HomeMy WebLinkAboutCUP 85C; Pilgrim United Church of Christ; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (13)JUNE 2,1999
.--
TO: ASSISTANT PLANNING DIRECTOR
GENERAL MANAGER
DISTRICT ENGINEER
FIRE CAPTAIN MIKE SMITH
PRINCIPAL CIVIL ENGINEER WOJCIK
FROM: City Attorney
DCC COMMENTS FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 16, I999
My comments for the above-referenced Planning Commission meeting are as follows:
1. NCHO CARR ILL0 VlLL AGE "K" MINOR AMENDMFNT (PUD 97-03(C)
A. In Resolution No. 4563, please add recitals reciting what the project is (to
make sense of the reference to "said project" in the current second
recital), and delete Finding No. 4 (only required for EIRs).
B. In Resolution No. 4564, please change the reference in the second recital
from "Planned Unit Development Permit" to "Minor Planned Unit
Development Permit Amendment", and please change Condition No. 4 to
make generic reference to the local agency providing water and sewer
services (use new draft Condition No. 12).
2. PACKARD RESIDENCE [CDP 99-20)
A. Please change the following findings: 2) delete reference to the grading
ordinance (the staff report says no grading permit is required; 4) delete
reference to Guidelines section 15304 (since no grading permit is
required); and 6) please make the same change as above regarding water
and sewer services (use new draft Finding).
B. Please change the following conditions: 4) please make the companion
change regarding the above-referenced Finding (use new draft Condition
No. 12); 6) please insert the name of the school district prior to reference
to the school district at line 27; and 7) please change the reference to final
map etc., at the bottom of page 3 and top of page 4 to "building permit".
3. fl
A. In Resolution No. 4579, please add a Finding No. 7 whereby the Director
has determined that the project is exempt under CEQA.
B. Please change Condition No. 8 as stated above with regard to water and
sewer facilities (use draft new Condition No. 12).
C. Please consult with CMWD regarding Condition Nos. 14 through 20. It is
incomprehensible that the standard conditions are present in this
resolution, when we not only have a site plan as part of a conditional use
permit for the project, so we know all we are ever going to know about the
project, including its water requirements, but it is a continuation of an
existing use which already has all of its water facilities in place. If there
are real water conditions, please insert them, if there aren't any, please
delete them all.
I will be out of the office June-3 through June 8, but Gary can contact me at home if it is
necessary for any of you to discuss the above comments in time for DCC on Monday,
June 7.
D. RICHARD RUDOLF
Assistant City Attorney
afs