HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 98-16; Worthing Subdivision; Tentative Map (CT) (17)5 Re: I amreviewing flradiiy**^ans and tinai map for 5 lot infill (vAforthing^^idlvlsion) on James Drive no PageT
JtaM^" ™" ' ~~ : " ~~~ ~~ ~~ SB/™*—~ — — ~ — —
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
James Drive no
Gary Wayne
Anne Hysong
3/31/00 8:21 AM
Re: I am reviewing grading plans and final map for 5 lot infill (Worthing Subdivision) on
I need more information before I can advise. Are finished grades changing from those that were
Was there any neighborhood opposition — \Js>^£<JU<L'
when the project considered? Would you have had concerns about an unbalanced grading oogration
whejij!pjjj^viewed the project^Why does the City have to "bail out" imprecise engineeringT'vVhat are
The~cansequen5es or saying noto the request? What have we done in similar circumstances?
Engineering has to be involved in the final decision here. While Chris is on vacation, please work with
Dee on this and let me know your recommendation before we inform the applicant. Thanks, GW
>» Anne Hysong 03/30/00 03:05PM >»
I am reviewing grading plans and final map for 5 lot infill (Worthing Subdivision) on James Drive north of
Buena Vista Way. It was supposed to be a balanced site, however, the engineer (Land Space
Engineering - Alex Pantich) is now requesting 1,346 cubic yards of import which is 67 trucks. Engineer
claims that during the tm stage, the dirt take-off is calculated with less precision than for the final grading
plan and he was not able to balance due to design circumstances. Do I approve - the overall grading
quantities only increased by 356 cy since the cut was reduced. Since this is infill, how do you want me to
handle this?
CC:Adrienne Landers