Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCUP 164; Kentucky Fried Chicken; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (8)f? MEMO RAN DUM TO : City Engineer FROM: Consulting Transportation Engineer DATE : August 7, 1979 SUBJECT: Proposed Drive-through at Kentucky Fried Chicken Of the numerous plans that have been submitted, only the attached plan comes close to being acceptable. However, I still find the plan unsat- isfactory for the following reasons: 1. The turning radii scale to 16 feet, which is less than the 20-foot radii that I normally consider a minimum. 2. When a motorist exits from the drive-through onto Elm Avenue, his/ her vehicle may not be clear of an incoming vehicle. 3. Adequate storage for drive-through vehicles still has not been pro- vided - any more than four cars will block vehicular movement through the parking lot. 4. Previous studies have indicated that when drive-through facilities are incorporated in fast food restaurants, the overall traffic generated by that use usually more than doubles. There is no diiect route from the parking lot into the restaurant with- out crossing the drive-through lane. 5. 6. Since Elm Avenue and the downtown area will hopefully continue to gen- erate more pedestrian traffic, it is important to minimize the pedes- triadvehicular conflicts wherever possible. \HF Kent A. Whi tson Consulting Transportation Engineer KAW:VEB C: Catherine Nicholas Attachment