HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 98-15; Rancho Carrillo Village B Phase II; Tentative Map (CT) (36)MEMORANDUM
October?, 1998
TO: ASSISTANT PLANNER - VAN LYNCH
FROM: Associate Engineer - Land Development
CT 98-15, CP 98-08, SDP 98-17: RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE "B" PHASE 2
COMPLETENESS REVIEW AND INITIAL ISSUES STATEMENT
Engineering Department staff have completed a review of the above-referenced project for application
completeness and have determined that the application and plans submitted for the project are complete
and suitable for continued review. Staff has also conducted a review of the project for engineering
issues of concern. Engineering issues which must be resolved or adequately addressed prior to staff
making a determination on the proposed project are as follows:
'; ;\i
Traffic and Circulation
1. Please show a 150' minimum Stopping Sight Distance, sight line at the Private Drive "A'VPaseo
Acampo intersection. Also, show a clear sight line from the Private Drive "K'VPaseo Acampo
intersection to the Paseo Acampo "southeasterly" end curb return (EC). Show these sight lines on
the tentative map and landscape concept plan.
2. Please show a worst case 1:1,1" = 2' scale profile for the proposed 5' "driveways," into the garages,
indicating that an AASHTO "P" Vehicle will not hit bottom accessing a garage.
1. Please show how the proposed grading along the southerly property line will match the existing
grading at Village "A." There should probably be a bench or key to match the existing slope at
Village "A." Or, submit verification from a registered Soils Engineer that just adding soil to the
Village "A" existing slope is acceptable.
Mapping and Land Title:
1. Please indicate which is the existing property boundary line and which one is being adjusted. Staff
assumes that the boundary line being shown is the existing one and that this line is being adjusted
to the north. However, it can also be interpreted that this boundary line is being adjusted to the
south to facilitate on-site grading. If this is the case, the proposal is unacceptable since the
boundary line would not be located at the top of the slope. Please review and revise as necessary.
2. Regarding Item No. 1 above, please show a setback from the top of the slope to the proposed
adjusted property boundary line, in accordance with City Standard GS-14.
Miscellaneous:
1 . Enclosed for the applicant's review for making the requested revisions is a red-lined check print of
the project. This check print must be returned with the revised plans to facilitate continued
staff review.
If you have any questions, please either^ee or call me at extension 4388.
MICHAEL J.
Associate Engineer - Land Development
Attachment
c: Principal Civil Engineer - Land Development