The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutGPA 06-09; Muroya Subdivision; General Plan Amendment (GPA) (2)---- - -------Prepared for: - Prepared by: - • - -- Phase II Environmental Site Assessment f ·, t 7 :1 '; 1 Muroya Growers CITY OF CARLSBAD APN 215-040-03 PLANNING DEPT 6697 Black Rail Road· Carlsbad, California Taylor Woodrow Homes 16745 West Bernardo Drive, Suite 140 San Diego, California 92127 DUDEK Engineering + Environmental 605 Third Street Encinitas, CA 92024 ~ Glenna McMahon nv:nmei: En;: April2006 -------------------- • • • .. Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 1 2. INTRODUCTION .......................................................•............................................................................ 2 2.1. ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE AND SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION ......................................................... 2 3. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ................................................................•..................................•.... 2 4. PHASE II ACTIVITIES ..............................................................•......................................................•.... 3 4.1 TPH SOIL SAMPLING ........................................................................................................................... 4 4.2 PESTICIDE SOIL SAMPLING .................................................................................................................. 4 5. PHASE II DATA EVALUATION .......................................................................................................... 5 5.1 TPH SOIL SAMPLING ........................................................................................................................... 5 5.2. PESTICIDE SOIL SAMPLING ................................................................................................................. 6 6. CONCLUSIONS ...............................................................................................................•....................... 7 7. LIMITATIONS ........................................................................................................................................ 7 Phase II Environmental Site Assessment 6697 Black Rail Road Carlsbad, California ii 5089-1 DUDEK April 2006 IIIII - ---- ------------ .. • • List of Figures Vicinity Map Site Map Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Soil Sample Locations -Diesel AST Pesticide Soil Sample Locations List of Tables TPH Soil Sample Data Table 1 Table 2 Organochlorine Pesticide Soil Sample Data List of Appendices Appendix A Laboratory Analytical Data Phase II Environmental Site Assessment 6697 Black Rail Road Carlsbad, California 111 5089-1 DUDEK April2006 - -------------------- -IIIII • - -- 1. Executive Summary DUDEK Engineering & Environmental (Dudek) conducted this Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for the property located at 6697 Black Rail Road in Carlsbad, California (subject property, Figure 1) in order to further investigate the recognized environmental conditions noted in the Phase I ESA (April 2006 Phase I ESA prepared by Dudek). The Phase I ESA identified records that indicated that the site may have been used for agriculture prior to its current use as a nursery. Findings of the Phase I also included the use of pesticides on site, as well as storage and use of diesel fuel. There was indication that runoff containing pesticides from surrounding properties may have impacted the subject property (Figure 2). Based on this information, Dudek recommended that a Phase II ESA be performed at the subject property. The objectives of the Phase II investigation were to: 1) determine if diesel is present in the soil beneath the aboveground storage tank (AST) and 2) to determine if pesticides are present in the soil due to former and current use of the site for agriculture and potential impact from surrounding properties. Dudek collected five soil samples at two locations adjacent to the AST for total petroleum hydrocarbon analysis (TPH; Figure 3). The soil samples were collected at two feet below ground surface (bgs) and four feet bgs at each of the locations. One sample was collected at 1-3 inches bgs at one of the locations. TPH soil samples were analyzed by D-TEK Analytical Laboratories, Inc. in San Diego, CA by Modified EPA Method 8015M. None ofthe eight soil samples had detectable concentrations ofTPH diesel. One sample contained concentrations ofhydrocarbons in the motor oil range. This sample was collected at a depth of approximately 1-3 inches bgs under the nozzle of the diesel AST, and had a concentration of 10,520 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) motor oil. However, the two and four foot samples at that location did not have detectable concentrations of motor oil or diesel. Based on Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Region IV guidance, soils which are between 20 and 150 feet above groundwater and have TPH concentrations above 1,000 mg/kg should be remediated. Based on these findings and those of the Phase I ESA, no further assessment is recommended for TPH. Dudek does recommend that the visibly stained soil be dug out and properly disposed of prior to making any modifications in this area of the subject site. Dudek collected eight soil samples from throughout the palm tree nursery for pesticides analysis (Figure 4). The soil samples were sent to D-TEK to be analyzed for organochlorine pesticides by EPA Method 8081A. All eight soil samples had detectable concentrations of organochlorine pesticides. Based of the analytical results, none of the samples contained concentrations greater than the US EPA Region IX's Residential Preliminary Remediation Goals (PRGs) or the Cal/EP A California Human Health Screening Levels (CHHSLs). PRGs and CHHSLs are established based on the theoretical de minimis cancer risk (one in a million increased risk) for contaminants that are considered carcinogenic. PRGs use USEP A toxicity factors, whereas CHHSLs use Phase II Environmental Site Assessment 6697 Black Rail Road Carlsbad, California 5089-1 DUDEK April2006 ----------------.. .. • -----.. • • -.. Cal/EP A toxicity factors if available. By comparison of the pesticide concentrations to the PRGs and CHHSLs, the long term cancer risk is less than one in a million. Based on these findings and those of the Phase I ESA, no further assessment is recommended for pesticides. 2. Introduction This Phase II ESA was performed according to the guidelines stipulated in the American Society for Testing and Materials Standard E 1903-97, "Standard Guide for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Process". The subject property is located at 6697 Black Rail Road in Carlsbad, California and has been used as an agricultural nursery, a residence, and open space. 2.1. Assessment Procedure and Scope of Investigation Phase II ESAs evaluate the recognized environmental conditions identified in the Phase I ESA for the purpose of providing sufficient information regarding the nature and extent of contamination to assist in making informed business decisions about the property. The Phase I ESA identified that the site was used for agriculture and that pesticides were used on the subject property. Although the type of pesticides formerly applied on the site are not known, organochlorine pesticides were used on the adjacent properties, from which storm water runoff flows onto the subject property. Additionally, chemical storage on the property has included an aboveground diesel storage tank. Staining was observed on the tank near the dispenser connection, indicating that diesel has leaked from the tank. Therefore, there is potential for contamination associated with the diesel tank. Based on this information, Dudek recommended that a Phase II ESA be performed at the subject property. The objectives of the Phase II investigation were to: 1) determine if aboveground storage of diesel caused contamination of soil on the subject property and 2) to determine if pesticides are present in the soil due to use of the site and adjacent sites for agriculture. 3. Background Information The subject property is an approximately 19 acre parcel located west of Black Rail Road in Carlsbad, California (Figure 1 ). The address for the nursery, which occupies approximately half of the subject property, is 6697 Black Rail Road in Carlsbad, California. The APN for the subject property is 215-040-03. Structures on the property include a residence, a maintenance building, and a small shack. The topography of subject property generally slopes from the north to the south and from east to west. The northeastern and eastern portions of the site are relatively flat, while Phase II Environmental Site Assessment 6697 Black Rail Road Carlsbad, California 2 5089-1 DUDEK April2006 -------- --------------------.. • -.. -- drainages with topographic depressions are located in the southwest portion of the property. The elevation of the subject property is approximately 300 feet above mean sea level. The surrounding area to the north and east slopes toward the subject property. The subject property is located north ofBatiquitos Lagoon. No surface water was observed on the subject property during the site reconnaissance. Based on a site investigation performed on the site to the north of the subject property, the depth to groundwater in the vicinity of the site is 46 feet below ground surface. The subject property was undeveloped until the mid-to late-1950s or early-1960s when it was cleared and possibly used for agriculture purposes (the 1963 aerial photograph shows a portion of the site as graded land, possibly used as a field). The current owner stated that the site was vacant when they purchased it in 1973. In the 1970s, the owners grew potted plants and ground cover on approximately half of the subject property. In 1980 they began to grow palm trees and phased out the potted plants and ground cover. Currently two pounds per month of a fungicide, weedkiller, and oil spray are used for the potted palm trees. More pesticides were used in the past for the potted plants and ground cover, but the amounts and types were not recorded. The owner stated they did not use DDT on the site. One aboveground 500-gallon diesel storage tank was observed during the site reconnaissance, south of the maintenance building. This tank replaced two former aboveground diesel tanks formerly located in the same area. Those two tanks were removed approximately 10 years ago. No stained soil was observed in this area during the site reconnaissance; however, staining was observed on the tank near the dispenser connection. Due to these historical activities, the identified potential environmental concerns at the site are the potential release of petroleum products to the soil and residual pesticides in soil resulting from historical agricultural activities. 4. Phase II Activities The objectives ofthe Phase II investigation were to: 1) determine if diesel-contaminated soil is present beneath the aboveground storage tank (AST) and 2) to determine if pesticides are present in the soil due to former and current use of the site and surrounding sites for agriculture. Dudek accomplished this by 1) collecting soil samples from the surface, two and four feet bgs to determine iftotal petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) in the diesel range were present in the soil and 2) collecting and analyzing shallow soil samples for pesticides . Phase II Environmental Site Assessment 6697 Black Rail Road Carlsbad, California 3 5089-1 DUDEK April2006 -.. .. -.. - --------------.. .. .. .. 4.1 TPH Soil Sampling Dudek collected five soil samples at two locations adjacent to the AST for TPH diesel analysis on April 19, 2006 (Figure 3). The samples were collected from underneath the dispenser and from under the middle of the tank. Visibly stained soil was observed on the ground surface under a piece of wood located under the dispenser. Additionally, Dudek noticed that the tank was tilted slightly from back to front, toward the dispenser. Soil sampling for TPH was conducted by Torin Snyder ofDudek. Four of the five soil samples were collected using a hand auger. Soil collected using the hand auger was placed in glass jars, which were labeled, placed in Ziploc bags, and placed in a cooler on ice. The surface soil sample was collected using a clean, dedicated hand trowel. The soil was also placed in a glass jar, which was labeled, placed in a Ziploc bag, and placed in a cooler on ice. A chain-of-custody record was filled out with the sample identifiers and sample time. The hand auger was decontaminated in between sample collection by washing it using water and alconox and then rinsing it using water. The decontamination water was stored on site in a labeled bucket. Following receipt of the soil sample analysis for which TPH diesel was not detected, the water was discarded. The sample cooler was sent to D-TEK Laboratory via Fed-Ex. The TPH soil samples were analyzed by Modified EPA Method 8015M (diesel) (Table 2; Appendix A). The sample results and quality control are discussed in Section 5.1. 4.2 Pesticide Soil Sampling Based on the aerial photograph review, approximately half the site (eight or nine acres) has been used for agriculture back to the 1960s or early 1970s. Based on the interview with the current owner, pesticides were used on the property; however, the owner could not remember the types or quantities of pesticides used. However, she did state that DDT was not used on the subject property. Based on a review of County of San Diego closure letters for two sites located just north and northeast of the subject property, chlorinated pesticides were used at those adjacent sites. Concentrations of the chlorinated pesticides DDT, toxaphene, endosulfan, and dieldrin were detected in the soil. Concentrations of toxaphene exceeded the EPA PRGs and the CHHSLs for the residential scenario. At both sites, the upper one foot of soil was removed from the site and placed at least five feet below ground surface under the streets Corte Orchildia and Sito Cedrela during development of the residential neighborhoods. During the Phase I ESA, Dudek noted that the topography of the site and surrounding area is such that runoff from these neighboring properties may have run across the subject site, toward the canyon, thus having an impact on the subject site . Phase II Environmental Site Assessment 6697 Black Rail Road Carlsbad, California 4 5089-1 DUDEK April 2006 --.. -- • • • ---------------- 111111!11 .. -• Organochlorine pesticides, such as DDT, were commonly used in the 1940s through the 1960s. Organophosphorus pesticides have commonly been used since the 1970s or 1980s. Organochlorine pesticides are persistent in the environment and are not very mobile. Organochlorine pesticides are large molecules with a low water solubility and high potential for sorption on soils. Therefore they tend not to migrate downward like other chemicals with higher solubility and lower affinity for soil. Therefore, concentrations of organochlorine pesticides are generally expected to be greatest in the shallow soils . Organophosphorus pesticides are not persistent in the environment. Concentrations of organophosphorus pesticides are often non-detectable within a year of application. If organophosphorus pesticides were used on the site several years ago, it is not likely that they remain in the soil at concentrations above the regulatory limits. Therefore, Dudek did not analyze the samples for organophosphorus pesticides. On April 19, 2006, Dudek collected eight soil samples from approximately four to six inches bgs uniformly throughout the agricultural areas and some key drainage areas of the subject property. Samples from this depth interval are representative of surface soils at this site. The sample locations are shown on Figure 4. Soil samples were collected using disposable hand trowels. A hand trowel was used to excavate a few inches of soil and then place the soil into 4 ounce glass jars. The glass jars were labeled, taped, and placed in a cooler on ice. A chain-of-custody record was filled out with the sample identifiers and sample time. The cooler was sent to D-TEK Laboratory via FedEx on April 19, 2006. The samples were analyzed by D-Tek for organochlorine pesticides by EPA Method 8081A. The sample results and quality control are discussed in Section 5.2. 5. Phase II Data Evaluation 5.1 TPH Soil Sampling Dudek collected five soil samples at two locations adjacent to the AST for TPH analysis (Figure 3). The TPH soil sampling data is summarized in Table 1. TPH was not detected above the detection limit of 10 mg!kg in any of the samples collected on April 19, 2006. Sample MS-11-1" was collected in an area of stained soil, at a depth of approximately 1- 3 inches bgs underneath the nozzle ofthe diesel AST. While sample MS-11-1" did not contain TPH-diesel (C 10-C23) above the detection limit, the lab did report that the sample contained hydrocarbons in the motor oil range (C10-C44) at a concentration of 10,520 mg/kg. Based on RWQCB Region IV guidance (Interim Site Assessment & Cleanup Guidebook, May 1996. RWQCB Region IV), soils which are between 20 and 150 feet above groundwater and have TPH concentrations above 1,000 mg/kg should be remediated. While there is no specified action level for motor oil, Dudek recommends removing the stained soil and properly disposing it. Phase II Environmental Site Assessment 6697 Black Rail Road Carlsbad, California 5 5089-1 DUDEK April2006 - .. ---- -------------- 1!11111 • -- As part of the laboratory quality control, a laboratory control sample was spiked with diesel. The percent recovery of the spike concentration for diesel was within the acceptable limits established by the laboratory. A matrix spike duplicate was also analyzed. The relative percent difference (RPD) between the sample result and the duplicate result was 5% for diesel. No acceptable limits for RPD were provided by the lab (Appendix A). 5. 2. Pesticide Soil Sampling The pesticide soil sampling data is summarized in Table 2. 4,4' -DDD was detected in five of the eight samples at concentrations ranging from 7.2 micrograms per kilogram (f.lg/kg) to 58 f.lg/kg (Table 2). 4,4' -DDE was detected in seven of the eight samples at concentrations ranging from 0.5 f.lg/kg to 134 f.lg/kg. 4,4' -DDT was detected in five of the eight samples at concentrations ranging from 10 f.lg/kg to 83 f.lg/kg. Alpha-chlordane was detected in three samples at concentrations ranging from 0.65 f.lg/kg to 2.4 f.lg/kg. Gamma-chlordane was detected in three samples at concentrations ranging from 0.55 f.lg/kg to 2.4 f.lg/kg. The laboratory reports are included in Appendix A. The US EPA Region IX has published Preliminary Remediation Goals (PRGs). The Cal/EPA has published California Human Health Screening Levels (CHHSLs). Both PRGs and CHHSLs have been established based on the theoretical de minimis cancer risk (one in a million increased risk) for contaminants that are considered carcinogenic. The residential PRG for both DDE and DDT is 1, 700 f.lg/kg. The residential CHHSLs for both DDE and DDT is 1,600 f.lg/kg. The highest concentrations ofDDE and DDT on the subject property were 134 f.lg/kg and 83 f.lg/kg, respectively. Both of these concentrations are orders of magnitude below the residential PRG and CHHSL. The residential PRG for DDD is 2,400 f.lg/kg. The residential CHHSL for DDD is 2,300 f.lg/kg. The highest concentration ofDDD on the subject property was 58 f.lg/kg, which was also below the residential PRG and residential CHHSLs. The residential PRG for technical chlordane or alpha-and gamma-chlordane is 1 ,600 f.lg/kg. There is no CHHSL established for chlordane. The highest concentrations of alpha-chlordane and gamma- chlordane on the subject property was 2.4 f.tg/kg for each, for a total of 4.8 f.lg/kg, which is below the residential PRG. Based on comparison of these results to the PRGs and CHHSLs, and the proposed residential use ofthe subject property, the DDD, DDE, DDT, and chlordane concentrations detected on the subject property do not pose an increased cancer risk greater than one in a million. As part of the quality control of the laboratory analyses for organochlorine pesticides, lindane, heptachlor, aldrin, dieldrin, endrin, and 4,4' -DDT were added as surrogates to each sample at known concentrations for the EPA Method 8081A analysis. All of the percent recovery results were within the quality control limits set for each compound (Appendix A). Phase II Environmental Site Assessment 6697 Black Rail Road Carlsbad, California 6 5089-1 DUDEK April2006 ----------• .. IIIII - • IIIII A laboratory control sample was spiked with the surrogate pesticides. The percent recovery of the spike concentration for each compound was within the acceptable limits established by the laboratory. A matrix spike duplicate was analyzed for lindane, heptachlor, aldrin, dieldrin, endrin, and 4,4' -DDT. The RPD between the sample results and the duplicate results were between 0% and 11% (Appendix A). 6. Conclusions Dudek conducted this Phase II ESA in order to further investigate the recognized environmental conditions noted in the Phase I ESA (April 2006 Phase I ESA prepared by Dudek). The Phase I ESA identified records that indicated that the site may have been used for agriculture prior to its current use as a nursery. Findings of the Phase I also included the use of pesticides on site, as well as storage and use of diesel fuel. There was indication that runoff containing pesticides from surrounding properties may have impacted the subject property. Based on this information, Dudek recommended that a Phase II ESA be performed at the subject property. The objectives of the Phase II investigation were to: 1) determine if diesel is present in the soil or beneath the AST and 2) to determine if pesticides are present in the soil due to former and current use of the site for agriculture and potential impact from surrounding properties. Dudek collected five soil samples at two locations adjacent to the AST for TPH analysis. The soil samples were collected at two feet bgs and four feet bgs at each of the two locations. In one of the locations a sample was collected within a few inches of the ground surface. None of the soil samples had detectable concentrations ofTPH diesel. One of the samples-the surface sample-had a detection of hydrocarbons in the motor oil range. This sample was located approximately 1-3 inches bgs under the nozzle of the diesel AST. The concentration was 10,520 mg/kg motor oil. Dudek recommends that the visibly stained soil be dug out and properly disposed of prior to making any modifications in this area ofthe subject site. Dudek collected eight soil samples from throughout the palm tree nursery for pesticides analysis. All eight soil samples had detectable concentrations of organochlorine pesticides. However, none of the samples contained concentrations greater than the US EPA Region IX's Residential PRGs or Cal/EPA Residential CHHSLs. Therefore, the long term cancer risk is less than one in a million based on the pesticide concentrations on the subject property . Based on these findings and those of the Phase I ESA, no further assessment is recommended for pesticides. 7. Limitations The findings and conclusions presented in this report are professional opinions based solely upon the indicated data described in this report, visual observations of the site and Phase II Environmental Site Assessment 6697 Black Rail Road Carlsbad, California 7 5089-1 DUDEK April2006 - , .. 1111!11 .. ... 1111!11 • 1111111 .. vicinity and our interpretation of the available historical information and documents reviewed. Dudek makes no warranty as to the accuracy of statements made by others or the accuracy of information included in documentation reviewed in connection with this study. It should be recognized that this study was not intended to be a definitive investigation of potential contamination at the site and that the recommendations do not necessarily include all conditions that may be present. Because the scope ofthe investigation was limited, it is possible that currently unrecognized conditions or contamination might exist at the site. No warranties or guarantees or representations, expressed or implied, are made by Dudek, except that this report has been prepared in accordance with current generally accepted practices and standards consistent with the level of care and skill exercised under similar circumstances by other professionals performing the same or similar services. The conclusions are intended exclusively for the purpose outlined herein and may not be suitable to satisfy the needs of other users. Thus, any use or reuse of this document is at the sole risk of said user. Phase II Environmental Site Assessment 6697 Black Rail Road Carlsbad, California 8 5089-1 DUDEK April2006 .... • "'Il • .. .. .. IIIII 111111!1 IIIII 111111!1 IIIII .. .. ----------- IIIII 1111111 .. ... ---... IIIII 'Ill! IIIII Muroya Phase II IIIII Carlsbad, CA • TABLE 1 Soil Sampling Data Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (milligrams per kilogram) SAMPLEID TPHDIESEL MS-9-2' <10 MS-9-4' <10 MS-10-2' <10 MS-10-4' <10 MS-11-1 II <10 5089-02 DUDEK I. I I I I I I I I J a J I I L-t • .• IIi • & J I J a J a J a I l. J l J I i i DETECTION US EPA LIMIT PRG ANALYTE (ug/kg) (f.lg/kg) 4,4'-DDD 0.5 2,400 4,4'-DDE 0.5 1,700 4,4'-DDT 0.4 1,700 Aldrin 0.2 Alpha-BHC 0.6 Beta-BHC 0.6 Gamma-BHC 0.3 Delta-BHC 0.6 Alpha-chlordane 0.5 1,600* Gamma-chlordane 0.5 Dieldrin 0.3 Endosulfan I 0.3 Endosulfan II 0.5 Endosulfan Sulfate 0.4 Endrin 0.4 Endrin Aldehyde 0.5 Endrin Ketone 0.5 . Heptachlor 0.2 Heptachlor Epoxide 0.3 Methoxychlor 12 Toxaphene 25 TABLE2 Soil Sampling Data Organochlorine Pesticides (micrograms per kilogram) US EPA CHHSLs (f.lg/kg) MS-1 MS-2 2,300 23.4 22.2 1,600 56 46.4 1,600 45 25.4 <0.2 <0.2 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.3 <0.3 <0.6 <0.6 0.7 <0.5 0.64 <0.5 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.5 <0.5 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.2 <0.2 <0.3 <0.3 <12 <12 <25 <25 * PRG for technical Chlordane, which is the total of alpha-and gamma-chlordane. Muroya Phase II Carlsbad, CA MS-3 MS-4 MS-5 41 7.2 <0.5 96 15.6 0.5 63 10 <0.4 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <12 <12 <12 <25 <25 <25 MS-6 58 134 83 <0.2 <0.6 <0.6 <0.3 <0.6 2.4 2.4 <0.3 <0.3 <0.5 <0.4 <0.4 <0.5 <0.5 <0.2 <0.3 <12 <25 MS-7 <0.5 <0.5 <0.4 <0.2 <0.6 <0.6 <0.3 <0.6 0.65 0.55 <0.3 <0.3 <0.5 <0.4 <0.4 <0.5 <0.5 <0.2 <0.3 <12 <25 MS-8 <0.5 1.0 <0.4 <0.2 <0.6 <0.6 <0.3 <0.6 <0.5 <0.5 <0.3 <0.3 <0.5 <0.4 <0.4 <0.5 <0.5 <0.2 <0.3 <12 <25 5089-02 DUDEK ------- - - -.. • • • .. IIIII IIIII Muroya Growers Black Rail Road Carlsbad, CA )> 3: )> r , •J-< tJ ;o &f!~ (qtq G'u~ OJ OJ'-1 C)- Om z.r ~>: m CAM IN() \IJDA f,l.OBLE 0 .2 q : ALGA RD ~cz IJ.J ... ·\'"0,. q •-? 5 <). u:f ~ f{} Figure 1 Vicinity Map SOURCE: GOOGLE MAPS SITE MAP MUROY A GROWERS CARLSBAD, CA FIGURE2 DUDEK LEGEND MS-9-2', MS-9-4' and MS-11-1" MS-1 0-2' and MS-1 0-4' L MS-1~-2' and J MS-10-4' TPH SAMPLE LOCATION AND ID TPH SOIL SAMPLE DATA MUROY A GROWERS CARLSBAD. CA Diesel Dispenser Above Ground Diesel Tank FIGURE 3 DUDEK SOURCE: GOOGLE MAPS 0 SAMPLE LOCATION AND 10 ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDE SOIL SAMPLE DATA MUROY A GROWERS CARLSBAD, CA FIGURE4 DUDEK ------ ... IIIII IIIII - ------- IIIII .. • APPENDIX A D-TEK Analytical Laboratories, Inc. Report - - - --------- ---------- D-TEK Analytical Laboratories, Inc. 9020 Kcnamar Drive, Suite 205 San Diego. CA 92121 (858) 566-4540 FAX (858) 566-4542 DUDEK & ASSOCIATES, INC. 605 3~0 Street Encinitas, CA 92024 Attn: Ms. Nicole Peacock Date of Report: Sampling Date: Date Sample Received: Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Analyzed By: Project Name: Pro,ject Nmnber: Method: Sample Type: Log Number: 4/24/06 4/l9/06 4/20/06 4/20/06 April 21, 2006 EA Muroya Property .Phase 11 5089~02 EPA 8081A Soil 06-2666 to 06-2673 The sample(s) were analyzed with EPA methodology or equivalent metltods as specified on the attached "Analyses Results" •·eport. The symbol for "Jess than" indicates a value below the re1>ortable detection limit. The results of these analyses and the quality control data are enclosed. ~-U:._- EIIen Atienza 0 Operations Manager ---------... .... .. - --- D-TEK Analytical Laboratories, Inc. 9020 Kenamar :Orivc, Suite 205 San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 566-4540 FAX (858) 566-4542 DUDEK c.t:: ASSOCIATES, INC. 605 3nn Street Encinitas, CA 92024 Attn~ Ms. Nicole Peacock Date of Report: Sampling Date: Date Sample Received: Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Analyzed By: Project Name: Project Number: Method: Sample Type~ Log Number: 4/24/06 411.9/06 4/20/06 4/20/06 April21, 2006 EA Muroya Property Phase 11 5089-02 OHS LUFT (TPH-Diesel) Soil 06-2674 to 06-2678 The sample(s) were analyzed with EPA methodology or equivalent methods as specified on the attached "Analyses Result.."" report. The symbol for "less than" indicates a value below the reportable detectjon limit. The results of these analyses and the quality control data are enclosed. E!b~~ Ellen Atienz~ Operations Manager -• .. ------- • .. • ... D-TEK Analytical Laboratorie$, Inc. 9020 Kenamar Drive, Suite 205 .DUDEK & ASSOCIATES 605 Thir-d Street Encinitas, CA 92024 Attn: Ms. Nicole Peacock .Date of Report: Sampling Date: Date Sample Received: Dntc Extracted: .Dnte Analyzed Analy7-ed By: Sample Type: Project Name: Project Nutnber: Method: Units: ANALYSlS Detection Limit 4,4'-ODD 0.5 4,4'-DD.E J.O 4~'-DDT ~8 Aldrin 0.2 Alpha-BHC 0.6 Beta-BHC 0.6 Gamma • BHC 0.3 Delta -BHC 0.6 Alpha-chlordnnc 0.5 Gnmmn-chlordane 0.5 Dieldrin 0.3 Endosutfan I 0.3 Endosulfan JI 0.5 Endosttlfan Sulfate 0.4 Endrin 0.4 Endrin Aldehyde 0.5 Endrin Ketone 0.5 Hcptacl1lor 0.2 Heptac!Jlor Epoxidc 0.3 Methoxychlor 12 Toxaphene 25 ~7(== Ellen Atienza Operations Manager San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 566-4540 FAX (858) 566-4542 4/24/06 4/19/06 4/20/06 4/20/06 April21, 2006 EA Soil Muroyn Property Phase 11 5089-02 EPA8081A ~lg/kg ANAJ.JYSES RESULTS Log Number: 06-2666 Snmple ID: MS-1 23.4 56 45 <DL <J)L <DL <DL <DL 0.7 0.64 <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL "'DF =Dilution Factor. The detection limits and analyses results were corrected accordingly. *DF 2x 2x .... ------ ... .. - -- 'Ill .. D-TEl< Analytical Laboratories, Inc. DUDEK & ASSOCIATES 605 Third Street Enclnltas, CA 92024 Attn: Ms. Nicole PencocJ< Date of Report: Sampling Date: Date Sample Received: Date Extracted: Date Analyzed Analyzed By: Snmple Type: Pto,ject Name: Pro.tect Number: Method: Uttits: Detection ANALYSIS Limit 4~'-DDD 05 4~'-DDE 1~ 4A"-DDT OA Aldrin 0.2 Alpha-BHC 0.6 Beta -13I-IC 0.6 Gamma-BHC 0.3 Delta -BHC 0.6 Alpha-chlordane 0.5 Gamma-chlordane 0.5 Dieldrin 0.3 Endosulfan 1 0.3 Endosutfan II 0.5 Endosulfan Sulfate 0.4 Endrin 0.4 Endrin Aldehyde 0.5 Enclrin Ketone 0.5 Heptachlor 0.2 T-Ieptac:hlor Epoxide 0.3 Methoxychlor 12 Toxaphene 25 ~~~~--------- Operations Manager 9020 Kennmnr Drive, Suite 205 Snn Diego, CA 92121 (858) 566-4540 FAX (858) 566-4542 4/24/06 4/19/06 4/20/06 4/20/06 April 21, 2006 EA Soil Muroya Property Phase 11 5089-02 EPA8081A ~tg/kg ANALYSES RESULTS Log Number: 06-2667 Sample ID: MS-2 22.2 46.4 25.4 <Dl. <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <Dl- <D.L *DP,., Dilution Factor. The detection. limits and analyses results were corrected accor.di.ugly. *DF 2x - ------- - - ------ --- - Ill ill .. • D-TEK Analytical Laboratories, Inc. 9020 Kennmar Drive! Suite 205 DtiDER & ASSOCIATES 605 Third Street Ertc:ittitns, CA 92024 Attn: Ms. Nicole Peacock Date of Report: Sampling Date: Date Sample Received: Date Extracted: Date Analyzed Analyzed By: Sample Type: Project Name: Project Number: Method: Units: ANALYSIS 4,4' M DDD 4,4' M DDE 4,4' -DDT Aldrin Alpha· BHC Beta -BHC Gamma -BHC Delta-BHC Alpha-chlordane Gamma~chlordane Dieldrin Endosulfan l Endostllfan II E11do!;ttlfan Sulfate Endrin Endrin Aldehyde Endrin Ketone Heptachlor Heptachlm· Epmdde Methoxychlor i:opl-le__.n,..,el---'-....1. Ellen Atienza Operations Mnnnger Detection Limit 1.0 2.0 1.6 0.2 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.3 12 25 Snn Diego, CA 92121 (858) 566-4540 FAX (858) 566-4542 4/24/06 4/l9/06 4/20/06 4/20/06 April 21, 2006 EA Soil Muroya Property Phase 11 5089-02 EPA 808lA ~tg/kg ANALYSES RESULTS Log Number: 06-2668 Sample ID: MS-3 41 96 63 <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL 1.5 <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL *DF = Dih1tion Factor. TI1e detection limits and analyses results were corrected accordingly . *DF 2x 4x 4x ------ ------ • ---------• D-TEK Analytical Laboratories, [nc. 9020 Kenamar Drive, Sufte 205 DUDEK & ASSOCIATES 605 Third Street Encinitas, CA 92024 Attn: Ms. Nicole·Peacock Dnte of Report: Sampling Dnte: Date Sample :Rece1ved: Date Extracted: Date Analyzed Analyzed By: Sample Type: Project Name: l"rojcct Number: Method: lJnits: ANALYSIS 4,4'-DDD 4,4'-DDE 4,4'-DDT Aldrin Alpha-BHC Beta-BHC Gamma-BHC Delta-BHC A lpha-chlordnue Gamma-chlordane Dieldrin Endosulfan T Enclosulfan 11 Endosulfan Sulfate Endrin Endrin Aldehyde E:ndrin Ketone Heptachlor Heptachlor Epoxidc Methoxychlor Tox11phene ~' v Ellen Atienza Operations Manager Detection Limit 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.3 12 25 San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 566-4540 FAX (858) 56(,..4542 4/24/06 4/19/06 4/20/06 4/20/06 April 21, 2006 EA Soil Muroyn Property Phase 11 5089-02 RP.A 8081A ~Lg/kg ANALYSES RESUT.J TS Log Nuinber: 06-2669 Sample ID: MS-4 7.2 15.6 10 <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL *DF =Dilution Factor. The detection limits and analyses results were corrected accordingly. *DF ----------- • - --- IIIII D-TEK Analytical l.Atboratories, Inc. 9020 Kenamar Drive, Suite 205 DUDEK & ASSOCIATES 605 Third Street Encinitas, CA 92024 Attn: Ms. Nicole Peacock .Date of Report: Sampling Date: .Date Sample Received: .Date Extracted: Date Analy:1-ed Analyzed By: Sample Type: Project Name: Project Number: Method: Units: ANAINSTS 4,4'-DOD 4,4' -DDE 4,4'-DDT Alddn Alphn-BHC Beta-BHC Gamma-BHC Delta-BHC Alpha-chlordane Gamma-chlordane:: Dieldrin Endosulfan T Endosulfan II Endosulfan Sulfate Endrin Endrin Aldehyde Endrin .Ketone Heptachlor Be::ptachlot Epoxide Methoxychlor Toxaphene Detection l .. itnit 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.3 12 25 ~Qo_)_J Ellen Atienza (.._=--- Operations Mannger Snn Diego, CA 92121 (858) 566-4540 FAX (858) 566~4542 4/24/06 4/19/06 4/20/06 4/20/06 Atnil 21, 2006 EA Soil Mnroya Property Phase ll 5089-02 EPA 8081A J.tg/kg ANALYSES RESULTS Log Number: 06-2670 Sample ID: MS-5 <DL 0.5 <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL *DF =Dilution Factor. The detection limits and analyses results were corr.ected accordingly. *DF ---- IIIII ... • - -• ... • ... • ------ • • .. D-TEK Analytical Laboratories, Inc. 9020 Kenamar Drive. Suite 205 .DUDEK & ASSOCIATES 60S Third Street Encinitas, CA 92024 Attn: Ms. Nicole Peacock Date of Report: Sampling Dnte: Date Sample Received: Date Extracted: Date Analyzed Analyzed By: Sample Type: Project Natne: Pro.te~t Number: Method: Untts: ANAl.YSJS_ 4,4'-.ODD 4,4'-DDE 4,4'-DDT Aldrin Alpha-BHC Beta-BHC Gamma-BHC Delta-BHC Alpha-chlordane Gnmmn-chlordane Dieldrin Endosulfan I Endosulfan TI Endosulfan Sulfate Endrin llndrin Aldehyde Endrin Ketone Heptachlor Heptachlor Epoxide Methoxychlor Detection J.,imit 2.5 2.5 2.0 0.2 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.3 12 aTo~~} 25 tp~ Ellen Atienza Operations Manager Snn Diego, CA 92121 (858) 566-4540 FAX (858) 566-4542 4/24/06 4/19/06 4/20/06 4/20/06 April 21, 2006 EA Soil Muroya Property Phase ll 5089-02 EPA8081A ~tglkg ANALYSES RESULTS Log Number: 06-2671. Sample ID: MS-6 58 134 83 <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL 2.4 2.4 <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL *DF =Dilution :Factor. The detection limits and analyses results were corrected accordingly. *DF 5x Sx 5x ------------------------- • IIIII Ill D-TEK Analytical Laboratories, Inc. 9020 Kenamnr Drive, S\lite 205 DUDEK & ASSOCIATES 605 Third Str-eet Encinitas, CA 92024 Attn: Ms. Nicole Peacock Date of Report: Sampling Drtte: Date Sample Received: Date Extracted: :Date Analy:T-ed Analyzed By: Sample Type: Pro,ject Name: Project Number: Method: Ur.lts: ANALYSIS 4,4'. ODD 4,4' ·ODE 4.4'-DDT Aldrin Alpha-BHC Beta-BHC Gamma-BHC Delta-BHC Alpha-chlotdnne Gamma-chlordane Di.eldtin Enclosulfan I Endosulfan II Endmmlfan Sulfate Endrin Endrin Aldehyde Endt'in Ketone Hcptnr:hlor Heptachlor Epoxide Mcthoxyr:hlor Toxaphene EJien Atienza Operations Mannger- Detection Limit 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.3 12 25 San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 566-4540 -FAX {858) 566-4542 4/24/06 4/19/06 4/20/06 4/20/06 April 21, 2006 EA Soil Muroya Property Phase 11 5089-02 EPA 8081A J.tg/kg ANALYSES RESULTS Log Number: 06-2672 Sample ID: MS-7 <DL <DL <DL <DL <D.L <DL <DL <DL 0.65 0.55 <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL *OF""' Dilution Far:tor. The detection limits and analyses results were corrected accordingly. *DF - --- 11111111 ill .. --- • Ill • -------~--------------------------- D-TEK Analytical La.boratodes, Inc. 9020 Kennmar Drive, Suite 205 DUDEK & ASSOClATES 605 Third Street Encinitas, CA 92024 Attn: Ms. Nicole Peacock Date of Report~ Snmpling Dnte: .Oatc Sample Received: Date Extracted: Date Analyzed Analyzed By: Sample Type; Pro.iect Name: Project Number: Method: Units: ANALYSIS .Detection Limit 4.4'-DDD 0.5 4,4' -DD.E 0.5 4,4' ·DDT 0.4 Aldrin 0.2 Alpha-BHC 0.6 Beta • BHC 0.6 Gamma • BliC 0.3 Delta-BHC 0.6 Alpha-chlordane 0.5 Gamma-chlordane 0.5 Dieldrin 0.3 Endo!;ttlfan I 0.3 Endosulfan II 0.5 Endosulfan Sulfate 0.4 .Endrin 0.4 Endrin Aldehyde 0.5 Endtin Ketone 0.5 Heptachlor 0.2 Heptachlor Epoxide 0.3 Methoxychlor 12 Toxaphene 25 @'C>Qc:z~· Ellen Atien:ln Operations Manager Snn Diego, CA 92121 (858) 566-4540 FAX (858) 566-4542 4/24/06 4/19/06 4/20/06 4/20/06 April 21, 2006 :EA Soil Muroya Property Phase 11 5089-02 EPA8081A ~Lgfkg ANAl, YSES RESULTS Log NumbeJ:: 06--2673 Snmple ID: MS-8 <DL 1.0 <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL <DL "'DF =Dilution Factor. The detection limits and analyses results were corrected accordingly. *DF - ----.. - ---- - ----- --.. .. 1111 Dnte: Attn: Log#; Dnte E:dl'Dcted; Date Analyzed: Analysis Method: METHOD BLL\NK D-TEK Analytical .Laboratories, Inc. 90ZO Kenamar Drive, Suite 205 San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 566-4540 FAX (858) 566-4542 QUALITY CONTROl .. DATA REPORT 4/24/06 Ms. Nicole Peacock 06-2666 to 06-2673 4/20/06 April 21, 2006 EPA 8081A No target analytcs were detected in the method blank. LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE Compound G-BHC (Lindane) Heptachlor Aldrin Dieldrin Endrin 4,4' DDT 1\;IATRJX SPIKE RESULTS (06-2672) Compound 0-BHC (Lindane) Heptachlor Aldrin Dieldrin .Endrin 4,4-DDT Spil<:e 0/o Recovery 74 100 98 93 114 85 * QC Limits: Applies to LCS, MS & MSD. %Recovery 54 86 83 74 82 84 Spike Dup. o/n Recovery 83 108 106 96 114 83 QUAUTY CONm.9J• TF,RMJNQLQGY QC .Limits % * 32-127 34-111 42-122 36-146 30-147 25-160 MS/MSD RPD % 11 8 8 3 0 2 I.C~-LABOitATORY CONTR.Ol. SAMPJ.F.. Reported a• % t'<:<!overy of an independent standard carried through ~II sample pt·cparntion proccnme• to verify method perfonn:mcc. Acceptable range is ha•cll on hi•torieallaborntory conu·ol datlt ancl EPA requirements. Any o•.ll·of-e<:>ntrol QC data iR clearly indicated. Spike-environmental sample i~ matrix •piked with method compounds and %recovery of concentration •piked into sample is cnlcul~tcd. Reported nR% recovery. Accept.1blc range for ''Normal Matrix Sample'' is based on hisloricollaboratory control data. Any out-of-control QC data is clcarly inllkated. Rnrl'OJ!;nt.,R-Compotmds rep•-e•entativc of:. group ofcompounr.ls. St.trr<)ente• ore •piked into environment:ll •ample• and% recovery <tfconccntralion spiked is cnlcul~tcd 3nd reported. Acceptable mngc v~trics depending on sample matrix and analy•i~ mcthorl. Any out-of·comrol QC d~ta i• clearly indicated. P:-tgc I of 2 --- - Ill ---------- • IIIII • IIIII 1111111 IIIII n ... TEK Analytical Laboratories, Inc. 9020 Kcnnmnr Drive, Suite 205 Log# Method Blank 06-2666 06-2667 06-2668 06-2669 06-2670 06-2671 06-2672 06-2673 LCS 06-2672 MS 06-2672 MSD Ellen Atienza Operations Manager San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 566-4540 FAX (858) 566-4542 SURROGATE RECOVERJES (Tctrachlm·o-M-Xylene) Percent Recovery: 75 78 112 103 112 103 108 78 86 82 78 91 QC Limits: 43 to 169% QUALITY CONTROL Tli:RMJNOLOGX J"CS "T,ARORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE. Keported ns % l"Ccovcry of an independent Alllmlnrd CIIITied through 311 •ample preparation procedure~ to verify method performance. Acccptahlc range is based on historical laboratory control data nncl EPA l'cquircmenl!;. Any out-of-control QC data is clearly fndfcllted. Spike-environmental Hample is fll~trix ~piked with method compounds ~nd% recovery of concentration opikcd Into sample is calculated. Reported as% recovery. Acceptable range for "Nom1al Matrix Sample" is bnsed on historical laboratory contrOl dntn. Any out-of-control QC dato is cle~rly indicated. ~htrro,::atc~-Compounds representative of11 group or compound a. SurroglltC9 nre ~piked into cnvlmnmenL'Il .<ample~ and% recovery of concentration spiked h calculnled nnd reported. Acceptable range vorics depending on sample m~triJC and snaly~i~ mctho<.l. Any out-of-control QC dnt.'l i$ clearly indicated . Page 2 of2 - ... .. -.. ------------ --.. ... D-TEK Analytical Laboratories, Inc. 9020 Kcnam~tr Drive. Suite 205 DUD.EK & ASSOCIATES 605 Third Street Encin.itas, CA 92024 Attn: Ms. Nicole Peacock Date of Report: Sampling Date: .Date Sample Received: Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Analyzed By: Sample Type: Ptoject Number: P1·ojcct Name: Log# 06-2674 06~2675 06-2676 06-2677 *06-2678 Sample ID! MS-9-2' MS~9-4' MS-10-2' MS~l0-4' MS-11-1" San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 566-4540-FAX (858) 566-4542 4/24/06 4/19/06 4/20/06 4/20/06 April 21, 2006 EA Soil 5089~02 Muroya Property Phase 11 ANALYSES RESULTS Analysis: Method: Units: TPH-Diesel DHSJ.JUFT mg/kg <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 *Also contains Motor Oil _Concentration= 10520 ppm Range: CJO-C44. Sample Quantita.ted against Motor Oil ~· .Ellen Atienza Operations Manager TPH • Total Pctro!cun, Hydroc:ubons DI--IS ·Recommended Procedure From Le~king Underground Fuel Tank Field Manual, May 19R9 ·rotal Petroleum J-lydroc!ltbon analysis l'csulting in hydrocarbons of the mnge C10-C23. S"mple quantitated against diesel. , .. ... ~·· .. -- ---- .. • ... • ... • • .. .Oate: Attn: Date Analyzed: AnJtlysis Method: Snmple Log #: METHOD BLANK D-TEK Analytical Laboratories, lnc. 9020 Kenamar Drive, Suite 205 San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 566-4540 FAX (858) 566-4542 QUALITY CONTROJ.J DATA REPORT 4/24/06 Ms. Nicole Pencoclc April 21, 2006 DHS LUFT (TPH-Diesel) 06-2674 to 06-2678 No target analytcs were detected in the method blank. LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPI~E Compound o/o Recovery Dup o/o Recovery TPH-Dicscl 112 118 e;~---= Ellen Atien.z Operations Manager Q!M__l.._JTY CON'fROL TERMJ.tilli.OGY 5 LCS-J.AilORA'rORY CONTROL SAMI'Lt. Reported na %recovery of an independent atnndnrd cnrtlcd through oll sample prtpamtion procedures to verify method pcrforrrwlcc. Acceptable range Is 80% -I 20"/n . Any out-of-contrul QC dam iA clearly indicated . Srll<~>-cnvironmclltal somLllc is mntrbc spiked with method compounds ~nd% rceovcty or conccntmtion spiked into Ramplc is calculated. Reported ru;% recovery. Acceptable r:mgc for "Normal Mntrix Sample" is 75% 125%. Any out-of-control QC c.lnta is clearly ind\c~tcd . •. J • _ _. &,.,~ .,."JI &,... IL .. JI ... • J IL... ~ J A.... .. • A. . .I ._ J l I l J l I l J t. I CHAIN·O F..CUSTODY RECORD AND ANALYSIS REQUEST FORM % ?6 'b % 06 PROJECT NAME PROJECT NO. SAMPLER(S) SAMPLER'S SIGNAlUR -= /~ NOlE: All samples are preserved on Ice in coolers. SAMPLe LAB SAMPI..E COL.l.!C:TtON MATRIX ID ID o.ll Tlme ... , ~I$ s::.:: -2.666 fi1J -I I 'f/17k. Jtf.'S"!:i' X r-266 7 IM.S-2 ~/tw)( 1.5'-'v} I .X l6b8 11\\5··.3 'fktfo':K Its:!) :X Z-661 IM~-'{ ' b Jl(:2.,) I 1 -u7o nv-~ ~ I!>•.J£"" 2-67( /lttj-6 ' 15':~.& -2672. % ~ '& 06 W/S-7 !S'.'IfJ t'6 M::, ()6 a 2673 2 6 74- Z67s- 2{;,76 2.6 7_7 1..678 .~-9 IV0-1-l' ~~'j-if I M$-le: -t \tll.5-l!)·'( I " ~$-1-{ I~S?J I f'f; 'fd \S":6e \5', o'1 I l)ilJ ,, 15'~ 2.9 'v f1LTRA110N IN fii!LP ...... "" I TOTAL Nllt.IBER OF COtiTAlHERS PSR ANAl. YSlS: Dale'-: -------1ime: ----- Send RBsi.I!Utmd Jmrolcs To: Peter Quinlan Dudek & Associates, Inc. 605 Th in:l Str&et Encinitas, CA 92024 Tel: 619/942-5147 Fax: 619{632.0164 SAMPlE CONTA!NI!RS ~NC~UO!PR!S!RVATIOM ""' ~ ... N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4J IY ~ i>O X. ;>< >< )( >< ~v I I l 1 Attn: ReU~~ Shipment Meti'l ~ t;i~ ANALYSES REQUEST!!O .! ~ I " ~ '.:\ &~ "'"'{ ~ -; . " 0~ '~~ ~ '"' ~9 .. \J A (I ... <;) ' ~ ~":t Ct ... L1' ....... ~\.-~ ~ 0\l 1JJ ,)( I I -...v )( I l TOTAl. NI!I.IBER OF CONTAINERS: Page _j_ Of _1__ SI'ECrAL. IIISTRUCTJONS i HR I i 0 Ct>:lformr b coc oX1JII'l!!rt