HomeMy WebLinkAboutCUP 150A; Carlsbad Girl's Club; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (16)b
I.
1.
2.
3.
11.
1.
r Exhibit ItPI It'
VR0"TAL IHPACT ASSESSHENT F ORH - PART I1
(TO BE COMPETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO. CUP-150 (AI
DATE : Auaust 22, 1988
BACKGROUND
APPLICANT : Carls bad G irls' Club
ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: Eileen Olson
3368 Eure ka Place, Carlsbad. CA 92009
DATE CHECK LIST SUBMITTED: June 17. 1988
IRONME NTAL IMPA CTS
(Explanations of all Affirmative Answers are to be written under Section I11 - Discussion of Environmental Evaluation)
Earth - Will the proposal have significant results in:
a.
b.
C.
d.
e.
f.
Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures?
Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil?
Change in topography or ground surface relief features?
The destruction, covering of modification of any unique geologic or physical features?
Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site?
Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel or a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
.NQ
X
X
X
X
X
X
r
MAYBE - NO
2. - Will the proposal have significant results in:
a. Air emissions or deterioration
b. The creation of objectionable
of ambient air quality?
odors?
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally?
3. Water - Will the proposal have significant results in:
a.
b.
C.
d.
e.
f.
g-
h.
Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters?
changes in absorption rates, drainage patters, or the rate and
amount of surface water runoff?
Alterations to the course or flow
of flood waters?
Change in the amount of surface water in any water body?
Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
Alteration of the direction or
rate of flow of ground waters?
Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies?
X
x
x
x
X
X
X
X
X
x
x
-2-
r 'I
4. plant Lifs - Will the proposal
have significant results in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass,
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species
c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing
crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? X
of plants? X
species? x
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
5. imal Life - Will the proposal have significant results in:
a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals?
c. Introduction,of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals?
d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?
6. Noise - Will the proposal significantly increase existing noise levels?
7. &iaht and Glare - Will the proposal sig-
nificantly produce new light or glare?
8. Land Use - Will the proposal have
significant results in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area?
x
X
X
X
X
X
v n
-3-
I r
9. Natural Resources - Kill the proposal have significant results in:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources?
b. Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource?
10. Risk of UDset - Does the proposal involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions?
11. Pomlation - Will the proposal signif- icantly alter the location, distribu-
tion, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area?
Housinq - Will the proposal signif- icantly affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing?
13. TransPortation/Circulation - Will the proposal have significant results in:
12.
a. Generation of additional vehicular
movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new parking?
c. Impact upon existing transportation systems?
d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people
and/or goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
MAY BE - NO
x
X
x
x
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
-4-
J ’I r
14. public Services - Will the proposal have a significant effect upon, or have signif-
altered governmental services in any of the following areas:
.. icant results in the need for new or
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational
e.’Maintenance of public facilities,
facilities?
including roads?
f. Other governmental services?
15. gnsrav - Will the proposal have significant results in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy?
Utilities - Will the proposal have
significant results in the need for new
systems, or alterations to the following utilities:
16.
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
17. Human Health - Will the proposal have significant results in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health
hazard (excluding mental heal,th)?
MAYBE - NO
x
- x
X
X
X
X
X
X
V A
X
X
X
-5-
18.
19.
20.
21.
- YES MAYBE - NO
Aesthetic s - Will the proposal have significant results in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in
creation of an aesthetically offensive
Recreation - Will the proposal have significant results in the impact upon
the quality or quantity of existing
Archeolouical/ Historical/Pa leontolouical, - Will the proposal have significant
results in the alteration of a significant archeological, paleontological or historical site, structure, object or
Analyze viable alternatives to the moposed moiect such as:
a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs,
c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site, e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alter- nate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative.
public view? X
recreational opportunities? X
building? x
Phasing the 540 square foot expansion is not necessary or
practical.
The proposed location of the expansion is compatible with the existing use.
The scale of the expansion is appropriate for the existing use.
The site already contains the Girls' Club as well as some
agricultural use. Alternate uses are not needed nor recommended.
The proposed expansion is needed at this time and the funds are
available.
Girls' Club expansion should be located on same site as existing Girls' Club use.
A no project alternative would leave the site as it currently exists with an undersized Girls' Club facility trying to serve Carlsbad's growing population.
-6-
I P I
MAYBE - NO
22. Yandatorv findinas of sianificance -
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, or curtail the diversity in the environment? X
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.)
c. Does the project have impacts which
are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? (A
project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.)
x
X
d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly? X
111. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
The proposed expansion of the Girls' Club may create an increase in the demand for new onsite parking. One condition of approval will be to prqvide nine paved parking spaces, based on the number of Girls' Club staff and the fact that most club users will not drive to the site but rather will be driven and dropped off there, walk there, or bike there.
-7-
f? b r'
I
IV. DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department)
On the basis of this initial evaluation: v
X I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on
the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant
effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in
this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. Declaration will be proposed.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
A Conditional Negative
c/ Date '
a /VI
Signature
Date PlanninFDirektor
V. MITIGATING MEASURES (If Applicable)
-a-