Figure 3 - Proposed Mitigation Design: Standard Pacific Poinsettia Property Development o o>aSa. caI(A '5a. i o"35 O) I 2a. • • COI o>