HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 98-15; Rancho Carrillo Village B Phase II; Tentative Map (CT) (4)y(?g.L?J /B- 8- 98
City of Chsbad
October 8, 1998
Mike Howes
Hofman Planning Associates
Suite 150
5900 Pasteur Court
Carlsbad CA 92008
SUBJECT: CT 98-15 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE “B”
Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning
Department has reviewed your Tentative Tract Map, application no. CT 98-15, as to its
completeness for processing.
The application is complete, as submitted. Although the initial processing of your
application may have already begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by the
date of this communication. The City may, in the course of processing the application,
request that you clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise, supplement the basic information
required for the application. In addition, you should also be aware that various design
issues may exist. Please see attached list of issues must be addressed before this
application can be scheduled for a hearing. The Planning Department will begin processing
your application as-of the date of this communication.
Please contact your staff planner, Van Lynch, at (780) 438-l 161, extension 4447, if you
have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application.
Sincerely,
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
Planning Director
MJH:VL:mh
c: Gary Wayne
Dee Landers
Mike Shirey
Bobbie Hoder
File Copy
Data Entry
Planning Aide
Attachments
David Lother
Continental Ranch, Inc.
Suite 300
12230 El Camino Real
San Diego CA 92130
2075 La Palmas Dr. 0 Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 - (760) 436-l 161 0 FAX (760) 438-0894 @
No. CT 98-l 5
-
ISSUES OF CONCERN
PLANNING:
Site Plan
The building setback on loop private drive “K” exceeds the required 20 foot setback
required. Because there are more than 12 units along this drive, the setbacks shall
be 20 feet.
Please provide a list of all the items requested as reductions in site development
standards or modifications of the zoning code requirements for the affordable
housing incentives.
Review the Parking Summary on the tentative map cover sheet. The numbers do
not relate to the spaces provided.
Identify the 5 driveway parking spaces.
Parking spaces adjacent to building 22 are labeled standard, but appear to be
compact spaces. Correct as necessary.
Provide a column of percentages of coverage with project summary table.
Under “Waivers” on site plan, include that “All buildings are to have a minimum 5
foot setback from private streets”. Some units will have a greater setback.
Provide outlines of adjacent proposed Village A, as done for Village B, Phase I.
Show how pedestrian access is gained to each unit. Smooth out jagged design of
proposed walkways.
Landscape
Provide percent of site used for landscaping on landscape plans. Total area is
approximately 3.0 acres.
Show how pedestrian access is gained to each unit. Correlate how walkways on
site plan relate to courtyards on landscape plan, or vise versa.
Show enhanced pavement treatments at the entrance of each driveway entrance
off the spine road (Pvt. Dr. A). Also add pavement treatments at the ends of each
driveway with bench or other amenity in the landscaping at the end of the drive.
-
This would have the effect of shortening the driveway and providing an additional
passive/active area.
Building elevations and floor plans
The garage elevations of the units should have additional architectural relief as to
eliminate the long two story face that is created. This is more pronounced when
multiple buildings are placed end to end, such as buildings 21 and 22, and across
from each other, which creates a long narrow alley effect. Second story setbacks,
balconies, false balconies, facade treatments such as reveals, belt courses, sills,
and enhanced window treatments, wrought iron railings, and trellises over the
garage entrances are some suggestions.
Provide an offset or stagger to the buildings, possibly 2 feet per units, to create a
little more relief and variety to the now somewhat square buildings. Also to add
some projections in the way of extended covered patios. Especially in the corners
of the buildings.
Fifty percent of the exterior openings (doors/windows) shall be recessed or
projected a minimum of two inches.
State on plans that the garages will be equipped with automatic garage door
openers.
Consider the use of roll-up type garage doors rather than tilt-up.
Garage doors should have a variety of styles, designs and or patterns.
Provide floor plans and elevations of main recreation facility. Does the main
recreation facility provide a common meeting room?
Provide some additional information on the tot lot learning wall
Please provide the construction materials board and color samples.
Engineering:
Traffic and Circulation
1. Please show a 150’ minimum Stopping Sight Distance, sight line at the Private
Drive “A”/Paseo Acampo intersection. Also, show a clear sight line from the
Private Drive “K”/Paseo Acampo intersection to the Paseo Acampo
“southeasterly” end curb return (EC). Show these siqht lines on the tentative
map and landscape concept plan.
2. Please show a worst case 1 :I, 1)) = 2’ scale profile for the proposed 5’
“driveways, ” into the garages, indicating that an AASHTO “P” Vehicle will not
hit bottom accessing a garage.
- -
Grading
1. Please show how the proposed grading along the southerly property line will
match the existing grading at Village “A.” There should probably be a bench
or key to match the existing slope at Village “A.” Or, submit verification from
a registered Soils Engineer that just adding soil to the Village “A” existing
slope is acceptable.
Mamins and Land Title:
1. Please indicate which is the existing property boundary line and which one is
being adjusted. Staff assumes that the boundary line being shown is the
existing one and that this line is being adjusted to the north. However, it can
also be interpreted that this boundary line is being adjusted to the south to
facilitate on-site grading. If this is the case, the proposal is unacceptable since
the boundary line would not be located at the top of the slope. Please review
and revise as necessary.
2. Regarding Item No. 1 above, please show a setback from the top of the slope
to the proposed adjusted property boundary line, in accordance with City
Standard GS-14.
Miscellaneous:
1. Enclosed for the applicant’s review for making the requested revisions is a red-
lined check print of the project. This check print must be returned with the
revised plans to facilitate continued staff review.