Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCUP 85B; Pilgrim Congregational Church; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (41)841 La Strada Drive Fallbrook, California 92028 June 16,1997 Mr. Robert Neilsen, Planning Commission City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, California 92009 Dear Mr. Neilsen: My family and I have been attending Pilgrim United Church of Christ (PUCC) since August 1995. On two separate occasions totaling 7 months, I helped teach church school to preschoolers on Sunday in the Children's Center. I am also a VISS (Volunteers in Social Services) Volunteer for the child visitation program run at PUCC's Mayflower House on Saturday mornings in conjunction with the County's Childrens Services Bureau, and a sleep-over volunteer for the Church's Homeless Shelter in the same location in January and February each year. Currently, I am a member of the Outreach Board which meets monthly at night in PUCC's narthex. I am unaware of any noise problem emanating from the Church, or its fhcilities. I read a copy of Reverend Jerry Stinson's letter to you dated June 13,1997, regarding renewal of PUCC's Conditional Use Permit for the Children's Center. The history of the contacts between PUCC representatives and Mr. Dwight Vallely is conking to me. Mr. Vallely complained to the City of Carlsbad without first contacting the Church. He was the only neighbor to attend a meeting with Church officials about alleged noise problems. PUCC changed its daily operations in an attempt to accommodate Mr. Vallely, with a request that he contact the Church if he had any subsequent problems with noise, but he never called after that meeting. Then, he requested another meeting with Church officials, but complained again to the City of Carlsbad before the meeting was to take place. He moved to his present location knowing of the existence of the Children's Center. He was a supporter of the Center when his own'daughter attended. I am unaware of any allegation that this "noise problem" arose after the remodeling of his house. If his wife was ill, why would he remodel his home to move her sleeping quarters closer to the Children's Center without first contacting the Church regarding noise problems? Mr. Vallely's actions give the appearance that he wanted to create a record of events that reflected contact on his part with PUCC, but without any meaningfbl results as he sees them. Otherwise, why would he complain to the City before each meeting with PUCC, and then not complain to the Church itself? In su only be supplied by the missing here that can