The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCUP 01-06; KING'S FISH HOUSE; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (2)• CITY OF CARLSBAD • LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION ' 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) !FOR DEPARTMEN'r USE ONLY) D Administrative Permit -2nd Dwelling Unit D Planned Industrial Permit D Administrative Variance D Planning Commission Determination ~ Coastal Development Permit CDP 01-l'b D Precise Development Plan ~ Conditional Use Permit C,l{POl-06 D Redevelopment Permit D Condominium Permit rgi ~a~t>MWiir Site velopmen la ~''""~INN D Environmental Impact D Special Use Permit Assessment D General Plan Amendment D Specific Plan D D .. Hillside Development Permit TeRtetive Pereel Mep Obtain from Engineering Department D Local Coastal Plan Amendment D Tentative Tract Map D Master Plan D Variance D Non-Residential Planned D Zone Change Development D Planned Development Permit D List other applications not specified 2) 3) 4) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: i..u-UJ.1-0+ PROJECT NAME: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: MAILING DDRESS ~13~ ~ '~0~\()t~ i\~~ MAILING ADDRESS (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) SPP ~O-llCi CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE CITY AND ST ATE ZI :, ~ fX \ /};{~ q~c\l\? 1 LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE AND CORRECT TO THE BES OF MY 9~802- 0 -& ;:ar_.a~ c::./::J--/ I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND _.,/-2 7-O/ " CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. --\i-=:::l6'--~~~~~.¥..~ ~..;:::,~:.....:~:....!.\t-=-)'-=U,~/-· _· >-\-"'---+--,~_:....__ _ _.._-7~ef"--- 7) DATE SIGNATURE DATE PD'Rfl&N efS uPr 4-1 MAP I ~D1 & , AND ~TI!N 6F" f,AftcSt; -z;.1 ~eat; MAf 11284- NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.MS ~ · Q Bl Form 16 (°"\ a-1-/ i -e;/ PAGE 1 OF 2 · ~0M4 l03'6 D • 8) LOCATION OF PROJECT: STREET ADDRESS ON THE I we=-sr I SIDE OF I ~SEO C!SL. Notqp; I !NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) (NAME OF STREET} BETWEEN '~~·Bo. AND 9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE .....__1? _____ ~ 10) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS I /ti/fl-111) NUMBER OF EXISTING ~ 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF l&"'-1 '/ r' RESIDENTIAL UNITS ~ RESIDENTIAL UNITS r '1"T 13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION l~ffil 14 ) PROPOSED IND OFFICE/ ~ 15) PROPOSED COMM ~ SQUARE FOOT AGE SQUARE FOOTAGE 16} PERCENT AGE OF PROPOSED 017} PROPOSED INCREASE IN ~ 18) PROPOSED SEWER ~ PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE ADT USAGE IN EDU 19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE ~20} EXISTING GENERAL [!BJ 21) PROPOSED GENERAL ~ f,etb~S PLAN PLAN DESIGNATION 22) EXISTING ZONING ~23) PROPOSED ZONING ~ 24) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO· INSPECT AND EN HE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT J" ENTRY FOR H •l' SE FEE COMPUT ATJON APPLICATION TYPE FEE REQUIRED TOTAL FEE REQUIRED DATE FEE PAID Form 16 MA't O 3 200\ C\TY OF CARLSBAD pLANN\NG DEPT. DATE ST AMP APPLICATION RECEIVED RECEIVED BY: :JJil;i;\ 10~ . RECEIPT NO. PAGE 2 OF 2 CITY OF CARLSBAD APPLICATION FORM FOR . -PRELIMINARY REVIEW APPLICATION CIIY IISE ONLY r)'l[,(;;J)'-'~ Pro_ject Number: PROJECT NAME: ..,-<c:::. / _,,&,,,.s ,,,;,::::/..S ;A-6 ~c:,.e.,,,CSIL_. ".sc~" Assessors Parcel Number(s): .,2.// 02,I' -3 / OWNER NAME (Print or Type) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type) ~/ ~&,._;, _.;;,c::,,-Q,,Y /~d~£. e:::;:;;r,:::,,.,-...y ~ • .....-.,,,-;, _7'6 "J>.,f- MAILING ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS 5e,,.2.~ .,.-=-...c::ise:o ~ ...,_.4<.~ ..3 /S..S--~ ...,-c.1-,.,;;c:..~~ A-v.e:. . CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPH3NE CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHOJE .r::::;.,-a.,..,~c.S&...,:a.Z) ?.zc:::>O:!!:> C 7G. o C7/~ c::::= c:>-S ,..-...,cQ ~,£ ..sA-9 ,2. c; ZG:t ~ / ...y,&/-:,=r/.s✓+--¥...S.Z-o ~o *O~natur~s pe;mission to conduct a preliminary review for a development proposal • . ~-- DESCRIPTION OF PR6«sAL (ADD ATTACHMENT IF NECESSARY): .,£ ><'.,...-,&: ~ .S/0 .J ~ ~ x,...s. .,,...,,,_6 ;::;--..--;;;r-,,o .._s,.-,;e L/G .,.-.::../A.,~ ...ca~ _,£'~-r--~.,a.c..A:.'"-'-4y ~-~0~77..J .A!=~ V"',..a.-,,. c!) ~ ~.,..,-,,,.,,,,e / 4/ -;;,--/J..iL-0~ ,,_;Id,'--sJIIQ-}'>jO~Oc./S 2) ?~ c..<....S., WOULD YOU LIKE TO ORALLY PRESENT YOUR PROPOSAL TO YOUR ASSIGNED STAFF PLANNER/ ENGINEER? YES □ NO ✓ PLEASE LIST THE NAMES OF ALL STAFF MEMBERS YOU HA VE PREVIOUSLY SPOKEN TO REGARDING THIS PROJECT. IF NONE, PLEASE SO STATE. ~;Ii!!.. v~.,.,._/ ~y.,,,.._,,,c:.# / FOR CITY USE ONLY s~o. 0 L.,:) FEE REQUIRED/DATE FEE PAID: RECEIPT NO.: -~~-RECENEDBY: Routing: Planning CT:' Engineering B Fire D Other Fonn 15 Rev. 04/04 Page 3 of3 CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT Fire Protection Services PRELIMINARY REVIEW REPORT PROJECT NAME: Kings Fish House "SCE" 06/08/05 Date: Project number: PRE 05-37 Staff Planner: V. Lynch Engineer: Preliminary comments: (Note: This report identifies missing information that must be included with the official project submittal. It may also identify fire protection issues associated with the project.) Fire Department has reviewed this application and will provide requirements at the appropriate time. GR June 16, 2005 King's Fish House Gary Mayeda 3185 H Airway Avenue Costa Mesa CA 92626 City of Carlsbad IRE•l•lii,i-ii•Ji•E•iii,14111 SUBJECT: PRE 05-37-KING'S FISH HOUSE (CUP 01-06) The Planning Director has completed a review of your application for a consistency determination ,for the revision of the approved, yet not constructed, banquet room to an extension of the existing dining patio, (APN: 211-021-31). After careful consideration of the circumstances surrounding this request, the Planning Director has determined that the application qualifies for a consistency determination with the approved permit and therefore, approves the changes to the project based on Planning Director Administrative Policy No. 35. The plans which were submitted for the determination will be stamped as "Consistency Determination" exhibits and retained on file. The City is retuning one set to you for your records. Future building permits will be reviewed for consistency with the revised plan . . If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact Van Lynch at (760) 602-4613. DON NEU Assistant Planning Director DN:VL:bd c: Van Lynch Jeremy Riddle File Copy Data Entry 1635 Faraday Avenue• Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us {!) Sent By: CSCACj C FEB•Ol·ZDOl 10:21 -FROM-MAYER CORPO~ON SITE 12137399318; Feb-1-_fl1 +714•374-7536 · - 9:48j Page 2/2 T·9DZ P.001/001 F·ZD9 WOULD YOU LIKE TO OllALL Y PRESENT YOUR PROPOSAL TO YOUR ASSIGNED STAFF Pl..ANNEIUENGINEER? YES ~ NQ 0 . PLEASE UST THE NAMtS OF ALL STAPF MEMBERS YOU HA VE PREVlOUSL Y SPOKEN TO REGARDING THIS PROJECT. J ONE, PLEASE SO STATE. ~ FOR CtTY USE ONLY PROJECTNUMBER: P!2..E O'-::=\,,,,,_---iOF-l:j _______________ _ f'f;E R.EQlirRED/O,1\TE FEc r'AlD; _l.-~~-~-•-a-="> _____________ _ RECEIPT NO.:--------------------------LUCEIVEO BY: __..4-'-______________________ _ ROUling: Planhina □ Engineerins 0 Fire O Water 0 Other ____ _ ~lt E.\¥: CSCACj ,( ·ana112001 14: 2s 71499771 _ 12137399318; ADC tRELIMINARY BEYlEW APPLIC\J'ION Jan-31-01 15:01; Page 2/2 PAGE 02 PROJECT NAME: /(l(ll~~ fi'ift /{()Vt;6/KIN6 C&1B ltiaN{re r& Indicate, permission to conduct a prelinainary review for a development proposal, PROJECT ASS~SOR'S PARCELNUMBcR(S) (APN}: ~.ae 4f/jji:lii4 DESClUPTION OF PROPOSAL (ADD ATIACHMENT IF NECESSARY): # 111~ s. F. Re5r--:ftmg41C{: 111id, 2 3~ r.F. /li/MJ WOULD YOU LIKE TO ORALLY PRESENT YOUR PROPOSAL TO YOUR ASSIGNED STAFF PLANNER/ENGINEER? YES ll1' MQ D . PLEASE LIST THE NAMES OF ALL STAFF MEMBERS YOU HA VE PREVIOUSLY SPOKEN TO REGARDING THIS PROJECT. IF NONE. PLEASE SO STATE. l;,gi a. P1UJIOZ . FOR CITY USE ONLY PROJECT NUMBER:~------------ FEE REQUIRED/DATE FEE PAID: _________________ _ RECEIPTNO.: ________ ~--------------- R.ECEIVEDBY:_, _______________ ~------ Routing: Plannins D . Engineering D Fir<= D Water D Other ____ _ FRMO015 U/98 PA<,;t: J or 3 ,ZGER DEVELOPMENT SERVICES; 213-763-7740; .... -. 0 -.0, II • - AH£.A::: 95,262.91 Sf/ l'i or 2. 1870 ACRES , KORE OR lESS LEAS£ AREA _for K.INC,S FISH HOUSE KI NC CRAB LOllNCE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 1711 PALMER WAY, SUITE G L.$. 4811 CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA 92008 <760> .f98-1728 FAX C780> 488-8091 JN 2004L( A~DIJG ' ' Jul-20-00 10:56AM; Page 3/4 ' CITY of CARLSBAD \ ' , PUBLIC ROAi) ct U TILJTY a.~· '[AS[M[NT ..-0 REC 10-21-85 ~ AS FILE 85-J90632 O.R. "': "' ~ ~" ~~"' ' t VICINITY MAP NO SCAL£ 5/15/2000 JN 2004 City of Carlsbad I A Fi••••• el· I •J§ ·E• I I• ,14 el I March 6, 2001 Metzgar Development Services, LLC. 1100 S. Flower Street, Suite 3100 Los Angeles CA 9001 5 SUBJECT: PRE 01-09 -KINGS FISH HOUSE APN: 211-021-04 A preliminary review of your project was conducted on February 28, 2001. Listed below are the issues raised by staff. Please note that the purpose of a preliminary review is to provide you with direction and comments on the overall concept of your project. The preliminary review does not represent an in-depth analysis of your project. Additional issues of concern may be raised after your application is submitted and processed for a more specific and detailed review. Planning: 1 . Overall, Staff is supportive of the design concept and restaurant use proposed. Please find below a list of items that will need to be addressed with a formal project submittal to the City. 2. The project will require the processing of; a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to the Commercial/Visitor overlay zone; A Coastal Development Permit, as the site is located in the coastal zone; and a Site Development Plan Amendment will be needed to reconfigure the parking lot of the adjacent Holiday Inn project site. 3. A study should be done for the reconfigured Holiday Inn parking lot with the total number of parking spaces provided and required to show that the redesign will work and meet the parking demand of the hotel. The parking lot will need to adhere to the same development/design standards as the restaurant parking lot. Shared parking with the hotel is not allowed. 4. Please review the Commercial/Visitor section of the Carlsbad Municipal code (21 .208), which provides the development standards for this project site. Specifically: 1635 Faraday Avenue• Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us (i) PRE 01-09 -KINGS ~'SH HOUSE March 6, 2001 Page 2 a. Provide required parking in the ratios provided in the code (i.e. restaurant, outdoor dining areas). The outdoor dining area, if enclosed and heated, will be considered a part of the main restaurant area and not parked as outdoor dining. b. The site will not be considered a freeway service facility. The maximum amount of signage allowed will be one square foot for every lineal foot of building frontage, or 101 square feet. The sign on the south elevation, directly facing the Interstate 5 freeway, will be prohibited. The City is currently reviewing the prohibition of exposed neon signs, which may affect the sign over the outdoor dining area. c. The building's stucco wall areas will be visible from Paseo Del Norte and the Interstate 5 freeway. This component of the elevations should have additional wall treatment or texture. The addition of brick veneer as the rest of the building, brick veneer columns, faux brick infill windows, and/or landscaping such as climbing vines are some suggestions. d. The landscape plan shall incorporate the landscape design elements of the overlay zone. The monument sign should show the Bird-of-Paradise and Palm tree plantings as required. e. Landscaping should be incorporated into the striped paved areas, which occur at the corners of the parking areas adjacent to the building. f. Please provide number of trees per parking space on the landscape plan (one tree per six parking spaces minimum required). Additional landscaped parking islands may need to be provided to meet the requirement and break up long sections of parking spaces. g. The parking areas shall be screened from public view (streets and freeway) by the use of 42-inch high screen walls. The screen walls shall be architecturally finished to complement the project's architecture. Engineering: SIGNIFICANT ISSUES 1. Existing and proposed lot lines must be more adequately defined. For example, the proposed lot lines probably do not go all the way across --- PRE 01-09 -KINGS P-:sH HOUSE March 6, 2001 Page 3 Paseo Del Norte (PON), they probably end at the centerline. Are additional lots being added? If they are, then a tentative and final map will be required for the project. 2. The preliminary review application included a transmittal indicating that street vacation is being requested at this time. A street vacation at the preliminary review stage of a project is premature. Additionally, if the project proposes mapping of the property, any requested street vacations/abandonment and easement quitclaims can be accomplished on the final map. Therefore, if a street vacation has been officially submitted please withdraw it. 3. Please indicate the project's proposed Average Daily Traffic (ADT). Additionally, submit documentation comparing the project's proposed ADT with that which was approved in the most recent approved traffic report for the area (i.e., Carlsbad Company Store report, and/or the KAKU Legoland/Carlsbad Ranch report). Please be advised, if the project's proposed ADT is greater than what was assumed in the previous reports, then a traffic report will be required for the project. 4. Please submit a preliminary striping plan for PON. Include all "legs" of the public street/private driveway intersections. 5. Major utility relocations are required to be constructed with this proposed project. Therefore, please actually show the relocated water lines/utilities. Show the relocated water lines/utilities within a paved on- site drive aisle (not just a proposed 20 water line easement within the parkway), with either a general utility and access easement or water line easement over it, whichever is applicable. 6. Please indicate how National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) criteria will be met. This could include, but not be limited to, doing one or a combination of the following: directing surface run-off through vegetated swales prior to discharge to a storm drain or the public right of way, constructing a gravel/sand filter system, constructing de- pollutant basins, numeric sizing, etc. Comprehensive pollutant mitigations measures must be proposed with this project. These measures should include the Pea Soup Andersen's parking lot, and, the proposed parcels to the north of the project. The project may be able to take advantage of an existing sump/pump facility at the southwesterly corner of Pea Soup Andersen's. Additionally, the proposed project falls under the statutory requirements of San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (SDRWQCB) Tentative Order No. 2001-01, which was adopted on February 21, 2001. Attached, for your use, are applicable provisions of that Order. PRE 01-09 -KINGS l" • .:)H HOUSE March 6, 2001 Page 4 Finally, please be advised that pre and post construction Storm Water Pollutant Prevention Plans (SWPPP) will be required for this project. ISSUES 1 . Please submit documentation from Caltrans and all effected utilities that they are aware of, and concur with the proposed project. 2. Please indicate all existing and proposed street improvements and utilities (i.e., concrete curb, gutter & sidewalk, storm drain, potable and reclaimed water, sewer, street light standards, fire hydrants, etc.) for on-site and off-site along PDN. Indicate gravity flow sewer facilities with inlet elevations. Indicate on-site and off-site surface drainage and storm drains with inlet and out-fall elevations. 3. Clear Caltrans Corner Sight Distance sight lines of a minimum of 440' must be met at the PON/project intersections. Any vegetation, walls, monument signs, structures, etc. must be located out of these sight lines. Also, sight distance should be met at all on-site drive aisle intersections. Upon formal application submittal, sight distance requirements must be indicated on the site plan tentative map and landscape plan. 4. Raised planted islands should be used to delineate drive aisles and parking radii, rather than striping. 5. Please show any additional existing intersections/driveways along PDN. 6. Please Provide a Vicinity Map on the site plan. 7. Show a typical street section for PDN. Indicate that the street is public and show the existing and proposed improvements on the typical section. 8. Please add proposed handicap ramps at the project entrance curb returns. 9. Are there any existing overhead utilities located within or adjacent to the property? If so, please indicate that the project will underground the utilities. 10. Please indicate the amount of grading proposed for the project in cubic yards of cut/fill and import/export. Show existing and proposed topography and any slopes and retaining walls (with top & bottom of wall height). 11 . Show proposed drainage patterns for the site. 12. A recent Preliminary Title Report (PR) (issued within 6 months of formal application submittal) will be required for the proposed project. 13. Please include the A.LT.A. Survey as part of the formal application submittal, on 24" x 36" sheets. Show all applicable easement and PRE 01-09 -KINGS t'-i~H HOUSE March 6, 2001 Page 5 encumbrance information, as identified in Schedule 'B' of the PR, on the actual project site plan. The future disposition of all easements and encumbrances must also be identified. 14. The complete property boundary, as identified in the PR, must be shown on the site plan, including bearings and distances. 15. Please indicate how a 42' radius truck (Caltrans 407-E) will circulate from PON throughout the site. 16. The proposed project must include designated loading zone, unless deliveries will be provided after business/patron hours of operation. Therefore, please either show a designated loading zone or supply documentation of (authentic) delivery times. 17. Please provide 5' offsets at proposed parking stalls that are located 90° adjacent to each other. 18. Adequate queuing area must be shown at the project driveway before impacting the proposed north/south on-site drive aisle. Generally 20 feet of queuing must be provided for each 1 000 ADT from the back of the PON sidewalk. 19. Indicate the appropriate utility service areas this proposed project falls under (e.g., Carlsbad Municipal Water District, SDG&E, etc.). 20. Reciprocal access and maintenance, and drainage easements will probably be required. Please indicate them on the site plan and tentative map. 21. Please indicate all existing and proposed utilities (i.e., storm drain, water, sewer, etc.) for on-site and off-site along PON. 22. Indicate gravity flow sewer facilities with inlet elevations. Show inlet elevations for proposed storm drain facilities also. 23. Are the three (3) driveways located north of the proposed project existing or proposed? If they are proposed, make sure that intersection spacing is in accordance with City Standards. 24. Please indicate all existing and proposed improvements in plan view. 25. Please fully dimension the site plan and tentative map. 26. Please submit a hydrology report at formal application submittal. Since the project is located within the California Coastal Commission, Mello II jurisdictional boundary, post developed off-site runoff for a 10-year/6- hour storm event cannot be increased. 27. Please make sure that all changes that are made on one plan, are made on all applicable plan sets. PRE 01-09 -KINGS P.,.;:.,H HOUSE March 6, 2001 Page 6 28. Please be advised, this preliminary review does not constitute a complete review of the proposed project, additional items of concern may be identified upon formal project application submittal. A red-lined check print is enclosed for use in making the requested revisions. This check print should be returned with the formal application submittal to facilitate continued staff review. Please contact Van Lynch at (760) 602-4613 in Planning, or Mike Shirey at 602- 27 4 7 in Engineering, to arrange a meeting to discuss the project and you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, QK~LJ ~j/Cvif-\z·'"· GARY E. WAYNE Assistant Planning Director GEW:Vl:cs c: Michael J. Holzmiller Chris Decerbo Mike Shirey Mike Smith Bill Plummer File Copy Data Entry .. ' March 2, 2001 TO: FROM: PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMORANDUM ASSOCIATE PLANNER -VAN LYNCH Associate Engineer -Engineering/Development Services PRE 01-09: KING'S FISH HOUSE/CRAB LOUNGE (APN: 211-021-04 & 23) PRELIMINARY REVIEW Engineering Department staff have completed a preliminary review of the above-referenced project. Prior to formal application submittal the following items must be adequately resolved/addressed: SIGNIFICANT ISSUES 1. Existing and proposed lot lines must be more adequately defined. For example, the proposed lot lines probably do not go all the way across PON, they probably end at the centerline. Are additional lots being added? If they are, then a tentative and final map will be required for the project. 2. The preliminary review application included a transmittal indicating that street vacation is being requested at this time. A street vacation at the preliminary review stage of a project is premature. Additionally, if the project proposes mapping of the property, any requested street vacations/abandonment and easement quitclaims can be accomplished on the final map. Therefore, if a street vacation has been officially submitted please withdraw it. 3. Please indicate the project's proposed Average Daily Traffic (ADT). Additionally, submit documentation comparing the project's proposed ADT with that which was approved in the most recent approved traffic report for the area (i.e., Carlsbad Company Store report, and/or the KAKU Lego land/Carlsbad ranch report). Please be advised, if the project's proposed ADT is greater than what was assumed in the previous reports, then a traffic report will be required for the project. 4. Please submit a preliminary striping plan for Paseo Del Norte (PON). Include all "legs" of the public street/private driveway intersections. 5. Major utility relocations are required to construct this proposed project. Therefore, please actually show the relocated water lines/utilities. Show the relocated water lines/utilities within a paved on-site drive aisle (not just a proposed 20 water line easement within the parkway), with either a general utility and access easement or water line easement over it, whichever is applicable. 6. Please indicate how National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) criteria will be met. This could include, but not be limited to, doing one or a combination of the following: directing surface run-off through vegetated swales prior to discharge to a storm drain or the public right of way, constructing a gravel/sand filter system, constructing de- pollutant basins, numeric sizing, etc. Comprehensive pollutant mitigations measures must be proposed with this project. These measure should include the Pea Soup Andersen's parking lot, and, the proposed parcels to the north of the project. The project may be able to take advantage of an existing sump/pump facility at the south westerly corner of Pea Soup Andersen's. PRE 01-09: KING'S FISH ~SE PRELIMINARY REVIEW V. LYNCH MEMO; MARCH 2, 2001 Additionally, the proposed project falls under the statutory requirements of San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (SDRWQCB) Tentative Order No. 2001-01, which was adopted on February 21, 2001. Attached, for your use, are applicable provisions of that Order. Finally, please be advised that pre and post construction Storm Water Pollutant Prevention Plans (SWPPP) will be required for this project. ISSUES 1 . Please submit documentation from Caltrans and all effected utilities that they are aware of, and concur with the proposed project. 2. Please indicate all existing and proposed street improvements and utilities (i.e., concrete curb, gutter & sidewalk, storm drain, potable and reclaimed water, sewer, street light standards, fire hydrants, etc.) for on-site and off-site along PON. Indicate gravity flow sewer facilities with inlet elevations. Indicate on-site and off-site surface drainage and storm drains with inlet and out-fall elevations. 3. Clear Caltrans Corner Sight Distance sight lines of a minimum of 440' must be met at the PON/project intersections. Any vegetation, walls, monument signs, structures, etc. must be located out of these sight lines. Also, sight distance should be met at all on-site drive aisle intersections. Upon formal application submittal, sight distance requirements must be indicated on the site plan tentative map and landscape plan. 4. Raised planted islands should be used to delineate drive aisles and parking radii, rather than striping. 5. Please show any additional existing intersections/driveways along PON. 6. Please Provide a Vicinity Map on the site plan. 7. Show a typical street section for PON. Indicate that the street is public and show the existing and proposed improvements on the typical section. 8. Please add proposed handicap ramps at the project entrance curb returns. 9. Are there any existing overhead utilities located within or adjacent to the property? If so, please indicate that the project will underground the utilities. 1 O. Please indicate the amount of grading proposed for the project in cubic yards of cut/fill and import/export. Show existing and proposed topography and any slopes and retaining walls (with top & bottom of wall height). 11. Show proposed drainage patterns for the site. 12. A recent Preliminary Title Report (PR) (issued within 6 months of formal application submittal) will be required for the proposed project. 13. Please include the A.LT.A Survey as part of the formal application submittal, on 24" x 36" sheets. Show all applicable easement and encumbrance information, as identified in Schedule 'B' of the PR, on the actual project site plan. The future disposition of all easements and encumbrances must also be identified. 14. The complete property boundary, as identified in the PR, must be shown on the site plan, including bearings and distances. 15. Please indicate how a 42' radius truck (Caltrans 407-E) will circulate from PON throughout the site. 2 ""'"" PR~ 01-09: KING'S FISH ~SE PRELIMINARY REVIEW V. LYNCH MEMO; MARCH 2, 2001 16. The proposed project must include designated loading zone, unless deliveries will be provided after business/patron hours of operation. Therefore, please either show a designated loading zone or supply documentation of (authentic) delivery times. 17. Please provide 5' offsets at proposed parking stalls that are located 90° adjacent to each other. 18. Adequate queuing area must be shown at the project driveway before impacting the proposed north/south on-site drive aisle. Generally 20 feet of queuing must be provided for each 1000 ADT from the back of the PON sidewalk. 19. Indicate the appropriate utility service areas this proposed project falls under (e.g., Carlsbad Municipal Water District, SDG&E, etc.). 20. Reciprocal access and maintenance, and drainage easements will probably be required. Please indicate them on the site plan and tentative map. 21. Please indicate all existing and proposed utilities (i.e., storm drain, water, sewer, etc.) for on-site and off-site along PON. 22. Indicate gravity flow sewer facilities with inlet elevations. Show inlet elevations for proposed storm drain facilities also. 23. Are the three (3) driveways located north of the proposed project existing or proposed? If they are proposed, make sure that intersection spacing is in accordance with City Standards. 24. Please indicate all existing and proposed improvements in plan view. 25. Please fully dimension the site plan and tentative map. 26. Please submit a hydrology report at formal application submittal. Since the project is located within the California Coastal commission, Mello II jurisdictional boundary, post developed off-site runoff for a 1 0-year/6-hour storm event cannot be increased. 27. Please make sure that all changes that are made on one plan, are made on all applicable plan sets. 28. Please be advised, this preliminary review does not constitute a complete review of the proposed project, additional items of concern may be identified upon formal project application submittal. 29. A red-lined check print is enclosed for the applicants use in making the requested revisions. This check print should be returned with the formal application submittal to facilitate continued staff review. If you or the applicant have any questions, please either see or call me at 760/602-2747. Attachment Cc: Senior Civil Engineer -Engineering/Development Services 3 .. February 14, 2001 TO: ( ', COUNCIL l\1El\1BER KULCHIN COUNCIL l\1EIVIBER NYGAARD COUNCIL l\1El\'1BER FINNILA COUNCIL l\1El\1BER HALL _______;:;,JL PLEASE READ, REVIEW AND COMMENT IF DESIRED THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT AND RETURN TO ME BY FEBRUARY 22, 2001. RAY PATCHETT - MEMORANDUM February 12, 2001 TO: FROM: RE: CITY MANAGER ASSOCIATE PLANNER PRE 01-09 -KINGS FISH HOUSE/ KING CRAB LOUNGE Please find attached a set of plans for the proposed King's Fish House Restaurant for your review and comment. The project is located north of Palomar Airport Road and West of Paseo Del Norte, across from the Company Stores and north of Holiday Inn within the CommercialNisitor-serving overlay zone. Pprojects are routed to you for review and comments. As you will recall, you saw the colored elevations in my office the other day. They can be made available to you if you wish to review or present them along with the plans. This project is proposing an Alternative Architectural style rather than the Village or Contemporary Southwest Architectural style. This alternative architectural style may accommodate a reasonable version of a user's corporate architectural style, provided the corporate architectural elements do not dominate the building design so as to create incompatibility in the area; or detract from the overlay zone's objective of ensuring high quality appearances for commercial/visitor- serving uses. Final approval of the proposed alternative architectural style is by the city council as part of the conditional use permit review. If you have any comments, such as building height which you have mentioned, please return then to me by Thursday the 22nd of February. VAN LYNCH VL attachment ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM -PART I (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT) BACKGROUND CASE NO: (AA p (!)[-(){, DATE RECEIVED: >-3-0 { ------'------(To be completed by staff) 1. 2. 3. CASENAME: ~~'s P,sl+ ffd'tJte APPLICANT: f-1~'1 ·s. s~Peco ~~Y, GH-'/ .MA---tet1,A- ADDREss AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: \el' W • ~'// SUffl?: ~ l,si' ~, CA 9c$cl. 4. PRorncTDEscRIPnoN: k§9o s,B PJte1i SfMIDJNE> StN&:12 ~;t ,Z~VJ2Mlr SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: Please check any of the environmental factors listed below that )VOuld be potentially affected by this project. This would be any environmental factor that has at least one impact checked "Potentially Significant Impact," or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" in the checklist on the following pages. D Land Use and Planning D Population and Housing D Geological Problems □water D Air Quality D Transportation/Circulation D Biological Resources D Public Services D Utilities & Service Systems D Energy & Mineral Resources D Aesthetics OHazards ONoise D Cultural Resources D Recreation D Mandatory Findings of Significance 1 Rev. 03/28/96 . ENVIRONMENTAL\.~ACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration. • A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following each question. A ''No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A "No Impact" answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. • "Less Than Significant Impact" applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not adversely significant, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies. • "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. • "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. • Based on an "EIA-Part II", if a proposed project could have a potentially significant effect on the environment, but all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional environmental document is required (Prior Compliance). • When "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked the project is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR if the significant effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" has been made pursuant to that earlier EIR. • A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. 2 Rev. 03/28/96 • If there are one or more potentially significant effects, the City may avoid preparing an EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce impacts to less than significant, and those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this case, the appropriate "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared. • An EIR must be prepared if "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked, and including but not limited to the following circumstances: ( 1) the potentially significant effect has not been discussed or mitigated in an Earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the impact to less than significant; (2) a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" for the significant impact has not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the impact to less than significant, or; (4) through the EIA-Part II analysis it is not possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to below a level of significance. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant. 3 Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be refe"ed to and attached) I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:. a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (Source #(s): ( ) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? ( ) c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? ( ) d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses? ( ) e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-income or minority community)? ( ) II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? ( ) b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly ( e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? ( ) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? ( ) III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? ( ) b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? ( ) e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? ( ) g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) h) Expansive soils? ( ) i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) Potentially Significant Impact □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ Less Than Significan t Impact □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ No Impact . [PA>r-o ~lC-fN-i,-"°' ~Al's 1..,,-,0 IV. WATER. Would the proposal result m: ~l!l'flil.N ~ &,Att 11') a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the D D ~ D rate and amount of surface runoff? ( ) b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards D D D ~ such as flooding? ( ) ~ c) Discharge into surf~ce waters or other alteration of D D D ~ surface water quahty ( e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? ( ) 4 Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body?( ) e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? ( ) f) Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? ( ) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? ( ) V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? ( ) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? ( ) d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the Potentially Significant Impact □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ proposal result in: ~'r:/( a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? 'irfZ,. ,-D ( ) . b) Hazards to safety from design features ( e.g. sharp D curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? ( ) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? D ( ) d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? D ( ) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? D ( ) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative D transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? ( ) g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? D ( ) VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds? ( ) b) Locally designated species ( e.g. heritage trees)? ( ) 5 □ □ Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ Less Than Significan t Impact □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ [3' □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ No Impact Rev. 03/28/96 ·Issues (and Supporting In~.~.ltion Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? ( ) d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? ( ) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal? a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? ( ) b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? ( ) c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? ( ) IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? ( ) b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ( ) c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazards? ( ) d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? ( ) e) Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? ( ) X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? ( ) b) Police protection? ( ) c) Schools? ( ) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) e) Other governmental services? ( ) XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? ( ) b) Communications systems? ( ) 6 Potential"· • Significant Impact □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ [j □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ Less Than Significan t Impact □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ No Impact Rev. 03/28/96 ,,,. -Issues (and Supporting Inf~tion Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? ( ) d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) e) Storm water drainage? ( ) t) Solid waste disposal? ( ) g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic or vista or scenic highway? ( ) b) Have a demonstrate negative aesthetic effect? ( ) c) Create light or glare? ( ) XIV. CULTIJRAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? ( ) b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) c) Affect historical resources? ( ) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ( ) e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? ( ) XV.RECREATIONAL. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? ( ) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? 7 ' Potential l'y"" Potentially Less Than No Significant Significant Significan Impact Impact Unless t Impact Mitigation Incorporated □ □ □ m □ □ □ 00 □ □ □ 00 □ □ □ ! □ □ □ □ □ □ ~ □ □ □ ~ □ □ □ ~ □ □ □ 00 □ □ □ [if □ □ □ □ □ □ ~ □ □ □ Ta]' D □ □ 1i<r □ □ □ ~ □ □ □ Rev. 03/28/96 . Issues (and Supporting Inr, .ation Sources): . (Supplemental documents ';mfy be referred to and attached) b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES. Potentia Significa'iti"" Impact □ □ Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated □ □ Less Than Significan t Impact □ □ No Impact Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site- specific conditions for the project. 8 Rev. 03/28/96 ·DISCUSSION OF EN(~lONMENTAL EVALUATION Please use this area to discuss any of the environmental factors that were checked "No impact" yet lack any information citations and any factors that were checked "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." The City has adopted a "Statement of Overriding Consideration" with regard to air quality and circulation impacts resulting from the normal buildout according to the General Plan. The following sample text is intended to guide your discussion of the impacts to these environmental factors. AIR QUALITY: The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased gas and electric power consumption and vehicle miles traveled. These subsequently result in increases in the emission of carbon monoxide, reactive organic gases, oxides of nitrogen and sulfur, and suspended particulates. These aerosols are the major contributors to air pollution in the City as well as in the San Diego Air Basin. Since the San Diego Air Basin is a "non-attainment basin", any additional air emissions are considered cumulatively significant: therefore, continued development to buildout as proposed in the updated General Plan will have cumulative significant impacts on the air quality of the region. To lessen or minimize the impact on air quality associated with General Plan buildout, a variety of mitigation measures are recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include: 1) provisions for roadway and intersection improvements prior to or concurrent with development; 2) measures to reduce vehicle trips through the implementation of Congestion and Transportation Demand Management; 3) provisions to encourage alternative modes of transportation including mass transit services; 4) conditions to promote energy efficient building and site design; and 5) participation in regional growth management strategies when adopted. The applicable and appropriate General Plan air quality mitigation measures have either been incorporated 1into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. Operation-related emissions are considered cumulatively significant because the project is located within a "non-attainment basin", therefore, the "hritial Study" checklist is marked "Potentially Significant Impact". This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for air quality impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan's Final Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of air quality impacts is required. This document is available at the Planning Department. CIRCULATION: The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased traffic volumes. Roadway segments will be adequate to accommodate buildout traffic; however, 12 full and 2 partial intersections will be severely impacted by regional through-traffic over which the City has no jurisdictional control. These generally include all freeway interchange areas and major intersections along Carlsbad Boulevard. Even with the implementation of roadway improvements, a number of intersections are projected to fail the City's adopted Growth Management performance standards at buildout. 9 Rev. 03/28/96 • To lessen or minimize~ impact on circulation-associated wi~neral Plan buildout, numerous , mitigation measures .._ ., e been recommended in the Final """"'1ster EIR. These include 1) measures to ensure the provision of circulation facilities concurrent with need; 2) provisions to develop alternative modes of transportation such as trails, bicycle routes, additional sidewalks, pedestrian linkages, and commuter rail systems; and 3) participation in regional circulation strategies when adopted. The diversion of regional through-traffic from a failing Interstate or State Highway onto City streets creates impacts that are not within the jurisdiction of the City to control. The applicable and appropriate General Plan circulation mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. Regional related circulation impacts are considered cumulatively significant because of the failure of intersections at buildout of the General Plan due to regional through-traffic, therefore, the "Initial Study" checklist is marked "Potentially Significant Impact". This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the recent certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for circulation impacts. This "Statement Of Ove¢ding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan's Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of circulation impacts is required. LIST OF MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE) 10 Rev. 03/28/96 J '" ' M M 'Pc:o.le• 1• -30' emt"l!/;Jneef'ln";'J~'c. 1843 Campesino PTace Oceanside, CA 92054 Tel<1:(7B0)439-2802 Fa: (?60) 439-2868 -":~~~.~- 18'U ... Rlll=6o.5 ifl'filV,6UJ HIGHWAY /-5 PRELIMINARY GRADING ANO DRAINAGE SCALE:1"=JO' VICINITY MAP PLAN GENERAL NOTES t>SITEAREA• 2.01>£. 2>GENERALPLANDESIGNATION• 3>ZDNING• EXISTING C-T-Q,NDCHANGEPROPDSED 4) LAND USE OVERLAY ZONE• COASTAL ZONE 5) LAND USE OVERLAY ZONE• CDMHERCIAL/VISITDR-SERVICES TYPICAL SECTION -PASFQ Dfl NORTE NOT TD SCALE KING'S FISH HOUSE KING CRAB LOUNGE CUP 01-06, CDP 01-18 SDP 80-ll(D) SYMBOi LEGEND ____ -(65)---- EXISTINGGRADES<ELEVATICN) ~ PRDPDSED GRADES CELEVATIDN) ~ CDNCRHE STEPS CATCH BASIN/ DRAitl PIPE CATCHBASIN'w'ITHFDSSIL FILTER INSERT ~·s·=sTANDARD ~·c•=CDMPACT r/ 'HC'= HANDICAP ~~ 0UAN~~f5c.v. g1it'oe:fHMio?N nmg_ cl.v. f?EMFD!Al FARTHWORK QUANTITIES REMOVAL ANO RECOMPACTION 2182 C.Y. ONSITF PARKING TABLE TYPE STANDARD SPACE COMPACT SPACE HANDICAPPED SPACE TOTAL PARKING SPACES pROeosm FNGIN£FR OF WORK: AQUATERRAENGINEERINGINC. 1843CAHPESINClPLACE OCEANSIDE,CA92054 TELE•760-439-2802 ' ELEVATION, HIGH POINT ELEVATION. LOW POINT ELEVATION, FLOW LINE APPLICATION DFSCRIPTION THIS EXHIBIT IS TD ACCllMPANY AN APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND SITE DEVELOP+IENT PLAN RELATEDTDARESTAURANTPROJECT. LHAPNO. 11284,RECORDEDMAY!l,1981 92-7PERHAPl3078,RECDRDED CITYOFCARLSBAD,CDUNTYOFSANDIEGQ, APNl211-022-04,211-021-23,211-021-24 SOURCE OF TOPOGRAPHY TDPcx;RAPHY SHCl'w'N ON THESE PLANS 'w'AS GENERATED BY rIELD SURVEY HETHCIDSFRIJHINFORMATIONGATHEREDON, APRIL,2000BY MELCHIOR LAND SURVEYING, TClPDGRAPHY SHD\JN 1£REaN CONFORMS TD NATIONAL HAP ACCURACY STANDARDS. SERVICE AGENCIES CARLSBADMUNICIPALIJATERDISTRICT CARLSBADMUNICIPALIJATERDISTRICT (760-438-2722) 'CARLSBADUNirIEDSCHODLDISTRICT (760-729-9291> PR~#ci~UPERVISJON ar1 &~----""$2ffi.J GARt-XIPSKA RCE 23080 EXPIRES 12/31/01 """"" -··-··-··-··-~ ------~ -·-·-4-·-·- PROPERlYUNE ~LINES STREET CENTERLINE EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONDITIONS NEW WATER LINE FIRE HYDRANT STREU LIGHT HAND HOLE MANHOLE MONITORING WELL !JACK FLOW PREVENTER ClJRBINLET CATCH BASIN CONCRETE CENTERLINE EU!CTRIC GASVAC LIGllJ :: S<iERC SAii OE ST<)RI! ;;,1'.::1°" WAirR V WAttR M WAT£R M I THERE ARE NO OVERHEAD UTIUTIES ALONG THE WEST SIDE (HIGHWAY 1-5) Of THE PROPERTY 2. INF\JTUREOEVELOPMENT,ALLEXISTINGUTIUTIES AND DRAINAGE CHANNELS ON SITE Will 8£ LOCATED UNDERGROUND. 3. RECIPROCAL ACCESS & PARKING £ASEME:NT AGREEMENT Will BE EXECUTED UPct!APPROVALOF SITE PLAN. 4, WATER/SEWER: CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT POWfR/GAS: TELEPHONE: SDG&E (SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMP#IY) PACIFIC BELL CABLE: DANJELS C\BLE SYSTEM r~~IIQti (j -- WWJ EXISTING PARKING ~ li~''-~I PROPOSED NEW PARKING ~ 0 UiliJJ MODlflEO PARKING ~ 0 C':!'.\ (_~ 697'-o" --- --- 0 PARCEL "D" I (AREA.-9.olACRBCiROSS) I (AREA-U7ACllESSNE'll I . I gr ~: ~~~~~~~~~~~-FUnJ&~ ~~~~~~~~-'-'~~- C-T COMMERCIAL/VlSITOlt ·ZQ.~: --- 100.00' I ------~--- ' •• I -----I '-----, ___ ----r ·-... -------~~~~t 30'REARYARDBUILD\NG SETBACK to' PARKING SETBACK .E--5 CARLSBAD MASTER PLAN AMENDED MASTER PLAN/SITE DEVELOPMENT EXHIBIT CARLSBAD CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 17, 2001 SCALE: 1'-50'-0' HEW PROPERlY LINE EXISTINGLOTLINETOBE R"'°"D JUIM'l'.; MELOllOR LAND SURVEYING INC (760) 438-1726 Q\11. ENCilNEER: AQUATERRA ENGINEERING, INC (760) 439-2802 ~ CARPENTERS PENSION lRUST FOR SOUlHERN CALIFORNIA QEYEl.OPMENT MANACjSt: =~~~~,LLC. ~--- MAmR PUN ARQICJECT· FONG KUTNER ASSOCIATES LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA SHEET 1Of4 LEOEUD -··-··-··-··-If_ PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINES ------it_ STREETCENTERLINE EXISTING PROPERTY UNE EXISTING CONDmONS -·-·-0---NEW WATER LINE FIRE HYDRANT smffiUGHT HANO HOLE MANHotE MONITORING WELL BACK FLOW PREV£NTER CURB INLET CATCH BASIN CONCRETE CENTERLINE El[CllOC GASVAf.VE LIGHT PEDEST.ll PROPERTY LINE POWER POLE S£WERCLEANQIJT SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC STORM DRAIN TELEPHONE JYPICAI. WATER VM..VE WATER M£TER WATER M£TE CARLSBAD MASTER PLAN CALIFORNIA AllHQ!NG [fiCB!PDQt! RESTAURANT DINING BANQUa ROOM (1ST R.R.) GIFT SHOP BIMQU£T ROOM (2NO FlR.) RESTAUAANTPATIO TOTAL REQUIRED-- 4,7465.f. J,8235.F. 7635.F. 4,3565.F. 1,8585.F. 1 SPACE/100 s.r. (1ST 2.000 s.r.) 1 SPACE/ 50 S.F. (2,746 S.f.) 1SPACE/100S.F. 1 SPACE/300 S.F. 1 SPACE/100 S.F. =75SPACES =J9SPACES = JSPACES =#SPACES • 1Ue&S 1 SPACE/100 S.F. --.;_»=180SPACES / I / I I , , I / / ,I / ,I / ,I / ,I / I ' , I I , , I ',/ / I " , I ,I / I , , I ....;., ' ""'"'~ , I (\ ,I/ ~ ,I/ ~ / / I , ;;. , I ci_.'> ,I / -" I ' A~ , I '" / ~ / ~ / J: / ~ / «,V HOffi 148ROOllS GAS STATION --------~-------1.2 SPACES PER UNIT -----:*' =178 SPACES PARKING REQUIRED PARKING PROWlED EXCESS PARKING AMENDED MASTER PLAN/SITE DEVELOPMENT EXHIBIT 5a'1EMllER17,2001 --~., ~ 8 SPACES =386SPACES =425 SPACES = 59 SPAC£S -MEl.OilOR LAND SURVEYING INC. (760)438-1726 OW.ENQINM AQUATERRA ENGINEERING, INC. ('60) 439-2802 .QWl!IB; CARPENTERS PENSION TRU5T FOR SOUlHERN CALIFORNIA L __ ~ ( ( __ /~'---_ ~ [~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 ~ ffi ~ ADy.c:ENT PROPERTY CARLSBAD MASTER PLAN EXISTING PARCEL AREA CARLSBAD CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 17, 2001 SCAl.E: 1'-50'.o' 0 0 = c=J 'c~ / )J / //c / < cf~ / ]\, JIHMl'.l MELOllOR LAND SURVEYING INC (760) 438-1726 aw, ENQINEQ; AQUATERRA ENGINEERING, INC (760) 439-2802 v LE<llll -··-··-··-··-If. l'ROPERTY LINE EXISTING PARCEL "A" EXISTJNCiPARCR'C" EXISTINCPAllCEL"D" _!Mtllll: CARPENTERS PfNSION TRUST FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA QEYB.OrtoMNTMNWiER; MFIZGER DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC. ~--~ WSHEETI MASTBl MN AROfOJCt• FONGKU'INERASSOCIATB 3 OF 4 LOS ANGEi.ES, CALIFORNIA _ _____ _ j ---u-- l ___ I !l CARLSBAD MASTER PLAN EXISTING PARCEL AREA SEPTEMBER 17, 2001 SCALE: 1"-50'-0' I -MEl.OllOR LAND SURVEYING INC. (760) 438-1726 0\111.ENC!NEEll; AQUA'fERRA.ENGINEERING, INC. (760) 439-2802 LEGl>IO -··-··-··-··-If. PROPERTY LINE EXISTINCiPARCEL"A." EXISTlNCPARCB."8" EXISTING PARal. "C" EXISTINCiPAACEL"D" .!lWl!IER; CARPENTERS PENSION TRUST FOR SOUlHERN CALIFORNIA DEVELOPM9fTMrVMQEB; METZGER DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC. LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA ~--- MASill PLAN AIQUlJ('.'J; FONG KUTNER ASSOCIATIS LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA SHEET 40F4 JIJl!ll: l. ~AGCZ!5•!'WtKIN69HHJ..lll! ~l'Olll!Dl!P'lfCf'~'/>.", '!l'•"e"f"!R.!l!pl"lrflt,f,ft!POGtM!NT. 2. l"Qll~~.~Lnet,NC t',IGILJTe,!il!l!M~MllWt'I"~~ 'Noetl!!D~~PLAH. CUP 01-06 CDP 01-oe SDP eo-ll(d) .... ..,,.,~ ... , ... tm ·--, ....... ~"""' ..... H!!'T'Zllll~ll!lt'llQ!&.UA .....,.~ .. ,,..,.llDOOc:. tumMffOM -....::fl, .:A ~ ~191Ql-'X8'1 OQNfMT, ltHt'( .. H!r-. --•-TIM!!ellllel.I! ALlllO'lle.IO,Cofo..~ ------CONl'MT•Uli'~ .... TQI~~ 919-0~l.OOl"IM. c.cer ... ,.,.,,u.~ -OM>-""'""'-CONl'MT•.Ji!l"r'tlol.TQI ---TOTAL-.0...~ ~~hlllt -"""'"-r"~~ ..... -- """"'21..2NIOP'~9,~Mlrol" M0.11»4,~Mi<'1' 11,191 NIOLOT<f, G...........o'!IVr.GTJO.O""NltHolPIOO"l9, ~~-~ALL!Nne =rc::~c:t:Um'Of'-CDO, 21!-022-04.211"°21-3,211'°2144 9l&PM • 6IMO .,._ :aooou.eVIOO ..iou .• wo •91"i'aS CUn:JOQt.,,.... • 390 ..,., 390.,.,elAOO 2191"Aea 10rk........ ....9f'\lloc:a ..,,......._. <IO:a~eJ'.elOO/IOf/I00091'J llOO .... ~.~ IQIOOM..llHtl'(.4"1'DI} .. -....... ,NJllllW;»(J -- D [ S I G N C 0 N S 0 R l I U M 1110 E. umu m. m. s GRAUE, Cl 11117 f ! l 111 · !!7 ·71!l l E L 711 · 99 7 • ! 7 JI la "a ;~I ~ I d ;,: ;r ~nn ~ "h li!!lmmrrm=mli6=1 z 0 -I- c( > w -I-...J c( w > w ...J w I- Cf) w 3: SOUTH (FREEWAY) ELEVATION SCALE: 114•.1·-o• :Z () i= ~ ~ ~ I 1 IP ~ ~I <t: I '5 I ~ r I 3 I ~ > ._ 18 I' p•o B 2 ~ 3 Ii ~~LB ~ 11U1inl ~ c( ..J a.. a:. o~ o~ ~l _J z <C ...I Q. LL 0 0 a: GRADING NOTES CIN ADDITION TC Tl-IE REQUIREMENTS or CHAPKR tl.06 IJF" TtlE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODD I. TH.IS PLAN SUPERSCDES ALL 011£R PLANS PRCVIIJUSl Y APPRDVEP BY THE CITY OF CARLSBAP RE6ARllING GRADING SHIJIJN ON THfS SET or PLANS. 3. CITY APPROVAL {f' Pi.ANS OOES NCT RtLlEVE 1llE tlEVE\...tlPat CR EHGlNEER-tlf'-IJORK F"ROM RCSPl>ISIBIUTY FOR THE CORRECTIIJH IJF" ERR~S AND l»llSSUINS DISCOVERED DLRING CONSTRUCTJlt.i. ALL Pt.AN REVISIONS SHALL BC F>ROFTL Y stJBHITTED TO THE CITY ENGINEER f"OR APPROVAL 5. UHLESS EXEMPTED BY SECTION 30L<b)5 OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING COOC, RETAINING 'WALLS IJJTStDE Of' PUBLIC RlGKr IJF" 'WAY REQUIRE SEPARAT£. ptRHlTS F'RDM TH£ BUILDJNG DEPARTMENT. 6. NCI 'w'IJRIC SHALL II( CIJMMENCED UNTIL ALL PERMITS HAVE: BEEN OBTAINED FRl>I n£ CITY AHD OTHER APPIUJPRJATE AGENCIES. 7. APPROVAL OF THESE: PLANS BY THE CITY ENGINEtR DlES NOT AUTHDRIZE ANY 'w'I]RIC OR GRADING TO BE PCRF'Ui!HED UNTIL THE PROPERTY OIJHER'S PERMISSDJN HAS BEEN OBTAINED AND A VALID GRADING PERHIT HAS IJEEN ISSUED. S. Nil RCVts!ClllS IJtLL BE. MADE TO THESE P\...ANS 'WlTHWl WE WITTEN APPROVAL OF THE CITY [!«;!NEER, NOTED 'WITHIN THE REVISU».I lll.JJCI(, ON THE APPRlJ>RIATE SHEtT IF THE PLANS AND THE TITLE Sl-£ET. 9, ORIGINAL JIRA'WIMGS SHALL BECl>IE THE PRlFERTY or THE CITY UPO.I BEING SIGNED B'I' TilE CIT'I' ENU11£ER, 10. THE ORIGINAL DRA'WIMG SHALL BE REVISED TO REFLECT AS-81JJL T CllNDfTll>IS BY THE EHGll£ER-llf'-IJ~K PRIOR TO f"lNAL ACCEPTANCE OF' THE IJ~K BY THE CITY. 11, ACCESS FOR FIRE AND OTHER EMER(i[NCY VEHICLES SHALL BE NAlffTAIHED TO THE PROJECT sm: AT All TIMES DURING Cl>ISTRUCTllJN. 16. THE O\IHER AND/~ APPLICANT THROUGH THE DEVELOPER AND/Ill: CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGN, CONSTRUCT AHD MAIHT AIN All SAF'ETY DEVICES, INCLUDING Sl-IJRING, AND SHALL Br SOLELY RESPCINSl'lll.t FOR OOWFO!tt'.ING Tn ALL UJCM.., STATE AND FEDERAL SAF'ETY AND 1£AlTH STANDARDS, LAW'S AND REGtlLATWNS. 17.THE ta. NCI lllASTIJ«i SHALL BC PCRF'ORHED UNTIL A VAlIP BLASTING PCRHIT HAS BEEN ~~{tfel~n/~~l /: f:'°~~iJ..'WJ,1 or~~ll'l9fT~~snNG . - "· AND THE Rt.START THE CITY e3. BE GRADED. NCI TREES Ali!E "'" C!.(. ALL ARCAS SHALL B£ GRADED TO MAIN.GRADING RESULTING IN THE PONDING Of" 'WATER IS NIJT PE~tTTtB. AU.. EART\JCM S'olAl...ES AND DITCMES Slllll.L Ho\VE A MJNINllM ON( P£RCENT SLOPE. C?5. THESE: PLANS Ali!E SUBJECT TO A SIGNED AND APPROVED SCT OF Ell:OSIOll CONTROL. PLANS. EROSJl>I CIJNTRDL SHALL BE AS SHOIJN AND AS APPROVED BY THE CIT\' EMGlMt.ai; tlR "S lllRECTt.b ~'1 Tl.£ P'il!JJECT DISfEC:TllR, C!6. ALL SLOPES SHALL llE TRJNHED TO A FINISH GRADE TO PRODUCE A UNlf"ORM SIJll:fACE AND CROSS SECTICIM. THE SIT£ SHALL llE LEFT IN A NEAT AND OROCRl Y CONDITWM. ALL STONES, ROOTS OR OTHER DEBRIS SHALL BE REMCIVED AMD DlSPtlSED [If' AT A SlTE APPRDVED tlF B't Tl-£ CITY ENG1/£ER. 27. ALL SLll'ES SHALL llE IRRIGATED, STABILIZED, PLANTED AND/Ill: H'l'DRDSEEDED ~T~.:iJ°HEN ~l~DAz~gv~~ ~~~JsA_CH SLIFE IS 8ROOOfT TD GRADE 28. LANDSCAPING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED ON ALL SUPE:S AND PADS AS REQUIRED B'I' THE CITY OF CARLSBAD LANDSCAPE HANLIAL, THE LANDSCAPING PLANS fOR THIS Pll:DJECT, DRAIJIMG lllJ.___ , AND/~ AS DIRECTED BY THE CIT'I' ENGINEER DR PLAr.ilffG DIRECTOR. 29. THE D\lt£R/APPLICANT SHALL INSURE THAT ALL CONTRACTORS SHALL COORDJHllTE THE 'w'ORl( ar THESE GRADlr«i PLAHS 'WITH THAT SHOIJN ON BOTH THE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION Pt.ANS AND THE IMPROVEMENT PLAHS AS RtQUIREO r~ THIS 'w'IJl:K lff ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAHDSCAPE MANUAL TIME REQOIR£MENTS, 33. TtlE CDNTRACTl:li: SHALL NC'Tlf'Y Af'f"ECTED UTILIT'I' CCllFANIES <SEE BELOIJ> AT I.EAST 2 F'ULL 'olDRICIHCi DAYS PRIOR TO STAli!TJNG GRADING NEAR THEIR F'ACILITIES AND SHALL CDCIRDINATE THE IJEJRIC \JITH A CllMPAN'I' REPRESENTATIVE. LERT t- DRAIN) a. RECLAIMED 'w'AT£R) '3.(, PERMIT CllMPLlANCE Rt.QUJREMENTS. A. r&\1..'rdBirB. ~~ J:o~IfaAHTGrersT~cfk'i&t. ~~'k CJBSERVE AND CONTROL THE 'w'[Jij( IN PRDGll:CSS <IL06-170Cil)) t:ARl...SBAD MltllCIPAL CODE. B. 'JI~'¥ E::JT Afr~UBMlfrl'DlilfOW!aTHEPE~:~-J:JfN~M':'r:r~ PimJECT IMS?Et:TDR <11.06.190())) CAll:l.s:BAD l«Jl'llCIPAl CODE• < .. > REf>[RT 'WITH AS-BUILT GEIJ...DGIC Pl.AH, IF REQUIRED B'I' THE CITY. 35. UNLESS A GRADING PERMIT f"OR THIS Pll:tlJECT JS ISSIJED 'WITHIN ONE (1) YEAR Af'T£R THE CITY ENGIMEER'S APAADVAL., MSE Fl.AMS MA'I' BE. REQUIRED TO BE RESUBHJTTED FOR PLAHCHECI<. PLANCHECK FEES 'WILL BE RCQUJRED f'IJR ANY SUCH RECHECK. 36. T~l'&~ REPORT TIT , DATED .,.19. , SHALL llE COOUIERED AS A PART IJF" THIS GRADING Pl.AM. ALL GRADING SHALL BC DONE IN ACCORDANCE 'WITH THE RECDMll£NIIATlONS AND SPf;CIFICATIOllS CONTAINED IN SAID SOILS REPORT. 'DECLAFlATll>I tF ll:ESPl:HSIBLE CHARGE' I HEREBY DECLARE THAT I AH THE ENCill£ER OF IJORK FOR THIS Pffil.JECT, 1l4AT l HAVE EXEll:C1S£D RESPONSIBLE CHAR!iE ovtR Tl-£ DESIGN Of" Tl-£ PROJECT AS DEFINED IN SECTIOll 6703 CF' THE BUSINESS AND PRDfESSil>IS ClJllE, AND THAT Tl£ DESIGN JS CONSISTANT IJl1ll CURRENT STANDARDS. 1 UNDERSTMID THAT THE CHECt< OF PROJECT JIRA'w'lNGS llMD SPEClFICATll>fS 8Y THE CITY OF CA1i!LS8AD DOES HOT RELIEVE ME, AS ENGINEER IJF" 'w'IJRK, CF' MY RESPl>ISIBILITJES FOR PROJECT DESIGN. •DDRl:SS•~-------- CITY, STATE•--------- <NAME CIF ENGINEER> R.C.E. ND.• ---------REGISTRATmN EXPJRATlllN DA,~---- SIGNED•--------- P.E. ND.> DATO---------- LICENSE tXPIRATIDN DATE• O'w'NE!t'S CERTiflCATE I <lo'E> HEREBY CERTifY llfA T A REGISTERED SOILS ENGINEER DR (i[[LIJGIST HAS BEEN OR 'WILL BE RETAINED TC SUPERVISE OVER-ALL GRADING ACTIVITY AND ADVISE ON THE Cotof>ACTJCJN AND STABILITY CF' THISSITC. "'"' X. STREET LIGHT STANDARD "' '" 33' VICINITY MAP SQURCE Of TOPQGRAPHY TCPDGRAPHY SHCJIJN ON THESE PLANS VAS GENERATED BY FIELD SURVEY METHODS f"ROM INFORtotATIDN GATHERED ON, APRIL, 2000 BY ME\..CHlllR LAND SUll:VE'l'ING. TOPOGRAPHY Sl<l'w'N HERECJN CONFORMS TD NATIONAL MAP ACCURACY STANDARDS. PROJECT LDCA Tll>I THIS PROJECT JS LOCATED 'WITHIN ASSESSORS PARCEL t«MllER<S> TliE CAl.If'DRHIA COCRD!NATE INllEX [J' THIS Pll:DJECT IS• •------~----- P.L. Ttf: GRADING IJDRK SHALL BE PERfDRMED IN ACCDRIIAHCE IJITH THE FCl..LO'w'IMG DOCUMENTS, CURRENT AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. AS Dill:CCTED BY THE CJTY ENGINEER, 1, CARLSllAD ~ClPAl CODE 2. CITY CF' CARLSBAD ST ANDAli!DS 3. THIS SET CF' PLANS RES[l..UTIDH NQ.___ DA!flL.___ Tl£ STAHllAll:D SP£Clf'ICATIONS FUi! PUBLIC lo'llRKS CDNSTRUCTDI <GREEN """'" • '-'~-'-'-''_ORTM~~·~~----- 7. THE SAN DIEGO 11:£GtQNAL. STANDARD !Rl\\JINGS AND AS MllY BE Kllllf'1ED BY THE CITY OF CARLSBAD STAHDAll:DS. S. CALJFCIRNJA CCIAST AL COMMISSION DEVELOPHENT PERtlIT CONDITIONS DAo1'E1'------- 9. ENVIROtKNTAL APPRCIVAL DOCUMENTS ~DAwrrin --- J)[SCRIPTll>I VICINITY MAP ~- DIJG.Nll. S'l'MBDL Wfi~'J,fi QLJAN~[~~~.Y. fuc:°t4ci'hfJrJM1,fi.L 2ssg cJY. QUANTITY ~~b R~bt~1ic%0J?K QLJ'\~lz'T~~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL 1--~-~,----I I IQOLl ....... IUlllllQ~ 1--~-=,---DA!I: I I 'AS BUil T' RC<--EXP. __ REVIEIJED BY• -II=--~-=-~--INSPECTOR ~ f'Hilil CITY OF CARI.'lBAD fSH'!"l 1---t--+------------+---+---t---!----il__!_J ENGINEERING DEPAAT~T L.!_j CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT WILLIAM E. PLUMMER OIS1RICT E\olGINEat R.C.E. 28176 GIW>ING PLi\lfS J'OB: 1--t--+------------+---+---tf----+---<IJC1NQ'S 1'11111 BOUSJI AND 1----lf---+----------+--+--lf---+--HltlNQ CRAB LDllNG• I GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN SCALE:1",.JO' ---------------------DATE _______ _ PREPARED UND£R THE SUPERVISIIJ.I OF' ED CATCH BASIN DETAIL NO SCM.E GARYLIPSKA RCE~OSOEXPtRESl2/31/0I EXISTING CONTOURS ~---.(65)---- PROPOSEDCONTCURS EXISTJNGGRADES<ELEVATIDN) ~ PROPOSED GRADES (ELEVAT!mn ~ PRDPOSED SITE BOUNDARY-· -• -· -· - PARKil>MJSPACECDUNT CATCH BASIN/DRAINPIPE CATCHJlASINW'ITHFCSSIL FILTER INSERT fSHffil\ CITY OF CARISBAD \f"""l LU. ENGINEERING DEPARTMOIT . L_!_J I= ~"'.:OUSB AND I . KING CRAB LOUNGE . !::R::E£R EXPMS DAlE ! o Y: --1 PROJECT NO. II DRAWING NO.I CHKDBY:--RVoli()BY:-- PLDTDATE•ll/8/01 9 b 11[CUI A 8'-0 II Front Elevation SCALE: 1 /2" = l '-0" YELLOW 'NHITE SKELETAL NEON 12" NEON INSTALLATION DETAIL DOUBLE FACE SIGN N.T.S. +--CLEAR RED COPY .125 ALUMINUM FACE TRANSFORMER NEON ILLUMINATION NEON TUBE STAND NEON TUBE HOUSING l 20V PRIMARY (provide by others) ALUMINUM CABINET Sq. Ft. =80.0 QUANTITY : ONE (1) Scope of Work: l"H@UAI Manufacture, Deliver and Install : One (1) Alum. Slide-in Panels, w/ Neon Illumination. Cabinet: Constructed of .090 Aluminum. Face: .1 25 Alum. w/ Sea Sponge Finish. Job Name: Job Address: LNI Rep: Designer: Scale: Logo: Painted to Match Original. Neon: See Neon Skeleton Detail. Project Information: King Fish House 4798 Commas Way Calabasas, CA Mike Blakely Travis Durbin Design #: 99071033-l a.cdr Date: 7.28.99 4" O.D. PIPE ------+-- 0 I ~ FOOTING DETAIL 3/8 " = 1'-0 " PROPOSED DOUBLE FACED INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED GROUND SIGN CABINET: ALUMINUM FABRICATION FACE: WHITE LEXAN WITH VARIOUS COLORED TRANSLUCENT VINYL GRAPHICS ILLUMINATION: 800ma FLUORESCENT LAMPS AS REQUIRED FOR PROPER ILLUMINATION REVEAL: ALUMINUM FABRICATION BASE: ALUMINUM WITH MONTEX FINISH ALL COLORS TO BE DETERMINED PER KING FISH HOUSE CORPORATE STANDARDS SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" CUSTOMER APPROVAL MEMBER OF Customer Signature Date COPY, COLORS & SIZES SIGNTECH does NOT provide primary electrical to sign location- RESPONSIBILITY OF OTHERS! Customer Signature Date This design is the exclusive property of Signtech and cannot be reproduced in whole or in part, without their prior written approval. 4'-0" 1 '-8 " 8 1/2" 3'-0" 121h" 5'-0" OAH 2" 1 '-1 O" 3'-0" 1 '-3" · Job Name: KING'S FISH HOUSE Date: 9/13/01 REVISIONS Drawing No. 01-01072 Address: Palomar Airport Road Sheet: City, State: Carlsbad CA Salesperson: Terry M. Kitaen Project Manager: Drawn by: t.thomsen Scale: Noted Of: b I ~ Front Elevation 11@~@ B SCALE: l" = l '-0" SKELETAL NEON 12" RED CRAB ALUMINUM FACE TRANSFORMER NEON ILLUMINATION NEON TUBE STAND NEON TUBE HOUSING l 20V PRIMARY (provide by others) ALUMINUM CABINET NEON INSTALLATION DETAIL DOUBLE FACE SIGN N.T.S. Sq. Ft. =9.0 QUANTITY: ONE (l) i>i[CJ:I BI Manufacture, Deliver and Install: One (1) D/F Projecting Sign. Skeleton Neon Illumination. Cabinet: Constructed of .090 Aluminum w/ internal frame. Face: .125 Alum. w/ Sea Sponge Finish. Job Nome: Job Address: LNI Rep: Designer: Scale: Logo: Painted to Match Original. Neon: See Neon Skeleton Detail Projection Beams: Accent: Project Information: King Fish House 4 798 Com mos Woy Calabasas, CA Mike Blakely T rovis Durbin Design #: 9907103320.cdr Dote: 8.24.99 ....... _.. ________________________________________________________________________ _ East Elevation A NTS Scope of Work: Job Nome: Job Address: LNI Rep: Designer: Scale: Project Information: King Fish House 4 798 Com mos Woy Calabasas, CA Mike Blakely T rovis Durbin Design#: Dote: ' . • • CONDITION OF TITLE REPORT ORDER NUMBER: 13048317 -U16 CillCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Missouri corporation, herein called the Company, SUBJECT TO THE TERMS, LIMITATIONS AND CONDITIONS OF THE APPLICATION FOR THIS CONDITION OF TITLE REPORT, WHICH APPLICATION, OR COPY THEREOF, IS ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF REPORTS To the party named in Schedule A, that as disclosed by the Title Instruments, the ownership of and the defects, liens and encumbrances against the Interest in the land are as shown in Schedule B. Any claim or other notice to the Company shall be in writing and shall be addressed to the Company at the issuing office or to: Chicago Title Insurance Company Claims Department 111 West Washington Street Chicago, Illinois 60602 \ THIS REPORT IS NOT VALID AND THE COMPANY SIDllLL HAVE NO LIABILITY HEREUNDER UNLESS THE APPLICATION REFERRED TO ABOVE, OR COPY THEREOF, IS ATTACHED HERETO. Issued by: CHI:CAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 925 "B" STREET SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 PHONE NO. (619) 239-6081 FAX NO. (619) 544-6277 COND11T -11 / 15/91-lrc Authorized Signatory . . • CONDIDON OF TITLE REPORT SCHEDULE A DATED AS OF: May 2, 2001 AT 7:30 A.M. ORDER NOMBER: 13048317 -U16 LIABILITY: $5,000.00 FEE: $ 500 .DO 1. Name of Party: CARPENTERS SO CA ADMINISTRATIVE CORP 2. The Interest referred to in the Application is: A FEE 3. The Land referred to in the Application is described as follows: PARCEL A: PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 11284, IN(THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, MAY 11, 1981. PARCEL B: PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 11284, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, MAY 11, 1981. PARCEL C: LOT 4 OF CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 92-7 (CARLSBAD RANCH UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2), IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 13078, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ON DEC.bOMBER 28, 1993. CONOTIT'2· 12/De/91-lrc . . • CONDffiON OF TITLE REPORT SCHEDULEB ORDER NUMBER: 13048317 -016 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY reports that the Title Instruments, on the date hereof, disclose: OWNERSHIP OF THE INTEREST :rs m THE NAME OF: CARPENTERS PENSION TRUST FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION B THE FOLLOWING MATTERS AFFECT PARCELS A AND B: c 1. PROPERTY TAXES, INCLUDING ANY ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED WITH TAXES, TO BE LEVIED FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 THAT ARE A LIEN NOT YET DUE. AV 2. A) PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR SHOWN BELOW ARE PAID. FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES THE AMOUNTS ARE: FISCAL YEAR: 1ST INSTALLMENT: 2ND INSTALLMENT: HOMEOWNERS EXEMPTION: CODE AREA: ASSESSMENT NO: 2000-2001 $39,244.36 $39,244.36 $NONE 09000 211-021-23 AFFECTS: PARCEL 2 OF PM 11284. AW B} PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR SHOWN BELOW ARE PAID. FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES THE AMOUNTS ARE: FISCAL YEAR: 1ST INSTALLMENT: 2ND INSTALLMENT: EXEMPTION: CODE AREA: ASSESSMENT NO: 2000-2001 $8,543.26 $8,543.26 $NONE 09000 211-021-24 AFFECTS: PARCELS 3 OF PM 11284. E 3 . THE LIEN OF SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES, IF AID: , ASSESSED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 3.5 (COMMENCING WITH SECTION 75) OF THE REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. F 4 . AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT CONOTTT'3-, 1 / 18/91 -In: Page 2 • GRANTED TO: PURPOSE: RECORDED: AFFECTS: e CONDIDON OF TITLE REPORT SCHEDULEB (Continued) ORDER NUMBER: 13049317 -U16 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE COMPANY POLES & WIRES AUGUST 2, 1941 IN BOOK 1200, PAGE 421, OFFICIAL RECORDS THE EXACT LOCATION AND EXTENT OF SAID EASEMENT IS NOT DISCLOSED OF RECORD. AFFECTS PARCELS 2 AND 3 G 5. THE FACT THAT THE OWNERSHIP OF SAID LAND DOES NOT INCLUDE RIGHTS OF ACCESS TO OR FROM THE STREET OR HIGHWAY ABUTTING SAID LAND, SUCH RIGHTS HAVING BEEN SEVERED FROM SAID LAND BY THE DOCUMENT RECORDED: AFFECTS: JUNE 18, 1965 AS FILE NO. 109756, OFFICIAL RECORDS INTERSTATE 5 ADJOINING SAID LAND AFFECTS PARCELS 2 AND 3 H 6 • AN 'ONRECORDED LEASE WITH CERTAIN TERMS, COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS SET FORTH THEREIN LESSOR: LESSEE: DISCLOSED BY: RECORDED: PAUL ECKE ANib MAGDELENA ECKE PEA SOUP ANDERSEN'S -BUELLTON MEMORANDUM OF LEASE AND RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL MAY 13, 1981 AS FILE NO. 81-147426, OFFICIAL RECORDS I THE PRESENT OWNERSHIP OF THE LEASEHOLD CREATED BY SAID LEASE AND OTHER MATTERS AFFECTING THE INTEREST OF THE LESSEE ARE NOT SHOWN HEREIN. J A MEMORANDUM OF ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES BETWEEN PAUL AND MAGDALENA ECKE POINSETTIA FOUNDATION, A CALIFORNIA NONPROFIT PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION, AND RAY W. WINTER, BARBARA WINTER, C. WILLIAM DEALY, JR. AND ROTH DEALY, AS SUCCESSOR CO-TRUSTEES OF THE PAUL ECKE, SR. TRUST DATED SEPTEMBER 8, 1983 AND CARPENTERS PENSION TRUST FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, A California Corporation, RECORDED APRIL 17, 1995, AS FILE NO. 1995-159071, OFFICIAL RECORDS. AFFECTS PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 11284 CONOTIT4-11 {2D/BHte • Page 3 CONDffiON OF TITLE REPORT SCHEDULEB (Continued) ORDER NUMBER: 13048317 -U16 K 7. THE RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL IN FAVOR OF PEA SOUP ANDERSEN'S BUELLTON AS DISCLOSED BY MEMORANDUM RECORDED MAY 13, 1981 AS FILE NO. 81-147426, OFFICIAL RECORDS. AFFECTS PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 11284 L 8 • AN UNRECORDED LEASE WITH CERTAIN TERMS, COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS SET FORTH THEREIN LESSOR: LESSEE: DISCLOSED BY: RECORDED: PAUL ECKE AND MAGDELENA ECKE PEA SOUP ANDERSEN'S -BUELLTON MEMORANDUM OF LEASE AND RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL MAY 13, 1981 AS FILE NO. 81-147427, OFFICIAL RECORDS M THE PRESENT OWNER.SHIP OF THE LEASEHOLD CREATED BY SAID LEASE AND OTHER MATTERS AFFECTING THE INTEREST OF THE LESSEE ARE NOT SHOWN HEREIN. N A MEMORANDUM OF ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES BETWEEN PAUL AND MAGDALENA ECKE POINSETTIA FOUNDATION, A CALIFORNIA :NONPROFIT PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION, AND RAY W. WINTER, BARBARA WINTER, C. WILLIAM DEALY, 1 JR. AND ROTH DEALY, AS SUCCESSOR CO-TRUSTEES OF THE PAUL ECKE, SR. TRUST DATED SEPTEMBER 8, 1983 AND CARPENTERS PENSION TRUST FOR SOUTHERN CJU.IFORNIA, A California Corporation, RECORDED APRIL 17, 1995, AS FILE NO. 1995-159071, OFFICIAL RECORDS. AFFECTS PARCELS 3 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 11284 o 9. THE RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL IN FAVOR OF PEA SOUP ANDERSEN'S BUELLTON AS DISCLOSED BY MEMORANDUM RECORDED MAY 13, 1981 AS FILE NO. 81-147427, OFFICIAL RECORDS. AFFECTS PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 11284 p 10 . AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHow:q BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL CONDTlT 4-11 /20/91-ln: THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUME:..'IT GRANTED TO: PURPOSE: RECORDED: AFFECTS: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY PUBLIC UTILITIES, INGRESS AND EGRESS AUGUST 5, 1981 AS FILE NO. 81-248284, OFFICIAL RECORDS THE EXACT LOCATION AND EXTENT OF SAID Page 4 • e CONDIDON OF TITLE REPORT SCHEDULEB (Continued) ORDER NUMBER: 13048317 -U16 EASEMENT IS NOT DISCLOSED OF RECORD. AFFECTS PARCEL 2 Q RESTRICTIONS ON THE USE, BY THE OWNERS OF SAID LAND, OF THE EASEMENT AREA AS PROVIDED IN THE DOCUMENT REFERRED TO ABOVE. R 11 . AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT GRANTED TO: PURPOSE: RECORDED: AFFECTS: THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY PUBLIC UTILITIES, INGRESS A.,'qD EGRESS MAY 10, 1982 AS FILE NO. 82-137223, OFFICIAL RECO THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND IS MORE FOLLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCUMENT. AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT GRANTED TO: PURPOSE: RECORDED: AFFECTS: AFFECTS PARCEL 2 PACIFIC BELL PUBLIC UTILITIES, INGRESS AND EGRESS APRIL 3, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995-0138116, OFFICIAL RECO THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND IS MORE FOLLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCUMENT. THIS EASEMENT WAS RECORDED TO CORRECT THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THAT EASEMENT F:tLED FOR RECORD AT FILE/PAGE NO. 82-137223 ON THE 10 DAY OF MAY, 1982 IN THE OFFICE OF THE COTINTY' RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY. s 12 . AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND ~ IGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT GRANTED TO: PURPOSE: RECORDED: CONDTIT ..._ 1 1 /'2D/91-irc CITY OF CARLSBAD WATERLINE JUNE 4, 1982 AS FILE NO. 82-171546, Page 5 • AFFECTS: CONDIDON OF TITI.E REPORT SCHEDULEB (Continued) ORDER NUMBER: 13048317 -UJ.6 OFFICIAL RECORDS THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCUMENT. AFFECTS PARCEL 2 T 13. AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SROWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT GRANTED TO: PURPOSE: RECORDED: AFFECTS: AFFECTS PARCEL 3 CITY OF CARLSBAD A PUBLIC ROAD, UTILITY, SEWER AND WATER OCTOBER 21, 1985 AS FILE NO. 85-390633, OFFICIAL RECORDS THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND IS MORE FOLLY DESCRIBED IN SAID OOCOMENT. u 14 . A FINANCING STATEMENT FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, SHOWING DEBTOR: SECURED PARTY: RECORDED: CARLSBAD PROPERTIES, INC. UNION BANK, CORPORATE CO-TRUSTEE FOR CARPENTERS PENSION TRUST FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA JONE 22, 1990 AS FILE NO. 90339648, OFFICIAL RECORDS v A CHANGE TO THE ABOVE FINANCING STATEMENT WAS FILED DATE: NATORE OF CHANGE: RECORDED: AUGUST 21, 1992 ASSIGNMENT AUGUST 4, 1993 AS FILE NO. 1993-0503436, OFFICIAL R A CHANGE TO THE ABOVE FINANCING STATEMENT WAS FILED RECORDED: JULY 29, 1997 AS FILE NO. 1997-0360449, OFFICIAL RECORDS Page 6 • NATORE OF CHANGE: CONDffiON OF TITLE REPORT SCHEDULEB (Continued) ORDER NOMBER: 13048317 -U16 ASSIGNMENT x 15. A FINANCING STATEMENT FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, SHOWING DEBTOR: SECORED PARTY: RECORDED: CARLSBAD PROPERTIES, INC. UNION BANK FEBRUARY 26, 1991 AS FILE NO. 1991-0083245, OFFICIAL RECORDS Y A CHANGE TO THE ABOVE FINANCING STATEMENT WAS FILED RECORDED: NATURE OF CHANGE: JANUARY 11, 1996 AS FILE NO. 1996-0015019, OFFICIAL RECORDS CONTINUATION z 16 . AN UNRECORDED LEASE WITH CERTAIN TERMS, COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS SET FORTH THEREIN LESSOR: LESSEE: DISCLOSED BY: RECORDED: PAUL ECKE SR. TRUST AND MAGDALENA AND PAUL 1 ECKE POINSETTIA FOUNDATION CARLSBAD PROPERTIES, INC. NOTICE OF NON-RESPONSIBILITY JULY 20, 1994 AS FILE NO. 1994-0449469, OFFICIAL RECORDS THE PRESENT OWNER.SHIP OF THE LEASEHOLD CREATED BY SAID LEASE AND OTHER MATTERS AFFECTING THE INTEREST OF THE LESSEE ARE NOT SHOWN HEREIN. AA 1 7. AN AGREEMENT, AND TEE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS CONTAINED THEREIN DATED: BY AND BETWEEN: RECORDED: REGARDING: CONOTIT..._11 /20f9Hn: SEPTEMBER 13, 1995 DANIELS CABLEVISION, INC. AND CARPENTERS PENSION TRUST FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER 15, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995-0519328, OFFICIAL RECORDS CABLE TELEVISION CONSTRUCTION WIRING AGREEMENT AND EASEMENT • e CONDffiON OF TITLE REPORT Page 7 SCHEDULEB (Continued) ORDER NOMBER: 13048317 -U16 REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID DOClJMENT FOR FULL PARTICULARS. AB 18 . AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT GRANTED TO: PURPOSE: RECORDED: AFFECTS: CARLSBAD MONICIPAL WATER DISTRICT WATER MARCH 24, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995-0122198, OFFICIAL RECORDS TEE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID -LAND AND IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCUMENT. AC 19. AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW MID RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT GRANTED TO: PURPOSE: RECORDED: AFFECTS: CARLSBAD PROPERTIES RECIPROCAL CROSS EASEMENTS APRIL 17, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995-159067, OFFICIAL RECORDS THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND IS MORE FOLLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCOMENT. AD RESTRICTIONS ON THE USE, BY THE OWNERS OF SAID LAND, OF THE EASEMENT AREA AS SET OUT IN THE EASEMENT DOCUMENT. AE 2 0. AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT GRANTED TO: PURPOSE: RECORDED: AFFECTS: CARLSBAD RANCH COMPANY L. P. , A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FOR VIEW CORRIDOR PURPOSES APRIL 17, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995-0159073, OFFICIAL RECORDS THE P.OUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND !WD IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCDM.ENT. AF 21. A FINANCING STATEMENT FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, SHOWING DEBTOR: CARLSBAD PROPERTIES, INC. CONOTIT.._11 /'ZC/91-<rc Page B • CONDffiON OF TITI..E REPORT SCHEDULEB (Continued) ORDER NUMBER: 13048317 -U16 SECURED PARTY: GUARDIAN TRUST COMPANY, CORPORATE CO-TRUSTEE FOR THE CARPENTERS PENSION TRUST FOR SOUTHERN ClU.IFORNIA RECORDED: JULY 19, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995-0306566, OFFICIAL RECORDS AG 22. RIGHTS OF PARTIES IN POSSESSION OF SAID LAND. MATTERS AFFECTING THE RIGHTS OF SAID PARTIES ARE NOT SHOWN HEREIN. AR THE FOLLOWING :MATTERS AFFECT PARCEL c: AI 23 . PROPERTY TAXES, INCLUDING ANY ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED WITH TAXES, TO BE LEVIED FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 THAT ARE A LIEN NOT YET DUE. AY 24. PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR SHOWN BELOW ARE PAID. FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES THE AMOUNTS ARE: FISClU. YEAR: l.ST INSTALLMENT: 2ND INSTALLMENT: EXEMPTION: CODE AREA: ASSESSMENT NO: 2000-2001 $5,679.80 $5,679.80 $NONE 09000 211-022-04 AFFECTS: PARCEL 4-0F PM l.1284. AK 25. AN ASSESSMENT BY THE IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT SHOWN BELOW ASSESSMENT ( OR BOND } NO: SERIES: DISTRICT: FOR: 22/30 86-1 CARLSBAD PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD BOND ISSUED: JULY 7, 1988 SAID ASSESSMENT IS COLLECTED WITH THE COUNTY/CITY PROPERTY TAXES. AL 26. THE LIEN OF SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES, IF ANY, ASSESSED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 3.5 (COMMENCING WITH SECTION 75) OF THE REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE OF THE STATE OF ClU.IFORNIA. CONDlTT 4-11 /2!J/914R: • Page 9 e CONDffiON OF TITLE REPORT SCHEDULEB (Continued) ORDER NUMBER: 13048317 -016 AM 27. AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCTJMENT GR.l\NTED TO: PURPOSE: RECORDED: AFFECTS: CITY OF CARLSBAD PUBLIC ROAD, UTILITY, SEWER AND WATER OCTOBER 21, 1985 AS FILE NO. 85-390632, OFFICIAL RECORDS THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCTJMENT. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID DOCUMENT FOR FOLL PARTICULARS. AN 28. AN AGREEMENT TO PAY DRAINAGE FEES AS REQUIRED BY THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AND THE ADOPTED LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 13 AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS CONTAINED THEREIN DATED: BY AND BETWEEN: RECORDED: DECEMBER 21, 1993 CARLTAS COMPANY, a California Limited Partnership AND THE CITY OF CARLSBAD DECEMBER 30, 1993 AS FILE NO. 1993-0886034 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID DOCUMENir FOR FULL PARTICULARS. AO 29 . AN AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS CONTAINED THEREIN DATED: BY AND BETWEEN: REGARDING: DECEMBER 13, 1993 CITY OF CARLSBAD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND THE CARLTAS COMPANY DECEMBER 30, 1993 AS FILE NO. 1993-0886060 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS CONTRACT FOR FUTURE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID DOCDMENT FOR FOLL PARTICULARS. AP 3 0 . CITY OF CARLSBAD AMENDMENT TO THE NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN (NOTICE OF ANNEXATION) FOR CDMMONITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1, ANNEXATION NO. 1, State of California RECORDED JANUARY 3, 1994 AS FILE NO. 1994-0002008, OFFICIAL RECORDS. AQ 31. AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT CONOTIT 4-11 (IJJ/91-ln:: • Page 10 GRANTED TO: PURPOSE: RECORDED: AFFECTS: CONDffiON OF TITLE REPORT SCHEDULEB (Continued) ORDER NUMBER: 13048317 -U16 CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT THE CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, REPAIR, RECONSTRUCTION AND ALL ACTIVITIES NECESSARY TO CONTRUCT, RECONSTRUCT, OPERATE, MAINTAIN AND REPAIR FACILITIES DESIGNED FOR THE GENERAL PURPOSE OF COLLECTING, STORING, TRANSPORTING, PUMPING AND TREATING ALL WATER., INCLUDING SURFACE WATER, STREAM WATER, FLOOD WATER AND GROUND WATER FLOWING INTO SAID FACILITIES AND ALL NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL DRAINAGE DITCHES AND STRUCTURES OF ANY KIND, WHETHER ABOVE OR BELOW THE SURFACE OF THE GROUND. APRIL 25, 1994 AS FILE NO. 1994-0272434, OFFICIAL RECORDS THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND IS MORE FOLLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCDMENT. AR 32 . AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT GRANTED TO: PURPOSE: RECORDED: AFFECTS: CARSLBAD RANCH COMPANY L. P. , a California Limited Partnership VIEW CORRmoi EASEMENT APRIL 17, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995-0159073, OF~ICIAL RECORDS THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND IS MORE FOLLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCUMENT. AS 33. RIGHTS OF PARTIES IN POSSESSION OF SAID LAND. MATTERS AFFECTING TEE RIGHTS OF SAID PARTIES ARE NOT SHOWN HEREIN. AT END OF SCHEDULE B AU SL CONOTIT 4-11 /20 /91-lrc • • • -CONDITION OF TITLE REPORT ORDER NDMBER: 13048317 -U16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Missouri corporation, herein called the Company, SUBJECT TO THE TERMS, LIMITATIONS AND CONDITIONS OF THE APPLICATION FOR THIS CONDITION OF TITLE REPORT, WHICH APPLICATION, OR COPY THEREOF, IS ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF REPORTS To the party named in Schedule A, that as disclosed by the Title Instruments, the ownership of and the defects, liens and encumbrances against the Interest in the land are as shown in Schedule B. Any claim or other notice to the Company shall be in writing and shall be addressed to the Company at the issuing office or to: Chicago Title Insurance Company Claims Department 111 West Washington Street Chicago, Illinois 60602 THIS REPORT IS NOT VALID AND THE COMPANY sm-Jr..r. HAVE NO LIABILITY HEREUNDER UNLESS THE APPLICATION REFERRED TO ABOVE, OR COPY THEREOF, IS ATTACHED HERETO. Issued by: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 925 "B" STREET SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 PHONE NO. {619) 239-6081 FAX NO. (619) 544-6277 CONOTIT-11 /15/91-lrc Authorized Signatory ~ SHT 2 t \ 0. "' ~ \. ~ \ i!i 2 ;<; < "' ~ 15 ~ s ~ l!i ... ~ ® 7 i i I ffi ~ ~ ~ ® ff ~ 0 JI< ~ ~ ... ~ 53. AC (§) OPEN SPACE D~IAIL "A" -1"=100' rd Cl o~ m~ <(Q a.z D~TAIL "C" -1'' ... 40' S.\H DIEGO cwm ASSESD'S llAP ! 211-02 SHT 1 OF 2 1" = 400' 11111 IHll MAP 13357-CARLSBAD TCT NO 94-09 CARLSBAD RANCH UNIT 1 MAP 13215 -CARLSBAD TCT NO 92-7 UNIT 3 MAP 13078 -CARLSBAD TCT NO 92-7 UNITS 1 & 2 _J ROS 12462, 13466, 13995