The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutEIR 83-07; ROBERTS GROUP; Environmental Impact Report (EIR)'1 ROBERT'S GROUP PROJECT EIR 83-7 PART H CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE OCTOBER 17 1 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ii COMMENTS III REVIEWING AGENCIES IV NOTICES V DRAFT EIR I RESPONSE TO COMMENTS WOODSIDE/KUBOTA & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1. Comment: Thank you very much for furnishing to the Water District the subject draft EIR. We appreciate this opportunity to respond to the public water system aspects of the development that are addressed in the report. First of all, the Costa Real Municipal Water District has adopted a five-year major facilities program as outlined in Table 4 (page 9) of the report entitled "Final Report - Costa Real Municipal Water District - Major Water Facilities - Fin- ancing Plan and Rate Study ?? dated June, 1983, prepared by Bar- tie Wells Associates. A copy of this Table 4 is attached for reference purposes. As an amplification to the statements that are included in the draft EIR, the Water District master plan that is currently operative for the development area, as well as the current update of the master plan for the entire Water District territory, identifies specific projects that our Board of Directors has deemed appropriate to proceed with on an im- mediate basis. There are a total of nine projects listed in Table 4 (attached), and it should be understood by all parties that the capability of the Water District to provide pipeline capacity, reservoir storage capacity and all the other important features of our entire water system is predicated upon the time- ly completion of all of the facilities listed therein. 0 Response: This comment has been acknowledged and is hereby incorporated into the final EIR. 2. Comment: Implementation of the "Major Water F ac iliti es?? construction pro- gram requires a companion District-wide financial program to fund the important projects. As one of several elements of the financial program, the District has established a new "Major Facilities Charge" (MFC) effective on August 1, 1983. At that time, the initial charge for the MFC amounted to $300.00 per equivalent dwelling unit and based upon a graduated scale of increases, the MFC will be $880.00 per equivalent dwelling unit commencing July 1, 1984. The MFC is a basic part of the Dis- trict's capital facilities financing program. Response: This comment has been acknowledged. Basedon the max- N imum development of 516 dwelling units; $454,080.00 would be collected from the proposed development upon project implementa- tion. 3. Comment: S The draft EIR has specific comments with respect to water con- servation measures. In this context, we believe it is approp- riate to consider the maximum utilization of reclaimed water for the subject development. Under a recently approved agreement between the Costa Real Municipal Water District and the City of Carlsbad, the reclaimed water service is the responsibility of the City of Carlsbad. We, therefore, recommend having the City's input regardihg plans to develop a reclaimed water system to serve this development. Response: This comment is acknowledged and is hereby included as part of the final EIR. 4. Comment: • We also call to your attention several matters that are referred to in the draft EIR that require amplification and correction. The Water District operates an existing 18-inch water main that traverses the property in an east to west direction and depending upon the actual location of the new street in the area, it may become necessary for this pipeline facility to. become relocated. Additionally, a major transmission main that brings water to this immediate area is an existing 20-inch line in E1 Camino Real and the adopted master plan also indicates the need to construct a • parallel 16-inch water main along the west side of El Camino Real to bring additional service to this area. The entire project area is ideally located from the standpoint of substantial trans- mission facilities so that in addition to the construction of the local in-tract water system facilities, the implementation of the five-year program as set forth previously will provide for all of the water supply needs of the proposed development Response: This comment has been acknowledged and is hereby in- corporated into the final EIR. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 1. Comment: Palomar Airport is a County owned and operated general aviation facility located within the City of Carlsbad. The airport is open 24 hours a day. In 1979 a total of 268,000 take-offs and landings were completed, making Palomar one of the busiest sin- gle runway airports in the nation. Current economic conditions have reduced the number of operations to 200,000, however, we expect this to increase to 300,000 annual operations within a few years. Paraphrasing conclusions found in the Draft EIR on Page 91, third paragraph: 1. Aircraft typically will not pass over the site. 2. Noise contours found in the airport land use plan are presented in CNR values. Both these conclusions are incorrect. This project lies within the Palomar Airport three-mile Air Traf- fic Control Zone. The area is now subject to frequent low level overflight by aircraft and helicopters making both visual and instrument approaches. There is no practicable means by which such overflights can be avoided in the future. A number of ac- tions have been taken to reduce the impact of airport noise in nearby communities. These include in-flight noise abatement procedures, as well as restrictions on use of the airport. The Comprehensive Land Use Plan, dated May 1974, projects that 20% of all air traffic will pass over or in close vicinity to the site. The CLUP also prbjects the 1990 65-CNEL noise contour in CNEL values. Additionally, the site underlies a published major helicopter flight path to the airport. In recent years as a result of residential growth in the vicinity of the airport, the County and City have received an increasing number of complaints over aircraft noise. These complaints gen- erally come from residents living within five miles from the air - port. The proposed residential development is in this area. Based upon recent noise complaint experience at Palomar, the location is clearly a noise sensitive area. There is no doubt that the residents will encounter problems of compatibility with respect to the airport environment. Requirements for residential sound proofing in the project area can reduce interior noise lev- els and be of some benefit, but not a solution. If this development is undertaken it will be of utmost importance for the impact of airport operations to be clearly identified to and acknowledged, in writing, by each propective purchaser prior to the close of escrow. To this objective, airport management will recommend to the City of Carlsbad that the developers be required to grant an avigation easement over the property as a condition for approval of the project. Response: In order to respond to this comment, Elfend Asso- ciate s1 contacted Mr. Paul Dunholter, P. E., of Mestre Greve Associates, who indicated the following: The subject property is located within an area designated as clearly to normally acceptable with respect to airport noise based on the information contained within the County of San Diego Comprehensive Land Use Plan for Palomar Airport (May 1974). In particular, the site is located approximately 4,000 feet out- side the 1990 65-CNEL Noise Contour. The 65-CNEL noise level is the accepted standard for the assessment of compatible resi- dential land uses located adjacent to airport facilities. This standard is recommended by the Federal Aviation Administration, the State of California Division of Aeronautics, and the Palo- mar Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Based on this cri- teria, the existing land use is compatible with the noise environment. An increase in density on this site would not violate the standards of the airport land use plan, but would add residential population to an area on the immediate border of the restricted area. An additional issue raised by the airport related to the need for an avigation easement. Avigation easements are normally associated with projects located within high noise impact areas. In such cases, the easement serves to protect the air- port's liability from impacts associated with excessive aircraft noise. Based on the information contained in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for Palomar Airport, this site would not necessi- tate such a requirement. Such an easement would be consistent, however, with the City's desire to officially inform future residents of the potential of noise impacts. lMestre Greve Associates is a professional engineering firm specializing in airport noise evaluations and noise/land use planning around airports. H COMMENTS SIDE/KUBOTA & ASSOCIATES, INC. 2465 Plo Pico Drive • P.O. Box 1095 • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (714) 729-1194 October 4, 1983 HAND DELIVERED Mr. Paul J. Kiukas Land Use Planning Office City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Subject: EIR 83-7 -- Roberts Group Costa Real Municipal Water District Dear Mr. Howes: Thank you very much for furnishing to the Water District the subject draft EIR. We appreciate this opportunity to respond to the public water system aspects of the development that are addressed in the report. First of all, the Costa Real Municipal Water District has adopted a five-year major facilities program as outlined in Table 4 (page 9) of the report entitled "Final Report - Costa Real Municipal Water District - Major Water Facilities - Financing Plan and Rate Study" dated June, 1983, prepared by Bartle Wells Associates. A copy of this Table 4 is attached for reference purposes. As an amplification to the statements that are included in the draft EIR, the Water Dis- trict master plan that is currently operative for the development area as well as the current update of the master plan for the entire Water District territory identifies specific projects that our Board of Directors has deemed appropriate to proceed with on an immediate basis. There are a total of nine projects listed in Table 4 (attached), and it should be understood by all parties that the capability of the Water District to provide pipeline capacity, reservoir storage capacity and all the other important features of our entire water system is predicated upon the timely completion of all of the facilities listed therein. Implementation of the "Major Water Facilities" construction program requires a companion District-wide financial program to fund the • important projects. As one of several elements of the financial program, the District has established a new "Major Facilities Charge" (MFC) effective on August 1, 1983. At that time, the initial charge for the MFC amounted to $300.00 per equivalent dwelling unit and In Orange County, Santa Ana .111 CON5ULTINO *NOINER Mr. Paul J. Kiukas City of Carlsbad October 4, 1983 Page 2 based upon a graduated scale of increases, the MFC will be $880.00 per equivalent dwelling unit commencing July 1, 1984. The MFC is a basic part of the District's capital facilities financing program. The draft EIR has specific comments with respect to water conservation measures. In this context, we believe it is appropriate to consider the maximum utilization of reclaimed water for the subject development. Under a recently approved agreement between the Costa Real Municipal Water District and the City of Carlsbad, the reclaimed water service is the responsibility of the City of Carlsbad. We, therefore, recommend having the City's input regarding plans to develop a reclaimed water system to serve this development. We also call to your attention several matters that are referred to in the draft EIR that require amplification and correction. The Water Dis- trict operates an existing 18-inch water main that traverses the property in an east to west direction and depending upon the actual location of the new street in the area, it may become necessary for this pipeline facility to become relocated. Additionally, a major transmission main that brings water to this immediate area is an existing 20-inch line in El Camino Real and the adopted master plan also indicates the need to construct a parallel 16-inch water main along the west side of El Camino Real to bring additional service to this area. The entire project area is ideally located from the standpoint of substantial transmission facilities so that in addition to the construction of the local in-tract water system facilities, the implementation of the fiveyear program as set forth previously will provide for all of the water supply needs of the proposed development. In the event you have any questions regarding our comments herein or if we can be of any additional help to you, please contact the undersigned. gc Ja truly yours /~X" Y)'ubota, District Engineer Real Municipal Water District S Enclosure cc: Costa Real Municipal Water District (w/o enc) The Roberts Land Group (w/enc) Elfend Associates (w/enc) J Y K : p a f TABLE 4 COSTA REAL MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT MAJOR FACILITIES Project No. & Description Year Average Escalated Annual Cost Cost Bonded 1/1/83 (10%/year) Cost' 1. Hi Reservoir, La Costa 6.0 MG storage 2. Squii'es Dam I Cogeneration station 3. TAP Extension 4. Squires Dam II Terminal reservoir Emergency storage 5. Santa* Fe 11 9.0 MG storage and Transmission Main 6. Tap Reservoir 6.0 MG storage 7. La Costa Reservoir II 1.5 MG storage 8. Evans Point Reservoir 2.5 MG storage 9. 'D' Reservoir 8.0 MG storage 1982/83 $ 300,0002 $ -- $ -- 1983/84 2,500,000 2,750,000 348,300 1982/83 60,0002 -- -- 1983/84 340,000 374,000 47,400 1982/83 20,0002 -- 1983/84 200,000 220,000 27,900 1982/83 10,0002 -- 1983/84 200,000 220,000 2 -- 1984/85 1,000,000 1,210,000 -- 1985/86 1,000,000 1,330,000 -- 1986/87 1,000,000 1,460,000 528,300 1983/84 30,000 33,000 2 1984/85 300,000 363,0002 -- 1985/86 2,000 1 000 2,662,000 -- 1986/87 2,000,000 2,924,000 727,000 1982/83 5,0002 1983/84 250,000 275,000 2 -- 1984/85 2,500,000 3,025,000 383,100 1987/88 600,000 966,000 122,300 1987/88 1,500,000 2,415,000 305,900 1986/87 5,000 7,300 1987/88 250,000 403,000 $16,070,000 1 - 20 years at 10%, beginning in year following completion. 2 - Funded from current and prior revenues. 3 - Minimum project may be substantially greater in master plan. 4 - Preliminary costs only. Director GILLESPIE FIELD MCCLELLAN-PALOMAR AIRPORT RAMONA AIRPORT BORREGO AIRPORT COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AIRPORTS DIVISION 1960 JOE CROSSON DR EL CAJON, CA 92020 PHONE: (619) 448-3101 October 3, 1983 Jf TO: Mike Holzmiller, Director of Planning City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA. 92008 FROM: R. W. Severson, Airport Manager McClellan-Palomar Airport, 2198 Palomar Airport Rd., Carlsbad, CA. 92008 RE: EIR 83-2 Roberts Group This is in reply to your request of August 23, 1983, for comment relative to the proposed residential development in the vicinity, of Palomar Airport. Palomar Airport is a County owned and operated general aviation facility located within the City of Carlsbad. The airport is open 24 hours a day. In 1979 a total of 268,000 take-offs and landings were completed, making Palomar one of the busiest single runway airports in the nation. Current economic conditions have reduced the number of operations to 200,000, however we expect this to increase to 300,000 annual operations within a few years. Paraphrasing conclusions found in the Draft EIR on Page 91, third paragraph: 1. Aircraft typically will not pass over the site. 2. Noise contours found in the airport land use plan are presented in CNR values. Both these conclusions are incorrect. This project lies within the Palomar Airport three-mile Air Traffic Control Zone. The area is now subject to frequent low level overflight by aircraft and helicopters making both visual and instrument approaches. There is no practicable means by which such overflights can be avoided in the future. A number of actions have been taken to reduce the impact of airport noise in nearby communities. These include in-flight noise abatement procedures, as well as restrictions on use of the airport. S 1~ • Mike Holzmiller, Director of Planning -2- October 3, 1983 City of Carlsbad - The Comprehensive Land Use Plan, dated May 1974, projects that 20% of all air traffic will pass over or in close vicinity to the site. The CLUP also projects the 1990 65-CNEL noise contour in CNEL values. Additionally, the site underlies a published major helicopter flight path to the airport. In recent years as a result of residential growth in the vicinity of the airport, the County and City have received an increasing number of complaints over aircraft noise. These complaints generally come from residents living within five miles from the airport. The proposed residential development is in this area. Based upon recent noise complaint experience at Palomar, the location is clearly a noise sensitive area. There is no doubt that the residents will encounter problems of compatibility with respect to the airport environment. Requirements for residential sound proofing in the project area can reduce interior noise levels and be of some benefit, but not a solution. If this development is undertaken it will be of utmost importance for the impact of airport operations to be clearly identified to and acknowledged, in writing, by each prospective purchaser prior to the close of escrow. To this objective, airport management will recommend to the City of Carlsbad that the developers be required to grant an avigation easement over the property as a condition for approval of the project. R. W. SEVERSON - - - - Airport Manager - - - - - - RWS : bw Attachments 0 FIGURE 2 ELFEND ASSOCIATES VICINY MAP t -1i -- I f••" I I - - 1. S SCALE: V - 2900 F1'. NORTH Z . . . FIGURE Ill-i CNELCONTOURS\ SOURCE: Wilsey & Ham Daniel, Manna J01U11041 & M.nd,nhitl UWtthMtNSIVt LAND USE PLAN - PALOMAR AIRPORT WILSEY & HAM . . ICI S Ite Runway 24 right pattern-70% FIGURE 11-2 EXISTING FLIGHT PATTERNS Straight in approach r —, VORTAC approach - SOURCE: Palomar Airport MPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN - PALOMAR AIRPORT WILSEY & HAM a LAGOON HELICOPTER PATTERNS LAGOON PATTERN. CLOCKWISE WHEN RWY 24 IN USE, COUNTER CLOCKWISE WHEN AWY 06 IN USE. ALTITUDE 900' MSL. LAGOON ENTRY ROUTE WHEN RWY 24 IN USE OR LAGOON RETURN ROUTE WHEN RWY 06 IS IN USE. .- LAGOON ENTRY ROUTE WHEN AWY 06 IS IN USE OR LAGOON RETURN ROUTE WHEN RWY 24 IS IN USE. AVOID POPULATED AREA - * HOVER POINT PALO MAR AIRPORT CIA Nil t i DEPAR3k\ RETURN ALTITUDE 700'MSL TWIN TANKS r / PATTERN ENTRY ALTITUDE 900' 'IN A 1' POINT OPTION (GREENHOUSE - - OCEAN \\ EAST LACOSTA OPERATING AREA ENTRY/RETURN - ATTACHMENT 7 APPENDIX N • MODEL AVIGATION AND NOISE EASEMENT WHEREAS, [property owner]1 , hereinafter called Grantor, is the owner in fee of that certain parcel of land situated in the [City, County, State] more particularly described and identified in Exhibit A (legal description of property) attached hereto and made a part hereof, hereinafter called "PARCEL" and WHEREAS, E ] hereinafter called Grantee, is the [owner and/or operator] of certain properties upon which [airport], described in Exhibit B attached hereto, is located, said properties lying within [City, County, State] and furthermore being In close proximity to said PARCEL; and WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee wish to establish provisions so that aircraft usingthe [airport] shall have the right of flight and the right to cause noise, light, and other effects associated with the operation of aircraft In the airspace over and above said PARCEL. NOW, THEREFORE, Grantor, for its heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, hereby grants and conveys • to Grantee, its successors and assigns forever: 1. A perpetual public-use avigation/noise easement subject to termination as expressly provided herein, and right-of-way for the free and unobstructed passage and flight of aircraft, of any and all kinds now known or hereafter Invented, used or designed for navigation or flight in the air, of the class, size and category operationally compatible with [airport]. Said easement shall be In, through, over and across the airspace of said PARCEL in an airspace as described and depicted in Exhibit C (map of areas protected by easement including description of imaginary surfaces and elevations). 2 The rights herein granted shall Include the right in such airspace to allow, make and emit such noise, light, vibrations, fumes, exhaust, smoke, air currents, dust, fuel particles, radio, television, and other electromagnetic Interferences, and all other effects as may be Inherent to the operation of aircraft for navigation or flight In the air. .Insert appropriate names, titles, etc. in brackets used throughout the model. L N-i 3. Grantor hereby fully waives, remises and releases any right or . cause of action that It may now have or that it may have In the future against Grantee, its successors, and assigns, and covenants not to sue due to such noise, light, vibrations, fumes, exhaust, smoke, air currents, dust, fuel particles, radio, television, and other electromagnetic Interferences, and all other effects that may - be caused or may have been caused by the operation of aircraft landing at, or taking off from, or operating at or on [airportl. Said release and covenant shall include, but not be limited to claims, known or unknown, for damages for physical or emotional Injuries, discomfort, inconvenience, property damage, death, • interference with use and enjoyment of property, diminution of property values, nuisance, or inverse condemnation or for Injunctive or other extraordinary or equitable relief. 4. It is further agreed that Grantee as (owner and/or operator) of (airport) shall have no duty to avoid or mitigate such damages by, without limitation, setting aside or condemning buffer lands, - rerouting air traffic, erecting sound or other barriers, establishing curfews, noise or other regulations, except to the extent, if any, that such actions are validly required by governmental authority. Grantor reserves such use, rights and :_-privileges in said PARCEL as may be exercised and enjoyed without -. Interference with or abridgment of the rights hereby granted. 5. (a) This grant of easement allows the level of aircraft noise Impinging on Grantor's PARCEL to be the lesser of: (1) The annual CNEL reflected on the latest map validated by the (County of ) and filed with the California Department of Transportation, Division of Aeronautics in accordance with §5050 of Title 21 of the California Administrative Code, or (2) The annual CNEL reflected on any subsequent map validated by the County of ] and filed with the California Department of Transportation, Division of Aeronautics in accordance with §5050 of Title 21 of the California Administrative Code. (b) There is hereby created an irrebutable presumption that this grant of easement is overburdened by unreasonable use if the noise which impiiges on the burdened property exceeds the easement by an 'amount equal to or greater than 1.5 dB CNEL, and Grantor may seek Injunctive relief from the unreasonable use of the easement. (c) There is hereby created an irrebutable presumption that this grant of easement Is so overburdened by unreasonable use that its purpose is defeated if the noise which impinges on the burdened property exceeds the easement by an amount equal to or greater than 3.0 dB CNEL, and Grantor may seek a court finding that the easement Is extinguished. - . (d) The provisions of subdivisions (b) or (c) shall not apply under the following circumstances: (specify exceptions, If desired). N-2 6. This grant of avigatlon/noise easement shall not operate to deprive the Grantor, his successors or assigns, of any rights that it may from time to time have against any individual or private operator for negligent or unlawful operation of aircraft. 7. For and on behalf of Itself, its successors and assigns, Grantor - hereby covenants with Grantee for the direct benefit of the real property constituting [airport] that neither Grantor nor Its • successors in interest or assigns shall hereafter construct or permit the construction or growth of any structure, tree or other object that penetrates an approved transitional, horizontal, or control surface as described and depicted inExhibit C or that constitjitesan obstruction to air navigation under FAA Part 77, or that obstructs or interferes with the use of the flight easements and rights of way herein granted or that creates electrical interference with radio communication between any installation upon said airport and aircraft, or as to make it difficult for pilots to distinguish between airport lights and other lights, or as to impair visibility In the vicinity of the airport, or as otherwise to endanger the landing, take-off or maneuvering of aircraft. Grantee reserves the right to mark and light as obstructions to air • navigation any such building, structure, tree or other object now upon, or that in the future may be upon Grantor's property, together with the right of ingress to, egress from, and passage over Grantor's property for the above purpose. 8. All promises, covenants, conditions and reservations contained in this document are made and entered into for the benefit of [owner and/or operator] of [airport]. These promises, covenants, conditions and reservations shall run with the PARCEL, described and identified on Exhibit A attached, and bind Grantor's heirs, administrators, executors, successors and assigns to the maximum extent now or hereafter permitted by statute or case law and are Intended by the parties to comply with California Civil Code §1468. The real property first hereinabove described as the PARCEL is the servient tenement and said !airportl is the dominant tenement. Grantor for itself and its successors and assigns waives all rights under Civil Code §1542. Successors and assigns" as used in this paragraph includes without limitation: invitees, licensees, permittees, tenants, lessees, and others who may use easement rights reserved herein or use or be upon said PARCEL, and/or their respective officers, agents, and employees. - 9. Grantor agrees to defend at its own cost, hold harmless and Indemnify Grantee from any liability for or based upon the exercise - of the easement rights granted herein. - 10. The avigation/noise • -herein shall continue And shall cease to be Dated: easement, covenants and agreements described in effect until airport' shall be abandoned used for public airport purposes. . S . Signed: - (Signatures of Grantor) Source: Derived from Reference 47 and other examples of easements in current use. This sample easement is from:. AIRPORT LAND USE PLANNING HANDBOOK - A Reference and Guide for Local Agencies - prepared for the California Department of Transportation Division of Aeronautics by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and the Association of Bay Area Governments July 1983 C 14-4 4.' RECEIVED tftHDUSE 0 September 20, 1983 (619) 236-2015• san dl€go Local agency formation commission 1600 pacific highway. san diego. Ca. 9I0I chairman Dr. Charles W. Hostler Public Member executive officer William D. Davis counsel Lloyd M. Harmon, Jr. members J.B. Bennett Councilman City of Imperial Beach Paul Eckert County Board of Supervisors Paul W. Fordm County Board of Supervisors Marjorie Hersom Alpine Fire Protection District . tanley A. Mahr San Marcos County Water District Linda Oravec Mayor, City of Poway TO: Paul Klukas, Planning Department City of Carlsbad FROM: Executive Officer Local Agency Formation Commission SUBJECT: GPA 83-2 E1R83-7 - Roberts Group Thank you for the opportunity to review this Draft EIR. The EIR appears adequate for our use as a Responsible. Agency. WILLIAM D. DAVIS Executive Officer alternate members WDD : ABH: dh Alex L. Adams Greater Mountain Empire Resource Conservation District Mike Gotch Councilman. City of San Diego . i . - III REVIEWING AGENCIES LIST OF REVIEWING AGENCIES LAFCO Environmental Coordinator 1600 Pacific Highway, Fm 452 San Diego, CA 92101 Archaelogical Fellowship San Diego State University San Diego, CA 92115 Superintendent Carlsbad Unified Sch. Dist. 801 Pine Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Calif. Native Plant Society San Diego Chapter Calif. Native Plan Society P. 0. Box 985 Plant Society National City, CA 92054 Parks & Recreation Dept. District 6 Headquarters 1350 Front Street, Fm. 6054 San Diego, CA 92101 San Diego Gas & Electric Co. P. 0. Box 1831 San Diego, CA 92112 Attn: Mike Evans County of San Diego Environmental Division 5201 Ruffin Road San Diego, CA 92123 State Dept. of Fish & Game State Building 1350 Front Street, Fm. 6054 San Diego, CA 92101 SANDAG Attn: Intergov. Relations 1200 3rd Ave., Suite 524 San Diego, CA 92101 Dr. John S. Bradshaw Environmental Studies Lab. University of San Diego Alcala Park, San Diego, CA 92110 Jim Tennant, Park Dev. Dir. County Parks & Rec. Dept. 5555 Overland Ave. San Diego, CA 92123 Anne Geraghty Air Resources Board 1102 Q Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Esther Maser, Env. Program Coord. Dept. of Conservation 1416 Ninth St., W. 1326-2 Sacramento, CA 95814 Nick del Cioppo Ofc.of Hist. Preservation 1220 K St.Mall, 3rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 Jim Cheshire Dept. of Transportation 2829 Juan Street San Diego, CA 92138 S. D. County Sanitation Attn: Environmental Coord. 5555 Overland San Diego, CA 92123 Costa Real Water District c/o Jack Kubota & Assoc. P. 0. Box 1095 Carlsbad, CA 92008 S. D. Co. Arch. Society c/o Carol Walker 237 Fowles Street Oceanside, CA 92054 Fred A. worthley Jr. Reg. Manager Department of Fish & Game 245 West Broadway Long Beach, CA 90802 San Diego Coast Regional Commission 6154 Mission Gorge Road Suite 220 San Diego, CA 92120 Carlsbad Municipal Water Dist. 5780 El Camino Real Carlsbad, CA 92008 Manager Palomar Airport 2198 Palomar Airport Road Carlsbad, CA 92008 IV NOTICES . NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF DRAFT ENVIRONMENT IMPACT REPORT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the city of Carlsbad has prepared a draft environmental impact report in accordance with the Environmental Protection Ordinance of 1980 (Ord. 9557) regarding a General Plan Amendment to increase residential densities and to provide recreational facilities. The project is generally located in a County island south of Camino Vida Roble and west of El Camino Real as shown on the location map. The draft EIR for the Roberts Group is available for public review from August 23, 1983 to October 6, 1983. The original draft EIR is on file with the city of Carlsbad Land Use Planning Office and Carlsbad Public Library and will be available for public review and comment until Octiber 6, 1983. All comments shall be submitted to the Land Use Planning Manager in writing. CASE FILE: EIR 83-7 APPLICANT: Roberts Group PUBLISH DATE: September 10, 1983 ION MAP PAL OMAR AIRPORT r--- - It SITE /1 E IR 0, __ Mail to: State Cr!iighouse, 1400 Tenth Street, Rm. 12j.. Sacrernento, CA 95314 -- 916/445-0613 - See NOTE Below NOTICE OF1PLETION AND ENVIRONlE'iT.L DOCUiENT FORM j 1. Project Title: RCRFPT GROUT DROJECT 2. Lead Agency:City of Carlsbad 3. Contact Person:Pani Kiukas 3a. Street Address:1200 Elm Ave. 3b. City: Carlsbad San Dieqo 92008 (619) 438-59l 3c. County:___________________________________ 3d. Zip:_______________________ 3e Phone:__________________________________ PROJECT L0CAT1 4. County:. San Diego 4a. City/Conitunity:Carlsbad 4b.(optional) Assssor's Parcel tic. 2l5020-Ql 4c Section Twp. Range_________________ El Camino Real/ Camino Vidac.1 Carlsbad 5a. Cross. Streets: -• 5b. Nearest Coennunity:________________________________________ 6. Within 2 miles of: a. State Hwy No. 1-5 b. Airports Palomar c. Waterways Batiquitos Lagoon 7. DOCUMENT TYPE 8.LOCALACTIONTYPE EELA 01 _General Plan Update 01 NOP 02 New Element 02 _Early Cons 03 XGeneral Plan Amendment ___ 04 Master Plan 05 X Annexation 06 _Specific Plan 07 _Reevelopment 08 X Rezone 09 Land Division TdivIsion, Parcel Map, Tract Map, etc.) 10 Use Permit 11 Cancel Ag Preserve 12 Other_________________ 1O_Other: open _Snace_(7_ 9.TOTALACRES: 11. PROJECT ISSUESDISCUSSEDINDCCWEMT - 01 _Aesthetic/V1sual 08X Geologic/Seismic 15 k_Sower Capacity 22 s_Water Suply 02 _Agricultural Land 09 Jobs/Housing Balance 16 X Soil Erosion - 23— Wetland,'Riparian 03 XAir Quality 10 _Minerals 17 _Solid Waste 24 X.Wjldlile 04 XArchaeological/Hi storftal 11_JLoise 18 _Toxic/Hazardous 25 Growth Inducing 05 XCoastal 12XPublic Services 19 X_Traffic/Circulation 26 X Incompatible Larduse 06 _Fire Hazard . 13X Schools 20 XVegetatlon 27 X Cumulative Effects - 07 XFlooding/Crainage 14 Septic Systems 21 _Water Quality 28 0thercdj.ng 12. FUUDING(approx.) Federal $________________ State $ Total $ . 13. PRESENT LAND USE AND ZONING: Property nresently zoned for agrIculture use in the County. Carlsbad has designated for medium-density residential use (4-10 du. ac. ). 14. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: General plan amendment and corresoondinq zone change to allow high density residential uses (20-0 du.ac.) and onen space. 15. SIGNATURE OF LO AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE - . Date- - . NOtE: Clearinghouse fl1 assign denIiflcatiOn number -, for al l nw projects. If a SON Number already exists for a project -- - - ..; n.lr,u ttr .nr' n1,c f111itin. 03 jleg Dec 04 X Draft SIR. 05 Supplement/ Subsequent. EIR (if so, prior SCM —j - NEPA 06 Notice of intent 07 Envir. Assessent/ FOIISI CS Graft ETS OTHER 09 Information Only 10 Final Document 11 Other__________ 10.DEVELOPMENTTYPE * 01 Residential: UnIt;50° Acres _36 .2.. 02 Office: Sq.Ft. Acres ___Employees__________________ 03 Shopping/Conmerc1al: Sq.Ft._____________________ Acres Employees __________________ 04 _Industrial: -Sq.Ft.____________________________ Acres Employees_________________ 05 Sewer: MGD______________________________________ 06 Water: MGD 07 Transportation: Type_____________________________ 08 _Mineral Extraction: Mineral_______________________ 09 Power Generation: wattage__________________________ Type: EIR LOG SHEET EIR NO. 47 OWNER/DEVELOPER D21714 'OU' TITLE: &2ict [L -\c2I CONSULTANT: - PROJECT RECEIVED: PROJECTS: Completed /Received 1) Request for Authorization I N/ I 12) Authorization letter I NIA 13) Prepare RFP 1NI A I 14) RFPs out Firms I i 15) Notice of Preparation Out Post Pub. I Pt A I 16) Agenda Bill Agreement f J ::\ 17) Consultant approved by C. C. I r A I 18) Consultant begins work I ô I 19) Draft EIR I ô I 110) Staff Review Id I Ml) Staff comments sent OV- 112) Draft returned 50 copies I I 113) Notice of Completion Post /)V Pub. /tO13 icr,f 114) Draft out for Review i B174101 i 115) Draft to Library 14 3 I 116) Draft to Developer 117) End Review period I 16 ( 3 I 118) Comments sent to Consultants 10 119) Response to Comments I W 7,0 M I 120) End Final Staff review I 10 0M I 121) Notice PC Hearing 122 11 Staff Report to P I I ( I 123) PC meeting I 1° 124) Agenda 13111 I (t I 125) Council Meeting i l 1S3 I 126) Notice of Determination I I Comments: cr.b -_._ I CASE NO.: jFLI 3 7 DATE RECEIVED: APPLICANT: REQUEST: 44€.. ._a._ CUP dJt ENVIRMENTAL Posted: Prior Compliance:_________________ Published: Filed: Filed: NEGATIVE DECLARATION:__________________________ Posted: Published: Notice of Determination: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT:___________________ Notice of Notice of Notice of Preparation: Completion: - Determination: PLANNING COMMISSION 1. Date of Hearing: 123 2. Publication:_____________________ 3. Notice to Property Owners:_____________ 4. Resolution No. Date: /O- ACTION:_________ (Continued to:__________________________ 5. Appeal:_______________________________ CITY COUNCIL 1. Date of Hearing:'')/'_ 2. Notices to City Clerk:'''' 3. Agenda Bill:''''' . 4.. Resolution No.'' 5. Ordinance No. CORRESPONDENCE Staff Report to Applicant Resolution to Applicant: LJ Date: //// ~/83 ACTION: Date S .: : : : ••H'.. :.. .• : :•• . • ',-.. , : p / L_ I LI V V: V V V V : V V ' V Q V ,V V V 41• ,f V V ,VQQM11wi V Of Vj V •rVV.Vu,. V V V V V V V V5V flV$) P V V V"V V V V - 11 V ,V V 'V V V .S VV O 4V V V V , V V V V 11 V : V V' CV V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V VVV VACP4N74 V 'V VV V S V V V V' V V'Il V : VV VV - - 'V V V ,V• V V V ,V VVVV V V p V VV , V VV V - VV , V V V - V , - V - VV,4 f R •. ' k - - . •. 0 :1 ® PAR, B 4®PAR.0 N 37273 7 I 6 I .5 co 5:4OAC 6.35AC :&83AC rj Z.99AC 24 95AC 7. CAMI 'ç7 NE 303kl- 9 • T89 OSAC 38 T. rn 15 2@4 25 . .. i 2 \ 2OOAC RPAR.A •. 4 I ____ 6.32AC 4(c35 \)624-30 FIC Ab 16.65 A 7AC AC 28 CAC 'JI.24AC 3.43 AC LAS R 2D6 AC 2.96ACI .02 - — 1 347 . - .- . . - 0 •'. - . • . - -I 36.20A 20.96 AC. - .. --.....- POI. PAR. 2 PM. N88 I 1 - i 6.55 AC; 348.I .: - .- .. -: :: '' 20.02 AC.- . •:. :... - 31.65 AC . ..lip i57CAL a/ 4010 di ni 20.02 AC. • 17 - '3 483A _I - . 1. -. 134&38. R.0$. N. Vç7"E..