HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 99-01; Carlsbad Beach Estates; Tentative Map (CT) (39)Ph_ 1 619 299 0957
reb 24 00 04:17P Randal Jay
EHM ARCHITECTURE
February 24, 2000
Elaine Blackburn, Planner
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
RE: Carlsbad Beach Estates
Dear Elaine,
Thank you for your comments on the above-referenced project. The following is a listing of responses
to those verbal comments, by sheet number. NOTE: Sheet numbers have been revised for clarity.
The sheet number at left corresponds to the original sheet numbers, while the sheet number at right
refers to the revised numbers for your reference:
A1 A1 Square footage of passive recreation area was corrected
A1 . 1 A2 The Plant Legend was revised to meet requirements of the Carlsbad Landscape
Guidelines.
Graphics for ground cover plantings were extended below trees; flat size was
indicated at the legend; deleted "Coyote Bush" plant type.
Tree was added behind Unit G to soften impact on adjacent property.
Groundcover was added at the Fire Department Turnaround Area,
Minimum width of turf areas was shown as six feet wide. Areas less than six feet
wide were changed to refined ground cover.
Shrubs were moved from driveway at Lot 2.
Eliminated Stamped concrete at public sidewalk over main driveway entrance.
The Water Conservation Calculations were moved to Sheet A3.
A1.2 A3 Turf symbols were changed to Zone 1 symbol w/ corresponding graphic per
Landscape Guidelines.
The Water Conservation Calculations were corrected.
Graphics that previously printed in the wrong locations were corrected.
Symbols were coordinated with the Landscape Plan.
Showed turf areas as Zone 1 with corresponding graphics.
Indicated annual irrigation requirements for Planting Zones.
A2.A A5 no change
A2.B A7 no change
A2.C-E A9 no change
A2.F A12 no change
A2.GH A14 no change
A3.A A6 Building heights were shown in relation to LOWEST adjacent pre-existing grade
per the Zoning Ordinance. This correction did not impact building height.
A3.B AS Building heights were shown in relation to LOWEST adjacent pre-existing grade
per the Zoning Ordinance. This correction did not impact building height.
A3C-E A1 0 Building heights were shown in relation to LOWEST adjacent pre-existing grade
per the Zoning Ordinance. This correction did not impact building height.
A3C-E A1 1 Building heights were shown in relation to LOWEST adjacent pre-existing grade
per the Zoning Ordinance. This correction did not impact building height.
SW M*1VuKwnrM<gMn,Si«tCI
••nil mditfetkBlKktn Sn Dt.in CA MlU-IHt 9«MU,W&»nU VwMW.WAWCtt HBUtk».Wi mtt
tattno <m.itanrdjm «I)WW«) tMUMttJ MOM4-I1II MOStf-Ull
FUC 1M 13S-ITS1
T.UFru Mt»M4U
reb 24 00 04:17p Randal Jay Ehm 1 619 E39 0957 p.2
David Buckmaster
Novembers, 1999
Page 2 of 2
A3.F A13 Building heights were shown in relation to LOWEST adjacent pre-existing grade
per the Zoning Ordinance. This correction did not impact building height.
A3.G A15 Building heights were shown in relation to LOWEST adjacent pre-existing grade
per ttie Zoning Ordinance. This correction did not impact building height
A4 A4 Building heights were shown in relation to LOWEST^^^pre-exisfang grade"
per the Zoning Ordinance. This correction did not irhpactbuilding height.
A5 A4 Site Sections were incorporated into Sheet A4.
The following changes were made at the request of the Owner, to enhance the quality and aesthetics
of the project:
A1 A1 No change
A1.1 A2 No change
A1.2 A3 No change
A2.A A5 The accessory unit entry was recessed to enhance the front elevation. Arches
were added to the front elevation. An exterior door to the Powder Room was
eliminated.. The layout of the accessory unit was modified with no impact to
required area or exterior elevations. The storage area was eliminated along the
left garage wall and added to the back wall and below the stair, resulting in a
reduction of 5 cu. ft., yet maintaining compliance to the minimum requirement.
A2.B A7 The entry was recessed to enhance the front elevation. The plumbing was
flipped at the second floor bathroom.
A2.C-E A9 The storage area of Unit C was expanded with no reduction of required garage
area. The first floor interior of Units D and E were reconfigured with no impact
to area or exterior elevations. The storage area at the Unit D garage was shown
to have doors opening to the garage, rather than the exterior, and storage was
added below the stair yet maintaining compliance. The second floor of Unit D
was revised to reflect a stacked condition over the first floor, as the previous
design would have encroached into the required 15'x15' backyard, with no
impact on coverage or elevation articulation requirements. The storage area of
Unit E was expanded with no impact on required garage area.
A2.F A12 Windows were added at the second floor Master Bedroom and the Bath.
A2.GH A14 The first floor interior of Unit H was reconfigured with no impact to area. The
fireplaces were eliminated at the first floor of Plans G and H to allow for addition
of an arched window with positive aesthetic impact to the front elevation. As you
disallowed inclusion of the second floor storage area in the storage requirement
calculation, the first floor Powder at Units G and H were reduced with the space
being assigned to storage in the garage, resulting in more storage than req'd.
A3.A A6 Added arches and window trim to enhance elevations.
A3.B A6 Added arches and window trim to enhance elevations.
A3C-E A10 Reconfigured windows; added arches and window trim to enhance elevations.
A3C-E A11 Reconfigured windows; added arches and window trim to enhance elevations.
A3.F A13 Reconfigured windows: added arches and window trim to enhance elevations.
A3.G A15 Reconfigured windows; added arches and window trim to enhance elevations.
A4 A4 Revised to reflect enhancements listed above.
A5 A4 Site Sections were incorporated into Sheet A4
Elaine, thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in helping facilitate approval of what
I feel will become a fine development in response to the surrounding neighborhood.