Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCUP 96-16; South Carlsbad Library; Conditional Use Permit (CUP)CITY OF CARLSBAD APPLICATION FORM FOR CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION APPLICATION rrrvTiSFONTY Proiect Number; QU " UQ PROJECTNAME; PtPv£- L'^R/^Ry /=R»^T S^TRY y^^Rox/^:^fiAjri. Assessors Parcel Number(s): "ZiS 050 -7ao OWNER NAME (Print or Type) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type) MAILING ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL (ADD ATTACHMENT EF NECESSARY): WOULD YOU LIKE TO ORALLY PRESENT THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO YOUR ASSIGNED STAFF PLANNER/ ENGINEER? YES • NO PLEASE LIST THE NAMES OF ALL STAFF MEMBERS YOU HAVE PREVIOUSLY SPOKEN TO REGARDING THIS PROJECT. DF NONE, PLEASE SO STATE. FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE REQUIRED/DATE FEE PAID: RECEIPT NO.: RECEIVED JUL 2 k 2009 RECEIVED BY: CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPT Routing: Planning Engineering [^ Fire []]] Other_ Form 16 Rev. 03/08 Page 2 of 2 CITY OF CARLSBAD APPLICATION FORM FOR CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION APPLICATION CTTY TJSE ONLY ^ ^ ^ , ^ ^ , Project Number: -^^^^^-t^g-^^ 0)09-0/ f^eloA^id't'o CUf ^6'1^ ^( I PROJECT NAME: P<yi/^ urn>U^Ry ptt^ 9A< ir~4 /.c^-r ir^PIZe v£./^£:^/rS Assessors Parcel Number(s): OWNER NAME (Print or Type) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type) MAILING ADDRESS /<^g^ P*9R&PAy Av£: MAILING ADDRESS CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL (ADD ATTACHMENT IF NECESSARY): WOULD YOU LIKE TO ORALLY PRESENT THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO YOUR ASSIGNED STAFF PLANNER/ ENGINEER? YES • NO PLEASE LIST THE NAMES OF ALL STAFF MEMBERS YOU HAVE PREVIOUSLY SPOKEN TO REGARDING THIS PROJECT. IF NONE, PLEASE SO STATE. RECEIVED FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE REQUIRED/DATE FEE PAID RECEIPT NO.: RECEIVED BY: JAN 2 1 2009 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPT Routing: Planning"^ Engineering • Fire • Other Form 16 Rev. 03/08 Page 2 of 2 CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECKBOXES) [ I Administrative Permit I I Administrative Variance I I Coastai Development Permit Conditional Use Permit I I Condominium Permit I I Environmental Impact Assessment I I General Plan Amendment I I Hillside Development Permit I I Local Coastal Program Amendment j I Master Plan [ I Minor Conditional Use Permit I I Non-Residential Planned Deveiopment I I Planned Development Permit (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) I I Planned Industrial Permit I I Planning Commission Determination I I Precise Development Plan I I Redevelopment Permit I I Site Development Plan I I Special Use Permit I I- Specific Plan I I Tentative Parcel Map Obtain from Engineering Department I I Tentative Tract Map I I Variance I I Zone Change I [ List other applications not specified (FOR DEPARTIVIENT USE ONLY) 2) 3) 4) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: PROJECT NAME: 3 (9 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type) i/lE (Pnnt or I vpe) 6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type) MAILING ADDRESS^ MAILING ADDRESS CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE EMAILADDRESS: EMAILADDRESS: I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ^ SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATURE DATE 7) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION ^]J^rO^ { C>yP JLTlPi:^ APPLICATIONS BF Fll Fn. MUST/BE SUBMITTFD PRIOR TO 3 NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS BE FILED, MUSTBE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M. Form 14 Rev. 03/06 PAGE 1 OF 5 3) LOCATION OF PROJECT: ^0tr9' ON THE BETWEEN STREET ADDRESS SIDE OF (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) AND (NAME OF STREET) 9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 10) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS 13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION a. 11) NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIDENTiAL UNITS 16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE 19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 12) EXISTING ZONING 6-f 14) PROPOSED IND OFFICE/ SQUARE FOOTAGE 17) PROPOSED INCREASE IN ADT 20) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN 23) PROPOSED ZONING (NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREET) 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS 15) PROPOSED COMM SQUARE FOOTAGE 18) PROPOSED SEWER USAGE IN EDU 21) PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION 24) HABITAT IMPACTS IF YES, ASSIGN HMP # ?5) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE SIGNATURE -OR CITY USE ONLY •EE COMPUTATION APPLICATION TYPE "OTAL FEE REQUIRED FEE REQUIRED DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED RECEIVED BY: Form 14 Rev. 03/06 PAGE 2 OF 5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY p, _ ^ DEPARTME^^F FISH AND GAME ^ y) O v5 U / ENVIROI^NTAL FILING FEE CASH RECEIPT DFG 753.5a (6-£ Lead Agency: C-*-"^ Date ^ f County/State Agency of ^ling: ^ A->^^ '^ ^^^C^ j Document No.:*^ Project Title: j^^J^ (SA^\Mi-^--4j "^^^^VtSL^v^ Q^Uf 96-/0/g^^ 9 7-0 f ant Name: U Phone Number: Project Applicant Project Applicant Address: Project Applicant (c/)ec/( appropriate/box); Local Public Agency LH School District LD Other Special District LH State Agency Q Private Entity I I CHECK APPLICABLE FEES: ) Environmental Impact Report $850.00 $ (^ Negative Declaration $1,250.00 $ • ) Application Fee Water Diversion (Sfafe Water Resources Confra/Soard On/yJ $850.00 $ ) Projects Subject to Certified Regulatory Programs $850.00 $ ) County Administrative Fee $25.00 $ •tA Project that is exempt from fees <Oo, TOTALRECEIVED $ " ' Signature^nd title of person receiving payment: ^^^'^AT"'^ l/RRST COPY-PROJECT APPUCANT SECOND COPY-DFG/FASB THIRD COa'-LEAD AGENCY FOURTH COPY-COUNTY/STATE AGENCY OF FlUNG CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION FOR PAGE 1 OF 2 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) (FOR DEPT USE ONLY) (FOR DEPT USE ONLY) • Master Plan • General Plan Amendment • Specific Plan • Local Coastal Plan Amendment • Precise Development Plan • Site Development Plan • Tentative Tract Map • Zone Change • Planned Development Permit I Conditional Use Permit • Non-Residential Planned Development • Hillside Development Permit • Condominium Permit • Environmental Impact Assessment • Special Use Permit • Variance • Redevelopment Permit • Planned Industrial Permit • Tentative Paroel Map Obtain from Eng. Dept • Coastal Development Permit • Administrative Variance • Planning Conunission Determination • Administrative Permit - 2nd Dwelling Unit • List any other applications not specified 2) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S) 3) PROJECT NAME: 4) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 5ei:-;r>L^P«7-^/Di^^-^ 5) OWNER (PJIBJT/OR T^E) /} / / 7 6) APPLICANT NAME NAME (PRINT OR TYPE MAILING i^RESS / MAILING ADDRESS Cnr^D/STJATE/ ZIP TELEPHONE CITY AND STATE TELEPHONE I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRtJE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATURE DATE 7) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION: NOTE: AI>KOi%»E»mO}BCritE<»3IRK k mmosm mmct mmm^ THAT munymmmimm mmm mmm mmmm mm TO r^. /I 2 CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION FOI PAGE 2 OF 2 8) LOCATION OF PROJECT : STREET ADDRESS ON THE BETWEEN t SIDE OF (NORTH. SOUTH EAST, WEST) 9) LOCAL FACIUTIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 10) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS 13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION (RES/ COMM/ INDUS) 16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE (NAME OF STREET) T AND (NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREET) 11) NUMBER OF EXISTING RESrDENTL\L UNITS 14) PROPOSED INDUSTRLU. OFHCE/SQUARE FOOTAGE A/A 17) PROPOSED INCREASE IN I / AVERAGE DAILY TRAFnc 1^/'^ 19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 22) EXISTING ZONING 20) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN 23) PROPOSED ZONING 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTL\L UNITS 15) PROPOSED COMMERCL\L SQUARE FOOTAGE 18) PROPOSED SEWER USAGE IN EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNFFS 21) PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION 1^ 24) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION FF MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CFFY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS, OR CFFY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT K THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE SIGNATURE FOR CFFY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION: APPLICATION TYPE FEE REQUIRED nCGCIVCD DATE JUL 3 0 1996 CiTY OF nfi jf|?„SBAP EIVED RECEIVED BY: TOTAL FEE REQUIRED DATE FEE PAID RECEIPT NO. FRM0016 3/96 PROOF OF PUBLICA#bN (2010 & 2011 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times Formeriy i<nown as the Biode-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, for the City of Oceanside and the City of Escondido, Court Decree number 171349, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: January 26*^ 2007 space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp Proof of Publication of 2) CUP 96-16x1 - SOUTH CARLSBAD LIBRARY quSW an eSflensioh d o contln- ment Zone 6 The proiect is exempt from the California Environmental Quaflty Act. I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at SAN MARCOS California This ,Day of January, 2007 Signature Jane Allshouse NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbaci will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, February 7, 2007, to consider a request for the following: CASE NAME: CUP 96-16x1 - South Carlsbad Library PUBLISH DATE: January 26, 2007 DESCRIPTION: Request for an extension of CUP 96-16 to allow the continued operation in perpetuity of a 64,000 square foot City library at 1775 Dove Lane in the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and in Local Facilities Management Zone 6. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing and provide the decision makers with any oral or written comments they may have regarding the project. Copies of the staff report will be available online at http://www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us/pdfdoc.html?pid=295 on or after the Friday prior to the hearing date. If you have any questions, or would like to be notified of the decision, please contact Mike Grim in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4623, Monday through Thursday 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008. APPEALS The time within which you may judicially challenge these projects, if approved, is established by State law and/or city ordinance, and is very short. If you challenge this project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing. • Appeals to the Citv Council: Where the decision is appealable to the City Council, appeals must be filed in writing within ten (10) calendar days after a decision by the Planning Commission. CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us NOT TO SCi4LE SITEMAP South Carlsbad Library CUP 96-16x1 Impression antibourrage et h sechage raplde Utilise! ie gabarit 5160® vvww.avery.com 1-800-6O-AVERY AVERY® 5160® JODY AGEE 6945 SANDPIPER FL #21 CARLSBAD, CA 92009 MICHAEL & DONELLE ANDERSON 6941 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 JEFFREY & TRACY BALOS 6964 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 GERALD CARDELLI 6974 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 JANELL CARTER 6960 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 EMILIO CORDERO 1730 GASCONY RD ENCINITAS, CA 92024 D W F LTD PO BOX 1475 WINDERMERE, FL 34786 YELENA DASKAL 6970 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 WILL & KATHERINE DENDY 6923 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 HOUSING ASSCS DOVE 1820 S ESCONDIDO BLVD #101 ESCONDIDO, CA 92025 HARRIET 05-10-02 DUARTE 6963 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 CHRISTOPHER & TERESA EDLERTSON 6930 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 LAURA EMERZIAN 6969 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 JOLENE PARISH 6984 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 10-11-05 FARRIS-MARTINEZ 999 CAPISTRANO DR OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 HONG THU MY FREEBERG 6937 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 LISA GIACOMINI 6950 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 LISA HUANG 1579 DAWSON DR VISTA, CA 92081 KATHLEEN 04-11-02 FUENTES 6938 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 KRISTA HAZELETT 6920 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD. CA 92009 TREVOR D ISAACS 6951 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD.CA 92009 JAMES GASCOYNE 6961 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 TYLER HOLSCHLAG 804 REGAL RD #6L ENCINITAS, CA 92024 JANICE ISRAEL 6933 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 DANIEL & ANNETTE KAYLOR 16133 HELLVALE AVE MONTE SERENO, CA 95030 04-24-03 KHORRAM-CHAGNON 3364 AVENIDA NIEVE CARLSBAD, CA 92009 10-20-05 KIMANA 1357 CAMINITO SEPTIMO CARDIFF, CA 92007 SHELLY LAPOINTE 6931 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 PHYLLIS 04-05-00 LASLEY 6967 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 KEVIN LUU 13041/2 6TH AVE #N SEATTLE, WA 98109 ®09is ®A^1AV Aa3AV-O9-008-|. uio3'\<eAe'M/uuw ®09l.S 3i\ndl/\iai ®^aAv asn Sui^uMd eajd a6pnuis pue luer Impression antibourrage et a sechage raplde 'iJtiiise;^'le gabarit 5160® vwvw.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY AVERY® 5160® BRIAN MATZINGER 6976 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 JOHN MERRILL 2912 AVENIDA PIMENTERA CARLSBAD, CA 92009 TED & SUE MIGDAL 6972 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 MARGARET MUDD 217 CHESTNUT ST PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950 MALCOLM NAPIER 2252 FELSPAR ST #2 SAN DIEGO, CA 92109 TERRY OSBORN & BARBARA MAIN 31841 VIAPATITO TRABUCO CANYON, CA 92679 SUSAN 02-22-06 PETERS 6948 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 PATRICK PHILLIPS & CHRISTOPHER P 6927 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 DAVID RUF 6965 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 SUSAN SHORT 15 RICHARDSON ST LANCASTER, NH 03584 JAMES SIMS 6928 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 05-26-05 SKOGERSON 6934 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 DONNA SLATER 6932 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 JAMES & JUDITH SNYDER 744 W PALO ALTO AVE FRESNO, CA 93704 ROBERT SPROWLS 6929 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 DONNA STEIN-KUBIN 6844 ADOLPHIA DR CARLSBAD, CA 92011 SUSANNE STEVENS 7103 COLUMBINE DR CARLSBAD, CA 92011 RICHARD STEWART & 02-10-97 588 BUENA CREEK RD SAN MARCOS, CA 92069 SCOTT & LISA STOABS 155 LAS FLORES DR #125 SAN MARCOS, CA 92069 JENNIFER STRYD & SEAN DONAHUE 6936 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 JOHN 12-19-88 TAYLLOR 6753 TEA TREE ST CARLSBAD, CA 92011 THE VONS COMPANIES INC <LF> PLA PASEO REAL ASSCS L 801 GRAND AVE DES MOINES, IA 50309 10-18-01 THIELE 6942 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 TROJAN 6940 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 MICHAEL & LISA WALSH 2254 VISTA LA NISA CARLSBAD, CA 92009 RICHARD & LOUISE WINDERS 01-24-01 PO BOX 676344 RANCHO SANTA FE,CA 92067 MIKE WINN 6980 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 JOYCE WINTER 6971 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 ELIZABETH YEARSLEY 6968 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 ROBERT YOUNGDALE & CAROL PISNl 6922 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 ®091S ®A^3AV Ay3AV-O9-008-l luo^'^l^Ae-MMM ®09l.S HiVldlAiai ©AjaAV asn Suijuud ^aid aSpnujs pue uisf 600ft Buffer of APN 215-050-70 © 1997 City of Carlsbad GIS /cargis2/products/commdav/r16.97/radmanaml 02/04/97 fib Cx^ City of Carlsbad Planning Department NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING COMPLETE DATE: September 29, 1996 DESCRIPTION: Request for a Conditional Use Permit and Coastal Development Permit to allow the construction and occupation of a 64,000 square foot library in the Plaza Paseo Real shopping center. LOCATION: This project is within the City of Carlsbad's Coastal Zone located: West of El Camino Real, south of Dove Lane in Local Facilities Management Zone 6. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No 16044, filed on April 5, 1990 in the Office of the County Recorder, City of Carlsbad, County of San Dlego, State of California. APPLICANT: The City of Carlsbad, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009 A public hearing on the above proposed project will be held by the Planning Commission In the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, on March 5, 1997 at 6:00 p.m. Persons are cordially invited to attend the public hearing and provide the decision makers with any oral or written comments they may have regarding the project. The project will be described and a staff recommendation given, followed by public testimony, questions and a decision. Copies of the staff report will be available on or after February 27, 1997. If you have any questions, or would like to be notified of the decision, please contact Mike Grim at the City of Carlsbad Planning Department, Monday through Thursday 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009, (619) 438-1161, extension 4499. 2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (619) 438-1161 • FAX (619) 438-0894 ^ APPEALS If you challenge the Conditional Use Permit and/or Coastal Development Permit In court, you may be limited to raising only those Issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad prior to the public hearing. 1. Appeals to the Citv Council: Where the decision is appealable to the City Council, appeals must be filed in writing within ten (10) calendar days after a decision by the Planning Commission. 2. Coastal Commission Appealable Project: • This site is located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area. 1^ This site is not located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area. Where the decision is appealable to the Coastal Commission, appeals must be filed with the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days after the Coastal Commission has received a Notice of Final Action from the City of Carlsbad. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal Commission of the date that their appeal period will conclude. The San Diego office ofthe Coastal Commission is located at 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego, California 92108-1725. CASE FILE: CUP 96-16/CDP 97-01 CASE NAME: SOUTH CARLSBAD LIBRARY PUBLISH: FEBRUARY 21, 1997 SOUTH CARLSBAD LIBRARY CUP 96-16/CDP 97-01 KEMP ROSANNE L 6927 MIM^OSA OR CARLSBAD CA 92009 ^MCaUIRE nkMILY TRUST 06-20-94 S982 ZEBRINA PL ^CARLSBAO CA 92009 ROBERTS BARBARA E TRUST 12-16-88 6936 DUSTY ROSE PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 KENT RICHARD T&DRUCILLA C 6946 DUSTY ROSE PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 MEAD LOREN Q&PATRICIA E 6937 DUSTY ROSE PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 ROHRING JEFFREY&SUSAN 6956 DUSTY ROSE PL CARLSBAD CA 82009 KUNIN CHARLES B&HOLLIE C 6933 MIMOSA DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 MEJIA RICHARD JR&MARIA A FAMILY 6986 BLUE ORCHID LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 SARNECKY GEORGE J&MARY T 6953 DUSTY ROSE PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 LAMPLUGH ALICE M TRUST 03-09-89 P O BOX 2533 DEL MAR CA 92014 MERTZ ROBERT L&CELINE T FAMILY T 6946 MIMOSA DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 SAWYER JAMES F B&TYLA L 1812 OVERLAND AVE #203 LOS ANGELES CA 90025 LEE GARY PEI-MING 14736 BROOKSTONE DR POWAY CA 92064 LEVATINO JOSEPH V&NOREEN L 22121 MALIBU LANE 'HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646 MILLER TIMOTHY R&DEBORAH L 6983 ZEBRINA PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 ITCHELL JAMES M&ADELE R 927 BLUE ORCHID LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 SIU FRANK M&HARDESTY CYNTHIA M 0957 DUSTY ROSE PL ««I::ARLSBAD CA 92009 SMITH ANNA M 6972 SANDPIPER PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 LOHF TRUST 06-22-92 1425 VIA DEL CORVO SAN MARCOS CA 92069 MOKAUS KONSTANDINQS&KRISTINA 6937 MIMOSA DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 THE VONS COMPANIES INC <LF> FED C/O FV^C PROPRTY 31921 CAMINO CAPISTRANO #417 SAN JUAN CAPO CA 92675 MAFFUCCI WILUAM B&JILL A 6943 DUSTY ROSE PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 MURPHY PAUL C&CHARLENE S 6974 BLUE ORCHID LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 TREAHY TIMOTHY D&01ANA L FAMILY 6998 BLUE ORCHID LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 MANOS JOHN G TRUST 01-31-96 6986 MIMOSA DR CARLSBAO CA 92009 PENN MARGARET E 7137 CIRCA DE MEDIA ESCONDIDO CA 92029 UEDA MASmiKI&KIYOKO 6962 MIMOSA DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 MASON RICHARD M N&JENINE M 6976 BLUE ORCHID LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 PODOLSKYNICK&INNA 6914 BLUE ORCHID LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 SERVICE MCCLAIN MICHAEL S&SUSAN R 6952 DUSTY ROSE PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 PRESSEY LYNN 6956 MIMOSA DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 VANDYKE WILLIAM W&NANCY G 6947 DUSTY ROSE PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 VODVARKA ALBERT J lll&CATHERINE 6996 MIMOSA DR CARLSBAO CA 82009 WESTBLUFF ASSOCIATEiaO 2040 MURRAY HOLLAQAYRD #207 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84117 WILLIAMS FAMILY TRUST 09-28-90 6982 MIMOSA DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 WITT MITCHELL A 6903 BLUE ORCHID LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 WOLFSON PHILLIP J 6972 MIMOSA DR CARLSBAO CA 92009 ZUCKER ERIC S&HAENGMI L 6990 ZEBRINA PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 AMICO FAMILY TRUST 11-80-94 6822 MIMOSA DR CARLSBAD CA 82009 ^BROWN GEORGE W&ESTHER L S992 MIMOSA DR ^CARLSBAD CA 92009 FEARN RKTRICK C&MARTHA K 6933 DUSTY ROSE PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 ANDERSON JULIE K 6913 BLUE ORCHID LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 CAMARATTA JOSEPH G&KIM F 6994 BLUE ORCHID LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 EMING DANIEL A&NANCY K .^:#947 MIMOSA DR " CARLSBAD CA 92009 ATLAS EUGENE L&STEPHANIE D 6973 MIMOSA DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 CHAFFIN JOHN E&CANDACE E 6912 MIMOSA DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 FLETT WILLIAM E&TRACI L A 6967 MIMOSA DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 BAKER KENNETH R&ANGELA K 6966 MIMOSA DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 CHARHUT DONALD E&LENITA B 6963 MIMOSA DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 FOX ERIC E&BEVERLY M 6952 MIMOSA DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 BETTiSON PAUL G&MARIE A 6982 BLUE ORCHARD LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 BLACKMORE COLLEEN M 6910 BLUE ORCHID LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 BLUM^^VEN&MAUREEN REVOCABLE T 6976 MIMOSA DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 BOARD OF ADMN TR C/O PAC PROPRTY 131921 CAMINO CAPISTRANO #417 ^SAN JUAN CAPO CA 92675 BOONE GREGG A&CYNTHIA J 6953 MIMOSA DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 BOWERS THOAMS E&BREHM-BOWERS MAR 6960 DUSTY ROSE PL ,. CARLSBAD CA 92009 CHATHAM JEFFREY M&ANNE S 6986 ZEBRINA PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 CHEN TZER-PEN&SU WEI-LUN 6907 BLUEDRCHID LN CARLSBAC^ 92009 OOOOO COLLINS JOHN W&LILLIAN M 6957 MIMOSA DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 COX THOMAS K&CLAUDIA M 6902 MIMOSA OR CARLSBAD CA 92009 '^-r CYPHER DOUGLAS A&MARGARET 6942 MIMOSA DR CARLSBAO CA 9^009 GEHLSEN KURTR&ROBIN M 6923 BLUE ORCHID LN CARLSBAD CAQ2009 )C^C GLIDOETfSCOTT&STEPHANIE R 37SNUSBAUMRD DURANGO CO 81301 HEBERT DOUGLAS W&JANET M 6942 DUSTY ROSE PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 HO NAI LOK&KHOO GEOK CHOO 6927 DUSTY ROSE PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 ^ HOLMES DONALD A&JEANI L 6943 MIMOSA DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 HWANG SOON HYUN&HYUN JOO 6917 BLUE ORCHID LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 BRANCH CALVIN S SR&VERNAL H 6990 BLUE ORCHID LN CARLSBAO CA 92009 DUCOMMUN DANIEL R&JOYCE M 6936 MIMOSA DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 JONES SCOTT J 6926 MIMOSA DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 AMICO FAMILY TRUST 11-30-84 6922 MIMOSA DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 1!^ ^ LEE GARY PEI-MING i14736 BROOKSTONE DR OWAY CA 82064 BOARD OF ADMN TR / r C/0 fV^C PROPRTY m 31921 CAMINO CAPISTMAftO«4l7 SAN JUAN CAPO CA 92675 LEVATINO JOSEPH V&NOREEN L 22121 MALIBU LANE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 02646 CHAFFIN JOHN E&CANDACE E 6912 MIMOSA DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 MERTZ ROBERT L&CELINE T FAMILY T 6946 MIMOSA DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 PRESSEY LYNN 6956 MIMOSA DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 •HCOX THOMAS K&CLAUDIA M ^902 MIMOSA DR 'TCARLSBAD CA 92009 THE VONS COMPANIES INC <LF> FEDE C/O PAC PROPRTY \ 31921 CAMINO CAPISTRANO #417 SAN JUAN CAPO CA 92675 CYPHER DOUGLAS A&MARGARET 6942 MIMOSA DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 DUCOMMUrl DANIEL R&JOYCE M 6936 MIMOSA DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 FOX ERIC E&BEVERLY M 6952 MIMOSA DR CARLSBAD CA82009 J GLIDDEN 8C0TT&STEPHANIE R 375 NUSBAUM RD DURANGO CO 81301 UEDA MASAYUKI&KIYOKO 6962 MIMOSA DR CARLSBAD CA 82009 all n°rnf .''^^ been mailed to DateO^' Signatu JONES SCOTT J 6926 MIMOSA DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 LAMPLUGH ALICE M TRUST 03-09-89 P 0 BOX 2533 DEL MAR CA 92014 Notice of Determination 970 003 To: [j^ Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 From: CITYOFCARLSBAD Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Drive ^ fl Hi ©Carlsbad, CA 92009 GrsfloivJ Smith RnconlwfCoimtyClark ^^j^^ jjgj m \ 8 m County Clerk County of San Diego Mailstop 833, Attn: MITA PO Box 1750 San Diego, CA 92112-4147 Project No: CUP 96-16/CDP 97-01 Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 ofthe Public Resources Code. South Carlsbad Library Project Title City of Carlsbad, Mike Grim (619) 43 8-1161 ext. 4499 Telephone Nuniber State Clearinghouse No. Lead Agency, Contact Person Northwest comer of El Camino Real and Aviara Parkway Project Locations (include County) Project Description: Replacement of previously approved, yet expired Conditional Use Permit for a 64,000 square foot City Library within the Plaza Paseo Real shopping center. This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad has approved the above described project on March 5, 1997, and has made the following determination regarding the above described project. 1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment 2. This project was reviewed previously and a Negative Declaration was prepared pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures were made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations was not adopted for this project. 5. Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the fmal Negative Declaration with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the General Public at THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. MIC Date received for filing at OPR: Director Date Revised October 1989 flLBD im THB OFPIOl OF THB aOUMT' GLim3t, iAH DIIGO COirirTT DM POSTED RSTURNSD TO AGENCY OH/ U/tQn^ City of Carlsbad Planning Departnnent PUBLIC NOTICE OF PRIOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE Please Take Notice: The Planning Department has determined that the environmental effects of the project described below have already been considered in conjunction with previously certified environmental documents and, therefore, no additional environmental review will be required and a notice of determination will be filed. Project Title: Project Location: Project Description: South Carlsbad Library Northwest corner of El Camino Real and Aviara Parkway, City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California. Replacement of previously approved, yet expired, Conditional Use Permit for the 64,000 square foot city library within the Plaza Paseo Real shopping center. Justification for this determination is on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 30 days of date of publication. DATED: CASE NO: CASE NAME: OCTOBER 6, 1996 CUP 96-16 SOUTH CARLSBAD LIBRARY PUBLISH DATE: OCTOBER 6, 1996 MICHAEL J.TTOL^ILLER MICHAEL J. H0L2 Planning Director 2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (619) 438-1161 • FAX (619) 438-0894 ® Exhibit "ND" 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 TELEPHONE (619) 438-1161 PMA/W/A/G DEPARTMENT NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: 27 Acres located at the northwest corner of El Camino Real and Alga Road. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A mixed use community shopping center which includes 123,400 sq. ft. of commercial/office land use, a 1,500 seat theater, a 58,000 sq. ft. public library and a 22,000 sq. ft. branch post office. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the city of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Coitanents from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within ten (10) days of date of issuance. MICHAEL J. HdLZMlfeLER Planning Director DATED: September 9, 1988 CASE NO: SDP 86-11(A)/SUP 88-1/ HDP 88-10/CUP 88-14/ CUP 88-15/ZC 88-1/ LFMP 6(A), LCPA 88-2 APPLICANT: Carlsbad Retail Associates PUBLISH DATE: September 9, 1988 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME PO BOX 944209 SACRAMENTO CA 94244-2090 CERTIFICATION OF FEE EXEMPTION De Minimis Impact Finding Project Title/Location (Include County): South Carlsbad Library - CUP 96-16/CDP 97-01- Northwest comer of El Camino Real and Aviara Parkway within the Plaza Paseo Real shopping center. City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of Califomia. Name and Address of Applicant: City of Carlsbad, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009 Project Description: Request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the constmction and occupation of a 64,000 square foot library in the Plaza Paseo Real shopping center. Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary): 1. The City of Carlsbad Planning Department has completed an Environmental Initial Study for the above referenced property, including evaluation of the proposed project's potential for adverse environmental impacts on fish and wildlife resources. 2. Based on the complete Environmental Initial Study, the City of Carlsbad Planning Department finds that the proposed project will not encroach upon wildlife habitat area, will have no potential adverse individual or cumulative effects on wildlife resources, and requires no mitigation measures to be incorporated into the proposed project which would affect fish or wildlife. Certification: I hereby certify that the public agency has made the above finding and that the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 ofthe Fish and Game Code. MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning D'wteXox Lead Agency: CITY OF CARLSBAD MG:kr Date: ?- ^--^ ^ 7 Section 711.4, Fish and Game Code DFG: 1/91 QAON PROOF OF PUBL! (2010 & 2011 0 STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk ofthe printer of North County Times formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudged newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, underthe dates of June 30, 1989 (Blade-Citizen) and June 21, 1974 (Times- Advocate) case number 171349 (Blade-Citizen) and case number 172171 (The Times-Advocate) for the cities of Escondido, Oceanside, Carlsbad, Solana Beach and the North County Judicial District; that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: Feb. 21, 1997 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated afCati^omfa, this 21st day FEb. 1997 of Signature NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising This space iS^Pthe County Clerk's Filing Stamp 11^ Proof of Publication of Notice of Public Hearing • rnMPi ETC n!?J?'?^ °^ Pl'B'JC HEARING - DESCRIPTO'??^^^ ^^"''^ 29,1996 StSVm^-.^. Conditional Use Pormlt and Coastal Develop- S?Sm^!™" 'iy^ *8 construction and occupatoTof a 64^000 square foot library In the Plaza Paseo Real shopSlg LOCAtlON: This proiect Is within the City of Carlsbad's Coastal Tim, in- Setellm^nT^^^^^^^^^^ south^^Tl^a^ifM LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 16044 filed on Anrii "5 loon i., «h« ^S^W^^^^- ^'"^ ^ Carlsbad, Call- A public hearing on the above proposed proiect will be held bv •iiiii™""u auBcision.(..opies01 will be available on or after February 27 1997 We Wf"?arffi APFIALS^^"' ^^^^ ^2009. W438ri 16%.'5l99.' nJtSinSj!Sl'®."S? fe. Conditional Use Permit and/or Coastai TiSPf^} CornmissionTypealable Project: I^U,"^^ ^ "^"^^ Z°"e CUP 96-16/CDP 97-01 ff CASENAME: SOOTH CAHt«WO MWWRY oal 49701 February 21,1997 PROOF OF PUBLld^lON (2010 & 2011 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen ofthe United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk ofthe printer of North County Times formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudged newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, under the dates of June 30, 1989 (Blade-Citizen) and June 21, 1974 (Times- Advocate) case number 171349 (Blade-Citizen) and case number 172171 (The Times-Advocate) for the cities of Escondido, Oceanside, Carlsbad, Solana Beach and the North County Judicial District; that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: October 6, 1996 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 7th Dated at California, this day of Oct. 1996 Signature NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising This space iiPr the County Clerk's Filing Stamp Proof of Publication of Public Notice of Prior Environmental Compliance PUBLIC NOTICE OF PRIOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE Please Tal<e Notice: The Planning Department has determined that the environmen-tal effects of the project described below have already been considered in conjunction with previously certified environmen-tal documents and, therefore, no additional environmental review will be required and a nolice of determination will be filed Project Title: South Carisbad Library Project Location: Northwest corner of El Camino Reai and Avi-ara Parl<way City of Carisbad, County of San Diego State of California. Prpject Description: Replacement ot previously approved yet expired. Conditional Use Permit for the/64,000 square footcitv librare within the Plaza Paseo Real shopping center Justification forthis determination is on file in the Planning De-partment. Community Development, 2075 Las Paimas Drive Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the pubiic are invited. PleaSe submit comments in writing to the Planning De-partment within twenty (20) days of date of publication Dated: OCTOBER 6,1996 CASE NO: CUP 96-16 CASE NAME: SOUTH CARLSBAD LIBRARY /s/Michael J. Holzmiller Planning Director Legal 48511 Octo'3er6,1996 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOUTH CARLSBAD LIBRARY EXTENSION CUP 96-16X1 March 10,2011 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR CUP 96-16x1. SOUTH CARISBAD LIBRARY EXTENSION Tills storm water report is written to satisfy condition no. 3 of the Planning Commission Resolution No. 6253, for South Cadsbad Library Conditional Use Permit Extension, CUP 96-16x1. CUP 96-16x1 was approved and adopted by the Planning Commission on February 7, 2007. It is a conditional use permit extension of existing conditional use permit, CUP 96-16, for South Carlsbad Library. The South Carlsbad Library, CUP 96-16, is a 64,000 square foot City library located at 1775 Dove Lane, City of Carlsbad (See attached vicinity map). After review of the project and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Order No. 2001-01 adopted on February 21, 2001, and the 2003 City of Carlsbad SUSIVIP, city staff determined that the SUSMP requirement does not apply to CUP 96-16X1 for the following reasons: 1) CUP 96-16 was approved by Planning Commission on March 5, 1997, and was already an existing development at the time of CUP 96-16x1 approval. Grading and construction activities were completed prior to adoption of California Regional Water Quality Control Board Order No. 2001-01 adopted on February 21, 2001. In accordance with the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Order No. 2001-01, F.l.b (2), the Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) requirements apply only to all priority projects or phases of priority projects which have not begun grading or construction activities. 2) The request for extension, CUP 96-16x1, did not include creation or addition of impervious area to the already developed site. Section F.l.b(2)(a) of California RWQCB order No. 2001-01 states that SUSMP requirements shall apply to all new development and significant redevelopment projects falling under the priority project categories or locations listed in F.l.b(2)(a) i. to vii . Significant redevelopment is defined as the creation or addition of at least 5,000 sq. feet of impervious surfaces on an already developed site including but not limited to expansion of building footprint, addition or replacement of a structure, or replacement of impervious surface that is not part of a routine maintenance activity. 3) See attached CUP 96-16x1 Storm Water Requirement applicability checklist. SOUTH CARLSBAD LIBRARY CUP 96-16 storm Water Standa 4/03/03 VI RESOURCES & REFERENCES APPENDIXA CUP C^c,-\G)^^ STORM WATER REQUIREMENTS APPLICABILITY CHECKLIST Complete Sections 1 and 2 of the following checklist to determine your projecfs permanent and construction storm water best managem.ent practices requirements. This form must be completed and submitted with your permit application. Section 1. Permanent Storm Water BMP Requirements: If any answers to Part A are answered "Yes," your project is subject to the "Priority Project Permanent Storm Water BMP Requirements," and "Standard Permanent Storm Water BMP Requirements" in Section III, "Permanent Storm Water BMP Selection Procedure" in the Sform Water Standards manual. If all answers to Part A are "No," and any answers to Part B are "Yes," your project is only subject to the "Standard Permanent Storm Water BMP Requirements"^- If every question in Part A and B is answered "No," your project is exempt from permanent storm water requirements. Part A: Determine Priority Project Permanent Storm Water BMP Requirements. Does the project meet the definition of one or more ofthe priority project categories?* Yes No 1. Detached residential deveiopment of 10 or more units 2. Attached residential development of 10 or more units 3. Commercial development greater than 100,000 square feet 4. Automotive repair shop 5. Restaurant 6. Steep hillside development greater than 5,000 square feet 7. Project discharging to receiving waters within Environmentally Sensitive Areas 8. Parking lots greaterthan or equal to 5,000 ft^ orwith at lea.st 15 parking spaces, and potentially exposed to urban runoff 9. Streets, roads, highways, and freeways which wouid create a new paved surface that is 5,000 square feet or greater * Refer to the definitions section in the Stonv Water Standards for expanded definitions of the priority project categories. Limited Exclusion: Trenching and resurfacing work associated with utility projects are not considered priority projects. Parking iots, buildings and other structures associated with utility projects are priority projects if one or more of the criteria in Fart A is met. If ail answers to Part A are 'iNo'? continue to Part B. CUP '^O-lfJx, CoM^\\k\^ Qk r^o^tz\ -for 0^ con^-koio^j storm Water Standards 4/03/03 Does the project propose: Yes No 1. New impervious areas, such as rooftops, roads, parking lots, driveways, paths and sidewalks? 2. New pervious landscape areas and irrigation systems? 3. Permanent structures within 100 feet of any natural water body? u— 4. Trash storage areas?' K- 5. Liquid or solid material loading and unloading areas? 6. Vehicle or equipment fueling, washing, or maintenance! areas? \^ 7. Require a General NPDES Pennit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities (Except construction)?* <^ 8. Commercial or industrial waste handling or storage, excluding typical office or household waste? \^ 9. Any grading or ground disturbance during construction? 10. Any new storm drains, or alteration to existing stonn drains? *To find out if your project is required to obtain an individual General NPDES Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities, visit the State Water Resources Control Board web site at, www.swrcb.ca.gov/stonTiwtr/industrial.html Section 2. Construction Storm Water BMP Requirements: If the answer to question 1 of Part C is answered "Yes," your project is subject to Section IV, "Construction Storm Water BMP Performance Standards," and must prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Ifthe answer to question 1 is "No," but the answer to any of the remaining questions is "Yes," your project is subject to Section IV, "Construction Storm Water BMP Performance Standards," and must prepare a Water Pollution Control Plan (WPCP). If every question in Part C is answered "No," your project is exempt from any construction storm water BMP requirements. If any of the answers to the questions in Part C are "Yes," complete the construction site prioritization in Part D, below. Part 0: Determine Construction Phase Storm Wiater Requirements Would the project meet any of these criteria during construction? Yes No 1. Is the project subject to California's statewide General NPDES Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated With Construction Activities? 2. Does the project propose grading or soil disturbance? 3. Would storni w^teror-urban runoff have the potential to contact any portion of the construction area, including washing and staging areas? 4. Would the project use any construction materials that could negatively affect water quality if discharged from the site (such as, paints, solvents, concrete, and stucco)? Storm Water Standari 4/03/03 CUP O^Q -IQYi^ Part D: Determine Construction Site Priority In accordance with the Municipal Permit, each construction site with construction storm water BMP requirements must be designated with a priority: high, medium or low. This prioritization must be completed with this form, noted on the plans, and included in the SWPPP or WPCP. Indicate the project's priority in one ofthe check boxes using the criteria below, and existing and surrounding conditions of the project, the type of activities necessary to complete the construction and any other extenuating circumstances that may pose a threat to water quality. The City reserves the right to adjust the priority of the projects both before and during construction. [Note: The construction priority does NOT change construction BMP requirements that apply to projects; all construction BMP requirements must be identified on a case-by-case basis. The construction priority does affect the frequency of inspections that will be conducted by City staff. See Section IV.1 for more details on construction BMP requirements.] • A) Higti Priority 1) Projects where the site is 50 acres or more and grading will occur during the rainy season 2) Projects 5 acres or more. 3) Projects 5 acres or more within or directly adjacent to or discharging directly to a coastal lagoon or other receiving water within an environmentally-sensitive area Projects, active or inactive, adjacent or tributary to sensitive water bodies Q B) Medium Priority 1) Capital Improvement Projects where grading occurs, however a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is not required "under the State General Constructiori Permit (i.e., water and sewer replacement projects, intersection and street re-a|ignments, Widening, comfort stations, etc.) 2) Permit projects in the public right-of-way where grading occurs, such as installation of sidewalk, substantial retaining walls, curb and gutter for an entire street frontage, etc., however SWPPPs are not required. 3) Permit projects on private property where grading permits are required, however, Notice Of Intents (NOIs) and SWPPPs are not required. Cj Low Priority 1) Capital Projects where minimal to no grading occurs, such as signal iight and loop installations, street light installations, etc. 2) Permit projects in the public right-of-way where minimal to no grading occurs, such as pedestrian ramps, driveway additions, small retaining walls, etc. 3) Permit projects on private property where grading permits are not required, such as small retaining walls, single-family homes, small tenant improvements, etc. Carlsbad Planning Department PUBLIC NOTICE OF PRIOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE Please Take Notice: The Planning Department has determined that the environmental effects of the project described below have already been considered in conjunction with previously certified environmental documents and, therefore, no additional environmental review will be required and a notice of determination will be filed. Project Title: Project Location: South Carlsbad Library Northwest corner of El Camino Real and Aviara Parkway, City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California. Project Description: Replacement of previously approved, yet expired. Conditional Use Permit for the 64,000 square foot city library within the Plaza Paseo Real shopping center. Justification for this determination is on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public are invited. Piease submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 30 days of date of publication. DATED: OCTOBER 6, 1996 CASE NO: CUP 96-16 CASE NAME: SOUTH CARLSBAD LIBRARY PUBLISH DATE: OCTOBER 6, 1996 MICHAEL J.TfOL^ILLER MICHAEL J. H0L2 Planning Director 2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (619) 438-1161 • FAX (619) 438-0894 ® ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO: CUP 96-16 DATE: October L 1996 BACKGROUND CASE NAME: South Carlsbad Library APPLICANT: CityofCarlsbad ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive. Carlsbad CA 92008 (619)434-2870 DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: July 30. 1996 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Replacement Conditional Use Permit for the 64.000 square foot city library within the Plaza Paseo Real shopping center on the northwest comer of El Camino Real and Aviara Parkway. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. • Land Use and Planning • Transportation/Circulation Public Services • Population and Housing • Biological Resources Q Utilities & Service Systems • Geological Problems • Energy & Mineral Resources Q Aesthetics • Water • Hazards Q Cultural Resources • Air Quality • Noise Recreation • Mandatory Findings of Significance Rev. 03/28/96 DETERMINATION. (To be completed by the Lead Agency) Q I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I I I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I I I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I I I find that the proposed project MAY have significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one potentially significant effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ^ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier Negative Declaration and the MEIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been voided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier Negative Declaration and MEIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, a Notice of Prior Compliance has been prepared. Planner Signature \ / Date Planning Director's Sighature Date Rev. 03/28/96 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration. • A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A "No Impact" answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. • "Less Than Significant Impact" applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not adversely significant, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies. • "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impacf to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. • "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. • Based on an "EIA-Part II", if a proposed project could have a potentially significant effect on the environment, but all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional environmental document is required (Prior Compliance). • When "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked the project is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR if the significant effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" has been made pursuant to that earlier EIR. • A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. Rev. 03/28/96 • If there are one or more potentially significant effects, the City may avoid preparing an EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce impacts to less than significant, and those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this case, the appropriate "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared. • An EIR must be prepared if "Potentially Significant Impacf is checked, and including but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant effect has not been discussed or mitigated in an Earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the impact to less than significant; (2) a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" for the significant impact has not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the impact to less than significant, or; (4) through the EIA-Part II analysis it is not possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to below a level of significance. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end ofthe form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant. Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:. a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (Sources: #1, pg. 8, #2, pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? (#1, pg. 8, #2, pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18) c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? (#l,pg. 8, #2, pgs 5.6-1-5.6-18) d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses? (#1, pg. 8, #2, pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18) e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-income or minority community)? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.5-1 - 5.5-6) Potentially Significant Impact • • • • • Potentially Less Than Significant Significan Unless t Inipact Mitigation Incorporated No Impact • • • • • • • • • • m II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.5-1 - 5.5-6) b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.5-1-5.5-6) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.5-1 - 5.5-6) • • • • • • • • • K III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? (#1, pg 7; #2, pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15) b) Seismic ground shaking? (#1, pg 7; #2, pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1- 15) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? (#1, pg 7; #2, pgs 5.1-1 -5.1-15) d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (#1, pg 7; #2, pgs 5.1- 1-5.1-15) e) Landslides or mudflows? (#1, pg 7; #2, pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1- 15) f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? (#1, pg 7; #2, pgs 5.1-1 -5.1-15) g) Subsidence ofthe land? (#1, pg 7; #2, pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1- 15) h) Expansive soils? (#1, pg 7; #2, pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15) i) Unique geologic or physical features? (#1, pg 7; #2, pgs 5.1-1 -5.1-15) IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes m absorption rates, drainage pattems, or the rate and amount of surface nmoff? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.2- 1-5.2-11) • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-11) c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or mrbidity)? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-11) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-11) e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-11) f) Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-11) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? (#1, pg8;#2, pgs 5.2-1 -5.2-11) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.2- 1-5.2-11) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.2-1 -5.2-11) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Less Than Significant Significan Unless Mitigation Incorporated t Impact No Impact • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.3-1 -5.3-12) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.3-1 -5.3-12) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.3-1 - 5.3- 12) d) Create objectionable odors? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.3-1 - 5.3-12) VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.7-1 -5.7-22) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7- 22) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? (#l,pg9;#2, pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7-22) d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.7-1 -5.7-22) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.7-1-5.7-22) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting altemative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (#1, pg9;#2, pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7-22) g) Rail, waterbome or air traffic impacts? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7-22) • • • • • • • • • • • • • m • • • • • • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, msects, animals, and birds? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-24 ) b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-24) c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-24) d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-24) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-24) Potentially Significant Impact • • • • • Potentially Less Than No Significant Significan Impact Unless t Impact Mitigation Incorporated • • • • • • ^ • • • • VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal? a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? (#1, pgs 8-9; #2, pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.1-5) b) Use non-renewable resources in a wastefiil and inefficient manner? (#1, pgs 8-9; #2, pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.1-5) c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents ofthe State? (#1, pgs 8-9; #2, pgs 5.12.1-1 -5.12.1-5) • • • • • • • • • IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.10.1-1 - 5.10.3-2) b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.10.1-1 -5.10.3-2) c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazards? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.10.I-I - 5.10.3-2) d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.10.1-1 - 5.10.3-2) e) Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or frees? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.10.1-1 - 5.10.3-2) • • • • • ^ • m • • • X • • • X • • • X X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.9-1-5.9-15) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.9-1 - 5.9-15) • • • • • • XL PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered govemment services in any of the following areas: Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). a) Fire protection? (#1, pg 9; #2. pgs 5.12.5-1 - 5.12.5-6) b) Police protection? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.12.6-1 - 5.12.6- 4) c) Schools? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.12.7-1 - 5.12.7-5) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (#1, pg9;#2, pgs 5.12.1-1 -5.12.8-7) e) Other govemmental services? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.12.1- 1-5.12.8-7) Potentially Significant Impact • • • • • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated • • • • • Less Than Significan t Impact • • • • • No Impact XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.1- 5) b) Communications systems? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.12.2-1 - 5.12.8-7) c) Local or regional water freatment or disfribution facilities? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.12.2-1 - 5.12.3-7) d) Sewer or septic tanks? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.12.2-1 - 5.12.3-7) e) Storm water drainage? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.12.2-1 - 5.12.3- 7) f) Solid waste disposal? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.12.4-1 - 5.12.4- 3) g) Local or regional water supplies? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.12.2- 1-5.12.3-7) • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X xm. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic or vista or scenic highway? (#1, pg 9, #2, pgs 5.11-1 -5.11-5) b) Have a demonsfrate negative aesthetic effect? (#1, pg 9, #2, pgs 5.11-1 -5.11-5) c) Create light or glare? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.10.3-1 - 5.10.3-2) • • • X • • • X • • • X XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.8-1-5.8-10) b) Disturb archaeological resources? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.8-1-5.8-10) c) Affect historical resources? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.8-1 - 5.8-10) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.8-1 -5.8-10) e) Resfrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.8-1 - 5.8-10) • • • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • K XV. RECREATIONAL. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional 8 • • • K Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). parks or other recreational facilities? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.12.8-1-5.12.8-7) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.12.8-1 -5.12.8-7) Potentially Significant Impact • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significan t Impact No Impact • • ^ XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or resfrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Califomia history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? • • • • • M • • K • • K Rev. 03/28/96 XVn. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analysis of the South Carlsbad Library project has been conducted on two occasions. The first was the Negative Declaration for the Plaza Paseo Real shopping center and related uses, including the proposed Post Office and the subject city library (SDP 86-l(A)/CUP 87-9, Source #1 above). The second source of earlier analysis was the Master Environmental Impact Report for the recent General Plan Update (MEIR 93-01/GPA 94-01, Source #2 above). With regard to the original Negative Declaration, no significant changes to the proposal have occurred that would require additional environmental review. With regard to the MEIR, the proposal is consistent with the applicable portions of the General Plan and is considered a Subsequent Project that was described in the MEIR and within its scope. There will be no additional significant effects due to this development that were not analyzed in the Negative Declaration or MEIR and no new or additional mitigation measures or altematives are required. This Subsequent Project is, therefore, within the scope of the prior Negative Declaration and EIR and no new environmental document nor Public Resources Code 21081 findings are required. All feasible mitigation measures or project altematives identified in the previous Negative Declaration or MEIR 93-01 which are appropriate to this Subsequent Project have been incorporated into this Subsequent Project. 10 Rev. 03/28/96 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION The proposed Conditional Use Permit is actually a reapplication of a previously approved, yet expired. Conditional Use Permit for a city library in the Plaza Paseo Real shopping center. The site development will include the building, parking areas and circulation, and landscaping. No significant changes, either in site or surroundings, have occurred since the project was last reviewed by the Planning Commission through Discussion Item DI 90-3 on December 5, 1990. The project is, therefore, substantially the same project as previously reviewed and approved. AIR OUALITY: The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased gas and electric power consumption and vehicle miles traveled. These subsequently result in increases in the emission of carbon monoxide, reactive organic gases, oxides of nitrogen and sulfur, and suspended particulates. These aerosols are the major contributors to air pollution in the City as well as in the San Diego Air Basin. Since the San Diego Air Basin is a "non-attainment basin", any additional air emissions are considered cumulatively significant: therefore, continued development to buildout as proposed in the updated General Plan will have cumulative significant impacts on the air quality of the region. To lessen or minimize the impact on air quality associated with General Plan buildout, a variety of mitigation measures are recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include: 1) provisions for roadway and intersection improvements prior to or concurrent with development; 2) measures to reduce vehicle trips through the implementation of Congestion and Transportation Demand Management; 3) provisions to encourage altemative modes of transportation including mass transit services; 4) conditions to promote energy efficient building and site design; and 5) participation in regional growth management strategies when adopted. The applicable and appropriate General Plan air quality mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. Operation-related emissions are considered cumulatively significant because the project is located within a "non-attainment basin", therefore, the "Initial Study" checklist is marked "Potentially Significant Impacf. This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for air quality impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan's Final Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of air quality impacts is required. This document is available at the Planning Department. CIRCULATION: The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased traffic volumes. Roadway segments will be adequate to accommodate buildout traffic; however, 12 full and 2 partial intersections will be severely impacted by regional through-traffic over which the City has no jurisdictional control. These generally include all freeway interchange areas and major intersections along Carlsbad 11 Rev. 03/28/96 Boulevard. Even with the implementation of roadway improvements, a number of intersections are projected to fail the City's adopted Growth Management performance standards at buildout. To lessen or minimize the impact on circulation associated with General Plan buildout, numerous mitigation measures have been recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include measures to ensure the provision of circulation facilities concurrent with need; 2) provisions to develop altemative modes of transportation such as trails, bicycle routes, additional sidewalks, pedestrian linkages, and commuter rail systems; and 3) participation in regional circulation strategies when adopted. The diversion of regional through-traffic firom a failing Interstate or State Highway onto City streets creates impacts that are not within the jurisdiction of the City to control. The applicable and appropriate General Plan circulation mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. Regional related circulation impacts are considered cumulatively significant because of the failure of intersections at buildout of the General Plan due to regional through-traffic, therefore, the "Initial Study" checklist is marked "Potentially Significant Impact". This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the recent certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for circulation impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan's Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of circulation impacts is required. 12 Rev. 03/28/96 LIST OF MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE^ ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE) APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATION MEASURES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. Date Signature 13 Rev. 03/28/96 CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LAND USE REVIEW December 28, 2006 TO: Michelle Gregory - Planning Dept. FROM: Clyde Wickham - Associate Engineer COMPLETENESS REVIEW PROJECT ID: CUP 96-16X1 SOUTH CARLSBAD LIBRARY The Engineering Department has completed its review of the above referenced project for application completeness and has determined that the application and plans submitted for this project are complete and suitable for continued review. Engineering staff does not have any comments to add to the project. Please add the following conditions to the approving resolution/letter: 1. Within 6 months of approval of this Conditional Use Permit extension, developer/owner shall submit and receive approval for a Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) to the City of Carlsbad Engineering Department. This project qualifies as a "priority project" as defined by California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region Order No. 2001-01 and the City Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan, and therefore, the project is required to capture and reduce pollutants to a level of insignificance. The organization and content of the SWMP shall be prepared in accordance with the guidelines established by the City of Carlsbad. The SWMP shall address the anticipated pollutants of concern associated with the Project. The SWMP shall also suggest the type(s) of post- construction (structural) Best Management Practices (BMP's) required to capture and filter said pollutants of concern. Within 1 year from this extension, recommended BMP's identified above shall be installed and operational. If you or the applicant has any questions regarding the above, please either see or call me at extension 2742. Clyde Wickham, Associate Engineer- Public Works Department, Development Services Division CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT Fire Prevention Division PROJECT NAME: Date: Project number: Staff Planner: Land Use Review Report So. Carlsbad Library 01/02/07 CUP 96-16x1 M. Grim Engineer: Proiect conditions: (Note: The following identifies specific conditions necessary to achieve Fire Department approval.) Fire Department has reviewed this application and has no comments or conditions to submit. GR MCUP &: ~UP ANNUAL REVI~"w SHEET fiLE COPY INSTRUCTIONS 1. COMPLETE PROJECT INFORMATION BELOW AND PRINT COPY. 2. DOWNLOAD (DMS) RESOLUTIONS AND REVIEW ALL CONDITIONS AND APPROVED PLANS (COORDINATE WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS). 3. REVIEW CODE COMPLAINT HISTORY (CODE ENFORCEMENT, POLICE, FIRE, ETc.). 4. CONTACT APPLICANT (OR OWNER) AND SCHEDULE AN APPOINTMENT FOR THE REVIEW. 5. COMPLETE REVIEW INFORMATION SECTION DURING REVIEW. 6. HAVE SENIOR PLANNER REVIEW AND SIGN. 7. PLACE COMPLETED REVIEW SHEET IN ADMIN IN-BOX FOR PROJECT FILE (ADMIN WILL FILE). PROJECT INFORMATION CASE NAME: South Carlsbad Library Extension Dove Lane CASE NUMBER(S): ~C~U""-P__,_9~6-=-"'-16~x~1 ________________ _ APPROVING RESO NO(S). "'62""3"'-5-"&"-"4""0""66"------------------ PLANNER COMPLETING REVIEW: ~C~ar"-!ol-"S~ti~ehl~------------ PROJECT HISTORY Does project have a code complaint history? If yes, check those that apply and explain below. D Code Enforcement D Police DYes Comments (include corrective actions taken and date compliance obtained): [g] No D Fire Prevention Q:'\CED'\PLANNING'\ADMIN'\ TEMPLATES'\MCUPANNUALREVIEWSHEET 03/13 3Jd (REVIEW INFORMATim!\ ( Has the permit expired? D Yes Date of review: March 17, 2015 ~ No Permit expires: !.:N~o!.!Eeex~p~i~ra!!ti~· o~n!..._ ______ _ Name: Carl Stiehl D Applicant D Owner ~ Other If other, state title: "'A,s,so"'c,ia,t"'e-"'P..,Ia,nn=e"-r ______________________ _ *CURRENT APPLICANT INFORMATION: Name: City of Carlsbad-Library and Cultural Arts Phone: !..7,60"'-"'6"'02=:-:=2.,05"'6'----------- Contact name (if different): "'H"'e"'a"'th"e"-r..:P..:iz"'z"'u"'to=-..:D"'i"'re"'c"'to,rc._ _______________ _ Address: 1775 Dove Lane Mailing (if different): ,sa"'m"""-e-,-.,---,-------..,---.,--------------- E-mail: heather.pizzuto@carlsbadca.gov (optional) *CURRENT OWNER INFORMATION: Does project comply with conditions of resolution(s) and approved plans? lz;J Yes D No If no, list below the condition(s) and/ or plan aspects the project is not in compliance with per resolution number or exhibit. N/A Corrective action( s) to be taken: N!A eted follow-up review and confirmed project compliance: Planner Sign 1 -lt-.a(l-tu-:r-zeru s~fll~i=7r-P-la_nn_e_r ___________ _ *Applicant and owner information must be updated for annual review to be complete. Q:"-CED"-PLANNING"-ADMIN"\. TEMPLATES"-MCUPANNUALREVIEWSHEET 03/13 MCUP ^UP ANNUAL REV<[W SHEET F|[f CQpy INSTRUCTIONS 1. COMPLETE PROJECT INFORMATION BELOW AND PRINT COPY. 2. DOWNLOAD (DMS) RESOLUTIONS AND REVIEW ALL CONDITIONS AND APPROVED PLANS (COORDINATE WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS). 3. REVIEW CODE COMPLAINT HISTORY (CODE ENFORCEMENT, POLICE, FIRE, ETC.). 4. CONTACT APPLICANT (OR OWNER) AND SCHEDULE AN APPOINTMENT FOR THE REVIEW. 5. COMPLETE REVIEW INFORMATION SECTION DURING REVIEW. 6. HAVE SENIOR PLANNER REVIEW AND SIGN. 7. PLACE COMPLETED REVIEW SHEET IN ADMIN IN-BOX FOR PROJECT FILE (ADMIN WILL FILE). PROJECT INFORMATION CASENAME: South Carlsbad Library on Dove Lane CASE NUMBER(S): CUP 96-16x1 APPROVING RESO NO(S). 6235 and 4066 PLANNER COMPLETING REVIEW: Kevin Pointer PROJECT HISTORY Does project have a code complaint history? Q Yes If yes, check those that apply and explain below. I I Code Enforcement Q Police Coinments (include corrective actions taken and date compliance obtained): N/A m No I I Fire Prevention Q:\CED\PLANNING\ADMIN\TEMPLATES\MCUPANNUALREVIEWSHEET 03/13 REVIEW INFORMATION Has the permit expired? Q Yes ^ No Permit expires: N/A. Does not expire Date of review: 2/11/2014 Name: South Carlsbad Library on Dove Lane Q Applicant Q Owner Q Other If other, state title: ^CURRENT APPLICANT INFORMATION: Name: Citv of Carlsbad Phone: 760-602-2893 Contact name (if different): Toe Garuba, Municipal Property Manager Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue Mailing (if different): N/A E-mail: joe.garuba@carlsbadca.gov (optional) *CURRENT OWNER INFORMATION: Name: City of Carlsbad Phone: 760-602-2893 Contact name (if different): joe.garuba@carlsbadca.gov Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue Mailing (if different): N/A E-mail: joe.garuba@carlsbadca.gov (optional) Does project comply with conditions of resolution(s) and approved plans? ^ Yes Q No If no, list below the condition(s) and/or plan aspects the project is not in compliance with per resolution number or exhibit. N/A Corrective action(s) to be taken: N/A Date pkutmer completed follow-up review and.aonfirmed proj ecLf ompliance: Planner Signature Serfior Planner *Applicant and owner information must be updated for annual review to be complete. Q:\CED\Pl_ANNlNG\ADMiN\TEMPLATES\MCUPANNUALREVlEWSHEET 03/1 3 A>-"- FILE COPY V^CARLSBAD " Planning Division www.carlsbadca.gov October 17, 2011 Belinda Martinez-Canez .1114 West St Oceanside CA 92054 SUBJECT: CAR 11-01- CAFECITO Your application for a coffee cart located at 1775 Dove Lane, has been approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The cart or kiosk is an accessory use to an existing principal use on the property. 2. Carts and Kiosks are to be used for the incidental sale of packaged food and beverages only. No on-site preparation of food is allowed. The sale of alcoholic beverages is prohibited. 3. The location of the cart or kiosk shall be located as per Exhibit "A", dated October 17, 2011. 4. The cart or kiosk shall not function as a drive-thru business and shall not be located in areas that: a. reduces the number of required parking spaces; b. interferes with vehicle or pedestrian circulation; c. presents a traffic hazard; d. result in the removal of mature landscaping; or e. are located closer than fifty (50) feet from any public right-of-way. 5. Signs shall be attached to the cart and shall not exceed a cumulative total of nine (9) square feet in area (including canopy, awning and umbrella signs, etc., but not including small menu signs). No one sign shall exceed a maximum of six (6) square feet. The size of the signs shall be in scale with the size and mass of the cart of kiosk. No off-site advertising or signs shall be permitted. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact Gina Ruiz at (760) 602-4675. Sincerely, CM>. CHRIS DeCERBO Principal Planner CD:GR:bd File copy Planning Director Principal Planner Debbie Fountain Joe Garuba, Municipal Property Manager Steven Didier, Management Analyst - Dove Library 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 © MCUP & #JP ANNUAL REVIltV SHEET i i INSTRUCTIONS 1. COMPLETE PROJECT INFORMATION BELOW AND PRINT COPY. 2. DOWNLOAD (DMS) RESOLUTIONS AND REVIEW ALL CONDITIONS AND APPROVED PLANS (COORDINATE WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS). 3. REVIEW CODE COMPLAINT HISTORY (CODE ENFORCEMENT, POLICE, FIRE, ETC.). 4. CONTACT APPLICANT (OR OWNER) AND SCHEDULE AN APPOINTMENT FOR THE REVIEW. 5. COMPLETE REVIEW INFORMATION SECTION DURING REVIEW. 6. HAVE PRINCIPAL PLANNER REVIEW AND SIGN. 7. PLACE COMPLETED REVIEW SHEET IN ADMIN IN-BOX FOR PROJECT FILE (ADMIN WILL FILE). PROJECT INFORMATION CASE NAME: South Carlsbad Library on Dove Lane CASE NUMBER(S): CUP 96-16x1 APPROVING RESO NO(S). 6235 and 4066 PLANNER COMPLETING REVIEW: Kevin Pointer PROJECT HISTORY Does project have a code complaint history? Q Yes If yes, check those that apply and explain below. I I Code Enforcement Q Police Comments (include corrective actions taken and date compliance obtained): N/A K No I I Fire Prevention Q:\CED\PI_ANNING\ADMIN\TEMPLATES\MCUPANNUALREVIEWSHEET 02/1 1 REVIEW INFORMATION Has the permit expired? Q Yes ^ No Permit expires: N/A. Does not expire. Dateof review: 2/13/2013 Name: Kevin Pointer Q Applicant Q Owner ^ Other If other, state title: Associate Planner CURRENT APPLICANT INFORMATION: Name: Citv of Carlsbad Phone: 760-602-2056 Contact name (if different): Heather Pizzuto, Library Director Address: 1775 Dove Lane Mailing (if different): N/A E-mail: heather.pizzuto@carlsbadca.gov (optional) CURRENT OWNER INFORMATION: Name: City of Carlsbad Phone: 760-602-2739 Contact name (if different): David Hauser, Property & Environmental Management Director Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue Mailing (if different): N/A E-mail: david.hauser@carlsbadca. gov (optional) Does project comply with conditions of resolution(s) and approved plans? ^ Yes Q No If no, list below the condition(s)and/or plan aspects the project is not in compliance with per resolution number or exhibit. Corrective action(s) to be taken: N/A Date planner completed follow-up review and confirmed project compliance: Planner Signature Principal Planner Signature * Applicant and owner information must be updated for armual review to be complete. Q:\CED\PI_ANNING\ADMIN\TEMPL-ATES\MCUPANNUALREVIEWSHEET 02/1 1 MCUP & •UP ANNUAL REVI#V SHEET ^ I u f INSTRUCTIONS 1. COMPLETE PROJECT INFORMATION BELOW AND PRINT COPY. 2. DOWNLOAD (DMS) RESOLUTIONS AND REVIEW ALL CONDITIONS AND APPROVED PLANS (COORDINATE WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS). 3. REVIEW CODE COMPLAINT HISTORY (CODE ENFORCEMENT, POLICE, FIRE, ETC.). 4. CONTACT APPLICANT (OR OWNER) AND SCHEDULE AN APPOINTMENT FOR THE REVIEW. 5. COMPLETE REVIEW INFORMATION SECTION DURING REVIEW. 6. HAVE PRINCIPAL PLANNER REVIEW AND SIGN. 7. PLACE COMPLETED REVIEW SHEET IN ADMIN IN-BOX FOR PROJECT FILE (ADMIN WILL FILE). PROJECT INFORMATION CASE NAME: South Carlsbad Library on Dove Lane CASE NUMBER(S): CUP 96-16x1 APPROVING RESO NO(S). 6235 and 4066 PLANNER COMPLETING REVIEW: Kevin Pointer PROJECT HISTORY Does project have a code complaint history? Q Yes If yes, check those that apply and explain below. I I Code Enforcement Q Police Comments (include corrective actions taken and date compliance obtained): N/A M No I I Fire Prevention Q:\CED\PL7^NNING\ADMIN\TEMPLATES\MCUPANNUALREVIEWSHEET 02/1 1 REVIEW INFORMATION Has the permit expired? Q Yes ^ No Permit expires: N/A. Does not expire. Date of review: 2/6/2012 Name: Kevin Pointer Q Applicant Ll Owner ^ Other If other, state title: Associate Planner CURRENT APPLICANT INFORMATION: Name: City of Carlsbad Phone: 760-602-2056 Contact name (if different): Heather Pizzuto, Library Director Address: 1775 Dove Lane Mailing (if different): N/A E-mail: heather.pizzuto@carlsbadca.gov (optional) CURRENT OWNER INFORMATION: Name: City of Carlsbad Phone: 760-602-2739 Contact name (if different): David Hauser, Property & Environmental Management Director Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue Mailing (if different): N/A E-mail: david.hauser@carlsbadca.gov (optional) Does project comply with conditions of resolution(s) and approved plans? ^ Yes Q No If no, list below the condition(s) and/or plan aspects the project is not in compliance with per resolution number or exhibit. Corrective action(s) to be taken: N/A Date planner completed follow-up review and confirn>ed project compliance: Planner Signature Principal Planner Signature *Applicant and owner information must be updated for annual review to be complete. Q:\CED\Ptj\NNlNG\ADMliMrEMPU\TES\MCUPANNUALREVlEW|*EET 02/1 1 MCUP &c CIP ANNUAL REVIElfjSHEET f |[[ QQpy INSTRUCTIONS 1. COMPLETE PROJECT INFORMATION BELOW AND PRINT COPY. 2. DOWNLOAD (DMS) RESOLUTIONS AND REVIEW ALL CONDITIONS AND APPROVED PLANS (COORDINATE WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS). 3. REVIEW CODE COMPLAINT HISTORY (CODE ENFORCEMENT, POLICE, FIRE, ETC.). 4. CONTACT APPLICANT (OR OWNER) AND SCHEDULE AN APPOINTMENT FORTHE REVIEW. 5. COMPLETE REVIEW INFORMATION SECTION DURING REVIEW. 6. HAVE PRINCIPAL PLANNER REVIEW AND SIGN. 7. PLACE COMPLETED REVIEW SHEET IN ADMIN IN-BOX FOR PROJECT FILE (ADMIN WILL FILE). PROJECT INFORMATION CASE NAME: South Carlsbad Library on Dove Lane CASE NUMBER(S): CUP 96-16x1 APPROVING RESO NO(S). 6235 and 4066 PLANNER COMPLETING REVIEW: Kevin Pointer PROJECT HISTORY Does project have a code complaint history? Q Yes If yes, check those that apply and explain below. I I Code Enforcement Q Police Comments (include corrective actions taken and date compliance obtained): N/A M No I I Fire Prevention H/ADMIN/TEMPLATE/MCUPANNUALREVIEWSHEET 03/09 ^REVIEW INFORMATION Has the permit expired? O Yes ^ No Permit expires: N/A. Does not expire. Date of review: 3/22/2011 Name: Kevin Pointer Q Applicant • Owner ^ Other If other, state title: Associate Planner •CURRENT APPLICANT INFORMATION: Name: CityofCarlsbad Phone: 760-602-2056 Contact name (if different): Heather Pizzuto, Library Director Address: 1775 Dove Lane Mailing (if different): N/A E-mail: heather.pizzuto@carlsbadca.gov ._ (optional) •CURRENT OWNER INFORMATION: Name: City of Carlsbad Phone: 760-602-2739 Contact name (if different): David Hauser, Property & Environmental Management Director Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue Mailing (if different): N/A E-medl: david.hauser@carlsbadca.gov (optional) Does project comply with conditions of resolution(s) and approved plans? ^ Yes Q No If no, list below the condition(s) and/or plan aspects the project is not in compliance with per resolution number or exhibit. Corrective action(s) to be taken: N/A Date plarmer completed follow-up review and confirmed project compliance: Planner Signature Principal Plarmer Signature *Applicant and owner information must be updated for annual review to be complete. H/ADMIN/TEMPLATE 03/09 MCUP & ^P ANNUAL REVIE^SHEET INSTRUCTIONS 1. COMPLETE PROJECT INFORMATION BELOW AND PRINT COPY. 2. DOWNLOAD (DMS) RESOLUTIONS AND REVIEW ALL CONDITIONS AND APPROVED PLANS (COORDINATE WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS). 3. REVIEW CODE COMPLAINT HISTORY (CODE ENFORCEMENT, POLICE, FIRE, ETC.). 4. CONTACT APPLICANT (OR OWNER) AND SCHEDULE AN APPOINTMENT FOR THE REVIEW. 5. COMPLETE REVIEW INFORMATION SECTION DURING REVIEW. 6. HAVE PRINCIPAL PLANNER REVIEW AND SIGN. 7. PLACE COMPLETED REVIEW SHEET IN ADMIN IN-BOX FOR PROJECT FILE (ADMIN WILL FILE). " PROJECT INFORMATION CASENAME: South Carlsbad (Dove) Library CASE NUMBER(S): CUP 96-16x1 APPROVING RESO NO(S). 6235 and 4066 PLANNER COMPLETING REVIEW: Kevin Pointer PROJECT HISTORY Does project have a code complaint history? Q Yes ^ No If yes, check those that apply and explain below. I I Code Enforcement Q Police Q Fire Prevention Comments (include corrective actions taken and date compliance obtained): N/A H/ADMIN/TEMPLATE/MCUPANNUALREVIEWSHEET 03/09 REVIEW INFORMATION Has the permit expired? Q Yes Date of review: 2/24/2010 Name: City of Carlsbad ^ No Permit expires: Never If other, state title: N/A Applicant ^ Owner O Other •CURRENT APPLICANT INFORMATION: Name: City of Carlsbad Contact name (if different): Heather Pizzuto Address: 1775 Dove Lane Phone: 760-602-2056 I Mailing (if different): N/A E-mail: heather.pizzuto@carlsbadca.gov •CURRENT OWNER INFORMATION: Name: City of Carlsbad (optional) Contact name (if different): Heather Pizzuto Address: 1775 Dove Lave Phone: 760-602-2056 Mailing (if different): N/A E-mail: heather.pizzuto@carlsbadca.gov (optional) Does project comply with conditions of resolution(s) and approved plans? I I Yes ^ No If no, list below the condition(s) and/or plan aspects the project is not in compliance with per resolution number or exhibit. The project does not comply with Condition 3 of Planning Commission Resolution 6235, which requires the approval of a Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) by 8/7/07 and installation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) recommended by the SWMP by 2/7/08. Corrective action(s) to be taken: N/A Date planner completed follow-up review and confirmed project compliance: ^^^^ JI/'./ Planner Signature Principal Plarmer Signature *Applicant and owner information must be updated for aivnual review to be complete. H/ADMIN/TEMPLATE 03/09 PROJECT REVIEW On March 9, 2004, CUP 96-16 - South Carlsbad Library was reviewed for compliance with the conditions contained therein. The project was found to be in compliance with all of the conditions of Resolution No. 4066 and no further action was taken. ACTIONS/COMMENTS: Signed: c: File Copy Data Entry Data Entry - please note: if #3 above is selected, the status of the project should be changed to Expired in Permits. PROJECT REVIEW On IVlarch 27, 2003, CUP 96-16 - South Carlsbad Library was reviewed for compliance with the conditions contained therein. The project was found to be in compliance with all of the conditions of Resolution No. 4066 and no further action was taken. Signed: c: File Copy # mco:: City of Carlsbad " Planning Department July 30, 2009 Jacob Moeder Associate Engineer 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: CD 09-08 - DOVE LIBRARY ENTRY IMPROVEMENTS The Planning Director has completed a review of your application for a Consistency Determination, CD 09-08, (APN: 215-050-70) which is a modification to CUP 96-16. The proposed modifications include: • Installing a zero curb face along the front of the library with associate truncated domes. • Removing a portion of the existing granite tiles and replacing with architectural concrete while installing the removed and salvaged tiles on the top of the redesigned granite bollards. • Retrofitting the existing granite bollards to relocate lighting from the ground in front of the bollards to a lighting fixture on top. • Adding a seat wall adjacent to an existing planter. After careful consideration of the circumstances surrounding this request, the Planning Director has determined that the application qualifies for a consistency determination with the approved permit. Staff finds that the use of architectural concrete is an equal replacement to the granite tiles and coordinates well with the redesigned bollards. The addition of the seat wall, topped by granite, is an enhancement. The application qualifies because the project meets all the findings of Administrative Policy No. 35 such as: the proposed project represents an overall upgrade, does not create changes greater than 10%, and the change would not be substantially different from the project as originally approved. Therefore, the Planning Director approves the changes to the project based on Planning Department Administrative Policy No. 35. Please submit two (2) blueline copies (24" X 36") of all applicable exhibits for the project file and a reproducible 24" X 36" mylar copy of the amended site plan. The mylar must be submitted, stamped "Consistency Determination", and signed by the Planning Director prior to issuance of any building permits for the project. CITY OF CARLSBAD DON NEU Planning Director DN:CG:lt c: Principal Planner, David de Cordova Senior Planner, Scott Donnell File Copy Data Entry 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us • • FILE COPY Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department January 27, 2009 Jacob Moeder Associate Engineer 1635 FaradayAvenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: CD 09-01 - DOVE LIBRARY BOOK DROP The Planning Director has completed a review of your application for a Consistency Determination, CD 09-01, (APN: 215-050-70) which is a modification to CUP 96-16. The proposed modifications include: • Removing a portion of sidewalk and landscape area to create a new vehicle book drop lane. • Relocating the existing book drop to the newly constructed book drop area. After careful consideration of the circumstances surrounding this request, the Planning Director has determined that the application qualifies for a consistency determination with the approved permit. The application qualifies because the project meets all the findings of Administrative Policy No. 35 such as: the proposed project represents an overall upgrade, does not create changes greater than 10%, and the change would not be substantially different from the project as originally approved. Therefore, the Planning Director approves the changes to the project based on Planning Department Administrative Policy No. 35. Please submit two (2) blueline copies (24" X 36") of all applicable exhibits for the project file and a reproducible 24" X 36" mylar copy of the amended site plan. The mylar must be submitted, stamped "Consistency Determination", and signed by the Planning Director prior to issuance of any building permits for the project. CITY OF CARLSBAD DON NEU Planning Director DN:CG:lt Principal Planner, David de Cordova Senior Planner, Scott Donnell File Copy Data Entry 1635 Faraday Avenue «• Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: JANUARY 23, 2006 CHERYL MAST, MANAGEMENT ANALYST Elaine Blackburn, Senior Planner via Don Neu, Assistant Director DOVE BOOK DROP RELOCATION The Planning staff has reviewed the proposed changes to the book drop locations and has determined that the proposed changes are consistent with the approved site plan and Conditional Use Permit (CUP). Therefore, no new or amended permits are necessary to make the changes. c: Chris DeCerbo File Copy Data Entry Planning Aide 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us Citv of Carlsbad Carlsbad City Library TO: ELAINE BLACKBURN, SR. PLANNER FROM: Cheryl Mast, Management Analyst DOVE BOOK DROP RELOCATION The Dove Library opened for operation in 1999. Location of the book drops was never ideal, but staff settled on locating both drops in the south parking lot near the staff entrance. This location has created much difficulty for customers to locate the drops. The Dove Library would like to relocate two current book drops to a new location in front of the library. Attached is a site plan showing the current locations as well as the new identified location. One book drop currently exists in the south parking lot near the staff entrance to the library. The other book drop is currently located along the front driveway of the library. Neither of these locations is providing adequate customer service to patrons. By providing an island in the front, east parking lot to house the book drops, customers can easily locate the drops and use the drops in a convenient, safe manner. Does this site plan, which identifies new book drop locations, need any permit amendments? Are there any additional recommendations that the Planning Department would like to share with the Library? I would like to thank you for your consideration of this request. CHERYL(MAST Attachment 1775 Dove Lane • Carlsbad, CA 92009-4048 • (760) 602-2011 • Fax (760) 602-7942 • www.carlsbadlibrary.org # # Citv of Carlsbad Community Development Febmary 5, 1997 THE VONS COMPANIES, E^C. C/O PAC PROPERTY 31921 Camino Capistrano #417 San Juan Capistrano, Califomia 92675 RE: VLAZA PASEO REAL SHOPPING CENTER, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA (jrentlemen: The City of Carlsbad is the property owner of the large lot within the Plaza Paseo Real shopping center complex located in Carlsbad, Califomia. The City will begin constmction of its 64,000 square foot public library facility on this site in September of 1997. We are reviewing several site issues as we finalize the project design. One issue that has been raised is the location of several palm trees and other landscaping that has been placed apparently on the City's property at the driveway entrance along Dove Lane. The palms were placed by the original shopping center developer at the time the center was opened for business now several years ago. The landscaping plan and character for the City's library facility will not include palm trees. Therefore, we would like to determine if the Plaza Paseo Real center is interested in removing and transplanting these palms within other areas of the center before they are cleared by the City's contractor in September. Please refer this letter to the individuals associated with the Plaza Paseo Real center that would be most appropriate to respond to this request. Thank you for your assistance and please call me at (619) 438-1161, x-4386 with any questions. JOHN J. CAHILL Municipal Projects Manager c: Les Medlin, McGraw - Baldwin Architects Brad Miller, Cardwell - Thomas Architects Mark Steyaert, Community Services Department Mike Grim, Planning Department 20/5 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (619) 438-1161 • FAX (619) 438-0894 ^ r^cj TfiTCity of Carlsbad Planning Department A REPORT TO THE PLANNING GOMMISSION Conditional Use Pennit Extension Item No. P.C. AGENDA OF: Febmary 7, 2007 Application complete date: December 6, 2006 Project Planner: Michael Grim Project Engineer: N/A SUBJECT: CUP 96-16x1 - SOUTH CARLSBAD LIBRARY - Request for an extension of CUP 96-16 to allow the continued operation in perpetuity of a 64,000 square foot City library at 1775 Dove Lane in the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and in Local Facilities Management Zone 6. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6235 APPROVING CUP 96-16x1 based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. INTRODUCTION This proposed extension of CUP 96-16 will allow the continued operation of the 64,000 square foot City library at 1775 Dove Lane from March 4, 2007 through perpetuity. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The applicant. City of Carlsbad, is requesting an extension in perpetuity of CUP 96-16 to allow the continued operation of a City library at this site. On March 5, 1997 the Planning Commission approved CUP 96-16 to allow the constmction and occupation of a 64,000 square foot City library at 1775 Dove Lane. Condition No. 5 of the approving CUP Resolution No. 4066 specifies that CUP 96-16 is granted for a period of 10 years but may be extended upon written application of the permittee (City of Carlsbad). Based upon recent amendments to the Conditional Use Ordinance (Chapter 21.42 ofthe Zoning Ordinance), the City library is eligible to be extended in perpetuity. IV. ANALYSIS A. The City library continues to be consistent with all applicable plans, policies and regulations described below: 1. Carlsbad General Plan; 2. Title 21 ofthe Carlsbad Municipal Code; 3. Local Coastal Plan (Mello II segment); and 4. Zone 6 Local Facilities Management Plan CUP 96-16x1 - SOUTH CARLSBAD LIBRARY February 7, 2007 Page 2 B. The adopted project findings for CUP 96-16, which are contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 4066 still apply to this project (CUP 96-16x1). C. The adopted project conditions for CUP 96-16, which are contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 4066, still apply to this project (CUP 96-16x1) with the exception of Condition No. 5 which is amended by Condition No. 4 in Planning Commission Resolution No. 6235 to extend CUP 96-16x1 from March 4, 2007 through perpetuity. D. No formal written complaints regarding CUP 96-16 have been submitted to the City. E. Annual reviews have been conducted for CUP 96-16 and the project is in compliance with all conditions of approval. V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Planning Director has determined that this project is exempt from the requirements of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15301, Existing Facilities, of the State CEQA Guidelines and will not have any adverse significant impact on the environment. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6235 2. Location Map 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4066, dated March 5, 1997 wor TO SCALE SITEMAP South Carlsbad Library CUP 96-16x1 9e City of CARLSBAD Planning DepartmlP A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Item No. ® P.C. AGENDA OF: March 5, 1997 Application complete date: September 29, 1996 Project Planner: Michael Grim Project Engineer: Clyde Wickham SUBJECT: CUP 96-16/CDP 97-01 - SOUTH CARLSBAD LIBRARY - Request for a Conditional Use Permit and Coastal Development Permit to allow the constmction and occupation of a 64,000 square foot library in the Plaza Paseo Real shopping center, located west of El Camino Real, south of Dove Lane in Local Facilities Management Zone 6. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4066 and 4067, APPROVING Conditional Use Permit CUP 96-16 and Coastal Development Pennit CDP 97- 01, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. INTRODUCTION The proposal involves reconstituting the approval of a Conditional Use Permit for the South Carlsbad Library in the Plaza Paseo Real shopping center. The previously approved Conditional Use Permit (CUP 87-09) expired without a timely request for extension, therefore requiring a new Conditional Use Permit. The project lies within the Coastal Zone, therefore also requiring a Coastal Development Permit. No revisions to the site or building exterior are proposed. The proposal does include minor modifications to the interior floor plan, mostly to accommodate recent requirements for physically-challenged access and facilities. The project meets the criterion established by Council (improvements valued at greater than one million dollars) for approval of a ten year CUP. Since no new circumstances have arisen that would affect the library or the library site and surroundings, staff has no issues with the proposal. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The City of Carlsbad Library Department is requesting a new Conditional Use Permit for the South Carlsbad Library located within the Plaza Paseo Real shopping center. The site is zoned C-2-Q, or General Commercial with a Qualified Development Overlay and designated C, or Community Commercial, in the City's General Plan. The site is currently vacant yet it is surrounded by the Plaza Paseo Real development, including the parking area and project slopes. The primary access for the library is off of El Camino Real via Dove Lane, however there is a reciprocal parking and access easement over the shopping center which allows library access from Aviara Parkway. CUP 96-16/CDP 97-01 - SOTTH CARLSBAD LIBRARY MARCH 5, 1997 PAGE 2 The South Carlsbad Library has already been reviewed and approved through various discretionary reviews. The first was the Site Development Plan for the Plaza Paseo Real mixed use development (SDP 83-11(A)) and the related Conditional Use Permit for the library (CUP/PCD/GPC 87-09). While the library site plan and a conceptual building elevation were included with the Plaza Paseo Real approval, the Conditional Use Permit was conditioned such that final building and site design would need further approval by the Planning Commission through a Discussion Item. On December 5, 1990, the Plaiming Commission reviewed and approved the 64,000 square foot library that had been approved by the Library Board Building Review Committee after eight months of discussion. Upon approval of the Discussion Item (DI 90-03), all conditions of approval for the library were met and constmction could proceed. Lack of an adequate operating budget has slowed constmction of the library, however, and the Conditional Use Permit lapsed into expiration without a timely request to renew. A more detailed project history is contained in the attached staff report for DI 90-03, dated December 5, 1990. As mentioned above, the proposed South Carlsbad Library is virtually identical to the previously approved project. The building's architecture, site layout, landscaping and intemal amenities have remained unchanged from that approved by the Planning Commission in 1990. As shovm on Exhibits "A" - "G", dated March 5,1997, and as fully discussed in the attached staff report for DI 90-03, dated December 5, 1990, the library follows the architecture of the early California Missions, with a stucco exterior and stone trim as a base material. The main element of the library is capped with a tile-roofed clerestory, similar in color and materials to the surrounding commercial buildings. The library building features an entry courtyard with a specimen oak tree and fountain. Inside, the library will still contain an approximately 200 seat auditorium/production stage, an art gallery, a children's library with extemal courtyard and a Friends of the Library book sales area. The only modifications proposed with the current project involve adjustments to accommodate new access requirements for physically-challenged individuals. The proposal is subject to the following regulations: A. General Plan; B. Local Coastal Program and Implementing Ordinances; C. C-2 - General Commercial Zone (Chapter 21.28 of the Zoning Ordinance); D. Qualifled Development Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.06 of the Zoning Ordinance); E. Conditional Use Ordinance (Chapter 21.42 ofthe Zoning Ordinance); F. Growth Management Ordinance (Chapter 21.90 of the Zoning Ordinance); and G. Zone 6 Local Facilities Management Plan. CUP 96-16/CDP 97-01 - MARCH 5, 1997 PAGE 3 TH CARLSBAD LIBRARY IV. ANALYSIS The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency with the applicable policies and regulations listed above. The following analysis section discusses compliance with each of these regulations/policies utilizing both text and tables. A. General Plan The proposed reconstitution of the South Carlsbad Library is consistent with the applicable policies and programs of the General Plan. Particularly relevant to the library are the Land Use, Circulation, Public Safety and Arts Elements. Table 1 below indicates how the project complies with these particular elements of the General Plan. TABLE 1 - GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE ELEMENT USE CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, OBJECTIVE OR PROGRAM PROPOSED USES AND IMPROVEMENTS COMPLIANCE Land Use Site is designated for Community Commercial uses. Project is a City Library, serving the southem portion of the City and surrounds. Yes Circulation Provide safe and adequately landscaped parking areas. Parking area/passenger drop- off area will be landscaped and meet safe design criteria Yes Public Safety Design structures to meet seismic design standards of the U.B.C. Entire building will meet all U.B.C. requirements, including seismic safety. Yes Arts To provide works of art in public places. The library site will contain several public art exhibit opportunities. Yes B. Local Coastal Program and Implementing Ordinances The South Carlsbad Library site lies within the Mello II segment of the City's Coastal Zone and is subject to the corresponding land use policies and implementing ordinances. The project site is located almost one mile from the Batiquitos Lagoon and almost three miles from the Pacific Ocean, therefore no shoreline development regulations apply. Since the site has been previously graded and contains no agricultural or environmentally sensitive lands, the grading provisions in the Mello II land use policies and the Coastal Agricultural Overlay Zone do not apply. No vistas or scenic panoramas exist on or near the library site and the library and associated services provide a visitor-serving use. Therefore, the South Carlsbad Library project is consistent with the Mello II land use policies and the applicable implementing ordinances. CUP 96-16/CDP 97-01 - STOTH CARLSBAD LIBRARY MARCH 5,1997 PAGE 4 C. C-2 - General Commercial Zone The project site is zoned C-2-Q, or General Commercial with a Qualified Development Overlay. According to Chapter 21.42 of the Zoning Ordinance, public buildings are allowed in the C-2 zone with approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The only applicable development standards contained in the C-2 zone include building height and placement of buildings. The proposed library building measures approximately 32 feet tall and has a clerestory on the top. As shown on Exhibits "D" - "E", dated March 5, 1997, the clerestory is actually a skylight that does not add any additional floor space. The building therefore complies with the building height requirements (35 feet maximum) of the C-2 zone. With regard to placement of the building, the C-2 zone requires a minimum 10 foot property line setback when commercial development is adjacent to residentially zoned property. The library is sited at the bottom of a large slope, over 40 feet from the adjacent residential property. Given the above, the proposed South Carlsbad Library is consistent with the C-2 - General Commercial Zone. D. Qualified Development Overlay Zone The project site is covered by a Qualified Development Overlay Zone and is subject to the provisions of Chapter 21.06 of the Zoning Ordinance. The provision requiring a Site Development Plan to be processed and approved has already been met through the approval of SDP 83-11(A) for the entire Plaza Paseo Real shopping center on Febmary 1, 1989. The findings required for issuance of a Site Development Plan deal with the compatibility of the use and the adequacy of the site and street system to accommodate the development. As previously discussed, no significant changes are proposed with the reconstitution of the South Carlsbad Library project and no external circumstances have changed significantly since the original approval of SDP 83-11(A). Section D below expounds upon the compatibility and site adequacy requirements, through the Conditional Use Permit findings, and the proposed library remains consistent with the Qualified Development Overlay Zone. E. Conditional Use Ordinance Since the project involves the placement of a public building in a C-2 zone, a Conditional Use Permit is required pursuant to Section 21.42.010(2)(I). The four findings required for a Conditional Use Permit involve compatibility and harmony of the use with the project site and its existing and future surroundings. The surrounding properties are already developed with their permitted uses (residential to the west, roadway to the north, and commercial center to the east and south). As discussed above, the project is still consistent with the City's General Plan and is setback, both horizontally and vertically, from the adjacent residential development. The library use is also compatible and complementary to the adjacent commercial uses. The existing site is still adequate is size and shape to accommodate the library building, outdoor areas, passenger drop off and parking with landscaping, as shown on Exhibit "A", dated March 5, 1997. The library is served by El Camino Real and Aviara Parkway, both prime arterials with capacities over 40,000 average daily trips, and by Dove Lane, a collector street with up to 10,000 trips per day capacity. All roadways can accommodate the 3,200 average daily trips generated by the library. Parking will be adequate in that the project requires 320 spaces and it will provide 350 CUP 96-16/CDP 97-01 MARCH 5,1997 PAGE 5 TH CARLSBAD LIBRARY spaces. Therefore, the South Carlsbad Library is still consistent with the requirements of the Conditional Use Ordinance. F. Growth Management Ordinance Since the South Carlsbad Library project involves no residential uses, many of the facilities regulated by the Growth Management Ordinance are not affected. Table 2 below show the project's compliance with the applicable Growth Management facility requirements. TABLE 2: GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE Standard Impacts/Standards Compliance City Administration N/A Yes Library N/A Yes Waste Water Treatment 35 EDUs Yes Parks N/A Yes Drainage PLDAD Yes Circulation 3,200 ADT Yes Fire Fire Station No. 2 Yes Open Space N/A Yes Schools CUSD Yes Sewer Collection System 35 EDUs Yes Water 7,700 GPD Yes G. Zone 6 Local Facilities Management Plan The South Carlsbad Library site is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 6. There are no special development conditions in the zone plan that apply to the non-residential project. All facilities required to serve the library are in place or will be in place prior to occupancy, therefore, the project is consistent with the Zone 6 Local Facilities Management Plan. V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Earlier analysis of the South Carlsbad Library project has been conducted on two occasions. The first was the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Plaza Paseo Real shopping center and related uses, including the proposed Post Office and the subject city library (SDP 86-l(A)/CUP 87-9). The second source of earlier analysis was the Master Environmental Impact Report for the recent General Plan Update (MEIR 93-01/GPA 94-01). With regard to the original Negative Declaration, no significant changes to the proposal have occurred that would require additional enviromnental review. With regard to the MEIR, the project was fully addressed. There will be CUP 96-16/CDP 97-01 - STOTH CARLSBAD LIBRARY MARCH 5, 1997 PAGE 6 no additional significant effects due to this development (ie, interior improvements to satisfy ADA requirements) that were not analyzed in the Negative Declaration or MEIR and no new or additional mitigation measures or altematives are required. The project is, therefore, within the scope of the prior Negative Declaration and EIR and no new environmental document nor Public Resotirces Code 21081 findings are required. All feasible mitigation measures identified in the previous Negative Declaration or MEIR 93-01 which are appropriate to this project have been incorporated into the project. For example, with respect to circulation and air quality, the project incorporates "good" circulation design, includes pedestrian linkages and bike facilities, and is located convenient to public transportation. A Notice of Prior Environmental Compliance was issued and duly noticed on October 6, 1997, and no comments were received. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4066 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4067 3. Location Map 4. Background Data Sheet 5. Notice of Prior Environmental Compliance dated October 6, 1996 6. Environmental Impact Assessment Part II dated October 1, 1996 7. Planning Commission Staff Report for DI 90-3/CUP 87-9 dated December 5, 1990 8. Exhibits "A"-"G" dated March 5,1997. SOUTH CARLSBAD LIBRARY CUP 96-16/CDP 97-01 BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO: CUP 96-16/CDP 97-01 CASENAME: South Carlsbad Library APPLICANT: CityofCarlsbad REQUEST AND LOCATION: Request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the constmction and occupation of a 64.000 square foot library in the Plaza Paseo Real shopping center, located west of El Camino Real, south of Dove Lane in Local Facilities Management Zone 6. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No 16044. filed on April 5. 1990 in the Office of the Countv Recorder. Citv of Carlsbad. County of San Diego. State of Califomia. APN: 215-052-70 Acres: 6.10 Proposed No. of Lots/Units: N/A GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation: RLM - Residential Low Medium density Density Allowed: 0.0 - 3.2 du/ac Density Proposed: N/A Existing Zone: R-P-Q Proposed Zone: R-P-O Stirrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad's Zoning Requirements) Zoning Land Use Site R-P-Q vacant North L-C vacant South R-P-Q parking lot East R-1-7500-Q single family residential West C-2-Q shopping center PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: Carlsbad Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 35 EDUs Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT I I Negative Declaration, issued [ I Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated_ Other, Notice of Prior Environmental Compliance City of Carlsbad Planning Department PUBLIC NOTICE OF PRIOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE Please Take Notice: The Planning Department has determined that the environmental effects of the project described below have already been considered in conjunction with previously certified environmental documents and, therefore, no additional environmental review will be required and a notice of determination will be filed. Project Title: Project Location: South Carlsbad Library Northwest corner of El Camino Real and Aviara Parkway, City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California. Project Description: Replacement of previously approved, yet expired. Conditional Use Permit for the 64,000 square foot city library within the Plaza Paseo Real shopping center. Justification for this determination is on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 30 days of date of publication. DATED: OCTOBER 6, 1996 CASE NO: CUP 96-16 CASE NAME: SOUTH CARLSBAD LIBRARY PUBLISH DATE: OCTOBER 6, 1996 MICHAEL J. HOL Planning Director ILLER 2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (619) 438-1161 • FAX (619) 438-0894 ® ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO: CUP 96-16 DATE: October 1. 1996 BACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME: South Carlsbad Library 2. 3. APPLICANT: Citv of Carlsbad 4. 5. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive. Carlsbad CA 92008 (619)434-2870 DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: July 30. 1996 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Replacement Conditional Use Permit for the 64.000 sauare foot citv library within the Plaza Paseo Real shopping center on the northwest comer of El Camino Real and Aviara Parkway. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. I I Land Use and Planning I I Population and Housing I [ Geological Problems • Water I I Air Quality I I Transportation/Circulation Public Services I I Biological Resources Q Utilities & Service Systems I I Energy & Mineral Resources Aesthetics I I Hazards Q Cultural Resources I I Noise Q Recreation I I Mandatory Findings of Significance Rev. 03/28/96 DETERMINATION. (To be completed by the Lead Agency) I I I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I I I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I I I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I I I find that the proposed project MAY have significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one potentially significant effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ^ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier Negative Declaration and the MEIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been voided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier Negative Declaration and MEIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, a Notice of Prior Compliance has been prepared. Planner Signature \ / Date Planning Director's Sighature Date Rev. 03/28/96 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration. • A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A "No Impact" answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. • "Less Than Significant Impact" applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not adversely significant, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies. • "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect fi-om "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. • "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. • Based on an "EIA-Part II", if a proposed project could have a potentially significant effect on the environment, but all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional environmental document is required (Prior Compliance). • When "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked the project is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR if the significant effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" has been made pursuant to that earlier EIR. • A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. Rev. 03/28/96 • If there are one or more potentially significant effects, the City may avoid preparing an EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce impacts to less than significant, and those mitigation measiu-es are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this case, the appropriate "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared. • An EIR must be prepared if "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked, and including but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant effect has not been discussed or mitigated in an Earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the impact to less than significant; (2) a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" for the significant impact has not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the impact to less than significant, or; (4) through the EIA-Part II analysis it is not possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to below a level of significance. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the forai under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant. Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:. a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (Sources: #1, pg. 8, #2, pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? (#1, pg. 8, #2, pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18) c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? (#l,pg. 8, #2, pgs 5.6-1 -5.6-18) d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses? (#1, pg. 8, #2, pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18) e) Dismpt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-income or minority community)? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.5-1 - 5.5-6) Potentially Significant Impact • • • • • Potentially Less Than Significant Significan Unless t Impact Mitigation Incorporated No Impact • • • • • • • • • • II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.5-1 - 5.5-6) b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.5-1 -5.5-6) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.5-1 - 5.5-6) • • • • • • • • • K III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Faultrupnire?(#l,pg7;#2,pgs5.1-1 -5.1-15) b) Seismic ground shalcing? (#1, pg 7; #2, pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1- 15) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? (# 1, pg 7; #2, pgs 5.1-1 -5.1-15) d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (#1, pg 7; #2, pgs 5.1- 1 -5.1-15) e) Landslides or mudflows? (#1, pg 7; #2, pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1- 15) f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? (#1, pg 7; #2, pgs 5.1-1 -5.1-15) g) Subsidence ofthe land? (#1, pg 7; #2, pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1- 15) h) Expansive soils? (#1, pg 7; #2, pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15) i) Unique geologic or physical features? (#1, pg 7; #2, pgs5.1-l -5.1-15) IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage pattems, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.2- 1 -5.2-11) • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-11) c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-11) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-11) e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-11) f) Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-11) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? (#1, pg8;#2, pgs 5.2-1 -5.2-11) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.2- 1-5.2-11) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.2-1 -5.2-11) Potentially Potentially Less Than Significant Significant Significan Impact Unless t Impact Mitigation Incorporated No Impact • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.3-1 -5.3-12) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.3-1 -5.3-12) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.3-1 - 5.3- 12) d) Create objectionable odors? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.3-1 - 5.3-12) VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7-22) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7- 22) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? (#l,pg9;#2, pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7-22) d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.7-1 -5.7-22) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? (#1, pg9;#2, pgs 5.7-1 -5.7-22) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting altemative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (#1, ' pg 9; #2, pgs 5.7-1-5.7-22) g) Rail, waterbome or air traffic impacts? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7-22) • • • • • • • • • • • • • K • • • • • m • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Vll. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-24 ) b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.4-1 -5.4-24) c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-24) d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? (#l,pg8;#2, pgs 5.4-1 -5.4-24) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-24) Potentially Significant Impact • • • • • Potentially Less Than Significant Significan Unless t Impact Mitigation Incorporated No Impact • • • • • • K • • • • VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal? a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? (#1, pgs 8-9; #2, pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.1-5) b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? (#1, pgs 8-9; #2, pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.1-5) c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents ofthe State? (#1, pgs 8-9; #2, pgs 5.12.1-1 -5.12.1-5) • • • • • • • • • m IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.10.1-1 - 5.10.3-2) b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.10.I-I -5.10.3-2) c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazards? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.10.1-1 - 5.10.3-2) d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.10.1-1 - 5.10.3-2) e) Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or nees? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.10.1-1 - 5.10.3-2) • • • ^ • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.9-1 -5.9-15) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (#1, pg 8; #2, pgs 5.9-1 -5.9-15) • • • • • • XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or resuk in a need for new or altered govemment services in any of the following areas: Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). a) Fire protection? (#1, pg 9; #2. pgs 5.12.5-1 - 5.12.5-6) b) Police protection? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.12.6-1 - 5.12.6- 4) c) Schools? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.12.7-1 - 5.12.7-5) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.12.I-I - 5.12.8-7) e) Other govemmental services? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.12.1- 1 -5.12.8-7) Potentially Significant Impact • • • • • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated • • • • • Less Than Significan t Impact • • • • • No Impact XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or namral gas? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.1- 5) b) Communications systems? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.12.2-1 - 5.12.8-7) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.12.2-1 - 5.12.3-7) d) Sewer or septic tanks? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.12.2-1 - 5.12.3-7) e) Storm water drainage? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.12.2-1 - 5.12.3- 7) f) Solid waste disposal? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.12.4-1 - 5.12.4- 3) g) Local or regional water supplies? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.12.2- 1-5.12.3-7) xm. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic or vista or scenic highway? (#1, pg 9, #2, pgs 5.11-1 -5.11-5) b) Have a demonstrate negative aesthetic effect? (#1, pg 9, #2, pgs 5.11-1 -5.11-5) c) Create light or glare? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.10.3-1 - 5.10.3- 2) XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.8-1 -5.8-10) b) Disturb archaeological resources? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.8-1 -5.8-10) c) Affect historical resources? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.8-1 - 5.8-10) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.8-1 -5.8-10) e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.8-1 - 5.8-10) • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • m XV. RECREATIONAL. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional 8 • • • m Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). parks or other recreational facilities? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.12.8-1 - 5.12.8-7) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? (#1, pg 9; #2, pgs 5.12.8-1 -5.12.8-7) Potentially Significant Impact • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significan t Impact No Impact • • K XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Califomia history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? • • • • • K • • m • • M Rev. 03/28/96 XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analysis of the South Carlsbad Library project has been conducted on two occasions. The first was the Negative Declaration for the Plaza Paseo Real shopping center and related uses, including the proposed Post Office and the subject city library (SDP 86-l(A)/CUP 87-9, Source #1 above). The second source of earlier analysis was the Master Environmental Impact Report for the recent General Plan Update (MEIR 93-01/GPA 94-01, Source #2 above). With regard to the original Negative Declaration, no significant changes to the proposal have occurred that would require additional environmental review. With regard to the MEIR. the proposal is consistent with the applicable portions of the General Plan and is considered a Subsequent Project that was described in the MEIR and within its scope. There will be no additional significant effects due to this development that were not analyzed in the Negative Declaration or MEIR and no new or additional mitigation measures or altematives are required. This Subsequent Project is, therefore, within the scope of the prior Negative Declaration and EIR and no new environmental document nor Public Resources Code 21081 findings are required. All feasible mitigation measures or project altematives identified in the previous Negative Declaration or MEIR 93-01 which are appropriate to this Subsequent Project have been incorporated into this Subsequent Project. 10 Rev. 03/28/96 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION The proposed Conditional Use Permit is actually a reapplication of a previously approved, yet expired. Conditional Use Permit for a city library in the Plaza Paseo Real shopping center. The site development will include the building, parking areas and circulation, and landscaping. No significant changes, either in site or surroundings, have occurred since the project was last reviewed by the Planning Commission through Discussion Item Dl 90-3 on December 5, 1990. The project is, therefore, substantially the same project as previously reviewed and approved. AIR OUALITY: The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased gas and electric power consumption and vehicle miles traveled. These subsequently result in increases in the emission of carbon monoxide, reactive organic gases, oxides of nitrogen and sulfur, and suspended particulates. These aerosols are the major contributors to air pollution in the City as well as in the San Diego Air Basin. Since the San Diego Air Basin is a "non-attainment basin", any additional air emissions are considered cumulatively significant: therefore, continued development to buildout as proposed in the updated General Plan will have cumulative significant impacts on the air quality of the region. To lessen or minimize the impact on air quality associated with General Plan buildout, a variety of mitigation measures are recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include: 1) provisions for roadway and intersection improvements prior to or concurrent with development; 2) measures to reduce vehicle trips through the implementation of Congestion and Transportation Demand Management; 3) provisions to encourage altemative modes of transportation including mass transit services; 4) conditions to promote energy efficient building and site design; and 5) participation in regional growth management strategies when adopted. The applicable and appropriate General Plan air quality mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. Operation-related emissions are considered cumulatively significant because the project is located within a "non-attainment basin", therefore, the "Initial Study" checklist is marked "Potentially Significant Impact". This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for air quality impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan's Final Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no fiirther environmental review of air quality impacts is required. This document is available at the Planning Department. CIRCULATION: The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased traffic volumes. Roadway segments will be adequate to accommodate buildout traffic; however, 12 full and 2 partial intersections will be severely impacted by regional through-traffic over which the City has no jurisdictional control. These generally include all freeway interchange areas and major intersections along Carlsbad 11 Rev. 03/28/96 Boulevard. Even with the implementation of roadway improvements, a number of intersections are projected to fail the City's adopted Growth Management performance standards at buildout. To lessen or minimize the impact on circulation associated with General Plan buildout, numerous mitigation measures have been recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include measures to ensure the provision of circulation faciUties concurrent with need; 2) provisions to develop altemative modes of transportation such as trails, bicycle routes, additional sidewalks, pedestrian linkages, and commuter rail systems; and 3) participation in regional circulation strategies when adopted. The diversion of regional through-traffic from a failing Interstate or State Highway onto City streets creates impacts that are not within the jurisdiction of the City to control. The applicable and appropriate General Plan circulation mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. Regional related circulation impacts are considered cumulatively significant because of the failure of intersections at buildout of the General Plan due to regional through-traffic, therefore, the "Initial Study" checklist is marked "Potentially Significant Impact". This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the recent certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Coimcil Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for circulation impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan's Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of circulation impacts is required. 12 Rev. 03/28/96 LIST OF MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE) APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATION MEASURES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. Date Signature STAFF REPORT DATE: DECEMBER 5, 1990 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: DI 90-3 FOR CUP 87-9 - SOUTH GARLSBAD LIBRARY - Review of the final design of the proposed City Library located west of El Camino Real, south of Dove Lane. I. RECOMMENDATION The Library Board Building Review Committee has voted, (with one dissenting vote) to recommend approval of the current South Carlsbad Library site and building design to the Planning Commission. Agreement wdth this recommendation would require that the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 3171 APPROVING DI 90-3 based upon the finding and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND A. Proiect Historv The proposed South Carlsbad Library is part of a larger mixed use development including a shopping center, six-plex movie theater and post office. This project was approved by the Plaiming Commission on February 1, 1989 through Site Development Plan Number 86 -11 (A) and associated permits, including Conditional Use Permit Number 87-9 that specifically allowed the library use on site. When the project went before the Planning Commission, the library was plarmed on a conceptual basis only and the Conditional Use Permit required that the final design of the library be reviewed by the Commission prior to issuance of building permits. A conceptual elevation of the library was made part of the exhibit package. The original conception of the new South Carlsbad Library outlined in The Strategic Plan for Library Space Needs, was for a 58,000 square foot single story library facility. The shopping center itself was designed with shared parking and access to prevent a separation in circulation and parking lots. To accommodate this, a reciprocal access and parking agreement was entered into by the City Council in May of 1990. On April 10, 1990, the City Council approved an increase of the library to 64,000 square feet and the newly chosen architectural firm of Cardwell/Thomas and Associates began designing the enlarged building. Over the last eight months, the Library Building Review Committee has been working with the architects to assimilate the desired programs and organization into the library proposal. The current design and construction schedule is based upon an opening date of July 1, 1992. This discussion item represents the review of the final design as required by CUP 87-9. DI 90-3 - SOUTH CARLUT^ LIBRARY DECEMBER 5, 1990 PAGE 2 B. Project Design The South Carlsbad Library project is interesting as it has been designed from the inside outward. The driving factor for most of the design has been the program space desired by the Library Board/Building Review Committee. Included within the library design are a 192 seat auditorium/production stage, an art gallery, a children's library with exterior courtyard, and a Friends of the Library book sales area. Although these special program areas have combined into a large building, approximately 64,000 square feet, the architectural style has broken the structure into several smaller elements. As seen in Exhibit "A" - "G" dated December 5, 1990, the auditorium, art gallery, entry courtyard, and children's reading room are distinct elements attached to the main, two-story library building. The architects have derived the building architecture from early Califomia Missions. The exterior surface is stucco plaster, lighter in color than the shopping center, and includes stone trim as a base material. The main element of the building is crowned by a tile-roofed clerestory, similar in color and material to the neighboring retail buildings. The entry courtyard is framed by an arcade that leads pedestrian traffic from the parking lot into the library. The courtyard is proposed to include decorative paving, a specimen oak tree, and a water feature. Windows on the front and sides of the building have been kept small in both size and number to cut down on glare within the library. The building footprint has been reduced and the eastem parking lot design has been rotated to allow for more landscaping and a drop-off area in front of the library. The current library proposal has been reviewed by the Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments for conformance with the appropriate codes and standards. With regard to the building itself, the Fire Department is working vnth the architects to incorporate all required safety devices. The stmcture conforms to all required setbacks and, while the clerestory element extends above the 35 foot height maximum, it qualifies as a skylight and may exceed the height limit as it does not provide additional floor space. The circulation and parking lot design are very similar to the original site development plan and have been reviewed by the Engineering Department for feasibility. Landscaping within the parking area is equivalent to that approved through SDP 86-11(A). During the course of the Planning Department's review of the project, it became evident that the current library parking standard of one space per one-hundred-fifty square feet of floor area (1:150) was perhaps inappropriate and overly restrictive. After preliminary research, staff recommended a reevaluation of the library parking in Resolution of Intention (ROI 184) presented to the Planning Commission on October 17, 1990. Because no survey of library parking adequacy was conducted prior to adoption in 1986 of the current standard of 1:150, staff believed more research in this area was necessary. .J ^^^^ DI 90-3 - SOUTH CARL3IR. LIBRARY DECEMBER 5, 1990 PAGE 3 This research involved polling numerous jurisdictions as to their library parking standards, investigating existing library developments and their parking supplies, and searching periodicals for pertinent studies. The results ofthis research indicated that a standard of between 1:200 and 1:350 was a logical and adequate requirement. On December 5, 1990, the Planning Commission will hold a public hearing regarding the Zone Code Amendment for library parking standards which proposes to change the standard from one space per one hundred-fifty square feet of floor area (1:150) to one space per two himdred square feet (1:200). The current 64,000 sq. ft. South Carlsbad Library design, if parked at 1:200, would require 320 spaces. The proposed site plan provides 350 parking spaces on the library parcel. Because this ratio does not meet the current ordinance, approval of this discussion item has been conditioned subject to approval of ZCA 90-1. Should the Plarming Commission and/or City Council reject the suggested parking standard amendment, either a reduction in building size or a redesign of the library parking lot to include a parking stmcture would be necessary. The provisional site plan for a parking stmcture including elevations is shown on Exhibits "H" - "I" dated December 5, 1990. If the Zone Code Amendment is approved, the new library would provide more parking than is required. The final item of analysis is the topic of compatibility with the Plaza Paseo Real Shopping Center. It is the Plarming Staffs understanding that the Planning Conunission intended the library to be similar in architecture to the rest of the center. This is reflected in the conceptual library elevation contained in the exhibit package for SDP 86-11(A). During design of the library, however, the architects and the Library Board/Building Review Committee have concluded that the library building should be distinctive in architecture. According to Richard Cardwell of Cardwell/Thomas and Associates, since the library is a municipal building, the stmcture should reflect a more timeless architectural style than the shopping center. This was accomplished by "emphasizing the calm dignity and permanence which belongs to a public building." This included a less decorative, less rounded building design and a lighter exterior coloration. The architects, while designing the library to be a "good neighbor" to the retail buildings, felt that distinctive architectural style was necessary to set the building apart from the center. The existing library pad is 20 feet above the rest of the center, further setting it apart from the retail complex. If the intention of the Planning Commission was to have a library building designed vdth similar architecture to the shopping center, then the Plaiming Department staff recommends that the proposed design does not meet this intention. If the Planning Commission was intending the library building to be distinctive from the center, as in the rationale described above, staff agrees that the current proposal accomplishes this goal. DI 90-3 - SOUTH CARLSWt. LIBRARY DECEMBER 5, 1990 PAGE 4 In summary, approval of this discussion item would satisfy condition no. 4 of Plarming Commission Resolution No. 2815 and allow the design and constmction schedule of the South Carlsbad Library to proceed. ATTACHMENTS 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3170 2. Location Map 3. Exhibits "A" - "I", dated December 5, 1990 MG:km November 9, 1990 STAFF REPORT DATE: DECEMBER 5, 1990 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM; PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: DI 90-3 FOR CUP 87-9 - SOUTH CARLSBAD LIBRARY - Review of the final design of the proposed City Library located west of El Camino Real, south of Dove Lane. 1. RECOMMENDATION The Library Board Building Review Committee has voted, (with one dissenting vote) to recommend approval of the current South Carlsbad Library site and building design to the Planning Commission. Agreement with this recommendation would require that the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 3171 APPROVING DI 90-3 based upon the finding and subject to the conditions contained therein. n. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND A. Proiect Historv The proposed South Carlsbad Library is part of a larger mixed use development including a shopping center, six-plex movie theater and post office. This project was approved by the Planning Commission on Febmary 1, 1989 through Site Development Plan Number 86 -11(A) and associated permits, including Conditional Use Permit Number 87-9 that specifically allowed the library use on site. When the project went before the Planning Commission, the library was planned on a conceptual basis only and the Conditional Use Permit required that the final design of the libraiy be reviewed by the Commission prior to issuance of building permits. A conceptual elevation of the library was made part of the exhibit package. The original conception of the new South Carlsbad Library outlined in The Strategic Plan for Library Space Needs, was for a 58,000 square foot single story library facility. The shopping center itself was designed with shared parking and access to prevent a separation in circulation and parking lots. To accommodate this, a reciprocal access and parking agreement was entered into by the City Council in May of 1990. On April 10, 1990, the City Council approved an increase of the library to 64,000 square feet and the newly chosen architectural firm of Cardwell/Thomas and Associates began designing the enlarged building. Over the last eight months, the Library Building Review Committee has been working v/ith the architects to assimilate the desired programs and organization into the library proposal. The current design and constmction schedule is based upon an opening date of July 1, 1992. This discussion item represents the review of the final design as required by CUP 87-9. DI 90-3 - SOUTH CARLSf^ LIBRARY DECEMBER 5, 1990 PAGE 2 B. Project Design The South Carlsbad Library project is interesting as it has been designed from the inside outward. The driving factor for most of the design has been the program space desired by the Library Board/Building Review Committee. Included within the library design are a 192 seat auditoriimi/production stage, an art gallery, a children's library with exterior courtyard, and a Friends of the Library book sales area. Although these special program areas have combined into a large building, approximately 64,000 square feet, the architectural style has broken the stmcture into several smaller elements. As seen in Exhibit "A" - "G" dated December 5, 1990, the auditorium, art gallery, entry courtyard, and children's reading room are distinct elements attached to the main, two-story library building. The architects have derived the building architecture from early Califomia Missions. The exterior surface is stucco plaster, lighter in color than the shopping center, and includes stone trim as a base material. The main element ofthe building is crowned by a tile-roofed clerestory, similar in color and material to the neighboring retail buildings. The entry courtyard is framed by an arcade that leads pedestrian traffic from the parking lot into the library. The courtyard is proposed to include decorative paving, a specimen oak tree, and a water feature. Windows on the front and sides of the building have been kept small in both size and number to cut down on glare within the library. The building footprint has been reduced and the eastem parking lot design has been rotated to allow for more landscaping and a drop-off area in front of the library. The current library proposal has been reviewed by the Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments for conformance with the appropriate codes and standards. With regard to the building itself, the Fire Department is working with the architects to incorporate all required safety devices. The stmcture conforms to all required setbacks and, while the clerestory element extends above the 35 foot height maximum, it qualifies as a skylight and may exceed the height limit as it does not provide additional floor space. The circulation and parking lot design are very similar to the original site development plan and have been reviewed by the Engineering Department for feasibility. Landscaping within the parking area is equivalent to that approved through SDP 86-11(A). During the course of the Planning Department's review of the project, it became evident that the current library parking standard of one space per one-hundred-fifty square feet of floor area (1:150) was perhaps inappropriate and overly restrictive. After preliminary research, staff recommended a reevaluation of the library parking in Resolution of Intention (ROI 184) presented to the Planning Coinmission on October 17, 1990. Because no survey of library parking adequacy was conducted prior to adoption in 1986 of the current standard of 1:150, staff believed more research in this area was necessary. DI 90-3 - SOUTH CARLSlR.. LIBRARY DECEMBER 5, 1990 PAGE 3 This research involved polling numerous jurisdictions as to their library parking standards, investigating existing library developments and their parking supplies, and searching periodicals for pertinent studies. The results of this research indicated that a standard of between 1:200 and 1:350 was a logical and adequate requirement. On December 5, 1990, the Planning Commission will hold a public hearing regarding the Zone Code Amendment for library parking standards which proposes to change the standard from one space per one hundred-fifty square feet of floor area (1:150) to one space per two hundred square feet (1:200). The current 64,000 sq. ft. South Carlsbad Libraiy design, if parked at 1:200, would require 320 spaces. The proposed site plan provides 350 parking spaces on the library parcel. Because this ratio does not meet the current ordinance, approval of this discussion item has been conditioned subject to approval of ZCA 90-1. Should the Plaiming Commission and/or City Council reject the suggested parking standard amendment, either a reduction in building size or a redesign of the library parking lot to include a parking stmcture would be necessary. The provisional site plan for a parking stmcture including elevations is shown on Exhibits "H" - "I" dated December 5, 1990. If the Zone Code Amendment is approved, the new library would provide more parking than is required. The final item of analysis is the topic of compatibility with the Plaza Paseo Real Shopping Center. It is the Planning Staff's understanding that the Planning Commission intended the library to be similar in architecture to the rest of the center. This is reflected in the conceptual library elevation contained in the exhibit package for SDP 86-11(A). During design of the library, however, the architects and the Library Board/Building Review Committee have concluded that the library building should be distinctive in architecture. According to Richard Cardwell of Cardwell/Thomas and Associates, since the library is a municipal building, the stmcture should reflect a more timeless architectural style than the shopping center. This was accomplished by "emphasizing the calm dignity and permanence which belongs to a public building." This included a less decorative, less rounded building design and a lighter exterior coloration. The architects, while designing the library to be a "good neighbor" to the retail buildings, felt that distinctive architectural style was necessary to set the building apart from the center. The existing library pad is 20 feet above the rest of the center, further setting it apart from the retail complex. If the intention of the Planning Commission was to have a library building designed with similar architecture to the shopping center, then the Planning Department staff recommends that the proposed design does not meet this intention. If the Planning Commission was intending the library building to be distinctive from the center, as in the rationale described above, staff agrees that the current proposal accomplishes this goal. DI 90-3 - SOUTH CARLSPL LIBRARY DECEMBER 5, 1990 PAGE 4 In summary, approval of this discussion item would satisfy condition no. 4 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2815 and allow the design and constmction schedule of the South Carlsbad Library to proceed. ATTACHMENTS 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3170 2. Location Map 3. Exhibits "A" - "I", dated December 5, 1990 MG:km November 9, 1990 Q 9 • s. ®— _ibraru reovce SUPPLY AD RETLEN CXXSaETE FOJOATIQN A^O H»F0BCN3 PCB AklfalS WATBJ FEATIBE. COOCTIATE N FBXI VWTH <eT6T. Sffi 9/A59. CCNTB^CTOJ B TO COOesNO.TE I* SOWJE FOOT .ajXK-OUT CF. PAVtG FOR N3rAllAI10 CF Am wcac. PAVBZS AJE TD EE DQPSJ 1? Afaxm AET STt»E. KB=BJ TO CETAI. 9/A59 FOJ LOCATION. OerA».S AKO BdBtr OF WOB: tsojBsa. ^ FACE OF MASCNgr DAEK VtES rtXME KVEAKBH) f=U*KE JONTS N DONCtaEIE aJB SIB5THATE. 3SE ySlJKK OETAJLS. LOCATE SJANTE Bf=.aMaOM JOrJIS ABOVE THESE AT 3a-Cr O.C. MAX. DO NOT CUT PAVB2S AT CCNIEOL XINT -JONTS TO FOLLOW OjmiS BCK) PATTB*! Auditorlurr TPe3^ DRAN SB; CM. Relocated Spaces 1 \y ! i 1 !