Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCUP 103A; Las Flores Church of the Nazarenes; Conditional Use Permit (CUP)March 6, 2002 Mr. Troy D. Schalge Dominy and Associates Architects 21 50 W. Washington Ste 303 San Diego, CA 921 10 SUBJECT: CUP 103 (A) - LAS FLORES CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE All of the items requested of you earlier have not been received and therefore your application is still deemed incomplete. Listed below are the item(s) still needed in order to deem your application as complete. This list of items must be submitted directly to your staff planner by appointment. All list items must be submitted simultaneously and a copy of this list must be included with your submittals. No processing of your application can occur until the application is determined to be complete. When all required materials are submitted the City has 30 days to make a determination of completeness. If the application is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the application will be initiated. Please contact your staff planner, Barbara Kennedy, at (760) 602-4626, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, Planning Director MJH:BK:cs C: Don Neu, Team Leader Jeremy Riddle, Project Engineer File Copy Data Entry Planning Aide 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 (760) 602-4600 FAX (760) 602-8559 www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @ LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION No. CUP 103 (A) - Las Flores Church of the Nazarene Planning: None. Engineering: 1. Provide a "focused" traffic evaluation that establishes the average daily traffic (ADT) generated by this proposed project (e.g.: sanctuary, classrooms, administration, etc.) The study should apply the worst-case scenario (Sunday services?) and any impacts the existing street system. Operation of the overall project (as it impacts traffic and parking) will be closely reviewed to verify compatibility with the residential neighborhood facilities. ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: Please make the following revisions to the plans and submit 10 copies to be routed for department comments. 1. Parking spaces: a) The drive aisle width on the west end of the project, near the eight parking spaces, needs to have a minimum 24' width. You will probably need to designate these spaces as compact spaces (1 5' min. depth). b) The four parking spaces near the handicap parking should be designated as standards spaces. Show a 2' overhang into the adjacent walkwaylplanter so that the overall depth of the spaces is 20'. C) Show a 2' car overhang for the nine parking spaces at the southeast corner by increasing the width of planter by 2' and using the planting curb as a wheel stop. d) Please include the number of compact and standard spaces with the parking summary (25% compact allowed). 2. Engineer's Plan: a) On section A-A, show the minimum/maximum height of the retaining portion of the wall. b) It looks like the top elevations of the retaining wall along the south property line are about 1.5 feet above the grade of the adjacent paved surface. Please revise the TW elevations to show the height of the retaining portion of the wall only and not the 3.5' high freestanding wall above. c) Please show the height of the retaining walls at the ramp near the existing administration building and at the front entrance to the administration building. d) Are planting areas proposed between the ramps as they switch back or will these be walls? e) Revise Section B-B to show an expanded planting area which will accommodate a 2' car overhang. f) Please show the height of the retaining wall on the north side of the drive. 3. Architectural plans: a) Please show the square footage of the multi-purpose/sanctuary space on sheet Al.l (4,606 sf?) b) Please dimension the building height to the roof just right of the A/V room (Section 1 I sheet A3.1). C) On Section 2, please show the maximum height from grade to the roof (not the parapet). d) On Section 3, please show the height of the freestanding portion of the wall adjacent to the drive. Will this extend all along the drive? Please clarify on the site plan. 4. Landscape Plans: a) Show only the landscape improvements proposed with the project or clearly define the limits of "future landscape". At a minimum, all perimeter landscape, parking lot landscape, foundation planting, and planting in new areas of construction will be required. b) Are planting areas proposed between the ramps as they switch back or will these be walls? Please coordinate with the engineer. c) Increase the width of the planting area near the southeast corner to accommodate a 2' car overhang area. Use low growing shrubs/groundcover under the vehicle overhang. 5. Please label the fence type on the west property line. 6. Provide a detail for the trash enclosure (decorative block/stucco walls, gate type). The trash enclosure should be designed to City standards (see attached) and may require relocation of the trash to another area of the site, such as near the handicap parking spaces on the west side of the new sanctuary. Please contact me if you have difficulty in locating this feature. Engineering: 1. Add average daily traffic rates using SANDAG figures. Refer to the redline plans for clarification on this issue. 2. Address all redlines as noted on the returned plans. This check print must be returned with the plan revisions to facilitate continued staff review. If you have any questions, please call me Jeremy Riddle at 602-2737.