HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 98-19; Roesch Property Residential Subdivision; Tentative Map (CT) (31)09/24/1999 08:20 760438/' '".
11/22/1995 20:26 SI* (BSBl
September 24,1999
TO: AnneHyaong
FROM; Jack Henthorn
SUDJ; Roeaca DCC package,
We «JH be attending the DCC meefing and are providing a summary of comments to date I will contactyou later today to discuss. Thanks
Comments re Itoesch project DCC
! 1 Paragraph 3. Would like
that need to to stated to demons*
demtiy it 21 units divided by 27.7
Management a 21 units divided by
units divided by 6,3 (fkould thil be
3.2 «aiti per ten.
- Parnntob 4. tecond I
' The reference to 40 (bet needs to to changed to 30
Rm shwe the new hilltide xegulatkjjiu are not in place within the Coastal zone.
clarification that the irta of imped
that this project may not he require
mitigation fees required could be refunded
of an urgency ordinance subject to
loduded to permit the City Engine r to aflow grading during the
15
Carlsbad accept* liability and mair
publte
HENTHORN
JACK HENTHORN
PAGE 02
PAGE 03
or all your effort* on thli.
nckage Need diKiurtofl or clariflcationat DCC meeting
tore discussion of Ihe 3 2 density There arc three density munbers
s the significance of the preservation effort on the site. The grow
r 0.76 unit* per acre. The rM allowable density per Growth
18.4, or 1,14 unitt per acre. The developer propmed density it 21
6.€ to be consistent with other reference*?) acres to be disturbed, or
- the word "southern" showW be changed to "northern"
t M«M«e»eat TrtlUg Maattariaa! itaMrt - Request -
to this intersection has not been fairy determined and that it is possible
to contribute to me improvement of the intersection and that any
Ufanexufiinolftwnd I think the reqairement lithe subject
eview within one year of Its implementation,
ok - aw comment above,
__ _^_ Dependent ttpouthe location of arry tietnng/braading
pain, the aMUty to «7«de the site OJkild be reitricted to m2 week to 1 month window, SiACe gturtcatchen
have been found in ttc vicinity oft ««tteAWJdocumettt^c«sfte,it1arfqBestKltlu^l8i^BBgerje
witwer rtstrietlon period.
\- Seeoommentrepaje
L2 see page 15
K t comment* regarding page 2, paragraph 3 •v>^r'
Rs|tuest addition of language clearly stating that unless tfce City of''
enaiicetesponsibiHty, acccs* will not be available to the general
-n quest that language per Page 9 comment be included -
/^^-^^^g^^^Jiz*^--
09/24/1999 08:20 760438<f 1
» li/22/1996 20:26 61?
•rqJRiett that the last sentence tettricken. The applicant has not reviewed
tibunement requested Thethe referenced letter and it it u»d« r If the City has audited the •mourn of win
applicant is prepared to renribune $r all legitimate verified proportional coats.
- See comment regarding diwutsioa ott page 3 rf ataff
rafMt-
oomi«ent vdth Map Act 24 month with 36 mooth extenwon period.
- See»twuMwm « «air repoit p«ge 2, pangnph 3
not jw« those within 200 feet,
in (hit comment sheet.
InJjoftriJtent with prior MtMttttenc in Hut it prohibit! all grading Activity,
I "rainy season provision* be included in other mea referencedReq ettthat*
HENTHORN
JACK HENTHORN
PAGE 03
PAGE 02
lii conflict! with Subdivision Map Act. flute remove or make