The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCT 99-14; The Regency; Tentative Map (CT) (8)city of October 12, 1999 Brett Development, Inc Mr. Bernard Reeder 205 Meadow Vista Way Encinitas, CA 92024 SUBJECT: CT 99-14/PUD 99-06 - THE REGENCY The items requested from you earlier to make your tentative tract map and planned development permit application no. CT 99-14/PUD 99-06, complete have been received and reviewed by the Planning Department. It has been determined that the application is now complete for processing. Although the initial processing of your application may have already begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by the date of this communication. Please note that although the application is now considered complete, there may be issues that could be discovered during project review and/or environmental review. Any issues should be resolved prior to scheduling the project for public hearing. In addition, the City may request, in the course of processing the application, that you clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise, supplement the basic information required for the application. Please contact your staff planner, Barbara Kennedy, at (760) 438-l 161, extension 4455, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director MJH:BK:eh c: Gary Wayne Adrienne Landers, Team Leader Jeremy Riddle, Project Engineer Bobbie Hoder File Copy Data Entry Planning Aide 2075 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 - (760) 438-l 161 - FAX (760) 438-0894 a9 LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION No. CT 99-14/PUD 99-06 ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. In order to create a more aesthetically pleasing development and a “neighborhood” atmosphere the following elements should be incorporated into the plans: a) b) cl d) e) Add 6’ x 8’ landscape fingers between the parallel guest parking spaces at intervals of every two parking spaces. Locate the planters so that they are not immediately behind the driveway areas. One or two guest parking spaces may have to be eliminated in order to provide for the landscape fingers. Choke,private street “B” down to a width of no less than 24 feet by utilizing expanded landscape areas adjacent to the front property lines of the lots (see attached drawing). Be sure that expanded landscape areas are shown as common area, to be owned and maintained by the HOA. Provide landscaped focal points at the ends of the private streets. Use bands of enhanced paving at the entrances to the private streets and at other locations within the project. Eliminate the fire pit, and instead, locate a play structure within the common recreation area. Design the recreation area elements to maximize the lawn activity area. 2. Please include exterior building elevations/floor plans for the single-family detached product. 3. Please revise the architectural plans as follows: a) Divided lite windows shall be shown on all exterior elevations. b) Indicate a 20’ x 20’ clear interior dimension within the garage. Water heaters and other encroachments are not permitted within this area. 4. The following minor revisions are required on the Tentative Map for clarification: a) Show the width of the planter adjacent to the east property line. b) Show top and bottom elevations of the retaining walls. c) The symbol for the stucco wall (parallel to Unicornio) looks like a property line. Delete or use another symbol. d) Identify the safety fence as WI with wooden posts to match the neighboring fences. e) Dimension the guest parking spaces as 10’ x 20’ or 12’ x 20’ when adjacent to a wall or fence. The parallel parking spaces shall be at least 8’ wide x 22’ deep. f) Show the true front and rear setbacks for the buildings in addition to the required building, setback lines. g) Section A-A should refer to PRIVATE STREET “A”. The paved width should be 32 feet from curb face to curb face. h) Provide a section detail for PRIVATE STREET “B”. The street width should be shown as 30 feet wide, with expanded landscape areas where shown. The minimum paved width between the expanded landscape areas shall be no less than 24 feet from curb face to curb face. 5. The following minor revisions are required on the landscape plans: a) Delete the reference to the 6’ high wooden fence along the east property line. b) Space the 18” columns at approximately 10 foot intervals along the stucco wall for interest. c) Please revise the maintenance responsibility exhibit to clearly show the lot lines so that there is a delineation between privately owned and commonly owned maintenance areas. Show the maintenance area for the rear yard of Lot 2. d) Street trees (along private streets and Unicornio Street) shall be increased in size to 24” box. Use broadheaded canopy trees within the front yards and landscape fingers. An accent tree/palm (15 gal. min.) should be located within each front yard area in front of the stuccoed recess area. Engineering: -1 . Revise the tentative map to include top-of-wall and bottom-of-wall elevations along all proposed retaining walls. 2. Review the tentative map to callout a proposed wrought-iron fence along Alga Road, which shall match the adjacent property’s fence. include a detail of the front view of the fence on the plans. Revise the cross-section for Alga Road to ensure the private fence is not constructed on the proposed sidewalk pavement. 3. Revise the tentative map to include catch basins and storm drains to collect and convey storm water from the private streets to Unicornio Street. Concentrated discharge should not be discharged across driveways. 4. Provide a title report which covers Lot 419 of map 11174 (listed in legal description on tentative map). A title report for lot 417 and 418 has only been provided. 5. Add an “Owner certificate on the tentative map to address if their are multiple owners for lots 417, 418 and 419. If so, list each owner and who owns each lot. Also include owner’s signatures on the tentative map, stating the name and title of the person(s) signing the tentative map. 6. Address the redline comments as noted on the returned check print. Enclosed is a red-lined check print of the project. This check print must be returned with the revised plans to facilitate continued staff review. Building: 1. The plan shows real property lines between the dwelling units. The elevations and roof plans show some architectural features that will not be approved in building plan check due to proximity to property lines. Generally, walls next to property lines need parapets or other fire-resistive features in the roof system. This is achievable except at the gables on the front elevations of the duplexes. That roof overhang at the gables is essentially a combustible projection over the property line. This is prohibited in the UBC. A redesign of this elevation is strongly recommended. Please contact Pat Kelly at 438-l 161, x 4503 if you have any questions. -! , ’ I ’ i B -i - rrl : 17,, ,B ::;a ,’ ., :,: ., : \,\ :; : ., : ‘: 1’. ., :, ,/., ,. :. ‘,:’ : 8.:: ii ‘: I ‘.I :; I ,,.. ,:: .::, : ‘1 :i j. : .:.’ :, :,i L,. . . . .: : .::. $ Y. i,.; :/ j(i, : : : :,. ;;. : 1;:. ! : ‘. :,I ,:. ., >‘, :, :, 1 ii :, .;,t, : . : : : .,’ : ;. ..i ; ., : : : i ,, :,,;; .,‘/ ‘., :,, . ,I” !I I 1 . 4 if 2 .2 -IL $ 68 / Cn: I ;; ncl ,$ i d 3 RKI ;