HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-04-07; Planning Commission; ; CT 98-15|CP 98-08|SDP 98-17 - RANCHQ CARRILLO VILLAGE B -PHASE IIme City of Carlsbad Planning Departmen
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Item No.
P.C. AGENDA OF: April 7, 1999
Application complete date: October 8, 1998
Project Planner: Van Lynch
Project Engineer: Mike Shirey
SUBJECT: CT 98-15/CP 98-08/SDP 98-17 - RANCHQ CARRILLO VILLAGE B -
PHASE II - Request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Condominium Permit
and Site Development Plan to construct 124 condominium units on property
generally located within the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan near the southeast
corner of Palomar Airport Road and Melrose Drive in Local Facilities
Management Zone 18.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4467, 4468,
4469, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of CT 98-15, CP 98-08, and SDP 98-15, based upon
the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein, including the errata dated April 7,
1999.
II. INTRODUCTION
This item was originally scheduled to be heard on March 3, 1999 and was continued to April 7,
1999.
ATTACHMENTS;
1. Errata sheet dated April 7, 1999
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4467 (CT)
3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4468 (CP)
4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4469 (SDP)
5. Staff Report dated March 3, 1999, with attachments
April?, 1999
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: CT 98-15/CP 98-08/SDP 98-17 - RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE B
PHASE II
Please replace Exhibit "A" and architectural exhibits (exhibits "G"-"R") with the attached new
plans. The revision is a result of floor plan number two being a three bedroom unit rather than a
two bedroom unit as correctly stated in the staff report. On Table 1 and Table 2 on page two of
the staff report, the three bedroom living square footage of 1,003 square feet should read as 1,034
square feet. The plan elevations have been modified to address the larger patio/deck area and
window placement. Staff supports the revision.
Please delete the last sentence on page 9 and add the following language to the "Environmental
Section" of the staff report:
The City has received its annual Growth Management Traffic Monitoring Report.
The Report has recorded an unanticipated intersection "level of service" (LOS)
failure at Palomar Airport Road (PAR) and El Camino Real (ECR) during both
the a,m. and p.m. peak hours. This potentially creates a changed circumstance
negating reliance on previous environmental documentation. Pursuant to §15162
of the CEQA Guidelines a lead agency must prepare a "Subsequent"
environmental documentation if substantial evidence (i.e., the recorded
intersection failure) determines that a changed circumstance exists. However,
case law has interpreted this section of the CEQA Guidelines to not require the
preparation of a "Subsequent EIR" if mitigation measures are adopted which
reduce the identified impacts to a level of insignificance.
A mitigation measure has been identified which, if implemented, will bring the
peak hours LOS into the acceptable range. The mitigation measure involves
construction of two dual right turn lanes-northbound to eastbound and westbound
to northbound. This project has been conditioned to pay its fair share of the
intersection "short-term improvements" thereby, guaranteeing mitigation to a
level of insignificance. The applicant is in agreement with the proposed
condition.
Please modify Resolution No. 4467 by the following additions:
New Finding 21.
That this project could have a potentially significant negative cumulative traffic
impact on the Palomar Airport Road/ El Camino Real intersection. However, this
project has been conditioned to pay its fair share of the "short-term
improvements" thereby, guaranteeing implementation of a mitigation measure
that reduces the potential impact to a level of insignificance.
New Condition 31 and then renumber.
The Developer shall pay their fair share for the "short-term improvements" to the
El Camino Real/ Palomar Airport Road intersection prior to approval of the final
map or the issuance of a grading permit, whichever occurs first. The amount shall
be determined by the methodology ultimately selected by Council, including but
not limited to, an increase in the city-wide traffic impact fee; an increased or new
Zone 18 LFMP fee; the creation of a fee or assessment district; or incorporation
into a Mello-Roos taxing district.