HomeMy WebLinkAboutCUP 01-22; ZONE 19 PARK; Conditional Use Permit (CUP)CITY OF CARLSBAD
LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION
1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES)
(FOR DEPARTMENT (FOR DEPARTMENT
USE ONLY)
Administrative Permit - 2nd
Dwelling Unit
LI Administrative Variance
Coastal Development Permit
IN Conditional Use Permit
Condominium Permit
LII Environmental Impact
Assessment
LI General Plan Amendment
Hillside Development Permit
LI Local Coastal Plan Amendment
LI Master Plan
1111 Non-Residential Planned
Development
LI Planned Development Permit
LI Planned Industrial Permit
LI Planning Commission
Determination
,
j/ LI Precise Development Plan
(e j - LI Redevelopment Permit
LI Site Development Plan
LI Special Use Permit
LI Specific Plan
- F-1 Tentative Porccl Map 1-frt7 t £.- / 2/ Obtain from Engineering Department
Tentative Tract Map
LI Variance
LI Zone Change
LI List other applications not
2) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S):
3) PROJECT NAME:
4) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJEC1
2 /5L)_ 21
5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type) 6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type) ur r em, r
MAILING 4kbDRESS MAII-14 ADDRESS
C4%IV49 tT Pik
CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE
C4 -7 7U
60 r
I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
INFORMATION 15 TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY OWNER AND THAT ALL T ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND
KNOWLEDGE. CORR TO THE BE V KNOWLEDGE.
' Of
SIGNATURE DATE SIG J#KURE 04/#I LL.- DAE
ra
7) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION
DejO1O-/
NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M.
A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M.
Form 16 PAGE 1OF2
40
8) LOCATION OF PROJECT:
STREET ADDRESS
JXJT90 IAikYiJ
(NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST)
L4A/ I
(NAME OF STREET)
BETWEEN AND I
(NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREET)
9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE I
10) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS 11) NUMBER OF EXISTING 12)
RESIDENTIAL UNITS N/If - PROPOSED NUMBER OF
RESIDENTIAL UNITS Al//fl
13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION 14) PROPOSED IND OFFICE/ ,'> 15)
SQUARE FOOTAGE
PROPOSED COMM
SQUARE FOOTAGE A/I
16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED i 17>
PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE 7
PROPOSED INCREASE IN JKA( 8)
ADT (7 5 (j
PROPOSED SEWER iff USAGE IN EDU ,4r?l7(
19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 20) EXISTING GENERAL 21)
PLAN
PROPOSED GENERAL
PLAN DESIGNATION
22) EXISTING ZONING 23) PROPOSED ZONING
24) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY
STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT
TO EN1)/ FOR TWP1JRPOSE
FOR CITY USE ONLY
FEE COMPUTATION
APPLICATION TYPE FEE REQUIRED
RMEIVED
AUG 172001
CITY OF CARLSBAD
DATE S-A4TflpCElVED
TOTAL FEE REQUIRED
DATE FEE PAID RECEIPT NO. I1
Form 16 PAGE 2OF2
I
-
1 ORDER NO. 1271173-15
THE FORM OF POLICY TITLE INSURANCE CONTEMPLATED BY THIS REPORT IS:
PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT
TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF IS VESTED IN:
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO
COVERED BY THIS REPORT IS:
AFEE RECEIVED
THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: OCT 02 201
(SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION) CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLAN NNG DEPT.
AT THE DATE HEREOF EXCEPTIONS TO COVERAGE IN ADDITION TO THE PRINTED
EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS CONTAINED IN SAID POLICY FORM WOULD BE AS
FOLLOWS:
I. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002, A LIEN NOT YET
DUE OR PAYABLE.
2. THE LIEN OF SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES ASSESSED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3.5
COMMENCING WITH SECTION 75 OF THE CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION
CODE.
3. AN EASEMENT FOR PIPE LINE AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED JULY 21,
1958 IN BOOK 7174, PAGE 290 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
GRANTED TO: CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT.
THE ROUTE OF SAID EASEMENT IS SET OUT IN SAID DOCUMENT AND AFFECTS A
PORTION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY.
4. THE FACT THAT SAID LAND LIES WITHIN THE BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE
DISTRICT NO. 1" ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION NO. 8744 BY THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, AS DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED AUGUST 19, 1986,
RECORDERS FILE NO. 86-35663 8 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
SAID INSTRUMENT, AMONG OTHER THINGS, PROVIDES FUNDS FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE BRIDGE FACILITIES WILL BE GENERATED BY FEES
COLLECTED AS BUILDING PERMITS ARE ISSUED FOR DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE
BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT
PAGE £
THE PAYMENT OF A PUBLIC AC1T 1ItP l(
INSTRUMENT NO. 86-509319 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
6. THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE DOCUMENT ENTITLED
"AGREEMENT BETWEEN DEVELOPER-OWNER AND THE CITY OF CARLSBAD FOR
THE PAYMENT OF A PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE" RECORDED NOVEMBER 19, 1987 AS
INSTRUMENT NO. 87-647735 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
7. THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE DOCUMENT ENTITLED "TITLE
SETTLEMENT AND EXCHANGE AGREEMENT AND CONVEYANCE OF PUBLIC ACCESS
EASEMENT (LAGOON NORTH SHORE TRAIL)", EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE STATE LANDS
COMMISSION, WITH THE CONCURRENCE OF THE CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL
AND PACIFIC RIM LAND ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A DELAWARE
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, RECORDED JUNE 10, 1988 AS FILE NO. 88-278452 OF
OFFICIAL RECORDS.
8. THE FACT THAT SAID LAND LIES WITHIN THE PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. I OF THE CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRICT, AS DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED MARCH 14, 1989 AS FILE
NO. 89-242769 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN RECORDED APRIL 9, 1990 AS FILE NO. 90-189679 OF
OFFICIAL RECORDS.
9. THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE DOCUMENT ENTITLED "DEED
RESTRICTION (LAGOON NORTH SHORE TRAIL)", EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN
AVIARA LAND ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A DELAWARE CORPORATION
AND THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION, RECORDED APRIL 14, 1989 AS FILE
NO. 89-196178 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
10. THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE DOCUMENT ENTITLED
"IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE OPEN-SPACE EASEMENT AND DECLARATION
OF RESTRICTIONS" RECORDED APRIL 14, 1989 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 89-196180 OF
OFFICIAL RECORDS.
II. AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED
MARCH 20, 1992 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 1992-0155861 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
GRANTED TO: CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, A PUBLIC AGENCY.
THE ROUTE OF SAID EASEMENT IS SET OUT IN SAID DOCUMENT AND AFFECTS A
PORTION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY.
12. A LEASE DATED JANUARY IS, 1998, EXECUTED BY THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, A
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AS LESSOR, AND SEA COAST GREENHOUSES, AS
LESSEE, RECORDED JANUARY 21, 1998 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 1998-0029627 OF
OFFICIAL RECORDS.
PAGE 3
THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY
OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THAT PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, ALL IN
TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE
OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY NO. 10774, FILED IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OCTOBER 30, 1986 AS FILE NO. 86-494180 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22; THENCE ALONG THE
EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 22 NORTH 0003317 EAST, 175720 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT
OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE SOUTH 89°46'56" WEST, 615.45 FEET
TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT 50.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
SOUTHEAST A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 83°58'22" EAST; THENCE
NORTHWESTERLY, WESTERLY AND SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 201 004'39" A DISTANCE OF 175.47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
27049'22" EAST, 46.87 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 90.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE
CONCAVE TO THE WEST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 170 14'25" A DISTANCE OF 27.08 FEET; TO THE
BEGINNING OF A COMPOUND 470.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE TO THE WEST, A
RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 79°25'03" EAST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG
THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25059'03" A DISTANCE OF
213.15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 15°24'06" WEST, 65.21 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A
TANGENT 25.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST; THENCE
SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
89037'40" A DISTANCE OF 39.11 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 1801.00 FOOT
RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH
15°01'46" EAST; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11 056'46" A DISTANCE OF 375.51 FEET; THENCE NORTH 86°55'00"
WEST, 243.11 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 22; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE
NORTH 00047'20" WEST, 95.35 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID WESTERLY LINE NORTH
89018'06" EAST, 17.66 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF THAT LAND
CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD (PARK SITE) AS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED
JUNE 29, 1989 AS FILE NO. 89-345769 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE ALONG THE
WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LAND THE FOLLOWING: NORTH 19 052'40"
EAST, 92.87 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45 1 10'21" WEST, 54.44 FEET; THENCE NORTH 13°28'04"
EAST, 60.92 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°22'40" WEST, 320.06 FEET; THENCE NORTH 12°18'08"
WEST, 92.73 FEET; THENCE NORTH 50°59'09" EAST, 201.72 FEET; THENCE NORTH 14°03'08"
WEST, 251.49 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°28'38" EAST, 322.56 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°43'00"
EAST, 121.67 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 49°41'33" WEST, 50.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 10°13'08"
WEST, 45.76 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 34°30'47" EAST, 34.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 62022'17"
EAST, 25.68 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 19°35'24" WEST 109.22 FEET: THENCE NORTH 75°32'32"
PAGE 5
ORDER NO. 127117345
T, 110.78 FEET; THENCE NORTH 35 -50'10" EAST, 100.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 82°53'54"
EAST, 31.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 56°01'44" EAST, 225.45 FEET; THENCE NORTH 43 054535"
EAST, 93.91 FEET; THENCE NORTH 73°18'15" EAST, 133.35 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 028'38"
EAST, 136.29 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 52045'54" EAST, 325.72 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST
LINE OF SAID SECTION 22; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE SOUTH 00°33'17" WEST,
539.21 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
AUGUST 24,20019-02 AM OM
PAGE 6
215-08
I°4O
1p
SEC 22 — T12S-R4 — SE 1/4
ROS 584. 6269, 10774, 13762 DIFAR rflirniY MD ev 7ir.
Ihis map may or may be a
survey o' the land do'd hereon
You shout& not rely upor it for
ny purpose other than .rientatlOn
to the general location ot the parcel
or parcels depicted First American
Title expressly disclaims &--v liability
for alleged loss or dan,a which rn
rt' rI'
e
SRI 3
MARTINGALE CT
(9
SRI 2 MARITIME DR
pOiNSET2 _
ST Op-
PAR i BLACKRAILRD•
SE MAP 2800-37-15-..
9
SRI1 30.
"ED" RESERVOIR- TWIN TANKS SITE
SHT 2
.-SHT 1
qRESERIMIR
TANK SHT 2
SIJT
02. 7AC
1/4 ------.__..... 22 23 COR
27 26
THS WAR WAS WPM FOR ASSES9.EHT Rqo5Es ONLY tO A5)E FOR THE ACCUPACY OF THE DATA SiCWN. ASSESSOR 5 PARCELS MAT NOT CDAPLY WTTH LOCAl. 5NISOH OR RULOIG CRDP4QCt.
o
Carlsbad
IF
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require
discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee.
The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot
be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print.
Note:
Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal
organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city
municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit"
Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be
provided below.
APPLICANI' (Not the applicant's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial
interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the
names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO
INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-
APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW If a publicly-owned corporation, include the
names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if
necessarv.)
Person
Title
Address /2cc Cst/iAID "ilI*eZ?.
C4.IthD 0:1 ?2A,
Corp/Part C/7/ OF CIsIMID
Title
Address
2. OWNER (Not the owner's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership
interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e,
partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a
corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more
than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES,
PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-
owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate
page may be attached if necessary.)
Person
Title
Address fZW 4!/IfJ 0111411-&
afith4óI, (7g. qz€
Corp/Part eiry tf
Title
Address
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559
NON-PROFIT NIZATION OR TRUST
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit oraariization or a trust, list the
names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit
organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the.
Non ProfivTrust_______________ Non ProfitlTrust_____________________
Title Title
Address Address
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff.
Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months?
LII Yes 21 No If yes, please indicate person(s):____________________________________
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
Signature of owner/date Signature of applicant/date
Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant
Sia4rier/applicant's agent if applicable/date
.1h'a C,frntt C/E% ar
Print or type name of owner/applidnt's agent
H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART I
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT)
CASE NO:
DATE RECEIVED:
(To be completed by staff)
BACKGROUND
L CASE NAME: Z/C I? eOA1J LU! (77 P4KJ(
2. APPLICANT: mi bE
3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT:
)1L6 D/( ft'
4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: oF
/ / Ji(fl) 17- [ !ZK
SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
Please check any of the environmental factors listed below that would be potentially affected by this
project. This would be any environmental factor that has at least one impact checked "Potentially
Significant Impact," or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" in the checklist
on the following pages.
LII Land Use and Planning
Population and Housing
LII Geological Problems
LII Water
[jj] Air Quality
Transportation/Circulation
Biological Resources
El Energy & Mineral Resources
LI Hazards
LI Noise
LI Mandatory Findings of Signil
Public Services
Utilities & Service Systems
LII Aesthetics
[]Cultural Resources
[]Recreation
icance
1 Rev. 03/28/96
n
4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City
conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant
effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following
pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human
factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to
use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental impact Report (EIR), Negative
Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration.
A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are
adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following each
question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information
sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A
"No impact" answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or
it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards.
"Less Than Significant Impact" applies where there is supporting evidence that the
potential impact is not adversely significant, and the impact does not exceed adopted
general standards and policies.
'Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation incorporated" applies where the incorporation
of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from 'Potentially Significant Impact" to a
"Less Than Significant impact." The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the
City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the
effect to a less than significant level.
"Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an
effect is significant.
Based on an "EJA-Part II", if a proposed project could have a potentially significant
effect on the environment, but all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable
standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated
Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon
the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or
supplemental EW are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior
environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional
environmental document is required (Prior Compliance).
When "Potentially Significant impact" is checked the project is not necessarily required
to prepare an EIR if the significant effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR
pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a "Statement of
Overriding Considerations" has been made pursuant to that earlier ErR.
A Negative Declaration maybe prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that
the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment.
2 Rev. 03/28/96
41
.
• If there are one or more potentially significant effects, the City may avoid preparing an
EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce impacts to less than significant, and
those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this
case, the appropriate "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated"
may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared.
An EIR must be prepared if "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked, and including
but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant effect has
not been discussed or mitigated in an Earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and
the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the impact to less than
significant; (2) a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" for the significant impact has
not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce
the impact to less than significant, or; (4) through the EIA-Part II analysis it is not
possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or
determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant
effect to below a level of significance.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the
form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention
should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined
significant.
3 Rev. 03/28/96
. .
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less Than No
(Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) Significant Significant Significan Impact
Impact Unless t Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:.
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? [] [] [] (Source #(s): ( )
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or [I] U U policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the
project? ( )
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? [] U Lai
d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts [] U U VV to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible
land uses? (
e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an 0 U U established community (including a low-income or
minority community)? ( )
IL POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local U U U
b)
population projections? ( )
Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or U U indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area
or extension of major infrastructure)?
c)
( )
Displace existing housing, especially affordable U U LI fA housing? (
ifi. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or
a)
expose people to potential impacts involving:
Fault rupture? ( ) U U U IR
b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) U U U
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? U U U IZ
d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? U U U 1J
e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) U U U
f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil [] U U conditions from excavation, grading, or fill?
g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) U U U
h) Expansive soils? ( U LI U i) Unique geologic or physical features? U U U
1V. WATER Would the proposal result in
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the U U U I) rate and amount of surface runoff? ( )
b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards U LII U such as flooding? ( )
c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of U U U Fil VY surface vater quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity)? ( )
4
4 Rev. 03/28/96
. .
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less Than No
(Supplemental documents may he referred to and attached) Significant Significant Significan Impact
Impact Unless t impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water F-1 F51
e)
body?
Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
f)
movements?
Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or
through substantial loss of groundwater recharge
g)
capability?
Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater?
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( )
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater El El F I otherwise available for public water supplies?
( I
V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an [] [I] existing or projected air quality violation?
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants'?
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause
d)
any change in climate?
Create objectionable odors? ( ) El Eli EZI
VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the
a)
proposal result in:
Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion'? 11
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp D F lxi curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses
c)
(e.g. farm equipment)? (
Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? El F El EXI
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? [I] Li]
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? F Eli
1) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative [] [] transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
g)
( )
Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? [I] []
VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result
in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats Ill 1Z1 (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects,
animals, and birds? ( )
b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? LA
5 Rev. 03/28/96
4
• .
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less Than No
(Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) Significant Significant Significan Impact
Impact Unless t Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? ( )
d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? [] []
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? [] [j] []
VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the
a)
proposal?
Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? [1 [1]
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and LI III LI EA
c)
inefficient manner? ( )
Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral LI [1] [1] resource that would be of future value to the region and
the residents of the State? ( )
IX, HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous II] [II LI II substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides,
b)
chemicals or radiation)? ( )
Possible interference with an emergency response plan LI LI III []
c)
or emergency evacuation plan? ( )
The creation of any health hazard or potential health LI LI [I]
d)
hazards? ( )
Exposure of people to existing sources of potential [] [] [] []
e)
health hazards? ( )
Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, [] [] [] grass, or trees? ( )
X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) [] [I] [I] Lmzxj
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? [II] [I]Nor I
XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered government
services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? ( )
b) Police protection? ( )
c) Schools? ( )
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( )
e) Other governmental services? ( )
a a a a a a ON a a a • a a
LI LI LI 91
XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies,
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? ( ) LI [II LI
b) Communications systems? ( ) LI LI LI
Rev. 03/28/96
. .
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less Than No
(Supplemental documents may be refel7ed to and attached) Significant Significant Significan Impact
Impact Unless t Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution El F I El
d)
facilities'?
Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) El F-1 F-1 1jd2<J1
e) Storm water drainage? ( ) El F
f) Solid waste disposal? ( )
g) Local or regional water supplies'? ( ) LII 1111
XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic or vista or scenic highway?
h) Have a demonstrate negative aesthetic effect'?
c) Create light or glare? ( I
xiv. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources? ( )
h) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) Eli LII
c) Affect historical resources'? ( )
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which El 1:1 would affect unique ethnic cultural values'?
e)
( )
Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the El F potential impact area'?
XV.RECREATIONAL. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional El El parks or other recreational facilities?
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities?
XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the [I] [j] 1:1 DQ quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
7 Rev. 03/28/96
. 0
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less Than No
(Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) Significant Significant Sgnifican Impact
Impact Unless t Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually D [1] [11 limited, but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable" means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,
the effects of other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects)?
c) Does the project have environmental effects which will El [] [] cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES.
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program ETR, or other CEQA
process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative
declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the
following on attached sheets:
a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available
for review.
b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist
were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant
to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by
mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
C) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation
Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or
refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-
specific conditions for the project.
8 Rev. 03128/96
S
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
Please use this area to discuss any of the environmental factors that were checked "No impact"
yet lack any information citations and any factors that were checked "Potentially Significant
Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." The City has
adopted a "Statement of Overriding Consideration" with regard to air quality and circulation
impacts resulting from the normal buildout according to the General Plan. The following sample
text is intended to guide your discussion of the impacts to these environmental factors.
AIR QUALITY:
The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated
1994 General Plan will result in increased gas and electric power consumption and vehicle miles
traveled. These subsequently result in increases in the emission of carbon monoxide, reactive
organic gases, oxides of nitrogen and sulfur, and suspended particulates. These aerosols are the
major contributors to air pollution in the City as well as in the San Diego Air Basin. Since the
San Diego Air Basin is a "non-attainment basin", any additional air emissions are considered
cumulatively significant: therefore, continued development to buildout as proposed in the
updated General Plan will have cumulative significant impacts on the air quality of the region.
To lessen or minimize the impact on air quality associated with General Plan buildout, a variety
of mitigation measures are recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include: 1) provisions
for roadway and intersection improvements prior to or concurrent with development; 2) measures
to reduce vehicle trips through the implementation of Congestion and Transportation Demand
Management; 3) provisions to encourage alternative modes of transportation including mass
transit services; 4) conditions to promote energy efficient building and site design; and 5)
participation in regional growth management strategies when adopted. The applicable and
appropriate General Plan air quality mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the
design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval.
Operation-related emissions are considered cumulatively significant because the project is
located within a "non-attainment basin", therefore, the "Initial Study" checklist is marked
"Potentially Significant Impact". This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the
preparation of an EIR is not required because the certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City
Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for air
quality impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent
projects covered by the General Plan's Final Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no
further environmental review of air quality impacts is required. This document is available at the
Planning Department.
CIRCULATION:
The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated
1994 General Plan will result in increased traffic volumes. Roadway segments will be adequate
to accommodate buildout traffic; however, 12 full and 2 partial intersections will be severely
impacted by regional through-traffic over which the City has no jurisdictional control. These
generally include all freeway interchange areas and major intersections along Carlsbad
Boulevard. Even with the implementation of roadway improvements, a number of intersections
are projected to fail the City's adopted Growth Management performance standards at buildout.
9 Rev. 03/28/96
To lessen or minimize the impact on circulation associated with General Plan buildout, numerous
mitigation measures have been recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include 1)
measures to ensure the provision of circulation facilities concurrent with need; 2) provisions to
develop alternative modes of transportation such as trails, bicycle routes, additional sidewalks,
pedestrian linkages, and commuter rail systems; and 3) participation in regional circulation
strategies when adopted. The diversion of regional through-traffic from a failing Interstate or
State Highway onto City streets creates impacts that are not within the jurisdiction of the City to
control. The applicable and appropriate General Plan circulation mitigation measures have either
been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval.
Regional related circulation impacts are considered cumulatively significant because of the
failure of intersections at buildout of the General Plan due to regional through-traffic, therefore,
the "Initial Study" checklist is marked 'Potentially Significant Impact". This project is
consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the
recent certification of Final Master E[R 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included
a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for circulation impacts. This "Statement Of
Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan's
Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of circulation
impacts is required.
LIST OF MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE)
ZD/00 Wq L H77d#b.
ATTACH MITIGATION MITIGATION MONTTOR1NG PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE)
10 Rev. 03/28/96