HomeMy WebLinkAboutCUP 189; Jack in the Box; Redevelopment Permits (RP) (3)eso 11).t .\un Ko , C- 21A
};arv^T}20^^^l!^^^TAT,_ IMPACT ?.:yK:^yy:\'.\:y FGRM - part i
-• . . {'i'o p.e CoKipletcd By .^opl.icant) . " >'
Fi'^: S-';'!ri.00 .. EIA KO.
jv'" cei pt lio.J_^/
Qyyyy\L INI'OPMATIO?^ - • •• • • • • .
1. Name and aclrlrc::;^: o:i: cl^V'cl'Oper or project sponr-or: _FOODMAKER_
I^iC,....-.Fl.-ol.BDx...^^^ Dk 92112.
2. Add re f-5 of projeci. : 901..Elm_ Street; 1
•Assessor's Plock rnd Lot K\).niber: ._2j[)3-313:::.jOJL&.JL8 ;
3. Name; ^ cidc'resr., and telephone nrr^ber '••>person to be ccntac':ed
• cojisernj .^^'j this pro j s:.:" :_Leandro ^orreia, 0. _Box _78^
..San Diego.,:CA_.... 92112 JJJA). .571rr2491....„
• 6. y.ri^y::'i.o nunLv^r of thc^ pit appl.ication for the project to'
\vhieh this fona per lai]-is: ^ _ _ _ _ ['
•5. Lisf li'nd dof-cribe any othor .relatc;d periri.lts and other public
cip)">rovaj.s reqrslied fo}: th:,.s project, inclucij.ncj those required
by city, retjienai, state and fedc:ral acjencfes: Public facilities
fee requirements, zone change application.
G Existing 'zoninrj di.strict C-2 & R D
V. Proposed vise of f>ite {project for v.'hich tliis form is f.lied) :
Drive-thru restaurant facility.
1, Give a ];).r.ioI; descript.ion of the proposed actlv.lty (attacii
any ]:)]."e] .i iiilnary devc:.lop;iien t |j.la.!rs); include a di.scuj;f.ion
of site size; scrus.re fooliage of ]:^i.oject; iiinoujit o.f off
jjtreet ]5arklnq; i^roposed schediiJln.g :uid related or associatecl
projects and ajiticipatcd incrcjr.ejU.al deveJ.opinent.
•Approximately 3,100 sq. ft. drive^thru restaurant facility 34 - 9 x 20
on-site parking stalls (on-site), slab on grade masonry block building
. • (approximately 18" high) with used brick veneer exterior. Construction to
start early '81. . • ' •
2 . Descr 11^e thc i\c11 v 11y area . .i nc.1 ud111(j d.1 sti cjui.sh 1 ncj
natural and laaniuade chcuractc^i'lstics; also provide precise
s.lope £iiialysis v;hen appropriate.
N/A Fully developed, downtowp commercial area with existing older J.I.B
facility existing. ' • . .
3. Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into
the design and/'or operation of the project. (For a more
.specific discussion of energy conservation requirements
see • .of the City's EIR guidelines).
All buildings designed for maicimum energy conservation,, inducing double
glazed windows, fully insulated exterior walls and ceilings. Calcs
available upon r-equest.
4.' If residential, include the number of units, schedule of
» unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of
'household size e.xiDected,
N/A -.' ' -
If commercial, indi.cate the type, v^hether neighborh ood,
city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area,
a}"id loading facilities.
City downtown commercially-oriented, area, approx. 3,100 sq. ft. -
with approx. 25% public dining area. . •. • .
If ij"idustrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift,
and loading facilities.
N/A ' • - . • .
7. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated
employmc'}it per shJft, estimated occu])a}icy, loading facilitic,
and community benefits to be derived from tl'ie project.
N/A • •
:. ENVI}K)NMENTAL IMPACT ANAPYSIS • ' .. -
' .Ansv;er the follo\7ing questions by placing a check in the •
• approp3"iate space. (r3iscuss aJ.l items checked yes. Attach
additional sheets as necessary). .
. • • • . ' Yes • No
1. Could the project significantly change present
land uses in the vicinity of the activity? ^ • x
2. Could the activity affect the use of a recrea-
• tional area, or area of important aesthetic value? X__
.3. Could the activity affect the functioiring of an
•established coiruaunity or neighJ^orhood? ' x
^. Could the activity result in the "displacemicnt of
community residents? ' ' • . . ^ ..J^_
5. Could the activity increase the number of low and
^iTiOdest cost housing units in the city.
6. Could the activity decrease the m-rmber of lev; and
modest cost liousing units in the city. ' x
7«. hro liny of the natural or mian-made features in tlic
activity area unique, that is, not found in other
. •• . parts of the County, State^ or Nat.ion? . ' *
. 8. Could the activity significantly affect a histor-
iceil or archaelogical site or its settings? x
9. Could the activity si.gnifi.cantly affect the
potential use, • extrsiction, or conservation of a
scarce natux"al resource? ' '-^ ^
10. Does the activity area serve a!3 a habitat, food
source nesting place, source of v;ater, etc. for
I'cire or endangered v;iJ.dlife on fish species? x
11. Could the activity significantly affect fish,
wildlife 03: plant life? ' ^ X
12. Are tliere any rare or endaiigered pliant species , •
in the activity area? - . ^ X
13. Could tlie activity cliange existing featu^.^es of
ixuy of the city's lagoons, bays, or .tidelands? " x
yA, Could the activity change existing features of
aiiy of the City's beaches? • X
15?. Could the act.ivity res.ult in the erosion or
elimj.]'iation oi: agricultur:il lands>? ' '
16. Could the activity serve to encourage develop- •
inent of pres.c.'ut.1 y mndcve.!Oj)ed ajreas or intensify
• development of already developed areas? ' ^
X
Yes No ^
17. V7il]. the activity recjuire a variance from
established enr/ironmental stcandards- (air, water.,
noise, etc)?. X
• .
V.*'. > 18, Vkill the activity require certification,
• " . authorizcitlon or issuance of a permit by any
local, .State or Federal environmental control
agency? - •' . X
19, V?ill the activity require issuance of a variance
or conditional use permit by the City? x
20. VJill the activity involve the application, use,
or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? x
21« V7ill the activity involve construction of
facilities in a flood plain? _X_
22V V?ill the activity involve construction of
facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? X
23. VJill the activity involve construction of
facilities in the area of an active fault?
30, Will the activity result in substantial increases
in the use of utilitiefj, sev;ers drains or.
streets?
_X-
X
2^1, Could tlie activity result in tlie generation
of significant amounts of noise?
25. Could the activity result in the generation of •
s"''jni fi cant amounts of dust? / • x
* 26. Will the activity involve the burning of brush,
trees, or other m.aterials? . ^_X_
27, Could tlie activity result in a significant
change in the' quali.ty of any portio]i of the
region's air or v;ater resources? (Should note,
Ji •. surface, grouiid v.'ater, off-sliore) .
20. Vvill tlie project substantially increase
fuel con.sumption (electricity, oil, natural
gas, etc.)? . x_
29. \\^ill tiiere be a significant change to existing
land form? ' . JC
(a) ind.icate estimated grading tb be done in . .
cubic yards. N/A LEVEL SITE
(b) percentage of £ilteration to tlio present 'land
N/A LEVEL SITE ,
(c) maximum height of cut or fill slopes. N/A
31. Is the a.ctiv.ity c-arried out as part of a
larger i:)roject or series of pi"ojects>?
STATE OF NO SIGNIFlCA>n^ Er.]VIRO:iMEMTAL EFFI'CTS
If you have ansvjerc^d yes to one or more of the questions in
• Section I but you tl7i]ik the activity wiJ.l have no significant
: environmental effects, indic£ite your reasons belov/:
Project will require re-zone of adjacent parcel from RD to commercial zone .
.Scope of pro-ject to include demolition of existing J. I. B. facility at
901 Elm, removal of-office building and residence at adjacent property
(to the South), re-zone of same and construction of new J. I. B. facility
(3,100 SO. FT.-) on larger site.
III. COMMENTS OR ELAB0R7.TI0NS I'O ANY OF'THE QUESTIONS IN SECTION I
(if additional space is 2ieeded for ansv.'ering any questions,
attach additional sheets as m.ay be needed.)
Sig n a t u r e Leandro Correia /^...^^^^^^j^yvA^ ^ A4^'£V T
- (Person -tfc^i^eting report)
Date Signed: /O — J^/'^tO
Conclusions (To be completed by the Planni.ng Director) . Place
a Ciieck in the appropriate box.
(. ) Further information is required.
{ ) It has been detcrmijied that the project v/ill not liave
significant environmental effects. ( ) You must submit
cl ]>rellmi]inry enviroimental impcHct statement by the
follov/ing date. . ( ) You' should mak.e an
iippointmeiU-. with the Planning Director to discuSs. furtlic^r
proces.'riiKj of your project, in accordance with Cha]3ter 19.04
• ' of the Municip£il Code.
DATE KECEIVED:
BY
Planning Director, or.
ENVIRroerrAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM ^art II
(To Be Completed By The
PLANNING DEPARMNT)
CASE NO.^-g^^^^^-p^ 1^
. DATC: \[/\A/^ .
I. BACKGROUND
1. _ APPLICANT: P^^tiiTM^b^ riOT=^P?
2. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT:
3. DATC CHECKLIST SUBMITTCD: \Ol'Zyr^/<^yO
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
IIMANATIONS OF ALL AFFIRMATP/E ANSIVERS ARE TO BE WRITTEN UNDER
Section III - DISCUSSION OF FWIROr^JMENTAL EVALUATION)
Yes Maybe . No
1, Earth Will the proposal have signi-
ficant results in;
a. LYistable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements, com-
paction or overcovering of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground
surface relief features?
d. The destmction, covering or
modification of any unique geologic
or physical features?
e. Ariy .increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, either on dr off
tlie site?
f. Changes in deposition or ero-
sion of beach sands, or changes
in siltation, deposition or erosion
wliich may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
ND 2
Yes Maybe No
2. Air: Will the proposal have signi-
results in:
a. Air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable
odors?
c. Alteration of air movement,
mositure or temperature, or any
• change in climate, either locally
or regionally?
3. Water: Will the proposal have sigi-
ficant results in:
a. Changes in currents, or the
course or direction of water move-
ments, in either marine or fresh
waters? ^
b. Changes in absorption rates,
drainage pattems, or the rate and
amount of surface water runoff?
c. Alterations to the course or
fiow of flood waters?
d. Change in the amount of sur-
face water in any water body?
e. Discharge into surface waters,
or in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but not
limited to temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity?
f. Alteration of the direction
or rate of flow of ground waters?
g. Change in the quantity of
ground waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals,
or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavations?
h. Reduction in the amount of
water otherwise available for
public water supplies?
-2-
Yes Maybe No
4, Plant Life. Will the proposal have signi-
ficant results in:
a. Change in the diversity of
species, or numbers of any species
of plants (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and
aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of
any unique, rare or endangered
• species of plants?
c. Introduction of new species
of plants into an area, or in a
barrier to the normal replenish'-
ment of existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any
agricultural crop?
5. Animal Life. Will the proposal have signi-
ficant results in:
a. Changes in the diversity of
species, or numbers of any species
of animals (birds, land anijiials
including reptiles, fish and shell-
fish, benthic organisms, insects or
microfauna)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of
any unique, rare or endangered
species of animals?
c. Introduction of new species
of animals into an area, or result
in a barrier to the migration or
movement of animals?
d. Deterioration to existing
fish or wildlife habitat?
6, Noise, Will the proposal signi-
ficantly increase existing noise
levels?
7. Light and Glare. Will the pro-
po sal~slgiu7icahtly produce new
light or glare?
^* La^"^^^ Dse. Will the proposal have
significant results in the alteration
of the present or planned land use of
an area?
-3-
Yes Maybe No
9. Natural Resources. Will the pro-
posal have significant results in;
a. Increase in the rate of use
of any natural resources?
b. Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource?
10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal
involve a significant risk of an
explosion or the release of haz-
ardous substances (including, but
not limited to, oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation) in the
event of an accident or upset
conditions?
11. Population. Will the proposal
significantly alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth
rate of the human population of
an area?
12. Housing. Will the proposal signi-
ficantly affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional
housing?
13. Transportation/Circulation. Will
tEe proposal have significant re-
sults in:
a. Generation of additional
vehicular movement?
b. Effects on existing paricing
facilities, or demand for new
parking?
c. Impact upon existing trans-
portation systems?
d. Alterations to present
patterns of circulation or move-
ment of people and/or goods?
e. Alterations to waterbome,
rail or air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards
to motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
-4-
Yes Maybe No
14. Public Services. Will the pro-
posal have a significant effect
upon, or have significant results
in the need for new or altered
govemmental services in any of
the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facili-
ties, including roads?
f. Other govemmental services?
15. Energy. Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of
fnel or energy?
b. Demand upon existing sources
of energy, or require the develop-
ment of new sources of energy?
16. Utilities. Will the proposal have'
significant results in the need for
new systems, or alterations to the
following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
b^ Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Stom water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
17^ Human Health. Will the proposal
have signigicant results in the
creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)?
-5-
Yes Maybe No
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have
significant results in the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view
open to the public, or will the pro-
posal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open
to public view? y
19. Recreation. Will the proposal have
significant results in the impact
upon the quality or quantity of y
existing recreational opportunities? . y
20. Archeological/Historical. W^ill the
proposal have significant results
in the alteration of a significant
archeological or historical site, .
structure, object or building? ' y
21. ANALYZF VIABLE ALTCRNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJFCT SUCH AS:
a) PHASED DF./ELOPMiNl' OF THE PROJECT; b) ALIERMAIE SED-
DESIGNS; c) AI.TERNATC SCALE OF DEVELOPMF.NT; d) ALTERNATE
USES FOR ThT. SITC; e) DEVELOPMENT AT SQME FUTURE TINE RATHER
TILAN NOW; f) ALTERNATE SITES FOR THE PROPOSED USE; g) NO
PROJECT ALTERNATIVE.
-6-
Yes Maybe No
22, MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) DOES THE PROJECT HAVE HE POTEN-
TIAL TO DEGRADE THE QUALITY OF
TIE ENVIRONNENT, OR CURTAIL TI-E
DIVERSITY IN THE ENVIRONf-ENT?
c) DOES THE PROJECT HAVE IMPACTS
miai ARE INTDTVIDUALLY LIMITCD,
BUT CUMUIATR^LY CONSIDERABLE?
(A PROJECT MAY IMPACT ON TIVO
OR MORE SEPARATC RESOURCES
VJHERE THE IMPACT ON EACH RE-
SOURCE IS RELATIVELY SMALL,
BUT wmm THE EFFECT OF THE
TOTAL OF TFIOSE INPACTS ON TIE
ENVIRONMENT IS SIGNIFICANT.)
b) DOES TOE PROJECT RAVE THE POTEN-
TIAL TO ACHIEVE SHORT-TCRM, TO
TIE DISADVANTAGE OF LONG-TCPvM,
ENVIRONNENTAL GQALS? (A SHORT-
TCRM IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONNENT
IS ONE WHICH OCCURS IN A RE-
LATTVELY BRIEF, DEFINITIVE . * ' : •
PERIOD OF TINE WHILE LONG-TCRM
IMPACTS WILL ENTDURE WELL INTO
THE FUTURE.)
d) DOES TIE PROJECT RA^/E ENVIRON- ' " "^«>
^ENTAL EFFECTS WHICH WILL
CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE * .. . .
EFFECTS ON BJNLAN BEINGS,
EITHER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY?
III.- DISCUSSION OF ENVIRQNMENTAL EVALUTION
^v\i^v^^ih\^r^ FT^i^s&^trs\TE .-TR&.APT=n^\c:^^
-7-
• MSCUSSION OF ENVIRONNENTAL EVALUATION (Continued)
iu?T^^S^^'^/ ^ ^F^— <^'T=vte-
-8-
# •
Tto BE CONIPLETED BY TFE PUWING DEP IV. DETCRMINATICN. (T'O BE CONIPLETED BY TFE PUWING DEPARTtvENT)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will
be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a
significant effect on the environment, there will not be
a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added
to the project. A conditional negative declaration will
wiil be prepared.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect
on the environment, and an ENVIRONNENTAL INIPACT REPORT
is required.
Date: Vg/s>/fe^
V. MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE)
-9-
vlrTIGATING MPASURES (Whtinued)
VI APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING NE.ASURES
TOIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIBVED THE ABOVE MITIGATIONG NEA-
SURES AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF TOESE NEASURES TO TFE PROJECT.
Date: .
Signature of Applicant
-10-
12CX) ELM AVEMUE
CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA 92008
TELEPHONE:
(714)1 433 5521
€iti> of CarlfJbab
NEGATIVE DECLARATION^ ' •
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: The southeast corner of Elm Avenue and
Harding Street. ^ v_ ^ .
PRdJECT DESCRIPTION: A proposed rezoning of a 7,000 sq. ft. parcel from
R-P to C-2 and a conditional use permit to demolish the existing
facility and replace it v^ath a larger, 3100 sq. ft. Jack-in-the-Box
drive-thru restaurant on the enlarged .48 acre site. It is antici-
pated that the cup review process will mitigate any potential
impacts to the environment.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the ah^ve described
project pursuant to the Guidelines for Im.plementation of the Califomia
Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the
City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declyration
that th.e project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby
issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in tlie
Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the
Planning Department, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, D\. 92008. Consents
from tlie public arc invited. Please submit comPT^fTp; in writingir-to^'^He~^lahning
Department v/itliin ten (10) days of date of publrc^ad^'C^-^'j^;^:..^, / ' yy/
^^^^^ I * * / 7 TAMlS-TTTlAGMVNl y^y'
CASE NO: 7r-7'9 9/rnp-i RQ /X Director of Planni-it^ luiJj
of Carlsbad'^' CORREIA
APPLICANl': (j^ck-i n-the-ELox)
PUIUJSIl DATE: December 20, 1980
City
ND 4
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA 92008
Citp of Carlgbab
PUBLIC NOTICE OF PREPARATION
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:
The Planning Department of the City of Carlsbad intends to prepare a
X Negative Declaration, Conditional Negative Declaration,
Environmental Impact Report for the following project:
TELEPHONE:
(714) 729-1181
Project Description: The applicant is proposing to rezone a
7,000 sq. ft. parcel from R-P to C-2. The applicant is
additionally requesting a conditional use permit to demolish
the existing facility and replace it with a larger 3100 sq. ft,
Jack-in-the-Box drive-thru restaurant on the enlarged
,48 acre site.
Proj ect address/Location:
and Hardina Street
The southeast cornei uf Elm Avenue
Anticipated significant impacts: None. It is anticipated that
the CUP review process will mitigate any potential impacts
Wfe need to know your ideas about the effect this project might have on
the environment and your suggestions for ways the project could be re-
vised to reduce or avoid any significant environmental damage. Your
ideas will help us decide what issues to analyze in the environmental
review of this project.
Your comments on the environmental impact of the proposed project may
be submitted in writing to the Planning Department, 1200 Elm Avenue,
Carlsbad, CA 92008, no later than
DATCD: l}g^,wJ^, 4 , H^C> Cji
CASE NO: ZC-222/CUP-189
APPLICANT: ^jank-Tn-thp-BQX.^—. ^
PUBLISH DATE: December 6, 1980
Tn/. D:
"TJANB^S C. HAGAMAN :
Planning Director/
City of Carlsbad/^^'^
y
ND 3