HomeMy WebLinkAboutCUP 60; Gaycrest Kennels; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (24)box 636 GAYCREST KENNELS
0 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 0 PHONE 729-1469 7250 PONTO DRIVE
To the Fhn
I am disapk ay invitati t raii or in you cannot this issue.
RE: Hearing CUT 60
.ning So.nmis s ion D
on to coae to ay property and inspect personally the crrpro4 question 2nd to 3iscuss ny position. Z'nerefore, I fee-*-
be totally familiar with the background surrounding
obted that only one of tne Commissioners resp -tt
I believe qou are aware the courts have rendered a ruinious decision agprosinateiy two months abo, or3ering my Froperty soad, the Frocess of apy;ealing that decision,
deckuse of the City's rezoning of 1374, and the Coastal Commissionls actions or intended ones, the galue of my property and business has men 3maded extensively, Xy June agpraisal came to &109,000.00. The new house ard roo1 that was completed in Cec of 1973, was rendered worthless by the rezoning of 1374, as was .zy biisiness and proFerty. Thsre is at actual investaent in :rAy property of close to $303.300,00. This allows nothing for the vtilue of ;ny estaolished business of nearly 16 years. do,lars couirl be recaptured, and ratner resigned ayseif to the fact that at Least I would be allowed to operate my business.
the courts have ssemingly ignored the fact that a business even exists on my property, the business that is 313' sole source of liviihood. a court order to operate the kennel, not create llwaste@l, etc., to protect ay wife's interest in the property!! Eontradictory, floesn't it? for the pnrpose af 24 hr. supervision, is necessary for me to operate the kennel in accordance with the courts order-----without it I couldn't deliver the service ay clientele expects and ha9 received for cAeeriy 16 years. 3iainishing such service woulc! result in diainishing incoae, thus resulting in my consitting %aSte1I, thus endangerlnq ay xife's interest in the Frorerty. I therefore would be hauled bock into court, (which has become ay nome awa, IBrom hone for the past 3h years) in contespt of the court Is order.
&- Wif3 is making every atteqt to gein the prorerty and the business----I woilid like to know if the City wouid allow ,her to ogerate it, if sne shsuld succeed. in written form? Ta.3 date, I have not beenable to receive such
assuriwlce- I have nad a nua&r of interested Feople, Fotential buyers, who "ere discouraged by trle City's reaction , whenasked aGout contirxing tne business, if they skould purchased it. ;erLe ShaFpee has had the same experience.
I recall vividly at one of your aeetings in i974, this statement--- "tne rresent owners and uses could continue ,'or 35 to 40 years- naweuer upon sbAe or trarsfel, the property .t;vau;d be subject to it's nevi zofiing.lf This stcteaent is nat in the written ainutes,
2 assi,lx it is recorded. It was at this aeeting .Jayor Cunne,
I a3 in
I realized in 1374, that there nras LO wa) hnose
3owever,
I am, and have been, for the Fast 3 an3 3 years, under
That sounds rsther At any rate, the keeFini; d the trailor
If so, COUM I get tnat fact
2
exyres~ed his cmcern, reg rriing the hardship such rezoning would create on the property owners in our area. Ze voted alme and against the rezoning and reccoinen3eZ the General Fian be aaended to conforn to the Fresent zoning retner tr-an chenge the zordng to confora to the General Fian.
I feel if Xeym Gunnels direction had been acknowledge3, aar-y of tlie €robhas we are fccir-6 now, vcouid have rievdr risen,
1 a;n askind the City, OGC~ agzin, to ailow ne a sreciai use Fer.xit to retbin ay trailor. 1 hoge this will be considered.
Thank You
L FF I-
:,!itch Follard
RECEIVED
OCT 27 1976
ClTY OF CAALS6AD ?tanning Department