The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCUP 03-23; Poinsettia Village Wireless; Conditional Use Permit (CUP)CITY OF CARLSBAD APPLICATION FORM FOR CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION APPLICATION CFTY USE ONLY Project Number? PROJECT NAME; T-mohlily ^fjf^ m'^r VUl^ci. fCuf Oh--D 2-^SCM9 h3 Assessors Parcel Number(s): Qm-'j'bO -'l^ OWNER NAME (Print or Type) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type) MAILING ADDRESS ' CITY AND STATE ZIP MAILING ADDRESS lOldo TWe5^3 et. f>Tc 333 TELEPHONE CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE, DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL (ADD ATTACHMENT IF NECESSARY): . TrM'3pAllnf lhdirt(J5 in^ll<^ '^^prm^ 9J^£>lci5> cr\ Wddi nj^ hit? \ner^$fy )n \)Ui^hY of hmUinc^ it? i^ra^e5d. ^0 chitruti^ % The. frtUiousUj WOULD YOU LIKE TO ORALLY PRESENT THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO YOUR ASSIGNED STAFF PLANNER/ ENGINEER? YES • NO PLEASE LIST THE NAMES OF ALL STAFF MEMBERS YOU HAVE PREVIOUSLY SPOKEN TO REGARDING THIS PROJECT. IF NONE, PLEASE SO STATE. FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE REQUIRED/DATE FEE PAID: RECEIPT NO.: RECEIVED BY: [^r/X /^'^CCirTC- Routing: Planning^^ Engineering^^f Fire''^^ Other_ Form 16 Rev. 06/06 RECEIVED AUG 2 0 2007 CITY OF CARLSBAD PiJ\NNiNG DEPT Page 2 of2 city of Carlsbad 163 5 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 llllllllllllllll Applicant: T MOBILE USA INC Description Amount CD070015 610.00 703 0 AVENIDA ENCINAS CBAD Not valid unless validated by Cash Register PLEASE RETAIN RECEIPT FOR REFUNDS OR ADJUSTMENTS Receipt Number: R0066094 Transaction ID: R0066094 Transaction Date: 08/20/2007 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 610.00 Transaction Amount: 610.00 T • -Mobile-Omnipoint Communications, Inc a subsidiary of T-IVIoblie USA Inc. 10180 Telesis Court, Suite 333 San Diego, California 92121 Desk: (858)334-6106 Fax: (858) 334-6198 January 16, 2007 Raymond R. Patchett, City Manager City of Carlsbad City Hall 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: T-Mobile Site No. SD06915 Poinsettia Plaza Dear Mr. Patchett: General Order 159-A (GO-159-A) of the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) requires cellular carriers to send a notification letter of a utility's Intent to construct a cellular facility to CPUC's Safety and Enforcement Division within 15 business days of receipt of all requisite local land use approvals. The notification letter shall state that such approvals have been received, or that no land use approvals are required. As set forth in GO 159-A, copies of the notification letter are required to be served concurrently by mail on the local governmental agency. Where the affected local governmental agency is a city, service of the notification letter to the city shall consist of service of separate copies of the notification letter upon the City Manager, the City Planning Director and the City Clerk. In order to comply with these requirements, I have enclosed a copy of the notification letter for our project within your city limits. If you have any questions or require additional information, please call me at (858) 334- 6106. Sincerely, Michael T. Raphael Senior Manager Development T-Mobile Attachments ATTACHMENT A 1. Proiect Location: Site Number and Name: SD06915 Poinsettia Plaza Site Address: 7030 Avenida Encinas Carlsbad, CA 92009 County: San Diego Location: 33° 6' 7.64" N 117° 18' 43.04" W Assessor's Parcel Number: 214-430-14 2. Proiect Description: T-Mobile proposes to construct, operate and maintain an unmanned wireless communications facility. This facility will consist of 12 antennas mounted inside a cupola, equipment cabinets and utility runs for telephone and electrical service. Required permits/approvals are planning and building. 3. Business addresses of all Local Government Agencies: City of Carlsbad City Hall 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 4. Land use approval & Building Permit: On 1/08/2007, the City of Carlsbad approved a Building Permit, BP # CB060871, for the installation use and maintenance of a Wireless Telecommunications Facility at 7030 Avenida Encinas, Carlsbad, CA 92009. ^ CITYOFCARLSBAD ^ LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECKBOXES) • • • • • • • • • • Administrative Permit - 2nd Dwelling Unit Administrative Variance Coastal Development Permit Conditional Use Permit Condominium Permit Environmental Impact Assessment General Plan Amendment Hillside Development Permit Local Coastal Plan Amendment Master Plan Non-Residential Planned Development Planned Development Permit (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) I I Planned Industrial Permit I I Planning CoWimission Determination I I Precise Development Plan I I Redevelopment Permit I I Site Development Plan I I Special Use Permit I I Specific Plan r~l Tentotive Pofcci Mop Obtain from Engineering Department I I Tentative Tract Map I I Variance I I Zone Change I I List other applications not specified (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) 2) 3) 4) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: PROJECT NAME: 214-430-14 Pninsiettia Village BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Please see attatched "Project Description" 5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type) |Jeio,« Donahue Schriber Realty Group ^^'"^ ^ '4t ^/ 6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type) Cingular Wireless- Tim Kolset MAIUNG ADDRESS (WW^ 2235 Faraday Ave #0 '^1^7 MAILING ADDRESS 6170 Cornerstone Court, Ste 180 CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE Carlsbad, Ca 92008 760-431-4210 CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE San Diego CA 92121 (858)650-4242 1 CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. Please see attached owner authorization form ^ 1 CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. SIGNATURE DATE 7) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRINQ MULTIPLE APPUCATIONS BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRINQ ONLY ONE APPUCATION BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M. Form 16 PAGE 1 OF 2 8) LOCATION OF PROJECT: ON THE BETWEEN East STREET ADDRESS SIDE OF (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) Avenida F.ncinas PninsiPttia T n AND (NAME OF STREET) 9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 10) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS 13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION 16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE 19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 22) EXISTING ZONING 0 N/A 3.0 O 11) NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNITS 14) PROPOSED IND OFFICE/ SQUARE FOOTAGE 17) PROPOSED INCREASE IN ADT 20) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN 23) PROPOSED ZONING (NAME OF STREET) '^an Luis N/A (NAME OF STREET) 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS 15) PROPOSED COMM SQUARE FOOTAGE 18) PROPOSED SEWER USAGE IN EDU 21) PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION N/A N/A 24) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE SIGNATURE FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION APPLICATION TYPE TOTAL FEE REQUIRED FEE REQUIRED RECEIVED AUG 1 3 m CITY OF CARLSBAD DATPiAWW WftlilififSS RECEIVED RECEIVED BY: DATE FEE PAID RECEIPT NO. Form 16 PAGE 2 OF 2 0 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad. CA 92008 Applicant: CINGULAR WIRELESS Description CUP03023 Amount 24 .42 Receipt Number: R0041186 Transaction Date: 03/23/2004 Pay Type Method Payment Cash Description Amount 24 .42 Transaction Amount: 24.42 8164 03/23/04 0002 01 02 CGP 24»42 City of Carlsbad Piannin g De part n^: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board. Commission or Comminee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your projeci cannoi be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defmed as "Any individiial, firm, co-partnership, joint ventuic, association, social ciub. fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and counry, cit>- municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owncr must be provided below. 1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include thc names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of thc shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON- APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW If a publiclv-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) ' Corp/Part Cingular Wireless Person Tim Kolset Title Project Manager Title_ Address 4810 Eastgate Mall Address 6170 Cornerstone Court, Ste 180 OWlSfER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of thc legal ownership (i.e. partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include thc names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% ofthe shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv- owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses ofthe corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person K Mi cfiele g>Q6<lodc Title ^ ^cxxf 'ive Vi ce Pres i jemt Addressee°^DQ £- ^aktr S-t- .S-fC-IOO Address! Costa /Heso,, dA '^^.tab Corp/PartKDonahue^iriber Real . Title. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 - (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 @ 4. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If ^ny person iaemified pursuant to (i:) or (2) above «eynd.d*„.« of person: serving as'tSf^lSSf'^- orgaiuzatKDff or as tnistee or beneficiary of the Non Profit/Trust Title r •••^ ofthe non-profii Non Profit/Trust. Title Address Address ClYes QNO Ifyes, please indicate person(s): M^LA. NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessaiy. I certify that all the above information is tme; and correct to the best Qf my knowledge. Signature of owhcr/date Signature oCappIicant/date Print pr type name of owner Print or type name of applicant Signamre of owneiv^pplicant's agent if applicable/date Cingular Wireless- Tim Kolset Print or type name of bwrier/applicant's agent H:ADMIN\C0UNTER\D1SCL0SURE STATEMENT 5/98 ^^^^ A PROJECT DESCRIPTIQN/gXPLANATipN PROJECT NAME: Poinsettia village APPLICANT NAME: cingular Wireless-Tim Kolset Please describe fuliy the proposed projeci Inciude any details necessary to aoeauateiy explain the scope and/or operation of me proposed project. You may also mctuae any bacicground information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for cr appropHateness of, tfw appiication. Use an addendum street if necessary. Oescription/Expianation. Please see attached project description. PROJECT DESCRIPTION CINGULAR WIRELESS FACILITY Poinsettia Village INTRODUCTION Cingular wireless is a Communications provider licensed to operate a v^^ireless communications network tliroughout the United States. Cingular has operated a network in San Diego, Orange, and Los Angeles counties for its Southern California subscribers since the early 1990's. This network is designed to transmit and receive calls by radio waves operating in the 1870-1965 MHz spectrum. Telecommunications technology has existed for many years and, in particular. Wireless technology is emerging as a necessary emergency service and business tool as well as being convenient for personal and family use. The high quality and convenience of the Cingular network has created increasingly strong demand for its service. In order to meet this demand, to improve the quality, and to expand the footprint of its service into areas that are not currently served, Cingular proposes to construct the subject Poinsettia Village antenna facility. PROJECT GOALS The goal of the proposed Cingular Poinsettia Village facility is to provide continuous Wireless service for personal, business and emergency purposes to nearby residential, commercial and industrial locations. The proposed location is necessary to provide continuous service to this area where there are currently gaps in the coverage network, and to augment existing service, which will soon decrease to a quality below acceptable standards. Cingular, and it's agent, WFI, intend to work with the City of Carlsbad to ensure that this project is consistent with local ordinances and zoning regulations while providing Wireless coverage critical for emergency, business and personal use. Cingular is currently negotiating a lease with the property owner, which would allow for construction and maintenance of this facility, as well as provide access to the site. The property owner has executed a letter of authorization (included with this application) indicating his consent for Cingular to obtain the requested permit(s). PROJECT DESIGN The proposed telecommunication site is designed to blend with the existing building and adjacent land uses while still meeting the radio coverage objectives necessary to provide Wireless service to the area. In order to obtain the necessary height and provide the desired radio coverage to the community, the proposed wireless project consists of constructing an architectural cupola masking twelve (12) panel antennas behind Radio Frequency screening. The antennas will reside at a height of 42 with the over all proposal residing at a height of 45'. All telephone and electrical equipment used by the facility will be located inside the proposed cupola under the antennas. All materials and design used in constructing this project will match the colors and textures associated with the existing building. SUMMARY This project proposes a wireless telecommunications transmitting facility consisting of 12 panel antennas (each of which is 4 feet in length and 8 inches wide) mounted behind fiberglass screening inside a to be constructed architectural cupola. All radio, power and telephone equipment will also be located inside the proposed cupola. o o City of Carlsbad Planning Department DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part ofthe City Council or any appointed Board. Commission or Comminee. The following infonnation MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnetship, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and count>', cit>- municipality, district or other political subdivision or any odier group or combination acting as a imit." Agents may sign this document; however, die legal name and entity of the appUcant and property owner must be provided below. 1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETC. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a fmancial interest in the apphcation. If the applicant includes a corporation or parmership. include thc names, title, ad^esses of all individuals owning mOTe than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON- APPUCABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW If a publiclv-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person Tim Kolset Corp/Part Cingular Wireless Title Project Manager jj^le Address 4810 Eastgate Mall Address 6170 Cornerstone Court, Ste 180 2. OWNER (Not thc owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of thc legal ownership (i.e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% ofthe shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv- owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person Phil Lyons Corp/PartDonahue Schirber Reality Group Title Title Address Address 2235 Faraday Ave. #0 Carlsbad, Ca 92008 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 ^ 3. NON-PROnT cO^NIZATION OR TRUST O If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, hst the names and addresses of itNi person serving as an officer or director ofthe non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/Trust ; Non Profit/Trust . . Title . Title Address____ Address. 4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of Cit>- staff. Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? CH ^ •^^ Ifyes, please indicate person(s):, NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I certify that all the above information is true and coirect to the best of my Icnowledge. Signature of owner/date ""^^^^jj^of applicant/date Print pr type name of owner Print or type name of applicant Please refer to attached owner authorization letter Signature of owner/applicant's agent if a|>plicable/date Cingular Wireless-Tim Kolset Print or type name of owner/appilicant's agent H:A0MIN\C0UNTEFhDISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 Of 2 Q Citv of Carisbacd Planning Department HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT Consultation Of Lists of Sites Related To Hazardous Wastes (Certification of Compliance with Govemment Code Section 65962.5) Pursuant to State of Califomia Govemment Code Section 65962.5,1 have consulted the Hazardous Wastes and Substances Sites List compiled by the California Environmental Protection Agency and hereby certify that (check one): W] The development project and any altematives proposed in this ^plication are not contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the State Govemment Code. O The development project and any altematives proposed in this application are contained on the . lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the State Govemment Code. APPLICANT Name: Cingular Wireless- Tim Kolset Address: 6170 Cornerstone Court, Ste 180 San Diego. CA 92121 Phone Number: (760) 250-1220 PROPERTY OWNER Name: Donahue Schriber Reality Group Address: 214-430-14 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone Number: 760 431-4210 Address of Site: 7030 Avenida Encinas Local Agency (City and Countv): Carlsbad, County of San Diego Assessor's book, page, and parcel number: 714-430-14 Specify list(s): Regulatory Identification Number:. Date of List: ' Please Refer to Owner Authorization Letter Property Owner Signature/Date 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad. CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 ^ t^ETTER QF AUTHORIZATION Date: - August 4,2003 To: Whom tt May Concem Re: Letter of Authorization Cingular Wireless Telo^mmsmications Facility CingultfSiteNo.: SD-91S-0S 702IQ-7070 Avenida Bncioas, Carlsbad, Califomia Donahue Schriber Realty Grov^» Li>., and Poinsettia Assooiates, owner of the bdow described ptopeity ("DSRO"), does hereby appoint Cingular Wlrel^, LLC, ot its authorised affiliates, subsidiaries, and/or third p«ty agents (collectively "Cingular^, as a non-eacolusive agent on DSRG's bdial£ for (he sole puipme nf congummatiBg any a^hcatloa necessaiy to insure Cingular's ability to use Ihe property foe which, Gngidar is negotiating a Hcense s^reement for die puip<»e of constiucdng and operating a comqiunicatiom fhoility. DSRG utul«rstjM)d» ^ thia ^pUoation and/or site plan may bt; denied, modified or {proved with oonditioos and dui such conditions or modijScations muat be conqitied with prior to issuance of buildiiig pennits. DSRG understands that all cost asaodtated with the ^^lioation aud/or site plan, or otherwite, in conjunction with this LiCter of Authorization shall be at the sole 0O9t and expense of Cingular. DSRO shall not be responsible for my costs or liability in the eyeiit that the appiication and/or site plan is ^ipioved, denied or modified for any reason whHtsQovei:. FiirthetmorB, this Letter of Authorization in no way is a Rpresentation, anthorization or guarantee diat DSRG is under any obligation to consuipEtate Ibe liodose agreeraant and/or any transaction to allow Cingular to use ptn^jetty. to construct and opmte a communications &cility or fbr any other puipose whaisoevor, or otherwise, nor does thia Letter of Authorization allow Ciagfiht any access or ri^t vidiatsoever to wmsiruct and operate any communioatioEffi ftettlty, or otherwise) at the prope^ in the event the iQ}pUoation and/or site plan is !^>prov«d, denied or modified fbr any reason whatsowsr. This Letter of Authomation shall be effective as of die daite first writtcai above and shall tamitudc OOO Kutubi^ eighty (160) tUy^ 'thdroAAor ftom i3ie date £rst wiittcn above. Upon teinijuaation, ihlfl Letter of Authorization Shall be of no Propeity Address: 7020-7070 Avenida ^inas, Carlsbad, Califomia: i-iUV3 at tja aO'iHHfi lAntnuc. a^»^Rlcs:»^ LBTTBR OF AUTIKHUZATION OWNER DONAHUE SCHRIBER REALTY GROUP, LJP. AlMD^IMSETnA ASSOOATES Agent fist Owner Snow Title: Pro}:«ttty Manager Date: August 4.2003 -2 .0 " Q T • DOC It 1998-0108146 Mar 02, 1996 11:54 AM RECORHnS REQUESTED BY STEWART Tm£ VVH9I RECORDED UAtL TO AN0U«.T«STATB«NT8TO SflH DE60WiSl'S TO Donalme Schriber Realty Gxoup, L.P. ' ' .(JEBORY J. SHITH» IMIYSEDIiH ADDRESS 3501 Jamboree Road, Soite 300, South Tower ^ ^^'^ cnv Heirport Beach, • STATEsap California 92660 GRANTDEED macweiNa oi-163l97 EscsowNa APN ma 2H'M34-H,ri,t8^to, 1 THE UNOERSIGNEO CRAKTOfKs) DEOAREti} DOCUMEWTARYTTWlSFERTAXlit O^WTlBtl tfVBrcnYTAXS — • UnineapenMmK • aital .am FOR A VALUABLE CONSIOB^MIC^ rsceipl of wMcfi is hereby acknowledOQd, IXnxahue Schriber Realty Groi^, L.P. vbo acquired title as P^5?^^ JS^"^ Realty Group, Inc. SgSMKontor «9.rcB! ra sscr s st Doaaliae Scfarxber Realty Group, L.P. C3 ic ris ZRsa umt fcs IT.^ C8 ss the foikwingdascribed real property in the Coun^ of San Oiego Stats of CaSfbmia: See attached Exhibit - I.egal Descri^rtJLon Donahue Schnber Realty Group, LP^ a Delaware EiTftad pattnerstsp r%^-^ }• ft By: Donahue SchftwReaHy Group, lot ^—-^-^ aMaiyiandccnioraGonaseenaalPWwr Kame^'lCw^.^L SrVA:>,>. Name: / W**" 'h^'^— STATEOrCAJF«MA } pMSdniii^lnMnani(^^MiHHinn^^5 •rf vinariMj^ ll ni liit^MMMhiy MKiM Ibt lira to ^iiliMMalr ft>pM<oii(<^or#>><<i^i)poRbihrf<firfiich8»pBiuift)tcl8d,tiiiwUterfftihwhuHM<^ wniiiE5Siiqrland<Ri«acW«Ht. -taftrtlMfc O • J Description: San Diego.CA Document-YearDocID 1998.108146 Page: 1 of 2 Order: 02-07-22-2003 07-56-29 AM Comment: ANDRE eaoer the global leac IN TEi-ECX>i\/l OUTSOURgNG Representing Cingular Wireless, Inc. 4810 Eastgate MaU San Diego, CA 92121 (Tel) 858-228-2000 (Fax) 858-228-2010 X cingular" WIRELESS July 30, 2003 Planning Department City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, Califomia 92008 RE: Application for Conditional Use Permit Cingular Wireless Communications Facility Poinsettia Village: Site Number SD-915 Dear Staff: The attached is an application for a Conditional Use Permit for a Wireless Telecommunications Facility for the aforementioned property. WFI is submitting this application as agent for and on behalf of Cingular Wireless, and as agent for the owner of the property. In accordance with your CUP application requirements, the following items are included: -Land Use Review Application Form -Environmental Impact Assessment Form -Disclosure Statement -Grant Deed -Project Description -Agent Authorization Letters -10 (24X36) Sets of Plans Showing Elevations and Site Dimensions -Photo Simulation -Pictures Showing the Undeveloped Site Looking In and Out at the Proposed Project -WFI Check for $2950.00 We appreciate your time and effort in reviewing this application. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please call me at (858) 250-1220. Sincerel Kolset roject Manager ^^ai0^ Site Justification Letter CINGULAR WIRELESSS FACILITY Plaza Poinsettia Search Ring Coverage Objectives The objective of the Cingular Plaza Poinsettia site is to provide radio signal coverage to subscribers traveling through and residing in the City of Carlsbad. More specifically in the areas adjacent to Interstate 5 along Poinsettia and Pacific Coast Highway. The proposed site will provide cellular telephone service to businesses, visitors, residences, and all passing foot and vehicular traffic in the vicinity. In addition, the site will relieve some of the capacity problems of the existing Cingular SD-i84, and SD-08. Currently these sites are unable to handle the amount of Cingular subscribers in the area. Although, there is minimal service to the area the quality of the Network substantially diminishes during peak hours of use. Candidates Considered In order to meet coverage objectives, Cingular had to examine all possibilities with regards to locating a site within the proposed Plaza Poinsettia area. With the high number of residentially zoned parcels in the area, Cingular decided it was in the best interest of all parties to pursue a commercially zoned parcel. Cingular did not pursued additional candidates after selecting the Plaza Poinsettia complex because it was determined to be the best possible candidate for all parties. The candidate meets Cingular's coverage objectives, there was a willing landlord and as well as meeting the City of Carlsbad wireless guidelines Existing and Approved Cingular Sites within a One Mile Radius Currently, there are is one existing Cingular site within one mile of the proposed Plaza Poinsettia antenna facility. This can be seen on the attached map showing all proposed and existing Cingular sites located in the area. Of the sites that currently exist, none provide the quality or coverage needed for continued uninterrupted service. Conclusion and Findings Through a process of exploration and elimination Cingular has determined that the proposed Plaza Poinsettia site located at 7030 Anvendia Encinas in the City of Carlsbad is the best candidate in meeting the radio coverage objectives. City regulations, and property owner desires. The proposed project uses an architectural cupola extension integrating a to be constructed extension into an existing building. The antennas will be mounted to the inside the cupola at a height of 42'. The equipment needed for the electrical and telephone will be located inside the proposed extension below the proposed antermas. This site meets the City of Carlsbad ordinance objectives buy using stealth technology, integration practices, and adhering to development regulations. The proposed site will be operated and maintained under all conditions placed on it by the Conditional Use permit and will be in accordance the City's Municipal Code and General Plan. This site will pose no threat to the public health, safety or welfare of persons residing or working in the area. Health related issues are govemed by the FCC and Cingular is required to maintain these safety levels to preserve their operating license. Wireless System and Customer Features The proposed wireless system is designed to allow subscribers to Cingular's network to make cellular phone calls, send text messages, browse the intemet, and communicate in a number of different fashions. The proposed Plaza Poinsettia Wireless Facility is one facility in a series of facilities designed to give subscribers the fi-eedom and mobility to communicate while on the go. Co-location Cingular Wireless will in no way discourage or deny additional carriers fi-om locating on the Plaza Poinsettia property, as long as the proposals do not interference or hinder Cingular's proposed design. Due to the space and height restrictions sanctioned by the City of Carlsbad it was determined that co-location with AT&T within the proposed cupola would be infeasible. Reasons for infeasibility included lack of separation, minimal square footage, and good integration designs for complete stealthing of the antennas. Service Providers Sewer, water and school services are provided by the City of Carlsbad. JERROLD T. BUSHBERG Ph.D., DABMP, DABSNM HEALTH AND MEDICAL PHYSICS CONSULTING^ 7784 Oalt Bay Circle Sacramento, CA 95831 (916) 393-6168 Tim Kolset October 1, 2003 Cingular Wireless 6180 Cornerstone Court San Diego, Califomia 92121 Introduction At your request, I have reviewed the technical specifications and calculated the maximum radiofrequency, (RF), power density from the proposed Cingular Wireless (CW) wireless telecommunications site, (referenced as SD-915-05), to be located at 7030 Avenida Encinas, Carlsbad, California as depicted in attachment 1. This proposed CW telecommunication site will consist of a Personal Communications Services (PCS) wireless facility. The facility will utilize directional transmit panel anteimae configured in three (3) sectors. The antennae are planned to be mounted inside the parapet on the existing building with their radiation center at least 39.0 feet above grade directed at 350 (sector A), 120 (sector B) and 240 (sector C) degrees true north. The antermas specified are EMS Wireless model #RR90-17- 00DPL2 for all sectors. Technical specifications of these antennae are provided in attachment two. The sectorized antennas are designed to transmit with an effective radiated power (ERP) of up to 800 watts per sector within a bandwidth between approximately 1,850 and 1,990 MHz. Calculation Methodology, Results & Recommendations Calculations were made in accordance with the recommendations contained in the Federal Communications Commission, Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin 65 (edition 97-01, page 24, equation 10 ) entitled "Evaluating Compliance with FCC-Guidelines for Human Exposiu-e to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields." Several assumptions were made in order to provide the most conservative or "worse case" proj ections of power densities. Calculations were made assuming that all channels were operating simultaneously at their maximum design effective radiated power. Attenuation (weakening) of the signal that would result from surrounding foliage or buildings was ignored. Buildings can reduce the signal strength by a factor of 10 (i.e., 10 dB) or more depending upon the constmction material. The ground or other surfaces were considered to be perfect reflectors (which they are not) and the RF energy was assumed to overlap and interact constmctively at all locations (which they would not) thereby resulting in the calculation of the maximum potential exposure. In fact, the accumulations of all these very conservative assumptions will significantly overestimate the actual exposures that would typically be expected from such a facility. However, this method is a prudent approach that errs on the side of safety. The maximum public RF exposure from this CW facility was calculated to be less than 1.4 |i,W/cm^ (i.e., -0.2 % of the public safety standard at 1,850 MHz). Exposure details are shown in appendix A. A sign conforming to with ANSI C95.2 color, symbol and content, and other markings as appropriate, should be placed close to the antennas with appropriate contact information in order to alert maintenance or other workers approaching the antenna to the presence of RF transmissions and to take precautions to avoid exposures in excess of FCC limits. RF Safety Standards The two most widely recognized standards for protection against RF field exposure are those published by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) C95.1 and the National Council on Radiation Protection and measurement (NCRP) report #86. The NCRP is a private, congressionally chartered institution with the charge to provide expert analysis of a variety of issues (especially health and safety recommendations) on radiations of all forms. The scientific analyses of the NCRP are held in high esteem in the scientific and regulatory community both nationally and intemationally. In fact, the vast majority of the radiological health regulations currently in existence can trace their origin, in some way, to the recommendations of the NCRP. All RF exposure standards are frequency-specific, in recognition of the differential absorption of RF energy as a function of frequency. The most restrictive exposure levels in the standards are associated with those frequencies that are most readily absorbed in humans. Maximum absorption occurs at approximately 80 MHz in adults. The NCRP maximum allowable continuous occupational exposure at this frequency is 1,000 [aW/cm^. This compares to 5,000 |a,W/cm^ at the most restrictive of the PCS frequencies (-1,800 MHz) that are absorbed much less efficiently than exposures in the VHF TV band. The traditional NCRP philosophy of providing a higher standard of protection for members of the general population compared to occupationally exposed individuals, prompted a two-tiered safety standard by which levels of allowable exposure were substantially reduced for "uncontrolled" (e.g., public) and continuous exposures. This measure was taken to account for the fact that workers in an industrial environment are typically exposed no more than eight hours a day while members of the general population in proximity to a source of RF radiation may be exposed continuously. This additional protection factor also provides a greater margin of safety for children, the infirmed, aged, or others who might be more sensitive to RF exposure. After several years of evaluating the national and intemationai scientific and biomedical literature, the members ofthe NCRP scientific committee selected 931 publications in the peer-reviewed scientific literature on which to base their recommendations. The current NCRP recommendations limit continuous public exposure at PCS frequencies to 1,000 |j,W/cm^. The current ANSI standard was developed by Scientific Coordinating Committee 28 (SCC 28) under the auspices of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE). This standard, entitled "IEEE Standards for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz" (IEEE C95.1-1991), was issued in April 1992 and subsequently adopted by ANSI in November 1992. The current ANSI/IEEE standard is similar to the current NCRP recommendation for public exposure at PCS frequencies (1,200 |J,W/cm^) for continuous exposure and incorporates the convention of providing for a greater margin of safety for public as compared with occupational exposure. Higher whole body exposures are allowed for brief periods provided that no 30 minute time-weighted average exposure exceeds these aforementioned limits. On August 9, 1996, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) established a RF exposure standard that is a hybrid of the current ANSI and NCRP standards. The maximum permissible exposure values used to assess environmental exposures are those of the NCRP (i.e., maximum public continuous exposure at PCS frequencies of 1,000 |j,W/cm^). The FCC issued these standards in order to address its responsibilities under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to consider whether its actions will "significantly affect the quality of the human environment." In as far as there was no other standard issued by a federal agency such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the FCC utilized their rulemaking procedure to consider which standards should be adopted. The FCC received thousands of pages of comments over a three-year review period from a variety of sources including the public, academia, federal health and safety agencies (e.g., EPA & FDA) and the telecommunications industry. The FCC gave special consideration to the recommendations by the federal health agencies because of their special responsibility for protecting the public health and safety. In fact, the maximum permissible exposure (MPE) values in the FCC standard are those recommended by EPA and FDA. The FCC standard incorporates various elements of the 1992 ANSI and NCRP standards which were chosen because they are widely accepted and technically supportable. There are a variety of other exposure guidelines and standards set by other national and intemationai organizations and governments, most of which are similar to the current ANSI/IEEE or NCRP standard, figure one. The FCC standards "Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation" (Report and Order FCC 96-326) adopted the ANSI/IEEE definitions for controlled and uncontrolled environments. In order to use the higher exposure levels associated with a controlled environment, RF exposures must be occupationally related (e.g., PCS company RF technicians) and they must be aware of and have sufficient knowledge to control their exposure. All other environmental areas are considered uncontrolled (e.g., public) for which the stricter (i.e., lower) environmental exposure limits apply. All carriers were required to be in compliance with the new FCC RF exposure standards for new telecommunications facilities by October 15, 1997. These standards applied retroactively for existing telecommunications facilities on September 1, 2000. The task for the physical, biological, and medical scientists that evaluate health implications of the RF data base has been to identify those RF field conditions that can produce harmful biological effects. No panel of experts can guarantee safe levels of exposure because safety is a null concept, and negatives are not susceptible to proof What a dispassionate scientific assessment can offer is the presumption of safety when RF-field conditions do not give rise to a demonstrable harmful effect. Summary & Conclusions This proposed PCS facility as specified above will be in fiill compliance with FCC RF public safety standards. PCS transmitters, by design and operation, are low-power devices. Even under maximal exposure conditions in which all the channels from all antennas are operating at full power (800 watts ERP per sector), the maximum exposure from this facility will not result in power densities in excess of 1.4 |i, W/cm^ at any publically accessible location. This maximum exposure is more than 710 times lower than the FCC public exposure standards for these frequencies. A chart ofthe electromagnetic spectrum and a comparison of RF power densities from various common sources is presented in figures two and three respectively in order to place exposures from PCS telecommunications systems in perspective. It is important to realize that the FCC maximum allowable exposures are not set at a threshold between safety and known hazard but rather at 50 times below a level that the majority of the scientific community believes may pose a health risk to human populations. Thus the previously mentioned maximum exposure from the site represent a "safety margin" from this threshold of potentially adverse health effects of more than 35,700 times. Given the low levels of radiofrequency fields that would be generated from this facility, and given the evidence on biological effects in a large data base, there is no scientific basis to conclude that harmful effects will attend the utilization of the proposed wireless telecommunications facility. This conclusion is supported by a large numbers of scientists that have participated in standard-setting activities in the United States who are overwhelmingly agreed that RF radiation exposure below the FCC exposure limits has no demonstrably harmful effects on humans. These findings are based on my professional evaluation of the scientific issues related to the health and safety of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation and my analysis of the technical specification as provided by CW. The opinions expressed herein are based on my professional judgement and are not intended to necessarily represent the views of the University of California. Please contact me if you require any additional information. Sincerely, Jerrold T. Bushberg Ph.D., DABMP, DABSNM Diplomate, American Board of Medical Physics (DABMP) Diplomate, American Board of Science in Nuclear Medicine (DABSNM) Enclosures: Figures 1-3; Attachments 1, 2; Appendix A, and Statement of Experience. Public Safety Exposure Standards at PCS (-1,800 MHzjFrequencies B o u LOOO LOOO LOOO 900 900 900 c ^ ^ •International Radiation Protection Association (IRPA)/ World Health Organization Environmental Health (WHO) Public Safety Exposure Standard (1993). Members of the Scientific Committee were from: •Australia 'Canada •France •Germany •Hungary • Italy •Poland •Russia • United Kingdom • United States o ••International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection Public Safety Exposure Standard (1998). Members of the Scientific Committee were from: •Australia •Sweden •France •Germany •Hungary •Finland • Italy •Poland •Austria • United Kingdom • United States 'Japan Figure 1 Non Ionizing Electromagnetic Radiation (NI/EMR) Wireless 1 PCS ~ 1,900 MHz Power Line 60 Hertz Communication J Cellular -900MHZ Services ol Television '^'^ Microwaves Visible Ionizing Electromagnetic Radiation light o..^^ Ultra- violet Toaster Energy (ev) Electric and Magnetic Fields _l I L Radio & TV waves 1 I I I uu L 10" 10* 10" 10* 10* •n"' 10' 10^ 10" 10' 10' 10" Infra-red J « I I .1 1 Ultra- violet 1 i 1 Medical diagnosis and therapy X-rays amma rays Cosmic Rays J I L O o 10 irf 10' 10* 10' 10' 10^ 10' 10* 10* in" The Electromagnetic Spectrum Figure 2 Typical Exposure from Various Radio Frequency/Microwave Sources O Police and Mobile Radio FM Radio Station Transmitters CB Mobile Radio Microwave Cordless Oven Phone Baby Typical Max. Typical PCS Monitor PubUc Public Exposure Exposure in from a PCS Neighborhood Transmission Site o Figure 3 Attachment 1 Site Specifications Attachment 2 Antenna Specifications 117f •('/('.V.S Electn'col Specif/cations Azimuth Beamwidth (-3 dB) Elevation Beamwidth(-3 dB) Elevation Sidelobes (Upper) Gain Polarization Port-to-Port Isolation Front-to-Back Ratio Electrical Downtilt Options VSWR Connectors Power Handling Passive Intermodulation Lightning Protection Mechanical Specifications Dimensions (L x W x D) Rated Wind Velocity Equivalent Flat Plate Area Front Wind Load @ 100 mph (161 kph) Side Wind Load @ 100 mph (161 kph) Weight RR90-17-XXDPL2 DualPol® Polarization 1850 MHz- 1990 MHz 90° 6° >18dB 16.5 dBi (14,4 dBd) Dual Linear Slant (± 45° >30dB >30dB 0°,2°,4°,6° 1.35:1 Max 2; 7-16 DIN (female) 250 Watts CW <-150 dBc [2 X 20 W (+ 43 dBm)] Chassis Ground 56 in X 8 in X 2.75 in (142 cm X 20.3 cm x 7.0 cm) 150 mph (241 km/hr) 3.1ftM.29m') 90 Ibs (400 N) 31 Ibs (139 N) 18 Ibs (8.2 kg) 2.75" OptiRange™ Suppressor™ ,8" 56" RF CONNECTORS ' / 42- Mounting Options MTG-POO-10, MTG-S02-10, MTG-DXX-20*, MTG-CXX-10*, MTG-C02-10, MTG-TXX-10* Note: *Model number shown represents a series of products. See Mounting Options section for specific model number Patterns Azimuth Elevation 0° Downtilt 0- i«o- -"H— 30- IW Elevation 2° Downtilt Elevation 4° Downtilt Elevation 8° Downtilt Revised 04/05/02 +1 770.582.0555 ext. 5310 • Fax +1 770.729.0036 www.emswireless.com Appendix A EMS Wireless Model # RR-90-17-00-DPL2 Reference Location: Ground Level Exposure Calculation AGL 6 ft. Radiation Center 39.0 ft. AGL Max ERP 800 Watts u a 93 3 OH u u Radiation exposure levels AGL= 6 feet Radiation Center 39.0 feet AGL 0.16000 0.14000 M 0.12000 £Z3 U O a. 0.10000 a 0.08000 0.06000 0.04000 ^ 0.02000 0.00000 o o 200 400 600 800 1000 Distance to base of antenna in feet 1200 1400 1600 Appendix A ARL (feet) 39 IVlax gain (dBd): 14.4 Max exposure: 0.00136162 mW/cm^ ***IVIax exposure is 0.14 percent of FCC Public Exposure Standard*** IVlax ERP: 800 An* type; EMS RR90-17-00DPL2 Feet from site: 44 (Watts) Radiation exposure levei Feet to Depress Antenna dB from Prop dist Act ERP Level Precent of Ant base angle gain max ERP in cm in mW mW/cm^ FCC STD 0 90.000 -24.7 -39.1 1188.72 98.4215 0.00004 0.00364 1 88.531 -25.6 -40 1189.11 80.0000 0.00003 0.00295 2 87.064 -25.6 -40 1190.28 80.0000 0.00003 0.00295 3 85.601 -25.6 -40 1192.23 80.0000 0.00003 0.00294 4 84.144 -25.6 -40 1194.96 80.0000 0.00003 0.00292 5 82.694 -25.6 -40 1198.45 80.0000 0.00003 0.00291 6 81.254 -25.6 -40 1202.71 80.0000 0.00003 0.00289 7 79.824 -24.2 -38.6 1207.72 110.4307 0.00004 0.00395 8 78.408 -24 -38.4 1213.47 115.6352 0.00004 0.00410 9 77.005 -23 -37.4 1219.96 145.5761 0.00005 0.00511 10 75.619 -20.7 -35.1 1227.17 247.2236 0.00009 0.00857 11 74.249 -20.1 -34.5 1235.10 283.8507 0.00010 0.00971 12 72.897 -18.2 -32.6 1243.72 439.6327 0.00015 0.01484 13 71.565 -15.4 -29.8 1253.02 837.7028 0.00028 0.02785 14 70.253 -14.7 -29.1 1262.99 984.2150 0.00032 0.03221 15 68.962 -13.4 -27.8 1273.61 1327.6695 0.00043 0.04273 16 67.694 -11.6 -26 1284.87 2009.5091 0.00064 0.06354 17 66.448 -11.3 -25.7 1296.74 2153.2278 0.00067 0.06685 18 65.225 -11.1 -25.5 1309.22 2254.7063 0.00069 0.06867 19 64.026 -10.5 -24.9 1322.28 2588.7493 0.00077 0.07729 20 62.850 -11.7 -26.1 1335.91 1963.7671 0.00057 0.05744 21 61.699 -13 -27.4 1350.10 1455.7607 0.00042 0.04169 22 60.573 -14.5 -28.9 1364.81 1030.5996 0.00029 0.02888 23 59.470 -16.6 -31 1380.04 635.4626 0.00017 0.01742 24 58.392 -19.5 -33.9 1395.77 325.9042 0.00009 0.00873 25 57.339 -25.2 -39.6 1411.98 87.7183 0.00002 0.00230 26 56.310 -25.6 -40 1428.66 80.0000 0.00002 0,00205 27 55.305 -18.4 -32.8 1445.79 419.8460 0.00010 0.01049 28 54.324 -14.5 -28.9 1463.36 1030.5996 0.00025 0.02512 29 53.366 -13.2 -27.6 1481.34 1390.2407 0.00033 0.03307 30 52.431 -11.9 -26.3 1499.73 1875.3831 0.00044 0.04353 31 51.520 -11.5 -25.9 1518.50 2056.3166 0.00047 0.04655 32 50.631 -12.7 -27.1 1537.65 1559.8757 0.00034 0.03444 33 49.764 -13.8 -28.2 1557.17 1210.8490 0.00026 0.02607 34 48.918 -17.3 -31.7 1577.03 540.8664 0.00011 0.01135 35 48.094 -17.3 -31.7 1597.22 540.8664 0.00011 0.01107 36 47.291 -25.6 -40 1617.74 80.0000 0.00002 0.00160 37 46.507 -22.9 -37.3 1638.57 148.9670 0.00003 0.00290 Apdx. A Page 1 EMS RR90-17-00DPL2 ARL 39 Max gain (dBd): 14.4 Max exposure: 0.00136162 mW/cm' Max ERP: (Watts) ''*Max exposure is 0.14 percent of FCC Public Exposure Standard* 800 Ant type; EMS RR90-17-00DPL2 Feet from site: Radiation exposure level 44 Feef to Depress Antenna dB from Prop dist Act ERP Level Precentof Ant base angle gain max ERP in cm in mW mW/cm^ FCC STD 38 45.744 -14.3 -28.7 1659,69 1079,1703 0.00020 0,02045 39 45.000 -14.3 -28.7 1681,10 1079,1703 0,00020 0.01993 40 44.275 -10 -24.4 1702,79 2904,6244 0.00052 0.05230 41 43.568 -7.4 -21.8 1724,75 5285,5476 0,00093 0,09275 42 42.879 -6.1 -20.5 1746,96 7130,0075 0,00122 0.12196 43 42.207 -6.1 -20,5 1769.42 7130,0075 0,00119 0,11888 44 41.553 -5.4 -19.8 1792,11 8377,0284 0,00136 0,13616 45 40.914 -6.1 -20.5 1815,03 7130.0075 0,00113 0,11298 46 40.292 -6.1 -20,5 1838,17 7130,0075 0,00110 0.11016 47 39.685 -7.3 -21,7 1861.53 5408.6638 0.00081 0.08148 48 39.094 -7.3 -21,7 1885.08 5408.6638 0.00079 0,07946 49 38.517 -10.5 -24.9 1908,84 2588.7493 0,00037 0,03709 50 37.954 -17.7 -32,1 1932,78 493.2760 0,00007 0,00689 51 37.405 -17.7 -32,1 1956,90 493.2760 0.00007 0,00672 52 36.870 -23.4 -37.8 1981,20 132.7670 0.00002 0.00177 53 36.347 -23.4 -37,8 2005,67 132.7670 0,00002 0.00172 54 35.838 -12.7 -27,1 2030,30 1559,8757 0,00020 0.01975 55 35.340 -12.7 -27,1 2055,08 1559.8757 0,00019 0.01928 56 34.854 -8.5 -22,9 2080.02 4102,8911 0.00050 0.04950 57 34.380 -8.5 -22,9 2105,11 4102,8911 0,00048 0.04833 58 33.917 -6.6 -21 2130,33 6354.6259 0,00073 0.07310 59 33.465 -6.6 -21 2155.69 6354.6259 0,00071 0.07139 60 33.024 -6.6 -21 2181.18 6354,6259 0,00070 0.06973 61 32.593 -6.2 -20,6 2206,80 6967.7087 0,00075 0.07469 62 32.171 -6.2 -20,6 2232,54 6967.7087 0,00073 0.07298 63 31.759 -7.3 -21,7 2258,40 5408.6638 0,00055 0.05536 64 31.357 -7.3 -21.7 2284,37 5408.6638 0,00054 0.05411 65 30.964 -10.7 -25.1 2310,46 2472,2363 0,00024 0.02418 66 30.579 -10.7 -25.1 2336,65 2472,2363 0.00024 0.02364 67 30.203 -10.7 -25,1 2362,94 2472,2363 0,00023 0.02311 68 29.836 -21.1 -35,5 2389,33 225.4706 0,00002 0.00206 69 29.476 -21.1 -35,5 2415,82 225.4706 0,00002 0,00202 70 29.124 -21.1 -35,5 2442.40 225.4706 0.00002 0,00197 71 28.780 -15.8 -30.2 2469,07 763.9941 0.00007 0,00654 72 28.443 -15.8 -30,2 2495,83 763.9941 0,00006 0,00640 73 28.113 -15.8 -30,2 2522,67 763.9941 0,00006 0,00627 74 27.790 -7.7 -22,1 2549.59 4932.7600 0.00040 0,03961 75 27.474 -7.7 -22.1 2576.60 4932.7600 0,00039 0.03879 76 27.165 -7.7 -22,1 2603.68 4932.7600 0,00038 0.03798 77 26.862 -4.1 -18,5 2630,83 11300.3004 0,00085 0,08523 78 26.565 -4.1 -18,5 2658.06 11300.3004 0.00083 0,08349 Apdx. A Page 2 EMS RR90-17-00DPL2 ARL (feet) 39 Max gain (dBd): 14.4 Max exposure: 0.00136162 mW/cm' Max ERP: (Watts) ''*Max exposure is 0.14 percent of FCC Public Exposure Standard* 800 Ant fype; EMS RR90-17-00DPL2 Feet from site: Radiation exposure level 44 Feet to Depress Antenna dB from Prop dist Act ERP Level Precentof Ant base angle gain max ERP in cm in mW mW/cm^ FCC STD 79 26,274 -4,1 -18.5 2685,36 11300.3004 0,00082 0,08181 80 25,989 -2.6 -17 2712,72 15962,0985 0.00113 0,11323 81 25,710 -2,6 -17 2740,15 15962,0985 0,00111 0,11098 82 25.436 -2.6 -17 2767.64 15962.0985 0.00109 0.10878 83 25.168 -2.6 -17 2795,20 15962,0985 0.00107 0.10665 84 24,905 -2.5 -16,9 2822,82 16333,9036 0,00107 0.10701 85 24,647 -2.5 -16.9 2850,49 16333.9036 0,00105 0.10494 86 24,394 -2.5 -16.9 2878,22 16333.9036 0,00103 0.10293 87 24.146 -2.5 -16.9 2906,01 16333,9036 0.00101 0.10097 88 23,902 -3,9 -18,3 2933,85 11832,8671 0,00072 0.07176 89 23.663 -3,9 -18,3 2961,74 11832.8671 0.00070 0,07042 90 23.429 -3,9 -18,3 2989,68 11832,8671 0.00069 0,06911 91 23.199 -3,9 -18,3 3017,67 11832,8671 0.00068 0,06783 92 22.973 -7.9 -22,3 3045,71 4710.7492 0,00027 0,02651 93 22.751 -7.9 -22,3 3073,80 4710.7492 0.00026 0,02603 94 22.533 -7.9 -22,3 3101.93 4710,7492 0.00026 0.02556 95 22,319 -7,9 -22,3 3130,10 4710,7492 0,00025 0.02510 96 22,109 -7,9 -22,3 3158,32 4710,7492 0,00025 0.02465 97 21,903 -23,5 -37,9 3186,58 129,7448 0.00001 0.00067 98 21,701 -23.5 -37,9 3214,88 129,7448 0,00001 0,00066 99 21.501 -23.5 -37,9 3243,22 129,7448 0,00001 0,00064 100 21.306 -23,5 -37,9 3271,60 129,7448 0,00001 0.00063 101 21.114 -23,5 -37,9 3300,01 129,7448 0.00001 0.00062 102 20,925 -10 -24,4 3328,47 2904,6244 0,00014 0,01369 103 20,739 -10 -24,4 3356,95 2904,6244 0,00013 0,01346 104 20,556 -10 -24,4 3385,48 •2904,6244 0,00013 0.01323 105 20,376 -10 -24,4 3414.03 2904,6244 0.00013 0,01301 106 20,200 -10 -24.4 3442,62 2904,6244 0,00013 0,01279 107 20,026 -10 -24.4 3471,24 2904.6244 0.00013 0,01258 108 19,855 -3,4 -17.8 3499.90 13276,6953 0.00057 0,05658 109 19,687 -3,4 -17.8 3528.58 13276,6953 0.00056 0,05567 110 19.522 -3,4 -17.8 3557,29 13276,6953 0,00055 0.05477 111 19.359 -3,4 -17.8 3586,03 13276,6953 0.00054 0.05390 112 19,199 -3,4 -17.8 3614,80 13276,6953 0.00053 0.05304 113 19.041 -3,4 -17,8 3643.60 13276,6953 0.00052 0,05221 114 18,886 -0,4 -14,8 3672,43 26490,4897 0,00103 0,10254 115 18,733 -0,4 -14,8 3701,28 26490,4897 0,00101 0,10094 116 18.583 -0,4 -14,8 3730,16 26490,4897 0,00099 0,09939 117 18,435 -0,4 -14,8 3759.06 26490,4897 0,00098 0.09786 118 18,289 -0.4 -14,8 3787.99 26490,4897 0.00096 0.09638 119 18.146 -0.4 -14,8 3816,94 26490,4897 0,00095 0.09492 Apdx. A Page 3 EMS RR90-17-00DPL2 ARL (feet) Max ERP: (Watts) 39 Max gain (dBd): 14.4 Max exposure: 0.00136162 mW/cm' "/Wax exposure is 800 Ant type: 0.14 percent of FCC Public Exposure Standard* EMS RR90-17-00DPL2 Feef froin site: 44 Radiation exposure level Feet to Depress Antenna dB from Prop dist Act ERP Level Precent of Ant base angle gain max ERP in cm in mW mW/cm^ FCC STD 120 18,004 -0,4 -14,8 3845,92 26490,4897 0.00093 0.09349 121 17.865 0,8 -13,6 3874,92 34921,2666 0.00121 0.12141 122 17,728 0.8 -13,6 3903,94 34921,2666 0,00120 0.11961 123 17.592 0.8 -13,6 3932,98 34921,2666 0,00118 0.11785 124 17.459 0.8 -13,6 3962,05 34921,2666 0,00116 0.11613 125 17.328 0,8 -13,6 3991,13 34921,2666 0,00114 0.11444 126 17.199 0,8 -13.6 4020,24 34921,2666 0,00113 0,11279 127 17.071 0,8 -13,6 4049,37 34921,2666 0.00111 0,11118 128 16.945 0,5 -13.9 4078,52 32590,4222 0,00102 0,10228 129 16,821 0,5 -13,9 4107,68 32590.4222 0,00101 0,10083 130 16.699 0,5 -13,9 4136,87 32590,4222 0.00099 0,09941 131 16,579 0,5 -13,9 4166,07 32590,4222 0,00098 0,09802 132 16,460 0,5 -13.9 4195,29 32590.4222 0,00097 0,09666 133 16,343 0,5 -13.9 4224,53 32590.4222 0,00095 0.09533 134 16,227 0,5 -13.9 4253,79 32590,4222 0.00094 0.09402 135 16,113 0,5 -13.9 4283,06 32590,4222 0,00093 0.09274 136 16,001 0,5 -13.9 4312,35 32590.4222 0,00091 0.09149 137 15,890 -1,4 -15.8 4341,66 21042,1439 0,00058 0.05827 138 15.781 -1,4 -15.8 4370,99 21042.1439 0,00057 0.05749 139 15,673 -1,4 -15.8 4400,32 21042.1439 0.00057 0.05673 140 15,566 -1,4 -15.8 4429,68 21042,1439 0.00056 0.05598 141 15,461 -1.4 -15.8 4459.05 21042,1439 0.00055 0.05525 142 15,357 -1.4 -15.8 4488.43 21042,1439 0.00055 0,05452 143 15.255 -1,4 -15.8 4517.83 21042.1439 0.00054 0.05382 144 15.154 -1,4 -15.8 4547.24 21042,1439 0.00053 0,05312 145 15.054 -1.4 -15.8 4576.67 21042,1439 0.00052 0,05244 146 14,956 -6,4 -20.8 4606.11 6654.1102 0.00016 0,01637 147 14,859 -6,4 -20.8 4635.57 6654,1102 0.00016 0,01617 148 14,763 -6.4 -20.8 4665.03 6654.1102 0,00016 0,01596 149 14,668 -6,4 -20,8 4694,51 6654.1102 0,00016 0,01576 150 14,574 -6,4 -20,8 4724,01 6654,1102 0,00016 0,01557 151 14.482 -6.4 -20.8 4753,51 6654,1102 0,00015 0,01537 152 14.390 -6,4 -20,8 4783,03 6654,1102 0,00015 0,01518 153 14.300 -6,4 -20,8 4812.56 6654,1102 0,00015 0,01500 154 14.211 -6,4 -20,8 4842,10 6654,1102 0,00015 0,01482 155 14.123 -6,4 -20,8 4871,65 6654,1102 0,00015 0,01464 156 14,036 -6,4 -20,8 4901,22 6654,1102 0,00014 0,01446 157 13,950 -16,6 -31 4930.79 635,4626 0,00001 0,00136 158 13,865 -16,6 -31 4960,38 635,4626 0,00001 0,00135 159 13,782 -16,6 -31 4989,98 635,4626 0.00001 0,00133 160 13,699 -16,6 -31 5019,58 635,4626 0,00001 0,00132 Apdx. A Page 4 EMS RR90-17-00DPL2 ARL (feet) 39 Max gain (dBd): 14.4 Max exposure: 0.00136162 mW/cm' *Max exposure is 0.14 percent of FCC Public Exposure Standard* Max ERP: (Watts) Feet to Ant base 800 Depress angle Ant type: EMS RR90-17-00DPL2 Feef from site: 44 Radiation exposure level Antenna dB from Prop dist gain max ERP in cm Act ERP in mW Level mW/cm' Precentof FCC STD 161 13,617 -16.6 -31 5049,20 635,4626 0,00001 0,00130 162 13,536 -16,6 -31 5078,83 635,4626 0,00001 0,00129 163 13,456 -16,6 -31 5108,47 635,4626 0,00001 0,00127 164 13,377 -16,6 -31 5138,12 635,4626 0,00001 0.00126 165 13,299 -16,6 -31 5167,78 635,4626 0,00001 0.00124 166 13,221 -16,6 -31 5197,44 635.4626 0,00001 0,00123 167 13.145 -16,6 -31 5227,12 635.4626 0,00001 0,00121 168 13,069 -16.6 -31 5256.81 635,4626 0,00001 0,00120 169 12,995 -4.6 -19 5286,50 10071.4033 0,00019 0,01881 170 12,921 -4.6 -19 5316.20 10071.4033 0,00019 0,01860 171 12,848 -4.6 -19 5345.92 10071.4033 0,00018 0,01840 172 12,775 -4,6 -19 5375.64 10071,4033 0,00018 0,01819 173 12,704 -4.6 -19 5405.37 10071.4033 0,00018 0.01799 174 12,633 -4.6 -19 5435,11 10071,4033 0,00018 0,01780 175 12,563 -4,6 -19 5464,85 10071,4033 0,00018 0,01760 176 12,494 -4,6 -19 5494,61 10071,4033 0,00017 0,01741 177 12,426 -4,6 -19 5524,37 10071,4033 0,00017 0,01723 178 12,358 -4,6 -19 5554,14 10071.4033 0.00017 0,01704 179 12,291 -4,6 -19 5583,92 10071.4033 0.00017 0,01686 180 12,225 -4,6 -19 5613.70 10071.4033 0.00017 0,01668 181 12,160 -4,6 -19 5643.49 10071,4033 0.00017 0,01651 182 12,095 -4,6 -19 5673,29 10071,4033 0.00016 0,01633 183 12,031 -4,6 -19 5703,10 10071,4033 0.00016 0.01616 184 11,967 0,3 -14,1 5732,91 31123,6116 0.00049 0.04943 185 11,904 0.3 -14,1 5762,74 31123,6116 0,00049 0.04892 186 11,842 0,3 -14,1 5792,56 31123,6116 0,00048 0.04842 187 11,781 0,3 -14,1 5822.40 31123,6116 0.00048 0.04793 188 11,720 0,3 -14,1 5852.24 31123,6116 0.00047 0.04744 189 11.659 0,3 -14,1 5882,09 31123,6116 0,00047 0.04696 190 11,600 0,3 -14,1 5911,94 31123,6116 0,00046 0.04649 191 11.540 0,3 -14,1 5941.80 31123.6116 0.00046 0.04602 201 10.981 2,6 -11.8 6240.74 52855,4758 0.00071 0.07085 211 10.472 2,6 -11,8 6540,22 52855,4758 0.00065 0.06451 221 10,008 2,6 -11,8 6840,16 52855,4758 0.00059 0.05897 231 9.583 3,2 -11,2 7140,52 60686,2060 0.00062 0.06213 241 9,192 3.2 -11.2 7441,24 60686,2060 0.00057 0.05721 251 8,832 2 -12,4 7742,28 46035,1950 0,00040 0.04009 261 8,499 2 -12,4 8043,60 46035,1950 0,00037 0.03714 271 8,189 2 -12,4 8345,18 46035,1950 0,00035 0.03451 281 7,902 -2,1 -16,5 8646,98 17909,7691 0,00013 0.01250 291 7,633 -2,1 -16,5 8948,98 17909,7691 0,00012 0.01167 Apdx. A Page 5 EMS RR90-17-00DPL2 ARL ffeef; 39 Max gain (dBd): 14.4 Max exposure: 0.00136162 mW/cm' *Max exposure is 0.14 percent of FCC Public Exposure Standard* Max ERP: (Watts) 800 Anffype; EMS RR90-17-00DPL2 Feef from site: 44 Radiation exposure levei Feet to Depress Antenna dB from Prop dist Act ERP Level Precentof Ant base angle gain max ERP in cm in mW mW/cm^ FCC STD 301 7.383 -2,1 -16,5 9251.17 17909,7691 0,00011 0,01092 311 7.148 -2.1 -16,5 9553,52 17909.7691 0,00010 0,01024 321 6.927 -6,6 -21 9856,03 6354,6259 0,00003 0,00341 331 6.720 -6,6 -21 10158,67 6354,6259 0,00003 0,00321 341 6.525 -6,6 -21 10461,44 6354,6259 0,00003 0,00303 351 6.340 -6,6 -21 10764,32 6354.6259 0,00003 0,00286 361 6.166 -6,6 -21 11067,30 6354.6259 0,00003 0.00271 371 6.001 -6,6 -21 11370,39 6354.6259 0,00003 0,00257 381 5.845 1,6 -12.8 11673,56 41984.5968 0,00016 0.01608 391 5.696 1,6 -12.8 11976,82 41984.5968 0,00015 0.01528 401 5.555 1,6 -12,8 12280,15 41984.5968 0,00015 0,01453 411 5.421 1.6 -12,8 12583.55 41984.5968 0.00014 0.01384 421 5.293 1.6 -12,8 12887,02 41984.5968 0,00013 0.01320 431 5.170 1,6 -12,8 13190,55 41984.5968 0.00013 0.01260 441 5.054 1,6 -12,8 13494.14 41984.5968 0.00012 0.01204 451 4.942 7.1 -7,3 13797,78 148966.9709 0.00041 0,04085 461 4,836 7,1 -7.3 14101,47 148966.9709 0.00039 0,03911 471 4,733 7,1 -7.3 14405,21 148966.9709 0.00037 0.03748 481 4,635 7,1 -7.3 14708.99 148966.9709 0.00036 0.03594 491 4,541 7,1 -7.3 15012.82 148966.9709 0.00035 0,03450 501 4.451 7,1 -7.3 15316,68 148966.9709 0.00033 0,03315 511 4,364 7,1 -7.3 15620,58 148966.9709 0.00032 0.03187 521 4,281 7,1 -7.3 15924.51 148966.9709 0.00031 0,03067 531 4,201 7.1 -7.3 16228,47 148966.9709 0.00030 0,02953 541 4,123 7,1 -7.3 16532,47 148966.9709 0.00028 0,02845 551 4,049 7.1 -7.3 16836.50 148966.9709 0.00027 0.02743 561 3.977 10.3 -4.1 17140,55 311236.1160 0.00055 0,05530 571 3.907 10,3 -4.1 17444,63 311236.1160 0.00053 0,05339 581 3,840 10,3 -4.1 17748,73 311236.1160 0.00052 0.05158 591 3,775 10,3 -4.1 18052,86 311236,1160 0.00050 0,04985 601 3,713 10.3 -4,1 18357,01 311236,1160 0.00048 0,04821 611 3,652 10.3 -4.1 18661,18 311236,1160 0.00047 0.04666 621 3,594 10,3 -4,1 18965,37 311236.1160 0.00045 0.04517 631 3,537 10,3 -4,1 19269,58 311236.1160 0.00044 0,04376 641 3,482 10.3 -4,1 19573,81 311236,1160 0.00042 0,04241 651 3.428 10,3 -4,1 19878,05 311236,1160 0.00041 0,04112 661 3,377 10,3 -4,1 20182,32 311236.1160 0.00040 0,03989 671 3.326 10,3 -4,1 20486,60 311236.1160 0.00039 0,03871 681 3.278 10,3 -4,1 20790,89 311236.1160 0.00038 0,03759 691 3.230 10,3 -4,1 21095,20 311236,1160 0.00037 0.03651 701 3.184 10,3 -4,1 21399,52 311236,1160 0,00035 0.03548 Apdx. A Page 6 EMS RR90-17-00DPL2 ARL ffeef; 39 Max gain (dBd): 14.4 Max exposure: 0.00136162 mW/cm' Max ERP: (Watts) ''*Max exposure is 800 Ant type: 0.14 percent of FCC Public Exposure Standard* EMS RR90-17-00DPL2 Feef from site: 44 Radiation exposure level Feet to Depress Antenna cfS from Prop dist Act ERP Level Precentof Ant. base angle gain max ERP in cm in mW mW/cm^ FCC STD 711 3.140 10.3 -4.1 21703,86 311236,1160 0,00034 0.03449 721 3,096 10.3 -4.1 22008,21 311236,1160 0,00034 0.03354 731 3,054 10.3 -4.1 22312,57 311236,1160 0,00033 0.03264 741 3,013 10.3 -4.1 22616.94 311236,1160 0,00032 0.03176 751 2,973 12.5 -1.9 22921.32 516523,3832 0,00051 0.05132 761 2,934 12.5 -1.9 23225.72 516523.3832 0,00050 0.04999 771 2,896 12.5 -1.9 23530.13 516523.3832 0,00049 0.04870 781 2,859 12.5 -1.9 23834.54 516523,3832 0.00047 0.04746 791 2,823 12.5 -1.9 24138,97 516523,3832 0,00046 0.04628 801 2,787 12.5 -1.9 24443,40 516523.3832 0.00045 0.04513 811 2,753 12.5 -1.9 24747,85 516523.3832 0.00044 0.04403 821 2,720 12.5 -1.9 25052.30 516523.3832 0.00043 0.04296 831 2,687 12.5 -1.9 25356.76 516523.3832 0,00042 0.04194 841 2,655 12.5 -1.9 25661,23 516523.3832 0,00041 0.04095 851 2,624 12.5 -1.9 25965,70 516523.3832 0.00040 0.03999 861 2,594 12.5 -1.9 26270,19 516523.3832 0.00039 0.03907 871 2,564 12.5 -1.9 26574,68 516523.3832 0,00038 0.03818 881 2,535 12.5 -1.9 26879,18 516523.3832 0,00037 0.03732 891 2.506 12.5 -1.9 27183,68 516523.3832 0,00036 0.03649 901 2.479 12.5 -1.9 27488,19 516523.3832 0,00036 0.03569 911 2.451 12.5 -1,9 27792,71 516523.3832 0,00035 0.03491 921 2.425 12.5 -1.9 28097,24 516523.3832 0,00034 0.03416 931 2.399 12.5 -1,9 28401,77 516523.3832 0,00033 0.03343 941 2.373 12.5 -1,9 28706,30 516523.3832 0,00033 0.03272 951 2.348 12.5 -1,9 29010.84 516523.3832 0,00032 0.03204 961 2.324 12.5 -1,9 29315.39 516523.3832 0,00031 0.03138 971 2.300 12.5 -1,9 29619.94 516523.3832 0.00031 0.03073 981 2.277 12.5 -1,9 29924.50 516523.3832 0.00030 0.03011 991 2.254 12.5 -1,9 30229,06 516523.3832 0,00030 0.02951 1001 2.231 12.5 -1,9 30533.63 516523.3832 0,00029 0.02892 1011 2.209 12.5 -1,9 30838.20 516523.3832 0.00028 0.02835 1021 2.188 12.5 -1,9 31142.77 516523.3832 0.00028 0.02780 1031 2.166 12.5 -1,9 31447,36 516523.3832 0,00027 0.02727 1041 2.146 12.5 -1,9 31751,94 516523.3832 0,00027 0.02675 1051 2.125 12.5 -1,9 32056,53 516523.3832 0.00026 0.02624 1061 2.105 12.5 -1,9 32361,12 516523.3832 0.00026 0.02575 1071 2.085 12.5 -1,9 32665.72 516523.3832 0.00025 0.02527 1081 2.066 12.5 -1,9 32970,32 516523.3832 0.00025 0.02480 1091 2.047 12.5 -1,9 33274,92 516523.3832 0.00024 0.02435 1101 2.029 12.5 -1,9 33579,53 516523.3832 0.00024 0.02391 1111 2.010 12.5 -1,9 33884.14 516523,3832 0.00023 0.02349 Apdx. A Page 7 EMS RR90-17-00DPL2 STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE Jerrold Talmadge Bushberg, Ph.D., DABMP, DABSNM PRESENT APPOINTMENT PRESENT ADDRESS Clinical Professor, Department of Radiology School of Medicine Director, Health Physics Programs Department of Environmental Health & Safety University of California, Davis University of California, Davis 2315 Stockton Boulevard Sacramento, CA 95817 (916)734-5620 (work) (916) 734-3956 (fax) jtbushberg@ucdavis.edu (e-mail) EDUCATION 1981 Ph.D. Radiological and Health Physics, Purdue University Department of Bionucleonics 1979 1978-1980 U.S. Department of Energy National Training Fellowship M.S. Yale University, Department of Radiology and Mayo Clinic Departments of Health and Medical Physics Radiological Physics Purdue University; Department of Bionucleonics 1971-1975 B.S. Physiology University of California, Davis DOCTORAL DISSERTATION Effect of 2450 MHZ Continuous Wave Microwave Radiation and Isothermal Conduction on Canine Platelet Aggregometry, Survival and Margination. Purdue University, 1981. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION Diplomate, American Board of Medical Physics. Certification in Medical Health Physics, 1991. Diplomate, American Board of Medical Physics. Certification in Nuclear Medicine Physics, 1991. Diplomate, American Board of Science in Nuclear Medicine. Comprehensive and Specialty Certification in Health Physics and Radiation Biology, 1990. International Healthcare Safety Professional Certification Board International Institute of Safety and Health, 1981 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE - SUMMARY 1999-Present 1992-1999 1995-1999 1983-Present 1991-1994 1991-1992 1988-1992 Clinical Professor, Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Director of Health Physics Programs, Department of Environmental Health & Safety, University of California, Davis Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Director of Health Physics Programs, Department of Environmental Health & Safety, University of California, Davis Commander/Radiation Science Officer & Command Technical Advisor United States Naval Reserve Medical Services Corps Office of the Chief of Naval Research (CBRD 120) Consultant, Radiological Emergency Management, Department of Diagnostic Radiology & Emergency Medicine Yale University School of Medicine Lieutenant Commander/Radiation Science Officer United States Naval Reserve, Medical Service Corps Clinical Associate Professor, Technical Director of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, UCD and UCDMC Radiation Safety Officer, University of California, Davis Chairman, Advisory Committee on Nuclear Emergency Planning Executive Appointment: Governor George Deukmejian, State of California 1989-1991 Clinical Associate Professor, Technical Director of Nuclear Medicine and UCDMC Radiation Safety Officer, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis 1984-1990 Lieutenant/Radiation Science Officer United States Naval Reserve, Medical Service Corps 1983-1989 Assistant Professor, Technical Director of Nuclear Medicine, and UCDMC Radiation Safety Officer, School of Medicine University of California, Davis 1982-1984 Adjunct Faculty-Consultant Emergency Management Institute Federal Emergency Management Agency National Emergency Training Center 1981-1983 Assistant Professor Section of Nuclear Medicine Department of Diagnostic Radiology Yale University School of Medicine 1981-1983 Advisor, Radiological Health and Emergency Response Office of the Governor, State of Connecticut 1979-1983 Consultant, Health Effects Branch Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1979-1981 Graduate Instructor - Academic Advisor Department of Bionucleonics Purdue University 1978-1979 Radiological Control Intern Department of Bionucleonics Purdue University 1977-1978 Lecturer - Senior Research Associate Section of Nuclear Medicine Yale University School of Medicine 1975-1977 Instructor-Staff Research Associate II Departments of Chemistry and Nuclear Medicine Stanford University and V. A. Medical Center Palo Alto, California Dr. Jerrold Bushberg is an expert in both health physics and medical physics. He is currently employed at the University of Califomia at Davis as Director of Health Physics Programs which includes the campus, medical center and 16 offsite research field stations throughout Califomia. The UCD Health Physics program is the second largest non-federal program in the state. In addition, he also holds an appointment as a Clinical Professor of Radiology, at the UC Davis School of Medicine with primary responsibility for medical postgraduate courses in medical physics, radiation (ionizing and non-ionizing) protection, and radiation biology. In addition. Dr. Bushberg has extensive experience and lectures on the science of Risk Assessment and on Effective Risk Communication in the public sector. Dr. Bushberg's doctoral dissertation at Purdue University was on various aspects of the biological effects of microwave radiation. He has maintained a strong professional interest in this subject and has served as consultant or appeared as an expert witness on this subject to a wide variety of organizations/institutions including, local govemments, school districts, planning departments, telecommunications companies, the Califomia Public Utilities Commission, ABC 20/20, and the U.S. Congress. In addition, his consultation services have included detailed computer based modeling of RF exposures as well as on-site safety inspections and RF field measurements of numerous wireless transmissions facility in order to determine their compliance with FCC safety regulations. Dr. Bushberg is a member of the main scientific body of Intemationai Committee on Electromagnetic Safety (ICES) which reviews and evaluates the scientific literature on the biological effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation and establishes exposure standards. He also serves on the ICES Risk Assessment Working Group that is responsible for evaluating and characterizing the risks of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation. Dr. Bushberg was appointed and is serving as a member of the main scientific council of the National Coimcil on Radiation Protection and Measurement's (NCRP) as well as it's scientific advisory committee on Radiation Protection in Medicine. The NCRP is the nation's preeminent scientific radiation protection organization, chartered by Congress to evaluate and provide expert consultation on a wide variety of radiological health issues. Dr. Bushberg was also appointed to the Intemationai Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Committee on Man and Radiation (COMAR) which has aSi its primary area of interest the biological effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic energy, examining and interpreting the biological effects, and presenting its findings in an authoritative and professional manner. Dr. Bushberg's position as Director of Health Physics Programs at UC Davis is particularly pertinent. The scientific discipline of Health Physics is devoted to radiation protection, which, among other things, involves providing analysis of radiation exposure conditions, biological effects research, regulations and standards as well as recommendations regarding the use and safety of ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. Dr. Bushberg is the senior scientist/health physicist at the University of California, Davis for which the evaluation of recent scientific literature and radiation safety standards is an integral part of his position. Dr. Bushberg received both a Masters of Science and Ph.D. from the Department of Bionucleonics at Purdue University. Dr. Bushberg is certified by several national professional boards with specific sub-specialty certification in radiation protection and medical physics. Prior to coming to the University of Califomia, Davis, Dr. Bushberg was on the faculty of Yale University School of Medicine. CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT Fire Protection Services PRELIMINARY REVIEW REPORT PROJECT NAME: Poinsettia Village - Cingular Wireless Date: 01/27/04 Project number: CDP 03-33/CUP 03-23 Preliminary comments: (Note: This commentary identifies missing information that must be included with the official project submittal. It may also identify fire protection issues associated with the project.) d Fire shall require signage requiring the presence of electrical equipment and storage batteries. Ll Additionally, FIRE shall require the installation of overhead fire sprinklers in the proposed space. Q FIRE shall also request that the applicant submit additional information regarding the storage battery array and compliance with Article 64 ofthe 2001 ed. CA Fire Code. City of Carlsbad Planning Department PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF DECISION April 13, 2004 William Lynch WFI for Cingular Wireless 4810 Eastgate Mall San Diego, CA 92191 SUBJECT: CUP 03-23/CDP 03-33 - POINSETTIA VILLAGE WIRELESS At the Planning Commission meeting of April 7, 2004, your application was considered. The Commission voted 5-0 (Commissioners Baker and White) to APPROVE your request. The decision of the Planning Commission became final on April 7, 2004. The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is govemed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking judicial review must be filed in the appropriate court not later than the ninetieth day following the date which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the decision becomes final a request for the record of the proceedings accompanied by the required deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost of preparation of such record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attomey of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the Planning Director, Michael J. Holzmiller, Secretary of the Planning Commission, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008. If you have any questions regarding the final dispositions of your application, please call the Planning Department at (760) 602-4600. Sincerely, MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director MJH:JG:mh Enclosed: Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5594, 5595 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us STATE OF CALIFORNIA - THE RESOURCES AGENCY ^ ^ r- >, DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME 239513 ENVIRONMENTAL FILING FEE CASH RECEIPT fCounty)state Agency of Fillrig: ^0^^^ Ql'fcCnO ^ ^—« OQ Vfih Document No.: ' ^;^Titie: Cup Q3>-9^aoP - ^^^^^^^^' W!^^ Project Applicant Name: Wa\u3tm UnciacO Wirelessfaa\tm^^.g^'^ Phcl,lm^_ai:2s^ Project Applicant (check appropriate box): Local Public Agency Q School District Q Other Special District \^ state Agency Private Entity " CHECK APPUCABLE FEES: ) Environmental Impact Report $850.00 $ ' ) Negative Declaration $1,250.00 $ ' ) Application Fee Water Diversion CSfafelVaferResourcesConfro/Board On/y; $850.00 $ ... ) Projects Subject to Certified Regulatory Programs $850.00 $ ) County Administrative Fee $25.00 $ (^^roject that is exempt from fees ' . TOTAL RECEIVED $ '^ZT Signature and title of person receiving payment: WHITE-PROJECT APPLICANT YELLOW-DFG/FASB ^ PINK-LEAD AGENCY K30LDENR0D-STATE AGENCY OF FIUNG NOTICE OF EXQ/IPTION Q_ To: Office ofPlanning and Research From:,s# CITYOFCARLSBAD P.O. Box 3044 Planning Department Sacramento, CA 95812 ^^^^'^ 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 County Clerk (760) 602-460j[^- n fi r , County of San Diego ^^^^^^^ , Attn: Karen Hernandez, Room 260 • ' ''' - ''^'"V Cterk 1600 Pacific Highway APR 1 ^ San Diego CA 92101 JO^^ Subject: Filing of this Notice of Exemption is in compliance with Section 21152b of the Publid ' ' Resources Code (Califomia Environmental Quality Act). Project Title; CUP 03-23/CDP 03-33 - Poinsettia Village Wireless Project Location - Specific: 7130-7140 Avenida Encinas Project Location - City: Carlsbad Project Location - Countv: San Diego Description of Project: Consttuction of a new cupola to house the equipment and antennas for a Wireless Communication Facilitv. Name of Public Agency Approving Project: CityofCarlsbad Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project: Jessica Galloway. Assistant Planner Name of Applicant: William Lynch (a), Wireless Facilities Inc Applicant's Address: 4810 Eastgate Mall. San Diego. CA 92121 Applicant's Telephone Number: 858-228-200 Exempt Status: (Check One) Ministerial (Section 21080(b)(1); 15268); Declared Emergency (Section 21080(b)(3); 15269(a)); Emergency Project (Section 21080(b)(4); 15269 (b)(c)); Categorical Exemption - State type and section number: 15303- Class 3 I Statutory Exemptions - State code number: Reasons why project is exempt: The FCC requires all PCS telecommunications facilities to comply with radio frequency power densitv standards ("ANSFIEEE C95.1-1992) for the general public. Lead Agency Contact Person: Jessica Galloway Telephone: (760) 602-4631 If filed by applicant: 1. Attach certified document of exemption finding. 2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? MICHAEL J. HOLZMltKER, Panning Director Date Signed by Lead Agency I I Signed by Applicant Revised March 2004 Returned to agenc^cfhMAU 7 200^ Deputy PROOF OF PUBLIC HON (2010 & 2011 C.C.P.) This space is : the County Clerk's Filing Stamp STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of Califomia, for the City of Oceanside and the City of Escondido, Court Decree number 171349, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at SAN MARCOS, Califomia This Day of April, 2004 Signature NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising Proof of Publication of cmr OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING COMPLETE DATE: JANUARY 8, 2004 DESCRIPTION: Request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Coastal Development Permit to allow tfie Installation, op-eration and maintenance of an unmanned vi/lreless com-munication facility. LOCATION: Tfiis project Is witfiln the City of Carlsbad's Coastal zone located at 7130-7140 Avenida Encinas in tfie C-2-Q zone and in Local Facilifies Management Zone 9. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 214-430-14 APPLICANT; CINGULAR WIRELESS 6170 CORNERSTONE CT, STE 180 SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 A public hearing on fhe above proposed project will be held by the Planning Commission in the Council Cham-bers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, on APRIL 7, 2004, af 6:00 p.m. Persons are cordially invited to attend the public hearing and provide fhe decision makers with any oral or written comments they may tiave regarding fhe project. The pro-ject will be described and a staff recommendation given, followed by public testimony, questions and a decision. Copies of fhe staff report will be available on or affer APRIL 1,2004. If you have any questions, or would lii<e to be notified of the decision, please confact Jessica Galloway at fhe City of Carlsbad Planning Department, Monday through Thursday 7:30 a.m. fo 5:30 p.m., Friday 8:00 a.m. fo 5:00 p.m. at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008, (760)602-4619. APPEALS If you challenge fhe Conditional Use Permit and Coastal Development Permit in court, you may be limited fo rais-ing only those issues you or someone else raised af fhe public nearing described In this nofice, or in written corre-spondence delivered fo fhe Cify of Carlsbad prior fo fhe public hearing. 1. Appeals to the City Council: Where the decision is ap-pealable fo fhe City Council, appeals must be filed in writ-ing within fen (10) calendar days after a decision by fhe Planning Commission. 2. Coastal Commission Appealable Project: This site is located within the Coastal Zone Appeal-able Area. _X_This site is not located within the Coastal Zone Ap-pealable Area. Where the decision is appealable to fhe Coastal Com-mission, appeals must be filed with the Coastal Commis-sion within ten (10) working days affer the Coastal Com-mission has received a Notice of Final Action from the Cify of Carlsbad. Applicants will be notified by fhe Coastal Commission of fhe date thaf their appeal period will conclude. The San Diego office of fhe Coastal Com-mission is located at 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, California 92108-4402. CASE FLE: CUP 03-23/CDP 03-33 CASE NAME: POINSETTIA VILLAGE WIRELESS PUBLISH: MARCH 25, 2004 NCT1620228 c o FILE City of Carlsbad Planning Department NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING COMPLETE DATE: January 8, 2004 DESCRIPTION: Request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Coastal Developnnent Permit to allow the installation, operation and maintenance of an unmanned wireless communication facility. LOCATION: This project is within the City of Carlsbad's Coastal Zone located at 7130-7140 Avenida Encinas in the C-2-Q Zone and in Local Facilities Management Zone 9. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 214-430-14 APPLICANT: Cingular Wireless 6170 Cornerstone CL, Ste. 180 San Diego, CA 92121 A public hearing on the above proposed project will be held by the Planning Commission in the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, on April 7, 2004 at 6:00 p.m. Persons are cordially invited to attend the public hearing and provide the decision mal<ers with any oral or written comments they may have regarding the project. The project will be described and a staff recommendation given, followed by public testimony, questions and a decision. Copies of the staff report will be available on or after April 1, 2004. If you have any questions, or would lil<e to be notified of the decision, please contact Jessica Galloway at the City of Carlsbad Planning Department, Monday through Thursday 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008, (760) 602-4631. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us APPEALS If you challenge the Conditional Use Permit and Coastal Development Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad prior to the public hearing. 1. Appeals to the Citv Council: Where the decision is appealable to the City Council, appeals must be filed in writing within ten (10) calendar days after a decision by the Planning Commission. 2. Coastal Commission Appealable Project: I I This site is located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area. [XI This site is not located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area. Where the decision is appealable to the Coastal Commission, appeals must be filed with the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days after the Coastal Commission has received a Notice of Final Action from the City of Carlsbad. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal Commission of the date that their appeal period will conclude. The San Diego office of the Coastal Commission is located at 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, California 92108-4402. CASE FILE: CUP 03-23/CDP 03-33 CASE NAME: POINSETTIA VILLAGE WIRELESS PUBLISH: MARCH 25, 2004 SITE POINSETTIA VILLAGE WIRELESS CUP 03-23/CDP 03-33 CDP 03-33/CUP 03-23 -PDINSETTIA VILLAGE WIRELESS ^ March 11,2004 Page 3 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS LIST AND LABELS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ON THIS DATE REPRESENT THE LATEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION FROM THE EQUALIZED ASSESSOR'S ROLES. APPLICATION NAME AND NUMBER CDP 03-33/CUP 03-23 - POINSETTIA VILLAGE WIRELESS APPLICANT OR A^PtXemJ'S REPRESENTATIVE mTE: RECEIVED BY DATE: VICINITY MAP SITE : 7030 AVENIDA ENCINAS - SD-915 POINSETTIA VILLAGE GC MAPPING SERVICE 711 MISSION ST. SUITE B SOUTH PASADENA CA 91030 (626) 441-1080 3 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMEIVT FORM - PART I (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT) CASE NO: DATE RECEIVED: 1. CASE NAME: Poinsettifi Villags 2. APPLICANT: Cingular Wireless- Tim Kolset (To fre completed by staff) 3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT:. 6170 Cornerstone Court, Ste 180 San Diego, Ca. 92121 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Pl.^Qg^ r>.fi.r tr. tittQpVipH "Prr.j.»pt np.;rriptir.n" frvr a Hptail desnriptinn nf proposal. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: Please check any of thc environmental factors listed below that would be potentially affected by this project. This would be any environmental factor that has at least one impact checked "Potentially Significant Impact," or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" in the checklist on the following pages. I 1 Land Use and Planning I I Population and Housing I I Geological Problems Q Water I I Air Ouaiity I I Transportation/Circulation I I Biological Resources X Public Services Utilities & Service Systems I I Energy & Mineral Resources [x] Aesthetics I I Hazards Cultural Resources 1x1 Noise n Recreation I I Mandatory Findings of Significance Rev. 03/28/96 [MP^ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ^ STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Enviromnental Impact Assessment to detennine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration. • A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses foliowing each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced infonnation sotirces show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A "No Impact" answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. • "Less Than Significant Impact" applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not adversely significant, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies. • 'Totentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect fi-om "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact" The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. • "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. • Based on an "EIA-Part E", if a proposed project could have a potentially significant effect on the enviroimient, but aU potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicabie standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated ptirsuant to that eariier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or supplemental EIR are present and ali the mitigation measures required by the prior environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional environmental dociunent is required (Prior Compliance). • When "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked the project is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR if the significant effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" has i>een made pursuant to that eariier EIR. A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. Rev. 03/28/96 If there are one or more potentially significant effects, the City may avoid preparing an EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce impacts to less than significant, and those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to pubiic review. In tiiis case, the 2q)propriate "Potentially Significant Impact Uniess Mitigation Incorporated" may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared. An EIR must be prepared if "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked, and including but not limited to the foilowing circumstances: (1) the potentially significant effect has not been discussed or mitigated in an Eariier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the impact to less tlian significant; (2) a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" for the significant impact has not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the impact to less than significant, or; (4) tiirough the EIA-Part U analysis it is not possible to determine the levei of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or detennine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to below a ievei of significance. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the fonn under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention shouid be given to discussing mitigation for impacts wiiich wouid otherwise l>e detennined significant Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Infonnation Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:. a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (Source #(s): ( ) b) Conflict with applicable enviromnental plans or policies adopted by agencies widi jurisdiction over the project? ( ) c) Be inconq>atible with existing land use in the vicinity? ( ) d) Affect agricultural resoiuces or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or inq>acts from inconq}atible land uses? ( ) e) Disrupt or divide the physical anangement of an established community (including a low-income or minority community)? ( ) II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? ( ) b) Induce substantial growdi in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. tiirough projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major in&astructure)? ( ) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? ( ) III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would tiie proposal result in or expose people to potential inq)acts involving: a) Fault rupture? ( ) b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? ( ) e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions ftom excavation, grading, or fill? ( ) g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) h) Expansive soils? ( ) i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) IV. WATER. Would tiie proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage pattems, or the rate and amount of surface nmoff? ( ) b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as floo(ting? ( ) c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? ( ) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Less Than No Significant Significan Impact Unless t Impact Mitigation Incorporated • • • X • • • X • • • H • • • X • . • • X • • • H • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • • • • X • n • X • • • \A • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body?( ) e) Changes in cunents, or tbe course or direction of water movements? ( ) f) Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or witiidrawals, or through intercq>tion of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or tiurough substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? ( ) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) h) Inpacts to groundwater quality? ( ) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of grotmdwater otherwise available for public water supplies? ( ) V. AIR QUALITY. Would tiie proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? ( ) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or catise any change in climate? ( ) d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would tiie proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) b) Hazards to safety firom design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or inconq)atible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? ( ) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? ( ) d) Insufficient parking capacity cm-site or off-site? ( ) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting altemative transportation (e.g. bus tumouts, bicycle racks)? ( ) g) Rail, waterbome or air traffic impacts? ( ) Vn. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would tiie proposal result in inq)acts to: a) End^gered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds? ( ) b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? ( ) Potentially Significant Impact • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated • Less Than Significan t Impact • No Impact X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • X • • • H • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • • • • m • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? ( ) d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vemal pool)? ( ) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) Vin. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would tiie proposal? a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? ( ) b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefncient manner? ( ) c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of fiiture value to tiie region and tiie residents of tiie State? ( ) DC. HAZARDS. Would tiie proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? ( ) b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ( ) c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazards? ( ) d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? ( ) e) Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? ( ) X. NOISE. Would the proposal resuh in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would tiie proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: ~ a) Fire protection? ( ) b) Police protection? ( ) c) Schools? ( ) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) e) Other govemmental services? ( ) Xn.UTILmES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would tiie proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? ( ) b) Communications systems? ( ) Potentially Significant Impact • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated • Less Than Significan t Impact No Impact • • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • - • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • X • • • X • • • • • • • bd • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X. • • • X Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) treatment ) c) Local or regional water facilities? ( d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( e) Storm water drainage? ( f) Solid waste disposal? ( g) Local or regional water supplies? ( or distribution Potentially Significant Impact • • • • • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated • • • • • Less Than Significan t Impact • • • • • No Impact X X X X Xin. AESTHETICS. Would tiie proposal: a) Affect a scenic or vista or scenic highway? ( ) b) Have a demonstrate negative aesthetic effect? ( ) c) Create light or glare? ( ) xrv. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would flie proposal: a) Disturb paieontological resources? ( ) b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) c) Affect historical resources? ( ) d) Have tiie potential to cause a physical change which woidd affect imique etimic cultiual values? ( ) e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential iiiq>act area? ( ) XV. RECREATIONAL. Would tiie proposal: a) Increase tiie demand for neighborhood or regional parks or otiier recreational facilities? ( ) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) • • • • • m • • • • m • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • • • • m • • • X • • • X XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does tiie project have die potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce fhe habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce tiie number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate inqxirtant exanqiles of the major periods of California history or prehistory? • • u m Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be r^erred to and attached) b) Does the project have inqiacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with tiie effects of past projects, tiie effects of other cunrent projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does tiie project have environmental effects which will cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings, eitiier directiy or indirectiy? Potentially Significant Impact • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated • LessHian Significan t Impact • • • • No Impact X XVn. EARLIER ANALYSES. Eariier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects liave been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In tills case a discussion sliould identify the foiiowing on attached sheets: a) Eariier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify wiiich effects from the above checkiist were witiiin ^e scope of and adequately analyzed in an eariier document pursuant to ^piicabie iegai standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the eariier analysis. c) Mitigation measiu-es. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures wliich were incorporated or refined fi-om the eariier document and the extent to wiiich they address site- specific conditions for the project Rev. 03/28/96 3«)N DISCUSSION QF ENVIRT3NMENTAL EVALUATION Please use tliis area to discuss any of the environmental factors that were checked "No impact" yet lack any information citations and any factors that were checked "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." The City has adopted a "Statement of Overriding Consideration" with regard to air quality and circulation impacts resulting firom the normal buildout according to the General Plan. The following sample text is intended to guide your discussion of the impacts to these environmental factors. AIR OUALITY: The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Pian will result in increased gas and electric power consumption and veiiicie miles traveled. These subsequentiy result in increases in the emission of carbon monoxide, reactive organic gases, oxides of nitrogen and sulfiir, and suspended particulates. These aerosols are the major contributors to air poiiution in the City as well as in tiie San Diego Air Basin. Since the San Diego Air Basin is a "non-attainment basin", any additionai air emissions are considered cumulatively significant: therefore, continued development to buildout as proposed in the updated General Plan will tiave cumulative significant impacts on the air quaiity of the region. To lessen or minimize the impact on air quality associated with General Pian buildout, a variety of mitigation measures are recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include: 1) provisions for roadway and intersection improvements prior to or concurrent with development; 2) measures to reduce vehicle trips tiirough the implementation of Congestion and Transportation Demand Management; 3) provisions to encourage altemative modes of transportation including mass transit services; 4) conditions to promote energy efficient buiiding and site design; and 5) participation in regional growth management strategies when adopted. The ^qjpiicable and appropriate General Pian air quaiity mitigation meastires iiave either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. Operation-related emissions are considered cumulatively significant becatise the project is located witiiin a "non-attainment basin", therefore, the "Initiai Study" checkiist is marked "Potentially Significant Impact". Tiiis project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation qf an EIR is not required because the certification of Final Master EER. 93-01, by City Council Resoiution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Oveniding Considerations" for air quaiity impacts. Tiiis "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to aii subsequent projects covered by the General Plan's Final Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of air quaiity impacts is required. Tiiis document is available at the Planning Department. cmcm^ATiQN: The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased traffic volumes. Roadway segments will be adequate to accommodate buildout traffic; however, 12 full and 2 partial intersections wili be severely impacted by regional through-traffic over which the City has no jurisdictional controi. These generally inciude aii fi-eeway interchange areas and major intersections along Carisbad Boulevard. Even with the implementation of roadway improvements, a number of intersections are projected to fail the City's adopted Growth Management performance standards at buildout. Rev. 03/28/96 10 lessen or mimmize the impact on circulation associated with General Plan buildout, numerous mitigation measures have been recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include 1) measures to ensure the provision of circulation facilities conciurent with need; 2) provisions to develop alternative modes of transportation such as trails, bicycle routes, additionai sidewalks, pedestrian linkages, and commuter rail systems; and 3) participation in regional circulation strategies when adopted. The diversion of regional tlirou^-traffic fix>m a failing Interstate or State Highway onto City streets creates impacts that are not within the jurisdiction of the City to controi. The applicabie and appropriate General Pian circulation mitigation measures have either l>een incorporated into the design ofthe project or are included as conditions of project approval. Regional related circulation impacts are considered cumulatively significant because of the failure of intersections at buildout of tiie General Plan due to regional through-traffic, therefore, tiie "Initial Study" checklist is marked "Potentially Significant Impact". This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because tiie recent certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resoiution No. 94-246, included a "Statonent Of Oveniding Considerations" for circulation impacts. This "Statement Of Oveniding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan's Master EIR, including tiiis project, tiierefore, no further environmental review of circulation impacts is required. LIST QF MITIGATING MEASURES (TF APPLICABLE^ ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROQRAM OF APPUC 10 Rev. 03/28/96 TRA W ^ =SK CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT REC'y. "O^ ^""^Protection Services PROJECT REVIEW REPORT PROJECT NAME: T-Mobile - Poinsettia Plaza Date: 08/27/07 Project number: CD 07-15 Staff Planner: C. Garcia Engineer: Initial review: (Note: This report identifies fire protection issues associated with the project, and/or prescribes specific corrections or information needed to achieve Fire Department approval.) Fire Department has reviewed this submittal as requested and has no conditions to submit GR CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO 6iU 7fU0f DATE: JANUARY 13, 2004 REVISED PLANS TO: * ENGINEERING - DEVELOPMENT SERVICES POLICE DEPARTMENT - ATTN: J. SASWAY FIRE DEPARTMENT - KARYN VAUDREUIL BUILDING DEPARTMENT - PAT KELLEY RECREATION - MARK STEYAERT PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT (STREETS) - HEIDI HEISTERMAN WATER/SEWER DISTRICT LANDSCAPE PLANCHECK CONSULTANT - LARRY BLACK SCHOOL DISTRICT NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT - PLANNING DEPARTMENT SEMPRA ENERGY - LAND MANAGEMENT • CALTRANS (send anytiiing adjacent to 1-5) PARKS/TRAILS - LIZ KETABIAN Always Send Exhibits FROM: Planning Department REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON APPUCATION NO. CDP 03-33/CUP 03-23 NOTE: Please use this number on all correspondence. PROJECT TITLE: POINSETTIA VILLAGE APPLICANT: CINGULAR WIRELESS TIM KOLSET PROPOSAL: WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to JESSICA GALLOWAY tfie Project Planner in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, bv^^N. 27, 2004. (If you have "No Comments", please so state.) If not received by the date indicated, it will be assumed that you have no comment and the proposal has your endorsement as submitted. If you have any questions, please contact JESSICA GALLOWAY at 602- 4631 . The request for conditions will follow at the appropriate time. THANK YOU COMMENTS: PLANS ATTACHED / FRM0020 12/03 From: Colleen Balch To: Jessica Galloway Subject: CDP 03-33/CUP 03-23 Project name Poinsettia Village. All rooms are required to Iiave fire sprinl<lers installed. CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LAND USE REVIEW August 18, 2003 TO: Jessica Galloway - Assistant Planner FROM: David Rick - Assistant Engineer COMPLETENESS REVIEW PROJECT ID: CUP 03-23 POINSETTIA VILLAGE The Engineering Department has completed its review of the above referenced project for application completeness and has determined that the application and plans submitted for this project are complete and suitable for continued review. Engineering staff does not have any comments or conditions to add to the project If you or the applicant has any questions regarding the above, please either see or call me at extension 2781. David Rick Assistant Engineer - Engineering Development Services H:\LIBRARY«NG\WPDATA\MISC\COMPREV v.. \mJ FILE COPY Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department NOTICE OF EXPIRATION December 2, 2008 Donahue Schriber Realty Group, LP c/o Deloitte & Touche, LLP 2235 Faraday Avenue, Suite 0 Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: CUP 03-23 - POINSETTIA VILLAGE WIRELESS This is a courtesy notice. In a recent audit of our records, we found that CUP 03-23, located at 7030 Avenida Encinas, will expire on April 6, 2009. Should you, the property owner, require an extension of this permit, please send the following: ^ Written request for an extension; ^ Completed Disclosure Statement (enclosed); Land Use Application (enclosed); ^ A check for the Noticing Fee; ^ A check totaling all additional application fees; ^ Additional infornnation will be requested by the planner. Send the required documents: City of Carlsbad Planning Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 Your request for an extension must be received before January 2, 2009, to allow adequate time to process your application and schedule a hearing before the Planning Commission. If you do not request an extension by this date, the permit will be considered invalid and to continue operating, you will be required to submit an application for a new permit, along with a check totaling all fees associated with initiating a new permit. . Should you have any questions, please contact the Planning Department at (760) 602-4610. Sincerely, SABRINA MICHELSON Senior Office Specialist c: Cingular Wireless, Attn: Tim Kolset, 6170 Cornerstone Court, Suite 180, San Diego, CA 92121 File Copy Shannon Werneke, Associate Planner Senior Office Specialist 1635 Faraday Avenue " Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us PROJECT REVIEW On March 10, 2008, CUP 03-23, Poinsettia Village Wireless, was reviewed for compliance with the conditions contained therein. 1. The project was found to be in compliance with all of the conditions of Resolution No. 5594 and no further action was taken. ACTIONS/COMMENTS: Proiect is in compliance. Signer File Copy Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department September 10, 2007 Karen Adier PlanCom Inc 302 State Place Escondido, CA 92029 SUBJECT: CD 07-15 - Poinsettia Village Wireless The Planning Director has completed a review of your application for Consistency Determination CD 07-15, (APN: 214-430-14). The original Wireless Communications Facility project was designed to increase the height of an existing tower feature and install 12 antennas in the higher feature. The new design calls for 6 antennas with a stealth design to be mounted on the existing building without constructing the higher tower feature. After careful consideration of the circumstances surrounding this request, the Planning Director has determined that the application qualifies for a consistency determination with the approved permit and therefore, approves the changes to the project based on the following findings of Planning Director Administrative Policy No. 35: Findinqs: 1. No project condition, feature, facility, or amenity is changed or deleted that had been considered essential to the project design, quality, safety or function in that aH conditions of approval and safety features of the project remain intact and unchanged, and the building appearance as it presently exists will remain unchanged. 2. The request represents an upgrade in overall design features and/or materials and improves upon the projects compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood in that the antenna count is decreased, the incorporation of the antennas into the building are screened from view by stucco covered fiberglass, and the existing building height will remain unchanged. 3. The proposed revision does not change the density or boundary of the subject property in that the project is non residential and no boundaries are changed. 4. The proposed revision does not involve the addition of a new land use not shown on the original permit. 5. The proposed revision does not rearrange the major land uses within the development. 6. The proposed revision does not create changes of greater than ten percent (10%), provided that compliance will be maintained with the applicable development standards of the Carlsbad Municipal Code as follows: Per individual lot or structure - yards, setbacks, coverage or height (height reductions of > 10% are permitted); 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 =» (760) 602-4600 » FAX (760) 602-8559 * www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us CD 07-15 - POINSETTIA VWLAGE WIRELESS September 20, 2007 Page 2 On an aggregate project basis - parking, open space, common area or landscaping The project complies in that the changes eliminate the alteration and increased height of the building. 7. The proposed change will not result in any significant environmental impact, and/or require additional mitigation in that the RF report shows compliance with FCC RF public safety standards. 8. The proposed change will not result in any health, safety or welfare impacts in that the RF report shows compliance with FCC RF public safety standards. 9. There were not any major issues or controversies associated with the original project which would be exacerbated with the proposed change. 10. The proposed change would not be readily discernible to the decision makers as being substantially different from the project as originally approved. The mylar must be submitted, stamped "Consistency Determination", and signed by the Planning Director prior to issuance of any building permits for the project. CITY OF CARLSBAD DON NEU Planning Director DN:CG:bd Principal Planner, Chris De Cerbo File Copy Data Entry PLAN COM s Telecommunications Project Management August 30, 2007 RECEIVED AUG 3 1 2007 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPT Chris Garcia Junior Planner CityofCarlsbad 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: CUP 03-023/CDP 03-033/CD 07-15/PCR 07-145 Dear Mr. Garcia: As supplemental information for T-Mobile's request for a Consistency Determination on the above application, I am enclosing the following items for your review. • A mylar of the site plan • An updated RF Report dated August 30, 2007 A plan change to the original building permit has already been filed. Ifthe above items meet with your approval, please let the building department know so that the permit may be issued. If you need any additional information, please contact me at 760-715-3416. I appreciate your assistance with this process and approval. Since;;ely, Karen Adler Planner Contract Representative for T-Mobile USA, Inc. Enclosures 302 state Place Escondido, CA 92029 760-715-3416 mobile 760-735-4913 fax PLAN COM ^ Telecommunications Project Management August 14, 2007 RECEIVED AUG 2 0 2007 Erin Endres, Project Planner CITY OF CARLSBAD City of Carisbad PLANNING DEPT 1635 Faraday Avenue Carisbad, CA 92008 RE: Consistency Determination Request for CUP 03-023/CDP 03-33 Pointsettia Plaza - T-Mobile USA, Inc. Dear Ms. Endres: The original approved design for this project included 12 panel antennas installed within a new, raised cupola structure on the front of the building with the equipment enclosure located in a landscaped area behind the building. T-Mobile is requesting a consistency determination in order to locate four (4) proposed antennas at this site behind RF transparent material inside the existing cupola on the front of the buiding and locate two (2) antennas behind RF transparent material on the rear of the existing building. There will be a total of six (6) antennas installed on this project. No additional height will be added to any part of the building. All materials will be painted and textured to match the existing surrounding surfaces. No changes to the location, size, or appearance of the previously approved equipment enclosure are proposed. Substantial Conformance Criteria per City Council Policy 35 (1) All conditions of approval and safety features of this project remain intact and unchanged. (2) The decrease in antenna count and the incorporation of the antennas into the existing building without raising the height will improve the project's compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood. (3) The project is not residential in nature and will not change the density or boundary of the project. (4) The proposed revision will not add any equipment or land use not already shown on the original permit and approved with CUP 03-23/CDP 03-33. (5) The proposed revision does not change any existing land use on the property. (6) The proposed revision negates the originally permitted changes to the existing building. All antennas will be incorporated into the existing building behind RF transparent materials. 302 State Place Escondido, CA 92029 760-715-3416 mobile 760-735-4913 fax PLAN COM s Telecommunications Project Management (7) The proposed change will not result in any significant environmental impact, and/or require additional mitigation. (8) The proposed change will not result in any health, safety, or welfare impacts. (9) No major issues or controversies were associated with the original project and the revision should not raise further issues. (10) The proposed change will not affect the outward appearance of the existing building from the street or parking lot of the property. Four (4) 24" x 36" size copies of the revised plans for the site are included for your review with this submittal, as well as photo simulations of the new antenna locations. Please let us know if you need additional materials for review of this request. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Karen Adler Plarmer Contract Representative for T-Mobile USA, Inc. Enclosures 302 State Place Escondido, CA 92029 760-715-3416 mobile 760-735-4913 fax PROJECT REVIEW On June 1, 2007, CUP 03-23 - Poinsettia Village Wireless was reviewed for compliance with the conditions contained therein. 1 The project was found to be in violation of Condition No. lOtff^esolution No. 5594 the following actions have been taken; ACTIONS/COMMENTS: Oi^.M.^y^^~Ji^ y^^zJ^txA^P Signed: ^^WZ^-v^^^^ c: File Copy Data Entry Data Entry - please note: if #3 above is selected, the status of the project should be changed to Expired in Permits. City of Carlsbad Planning Department June 1,2007 Cingular Wireless Suite 180 6170 Cornerstone Court San Diego, CA 92121 RE: CUP 03-23 - POINSETTIA VILLAGE WIRELESS During the annual review of you Conditional Use Permit, staff obsen/ed that one of the conditions of approval for this project is not being met. Condition No. 10 of Resolution No. 5594 approved April 7, 2004 which is enclosed for your convenience, states that the Developer/Operator shall submit to the Planning Director either verification that the project is categorically exempt excluded from having to determine compliance with the RF exposure guidelines per 47 CFR §1.1307(b)(1) or a project implementation report which provides cumulative field measurements of RF emissions of all antennas installed at the subject site. Currently, there is no verification letter or report in the file. Staff would like to remind you that it is pertinent to abide by the conditions of approval or your Conditional Use Permit may not be extended. Please provide the needed information. If you have any additional questions, please give me a call at 760-602-4625. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Sincerely, ERIN ENDRES Junior Planner EE:bd Enclosure 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us ^ Citv Qf Cgrj.s.^..^!? September 12, 2003 Cingular Wireless Tim Kolset 6170 Cornerstone Court, Suite 180 San Diego CA 92121 SUBJECT: CDP 03-33/CUP 03-23 - POINSETTIA VILLAGE Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department has reviewed your Coastal Development Permit and Conditional Use Permit, application no. CDP 03-33 and CUP 03-23, as to its completeness for processing. The application is incomplete, as submitted. Attached are two lists. The first list is information which must be submitted to complete your application. This list of items must be submitted directly to your staff planner by appointment. All list items must be submitted simultaneously and a copy of this list must be included with your submittals, including five (5) sets of plans. No processing of your application can occur until the application is determined to be complete. The second list is issues of concern to staff. When all required materials are submitted the City has 30 days to make a determination of completeness. If the application is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the application will be initiated. In addition, please note that you have six months from the date the application was initially filed, August 13, 2003, to either resubmit the application or submit the required information. Failure to resubmit the application or to submit the materials necessary to determine your application complete shall be deemed to constitute withdrawal of the application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new application must be submitted. Please contact your staff planner, Jessica Galloway, at (760) 602-4631, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director MJH:JG:bd c: Gary Barberio David Rick File Copy Data Entry Planning Aide 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION No. CDP 03-33/CUP 03-23 - POINSETTIA VILLAGE Planning: 1. Please add the following application data to the site plans: a. CUP 03-33 b. CDP 03-23 2. Provide the name of the sewer, water, and school districts providing service to the project. 3. Add the following data to the summary table: a. Site acreage. b. Existing and proposed land uses. c. Total building coverage. d. Building square footage. e. Required and provided parking. 4. Provide the following site information: a. Label all facilities as "proposed" or "existing." b. Setback dimensions for front, rear, and side yards for all proposed wireless communication facility structures. c. Width, location and use all existing and/or proposed public or private easements. d. Show all existing and proposed wireless communication facilities within and adjacent to site. 5. Building elevations and floor plan: a. Provide overall dimensions and square footage of the new proposed cupola. b. Label the materials for all new structures, walls, and/or fences, and exterior lights. 6. Other required Information: a. 2 Preliminary Title Reports current within the last 6 months. b. The property owner must sign the Disclosure Statement. A new disclosure statement is attach to be filled out and returned. c. Provide an analysis of the cumulative impacts of RF exposure. The RF Analysis should include: i. a description of the site selection process. ii. a description or map of the applicant's existing and other proposed sites. AT&T is proposing a WCF within the same shopping plaza and another one already exists. iii. description of the wireless system proposed and it's customer features. iv. verification that the proposed WCF will either comply with FCCs guidelines for human exposure to radio frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields or will be categorically excluded per 47 CFR §1.1307(b)(1). ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. Dimension the size of the typical antenna. 2. The WFC should be designed to promote and enable a collocation. Possibly the AT&T WFC could be part of this design. 3. The CDP and CUP will be conditioned not to allow signage on the new structure. A note to this affect should be added to the site plan and elevations: Fire: 4. All rooms are required to have fire sprinklers installed. RECEIVED AUG 3 1 2007 JERROLD T. BUSHBERG Ph.D., DABMP, DABSNM CITY OF CARLSBAD ^HEALTH AND MEDICAL PHYSICS CONSULTING^ PLANNING DEPT 7784 Oak Bay Circle Sacramento, CA 95831 (800) 760-8414-jbushberg@hainpc.com Darrell W. Daugherty August 30, 2007 PLANcom Inc. 302 State Place Escondido, Califomia 92029-1362 Introduction At your request, I have reviewed the technical specifications and calculated the maximum radiofrequency, (RF), power density from the proposed T-Mobile (TM) wireless telecommunications site, (referenced as SD- 06915A), to be located at Poinsettia Plaza, 7030 'A' Avenida Encinas, Carlsbad, Califomia as depicted in attachment 1. This proposed TM telecommunication site will consist of a Personal Communications Services (PCS) wireless faciUty. The facility will utilize directional transmit panel antennae configured in three (3) sectors. The antennae are planned to be mounted within an existing cupola structure on the existing building with their center at least 23.0 feet above grade directed at 80 (sector A), 160 (sector B), and 240 (sector C) degrees true north. The antermas specified are Andrew model #TMBXX-6516-R2M for all sectors. Technical specifications of these antennae are provided in attachment two. The sectorized antennas are designed to transmit with an effective radiated power (ERP) of up to 800 watts per sector within a bandwidth between approximately 1,850 and 1,990 MHz. Calculation Methodology, Results & Recommendations Calculations were made in accordance with the recommendations contained in the Federal Communications Commission, Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin 65 (edition 97-01, page 24, equation 10 ) entitled "Evaluating Compliance with FCC-Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields." Several assumptions were made in order to provide the most conservative or "worse case" projections of power densities. Calculations were made assuming that all channels were operating simultaneously at their maximum design effective radiated power. Attenuation (weakening) of the signal that would result from surrounding foliage or buildings was ignored. Buildings can reduce the signal strength by a factor of 10 (i.e., 10 dB) or more depending upon the construction material. The ground or other surfaces were considered to be perfect reflectors (which they are not) and the RF energy was assumed to overlap and interact constructively at all locations (which they would not) thereby resulting in the calculation ofthe maximum potential exposure. In fact, the accumulations of all these very conservative assumptions will significantly overestimate the actual exposures that would typically be expected from such a facility. However, this method is a prudent approach that errs on the side of safety. o The maximum public RF exposure from this TM facility was calculated to be less than 7.2 |j,W/cm^ (i.e., ~0.7% of the public safety standard at 1,850 MHz). Exposure details are shown in appendix A. A sign conforming to with ANSI C95.2 color, symbol and content, and other markings as appropriate, should be placed close to the antennas with appropriate contact information in order to alert maintenance or other workers approaching the antenna to the presence of RF transmissions and to take precautions to avoid exposures in excess of FCC limits. RF Safety Standards The two most widely recognized standards for protection against RF field exposure are those published by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) C95.1 and the National Council on Radiation Protection and measurement (NCRP) report #86. The NCRP is a private, congressionally chartered institution with the charge to provide expert analysis of a variety of issues (especially health and safety recommendations) on radiations of all forms. The scientific analyses of the NCRP are held in high esteem in the scientific and regulatory community both nationally and intemationally. In fact, the vast majority of the radiological health regulations currently in existence can trace their origin, in some way, to the recommendations of the NCRP. All RF exposure standards are frequency-specific, in recognition of the differential absorption of RF energy as a fiinction of frequency. The most restrictive exposure levels in the standards are associated with those frequencies that are most readily absorbed in humans. Maximum absorption occurs at approximately 80 MHz in adults. The NCRP maximum allowable continuous occupational exposure at this frequency is 1,000 nW/cml This compares to 5,000 |iW/cm^ at the most restrictive of the PCS frequencies (-1,800 MHz) that are absorbed much less efficiently than exposures in the VHF TV band. The traditional NCRP philosophy of providing a higher standard of protection for members ofthe general population compared to occupationally exposed individuals, prompted a two-tiered safety standard by which levels of allowable exposure were substantially reduced for "uncontrolled " (e.g., pubUc) and continuous exposures. This measure was taken to account for the fact that workers in an industrial environment are typically exposed no more than eight hours a day while members of the general population in proximity to a source of RF radiation may be exposed continuously. This additional protection factor also provides a greater margin of safety for children, the infirmed, aged, or others who might be more sensitive to RF exposure. After several years of evaluating the national and international scientific and biomedical literature, the members of the NCRP scientific committee selected 931 publications in the peer-reviewed scientific literature on which to base their recommendations. The current NCRP recommendations Umit continuous public exposure at PCS frequencies to 1,000 jiW/cm^. The 1992 ANSI standard was developed by Scientific Coordinating Committee 28 (SCC 28) under the auspices of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE). This standard, entitled "IEEE Standards for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz" (IEEE C95.1-1991), was issued in April 1992 and subsequently adopted by ANSI. A revision of this standard (C95.1-2005) was completed in October 2005 by SCC 39 the IEEE Intemationai Committee on Electromagnetic Safety. Their recommendations are similar to the NCRP recommendation for the maximum permissible exposure (MPE) to the public PCS frequencies (950 |a,W/cm^ for continuous exposure at 1,900 MHz) and incorporates the convention of providing for a greater margin of safety for public as compared with occupational exposure. Higher whole body exposures are allowed for brief periods provided that no 30 minute time-weighted average exposure exceeds these aforementioned limits. On August 9, 1996, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) established a RF exposure standard that is a hybrid ofthe current ANSI and NCRP standards. The maximum permissible exposure values used to assess environmental exposures are those of the NCRP (i.e., maximum public continuous exposure at PCS frequencies of 1,000 |i W/cm^). The FCC issued these standards in order to address its responsibilities under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to consider whether its actions will "significantly affect the quality of the human environment." In as far as there was no other standard issued by a federal agency such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the FCC utilized their mlemaking procedure to consider which standards should be adopted. The FCC received thousands of pages of comments over a three-year review period from a variety of sources including the public, academia, federal health and safety agencies (e.g., EPA & FDA) and the telecommunications industry. The FCC gave special consideration to the recommendations by the federal health agencies because of their special responsibility for protecting the public health and safety. In fact, the maximum permissible exposure (MPE) values in the FCC standard are those recommended by EPA and FDA. The FCC standard incorporates various elements ofthe 1992 ANSI and NCRP standards which were chosen because they are widely accepted and technically supportable. There are a variety of other exposure guidelines and standards set by other national and intemationai organizations and govemments, most of which are similar to the current ANSI/IEEE or NCRP standard, figure one. The FCC standards "Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation" (Report and Order FCC 96-326) adopted the ANSI/IEEE definitions for controlled and uncontrolled environments. In order to use the higher exposure levels associated with a controlled environment, RF exposures must be occupationally related (e.g., PCS company RF technicians) and they must be aware of and have sufficient knowledge to control their exposure. All other environmental areas are considered uncontrolled (e.g., public) for which the stricter (i.e., lower) environmental exposure limits apply. All carriers were required to be in compliance with the new FCC RF exposure standards for new telecommunications facilities by October 15, 1997. These standards appUed retroactively for existing telecommunications facilities on September 1, 2000. The task for the physical, biological, and medical scientists that evaluate health implications ofthe RF data base has been to identify those RF field conditions that can produce harmful biological effects. No panel of experts can guarantee safe levels of exposure because safety is a null concept, and negatives are not susceptible to proof What a dispassionate scientific assessment can offer is the presumption of safety when RF-field conditions do not give rise to a demonstrable harmfiil effect. Summary & Conclusions This proposed PCS facility as specified above will be in fiill compliance with FCC RF public safety standards. PCS transmitters, by design and operation, are low-power devices. Even under maximal exposure conditions in which all the channels from all antermas are operating at fiill power (800 watts ERP per sector), the maximum exposure from this facility will not result in power densities in excess of 7.2 jiW/cm^ (i.e., 0.7% of the FCC public safety exposure standard) at any publically accessible location. This maximum exposure is more than 138 times lower than the FCC public exposure standards for these frequencies. A chart of the electromagnetic spectmm and a comparison of RF power densities from various common sources is presented in figures two and three respectively in order to place exposures from PCS telecommunications systems in perspective. It is important to realize that the FCC maximum allowable exposures are not set at a threshold between safety and known hazard but rather at 50 times below a level that the majority of the scientific community believes may pose a health risk to human populations. Thus, the previously mentioned maximum exposure from the site represents a "safety margin" from this threshold of potentially adverse health effects of more than 6,940 times. Given the low levels of radiofrequency fields that would be generated from this facility, and given the evidence on biological effects in a large data base, there is no scientific basis to conclude that harmfiil effects will attend the utilization ofthe proposed wireless telecommunications facility. This conclusion is supported by a large numbers of scientists that have participated in standard-setting activities in the United States who are overwhelmingly agreed that RF radiation exposure below the FCC exposure limits has no demonstrably harmfiil effects on humans. These findings are based on my professional evaluation of the scientific issues related to the health and safety of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation and my analysis of the technical specification as provided by TM. The opinions expressed herein are based on my professional judgement and are not intended to necessarily represent the views ofany other organization or institution. Please contact me if you require any additional information. Sincerely, Jerrold T. Bushberg Ph.D., DABMP, DABSNM Diplomate, American Board of Medical Physics (DABMP) Diplomate, American Board of Science in Nuclear Medicine (DABSNM) Enclosures: Figures 1-3; Attachments 1, 2; Appendix A, and Statement of Experience. • Public Safety Exposure Standards at PCS (-1,800 MHz)Frequencies o u ^International Radiation Protection Association (IRPA)/ World Health Organization Environmental Health (WHO) Public Safety Exposure Standard (1993). Members ofthe Scientific Committee were from: • Australia • Canada • France • Germany • Hungary • Italy • Poland • Russia * United Kingdom • United States **International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection Public Safety Exposure Standard (1998). Members of the Scientific Committee were from: • Australia • Sweden • France • Germany • Hungary • Finland Italy Poland • Austria United Kingdom Figure 1 • United States Japan Non Ionizing Electromagnetic Power Line 60 Hertz Radiation (NI/EMR) Wireless 1 PCS ~ 1,900 MHz Communication J Cellular -900MHZ Services Television Ionizing Electromagnetic Radiation Visible light IVIicrowaves^ Toaster ]^ Medical diagnosis and tiierapy OP Energy C) 10" 10* 10" io" 10* 10^ io' 16* mi* 10^ io' «* .1 i io The Electromagnetic Spectrum Figure 2 Typical Exposure from Various Radio Frequency / Microwave Sources O Police and Mobile Radio FM Radio Station Transmitters CB Mobile Radio Outside Microwave Oven Cordless Phone 1 r Baby Typical Max. Typical PCS Monitor Public Public Exposure Exposure in from a PCS Neighborhood Transmission Site Figure 3 Attachment 1 Site Specifications ABBREVIATIONS | A a. ANCHOR BOLT «U ADJUSTAeiE/AOJACENT AFF ABOVE FINISH FLOOR ALT ALTERNATE ANTENNA AMERICAN SOCIEH- FOB TESTING « MATKIALS CAST IN PLACE (NsloE OlAMCTER INSUIATION LAMINATED LOW NOISE AMPLI MATERIAL UECMANICAL MANUFACTUftEH umpOP UISCELLANEOUS MILUUETEFifS) COMPACT UETRO CELL OUDOOP CONCRETE MASONRV UNIT COLUMN COMBINATION CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION CONTINUOUS DIRECT BURIAL DOUGLAS RR DIAMETER DIMENSION DIVISION DOOR DRAWING EOCE OF EDGE OF SLAQ -~D POLTSTYRENE NOT TO SCALE OPENING OPPOSITE PROPOSED PERIMETER PRESSURE TREATED ROOF GRAIN REFERENCE REQUIRED ROOF JOIST ROUGH OPENING EOUIPUENT EXTERIOR FLOOR DRAIN FLOOR JOIST FLOOR FIELD NAILING FOUNDATION FACE OF FACE OF CONC/CUBB FACE OF STUD FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC SOUARE SQUARE FOOT STAINLESS STEEL SITEL SUSPENDED STMETWCAL FOOTING FUTURE GAUGE GLASS CLUE LAM BEAM HEAW ourr HARDWARE HOLLO* METAL E CDNSULTANT/ENCINI TEMP0RART/7EMPERAIURE THICK (NESS) TOP * BOTTOM TOP OF CONCRETE TOWER MOLNTEO AMPLIFIER UNLESS "NOTED" OTHERWISE VERIFY IN FIELD I/ERTICAL WATER/WEATHER PROOF SYMBOLS SECTION REFERENCE 4^ SECTION DETAIL F DETAIL REFERENCE iNT/SETBACK LINE ELEVATION OR VIEW H KEYNOTE REFERENCE ^ REFtRescr poiN WOOO FENCE PLYWOOD FRAMING MEMBEH BLOCKING EXPOSED VICINITY MAP PROJECT DESCRIPTION [P) INSTALLATION O CRICKET WIRELESS 0 EQUIPMENT CABINETS MOUNTED INSIDE (N) CWU -2" « a'-O" HIGH EOUIPMENT ENCLOSURE S MOUNTED COAX CABLES FROM CABINET TO ANTENNAS CODE COMPLIANCE MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCCWDANCE H " COOES AS ADOPTED BY TME LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES ^ TO BE CONSn(UED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORWING TO THESE CODES. A BUILDINC CODE 2001 (INCL TITLES J4 * 25) 2 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE 201: 3. ANSI/EIA-222-F LIFE SAFETY EXISTING CONSTRUCTION TYP^; EXISTING HRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM HEIGHT OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION. APPL>CANT/LESSEE A NEVADA LIMITED I. CALIFORNIA 92121 :K. PHOJECT MANAGER PROPERTY INFORMATION T • -Mobile POINSETTIA PLAZA 7030 'A' AVENIDA ENCINAS CARLSBAD, CA 92009 SD06915A SPECIAL INSPECTIONS NOT APPLICABLE FOR LAND USE PLANNING CONSULTANTS T-UQBILE 10180 TELESIS cr. SUITE 333 SAN OIEGO, CA 92121 ESCWraOO. "cA^ 303 9 PHONE: (760) 807-1B50 FAX (760) 735-4915 ARCHITECTURAL/ STRUCTURAL/ ELECTRIC/ MSA ARCHITECTURE tc PLANNING 6930 MIWMAR RD.. SUITE 203 SAH DiEGO, CA 92121 CONTACT' DEAN HANSELMAN PHONE: (858) 530-0578 AIRWAY AVE.. SUITE D-I A MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626 ACT XICO SALAZAR E- (714) M0-7S69 (714)540-7673 EDS, INC. RIVERSIDE, CA 92505 COORDINATES APPROVALS D MODIFICATIONS T SITE ACQUISITION RF ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION U SHEET INDEX TITLE SHEET SITE PLAN A3 DETAILS A4 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A5 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 15187. IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAO, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. RLEO IN THE OFFICE TTIE COUNTY RECOHDEJi OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY. MARCH 28. 198S Al FILE/PAGE NO 6S-140044 OF OFHClAL RECORDS. EXCEPTING THEREFfiOM ALL MINERAL RIGHTS NOT HERETOFORE C CONVEYED Ofi RESERVED BY GRANTOR. INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION ALL OIL, GAS. HYDROCARBON AND SIMILAR RIGHTS. ANO ALL WATER, WATER RIGHTS, GEO THERMAL STEAM AND STEAM POWER. WITHIN OR UNDERLYING RIGHT OF DEVELOPMENT THEREOF, PROVIDED, HOWEVER. THAT THE RIGHTS HEREIN RESERVED ANO EXCEPTED 00 NOT INCLUDE THE RIGHT TO ENTER UPON THE SURFACE AND THE TOP 500 FEET TO THE SUBSURFACE OF THE REAL PflOPERTY HEREIN CONVEYED AS RESERVED BV OCCIDENTAL LAND, INC., WHO ACQUIRED TITLE AS OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM LAND AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, RECORDED JULY 21 1961 AS FILE/PACE NO I -228252 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS ENCUMBERING PARCELS 1 Y OF CARLSBAD. COUNTY PARCEL B. NON-EXCLUSIVE ( AND 14, OF PARCEL MAP r OF SAN DIEGO, STATE Of CALIFORNIA. OLED I . . _ COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, MARCH 38, 1988 AS FILE/PAGE NO 88-140044 OF OFFICLAL RECORDS AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE OPERATION AND RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT DATED JUNE I. 1988, EXECUTED BY POINSETTIA ASSOCIATES, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ANO FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.. A ODAWARE CORPORATION RECORDED JUNE 6, 1988 AS FILE/PAGE NO. BB-267194 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS (NOT PLOTTED-EASEMENT RELATES TO THE COMMON AREA OF ALL THE PARCELS FOR ACCESS ROADS. PARKING. INGRESS AND EGRESS, PEDESTRIAN ANO VEHICULAR TRAVEL) PROPRIETARY e DISCLOSURE OTnER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO T-MOBILE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED • rH rQ O ( 1 MSA Architerhire A Plaminij, kr. S920 Miramar Rd., Suite 2(i: SaiiDkgo,Ca,9;!21 Ph.858.530,(fiffl Fx,fi5a.!i30.1467 SD06915A POINSETTIA PLAZA TITLE SHEET I SITE PLAN l"=20'-0" ^ 10' 20' 4-0' • I—I O en 6 MSA Architertuir A Wanning, Inc 6920 MiTanwr Rd, Suile 2l)2 San Kep), Ca 92121 Pli.mSM.ISTS Fx.S5K.53(l,l«7 Ssr, FundsCQ - Saiita 'ina . SD06915A POINSETTIA PLAZA A1 NOTE: FIELD VERIFY ACTUAL LOCATIONS ENLARGED PLAN SCALE- « l/2"=r-0"~| ^ (E) DECORATIVE CORNICE ELEVATION (E) 2X6 STUDS O K (E) SHINGLES SIDING (P) (2) 2X6 BOnOM SILL (E) CEMENT PLATER SECTION ENLARGED SITE PLAN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION CONTAJNED 1^ THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS i; PROPRIETARY BY NATURE, ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO T-MOBILE IS STRICTlY PROHIBITED. • 1—1 O MSA .\rchilecliire & Ftajining. Inc 6920 MiramaT Rd, Suite 2(C San DiegD, Ca 92121 Hi.Si8.5mtB7K Fx.fi58.530.1467 San FranciMo . Sniiia Irm . SD06915A POINSETTIA PLAZA ENLARGED SITE PLAN & DETAILS A2 I FRAMING PLAN (E) EIFFS CORNICE SECTION SECTIONAL PLAN (P) FRP SCREEN PARTIAL ELEVATION SECTIONAL PLAN -(P) FRP SCREEN PARTIAL ELEVATION REV DATE DESCRIPT a 8/8/07 PREUMINAIK ZO 0) • I—I o IMSA T* .ArcMtKlure tt Flannmg, Inc 6920 Miramar Rd, Suite M SanDieRi),Ca 92121 Ph HS(,53fl.t57S Fx (68530,1467 SD06915A POINSETTIA PU\ZA A3 1 NO FACILITIES TO BE INSTALLED A UNMANNED NO (E) PARKING SPACES * IMPACTED BY THE NEW USE, SOUTHWEST ELEVATION (P) COAX CABLE TRAY MOUNTED . ^ TEXTURE TO " EXISTING SECTOR >• (O 80*) (P) (2) T-MOBILE PANEL AfJTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN WALL TYP. DETAJL -/- 340-) |P) (2) r-MOBILE PANEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN WALL SPACE SEE TYP DETAIL CABINETS BLOCK WALL ENCLOSURE PLASTER ONISH TO BUILDING NORTHWEST ELEVATION CONTAINED IN HIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE DR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN IHAT WHICH RELATES TO T-UOeiLE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. CD • 1-1 o EH MSA Arrhileclwe ft Planning. Jnc *i921l Miramar Rd, Suite 2l>: SarDiefiii.Ca 92121 Ph. S5S5J0.(H7S Fx SSJi .330,1467 SD06915A POINSETTIA PLAZA EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A4 SECTOR "A" (O B0-) (P) (2) T-MOBtL£ PANEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN SPACE, SEE TYP. DETAIL */*2 (P) COAX CABLE TRAY MOUNTED AGAINST WALL, PAINT & TEXTURE TO MATCH EXISnNC NORTHEAST ELEVATION BLOCK WALL ENCLOSURE WITH PLASTER FINISH TO MATCH (E) BUILDINC SOUTHEAST ELEVATION 0 8/8/D7 PREUMNWt • 1—I rQ I. Ef MSA ,\rchafclure & Planning, Jnc 6920 Miramar Rd,Suite 2('2 Sar Diegu, Ca 92121 Hi 8S(,53(),1)578 Fx S5fi,530,1467 SD06915A POINSETTIA PLAZA EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A5 Attachment 2 Antenna Specifications Appendix A Andrew (Decibel) Model # TMBXX-6516-R2M Exposure Calculation 6.0 ft: AGL Antenna RF Center 23.0 ft ERP 800 Watts (PCS) TMBXX-6516-R2M ±45° Diversity, Quad Antenna Decibel® Base Station Antennas Patented cross dipoie and feed systenn. Rugged, reliable design with excellent PIM suppression. Includes factory installed AISG RET actuator. Fully compatible with Andrew Teletilt® remote control antenna system. ELECTRICAL Frequency (MHz): 1710-1755 1850-1990 2110-2155 TI Polarization : ±45° ±45° ±45° Gain (dBd/dBI): 15.4/17.5 15.4/17.5 15.4/17,5 m Azimuth BW (Deg.): 65 65 65 Elevation BW (Deg.): 7 7 7 Beam Tilt (Deg.): 2-10 2-10 2-10 USLS* (dB): 18 18 18 > Front-To-Back Ratio* (dB): 30 30 30 Isolation (dB): >30 >30 >30 VSWR : <1.35:1 <1.35:1 <1.35:1 PIM3 @ 2 X 20w (dBc): -155 -155 -155 Max. Input Power (Watts): 250 250 250 Impedance (Ohms): 50 50 50 Lightning Protection : DC Ground DC Ground DC Ground Notes: USLS, all upper lobes to 20 degrees above horizon. \ MECHANICAL 1 Weight: 8.5 kg (18.8 Ib) Dimensions (LxWxD): 1,295 X 330 X 89 mm (51 X 13x3.5 in) Max. Wind Area : 0.22 m^ (2.4 ft") Max. Wind Load (@ 100 mph): 578.2 N (130 Ibf) Max. Wind Speed : 241 km/h(150 mph) Hardware Material : Stainless Steel Connector Type : 7-16 DIN - Female (4, Bottom) Color: Off White Standard Mounting Hardware : TM602030A Andrew Corporation Fax: 214.631.4706 * - Indicates Typical 2601 Telecom Parkway Richardson, Texas U.S A 75082-3521 Tel: 214.631.0310 Toll Free Tel: 1.800.676.5342 Fax: 1.800.229.4706 www.andrew.com Preliminary information correct at date of issue but may be subject to cliange without notice. 5/9/2006 dbtech(gandrew.com 0.00800 0.00700 s (J s 0.00100 0.00000 RF Exposure Levels AGL= 6 feet Antenna Center 23.0 feet AGL e 200 400 600 800 1000 Distance to base of antenna in feet 1200 1400 1600 Appendix A ARL 17 Max gain (dBd): 15.5 Max exposure: 0.00717152 mW/cm' Max ERP ON): 800 Ant type: Andrew TMBX-6516-R2M Feet from site: 21 Feet to Ant base Depress angle Antenna gain RF Exposure Level dB from max ERP Prop dist in cm Act ERP in mW Level mW/cm' Precent of FCC STD 0 90,000 -21,7 -37,2 518.16 152,4369 0.00019 0,01897 1 86,634 -20,5 -36 519.06 200,9509 0.00025 0.02492 2 83,290 -20,7 -36,2 521.73 191,9066 0.00024 0.02355 3 79.992 -24,5 -40 526.17 80.0000 0.00010 0,00965 4 76.759 -24,5 -40 532,31 80.0000 0.00009 0.00943 5 73.610 -24,5 -40 540,11 80.0000 0.00009 0.00916 6 70.560 -21,9 -37,4 549,49 145,5761 0.00016 0.01611 7 67,620 -18,2 -33,7 560,37 341,2636 0.00036 0.03631 8 64.799 -16,2 -31,7 572,67 540.8664 0.00055 0,05510 g 62.103 -16,1 -31,6 586,29 553,4648 0.00054 0.05379 10 59.534 -18 -33.5 601.16 357,3469 0.00033 0.03304 11 57.095 -20,7 -36.2 617.17 191,9066 0.00017 0,01683 12 54.782 -19,7 -35.2 634.25 241,5961 0.00020 0,02007 13 52.595 -17,7 -33.2 652,30 382,9041 0.00030 0.03007 14 50,528 -18 -33.5 671.25 357,3469 0.00026 0.02650 15 48,576 -24,2 -39.7 691,03 85.7215 0.00006 0.00600 16 46.736 -16,1 -31.6 711.56 553,4648 0,00037 0.03652 17 45.000 -11,8 -27.3 732,79 1489,6697 0,00093 0,09268 18 43.363 -6,2 -21.7 754,65 5408,6638 0.00317 0.31730 19 41.820 -3,1 -18.6 777,09 11043,0741 0.00611 0.61097 20 40.365 -2.3 -17.8 800,06 13276,6953 0,00693 0,69297 21 38,991 -1.9 -17.4 823,52 14557,6069 0,00717 0,71715 22 37,694 -2.5 -18 847,43 12679,1455 0,00590 0,58987 23 36.469 -3.7 -19.2 871,75 9618.1155 0.00423 0.42284 24 35,311 -5,5 -21 896,44 6354.6259 0.00264 0.26419 25 34,216 -8,6 -24,1 921,48 3112.3612 0.00122 0.12246 26 33.179 -13.9 -29.4 946,84 918.5229 0,00034 0.03423 27 32,196 -24,5 -40 972.50 80,0000 0,00003 0.00283 28 31,264 -19 -34.5 998,42 283.8507 0,00010 0.00951 29 30.379 -13,3 -28.8 1024,60 1054.6054 0,00034 0.03356 30 29,539 -11,3 -26.8 1051,01 1671.4369 0.00051 0,05055 31 28.740 -11.3 -26.8 1077,63 1671.4369 0,00048 0,04809 32 27.979 -13,2 -28.7 1104.45 1079,1703 0,00030 0,02956 33 27,255 -13,2 -28.7 1131.46 1079,1703 0,00028 0.02816 34 26,565 -18,5 -34 1158,64 318,4857 0.00008 0.00793 35 25,907 -24,5 -40 1185,98 80.0000 0.00002 0.00190 Apdx, A Page 1 TMBX-6516-R2M ARL 17 Max gain (dBd): 15.5 Max exposure: 0.00717152 mW/cm' Max ERP (W): 800 Ant type: Andrew TMBX-6516-R2M Feet from site: 21 RF Exposure Levei Feet to Depress Antenna dB from Prop dist Act ERP Level Precent of Ant. base angle gain max ERP in cm in mW mW/cm^ FCC STD 36 25.278 -24,5 -40 1213,47 80.0000 0.00002 0.00182 37 24.677 -14,8 -30.3 1241,10 746.6034 0.00016 0.01619 38 24.102 -14,8 -30.3 1268,86 746,6034 0.00015 0,01549 39 23.552 -9,9 -25.4 1296,74 2307,2252 0.00046 0.04584 40 23.025 -9.9 -25.4 1324,74 2307,2252 0.00044 0,04392 41 22.521 -7,8 -23.3 1352,85 3741,8811 0.00068 0.06831 42 22.036 -7,8 -23.3 1381,05 3741,8811 0.00066 0.06555 43 21.571 -7,2 -22.7 1409,35 4296.2544 0,00072 0.07226 44 21.125 -7.2 -22.7 1437.74 4296,2544 0.00069 0.06944 45 20.695 -8.4 -23.9 1466.21 3259,0422 0.00051 0.05065 46 20.283 -8.4 -23.9 1494,76 3259,0422 0,00049 0,04873 47 19.885 -12,2 -27.7 1523,39 1358,5949 0,00020 0,01956 48 19.502 -12,2 -27.7 1552,09 1358,5949 0,00019 0,01884 49 19.134 -12,2 -27.7 1580,85 1358,5949 0,00018 0,01816 50 18,778 -20,3 -35.8 1609,68 210,4214 0,00003 0,00271 51 18.435 -20.3 -35.8 1638,57 210,4214 0,00003 0.00262 52 18.104 -20,3 -35.8 1667,51 210.4214 0,00003 0.00253 53 17.784 -11,4 -26.9 1696,51 1633,3904 0.00019 0.01896 54 17,475 -11,4 -26.9 1725,56 1633.3904 0,00018 0,01833 55 17.176 -11,4 -26.9 1754,65 1633.3904 0,00018 0,01772 56 16.887 -5,6 -21,1 1783,80 6209.9769 0,00065 0,06520 57 16,607 -5,6 -21.1 1812,98 6209.9769 0.00063 0,06312 58 16.336 -5,6 -21,1 1842,21 6209.9769 0.00061 0.06113 59 16,074 -5,6 -21,1 1871.48 6209.9769 0.00059 0,05924 60 15.819 -2,6 -18,1 1900,79 12390.5330 0.00115 0,11458 61 15,573 -2.6 -18,1 1930,13 12390,5330 0,00111 0,11112 62 15.333 -2.6 -18.1 1959.51 12390,5330 0,00108 0,10781 63 15.101 -2,6 -18,1 1988,92 12390,5330 0,00105 0,10465 64 14,876 -1,2 -16,7 2018,37 17103,6967 0,00140 0.14027 65 14.657 -1,2 -16.7 2047.84 17103,6967 0,00136 0.13626 66 14.444 -1.2 -16.7 2077.34 17103.6967 0,00132 0,13242 67 14,237 -1,2 -16,7 2106.87 17103,6967 0,00129 0,12873 68 14,036 -1,2 -16,7 2136.43 17103,6967 0,00125 0,12520 69 13.841 -1.3 -16,8 2166.01 16714,3690 0,00119 0,11903 70 13,650 -1,3 -16,8 2195.62 16714.3690 0.00116 0,11584 71 13,465 -1,3 -16,8 2225.25 16714,3690 0.00113 0.11277 72 13,285 -1,3 -16.8 2254,90 16714,3690 0.00110 0,10983 73 13,109 -1,3 -16.8 2284,58 16714.3690 0.00107 0,10699 74 12,938 -3,4 -18.9 2314.27 10305.9964 0.00064 0,06429 75 12.771 -3,4 -18.9 2343.99 10305.9964 0.00063 0.06267 Apdx, A Page 2 TMBX-6516-R2M ARL 17 Max gain (dBd): 15.5 Max exposure: 0.00717152 mW/cm' Max ERP (W): 800 Ant type: Andrew TMBX-6516-R2M Feet from site: 21 RF Exposure Levei Feet to Depress Antenna dS from Prop dist Act ERP Level Precent of Ant. base angle gain max ERP in cm in mW mW/cm ^ FCC STD 76 12,609 -3.4 -18.9 2373,72 10305,9964 0,00061 0.06111 77 12,450 -3,4 -18,9 2403,48 10305,9964 0,00060 0.05961 78 12,295 -3,4 -18,9 2433.25 10305,9964 0,00058 0,05816 79 12,144 -3.4 -18.9 2463.04 10305,9964 0,00057 0,05676 80 11.997 -11 -26,5 2492.85 1790,9769 0,00010 0.00963 81 11.853 -11 -26,5 2522.67 1790.9769 0,00009 0.00940 82 11.712 -11 -26,5 2552.51 1790,9769 0,00009 0.00918 83 11.575 -11 -26,5 2582,36 1790.9769 0.00009 0.00897 84 11.441 -11 -26,5 2612,23 1790,9769 0,00009 0,00877 85 11.310 -11 -26.5 2642.11 1790.9769 0.00009 0,00857 86 11.182 -11 -26,5 2672,00 1790,9769 0,00008 0.00838 87 11.056 -11 -26.5 2701,91 1790,9769 0,00008 0,00820 88 10,934 -10,7 -26.2 2731,83 1919.0663 0.00009 0.00859 89 10.814 -10,7 -26.2 2761,76 1919,0663 0.00008 0,00841 90 10.697 -10.7 -26.2 2791,71 1919,0663 0.00008 0,00823 91 10.582 -10.7 -26.2 2821,66 1919,0663 0.00008 0,00805 92 10.469 -10.7 -26.2 2851,63 1919,0663 0.00008 0,00788 93 10.359 -10,7 -26.2 2881,61 1919,0663 0,00008 0,00772 94 10.251 -10,7 -26,2 2911,60 1919,0663 0.00008 0,00756 95 10.146 -10,7 -26,2 2941,60 1919,0663 0.00007 0,00741 96 10,042 -10,7 -26,2 2971,60 1919,0663 0,00007 0.00726 97 9,941 0,7 -14.8 3001,62 26490.4897 0.00098 0.09823 98 9.841 0,7 -14,8 3031,65 26490,4897 0.00096 0.09630 99 9.744 0.7 -14.8 3061.69 26490,4897 0.00094 0,09442 100 9.648 0,7 -14,8 3091.73 26490,4897 0.00093 0,09259 101 9.554 0.7 -14,8 3121,78 26490,4897 0,00091 0,09082 102 9,462 0,7 -14,8 3151,84 26490,4897 0.00089 0,08909 103 9.372 0,7 -14,8 3181.91 26490,4897 0.00087 0,08742 104 9,284 0,7 -14.8 3211.99 26490,4897 0,00086 0.08579 105 9.197 0,7 -14,8 3242.07 26490,4897 0,00084 0.08420 106 9.111 0,7 -14,8 3272.17 26490,4897 0,00083 0.08266 107 9.028 0,7 -14,8 3302.27 26490,4897 0,00081 0.08116 108 8.945 5,8 -9.7 3332.37 85721,5444 0.00258 0.25790 109 8,865 5,8 -9.7 3362,48 85721,5444 0.00253 0,25330 110 8.785 5,8 -9,7 3392,60 85721.5444 0,00249 0.24883 111 8,707 5.8 -9,7 3422.73 85721,5444 0,00244 0.24447 112 8,631 5.8 -9.7 3452,86 85721.5444 0,00240 0.24022 113 8,556 5,8 -9,7 3483,00 85721,5444 0,00236 0.23608 114 8.482 5,8 -9.7 3513.14 85721.5444 0,00232 0.23205 115 8.409 5,8 -9,7 3543,29 85721,5444 0,00228 0,22811 Apdx. A Page 3 TMBX-6516-R2M ARL 17 Max gain (dBd): 15.5 Max exposure: 0.00717152 mW/cm' Max ERP ON): 800 Ant type: Andrew TMBX-6516-R2IVI Feet from site: 21 RF Exposure Levei Feet to Depress Antenna dB from Prop dist Act ERP Level Precent of Ant base angle gain max ERP in cm in mW mW/cm^ FCC STD 116 8,337 5.8 -9.7 3573,45 85721,5444 0.00224 0,22428 117 8,267 5,8 -9.7 3603,61 85721.5444 0.00221 0.22054 118 8.198 5.8 -9.7 3633,77 85721,5444 0.00217 0.21689 119 8,130 5,8 -9.7 3663,94 85721,5444 0.00213 0.21334 120 8,063 5,8 -9,7 3694,12 85721,5444 0.00210 0.20987 121 7,997 9,3 -6,2 3724,30 191906,6335 0.00462 0.46225 122 7,933 9,3 -6.2 3754,49 191906,6335 0.00455 0,45484 123 7,869 9,3 -6,2 3784,68 191906,6335 0.00448 0,44762 124 7,806 9,3 -6,2 3814,87 191906,6335 0.00441 0,44056 125 7,745 9,3 -6,2 3845,07 191906,6335 0.00434 0,43367 126 7,684 9.3 -6.2 3875,28 191906,6335 0.00427 0,42693 127 7,624 9,3 -6,2 3905,49 191906,6335 0.00420 0.42035 128 7,565 9,3 -6,2 3935,70 191906.6335 0.00414 0.41392 129 7,507 9.3 -6.2 3965,92 191906,6335 0.00408 0.40764 130 7,450 9.3 -6,2 3996.14 191906,6335 0.00401 0.40150 131 7.394 9.3 -6,2 4026,36 191906,6335 0.00395 0.39549 132 7.339 9.3 -6,2 4056,59 191906,6335 0.00390 0.38962 133 7,284 9.3 -6,2 4086,82 191906,6335 0.00384 0.38388 134 7.230 9.3 -6.2 4117.06 191906,6335 0.00378 0,37826 135 7.177 9,3 -6.2 4147.30 191906,6335 0.00373 0,37276 136 7,125 9,3 -6,2 4177,54 191906,6335 0.00367 0.36739 137 7,074 9.3 -6,2 4207,79 191906,6335 0.00362 0.36212 138 7,023 9,3 -6,2 4238,04 191906,6335 0,00357 0.35697 139 6,973 11,7 -3,8 4268,29 333495,5068 0.00612 0.61158 140 6,923 11,7 -3.8 4298,54 333495,5068 0.00603 0,60301 141 6,875 11,7 -3,8 4328,80 333495,5068 0.00595 0.59460 142 6.827 11.7 -3.8 4359.07 333495,5068 0,00586 0.58638 143 6.780 11,7 -3.8 4389,33 333495,5068 0.00578 0,57832 144 6.733 11,7 -3.8 4419.60 333495,5068 0.00570 0,57042 145 6.687 11,7 -3.8 4449,87 333495,5068 0.00563 0,56269 146 6.642 11,7 -3.8 4480,15 333495,5068 0,00555 0,55511 147 6.597 11,7 -3.8 4510,42 333495,5068 0.00548 0,54768 148 6.553 11.7 -3.8 4540,70 333495,5068 0.00540 0,54040 149 6,509 11,7 -3,8 4570.98 333495,5068 0,00533 0.53327 150 6.466 11,7 -3.8 4601.27 333495,5068 0,00526 0.52627 151 6.423 11,7 -3.8 4631,56 333495.5068 0,00519 0.51941 152 6.382 11.7 -3.8 4661.85 333495.5068 0.00513 0.51268 153 6.340 11.7 -3.8 4692.14 333495.5068 0.00506 0,50608 154 6,299 11,7 -3.8 4722.43 333495,5068 0.00500 0,49961 155 6.259 11.7 -3.8 4752.73 333495,5068 0.00493 0.49326 Apdx, A Page 4 TMBX-6516-R2M ARL 17 Max gain (dBd): 15.5 Max exposure: 0.00717152 mW/cm' Max ERP ON): 800 Ant type: Andrew TIVIBX-6516-R2IVI Feet from site: 21 RF Exposure Level Feet to Depress Antenna dB from Prop dist Act ERP Level Precent of Ant. base angle gain max ERP in cm in mW mW/cm ^ FCC STD 156 6.219 11.7 -3,8 4783.03 333495,5068 0,00487 0.48703 157 6.180 11,7 -3,8 4813.33 333495.5068 0,00481 0.48092 158 6.141 11,7 -3,8 4843.64 333495.5068 0,00475 0.47492 159 6.103 11,7 -3.8 4873.94 333495.5068 0,00469 0.46903 160 6.065 11.7 -3.8 4904,25 333495.5068 0.00463 0.46325 161 6.028 11.7 -3.8 4934,56 333495.5068 0,00458 0.45758 162 5.991 13,4 -2.1 4964.87 493276.0015 0,00669 0.66857 163 5.954 13.4 -2.1 4995,19 493276.0015 0,00660 0.66048 164 5.918 13.4 -2.1 5025,50 493276.0015 0,00653 0.65254 165 5.882 13.4 -2.1 5055.82 493276.0015 0.00645 0,64473 166 5.847 13.4 -2,1 5086,14 493276.0015 0,00637 0,63707 167 5.812 13.4 -2,1 5116,47 493276.0015 0,00630 0,62954 168 5.778 13.4 -2,1 5146,79 493276.0015 0,00622 0,62214 169 5.744 13,4 -2,1 5177.12 493276.0015 0,00615 0,61488 170 5,711 13.4 -2.1 5207.44 493276.0015 0,00608 0,60774 171 5,677 13,4 -2,1 5237,77 493276.0015 0.00601 0.60072 172 5,645 13.4 -2,1 5268,10 493276.0015 0.00594 0.59382 173 5,612 13,4 -2,1 5298,44 493276.0015 0.00587 0,58704 174 5,580 13.4 -2,1 5328.77 493276.0015 0.00580 0,58038 175 5,548 13,4 -2,1 5359.11 493276.0015 0.00574 0,57382 176 5,517 13,4 -2,1 5389,45 493276.0015 0,00567 0,56738 177 5,486 13,4 -2,1 5419,79 493276.0015 0,00561 0.56105 178 5.456 13.4 -2.1 5450,13 493276.0015 0,00555 0.55482 179 5.425 13,4 -2.1 5480.47 493276.0015 0,00549 0.54869 180 5,395 13,4 -2,1 5510,81 493276.0015 0,00543 0.54267 181 5,366 13.4 -2,1 5541,16 493276.0015 0.00537 0.53674 182 5.336 13.4 -2.1 5571.51 493276.0015 0.00531 0.53091 183 5,307 13.4 -2,1 5601.86 493276.0015 0.00525 0.52517 184 5,279 13.4 -2,1 5632.21 493276.0015 0.00520 0.51953 185 5,250 13.4 -2,1 5662,56 493276.0015 0.00514 0.51397 186 5,222 13.4 -2.1 5692.91 493276.0015 0.00509 0.50851 187 5.194 13.4 -2,1 5723,26 493276.0015 0.00503 0.50313 188 5,167 13,4 -2.1 5753,62 493276.0015 0.00498 0.49783 189 5.140 13,4 -2,1 5783.98 493276.0015 0.00493 0.49262 190 5,113 13,4 -2.1 5814.33 493276.0015 0.00487 0.48749 191 5,086 13,4 -2,1 5844,69 493276.0015 0.00482 0.48244 201 4,834 14,6 -0,9 6148,35 650264,4129 0.00575 0.57471 211 4,606 14,6 -0,9 6452.12 650264.4129 0.00522 0.52187 221 4,399 14,6 -0,9 6755.98 650264.4129 0.00476 0.47598 231 4,209 14,6 -0,9 7059,92 650264,4129 0.00436 0.43588 Apdx. A Page 5 TMBX-6516-R2M ARL 17 Max gain (dBd): 15.5 Max exposure: 0.00717152 mW/cm' Max ERP ON): 800 Ant type: Andrew TIVIBX-6516-R2IVI Feet from site: 21 RF Exposure Level Feet to Depress Antenna dB from Prop dist Act ERP Level Precent of Ant base angle gain max ERP in cm in mW mW/cm^ FCC STD 241 4.035 14,6 -0,9 7363.93 650264,4129 0,00401 0,40063 251 3.875 15.3 -0,2 7668.01 763994,0688 0.00434 0,43411 261 3.727 15.3 -0,2 7972.14 763994.0688 0.00402 0,40162 271 3.589 15.3 -0,2 8276.32 763994.0688 0.00373 0,37264 281 3.462 15,3 -0,2 8580.54 763994.0688 0.00347 0,34668 291 3.343 15,3 -0,2 8884.80 763994.0688 0.00323 0.32335 301 3.233 15,3 -0,2 9189.10 763994.0688 0.00302 0.30229 311 3.129 15,3 -0,2 9493.43 763994.0688 0.00283 0.28322 321 3.032 15.3 -0,2 9797.79 763994.0688 0.00266 0.26589 331 2.940 15,5 0 10102.18 800000.0000 0.00262 0.26190 341 2.854 15,5 0 10406.59 800000.0000 0.00247 0.24680 351 2.773 15,5 0 10711.02 800000,0000 0.00233 0.23297 361 2.696 15,5 0 11015.47 800000,0000 0.00220 0.22027 371 2.624 15.5 0 11319.95 800000,0000 0.00209 0.20858 381 2.555 15.5 0 11624,43 800000,0000 0.00198 0.19780 391 2,490 15,5 0 11928,94 800000,0000 0.00188 0.18783 401 2,428 15,5 0 12233,46 800000,0000 0.00179 0.17859 411 2.369 15,5 0 12537,99 800000.0000 0.00170 0.17002 421 2.312 15,5 0 12842,54 800000,0000 0.00162 0.16205 431 2.259 15.5 0 13147,09 800000,0000 0.00155 0.15463 441 2,208 15.5 0 13451,66 800000,0000 0.00148 0.14771 451 2.159 15.5 0 13756,24 800000,0000 0.00141 0.14124 461 2.112 15.5 0 14060,83 800000,0000 0.00135 0.13519 471 2.067 15.5 0 14365,43 800000.0000 0.00130 0.12952 481 2.024 15.5 0 14670,03 800000.0000 0,00124 0.12419 491 1.983 15.3 -0.2 14974,65 763994.0688 0.00114 0,11383 501 1.943 15.3 -0.2 15279,27 763994.0688 0,00109 0,10933 511 1.905 15.3 -0.2 15583,90 763994.0688 0,00105 0.10510 521 1.869 15.3 -0.2 15888.53 763994.0688 0,00101 0.10111 531 1.834 15.3 -0.2 16193,17 763994,0688 0,00097 0.09734 541 1.800 15.3 -0.2 16497.82 763994.0688 0,00094 0.09378 551 1.767 15.3 -0.2 16802,47 763994.0688 0,00090 0.09041 561 1,736 15.3 -0,2 17107,13 763994.0688 0,00087 0.08722 571 1.705 15,3 -0,2 17411,79 763994.0688 0,00084 0.08419 581 1,676 15,3 -0,2 17716,46 763994.0688 0,00081 0.08132 591 1.648 15,3 -0,2 18021,13 763994.0688 0,00079 0,07860 601 1.620 15,3 -0,2 18325.81 763994.0688 0,00076 0.07600 611 1.594 15,3 -0.2 18630.49 763994.0688 0,00074 0,07354 621 1.568 15,3 -0.2 18935.17 763994.0688 0,00071 0.07119 631 1,543 15,3 -0.2 19239,86 763994.0688 0,00069 0,06895 Apdx. A Page 6 TMBX-6516-R2M ARL 17 Max gain (dBd): 15.5 Max exposure: 0.00717152 mW/cm^ Max ERP ON): 800 Antt/pe: AndrewTIVIBX-6516-R2IVI Feet from site: 21 RF Exposure Level Feet to Depress Antenna dB from Prop dist Act ERP Level Precent of Ant. base angle gain max ERP in cm in mW mW/cm ^ FCC STD 641 1.519 15.3 -0.2 19544.55 763994,0688 0,00067 0,06682 651 1.496 15,3 -0.2 19849.24 763994.0688 0,00065 0,06479 661 1.473 15.3 -0.2 20153.94 763994.0688 0,00063 0,06284 671 1.451 15,3 -0.2 20458.64 763994.0688 0,00061 0,06098 681 1.430 15,3 -0.2 20763.35 763994,0688 0,00059 0,05921 691 1.409 15,3 -0.2 21068.05 763994,0688 0,00058 0.05751 701 1.389 15.3 -0.2 21372.76 763994,0688 0.00056 0.05588 711 1.370 15,3 -0.2 21677.47 763994.0688 0.00054 0.05432 721 1.351 15,3 -0.2 21982.19 763994.0688 0.00053 0.05282 731 1,332 15,3 -0.2 22286.90 763994.0688 0.00051 0.05139 741 1,314 15,3 -0,2 22591.62 763994.0688 0.00050 0.05001 751 1,297 15,3 -0,2 22896.34 763994.0688 0.00049 0.04869 761 1,280 15,3 -0,2 23201.07 763994.0688 0.00047 0.04742 771 1,263 15,3 -0,2 23505,79 763994.0688 0,00046 0.04620 781 1,247 15,3 -0,2 23810,52 763994.0688 0,00045 0.04502 791 1.231 15,3 -0,2 24115,25 763994.0688 0,00044 0.04389 801 1.216 15.3 -0,2 24419,98 763994.0688 0,00043 0.04280 811 1.201 15.3 -0.2 24724,71 763994.0688 0,00042 0.04175 821 1.186 15.3 -0.2 25029,44 763994.0688 0,00041 0.04074 831 1.172 15,3 -0.2 25334,18 763994.0688 0,00040 0.03977 841 1.158 15,3 -0.2 25638,92 763994.0688 0,00039 0.03883 851 1,144 15,3 -0.2 25943,65 763994.0688 0,00038 0.03792 861 1.131 15,3 -0,2 26248.39 763994.0688 0.00037 0.03705 871 1,118 15,3 -0,2 26553.14 763994.0688 0.00036 0.03620 881 1,105 15,3 -0.2 26857,88 763994.0688 0.00035 0.03539 891 1,093 15.3 -0,2 27162,62 763994.0688 0.00035 0.03460 901 1,081 15,3 -0,2 27467.37 763994.0688 0.00034 0.03383 911 1.069 15.3 -0,2 27772,11 763994,0688 0,00033 0.03309 921 1.057 15,3 -0,2 28076.86 763994,0688 0,00032 0.03238 931 1.046 15,3 -0.2 28381,61 763994,0688 0,00032 0.03169 941 1,035 15.3 -0.2 28686.36 763994.0688 0,00031 0.03102 951 1,024 15,3 -0,2 28991,11 763994.0688 0,00030 0.03037 961 1,013 15,3 -0,2 29295.86 763994,0688 0.00030 0.02974 971 1.003 15,3 -0.2 29600.62 763994,0688 0.00029 0.02913 981 0.993 14,6 -0,9 29905.37 650264.4129 0.00024 0.02429 991 0.983 14,6 -0.9 30210.12 650264.4129 0.00024 0.02380 1001 0.973 14,6 -0,9 30514.88 650264,4129 0.00023 0.02333 1011 0.963 14.6 -0,9 30819,64 650264,4129 0.00023 0.02287 1021 0.954 14,6 -0.9 31124,39 650264,4129 0.00022 0.02243 1031 0.945 14.6 -0,9 31429,15 650264,4129 0,00022 0.02199 Apdx. A Page 7 TMBX-6516-R2M STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE Jerrold Talmadge Bushberg, Ph.D., DABMP, DABSNM (800) 760-8414 jbushberg@hampc.com Dr. Jerrold Bushberg has performed health and safety analysis for RF & ELF transmissions systems since 1978 and is an expert in both health physics and medical physics. In addition. Dr. Bushberg has extensive experience and lectures on several related topic including medical physics, radiation protection(ionizing and non-ionizing), radiation biology, the science of risk assessment and effective risk communication in the public sector. Dr. Bushberg's doctoral dissertation at Purdue University was on various aspects of the biological effects of microwave radiation. He has maintained a strong professional interest in this subject and has served as consultant or appeared as an expert witness on this subject to a wide variety of organizations/institutions including, local governments, school districts, city planning departments, telecommunications companies, the Califomia Public Utilities Commission, ABC 20/20, and the U.S. Congress. In addition, his consultation services have included detailed computer based modeling of RF exposures as well as on-site safety inspections and RF & ELF field measurements of numerous transmission facilities in order to determine their compliance with FCC and other safety regulations. The consultation services provided by Dr. Bushberg are based on his professional judgement as an independent scientist, however they are not intended to necessarily represent the views of any other organization. Dr. Bushberg is a member of the main scientific body of International Committee on Electromagnetic Safety (ICES) which reviews and evaluates the scientific literature on the biological effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation and establishes exposure standards. He also serves on the ICES Risk Assessment Working Group that is responsible for evaluating and characterizing the risks of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation. Dr. Bushberg was appointed and is serving as a member of the main scientific council of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement's (NCRP). He is also a Scientific Vice-President of the NCRP and chairs it's committee on Radiation Protection in Medicine and serves as a member of it's scientific advisory committee on Non-ionizing Radiation Safety. The NCRP is the nation's preeminent scientific radiation protection organization, chartered by Congress to evaluate and provide expert consultation on a wide variety of radiological health issues. Dr. Bushberg was also elected to the International Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Committee on Man and Radiation (COMAR) which has as its primary area of interest the biological effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic energy, examining and interpreting the biological effects, and presenting its findings in an authoritative and professional manner. Dr. Bushberg is also a member of a six person U.S. expert delegation to the international scientific community on Scientific and Technical Issues for Mobile Communication Systems established by the Federal Communications Commission. Dr. Bushberg received both a Masters of Science and Ph.D. from the Department of Bionucleonics at Purdue University. The scientific discipline of Health Physics is devoted to radiation protection, which, among other things, involves providing analysis of radiation exposure conditions, biological effects research, regulations and standards as well as recommendations regarding the use and safety of ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. Dr. Bushberg is certified by several national professional boards with specific sub-specialty certification in radiation protection and medical physics. Prior to coming to California, Dr. Bushberg was on the faculty of Yale University School of Medicine. Proposed antennas mounted behind proposed FRP panels within existing wall space— 06915A Pointsettia Plaza 7030-A Avenida Encinas Carlsbad, CA 92009 T • -Mobile RECEIVED AUG 2 0 2007 CITY OF CARLSBAt PUNNING DEPT Photosimulation of proposed telecommunications site EXISTING jjjjj^^ Proposed antennas mounted behind proposed FRP panels within existing wall space Proposed equipment enclosure painted ind textured to match existing building I roposed new and existing landscaping <06915A Pointsettia Plaza 7030-A Avenida Encinas Carlsbad, CA 92009 T • -Mobile RECEIVED AUG 2 0 2007 CITY OF CARLSeko PUNNING DEF" [Uit I I.' \ \ s \ ibtos/mii/at/bn of proposed Proposed new and existing landscaping. Ptiotosimulation of proposed telecommunications site Cingular Wireless- Poinsettia Village 7030 Avenida Encinas APN: 214-430-14 View of proposed project looking from West View of proposed project looking from East Cingular Wireless- Poinsettia Village 7030 Avenida Encinas APN: 214-430-14 View looking from proposed project toward the West View looking from proposed project toward the East Cingular Wireless- Poinsettia Village 7030 Avenida Encinas APN: 214-430-14 View looking from proposed project toward the North View looking from proposed project toward the South Cingular Wireless- Poinsettia Village 7030 Avenida Encinas APN: 214-430-14 View of proposed project looking from North 4 1^"' View of proposed project looking from South