The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutGPA 06-04; Tabata 10; General Plan Amendment (GPA). . . , CITY OF CARLSBAD APPLI.ON FORM FOR CONSISTENCY DETE.NATION APPLICATION I CITY USE ONLY ~roject Number: CD \2>-1 Q I PROJECT NAME: ~ o..S ..A:p,. \ 0 1 Assesso~sPare~Numbe~s): e~~'~~-~0~~~-~~~~~~~~=~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Description of proposal (add attachment if necessary): ' I ! Would you like to orally present your proposal to your asslg staff planner/engineer? Yes No D Please list the staff members you have previously spoken to regarding this project. If none, please so state. ~~~ ~b, \Jo,.,-...,~\S)~ ~<-M ~v\s.. U'v~ ~ ~v~?~~ OWNER NNIIE (Print): "f ~~ MAILINGADDREss: t..e~_ k __ Ur· CITY, STATE, ZIP: (p.y\s\.,~l (b. C\.;l?\\ TELEPHONE: l:J 1£?0) '8-0 \ ,.... \p Q ;x) EMAIL ADDRESS: Y'"C.A\~~..S(Oit)<,. r..tl *Owner's signature indicates pennission to conduct a preliminary review for a development proposal. I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. t;;<.L ~A.(\,~2 SIGNATURE DATE APPLICANTS REPRESENTATIVE (Print): I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. S<-~ ~L-\re d SIGNATURE DATE MAILING ADDRESS: '\.1 01 \..U, ~~~--~~----+-----------------------------------------~~~~' ~~:p:;:;ZIP: ~~~ ~~s!Ql.\d.\ EMAIL ADDRESS: C. :ii <9 \Mr,$..JCMc S .J . ( ~ I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE APPLICANT AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ~-~-\:> DATE P-16 Page 2 of2 ~~ ......... 3a~ h...,s .. 'C<.v-si. ~ RECEIVED AUG 0 2 2013 wcx..oeo'S Revised 07/10 ' • •• CITY OF CARLSBAD APPLICATION FORM FOR PRELIMINARY REVIEW APPLICATION CITY USE ONLY Project Number: PROJECT NAME: Tabata 10 ---------------------------------------------------------------Assessor's Parcel Number(s}: 212-050-32, 33 -------------------------------------------------------Description of proposal (add attachment If necessary): Preliminary concept request to have staff review modifications to CT 06-13 Tentative Map Grading. lot lines. and pad elevations. Would you like to orally present your proposal to your assigned staff planner/engineer? Yes 1&1 No 0 Please list the staff members you have previously spoken to regarding this proJect. If none, please so state. Chris Garcia, Glen Van Peskl, Tecla Levy, P~ N~t.~ OWNER NAME (Print}: ~~~~~~~~~~~~ MAILING ADDRESS: -Z~~~==~~~~~~~- CITY, STATE, ZIP: TELEPHONE: EMAJt ADDRESS: •owner's signature Indicates permission to conduct a preliminary review for a development proposal. I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE ~D CORRECT TO THE BEST OF OWLED E. DATE APPLICANT NAME (Print): Lennar Communities MAILING ADDRESS: 25 Enterprise, # 310 CITY, STATE, ZIP: Ailsa VIejo, CA 92656 TELEPHONE: (949) 349-3000 ~----------------------EMAIL ADDRESS: davld.steam@lennar.com I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. 7/1412 DATE APPLICANrs REPRESENTATIVE (Print): Hunsaker & Associates San Diego, Inc. -Chuck Cater or Marybeth Murray MAILING ADDRESS: 9707 Waples Street CITY, STATE, ZIP: San Diego. CA 92121 TELEPHONE: (858) 558-4500 EMAIL ADDRESS: ccater@hunsakerd.com/mmurray@hunsakersd.com I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE APPUCANT AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORREC ST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. "l-~~--\3 DATE FEE REQUIRED/DATE FEE PAID: RECEIVED BY: P-14 Page3of3 Revised 02113 ' • • Appendix 1 OWNER NAME (Print): \V'\l •V \i. ( I, }J.:)• 1\y a k~ Q ,,I 1\ rt:A' .. b *"Owner's signature indicates permission to conduct a preliminary review for a development proposal." I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE JNFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ~~ ·-rjr•11'3 SIGNATURE DATE • • PRELIMINARY REVIEW CHECKLIST Staff would like to know what information you primarilY want from this review. With this known, we can focus most of our attention on researching and answering your main questlons(s). Please check the one or two boxes below which best describes the Information you would like us to concentrate on, and/or check the box marked "other" and tell us in your own words what information you would like from us. (8] SITE DESIGN: Focus is on reviewing issues such as development standards (setbacks, building height, etc.}, hillside compliance, landscaping, slgnage, open space requirements, and other physical aspects of zoning. Plans adequately illustrating these features are needed for review. 0 LANDUSE: Focus is on determining the compatibility of the proposed land use with the existing general plan and zoning designations, determining whether staff could support a general plan amendment or zone change, and determining compatibility of the proposed land use with surrounding land uses. 0 ARCHITECTURE: Focus is on establishing quality architecture and checking its compatibility with the surrounding area and against any applicable guidelines or plans. Building elevations or other architectural information are needed for review. 0 ZONING INTERPRETATIONS: Focus is on interpreting any aspects of the zoning ordinance. (KI LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING STANDARDS: Focus is on reviewing all engineering·related issues, such as grading, drainage, Best Management Practices for Storm Water Pollution Control, circulation and traffic, street vacations, easements, subdivisions, etc. 0 OTHER: In the space below, please list any other issues you would like us to review. P-14 Page2 of3 Revised 02/13 PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING IRVINE LOS ANGELES RIVERSIDE SAN DIEGO ARIZONA DAVE HAMMAR LEX WILLIMAN ALISA VIALPANDO DAN SMITH RAY MARTIN CHUCK CATER 9707 Waples Street San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 558-4500 PH (858) 558-1414 FX www.HunsakerSD.com lnfo@HunsakerSD.com • HUNSAKER &ASSOCIATES 5 A N D I E G 0. I N C. August 1, 2013 Chris Garcia City of Carlsbad Planning Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 • Re: Tabata 10 Preliminary Review Application Request Project Reference: GPA 06-04/CT 06-13/SUP 06-08/ HOP 07-03/CDP 06-19/LCPA 06-02/ZC 06-03 Dear Chris: On behalf of Lennar Homes of California, please find enclosed our request for a Preliminary Review of the Tabata 10 Project. Our current project submission includes both an updated design overlaid on the approved TM as well as a Preliminary Plotting Exhibit showing some dwelling units which are only to be considered "conceptual architectural footprints" at this time. Below are a few items explaining the design rationale and project benefits behind our project updates. • Street and pad grades have been revised to provide standard driveway access to lots that were previously inaccessible. The approved TM was designed with lots that were either too high above or too far below the street grade. • The project update proposes lowering the pad elevations of Lots 4-13 an average of four feet. These pads were too high above the street grade specifically for Lots 4-6 in order for a standard driveway grade to work within the 14% maximum allowed. • Similarly, the project update proposes increasing the pad elevations of Lots 14-20 an average of 3.3 feet. These pads were too far below the street grade and created a negative drainage condition for each lot. The updated grading also eliminates the cross lot drainage system at the rear of these lots by designing the pads to drain to the street in a more standard configuration. • The retaining wall located within the bio retention/detention basin along El Camino Real will be reduced or eliminated due to engineering constraints thus minimizing the potential wall instability that can occur within a wet or saturated basin. MM kc K \P999\2013V"<)59 docx w u 9999-044 7 VC./Ol/2013 • • C1ty of Carlsbad Preliminary Review Application Request August 1, 2013 Page 2 • • With the updated pad grades mentioned above, the maximum roof peaks would consistent with and no greater than those heights allowed under the existing approved TM. Therefore, the project updates will not impede the view of the adjoining properties to the south. • Lot lines have been shifted in order to accommodate corner side yard setbacks for Lots 13, 14, 20, 21 and 26. Additional lot lines were then shifted accordingly in order to maintain consistent lot widths as those shown on the Approved TM. All lots, however, still maintain a 7,500 square foot minimum size. The smallest lot size proposed is now 7,550 square feet where on the approved TM the smallest lot size was 7,506 square feet. • Retaining walls on Lots 1 and 4 through 10 are included as part of the project update as a result of the aforementioned necessary corrections of raising and lowering street and pad grades. • Finally, the project will update the sound attenuation along El Camino Real. The sound berm itself will be reduced in height and a small 4' sound wall added. The top of the new sound wall will be the same height as the top of berm shown on the approved TM. Also, the maximum 15' grade differential above El Camino Real as shown on the approved TM will not change. The updated condition will be consistent with and maintain that same maximum 15' height differential. The berm w111 be fully landscaped and will maintain the contour grading concept. The buffer will be enhanced and will maintain consistency with the El Camino Real Corridor Plan. There will continue to be a visual and physical separation for the future homes from the roadway as well as additional visual relief for the El Camino Real corridor from the development Please let us know if you require any additional information or have any questions. We would like to .request a meeting with staff to go over this preliminary submittal package and we look forward to your review comments. It is our hope that we can meet prior to August 21 51 to discuss the project details. Sincerely, Hunsaker & Associates San Diego, Inc. Cc: Chuck Cater, Hunsaker & Associates David Stearn, Lennar Communities Lester Tucker, Lennar Communities James Neil, Lennar Communities. MM.kc K \P999\2013\zx259 docx w.o 9999-0447 08/01/2013 City of Carlsbad Faraday Center .. Faraday Cashiering 001 1321401-2 08/02/2013 149 Fri, Aug 02, 2013 12:32 PM Receipt Ref Nbr: R1321401-2/0022 PERMITS -PERMITS Tran Ref Nbr: 132140102 0022 0030 Trans/Rcpt#: R0096286 SET #: CD130010 Amount: Item Subtota 1 : Item Tot a 1: 1 @ $682.00 $682.00 $682.00 ITEM(S) TOTAL: $682.00 Credit Card (Auth# 02237B) $682.00 Total Received: $682.00 Have a nice day! • **************CUSTOMER COPY************* • • City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll~lllllllllllllllllll Applicant: LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA Description Amount CD130010 682.00 2311 CAMINO HILLS DR CBAD Receipt Number: R0096286 Transaction ID: R0096286 Transaction Date: 08/02/2013 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 682.00 Transaction Amount: 682.00 • • CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) (FOR (FOR DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT USE ONLY\ USE ONLY) D Administrative Permit D Planned Industrial Permit D Administrative Variance D Planning Commission Determination 0 Coastal Development Permit ~DP{;(p-~ D Precise Development Plan D Conditional Use Permit D Redevelopment Permit D Condominium Permit D Site Development Plan ~ Environmental Impact Assessment J m Special Use Permit SJP c£::---~ Gf General Plan Amendment {:_ ~ tfbeh -c4-D Specific Plan D Hillside Development Permit 'HDP07-a p +eRtative PaFeel Ma13 Obtain from Engineering Department 0 Local Coastal Program Amendment ~-D2 ~ Tentative Tract Map C+ C~s?-t= D Master Plan D Variance D Non-Residential Planned Development 0 Zone Change ~C:b-~o-- D Planned Development Permit D List other applications not specified 2) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: II~· p~p, ~~ t ~~ --~--~~~~----------------------------------------- 3) PROJECT NAME: 7)/!?U;II /P --~~~~~~----------------------------------------- 4) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: ~ /.Pr fl£71'/:?etiTIAL ~1160/YIS/t?l/ 5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type) /JtNrA FIMttY MAILING ADDRESS P, P, /)())(' ~ 7"1 6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type) 5MA A-~ 4tiiHE~ MAILING ADDRESS CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE EMAIL ADDRESS: I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. &~l2~~ SIGNATURE -v/2--/::?~ DATE EMAIL ADDRESS: I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. SIGNATURE DATE 7) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION f?Ma-1-j ~ e J'P Jill' 'f'i#l, ?'Jn q aRn7AIJ, ~~1/Nrl &I' S"M't;?JU.~ NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30P.M. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BEFILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00P.M. Form 14 Rev. 1 2/04 'Df3\{ 00 0 ~ 5 PAGE 1 OF 5 ~ ~ • • 8) LOCATION OF PROJECT: (/_211 CAMihP 1//ti.S ~IVe, STREET ADDRESS ON THE I '7PV11f (NORTH, soOTH. EAST, WEST) I siDE oF 1 e~JMINP Nteis t:RtVl! (NAME OF STREET) BETWEEN I MJI.IPN RP"P AND 1 e;. c,t/MI'NP H£4'- (NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREET) 9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE ~ 1 0) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS ~11) NUMBER OF EXISTING 012) PROPOSED NUMBER 0 RESIDENTIAL UNITS OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS ~ 13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION ~14) PROPOSED IND OFFICE/ 0 15) PROPOSED COMM 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE 16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED 017) PROPOSED INCREASE It(// 118) PROPOSED SEWER [!D PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE INADT USAGE IN EDU 19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 020) EXISTING GENERAL 1/?I.M 121) PROPOSED GENERAL I fU-/1111 PLAN PLAN DESIGNATION 22) EXISTING ZONING EJ23) PROPOSED ZONING IRtM 124) HABITAT IMPACTS ~ IF YES, ASSIGN HMP # 25) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. 1/WE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE /'ce.huu c,ZJaL;;_ SIGNATURE FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION APPLICATION TYPE FEE REQUIRED TOTAL FEE REQUIRED Form 14 Rev. 1 2/04 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPT DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED RECEIVED BY: PAGE 2 OF 5 ' • CITY OF CARLSBAD APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR: COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (SINGLE FAMILY REGULAR AND MINOR) COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION (FOR ALL COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMITS) This supplemental application is to be filed for any development requiring a Coastal Development Permit issued by the City of Carlsbad. **Application checklist for Non-Single Family Regular Coastal Development Permits covered under separate handout. A proposed project requiring that multiple applications be filed must be submitted prior to 3:30 p.m. A proposed project requiring that only one application be filed must be submitted prior to 4:00 p.m. All joint application exhibits, i.e. Tentative Map and Planned Development Site Plan should be prepared at the same scale. (Use a scale no smaller than I"= 40' .) This supplemental application is to be filed for any development requiring a Coastal Development Permit issued by the City of Carlsbad. I. GENERAL BACKGROUND A. Estimated Cost of Development: Development costing $60,000 or more does not qualify as a Minor Coastal Development Permit. The Planning Director shall make the final determination regarding a project's cost of development. The primary basis for determining cost of development will be the application of dollar costs per square foot for different types of residential construction. These costs are set by the International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO) and are applied throughout San Diego County. Please complete the following information to assist in the determination of this project's cost of development (Contractor proposals may also be submitted for consideration by the Planning Director). Please refer to the current fee schedule for the appropriate $/square foot fee rate. => New Residential Square Footage: N/A square feet x $ /sq. ft.== $ I => Residential Addition Square Footage: N/J square feet x $ /sq. ft.=$ => Any Garage Square Footage: Nfl, square feet x $ /sq. ft. == $ • Residential Conversion Square Footage: "/1 square feet x $ /sq. ft.=$ Please contact the City of Carlsbad Building Department for current fee rate for Non- Residential uses (i.e. Retail/Store; Restaurants; Office; and Manufacturing/Warehouse uses.) AiM_ ______ square feet x $ __ /sq. ft. = $ _____ ....:1'--J~'/!JJL:.•~----- COST OF DEVELOPMENT ESTIMATE: $ _______ _:_11+)-=-/f ____ _ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Form 13 Revised 04/04 Page 1 of7 II. Ill • • • Form 13 • B. Do you wish to apply for: 1. A Minor Coastal Development Permit (Under $60,000 cost estimate) D 2. A Regular Coastal Development Permit ($60,000 or more cost estimate) 12(1 C. Street address of proposed development ~,II eAII/111~ 11/t.LS t:JtletV£, D. Assessor's Parcel Number of proposed development ~~~·t'fiJ·~~ ;1L E. Development Description: Briefly describe project: __ 'J.'-~=---t:::...W::._:_~R,~-~~::...:~:__:~::_:_:'e=-:.::'ll~rt--=--:.!4'-={,:::::___:Si=-=iri.-='S::..:!~~V.:..:!J.-=:s4:..::.k?N=c_-- F. Describe the present land uses (i.e. vacant land, single family homes, apartments, offices, etc.) that surround the proposed development to the: North: ftES:~IITI~ South: flMitJV/7141/' East: Jl£~11/~n~(., West: nE~KJ~rt4l., G. Is project located within a I 00-year flood plain? DYes ~ No PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY A. B. Are there existing structures on the property? [li]Yes D No If yes, please describe. t?NE 5"1/f{;t:E-F;4Mil/Y R£Sm~ Will any existing structure be removed/demolished? 0Yes D No If yes to either question, describe the extent of the demolition or removal, including the relocation site, if applicable (also show on plans). flUA?Ua ~IU -I¥ t::IJ~NEP LOT COVERAGE A. Existing and Proposed Existing New Progosed Total Building Coverage sq. ft. 4P~ sq. ft. sq. ft. Landscaped Area sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. Hardscape Area sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. Unimproved Area (Left Natural) sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Revised 04/04 Page 2 of7 • B. Parking: Number of existing spaces Number of new spaces proposed Existing/Proposed TOTAL: Number oftotal spaces required Number of covered spaces Number of uncovered spaces Number of standard spaces Number of compact spaces Is tandem parking existing? Is tandem parking proposed? • ? ?~ 7e ~e er 0 ~ () DYes#_ DYes#_ C. Grade Alteration: Is any grading proposed? IX] Yes If yes, please complete the following: 1. Amount of cut ~~14r 2. Amount of fill r"/;8~1 Maximum height of fill slope---~-~-------- Maximum height of cut slope---~-------- Amount of import or export __ 'l--=./..,_1--'4-H'--------- OC]No ~No DNo cu. yds. cu. yds. feet feet cu. yds. 3. 4. 5. 6. Location of borrow or disposal site _l=-'-.I.:M""""'~-'-''M-~ __ W _________ _ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Form 13 Revised 04/04 Page 3 of7 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 1 ~~~~~~m ~ 11~1 ~~~ mlmlmlllll ~~ 11~ Applicant: TABATA FAMILY Description Amount HDP07003 1,628.00 Not valid unless validated by Cash Register PLEASE RETAIN RECEIPT FOR REFUNDS OR ADJUSTMENTS Receipt Number: R0065997 Transaction ID: R0065997 Transaction Date: 08/14/2007 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 1,628.00 Transaction Amount: 1,628.00 • • PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION PROJECT NAME: 171/JJA-iA IP APPLICANT NAME: /AIJAT, ~!'.AUII'I Please describe fully the proposed project by application type. Include any details necessary to adequately explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. Description/Explanation: SH~MIS"S"Il/N IJF A ~~ j,pr I?HH78N7JAG ~VJS/~ 118~PII'll/llt; A (;EN~ Pt 41V AAA~Nt?MENT ~e,4t., I ~~t, PtAN AMIENI?"''Etn; ,ZL;N~ t::;H-,4116/!.1 ~N1)11.rJ-Vf!!:, 'l~~ M#Fj ~CJ,U. tl~ P6~AIItr1 /J.If/0 t::&,frT~l- 1/l!vet.tCPMe}lr ?8T?MIT. /?XPJ/!~1"" IS t/eS"J&#E17 lltt'r 1P ~~de•o 3.~ ·~u;~ Project Description 1 0/96 Page 1 of 1 • e . . -. City of Carlsbad w:;na.t.n.t.M•J§.fiiii .. t§.Ji DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. 1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation. include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person,A/e.Bd/i??t 7AM7A $ellfillilest ,/6'"t>ft:AZ~ 74jA/t9 fl*ie E vcL}L&! zAAAT/'f Title ____________ _ Address g,uqz_ lj(Ht!'-¥ t.,e/"1//JJif-. Address ___________ _ C7 /9 ,4-l..s ;9/1.£) c!,.t~ .I/~ jl',.? d // / 2. OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation. include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person :?Hll # Af)?Jte Corp/Part. ___________ _ Title ___________ _ Title _____________ _ Address ___________ _ Address ____________ _ 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • Y.tww.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @ 3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/Trust Non Profit/Trust -------------------Title ______________________ _ Title. __________________________ _ Address ____________________ _ Address ________________________ _ 4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? D Yes UNo If yes, please indicate person(s): ______________________ _ NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. ~c2dda_ Signature of owner/date /1/cli?c::> ,!?a z;iip/9 L/1 Print or type name of owner Signature of applicant/date Print or type name of applicant Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 City of Carlsbad I#IJ fl ,j,Ji,f. i•i§.ffhl, .t§.JI HAZARDOUS \V ASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT Consultation Of Lists of Sites Related To Hazardous Wastes (Certification of Compliance with Government Code Section 65962.5) Pursuant to State of California Government Code Section 65962.5, I have consulted the Hazardous Wastes and Substances Sites List compiled by the California Environmental Protection Agency and hereby certify that (check one): ~ The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the State Government Code. 0 The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the State Government Code. APPLICANT Name: r#.BffA FAM/t. Y Address: P. /?, l;py ~7~ CIJKt58A&l, ?A ~~t/ I& Phone Number: ?V~· 77~· /~ PROPERTY OWNER Name: .5.1M€ ,I~ -Af?'£/&.A-/1{"" Address: ___________ _ Phone Number: ________ _ Address of Site: .Z~ II 0,4MJ/tP illtt5 1/C/'1/!.. Local Agency (City and County): t::/1Y PF t:/1Kt~l3AO-C~AJTY t!)F SANVIEG~ Assessor's book, page, and parcel number: __ ;-J_/~_-=-~..=:.~.....:..p_ ... .....:..?=----1!_.J..fj:_~..:...a _________ _ Specify list(s): _ ___,V~/=-7Y.:....__/,;_;J:...:~c...:'------------------------- Regulatory Identification Number:_....:.P.-L.,-=6:....:'c..:..M;.__;_. --'C:::....!:....:A=t.=E?;:!...!:...:~----=·7 _____________ _ Date of List: __ _:_/J,---'-P/{--=--~-"'-/_7~/1.!-?.~~=-------------------- Applicant Signature/Date Property Owner Signature/Date Admin/Counter/HazWaste 1635 Faraday AveQue • Carlsbad. CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602·8559 • w;vw.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @ • STATEMENT OF AGREEMENT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP CITY OF CARLSBAD The Subdivision Map Act and the Carlsbad Municipal Code sets a fifty (50) day time restriction on Planning Commission processing of Tentative Maps and a thirty (30) day time limit for City Council action. These time· limits can only be extended by the mutual concurrence of the applicant and the City. By accepting applications for Tentative Maps concurrently with applications for other approvals which are prerequisites to the map; i.e., Environmental Assessment, Environmental Impact Report, Condominium Plan, Planned Unit Development. etc .. the fifty (50) day time limits and the thirty (30) day time limits are often exceeded. If you wish to have your application processed concurrently, this agreement must be signed by the applicant or his agent. If you choose not to sign the statement, the City will not accept your application for the Tentative Map until all prior necessary entitlements have been processed and approved. The undersigned understands that the processing time required by the City may exceed the time limits, therefore the undersigned agrees to extend the time limits for Planning Commission and City Council action and fully concurs with any extensions of time up to one year from the date the application was acc~pted as complete to properly review all ·of the applications. Signature N arne (Print) FRM0037 2/96 Date Relationship to Application (Property Owner-Agent) • • PROJECT LOCATION MAP April 19, 2006 .Mr. James .M. Boeker Pasco Engineering, Inc. • 535 North Highway 101, Suite A Solana Beach, CA 9207 5 RE: Tabata Family Properties 6764 Lonicera Street; 2311 Camino Hills Drive Dear .Mr. Boeker, • . .. a world class district The developments relative to the aforementioned property locations are within the Carlsbad Unified School District boundaries. With respect to the Lonicera address, the neighborhood schools would be as follows: Elementary .Middle High School Pacific Rim Elementary School, 1100 Camino de las Ondas Aviara Oaks .Middle School, 6880 Ambrosia Lane Carlsbad High School, 3557 Monroe Street With respect to the Camino Hills Drive address, the neighborhood schools would be as follows: Elementary .Middle High School Kelly Elementary School, 4885 Kelly Drive Valley .Middle School, 1645 Magnolia Ave Carlsbad High School, 3557 Monroe Street This letter, in no way, confirms enrollment at the time these properties will be occupied. If you have any further questions, please call me at 760-331-5005. Best regards, Carlsbad Unified School District ~~ Construction Department (760) 331-5005 Ph. (760) 331-5007 FAX • PHOTO EXHIBIT PREPARED FOR: NOBORU & EVELYN TABATA 2311 CAMINO HILLS DR. CARLSBAD, CA 92018 APN: 212·050-32&33 5-5-06 BY: PASCO ENGINEERING, INC. 535 N. HWY 101, STE. A SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 6tfl oll I t"'tl ~ 6'!1 ~tl ' ¥ .. ~,1 . . Tabata 10 Existing Site Photos Developed area on Northwest side of Camino Hills Drive Undeveloped area on south side of existing access road on on Northwest side of Camino Hills Drive Undeveloped area on the corner of Camino Hills Drive and El Camino Real • • • e RECEIVED CITY OF CARLSBAD First American Title Company 411 Ivy Street San Diego, CA 92101 Pasco Engineering 535 North Highway 101, Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075-1175 Attention: Jim Boeker File No.: 2264406 Property Address: 2311 Camino Hills Drive Carlsbad, CA Ref: 212-050-32 & 33 Enclosed: Preliminary Reports and copies of items Kenneth Brown Title Officer Phone: (619)231-4664 Fax: (619)231-4647 Email: kenbrown@firstam.com PLA~~.~-,,,/ ..... DEPT ,,,, ll<'IIL:i Dated: February 14, 2006 Order Number: 2264406 (22) Page Number: 1 First American Title Company Jim Boeker Pasco Engineering 535 North Highway 101, Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075-1175 Phone: Fax: Customer Reference: Order Number: Title Officer: Phone: Fax No.: E-Mail: Buyer: Owner: Property: 411 Ivy Street San Diego, CA 92101 212-050-32 and 33 2264406 (22) Kenneth Brown (619)231-4664 (619)231-4647 kenbrown@firstam.com Tabata 2311 camino Hills Drive carlsbad, CA PRELIMINARY REPORT In response to the above referenced application for a policy of title insurance, this company hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a Policy or Policies of Title Insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an Exception below or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations of said Policy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage of said Policy or Policies are set forth in Exhibit A attached. Copies of the Policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which issued this report. Please read the exceptions shown or referred to below and the exceptions and exclusions set forth in Exhibit A of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be carefully considered. It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of title and may not list all liens, defects, and encumbrances affecting title to the land. This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested. First American Title Dated as of February 02, 2006 at 7:30A.M. Order Number: 2264406 (22) Page Number: 2 The form of Policy of title insurance contemplated by this report is: To be determined A specific request should be made if another form or additional coverage is desired. Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in: Noboru and Evelyn Tabata, Co-Trustees of the Tabata Family Trust U.D.T dated January 14, 1983, as to an undivided fifty percent (SO%) interest and Isokazu Tabata, or his successor(s) in interest as Trustee of the Isokazu Tabata Family Trust U.D.T dated March 9, 1999 as to an undivided fifty percent (50%) interest as tenants in common, as to Parcel A and Noboru Tabata and Evelyn Tabata, Co-Trustees or their successors in interest pursuant to The Tabata Family Trust executed January 14, 1983, as to an undivided one-half interest and Isokazu Tabata, a single man, as to an undivided one-half interest, as to Parcel B The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this Report is: A fee as to Parcel(s) A and B, an easement as to Parcel(s) A1 and Bl. The Land referred to herein is described as follows: (See attached Legal Description) At the date hereof exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed Exceptions and Exclusions in said policy form would be as follows: 1. General and special taxes and assessments for the fiscal year 2006-2007, a lien not yet due or payable. 2. The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to Chapter 3.5 commencing with Section 75 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code. The Following Matters Affect Parcel A: A"rst American Title Order Number: 2264406 (22) Page Number: 3 3. An easement for pipeline or pipelines for any and all purposes, together with their necessary fixtures and appurtenances, together with the right of ingress thereto and egress therefrom and incidental purposes, recorded July 2, 1962 as Instrument No. 111781 of Official Records. In Favor of: Carlsbad Municipal Water District Affects: The centerline of said easement or right of way is particularly described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the center line tangents to the curve lying between Station 134 plus 90.61 and Station 132 plus 6.45 of San Diego County Road "EI Camino Real" as shown on Road Survey No. 682 on file in the Office of the County Surveyor of San Diego County, thence South 54°,11' 18" East (Record South 54° 44' East) 132.53 feet to the true point of beginning, thence South 40° 23' 32" West 750.00 feet 4. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled "Mutual Easement Deed Agreement" recorded September 17, 1971 as Instrument No. 211501 of Official Records. 5. The Parcel Map referred to in the Legal Description herein contains various restrictions in improving or developing the property herein described. Reference is made to said Parcel Map for further particulars 6. An easement for ingress and egress for road purposes and incidental purposes, recorded April 9,. 1974 as Instrument No. 74-88589 of Official Records. In Favor of: Affects: Robert E. Hicks and Inis M. Hicks The Westerly 20 feet 7. An offer of dedication for public right of way purposes and incidental purposes, recorded October 10, 1984 as Instrument No. 84-384021 of Official Records. To: The County of San Diego The Following Matters Affect Parcel B: 8. An easement for public utilities and incidental purposes, recorded October 20, 1948 in Book 2988, Page 337 of Official Records. In Favor of: San Diego Gas and Electric Company Affects: The land 9. An easement for pipe line or pipe lines and incidental purposes, recorded July 2, 1962 as Instrument No. 111781 of Official Records. In Favor of: Affects: Carlsbad Municipal Water District The land 10. An easement for drainage, excavation, embankment slopes and incidental purposes, recorded October 29, 1969 as Instrument No. 198734 of Official Records. In Favor of: County of San Diego Affects: The land First American Title Order Number: 2264406 (22) Page Number: 4 11. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled "Agreement Regarding the Mutual Grant of an Easement and Right of Way Over a Portion of Said Land and Other Lands" recorded September, 17 1971 as Instrument No. 211501 of Official Records. 12. An easement shown or dedicated on the Map as referred to in the legal description For: Limit of proposed street widening and incidental purposes. 13. An easement and right of way for ingress and egress for road purposes and public utilities and incidental purposes as reserved by instrument recorded April 9, 1974 as File No. 74-088589 of Official Records, and the right of others to use said easement as conveyed or reserved in various other instruments of record, over, under, along and across the Northwesterly 20.00 feet of Parcel 1 herein described. ' 14. An offer of dedication for public right of way and incidental purposes, recorded October 10, 1984 as Instrument No. 84-384018 of Official Records. To: The County of San Diego 15. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled "Agreement Regarding Grant of Easement" recorded January 23, 1985 as Instrument No. 85-023357 of Official Records. 16. An offer of dedication for public right of way and incidental purposes, recorded January 31, 1985 as Instrument No. 85-033902 of Official Records. To: The County of San Diego Said instrument also grants the privilege and right to extend and maintain drainage structures and excavation and embankment slopes beyond the limits of said right of way where required for the construction and maintenance thereof. Said document further recites: ''The Grantor further understands that the present intention of the Grantee is to construct and maintain a public highway on the lands hereby conveyed in fee and the Grantor, for himself, his successors and assigns, hereby waives any claims for any and all damages to Grantor's remaining property contiguous to the property hereby conveyed by reason of the location, construction, landscaping or maintenance of said highway." Prior to the issuance of any policy of title insurance, the Company will require: 17. With respect to the trust referred to in the vesting: a. A certification pursuant to Section 18100.5 of the California Probate Code in a form satisfactory to the Company. b. Copies of those excerpts from the original trust documents and amendments thereto which designate the trustee and confer upon the trustee the power to act in the pending transaction. c. Other requirements which the Company may impose following its review of the material required herein and other information which the Company may require. First American Title Order Number: 2264406 (22) Page Number: 5 INFORMATIONAL NOTES 1. No known matters otherwise appropriate to be shown have been deleted from this report, which is not a policy of title insurance but a report to facilitate the issuance of a policy of title insurance. For purposes of policy issuance, items *none* may be eliminated on the basis of an indemnity agreement or other agreement satisfactory to the Company as insurer. 2. General and special taxes and assessments for the fiscal year 2005-2006. First Installment: $1,482.16, Paid Penalty: $148.22 Second Installment: $1,482.16, Paid Penalty: $158.22 Tax Rate Area: 09162 A. P. No.: 212-050-32-00 3. General and special taxes and assessments for the fiscal year 2005-2006. First Installment: $915.88, Paid Penalty: $91.59 Second Installment: $915.88, Paid Penalty: $101.59 Tax Rate Area: 09162 A. P. No.: 212-050-33-00 The map attached, if any, may or may not be a survey of the land depicted hereon. First American expressly disclaims any liability for loss or damage which may result from reliance on this map except to the extent coverage for such loss or damage is expressly provided by the terms and provisions of the title insurance policy, if any, to which this map is attached. First American Title Order Number: 2264406 (22) Page Number: 6 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Real property in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, described as follows: PARCEL A: PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 2481, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, MARCH 21, 1974 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 74-071006 OF OFFICIAL RECORPS. PARCEL A1: AN EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR ROAD PURPOSES, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO CONVEY THE SAME TO OTHERS, OVER, ALONG AND ACROSS A STRIP OF LAND 40.00 FEET IN WIDTH LYING WITHIN LOT "F" OF RANCHO AGUA HEDIONDA, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 823, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, NOVEMBER 16, 1896, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID 40.00 FOOT STRIP BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT POINT 1 OF SAID LOT "F" AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 823, THENCE SOUTH 25° 01' OS" EAST (RECORD -SOUTH 24° 45' 00" EAST) A DISTANCE OF 229.00 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS DESIGNATED ON SAID MAP NO. 823 AS POINT 23 OF SAID LOT "F" WHICH POINT IS THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED FROM CHARLES KELLY AND LAVINIA I. KELLY TO ELMER L. CARPENTER RECORDED JUNE 1, 1937 IN BOOK 662, PAGE 75, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 26791 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, SAID CARPENTER'S LAND BEING NOW THE PROPERTY OF ROBERT E. HICKS AND INIS M. HICKS, HUSBAND AND WIFE BY DEED TO THEM RECORDED JULY 22, 1948 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 24654 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS (TORRENS), FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY AND NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY LINES OF SAID CARPENTER'S (HICKS') LAND AS FOLLOWS: SOUTH 11° 51' 12" WEST, 315.60 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT; AND SOUTH 42° 55' 37" WEST, 374.50 FEET TO THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LAND; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID HICKS' PROPERTY, SOUTH 54° 10' 08" EAST A DISTANCE OF 2.14 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE WATER LINE EASEMENT GRANTED TO CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT BY DEED RECORDED JULY 2, 1962 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 11781 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AND KNOWN AS LINE "D" OF THE C.M.W.D; THENCE ON AND ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF SAID LINE "D" OF THE C.M.W.D AND ON AND ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY LINES OF LANDS DESCRIBED AS PARCELS 1 AND 2 IN DEED TO JOHN ALLEN ASSOCIATES, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, RECORDED DECEMBER 31, 1969 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 236220 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS SOUTH 42° 38' 52" WEST (C.M.W.D DEED - SOUTH 42° 23' 32" WEST, AND JOHN ALLEN ASSOCIATES DEED -SOUTH 42° 24' 42" WEST), A DISTANCE OF 938.72 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 600.00 FEET, THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, 269.80 FEET TO A POINT IN SAID CURVE, THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE, SOUTH 16° 38' 52' WEST, 386.15 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO JAMES A. DYE AND MARILYNN E. DYE, HUSBAND AND WIFE, RECORDED DECEMBER 31, 1969 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 236219 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE ON AND ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID DYE PROPERTY AND CONTINUING ON THE SAME LINE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF LAND First American Title Order Number: 2264406 (22) Page Number: 7 ALLOTTED TO BARBARA J. HIGDON AND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 2 IN DECREE OF PARTITION, SAN DIEGO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, CASE NO. 263205, A COPY OF WHICH WAS RECORDED MARCH 24, 1965 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 52516 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND CONTINUING ON THE SAME LINE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF PARCEL 2 OF THE AFOREMENTIONED DEED TO JOHN ALLEN ASSOCIATES RECORDED DECEMBER 31, 1969 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 236220 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, SOUTH 52° 32' 21" EAST, A TOTAL DISTANCE ALONG SAID LINE OF 1214.69 FEET, TO THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2 OF JOHN ALLEN ASSOCIATES' LAND, WHICH CORNER IS THE MOST SOUTHERLY TERMINUS OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY DESCRIBED HEREBY, EXCEPTING FROM SAID EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY, ABOVE DESCRIBED, THAT PORTION WITHIN PARCEL A HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED. PARCEL B: PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 2481, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON PAGE 2481 OF PARCEL MAPS, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, MARCH 21, 1974 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 74- 071006 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL Bl: AN EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR ROAD PURPOSES, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO CONVEY THE SAME TO OTHERS, OVER, ALONG AND ACROSS A STRIP OF LAND 40.00 FEET IN WIDTH LYING WITHIN LOT "F" OF RANCHO AGUA HEDIONDA, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 823, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, NOVEMBER 16, 1896, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID 40.00 FOOT STRIP BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT POINT 1 OF SAID LOT "F" AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 823, THENCE SOUTH 25° 01' OS" EAST (RECORD-SOUTH 24° 45' 00" EAST), A DISTANCE OF 229.00 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS DESIGNATED ON SAID MAP NO. 823 AS POINT 23 OF SAID LOT "F" WHICH POINT IS THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED FROM CHARLES KELLY AND LAVINIA I. KELLEY TO ELMER L. CARPENTER, RECORDED JUNE 1, 1937 IN BOOK 662, PAGE 75 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 26781 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, SAID CARPENTER'S LAND BEING NOW THE PROPERTY OF ROBERT E. HICKS AND INIS M. HICKS, HUSBAND AND WIFE, BY DEED TO THEM RECORDED JULY 22, 1948 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 24654 (TORRENS), FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY AND NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY LINES OF SAID CARPENTERS' (HICKS') LAND AS FOLLOWS: SOUTH 11° 51' 12" WEST 315.60 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT, AND SOUTH 42° 55' 37" WEST 374.50 FEET TO THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LAND; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID HICKS' PROPERTY, SOUTH 54° 10' 08" EAST A DISTANCE OF 2.14 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE WATER LINE EASEMENT GRANTED TO CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT BY DEED RECORDED JULY 2, 1962 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 11781 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AND KNOWN AS LINE "D" OF THE C.M.W.D.; THENCE ON AND ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF SAID LINE "D" OF THE C.M.W.D. AND ON AND ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY LINES OF LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCELS 1 AND 2 IN DEED TO JOHN ALLEN ASSOCIATES, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, RECORDED DECEMBER 31, 1969 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 236220 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, SOUTH 42° 38' 52" WEST, (C.M.W.F- DEED -SOUTH 42° 23' 32" WEST AND JOHN ALLEN ASSOCIATES DEED -SOUTH 42° 24' 42" WEST), A DISTANCE OF 938.72 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 600.00 FEET; First American Title Order Number: 2264406 (22) Page Number: 8 THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, 269.80 FEET TO A POINT IN SAID CURVE; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 16° 38' 52" WEST, 386.15 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO JAMES A. DYE AND MARILYNN E. DYE, HUSBAND AND WIFE, RECORDED DECEMBER 31, 1969 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 236219 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE ON AND ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY UNE OF SAID DYE PROPERlY AND CONTINUING ON THE SAME UNE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY UNE OF LAND ALLOTTED TO BARBARA J. HIGDON AND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 2 IN DECREE OF PARTITION, SAN DIEGO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, CASE NO. 263205, A COPY OF WHICH WAS RECORDED MARCH 24, 1965 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 52516 OF OFFIOAL RECORDS, AND CONTINUING ON THE SAME UNE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY UNE OF PARCEL 2 OF THE , AFOREMENTIONED DEED TO JOHN ALLEN ASSOCIATES, RECORDED DECEMBER 31, 1969 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 236220 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, SOUTH 52° 32' 21", A TOTAL DISTANCE ALONG SAID UNE OF 1214.69 FEET TO THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2 OF JOHN ALLEN ASSOCIATES' LAND, WHICH CORNER IS THE MOST SOUTHERLY TERMINUS OF THE CENTER UNE OF THE EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY DESCRIBED HEREBY. EXCEPTING FROM SAID EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY, ABOVE DESCRIBED, THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN PARCEL B HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED. APN: 212-050-32-00 and 212-050-33-00 A'rst American ntle ··---···---------·--··-··--··----·---·----~---I' , , , , , 1 1 1 1 ! 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ;1 1 1 1 1 1 • • 1 ~~ • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 'sl SCALE II 1110 Olf All iiCH I, I 1-000;..345-7334 ~--~------~----------------------------------------------------------~c I~ I~ ~ ~-I~ ;; :n, . ~ ll~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ·~ ~ ' 1\'! l! (;:::; 1.-.~ ":i li!ll~ I]:! :I 8 ;l·i I~ o ~~ lJ ~~;~ ~~~~ ~~ t 't ;~~ z .. ot 1~1~ ;;:~ <( ~~ '\3~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ '~ ~~ l\ ~·~ 10 '-~ 'l ~ I= ~ I* CP£H SPACE @ SHT. 2 _ MAP 823 -RFD AQJA HEDIIJNDA -POR LOT F ROS 9670 (ffi) SAil DlfGD CDUXTY lSSESSOA' S MAP II 212 PQ r~ PT.5 212-05 1. 1• • .o~.oo $t1l .. _1 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 1111111 ~IU IJ 1111 Applicant: TABATA FAMILY Description Amount CT060013 1,565.00 2311 CAMINO HILLS DR CBAD Not valid unless validated by Cash Register PLEASE RETAIN RECEIPT FOR REFUNDS OR ADJUSTMENTS Receipt Number: Transaction ID: T000087854 Transaction Date: 09/22/2008 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 1,565.00 Transaction Amount: 1,565.00 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 11111111111111~111111~ IN 1m1111111111~ ~~ Applicant: TABATA FAMILY Description Amount CT060013 1,565.00 2311 CAMINO HILLS DR CBAD Receipt Number: R0071948 Transaction ID: R0071948 Transaction Date: 09/22/2008 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 1,565.00 Transaction Amount: 1,565.00 City of Carlsbad Faraday Center Faraday Cashiering 00 0826601-1 09/22/2008 7 Mon Sep22,2008 10:46 ~ PERMITS -PERMITS $1 ,565.00 Tran Nbr: 082660101 Oili 0015 Trans/Rcpt#: R0071948 SET #: CT060013 ITEM(S): TOTAL: Check (Chk# 001574) Total Received: Have a nice day! $1,565.00 $1,565.00 $1,565.00 **~***********CUSTOMER COPY************* City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 lllllllll~lll~lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Applicant: TABATA FAMILY Description Amount LCPA0602 4,031.25 2311 CAMINO HILLS DR CBAD Receipt Number: R0058717 Transaction ID: R0058717 Transaction Date: 07/17/2006 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 4,031.25 Transaction Amount: 4,031.25 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 111111111~111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Applicant: TABATA FAMILY Description Amount ZC060003 4,151.25 2311 CAMINO HILLS DR CBAD Receipt Number: R0058718 Transaction ID: R0058718 Transaction Date: 07/17/2006 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 4,151.25 Transaction Amount: 4,151.25 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 lllllllll~lllllllll!l~ll~lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Applicant: TABATA FAMILY Description Amount CDP06019 2,212.50 2311 CAMINO HILLS DR CBAD Receipt Number: R0058719 Transaction ID: R0058719 Transaction Date: 07/17/2006 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 2,212.50 Transaction Amount: 2,212.50 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 111111111!111~1111111~11~1111111111111111111111111111111 Applicant: TABATA FAMILY Description Amount CT060013 9,681.80 2311 CAMINO HILLS DR CBAD Receipt Number: R0058712 Transaction ID: R0058712 Transaction Date: 07/17/2006 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 9,681.80 Transaction Amount: 9,681.80 ' . City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 1 ~~~~~~~~ 111m1 ~ 11~11~1m11m ~111m11~ ~~~ Applicant: TABATA FAMILY Description Amount SUP06008 2,910.00 2311 CAMINO HILLS DR CBAD Receipt Number: R0058715 Transaction ID: R0058715 Transaction Date: 07/17/2006 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 2,910.00 Transaction Amount: 2,910.00 • ' . City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 lllllllllllllllllllllll~ll~llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Applicant: TABATA FAMILY Description Amount GPA06004 2311 CAMINO HILLS DR CBAD Receipt Number: R0058713 Transaction ID: R0058713 Transaction Date: 07/17/2006 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check Transaction Amount: 5,125.00 . ' • Notice of Determination CITY OF CARLSB To: D Office of Planning and Res ch NOV 0 4 20 om: CITY OF CARLSBAD P.O. Box 3044 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Planning Department Sacramento, CA 95812-304tt'-------.J 1635 Faraday Avenue SD County Clerk Attn: Linda Kesina Mail Stop A-33 1600 Pacific Highway San Diego, CA 921 01 '""' \ Carlsbad, CA 92008 UI·FICE OF THE COUNTY CLE 60) 602-4600 ~10 Coc~nty on SEP 2 4 zo:· I SEP. 2 4 20( J _ ~emovecNOV 0 2 ZDD~ '" 1' nc on. -llil.v.:-l0~2 .,/.;;.?Oill.lift.;;..t ---· . Kesian Project No: GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ CDP 06-19/ HDP 07- 03 Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Tabata 10 Project Title City of Carlsbad, Corey Funk (760) 602-4645 State Clearinghouse No. Lead Agency, Contact Person Telephone Number At the north-east end of Camino Hills Drive along the west side of El Camino Real in Carlsbad, in San Diego County Project Locations (include County) Name of Applicant: Tabata Family Applicant's Address: P.O. Box 679, Carlsbad, CA 92018 Applicant's Telephone Number: 760-754-1900 Project Description: Request for adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and approval for the subdivision, grading and development of a 1 0.16-acre site into twenty six (26) single-family residential parcels and one ( 1) open space parcel. This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad has approved the above described project on September 15 , 2009, and has made the following determination regarding the above described project. 1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment 2. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQ A. 3. Mitigation measures were made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project. 5. A statement of Overriding Considerations was not adopted for this project. 6. Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQ A. This is to certify that the final Mitigated Negative Declaration with comments and responses record of project approval is available to the General Public at THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. DON NEU, Planning Director Date received for filing at OPR: David Buller, Recorder/County Clork BY SEP 2 4 Z009 • L. Kes1an DEPUTY Cf-17-o Date Revised December 2004 St~te of California-The Resources AI DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL FILING FEE CASH RECEIPT SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE. TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY LEAD AGENCY CITY OF CARLSBAD COUNTY/STATEAGENCY OF FILING SAN DIEGO PROJECT TITLE TABATA10 PROJECT APPLICANT NAME TABATA FAMILY PROJECT APPLICANT ADDRESS PO BOX679 PROJECT APPLICANT (Check appropriate box): 0 Local Public Agency 0 School District CHECK APPLICABLE FEES: 0 Environmental Impact Report 0 Negative Declaration CITY CARLSBAD 0 Other Special District 0 Application Fee Water Diversion (State Water Resources Control Board Only) 0 Projects Subject to Certified Regulatory Programs 0 County Administrative Fee 0 Project that is exempt from fees 0 Notice of Exemption 0 DFG No Effect Determination (Form Attached) 0 Other-------------------- PAYMENT METHOD: 0 Cash 0 Credit 0 Check 0 Other 1751 ------ SIGNATURE L. Kesian X • RECEIPT# SD2009 000913 STATE CLEARING HOUSE# (lfappticabte) STATE CA DATE 09-24-2009 DOCUMENT NUMBER 090261 PHONE NUMBER 760-754-1900 ZIP CODE 92018 0 State Agency 0 Private Entity $ ______ _ $ $1 ,993.00 ------- $50.00 $ ______ _ TOTALRECEIVED $ ____ $_2_,0_4_3._00_ 111111111111111111111111111111 ORIGINAL-PROJECT APPLICANT COPY-OFG/ASB COPY-LEAD AGENCY COPY -COUNTY CLERK FG 753.5a (Rev. 7/08) .----------------------------------------- • David L. Butler • COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ASSESSOR/RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK ASSESSOR'S OFFICE 1600 Pacific Highway, Suite 103 San Diego, CA 92101-2480 Tel. (619) 236-3771 *Fax (619) 557-4056 www.sdarcc.com RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE 1600 Pacific Highway, Suite 260 P.O. Box 121750 * San Diego, CA 92112-1750 Tel. (619)237-0502 *Fax (619)557-4155 Transaction#: 211950120090924 Deputy: LKESIAN Location: COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 24-Sep-2009 15:59 FEES: 1,993.00 Qty of 1 Fish & Game Neg Dec (1800) for Ref# NOD: 090261 50.00 Qty of 1 Fee Notice of Exemption for Ref# RCT: 913 ------ 2,043.00 TOTAL DUE PAYMENTS: 2,043.00 Check ------ 2,043.00 TENDERED SERVICES AVAILABLE AT OFFICE LOCATIONS * Tax Bill Address Changes * Records and Certified Copies: Birth/ Marriage/ Death/ Real Estate * Fictitious Business Names (DBAs) * Marriage Licenses and Ceremonies * Assessor Parcel Maps * Property Ownership * Property Records * Property Values * Document Recordings SERVICES AVAILABLE ON-LINE AT www.sdarcc.com * Forms and Applications * Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) * Grantor/ Grantee Index * Fictitious Business Names Index (DBAs) * Property Sales * On-Line Purchases Assessor Parcel Maps Property Characteristics Recorded Documents CASE NAME: CASE NO: PROJECT LOCATION: • City • of Carlsbad • u e• '' ,, • ''·' .xg .,, a• '·'4''' MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Tabata 10 GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ COP 06- 19/HDP 07-03 At the north-east end of Camino Hills Drive and the west side of El Camino Real PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project consists of a General Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Special Use Permit, Coastal Development Permit and Hillside Development Permit to subdivide and grade a 10.16 acre site located at the northeast end of Camino Hills Drive into 26 single family residential lots and one open space lot. Single-family residences are not proposed for development at this time. The GPA is proposed to rectify a previous mapping error by re- designating the southwest one-third of the property from Open Space (OS) to Residential Low Medium (RLM) and the ZC will change the zoning of the entire property from Limited Control (LC) to One-Family Residential (R-1 ). An LCP amendment is required to reflect the new RLM designation and R-1 zone on the LCP Land Use Plan and Zoning Maps respectively. DETERMINATION: The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review ofthe above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, the initial study (EIA Part 2) identified potentially significant effects on the environment, and the City of Carlsbad finds as follows: IZ! Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on the attached sheet have been added to the project. D The proposed project MAY have "potentially significant impact(s)" on the environment, but at least one potentially significant impact 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. (Mitigated Negative Declaration applies only to the effects that remained to be addressed). D Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATNE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATNE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, nothing further is required. A copy of the initial study (EIA Part 2) documenting reasons to support the Negative Declaration is on file in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008. ADOPTED: September 15, 2009, pursuant to CC Ordinance No. CS-056 and CC Resolution No. 2009- 230. AITEST~YL DONNED Planning Director 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us (!) Also complete Item 4 If Restricted Is desired. • Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front If space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: California Coastal Commission Attn: Toni Ross Suite 103 7575 Metropolitan Drive San Diego, CA 92108-4402 B. Received by (Printed Nama) G~e-t..sz.-<...-~ D. Is delivery address different from item 17 U YES,"""'"'-o<ld~ ""'"' ~ I 1YPe Certified Mall 0 Express Mall 0 Registered ~etum Receipt for Merchandise 0 Insured Mall 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes 2. 7008 1140 0002 3921 4648 (! l)E r' ti :: =:.e ru CJ F· urn :...c l•i '9E CJ (E,l<'Or ~mH! 1: ~ (,V E·d] CJ Pelt!• ted [J, :i\ 'y '3E CJ (E l< 01 •lffifll ' 1 C ·.•· Ed] ······-----~ ··----·-·---~ ----·-" ·---·----j Postmark Here 7·1·0ct ~ . ...C....PA o~"()\1. of P.tllic.~CF .-:1 .,,ta: "o~1 '"' • California Coastal Commission Attn: Toni Ross Suite 103 7575 Metropolitan Drive San Diego, CA 92108-4402 • FILE COP/ City of Carlsbad IQbiiiiiiii·I•J§.LIIII.t§.ii NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00p.m. on Wednesday, July 15, 2009, to consider a request for the following: CASE NAME: GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ HOP 07-03/ COP 06-19-Tabata 10 PUBLISH DATE: July 3, 2009 DESCRIPTION: Request for a recommendation of adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; a recommendation of approval for a General Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Program Amendment and Zone Change; and a request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Special Use Permit, Hillside Development Permit and Coastal Development Permit for the subdivision, grading and utility development of a 1 0.16-acre site into twenty six (26) single-family residential lots and one (1) open space Jot, on property generally located at the north-east end of Camino Hills Drive along the west side of El Camino Real within the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and Local Facilities Management Zone 24. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing and provide the decision makers with any oral or written comments they may have regarding the project. Copies of the staff report will be available online at http://www.carlsbadca.gov/planning/pcvideo.html on or after the Friday prior to the hearing date. If you have any questions, or would like to be notified of the decision, please contact Corey Funk in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4645, Monday through Thursday 7:30 a.m. to 5:30p.m., Friday 8:00a.m. to 5:00p.m. at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008. APPEALS The time within which you may judicially challenge these projects, if approved, is established by State law and/or city ordinance, and is very short. If you challenge this project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing. Q Appeals to the Citv Council: Where the decision is appealable to the City Council, appeals must be filed in writing within ten (10) calendar days after a decision by the Planning Commission. Q Coastal Commission Appealable Project: [8] [8] This site is not located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area. Application deemed complete: 07/17/2008 Where the decision is appealable to the Coastal Commission, appeals must be filed with the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days after the Coastal Commission has received a Notice of Final Action from the City of Carlsbad. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal Commission of the date that their appeal period will conclude. The San Diego office of the Coastal Commission is located at 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, California 92108-4402. CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @ • SITE MAP • N NOT TO SCALE Tabata 10 GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02 I ZC 06-03 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2010 & 2011 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times- Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, for the City of Oceanside and the City of Escondido, Court Decree number 171349, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: July 03rd 1 2009 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at OCEANSIDE, California • This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp • Complete items 1 , item 4 if Restricted is desired. • Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mail piece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: California Coastal Commission Attn: Toni Ross Suite 103 7575 Metropolitan Drive San Diego, CA 921 08-4402 Mail 0 Express Mail D Registered ~etum Receipt for Merchandise D Insured Mail/ Oc.o.o. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) D Yes 2. Article Number (Tiansfer from service label) 7008 1140 0002 3921 4686 1 ru io Cl Cl R tum inc oipt FeE· ~ ·-•• ·---·-··---1 (Endo• am< 1 R· ·ou red;, ! Restr'cted lHiiH::H)' FeE< r -··-----· Cl (Endor ame t R ·Qu red) J ·-----.:r ~J'I Oct.--.:r-r.c=.,...,d Postmark Here 7~·0'f r-'1 Tota' Pos· 1qe R. ~ ""~ 1 <1:. r-'1 · California Coastal Commission C[) Cl ent ~--Attn: Toni Ross Suite 103 ctiy:siaie;iii' 7575 Metropolitan Drive •• ,!11_,, San Diego, CA 92108-4402 ______ .... o "§r€ieCJ.pCrlo I'-or PO Box No. • e FILE COFY 7·.:JO.oct City of Carlsbad I@ Fi ,.,.,,,.I •14 ·t• ji ;.t§ ,,, NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT The following project is located within the City of Carlsbad Coastal Zone. A coastal permit application for the project has been acted upon. SENT TO COASTAL COMMISSION ON: July 20. 2009 Application #: -=C-=D'"'-P__,0:;..;:6'--1.:....:9=------------- CaseName:~T=a~ba=t=a~1~0~---------------------- Applicant: Tabata Family Address: Phone: 6692 Lemon Leaf Dr.. Carlsbad. CA 92011 760-754-1900 Filing Date: !'.:Ju,_,_lyJ-...!-17w·-=2'-""0.:::.:06,.__ ______ _ Decision Date: =-J u=l..._y-'1=5,_,. 2=0=-=0:...::9'---------------- Agent (if different): Pasco Laret Suiter & Associates Address: 535 N Coast Highway 101 Ste A Solana Beach CA 92075 Phone: 858.259.8212 Project Description: Request for a recommendation of adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; a recommendation of approval for a General Plan Amendment. Local Coastal Program Amendment and Zone Change; and a request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map. Special Use Permit. Hillside Development Permit and Coastal Development Permit for the subdivision. grading and utility development of a 1 0.16-acre site into twenty six (26) single-family residential lots and one ( 1) open space lot. Project Location: At the north-east end of Camino Hills Drive along the west side of El Camino Real within the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and Local Facilities Management Zone 24. ACTION: 0 APPROVED iZI APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS D DENIED (Copy of final resolution/decision Jetter is sent to: Coastal Commission, any persons who specifically requested it, and the applicant). COASTAL COMMISSION APPEAL STATUS: iZI NOT APPEALABLE TO THE COASTAL COMMISSION. Attachment: -Location Map to CCC for non-appealable COPs -Staff Report to CCC for appealable COPs The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedures, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 16. Any petition or other paper seeking judicial review must be filed in the appropriate court not later than ninety (90) days following the date on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten (10) days after the decision becomes final a request for the record of the proceedings accompanied by the required deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost of preparation of such a record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than thirty (30) days following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California 92008. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @ • Complete Items 1, 3. Also complete Item 4 If Restricted Delivery Is desired. • Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mallplece, or on the front If space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: California Coastal Commission Attn: Toni Ross Suite 103 7575 Metropolitan Drive San Diego, CA 92108-4402 If YES, enter delivery address below: D No 3. Service lYPe ~Mall D Expreaa Mall D Registered ~etum Receipt for Merchandise 0 Insured Mall 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) D Yes 2. Article Number (71ansfer from ti81VIce l8bel) 7006 2150 0004 4779 0855 PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 1.02595-02-M-1540 ::g j,f ~ L ~ :~~ii~~ r- ["-·n:'aqE .:::r- .:::r- 0 D D D L.l") r-'l ru ..D D D r- F1durn :~~~cdpt FeE: : (Endof~;emt ·1! Roouired, Restnded !\~fivery FeE (Endorsemr·m R2qwred, Postmark Here Tota,Posna&&'---! :1'.4..C.Pf!IO••o;),p blit.AJO'ti~/~J: -Cahfomm Coastal Commission sentta--·--Attn: Toni Ross -s;;;,-eci.ri.·~v;,:_:-· Suite 103 or PO RoxNo. City, State, ZIP+4 PS Form 3800, A 7575 Metropolitan Drive San Diego, CA 92108-4402 • • FILE COPY City of Carlsbad c. . .,.o., · lilJ6hhiih•i•X4·ihiii·*4·1M PUBLIC NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES: Please be advised that the City of Carlsbad is considering text amendments to its Local Coastal Program (LCP) as summarized below. This amendment is being proposed by the Tabata Family and is currently under review. This notice hereby opens a six week review period after which the Planning Commission and City Council will consider all comments and act on the proposed amendment. The Planning Commission hearing is expected to take place in July 2009, and will be duly noticed. The City Council hearing is expected to take place in August/September 2009, and will be duly noticed. Copies of the LCP amendment are available for review at the following locations: (1) Carlsbad Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue; (2) City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive; (3) Carlsbad Main Library, 1775 Dove Lane; (4) Georgina Cole Library, 1250 Carlsbad Village Drive; and (5) the California Coastal Commission, 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, CA 92108-4402 PROPOSED LCP AMENDMENT SUMMARY LCPA 06-02-TABATA 10 The City's Zoning Ordinance is the implementing ordinance for the City's Local Coastal Program. Accordingly, this Local Coastal Program Amendment is necessary to ensure consistency between its proposed amended Zoning Ordinance and its Local Coastal Program. This specific Zone Code Amendment is as follows: The proposed project includes a General Plan Amendment (GPA), Local Coastal Program Amendment (LCPA), Zone Change (ZC), Tentative Tract Map (CT), Special Use Permit (SUP), Coastal Development Permit (CDP) and Hillside Development Permit (HDP) to allow for the subdivision and grading of a vacant 10.16-acre project site (APNs 212-050-32 and -33) located at the north-east end of Camino Hills Drive along the west side of El Camino Real within the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and Local Facilities Management Zone 24. The GPA is proposed to rectify a previous mapping error by re-designating the southwest one-third of the project site from an Open Space (OS) designation to a Residential Low Medium Density (RLM) designation, and the ZC will change the zoning for the entire project site from Limited Control (L-C) to One Family Residential (R-1). The LCPA is required to reflect the proposed R-1 zone designation on the Local Coastal Program Zoning Map. The subdivision of land will result in 26 residential parcels for the development of single-family homes and one open space lot for purposes of providing a sound berm, buffering from El Camino Real and a landscaped amenity area. Associated street and utility improvements are also proposed; however, no homes are proposed at this time and the construction of single family homes on the proposed lots will require a separate application for development. If you have any questions, please call Corey Funk in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4645. Written comments should be sent to the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008. PUBLISH DATE: June 12, 2009 PUBLISH DATE FOR NORTH COUNTY TIMES: June 12, 2009 PUBLISH DATE FOR COAST NEWS: June 12, 2009 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us <!) The Coas'!News Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County. Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to The Coast News, P.O. Box 232-550, Encinitas, CA 92023 (760) 436-9737 Proof of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am principal clerk of the printer of The Coast News, a newspaper printed and published weekly and which news- paper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation for the cities of Del Mar, Solana Beach, Encinitas/Cardiff, Carlsbad, Oceanside, San Marcos/Vista and the County Judicial District by the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego (8/4/94, #677114, B2393, P396); and that the notice, of which the annexed is a print- ed copy, has been published in, each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: June 12. 2009 I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California on the 12th day of June, 2009. ~-D.~ Clerk of the Pnnter • Space above for County Clerk's Filing Stamp • . -·· .. PUBLIC NOncE. · •. __ TO 1tf1'~~Sn:oPARnes: PJeas.e be advi$Eid 111at the City pf Carlsbad is .Con- . . . l!icler!ng text ameildnieots tO .itS LGCSI Coastal • .· . Program (~a surnrnarized b&low. This amend· rilent is being propo!!8d by !he" Tabata Family and i8 cun'entty under review; This notice he~ opens a six Mel< ~ew period after Which )he Planning Cdnlmltlsion and City Council wHI consider all COII1illeilt$ and fCI on the~ amendment. ~ Planning ComnliSslon heari!lgls expeCted to take place In July 2009, and will be duly~ •. T{le City Council hearing is expected to take place in August/Septemb&r 2009, and WIH be duly noticed. . _ Copies. ot the LCP arr-drnenl are avallable for nwiew at the fof. lowing~ (1) carlsbad Plarining ~.1835 Faiaday Avenue;_ (2) City ~~ ~.-1290 -~ Vi11aQe. Drive; (3) . callabadJMin lil!laiY, 1'?75 DOve l..ane; (4) .Geolginl,~ Library. 12$0 Call&bad ·\lllllage Drive; and (5) the ~ Coastal CoiMiisaion, 7575 t.t8lropolitsn Drive, Suite 103, San Oligo, CA 921084402 . . . . . . . PRoPOseD LCP AMENDMENT SUMMARY . . . LCPA 06-02-TABATA 10 . . The City's ?!Oiling O,rdinance Is ~ irnplernentirll orilioa!\Ce for the City's Local_ Coastal Program. .·· Acooldingly. . thi8 looal Coastal Pro!iram Amendinent Is ll8Cl&SS8iyto-coneistellc)' between its ~ ~ ~-Oidinance and its~ :Coastal · Program. This llpeCifiC Zone Code Airi8ndment Is atffollows: . ' ' t 1}le ~ J)IOjecl Includes. a~ Pian~ (GPA), Local COaetal Pi'ogram Amendment. (LCPA), Zone ·CfNinue. (ZC), ~ Tract Map (CT), $p8cial 'Use Peimit {SJ.IP); . Coastal lleY8Iopment Permit (COP)' 8Jld" Hillside Oevelojimeiit P8rmif _(HOP) to &!lOW for the~ and•Q111ding Of a vacant 10.16-acre projecfalte.~ 212~ and -33) localeil• fhe·north· · east end. of ~ 1-fn~s-.~ M t11e Yil!SI side .ot:aCamlnO Real within the Mello u Segrnflnt Of the Loc8l Coastal ~.alld Local Facilities~~~ 24. ;The~PAls.pfOpQseitfO reo- . tify a preVIous ~error.,~ .the ~One third of the projeca alte from ··Open Space (OS)~ to a Reside(!tiaU.ow 'Medium ~ (RLM) deaignatlon, and the ZC wiU change the Zoning for. fie . ~ prOject site 'IQ)m .limited COntrQI (l'C) to. One Fami!Y Residential (R-1f .. The. LcPA is required to re11ect the PI'OPQ8!!d .R-1 .Zone ~!Ill the local Coestal Progran!Zonitlg ~ Tile subdivisioil of tana Wtft I'9IIUii in ·2(1 teslderlti8l Jlll(tels foi' the.~ of single-family homes and one ·open space lol.for·~ of providirig a 80UIId beim, -~!~~~:a~~a~. . . . . _h!ljfiOV8tii8hil58felilso propoead; how· ever. no~-are proposed at this time and the 'CorlatnJctlon of · sirigle family homes on the j:lroposed· lots wiU require a separate ~.for development. .... If yoU haVtf~ queStions, pJi.ase call Corey Funk in the Planning . _Depaarriett at (760). 602-4646. Written comments shoUld be sent i& the Plilnning Deparlment at 1 6;)5 Fall8day Avenue, cSrlsbad, Galifomia $2()08. · CN 8199, June 12, 2009 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2010 & 2011 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times- Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, for the City of Oceanside and the City of Escondido, Court Decree number 171349, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regula r and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: June 12th, 2009 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at OCEANSIDE, California Jane Allshouse NORTH COUNlY TIMES Legal Advertising This space is f.e County Clerk's Filing Stamp Proof of Publication of ~~ TO INTERESTED PARTIES: Please be advised that the City of Carlsbad is considerin_g text amendments to its Local Coastal Pro-qram (LCI-') as summarized below. This amendment is l'ieing proposed by the Tabata Family and is currently under rev1ew. This notice hereby opens a six week re-view period after which the Planning Commission and City Council will consider all comments and act on the proposed amenament. The Planning_ Commission hear-Ing is expected to take place in Juty 2009, and will be duly noticed. The C~ Council hearing is exflected to ~~fcC~ace in Augusv eptember 2009, and w11 be duty Copies of the LCP amendment are available for review at the following locations: (1) Carlsbad Planninfl Depart-ment, 1635 Faraday Avenue· (2) City Clerks Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive; (31 Carlsl:iad Main Libra!Y, 1775 Dove Lane; (4) Georgina Cole Library, 1250 Carls-bad Village Drive· and (5) the California Coastal Com-missionb7575 Melropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, CA 921 8-4402 PROPOSED LCP AMENDMENT SUMMARY LCPA 06-02-TABATA 10 . The City's Zonin\l Ordinance is the implementing_ ordi-nance for the City s Local Coastal Program. Accoraingly, this Local Coastal Program Amendment is necessarY to ensure consistency befween its proposed amended Zon-ing Ordinance and its Local Coastal Program. This §llecific Zone Code Amendment is as follows: The prQl)osed project includes a General Plan Amend-ment (GPA)(;Local Coastal Program Amendment (LC-PA), Zone hangs (ZC", Tentative Tract Map (CT), Special Use Permit !SUP , Coastal Development Perm1t /COP) and Hillside Deve opment Permit (HOP) to allow or the subdivision and grading of a vacant 10.16-acre project site (APNs 212-050-3Z and -33) located at the north-east end of Camino Hills Drive along the west side of El Camino Real within the Mello II Segment of the Lo-cal Coastal Program and Local Facilities Management Zone 24. The GPA is proposed to rectify a previous mapping error by re-designating the southwest one-third of the project site from an Open Space (OS) designation to a Residential Low Medium Densitv (RLM) designation, and the ZC will change the zoninll lor the entire project site from Limited Confrol (L-C\ to One Family Residential (R-1). The LCPA is requ1red o reflect the proposed R-1 zone designation on the Local Coastal Program Zoning Map. The subdivision of land will result in 26 residential parcels for the development of single-family homes and one open space lot for purposes of providing a sound berm, buffering from El Camino Real and a landscaped amenity area. Associated street and utility improve-ments are also proposed; however, no homes are pro-~g~~s 8cint~~e t~gp~~~dt~gt~~iflt~~~~~~ o,1 ~~'19~~a~~~i!Y- plication for development. If you have a~· questions,j)lease call Corey Funk in the Planning De rttnent at (760) 602·4645. Written com-ments Shou d be sent to the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92006. PUBLISH DATE: June 12,2009 NCT 2216624 • PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your Interest may be affected, lhal the PlannlngCommission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Counctl Chambers 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Catlsbad, Cali· fornla, at 6:00 p.m·. on Wednesday, July 15, 2009, to consider the following: 1) CUP 00-36x1-AT&T 7512 CADENCIA -Request for a recommendation of approval for a retroactive len year extension of Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 00-36 to allow the continued operation of an existing Wireless Communications Facility consisting of a 240 square foot radio base station (RBS) within a 400 square foot garage and a total of six (6) panel antennas within two expanded'chlmney structures and one faux chimney on residential property located at 7512 Cadencia Street in Local Facilities Management Zone 6. The ~oject is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. 2) CUP 08-10 -7412 CADENCiA RESIDENCE · Re· quest for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the cllntlnued operation of an existing Wireless Commu- nications Facility consisting of two wall-mounted equip- ment cabinets and three panel antennas housed within a faux chimney on the roof of an existing single family residence located at 7412 Cadencia Street in Local Fa- cilities Management Zone 6. n .. project b C<ompl from tho Colifornio Environmental Quality Act. quest for a r adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; a recommendation of approval for a General Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Program Amendment and Zone Change; and a request for ap- proval of a Tentatlve.Tract Map, Special Use· Permit, Hill-side Development Permit and Coastal Development Per-mit for the subdivision, grading and utility development of a 10.16 acre site Into twenty six (26) single-family residential lots and one (I) open space lot, on property generally located at the north-east end of Camino Hills Drive along the west side of El Camino Real within the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and Local Facilities Management Zone 24. The Planning Director has determined that the project will not result In potentially significant Impacts and has issued a Notice of Intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration. This project is nof located within the appealable area of the California Coastal Commission. 4) ZCA 06-02/lCPA 06=04 -' ADULT BUSINESSES ORDINANCE-Staff requests that the Planning Commis- sion recommend to City Council approval of a Zone Code Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment to amend Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code fly: 1) amending Chapter 21.06 to exempt adult businesses from Chapter 21.06 (0 Qualified Development Overlay Zone); 2) amending Chapters 21.30, 21 .32 and 21.34 to add adult lxtsinesses to the list of permiHed uses in Chapters 21.30 (C·M Heavy Commercial-Limited In- dustrial Zone), 21.32 (M Industrial Zone, and 21.34 (P- M Planned Industrial Zone); 3) repealing and reenacting Chapter 21.43 (Adult Entertainment) fo amend the defi- nitions and location requirements for adult lxtsinesses; and 4) amending Chapter 21.44 (Parl<ing) fly revising the joint use parking provisions. The project is exempt from the California Environmental OualityAtt. If you challenge these f)'ojects in court, you may be lim- Ited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in wrilten correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing. Copies of the environmental documents are available at the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue during regular business hours from 7:30am to 5:30 prn Monday through Thursday and 8:00 am to 5:00 pm Frillay. Those persons wishing to speak on these propos- als are cordially Invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff reports will be available online at htlp://www.carlsbadca.gov/pdfdoc.html?pid=295 on or after the Friday prior to the hearing date. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Depart- ment at (760) 602-4600. PUBLISH: July 3, 2009 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE NAME: CASE NO: • e City of Carlsbad l@i§iliiii.t•i•X§.iiiii•i§.IM NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Tabata 10 GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ CDP 06- 19/HDP 07-03 PROJECT LOCATION: At the north-east end of Camino Hills Drive and the west side of El Camino Real PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project consists of a General Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Special Use Permit, Coastal Development Permit and Hillside Development Permit to subdivide and grade a 10.16 acre site located at the northeast end of Camino Hills Drive into 26 single family residential lots and one open space lot. Single-family residences are not proposed for development at this time. The GPA is proposed to rectify a previous mapping error by re-designating the southwest one-third of the property from Open Space (OS) to Residential Low Medium (RLM) and the ZC will change the zoning of the entire property from Limited Control (LC) to One-Family Residential (R-1 ). An LCP amendment is required to reflect the new RLM designation and R-1 zone on the LCP Land Use Plan and Zoning Maps respectively. PROPOSED DETERMINATION: The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, the initial study (EIA Part 2) identified potentially significant effects on the environment, but (1) revisions in the project plans or proposals made by, or agreed to by, the applicant before the proposed negative declaration and initial study are released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment would occur, and (2) there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the City that the project "as revised" may have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration will be recommended for adoption by the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission and City Council. A copy of the initial study (EIA Part 2) documenting reasons to support the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration is on file in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday A venue, Carlsbad, California 92008. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 30 days of the date of this notice. The proposed project and Mitigated Negative Declaration are subject to review and approval/adoption by the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission and City Council. Additional public notices will be issued when those public hearings are scheduled. If you have any questions, please call Corey Funk in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4645. PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD January 16,2009-February 15,2009 PUBLISH DATE January 16, 2009 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us {!) • PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2010 8t 2011 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times- Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, for the City of Oceanside and the City of Escondido, Court Decree number 171349, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: January 16th , 2009 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at OCEANSIDE, California This 16th, day of January, 2009 -~ ~ rr;;Ds{! J ~ '"" Jane Allsho4se NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising • This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp Proof of Publication of CASENAME: ~ . CASE NO: 1 ~~~-: - ~~SQQ~~ !:l§ll! PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The prolect consists of a I General Plan Amendment Local Coastal Proqram Amendment, Zone ChanQ!l, Tentative Tract ~ap, 'SP.!~· cial Use Permit, Coastal Uevelopment Permtt and Htll· side Development Permit to subdtvide and grade.a 10.)6 acre site at the northeast end of Camtno Htlls Drive into single family residential lots and one open space lot. gle-family residences are not proposed 'or developmen at this time. The GPA is proposed to rectify a prevtous map in error by re-designating the soutti-west one-third o operty from Open Space (OS) to Residential Low m (RCM) and the ZC will change the zoning of the re propertY. from Limited Control (LC) to One:Family esidential (R-1). An ~CP !'lmend- ment is reqwred to reflect the new RlM de~natton and R-1 zone on the LCP Land Use Plan and Zoning Maps respectively. PROPOSED DETERMINATION: The Citv of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental r\lvie.w of !he above de-scribed project pursuant to the GUidelines for lmplemen-~ tation ofthe California Enyironme~tal Qualitv Act anp the Environmental Protectton Ordmance of the Ctt~ of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, the initial study (EIA Part 2) identified pote~tii!IIY s,ignificant !lffects on the en-vironment but (1) revtstons tn the project plans or pro- posals made by or agreed to by, the applicant before the proposed negalive declaration and initial study are re- leased for public review would avoid the ellects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment would occur, and (2) there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record be-fore the City that the projecl 'as revised' may have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, a Miti-gated Negative Declaration will be recommended for adoption oy the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission and City Council. A copy of the initial study (EIA Part 2) documentinJl lea-sons fo sup119rt the prQPoSed Mitigated Negative Decla-1 ration is on file in the Planning Departmenf, 1635 Fara-day .Avenue Carlsbad, CalifOrnia 92008. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in ~~~~n§f\~i~~o';~g~ning Department within 30 days of the The proposed project and Mitigated Negative Declara-tion are subject to review and approval/adoptiQn by the Ci!Y of Carlsbad Planning Commtssion and City Council. Ad<lltlonal public notices will be issued when those public hearings art scheduled. If you have .any questions1 please call corey Funk In 1M Planning D8plirtment a {760) 602-4645. PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD~).~~ PUBLISH DATE JanJwy ~~15 I 'f/11/P?- ffl£ CQPY City of Carlsbad l#lJ@Ihhih~i•A§·ihill•l§bl PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: EARLY PUBLIC NOTICE TABATA 10 CT 06-13/ GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ SUP 06-08/ COP 06-19 This early public notice is to let you know that a development application for a single- family residential subdivision project within your neighborhood has been submitted to the City of Carlsbad on July 17, 2006. The project application is undergoing its initial review by the City. LOCATION: At the north end of Camino Hills Drive, on the west side of El Camino Real (APNs: 212-050-32 & -33). PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A proposal to subdivide an approximately 10-acre property into 26 single-family lots. The project requires approval of a General Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Special Use Permit, Hillside Development Permit, and Coastal Development Permit. The project includes the design of the subdivision lot layout, grading, landscaping, road and utility improvements. The project proposes lots that will be greater 7,500 square feet in size, with an RLM (Low-Medium Density) General Plan Designation and an R-1 (One-Family Residential) Zoning Designation. Access for the project will be provided by Camino Hills Drive. A separate approval at a later time will be required to develop homes on the lots. Please keep in mind that this is an early public notice and that the project design could change as a result of further staff and public review. A future public hearing notice will be mailed to you when this project is scheduled for public hearing before the Planning Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION: If you have questions or comments regarding this proposed project please contact Corey Funk, Assistant Planner at cfunk@ci.carlsbad.ca.us, (760) 602-4645, City of Carlsbad Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008. I 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us (!) El\.VIR0!\1'1\IENTAL IMPACT ASSESSl\IE!\"T FOR'\'1-PART I BACKGROUND (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT) CASENO: C"l06-13 DATE RECEIVED: ------,:::--:----,---- rro be complered by sraJj) I. CASE NAME:_-=-TJ-=-;f_~_.:.;#;....:;.T.=i#___:/_tJ _______________ _ 2. APPLICANT: __ /'-11_.-_'#_"h_il___,_f=._~_'l._'t-'--Y _____________ _ 3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 7j,p, 794·1tfPR ?, ~~ tiPX /, 74f, ~AKJ,~~At? &A #fiP/8 4. PROJECT DESCRJPTION: -------------------- SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMEl'-11 AL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: Please check any of the environmental factors listed below that would be potentially affected by this project. This would be any environmental factor that has at least one impact checked "Potentially Significant Impact," or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" in the checklist on the following pages. D Land Use and Planning D Transportation/Circulation D Public Services D Population and Housing D Biological Resources D Utilities & Service Systems D Geological Problems D Energy & Mineral Resources D Aesthetics Owater 0Hazards D Cultural Resources D Air Quality 0Noise D Recreation D Mandatory Findings of Significance 1 Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Infonnation Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) I. LAND USE Al\.TI PLA~"NING. Would the proposal:. a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (Source #(s): ( ) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? ( ) c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? ( ) d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or fannlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses? ( ) e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-income or minority community)? ( II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? ( ) b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? ( ) c) Displace ex1stmg housing, especially affordable housing? ( ) III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? ( ) b) Seismic ground shaking? ( c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? ( ) e) Landslides or mudflows? ( f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? ( ) g) Subsidence of the land? ( h) Expansive soils? ( i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? ( ) b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? ( ) c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? ( ) Potentially Significant Impact D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D Less Than Significan t Impact D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D 1\o Impact Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? ( ) e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? ( ) f) Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? ( ) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? ( ) V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? ( ) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? ( ) d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? ( ) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? ( ) d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? ( ) g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? ( ) VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds? ( ) b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? ( ) Potentially Significant Impact D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D Less Than Significan t Impact D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D 1\o Impact ~ [M Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? ( ) d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( e) Storm water drainage? ( f) Solid waste disposal? ( g) Local or regional water supplies? ( XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic or vista or scenic highway? ( ) b) Have a demonstrate negative aesthetic effect? ( ) c) Create light or glare? ( ) XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? ( ) b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) c) Affect historical resources? ( ) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ( ) e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? ( XV. RECREATIONAL. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? ( ) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? • Potentially Potentially Less Than No Significant Significant Significan Impact Impact Unless t Impact Mitigation Incorporated D D D ~ D D D ~ D D D ~ D D ~ L_ D D ~ D D D ~ D D D D ~ D D D ~ D D D ~ D D D ~ D D D ~ D D D ~ D D D [EI D D [RJ D D D D ~ D D D • • Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less Than :'\o (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) Significant Significant Significan Impact b) c) XVII. Impact Unless t Impact Mitigation Incorporated Does the project have impacts that are individually D D ~ D limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? Does the project have environmental effects which will D D D cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site- specific conditions for the project. • • CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU Discretionary Review Checklist PROJECT NUMBER: _;C=..:D:::.....:..13::....-..:.1 O=----.:.T.:.....:A::.:BA....:..J::.:...A~1:..::.0 ________________ _ BUILDING ADDRESS: 2311 CAMINO HILLS DR PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Conceptual plan submitted for preliminary review and consistency determination of modifications to CT 06-13 TM, Grading Plan, Lot Lines and Pad and Street elevations. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 212-050-32+33 FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore, any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. By: G. Ryan Date: 08.25.2013 ATTACHMENTS DENIAL Please see the attached report of deficiencies marked with D. Make necessary corrections to plans or specifications for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. By: Date: By: Date: By: Date: FIRE DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSON NAME: ADDRESS: 1635 Faraday Ave Carlsbad, CA 92008 PHONE: COMMENTS: NO COMMENTS OR CONDITIONS (~) CITY OF ¥CARLSBAD • • Memorandum August 19, 2013 To: Chris Garcia, Planner From: Tecla Levy, Associate Engineer Re: CD 13-10 (CT 13-06}-TABATA 10 Engineering Department staff has completed the 1st review of the above application submittal documents for completeness. The application documents submitted for this project are complete. Prior to next submittal, it is suggested the following items are adequately addressed: 1. Process a substantial conformance exhibit (SCE) application through Land Development Engineering. 2. Remove the original approved tentative map as sheet 1 of the Consistency Determination (CD) set of plans. You may add it to the CD set for reference only. 3. Provide a complete revised tentative map site plan/preliminary grading plan. Revise sheet 2 of the site plan to include the following: a) Existing and the proposed contour lines and elevations. b) Existing and proposed utilities including water, sewer, storm drain, treatment and hydromodification facilities. c) Project information including land use, no. of lots, vicinity map, general notes, legend, legal description, bench mark, basis of bearing, lot area, project traffic generation in ADT, water demand {GPD), sewer demand (EDU), etc. d) Provide revised grading quantities. 4. Show how the drainage behind the proposed retaining walls is captured. 5. Address the potential cross-lot drainage at the existing brow ditch at the southwest corner of the property. 6. This project may be subject to upcoming City of Carlsbad BMP Design Manual pursuant to provision E.3.d of the new California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Order No. R9-2013-001 adopted on June 27, 2013. During final design, developer shall demonstrate compliance with latest storm water requirements to the satisfaction of the city engineer. Community & Economic Development 1635 Faraday Ave. I Carlsbad, CA 92008 I 760-602-2710 I 760-602-8560 fax I www.carlsbadca.gov • • CD 13-10 (CT 13-06)-TABATA 10 August 19, 2013 Page 2 7. Comply with all other comments shown on red-lined plans. Resubmittal: 8. Please submit the following documents in the next review submittal: a) 1 copy of the revised preliminary site plan b) 2nd review redlined plans. • CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT Fire Prevention Division Land Use Review Report PROJECT NAME: Tabata 10 Date: 06112109 Project number: CUP 06-19 I GPA 06-04 I SUP 06-08 I CT 06-13 Staff Planner: C. Funk Engineer: Project conditions: (Note: The following identifies specific conditions necessary to achieve Fire Department approval.) Fire Department has reviewed this application and would condition this project as follows: Without the benefit of a plan that shows the proposed homes and their finish and trim I would have to assume based on the Preliminary Site Plan that those homes on lots not providing at least ten-feet of separation (eave-to-eave) will be considered as one building. Furthermore it is assumed that the siting of these homes will in all likelihood result in the 5000 s.f. aggregate floor area will be crossed, thus prompting fire sprinklers being included in all of those homes meeting this threshold. The applicant should anticipate if not already agreed upon to include revisions to these plans that the water meter services are W3A, and provide a note on this submittal indicating that Automatic Fire Sprinklers are to be provided. CMC 17.04.230 amending Section 903.2 -Automatic Fire Extinguishing systems states, When required by the Carlsbad Municipal Code, an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in new buildings and structures shall be provided in the locations described in this section. For the purpose of fire sprinkler systems, buildings separated by less than ten (1 0) feet from adjacent buildings (eave-to-eave) shall be considered as one. Regardless of rating, walls, partitions and fire barriers shall not be considered as creating separate buildings for the purposes of determining fire sprinkler requirements. GR • • PLAN~lNG DEPT CITY OF CARLSBAD TRAC,<,iNG DESK REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO REC'D:]t b( IT\ SEPTEMBER 22. 2008 REVIEW NO: ISSUES TO: 1Z1 Engineering, Development Services-Terie Rowley D Police Department-J. Sasway FROM: D Fire Department -Greg Ryan D Building Department-Will Foss D Recreation -Mark Steyaert D Public Works Department (streets)-Thomas Moore D Water/Sewer District 1ZJ Landscape Plancheck Consultant -PELA D School District D North County Transit District -Planning Department D Sempra Energy - Land Management D Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) D Parks/Trails -Liz Ketabian *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON PROJECT NO(S): GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06- 02/ ZC 06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ HOP 07-03/ COP 06-19 PROJECT TITLE:---!.T.:.....:A=BA:.....:.T.!.!.A....:...-.:...:1 0:..__ ________________ _ APPLICANT: TABATA FAMILY PROPOSAL: 26 LOT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to MEGHAN JACOBSON, Senior Office Specialist in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by 10/13/08 . If you have "No Comments", please so state. If you have any questions, please contact COREY FUNK , at X4645 . Thank you ·-/1 -' ..n.-r ·-.. n ~· '1-COMMENTS: ____ IW~~~~--~-)--~------------------~--~----~--~-r--------- 1 vj vt£ f e; g I I PLANS ATTACHED Review & Comment 09/07 September 24, 2008 TO: Corey Funk, Assistant Planner Michele Masterson, Senior Management Analyst Meghan Jacobson, Senior Office Specialist --------------------------, FROM: Michael Elliott, City of Carlsbad's Contract Landscape Architect RE: Landscape Architectural Review -Conceptual Review -5th Review Tabata 10-GPA06-04-ZC06-03-LCPA06-02-CT06-13, CDP06-19 Camino Hills Drive PELA file: 119-Tabata 10-CT06-13-ConS Landscape Architect: California Landscape Technologies, Phone (760) 942-9320 Please advise the applicant to make the following corrections to the plans so that they will meet the requirements of the City of Carlsbad's Landscape Manual. Numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of the comment concern. REPEAT COMMENTS 1-21 Completed. 22. RETURN REDLINES and provide 2 copies of all plans (concept, water conservation, and colored water use plan) on the next submittal. 1B-7B Completed. 1 C-4C Completed. 1D-2D Completed. 3D. It is recommended that the HOA be responsible for maintenance of areas outside the lot ·.valls. These areas tend to be forgotten and not maintained by private m.vners. Please revise accordingly. Include landscaping ofthese areas on the planting plans. 2nd Review: Please show conceptual plantings in these new HOA maintained areas. NEW COMMENTS IE. Please provide a copy of the revised civil plans showing the new retaining wall heights and construction materials for cross checking. The wall may need vegetative softening. The wall should be of an upgraded material (split-face block, plaster, with appropriate cap, etc.) since it appears that it will be visible from El Camino ReaL PROJECT NAME: Date: Project Number: Staff Planner: • CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT Fire Protection Services PLAN REVIEW REPORT Tabata 10 07115108 PLANNING DEPT TRACKING DESK REC'D:)( l 5Lr& GP A 06-04 I LCP A 06-02 I ZC 06-03 I CT 06-13 I SUP 06-08 I HDP 07-031 CDP 06-19 C. Funk Engineer: Initial review: (Note: This commentary identifies fire protection issues associated with the project, and/or prescribes specific corrections or information needed to achieve Fire Department approval.) Fire department has reviewed this application and has no comments or conditions for approval. GR TO: Corey Funk, Assistant Planner Michele Masterson, Management Analyst Meghan Jacobson, Senior Office Specialist FROM: Michael Elliott, City ofCarlsbad's Contract Landscape Architect RE: Landscape Architectural Review -Conceptual Review -4th Review Tabata 10-GPA06-04-ZC06-03-LCPA06-02-CT06-13, CDP06-19 Camino Hills Drive PELA file: 119-Tabata 10-CT06-13 -Con4 Landscape Architect: California Landscape Technologies, Phone (760) 942-9320 Please advise the applicant to make the following corrections to the plans so that they will meet the requirements of the City of Carlsbad's Landscape Manual. Numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of the comment concern. REPEAT COMMENTS 1-21 Completed. 22. RETURN RED LINES and provide 2 copies of all plans (concept, water conservation, and colored water use plan) on the next submittal. 1B-7B Completed. 1 C-4C Completed. NEW COMMENTS 1D. Are trees allowed within the SDG&E easement? Please review and revise plans as appropriate. 2D. Please show all water and sewer line services and coordinate street tree locations. Locate street trees: a. A minimum of 3' outside the public right-of-way. b. A minimum of5' from paving. c. A minimum of 7' from any sewer line. d. Not in conflict with public utilities. e. Not to be allowed on street comers within a triangular zone drawn from two points, 25' from the beginning of curves and end of curves or within sight lines as described under "Sight Distance" above. (See Appendix C.4). 3D. It is recommended that the HOA be responsible for maintenance of areas outside the lot walls. These areas tend to be forgotten and not maintained by private owners. Please revise accordingly. Include landscaping of these areas on the planting plans. June 10, 2008 TO: Corey Funk, Staff Planner Tecla Levy, Project Engineer SUBJECT: GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ HDP 07- 03/ CDP 06-19 TABATA 10 Response to comments Dated 8-10-07 LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION -Planning 1. A preliminary vegetation assessment letter has been prepared by Dossey and Associates and included with this submittal (2 copies) 2. Eucalyptus trees located to the north-west have been shown on the Landscape plans. ISSUES OF CONCERN -Planning 3. Portions of the existing homes to the north of Camino Hills Drive can be seen on the existing topo. Our topo shows offsite information a minimum of 60' from subdivision boundary for a limited portion but typically shows 100' beyond the subdivision boundary. The APN's and footprints for the homes on the north west side of Camino Hills Dr. have been shown. 4. HDP 07-03 has been added to plans 5. Fence detail drawings have been added to the landscape drawings as well as details for the "split face" walls. 6. The total percentage of the site to be landscaped has been added to the Landscape plans. 7. All lot widths have been provided 8. Camino Hills Dr. IOD has been properly accounted for in the density calculations. 9. A Habitat Mapping Report has been prepared and included with this submittal. 10. The proposed pedestrian path has been moved further north and the berm extended. 11. The proposed setbacks have been shown on the easements exhibit sheet. 12. The addition of a retaining wall along the north-west side of Camino Hills Dr. will allow for no grading in this area therefore allowing the existing trees to remain undisturbed. 13. The contour lines line weight has been increased in an effort to make them clearer. 14. Please refer to the revised Landscape plans. 15. The Landscape plans and Tentative Map now show consistent grading limits. 16. Redlines have been addressed for both engineering and planning. 17. Landscape plan red1ines have been addressed and including in this submittal -Engineering 18. The common area has been labeled with the correct lot number 19. Proposed brow ditches have been removed along the southwest and south east boundaries. The lots now drain to the roadway. 20. The preliminary drainage report has updated to reflect the updates to the tentative map and per engineering's request. 21. A proposed storm drain easement has been shown on the easement exhibit and shall be required on the final map. 22. Agree with comment and will comply during final engineering and mapping (with the exception of the "contech device" as it has been removed from the plans. 23. The pedestrian trail that leads to El Camino Real will act as the emergency overflow system. In the case where the storm drain system is completely clogged runoff will rise above the curb face and be directed to flow towards El Camino Real. The elevation of the curb face is low enough to allow runoff to travel along the path rather than flood any pads. 24. Low Impact Development (LID) has been implemented into the project per the revised SUSMP requirements. All comments on plans have been addressed 25. Noted, and will comply during final engineering 26. Redlined check prints have been submitted with this package as requested. In addition to the written comments dated August 1oth 2007, comments from a meeting between. Pasco Engingeering and the City of Carlsbad's Planning and Engineering staff were also addressed. The following is a short narrative summarizing the major revisions from that meeting: -The LID roadway swale has been eliminated and replaced with grassy swales (in excess of750 ft) and several Filterra bioretention filters. The primary reasons for the changes were the inconsistencies between the roadway section with the LID and the standard roadway section and maintenance of the LID swale. -A small retaining wall is proposed to run along portions of Camino Hills Dr. in an effort to eliminate or minimize the offsite grading and preserve the existing vegetation. -In order to satisfy the affordable housing aspect of the project, second dwelling units are proposed on lots 3,4,5, and 13. I August 29. 2007 PLANN~NG DEPT TRACKING DESK REC'D: ~ ·l9 · 07 TO: FROM: RE: Corey Funk, Assistant Planner Michele Masterson, Management Analyst Meghan Jacobson, Senior Office Specialist Michael Elliott, City of Carlsbad's Contract Landscape Architect Landscape Architectural Review-Conceptual Review -3rd Review Tabata 10-GPA06-04-ZC06-03-LCPA06-02-CT06-13, CDP06-19 Camino Hills Drive PELA file: ll9-Tabata 10-CT06-l3-Con3 Landscape Architect: California Landscape Technologies, Phone (760) 942-9320 Please advise the applicant to make the following corrections to the plans so that they will meet the requirements of the City of Carlsbad's Landscape Manual. Numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of the comment concern. REPEAT COMMENTS 1-14 Completed. 14. Deleted. 16-21 Completed. 22. RETURN REDLINES and provide 2 copies of all plans (concept, water conservation, and colored water use plan) on the next submittal 1B-5B Completed. 6B. Some Platanus species have proven to do poorly in the Carlsbad area. It is unknown if 'Bloodgood' is one of the varieties doing poorly. It is recommended that Platanus be used along El Camino Real to be compatible with adjacent existing plantings however it will need to be insured that the variety selected will have a good chance of success. Please indicate that the Platanus variety shall be revised as appropriate and be subject to final City approval. 3rd Review: The applicant has deleted Platanus from the plans. Please add back in along El Camino Real per above comments. 7B. Please address landscaping of all graded areas up to the daylight line. NEW COMMENTS 1C. It is unclear if there is existing landscaping including irrigation in this area. Since the area is being graded, landscaping to incJude irrigation wiJJ be required. Please be more specific as to what is to occur here. 2C. Please add the following notes to the plans: Slopes 6:1 or steeper requiring erosion control measures as specified herein shall be treated with one or more of the following planting standards: a. Standard 1 -Cover Crop/Reinforced Straw Matting: Cover crop shall be a seed mix typically made up of quick germinating and fast covering grasses, clovers, and/or wild flowers. Submit the specific seed mix for City approval prior to application. The cover crop shall be applied at a rate and manner sufficient to provide 90% coverage within thirty (30) days. ... ~ \ Tabata IO-GPA06-04-ZC06-03-LCPA06-02-CT06-I3 Conceptual Plan Review August 29, 2007 Page2 Type of reinforced straw matting shall be as approved by the city and staked to the slope as recommended by the manufacturer. Reinforced straw matting shall be required when planting occurs between August IS and April IS. The cover crop and/or reinforced straw mat shall be used the remainder of the year. b. Standard #2-Ground Cover One hundred (1 00%) percent of the area shall be planted with a ground cover known to have excellent soil binding characteristics (planted from a minimum size of flatted material and spaced to provide full coverage within one year). c. Standard #3 -Low Shrubs Low spreading woody shrubs (planted from a minimum of2-3/4 inch liners) shall cover a minimum of seventy (70%) percent ofthe slope face (at mature size). d. Standard #4 -Trees and/or Large Shrubs Trees and/or large shrubs shall be (planted from a minimum of I gallon containers) at a minimum rate of one (I) per two hundred (200) square feet. Slopes-6: I or steeper and: a. 3' or less in vertical height and are adjacent to public walks or streets require at minimum Standard #I. b. 3' to 8' in vertical height require Standards #I, #2 and #3. c. In excess of8' in vertical height require Standards #I, #2, #3, and #4. Areas graded flatter than 6:I require Standard #I (cover crop) with temporary irrigation when they have one or more of the following conditions: a. Sheet graded pads not scheduled for improvements within 6 months of completion of rough grading. b. A potential erosion problem as determined by the City. c. Identified by the City as highly visible areas to the public or have special conditions that warrant immediate treatment. 3C. Street trees are required at the rate of I per 40' of street frontage. Please provide street trees on the west side of the street. These trees were shown on previous submittals. 4C. Please show all easements. The proposed 20' sewer easement is not shown. e • City of Carlsbad ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMORANDUM August 27, 2007 TO: Corey Funk, Planning FROM: Tecla Levy, Engineering SUBJECT: COMPLETENESS REVIEW AND INITIAL ISSUES STATEMENT TABATA 10: CT 06-13/ COP 06-19/ SUP 06-08/ ZC 06-03/ GPA 06-04 I LCPA 06-02 Engineering Department staff has completed a first review of the above referenced project. Staff has reviewed the submittal for completeness and has determined that the application and plans submitted for the project are complete. However, additional issues of concern are identified below. Prior to next submittal, it is suggested the following items are adequately addressed: ISSUES OF CONCERN: 1) Identify, label and provide lot number for the common area shown on the preliminary grading plan as "Greenbelt". 2) Eliminate proposed brow ditches shown along the toes of existing slopes at the Southwest and Southeast boundaries of the subject property. This is to avoid potential future problems associated with cross-lot drainage. Each lot should drain into the proposed public street where feasible. 3) Revise the Preliminary Drainage Report in accordance with the revisions requested in item no. 1 above. The report must include a table showing pre- development Q 100 and post development Q 100 comparison at the outlet point. Clearly indicate the increase in Q1 00 proposed to be detained on-site. 4) Provide drainage easement for the storm drain system proposed outside the public-right-of way. (See red-lined plans for location.) 5) The proposed treatment BMP "Stormfilter by Contech" and the proposed concrete detention basin shall be privately owned and maintained by Home Owner's Association. Storm Water Maintenance Agreement and Encroachment Agreement will be required. 6) Provide/show on the plan an emergency overflow system in the event that the proposed storm drain system fails. Show that run-off will drain into the street and no ponding or flooding occurs when storm drains are 100% plugged. • 7) Incorporate "Low Impact Design (LID)" in the development, as required by the Regional Water Quality Control Board. See attached design samples. 8) Please comply with all comments shown on the plan. 9) Provide street name for the proposed on-site public road. 1 0) A red lined check print is enclosed for the applicants use in making the requested revisions. Please return this check print with the formal application submittal to facilitate continued staff review. This review does not constitute a complete review of the proposed project and additional items of concern, as well as comments on technical and design issues will be identified upon submission of the above items. If you have any questions, please either see or call me at 760-602-2733. F:\Projects\CT 06-13\CT 06-13 Issues Ltr 2nd Review review.doc Page 2 of2 .------------------------- April 26, 2007 Michelle Lenkowski City of Carlsbad Planning Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 N C T D 00 2001 ~'P' Planning Department City of carlsbad . RE: Tabata 10 (CT 06-13; GPA 06-04; LCPA 06-02; ZC 06-03; SUP 06-08; CDP 06-19) Dear Ms. Lenkowski: Thank you for the opportunity to common~ on the tentative map for the Tabata ·;o, a :::.ubdi\·is~·:~n of 10 acres into 26 single-family residential lots, along the south side of El Camino Real, east of Camino Hills Drive in the City of Carlsbad. The North County Transit District (NCTD) currently operates fixed route bus service (Route 309) along this stretch of El Camino Real that connects the area with regional and local transit service at Town Center North, Plaza Camino Real, and the Encinitas COASTER station. REQUESTED BUS STOP After reviewing the tentative map, NCTD requests that the developer make infrastructure improvements at one bus stop location. This request is made due to the likely number of transit passengers, specifically residents and visitors, which will be generated from this type and size of development. This location is at: • Southbound El Camino Real@ 16-feet south of the sidewalk connecting Camino Hills Drive to El Camino Real. Specific improvements that should be designed and built at this existing bus stop location include: 1. Concrete Bus Pad -In order to minimize the wear and tear on El Camino Real where buses will be stopping, NCTD recommends that the developer install a concrete bus pad in the street adjacent to the bus stop improvements. The concrete bus pad should extend out 1 0-teet from the existing concrete curb-and-gutter, and be a total ot 80-feet long. The 80-feet should begin 30-feet north of the northern edge of the 1 0-foot wide sidewalk connecting Camino Hills Drive and El Camino Real and continue to 40-feet south of the southern edge of the aforementioned sidewalk. I have included a sample of the desired pavement composition (Case Ill) for this concrete bus pad. 2.: ADA-Compliant Boarding Pad -Starting at 16-feet south of the southern edge of the sidewalk connecting Camino Hills Drive and El Camino Real and extending to 40-feet south, an ADA-compliant boarding pad should be constructed so that wheelchair passengers can load and unload safely. This concrete pad should be 1 0-feet wide from the face of the curb by 24-feet long. It is important that this pad be on as level ground as possible to facilitate easy wheelchair access. If the existing/proposed sidewalk on the west side of El Camino Real is 5-feet wide and directly adjacent to the curb, then only an additional 5-feet in width of concrete should be poured behind the sidewalk for a length of 24-feet. This concrete boarding pad should also be sloped slightly toward the street NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT 810 MISsion Avenue. Oceanside. CA 92054-2825 760-967-2828 l ,---------------------,----~~--~~~--------------- Ms. Michelle Lenkowski April 26, 2007 Page 2 for drainage purposes, but should not exceed the standard 2% cross-slope for sidewalks. Specific information on the design of the boarding pad has been included with this letter. 3. Passenger Waiting Bench -Due to the higher passenger demand that this development is likely to generate, the developer should install a new 8-foot long, brown Wabash Valley wire-grill, non-advertising bench with back (model # PP307D) and a third center leg centered and at the rear of the above mentioned ADA-compliant boarding pad. It is important to note that the City of Carlsbad prefers brown, and not the NCTD standard blue color for its benches. Information on the Wabash Valley bench has also been included with this letter. 4. Trash Can-To keep the bus stop area free of litter and debris, the developer should install a brown Wabash Valley trash receptacle (model # LR300) with a 32 gallon liner (model# LR310), a brown domed lid (model# DT100), and a surface mount post package (model# LR105) on the southwestern corner of the above mentioned ADA- compliant boarding pad. Information on the Wabash Valley trash receptacle can be obtained by calling (800) 253-8619 or going online at www.wabashvalley.com. 5. Solar Bus Stop Light-To ensure the bus stop is well lit in the early morning and late evenings, the developer should install an On-Demand Solar Bus Stop Light from National Solar Technologies on the northwest corner of the above mentioned ADA- compliant boarding pad. Information on the light and pole can be obtained by calling (800) 310-7413 x108 or going online at www.nationalsolaronline.com. Once the City's review of this development application has been completed, please send a list of the conditions of approval (which are sent to the developer) to NCTD for our files. And once the developer is ready to install these facilities, please have them contact me so our transportation services staff can review the siting of the improvements to ensure compliance with the ADA. Thank you again for the opportunity to review the site plan for this project. If you have any questions regarding my comments, please contact me at (760) 966-6546 or email me at kluhrsen@nctd.org. I would also be pleased to review any plan modifications once they have been generated to ensure the changes will meet the needs of the Transit District and our bus passengers. Sincerely, Kurt Luhrsen Principal Planner Attachments Cc: Corey Funk, City of Carlsbad PAVEMENT COMPOSITION For streets suitable for regular use by buses Scale 1" = 4' CASE I · Asphalt Roadway Type H Curb•• Slope 2% (typical} Type H Curb•• Portland cement concrete (minimum 7" to 1 0.5" ") Concrete treated base (minimum 0" to 6n *) Native soil CASE Ill • Concrete Bus Pad Note: for Curbside lane at Bus Stop Slope 2% (lypicol) ' Portland cement concrete (9", or 8" wilh rebar) Concrete treated base (6" compacted to 95% standard proctor) Native soil • Thickness of layers depends upon average daily traffic volume and resistance value of native soil. •• Type G curb is acceptable on collector streets. 11 ~-:z a. "0 CD c;· =E ~ ~ " (/) :z a: "0 CD c;· =E ~ OJ " (/) :z a: "0 CD c;· =E ~ ~ -" A I I I I I 01 ::ll I I I v A I I I ! 01 ::ll I I I v A I I I ! 01 ::ll I I I v ~CTD's Bus Stop Pad Dimensfns OPTION 1: Desired Shelter Pad Dimension for a 13-foot Shelter 13-foot long passenger shelter ADA Boarding ~ Pad ··········································································································································t····································<-······ i Area l I <------------------------------18 feet ---------------------------> I <------6 feet -----> I OPTION 2: Desired Bench Pad Dimension for an 8-foot Bench 8-foot long bench ADA Boarding . Pad 1 -·--r Area ·r I<-----5 feet ---->1 I<--------------------12 feet ---------------------> <------6 feet -----> A I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I v OPTION 3: Desired Bench Pad Dimension for a 6-foot Bench 6-foot long ben:fi"l:,· ADA __j Boarding Pad .............................................................................. ; .................................... .;. ..... . l Area 1 I<-----------------1 0 feet -----------> I<-----5 feet ---->1 <------6 feet -----> A : I I I I I I I I I I I I v NOTE 1: The minimum pad depth (from face of curb) to be compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act (1990) is 8-feet. NOTE 2: No street furniture (benches, shelters, or trash cans) should be installed within 2 1/2 feet of the curb to avoid being hit by passing buses or trucks. I I I I I I I v .. Street Furniture In attempts to standardize the look of street furniture, we have chosen specific benches and shelters to be installed at NCTD bus stops. All new stops should incorporate 13-foot Tolar non- advertising shelters with a dome roof, or Wabash Valley metal benches. If the requested bus stop locations are not currently lit (i.e. located under or near a streetlight) we would also request that a solar panel be installed on the bus shelter to light the structure at night. Developers are required to purchase, install and clean all bus benches and shelters. NCTD recommends that developers and the eventual owner/operator are required to clean all bus benches and shelters installed as part of their development. These bus stop facilities typically are dedicated to the Jurisdiction. Replacement of bus stop facilities are typically the responsibility ofNCTD and the Jurisdiction though this varies with each Jurisdiction. NCTD understands that in some cases the installation of a custom bench or shelter is desirable. District staff does not discourage the use of custom facilities, although all designs MUST be approved by NCTD staff prior to installation. Bus Stops with Benches • Wabash Valley 8-foot metal bench with back & 3rd center leg • Model number PP307D (surface mounted legs) • Royal Blue in color* • Wabash Valley Manufacturing, Inc. P.O. Box 5, 505 E. Main Street Silver Lake, IN 46982 1-800-253-8619 www. wabashvalley.com Bus Stops with Shelters • Tolar 9-foot, 13-foot or 17-foot dome roof non- advertising shelter (size to be specified by NCTD)** • Model 9NALD-PM NCTD Drawing Number 3345 • Model 13NALD-PM NCTD Drawing Number 3343 • Model 17NALD-PM NCTD Drawing Number 3346 • Solar panels for lighting • Wire grill bench with vagrant bars • Signal Blue in color (RAL 5005)* • Tolar Manufacturing Company, Inc. 258 Mariah Circle Corona, CA 92879 1-800-339-6165 www.tolarmfg.com * Check with City staff, as some jurisdictions prefer the use of other colors. ----· -~· -'" ._.._. ~. **In some cases, the Tolar shelter is not preferred. Check with City staff, as some jurisdictions prefer that shelters be designed to meet neighborhood or community architectural themes. 13 January 25, 2007 TO: Corey Funk, Assistant Planner Michele Masterson, Management Analyst Michelle Lenkowski, Senior Office Specialist FROM: Michael Elliott, City of Carlsbad's Contract Landscape Architect RE: Landscape Architectural Review -Conceptual Review -2nd Review Tabata 10-GPA06-04-ZC06-03-LCPA06-02-CT06-13, CDP06-19 Camino Hills Drive PELA file: ll9 -Tabata lO -CT06-13 -Con2 Landscape Architect: California Landscape Technologies, Phone (760) 942-9320 Please advise the applicant to make the following corrections to the plans so that they will meet the requirements ofthe City of Carlsbad's Landscape Manual. Numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of the comment concern. REPEAT COMMENTS 1-13 Completed. 14. Will there be any perimeter walls installed as a part of this project along the north, south, east or west sides of the project? Please show any proposed walls and indicate heights and materials to be used. 2nd Review: The applicant has responded: "No new walls and fences are currently proposed " Walls and/or fences will most likely be needed along Camino Hills Drive and between lots. When will these be addressed? 15. Landscaping shall be used to provide and enhance opportunities for outdoor recreation, relaxing, and eating. The area at the top of slope along El Camino Real is large enough to provide for recreational needs. It is recommended that this area be designed for outdoor recreational uses (i.e. exercise course, play area, picnic and BBQ, etc.) Please address. 2nd Review: The applicant has provided small turf areas with 4 benches and 2 trash receptacles. This area is large enough to provide more recreational use such as picnic tables, BBQ 'sand possibly a small childrens play area. It is recommended that additional recreational amenities be provided to include these items. 16-19 Completed. 20. Areas graded flatter than 6:1 require Standard #1 (cover crop) when they have one or more of the following conditions: a. Sheet graded pads not scheduled for improvements within 6 months of completion of rough grading. b. A potential erosion problem as determined by the City. c. Identified by the City as highly visible areas to the public or have special conditions that warrant immediate treatment. Please indicate the timing for graded pads. 2nd Review: The applicant has re~ponded: "Per conversation with Mike Elliott, slopes 6:1 and flatter that do not meet shrub requirements and are adjusted to conditions noted shall receive straw fiber mats 5 ' Tabata 10-GPA06-04-ZC06-03-LCPA06-02-CT06-13 Conceptual Plan Review January 25, 2007 Page 2 minimum. " This does not address the comment. Please add the above notes on the plans. 21. Completed. 22. RETURN REDLINES and provide 2 copies of all plans (concept, water conservation, and colored water use plan) on the next submittal NEW COMMENTS lB. Please identify all symbols used on the plans. 2B. The City Engineering Department no longer allows the use of jute mesh. Please revise to reinforced straw mat. 3B. The water use map has been forwarded to Public Works Maintenance and Operations for review. 4B. Can trees be planted over the underground detention basin? Please coordinate. SB. Plantings along El Camino Real need to blend and be compatible with adjacent plantings to the north and south. Please add Acacia redolens, Eucalyptus sideroxylon and Schinus molle. 6B. Some Platanus species have proven to do poorly in the Carlsbad area. It is unknown if 'Bloodgood' is one of the varieties doing poorly. It is recommended that Platanus be used along El Camino Real to be compatible with adjacent existing plantings however it will need to be insured that the variety selected will have a good chance of success. Please indicate that the Platanus variety shall be revised as appropriate and be subject to final City approval. 7B. Please address landscaping of all graded areas up to the daylight line. August 8, 2006 TO: FROM: RE: Corey Funk, Assistant Planner Michele Masterson, Management Analyst Michael Elliott, City of Carlsbad's Contract Landscape Architect Landscape Architectural Review-Conceptual Review-1st Review Tabata 10-GPA06-04-ZC06-03-LCPA06-02-CT06-13, CDP06-19 Camino Hills Drive PELA file: 119-Tabata 10-CT06-13-Coni Landscape Architect: ADL Planning Associates, Phone (760) 729-8637 Please advise the applicant to make the following corrections to the plans so that they will meet the requirements ofthe City of Carlsbad's Landscape Manual. Numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of the comment concern. 1, Please show all existing easements and street right-of-ways. 2. Provide a plant palette list indicating shrub quantities. 3. Generally identify all existing woody plant material to be removed or retained. Trees over 12" in caliper diameter shall be identified on the plan individually as to caliper size and type and labeled to be retained or removed. 4. Provide a complete Water Conservation Plan in conjunction with the Landscape Concept Plan. This plan shall demonstrate to the City how the proposed development will use all practical means available to conserve water in the landscape. 5, All planting areas shall be outlined as one of the four planting zones below and described in Appendix A: Zone One Lush Zone Two Refined Zone Three Naturalizing/Transitional Zone Four Native Indicate the following percentages: Percent ofthe landscaped area (as defined in Appendix G) of each planting zone as described in Section A.5-3 and Appendix A. 6. Plans shall include but not be limited to: a. Extent of Planting Zone 1 (Lush)-Indicate percentage of Zone 1 planting (per Appendix A) of the total landscaped area (as defined in Appendix G). Provide justification for the appropriateness of where Zone I plantings are used in terms ofwater conservation. (For example, are Zone 1 plantings in areas of shade where they will use less water and/or has the soil been suitably amended so as to retain relatively greater moisture?) b. Proposed turf areas. (See limitations in IV.C.3-4.2) Give percentage ofturfofthe total landscaped area. c. Accommodations for reclaimed water (existing or future) and outline planting areas proposed to use reclaimed water. ---------------------------------- Tabata 10-GPA06-04-ZC06-03-LCPA06-02-CT06-13, CDP06-19 Conceptual Plan Review August 8, 2006 Page 2 d. Written description of water conservation features including addressing xeriscape principles (see Appendix B) within the project. 7. Recycled water should be available in this area in the future. Please provide a colored plan showing ultimate potable and reclaimed use areas. 8. Alternative water sources (non-potable) shall be used and/or planned for landscape irrigation. Projects must be designed to utilize reclaimed water and/or other alternative non-potable water sources for landscaping to the satisfaction of the City. All regional and local water and health code requirements in force at the time of final landscape approval shall apply including, but not limited to, installation of labeled or colored irrigation pipe to denote reclaimed water use. 9. Turf areas shall be limited by type of project and percentage of landscaped area in accordance with the following: RLM 15% (cool season grass) or 25% (warm season grass) 10. Per the water conservation section of the manual (C.3-4.6), woody shrubs must be planted over herbaceous groundcover to cover 60% of the groundcover area at maturity. Please show how this requirement will be met. 11. Please clearly indicate with a different symbol those areas to be maintained by private lot owners and those to be maintained by an HOA or landscape district. Clearly indicate if common areas are to be maintained by an HOA or district. 12. There is a large amount of high water use turf proposed. If not to be used for recreation, please substitute low water use shrubs and ground covers in place of the proposed Zoysia at the top of slope along El Camino Real. See comment number 15 below. 13. Landscaping consisting of ground cover, shrubs, and trees shall be used to screen elements of unsightliness and screen/soften new improvements. Please provide screening of the bio-swale. 14. Will there be any perimeter walls installed as a part of this project along the north, south, east or west sides of the project? Please show any proposed walls and indicate heights and materials to be used. 15. Landscaping shall be used to provide and enhance opportunities for outdoor recreation, relaxing, and eating. The area at the top of slope along El Camino Real is large enough to provide for recreational needs. It is recommended that this area be designed for outdoor recreational uses (i.e. exercise course, play area, picnic and BBQ, etc.) Please address. 16. Spacing of plants shall allow for their size at maturity. Please indicate spacing of all shrubs and ground covers. 17. Please address refurbishment of the existing slope landscaping. All areas need to be filled in with appropriate shrubs and ground covers. How are the existing slope plantings presently irrigated? Will existing irrigation remain and be connected to a new point of connection? Please fully address. 18. Locate street trees: a. A minimum of 3' outside the public right-of-way. b. A minimum of 5' from paving. c. A minimum of 7' from any sewer line. d. Not in conflict with public utilities. Tabata 10 -GP A06-04 -ZC06-03 -LCP A06-02 -CT06-13, CDP06-19 Conceptual Plan Review August 8, 2006 Page 3 e. Not to be allowed on street comers within a triangular zone drawn from two points, 25' from the beginning of curves and end of curves or within sight lines as described under "Sight Distance" above. (See Appendix C.4). 19. Please fully address landscaping of slopes and erosion control. Clearly show all slope areas (grades 6:1 or greater) and landscape as follows: On all slopes (all heights) that abut streets or sidewalks: Standard "A": • "A"-Cover crop plus jute net. Jute required ifinstalled August 15 -April15* On all slopes 4' and greater: "A, B & C" • "B" -Groundcover spaced to provide 100% coverage in one year. (ex: flats spaced at 12" O.C.) • "C" -Low spreading woody shrubs to provide a minimum of 70% cover at maturity. This is in addition to the requirements of"D" below. On all slopes that are 8' and greater: "A, B, C & D" • "D"-Trees and/or large shrubs at a rate of 1 per 200 SF or greater in height Provide a calculation indicating how the above requirements have been met. *Since the time of installation is not a certainty, in lieu of a cover crop, it is advised that reinforced straw mats be installed with groundcover from flats at 12" O.C. for Standard "A", to insure rapid coverage that will deter erosion. The elimination of the hydro-seed will also allow maintenance crews to more efficiently weed slopes and thus improve the success of the final permanent planting. All groundcover from flats must be spaced at 12" O.C. on slopes Add a note that: ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED. 20. Areas graded flatter than 6:1 require Standard #1 (cover crop) when they have one or more of the following conditions: a. Sheet graded pads not scheduled for improvements within 6 months of completion of rough grading. b. A potential erosion problem as determined by the City. c. Identified by the City as highly visible areas to the public or have special conditions that warrant immediate treatment. Please indicate the timing for graded pads. 21. Please revise the street trees deleting Metrosideros and Magnolia and adding Koelreuteria bipinnata and/or Jacaranda mimosifolia. Pistacia may remain. These substitutions are made in order to provide trees that will be more appropriate in a parkway area, providing canopy within a reasonable time period. 22. RETURN REDLINES and provide 2 copies of all plans (concept, water conservation, and colored water use plan) on the next submittal. PROJECT NAME: Date: Project number: Staff Planner: CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT Fire Prevention Division Land Use Review Report Tabata 10 07124106 I• l CUP 06-19 I GPA 06-04 I SUP 06-08 I CT 06-13 C. Funk Engineer: Project conditions: (Note: The following identifies specific conditions necessary to achieve Fire Department approval.) Fire Department has reviewed this application and has no comments or conditions to submit. GR e e City of Carlsbad Date: July 20, 2006 ~ To: From: Corey Funk-Planning Department JUL '';~;, • G u>?~I{\:.11:.\H J. Sasway, Crime Prevention Specialist, Carlsbad Police Department PLM'Hl'\11;al ca11sbad Subject: Tabata 10, residential subdivision, CDP 06-19/SUP 06-08 Plan Review Recommendations Carlsbad Police Department's Crime Prevention Unit has provided the following optimal security recommendations. The purpose of this document is to safeguard property and public welfare by regulating and reviewing the design, construction, quality of materials, use and occupancy, location, and maintenance of all buildings and structures. The standards used in this document represent model international standards. Crime Prevention through Environmental Design The proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime and an improvement in the quality of life. The proper design influences this by positively affecting human behavior. The design includes the physical environment, the planned behavior of people, the productive use of space and an effective crime floss prevention program. Natural Surveillance 1. Place and design physical features to maximize visibility. This will include building orientation, windows, entrances, walkways, landscape trees and shrubs, fences and any other physical obstruction. 2. Design the placement of persons and or activities to maximize surveillance possibilities. 3. Design lighting that provides for appropriate nighttime illumination of walkways, entrances and driveways. Natural Access Control 1. Use walkways, pavement, lighting and landscaping to clearly guide guests to and from selected entrances. 2. Use real or symbolic barriers like fences or landscaping to prevent and or discourage access to or from dark and or unmonitored areas. Provisions for territorial reinforcement 1. Use pavement treatments, landscaping and fences to define and outline ownership or property. Lighting 1. Equip homes on all sides with lighting fixtures. 2. Install lights on the house in the eaves to illuminate the walls of the house. 3. Choose light fixtures with dawn to dusk sensors or timers. 4. Equip all entrances, including the garage door, with a light fixture that is capable of illuminating the door and five (5) feet of the surrounding area. ,~ I 2560 Orion Way • Carlsbad, CA 92010-7240 • (760) 931-2100 • FAX (760) 931-8473 (!) • Landscaping 1. Plan a landscaping design that enhanced surveillance and security. 2. Tree canopies should be no lower than six (6) feet and should not allow access to roofs or balconies. 3. Let landscaping augment, not deter from lighting and addressing. 4. Plant only low profile shrubs and maintain below two (2) feet. 5. Use security plants where necessary to prevent entering and tampering. 6. Install walls and fences that are see through for surveillance. 7. Install lockable gates that allow surveillance 8. Keep entranceways clear of clutter Addressing 1. Locate numerals where they are clearly visible from the front street 2. They should be a contrasting color to the background on which they are affixed. 3. Numerals shall be no less than four (4) inches in height and illuminated during the hours of darkness. Entrances Front entrances that are not visible from the front street or that are separated by an enclosed courtyard create a security risk. The ability to see and be seen is the number one deterrent to crime. Non-visible or removed front entrances have an increased risk of residential crime as residents cannot watch the street nor is there surveillance protecting the front door. Further this type of front entrances decreases a residents feeling of community and their ability to self- police their neighborhood ultimately reducing the quality of life for the resident and neighborhood. 1. Front entrance designs should allow vision from the front door to the access street. 2. Keep entranceways clear of clutter. Alcoves and Courtyards Alcoves or courtyards placed on side or back of a house creates a place to hide and tamper with a door or windows within that area and out of surveillance via the street or neighbor. There is an increased risk of residential crime in this area. Doors 1. Do not use of glass within 42 inches of a locking device as it increases the risk of burglary. 2. Install wooden doors of solid core construction with a minimum thickness of one and three-fourths (1-3/4) inches. This includes the garage pedestrian door to the outside and the door from the garage into the residence. 3. Further, equip all doors with a single cylinder dead-bolt lock using a 5-pin tumbler. Viewer Connect the dead bolt to the inner portion of the lock by connecting screws. Ensure the lock has a one-inch throw that can withstand a cutting tool attack. Choose a deadbolt that embeds at least three-fourths of an inch into the strike plate. 1. Arrange entrance doors so that the occupant has a view of the area immediately outside the door without opening the door. Except doors requiring a fire protection rating that prohibits them, such a view may be provided by a door viewer having a field of view of not less than 190 degrees. Mounting height should not exceed fifty-four (54) inches from the floor. • • Strike Plates 1. Reinforce all deadbolt strike plates. Choose Strike plates constructed of a minimum 16 U.S. gauge steel, bronze, or brass and secure it to the jamb by a minimum of two screws, which should penetrate at least two (2) inches into the solid backing beyond the surface to which the strike is attached. Window and sliding glass doors 1. All exterior sliding glass doors and windows should be equipped with locking devices which will keep the sliding panel of the door or window from being opened from the outside horizontally or vertically. 2. Louvered windows should not be used. Hinges 1. Equip hinges for out-swinging doors with non-removable hinge pins or a mechanical interlock to preclude removal of the door from the exterior by removing the hinge pins. This information is a representation of information gathered on a national level. The purpose is to provide effective and consistent information. If you would like additional assistance concerning building security or employee security issues, please contact the Crime Prevention Unit at (760) 931-2105. By, Jodeene R. Sasway Crime Prevention Specialist Carlsbad Police Department (760) 931-2195 , STATE OF CALIFORNIA·· THE NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SAN DIEGO AREA 7575 METROPOLITAN DRIVE, SUITE 103 SAN DIEGO, CA 92108-4421 (619) 767-2370 EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., Governor March 8, 2011 C' · t'r ,. f\ o; r· · ~ ~ ' :, l! t' ~ Matt Hall, Mayor City of Carlsbad 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 MAR 1 4 1011 C0·~"~'·,~itP n rr:-"~·')·~.-8c [i._ . . ' .. • ,,t Re: Certification of City of Carlsbad Major LCP Amendment No. 4-09E (Tabata 1 0) Dear Mayor Hall, On December 15,2011, the California Coastal Commission approved the above- described Local Coastal Program (LCP) amendment request. In its action, the Commission certified the request to amend the City's certified City of Carlsbad LCP implementation plan. Specifically, the amendment included modifying the zoning designation from Limited Control (L-C) to Residential 1 (R-1) on a 10.16 acre site. The subject site is generally located at the north-east end of Camino Hills Drive along the west side of El Camino Real, and it was previously used for agricultural activities. There is no habitat value or any other coastal resources on the site. The proposed zoning amendment will facilitate the subdivision of the site into 27 lots. Since the amendment request was intended to take effect automatically upon Commission certification, and the Commission certified the amendment as submitted (without any suggested modifications or other terms), there is no further action necessary for the local government. If you have any questions about the Commission's action, please contact Toni Ross in our office. We thank you and the other staff members who worked on this planning effort and we remain available to assist in any way possible your continued efforts toward successful implementation of the local coastal program. Sincerely, 7L, ~ ~ District Manager cc: Corey Funk (G:\San Diego\Reports\LCPs\Carlsbad\CAR-MAJ-4-09E Tabala 10 Cert Letter.doc) STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE NATURAL RESOURCES ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COM ION SAN DIEGO AREA 7575 METROPOLITAN DRIVE, SUITE 103 SAN DIEGO, CA 92108-4421 (619) 767-2370 IMPORTANT PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CITY OF CARLSBAD LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM MAJOR AMENDMENT NO. 4-09E (Tabata 10) I. HEARING TIME AND LOCATION DATE: TIME: LOCATION: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 10:00 a.m. San Francisco City Hall Board of Supervisors Chambers 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, CA 94102 (415) 407-3211 II. AMENDMENT REQUEST The subject amendment proposes to modify the zoning designation from Limited Control (L-C) to Residential! (R-1) on a 10.16 acre site. The subject site is generally located at the north-east end of Camino Hills Drive along the west side of El Camino Real, and it was previously used for agricultural activities. There is no habitat value or any other coastal resources on the site. The proposed zoning amendment will facilitate the subdivision of the site into 27 lots. The current proposal pending before the City would allow 26 of these future lots to be developed with single family homes, although this development is not in front of the Commission at this time. The remaining land will be landscaped and will serve as a sound berm and physical barrier from El Camino Real. · The subject site slopes downward from south-west to north-east toward EL Camino Real. A portion of the site contains steep (in excess of 40%) manufactured slopes. The site was previously used for agricultural operations and contains 7.7 acres of disturbed habitat, 0.9 acres ofNon-native grassland, 0.3 acres of Eucalyptus woodland, 1.2 acres of developed area, and 0.04 acres of landscaping. The site contains no sensitive plant species. Surrounding land uses include single family homes to the north and west, the Camino Hills mobile home neighborhood to the south, and a vacant, commercially designated property to the east of El Camino Real. The subject site is not located adjacent to any hardline, standards, or habitat corridor areas as defined by the City's Habitat Management Plan (HMP). III. HEARING PROCEDURES At the time of the public hearing, staff will make a brief oral presentation to the Commission. Immediately following the presentation of the staff, a representative or representatives from the City of Carlsbad may address the Commission regarding the local coastal program amendment. Upon conclusion of the City's presentation, members of the public and agencies will have an opportunity to address the Commission and comment on the amendment. The Commission will then close the public hearing; and, since there are preliminary recommendations and findings prepared for the Commission, the Commission may take final action on the amendment request at this time. Important Public Hearin.ot1ce Page2 IV. BACKGROUND • The California Coastal Commission and the local governments within the coastal zone share responsibility for managing the state's coastal resources. The Local Coastal Program (LCP) is a specific long-term management plan prepared by a coastal city or county for its jurisdiction in the coastal zone. The LCP contains policies and implementation measures designed to protect sensitive coastal resources and set standards for future development. -Each LCP has two components: The land use plan (LUP), and implementation plan (IP) which consists of the zoning ordinance, zoning district maps, and other implementing actions within sensitive coastal resources areas. The Commission certifies each LCP to determine that it meets the requirements of the Coastal Act. After the Coastal Commission certifies an LCP, the local government assumes the authority to issue coastal development permits for most development in the coastal zone pursuant to the certified LCP. A local government may amend its certified LCP, but the change will become effective only after the LCP amendment has been effectively certified by the Coastal Commission. The City of Carlsbad's certified LCP contains six geographic segments as follows: Agua Hedionda, Mello I, Mello II, West Batiquitos Lagoon/Sammis Properties, East Batiquitos Lagoon/Hunt Properties, and Village Redevelopment. Pursuant to Sections 30170(f) and 30171 of the Public Resources Code, the Coastal Commission prepared and approved two portions ofthe LCP, the Mello I and II segments in 1980 and 1981, respectively. The West Batiquitos Lagoon/ Sammis Properties segment was certified in 1985. The East Batiquitos Lagoon/Hunt Properties segment was certified in 1988. The Village Redevelopment Area LCP was certified in 1988; the City has been issuing coastal development permits there since that time. On October 21, 1997, the City assumed permit jurisdiction and has been issuing coastal development permits for all segments except Agua Hedionda. The Agua Hedionda Lagoon LCP segment is a deferred certification area until an implementation plan for that segment is certified. This LCP amendment affects both the Mello II segment of the LCP and the HMP. V. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORT A staff report on the LCP amendment containing recommendations has been prepared for the Commission. If you would like the full text of the staff report, it can be obtained from the Coastal Commission's website at http://www.coastal.ca.gov/mtgcurr.html. Alternatively you can call or write the San Diego Area Office of the Coastal Commission and request a copy of the City of Carlsbad Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 4-09E staff report. A copy will be mailed to you promptly. Questions regarding the report or hearing should be directed to Toni Ross at (619) 767-2370. We apologize if you received duplicate notices; however, because of the overlap of persons with interest in more than one community on our mailing lists, the duplications are unavoidable. (G:\San Diego\Reports\LCPs\Carlsbad\CAR-MAJ-4-09E Tabata I 0 _IP NOTICE.doc) STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE NATURAL RESOURCES ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor eALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SAN DIEGO AREA 7575 METROPOLITAN DRIVE, SUITE 103 SAN DIEGO, CA 92108-4421 (619) 767-2370 t<OV 2 9 2010 November 23, 2010 W23b TO: COMMISSIONERS AND INTERESTED PERSONS FROM: SHERILYN SARB, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, SAN DIEGO COAST DISTRICT DEBORAH LEE, DISTRICT MANAGER, SAN DIEGO COAST DISTRICT TONI ROSS, COASTAL PROGRAM ANALYST, SAN DIEGO COAST DISTRICT SUBJECT: STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON CITY OF CARLSBAD MAJOR LCP AMENDMENT CAR-MAJ-4-09E (Tabata 10) for Commission Meeting of December 15-17,2010 SYNOPSIS The subject LCP implementation plan amendment was submitted and filed as complete on December 29, 2009. A one-year time extension was granted on March 10, 2010. As such, the last date for Commission action on this item is March 29, 2011. This is the second component of five unrelated items submitted as LCP Amendment Number 4-09 (A-E) to be heard by the Commission. The first component 4-09B (Building Height) was certified by the Commission at its June, 2010 hearing. Additionally, a third component 4-09D (Tabata Ranch) is also scheduled for the December, 20 1 0 hearing. SUMMARY OF AMENDMENT REQUEST The subject amendment proposes to modify the zoning designation from Limited Control (L-C) to Residential 1 (R-1) on a 10.16 acre site. The subject site is generally located at the north-east end of Camino Hills Drive along the west side of El Camino Real, and it was previously used for agricultural activities. There is no habitat value or any other coastal resources on the site. The proposed zoning amendment will facilitate the subdivision of the site into 27 lots. The current proposal pending before the City would allow 26 of these future lots to be developed with single family homes, although this development is not in front of the Commission at this time. The remaining land will be landscaped and will serve as a sound berm and physical barrier from El Camino Real. The subject site slopes downward from south-west to north-east toward EL Camino Real. A portion of the site contains steep (in excess of 40%) manufactured slopes. The site was previously used for agricultural operations and contains 7.7 acres of disturbed habitat, 0.9 acres of Non-native grassland, 0.3 acres of Eucalyptus woodland, 1.2 acres of developed area, and 0.04 acres of landscaping. The site contains no sensitive plant species. Surrounding land uses include single family homes to the north and west, the Camino Hills mobile home neighborhood to the south, and a vacant, commercially designated l CAR-MAJ-LCP Ao9E Tabata 10 Page2 property to the east ofEl Camino Real (ref. Exhibit #4). The subject site is not located adjacent to any hardline, standards, or habitat corridor areas as defined by the City's Habitat Management Plan (HMP). SUMMARY OF STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of the proposed zoning redesignation as submitted. The modification does not result in any potential impacts to sensitive habitat, public access, water quality or public views. And, although the subject site has previously been used for agricultural uses, the proposed zoning revision does not raise concerns regarding the conversion of agricultural lands for development. The site currently has a residential land use designation. The zoning designation of Limited-Control is meant to be a "holding zone" designation until more specific planning is completed. Since the project is surrounded by development on three sides and an undeveloped commercially designated property on the other, no habitat buffers, or fire suppression zones are necessary. As such, the rezoning can be found consistent with the City's LCP as submitted. The appropriate resolutions and motions begin on Page 4. The findings for approval of the Implementation Plan Amendment as submitted begin on Page 5. BACKGROUND The City of Carlsbad's certified LCP contains six geographic segments as follows: Agua Hedionda, Mello I, Mello II, West Batiquitos Lagoon!Sammis Properties, East Batiquitos Lagoon/Hunt Properties, and Village Redevelopment. Pursuant to Sections 30170(f) and 30171 of the Public Resources Code, the Coastal Commission prepared and approved two portions ofthe LCP, the Mello I and II segments in 1980 and 1981, respectively. The West Batiquitos Lagoon/ Sammis Properties segment was certified in 1985. The East Batiquitos Lagoon/Hunt Properties segment was certified in 1988. The Village Redevelopment Area LCP was certified in 1988; the City has been issuing coastal development permits there since that time. On October 21, 1997, the City assumed permit jurisdiction and has been issuing coastal development permits for all segments except Agua Hedionda. The Agua Hedionda Lagoon LCP segment is a deferred certification area until an implementation plan for that segment is certified. This LCP amendment affects both the Mello II segment of the LCP and the HMP. The Mello II Segment Land Use Plan and Implementation Plan were approved in 1981. The Mello II Segment is comprised of 5,500 acres, or approximately 75% of the City. Unresolved issues remained for the segment regarding preservation of agricultural lands, and protection of steep sensitive slopes. Multiple additional amendments were brought forward, and, with the incorporation of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan, the City's LCP was certified by the Commission, and the City obtained permit authority in 1996. Furthermore, the proposed LUP amendment is located in an area also protected through the City's Habitat Management Plan (HMP). The Carlsbad HMP was prepared to satisfy the requirements of a federal Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP), and as a subarea plan of CAR-MAJ-LCP-09E Tabata 10 Page 3 the regional Multiple Habitat Conservation Plan (MHCP). The MHCP study area involves approximately 186 square miles in northwestern San Diego County. This area includes the coastal cities of Carlsbad, Encinitas, Solana Beach and Oceanside, as well as the inland cities of Vista and San Marcos and several independent special districts. The participating local governments and other entities will implement their portions of the MHCP through individual subarea plans such as the Carlsbad HMP. Once approved, the MHCP and its subarea plans replace interim restrictions placed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the California Department ofFish and Game (CDFG) on impacts to coastal sage scrub and gnatcatchers within that geographical area, and allow the incidental take of the gnatcatcher and other covered species as specified in the plan. In its action on City of Carlsbad LCP Amendment No. 1-03B in July 2003, the Commission certified the HMP as part of the LCP and found it to meet the requirements of Sections 30240 and 30250 ofthe Coastal Act despite some impacts to environmentally sensitive habitat area (ESHA). The Commission found that, pursuant to Sections 30007.5 and 30200(b), certification of the HMP with suggested modifications was most protective of significant coastal resources, through conflict resolution. The subject site, while located within the City's established HMP boundaries, is designated as a "development area" within the HMP, and the project is not located within any corridor or linkage area. Consequently, the majority of policies contained in the HMP will not apply in this evaluation. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Further information on the City of Carlsbad LCP Amendment No. 4-09E (Tabata 1 0) may be obtained from Toni Ross, Coastal Planner, at (619) 767-2370. B. STANDARD OF REVIEW CAR-MAJ-LCP.-09E Tabata 10 Page 4 Pursuant to Section 30513 of the Coastal Act, the Commission may only reject zoning ordinances or other implementing actions, as well as their amendments, on the grounds that they do not conform with, or are inadequate to carry out, the provisions of the certified land use plan. The Commission shall take action by a majority vote of the Commissioners present. C. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION The City has held Planning Commission and City Council meetings with regard to the subject amendment request. All of those local hearings were duly noticed to the public. Notice of the subject amendment has been distributed to all known interested parties. PART II. LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM SUBMITTAL-RESOLUTIONS Following a public hearing, staff recommends the Commission adopt the following resolutions and findings. The appropriate motion to introduce the resolution and a staff recommendation are provided just prior to each resolution. I. MOTION: I move that the Commission reject the Implementation Program Amendment for the City of Carlsbad LCPA 4-09E submitted. STAFF RECOMMENDATION OF CERTIFICATION AS SUBMITTED: Staff recommends a NO vote. Failure of this motion will result in certification of the Implementation Program Amendment as submitted and the adoption of the following resolution and findings. The motion passes only by an affirmative vote of a majority of the Commissioners present. RESOLUTION TO CERTIFY IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM AMENDMENT AS SUBMITTED: The Commission hereby certifies the Implementation Program Amendment for the the City of Carlsbad as submitted and adopts the findings set forth below on grounds that the Implementation Program Amendment conforms with, and is adequate to carry out, the provisions of the City of Carlsbad, and certification of the Implementation Program Amendment will meet the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, because either 1) feasible mitigation measures and/or alternatives have been incorporated to substantially lessen any significant adverse effects of the Implementation Program Amendment on the environment, or 2) there are no further feasible alternatives or mitigation measures that would substantially lessen any significant adverse impacts on the environment that will result from certification of the Implementation Program. CAR-MAJ-LCP~09E Tabata 10 Page 5 PART III. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AMENDMENT, AS SUBMITTED A. AMENDMENT DESCRIPTION The subject LCP amendment proposes to change the zoning designation from Limited Control (L-C) to One-Family Residential (R-1) on a 10.16 site. The site has previously been used for agricultural operation and does not contain any sensitive habitat. B. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL The standard of review for LCP implementation submittals or amendments is their consistency with and ability to carry out the provisions of the certified LUP. The project site is being modified from Limited Control (L-C) to Residential (R-1). The subject site is also subject to the requirements of the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone in the City's certified LCP. a) Purpose and Intent of the Ordinance. 1. Residential (R-1). The intent and purpose of the of the Residential (R-1) designation is to provide regulations and standards for the development of one-family dwellings and other permitted or conditionally permitted uses, as specified. 2. Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone. The intent and purpose of the Coastal Resource Overlay Zone is to supplement the underlying zoning with additional resource protective regulations to preserve, protect, and enhance habitat resource values. b) Major Provisions of the Ordinance. 1. Residential (R-1). The major provisions of the R-1 district are the allowable uses within the zone, including one-family dwellings, crops, greenhouses, mobile homes, sheds, and trailers. Additional uses are possible with a conditional use permit. 2. Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone. The major provisions of the ordinance include a series of development standards incorporated to provide adequate protection of sensitive resources, including provisions for preservation of steep slopes, preservation of Coastal sage scrub and southern maritime chaparral, and to require conservation easements, provide for the restoration of disturbed areas within designated open space and sufficient brush management. c) Adequacy of the Ordinance to Implement the Certified LUP Segments. Applicable certified City of Carlsbad LUP policies: Policy 2-1 Conservation of Agricultural Lands CAR-MAJ-LCP--09E Tabata 10 Page 6 (1) Coastal Agriculture: Consistent with the provisions of Sections 30241 and 30242 of the Coastal Act, it is the policy of the City to contribute to the preservation of the maximum amount of prime agricultural land throughout the coastal zone by providing for the balanced, orderly conversion of designated non-prime coastal agricultural lands. Non-prime agricultural lands identified on Map X, including the 301.38 acres Carltas Property, are designated Coastal Agriculture and shall be permitted to convert to urban uses subject to the agricultural mitigation or feasibility provisions set forth in the LCP. Policy 3-S(c) Preservation of Steep Slopes, Sensitive Vegetation and Erosion Control Any development proposal that affects steep slopes (25% inclination of greater) shall be required to prepare a slope map and analysis for the affected slopes ... (1) Areas and Slopes Possessing Endangered Species and/or Coastal Sage Scrub and Chaparral Plant Communities: For those slopes possessing endangered plant/animal species and/or coastal sage scrub and chaparral plant communities, the following policy language applies: a) Coastal Sage Scrub and Chaparral plant communities shall be preserved in their natural state within designated open space areas shown on the LCP Kelly Ranch Open Space Map ... The standard of review for LCP implementation submittals or amendments is their consistency with and ability to carry out the provisions of the certified Land Use Plan (LUP). Additionally, the Carlsbad LCP has also been amended to incorporate the City's Habitat Management Plan (HMP). In this case, the subject amendment will modify the site from a L-C, or Limited Control, zoning designation, that is used to provide an "interim zone for areas where planning for future development has not been determined", to a residential zone to facilitate a specific development. Currently, the site is developed with one single family home, agricultural lands, a small stand of Eucalyptus trees, and landscaping. The subject site does not contain any sensitive resources, nor does it provide any public access opportunities or any coastal views. Additionally, the project site is not located adjacent to any designated lands contained within the HMP. The proposed IP amendment would allow the conversion ofhistorical agricultural lands to more urban uses. The conversion of these agricultural lands to more urban uses was previously considered in the City's LCP, as the property has already been designated for residential uses in the City's LUP. Additionally, the Commission has certified policies in the City's Land Use Plan and Habitat Management Plan that allow the conversion of agricultural lands. CAR-MAJ-LCP ..8.o9E Tabata 10 Page 7 Policy 2-1 Conservation of Agricultural Lands allows non-prime agricultural lands to be converted to urban uses, as long as such conversions are consistent with the mitigation and feasibility provisions of the LCP. In this case, the subject site was identified as a non-prime agricultural site, and, as such, the conversion of the land is permitted. Mitigation for the conversion will be required through implementation of the agricultural conversion policies of the City's HMP, as discussed below. The City's HMP also contains policies that address the protection of agricultural lands, and indicates that there is, while limited, some habitat value in agricultural lands. Specifically, while agricultural lands are not as valuable as naturally vegetated lands, they do provide wildlife corridors, food/foraging opportunities, predator protection, etc., simply through their undeveloped state, and the conversion of these undeveloped lands requires some mitigation. In this case, any proposed development will be required to include the appropriate mitigation for the conversion of undeveloped, historic agricultural lands to other uses. Additionally, and as previously noted, the subject site does contain some steep slopes (in excess of 40%) as defined by the City. The City's LCP requires the protection of steep slopes that contain endangered plant/animal species and/or coastal sage scrub and chaparral plant communities. The Coastal Resource Protection Overlay implements this policy. However, in this case, the steep slopes are actually manufactured slopes and they do not contain sensitive habitat. Allowing a Residential-I zoning designation, and subsequently grading and development on the site, can thus be found consistent with the City's LUP. In conclusion, the proposed zoning modification can be found consistent with the City's Land Use Plan because the subject site is designated for Residential use, has not been identified as prime agricultural lands and there are no sensitive resources on the site's steep slopes. Furthermore, consistent with the City's certified HMP, any future development on the site will be required to provide mitigation for converting undeveloped land to developed lands. The rezoning can therefore be approved as submitted. PART V. CONSISTENCY WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) Section 21080.9 of the California Public Resources Code-within the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)-exempts local government from the requirement of preparing an environmental impact report (EIR) in connection with its activities and approvals necessary for the preparation and adoption of a local coastal program. The Commission's LCP review and approval program has been found by the Resources Agency to be functionally equivalent to the EIR process. Thus, under CEQA Section 21080.5, the Commission is relieved of the responsibility to prepare an EIR for each LCP. CAR-MAJ-LCP --09E Tabata 10 Page 8 Nevertheless, the Commission is required, in a LCP submittal or, as in this case, a LCP amendment submittal, to find that the approval of the proposed LCP, or LCP, as amended, conforms to CEQA provisions, including the requirement in CEQA section 21080.5(d)(2)(A) that the amended LCP will not be approved or adopted as proposed if there are feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures available which would substantially lessen any significant adverse impact which the activity may have on the environment. 14 C.C.R. §§ 13542(a), 13540(±), and 13555(b). The zoning amendment will not result in adverse impacts on coastal resources or public access. The Commission finds that there are no feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures available which would substantially lessen any significant adverse effect which the LCP amendment may have on the environment. Therefore, in terms ofCEQA review, the Commission finds that approval of the LCP amendment will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. { G:\San Diego\Reports\LCPs\Carlsbad\CAR-MAJ-4-09E Tabata I 0 _ IP.doc) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ----··-····--·--·---------·--~--~--------------- follows: EXHIBIT 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2009-230 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM, AND APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM RESIDENTIAL LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY (RLM, 0-4 DUlAC) AND OPEN SPACE (OS) TO RESIDENTIAL LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY (RLM, 0-4 DU/AC) AND THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM ZONING DESIGNATION FROM LIMITED CONTROL (L-C) TO ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1) ON A 10.16 ACRE SITE GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTH- EAST END OF CAMINO HILLS DRIVE ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL WITHIN THE MELLO II SEGMENT OF THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AND LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 24. CASE NAME: TABATA 10 CASE NO.: GPA 06-041LCPA 06-02 The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning Commission did, on July 15, 2009, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting program, as referenced in Planning Commission Resolution No. 6601, General Plan Amendment GPA 06-04, according to Exhibit "GPA 06-04" attached to Planning Commission Resolution No. 6602 and incorporated herein by reference, and Local Coastal Program Amendment LCPA 06-02, according to Exhibit "LCPA 06-02" attached to Planning Commission Resolution No. 6602 and incorporated herein by reference to change the General Plan designation from Residential Low- Medium Density (RLM, 0-4 dulac) and Open Space (OS) to Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM, 0-4 dulac), and to change the Local Coastal Program Zoning designation from Limited Control (L-C) to One Family Residential (R-1), and the Planning Commission adopted Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6601, 6602, and 6603 recommending to the City Council that they be approved; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the lStb day of ...!=S~e'-"'p.l:.:te>o.!lm~be~r=-----· 2009, held a duly noticed public EXHIBIT#1 Resolution 'of Approval LCPA #4-09E Tabata 10 l{tcalifornia Coastal Commission 1 Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, General Plan 2 Amendment, and Local Coastal Program Amendment; and 3 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony 4 and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the City Council considered all factors 5 relating to the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, 6 General Plan Amendment, and Local Coastal Program Amendment. 7 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City 8 of Carlsbad as follows: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 2. That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and approval of a General Plan Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment are adopted and approved, and that the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission contained in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6601, 6602, and 6603 on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, are the findings and conditions of the City Council. 3. That the application for a General Plan Amendment to change the Land Use designation from Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM, 0-4 dulac) and Open Space (OS) to Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM, 0-4 dulac) on a 10.16 acre site generally located at the north-east end of Camino Hills Drive along the west side of El Camino Real within the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and Local Facilities Management Zone 24, as shown in Planning Commission Resolution No. 6602, is hereby accepted and approved, and shall be effective no sooner than thirty days after its adoption but not until LCPA 06-02 is approved by the California Coastal Commission. 4. That the approval of LCPA 06-02 shall not become effective until it is approved by the California Coastal Commission and the California Coastal Commission's approval becomes effective. 5. This action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City Council and is subject to the approval of the LCPA 06-02 by the California Coastal Commission. The Provisions of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, "Time Limits for Judicial Review" shall apply: Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill -2- 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ·--~---------·-.. ·-·-· "NOTICE TO APPUCANr The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking review must be filed in the appropriate court not later than the nineteenth day following the date on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the decision becomes final a request for the record of the deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost or preparation of such record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA. 92008." PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 15th day of September 2009, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members Le'l.iri 9, Kulchin, ~all, Packard & Blackburn. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. -3-5 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1'8 19 20 .21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 EXHIBIT 2 ORDINANCE NO. CS-056 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 21.05.030 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE BY AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING MAP TO GRANT A ZONE CHANGE FROM LIMITED CONTROL (L-C) TO ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1) ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST END OF CAMINO HILLS DRIVE ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 24. CASE NAME: TABATA 10 CASE NO.: ZC 06-03 The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does ordain as follows: WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 15th day ofSeptember , hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request for a Zone Change as shown on Exhibit "ZC 06-03 -TABATA 10," dated July 15, 2009, attached hereto and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said City Council considered all factors relating to the ZC 06-03-TABATA 10. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: That section 21.50.030 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, being the zoning map, is amended as shown on the map marked ·zc 06-03-TABATA 10," dated July 15, 2009, attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION II: That the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission in~ Planning Commission Resolution No. 6604 shall also constitute the findings and conditions of the City Council. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective no sooner than thirty days after its adoption, but not until Local Coastal Pro r--~_;111 __ E_X_H-IB_I_T_#"""2~---- approved by the California Coastal Commission, and the Ci Ordinance -1-. _LCPA #4-09E Tabata 10 Cahfornra Coastal Commission of this ordinance and cause it to be published at least once in a publication of general circulation 2 in the City of Carlsbad within fifteen days after its adoption. (Notwffhstanding the preceding, this 3 ordinance shall not be effective within the City's Coastal Zone until approved by the California 4 Coastal Commission.) 5 INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad City 6 Council on the 15th day of September 2009, and thereafter. 7 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of 8 Carlsbad on the 22nd day of September 2009, by the following vote, to wit: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AYES:COUNCIL MEMBERS LEWIS, KULCHIN, HAll., PACKARD AND BlACKBURN. NOES: NONE. ABSENT: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. APPRI\V!=I1 AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY Signature on fife bmaR_ RQN R. BALL, City Attorney/ J ft, /1 . ./j~,),.~ o?. SitJnature on file · "CLAUDE A. LEW.IS.M~~;r:?;., ATIEST: SitJnature on .fife · ~·i.Jzd;o~ -~l@r\.(j}ooD@itY cterk 7J (SEAL) ,,,u• "''' ,,'\..sBAo ,,,, ,, ,.~ ............ "~:" ~~-~ .:~... •• 1\":. =o: o= -. ·--: . . !~: ,.)'. .;p:_ -=-~·. .:~.:-, v ........ ,,, .... ,~ ,,,,... * ',,,, '''"""'' -2- zc 06-03 Tabata 10 EXISTlNG PROPOSED Related Caae File No(s): GPA ~ LCPA0&-421 CT 06~06-081 COP06-191 HOP 07..03 Zoriina-Oesianation Chanoes PrODeriY From: To. A 212-050-33 L-C R-1 B. 212-050-32 l-C R-1 c D. E. ' F G SITE MAP • N NOT TO SCALE Tabata 10 GPA 06-041 LCPA 06-02 I zc 06· .----____;__E_XH___;_IB:....:....:.IT.....:.:.#-=-3 __ __. SUP 06-08 I HOP 07-03 1 Cl Project Location t-----~LC~P~A~#4~-~09~~~T~a~b-a~ta-1~0----__J California Coastal Commission EXHIBIT#4 Aerial Photographs of Site LCPA #4-09E Tabata 10 California Coastal Commission STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION CITY OF CARLSBAD MAR 01 2010 SAN DIEGO AREA 7575 METROPOLITAN DRIVE, SUITE 103 SAN DIEGO, CA 92108-4421 (619) 767-2370 IMPORTANT PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNlNG DEPARTMENT LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT NO. 4-09 (A-E) <VARIOUS LUP AND CODE CHANGES) TIME EXTENSION ~-~~ ~~~~1{oi" \2_~.~-,.r J. fz::> ~t OV\. . it-~ HEARING TIME AND LOCATION: DATE: TIME: LOCATION: SUBJECT: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 10:00 a.m. Santa Cruz Board of Supervisors Chambers 701 Ocean Street Santa Cruz, CA 95060 (831) 588-4112 3/z. q I JD qv--r-l~·. ~lliV\ J i'igvv v~v:r~ . t/1!--C-f-t. (5"V'. ~ 3{~1ll\ City of Carlsbad LCP Amendment No. 4-09 (A-E) (Various LUP and Code Changes) Time Extension. Public hearing and action to extend the time limit for Commission action up to one year on request by City of Carlsbad to amend the LCP Land Use Plan and Implementation Plan to revise certain land use designations and zoning related to: (A) nonconforming building and uses; (B) height calculations and definitions; (C) definitions and location requirements for adult businesses; (D) modifying the land use designa:tiorfJrom Residential Medium (RM) to Residential Low-medium (RLM) and zoning from Residential Density - Multiple (RD-M-Q) and Limited Control (LC) to One Family Residential_ (R-1) and Open Space (OS) at north side of Poinsettia Lane at westernmost terminus of Lemon Leaf Drive (Tabata Ranch); and (E) modifying the land use designation from Open Space (OS) to Residential Low Medium (RLM) and zoning from Limited Control (LC) to Residential I (R-1) at north-east end of Camino Hills Drive along west side ofEl Camino Real (Tabata lO).Questions regarding the report or hearing should be directed to Toni Ross, Coastal Analyst, San Diego Area Office at (619) 767-2370. (G:\San Diego\Reports\LCPs\Carlsbad\CAR LCPA 4-09 (A-E)_time extension NOTICE.doc) ·. STATE OF CALIFORNIA --THE NATURAL RESOURCES-ENCY ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SAN DIEGO AREA 7575 METROPOLITAN DRIVE, SUITE 103 SAN DIEGO, CA 92108-4421 (619) 767-2370 DonNeu City of Carlsbad Planning Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 November 13,2009 CITY OF CARLSBAD NOV 17 2009 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Re: City of Carlsbad LCP Amendment #4-09A (Nonconforming Buildings), B (Building Height), C (Adult Business Ordinance), D (Tabata Ranch), E (Tabata 10) Dear Mr. Neu, On October 9, 2009, a submittal was received in our office from the City of Carlsbad. This letter updates the status ofwhat is the City of Carlsbad's fourth, LCP amendment submittal for the calendar year 2009. While it is the City's fourth LCP amendment for the calendar year, it is only the City's "second" official package for purposes of Section 30514(b) which limits local governments to three LCP amendments for year because two earlier amendments were accepted as "de minimus." This amendment package includes five separate and unrelated items. The package includes: 1. Nonconforming Buildings (4-09A). An IP amendment modifying several chapters of the City's certified Implementation Plan including replacing Chapter 21.48 - Nonconforming Building and Uses, and other associated relevant chapters to encourage rehabilitation and/or repair of over-density residential structures and other nonconforming buildings and nonconforming uses. 2. Building Height (4-09B). An IP amendment to 1) amend the method for calculating building height; and 2) amend related definitions for consistency including "Basement", "Grade", and "Underground Parking, in order to clarify how height is to be measured. However, maximum building heights are not being modified in any zone. 3. Adult Business Ordinance (4-09C). An IP amendment modifying several chapters of the City's certified Implementation Plan including Chapter 21.43 -Adult Entertainment, to update the definitions and location requirements for adult businesses. 4. Tabata Ranch (4-09D). An LCP amendment modifying the land use and zoning designations on a 2.9 acre site located on the north side of Poinsettia Lane at the westernmost terminus of Lemon Leaf Drive to 1) modify the land use designation from Residential Medium (RM) to Residential Low-Medium (RLM) and; 2) modify existing zoning from Residential Density-Multiple with a Qualified Development Overlay (RD- M-Q) and Limited Control (L-C) to One Family Residential (R-1) to facilitate the subdivision of the lot into 5 residential and 3 open space lots. ·, LCPA 4-09 A-E November 13,2009 Page2 5. Tabata 10 (4-09E). A LCP amendment modifying the land use and zoning designations on a 10.16 acre lot located at the north-east end of Camino Hills Drive along the west side of El Camino Real to 1) modify the land use designation on the southwest 1/3 of the lot from Open Space (OS) to Residential Low Medium (RLM) to correct a previous mapping error, and 2) modify existing zoning on the entire project site from Limited Control (L-C) to Residential 1 (R-1) to facilitate a subdivision into 26 residential and 1 open space lot. Therefore, the amendment package will amend both the City's certified LCP land use plan(s) and implementation plans. Section 13553 of the California Code ofRegulations states "[a]n amendment to a certified LCP or LRDP together with all necessary attachments and exhibits shall be deemed "submitted" after having been received and found by the executive director of the Commission to be in proper order and legally adequate to comply with Public Resources Code Section 3051 O(b ). Said review shall be completed within a reasonable time, but unless there are unusual circumstances, no later than ten (10) working days after the date it is received in the Commission offices during normal working hours [ ... ]". Due to existing LCP workload and staffing constraints, along with state mandated office closures and the size of the submittal, we had to take additional time to review this submittal. As of the date of this letter, the amendment package is not complete or deemed filed. The entire submittal will not be deemed complete until all the outstanding items for each component has been received. The following paragraphs will describe the outstanding items for each component. For the Nonconforming Buildings submittal, please clarify if the strike-out/underline language includes the modifications associated with the errata sheet. If the language does not include those changes, please submit a strike-out/underline version of the approved changes including those documented in the errata sheet. This portion of the submittal includes revisions to Chapter 21.45 (Planned Development). Please provide a new Chapter 21.45 including the changes approved associated with the previously approved LCP amendment 1-07B, to provide the most up-to-date/correct version of this chapter. Please provide the letter received from Felicia and Wayne Brechtel, as indicated in the Planning Commission minutes. Please provide the certified minutes from the City Council hearing dated August 11, 2009. Please also provide any specific analysis regarding the amendment's potential impacts on blufftop/shoreline stability and scenic resources through the persistence of reduced setbacks, building design inconsistent with the Coastal Act, public access impacts associated with deficient parking, and the perpetuation of non-priority uses within the Coastal Zone. With respect to the Building Height submittal, please provide the certified minutes from the City Council hearing on July 28, 2009. Also, please provide an updated mailing list for interested parties including all those who submitted comments (ref. Exhibit C of the City's staff report). Additionally, Exhibit Conly provides excerpts from original comments received; please provide all original comments received. .: ·. LCPA 4-09 A-E November 13, 2009 Page 3 Regarding the Adult Business Ordinance, this submittal was relatively complete. However, please provide signed copies of the City Council approved resolution and ordinance certifying the proposed changes. Please also provide the adopted minutes for the Planning Commission hearing held on July 15, 2009, and the adopted minutes for the City Council meeting held on October 6, 2009. With regard to the Tabata Ranch submittal, please provide the adopted minutes for the City Council hearing on October 6, 2009. Also, pleased provide the signed resolution certifying the City Council's action. The staff report indicates that among the required discretionary review, Specific Plan 203 was amended to reflect the changes to land use and zoning. Please identify how Specific Plan 203 is/is not a component of the City's LCP, given the property is located in the Coastal Zone. With regard to the project specifically, please provide the agricultural history for this site, and how the Habitat Management Plan identified this land for development. Also please provide three color copies of any biological surveys associated with the project site. Please indicate if the open space lands preserved associated with the proposed development will be included in the City' HMP lands, and ifthe desire is to include the land into the HMP preserve, please provide comments as to how this would be accomplished with an amendment to the HMP specifically. Lastly, regarding the Tabata 10 submittal; the main clarification necessary related to the modification to the land use designation. As indicated by the staff report, and portions of the submittal, the LCP amendment proposes changes to both the land use (for the southwestern 1/3 of the lot) from OS to R-1 as well as a zoning re-designation on the entire from L-C to R-1. The staffreport also indicated that the change in land use requires a General Plan amendment, but did not include that it would also require an amendment it the City's Land Use Plan, and thus an LCP amendment. Please proved the resolution/map changes reflecting the land use re-designation, or, please indicate why the City has not included the land use change into the submittal. Also provide three color copies of any vegetation mapping of the entire site. Also, similar to the previously discussed submittal, please clarify how the change in to Open Space lands associated with the HMP can be modified without also modifying the HMP itself to reflect such changes, e.g. the loss of the Open Space designated land. Lastly, please provide adopted (as Planning Commission minutes are draft) for both the Planning Commission and the City Council hearings held on July 15 and September 15, 2009 respectively. Once we receive all of the identified items and review your responses, we will be able to proceed with our more detailed review. As always, if there are any other supplemental materials that the City has on record for any of the items that you or other City staff believe would be helpful (i.e. powerpoint presentations, aerial photographs), please provide them as well. We continue to work under serious staffing limits and now face mandated furloughs that will further limit our available time. In addition, we have numerous LCP amendments already in the queue that we feel should equitably be considered first. So, it will likely be some time before we begin to dedicate additional . . . ' . LCPA 4-09 A-E November 13,2009 Page 4 time to these five items. I have copied this letter to your colleagues and we thank you in advance for your attention to providing the above information. Please call Toni Ross of our staff or me if you have any questions or need to discuss the above mentioned items. cc: Corey Funk Jason Goff Barbara Kennedy Kevin Porter Deborah Lee Sherilyn Sarb (G:\San Diego\Toni\Carlsbad LCP A 4.09 A-E nonfilingltr.doc) tt e City of Carlsbad I Q Ll ,J II I .I~ I •J§ ·fi iii .I§ ,J M October 8, 2009 Deborah Lee San Diego Coast District California Coastal Commission 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103 San Diego, CA 921 08-4402 SUBMITTAL: CARLSBAD LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT: 2-09 Please find enclosed the second City of Carlsbad LCPA package for the 2009 calendar year. The LCPA batch involves the projects as shown below. PROJECTNAME LCPAFILE#. · STAFf: PLANNER, . .. . ... PHONE CONTACT .. Tabata 10 LCPA 06-02 Corey Funk 760-602-4645 Tabata Ranch LCPA 06-03 Jason Goff 760-602-4643 Adult Businesses Ordinance LCPA 06-04 Kevin Pointer 760-602-4620 Building Height Zone Code LCPA 08-02 Corey Funk 760-602-4645 Amendment Nonconforming Buildings and LCPA 09-01 Barbara Kennedy 760-602-4626 Uses Ordinance Please process this application as the second of three Local Coastal Program Amendments for the City of Carlsbad for the 2009 calendar year. Additionally, accompanying this transmittal is the City's re-submittal of LCPA 05-09 (Habitat Management Plan -Implementation Plan). If you have any questions, or require additional information, please feel free to contact me at (760) 602-4620, or the project planners at the numbers listed above. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, -~~ KEVIN POINTER Associate Planner Enclosures c: Gary Barberio, Assistant Planning Director David de Cordova, Senior Planner ~e~f\s~ate Planner Jason Goff, Associate Planner Mike Grim, Senior Planner Jennifer Jesser, Senior Planner Barbara Kennedy, Associate Planner Don Neu, Planning Director 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us (!) • OPA 06..041 LCPA 06..()2/ ZC 0~-Q~/ CT 0~ t:v SUP 06-08/ COP 00-191\'IDP 01-03 TtlbMI HI APM..JCANT CONCURRENCC WITH M!TIGAIJON MEASURES nilS lS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWEO THE AlJOVE MniGATfNG MEASURES AND CONCUR WITHTHll ADDITION DPTI11!:Sr; MEASI!RES TOTH'F. PltOJfo:CT. Dille Si,gnnwre 1 30 Rc~·. I 2113/IJi July 16, 2009 Tabata Family PO Box679 Carlsbad, CA 92018 • Cit of PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF DECISION • ' SUBJECT: GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ HDP 07-03/ CDP 06-19- TABATAlO At the Planning Commission meeting of July 15, 2009, your application was considered. The Commission voted (7-0-0) to RECOMMEND ADOPTION/ RECOMMEND APPROVAL! APPROVE. The decision of the Planning Commission is advisory and will be forwarded to the City Council. If you have any questions regarding the final dispositions of your application, please call the Planning Department at (760) 602-4600. Sincerely, a,x DONNEU Planning Director DN:CF:lt cc: Data Entry File Enclosed: Planning Commission Resolution No. 6601, 6602, 6603, 6604, 6605, 6606, 6607, 6608 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX {760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us {!) • City June 23, 2009 Tyler Lawson 535 North Coast Highway 1 01, Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 e FILE COPY of Carlsbad IQFIIIIII.t.i•X§.tliil.t§.il SUBJECT: GPA 06-04/LCPA 06-02/ZC 06-03/CT 06-13/SUP 06-08/HDP 07-03/CDP 06-19 - TABATA10 The preliminary staff report for the above referenced project will be sent to you via email on Wednesday, July 1, 2009, after 8:00 a.m. This preliminary report will be discussed by staff at the Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) meeting which will be held on July 6, 2009. A twenty (20) minute appointment has been set aside for you at 9:00AM. If you have any questions concerning your project you should attend the DCC meeting. It is necessary that you bring the following required information with you to this meeting or provide it to your planner prior to the meeting in order for· your project to go forward to the Planning Commission: 1. Unmounted colored exhibit(s) of your site plan and elevations 2. A PDF of your colored site plan and elevations The colored exhibits must be submitted at this time to ensure review by the Planning Commission at their briefings. If the colored exhibits are not available for their review, your project could be rescheduled to a later time. The PDF of your colored site plan and elevations will be used in the presentation to the Planning Commission and the public at the Planning Commission Hearing. If you do not plan to attend this meeting, please make arrangements to have your colored exhibit(s) and the PDF here by the scheduled time above. Should you wish to use visual materials in your presentation to the Planning Commission, they should be submitted to the Planning Department no later than 12:00 p.m. on the day of a Regular Planning Commission Meeting. Digital materials will be placed on a computer in Council Chambers for public presentations. Please label all materials with the agenda item number you are representing. Items submitted for viewing, including presentations/digital materials, will be included in the time limit maximum for speakers. All materials exhibited to the Planning Commission during the meeting (slides, maps, photos, etc.) are part of the public record and must be kept by the Planning Department for at least 60 days after final action on the matter. Your materials will be returned upon written request. If you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact your Planner, Corey Funk at (160) 602-4645. Sincerely, Gmn DON NEU · Planning Director DN:CF:sm· c: File Copy . Tecla Levy, Project Engineer Data Entry 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, Cl\ 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 •. www.~i.carlsbad.ca.us @ Corey Funk From: Sent: To: Subject: Corey, • David Lawhead [Dlawhead@dfg.ca.gov] Thursday, June 11, 2009 8:57 AM Corey Funk Re: Response to Tabata 10 Project-Comments • Thank you for following up on my comments on the Tabat 10 project. With the negative results of the thread-leaved brodiaea survey, and the inclusion of a requirement for a pre-tree removal nesting survey in the final MND, I am satisfied that the Tabat 10 project is consistent with the City's HMP and have no objections to the project proceeding. Dave David Lawhead Staff Environmental Scientist CA Dept. of Fish and Game South Coast Region 4949 Viewridge Ave. San Diego, CA 92123 (858) 627-3997 >>> Corey Funk <Corey.Funk@carlsbadca.gov> 6/10/2009 5:17 PM >>> David, Regarding FWS/CDFG-SDG-09B0166-09TA0437 In response to comment 1, a focused thread-leaf brodiaea survey was performed in April and May 2009 to address the concerns of CDFG. No evidence of the species was found on the property (see attached). In response to comment 2, a mitigation measure is included with the project to require pre- tree removal surveys for nesting birds during bird breeding season. I hope these responses are helpful and am currently preparing the project for a Planning Commission hearing on July 15, 2009. Please feel free to contact me if you have further questions. Thanks, Corey Corey Funk, AICP Associate Planner City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 corey.funk@carlsbadca.gov (760) 602-4645 (760) 602-8559 fax [cid:image001.png@01C9E9EE.DC5C8930] 1 e f1fLE COFY e 5·o?G;.·09 City of Carlsbad .I#IJ@hhiilt.i•J§.fhill•l§ .11 May 26,2009 Tabata Family P.O. Box 679 Carlsbad, CA 92018 SUBJECT: GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ HOP 07-03/ COP 06- 19-TABATA 10 Your application has been tentatively scheduled for a hearing by the Planning Commission on July 15, 2009. However, for this to occur, you must submit the additional items listed below. If the required items are not received by June 19, 2009, your project will be rescheduled for a later hearing. In the event the scheduled hearing date is the last available date for the City to comply with the Permit Streamlining Act, and the required items listed below have not been submitted, the project will be scheduled for denial. 1. Please submit the following plans: A) 10 copies of your (site plans, landscape plans, building elevation plans, floor plans) on 24" x 36" sheets of paper, stapled in complete sets folded into 9" x 12" size. B) One 8%" x 11" copy of your reduced site plan, building elevation and floor plans. These copies must be of a quality which is photographically reproducible. Only essential data should be included on plans. 2. As required by Section 65091 of the California Government Code, please submit the following information needed for noticing and sign the enclosed form: A) 600' Owners List - a typewritten list of names and addresses of all property owners within a 600 foot radius of the subject property, including the applicant and/or owner. The list shall include the San Diego County Assessor's parcel number from the latest equalized assessment rolls. B) 1 00' Occupant List -(Coastal Development Permits Only) a typewritten list of names and addresses of all occupants within a 1 00 foot radius of the subject property, including the applicant and/or owner. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @ ' } tp;:;~~~4/ LCPA 06-02/ zcl-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ HOP 07 -·COP 06-19 -TABA T A 10 May 26,2009 Pa e 2 C) Mailing Labels -two (2) separate sets of mailing labels of the property owners within a 600 foot radius and occupants within a 100 foot radius of the subject property. For any address other than a single-family residence, an apartment or suite number must be included. DO NOT provide addressed envelopes - PROVIDE LABELS ONLY. Acceptable fonts are: Arial 11 pt, Arial Rounded MT Bold 9 pt, Courier 14 pt, Courier New 11 pt, and MS Line Draw 11 pt. Sample labels are as follows: ACCEPTABLE Mrs. Jane Smith 123 Magnolia Ave., Apt #3 Carlsbad,CA 92008 ACCEPT ABLE (with APN) 209-060-34-00 MRS JANE SMITH APT3 123 MAGNOLIA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 D) Radius Map - a map to scale, not less than 1" = 200', showing all lots entirely and partially within 600 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property. Each of these lots should be consecutively numbered and correspond with the property owner's list. The scale of the map may be reduced to a scale acceptable to the Planning Director if the required scale is impractical. E) Fee - a fee shall be paid for covering the cost of mailing notices. Such fee shall equal the current postage rate times the total number of labels. Cash check (payable to the City of Carlsbad) and credit cards are accepted. C RE FUNK, AICP Associate Planner CF:It Attachment c: Tyler Lawson, Pasco Laret Suiter & Associates, 535 N. HWY 101, Ste. A, Solana Beach, CA 92075 File STATE OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE of PLANNING AND RESEARCH STATE CLEARINGHOUSE AND PLANNING UNIT ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER GoVERNOR Febnuuy 19, 2009 Corey Funk City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Subject: Tabata 10 SCH#: 2009011044 Dear Corey Funk: CYNTHIA BRYANT DmECI'OR The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named Negative Declaration to selected state agencies for review. The review period closed on February 17, 2009,. and no state agencies submitted comments by that date. This letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Please call the State Clearinghouse at (916) 445-0613 if you have any _questions regarding the environmental review process. If you have a question about the above-named project, please refer to the ten-digit State Clearinghouse number when contacting this office. Sincerely; .. . . ~ ~"' ' .. -;--,(:At~~ rry erts . Director, State Clearinghouse 1400 lOth Street P.O. Box 3044 Sacramento, California 95812-3044 (916) 445-0613 FAX (916) 323-3018 www.opr.ca.gov Document Details Report State Clearinghouse Data Ba- SCH# 2009011 044 Project Title T abata 1 0 Lead Agency Carlsbad, City of Type Neg Negative Declaration Description The project consists of a GP Amendment, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Special Use Permit, Coastal Development Permit and Hillside Development Permit to subdivide and grade a 10.16 acre site located at the northeast end of Camino Hills Drive into 26 single family residential lots and one open space lot. Single-family residences are not proposed for development at this time. The GPA is proposed to recitify a previous mapping error by re-designating the southwest one-third of the property from OS to RLM and ZC will change the zoning of the entire property from LC to R-1. An LCP amendment is required to reflect the new RLM designation and R-1 xone on the LCP Land Use Plan and Zoning Maps respectively. Lead Agency Contact Name Agency Phone email Address Corey Funk City of Carlsbad (760) 602-4645 1635 Faraday Avenue City Carlsbad Project Location County San Diego City Carlsbad Region Lat I Long 33" 8' 38.182" N I 11 yo 17' 11.538" W Fax State CA Zip 92008 Cross Streets north-east end of Camino Hills Drive and west side of El Camino Real Parcel No. 212-050-32, -33 Township Range Section Base Proximity to: Highways No Airports McClellan, Palomar Railways No Waterways Agua Hedionda Lagoon Schools Carlsbad USD, Kelly ES Land Use GP:RLM/OS Z:L-C Project Issues Archaeologic-Historic; Noise; Wildlife Reviewing Resources Agency; California Coastal Commission; Department of Conservation; Department of Fish Agencies and Game, Region 5; Office of Historic Preservation; Department of Parks and Recreation; Department of Water Resources; Caltrans, Division of Aeronautics; California Highway Patrol; Caltrans, District 11; Department of Housing and Community Development; Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region 9; Native American Heritage Commission Date Received 01/16/2009 Start of Review 01/16/2009 End of Review 02/17/2009 Note: Blanks in data fields result from insufficient information provided by lead agency. Corey Funk From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: In response refer to: David Lawhead [Dlawhead@dfg.ca.gov] Wednesday, February 11, 2009 12:07 PM Corey Funk Marci_Koski@fws.gov Tabata 10 Project-Comments FWS/CDFG-SDG-e9Be166-e9TAe437 To: Corey Funk Associate Planner City of Carlsbad Dear Mr. Funk, The California Department of Fish and Game (Department) and the u.s. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), hereafter collectively referred to as the Wildlife Agencies, have reviewed the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (DMND) for the Tabata 1e Project (SCH #2ee9e11e44), dated January 16, 2ee9, in the City of carlsbad (City). The following comments and recommendations are based upon the information provided in the DMND, our knowledge of sensitive and declining vegetation communities in the County of San Diego; and our participation in regional conservation planning efforts, including the City's Habitat Management Plan (HMP). The primary concern and mandate of the Service is the protection of public fish and wildlife resources and their habitats. The Service has legal responsibility for the welfare of migratory birds, anadromous fish, and endangered animals and plants occurring in the United States. The Service is also responsible for administering the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act) (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). The Department is a Trustee Agency and a Responsible Agency pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Sections 15386 and 15381, respectively. The Department is responsible for the conservation, protection, and management of the State's biological resources, including rare, threatened, and endangered plant and animal species, pursuant to the California Endangered Species Act (CESA), and administers the Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP) program. The City of Oceanside is its draft MHCP SAP. Streambed Alteration wetlands resources. currently a participant in the NCCP program through the preparation of The Department also is responsible for the administration of the Agreement Program, which oversees potential threats to the State's The Wildlife Agencies have the following comments and recommendations: 1. While the majority of the project site has been disturbed due to past agricultural operations, there is still concern that the biological surveys completed for the project were conducted at a time of year (October 2ee7) when certain endangered/threatened species would not be detectable. In particular, we are concerned that the October surveys for the thread- leaved brodiaea (Brodieae filifolia), a state-endangered and federal-threatened plant species, would not have detected this species on the property if it was present. The Habitat Mapping Report for the project concludes that there is no potential for this species to occur on-site. We do not concur with this assessment. The area on-site mapped as non-native grassland is of particular concern. This species is known from the immediate area of the project site, and clay soils are present on the property. We request that appropriate 1 ~~ surveys be conducted this comtlt spring on the property, especi~, but not exclusively, within the non-native grasslands. Surveys for the vegetative component of the plant can be done in March-April, depending upon rainfall. Flowering brodiaea should be present by mid- May. The Fox-Miller (Salk) property along El Camino Real to the south of the property has a good population of Brodiaea, and can be used as a reference site for growth and flowering times of this species. If this species is found on the site then the requirements of the City's HMP require conservation of 80 percent of the population. This may affect the project design, so surveys should be completed before this project proceeds further in the environmental review process. 2. Removal of eucalyptus or other ornamental trees on the property, or off-site, should not be done during the breeding season (January 15-August 30), especially for raptor species, unless pre-removal surveys indicate that no nesting birds are present. This concludes our comments. If you have any questions please contact us at the phone numbers listed below. David Lawhead Staff Environmental Biologist CA Dept. of Fish and Game (858) 627-3997 Marci Koski, Ph.D. Fish and Wildlife Biologist U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (760) 431-9440 2 ! a • ~nr.! 1COPY • /0·..;>3·0'8' City of Carlsbad • :;a e• ,, ,,,,,.' •*4 ·'''''·'4''• October 23, 2008 Tyler Lawson Pasco Engineering 535 N. HWY 101, Ste. A Solana Beach, CA 92075 SUBJECT: 1st ISSUES REVIEW FOR GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ HOP 07-03/ COP 06-19-TABATA 10 Dear Mr. Lawson, Your project was deemed complete on July 17, 2008. There are issues of concern with the project that remain to be resolved. The issues are listed on the attached page(s). Though the comments are minor and a formal application re-submittal is not necessary, all issues will need to be resolved prior to scheduling the project for a public hearing. Please coordinate with staff to address these issues. Please contact me at (760) 602-4645, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Si"!J- CORJY FUNK, AICP CF:It c: Tabata Family, P.O. Box 679, Carlsbad, CA 92018 Chris De Cerbo, Team Leader David de Cordova, Principal Engineer Tecla Levy, Project Engineer File Copy Data Entry 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us (i} • "'ft'!'.~,4'f. 61f1J ' , ,, r ~ :W 'J I ~!· . ' . G~A~6-~4t LCPA 06-02/ fo6-03/ cr 06-13/ suP 06-08/ HDP oAt coP 06-19-TABATA 10 October 23, 2008 Pa e 2 Planning: ISSUES OF CONCERN 1. Please add elevations for the top and bottom of the retaining wall proposed along the pedestrian path. 2. On the landscape plan, please identify the symbols "ES" and "EC" and any other trees that will be removed by the expansion of Camino Hills Drive. · 3. Please address Comment 3D on the attached Landscape Review Comments. Attached Comment 1E has been addressed. Engineering: 4. Under the General Notes on Sheet 1, the total number of lots shown is 26 lots. There are 27 lots proposed, 26 residential lots and one open space lot. Please revise this note. '· September 24, 2008 TO: FROM: RE: Corey Funk, Assistant Planner Michele Masterson, Senior Management Analyst Meghan Jacobson, Senior Office Specialist Michael Elliott, City of Carlsbad's Contract Landscape Architect Landscape Architectural Review -Conceptual Review -5th Review Tabata 10-GPA06-04-ZC06-03-LCPA06-02-CT06-13, CDP06-19 Camino Hills Drive PELA file: 119-Tabata 10-CT06-l3-Con5 Landscape Architect: California Landscape Technologies, Phone (760) 942-9320 Please advise the applicant to make the following corrections to the plans so that they will meet the requirements of the City of Carlsbad's Landscape Manual. Numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of the comment concern. REPEAT COMMENTS 1-21 Completed. 22. RETURN RED LINES and provide 2 copies of all plans (concept, water conservation, and colored water use plan) on the next submittal. 1B-7B Completed. 1 C-4C Completed. 1D-2D Completed. 3D. It is recommended that the HOA be responsible for maintenance of areas outside the lot ;valls. These areas tend to be forgotten and not maintained by private ovmers. Please revise accordingly. Include landscaping ofthese areas on the planting plans. 2nd Review: Please show conceptual plantings in these new HOA maintained areas. NEW COMMENTS IE. Please provide a copy of the revised civil plans showing the new retaining wall heights and construction materials for cross checking. The wall may need vegetative softening. The wall should be of an upgraded material (split-face block, plaster, with appropriate cap, etc.) since it appears that it will be visible from El Camino Real. From: To: Date: Subject: Attachments: Corey, "Steve Sherman" <cltlandarch@adelphia. net> "Corey Funk" <cfunk@ci.carlsbad.ca.us> 10/20/2008 11:57 AM Tabata 10 revisions per telecon CL T-Tabata-CPT-1.1rev.pdf Per your telecon 10.20.08 I have revised sheet 1.1 of the Tabata 10 submittal to include: Species names for Eucalyptus EC = Euc. citridora ES = Euc. Sideroxylon Ground cover added for HOA adjacent to lots 1, 20, 21, 14, 26. As discussed, C-2 for the retaining wall indicated the engineering detail for the wall as provided by the Civil, while the walls would be split face. Walls and fences are described on sheet 1.2. All retaining walls have fig vines shown at 8 foot centers. Please see attached plan. Call me if you need any additional changes. Steve Sherman, ASLA Landscape Architect, RLA #2887 California Landscape Technologies cltlandarch@adelphia. net 760.942.9320 ----------------------------------------- [~08/18/~008) Corey Funk-Tabata 10-Acriied __ P_a_t_h~~~~~~~---~~ From: To: CC: Date: Subject: Attachments: Corey, "Tyler Lawson" <tlawson@pascoeng.com> '"Corey Funk'" <Cfunk@ci.carlsbad.ca.us> '"Tecla Levy"' <Tievy@ci.carlsbad.ca.us> 08/18/2008 11 :34 AM Tabata 10-Acre Ped Path 1011 Ped Path Exhibit. pdf Attached you will find my revised design for the pedestrian path leading to the bus stop on El Camino Real. The walls are slightly higher than I originally told you but are still relatively low. The pathway now complies with ADA standards for pathways -5% max slope. Please let me know what material you would like for the walls i.e. split faced to match other wall in the subdivision? Tecla, Per the planning departments comments I am adding a retaining wall to allow for ADA compliance with the pedestrian pathway. In case of the storm drain system being completely clogged, the pathway and grades will still act as the emergency overflow. Let me know if you have any comments. This is the final outstanding comment I have not addressed. As soon as I get a response I will coordinate with the landscape architect and resubmit. Thanks. Tyler Lawson Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 No. Highway 101 Solana Beach, CA 92075 tlawson@pascoeng.com P. 858.259.8212 ext. 113 F. 858.259.4812 These electronic files are non-certified recordings of documents prepared by Pasco Engineering, Inc. These files are provided only for the convenience of the receiving party, are intended solely for exclusive use by that party and Page 1 J [~~C-~!~008) Corey Funk -Tabata 1 0-Ac •. e_d_· _Pa_t~h ~---~~~-~~ are for the purpose(s) expressly authorized. In accordance with standard industry practice, only printed copies of documents conveyed by Pasco Engineering, Inc. may be relied upon. Any use of the information obtained or derived from these electronic files will be at the receiving party's sole risk. Page 2] • e FILE,£9£';' City of Carlsbad l@fhh•li.i~i•i§·LIIII•I§hM August 14, 2008 Tyler Lawson Pasco Engineering 535 N. Hwy 101, Ste. A Solana Beach, CA 92075 SUBJECT: GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ HOP 07-03/ COP 06- 19-TABATA 10 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) APPLICABILITY/PROCESS DETERMINATION This is to advise you that after reviewing the application for the project referenced above, the City has determined that the following environmental review process (pursuant to CEQA) will be required for the project: The project is subject to the provisions of CEQA. Based on the City's analysis of the proposed project, the following CEQA documentation/process is required for the project: A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (MND) will be prepared for the project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. Please submit the Environmental Impact Assessment Fee of $1,565.00 ($861.00 single family lot) for the continued processing of the CEQA documentation. For additional information related to this CEQA applicability/process determination, please contact the project planner, Corey Funk, at (760) 602-4645 or cfunk@ci.carlsbad.ca.us. Sincerely, ~~ DON NEU Planning Director DN:CF:It c: Tabata Family, P.O. Box 679, Carlsbad, CA 92018 Chris De Cerbo, Team Leader Tecla Levy, Project Engineer File Copy Data Entry 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • {760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us (!) I • City of July 17, 2008 Tyler Lawson Pasco Engineering 535 N. HWY 101, Ste. A Solana Beach, CA 92075 e FiLE COPY 7.17·0~ Carlsbad I Q filii ;t t;t. I •l§ ·Fill; ,t§ II I SUBJECT: 4th REVIEW FOR GPA 06-04/LCPA 06-02/ZC 06-03/CT 06-13/SUP 06-08/HDP 07 -03/CDP 06-19 - T ABATA 10 The items requested from you earlier to make your General Plan Amendment, Local Costal Program Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Special Use Permit, Hillside Development Permit and Coastal Development Permit, application no. GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ HDP 07-03/ CDP 06-19 complete have been received and reviewed by the Planning Department. It has been determined that the application is now complete for processing. Although the initial processing of your application may have already begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by the date of this communication. Please note that although the application is now considered complete, there may be issues that could be discovered during project review and/or environmental review. Any issues should be resolved prior to scheduling the project for public hearing. In addition, the City may request, in the course of processing the application, that you clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the basic information required for the application. At this time, the City asks that you provide 4 complete sets of the development plans so that the project can continue to be reviewed. Please contact your staff planner, Corey Funk, at (760) 602-4645, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, ~X DON NEU Planning Director DN:CF:bd c: Tabata Family, P.O. Box 679, Carlsbad, CA 92018 Chris de Cerbo, Team Leader Tecla Levy, Project Engineer File Copy Data Entry 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us (i) .-------------------------------------------------------- . : ·~.· ~p~·~6~~4/LCPA 06-02/.6-03/CT 06-13/SUP 06-08/HDP 07--DP 06-19-TABATA 10 July 17, 2008 Pa e 2 ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. The Habitat Mapping Report prepared by Dossey and Associates for the Tabata 1 0 project is still under review. Staff comments regarding the report, if any, will be prepared in a subsequent letter. 2. The pedestrian pathway that connects Camino Hills Drive and El Camino Real must be ADA accessible (California Building Code Section 11338.7). The pathway must either have no more than a maximum grade of 5%, or if exceeding the 5% grade, must meet the requirements of a ramp. 3. For lots 13, 14, 20, 21 and 26, the landscape area between the sidewalk and side yard wall should be maintained by the HOA instead of the future individual owners. Please revise the Water Conservation Plan to reflect these changes. 4. On the landscape plan, please identify the symbols "ES" and "EC" and any other trees that will be removed by the expansion of Camino Hills Drive. 5. Please see the attached conceptual landscape plan review comments. Engineering: 6. Please clearly identify on the plans which of the proposed filterra systems has been numerically sized as treatment BMP and which of the proposed filterra systems are the proposed"LID". Note that LID is a requirement in addition to the treatment BMP requirement. 7. The plan shows the filterra system being added only at the end of each drainage system. This does not meet the LID standard requirement. In addition, there is no back-up system in case the end system fails. Treatment train is recommended. Additional Filterra systems are required for treatment train and to meet LID requirements. 8. Include numeric sizing of all proposed treatment BMPs. The report does not include numeric sizing for the proposed filterra systems used as treatment BMPs. 9. Show a cross section of the proposed grass swale. Provide/incorporate engineered filter medium in the proposed bio-filtration swale that has high efficiency in removing pollutants of concern identified in this project. 10. Section 1.4 of hydrology report shows post development Q of 34 cfs, which is 7 cfs increase from the pre-development Q. Please include in your narrative discussions on how potential impacts due to this increase are mitigated. The amount of Q proposed to be detained is not clear in your calculations. In your summary, please include the amount of post development Q after detention. 11. Please comply with all other comments shown on the hydrology and SWMP reports. 12. Please comply with all comments shown on the plan. 13. A redlined check print is enclosed for the applicants use in making the requested revisions. 14. Please return this check print with t~e next submittal to facilitate continued staff review. \ I .,, TO: Corey Funk, Assistant Planner Michele Masterson, Management Analyst Meghan Jacobson, Senior Office Specialist FROM: Michael Elliott, City of Carlsbad's Contract Landscape Architect RE: Landscape Architectural Review -Conceptual Review -4th Review Tabata 10-GPA06-04-ZC06-03-LCPA06-02-CT06-13, CDP06-19 Camino Hills Drive PELA file: 119-Tabata 10-CT06-13-Con4 Landscape Architect: California Landscape Technologies, Phone (760) 942-9320 Please advise the applicant to make the following corrections to the plans so that they will meet the requirements of the City of Carlsbad's Landscape Manual. Numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of the comment concern. REPEAT COMMENTS 1-21 Completed. 22. RE~ RED LINES and provide 2 copies of all plans (concept, water conservation, and colored water use plan) on the next submittal. 1B-7B Completed. 1 C-4C Completed. NEW COMMENTS 1D. Are trees allowed within the SDG&E easement? Please review and revise plans as appropriate. 2D. Please show all water and sewer line services and coordinate street tree locations. Locate street trees: a. A minimum of 3' outside the public right-of-way. b. A minimum of5' from paving. c. A minimum of 7' from any sewer line. d. Not in conflict with public utilities. e. Not to be allowed on street corners within a triangular zone drawn from two points, 25' from the beginning of curves and end of curves or within sight lines as described under "Sight Distance" above. (See Appendix C.4). 3D. It is recommended that the HOA be responsible for maintenance of areas outside the lot walls. These areas tend to be forgotten and not maintained by private owners. Please revise accordingly. Include landscaping of these areas on the planting plans. From: To: Date: Subject: Tyler, Corey Funk Tyler Lawson 04/28/2008 11:44 AM Re: Tabata 10-Acre Approval for a 3-month application time extension for GPA 06-04/LCPA 06-02/ZC 06-03/CT 06-13/SUP 06-08/CDP 06-19/HDP 07-03 Tabata 10 is formally granted via this email. Please resubmit the application for city review by June 10, 2008. Regards, Corey Funk, AICP Associate Planner City of Carlsbad dunk@ci.carlsbad.ca.us (760) 602-4645 >>>''Tyler Lawson" <tlawson@pascoenq.com> 04/28/2008 11:07 AM>>> Corey, I would like to formally request an extension on GPA 06-04/LCPA 06-02/ZC 06-03/CT 06-13/SUP 06-08/CDP 06-19/HDP 07-03. anticipate resubmitting to the City of Carlsbad within two weeks. Tyler Lawson Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 No. Highway 101 Solana Beach, CA 92075 tlawson®pascoeng.com P. 858.259.8212 F. 858.259.4812 These electronic files are non-certified recordings of documents prepared by Pasco Engineering, Inc. These files are provided only for the convenience of the receiving party, are intended solely for exclusive use by that party and are for the purpose(s) expressly authorized. In accordance with standard industry practice, only printed copies of documents conveyed by Pasco Engineering, Inc. may be relied upon. Any use of the information obtained or derived from these electronic files will be at the receiving party's sole risk. From: To: Date: Subject: Attachments: Corey, "Tyler Lawson" <tlawson@pascoeng.com> <cfunk@ci.carlsbad.ca.us> 04/24/2008 12:03 PM 2311 Camino Hills Dr.-Tabata 10 Acre CA-SD-Document-Year. Doc I D-1984. 384022. PDF Attached you will find the IOD document for the portion of land currently controlled by the Eagle Canyon HOA The IOD was granted by the YMCA as they were the original owners of that land. The language of significance to me is on page 469 of the document. Also, any information or suggestions you have on extending the re-submittal date would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Tyler Lawson Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 No. Highway 101 Solana Beach, CA 92075 tlawson@pascoeng. com P. 858.259.8212 F. 858.259.4812 These electronic files are non-certified recordings of documents prepared by Pasco Engineering, Inc. These files are provided only for the convenience of the receiving party, are intended solely for exclusive use by that party and are for the purpose(s) expressly authorized. In accordance with standard industry practice, only printed copies of documents conveyed by Pasco Engineering, Inc. may be relied upon. Any use of the information obtained or derived from these electronic files will be at the receiving party's sole risk. ;_.,, ,'.lH\t;INSlP.UMI:.Nl 10: e , .. • • RFCCI"~~" .I'T '!'~'': REQUES'I' OJir • , • SAF~<:~o~ iJ"IU; INSURANCI; W • .tfl£k, Board of Supr.vlsors -san Diego County Admlnl$tr~rtlon Cen18r 1600 Peclflc Highway San Dllgo, California 92101 RECORDED REQUEST OF DEPT. GENERAL SERYJCES 467 198' OCT I 0 AH 10: 3 7 I _yEP.A L.:..YL E . ., l ~UNTY RtCORil~ • NO TRANSFER TAX DUE • SPACE 'ABOVE FOR RECO~DER'S USE ONLY---=- '"8VOCGbfe OHer To· Dedicate Re~l Prope,.,Y NO FEe . Projeet CT 83-25 . W.O.N~--"~'~400~~------Parcel No ... 8!:00Z3-A Log No. 930-U . ..c=.c-.--- YOUNG MEN'S CBRJ:STIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN DIEGO COUN'l'Y, formerly YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN DIEGO AND SAN DIEGO COUNTY, a nonprofit corporation hereinafter dellgnated GrantorOO, rap~ that 1t is 1he owner{~ of 1he herelnaflar described teal property,· end ',for a valuable cortsldoratlon hereby make(sJ an Irrevocable Offer of Dedlcedon of the.' hereinaflar cfes. crlbed real property ~or the following P!Jbllc purpos~J: PUBLIC HIGHWAY The real property reiermf to above is.sltuatad In 1he unincorporated area of ·the County of San Diego, Stau of Celif.:...,la, · and Is more particularly described as follows: . · · · • Parcel No. 84-0073-A (3.7-84) (LT:lT:rlf) Those portions of Lot F in the Rancho Agua Hedfonda fn the County of San· Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 823 filed in the Office of the Recorder of said County November 16, 1896, included fn that land described in deeds to Young Men's Christian Association of San Dfego and San Diego County recorded December 31, 1971 and March 28, 1972, as File/Page Nos. 397790 and 73al9, respectively, in said Recorder's Office, lying withtn a 60.00 foot wide strip of land, the sidelines of safd strip lyfng 30.00 feet on each side' of • the following described centerline: CCIF, 81.».1171 ··-=-· • :r ) I ' " ol'"""*" • ·---- 468 Parcel No. 84-0073-A (Cont.) CoiiPiencing at the most Easterly corner of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 2481, recorded March 21, 1974, in safd Recorder's Office; thence along the North· easterly prolongation of the Southeaster.ly lfne of said Parcel 1 -----~-., 45.02 feet to the c:enterl intt of El Cemfno Real, R.$, 1800..1 ~ as s~wn on seid Parcel Map No. 2481; thence along said center- line North 52°31'17• west, 680.96 feet to B.C. 407+57.25 at the begfnning of a tangent 3500.00 foot radius c1.1rve concave Southwesterly; thence North- westerly along stfd curve through a central angle of 00°10'25" a distance of 10.60 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNINS; thence leaving said centerline of R.S. 1800-1 South 37°28'43" West, 572.74 feet to the beginning of a tan-gent 1000.00 foot radius curve concave Northwesterly; thell(:e Southwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 04°57'06" a distance of 86.42 feet to a point of tangency in the Easterly prolongation of the Northerly lfmt of that land described fn deed to Ivar, H. v., e Netherlands Antilles corporation, recorded December 28, 1979, as Ffle/Page No. 79 .. 540030 in said Recorder's Offfce; thence along said Northerly line and the Easterly prolongation thereof South 42°25'49" West, 970.90 feet to a pofnt of tangency fn an arc: of that 600.00 foot radius curve concave Southeasterly, in the centerline of Slippery Hfll Lane. as said centerline fs shown on Parcel Map No. 8403, recorded February 8, 1979, in said Recorder's Office; thence Southwesterly along said curve through • central angle of 20°02'30" a distance of 209.88 feet to the most Northerly corner of said Parcel Map no. 8403; thence continuing along safd curve and the Northwesterly line of said Parcel Map No. 8403 through a central angle of 05°44'35a a distance of 60.14 feet to a POINT OF TERMINUS. -2· .. i A j !'"' ~ :• . .J ... · ./~1~. ~~~· ~ .. I -·. -·····~··-. ·····-· . . --·. e ·-__ , ___ e---___ ........ ··-·· .. -. . . . . .. ""...... j69 · 'Jhe:Grentor hereby further offers to the CountY ~f San Daego the privilege and right to extend drainage muctures .mt excavet~on and 'mbankment slopes beyond 1hc limlu of the hent!n detcribed right-of-way where required for the c:otll1r'UCiion and mainunance of said County Hfghway. RESERVING unto grantor of ttw above described parcel of land. his auccesson or assigns, the right to olf"nlnate such alopas and/or dtalnags muctunll or ponfana thereOf, when in the written opinion of the r.ounty and/or Dfllrict Engl'neer of Grantet, tht neces;lty therefore Ia ren'ICMid by substl· tutltlg other protection, support and/ or cltalnags facility, provided II!Ch IUbltJtutlon It flm approved In writing by Aid I J Engineer(s). · ' 'The Grantor hereby further offers to Grantee all trees, growths (growing or that may herafm grow), • JOad bulldlng materials within saia right-of-way, Including the rlgln to .take water,1ogather wlth the right tO use the ume In IUCh manner a.ld It such locations a said Grantee may deem proper, needfvl :: ~---~-"!: ~ 1he canstructlc:.:!d:ecor1aruc- tion,lm~ment or maintenanCe of said hlghMy. · The Grantor, for himself, his successors and assigns, hereby waives any claim for any and all danJages to Gnsntor'1 remaining property contiguous to 1he right-ot-way hereby conveyad by reason of 1he location, c:aMtrucdon, land- xaping or maintenance of said highway. CCSP 85.32-5/77 ~~· .... ,_,_,_ ... _ ... -----. -. --:.-... -:1 . ., .· ... --. 0 .... _. --r:r--·-, .. :-:; t::\·· .1t:· ~....,. .r : • '. ' "' ..... "' . . . ... . .. . . . . ·-•" .... .470; . . This Offal df Dedication II nllde punuent ta Secdon 7050 of tht Gowmni!Mt Code of 1ht Stlte of Cltlfamfall'ld may ~~~~ at lnY time by 1hl dtv council of 1ht city within which aa:h rat propeny Is toc.t.d at 1he time of -=ep- ance ar, If locaud In 1hlt unlncOrpOtatld 111'ri1Dry, by lhe 8ocd of Supmilorl of the CGunty af Sin Dllgo. Thil Offlr of DedJcltion may be tllnnfnaUid and 111 right 1D ppt aach offer lbandaned In the ..,. manner a II preelblld fot 1he ¥1C1tion of 1tn1e11 or hfghwlya by Put 3 ofiDMslon 9 or Chap1t~r 2 of Division 2 of sueeu and Hlflways Code of 1hc Staat of Clllfamla, whlc:hever llappllcablt. Such tennfnltion and at.ldanrnent IMY be made by 1he city caunc11 of the city wllhln which IUCh ral Pf'OPII'lY ls focatld. ar If Cocatld In die un~ territory, by"'! 8olrd of~ of the County of Sin Dl~go. 'nils Offw of Dedlc8tfan shall be lrrevoabte end lhall be btndlng on the GrtntorW'--''"'t~s ___ heirt, QQCUtOR, , ldmfnfs1ratorl, ~end aslwas. 1 JOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION Of SAN DIEGO COUNTY STATE OF.-------<) ·ss COunt; of _____ ). On this . day of :. : , l9 , before me, tli'e undersigned, a Notary Public fn and for safd county and State; personally appeared . · · known to me to be the of the associat1on that executea the within instrUIIlent and known to me to be the person who executed the within fnstrumeJtt on • behalf of said association, and acknowledged to me that such assoc1at~on executed the within instrument pursuant to a Resolution of its Governing Board. ' WilNESS my hand and Offfcfal Seal 1 Signature. ______ ~-- Name (Typed or Printed) · (This area ior Official Notariil sean certify on behalf of tho Board of Supefvlson of 1he CountY of San Dltgo punu~nt to anhOrity confemd bV Raolu- lon af llfd Board ldoplld on Mard\ 20, 1979, that tfle County of San Diego con~e~•rs to tfle making of the fotegofng 'ni'IOCible Offer and coatln1S 1D recordation Ulereof by its duly IU1t1oriud officer. (• lftld-1-~ 4, z"M t . -k.je [L£~ :uo.~LZ~.vn ··--···----.. -----· .... -- -......-. --.... . ' : ' .., .... , .. ,;; -... ,... i I \ ~ ' .. I STAll OF CAUtORNIA COUNTY OF SA.u :lluu;.A }· 471 -----------and <!L,E€1Jf<D rfie,rviiS .fee cc rA~ , pef$CIIIIIIy known ID 1111 (or PIMd 1o me;; till basis ot satiSfacloly evldenl:e) to 111 me persons w11o eaecutld tilt within lnslrument IS Prlsldtnt IIIII Secnlrary. raspectivlly, of till Cofpora1ion lllereln named, and ICIIIICIWIIdged to 1111 tlllt tile CofiiiQIIon ~ II PIIIJI#IIIIO liS by.faWa or II'ISOiu• lion of l1s board of clli'IICIIIt1. WITNESS my hand flld ofllclal RaJ. ~"&-£e.~. ~<Ap ••• •..o:.;..:;..;..& •. •• ---_ ........ -... •· .,...,._._ .. ...__. .... ~- . •. . . .;. .. . ~ I ,, J." ... December 13, 2007 James Boeker e Cit PASCO ENGINEERING, INC. 535 North Highway 101, Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 CAMINO HILLS DRIVE /JACKSPAR DRIVE MUL TIWAY STOP REQUEST The purpose of this letter is to follow-up to concerns of homeowners in Camino Hills, and your request that the City install a multiway stop at the intersection of Camino Hills Drive/ Jackspar Drive. As you are aware, Jackspar Drive is currently controlled by a STOP sign at this intersection. Staff has completed the traffic studies necessary to conduct the multiway stop warrant analysis at the above-mentioned intersection. The traffic studies included a review of current traffic volumes, traffic collision history for the past two years, and intersection geometries/sight distance evaluation. The procedure multiway stop warrant analysis and is taken directly from the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Based on the warrant analysis, a multiway stop is not warranted or justified at this intersection. At a "T" intersection such as Camino Hills Drive/Jackspar Drive, a stop sign is typically only installed on the terminating leg of the intersection (Jackspar Drive) to assign the right-of-way. A multiway stop would only be warranted when the traffic volumes and the delay to the side street (Jackspar Drive) are large enough to justify the stopping traffic in all directions. Current traffic volumes on Jackspar Drive and Camino Hills Drive do not meet the minimum volume and delay requirements needed to justify stopping all vehicles on Camino Hills Drive. STOP signs are used to assign the right-of-way at an intersection not to try and control vehicle speeds. There are documented cases where STOP signs have introduced collisions at an intersection when they were installed but not warranted. I have included a copy of a handout titled STOP SIGNS, which has some good general information four your use. Staff reviewed the traffic collision history for the past two years at this intersection. During this time period, there have been no reported traffic collisions. The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices states that an "accident problem" is typically indicated by five or more reported traffic collisions within a 12-month period of a type susceptible to correction by a multiway stop (right-angle collisions). The installation of stop signs on a street with a low collision history can actually increase the potential for some types of collisions (rear end). The lack of a traffic collision history is an indication that the intersection is operating satisfactorily. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-2720 • FAX (760) 602-8562 @ December 13, 2007 CAMINO HILLS DRIVE /JACKSPAR DRIVE MULTIWAY STOP REQUEST Page 2 The existing corner sight visibility from Jackspar Drive was also evaluated at this intersection. Drivers are required to stop at the stop limit line, but can then move forward to a driver position 10 feet back from the curb projection on Camino Hills Drive to increase their sight visibility. From this location, a driver can see northbound (downhill) vehicles on Camino Hills Drive approaching the intersection approximately 675 feet away, which slightly exceeds the corner sight distance required for 60 miles per hour. Camino Hills Drive is posted 35 miles per hour, which has a required corner sight distance of 385 feet. Thank you for your concerns regarding traffic safety and for your patience while staff completed the studies and the warrant analysis. If you have any questions, or would like to discuss this ft.;~rther, please give me a call at (760) 602-2734. ~~ Associate Engineer Transportation Division c: City Engineer Associate Engineer, Levy Associate Planner, Funk Robert Waychoff TRAFFIC I NFORMATION PROGRAM SERIES 0TOP&IGN& WHY DONI THEY PUT IN MORE STOP SIGNS? A stop sign is one of our most valuable and effectiv~ control devices wheri used at the right place and under the ri·ght conditions. It is intended to help drivers and pedestrians at an intersection decide who has the right-of-way_ . One common misuse of stop signs is to arbitrarily interrupt through traffic, either by causing it to stop, or by causing such an inconvenience as to force the traffic to use other routes. Where stop signs are installed as ''nuisances" or .. sp~ br~akers," there is a high · incidence of intentional violation. In those iocations Where vehicles do stop,; the speed reduction is effective only in the immediate vi~inity of the stop sign. and frequently speeds are actually higher between intersections. For these reasons, it should not be used as a speed control device. A school crossing may look dangerous for children io use, causing parents to demand a stop sign to halt traffic. Now a vehicle which had been a problem for 3 seconds while approaching and passing the intersection becomes a problem for a,much longer period. · A situation of indecision is created as to when to cross as a pedestrian or when to start as a motorist. Normal gaps_ in traffic through which crossings could be made safely no longer exist. An intersection which previously was not busy now looks like a major intersection. It really isn't-it just looks like it. It doesn't even look safer and it usually isn't. Most drivers are ree15onable and prudent with no intention of maliciously violating traffic regulations;· however. when an unreasonable restriction is imposed, it may result in flagrant violations. In such cases, the stop sign can create a false sense of security in a pedestrian and an attitude of contempt in a motorist. These two attitudes can and often d.o conflict with tragic resi.JitS. Well-developed, nationally recognized guidelines help to indicate when such controls become necessary_ These guidelines take into consideration, among other things, the probability. of vehicles arriving at an intersection at the same time, the length of time traffic must wait to enter, and the availability of safe crossing opportuniti~s- e e City of Carlsbad I#Mbli¥9i·Ji@-§iU.IIUJ§iiU•J November 1, 2007 James M. Boeker Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 No. Highway 101, Suite A Solana Beach, California 92075 SIGHT DISTANCE AT INTERSECTION OF CAMINO HILLS DRIVE AND JACKSPAR DRIVE Dear Mr. Boeker, Thank you for your letter of October 1 0, 2007 requesting the City install a multiway stop at the intersection of Camino Hills and Jackspar Drive. In response, the City has scheduled a multiway stop warrant analysis to determine if a multiway stop is warranted. City staff will inform you of the results as soon as it is completed. It will take several weeks before the study begins. You expressed concern about existing landscaping located at the southwest corner of Jackspar Drive obstructing the view of a driver making a left turn from Jackspar Drive to Camino Hills Drive. City staff performed a site visit and careful review of the intersection, including measurement of corner sight distance at the intersection. City Staff found unobstructed sight distance at the subject intersection. Removing the existing landscaping is not justified at this time. Corner sight distance is measured based on Caltrans standards. It is measured from a driver position ten feet behind the projection of the curb of the intersecting street. In this case, southbound driver on Jackspar Drive is required to first stop at the stop limit sign, then move forward to a driver location approximately 10 feet behind the curb projection of Camino Hills Drive. From this location, the landscaping is not an issue and there is unobstructed visibility to view approaching vehicles until the road begins to curve to the south, at about 675 feet from the intersection. The posted speed limit on Camino Hills Drive is 35 mph. The required corner sight distance for a 35 mph speed is 385 feet in accordance with Caltrans criteria. The existing available sight distance is about 675 feet. As a result, there is adequate sight distance to view those vehicles that may be exceeding the posted speed limit. If you have any questions, please contact me at 760 602 2733. ~ Associate Engineer Engineering Department, Land Development Services Cc David Hauser, Deputy City Engineer Bob Johnson, City Engineer Jim Murray, Associate Engineer Corey Funk, Associate Planner 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-2720 • FAX (760) 602-8562 (!) ... e • PASCO ENGINEERING, INC. October 10, 2007 Corey Funk Planning Department City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 535 NORTH HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 (858) 259-8212 FAX (858) 259-4812 RE: INTERSECTION OF CAMINO fiLLS DRIVE AND JACKSP AR DRIVE Dear Corey; PE 1011TM WAYNE A. PASCO R.C.E. 29577 JOSEPH YUHAS P.L.S. 5211 W. JUSTIN SUITER R.C.E. 68964 Attached are two photos that are illustrative of the problem at the above referenced intersection. As we have discussed, the problem at this intersection is twofold. The landscaping on the southwest corner of the intersection interferes with a clear view for motorists wanting to make a left turn from Jackspar Drive on to Camino Hills Drive. · The second part of the problems is that although the sight distance may be within standards for the posted speed limit, cars coming down Camino Hills Drive are exceeding that limit. Therefore, in practical terms, there is a potential traffic hazard. The homeowners in Camino Hills are very concerned about doing something that would provide for a safer driving situation. The problem could be solved by installing a stop sign on Camino Hills Drive at Jackspar Drive, and this is what the homeowners prefer. The situation could be immediately be improved by replacing one or two of the existing plants at the intersection with lower growing plant material. The Camino Hill residents are undoubtedly not the only ones affected. Perhaps the city could assist us in getting permission to install lower growing plant material for the safety of everyone if the city turns down a request for a stop sign. Regards, C!~/11~ James M. Boeker Project Manager Attached: photos r---------------------------------------------- ~~10,2007 Tabata Family P.O. Box 679 Carlsbad, CA 92018 e City e of Carlsbad IQ@Jbblb~I•J§.JUJIIel§bl SUBJECT: GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ HOP 07-03/ COP 06- 19-TABATA 10 Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department has reviewed your General Plan Amendment, Local Costal Program Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Special Use Permit,• Hillside Development Permit and Coastal Development Permit, application nos. GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06- 08/ HOP 07-03/ COP 06-19, as to its completeness for processing. The application is incomplete, as submitted. Attached are two lists. The first list is information which must be submitted to complete your application. This list of items must be submitted directly to your staff planner by appointment. All list items must be submitted simultaneously and a copy of this list must be included with your submittals, including five (5) sets of plans. No processing of your application can occur until the application is determined to be complete. The second list is issues of concern to staff. When all required materials are submitted the City has 30 days to make a determination of completeness. If the application is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the application will be initiated. In addition, please note that you have six months from the date the application was initially filed, 8/10/07, to either resubmit the application or submit the required information. Failure to resubmit the application or to submit the materials necessary to determine your application complete shall be deemed to constitute withdrawal of the application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new application must be submitted. Please contact your staff planner, Corey Funk, at (760) 602-4645, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. ~~Yt DON NEU Planning Director DN:CF:mj c: Gary Barberio, Team Leader Tecla Levy, Project Engineer File Copy Data Entry Jim Boeker, Pasco Engineering, 535 N. HWY 101, Ste. A, Solana Beach, CA 92075 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @ ,GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ Z~6-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ HOP 0./ COP 06-19-TABATA 10 August10,2007 Page 2 LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION Planning: 1. Please submit a preliminary vegetation assessment letter that identifies the amount (acreage) and type of all vegetation on the project site, including any off site vegetation that will affected by the widening of Camino Hills Drive. (Third request-this letter must be prepared by a qualified biologist) 2. Please show all major vegetation within 100 feet of the project site. (second request- please show the location of the large group of eucalyptus trees located to the north-west of the project site ) ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 3. Please show the location and elevations of the existing homes on the north side of Camino Hills Drive. (second request) 4. Please add the Hillside Development Permit number HPD 07-03 to the plans. 5. On the fence exhibit, please provide detail drawings of all fences and walls to be used in the project. 6. On the landscape plan, please provide the overall percent of the site to be landscaped: (second request) 7. Please provide the lot widths for Lots 4 and 5, as measured from the front setback line. (second request) 8. Please add the area of the Camino Hills Drive 100 back into the density calculations. According to CMC Sec. 21.53.230, the only features on the property that should be excluded from the net area calculation for density are the slopes. 9. The City of Carlsbad Habitat Management Plan (HMP) has established additional conservation standards for projects within the Coastal Zone. These conservation standards include a mitigation fee for development impacts to disturbed vegetation, eucalyptus and agricultural lands (see attached). In addition to the identification of any sensitive habitat on site, please ensure that the preliminary vegetation assessment requested by staff (see Item 1 above) includes the acreage of all disturbed vegetation and agricultural lands so that the appropriate mitigation fees can be calculated consistent with the HMP. (third request) 10. Please move the proposed pedestrian path that connects Camino Hills Drive with El Camino Real closer to the north-west property boundary to allow for a longer sound berm. A longer berm will provide improved buffering for Lot 21 from El Camino Real. 11. Please show the typical setbacks for the proposed lots. .GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ Z~6-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ HOP 0 .. / COP 06-19-TABATA 10 August10, 2007 Page 3 12. Staff is concerned that existing eucalyptus trees will be impacted by the proposed grading located to the north-west of the end of Camino Hills Drive (see redlines). Please decrease the size of the proposed grading limit encroachment, or show that no eucalyptus trees will be impacted by the grading. 13. Please increase the clarity of the contour lines and spot elevations of the existing topography, which are difficult to read on the tentative map. 14. Along Camino Hills Drive, please add street trees to the north-west side of the street (where no conflicts with utilities occur) and adjacent to the side yards of Lots 20 and 21. The trees should be located within the ROW and the future project HOA will be obligated to maintain the trees. 15. The limits of grading shown on the landscape plan are inconsistent with that shown on the tentative map. Please ensure consistency between the plans. 16. Redlines have been attached to this letter. 17. Please address the Conceptual Landscape Plan Review comments and redlines attached to this letter. Engineering: 18. Identify, label and provide lot number for the common area shown on the preliminary grading plan as "Greenbelt". 19. Eliminate proposed brow ditches shown along the toe of the existing slopes at the Southwest and Southeast boundaries of the subject property. This is to avoid potential future problems associated with cross-lot drainage. Each lot should" drain into the proposed public street where feasible. 20. Revise the Preliminary Drainage Report in accordance with the revisions requested in item no. 19 above. The report must include a table showing pre-development Q1 00 and post development 0100 comparison at the outlet point. Clearly indicate the increase in 0100 proposed to be detained on-site. 21. Provide drainage easement for the storm drain system proposed outside the public-right- of way. (See red-lined plans for location.) 22. The proposed treatment BMP "Stormfilter by Contech" and the proposed concrete detention basin shall be privately owned and maintained by Home Owner's Association. A Storm Water Maintenance Agreement and Encroachment Agreement will be required. 23. Provide/show on the plan an emergency overflow system in the event that the proposed storm drain system fails. Show that run-off will drain into the street and no pending or flooding occurs when storm drains are 1 00% plugged. 24. Incorporate "Low Impact Design (LID)" in the development, as required by the Regional Water Quality Control Board. See attached design samples. "GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/-6-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ HOP 0 .. / COP 06-19-TABATA 10 August 10, 2007 Page 4 25. Please comply with all comments shown on the plan. 26. Please be aware that as a condition of final map approval, the project will be required to provide a street name for the proposed on-site public road. 27. A redlined check print is enclosed for the applicants use in making the requested revisions. Please return this check print with the formal application submittal to facilitate continued staff review. ... August 10, 2007 Tabata Family P.O. Box 679 Carlsbad, CA 92018 e City e of Carlsbad I@FIUUiiiji•J§.fiiil·'4hl SUBJECT: GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ HOP 07-03/ COP 06- 19-TABATA 10 Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department has reviewed your General Plan Amendment, Local Costal Program Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Special Use Permit,• Hillside Development Permit and Coastal Development Permit, application nos. GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06- 08/ HOP 07-03/ COP 06-19, as to its completeness for processing. The application is incomplete, as submitted. Attached are two lists. The first list is information which must be submitted to complete your application. This list of items must be submitted directly to your staff planner by appointment. All list items must be submitted simultaneously and a copy of this list must be included with your submittals, including five (5) sets of plans. No processing of your application can occur until the application is determined to be complete. The second list is issues of concern to staff. When all required materials are submitted the City has 30 days to make a determination of completeness. If the application is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the application will be initiated. In addition, please note that you have six months from the date the application was initially filed, 8/10/07, to either resubmit the application or submit the required information. Failure to resubmit the application or to submit the materials necessary to determine your application complete shall be deemed to constitute withdrawal of the application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new application must be submitted. Please contact your staff planner, Corey Funk, at (760) 602-4645, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. ["l);t DON NEU Planning Director DN:CF:mj c: Gary Barberio, Team Leader Tecla Levy, Project Engineer File Copy Data Entry Jim Boeker, Pasco Engineering, 535 N. HWY 101, Ste. A, Solana Beach, CA 92075 1635 Faraday Avenue .. Carlsbad, CA 92008--1314 "'(760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @ ·~PA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ Z~6-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ HOP 07-· COP 06-19-TABATA 10 August10,2007 Page 2 LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION Planning: 1. Please submit a preliminary vegetation assessment letter that identifies the amount ~· (acreage) and type of all vegetation on the project site, including any off site vegetation that will affected by the widening of Camino Hills Drive. {Third request-this letter must be prepared by a qualified biologist) 2. Please show all major vegetation within 100 feet of the project site. (second request-v---· please show the location of the large group of eucalyptus trees located to the north-west of the project site ) ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 3. Please show the location and elevations of the existing homes on the north side of ~ Camino Hills Drive. (second request) 4. Please add the Hillside Development Permit number HPD Oi-03 to the plans. ~ 5. On the fence exhibit, please provide detail drawings of all fences and walls to be used in ./"' the project. 6. On the landscape plan, please provide the overall percent of the site to be landscaped: v-- (second request) 7. Please provide the lot widths for Lots 4 and 5, as measured from the front setback line . .,.--~ (second request) ,1 'JA.., ~ ) 8. Please add the area of the Camino Hills Drive 100 back into the density calculations. "'1-"~ ) ' \"'c, According to CMC Sec. 21.53.230, the only features on the property that should be o7 9~ 9. 10. 11. excluded from the net area calculation for density are the slopes. 4l· The City of Carlsbad Habitat Management Plan (HMP) has established additional conservation standards for projects within the Coastal Zone. These conservation standards include a mitigation fee for development impacts to disturbed vegetation, eucalyptus and agricultural lands (see attached). In addition to the identification of any sensitive habitat on site, please ensure that the preliminary vegetation assessment requested by staff (see Item 1 above) includes the acreage of all disturbed vegetation and agricultural lands so that the appropriate mitigation fees can be calculated consistent with the HMP. (third request) Please move the proposed pedestrian path that connects Camino Hills Drive with El Camino Real closer to the north-west property boundary to allow for a longer sound berm. A longer berm will provide improved buffering for Lot 21 from El Camino Real. Please show the typical setbacks for the proposed lots. .. ' ~PA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC,-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ HOP 07--CDP 06-19-TABATA 10 August10,2007 Page 3 12. Staff is concerned that existing eucalyptus trees will be impacted by the proposed ~ grading located to the north-west of the end of Camino Hills Drive (see redlines). Please decrease the size of the proposed grading limit encroachment, or show that no eucalyptus trees will be impacted by the grading. 13. Please increase the clarity of the contour lines and spot elevations of the existing topography, which are difficult to read on the tentative map. 14. Along Camino Hills Drive, please add street trees to the north-west side of the street (where no conflicts with utilities occur) and adjacent to the side yards of Lots 20 and 21. The trees should be located within the ROW and the future project HOA will be obligated to maintain the trees. 15. The limits of grading shown on the landscape plan are inconsistent with that shown on the tentative map. Please ensure consistency between the plans. 16. Redlines have been attached to this letter. 17. Please address the Conceptual Landscape Plan Review comments and redlines attached to this letter. Engineering: 18. Identify, label and provide lot number for the common area shown on the preliminary grading plan as "Greenbelt". 19. Eliminate proposed brow ditches shown along the toe of the existing slopes at the Southwest and Southeast boundaries of the subject property. This is to avoid potential future problems associated with cross-lot drainage. Each lot should. drain into the proposed public street where feasible. 20. Revise the Preliminary Drainage Report in accordance with the revisions requested in item no. 19 above. The report must include a table showing pre-development 0100 and post development 0100 comparison at the outlet point. Clearly indicate the increase in Q1 00 proposed to be detained on-site. 21. Provide drainage easement for the storm drain system proposed outside the public-right- of way. (See red-lined plans for location.) 22. The proposed treatment BMP "Stormfilter by Contech" and the proposed concrete detention basin shall be privately owned and maintained by Home Owner's Association. A Storm Water Maintenance Agreement and Encroachment Agreement will be required. 23. Provide/show on the plan an emergency overflow system in the event that the proposed storm drain system fails. Show that run-off will drain into the street and no pending or flooding occurs when storm drains are 100% plugged. 24. Incorporate "Low Impact Design (LID)" in the development, as required by the Regional Water Quality Control Board. See attached design samples. • r, .GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ Z~6-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ HOP 07./ COP 06-19-TABATA 10 August 10, 2007 Page 4 25. Please comply with all comments shown on the plan. 26. Please be aware that as a condition of final map approval, the project will be required to provide a street name for the proposed on-site public road. 27. A red lined check print is enclosed for the applicants use in making the requested revisions. Please return this check print with the formal application submittal to facilitate continued staff review. ) I August 29. 200-:: TO: FROM: RE: Corey Funk, Assistant Planner Michele Masterson. Management Analyst Meghan Jacobson, Senior Office Specialist Michael Elliott, City of Carlsbad's Contract Landscape Architect Landscape Architectural Review -Conceptual Review -3rd Review Tabata 10-GPA06-04-ZC06-03-LCPA06-02-CT06-13, CDP06-19 Camino Hills Drive PELA file: II 9 -Tabata l 0 -CT06-l3 -Con3 Landscape Architect: California Landscape Technologies, Phone (760) 942-9320 Please advise the applicant to make the following corrections to the plans so that they will meet the requirements of the City of Carlsbad's Landscape Manual. Nurp_bers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of the comment concern. REPEAT COMME~TTS 1-14 Completed. 14. Deleted 16-21 Completed. 22. RETURN REDLINES and provide 2 copies of all plans (concept, water conservation, and colored water use plan) on tbe next submittal 1B-5B Completed. 6B. Some Platanus species have proven to do poorly in the Carlsbad area. It is unknown if 'Bloodgood' is one ofthe varieties doing poorly. It is recommended that Platanus be used along El Camino Real to be compatible with adjacent existing plantings however it will need to be insured that the variety selected will have a good chance of success. Please indicate that the Platanus variety shall be revised as appropriate and be subject to final City approval. 3rd Review: The applicant has deleted Platanus from the plans. Please add back in along El Camino Real per above comments. 7B. Please address landscaping of all graded areas up to the daylight line. NEW COMMENTS 1C. It is unclear if there is existing landscaping including irrigation in this area. Since the area is being graded, landscaping to include irrigation will be required. Please be more specific as to what is to occur here. 2C. Please add the following notes to the plans: Slopes 6:1 or steeper requiring erosion control measures as specified herein shall be treated with one or more of the following planting standards: a. Standard 1 -Cover Crop/Reinforced Straw Matting: Cover crop shall be a seed mix typically made up of quick germinating and fast covering grasses, clovers, and/or wild flowers. Submit the specific seed mix for City approval prior to application. The cover crop shall be applied at a rate and manner sufficient to provide 90% coverage within thirty (30) days. :I .. . Tabata 10-GPA06-04-ZC06-03-LCPA06-02-CT06-13 Conceptual Plan Review August 29, 2007 Page 2 Type of reinforced straw matting shall be as approved by the city and staked to the slope as recommended by the manufacturer. Reinforced straw matting shall be required when planting occurs between August 15 and April 15. The cover crop and/ or reinforced straw mat shall be used the remainder of the year. b. Standard #2-Ground Cover One hundred ( 1 00%) percent of the area shall be planted with a ground cover known to have excellent soil binding characteristics (planted from a minimum size of flatted material and spaced to provide full coverage within one year). c. Standard #3 -Low Shrubs Low spreading woody shrubs (planted from a minimum of2-3/4 inch liners) shall cover a minimum of seventy (70%) percent of the slope face (at mature size). d. Standard #4 -Trees and/or Large Shrubs Trees and/or large shrubs shall be (planted from a minimum of 1 gallon containers) at a minimum rate of one (1) per two hundred (200) square feet. Slopes-6:1 or steeper and: a. 3' or less in vertical height and are adjacent to public walks or streets require at minimum Standard # 1. b. 3' to 8' in vertical height require Standards #1, #2 and #3. c. In excess of8' in vertical height require Standards #1, #2, #3, and #4. Areas graded flatter than 6: I require Standard # 1 (cover crop) with temporary irrigation when they have one or m@re of the following conditions: a. Sheet graded pads not scheduled for improvements within 6 months of completion of rough grading. · b. A potential erosion problem as determined by the City. c. Identified by the City as highly visible areas to the public or have special conditions that warrant immediate treatment. 3 C. Street trees are required at the rate of 1 per 40' of street frontage. Please provide street trees on the west side of the street. These trees were shown on previous submittals. 4C. Please show all easements. The proposed 20' sewer easement is not shown. I I I I I I I I I I I I I • CARLSBAD HMP Table 11 Mitigation Ratios for Impacts to HMP Habitats Habitat Group and Type Mitigation Ratio/Requirement by Type of Impacted Habitat A. Coastal salt marsh, alkali marsh, freshwater marsh, No net loss goal (mitigation ratio varies by type of estuarine, salt pan/mudflats, riparian forest, riparian replacement habitat) woodland, riparian scrub, vernal pools, disturbed wetlands, flood channel, fresh water Engelmann oak woodland, coast live oak woodland (1) B. Beach, southern coastal bluff scrub, maritime 3:1 (2) succulent scrub, southern maritime chaparral, native grass c. Gnatcatcher -Occupied coastal sage scrub 2:1 (3) D. Unoccupied coastal sage scrub, coastal 1 :1 (4) sage/chaparral mix, chaparral (excluding southern maritime chaparral) E. Annual (non-native) grassland 0.5:1 (4) F. Disturbed lands, eucalyptus, agricultural lands Mitigation Fee (4) Footnotes: 1. Group A habitats are associated with wetlands. Impacts to these habitat types are subject to review under Section 404 of the federal Clean Water Act or Section 1600 of the California Fish and Game Code. 2. It is assumed that all habitat types in Group B will be included in the proposed preserve system. Small, isolated patches of low quality southern maritime chaparral may be located outside a preserve area and maximum avoidance and onsite conservation is preferred. ' 3. Maximum avoidance and onsite conservation of Group C habitat is encouraged. 4. Offsite mitigation for habitat in this group which is not conserved or mitigated onsite, shall pay a per acre in lieu mitigation fee in an amount to be determined by the City Council. This fee is discussed in more detail in Section E of the Plan. 5. City projects that impact Type 0, E, and F habitats will not pay the fee and will mitigate at the Lake Calavera Mitigation Bank. These projects may mitigate out-of-kind because the objective is to build the preserve system by combining small mitigation requirements into a larger, contiguous area. City projects that impact Type A, B, and C habitats must mitigate in-kind at the ratios stated above D-113 DECEMBER. 1999 AS AMENDED FINAL. APPROVAL NOVEMBER, 2004 • MEMO LANDSCAPE TECHNOlOGIES Corey: To: Corey Funk Assistant Planner, City of Carlsbad 760.602.4645 From: Steven L. Sherman, ASLA Landscape Architect, ALA #2887 California Landscape Technologies 760.942.9320 Date: August 7, 2007 • RECEIVED AUG ·1 0 2007 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPT Re: Tabata 10 Revised Cohceptual Landscape Plan We are submitting revised Tabata 10 conceptual landscape plans per City comments from 2nd submittal and correspondence between you and our office over th& last a couple of months: 1. Proposed landscape and maintenance responsibility for north side of Camino Hills Drive to limit of grading Per the agreement between owner and adjacent association(s) and Owner(s), area north side of Camino Hills Drive to limit of grading will receive landscape including planting and irrigation to match pre-construction condition upon completion of grading. No street trees will be proposed. Area to continue to be maintained by adjacent association(s) and Owner(s). 2. Street tree location and maintenance responsibility Per e-mail from you dated on 5/22/07, street trees along proposed interior public street have been relocated into the public right-of-way, except for trees in the HOA maintained recreation area. Street trees will be maintained by HOA along with the public ROW. A copy of the e-mail is attached for your reference. 3. Additional buffering trees at rear of lots 10-13 Per request from Camino Hills Development, additional buffering trees are added on at rear of lots 1 0-13. Approximate numbers and locations of the trees were discussed with you on a phone conversation in May. 4. Fencing material for rear yard between lots 1 -13 Fencing material for rear yard between lots 1 -12 has been verified with Pasco Engineering, and it will be tubular steel view fence. Fencing material for rear of lot 13 will be CMU wall per your directions. Correspondence (documents and PDF files) regarding fencing is attached for your reference. MEMO Tabata 10-Conceptual Landscape 3"'Submittal August 7, 2007 Page 2 of2 Response to City comments and City Red-line set from the previous submittal are also attached for your review and approval. Please do not hesitate to contact us at 760.942.9320 if you have any questions regarding this submittal. Thank you. ~ondscaoe Architecture Irrigation Design Cardiff ov tr'2 Se~J Californ!c. c, .. \ ?2C:C7 ~~--·,,.-:,:. LANDSCAPE TECHNOLOGIES REPEAT COMMENTS 1-13 Completed. REVIEWER ISSUES R&ONSE Date: August 7, 2007 Project : Tabata 10 -GPA0604, ZC0&-03, LCPA0&-02, CT0&-13, CDP0&-19, Camino Hills Drive PELA File: 119-Tabata 1 0, CT0&-13, Con 1 Re: Conceptual Landscape Architectural 2ndReview Comment Issue Date: 1/25/07 21. Will there be any perimeter walls installed as a part of this project along the north, south, east or west sides of the project? Please show any proposed walls and indicate heights and materials to be used. Completed. Wall/Fence Plan has been added. See Sheet 3. 22. Landscaping shall be used to provide and enhance opportunities for outdoor recreation, relaxing, and eating. The area at the top of slope along El Camino Real is large enough to provide for recreational needs. It is recommended that this area be designed for outdoor recreational uses (i.e. exercise course, play area, picnic and 880, etc.). Please address. Per meeting with Corey Funk on 4/11/07, turf area for,outdoor recreation use is maximized within current proposed grading, and while benches have been added, no additional active recreation facilities are required or proposed. See sheets 2 and 3. 16-19 Completed. 20. Areas graded flatter than 6:1 require Standard #1 (cover crop) when they have one or more of the following conditions: a. Sheet graded pads not scheduled for improvements within 6 months of completion of rough grading. b. A potential erosion problem as determined by the City. c. Identified by the City as highly visible areas to the public or have special conditions that warrant immediate treatment. Please indicate the timing for graded pads. Completed. See 'Planting Notes' on sheet 3. 23. Completed. 24. RETURN REDLINES and provide 2 copies of all plans (concept, water conservation, and colored water use plan) on the next submittal. Completed. Please note that Water Conservation Plan was omitted from this revised set since the previously submitted plan was approved by Public Works Maintenance and Operation and per correspondence from Mike Elliot dated on 5/30/07. The correspondence from Mike Elliot was attached for your reference. ------------------------------~--~-- REVIEWER ISSUES RESPONSE e Tabata 10-Conceptual Landscape 2nd Review August 7, 2007 Page2of2 NEW COMMENTS 1 B. Please identify all symbols used on the plans. Completed. See Sheets 2 and 3. 28. The City Engineering Department no longer allows the use of jute mesh. Please revise to reinforced straw mat. Completed. See all sheets. 38. The water use map has been forwarded to Public Works Maintenance and Operations for review. Plan was approved by Public Works on the previous submittal. See our respond for Repeat Comment #24 above. 48. Can trees be planted over the underground detention basin? Please coordinate. Completed. See Sheet 2. 58. Plantings along El Camino Real need to blend and be compatible with adjacent plants to the north and south. Please add Acacia redo/ens, Eucalyptus sideroxyfon and Schinus mol/e. Completed. See Sheet 2. 68. Some Platanus species have proven to do poorly in the Carlsbad area. It is unknown if 'Bloodgood' is one of the varieties doing poorly. It is recommended that Platanus be used along El Camino Real to be compatible with adjacent existing plantings; however, it will need to be insured that the variety selected will have a good chance of success. Please indicate that the Platanus variety shall be revised as appropriate and by subject to final City approval. Completed. Lophostemon confertus {Brisbane Box) has been substituted for Platanus a. 'Bloodgood'. See Sheet 2. 78. Please address landscaping of all graded areas up to the daylight line. Completed. See Sheet 2. -END OF DOCUMENT-Landscape Architecture Irrigation Design 970 Woodlake Drive Cardiff by the Sea Colifornia, CA 92007 Phone/Fax: 760.942.9320 EmoH: cltlonc1crch@odelphia.net Steve Sherman From: To: Cc: Sent Attach: Subject: Yuko, "Corey Funk" <Cfunk@ci.carlsbad.ca.us> <clllandarch@adelphia.net> <tlawson@pascoeng.com> Thursday, May 17, 2007 3:39 PM Tabata10 maintenance map_comments.pdf; Tabata 10 019.jpg Tabala 10 maintenance map -Planning response Page 1 of2 Thank you for your patience with mv response. Please see my responses to your questions on the attached pdf. As for Q1a & Qlb, I will need to coordinate with the Engineering Dept. next week. Regarding fence locations, all locations shown are correct. However, for Lot 13, the rear yard should be a solid CMU wall. For the rear yard fences for Lots 1 -13, please coordinate With Pasco Engineering as they have mentioned these may be solid wood instead of tubular steel view fences. Regarding the maintenance of the landscape area outside of the ROW on the north side of Camino Hills Drive, please have Pasco Engineering contact the Eagle Canyon HOA to verify if Eagle Canyon maintains this area. The contact I have is Bobbie Gibbs, who can be reached at bobbieg@nni.com or 858-550- 7920x255. Please increase the use of trees on at the rear of Lots 10 -13 to create an improved landscape buffer between the existing homes in the Camino Hills Development and new homes on Tabata property. The attached photo shows the areas of the existing slope that are bare and in need of landscape screening. Regards, Corey Funk Assistant Planner City of Cat1sbad cfl!nk@d.carlsbad.ca.us (760) 602-4645 8/7/2007 Steve Sherman From: To: Cc: Sent: Attach: Subject: Yuko, "Corey Funk" <Cfunk@ci.carlsbad.ca.us> <cltlandarch@adelphia.net> <tlawson@pascoeng.com> Tuesday, May 22, 200710:18 AM Tabata 10 maintenance map_comments 2.pdf Tabata 10 maintenance map-Engineering response Page 1 of 1 The Engineering Dept. has responded to your questions about location and maintenance of street trees along Camino Hills Drive. The answers are below, and also on the attached sheet: Q1-The street trees may be located inside the parkways between curb and sidwalk (inside ROW) under the condition that these trees and parkways be maintained by the future Tabata 10 HOA, and that no conflicts exist with existing utilities. Please verify with Pasco Eng. that no conflicts exist with utilities, and if so, please locate the trees inside the parkway and add a note to the plan that states the future Tabata 10 HOA will maintain the trees. Q2 -If trees must be located outside the ROW (on Eagle Canyon property), the Engineering Dept. may require Tabata to obtain an easement allowing the Tabata 10 HOA to maintain these trees. If we end up at this option, please let me look into this to make sure there is not a better way. I also noticed that all of the street trees on the proposed new loop street are outside of the parkway. The Engineering Dept. requirement that street trees be located outside of the ROW typically only applies to streets classified as "Collector" or larger streets. "Local" streets are allowed to locate street trees in the parkway provided the HOA maintains these trees. Please relocate all street trees on the proposed new loop street inside parkway and note that the HOA will maintain the trees. Thank you, Corey Funk Assistant Planner City of Carlsbad cfunk@ci.carlsbad.ca.us (760) 602-4645 No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 I Virus Database: 269.7.6/814-Release Date: 5/21/2007 2:01 PM 8/7/2007 Steve Sherman From: To: Sent: Subject: Yuko, "Corey Funk" <Cfunk@ci.carlsbad.ca.us> <cltlandarch@adelphia. net> Wednesday, May 30,200710:05 AM Fwd: Re: CT 06-13 Tabata 10 landscape plan Page 1 of 1 Please see the response from Michael Elliott below regarding the PW comments for Tabata 10. Apparently PW has no comments and your plans are fine. Corey >>> "Michael Elliott" <mikeelliott2@cox.net> 05/30/07 9:31 AM >>> Corey, The response is generally within a week. I send the plans to Pam Adams in PW M&O. In this case I already have comments back and she has indicated that what was submitted is fine. The applicant does not need to make any changes. The applicant can call me within a week after any comments and I can relay the comments to them. Mike -Original Message ---- From: Corey Funk To: mikeelliott2@cox.net Sent: Wednesday, May 30,2007 9:23AM Subject: CT 06-13 Tabata 10 landscape plan Mike, When you forward the water use map to Public Works Maintenance and Operation for review (item 38 in your letter dated 1/25/07) in the conceptual landscape phase, what is the typical time frame for a response from PW? The applicant is inquiring about the PW comments. Should I direct them to PW, or would it be better for me to contact PW? I assume that the contact is Richard, correct? Thanks for your help, Corey No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.472 I Virus Database: 269.8.3/824 -Release Date: 5/29/2007 1:01 PM 8/7/2007 == sf .0 1T 16 ?EA= 83 sf =107.0 NG EXISTING BROW NTAINEDBY :OWNER. -~~~-,Jl _:=J LOT 9 AREA= ! 8,935 sf r EL=114.0 LOT 10 AREA= 8,687 sf EL=114. 0 LOT 18 AREA= 8,654 sf EL==105.0 LOT 19 AREA== 8,939 sf EL==105.0 5' HIGH WOOD FENCE. (T 5' HIGH CMU. (T ~k.o c H u. t;~t~~t.V . 11e..re l; ~ I \1 I I ~~E.t.~~~~ LOT 20 AREA== 17,845 sf EL=105.0 ==to5.9 FG=104.8 ;~105 =~i'[:c~to4_....;.9:...;.: d~~~~~~~~~~F;i;~~77;-f7;77,?;;::'tlf j j j j j j . j ~I ......... ....,_• \' 111 •J IGH CMU. (TYP.) EXISTING ACCESS ROAD LEGENDS GROUNDCOVER SUCH AS: COMMON NAME SIZE Baccharis p. 'Pigeon Point' Dwarf Coyote Brusn Flats + Myoporum p. 'Pink' Pink Myoporum + + Aosmarlnus o. 'Prostratus' Trailing Rosemary + + + Trachelospermum jasmlnoldes Star Jasmine @ PROPOSED STREET TREES WALIJFENCE LEGEND ezzzmm 5' HIGH CMU WALL-TAN SPLIT FACE BLOCK •---5' HIGH TUBULAR STEEL VIEW FENCE 5' tfiGH WOOD FENCE 03. a. We propose using straw mat and non-Irrigated hydroseed in v. off-side grading to north adjacent native areas. Is this It-S acceptable? '----b. We propose replanting developed area and reinstalllng YeS irrigation. Is this acceptable? ' ~------01. T.&.P. a. Should street tree be planted inside ROW or outside per' City's requirements? b. If outside, who will irrigate and care of trees In undeveloped areas? r----------Q2. a. Is there an existing HOA taking care of developed property to north? c:.cw\+-.c,..t--s ... ,..le. e-rryo Vi b. We propose the Tabata HOA care the ROW planting and irrigation. Is this acceptable? . 'J<.. ~ n~~~~~~~~-a3. a. We propose using straw mat and non-irrigated hydroseed in off-side grading to north adjacent native areas. Is this ye S acceptable? June 15, 2007 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008-7314 ATTN: Corey Funk Re: Consultation, GPA 06/04/LCPA 06-02/ZC 06-03/CT 06-13/SUP 06- 08/CDP 06-19 - T abata 1 0 Mr. Strong, The Pala Band of Mission Indians Tribal Historic Preservation Office has received your notification of the project as above. This letter constitutes our response on behalf of Robert Smith, Tribal Chairman. We have consulted our maps and have determined that the project as described is not within the boundaries of the recognized Pala Indian Reservation. It also is beyond the boundaries of territory that the Tribe considers its Traditional Use Area. Therefore, we have no objection to continuation of project activities as currently planned and we defer to the wishes of Tribes in closer proximity to the project area. However, if the project boundaries are modified to extend beyond the currently proposed limits, we do request updated information and the opportunity to respond to your changes. We appreciate involvement with your initiative and look forward to working with you on future efforts. If you have questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact Joseph M. Nixon at 1 (760) 891 3592 or at e.mail jnixon@palatribe.com. . ix n, Ph. D., RPA ---=-=---Cultural Resource Coordinator Pala Band of Mission Indians C:\J MN\thpo\consultations\beyond _ tua\2007\city _carlsbad_ 6 _15 _ 07 .doc 35008 Pala Temecula Road PMB 445 Pala, CA 92059 760-742-1590 [phone] 760-742-4543 [fax] June 11, 2007 Russell Rome Tribal Captain e City of San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians 1889 Sunset Drive Vista, CA 92081 ') 0~ e FILE COPY Carlsbad IQ@I.Ihl.t.i•J§.JUIII·*4hl SUBJECT: SB 18 CONSULTATION-GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ COP 06-19 -TABA T A 10 Dear Mr. Rome, As requested, attached is a copy of the cultural resources study that was submitted with the project application for the Tabata 10 project. Please contact me at (760) 602-4645 or cfunk@ci.carlsbad.ca.us if you have any questions or wish to discuss the project. ~ COREY FUNK Assistant Planner CF:aw c: File Copy Enclosure 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314" (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @ Tribal Council Russell Rome Captain Carmen Mojado Secretary of Government Relations Charlotte Herrera Secretary of tlze Treasury Tom Beltran Secretary of Economic Development AI Cerda Secretary of Tribal Ethics and Infonnation Oara Guy Tribal Elder Henry Contreras Council Member Mel Vernon Council Member Mary Lou Beltran Council A1cmbcr Carrie Lopez Tribal Adr,isor Merri Lopez, Esq. Tribe Legal Adr,isor Contact inform.Jlion 1889 Sunset Dri \'C VL'>ta, CA <J2otH T <'1: (760) 72~-H505 Fax: (7oO) 72-J-2172 Rn·t.~ed. 0 I fi5 SAN LUIS REY BAND of Mission Indians Re: SB 18 CONSULTATION Site Name: --;;j~~ / {) SiteNumber: G;:; /l a~k~ J_ ~;Jil CJ6/t~jz ~· 1 / ~ tJ 6 ~p 51 e r cJ tf' -<31 S'u/ p~ ~t?r;e o P tl~-11 Dear ~;ll-/171 ;;(;;7'p --J' The San Luis y Band ofMissionindians does wish to participate in fonnili consultation with the ~~rsuant to SB 18 regarding the above referenced project and ~ Plan. Please send us a copy of the cultural resources report for the project. __ The San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians does not wish to participate in formal consultation with the-------------pursuant to SB 18 regarding the above referenced project and Plan. We understand that this does not limit the Band's ability to comment or claim any artifacts or cultural items found during excavation or any ground-disturbing activity associated with the above project. The Band requests that the Developer notifY the Band in the event that such items are found so that an appropriate tribal monitor can be sent to the project site. Sincerely, Russell Romo, Tribal Captain San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians _;I d C) /O::::t FILE C~PY City of Carlsbad IQEIIIIII.t.I•J§.fllll,i§iil May 22,2007 KUMNEY AA Y CULTURAL REPATRIATION COMMITTEE STEVE BANEGAS, SPOKESPERSON 1095 BARON A ROAD LAKESIDE, CA 92040 To Whom It May Concern: SUBJECT: SENATE BILL 18 CONSULTATION RE: GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ CDP 06-19-TABATA 10; CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the provisions of Senate Bill 18, the purpose of this letter is to initiate consultation with the Native American tribes, as identified by the Native American Heritage Commission, regarding the proposed Tabata 10 project located in the City of Carlsbad, California. · Project Description The proposed Tabata 1 0 project is located at the north end of Camino Hills Drive, on the west side of El Camino Real (APNs: 212-050-32 & -33). The project is a proposal to subdivide an approximately 10-acre property into 26 single-family lots. The project requires approval of a General Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Special Use Permit, Hillside Development Permit, and Coastal Development Permit. The project includes the design of the subdivision lot layout, grading, landscaping, road and utility improvements. The project proposes lots that will be greater 7,500 square feet in size, with an RLM (Low-Medium Density) General Plan Designation and an R-1 (One-Family Residential) Zoning Designation. Access for the project will be provided by Camino Hills Drive. A separate approval at a later time will be required to develop homes on the lots. Cultural Resources Survey A cultural resources survey has been conducted by Brian F. Smith and Associates for the proposed project (April 20, 2006). The results of the survey indicate that records searches with the South Coastal Information Center and the Native American Heritage Commission identified no recorded prehistoric or cultural resources within the project area. Additionally, the field survey conducted on April 3, 2006 was negative, identifying no cultural resources within the project area. Given the absence of previously recorded cultural resources and a negative field survey, no additional cultural resource work is recommended. A copy of the cultural resources survey has been sent to Mr. Mark Mojado, San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008~7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us (i) May 22,2007 e City SAN LUIS REY BAND OF MISSION INDIANS CARMEN MOJADO, CO-CHAIR 1889 SUNSET DR. VISTA, CA 92081 To Whom It May Concern: of e Carlsbad SUBJECT: SENATE BILL 18 CONSULTATION RE: GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ CDP 06-19-TABATA 10, CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the provisions of Senate Bill 18, the purpose of this letter is to initiate consultation with the Native American tribes, as identified by the Native American Heritage Commission, regarding the proposed Tabata 10 project located in the City of Carlsbad, California. · Project Description The proposed Tabata 10 project is located at the north end of Camino Hills Drive, on the west side of El Camino Real (APNs: 212-050-32 & -33). The project is a proposal to subdivide an approximately 10-acre property into 26 single-family lots. The project requires approval of a General Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Special Use Permit, Hillside Development Permit, and Coastal Development Permit. The project includes the design of the subdivision lot layout, grading, landscaping, road and utility improvements. The project proposes lots that will be greater 7,500 square feet in size, with an RLM (Low-Medium Density) General Plan Designation and an R-1 (One-Family Residential) Zoning Designation. Access for the project will be provided by Camino Hills Drive. A separate approval at a later time will be required to develop homes on the lots. Cultural Resources Survey A cultural resources survey has been conducted by Brian F. Smith and Associates for the proposed project (April 20, 2006). The results of the survey indicate that records searches with the South Coastal Information Center and the Native American Heritage Commission identified no recorded prehistoric or cultural resources within the project area. Additionally, the field survey conducted on April 3, 2006 was negative, identifying no cultural resources within the project area. Given the absence of previously recorded cultural resources and a negative field survey, no additional cultural resource work is recommended. A copy of the cultural resources survey has been sent to Mr. Mark Mojado, San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @ e City of May 22,2007 CAMPO KUMEY AA Y NATION ATTN H PAUL CUERO JR CHAIRPERSON 36190 CHRUCH ROAD STE 1 CAMPO CA 91906 To Whom It May Concern: e Carlsbad IQFihlhU·I•J§.i%1111,1§01 SUBJECT: SENATE BILL 18 CONSULTATION RE: GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ CDP 06-19-TABATA 10, CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the provisions of Senate Bill 18, the purpose of this letter is to initiate consultation with the Native American tribes, as identified by the Native American Heritage Commission, regarding the proposed Tabata 10 project located in the City of Carlsbad, California. · Project Description The proposed Tabata 1 0 project is located at the north end of Camino Hills Drive, on the west side of El Camino Real (APNs: 212-050-32 & -33). The project is a proposal to subdivide an approximately 1 0-acre property into 26 single-family lots. The project requires approval of a General Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Special Use Permit, Hillside Development Permit, and Coastal Development Permit. The project includes the design of the subdivision lot layout, grading, landscaping, road and utility improvements. The project proposes lots that will be greater 7,500 square feet in size, with an RLM (Low-Medium Density) General Plan Designation and an R-1 (One-Family Residential) Zoning Designation. Access for the project will be provided by Camino Hills Drive. A separate approval at a later time will be required to develop homes on the lots. Cultural Resources Survey A cultural resources survey has been conducted by Brian F. Smith and Associates for the proposed project (April 20, 2006). The results of the survey indicate that records searches with the South Coastal Information Center and the Native American Heritage Commission identified no recorded prehistoric or cultural resources within the project area. Additionally, the field survey conducted on April 3, 2006 was negative, identifying no cultural resources within the project area. Given the absence of previously recorded cultural resources and a negative field survey, no additional cultural resource work is recommended. A copy of the cultural resources survey has been sent to Mr. Mark Mojado, San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @ May 22,2007 e City SANTA YSABEL BAND OF DIEGUENO INDIANS ATTN DEVON REED LOMA YESV A ESQ TRIBAL ATTORNEY PO BOX 701 SANTA YSABEL CA 92070 To Whom It May Concern: e of Carlsbad IQibbiJI,j.i•l§•Lilllef§ell SUBJECT: SENATE BILL 18 CONSULTATION RE: GPA 06-04/ LCP A 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ CDP 06-19-TABATA 10, CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the provisions of Senate Bill 18, the purpose of this letter is to initiate consultation with the Native American tribes, as identified by the Native American Heritage Commission, regarding the proposed Tabata 10 project located in the City of Carlsbad, California. Project Description The proposed Tabata 1 0 project is located at the north end of Camino Hills Drive, on the west side of El Camino Real (APNs: 212-050-32 & -33). The project is a proposal to subdivide an approximately 1 0-acre property into 26 single-family lots. The project requires approval of a General Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Special Use Permit, Hillside Development Permit, and Coastal Development Permit. The project includes the design of the subdivision lot layout, grading, landscaping, road and utility improvements. The project proposes lots that will be greater 7,500 square feet in size, with an RLM (Low-Medium Density) General Plan Designation and an R-1 (One-Family Residential) Zoning Designation. Access for the project will be provided by Camino Hills Drive. A separate approval at a later time will be required to develop homes on the lots. Cultural Resources Survey A cultural resources survey has been conducted by Brian F. Smith and Associates for the proposed project (April 20, 2006). The results of the survey indicate that records searches with the South Coastal Information Center and the Native American Heritage Commission identified no recorded prehistoric or cultural resources within the project area. Additionally, the field survey conducted on April 3, 2006 was negative, identifying no cultural resources within the project area. Given the absence of previously recorded cultural resources and a negative field survey, no additional cultural resource work is recommended. A copy of the cultural resources survey has been sent to Mr. Mark Mojado, San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @ May 22,2007 e City SAN PASQUAL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS ALLEN E. LAWSON, CHAIRPERSON PO BOX 365 VALLEY CENTER, CA 92082 To Whom It May Concern: e of Carlsbad I #IF I h h i.t. I •I§ ·lUI t;.t§UI SUBJECT: SENATE BILL 18 CONSULTATION RE: GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ CDP 06-19-TABATA 10, CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the provisions of Senate Bill 18, the purpose of this letter is to initiate consultation with the Native American tribes, as identified by the Native American Heritage Commission, regarding the proposed Tabata 10 project located in the City of Carlsbad, California. · Project Description The proposed Tabata 10 project is located at the north end of Camino Hills Drive, on the west side of El Camino Real (APNs: 212-050-32 & -33). The project is a proposal to subdivide an approximately 10-acre property into 26 single-family lots. The project requires approval of a General Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Special Use Pennit, Hillside Development Permit, and Coastal Development Pennit. The project includes the design of the subdivision lot layout, grading, landscaping, road and utility improvements. The project proposes lots that will be greater 7,500 square feet in size, with an RLM (Low-Medium Density) General Plan Designation and an R-1 (One-Family Residential) Zoning Designation. Access for the project will be provided by Camino Hills Drive. A separate approval at a later time will be required to develop homes on the lots. Cultural Resources Survey A cultural resources survey has been conducted by Brian F. Smith and Associates for the proposed project (April 20, 2006). The results of the survey indicate that records searches with the South Coastal Information Center and the Native American Heritage Commission identified no recorded prehistoric or cultural resources within the project area. Additionally, the field survey conducted on April 3, 2006 was negative, identifying no cultural resources within the project area. Given the absence of previously recorded cultural resources and a negative field survey, no additional cultural resource work is recommended. A copy of the cultural resources survey has been sent to Mr. Mark Mojado, San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @ e e City of Carlsbad IQ@J;J;JJii•i•J§.SJillei§IJI May 22,2007 SAN LUIS REY BAND OF MISSION INDIANS RUSSELL ROMO, CHAIRMAN 12064 OLD POMERADO ROAD POWAY, CA 92064 To Whom It May Concern: SUBJECT: SENATE BILL 18 CONSULTATION RE: GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ CDP 06-19-TABATA 10, CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the provisions of Senate Bill 18, the purpose of this letter is to initiate consultation with the Native American tribes, as identified by the Native American Heritage Commission, regarding the proposed Tabata 10 project located in the City of Carlsbad, California. · Project Description The proposed Tabata 10 project is located at the north end of Camino Hills Drive, on the west side of El Camino Real (APNs: 212-050-32 & -33). The project is a proposal to subdivide an approximately 1 0-acre property into 26 single-family lots. The project requires approval of a General Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Special Use Permit, Hillside Development Permit, and Coastal Development Permit. The project includes the design of the subdivision lot layout, grading, landscaping, road and utility improvements. The project proposes lots that will be greater 7,500 square feet in size, with an RLM (Low-Medium Density) General Plan Designation and an R-1 (One-Family Residential) Zoning Designation. Access for the project will be provided by Camino Hills Drive. A separate approval at a later time will be required to develop homes on the lots. Cultural Resources Survey . A cultural resources survey has been conducted by Brian F. Smith and Associates for the proposed project (April 20, 2006). The results of the survey indicate that records searches with the South Coastal Information Center and the Native American Heritage Commission identified no recorded prehistoric or cultural resources within the project area. Additionally, the field survey conducted on April 3, 2006 was negative, identifying no cultural resources within the project area. Given the absence of previously recorded cultural resources and a negative field survey, no additional cultural resource work is recommended. A copy of the cultural resources survey has been sent to Mr. Mark Mojado, San Luis Rey Band ofMission Indians. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @ May 22,2007 e City BARONA GROUP OF THE CAPITAN GRANDE ATTN RHONDA WELCH SCALCO CHAIRPERSON . 1095 BARONA ROAD LAKESIDE CA 92040 To Whom It May Concern: e of Carlsbad I #IJ Fi .• ,j '''·I •I§ ·F• ,, ; ·14 ,,, SUBJECT: SENATE BILL 18 CONSULTATION RE: GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ CDP 06-19-TABATA 10, CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the provisions of Senate Bill 18, the purpose of this letter is to initiate consultation with the Native American tribes, as identified by the Native American Heritage Commission, regarding the proposed Tabata 10 project located in the City of Carlsbad, California. Project Description The proposed Tabata 10 project is located at the north end of Camino Hills Drive, on the west side of El Camino Real (APNs: 212-050-32 & -33). The project is a proposal to subdivide an approximately 10-acre property into 26 single-family lots. The project requires approval of a General Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Special Use Permit, Hillside Development Permit, and Coastal Development Permit. The project includes the design of the subdivision lot layout, grading, landscaping, road and utility improvements. The project proposes lots that will be greater 7,500 square feet in size, with an RLM (Low-Medium Density) General Plan Designation and an R-1 (One-Family Residential) Zoning Designation. Access for the project will be provided by Camino Hills Drive. A separate approval at a later time will be required to develop homes on the lots. Cultural Resources Survey A cultural resources survey has been conducted by Brian F. Smith and Associates for the proposed project (April 20, 2006). The results of the survey indicate that records searches with the South Coastal Information Center and the Native American Heritage Commission identified no recorded prehistoric or cultural resources within the project area. Additionally, the field survey conducted on April 3, 2006 was negative, identifying no cultural resources within the project area. Given the absence of previously recorded cultural resources and a negative field survey, no additional cultural resource work is recommended. A copy of the cultural resources survey has been sent to Mr. Mark Mojado, San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us (i} e e City of Carlsbad IQfiiehJI,J.i•J§.J:Jiilei§bl May22, 2007 VIEJAS BAND OF MISSION INDIANS ATTN BOBBY L. BARRETT CHAIRPERSON PO BOX 908 ALPINE CA 91903 To Whom It May Concern: SUBJECT: SENATE BILL 18 CONSULTATION RE: GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ CDP 06-19-TABATA 10, CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the provisions of Senate Bill 18, the purpose of this letter is to initiate consultation with the Native American tribes, as identified by the Native American Heritage Commission, regarding the proposed Tabata 10 project located in the City of Carlsbad, California. · Project Description The proposed Tabata 10 project is located at the north end of Camino Hills Drive, on the west side of El Camino Real (APNs: 212-050-32 & -33). The project is a proposal to subdivide an approximately 1 0-acre property into 26 single-family lots. The project requires approval of a General Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Special Use Permit, Hillside Development Permit, and Coastal Development Permit. The project includes the design of the subdivision lot layout, grading, landscaping, road and utility improvements. The project proposes lots that will be greater 7,500 square feet in size, with an RLM (Low-Medium Density) General Plan Designation and an R-1 (One-Family Residential) Zoning Designation. Access for the project will be provided by Camino Hills Drive. A separate approval at a later time will be required to develop homes on the lots. Cultural Resources Survey A cultural resources survey has been conducted by Brian F. Smith and Associates for the proposed project (April 20, 2006). The results of the survey indicate that records searches with the South Coastal Information Center and the Native All}erican Heritage Commission identified no recorded prehistoric or cultural resources within the project area. Additionally, the field survey conducted on April 3, 2006 was negative, identifying no cultural resources within the project area. Given the absence of previously recorded cultural resources and a negative field survey, no additional cultural resource work is recommended. A copy of the cultural resources survey has been sent to Mr. Mark Mojado, San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us ('!) e e City of Carlsbad I QGI lllllli·i •J§.fljl .. i§lil May22, 2007 KWAA YMIL LAGUNA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS CARMEN LUCAS POBOX 775 PINE VALLEY, CA 91962 To Whom It May Concern: SUBJECT: SENATE BILL 18 CONSULTATION RE: GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ CDP 06-19-TABATA 10, CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the provisions of Senate Bill 18, the purpose of this letter is to initiate consultation with the Native American tribes, as identified by the Native American Heritage Commission, regarding the proposed Tabata 10 project located in the City of Carlsbad, California. · Project Description The proposed Tabata I 0 project is located at the north end of Camino Hills Drive, on the west side of El Camino Real (APNs: 2I2-050-32 & -33). The project is a proposal to subdivide an approximately I 0-acre property into 26 single-family lots. The project requires approval of a General Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Special Use Permit, Hillside Development Permit, and Coastal Development Permit. The project includes the design of the subdivision lot layout, grading, landscaping, road and utility improvements. The project proposes lots that will be greater 7,500 square feet in size, with an RLM (Low-Medium Density) General Plan Designation and an R-1 (One-Family Residential) Zoning Designation. Access for the project will be provided by Camino Hills Drive. A separate approval at a later time will be required to develop homes on the lots. Cultural Resources Survey A cultural resources survey has been conducted by Brian F. Smith and Associates for the proposed project (April 20, 2006). The results of the survey indicate that records searches with the South Coastal Information Center and the Native American Heritage Commission identified no recorded prehistoric or cultural resources within the project area. Additionally, the field survey conducted on April 3, 2006 was negative, identifying no cultural resources within the project area. Given the absence of previously recorded cultural resources and a negative field survey, no additional cultural resource work is recommended. A copy of the cultural resources survey has been sent to Mr. Mark Mojado, San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us (!) May 22,2007 e City CUPA CULTURAL CENTER (PALA BAND) ATTN: SHASTA GAUGHEN 35008 PALA-TEMECULA RD PMB BOX445 P ALA, CA 92059 To Whom It May Concern: e of Carlsbad •Rt•aa•a·'·,4·t•a•;.«gn• SUBJECT: SENATE BILL 18 CONSULTATION RE: GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ CDP 06-19-TABATA 10, CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the provisions of Senate Bill 18, the purpose of this letter is to initiate consultation with the Native American tribes, as identified by the Native American Heritage Commission, regarding the proposed Tabata 10 project located in the City of Carlsbad, California. Project Description The proposed Tabata 10 project is located at the north end of Camino Hills Drive, on the west side of El Camino Real (APNs: 212-050-32 & -33). The project is a proposal to subdivide an approximately 1 0-acre property into 26 single-family lots. The project requires approval of a General Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Special Use Permit, Hillside Development Permit, and Coastal Development Permit. The project includes the design of the subdivision lot layout, grading, landscaping, road and utility improvements. The project proposes lots that will be greater 7,500 square feet in size, with an RLM (Low-Medium Density) General Plan Designation and an R-1 (One-Family Residential) Zoning Designation. Access for the project will be provided by Camino Hills Drive. A separate approval at a later time will be required to develop homes on the lots. Cultural Resources Survey A cultural resources survey has been conducted by Brian F. Smith and Associates for the proposed project (April 20, 2006). The results of the survey indicate that records searches with the South Coastal Information Center and the Native American Heritage Commission identified no recorded prehistoric or cultural resources within the project area. Additionally, the field survey conducted on April 3, 2006 was negative, identifying no cultural resources within the project area. Given the absence of previously recorded cultural resources and a negative field survey, no additional cultural resource work is· recommended. A copy of the cultural resources survey has been sent to Mr. Mark Mojado, San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @ May 22,2007 e City MESA GRANDE BAND OF MISSION INDIANS ATTN MARK ROMERO CHAIRPERSON - PO BOX 270 SANTA YSABEL CA 92070 To Whom It May Concern: e of Carlsbad I :;a Fi ,, ,. ,,,.I •I§ ·»• '''·'4111 SUBJECT: SENATE BILL 18 CONSULTATION RE: GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ CDP 06-19-TABATA 10, CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the provisions of Senate Bill 18, the purpose of this letter is to initiate consultation with the Native American tribes, as identified by the Native American Heritage Commission, regarding the proposed Tabata 10 project located in the City of Carlsbad, California. Project Description The proposed Tabata 10 project is located at the north end of Camino Hills Drive, on the west side of El Camino Real (APNs: 212-050-32 & -33). The project is a proposal to subdivide an approximately 1 0-acre property into 26 single-family lots. The project requires approval of a General Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Special Use Permit, Hillside Development Permit, and Coastal Development Permit. The project includes the design of the subdivision lot layout, grading, landscaping, road and utility improvements. The project proposes lots that will be greater 7,500 square feet in size, with an RLM (Low-Medium Density) General Plan Designation and an R-1 (One-Family Residential) Zoning Designation. Access for the project will be provided by Camino Hills Drive. A separate approval at a later time will be required to develop homes on the lots. Cultural Resources Survey A cultural resources survey has been conducted by Brian F. Smith and Associates for the proposed project (April 20, 2006). The results of the survey indicate that records searches with the South Coastal Information Center and the Native American Heritage Commission identified no recorded prehistoric or cultural resources within the project area. Additionally, the field survey conducted on April 3, 2006 was negative, identifying no cultural resources within the project area. Given the absence of previously recorded cultural resources and a negative field survey, no additional cultural resource work is recommended. A copy of the cultural resources survey has been sent to Mr. Mark Mojado, San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @ May 22,2007 e City LA JOLLA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS ATTN: ROB ROY 22000 HIGHWAY 76 PAUMA VALLEY, CA 92061 To Whom It May Concern: e of Carlsbad· liJFIIIIIIII·i•i4·FIIII•i4111 SUBJECT: SENATE BILL 18 CONSULTATION RE: GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ CDP 06-19-TABATA 10, CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the provisions of Senate Bill 18, the purpose of this letter is to initiate consultation with the Native American tribes, as identified by the Native American Heritage Commission, regarding the proposed Tabata 10 project located in the City of Carlsbad, California. · Project Description The proposed Tabata I 0 project is located at the north end of Camino Hills Drive, on the west side of El Camino Real (APNs: 212-050-32 & -33). The project is a proposal to subdivide an approximately I 0-acre property into 26 single-family lots. The project requires approval of a General Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Special Use Permit, Hillside Development Permit, and Coastal Development Permit. The project includes the design of the subdivision lot layout, grading, landscaping, road and utility improvements. The project proposes lots that will be greater 7,500 square feet in size, with an RLM (Low-Medium Density) General Plan Designation and an R-1 (One-Family Residential) Zoning Designation. Access for the project will be provided by Camino Hills Drive. A separate approval at a later time will be required to develop homes on the lots. Cultural Resources Survey A cultural resources survey has been conducted by Brian F. Smith and Associates for the proposed project (April 20, 2006). The results of the survey indicate that records searches with the South Coastal Information Center and the Native American Heritage Commission identified no recorded prehistoric or cultural resources within the project area. Additionally, the field survey conducted on April 3, 2006 was negative, identifying no cultural resources within the project area. Given the absence of previously recorded cultural resources and a negative field survey, no additional cultural resource work is recommended. A copy of the cultural resources survey has been sent to Mr. Mark Mojado, San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @ City of Carlsbad Tabata 10 CT 06-13/ GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ SUP 06-08/ COP 06 -19 N A 0 1,200 ----=======-------Feet 300 600 Map created by the City of Carlsbad GIS. Portions of the DERIVED PRODUCT contain geographic information copyrighted by SanGIS. All Rights Reserved May 22,2007 e Cit To Whom It May Concern: SUBJECT: SENATE BILL 18 CONSULTATION RE: GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ CDP 06-19-TABATA 10, CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the provisions of Senate Bill 18, the purpose of this letter is to initiate consultation with the Native American tribes, as identified by the Native American Heritage Commission, regarding the proposed Tabata 10 project located in the City of Carlsbad, California. Project Description The proposed Tabata 10 project is located at the north end of Camino Hills Drive, on the west side of El Camino Real (APNs: 212-050-32 & -33). The project is a proposal to subdivide an approximately 10-acre property into 26 single-family lots. The project requires approval of a General Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Special Use Permit, Hillside Development Permit, and Coastal Development Permit. The project includes the design of the subdivision lot layout, grading, landscaping, road and utility improvements. The project proposes lots that will be greater 7,500 square feet in size, with an RLM (Low-Medium Density) General Plan Designation and an R-1 (One-Family Residential) Zoning Designation. Access for the project will be provided by Camino Hills Drive. A separate approval at a later time will be required to develop homes on the lots. Cultural Resources Survey A cultural resources survey has been conducted by Brian F. Smith and Associates for the proposed project (April 20, 2006). The results of the survey indicate that records searches with the South Coastal Information Center and the Native American Heritage Commission identified no recorded prehistoric or cultural resources within the project area. Additionally, the field survey conducted on April 3, 2006 was negative, identifying no cultural resources within the project area. Given the absence of previously recorded cultural resources and a negative field survey, no additional cultural resource work is recommended. A copy of the cultural resources survey has been sent to Mr. Mark Mojado, San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us ('!) GP A 06-04/ LCP A 06./ ZC 06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ C.06-19 - T ABA T A 10 MAY 22,2007 PAGE2 Notice of Completion The City of Carlsbad is currently in the process of reviewing the proposed Tabata 10 project. When the environment review for the project is complete, the City will issue a Notice of Completion in accordance with CEQA Guidelines. Requested Deadline Pursuant to Government Code §65352.3(a)(2), please respond within 90 days of receipt of this notice in the event your tribe wishes to consult with the City regarding this matter. Please contact: COREY FUNK ASSISTANT PLANNER City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 If you have any questions regarding this letter please contact me at (760) 602-4645. Assistant Planner CF:aw Attachments: Location Map From: To: Date: Subject: Hello Corey, <JUNEKELLY®aol.com> <Cfunk®ci.carlsbad.ca.us> 05/07/2007 11:04:07 AM Tabata 10 -Question Several months ago, I telephoned you with questions about the Tabata 10 - Application for Development. You provided me with information regarding the procedures that the city would be taking. After relating our conversation to the Camino Hills Homeowners' Broad, Jim O'Connor was instructed to communicate with you in behalf of the Board and Homeowners. Subsequently, he informed me of his visit with you. Since my matter of concern does not effect any other homeowner, I am directing my question to you for advise In referring to upper left hand Drainage Ditch. Camino the "Tentative Map For: Tabata -10", you will corner, the dotted line indicates the existence Because of the shading, I cannot tell if this note, of a ditch in the is on Hill's or Tabata's property?? (The reason for my concern is that at the end of the ditch, there is a pipe that extends through my property to the street in front of my house. Since I am not the original owner, I was completely unaware of this violation to my property until recently. The ditch is also a health hazard as stagnate water accumulates, from the sprinklers, which becomes a mosquito breeding place.) I would be most appreciative if you could answer my question . . . or direct me to someone that can. Thanks! June Kelly (760-438-5135) ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. ~~ 1,_.-J:;.y~ 11...... ''d.,.\~ .. (-;, UtA~~\:-<; I '"~ , r ' I y' I<:; ""'"'"7'.:!:'>·1 t-{ -s 1.::" i .. <: ... ~ tYV~7 o-....-d :Jr ... '¥'·~ 1 i.-1 lo -.,.__, ,4 &! ~--..._ --k> d.f~l ,~..,"'J--'·· cc.pf1t?cl I., ,.,. "' {A.,4-V:,..,,.~-., 7L ~1/z<.--('V'";,v~t:~--*~/~5 c; {....,....,..e_ +-12<-s>rT ~ I( h-.J .,..( . 1 (_<--· From: To: Date: Subject: Hi Corey, Tecla Levy Corey Funk 05/03/2007 5: 11:11 PM Fwd: re: Tabata 10 Sorry it took me so long to respond to you. Below are our answers to your questions: 1. Yes. Camino Hills Drive has the capacity to accommodate the projected 260 ADT from Tabata 10 project. Camino Hills Drive is Collector Street and has Capacity limit of 10,000 ADT (See attached Table A, City of Carlsbad Street Design Criteria). The existing ADT on Camino Hills Drive is only 2,267 according to the recent traffic count dated March 3, 2007, by City of Carlsbad Transportation Division. ~!1--vi~ (See attached traffic coui)IS.)--------------------------:?f~ 2. The impacts will be insignificant. The additional peak hour traffic is only 26 ADT, less than the 0 AD threshold to be considered significant. ~ 1'5 c-..~b ft1r-e?l..r ck_ ...P~ ~ IYl~~ --r:t-~Le/-- 3. Your concern regarding possible sight distance issue at the intersection of Jackspar Road and Camino ..._1~1(-d: Hills Drive has been brought to the attention of the City Street Maintenance and Operations Section. Z-G:,. e::..rf-· t""-+..YthL~ Please let me know if you have additional questions. Hope this helps. ~ "'-~·4> uu, Thanks, Pv->~M:...... . Tecla Levy, PE »>Corey Funk 04/25/07 2:21 PM »> Hello Tecla, Thanks for your help exlaining these traffic issues. Below is the email I received from a resident in the Camino Hills development adjacent to the Tabata 10 project. In addition to their concern, I received two more traffic concerns from residents of Camino Hills (as we discussed this afternoon). The three traffic issues I would like your assistance addressing are: 1. Can Camino Hills Drive accomodate the traffic impacts generated by the Tabata 10 project? Will the project traffic volumes fit within the capacity of Camino Hills Drive? 2. What will the project impacts be to the entrance intersection of the Camino Hills development (the intersection of Camino Hills Drive and Browning Road)? Since the Tabata property is currently a farm, the Camino Hills residents will notice some traffic effects once the project is constructed; however, will these effect be considered a significant impact to the Camino Hills entrance? 3. A concern was raised about a possible problem with the sight distance corridor at the intersection of Jackspar Road and Camino Hills Drive (when looking up-hill and to the right from Jackspar on Camino Hills). Thank you for your help, Corey »> Robert 0 Waychoff <waychoff@juno.com> 04/24/07 11:30 AM >» IN GOD WE TRUST we are residents of Camino Hills, a senior park next to the proposed Tabata development. ... First, there is a statement that 26 single family lots are to be built. .. in looking at the map, there are an additional 13 lots around the perimeter ... how come? Second, if you use the only entrance to this development as Camino Hills Drive, this would have a negative affect on our senior community entering and exiting our gate .... So this looks like Carlsbad is interested in building, building, and more building without the consequences ... Sincerely, Bob and Joyce Waychoff waychoff@juno.com 5419 Kipling Lane w 527 5/04/99 TU 534 1/11/00 TU 623 1/12/00 w 572 5/14/02 TU 1,286 5/15/02 w 1,239 5/16/02 TH 1,270 CAMINO HILLS DRIVE LINK CQUNT HISTORY 661 507 621 606 1,137 1,107 1,230 Page 1 of 1 1,041 1,244 1,178 2,423 2,346 2,500 I -.. ·· . .I . ;~ ., . r· '. JSt rt •. -~f!Jrt ,. , ... '!I':;, .. Dilt~'·! pay . '.NB 6/17/97 TU 703 6/16/98 TU 875 6102/99 w 961 1/11/00 TU 1,023 1/12/00 w 1,021 5/14/02 TU 1,232 5/15/02 w 1,264 5116/02 TH 1,295 ''· ~:i r ~ ..• ~ ~ •. 'I . ~ Na:. 1/11/00 TU 1/12100 w 5/28/02 TU 5125/05 w JACKSPAR DRIVE LINK COUNT HISTORY FORECASTLE COURT TO LONGFELLOW ROAD · ·,· ·.·:. 24"HQurAQJ . , : . ·. -t '-·; ·t .Ss EB 671 .1,374 860 1,735 1,260 2,221 1,056 2,079 1,115 2,136 1,363 2,595 1,367 2,631 1,326 2,621 LONGFELLOW ROAD TO CAMINO HILLS DRIVE SB EB wa rot111 699 671 1,370 736 683 1,419 1,165 1,247 2,412 982 1,085 2,067 ------.. -----~-~-----·-'l Page 2 Page 1 of 1 Minimum Spi1cing of Intersections (including right-tum in/out) (in feet) Access to Ac;tj<)ining Property 2,600 · None 1,200 None TABLE A CITY OF CARLSBAD STREET DESIGN CRITERIA 600 300 300 Where no Umlted subject Limited subject 150T's others O.K. 150T's others O.K. O.K. other access to approval to approval · MQIE&: (1lNA (2 Reduction to 1 00' with approval of City Engineer. (3)Grades greater than 10% will require spedflc approval, chip seal, etc. (4lNot to exceed 6% thru Intersections. Local, cukle-sac and hlUside may Increase grade throu9h lntersecllons up to 8%, provided that CAL TRANS guidelines for s lght dostance and vertical cuiVes ere complied with. (5)Stowlng Sight: Distance per CAL TRANS Highway Design Manual Topic 2Ct1 and Section 8 on Page 8 of City Standards. (6)Assumes no stuperelevatlons; Includes standard c:rossfall. '• (7)Mlnimum t~rade of 2.0% Is encouraged. If 1.0% minimum is not po~lt1le, special con~tructlon may be used with Cltv Engineer approval. Gutter Hne of cukle-sac bulbs and knuckles shaH have minimum grade of 1.0%. Typical centerline gra• at the upper reach of cul~acs shall be 2% minimum. ~~~ley sections shall conform to SDRSD G-21. . ( Comer S~jht Distance per Callrans Highway Design manual Topic 405: and Section 8 on Page 8 of Cily Standards. Page4of4 u 150 limited sub)ect to approval ( ) '--...) [9oreyFunk -Tabata 10 From: To: Date: Subject: Corey: "Steve Sherman" <cltlandarch@adelphia.net> "Corey Funk" <cfunk@ci.carlsbad.ca.us> 04/27/2007 10:50:47 AM Tabata 10 Per our phone conversation, attached is a PDF file of Tabata 10 proposed maintenance map and proposed fence location. As I described over the phone, there are native landscape areas and ornamentally planted and irrigated areas existing on northwest side of Camino Hills Drive. We have initially proposed that the parkway be maintained by the Tabata 10 HOA with appropriate ground cover and permanent irrigation. While we have initially proposed street trees, the City of Carlsbad standard requires street trees be planted just outside the Right-of-way. My first question is, who is currently maintaining the existing improved landscaping along a portion of Camino Hills Drive? Is it private, or is it being maintained by an HOA currently? From an irrigation point of view, it would be better to irrigate this area on the Tabata HOA systems, rather than try and patch into an existing system. We just need to make sure the adjacent property owners are aware of the new trees we are proposing. As for the limit of grading, we are proposing repairing all existing planting and irrigation along the improved portions beyond the ROW, and I would like to propose non-irrigated native hydro-seed and straw mat for the areas adjacent more native vegetation. Please let me know if these proposals are acceptable, or if you have any additional ideas on how this should be handled. Also, please verify the proposed wall/fence location. Existing site photos are also attached for your reference. Thank you for your assistance. Yuko Sugiyama California Landscape Technologies cltlandarch@adelphia. net 760.942.9320 AREA BETWEEN PROPOSED VIEW FENCE AND EXISTING NEIGHBORING WAll TO BE MAINTAINED BY EAGLE CANYON HOA-CITY TO VERIFY. SLOPES (INCLUD!NG EXISTING BROW DITCH) TO BE MAINTAINED BY INDIVIDUAL HOMEOWNER. 5' HIGH WOOD FENCE. {IYP.) LEGENDS .... NOT!I + ~ Myoporum p. 'Pink' Plra Myopon.m + ~ Ao1nw1nus o. 'Prolllratw' Trailing RoMrMiy F-. Plwt @12" O.C. ++T~~.WnjUrnino1081srat.J&Imir.- 03. a. We propose ~ng straw mat and non--frrigated hydrOIAMid fn off-aide grading to north adjacent nadYe areas. Ia this acceptable? b. We propose replanting developed area and relnatalling Irrigation. lalhla~? ]!.A,--------01. a Should street tree be planted Inside ROW or outside per City's requirements? b. tf outskie, who will irrigate and care of trees in undeveloped oreu? --r-------02. a. Is there an extstlng HOA taking care ot developed PfD1*tY to north? b. We propose the Tabela HOA care the ROW planting and irrigation. Is this llCX:8P1aiJ'e? ....:o.~:::---03. a We propose ualng straw mat and non-Irrigated hydroseed In off-tide grading to north adjacent native areas. Ia this ~? TABATA 10 PROPOSED MAINTENANCE MAP AND FENCE/WALL LOCATION April 24, 2007 JAMES M. BOEKER PASCO ENGINEERING, INC. 535 NORTH HIGHWAYlOl, SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CA. 92075 RE: AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR TABATA FAMILY-CT 06-13 Dear Mr. Boeker: Thank you for your request to purchase housing credits to satisfy the low income affordable housing requirements of the Tabata Family development at Camino Hills Drive and El Camino Real (CT06-13/CDP 06-19). Based on our review of your request, the proposed development is located within the northwest quadrant of the City and will result in the production of 26 single family dwelling units. If provided on site, the development would need to provide 4 dwelling units affordable to low income households and the remaining 22 dwelling units may be sold at market rate prices. If the intent is to satisfy the affordable obligation off-site, then 5 dwelling units will need to be provided off-site and 26 dwelling units could then be provided on the Tabata site. Because the subject development is located within the northwest quadrant of the City, it is not eligible to purchase housing credits from the Villa Lorna combined affordable housing development. The only combined affordable housing project currently available within the northwest quadrant of the City is the Roosevelt Condominium project in the Village of Carlsbad. It is an 11 unit affordable housing project and has only 7 credits remaining for purchase. The credit price for these units currently is $120,000 per credit. This credit price is subject to change at anytime. Any request to purchase credits in an off-site combined development is not final until approved by the City Council. Your request to purchase credits in the Roosevelt Street development will be submitted to City Council for consideration once your project has been approved by the final approving authority. We currently do not pre-reserve credits for a project. The sale of credits is on a first come, first served basis and your request can't be processed until you have an approved project which includes the option to satisfy the affordable requirement off-site. Because there is no guarantee that the City Council will approve your request to purchase credits within the Roosevelt Street condominium project, it is my suggestion that you include an alternative within your development so that you will not be required to amend your permits if the credit purchase request is not approved. In the past, it has been my suggestion to include the use 2965 Roosevelt St., Ste. 8 • Carlsbad, CA 92008-2389 • (760) 434-2810/2811 • FAX (760) 720-2037 (i} of second dwelling units on your site to satisfy the low income affordable housing obligation or to produce much smaller units on site and identify those units as the affordable. A similar size project within the Calavera Hills development was able to meet their affordable requirement on site through this method of producing smaller units and incorporating them into their development. Depending on your cost for the land. and construction, you may want to consider this alternative in light of the substantial cost of purchasing credits within the Roosevelt Street Condominiums. · If you have any questions regarding this correspondence or the options outlined above, please contact my office at (760) 434-2815. C: Corey Funk, Project Planner-City of Carlsbad· ---------------------------~~/20/2007 11:11 FAX 916 657 5390 e NAHC 141001 1IAUi Q! CAl F08NIA lm!W'FWP,_." poremgr NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION 115 Co\PITCX. MALL. 1'0011 a6' SACRAIENTO, CA 8581' (118) IIIH2i1 tt.c (91&) 167.-o Web Sh www aa.bf<_.Qa,gov --=~.net COrey Funk CITY OF CARLSBAD 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Sent by FAX to: ;~~02:~~~·9 Number of pages:.· ~ . 3 · Apl'il19,2007 Re: Tribal Consultation Per Ggyemrnent Code 65352.3 <SB 181 I saerec:t Land' Fjle Search for ergioet-General PlaQ Amandmtnt lo~ JABATA 10; APN 212:050-32 & -33; City of CatlsbQd: San Di!QO COuntv Ca!ifpmia Dear Corey Funk: GOWfTII1'lent Code §85352.3 requires local governments to consult wfth california Native Am.man tribes identified by the Native American Heritage Ciommi881on (NAHC) for the purpose of protecting, and/Or mitigating ~ to cultural places. Attacned IS a Native Arnetican Tribal Consultation list of tribes with traditional lands or cultural places located within the requested plan boundaries As a pan of consultation, the NAHC recommends that ~governments conduct record searches through the NAHC and caJilomia t-tlstork: Resources Information System (CHRIS) to determlrle H any CUINral places are located within the arA(s) affetted by the proposed adior'l. A NAHC Sacred Lands File search was conducted based on the toWMhip, range, and section information included In your request and no Sites were found wilhln the area or potential effect you id~. However, local governments should be aware that I'8COfds maintained by the NAHC and CHRIS are not exhaustive, and a negative response to the$e searches don not preclude the existence of a cultural place. A tribe may be tne only soui'Ce of irrforn'latlon regarding the existence ot a cultUral place. I suggest you consult with all of those on the accompanying Native American Contacts list, which has been included separately. If they cannot supply information, they might recommend others with specific knowledge about cultural resources in your plan area. If a response has not been received within two weeks of notification, the Commission requests that you follow-up with a telephone c:all to ensure that the project infonnation has been received. If you receive nalificalion of change of addresses and phone numbers from Tribes, please notify me. With your assistance we are able to re that our consultation liSt contains current information. Attachment: ~4/20/2007 11:12 FAX 916 657 5390 NAHC NJIIILte American Tribal Consultation LIA W San Diego County ----,. Barona Group of the Capitan Grande Rhonda WeiCh-Scalco, Chairperson April 19, 2007 Kwaaymii Laguna Band of Mission Indians Carmen Lucas ~002 1095 Barona Road Diegueno Lakeside , CA 92040 P.O. Box ns Dleguer:-o-Kwaaymli Pine Valley , CA 91962 sue@barona-nsn.gov (619) 443-6612 San Pasqual Band of Mission Indians Allen If. Lawson, Chairperson PO Box 365 Dlegueno Valley Center I CA 92082 (760) 749-3200 (619) 709-4207 Kumeyaay Cultural Repatriation Committee Steve Banegas, Spokesperson 1095 Barona Road DieguenoJKumeyaay Lakeside I CA 92040 (619) 443~12 San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians Russell Romo, Chairman Viejas Band of Mission Indians Bobby L. Barrett, Chairperson PO Box908 Diegueno/Kumeyaay 12064 Old Pomerado Road Luiseno Alpine , CA 91903 daguilar@viejas-nsn.gov (619) 445-3810 Campo Kumeyaay Nation H. Paul Cuero, Jr., Chairperson 36190 Church Road, Suite 1 Kumeyaay Campo , CA 91906 chairgoff@aol.com (619) 478-9046 Mesa Grande Band of Mission Indians Mark Romero. Chairperson P.O Box270 Diegueno Santa Ysabel • CA 92070 mesagrandeband@msn.com (760) 782·3818 1111sllst .. current only -of the clc* of W5 dooumenL Poway I CA 92064 (858) 74&-1586 Santa Ysabel Band of Dlegueno Indians Devon Reed Lomayesva, Esq. Tribal Attorney PO Box 701 Oiegueno Santa Ysabel , CA 92070 drlomayevsa@verizon.net (760) 765-0845 San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians Carmen Mojadol Co..Chalr 1889 Sunset Or. Luiseno Vista , CA 92081 IHI!tltbullon ofthlsllld do. not,.....,. •nv peNOn ot ttatutary .....,l'llllblllty • dlllllllld In Sec:aon 7050.t ot ft..._.. •nd Slfety COCI8. secaon IIJ87.M cn111e Putlllc l'laeoulae8 Code and Sedan 5017' .11 Of the Publrc Fle50un-Code. 1'nltllat •• •ppi!QIIble only far CDIB&IIbdiDn with Nllttve Amerlclin trtbeS under Gcwemmet4 Code Section 65362.S. ~J12012007 11:12 FAX 916 657 5390 NAHC N.e American Tribal Consultation L. . San Diego County Cupa Cultural Center (Pala .Band) Shasta Gaughen, Assistant Director 35008 Pala-Ternecula R<t.PMB Box .us Luiseno Pala , CA 92059 cupa@palatribe.com (760) 742-1590 La Jolla Band of Mission Indians ATTN: Rob Roy,Environmental Director 22000 Highway 76 Luiseno Pauma Valley , CA 92061 lajolla-sherry@ aol.com and (760) 7 42-3790 ,... llati!S ~onlY. of the .. of thle document. April 19, 2007 ~ ot tlllallllt dD8II nat relieve any person of~ reeponslbllltv • datlnm In Secllan 7050.5 of the HRith and Safllly Cade, SecUan 5011.14 of the PUIJIIo ..._,....,_ Cade arid Sedlan 1!1097 .81 of the P'ubfle ..._,urea Code. This I.., I& appllcabllt only for c:onaubdon wllh Native American trlbm under GoveMMent Code Section &A&2.3. ~003 • e FILE' CDPY lJ I ;q !_ n arlsbad City of C • :;a e1; 1; 1 •; '·' .xg -tl a';. '4 ,, • April 18, 2007 Tabata Family P.O. Box 679 Carlsbad, CA 92018 SUBJECT: GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ COP 06-19- TABATA 10 Dear Tabata Family, This letter provides the Planning Department issues review for the above project, in association with the previous incompleteness letter dated February 22, 2007. There are issues of concern with the project that remain to be resolved. The issues are listed on the attached page(s). All issues will need to be resglved prior to scheduling the project for a public hearing. Please contact me at (760) 602-4645, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. c Assistant Planner CF:aw c: Gary Barberio, Team Leader Tecla Levy, Project Engineer File Copy Data Entry Jim Boeker, Pasco Engineering, 535 N. HWY 101, Ste. A, Solana Beach, CA 92075 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us <!} GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ~06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ COP o!g-TABATA 10 April 18, 2007 Pa e 2 ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. Please add Tentative Tract Map number CT 06-13 to the plans. 2. Please add the Hillside Development Permit number to the plans. 3. Please include a fence plan exhibit with the following information (also see landscape plan redlines): a. As discussed with Jim Boeker, staff agrees that the street side yard fencing for Lots 13, 14, 20, 21 and 26 should be a split-faced masonry type wall. Please provide the wall type selected and a detail drawing on the fence plan exhibit. b. Due to its visibility from Camino Hills Drive, the rear property line fencing for Lot 13 should be a masonry wall consistent with the street side masonry walls. c. Fencing along the rear lot lines of Lots 1 -12 should be a metal view fence type, placed at the rear property line. It is staff's experience in situations similar to this that the slope areas will be adequately maintained by each homeowner. 4. Please contact the Home Owner's Association representatives for neighboring developments to discuss adjacency issues relating to fencing, landscaping, maintenance, and off-site grading. lnfill development projects such as this benefit from early neighbor contact prior to a public hearing. 5. Please provide the overall percent of the site to be landscaped. 6. The colors symbols used in the legend on Sheet 3 of the landscape plan are inconsistent with the colors used on the site plan (see redlines). 7. On the project side of the sound berm, please increase the use of turf in the flat areas of the green belt up to the boundary of the berm slope (see landscape plan red lines). With the exception of street trees, please move the trees and shrubs currently shown in the flat areas to the berm in order to increase the usability of the flat area as a passive recreation amenity (second request). 8. What type of vegetation can be planted over the proposed Rainstore Detention Basin? Staff suggests turf be planted in this area to increase the size of the passive use portion of the green belt. The shrubs currently proposed over the basin should be moved elsewhere on the sound berm. 9. To aid staff in preparing the environmental documentation for Tabata 10, please expand on the acoustic study (Investigative Science and Engineering, Inc., Report #06-021, dated May 5, 2006) to describe the noise impacts to the project without the proposed sound berm, and the noise mitigation provided by the sound berm. Additionally, please clarify the definition of the "Mitigated 151 Floor Sound Levels" in Table 2 (page 11 ). What mitigation is this referring to? The report text states this sound level is for both the first and second floors of future structures. ... • GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ !06-03/ CT 06-13/ SUP 06-08/ COP oA-TABATA 10 April 18, 2007 Pa e 3 10. Will the most current design of the sound berm (with the pedestrian opening) provide the same level of noise mitigation as the previous berm design shown in acoustic study mentioned above? 11. Staff has strong concerns with the proposed fill grading and excessive pad heights (in relation to natural grade) in the general area of Lots 1, 2 and 26 (second request). Please lower the pad elevations in this area consistent with the following: a. According the El Camino Real Corridor Development Standards, no cut or fill in excess of 10 feet is permitted for properties subject to these standards (ECRCDS, page 6). While staff supports a deviation to this standard (ECRCDS, page 1 0) for the grading of the existing knoll and the creation of the sound berm, increasing residential lot pad heights in excess of 10 feet from natural grade is not supported. The purpose of these standards is to minimize cut and fill, keep pad elevations as close to natural topography as possible, and limit the visibility of development along the roadway. Staff considers the current design of these pad elevation inconsistent with ECRCDS. b. According the Hillside Development Ordinance, the definition of development includes grading (CMC Sec. 21.95.020.4). This definition applies to the development of manufactured slopes over 40 percent gradient (CMC Sec. 21.95.120..C) and as such, Lots 1 and 2 exceed this standard and should be revised. -~ c. For all infill projects, staff gives special attention to the sensitivity of grading relative to adjacent existing properties. Instances of excessive increases in pad height are considered incompatible with neighboring properties. Where this can be avoided, such as the area of Lots 1, 2 and 26, staff encourages development to limit pad elevations increases above natural grade. 12. Please add a note on the plans to provide an irrevocable offer of dedication for public access over the pedestrian pathway that connects Camino Hills Drive with El Camino Real. 13. Please provide the lot widths for Lots 4 and 5. 14. Please revise the labeling of the future street, which is inconsistently shown as both "public" and "private" on different sheets. 15. Please remove the Camino Hills Drive 100 from the density calculations consistent with CMC Sec. 21.53.230. 16. The City of Carlsbad Habitat Management Plan (HMP) has established additional conservation standards for projects within the Coastal Zone. These conservation standards include a mitigation fee for development impacts to disturbed vegetation, eucalyptus and agricultural lands (see attached). In addition to the identification of any sensitive habitat on site, please ensure that the preliminary vegetation assessment requested by staff (see the Feb. 22, 2007 Incomplete Letter) includes the acreage of all disturbed vegetation and agricultural lands so that the appropriate mitigation fees can be calculated consistent with the HMP. GPA 06-041 LCPA 06-021 t 06-03/ CT 06-131 SUP 06-081 CDP 0!9-TABATA 10 April 18, 2007 Pa e4 17. Please submit an LCPA Zone Change exhibit for the LCPA Interested Parties notice. The exhibit should provide two maps, one with the existing coastal zoning of Limited Control (L-C) and one with the proposed coastal zoning of One-Family Residential (R-1- 7,500). Please also show all surrounding property within the vicinity of the project site on the exhibit. .. • LOCAL GOVERNMENT TRIBAL CONSULTATION LIST REQUEST NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION 915 CAPITOL MALL, ROOM 364 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 (916) 653-4082 (916) 657-5390-Fax DATE: April16, 2007 ___ _ PROJECTTITLE: TA~B~A~T~A~lO~------------------- LEAD AGENCY: City~of'-'C"'"'a,_rl'"""s~ba,.,d'-------CONTACT PERSON: Corey Funk PHONE (760) 602-4645 STREET ADDRESS: 1635 Faraday Avenue FAX: .....,(7"""""6-"-0)1-6=0=2'-'-8=5_,_59~------ CITY: Carlsbad CA ZIP: "-'92=0=08"----- Specific Area Subject To Proposed Action Carlsbad, CA San Diego County APN: 212-050-32 & -33 Local Action Type: 0 General Plan 0 General Plan Element 0 Specific Plan I:8J General Plan Amendment 0 Specific Plan Amendment 0 Master Plan 0 Pre-planning Outreach Activity Project Description: The Tabata 10 project is located at the north end of Camino Hills Drive, on the west side ofEl Camino Real. The project is a proposal to subdivide an approximately 10-acre property into 26 single-family lots. The project requires approval of a General Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Special Use Permit, Hillside Development Permit, and Coastal Development Permit. The project includes the design of the subdivision lot layout, grading, landscaping, road and utility improvements. The project proposes lots that will be greater 7,500 square feet in size, with an RLM (Low- Medium Density) General Plan Designation and an R-1 (One-Family Residential) Zoning Designation. Access for the project will be provided by Camino Hills Drive. A separate approval at a later time will be required to develop homes on the lots. Location Map -Attached ---------------, NAHC Use Only Native American Tribal Consultation lists are only applicable for consulting with California Native American Tribes per Government Code Section 65352.3. City of Carlsbad Tabata 10 CT 06-13/ GPA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ SUP 06-08/ COP 06-19 N A 1,200 ----=====:::::~------• Feet 0 300 600 Map created by the City of Carlsbad GIS. Portions of the DERIVED PRODUCT contain geographic information copyrighted by SanGIS. All Rights Reserved . l April 16, 2007 e City San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians Mr. Mark Mojado P.O. Box 1 Pala, CA 92059 i.E CU~f Mccdd 4/llJf07- 0f Carlsbad I¥Jihh•li;t.i•X§.Ihillei§;tl SUBJECT: SENATE BILL 18 CONSULTATION RE: GPA 06-04/LCPA 06-02/ZC 06-03/CT 06-13/SUP 06-08/CDP 06-19 - T ABA T A 1 0, CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA Dear Mr. Mojado: In accordance with the provisions of Senate Bill 18, the purpose of this letter is to initiate consultation with the Sanl.uis Rey Band of Mission Indians tribe regarding the proposed Tabata 10 project located in the City of Carlsbad, California. Project Description The Tabata 10 project is located at the north end of Camino Hills Drive, on the west side of El Camino Real (APNs: 212-050-32 & -33). The project is a proposal to subdivide an approximately 1 0-acre property into 26 single-family lots. The project requires approval of a General Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Special Use Permit, Hillside Development Permit, and Coastal Development Permit. The project includes the design of the subdivision lot layout, grading, landscaping, road and utility improvements. The project proposes lots that will be greater 7,500 square feet in size, with an RLM (Low-Medium Density) General Plan Designation and an R-1 (One-Family Residential) Zoning Designation. Access for the project will be provided by Camino Hills Drive. A separate approval at a later time will be required to develop homes on the lots. Cultural Resources Survey A cultural resources survey has been conducted by Brian F. Smith and Associates for the proposed project (April 20, 2006). The results of the survey indicate that records searches with the South Coastal Information Center and the Native American Heritage Commission identified no recorded prehistoric or cultural resources within the project area. Additionally, the field survey conducted on April 3, 2006 was negative, identifying no cultural resources within the project area. Given the absence of previously recorded cultural resources and a negative field survey, no additional cultural resource work is recommended. A copy of the cultural resources survey is enclosed. Notice of Completion The City of Carlsbad is currently in the process of reviewing the proposed Tabata 10 project. When the environment review for the project is complete, the City will issue a Notice of Completion in accordance with CEQA Guidelines. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @ ... GPA 06-04/LCPA 06-02/Z~6-03/CT 06-13/SUP 06-08/CDP 06-1.TABATA 10 April16, 2007 Pa e 2 Requested Deadline Pursuant to Government Code §65352.3(a)(2), please respond within 90 days of receipt of this notice in the event your tribe wishes to consult with the City regarding this matter. Please contact: COREY FUNK ASSISTANT PLANNER City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 If you have any questions regarding this letter please contact me at (760) 602-4645. Assistant Planner CF:bd Attachments: Cultural Resources Survey Location Map • Corey Funk -Re: Eagle Canyon at Evan's Point From: To: Date: Subject: Hello Bobbie, Corey Funk Bobbie Gibbs 03/29/2007 11:25 AM Re: Eagle Canyon at Evan's Point Page 1 of2 Thank you for your inquiry and I apologize for my delayed response. The property owner has submitted an application to subdivide the approximately 10 acre property located at the end of Camino Hills Drive and adjacent to El Camino Real. The project property is located immediately south-east of Eagle Canyon. The property had been used primarily for agriculture in the past, and the future intended land use is single-family residential. The project proposes to create 26 single-family lots, a looped access road from Camino Hills Drive, and a sound berm with landscaping along El Camino Real. No homes are being proposed at this time; only the approval of the lots, grading and road improvements are being requested. A subsequent project and separate City approval will be required to develop the homes. Camino Hills Drive will create a buffer between Eagle Canyon and the proposed subdivision. Three photos are attached in the pdf document to help show what is described below. In regards to the project design, the areas of particular interest to Eagle Canyon are likely to be the following: 1. The widening of Camino Hills Drive, which currently narrows to one lane and must be widened to 2 lanes (one lane each direction). This widening will occur within the boundaries of the existing irrevocable offer of dedication (IOD), which had previously been dedicated to the City for Camino Hills Drive. This widening will remove the vegetation currently located in IOD. (See Photo 1) 2. Along the frontage of El Camino Real at the northernmost part of the property, the City has requested that the project incorporate off-site grading (on Eagle Canyon property) in order to blend the slope and create a natural transition as viewed from El Camino Real. (See Photo 2) 3. The project includes the planting of street trees in a parkway along the north side of Camino Hills Drive. If any items discussed here are unclear, or if you have other areas of the project you would like to discuss, please feel free to contact me or set up an appointment and I can show you the full-size plans. Regards, file://C:\Documents and Settings\cfunk\Local Settings\Temp\GW}00002.HTM 03/29/2007 Corey Funk Assistant Planner City of Carlsbad cfunk@ci.carlsbad.ca.us (760) 602-4645 • >>> "Bobbie Gibbs" <BobbieG@nnj.com> 03/26/07 11:39 AM >>> Hi Corey, Page 2 of2 Would you please send me some information regarding the development of the 26 homes and the boundaries that would affect Eagle Canyon? Thank You, Bobbie Gibbs Management Representative N. N. Jaeschke, Inc. 961 0 Waples Street San Diego, CA 92121 858-550-7920 Ext. #255 file://C:\Documents and Settings\cfunk\Local Settings\Temp\GW}00002.HTM 03/29/2007 • • • February 22, 2007 Tabata Family P.O. Box 679 Carlsbad, CA 92018 e City of . r W•JJ'xJ i. e Carlsbad I :;a til II II I ;t. I •l§ ·!I II; .I§ II I SUBJECT: GPA 06-04/LCPA 06-02/ZC 06-03/CT 06-13/SUP 06-08/CDP 06-19-TABATA 10 Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department has reviewed your General Plan Amendment, Local Costal Program Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Special Use Permit, and Coastal Development Permit, applications no. GPA 06-04/LCPA 06-02/ZC 06-03/CT 06-13/SUP 06-08/CDP 06-19, as to their completeness for processing. All of the items requested of you earlier have not been received and therefore your application is still deemed incomplete. Listed below are the item(s) still needed in order to deem your application as complete. This list of items must be submitted directly to your staff planner by appointment. All list items must be submitted simultaneously and a copy of this list must be included with your submittals, including five (5) sets of plans. No processing of your application can occur until the application is determined to be complete. When all required materials are submitted the City has 30 days to make a determination of completeness. If the application is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the application will be initiated. In addition, please note that you have six months from the date the application was initially filed, July 17, 2006, to either resubmit the application or submit the required information. Failure to resubmit the application or to submit the materials necessary to determine your application complete shall be deemed to constitute withdrawal of the application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new application must be submitted. Please contact your staff planner, Corey Funk, at (760) 602-4645, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. DON NEU Assistant Planning Director DN:CF:bd c: Gary Barberio, Team Leader Tecla Levy, Project Engineer File Copy Data Entry Jim Boeker, Pasco Engineering, 535 N. HWY 101, Ste. A, Solana Beach, CA 92075 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us (!} --------------------------------------------. GPA 06-04/LCPA 06-02/Z~6-03/CT 06-13/SUP 06-08/CDP 06-1'-TABATA 10 February 22, 2007 Pa e 2 LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION Planning: 1. Our records show that the application and fees for a Hillside Development Permit have not been received. These items must be received prior to the overall project application completeness. 2. Please submit a preliminary vegetation assessment letter that identifies the amount (acreage) and type of vegetation on the project site, including the area affected by the widening of Camino Hills Drive. (second request -this Jetter must be prepared by a qualified biologist) 3. Please show all existing topographic contours and structures located within 100 feet of the project site. This information should show pad elevations of the homes adjacent to the project site. (second request-Please expand the contours/structures to better show the area to the west and north sides of the project site, including the existing homes north of Camino Hills Drive. Please increase the number of existing pad elevations on the surrounding lots. Please see item ) 4. Please show all major vegetation within 100 feet of the project site. (second request- see Item #20 below) Engineering: 5. Preliminary Drainage Report: a. Hydrology and hydraulic calculations should follow San Diego County Hydrology Manual, June 2003. b. Use 5 minutes minimum time of concentration (tc) instead of 6 minutes used in the report or provide tc calculations. See section 3 of June 2003 hydrology manual. c. Can't verify data used in the hydrology calculations due to inadequate information shown in both existing and proposed hydrology maps. Contour elevations are not legible. Use the site plan or preliminary grading plan for post development hydrology map and clearly delineate the sub-basins. Show data used in the calculations on the map including: drainage areas (A), length of travel (L), time of concentration (tc}, high point elevations (HP), low point elevations (LP), flow rates (Q). Show typical pad drainage, d. Show and identify all existing and proposed drainage pipes, structures and drainage channels on the hydrology map. Show invert elevations and flow line elevations. e. Evaluate/show all existing storm drain systems (drainage pipe sizes and invert elevations, etc.), on all adjacent properties. Show direction of drainage. f. The size of pipe designated as "pipe A" in the drainage report appears to be in error. Hydraulic calculations show "pipe A" to be 60" diameter. This proposed pipe A is shown connected to a smaller existing 36" culvert at El Camino Real. Please revise. Evaluate/analyze capacity of existing 36" RCP this project is tying into. g. Show how post-development runoff rates and velocities from the site are mitigated in order to maintain the pre-development runoff rates and velocities. .. .. GPA 06-04/LCPA 06-02/Z~6-03/CT 06-13/SUP 06-08/CDP 06-1.TABATA 10 February 22, 2007 Pa e 3 h. If rainstore is used to mitigate for increase in run-off (Q), please provide capacity calculations, as well as inflow and outflow calculations. Determine the capacity and size (depth, length and width) of the proposed rainstore. Provide details for by-pass system, if any. Provide emergency flow outlet in case the system fails. Show that the emergency flow system will not have negative impact to adjacent road, El Camino Real. i. Ensure that site topography allows the outflow pipe from the proposed rainstore to tie in to the existing 36" RCP as shown on the plan. Show invert elevations of the existing and proposed storm drain pipes. j. Please comply with all comments shown in hydrology report and hydrology maps. 6. In order to comply with Carlsbad's Standard Urban Stormwater Management Plan (SUSMP), the applicant must prepare a Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP), (separate from hydrology report) per the City Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan dated April 2003 to: a. Identify existing and post-development on-site pollutants-of-concern. b. Identify the hydrologic unit and impaired water bodies this project contributes to. c. Recommend source controls and treatment controls that will be implemented with this project. Stormwater pollutants from the project must be treated to the maximum extent practicable before exiting the project site and/or discharging to City right-of-way, sensitive habitat or natural watercourse. d. Establish specific procedures for handling spills and routine clean up. Special considerations and effort shall be applied to resident education on the proper procedures for handling clean up and disposal of pollutants. e. Ensure long-term maintenance of all post construct BMPs in perpetuity. f. Provide hydraulic/hydrologic calculations to verify that numeric sizing criteria is met for filtration/treatment of the site. g. Provide Permanent Construction BMP map showing all proposed treatment BMPs. 7. Hydrology report showed 851h percentile peak flow and volume determination (waterquality Q). Item 1.3 of the hydrology report also identified biofilter swales, stormfilter system by Contech and Rainstore detention system as permanent BMPs. Please include this information in the SWMP report mentioned in item 2above. Provide capacity calculations for the proposed Contech and Rainstore BMPs. 8. Please submit all the necessary data and calculations in order to determine the feasibility, appropriateness, and design of proposed Rainstore. 9. Rainstore infiltration BMP shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of applicable groundwater quality objectives as set out by RWQCB and shall not degrade ground water quality. 10. Rainstore infiltration BMP shall not be used unless the soil is shown to have physical and chemical characteristics (such as appropriate cation exchange capacity, organic content and infiltration rate) that are adequate for proper infiltration durations and treatment of urban run-off for the protection of groundwater beneficial uses. 11. Soils investigation must be conducted to determine its suitability for infiltration BMP. Submit a soils report. The site is not considered suitable for infiltration BMPs if the height of the seasonally high water table extends to within 10 feet of the bottom of the proposed GPA 06-04/LCPA 06-02/Z~6-03/CT 06-13/SUP 06-08/CDP 06-1'-TABATA 10 February 22, 2007 Pa e4 rainstore infiltration BMP. Infiltration BMP shall not be located within 100 feet of a building foundation. 12. Rainstore infiltration BMP must be designed to completely drain within 72 hours after a storm. Please provide calculations. 13. Provide a letter of support from the adjacent property owner indicating that they are willing to sign a permission to grade for proposed off-site grading. 14. Please show proposed improvements to complete El Camino Real along the project frontage (including Paving, median, sidewalk and landscaping). 15. Show existing improvements to Camino Hills Drive where this project is tying into. 16. Plan show portions of existing waterline and sewer line directly under the proposed curb and gutter and sidewalk at some locations. Please revise plan to meet 7' minimum required horizontal distance from face of curb. Typical sections shown do not agree with the plan. Provide additional cross sections if necessary. 17. As requested in the first plan check, proposed sewerline horizontal alignment shall comply with City of Carlsbad Engineering Standard, Volume 1, Chapter 6, section 5. Please revise design .. 18. Proposed waterline alignment shall comply with Volume 2, Chapter 6, Division 15, section 15064, 3.5. No longitudinal bending shall be allowed in the installation of PVC pressure pipe. Please revise. 19. Proposed Camino Hills Drive must be constructed within the right-of-way. Site plan shows improvements extending outside existing RIW. Realign the road or show additional dedication. ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 20. The landscape plans do not clearly identify the vegetation that will be protected in place from that which will be removed. In the landscape submittal package, please submit a separate sheet for the existing vegetation conditions of the site, which clearly identifies the existing planting to remain or be removed. This should show all major vegetation within 100 feet of the project site (see Incomplete Item #4) and the major vegetation existing on the north side of Camino Hills Drive. 21. Planning Department issues of concern will follow in a separate letter. Be advised that this review does not constitute a complete review of the proposed project and items of concern will be provided to you in a separate letter. 22. Conceptual landscape plan review comments are included as an attachment to this letter. .. •' GPA 06-04/LCPA 06-02/2~6-03/CT 06-13/SUP 06-08/CDP 06-1.TABATA 10 February 22, 2007 Pa e 5 Engineering: 23. Provide maintenance requirements and mechanism for the proposed BMPs. 24. Provide sufficient information on adjacent subdivisions. Some pad elevations adjacent to this project are not shown. Direction of drainage is not clear. Off-site existing drainage pipes and structures must be shown, including invert elevations including direction of drainage. 25. Sewer, water (include pressure zone) and utility services must be shown. Show cleanouts and meter locations (should not be located in driveways). A typical section and a note will address the portions not shown at this time (driveways and proposed lot services, cleanouts and meters. Identify the high point and provide two gravity sewer systems (flowing downhill). Show access hole locations per City Standards section G.1 to 10. 26. Proposed Utilities shown on street cross sections (sheet 2) do not agree with the locations shown on the plan. Please revise plan to meet Engineering Standard, Volume 2, section 3.3.7. This is an effort to look ahead to conflict with meter boxes, SDG&E, as well as phone and cable TV locations. Sewer, water and storm drain systems should be located per City Std. GS-6 and 6A. 27. Show locations of air-vacuum release valve, shut-off valve, blow-off valves per Engineering Standard Volume 2, section 3.3.5. Show locations of proposed fire hydrants. 28. The existing brow ditch shown along the south and east sides terminate on top of slopes. Show where the run-off ultimately drains and address potential erosion problems on the existing and proposed slopes. 29. Please comply with all comments shown on the plan. 30. Show proposed street lights locations, if any, per engineering standard. 31. Provide street name for the proposed on-site public road. 32. A redlined check print is enclosed for the applicants use in making the requested revisions. Please return this check print with the formal application submittal to facilitate continued staff review. This review does not constitute a complete review of the proposed project and additional items of concern, as well as comments on technical and design issues will be identified upon submission of the above items. City of Carlsbad Planning Department 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 SUBJECT: GPA 06-04/LCPA 06-02/ZC 06-03/CT 06-13/SUP 06-08/CDP 06-19- T ABAT A 10, Response to staff comments Dear Mr. Neu: Thank you for your response to our application for a Land Use Permit. Pasco Engineering has revised the plan set to complete the application and address the concerns that were expressed regarding the project design. Below you will find a summary of revisions and explanations to each concern that was listed. Please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions regarding the resubmitted plans. Thank you. LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION Planning 1. Please see the Hillside Development Permit Exhibit. 2. Please see landscape submittal package. 3. Plans have been revised to show existing contours and adjacent pad elevations. 4. Topography has been expanded. See landscape submittal package for details. 5. Street grades have been added to the plan. 6. Infill project notice sign is being prepared and will be posted upon completion of application. 7. Sheet 1 has been updated. Engineering 1. The hydrology study has been revised and includes an analysis of both pre- development and post-development conditions during the 100 year storm event. All drainage facilities have been sized to adequately convey runoff from the 10- year, six hour storm event, per Carlsbad Drainage and storm drain standards. Please note that the treatment swale has been removed and replaced with a proposed underground Stormfilter and Rainstore system (see hydrology report). This design allows for more recreational area in the proposed "Green Belt", while meeting all BMP requirements. 2. Plans have been revised. 3. Plans have been revised. 4. The SWPPP has been prepared and is included with the resubmittal package. ,---------------------------------------------,. ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning 1. Lot 14 has been revised to meet the minimum lot area. 2. A pedestrian walkway has been added to the plan. 3. Existing topography is shown more clearly. 4. Pasco Engineering believes that the proposed fill along the eastern property line is the best design and will not negatively impact the neighboring properties. The proposed pad elevations are significantly lower than neighboring properties. 5. Per CMC Sec. 21.95.120.C.a.i., the following types of development on or into an uphill perimeter manufactured slope shall be limited to a maximum of six vertical feet as measured from the existing grade at the toe of slope: (a) main buildings; (b) accessory buildings; (c) retaining walls This plan does not propose the development of buildings or walls. Pasco Engineering does not believe that the development of pads is restricted by the terms listed in this section of the municipal code. Any future development of buildings/walls will meet the code requirements stated in this section. 6. The sound berm has been revised to include undulation and varied contours. 7. The sound berm has been extended to blend with the existing adjacent slopes. Permission to Grade letter will be granted prior to final approval of the plan. 8. Please see revised plans. 9. Please see the Hillside Development Permit Exhibit. 10. The Slope Analysis has been revised. Please see the exhibit. Landscaping N/ A -please see landscape plans. General Items 16. The project proposes to pay the in-lieu fee for 5-offsite affordable dwelling units. We have been in contact with Ms. Fountain on this matter and an application will be made available to the Housing and Redevelopment. 17. Please see the phase II soils report, included with this resubmittal package. 18. OK 19. A table showing depth-to-width ratios for each lot has been added to sheet 1. 20. The correct number of lots (26) has been revised in the General Notes. 21. The correct zoning has been revised in the General Notes. 22. The missing 1 00' radius occupant list has been included with this submittal. 23. The Hazardous Waste and Substances Statement has been completed and 1s included with this resubmittal package. 24. CMC Section 21.53.230 is not applicable to this project. A note to this effect has been added to sheet 1. 25. No fencing is proposed per this plan. Engingeering 1. The legal description has been revised. Please see sheet 1. 2. The existing improvements along El Camino Real have been made clearer and callouts have been added to the plan. Existing and proposed improvements along Camino Hills Drive have been added to the plan. Curb-to-curb width has been changed to 40'. See landscape plans for landscape improvements. 3. Street grades have been added to the plan. 4. Utilities have been shown clearly on the plan as well as the typical sections for both Camino Hills Dr. and the proposed Public Street. Proposed lot services have not been shown on the plan to avoid clutter, however a note has been added to the typical section regarding locations of proposed services. 5. Existing and proposed utilities have been added to the sections. 6. The existing brow ditch has been added to the plan. The existing manufactured slope at Lot 5 is 46'. The proposed pad elevation has been raised four feet so as not to increase the height of the slope. !sco ENGINEERING, 1rf. WAYNE A. PASCO R.C.E. 29577 JOSEPH YUHAS P.L.S. 5211 ovember 30, 2006 535 NORTH HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 (858) 259-8212 FAX (858) 259-4812 PE 1011TM W. JUSTIN SUITER R.C.E. 68964 Ms. Debbie Fountain City of Carlsbad City Housing and Re-development Agency 2965 Roosevelt Street Carlsbad, CA 92018 RE: AFFORDABLE HOUSING Dear Ms. Fountain: Thanks for verifying the various options available to us in our effort to satisfy the affordable housing requirements regarding the processing ofthe Tentative Map (GPA 06- 04/LCPA 06-02/ZC 06-03/CT 06-13/SUP 06-08/CDP 06-19). It is our opinion that the most effective method available to us is to seek an off-site solution such as the City's Villa Roma project. The Tabata family, owners of the subject property, shares our opinion and has requested that we seek an off-site solution to the affordable housing requirements. Submitted herewith is our application for your Board's consideration. Because of the limited space on the assessment worksheet, we have listed our responses to the questions as follows: 1. Feasibility of the On-Site Proposal a. An on-site solution is impractical due to the fact that the cost to supply five units for low income housing would greatly impact the profitability of the project. b. The affordable units would need to be one story houses and considerably smaller that other units in the project, as well as, other units being marketed in the area. c. The project developers would not have the capacity to deliver affordable housing on-site because of the anticipated profit shortfall. 2. Relative advantages/ disadvantages of the Off-Site proposal. a. The off-site option is financially feasible and is by far the most cost effective method for providing low cost housing. The degree of public assistance has made the difference in meeting this important housing need. b. The off-site proposal has many advantages i.e. location relative to jobs, schools, transportation, and other services. The off-site proposal is well integrated into the existing community's housing matrix. c. Through the foresight of the city, the off-site proposal is fully available. d. The city has made it possible for many smaller developments to fulfill the affordable housing requirements in a manner that would be nearly impossible if attempted individually. 3. Advancing housing goals and strategy a. The off-site proposal advances and supports the goals and policies of the city's housing element in a highly workable manner that would have been nearly impossible as related to the compliance capability of smaller individual projects. Please feel free to contact us if you need any additional information or have any questions on this matter. Regards, James M. Boeker Project Manager Attachments: 1. Assessment worksheet 2. Copy ofthe proposed Tentative Map 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. .e OFF-SITE AND COJ/BINED INCLUSIO.Y4.RY HOUSI:YG PROJECT ASSESSJ!El\T JVORKSHEET BACKGROUSD Applicant l"ame and Address: Tabata Brothers c/o Gregg Harrington P.O.Box 679 Carlsbad, CA. 92018 Off-site or Combined Project Name: Tabata El Camino Description of Project with Inclusionary Housing Obligation: A proposed twenty-six unit residential subdivision with a Tentative Map being processed as 6PA 06-04/ LCPA 06-02/ ZC 06-03/ CT 06-13/SUP 06-08/ CDP 06-19 Proposed On-site Project Description (if any): None Proposed Off-site Project Description: Request to satisfy the affordable housing requirement by purchasing five units in the Villa Lorna project. Description of On-site Project Constraints: It is not financially feasible to provide affordable housing on-site and it would be difficult to integrate the affordable units. . WORKSHEET ASSESSil-/ENT CONCLUSION (Check appropriate box) DOES NOT SUPPORTS ASSESStl!ENT CRITERIA SUPPORT IlVCONCL USIVE OFF-SITE OFF-SITE PROPOSAL PROPOSAL 1. FeasibilitY of the On-site Pro12osal. a. Are there significant feasibility issues due to factors such as project size, site constraints, amount and availability of required subsidy, and competition from multiple projects that make an on-site option impractical? Brief Narrative: b. Will an affordable housing product be difficult to integrate into the proposed market development because of significant price and product type disparity? Brief Narrative: c. Does the on-site development entity have the capacity to deliver the proposed affordable housing on-site? Brief Narrative: 2. Relative Advantages/Disadvantages of the Off-site Proposal. a. Does the off-site option offer greater feasibility and cost effectiveness than the on-site alternative, particularly regarding potential local public assistance? WORKSHEET ASSESSJlfENT CONCLUSION (Check appropriate box) DOES NOT SUPPORTS ASSESSi\JENT CRITERIA SUPPORT If\"CONCL USIVE OFF-SITE OFF-SITE PROPOSAL PROPOSAL Brief Narrative: b. Does the off-site proposal have location advantages over the on-site alternative, such as proximity to jobs, schools, transportation, services; less impact on other existing developments, etc.? Brief Narrative: c. Does the off-site option offer a development entity with the capacity to deliver the proposed project? Brief Narrative: d. Does the off-site option satisfy multiple developer obligations that would be difficult to satisfy with multiple projects? Brief Narrative: 3. Advancing Housing Goals and Strate~~:v a. Does the off-site proposal advance and/or support City housing goals and policies expressed in the Housing Element. CHAS and Inclusionary Housing Ordinance? Brief Narrative: ' .. DOES NOT SUPPORTS SUPPORT OFF-SITE INCONCLUSIVE OFF-SITE S UJ}f!'rL4R Y PROPOSAL PROPOSAL Date Considered bv Review Committee: Review Committee Action: Action: From: To: Date: Subject: Hi Corey, "Tom Eagling" <teagling@pascoeng.com> "'Corey Funk'" <Cfunk@ci.carlsbad.ca.us> 10/17/2006 3:43:33 PM Tabata Hillside Development Permit Exhibit I've worked out the grading volumes for the HDP Exhibit. The proposed grading is larger than I originally told you over the phone, because I used the proposed cut volume rather than proposed fill (which is larger), however this has been corrected. Using the proposed fill volume alone, we are still in the acceptable range. When considering the remedial grading as well, we are kicked into the unacceptable range. The numbers are as follows: VOLUME OF CUT (PER GRADING PLAN): 34,000 CY VOLUME OF FILL (PER GRADING PLAN): 55,350 CY VOLUME OF REMEDIAL GRADING (PER GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION): -70,000 CY TOTAL GRADED AREA: 433,397 SF (9.9 AC) (55,350+70,000) CY I 9.9 AC = 12,662 CY/ACRE Please let me know your thoughts on this issue. Thanks, Tom Eagling Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N. Highway 101, Ste. A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259-8212 x110 These electronic files are non-certified recordings of documents prepared by Pasco Engineering, Inc. These files are provided only for the convenience I August 16, 2006 Tabata Family P.O. Box 679 CaMsbad, CA 92018 e City of M CUltd t3j2tf{CV. e Carlsbad l:tJFihhi.J~I•J§.fiiii•i§UI SUBJECT: GPA 06-04/LCPA 06-02/ZC 06-03/CT 06-13/SUP 06-08/CDP 06-19-TABATA 10 Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department has reviewed your General Plan Amendment, Local Costal Program Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Special Use Permit, and Coastal Development Permit, applications no. GPA 06-04/LCPA 06-02/ZC 06-03/CT 06-13/SUP 06-08/CDP 06-19, as to their completeness for processing. The application is incomplete, as submitted. Attached are two lists. The first list is information which must be submitted to complete your application. This list of items must be submitted directly to your staff planner by appointment. All list items must be submitted simultaneously and a copy of this list must be included with your submittals, including five (5) sets of plans. No processing of your application can occur until the application is determined to be complete. The second list is issues of concern to staff. When all required materials are submitted the City has 30 days to make a determination of completeness. If the application is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the application will be initiated. In addition, please note that you have six months from the date the application was initially filed, July 17, 2006, to either resubmit the application or submit the required information. Failure to resubmit the application or to submit the materials necessary to determine your application complete shall be deemed to constitute withdrawal of the application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new application must be submitted. Please contact your staff planner, Corey Funk, at (760) 602-4645, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. [I~ DON NEU Assistant Planning Director DN:CF:bd c: Gary Barberio, Team Leader Clyde Wickham, Project Engineer File Copy Data Entry Jim Boeker, Pasco Engineering, 535 N. HWY 101, Ste. A, Solana Beach, CA 92075 Enclosure 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us (!} GPA 06-04/LCPA 06-02/Zci6-03/CT 06-13/SUP 06-08/CDP 06-19,TABATA 10 August 16, 2006 Pa e 2 I-LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION Planning: 1. Slope conditions on the project site meet the criteria for a Hillside Development Permit (CMC Sec. 21.95.030). Please submit the application materials necessary for a Hillside Development Permit. 2. Please submit a preliminary vegetation assessment letter that identifies the amount (acreage) and type of vegetation on the project site, including the area affected by the widening of Camino Hills Drive. 3. Please show all existing topographic contours and structures located within 100 feet of the projeCt site. This information should show pad elevations of the homes adjacent to the project site. 4. Please show all major vegetation within 100 feet of the project site. 5. Please provide the proposed street grade percentages. 6. Please post the infill project notice sign at the project site pursuant to Planning Department Policy No. 37. A copy of Policy No. 37 has been attached to this letter for your reference. 7. Please provide the following information on Sheet 1 of the plans: a. Property owner name and address b. Project name and number c. Project site address Engineering: 1. We have reviewed the Preliminary Drainage Study submitted with the application and have some concerns about the existing development and the basin capacity in an existing condition. The pre-development condition appears to have been overlooked with respect to the basin for which this project is part of. The existing system inlets and downstream outlets need to be reviewed for ultimate capacity in a fully developed condition. A Basin Exhibit with nodes and separate sub-basins should be provided to address time of concentration and capacity of system (and mitig~tion if necessary) considering the detention basin proposed. The report submitted has information from 1253 Urania Ave., (Encinitas) that should be removed. Downstream receiving storm drain (existing storm drain and existing catch basins) should be shown and accounted for. Adjacent reports or calculations should be reviewed and incorporated to consider the total picture of development. References on page 1.6 includes City of Encinitas criteria that is not related to this project. 2. Please list the CT number, CT 06-05, and all other applications associated with this development on sheet 1 of the TM I site plan. 3. Please show the adjacent subdivision information, lot numbers, and pad elevations adjacent to and within 1 00 feet of this project . ' -• GPA 06-04/LCPA 06-02/Z~6-03/CT 06-13/SUP 06-08/CDP 06-19,TABATA 10 August 16, 2006 Pa e 3 ,_ 4. Provide a preliminary storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) that identifies "pollutants of concern" that could be generated by this type of project The preliminary SWPPP shall address what structural and non-structural best management practices BMP's are (or will be) implemented to capture and treat storm runoff (and pollutants generated by this development) to ensure compliance with new NPDES regulations. A storm water pollution control basin (at least 1) will be required with this project Provide calculations to prove the size of basin is adequate for the project of this size. It appears that the basin is required to filter and detain runoff. ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: Grading and Site Design: 1. Lot 14 does not provide the minimum requirement of 7,500 square foot for the R-1 Zoning District and must be revised (CMC. Sec. 21.1 0.090.8). 2. Consistent with Item 5 of City Council Policy No. 66 -Livable Neighborhoods, please add a pedestrian connection to El Camino Real from the northernmost point of Camino Hills Drive (see redlines). 3. The plans do not clearly show the existing topography, which appears faint and difficult to read. Please increase the clarity of the existing topography on the plans. 4. Staff has strong concerns that the proposed fill grading is excessive along the eastern property line. Excessive fill that allows future development to impact the neighbors on the east should be avoided. Please lower these pad elevations so they are significantly closer to the existing topography. 5. Please clearly show the toe-of-slope compared to the proposed grading along the manufactured slope that exists on the south and east property boundaries. The proposed grading can not alter the existing manufactured slope with cut or fill in excess of six vertical feet, according to CMC Sec. 21.95.120.C.a.i. 6. Staff has strong concerns that contour grading is necessary to create a more natural appearance with the proposed sound berm (EI Camino Real Corridor Development Standards, pg. 1). Please incorporate 2:1 and 3:1 grade and height'\tariations to create undulations in the peak and face of the berm that will obtain a more "natural" looking appearance. 7. Staff strongly suggests grading the sound berm so it blends with the adjacent slopes to the east and west side of the project site in order to create a continuous slope as viewed from El Camino Real. As shown, the grading stops at the property lines and will create an unnatural transition. Please contact the neighboring property owners regarding the connection of this off-site grading. 8. Please continue the sound berm to the western property line along El Camino Real, with the exception of an area for a pedestrian connection (see redlines). GPA 06-04/LCPA 06-02/Z~6-03/CT 06-13/SUP 06-08/CDP 06-19,TABATA 10 August 16, 2006 Pa e4 I· 9. Please identify the grading volume per acre using the method described in CMC Sec. 21.95.120.D.3. 10. Please revise the Slope Analysis so it is consistent with the Hillside Mapping Procedures listed in CMC Sec. 21.95.110. Landscaping 11. Staff suggests leaving the majority of the flat green belt area west of the sound berm (not including the peak of the berm) relatively free of trees to provide an open turf area (see landscape plan redlines). 12. Please revise the landscape plan to show the London Plain tree as the street tree along El Camino Real (EI Camino Real Corridor Development Standards, pg. 2). 13. On the Landscape Plan General Notes, please separate the data for the percent of the site to be landscaped to show existing, proposed and total landscape area. 14. On the Landscape Plan, please clearly identify the vegetation that will be protected in place and that which will be removed for the project. 15. Additional conceptual landscape plan review comments are included as an attachment to this letter. Genera/Items 16. How does this project propose to comply with the City of Carlsbad requirements for inclusionary housing (CMC Chapter 21.85)? Staff calculated the inclusionary requirement for this project as the following: 4 on-site or 5 off-site affordable dwelling units. Staff suggests contacting Debbie Fountain (760-434-2935) at the City of Carlsbad Housing and Redevelopment Department to discuss options for meeting the inclusionary housing requirements. 17. Consistent with the recommendations of the Environmental Site Assessment report prepared by Vinje & Middleton Engineering, Inc. (dated 4/27/06), please submit the results of a soil sample assessment for evaluation of agricultural chemicals. In addition to the area that was farmed, this analysis should also include soil samples of the ground underneath the diesel storage tank. 18. Be advised that a condition of approval will be added to this project requiring an asbestos assessment of the existing residence prior to its demolition. Other conditions may be necessary based on the recommendations of the submitted documents including the noise study and the Environmental Site Assessment. 19. Please provide the depth-to-width ratio for the proposed lots consistent with CMC Sec. 20.16.01 0.8. 20. Please clarify the number of lots proposed, as 26 are shown on the plans and 28 are listed in the General Notes. 21. Under the General Notes on Sheet 1, the proposed zoning should be R-1 instead of RLM. -,, ·. _, GPA 06-04/LCPA 06-02/Z~6-03/CT 06-13/SUP 06-08/CDP 06-1*ABATA 10 August 16, 2006 Pa e 5 ! . 22. The Early Public Notice mailing labels submitted with this project application does not include the 1 00' radius occupant list required for Coastal Development Permits. For Early Public Notice requirements, please visit: http://www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us/planning/reviewdocspdf/earlypublicnotice.pdf 23. The Hazardous Waste and Substances Statement form is incomplete. Please inquire with staff about the items missing from this form. 24. Please provide area of the site that is undevelopable per CMC Sec. 21.53.230, or state if this section is not applicable. 25. Is fencing proposed for the site? Engineering: 1. The legal description is confusing please add the CT number of the Map 2481. 2. Please show existing and proposed improvements to complete El Camino Real (including Paving, median, sidewalk and landscaping). Show existing and proposed improvements to Camino Hills Drive. The adjacent subdivision (DWG 245-1) shows a 60' RIW with a 40' Curb to Curb distance. Show paving, sidewalk, curb, gutter, parkway and landscaping. 3. Show existing and proposed_ street grades on Camino Hills Drive and proposed internal streets. Check GS-9 for special cross gutters with steep street conditions. 4. Sewer, water (include pressure zone) and utility services must be shown. Cleanouts and meter locations should not be located in driveways. A typical section and a note will address the portions not shown at this time (driveways and proposed lot services, cleanouts and meters. The proposed sewer system is confusing. It appears that 2 systems would be a better design to reduce pipe and flow downhill to the existing (not shown clearly) system. Show access holes and main locations per City Standards. 5. Please include the proposed Utilities for street cross sections (sheet 2). This is an effort to look ahead to conflict with meter boxes, SDG&E, as well as phone and cable TV locations. Sewer, water and storm drain systems should be located per City Std. GS-6 and 6A. Note Camino Hills Drive will be 60'RIW with a 40' curb to curt} distance. 6. The proposed slope along the south and east sides is missing a brow ditch (San Diego Regional Std. D-75). The slope above Lot 5 as shown would be 50' which requires a bench, please check City Standards for the proposed design. The proposal grading increases the existing slope condition and exceeds the maximum height limit of 40' for manufactured slopes established by CMC Sec. 21.95.120.E.