Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
GPA 13-02; Robertson Ranch West Village; General Plan Amendment (GPA) (2)
CITV or CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION P-1 Development Services Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue (760) 602-4610 wv*/w.carlsbadca.gov APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) Development Permits (FOR DEPT. USE ONLY) Leqlslative Permits (FOR DEPT. USE ONLY) CU Administrative Permit 1 1 General Plan Amendment 1 1 Coastal Development Permit (*) Q Minor 1 1 Local Coastal Program Amendment (') O Conditional Use Permit (*) Q Minor • Extension 1 1 Master Plan Q Amendment (•] Environmental Impact AssessmenJ^^^^ 1 1 Habitat Management Permit Q IVIinor 1 1 Specific Plan Q Amendment (•] Environmental Impact AssessmenJ^^^^ 1 1 Habitat Management Permit Q IVIinor • Zone Change (*) B Hillside Development Permit (*) O Zone Codc Amendment HI Planned Development Permit Bl Residential dl Non-Residential South Carlsbad Coastal Review Area Permits n Planned Industrial Permit 1 1 Review Permit 1 1 Administrative d] Minor Q Major 1 1 Planning Commission Determination n Site Development Plan Villaae Review Area Permits [B] Special Use Permit r~l Review Permit 1 1 Administrative [D Minor Q Major Bl Tentative Tract Map/Parcel Map O Variance n Administrative (*) = eligible for 25% discount NOTE; A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M. ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: 208-010-40 PROJECT NAME: Robertson Ranch West Village - B Map BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Proposed development of 339 lot residential, commercial and OS subdivision BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots E and I of Rancho Agua Hedionda According to City of Carlsbad map 823 LOCATION OF PROJECT: ON THE: North 5056 El Camino Real STREET ADDRESS SIDE OF El Camino Real (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) BETWEEN Cannon Road (NAME OF STREET) AND Tamarack Avenue (NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREET) p-1 Page 1 of 6 Revised 11/12 OWNER NAME (Print); Rancho Costera LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 8383 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 700 CITY, STATE, ZIP: Beverly Hills. CA 90211 TELEPHONE: (323)988-7511 EMAIL ADDRESS: tsousa@shapell.eom APPLICANT NAME (Print): Rancho Costera LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 8383 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 700 CiTY, STATE, .ZIP: Beverly Hills, CA 90211 TELEPHONE: (323) 988-7511 EMAIL ADDRESS: tsousa(gshapell.com I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ^1 DATE I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. i|G(|e ATURE DATE APPLICANTS REPRESENTATIVE (Print): Paul J. Klukas - PLANNING SYSTEMS MAILING ADDRESS: 1530 Faraday Ave., Suite 100 CITY, STATE, ZIP: Carlsbad, CA 92008 TELEPHONE: EMAIL ADDRESS: (760)931-0780 pklukas@planningsystems.net I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE APPLICANT AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. SIGIfATURE rvm DATE I , I PLICATION I IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSAFRY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE. NOTICE OF RESTRICTION: PROPERTY OWNER ACKNOWLEDGES AND CONSENTS TO A NOTICE OF RESTRICTION BEING RECORDED ON THE TITLE TO HIS PROPERTY IF CONDITIONED FOR THE APPLICANT. NOTICE OF RESTRICTIONS RUN WITH THE LAND AND BIND ANY SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST. V-/ PROPERTTOWN OWNER SIGNATURE FOR CITY USE ONLY RECEIVED JUN 0 5 2013 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED RECEIVED BY: p-1 Page 2 of 6 Revised 11/12 • > * DISCLOSURE Development Services • STATEMENT Planning Division -^v?' C 1 T Y O F P-1(A) 1635 Faraday Avenue CARLSBAD P-1(A) (760) 602-4610 www.carlsbadca.gov Applicant's statement or (jisclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part ofthe City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Piease print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other cbunty, city and Co city municipality, district or other politicarsUbdivlsion or any other group or Combination actini^ as a iJriit:" Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below: 1. *See attached APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) N/A r.nmlPari Rancho Costera LLC Person Title Corp/Part_ Title N/A Address Address 250 Gibraltar Road Horsham, PA 1^44 OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property Involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e., partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership. Include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% ofthe shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person R/A Title Address Corp/Part Rancho Costera LLC Title N/A Address 250 Gibraltar Road Horsham, PA 19044 P-1 (A) Page 1 of 2 Revised 07/10 3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit oroanization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non- profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/T rust Title Non Profit/7 rust_ Title Address Address 4. Have you had more than $500 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? • Yes 3 No If yes, please Indicate person(s):_ NOTE; Attach additional sheets if necessary. J^cecti^ thatajl the above information is true and correctjothe best of my knowledge. Signature of owner/date Bradley L. Hare, Division VP of Rancho Costera LLC Print or type name of owner Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable Signature of applicant/date Bradley L. Hare, Division VP of Rancho Costera LLC Print or type name of applicant Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent p-1 (A) Page 2 of 2 Revised 07/10 CITY OF CARLSBAD DISCLOSURE STATEMENT P-1(A) Name: Shapell Land Company, LLC Title: Sole Member of Rancho Costera LLC Address: 250 Gibraltar Road Horsham, PA 19044 Name: Title: Address: Shapell Industries, LLC Sole Member of Shapell Land Company, LLC 250 Gibraltar Road Horsham, PA 19044 Name: Title: Address: Toll CA Holdings, Inc. Sole Member of Shapell Industries, LLC 250 Gibraltar Road Horsham, PA 19044 PROJECT Development Services %m^' DESCRIPTION Planning Division ^ CITY OF p 1635 Faraday Avenue PARI ^RAD ^'*\°f (760)602 4610 ilAI—JU/ \tm^ www.carlsbadca.gov Robertson Ranch West Village - B Map PROJECT NAME: Rancho Costera LLC APPLICANT NAME: Please describe fully the proposed project by application type, include any details necessary to adequately explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. Description/Explanation: The proposed project involves the proposed development of a 339 lot residential, commercial and open space subdivision on a 201 acre undeveloped property. A package of several policy and permit actions are requested; a Tentative Tract Map, a Residential Plaimed Development Permit, a Hillside Development Permit, and a Special Use Permit. The West Village Final residential Land Uses include a total of 305 single family residential lots in five planning areas, and 367 high-density multifamily residential imits in two multifamily neighborhoods. The two high-density multifamily neighborhoods include the required low income inclusionary housing units and 56 units of moderate income housing. The property is governed by the Robertson Ranch Master Plan. In addition to the residential component, the West Village provides a 11.5 net-acre Village Center which will accommodate commercial uses and all or a portion of the project's 5.0-acre community facilities requirement. The West Village also provides a separate 2.3 acre community facilities and 1.0-net acre of centralized community recreation for the surrounding neighborhoods. The West Village provides approximately 5.4 acres of roadways and 88.3 acres of open space, mostly located within the wildlife corridor, as well as recreation and circulation trails to encourage altemative transportation methods. The tentative tract map proposes approximately 1.4 million cubic yards of earthwork in a balanced grading operation. P-1(B) Pagel ofl Revised 07/10 City of Carlsbad Faraday Center Faraday Cashiering 001 1330401-1 10/31/2013 32 Thu, Oct 31, 2013 03:42 PM Receipt Ref Nbr; Rl330401-1/0030 PERMITS - PERMITS Tran Ref Nbr: 133040101 0030 0035 Trans/Rcpt#: R0097945 SET #: GPA13002 Amount; 1 % $4,206.00 Item Subtotal; $4,205.00 Item Total; $4,206,00 PERMITS - PERMITS Tran Ref Nbr: 133040101 0030 0036 Trans/Rcpt#: R0097947 SET #: MP02003E Amount; 1 § $1,643.00 Item Subtotal: $1,643.00 Item Total: $1,643.00 2 ITEM(S) TOTAL: $5,849.00 Check (Chk# 009974) $5,849.00 Total Received: $5,849.00 Have a nice day! **************(;USTOMER COPY************* City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 920 08 •IIIIIIIIHIIIIIII Applicant: PLANNING SYSTEMS Description Amount MP02003E 1,643.00 5 056 EL CAMINO REAL CBAD Receipt Number: R0097947 Transaction ID: R0097947 Transaction Date: 10/31/2013 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 1,643.00 Transaction Amount: 1,643.0 0 city of Carlsbad 163 5 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA llllllllllllllllllilllllllllll 92008 Applicant: PLANNING SYSTEMS Description GPA13002 5056 EL CAMINO REAL CBAD Amount 4,206.00 Receipt Number: R0097945 Transaction Date: 10/31/2013 Transaction ID: R0097945 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 4,206.00 Transaction Amount: 4,206.00 ^ARDOUS WASTi •MENT (C) Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue (760) 602-4610 www.carlsbadca.gov Consultation of Lists of Sites Related to Hazardous Wastes (Certification of Compliance with Government Code Section 65962.5) Pursuant to State of California Government Code Section 65962.5, I have consulted the Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List compiled by the California Environmental Protection Agency and hereby certify that (check one): [g] The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of tlie State Government Code. I I The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 ofthe State Government Code. APPLICANT [vjgi^g. Ranciio Costera ttC Address:_S383 Wilshire Blvd. #700 Beverly Hills^ ca 9021] Phone Number: {323] 988-7518 PPNOPERTY OWNER Name' Kanclio Costera liC Address: 3383 wilshire Blvd., Beverly Hills„ CA 90211 Phone Number: {323) 988-7518 Address of Site: Robertson Ranch West tillage Local Agency (City and Countv): City of Carlsbad„ Comitv of San Diego Assessor's book, page, and parcel number: 214-010-40-00 Specify list(s): Hazardoias Waste and Siibstances Site ]List Regulatory Identification Number:. Date of List: 10/21/03 Api licant Signature7*Date The Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List (Cortese List) is used by the State, local agencies and developers to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act requirements in providing information about the location of hazardous materials release sites. P-1(C) Page 1 of 2 Revised 07/10 /A. TIME LIMITS ON Development Services €$^> DISCRETIONARY planning Division CITY OF PPO IP^TQ 1635 Faraday Avenue PARI <^RAn rKUJcuio (750)60246io ^/-lI\LOD/^L/ P-1(E) v.v.w.carlsbadca.gov PLEASE NOTE: Time limits on the processing of discretionary projects established by state law do not start until a project application is deemed complete by the City. The City has 30 calendar days from the date of application submittal to determine whether an application is complete or incomplete. Within 30 days of submittal of this application you will receive a letter stating whether this application is complete or incomplete. If it is incomplete, the letter will state what is needed to make this application complete. When the application is complete, the processing period will start upon the date of the completion letter. If you have any questions regarding application submittal requirements (i.e., clarification regarding a specific requirement or whether all requirements are necessary for your particular application) please call (780) 602-4610. Applicant Signature: staff Signature: _ Date: To be stapled with receipt to the application p-1 (E) Page 1 of 1 Revised 07/10 % • City of Carlsbad Faraday Center Faraday Cashiering 001 1401001-6 01/10/2014 98 Fri, Jan 10, 2014 03:25 PM Receipt Ref Nbr: R1401001-5/0016 PERMITS - PERMITS Tran Ref Nbr: 140100106 0016 0017 Trans/Rcpt#: R0099243 SET #; CT130003 Amount: 1 @ $1,148.16 Item Subtotal: $1,148.16 Item Total; $1,148.16 1 ITEM(S) TOTAL: $1,148.16 Check (Chk# 002554) $1,148.16 Total Received: $1,148.15 Have a nice day! **-4;***********CUST0MER COPY************* city of Carlsbad 163 5 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 iiiiniiiiii Applicant: PLANNING SYSTEMS Description CT130003 5 05 6 EL CAMINO REAL CBAD Amount 1,148.16 Receipt Number: R0099243 Transaction Date: 01/10/2014 Transaction ID: R0099243 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 1,14 8.16 Transaction Amount: 1,14 8.16 City of Carlsbad Faraday Center Faraday Cashiering 001 1315601-1 06/05/2013 32 Wed, Jun 05, 2013 03:55 PM Receipt Ref Nbr: R1315601-1/0020 PERMITS - PERMITS Tran Ref Nbr: 131560101 0020 0021 Trans/Rcpt#: R0095395 SET #: CT130003 Amount: 1 i $23,130.36 Item Subtotal: $23,130.36 Item Total: $23,130.36 PERMITS - PERMITS Tran Ref Nbr: 131560101 0020 0022 Trans/Rcpt#: R0095396 SET #; HDP13001 Amount; 1 @ $1,818,00 Item Subtotal: $1,818.00 Item Total; $1,818.00 PERMITS - PERMITS Tran Ref Nbr; 131560101 0020 0023 Trans/Rcpt#: R0095397 SET #: PUD13006 Amount: 1 i $12,741.00 Item Subtotal: $12,741.00 Item Total: $12,741.00 PERMITS - PERMITS Tran Ref Nbr; 131560101 0020 0024 Trans/Rcpt#; R0095398 SET #: SUP13002 Amount: 1 6 $3,366.00 Item Subtotal: $3,366.00 Item Total: $3,366.00 4 ITEM(S) TOTAL: $41,055.36 Check (Chk# 008261) $41,055.36 Total Received: $41,055.36 Have a nice day! **************CUSTOMER COPY************* City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 Applicant: RANCHO COSTERA LLC Description Amount CT130003 23,130.36 5056 EL CAMINO REAL CBAD Receipt Number: R0095395 Transaction ID: R0095395 Transaction Date: 06/05/2013 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 23,130.36 Transaction Amount: 23,130.36 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 Applicant: RANCHO COSTERA LLC Description Amount HDP13001 1,818.00 505 6 EL CAMINO REAL CBAD Receipt Number: R0095396 Transaction ID: R0095396 Transaction Date: 06/05/2013 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 1,818.00 Transaction TVmount: 1,818.00 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 Applicant: RANCHO COSTERA LLC Description PUD13006 5056 EL CAMINO REAL CBAD Amount 12,741.00 Receipt Number: R0095397 Transaction Date: 06/05/2013 Transaction ID: R0095397 Pay Type Method Description TVmount Payment Check 12,741.00 Transaction Amount: 12,741.00 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 Applicant: RANCHO COSTERA LLC Description SUP13002 5056 EL CAMINO REAL CBAD Amount 3,366.00 Receipt Number: R0095398 Transaction Date: 06/05/2013 Transaction ID: R0095398 Pay Type Method Payment Check Description Amount 3,366.00 Transaction Amount: 3,366.00 3 Form No. 1068-2 ALTA Plain Language Commitment Commitment No.; NCS-615644-58-LA2 Page Number: 1 August 02, 2013 First American Title Insurance Company National Commercial Services 777 South Figueroa Street, Suite 400 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Irene Hymanson Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071 Phone: (213)229-7303x0 Fax: (213)229-6303 Customer Reference: SoCal 58 - Robertson Ranch Title Officer: Phone: Email: Order Number: Sharon Ryan (213)271-1748 skryan@firstam.com Title Assistant: Phone: Email: Irma Pimentel (213)271-1717 ipimentel@firstam.com NCS-615644-58-LA2 Property: 5056 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA Attached please find the following item(s): Commitment Thank You for your confidence and support. We at First American Title Insurance Company maintain the runoamental pnnciple: Customer F/rst.^ First American Title Insurance Company Form No. 1068-2 ALTA Plain Language Commitment Commitment No.; NCS-615644-58-LA2 Page Number; 2 First American Title Insurance Company INFORMATION The Company will give you a sample of the Policy form, if you ask. The Commitment is subject to its Requirements, Exceptions and Conditions. This information is not part of the title insurance commitment. TABLE OF CONTENTS Agreement to Issue Policy Schedule A Page 3 1. 2. 3. 4. Commitment Date Policies to be Issued, Amounts and Proposed Insured Interest in the Land and Owner Description of the Land Schedule B-1 - Requirements Schedule B-2 - Exceptions 4 4 4 4 Conditions YOU SHOULD READ THE COMMITMENT VERY CAREFULLY If you have any questions about the Commitment, please contact the issuing office. Form No. 1068-2 Commitment No.; NCS-615644-58-LA2 ALTA Plain Language Commitment Page Number: 3 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Issued by First American Title Insurance Company Agreement to Issue Policy We agree to Issue a policy to you according to the terms of this Commitment. When we show the policy amount and your name as the proposed insured in Schedule A, this Commitment becomes effective as of the Commitment Date shown in Schedule A. If the Requirements shown in this Commitment have not been met within six months after the Commitment Date, our obligation under this Commitment will end. Also, our obligation under this Commitment will end when the Policy is issued and then our obligation to you will be under the Policy. Our obligation under this Commitment is limited by the following: The Provisions in Schedule A. The Requirements in Schedule B-1. The Exceptions in Schedule B-2. The Conditions. This Commitment is not valid without Schedule A and Sections 1 and 2 of Schedule B. Form No. 1068-2 Commitment No.; NCS-615644-58-LA2 ALTA Plain Language Commitment Page Number: 4 SCHEDULE A 1. Commitment Date: July 26, 2013 at 7:30 A.M. 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount (A) ALTA Extended Owner Policy - 2006 $TBD Proposed Insured: To Be Determined (B) To Be Determined $TBD Proposed Insured: To Be Determined 3. (A) The estate or interest in the land described in this Commitment is: Fee Simple (B) Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in: Rancho Costera LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and is described as follows: ALL THAT PORTION OF LOTS E AND I OF RANCHO AGUA HEDIONDA, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO PARTmON MAP THEREOF NO. 823, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, NOVEMBER 16, 1896, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF LOT 140 OF CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 76-12 CALAVERA HILLS, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 9935, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PARCEL 2 OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RECORDED NOVEMBER 28, 2001 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2001-0855065 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, HEREON REFERRED TO AS REC 1, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 140 OF MAP NO. 9935 RECORDED DECEMBER 16, 1980; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2, SOUTH 01°42'35" WEST 1619.75 FEET, SOUTH 63°42'38" EAST 313.13 FEET, SOUTH 73°19'52" EAST 230.87 FEET, SOUTH 04°56'41" EAST 436.72 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE GRANT DEED RECORDED AUGUST 14, 2008 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2008-0435947 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, HEREON REFERRED TO AS REC 2, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 594.00 FEET, A RADIAL TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 65°36'53" WEST; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 20°0y37" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 207.97 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSING 50.00-FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03°54'16" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 3.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE RECORDED AUGUST 14, 2008 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2008-0435946 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AND ACCEPTED BY A RESOLUTION Form No. 1068-2 Commitment No.: NCS-61S644-58-LA2 ALTA Plain Language Commitment Page Number: 5 RECORDED JULY 20, 2011 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2011-0368561 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, HEREON REFERRED TO AS REC 3, A RADIAL TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 81°46'14" EAST; THENCE, CONTINUING NORTHERLY ALONG SAID 50.00-FOOT RADIUS CURVE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF REC 3 THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 23°2574" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 20.44 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSING 61.00-FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY; T>IENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 36°38'54" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 39.02 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID LINE, NORTH 82°50'17" WEST 88.59 FEET, NORTH 41°40'54" WEST 37.97 FEET, NORTH 86''15'38" WEST 99.25 FEET, SOUTH 51°18'20" WEST 178.66 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE GRANT DEED RECORDED MAY 11, 2009 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2009- 0247694 OF OFRCIAL RECORDS; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LAND. NORTH 60°10'35" WEST 489.73 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST POINT OF SAID LAND; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LAND SOUTH 37°23' 17" WEST 15.91 FEET, SOUTH 33°10'05" WEST 30.06 FEET, SOUTH 31°28'07" WEST 28.46 FEET, SOUTH 28°18'16" WEST 27.22 FEET, SOUTH 2304432" WEST 26.06 FEET, SOUTH 20°05'59" WEST 24.51 FEET, SOUTH 17°41^43" WEST 25.83 FEET, SOUTH 16°32'33" WEST 22.22 FEET, SOUTH 00°14'53" EAST 4.75 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF REC 3; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID REC 3, SOUTH 00°14'53" EAST 44.78 FEET, SOUTH 18°38'34" WEST 24.61 FEET, SOUTH 18°02'54" WEST 38.98 FEET, SOUTH 15°24'50" WEST 44.23 FEET, SOUTH 15°04'00" WEST 29.09 FEET, SOUTH 19°24'35" WEST 37.42 FEET, SOUTH 19°00'56" WEST 53.80 FEET, SOUTH 14°39'44" WEST 24.34 FEET, SOUTH 19°51'30" WEST 24.56 FEET, SOUTH 27° 19' 12" WEST 25.25 FEET, SOUTH 32°56'33" WEST 24.91 FEET, SOUTH 32°10'41" WEST 96.78 FEET, SOUTH 15°05'50" WEST 17.77 FEET, SOUTH 08°3r45" WEST 16.96 FEET, SOUTH 02°09'19" WEST 21.18 FEET, SOUTH 04°24'40" EAST 20.65 FEET, SOUTH 14°2r09" EAST 17.42 FEET, SOUTH 29°25'43" EAST 12.21 FEET, SOUTH 43°13'05" EAST 20.44 FEET, SOUTH 53°46'06" EAST 20.48 FEET, SOUTH 53°18'58" EAST 26.23 FEET, SOUTH 56°52'22" EAST 37.20 FEET, SOUTH 56°0r32" EAST 36.13 FEET, SOUTH 54°4r34" EAST 39.70 FEET, SOUTH 53°46'31" EAST 41.98 FEET, SOUTH 48°39' 14" EAST 23.08 FEET, SOUTH 52°25'37" EAST 29.91 FEET, SOUTH 52°23'29" EAST 35.98 FEET, SOUTH 51°15'33" EAST 43.67 FEET, SOUTH 48°21'33" EAST 8.42 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF REC 2; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID REC 2, SOUTH 48°21'33" EAST 30.47 FEET, SOUTH 47°55'10" EAST 40.97 FEET, SOUTH 47°39'34" EAST 32.41 FEET, SOUTH 50°46'26" EAST 46.12 FEET, SOUTH 49°00'19" EAST 21.99 FEET, SOUTH 66°34'56" EAST 16.06 FEET, SOUTH 47°23'48" EAST 71.12 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF REC 1; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE, SOUTH 25°38'31" WEST 90.12 FEET, SOUTH 23°3r32" WEST 109.80 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF REC 1; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF REC 1, NORTH 82°48'22" WEST 72.17 FEET, SOUTH 32°44'07" WEST 16.78 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 6855.31-FOOT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03°59'05" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 476.75 FEET; THENCE NORTH 60°32'15" WEST 449.43 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 2045.09-FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 31°40'36" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 1130.65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87°47'10" WEST 761.88 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 1555.07-FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 43°0r37" REC AN ARC DISTANCE OF 1167.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 49°11'14" WEST 511.31 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 2045.09-FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05°23'02" A DISTANCE OF 192.17 FEET; THENCE NORTH 35°25'44" EAST 55.00 FEET, NORTH 44°53'07" WEST 132.79 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF REC 1; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF REC 1, NORTH 31°52'21" EAST 69.52 FEET, NORTH 36°53'17" EAST 92.46 FEET, NORTH 42°37'04" EAST 92.46 FEET, NORTH 48°26'33" EAST 92.75 FEET, NORTH 63°26'12" EAST 92.35 FEET, NORTH 47°38'51" EAST 94.49 FEET, NORTH 78°03'31" EAST 93.72 FEET, NORTH 77°30'47" EAST 91.01 FEET, NORTH 76°56'34" EAST 89.97 FEET, NORTH 64°32'02" EAST 96.25 FEET, NORTH 84°58'35" EAST 96.38 FEET, NORTH 89°31'55" EAST 100.00 FEET, NORTH 88°50'52" EAST 100.13 FEET, NORTH 85°52'25" EAST 106.46 FEET, SOUTH 86°48'16" EAST 110.56 FEET, NORTH 61°21'44" EAST 110.57 FEET, NORTH 66°10'33" EAST 106.20 FEET, NORTH 60°33'09" EAST 105.87 FEET, NORTH 54°35'52" EAST 104.85 FEET, NORTH 55°32'10" EAST 99.66 FEET, NORTH 58°20'10" EAST 100.12 FEET, NORTH 58°14'41" EAST 100.18 FEET, NORTH 55°22'41" EAST 99.96 FEET, NORTH 52°29'55" EAST 100.20 FEET, NORTH 51°34'19" EAST 103.75 FEET, NORTH 48°25'31" EAST 104.73 FEET, NORTH 42°59'01" EAST 104.95 FEET, NORTH 41°35'15" Form No. 1068-2 Commitment No.: NCS-615644-58-LA2 ALTA Plain Language Commitment Page Number: 6 EAST 101.54 FEET, NORTH 41°19'05" EAST 100.09 FEET, NORTH 38°24'41" EAST 99.98 FEET, NORTH 37°43'45" EAST 106.34 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF REC 1; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF REC 1, SOUTH 89°25'37' EAST 1688.99 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTH LINE, NORTH 54°00'27" WEST 173.74 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 470.00-FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05°58'25" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 49.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°25'37" EAST 20.54 FEET, SOUTH 57°45'41" EAST 249.77 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH UNE OF REC 1, SAID LINE ALSO BEING THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 140 OF MAP NO. 9935; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID LINE, SOUTH 89°25'37" EAST 346.33 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. APN(s): 208-010-41-00 AND A PORTION OF 208-101-02-00 Form No. 1068-2 Commitment No.: NCS-615644-58-LA2 ALTA Plain Language Commitment Page Number: 7 SCHEDULEB SECTION ONE REQUIREMENTS The following requirements must be met: (A) Pay the agreed amounts for the interest in the land and/or the mortgage to be insured. (B) Pay us the premiums, fees and charges for the policy. (C) Documents satisfactory to us creating the interest in the land and/or the mortgage to be insured must be signed, delivered and recorded. (D) You must tell us in writing the name of anyone not referred to in this Commitment who will get an interest in the land or who will make a loan on the land. We may then make additional requirements or exceptions. (E) Releases(s) or Reconveyance(s) of Item(s): None (F) Other: None (G) You must give us the following information: 1. Any off record leases, surveys, etc. 2. Statement(s) of Identity, all parties. 3. Other: With respect to the legal description: A corrected Certificate of Compliance for Adjustment Plat that corrects the preamble of the legal description of the document recorded November 13, 2012 as Instrument No. 2012-0706271 of Offidal Records. The following additional requirements, as indicated by "X", must be met: [X] (H) Provide information regarding any off-record matters, which may indude, but are not limited to: leases, recent works of improvement, or commitment statements in effect under the Environmental Responsibility Acceptance Act, Civil Code Section 850, et seq. The Company's Owner's Affidavit form(as provided by company) must be completed and submitted prior to close in order to satisfy this requirement This Commitment will then be subject to such further exceptions and/or requirements as may be deemed necessary. [X] (I) An ALTA/ACSM survey of recent date, which complies with the current minimum standard detail requirements for ALTA/ACSM land title surveys, must be submitted to the Company for review. This Commitment will then be subject to such further exceptions and/or requirements as may be deemed necessary. [X] (J) The following LLC documentation is required: (i) a copy of the Articles of Organization (ii) a copy ofthe Operating Agreement, if applicable (iii) a Certificate of Good Standing and/or other evidence of current Authority to Conduct Business within the State (iv) express Company Consent to the current transaction Form No. 1068-2 Commitment No.; NCS-615644-58-LA2 ALTA Plain Language Commitment Page Number: 8 [] (K) The following partnership documentation is required : (i) a copy of the partnership agreement, induding all applicable amendments thereto (ii) a Certificate of Good Standing and/or other evidence of current Authority to Conduct Business within the State (iii) express Partnership Consent to the current transaction [] (L) The following corporation documentation is required: (i) a copy of the Articles of Incorporation (ii) a copy of the Bylaws, Induding all applicable Amendments thereto (iii) a Certificate of Good Standing and/or other evidence of current Authority to Conduct Business within the State (iv) express Corporate Resolution consenting to the current transaction [X] (M) Based upon the Company's review of that certain partnership/operating agreement dated Not disclosed for the proposed insured herein, the following requirements must be met: Any further amendments to said agreement must be submitted to the Company, together with an affidavit from one of the general partners or members stating that it is a true copy, that said partnership or limited liability company is in full force and effect, and that there have been no further amendments to the agreement. This Commitment will then be subject to such further requirements as may be deemed necessary. [] (N) A copy of the complete lease, as referenced in Schedule A, #3 herein, together with any amendments and/or assignments thereto, must be submitted to the Company for review, along with an affidavit executed by the present lessee stating that it is a true copy, that the lease is in full force and effect, and that there have been no further amendments to the lease. This Commitment will then be subject to such further requirements as may be deemed necessary. [X] (0) Approval from the Company's Underwriting Department must be obtained for issuance of the policy contemplated herein and any endorsements requested thereunder. This Commitment will then be subject to such further requirements as may be required to obtain such approval. [] (P) Potential additional requirements, if ALTA Extended coverage is contemplated hereunder, and work on the land has commenced prior to close, some or all of the following requirements, and any other requirements which may be deemed necessary, may need to be met: [] (Q) The Company's "Mechanic's Lien Risk Addendum" form must be completed by a Company employee, based upon Information furnished by the appropriate parties involved. [] (R) The Company's "Indemnity Agreement I" must be executed by the appropriate parties. [] (S) Finandal statements from the appropriate parties must be submitted to the Company for review. [] (T) A copy of the construction contract must be submitted to the Company for review. [] (U) An inspection of the land must be performed by the Company for verification of the phase of construction. Form No. 1068-2 Commitment No.: NCS-615644-58-LA2 ALTA Plain Language Commitment Page Number: 9 SCHEDULE B SECTION TWO EXCEPTIONS Any policy we issue will have the following exceptions unless they are taken care of to our satisfaction. The printed exceptions and exdusions from the coverage of the policy or policies are set forth in Exhibit A attached. Copies of the policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which issued this Commitment. 1. General and spedal taxes and assessments for the fiscal year 2013-2014, a lien not yet due or payable. 2. The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to Chapter 3.5 commencing with Section 75 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code. 3. Water rights, daims or title to water, whether or not shown by the public records. 4. An easement for pipeline and inddental purposes, recorded July 11, 1930 as Instrument No. 33022 in Book 1796 of Deeds, Page 142. In Favor of: Oceanside Munidpal Water Company, a corporation Affects: As described therein 5. An easement for the privilege and right to extend drainage structures and excavation and embankment slopes beyond the limits of El Camino Real and incidental purposes, recorded March 10, 1936 as Instrument No. 16633 in Book 479, Page 341 and June 12, 1936 as Instrument No. 33744, in Book 521, Page 230, both of Offidal Records. In Favor of: County of San Diego Affects: As described therein 6. An easement for public utilities and inddental purposes, recorded November 27, 1951 as Instrument No. 143719 in Book 4302, Page 427 of Offidal Records. In Favor of: San Diego Gas and Electric Company Affects: As described therein 7. An easement for public utilities and inddental purposes, recorded June 1, 1953 as Instrument No. 74511 in Book 4874, Page 143 of Offidal Records. In Favor of: San Diego Gas and Electric Company Affects: As described therein 8. An easement for public utilities and inddental purposes, recorded June 1, 1953 as Instrument No. 74512 in Book 4874, Page 148 of Offidal Records. In Favor of: San Diego Gas and Electric Company Affects: As described therein Form No. 1068-2 Commitment No.: NCS-615644-58-LA2 ALTA Plain Language Commitment Page Number: 10 9. An easement for a pipeline or pipelines for any and all purposes, together with their necessary fixtures and appurtenances induding but not limited to conduits and cables for power transmission and communication and inddental purposes, recorded June 16, 1961 as Instrument No. 96185 of Offidal Records. In Favor of: Carlsbad Munidpal Water District Affects: As described therein 10. An easement for public utilities and inddental purposes, recorded June 16,1966 as Instrument No. 98887 of Offidal Records. In Favor of: San Diego Gas and Electric Company Affects: As described therein 11. An easement for drainage channel and inddental purposes, recorded March 12, 1970 as Instrument No. 44687 of Official Records. In Favor of: The County of San Diego Affects; As described therein 12. An easement for public utilities and inddental purposes, recorded November 20, 1970 as Instrument No. 213363 of Offidal Records. In Favor of: San Diego Gas and Electric Company Affects: As described therein 13. An easement for drainage and incidental purposes, recorded July 2,1974 as Instrument No 74- 177855 of Offidal Records. In Favor of: The City of Carlsbad Affects: As described therein 14. An easement shown or dedicated on the map filed or recorded December 16, 1980 as Carlsbad Tract No. 76-12 Calavera Hills as Map No. 9935 of Maps For: Sewer and incidental purposes. 15. An easement shown or dedicated on the map filed or recorded December 16, 1980 as Carlsbad Tract No. 76-12 Calavera Hills as Map No. 9935 of Maps For: Open space and inddental purposes. 16. The following redtal as contained on Map No. 9935: Note: The Lots in this subdivision are in proximity to a sewage treatment plant, and may from time to time be subject to unpleasant sewage odors emanating from the treatment plant, use and enjoyment of lots shall be subject to the City's right to operate the plant. 17. Covenants, conditions, restrictions, easements, assessments, liens, charges, terms and provisions in the document recorded July 28,1981 as Instrument No, 81-237824 of Offidal Records, which provide that a violation thereof shall not defeat or render invalid the lien of any first mortgage or deed of trust made in good faith and for value, but deleting any covenant, condition or restriction indicating a preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, national origin, sexual orientation, marital status, ancestry, source of income or disability, to the extent such covenants, conditions or restrictions violate Titie 42, Section 3604(c), of the United States Codes or Section 12955 of the California Government Code. Lawful restrictions under state and federal law on the age of occupants in senior housing or housing for older persons shall not be construed as restrictions based on familial status. Document(s) declaring modifications thereof recorded September 25, 1981 as Instrument No. 81- 305766 of Offidal Records. Form No. 1068-2 Commitment No.; NCS-615644-58-LA2 ALTA Plain Language Commitment Page Number: 11 18. An easement for a drainage easement for maintenance and access purposes and incidental purposes, recorded May 20, 1985 as Instmment No. 85-176497 of Official Records. In Favor of: The City of Carlsbad, a municipal corporation Affects: Lot 140 19. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitied "Parkland Agreement for the Robertson Ranch Master Plan" recorded January 31, 2007 as Instrument No. 2007-0066979 of Offidal Records. 20. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitied "Parkland Purchase Agreement" recorded January 31, 2007 as Instrument No. 2007-0066990 of Offidal Records. 21. An easement for public street and public utility and inddental purposes, recorded June 8, 2007 as Instrument No. 2007-0388769 of Ofliciai Records. In Favor of: City of Carlsbad, a munidpal corporation Affects: As described therein 22. An easement for temporary easement for construction and inddental purposes, recorded June 8, 2007 as Instrument No. 2007-0388771 of Ofliciai Records. In Favor of: City of Carlsbad, a municipal corporation Affects: As described therein 23. An easement for public drainage and access and incidental purposes, recorded June 8, 2007 as Instrument No. 2007-0388772 of Official Records. In Favor of: City of Carlsbad, a munidpal corporation Affects: As described therein 24. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled "Deed Restriction" recorded June 14, 2007 as Instrument No. 2007-0404419 of Ofliciai Records. 25. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitied "Notice of Restriction on Real Property" recorded December 19, 2007 as Instrument No. 2007-0781702 of Official Records. 26. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitied "Notice of Restriction on Real Property" recorded December 19, 2007 as Instrument No. 2007-0781703 of Offidal Records. 27. The terms, provisions and easement(s) contained in the document entitied "Conservation Easement Deed" recorded December 21, 2007 as Instrument No. 2007-0786167 of Oflldal Records. 28. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitied "Memorandum of Management and Funding Agreement (Robertson Ranch West Village)" recorded December 21, 2007 as Instrument No. 2007-0786169 of Offidal Records. 29. An easement for open space and inddental purposes, recorded January 16, 2008 as Instrument No. 2008-0021749 of Offidal Records. In Favor of: City of Carlsbad, a munidpal corporation Affects: As described therein Terms and provisions contained in the above document. Form No. 1068-2 Commitment No.: NCS-615644-58-LA2 ALTA Plain Language Commitment Page Number; 12 30. An easement for public pedestrian trail and incidental purposes, recorded June 16, 2008 as Instrument No. 2008-0322654 of Official Records. In Favor of: City of Carlsbad, a municipal corporation Affects: As described therein 31. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitied "Construction License Agreement" recorded April 5, 2012 as Instrument No. 2012-0198551 of Offidal Records. 32. The effect of a document entitied "Certificate of Compliance for Adjustment Plat", recorded November 13, 2012 as Instrument No, 2012-0706271 of Offidal Records. The Company will require the re-recording of said document to correct the legal description, 33. Any facts, rights, interests or daims which would be disdosed by a correct ALTA/ACSM survey. 34. Rights of parties in possession. Form No. 1068-2 Commitment No.: NCS-615644-S8-LA2 ALTA Plain Language Commitment Page Number: 13 INFORMATIONAL NOTES 1. Taxes for proration purposes only for the fiscal year 2012-2013. First Installment: $188,025.83, PAID Second Installment: $188,025,83, PAIDWPEN Tax Rate Area: 09162 APN: 208-010-41-00 2. Taxes for proration purposes only for the fiscal year 2012-2013. First Installment: $0.00, NO TAX DUE Second Installment: $0.00, NO TAX DUE Tax Rate Area: 09013 APN: 208-101-02-00 3. The property covered by this report is vacant land. 4. According to the public records, there has been no conveyance of the land within a period of twenty four months prior to the date of this report, except as follows: A document recorded January 11, 2013 as Instrument No. 2013-0021930 of Offidal Records. From: The Colony at Calavera Hills Homeowners Assodation, a California non-profit mutual benefit association To: Rancho Costera LLC, a Delaware limited liability company A document recorded January 11, 2013 as Instrument No. 2013-0021931 of Offidal Records. From: Rancho Costera LLC, a Delaware limited liability company To: Rancho Costera LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 5. This preliminary report/commitment was prepared based upon an application for a policy of titie insurance that identified land by street address or assessor's parcel number only. It is the responsibility of the applicant to determine whether the land referred to herein is in fact the land that is to be described in the policy or policies to be issued. The map attached, if any, may or may not be a survey of the land depicted hereon. First American Titie Insurance Company expressly disdaims any liability for loss or damage which may result from reliance on this map except to the extent coverage for such loss or damage is expressly provided by the terms and provisions of the titie insurance policy, if any, to which this map is attached. *****To obtain wire instructions for deposit of funds to your escrow file please contact your Escrow Officer ***** Form No. 1068-2 ALTA Plain Language Commitment Commitment No.: NCS-615644-58-LA2 Page Number: 14 CONDITIONS 1. DEFINITIONS (a) "Mortgage" means mortgage, deed of trust or other security instrument. (b) "Public Records" means titie records that give constructive notice of matters affecting the titie according to the state law where the land is located. 2. LATER DEFECTS The Exceptions in Schedule B - Section Two may be amended to show any defects, liens or encumbrances that appear for the first time in the public records or are created or attached between the Commitment Date and the date on which all of the Requirements (a) and (c) of Schedule B - Section One are met We shall have no liability to you because of this amendment 3. EXISTING DEFECTS If any defects, liens or encumbrances existing at Commitment Date are not shown in Schedule B, we may amend Schedule B to show them. If we do amend Schedule B to show these defects, liens or encumbrances, we shall be liable to you according to Paragraph 4 below unless you knew of this information and did not tell us about it in writing. 4. LIMITATION OF OUR LIABILITY Our only obligation is to issue to you the Policy referred to in tills Commitment, when you have met its Requirements. If we have any liability to you for any loss you incur because of an error in this Commitment, our liability will be limited to your actual loss caused by your relying on this Commitment when you acted in good faith to: comply with the Requirements shown in Schedule B - Section One or eliminate with our written consent any Exceptions shown in Schedule B - Section Two. We shall not be liable for more than the Policy Amount shown in Schedule A of this Commitment and our liability is subject to the terms of the Policy form to be issued to you. 5. CLAIMS MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT Any daim, whether or not based on negligence, which you may have against us concerning the titie to the land must be based on this commitment and is subject to its terms. Form No. 1068-2 Commitment No.: NCS-615644-58-LA2 ALTA Plain Language Commitment Page Number; 15 First American Title Privaqr Information We Are Committed to Safeguarding Customer Information In order to better serve your needs now and in the future, we may ask you to provide us with certain information. We understand that you may bs concerned about what we wiii do with such information - particularly any personal or financial information. We agree that you have a right to l^now how we will utilize the personal Information you provide to us. Therefore, together with our subsidiaries we have adopted this Privacy Policy to govern the use and handling of your personal information. Applicability Tills Privacy Policy governs our use of the information that you provide to us. It does not govem the manner In which we may use informadon we have obtained from any other source, such as information obtained from a public record or from another person or entity, Rrst American has also adopted broader guidelines that govem our use of personal Information regardless of its source. First American calls these guidelines its Fair Information Values. Types of Infonnation Depending upon which of our services you are utilizing, the types of nonpublic personal informadon that we may collect include: • Information we receive from you on applications, forms and In other communications to us, whether In writing, in person, by telephone or any other means; • Information about your transactions with us, our affiliated companies, or others; and • Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency. Use of Information We request informadon from you for our own legitimate business purposes and not for the benefit of any nonaffiliated party. TTierefore, we will not release your InfonnaBon to nonaffiliated parties except: (1) as necessary for us to provide the product or service you have requested of us; or (2) as permitted by law. We may, however, store such informadon indefinitely. Including tJie period after which any customer relationship has ceased. Such informadon may be used fbr any intemal purpose, such as quality control efforts or customer analysis. We may also provide all ofthe types of nonpublic personal information listed above to one or more of our affiliated companies. Such afTiiiated companies include financial service providers, such as tide insurers, property and casualty Insurers, and trust and investment advisory companies, or companies Involved in real estate services, such as appraisal companies, home warranty companies and escrow companies. Furthemiore, we may also provide all the informadon we collect, as described above, to companies that perform mariteting services on our behalf, on behalf of our affiliated companies or to other financial institutions with whom we or our affiliated companies have joint marketing agreements. I^ormer Customers Even If you are no longer our customer, our Privacy Policy will continue to apply to you. Confidentiality and Security We will use our best efforts to ensure that no unauthorized parties have access to any of your Informadon. We restrict access to nonpublic personal Infomiation about you to those Individuals and entities v«ho need to know that Informatton to provide products or services to you. We will use our best efforts to train and oversee our employees and agents to ensure that your information will be handled responsibly and In accordance with this Privacy Policy and First American's Fair Informadon Values. We cun-enBy maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information. Information Obtained Tlirough Our Web Site First American Financial Corporation Is sensitive to privacy Issues on the Internet. We believe it is Important you know how we b-eat the Information about you we receive on the Intemet. In general, you can visit First American or Its affiliates' Web sites on the Worid Wide Web wifliout telling us who you are or revealing any InformaBon about yourself. Our Web servers collect ttie domain names, not the e-mail addresses, of visitors. This information Is aggregated to measure the number of visits, average Hme spent on the site, pages viewed and similar informatton. First American uses this Informatton to measure the use of our site and to devetop Ueas to Improve the content of our site. There are times, however, when we may need Information from you, such as your name and email address. When infonnation is needed, we will use our best efforts to let you know at the time of collection how we will use the personal Informatton. Usually, the personal Information we collect Is used only by us to respond to your inquiry, process an order or allow you to access specific account/profile information. If you choose to share any personal InformaBon with us, we will only use it in accordance with the policies outtined above. Business Relationships First American Financial Corporatton's site and Its affiliates' sites may contain links to other Web sites. While we try to link only to sites that share our high standards and respect for privacy, we are not responsible for the content or the privacy practices emptoyed by other sites. Coolcies Some of First American's Web sites may make use of "cookie" technology to measure site acttvity and to customize informatton to your personal tastes. A cookie is an element of data that a Web site can send to your browser, which may then store the cookie on your hard drive. FirstAm.com uses stored cookies. The goal of this technology Is to better serve you when visiting our site, save you time when you are here and to provide you with a more meaningful and productive Web site experience. Fair Information Values Fairness We consider consumer expectations about their privacy in all our businesses. We only offer products and services that assure a favorable balance between consumer benefits and consumer privacy. Public Record We believe that an open public record creates significant value for society, enhances consumer choice and aeates consumer opportunity. We actively support an open public record and emphasize its Importance and contribution to our economy. Use We believe we should behave responsibly when we use Infomiab'on about a consumer In our business. We will obey the laws governing the collection, use and dissemination of data. Accuracy We will take reasonable steps to help assure the accuracy of die data we collect, use and disseminate. Where possible, we will take reasonable steps to con-ect inaccurate Information. When, as with the publk: record, we cannot correct inaccurate Inforniatton, we will take all reasonable steps to assist consumers In Menttfylng the source of ttie ennneous data so that ttie consumer can secure the required corrections. Education We endeavor to educate the users of our products and services, our employees and others in our industry about the Importance of consumer privacy. We will Instruct our employees on our fair informatton values and on the responsible collection and use of data. We will encourage others in our Industry to collect and use Information in a responsible manner. Security We will maintain appropriate ^ciliUes and systems to protect against unauthorized access to and corruptton of the data we maintain. Form 50-PRIVACy (8/1/09) Page 1 of 1 Privacy Information (2001-2010 First American Financial Corporation) Form No. 1068-2 Commitment No.: NCS-615644-58-LA2 ALTA Plain Language Commitment Page Number; 16 EXHIBIT A LIST OF PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS (BY POUCY TYPE) 1. CAUFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POUCY - 1990 SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not Insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of; 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result In taxes or assessments, or notice of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any fects, rights. Interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an Inspection ofthe land or which may be asserted by persons In possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. 4. Disaepancles, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage In area, encroachments, or any other facts which a coaect survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the Issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the public records. EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or govemmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (1) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment ofthe land; (il) the character, dimensions or location of any Improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land Is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or govemmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any govemmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exerdse thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any talcing which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting In loss or damage which would not have been sustained If the Insured claimant had paid value fbr the insured mortgage or for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured mortgage because of the Inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicabie "doing business" laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. /\ny claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting In the Insured the estate or interest insured by their policy or the transaction creating the interest of the insured lender, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency or similar creditors' rights laws. 2. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POUCY FORM B - 1970 SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE 1. Any law, ordinance or govemmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning ordinances) restricting or regulating or prohibiting the occupancy, use or enjoyment of the land, or regulating the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land, or prohibiting a separation in ownership or a reduction in the dimensions of area of the land, or the effect of any violation of any such law, ordinance or governmental regulation. 2. Rights of eminent domain or govemmental rights of police power unless notice of the exercise of such rights appears in the public records at Date of Policy. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company and not shown by the public records but known to the insured daimant either at Date of Policy or at the date such claimant acquired an estate or interest insured by this policy and not disdosed in writing by the insured claimant to the Company prior to the date such insured claimant became an insured hereunder; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured daimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the Insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 3. AMERICAN UND HTLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POUCY FORM B -1970 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the American Land Title Assodation policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and not as an Extended Coverage Policy the exdusions set forth in paragraph 2 above are used and the following exceptions to coverage appear in the policy. SCHEDULE B Form No. 1068-2 ALTA Plain Language Commitment Commitment No.: NCS-615644-58-LA2 Page Number: 17 This policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the matters shown in parts one and two following: Part One 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or daims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, daims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. 4. Disaepancles, conflicts In boundary lines, shortage In area, encroachments, or any other facts which a con-ect survey would disdose, and which are not shown by public records. 5. Unpatented mining daims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, daims or title to water. 6. Any lien, or right to a lien, fbr services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 4. AMERICAN UND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY - 1970 WITH A.LT.A. ENDORSEMENT FORM 1 COVERAGE SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE 1. Any law, ordinance or govemmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning ordinances) restricting or regulating or prohibiting the occupancy, use or enjoyment of the land, or regulating the character, dimensions or location of any Improvement now or hereafter erected on the land, or prohibiting a separation in ownership or a reduction in the dimensions or area of the land, or the effect of any violation of any such law ordinance or governmental regulation. 2. Rights of eminent domain or govemmental rights of police power unless notice of the exerdse of such rights appears In the public records at Date of Policy. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse daims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured daimant, (b) not known to the Company and not shown by the public records but known to the insured daimant either at Date of Policy or at the date such daimant acquired an estate or interest Insured by this policy or acquired the insured mortgage and not disdosed in writing by the insured daimant to the Company prior to the date such insured claimant became an insured hereunder, (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured daimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to any statutory lien for labor or material or to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for street improvements under construction or completed at Date of Policy). 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortigage because of failure of the insured at Date of Policy or of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness to comply with applicable "doing business" laws ofthe state in which the land is situated. 5. AMERICAN UND TITLE ASSOCIAnON LOAN POLICY - 1970 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the American Land Titie Assodation Lenders Policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and not as an Extended Coverage Policy, the exdusions set forth in paragraph 4 above are used and the following exceptions to coverage appear in the policy. SCHEDULE B This policy does not Insure against loss or damage by reason ofthe matters shown in parts one and two following: Part: One 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or daims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making Inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, daims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. 4. Disaepancles, conflicts In boundary lines, shortage In area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disdose, and which are not shown by public records. 5. Unpatented mining daims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. 6. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 6. AMERICAN UND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY -1992 WITH A.LT.A. ENDORSEMENT FORM 1 COVERAGE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The foiiowing matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of; 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or govemmental regulation (induding but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) resWcting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (I) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment ofthe land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any Improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area ofthe land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part:; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or govemmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy; (b) Any govemmental police power not exduded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exerdse thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. Form No. 1068-2 Commitinent No.: NCS-615644-58-LA2 ALTA Plain Language Commitment Page Number; 18 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not exduding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters; (a) whether or not recorded In the public records at Date of Policy, but created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured daimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured daimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured daimant prior to the date the Insured daimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services, labor or material or the extent insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for street improvements under construction or completed at date of policy); or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the Insured mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with the applicable "doing business" laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or daim thereof, which arises out of the b-ansaction evidenced by tire insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Any statutory lien for sen/ices, labor or materials (or the daim of priority of any statutory lien for services, labor or materials over the lien of the insured mortigage) arising from an Improvement or work related to the land which is contracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or In part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance. 7. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction creating the Interest of the mortgagee insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on; (i) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (ii) the subordination of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a result of the application of the doctrine of equitable subordination; or (iii) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. 7. AMERICAN UND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY - 1992 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPHONS When the American Land Titie Assodation policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and not as an Extended Coverage Policy the exclusions set forth in paragraph 6 above are used and the following exceptions to coverage appear in the policy. SCHEDULE B This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, daims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. 4. Disaepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a con-ect survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records. 5. Unpatented mining daims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the Issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. 6. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 8. AMERICAN UND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POUCY - 1992 EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any taw, onjinance or govemmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (1) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any Improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (ill) a separation In ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or tiie effect of any violation of these laws, onJinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not exduded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exerdse thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting tiie land has been recorted in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. fUghts of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not exduding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse daims, or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured daimant; (b) not known to tire Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed In writing to the Company by the insured daimant prior to the date the insured daimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or Form No. 1068-2 Commitment No.: NCS-615644-58-LA2 ALTA Plain Language Commitment Page Number: 19 (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4 Any daim, which arises out ofthe transaction vesting in the insured the estate or interest insured by this policy, by reason ofthe operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (i) the h-ansaction aeating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent b-ansfer; or (ii) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a preferential b-ansfer except where the preferential transfer results from the feilure: (a) to timely record the instnjment of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien aeditor. 9. AMERICAN UND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POUCY -1992 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the American Land Titie Assodation policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and not as an Extended Coverage Policy the exdusions set forth in paragraph 8 above are used and the following exceptions to coverage appear in the policy. SCHEDULE B This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and tiie Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of; Part One; 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, Interests, or daims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, daims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepandes, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a con-ect survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records. 5. Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. • 6. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. ALTA RESIDENTIAL TITLE INSURANCE POLICY (6-1-87) EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, you are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from: 1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law or government regulation. This includes building and zoning ordinances and also laws and regulations concerning: (a) and use (b) improvements on the land (c) and division (d) environmental protection This exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of these matters which appear in the public records at Policy Date. This exclusion does not limit the zoning coverage described in Items 12 and 13 of Covered Title Risks. 2. The right to take the land by condemning it, unless: (a) a notice of exerdsing the right appears in the public records on the Policy Date (b) the taking happened prior to tiie Policy Date and is binding on you if you bought the land without knowing of the taking 3. Trtle Risks: (a) that are aeated, allowed, or agreed to by you (b) that are known to you, but not to us, on the Policy Date - unless they appeared in the public records (c) that result in no loss to you (d) that first affect your titie after the Policy Date - this does not limit the labor and material lien coverage in Item 8 of Covered Titie Risks 4. Failure to pay value for your titie. 5. Lack of a right: (a) to any land outside the area spedfically described and referred to in Item 3 of Schedule A OR (b) in streets, alleys, or waterways tiiat touch your land This exdusion does not limit the access coverage in Item 5 of Covered Title Risks. 11. EAGLE PROTECnON OWNER'S POLICY CLTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE -1998 ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POUCY OF TITLE INSURANCE -1998 Covered Risks 14 (Subdivision Law Violation). 15 (Building Permit). 16 (Zoning) and 18 (Encroachment of boundary walls or fences) are subject to Deductible Amounts and Maximum Dollar Limits of Liability Form No. 1068-2 Commitment No.: NCS-615644-58-LA2 ALTA Plain Language Commitment Page Number; 20 EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, you are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from; 1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law or govemment regulation. This includes ordinances, laws and regulations conceming: a. building b. zoning c. land use d. improvements on the land e. land division f. environmental protection This exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of these matters if notice of the violation or enforcement appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date. This exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14,15,16,17 or 24. 2. The failure of Your existing structures, or any part of them, to be constructed in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exdusion does not apply to violations of building codes if notice of the violation appears in tiie Public Records at the Policy Date. 3. The right to take the Land by condemning it, unless: a. a notice of exercising the right appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date; or b. the taking happened before the Policy Date and is binding on You if You bought the Land without Knowing of the taking. 4. Risks: a. that are aeated, allowed, or agreed to by You, whether or not they appear in the Public Records; b. that are Known to You at the Policy Date, but not to Us, unless they appear in the Public Records at the Policy Date; c. that result In no loss to You; or d. that first occur after the Policy Date - this does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 7, S.d, 22, 23, 24 or 25. 5. Failure to pay value for Your Titie. 6. Lack of a right: a. to any Land outside the area specifically described and referred to in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and b. in stteets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land. This exdusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 11 or 18. .^^^ 12. THIRD GENERATION EAGLE LOAN POLICY AMERICAN UND TITLE ASSOaATION EXPANDED COVERAGE RESIDENTIAL LOAN POUCY (1/01/08) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly exduded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any Improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or(iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exdusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5, 6,13(c), 13(d), 14 or 16. (b)Any govemmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modif / or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5, 6,13(c), 13(d), 14 or 16. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse daims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Reconjs at Date of Policy, but Known to tiie Insured Claimant and not disdosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting In no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or aeated subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27 or 28); or (e) resulting In loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the Insured Qaimant had paid value for tiie Insured Mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mort;gage because of the inability or fiailure of an Insured to comply with applicable doing business laws of the state where the Land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability in whole or in part of the lien of the Insured (Mortgage that arises out of the ttansaction evidenced by the Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury, or any consumer aedit protection or ttuth-in-lending law. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 26. 6. Any daim of invalidity, unenforceability or lack of priority of tiie lien of the Insured Mortgage as to /Advances or modifications made after the Insured has Knowledge that the vestee shown In Schedule A is no longer the owner of the estate or interest covered by this policy. This Exdusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 11. 7. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching subsequent to Date of Policy. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 11(b) or 25. 8. The failure of the residential sbxicture, or any portiion of it, to have been consttucted before, on or after Date of Policy in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exdusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 5 or 6. 13. AMERICAN UND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POUCY - 2006 EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of; 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to Form No. 1068-2 ALTA Plain Language Commitment Commitment No.: NCS-615644-58-LA2 Page Number: 21 (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or govemmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any govemmental police power. This Exdusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exdusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse daims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disdosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Qaimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Qaimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11, 13, or 14); or (e) resulting In loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the inability or failure of an Insured to comply with applicable doing- business laws of the state where the Land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability in whole or in part: of the lien of the Insured Mortgage that arises out of the transaction evidenced by the Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth-in-lending law. 6. Any daim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction creating the lien of the Insured Mortgage, is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 13(b) of this policy. 7. Any lien on the Titie for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the Insured Mortgage in the Public Records. This Exdusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11(b). 14. AMERICAN UND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POUCY - 2006 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the American Land Titie Association policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and not as an Extended Coverage Policy the exclusions set forth in paragraph 13 above are used and the following exceptions to coverage appear in the policy. SCHEDULE B This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an Inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession ofthe Land. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or daims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disdosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining daims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the Issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or titie to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. 15. AMERICAN UND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY - 2006 EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restticting, regulating, pt-ohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection;or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exdusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. Form No. 1068-2 ALTA Plain Language Commitment Commitinent No.: NCS-615544-S8-Lfli2 Page Number: 22 (b) Any govemmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exdusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public ReconJs at Date of Policy, but Known to ttie Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Qaimant prior to the date the Insured Qaimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Qaimant; (d) attaching or aeated subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modif/ or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 9 and 10); or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Qaimant had paid value for the Titie. 4. Any daim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors rights laws, that the transaction vesting the Titie as shown in Schedule A, is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent ttansfer; or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9 of this policy. 5. Any lien on the Titie for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by govemmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other insttument of b-ansfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. 16. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY - 2006 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the American Land Title Assodation policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and not as an Extended Coverage Policy the exdusions set fortii in paragraph 15 above are used and the following exceptions to coverage appear in the policy. SCHEDULE B This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or daims that are not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of tiie Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any enaoachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Titie that would be disdosed by an accurate and complete land survey ofthe Land and not shown by the Public Recorts. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or In Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or titie to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. %>cn.o, • • a FILE ^ CARLSBAD Community & Economic Devetopment www.carisbadca.gov NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, February 5, 2014, to consider a request for the following: CASE NAME: GPA 13-02/MP 02-03(E)/CT 13-03/PUD 13-06/HDP 13-01/SUP 13-02 - ROBERTSON RANCH WEST VILLAGE PUBLISH DATE: January 24, 2014 DESCRIPTION: Request for a recommendation of approval of a General Plan Amendment, Master Plan Amendment, Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Planned Development Permit, Hillside Development Permit, and Special Use Permit to subdivide and grade a 201.37 acre site into 345 lots including 308 single-family residential lots, 2 multi-family lots for the future development of 364 dwelling units, one 12 acre commercial lot, 5 open space lots, 5 neighborhood recreation lots, 1 Community Facilities lot, 9 private Street lots, and 14 lots to be owned by future Home Owners' Associations on property generally located south of Tamarack Avenue, north and east of El Camino Real and north of Cannon Road in Local Facilities Management Zone 14. The City Planner has determined that this project is within the scope of the Robertson Ranch Master Plan EIR 03-03 and Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted for GPA 11-07/MP 02-03(C)/CT 11-01/HDP 11-01/SUP 11-02/HMP 11-03 - Robertson Ranch West Village on October 17, 2012. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing and provide the decision makers with any oral or written comments they may have regarding the project. Copies of the staff report will be available online at http://carlsbad.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.php7view id=6 on or after the Friday prior to the hearing date. If you have any questions, or would like to be notified of the decision, please contact Christer Westman in the Planning Division at (760) 602-4614, Monday through Thursday 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008. APPEALS The time within which you may judicially challenge these projects, if approved, is established by State law and/or city ordinance, and is very short. If you challenge this project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing. • Appeals to the Citv Council: Where the decision is appealable to the City Council, appeals must be filed in writing within ten (10) calendar days after a decision by the Planning Commission. CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION Planning Division 1635 Faraday Ave. I Carlsbad, CA 92008 I 760-602-4600 ! 760-602-8558 fax NOT TO SCALE SITE MAP Robertson Ranch West Village GPA 13-02 / MP 02-03(E) / CT 13-03 / PUD 13-06 / HDP 13-01 / SUP 13-02 The Coast News Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County. Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to The Coast News, P.O. Box 232550, Encinitas, CA 92023 (760) 436-9737 Proof of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am principal clerk of the printer of The Coast News, a newspaper printed and published weekly and which news- paper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation for the cities of Carmel Valley, Del Mar, Solana Beach, Encinitas/Cardiff, Carlsbad, Oceanside, Vista, San Marcos, Escondido and the County Judicial District by the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego (8/4/94, #677114, B2393, P396); and that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in, each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: January 24. 2014 I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California on this 24th of Jaijuary 2014. City of Carlsbad JAN 2 8 2014 Planning Division Space above for County Clerk's Filing Stamp cmr OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN 10 you, berause your interest may bs affeaed that the Planning Commission ol ths City of Carisbad will hold a public hgar-ing at the Council Chambars, 1200 Carlstwcl jVillaoe Drive, Carlsbad. California, at 6:00 p m. on Wednesday. February S, 2014, to consider the fol- itjWing: 1) AV 13-08 - ROSS RV PARKING - An appeal ol the City Planner's deci- sion to approve Admtnistralivo Variance, AV 13-08. to allow a recreational irehicle (BV) to be parted in the required front yard setback of a loi located al Garboso Street. The City Planner has detarrnineo that tho protect belongs to a class of proiects Ihat the State Secretary lot Resources has found do not have a .significant impact on tho environment, and It is thafs- foro catogoiicalty exempt from tha requirement lor the preparation ol envi- ronmental dbcumants pursuant to Section 15305 - Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations for a setbactr variance, of the state CEOA Guidelines, e • ,~ , ' , • \' Rosa RV Perking 2) GPA 13-02/MP 02-03(E)/CT 13-03/PUD 13-06/HDP 13-01/SUP 13-02 -ROBERTSON RANCH WEST VILLAGE - Request lor a recommendation oi approval of a General Plan Amendment, Master Plan Amendmam, Vasting Teniative Tract Map, Planned Development Permit, Hillside Development Permit, and Special Use Permit lo subdivide and grade a 201,37 acre siia into 34B lots inclucSng 308 single-family residential lots, 2 molti-larnily lots tor the luture development ol 38<» dwelling units, one 12 acre commercial lot, 5 open space lots, 5 neightwrhood recreation lots, 1 Community Facilities loi. 9 private street lots, and 14 lots to be owned by future Home Owners" Associations on property generally located south of Tamarar* Avenue, nortti and east of El Camino Real and north ol Cannon Road in Local Factlilies Ivlanagemont Zone 14. The City Planner has dater-minod that Ihis project is within Ihe scope of the Robertson Ranch Master Plan EIR 03-03 and (ilitiBated Negative Daclaration adopted lor GPA 11-07/MP 0Z-03(Ci/CT 11-01/HOP n.Ol/SUP ll-oa/HMP 11-03 - Robertson Ranch West Village on October 17, 20i 2, e Hcteto; Raficii Weal Visia^je r-VCl ti*3(i' fKP 1301SAg> U-JK? II you challenge thcso projects in court, you may Ise limited to raising cMify those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing deserved in this notice or in wrttien corrospondence deiivored to the City of Cartsbad at or prior lo Iho pubtic hearing. Copies ot tho enviforvmonta! documertfs are avaitabJe at the Pianning Division at 1635 Faraday Avenue during r^gutar business hours from 7:30 am to 5:30 pm Monday through TTiursday and 8:00 am to 5:00 pm Friday. Th.ose parscffvs wishing to speak on these proposals aro cordially invited to attend the pubftc hearing, Coptea of the statt reports will be avaiiabie oniino at hta^tedSkarf^caniS«S,C«IBi5?iffi^^ on or after the Friday prior to the hsaring dais. If you have any questions, pisaso call the Planning Division at (700) 602-4600. CfTY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIViSiON 01/^4/14 CN 1581't PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2010 & 2011 CCP.) This space is for the CounlY Clerk's Filing Stamp City of Carlsbad STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. I am the princ '"'prk ofthe printer of UT - Nortii County JAN 2 7 2014 Pianning Division Proof of Publication of Formerly known as the North County Ti which newspaper has been adjudicate newspaper of general circulation by the Court of the County of San Diego, California, for the City of Oceanside and tt" Escondido, Court Decree numbers 17 172171, for the County of San Diego, notice of which the annexed is a printed ( in type not smaller than nonpariel), h published in each regular and entire issu' newspaper and not in any supplement ti- the following dates, to-wit: 3anuary 24*^ 2014 I certify (or declare) under penalty of pe the foregoing is true and correct. PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your Interest may be affected, that the Platining Cointnission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, February 6,2014, to consider the foilowing: 1) AV 13-08 - ROSS RV PARKING - An appeal of the City Planner's decision to approve Administrative Variance, AV 13-08, to allow a recreational vehicle (RV) to be parked In the required front yard setbacl< of a lot located at 3024 Garboso Street. The City Planner has determined that the project belongs to a class of projects that the State Secretary for Resources has found do not have a signifi- cant impact on the environment, and it is therefore categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents pursuant to Section 15305 - Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations for a setback variance, of the state CEQA Guidelines. 21 GPA 13-02/MP 02-03<E1/CT IS-OaffUD 13-06/HPP 13-01/SUP 13-02 - ROBERTSON RANCH WEST VILLAGE - Request for a recommendation of approval of a General Plan Amendment, Master Plan Amendment, Vesting Ten- tative Tract Map, Planned Development Permit, Hillside Development Permit, and Special Use Permit to subdivide and grade a 201.37 acre site into 345 lots including 308 single-family residential lots, 2 multi-family kits for the future development of 364 dwelling units, one 12 acre commercial lot, 5 open space lots, 5 neighborhotDd recreation lots, 1 Com- munity Facilities lot, 9 private street lots, and 14 lots to be owned by future Home Owners' Associations on property generally located south ot Tamarack Avenue, north and east of El Camino Real and north of Cannon Road in Local Facilities Management Zone 14. The City Planner has determined that this project is within the scope ofthe Robertson Ranch Master Plan EIR 03-03 and Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted for GPA 11 -07/MP 02-03(C)/CT 11 -01/HDP 11-01/SUP 11 - 02/HMP 11-03 - Robertson Ranch West Viilage on October 17, 2012. If you challenge these projects in court, you may be limited to raising only tho^ Issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence deliv- ered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing. Copies of the environmental documents are available at the Planning Division at 1635 Faraday Avenue during regu- lar business hours from 7:30 am to 5:30 pm Monday through Thursday and 8:00 am to 5:00 pm Friday. Those persons wishing to speak on these proposals are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff reports will be available online at http://carlsbad.granictjs.com/ViewPubiisher.php?viewJd=6 on or after the Friday prior to the hearing date. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Division at (760) 602-4600. PUBLISH: January 24,2014 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION Dated at Oceanside, California On This 24*^ day January 2014 Jane Allshouse NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Ac^vertising ATTACHMENT "1' I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS LIST AND LABELS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ON THIS DATE REPRESENT THE LATEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION FROM THE EQUALIZED ASSESSOR'S ROLES. APPLICATION NAME AND NUMBER Robertson Ranch West Village: GPAi11-07/MP 02-03(C) / CT 11-01 / HDP 11-01 / SUP 11-03 DATE: / RECEIVED BY DATE: 168-05 SHT 1 OF 1"=800' SHT 3 a b c d Q f SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S M AP BOOK 168 PAGE 05 SHT 1 OF 5 N23°04'17''E R=700, N32°36 0/ E R=400, , R=300, S78°59'51 E R=400, N67°25'41 E R=700 N50°22'37"E N3''38 23 E 11.02 105.80 116.44 272.32 214.92 347.71 196.95 399.16 234.39 74.19 208.32 1559.73 965.38 N55''58 24 E R=1000 „ Nss-ss'ia"/ N10°54'38°W N4°26'W HvW^ 1.44°44"Vt; N4°39'W N4°42Vtf NI MS'Vt/ NI"25 W N0°05 E N69°55E 2111.34 133.76 240.42 123.48 98.81 50.20 50.20 50.62 78.93 52.55 57.66 54.69 31.21 AAR=210, BB S6ri8'45"W CC R=190 DD R=253, „ EE S3r57 56 W FF R=1958 GG R=1346 „ HH S24°14 45 V(/ II R=25 , ^ JJ S80°2340"'E KK R=25 LL N24°14'45"E 29.53 64.57 26.72 19.01 73.26 22.55 165.85 114.54 39.56 67.14 39.55 114.58 1* CONDO RANCHO CARLSBAD COUNTRY CLUB ESTATES DOC98 -85694 (SEE SHTS 4 *: 2» RANCHO CARLSBAD COUNTCY CLUB ESTATES (COMMUNITY COMMON AREA) SEE MAP FOR BEARINGS & DISTANCES NO ACCESS 18' PUBLIC TRAIL ESMT OPEN SPACE MSD - RHO AGUA HEDIONDA - POR LOTS D.E & L MM 23? - ROS 6616 7918.9336,14818.15661,17111 ROS 20106 SPACE; PARCEL NUMBER 1 TO 99 771 -680-50--01 TO 99 100 TO 199 771 -680-51--00 TO 99 ado TO 299 771 -630-•52 -00 TO 99 505 771 -680-•55 -05 * PRI VATE ST REET 9/27/2011 CS CHANGES CUT SATt DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOff'S WP BOOKteS PAGt 05 SHT. 168-05 SHT. 2 \ T NO SCALE NC ;ES BLKIOLD NEW CUT 51 58,61,62 65,67,6S 5g,70,74, 77.7Sj!8q ) >KIU. 1 00 00 00 6222 6225 6224 Si 82,83,63, 89,30,92, H9e&99 ) >KIU- ) 00 00 00 6222 6225 6224 52 0t,a3,dcOS ) >KIU- ) 00 00 00 6222 6225 6224 32 07,12,15, 07.12,15. 00 00 00 6222 6225 6224 33,39,50 53 tt 591 1 00 00 00 6222 6225 6224 6),SS,75, 77,814:90 KILL 00 6225 55 05 KILL 00 6229 50 IB KILL 00 4020 50 94 Kip. m 4038 52 50 34 Kia 4038 52 50 ?1 Kia 01 4083 51 60 KILL 01 4371 50 34&93 KILL 4453 52 52 KILL 4453 51 KILL •02 ) 4075 52 2g&98 KILL •02 ) 4075 55 PICKUP 52 02 4077 51 EICKUP 09 02 4217 51 14&96 KILL ' •02 4358 5? 14 KILL ' •02 4358 51 18&38 } 52 9,26,41, +2.49,518 65 ;>kiLL 02 4393 9,26,41, +2.49,518 65 ) 52 KILL 02 6058 51 771-665-S1-48 02 10079 50 07 KILL 03 4012 51 02 KILL 03 03 4023 4190 51 28 KILL 03 03 4023 4190 52 50 11,HS4, 55,62,63, 72,73,80, S3,S7,34S 99 00,78,8.08 ) 4267 52 50 11,HS4, 55,62,63, 72,73,80, S3,S7,34S 99 00,78,8.08 KILL >03 4267 52 50 11,HS4, 55,62,63, 72,73,80, S3,S7,34S 99 00,78,8.08 ) 52 50 11,HS4, 55,62,63, 72,73,80, S3,S7,34S 99 00,78,8.08 KILL 03 4269 52 50 THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY IS ASSU\€D FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE DATA SHOW. ASSESSOR'S PARCELS MAr NOT COMPLY WH LOCAL SUBDIVISDN OR BUILDING ORDINANCES. RANCHO CARLSBAD MOBILE HOME PARK MAPPED FOR MOBILE HOME ASSESSMENT ONLY 09 , QjUJ t: cc 2: .-.ceo lis 5=a 5/5/03 CHANGES BLK 53 54 55 OLD 49&7S 36a44_ 06 NEW YR CUT > KILL 03 4393 SAM DiEOO r.CUN1Y •^SESSO;*'? V'AP BOOK lea P-AQl 03 .SHT 3 SPACE PARCEL NUMBER 300 TO 399 771-680-53-00 TO 99 400 TO 499 771-680-54-00 TO 99 .500 TO 504 771-630-55-00 TO 04 * PRIVATE STREET RANCHO CARLSBAD MAPPED FOR MOBILE CHA NGES BLK OLD NEW CUT 54 93 KILL 01 4327 54 53 08 90 KILL KILL OS KILL| 2L 01 02 4446 4532 4122 54 55 54 53 53 +0&64 PICKUP KILL KILL OS KILL| 2L 01 02 4446 4532 4122 54 55 54 53 53 73 04 KILL KILL OS KILL| 02 4393 54 55 54 53 53 14.18.20, 21,23,24, 33&35 ' KILL ) 02 6058 54 55 54 53 53 57,58,60, 62,64,58; 78,86,89 92.96&9'j • KILL _ 02 6059 53 98 ) 02 6059 54 00.01,oei 07,10,15, 16,13,19,( 28,39,42 a 45 > KILL 02 6060 00.01,oei 07,10,15, 16,13,19,( 28,39,42 a 45 ) 54 KILL 02 6067 53 72 KILL 03 4028 53 76 KILL 03 4190 53 31,32,S4, -> 54 11,12,50, 51,54,7Z 73,75,76, 77,80,Slk KILL^ 54 11,12,50, 51,54,7Z 73,75,76, 77,80,Slk KILL^ |>0J 4267 82 KILL^ 55 01 63 02,06413 KILL 03 4269 (68 -03 SHT. 3 MO SCALE CHA t^GES BLK OLD NEW VR CUT 55 02 KILL 89 4164 _ 53 =ICKUP 02 89 b 4183 3 5 55 'ICKUP 99 89 b 4183 3 5 53 =ICKUP 03 go 4412 3 53 PICKUP 04 91 4188 3 53 PICKUP 05 '31 S 4284 ; 3 53 PICKUP OS '31 S 4284 ; 3 54 02 KILL •?2 4266 53 07 KILL •?2 4266 53 04 KILL 94 4183 55 93 KILL 96 4006 53 35 KILL 96 4145 S4 PICKUP 95 96 S 4300 4 53 PICKUP 07 95 c 4323 ? 54 97 KILL 97 4075 54 83 KILL 9S 4093 54 PICKUP 64 99 4013 53 63 KILL! DO 6058 54 20&31 KILL! DO 6058 53 08 KILL •00 \ 6074 54 86 KILL •00 \ 6074 53 Ol, Da,Q5i07 KILL 00 6225 53 10.11,15 22,27,23 34.37,47 »3,Soa5 ) •KILL 00 6226 10.11,15 22,27,23 34.37,47 »3,Soa5 ) •KILL 00 6226 53 59,74,B0 85,68,91 94S!99 53 59,74,B0 85,68,91 94S!99 >KILL 00 6227 54_. 54 03,05& 09 23,24,2-30.33.3e 54_. 54 03,05& 09 23,24,2-30.33.3e • •KILL 00 5228 "54" 38.43.48 • •KILL 00 5228 "54" 35,70.76 85,68.9S > •KILL 1 00 6229 98!c99 > •KILL 1 00 6229 53 52&S1 'KILL ) 01 403S 54 91 'KILL ) 01 403S 53 42 KILL 01 4188 53 41.93 { 1 95 1 KILL _oi 4511. BILE HOME PARK HOME ASSESSMEIMT ONLY i o — oi o o o CM 3 o § 09 SAH OEGO COIMTY ASSESSOR'S MAP 168-31 SHT 1 OF 2 1" = 400' 01/28/04 ASF DETAIL "B SCALE 1"=200' CHANQE J O m pmfJV mWAPH yn cyrro. no 01 THRU Oi 04 3 no 03 05 A (JS 04 IJ90 01 07iPSi} SHTS fi2 04 163 02 P0S5 SHIS 1-4 04 IBS 04 oaipon SllSli2 04 w MAP 14725-CARLSBAD TCT NO 01-04 CALAVERA HILLS-VILLAGE U MAP 14706 - CARLSBAD TCT NO 01-06 CALAVERA HILLS-VILLAGE X MAP 14541 - CARLSBAD TCT NO 00-02 CALAVERA HILLS - PHASE II J SAN DIEGO emu ASESSOR'S MAP 168-33 SHT 2 OF 2 f^^r^ 2 CL CO CM o 09 03 CO to CM d o o JM CO g CM o SAN «EGO COUNTf ASESSIR'S MAP 168-35 SHT 1 OF 4 1" = 100' Brotn: 01/15/04 gtf ASF from: lSS-3fO CHANG-ES pmixim «? curm 350 1 muj7 04 im 1* PUBUC TRAIL EASEMENT 2* LOT 120 IS ASSESSED ON PG 35 SHT 4 3* LOT 122 IS ASSESSED ON PG 35 SHT 4 MAP 14724-CARLSBAD TCT NO 01-05 CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE "W" J a9 < O o o o SA« DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S HAP 168-35 SHT 2 OF 4 1" = 100' / 02/25/2004 KJA v CHANGES BLK mm 351 01 muio Oi tas 1* PUBUC TRAIL EASEMENT 2* LOT 119. ts ASSESSED ON PG'55 SHT 1 3* LOT 120 IS ASSESSED ON PG 35 SHT 4 4* LOT 122 IS ASSESSED ON PG 35 SHT 4 MAP 14724-CARLSBAD TCT NO 01-05 CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE "W" J 09 a a. I LU fe e 1 O g S 11* CONDO PLANNING AREA 21 IN THE FOOTHILLS AT CARLSBAD - PHASE D0C11-0590783 (SEE SHT 4) 12* CONDO PLANNING AREA 21 IN THE FOOTHILLS AT CARLSBAD - PHASE 8 DQC11-0590784 (SEE SHT 4) 13* CONDO PLANNING AREA 21 IN THE FOOTHILLS AT CARLSBAD - PHASE 9 D0C11-0590785 (SEE SHT 4) CONDO PLANNING AREA 21 IN THE FOOTHILLS AT CARLSBAD -D0C11-0590786 (SEE SHT 4) CONDO PLANNING AREA 21 IN THE FOOTHILLS AT CARLSBAD D0C11-0590787 (SEE SHT 4) 16* CONDO PLANNING AREA 21 IN THE FOOTHILLS AT CARLSBAD D0C11-0590788 (SEE SHT 4) PHASE 10 17* CONDO PLANNING AREA 21 IN THE FOOTHILLS AT CARLSBAD -D0C11-0590789 (SEE SHT 4) 18* CONDO PLANNING AREA 21 IN THE FOOTHILLS AT CARLSBAD -D0C11-0590790 (SEE SHT 4) 19* CONDO PLANNING AREA 21 IN THE FOOThllLLS AT CARLSBAD - D0C11-0590791 (SEE SHT 4) 20* CONDO PLANNING AREA 21 IN THE FOOTHILLS AT CARLSBAD - 00C11-0590792 (SEE SHT 4) PHASE 13 PHASE 14 SHT 2 MATCH UNE 72.17 N32-44TE IS.77 73.9S SAN DIECO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S HAP 168-36 SHT 1 OF 4 .i 1" = 200' f » 02/08/12 MGC [CHANGES! BLK PRIOR APN mm W CUT tw. 3S0 01 THRU OB Od 103 02&03 09 10 15 09 I0&I1 10 1311 4 PC 33 tt e 05 Sl -050-55 12 Ik 13 fl 1177 10 cmo tt 524 12 t4&l5 12 1231 RC II CONDO 12 555 1* OPEN SPACE 2* CONDO PLANNING AREA 21 IN THE FOOTHILLS AT CARLSBAD - PHASE 1 DOC09-0541394 (SEE SHT 3) 3* CONDO PLANNING AREA 21 IN THE FOOTHILLS AT CARLSBAD - PHASE 2 D0C09-0672308 (SEE SHT 3) 4* CONDO PLANNING AREA 21 IN THE FOOTHILLS AT CARLSBAD - PHASE 3 D0C09-0672309 (SEE SHT 3) 5* CONDO PLANNING AREA 21 IN THE FOOTHILLS AT CARLSBAD - PHASE 4 DOC09-0672310 (SEE SHT 3) 6* CONDO PLANNING AREA 21 IN THE FOOTHILLS AT CARLSBAD - PHASE 17 00009-0672311 (SEE SHT 3) 7* CONDO PLANNING AREA 21 IN THE FOOTHILLS AT CARLSBAD - PHASE 18 DOCOg-0672312 (SEE SHT 3} 8* 18' PUaUC'TRAIL ESMT 9* CON6"O PLANNING AREA 21 IN THE FOOTHILLS AT CARLSBAD - PHASE 5 0OC11-0590731 (SEE SHT 4) 10* CONDO PLANNING AREA 21 IN THE FOOTHILLS AT CARLSBAD - PHASE 6 00011-0590782 (SEE SHT 4) MAR, 1S-754'-CARLSBAD TCT 06-25 ROBERTSON RANCH EAST VILLAGE PLANNING AREA 21 TAP 15608-CARLSBAD TCT 02-16 ROBERTSON RANCH EAST VILLAGE J 09 3 3 CJ o OL. O (/) i LU o >- I i LU s i SAH DIEGO COUMTi' ASSESSOR'S MAP 168-36 SHT 2 OF 2 1" = 400' 7/07/09 MGS gACTffi 12/27/07 Sf. MS.rrmJOB-tSg^ BLK PRia9 APti YR CUTNO. 361 01 mj 03 OS ICS 01 S02 S«il€ & CGVSfSMr 03 5319 Oi PG 37 SITS t THRU 4 09 14 1* SEE RECORD MAP FOR DIST & BRGS P 15608-CARLSBAD TC"L/<f2-16 ROBERTSON RANCH EAST VILLAGE C/5 UJ O s a o a o ca 3 >2 s i 09 PLANNING AREA 21 IN THE FOOTHILLS DOC 09 - 541394 LOT 1 ~ MAP 15754 ASSESSMENT PAR NO 168-360-10 SUB ID l25l- |28| PLANNING AREA 21 IN THE FOOTHILLS DOC 09 ~ 672308 LOT 1 - MAP 15754 ASSESSMENT PAR NO 168-360-10 SUB ID Ql- QH PLANNING AREA 21 IN THE FOOTHILLS DOC 09 - 672309 LOT 1 - MAP 15754 ASSESSMENT PAR NO 168-360-10 SUB ID PLANNING AREA 21 IN THE FOOTHILLS DOC 09 - 672310 LOT 1 - MAP 15754 ASSESSMENT PAR NO 168-360-10 SUB ID O- US PLANNING AREA 21 IN THE FOOTHILLS DOC 09 - 672311 LOT 1 - MAP 15754 ASSESSMENT PAR NO 168-360-10 SUB ID AT CARLSBAD PHASE 1 AT CARLSBAD PHASE 2 AT CARLSBAD PHASE 3 AT CARLSBAD PHASE 4 SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP 168 — 36 SHT 3 Pram: 07/29/10 By:EO PLANNING AREA 21 IN THE FOOTHILLS DOC 09 - 672312 LOT 1 - MAP 15754 ASSESSMENT PAR NO 168-360-10 SUB ID jMI- lOl AT CARLSBAD PHASE 17 AT CARLSBAD PHASE 18 CONDOMINIUM PHASE 6 DOC 11 - 590782 LOT 1, MAP 15754 PHASE 7 DOC 11 - 590783 LOT 1, MAP 15754 ASSESSMENT PAR NO 168-360-11 SUB ID [45l- [48l PHASE 9 DOC 11 - 590785 LOT 1, MAP 15754 ASSESSMENT PAR NO 168-360-11 SUB ID IU- |52! PHASE 11 DOC 11 - 590787 LOT 1, MAP 15754 ASSESSMENT PAR NO 168-360-11 SUB ID PHASE 8 DOC 11 ~ 590784 LOT 1, MAP 15754 ASSESSMENT PAR NO 168-360-11 SUB ID SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP 168-36 SHT 4 1" = 80" Dram 02/07/12 ByrltCC - 123 PHASE 10 DOC 11 - 590786 LOT 1, MAP 15754 ASSESSMENT PAR NO 168-360-11 SUB 10 QT]- HO] PHASE 12 DOC 11 - 590788 LOT 1, MAP 15754 ASSESSMENT PAR NO 168-360-11 SUB ID (Hj- IH PHASE 14 DOC 11 - 590790 LOT 1, MAP 15754 ASSESSMENT PAR NO 168-360-11 SUB ID {OT!- PHASE 16 DOC 11 - 590792 LOT 1, MAP 15754 ASSESSMENT PAR NO 168-360-11 SUB ID 121- l34| CONDOMINIUM-PLANNING AREA 21 FOOTHILLS AT CARLSBAD J SAN WEGO COUNTf ASSESSOR'S MAP 168-37 SHT 1 OF 4 1" = 100' CHANGES SLK PRIOR APN m/ APII )5? CUTNO. 370 1 TriRU 90 09 14 1* CONSERVATION EASEMENT 2* REMAINDER OF LOT 310 IS SHOWN PG 37 SHTS 2 & 3 MAP 3S 15682-CARLSBAD TCT NO 04-26 ROBERTSON RANCH EAST VILLAGE PLANNING AREAS 16, 17 18 j SAM DEW mm ASSESSOR'S MAP 168-37 SHT 2 OF 4 1" = 100' CHANGES BLK PRiOR APN new m •/R (XJTNO. 37/ 1 mj75 09 14 1* PEDESTRIAN TRAIL EASEMENT 2* CONSERVATION EASEMENT 3* REMAINDER OF LOT 311 tS SHOWN ON PG 37 SHT 4 SAN OIEGO COUNTf ASSESSOR'S MAP 158—37 SHT 3 OF 4 CHANGES BLK PRiOR APH nat APii YR CUTNO. 372 t THRU S3 09 If 36^ SHT^I MAP 15682-CARLSBAD TCT NO 04-26 ROBERTSON RANCH EAST VILLAGE PLANNING AREAS 16, 17 & 18 ^ DETAIL "B' SCALE 1"=10' SAM DIECO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP 158 — 37 SHT 4 OF 4 1" = 100' CHANGES BLK PRIOR APH HEW APII m cunn. 373 ! THRU 77 t4 1* PUBUC P03ESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT MAP 15682-CARLSBAD TCT NO 04-26 ROBERTSON RANCH EJ^ST VILLAGE PLANNING AREAS 16, 17 & 18 .J ..X £3 09 SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP 168-38 f2 in 1" = 100' 1^ 8 5 >- •a: 1 CO o i LU LL. O Dram: 7/14/10 Br.M Fran: 163-360 CHANGES BU< PRIOR APN NEW APN m CUTNO. 380 01 THRU 19 ft 6 1* DEDICATED & REJECTED 2* PEDESTRIAN & NON-MOTOR VEHICULAR RIGHT OF WAY MAP 15780-CARLSBAD TCT 07-03-R0BERTS0N RANCH EAST VILLAGE PLANNING AREA 14 J I b 207-10 SHT I0F2 I SHT 3 3/06/01 JGRO GO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP BK 207 PG 10 - SHT I OF 2 MARINA DR.- ® ® •4400' y I • = NO ACCESS 2* = OPEN SPACE 1 CHANGES BLK CX.D NEW Yf^jCUT •• \ • PAHSf V PS.3& 78 30 P6.3(, 78 /0OS4 80 Z306, ,. 3/ 2.^4- /^a l9 Z55Z /CO SS 57-SS 35 /323 100 ^9 \ fW.3J> 85 S3 39 Si, z/i> 87 123 44 '• -^fl-4to 61: lOOjlo • .':) ~poe. f>e,> 88:, 27J I 88 1573 6Z 89 5S08 iHr-l/l 89 THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESaCI'JT PURPOSES ONLY LWBm ASSliMEO TO THE ACCURACY OF THE DATA SKJWN. ASSESSOR S PARCELS IIT CO^KY WH LOCAL SUBDWISDN OR BUILDING ORDIIWCES. MAP 10870-CARLSBAD TCT N0.S2-2I MAP 823 - RHO AGUA HEDIONDA POR LOT I - MM-231 ROS 3786. H^8^.^852. 5289. SmH, 11507 , 12164 .43 CANC CANC SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK 207 PAGE 10 SHT 2 OF 2 MM 231, ROS 3786,4484,4852,5289,5414,9017,9564,9860,10874,12164 207-23 I = 100 OLD NEW CUT 73 DETAIL NO SCALE THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESa^ENT PURPpSES ONLY NO LBBI^^^^^^ ASSWvlED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE DATA SHOWN. ^.-^SSESSOR S PARC^^^^^ MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL SUBDIVISON OR BUILDING ORDINANCES. T-3/-70 SAN OIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP BK 207 PQ 23 MAP 6155 MAP 5871 LAGUNA RIVIERA UNIT NO. 2 LAGUNA RIVIERA UNIT NO.1 ,01 «o© 207-33 SAN OIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOl- 2^07 P.,GE 3.^. MAP 8033 = CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 73-^5 i i"= lOO" e J 6/03/99 BEM CHANGES BLK OLD NEW CUT 331 ?=72— t-17 ? 333 -It, I4S. m 332 5513 • 0 o I o CVI 207-34 SHTI OF2 ! e REAU CAMlNO CHANGES BLK OLD NEW YR CUT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY. NO 1-IABILITY IS S IMb TOR THE ASCY OF THE DATA SHOWN. „.ASSESSOR^S PARCE^^^^ SftY WDT COMPLY WITH LOCAL SUBDIVISION OR BUILDING ORDINANCES. SAN OIESO COUNTV ASSESSOR'S HAP BR 207 PS 34 SHT.! MAP 8039 - CARLSBAD TCT NO. 73-8 THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES O.^L^' ^g^^^^^^^ it;";! MFn FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE DATA SHOWN, ASSESSOR b HWitLS ^Y tCT CC»Ii*Y WTO OR BUiLDING ORDINANCES. 0 0 o cu PALISADES DR. 1 207-34 SHT20F2 /Oo* CHANGES BLK OLD NEW YR CUT 342 1 e SAN 01E60 COUNTY ASSESSOR'S HAP SR 207PS 34 SHT. 2 MAP 8039 - CARLSBAD TCT NO. 73-8 09 207-37 ® 1 I"=100* y 6/03/99 BEM CHANGES BLK OLD NEW YR CUT S3 ® SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK.207. PAGE..37. THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY. NO LlABILirf IS ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE DATA SHOWN. ASSESSOR'S PARCELS MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL SUBDIVISION OR BUILDING ORDINANCES. MAP 10558-CARLSBAD TCT NO. 81-37 207 - 38 SHT 2 OF 3 l"= 100' c m iE ;$ BLK 01/0 NEW YR CUT 3d3 1 1 3S4 i 1 S3 222 \ \ 1 i \ \ I t \ SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK .207. PAG E .38.. SHT 2 O F 3 THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE DATA SHOWN. ASSESSOR'S PARCELS MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL SUBDIVISON OR BulDING ORDINANCES. MAP 10579 - CARLSBAD TCT NO. 76-15 UNIT 3 MAP 10578 - CARLSBAD TCT NO. 76-15 UNIT 2 MAP 10577 - CARLSBAD TCT NO. 76-15 UNIT I I.i. - FOR BEARINGS & DIMENSIONS ALONG RD. OP. SEE R.O.S. 8927 2* -FOR BRS.8. DIST. SEE SUB. MA^ II5S4 3 OPEN SPACE DETAIL "A" NO SCALE l-s— 35.81 N04°5e'41"W 208-01 VOID- SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK 208 PAGE 01 MAP 15780 - CARLSBAD TCT 07-03-ROBERTSON RANCH EAST VILLAGE PLANNING AREA 14 MAP 11584-CARLSBAD TCT NO 84-14 UNIT NO 3 MAP 823-RANCHO AGUA HENDIONDA MM 231, ROS 8927, 17111 I 1"=800' mo6m CHANGES BIK 010 NEW YR CUT o/o fa 7 (,W7:''f* 71 7 strip 11 39S1 /G 7^ 748 3j to 11-14 115 —& SStSf a. ' •' IS. ' .> 7? 3561 /s /y. y / 115 > 77 /a e, 77 fx CIS'. 5/lMe 77 3 767-la p&d 7g 12 of..* i 7& 2^ ^/ 2705 e.e.oi>i,- '?>l 2571 33 'f;4f| !87 ' US 1Ea-050-17 36 8c BA CHG 02 1824 36 SAME& STOP 08 46S4 36 SAME& CONS ESMT 08 5632 SB 37&38 09 1571 37 39&40 10 1074 40 413:42 12 15S1 TRA CC -VOID CANC CANC CANC CANC CANC CANC A - BUCKINGHAM LN. B - TRAFALGAR LN. C - PICADILLY CT. D - CHELSEA CT. E - SOUTHAMPTON RD. F-S24WISVi 40.n9 H-S42iri7im3.se I.S3IW121/VS0.1} J-S29VrSfW 77.37 K-sss-ssfsm m.oa L-S23'3f!2W torn tl-HS2'4emV 7Z17 N-S32'44'07Vf1S.7S p-ss7i5fs'vi ism a •SS3'49'S3W 241.03 R-S4a'32WW 2Sf.es 09 208-02 9 Ul . "JZ r.- fxQ cr X rs* 111 <:oo a:>-3 (11^!— -XO- 1—<c2 30/31/2002 SM ICHANGESJ 020 Si. few } |75 /^^ fao 77 z& 95 1192 RC Ziz-BSe a^-/ooxf 17 1193 304 37 39-41 99 135B 41 SAME * ST OP 99 4594 17.36&41 pe IB 99 180 38 SAME ft ST OP 00 4755 39 SAME k ST OP 02 4629 38 SAME b STOP 02 4737 3im 42&PG'S IBSHTI-T, 02 m 42 43&44 03 1S67 CANC MAP 823 - RHO AGUA HEDIONDA - POR LOT F & I MM - 231 ROS 6200, 16331 09 208-04 CM O 1 OO o (N tn W CO t2 —I UJ ^< UJ 3: CO UJ,,, Q COi± UlU. COO -s CO: < <>-o UJ C 1 — ^< ^i^ 3: cog 1"=200' 7/16/2010 AJR VOID- NGES OLD NEW CUT 040 o/ /a 75 sffMe 77 S7J9 —f 43-to3 - / Z03 6-10 PG 17 00 24 2,3,4.5 SAME it sr OP 00 4604 1 2&3 06 1403 5 13-17 08 1183 040 11 SAMES STVAO 11 5534 — -VOID 1'CTRL #9759 CITY OF CARLSBAD TPWl WIS 05-10 SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK 208 PAGE 04 MAP 823 - RHO AGUA HEDIONDA MM-231, ROS 6200 PORLOTI THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSME^^^/JnPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY IS ASSW/ED FOfl THE ACCURACY OF THE DATS SHOWN. ASSESSOR S PAR^^^^^^^ MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL SUBDIVISION DR ButDNG ORDINANCES. 208-05 d I. e CHANGES BLK OLD NEW YR CUT O / (3-7-59 7£ 1 /s - MAP 8006 - CARLSBAD TRACT 73-36 UNIT NO.1 SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK 2.0.3 PAGE.05. LU o z < X u 208-08 ^ ^rr^^ SHT 3 ?^ > i ll > i pi 1 j3, SHT 3 SS fiijT^^S SffrKK £™T cotI,aY wm OR B^^ING ORDINANCES. * OPEN SPACE EASEMENT e SAN DIf SO COUHTY ASSET'S HAP BK 20SPS 07 MAP 8358-CARLSBAD TRACT 75-2 09 I SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP e00K20S PAGE 10 SHT I Of 2 MAP 10606CARLSBAD TCT. NO.81 =47 UNII NO. 2 MAP 9935-CARLSBAD TCT NO.76-12 MAP 823-RHO AGUA HEDIONDA, ROS 16661 .203-10 SHTI OF2 '•=.200' ® 4/16/03 MGS c HA NG iE :s BLK OLD NEW YR CUT /^/ /-a. ltF-/0O- Sl 4 ^ 25/ f67-'ra-5 93 f.fi' sme 55)3 3 P& IZ 7/ 5 POR 168 -310-01 04 3 1*OPEN SPACE 09 5 THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE DATA SHOWN. ASSESSOR'S PARCELS MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL SUBDIVISION OR BUiLDING ORDINANCES. I* OPEN SPACE ESM 208-11 SHT I OF 2 ® = 100' ^ .i\yy CHA NGE •s BLK OLD NEW YR CUT /-^ f/ III 36-41 looso SAH DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK208 PAGE H SHT ( OF 2 _MAP 9935" CARLSBAD TCT NO.76-12 208 - I I SHT 2 OF2 = 100 NEW THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMEf'ff PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE DATA SHOWN. ASSESSOR'S PARCELS MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL SUBDIVISION OR BUHDING ORDINANCES. SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK 208PAGE.((... SHT 2 OF 2 MAP 9935 -- CARLSBAD TCT NO. 76-12 MAP 823 - RANCHO AGUA HEDIONDA-MM 231 ROS 8927 09 208 = 12 100' CHANGES BLK OLD NEW YR CUT 110 71 MO-jutku Al g6 lOOSO MO- THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FDR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE DATA SHOWN. ASSESSOR'S PARCELS MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL SUBDIVISION OR BulDING ORDINANCES. SAN DIEGO COUNT.- ASSESSORS MAP B00K208.PAGE '2 MAP 11240 - CARLSBAD TCT NO. 84= I MAP 9935 - CARLSBAD TCT NO. 76-12 208-13 SHT 3 OF 7 ] r=2oo' 3- ?|-'8 ? / CHANGES BLK OLD NEW YR CUT /33 f« \c07/m^^ 3 ico«BAA's.8 S£ 89-jo9.. L._. COAiPAA S£ 89-jo9.. 2 S£ 89-jo9.. SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSORS MAP 80OK20epAGE 13 SHT.30F7 MAP 11255"CARLSBAD TCT N0.34-I4-UNIT NO. i MAP 823 - RHO AGUA HEDIOI^A- POR LOT I 09 ASSESSMENT 208- 133-04 SUB ID 01 NOTE; EACH SUB ID. INCLUDES AN UND. INT IN COMMON AREA 208-13 SHT 5 ] SCALE: Hi SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK 208 PAGE 13 SHT 5 CONDOM DOC 86-364946 TAMARACK POINT PHASE 2 ,,M,T-Mr^ MAP 11255-CARLSBAD TCT NO 84-14 - UN IT NO. LOT 60 09 208-13 SHT 6 t CI: ^ §8^ gig TAMARACK POINT- PHASE 4 DOC 87- 090793 LOT 81 ASSESSMENT PAR. NO. 208-133-05 SUB ID TAMARACK POINT- PHASE 5 DOC87-090784 LOT 77 ASSESSMENT PAR NO,—, 208-133-01 SUB IDjOlJ- NO SCALE Hi 23 l» PRIVATE ST NOTE'.EACH SUB iD INCLUDES AN UND NT IN ITS RESPECTIVE COMMON AREA CONDOMINIUMS ,^ ^ ^ ,^ , ,M,T- I MAP 11255-CARLSBAD TCT NO. 84-14-UNlT NO. I SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK 208 PAGE 13 SHT 09 THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES C»iLY. NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE DATA SHOWN. ASSESSOR'S PARCELS MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL SUBDIVISION OR BUiLDING ORDINANCES. ^0 208-13 \ SHT. 7 .r HO SCALE /^SESSMENT PAR. NO. 208-133-06 SUB ID. SAME AS UNIT NO. NOTE^EACH SUB ID INCLUDES AN UND INT IN COMMON AREA SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK 203 PAGE 13 SHT 7 CONDOMINIUM TAMARCK POINT PHASE 3 DOC 87-090787 MAP 11255-CARSBAD TCT. NO. 84-14,UNIT NO. THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSvlBff PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE DATA SHOWN. ASSESSOR'S PARCaS MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL SUBDIVISION OR BUiLDING ORDINANCES. c HANGES BLK OLD NEvi YR CUT 151 153 1-10 / 153 l-4(ol 154 ! i-isj 8T l\5 3AN DIEGO CO-'NTY ASSESSORS MAP GOC- 208 P4GE 15 on cr> CD C3 I 3 3 a. 09 a: 3 -< UJ .s 1 —1 o CD a. 1— UJ SAN OIEGO COUNTY ASESSOR'S MAP 208-16 SHT 3 OF 3 1" = 100' pnmi:2/2S/}9 8fLU PiomTOS-O! SAN i PRIOHAPH leWAPN )f? aiTm. 1 Tm3S ss ISO 1* REMAINDER OF LOT 146 SHOWN ON PAGE 16 SHT 2 MAP 13715 - CARLSBAD TCT NO 96-07 KELLY RANCH VILLAGE "E" J •ZD OJ -3 1. OPEN SPACE 2« PUBLIC ACCESS Tf^AJLS MAP 13753-CARLSBAD TCT NO CT 90-13 SW OIEGO CQUNIY AS^SSQR'S MAP 208 — 17 J 09 209-06 12/8/2007 JGD o I [c HANGES OLD NEW" CUT 'a 4? p<a 14 r- d>sa I'l 1^,17, 79-ZZ. ZS,Z'?. J 77- 4n et /324 44 A3tS0 Pdf, 9 S6 7J ZS 09O-IZ $6 10037 SA»Ef S&3& 6 SAME & ST OP 99 4715 3&6 60ae~l -050-33&34J •99 1704 59 6/ * POR PGIISHT3 01 119 60& POR^ -070-01 62,63. -070-10, 168-050-S9&STOF 08 1002 10,11, 14i55 64-69, STOP & ACC RTS 08 03 1003 1049 62-64, 66,e7&69 70-72 08 03 1003 1049 57 SAME& STOP 08 4661 SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK 209 PAGE 06 MAP 14060 - CARLSBAD TCT NO 96-02 (THE TERRACES AT SUNNY CREEK 1) MAP 823 - RHO AGUA HEDIONDA - POR LOTS B 8c E ROS 517,4223.6169,6570,6617,17348 09 OD cn OJ m QJ CD ui O g s i s a: >. sf S i _ DETAIL -A' SAM OKGO COUHTY ASSIS^'S MAP 212-15 SHT 3 OF 3 1" = 400" 12/8/98 Oja HtmL- OS-tS-lS Be£ti Pms2l2-im CHANG ESI BU 152 PRIOR APN mwAPH K? curm BU 152 out 02 93 !S 02 srcp 99 4669 02 1» SEE RECORD MAP FOR BRGS & DISTS "Tliis plat is for ycur aid in loMtinj^ your bnd v-.ith rdcMP..-;-; io s'-..v's x.v.i I:-".:T n.-ir- xc^.,K.^:Cw.'fir.-: •^•' ••]••.• •<••:;••/ MAP 13189-CARLSBAD TCT NO 91-3 J 09 ui CQ cn cn CM rn C33 o s 5 o I fe 9 DETAIL 'A" 1"=50' SAN OIEGO COUHTY ASSESSOR'S MAP 212-15 SHT 3 OF 3 1" = 400' 12/8/98 OJB aromn-gS-IS-SS BeMH Frtm-in-Kn men APN H£WAPN n> cur NO 152 Olt02 95 ss 152 02 sAiet ST CP 99 4S69 152 02 -— -— !• SEE RECORD MAP FOR BRGS k DISTS ^rLis plat is for ycur aid in loMtinr^ your lar\d v-.-ith rcfcr^vr..-:-; to s'r a-n'i i — np.-cols. Whils i>.'r. rbl he '.v ;i ^ • -rv- rcof, thi C:::.--;i;";''.;r:ii!/ loss oc;c'L\;'.':; : 'r.y i*.:;;.;;;! u :•ii.-.-. MAP 13189-CARLSBAD TCT NO 91-3 J ^ EIA INFORMATION Development Services <km FORM Planning Division CITY OF p 'l/nx 1635 Faraday Avenue PARI ^RAPl (760)602-4610 ^—'AlxL. JD/\L/ www.carlsbadca.gov INSTRUCTION SHEET FOR COMPLETING AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT INFORMATION FORM This Environmental Information Form will be used to assist staff in determining what type of environmental documentation (i.e., Environmental Impact Report, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Negative Declaration or Exemption) will be required to be prepared for your application, per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Title 19 of Carlsbad's Municipal Code. The clarity and accuracy of the information you provide is critical for purposes of quickly determining the specific environmental effects of your project. Any environmental studies (i.e., biological, cultural resource, traffic, noise) that are necessary to substantiate a "no impact" or "yes impact" determination should be submitted as an attachment to this Environmental Information Form. This is especially important when a Negative Declaration is being sought. The more information provided in this form, the easier and quicker it will be for staff to complete the Environmental Impact Assessment Form - Initial Study. P-1(D) Pagel of 4 Revised 07/10 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To be Completed by Applicant) Date Filed: (To be completed by City) Application Number(s): General Information 1. Name of project: |^6tO^T4<>o (U/iCji UJgjT V'^U.^^g - fe 2. Name of developer or project sponsor: /^A'^C'Ho CoCTtPOA tAC Address: City, State, Zip Code: B^^V<^/lW Ut>^i', CA 'jo'VH Phone Number: f3^3') ^H^lSl\ Name of person to be contacted concerning this project: P/H'^ J. l^-WM^f Address: (^30 f-fid^Ofi^ A\C. ^V/lTg I00 City, State, Zip Code: CA(US($(yO^ iPi ^ZO0$ Phone Number: C T «>) ^"bX" blZO 4. Address of Project: ^6^4 Cii> r^<A< 6 fLtfAU Assessor's Parcel Number: - 0 I 6 - ^0 List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: US/VC^ ^0^) P>lA)(t>C5 ^01; COf\/^ 6. Existing General Plan Land Use Designation: /lUM , (IrA , p^H , U ^ C/^ , 0 S 7. Existing zoning district: ( O 8. Existing land use(s): 9. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): f\ANN£o Ce>Mf\^\^^^^V1 Project Description 10. Site size: ^\ AC' 11. Proposed Building square footage: N6 $>>H\JO {r'Cri PnU^'ofirO 12: Number of floors of construction: M |^ 13. Amount of off-street parking provided: Af |A 14. Associated projects: llAP C>Z^O*>Cc)l cf l\-<? I p-1 (D) Page 2 of 4 Revised 07/10 15. If residential, include the number of units and schedule of unit sizes: 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities: 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities: 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project: Ik 19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or rezoning applications, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required: 4^ p-1 (D) Page 3 of 4 Revised 07/10 Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). Yj^ No 20. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, or hills, or substantial |Z> • alteration of ground contours. 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or I2 D roads. 22. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project. ^ • 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. D Kl 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. • ^ 25. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or • ^ alteration of existing drainage patterns. 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. • ^ 27. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more. ^ • 28. Use of disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, ^ • flammables or explosives. 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, Kl D etc.). 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). • 13 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. 0 • Environmental Setting Attach sheets that include a response to the following questions: 32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. j^ffACt^*^ • 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. . Certification I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date: t (3 | O signature: 'QM^T For: PMNfiif^fr S^j\e'l/A.S P-1 (D) Page 4 of 4 Revised 07/10 Robertson Ranch West Village B Map CEQA Checklist Additional Information Sheet Note: A Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared and certified for the Robertson Ranch Master Plan. This EIR was prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Cahfornia Environmental Quahty Act (CEQA), the CEQA Guidelines, and the Environmental Protection Procedures (Title 19) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The Program EIR addressed the environmental impacts associated with the Robertson Ranch Master Plan, and its ultimate buildout. The EIR analysis concluded that all significant impacts would be mitigated to below a level of significance with the exception of significant direct and cumulative impacts to Traffic/Circulation and Air Quahty (Long Term Mobile Emissions). Direct impacts, also referred to as primary effects, are those caused by the project and that occur at the same time and place. In contrast, cumulative impacts refer to two or more individual impacts that, when considered together, are considerable or that compound or increase other environmental impacts. As long as the proposed project is required to comply with the mitigation measures adopted in the certified EIR, he proposed project is not anticipated to result in significant environmental impacts beyond those identified in the EIR. 20. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, or hills, or substantial alteration of ground contours. Yes. The project wiU result in a change in ground contours of the West Village property. Approximately 1.4 miUion cubic yards of earthwork is proposed. The grading is anticipated to be conducted in a balanced grading operation. The proposed earthwork and grading is within the parameters analyzed in the Program EIR. As a result, no significant impact beyond those identified and mitigated in the EIR, wiU result. 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. Yes. The views into the project site from El Camino Real and surrounding environs will change from that which is visible under existing conditions. The EIR identifies El Camino Real is a scenic highway. Subject to the project's comphance with the mitigation measures adopted in the Program EIR, the proposed project is within the parameters analyzed in the EIR, and thus, no significant impact beyond those identified and mitigated in the EIR, will result. 22. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project. Yes. The subject site is utihzed almost exclusively for agricultural production at this time. The proposed project wiU result in a change in pattern and character of the general area of the project. This change will be to residential and commercial [urban] land uses. Subject to the project's comphance with the mitigation measures adopted in the Program EIR, the proposed project is within the parameters analyzed in the EIR, and thus, no significant impact beyond those identified and mitigated in the EIR, will result. 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. No. The project will not result in the creation of significant amounts of solid waste or litter. 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. No. The project will not result in a change or substantial increase in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in the vicinity of the project. 25. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. Yes. The project will alter the existing drainage patterns on the West Village property. However, the modification of these drainage patterns is not substantially different from that analyzed in the Program EIR. Subject to the project's comphance with the mitigation measures adopted in the EIR, the proposed project will not result in significant impacts to drainage patterns beyond those impacts analyzed and mitigated in the EIR. 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. No. The project wiU not result in a substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity of the project. 27. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more. Yes. The subject property contains natural slopes of over 10% in gradient. The proposed grading of these slopes and filled land was analyzed in the EIR and determined to not result in significant environmental impacts beyond those 28. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives. Yes. Construction of the proposed project will involve the use of hazardous materials, although the hazardous materials use is not expected to be greater or more dangerous than that projected and analyzed in the Program EIR, As a result, subject to the project's comphance with the mitigation measures adopted in the Program EIR, the proposed project will not result in a significantly greater impact to hazards or hazardous materials. 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.). Yes. The proposed project will result in the urbanization of a presently agricultural site. This urbanization wiU result in a significantly increased demand for municipal services, including pohce, fire, water, sewage and other urban infrastructure and services. This demand however, will not be greater than that analyzed in the Program EIR, and thus, subject to the project's compliance with the mitigation measures adopted in the EIR, the proposed project will not result in a significantly greater impact to municipal services. 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). No. The project wiU not substantially increase fossil fuel consumption. 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. Yes. The project will be followed up by architectural approvals for residential and commercial structures and roads per the requirements of the Robertson Ranch Master Plan. 32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. The Robertson Ranch West Village is situated on 201 acres located in the northeast quadrant of the city of Carlsbad in northern San Diego County. The project site is located north of El Camino Real, east of Tamarack Avenue and west of Cannon Road. The majority of the project site is currently used for agricultural purposes, including the cultivation of field crops and flowers. No substantive structures are located on the site. Wetland restoration activities are also underway within a portion of the project site. In addition to agricultural cropland, the site contains a variety of native vegetation, including chamise chaparral and Diegan coastal sage scrub plant communities, located on the higher slopes and canyons of the site. Riparian vegetation is located within the natural drainage on the western portion of the property. Topographically, the site varies considerably and ranges in elevation from approximately 40 feet MSL to 225 feet MSL. The topography of the West Village is dominated by high terraces and canyons crosscut by drainages and is underlain by sedimentary layers of the Eocene -aged Santiago Formation and metavolcanic bedrock. No active faults are known to exist on the project site or in the immediate vicinity of the project site. 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Land uses surrounding the West Village vary considerably and include estabUshed residential neighborhoods and the Robertson Ranch East Village development which is presently under construction to the east. The northern boundary of the subject property is generally defined by The Colony, and existing single-family residential development. Existing access to the site is off of El Camino Real, via dirt roads and informal agricultural trails and roads. The proposed project will involve the ultimate buildout construction of 672 residential units in densities between 3.5 du/ac to 32 du/ac. Also the development wiU allow for construction of a neighborhood commercial development, a community facilities site, and a substantial amount of conserved open space. No structures are proposed at this time. Urban development of the site wiU follow-up with entitlement processing for future site development plans. CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION REQUEST FOR CONDITIONS DATE: NOVEMBER 1. 2013 FINAL REVISED PLANS INCLUDED |^ TO: LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING - JEREMY RIDDLE POLICE DEPARTMENT-J. SASWAY 13 FIRE DEPARTMENT-GREG RYAN • BUILDING DEPARTMENT-WILL FOSS 13 LANDSCAPE PLANCHECK CONSULTANT - PELA • PARKS/TRAILS - LIZ KETABIAN • M & O - CMWD - STEVE PLYLER *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DIVISION REQUEST FOR CONDITIONS ON PROJECT NO(S): (GPA 13-02)/a 13-03/PUD 13-06/HDP 13- 01/SUP 13-02/MP 02-03(E)#iy PROJECTTITLE: ROBERTSON RANCH WEST VILLAGE APPLICANT: PLANNING SYSTEMS/PAUL KLUKAS PROPOSAL: B MAP; 339 LOT RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL & OS Please review and submit written conditions to the PLANNING TRACKING DESK in the Planning Division at 1635 Faraday Avenue, bv^l 1/21713. If you have "No Conditions", please so state. Please note that time is ofthe essence, as the staff report preparation has begun. If you have any questions, please contact CHRISTER WESTMAN. at 4614. THANK YOU COMMENTS: ve d'te.- c: File Date Request for Conditions 03/13 November 7, 2013 TO: Christer Westman, Senior Planner Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner Bridget Desmarais, Administrative Secretary Sabrina Michelson, Senior Oflfice Specialist FROM: Michael Elliott, City of Carlsbad's Contract Landscape Architect RE: Landscape Architectural Review - Conceptual Review - 3"* Review Robertson Ranch West Village (B Map), CT 13-03, PUD 13-06, SUP 13-02 El Camino Real MELA file: 493 - Robertson Ranch West Village (B Map) - Con3 Landscape Architect: Planning Systems, Phone: (760) 931-0780 Landscape conditions of approval are as follows: 1. Maintenance responsibility shall be revised to Common Maintenance Responsibility in the following slope locations as approved by the Planning Division: east side of Lot 76; west side of Lot 77; east side of Lot 99; west side of Lot 100; east side of Lot 121; west side of Lot 122; east side of Lot 81; east side of Lot 104; east side of Lot 126; northeast side of Lot 103, east side of Lot 268, west side of Lot 269; east side of Lot 289; west side of Lot 290; east side of Lot 308; west side of Lot 309; and east side of Lot 324. Fencing and walls shall be located at the top of slope at each of these locations as approved by the Planning Division. 2. Trees shall not be allowed in fire suppression zones Al and A2. 3. Street trees and parkway plantings on Mist Court shall match proposed fire station plantings on the south side as approved by the Planning Division. 4. Street trees located along Robertson Road from Tamarack Avenue to the first traffic circle shall be a tree that will be compatible with native species and surrounding native species water requirements as approved by the Planning Division. 5. Street trees shall be selected from the approved tree replacement list identified in Chapter 6 of the Carlsbad Community Forest Management Plan, unless approved otherwise by the Planning Division. 6. Recycled water shall be used in all Common Maintenance Responsibility areas and potable water used in all Private Individual Maintenance Responsibility areas as approved by the Engineering and Planning Divisions. CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: SEPTEMBER 4. 2013 PROJECT NO(S): CT 13-03/PUD 13-06/HDP 13-01/SUP 13-02 REVIEW NO: 2 PROJECT TITLE: ROBERTSON RANCH WEST VILLAGE APPLICANT: PLANNING SYSTEMS/PAUL KLUKAS TO: Land Development Engineering-Jeremy Riddle • Public Works (Storm Drain) - Clayton Dobbs • Police Department-J. Sasway • Public Works (Wastewater) - Don Wasko Fire Department - Greg Ryan • Public Works (Water) - Jase Warner • Building Division - Will Foss • Water/Sewer District Parks & Recreation (Parks/Trails) - Liz Ketabian Landscape Plancheck Consultant - PELA • Parks & Recreation (Trees & IVIedians) - IVIike Bliss • School District • Public Works Department (Streets) - Nick Roque • North County Transit District - Planning Dept. • Public Works Department (Traffic) - John Kim • Sempra Energy - Land Management • Public Works Department (Design) - Bill Plummer • Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) •ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DIVISION Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the PLANNING TRACKING DESK in the Planning Division at 1635 Faraday Avenue, bv 9/25/13. If you have "No Comments," please so state. If vou determine that there are items that need to be submitted to deem the application "complete" for processing, please immediatelv contact the applicant and/or their representatives (via phone or e-mail) to let them l<now. •'.•)Q£ Thank you COMMENTS: ot-i Signature Date PLANS ATTACHED Review & Comment 03/13 CW • w CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: SEPTEMBER 4. 2013 PROJECT NO(S): CT 13-03/PUD 13-06/HDP 13-01/SUP 13-02 REVIEW NO: 2 PROJECTTITLE: ROBERTSON RANCH WEST VILLAGE APPLICANT: PLANNING SYSTEMS/PAUL KLUKAS TO: Land Development Engineering-Jeremy Riddle • Public Works (Storm Drain) - Clayton Dobbs • Police Department - J. Sasway • Public Works (Wastewater) - Don Wasko Fire Department - Greg Ryan • Public Works (Water) - Jase Warner • Building Division - Will Foss • Water/Sewer District Parks & Recreation (Parks/Trails) - Liz Ketabian Landscape Plancheck Consultant - PELA • Parks & Recreation (Trees & Medians) - Mike Bliss • School District • Public Works Department (Streets) - Nick Roque • North County Transit District - Planning Dept. • Public Works Department (Traffic) - John Kim • Sempra Energy - Land Management • Public Works Department (Design) - Bill Plummer • Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) *ALWAYSSEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DIVISION Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the PLANNING TRACKING DESK in the Planning Division at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by 9/25/13. If you have "No Comments," please so state. If vou determine that there are items that need to be submitted to deem the application "complete" for processing, please immediatelv contact the applicant and/or their representatives (via phone or e-mail) to let them l<now. Thank you / COMMENTS: >1 ^(C^^.^.,..^ //ZA.^^J-\.^'K - 'pL.iA^S'^ ^^i4-i^>c-Q jigna PLANS ATTACHED Review & Comment 03/13 CW CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU Discretionary Review Checldist PROJECT NUMBER: CT 13-03 / PUD 13-06 / SUP 13-02 / HDP 13-01 BUILDING ADDRESS: ROBERTSON RANCH WEST VILLAGE - B MAP LOTS E AND I OF RANCHO AGUA HEDIONDA ACCORDING TO CITY OF CARLSBAD MAP 823. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DEVELOPMENT OF 339 RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND OS SUBDIVISION ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 208-010-40 FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore, any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instmctions in this report can result in suspension of pemiit to build. By: G. Ryan Date: 9.15.2013 DENIAL Please see the attached report of deficiencies marked with 13. Make necessary corrections to plans or specifications for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. By: By: By: Date: Date: Date: ATTACHMENTS NO COMMENTS OR CONDITIONS FIRE DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSON NAME: ADDRESS: 1635 Faraday Ave Carlsbad, CA 92008 PHONE: (760) 602^665 DATE: CITY OF CARLSBAD ^ REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO JUNE 6. 2013 <^(^lifi PROJECT NO(S): CT 13-03/PUD 13-06/HDP 13-01/SUP 13-02 REVIEW NO: 1 PROJECTTITLE: ROBERTSON RANCH WEST VILLAGE (B MAP) APPLICANT: PLANNING SYSTEMS/PAUL KLUKAS TO: Land Development Engineering-Jeremy Riddle • Public Works (Storm Drain) - Clayton Dobbs m Police Department-J. Sasway • Public Works (Wastewater) - Don Wasko Fire Department - Greg Ryan • Public Works (Water) - Jase Warner Building Division - Will Foss • Water/Sewer District • Parks & Recreation (Parks/Trails) - Liz Ketabian Landscape Plancheck Consultant - PELA • Parks & Recreation (Trees & Medians) - Mike Bliss • School District • Public Works Department (Streets) - Nick Roque • North County Transit District - Planning Dept. • Public Works Department (Traffic) - John Kim • Sempra Energy - Land Management • Public Works Department (Design) - Bill Plummer • Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DIVISION Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the PLANNING TRACKING DESK in the Planning Division at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by 6/26/13. If you have "No Comments," please so state. If vou determine that there are items that need to be submitted to deem the application "complete" for processing, please immediatelv contact the applicant and/or their representatives (via phone or e-mail) to let them l<now. Thank you 0 C \ -i Iwl COMMENTS: Ke^^gT <4HO jKVflftftp fiA^fcA I PLANS ATTACHED Review & Comment 03/13 • ^ CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: JUNE 6, 2013 PROJECT NO(S): PROJECT TITLE: APPLICANT: CT 13-03/PUD 13-06/HDP 13-01/SUP 13-02 REVIEW NO: 1 PROJECT NO(S): PROJECT TITLE: APPLICANT: ROBERTSON RANCH WEST VILLAGE (B MAP) PROJECT NO(S): PROJECT TITLE: APPLICANT: PLANNING SYSTEMS/PAUL KLUKAS PROJECT NO(S): PROJECT TITLE: APPLICANT: TO: Land Development Engineering-Jeremy Riddle • Public Works (Storm Drain) - Clayton Dobbs Police Department - J. Sasway • Public Works (Wastewater) - Don Wasko Fire Department - Greg Ryan • Public Works (Water) - Jase Warner Building Division - Will Foss • Water/Sewer District • Parks & Recreation (Parks/Trails) - Liz Ketabian Landscape Plancheck Consultant - PELA • Parks & Recreation (Trees & Medians) - Mike Bliss • School District • Public Works Department (Streets) - Nick Roque • North County Transit District - Planning Dept. • Public Works Department (Traffic) - John Kim • Sempra Energy-Land Management • Public Works Department (Design) - Bill Plummer • Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) •ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DIVISION Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the PLANNING TRACKING DESK in the Planning Division at 1635 Faraday Avenue, bv 6/26/13. If you have "No Comments," please so state. If vou determine that there are items that need to be submitted to deem the application "complete" for processing, please immediatelv contact the applicant and/or their representatives (via phone or e-mail) to let them l<now. Thank you COMMENTS: 3_ Signature Date PLANS ATTACHED Review & Comment 03/13 CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU Discretionary Review Checklist PROJECT NUMBER: CT 13-03 / PUD 13-06 / SUP 13-02 / HDP 13-01 BUILDING ADDRESS: ROBERTSON RANCH WEST VILLAGE - B MAP LOTS E AND I OF RANCHO AGUA HEDIONDA ACCORDING TO CITY OF CARLSBAD MAP 823. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DEVELOPMENT OF 339 RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND OS SUBDIVISION ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 208-010-40 FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore, any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. By: Date: DENIAL Please see the attached report of deficiencies marked with El. Make necessary corrections to plans or specifications for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. By: G. Ryan By: By: Date: 5.29.2013 Date: Date: ATTACHMENTS NO COMMENTS OR CONDITIONS FIRE DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSON NAME: ADDRESS: 1635 Faraday Ave Carlsbad, CA 92008 PHONE: (760) 602-4665 REVIEW CHECKLIST LANDSCAPE ^ STi 2^01 3RD11 • • • 1. Lots in Fire Suppression Zones. All lots that abut or are impacted by Fire Suppression Zones as those identified in the Fire Protection Plan shall be identified by Lot Number in all disclosures and vesting documents. The purpose is to identify all those lots which will have specific restrictions placed upon them for future construction and amenity projects. Specifically, the construction of combustible structures within'i|^feet of any FSZ or construction of an outdoor fireplace or fire ring within feet of any FSZ. ll>0 \0V • • CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: JUNES. 2013 PROJEa NO{S): PROJECTTITLE: APPLICANT: a 13-03/PUD 13-06/HDP 13-01/SUP 13-02 REVIEW NO: 1 PROJEa NO{S): PROJECTTITLE: APPLICANT: ROBERTSON RANCH WEST VILLAGE (B MAP) PROJEa NO{S): PROJECTTITLE: APPLICANT: PLANNING SYSTEMS/PAUL KLUKAS PROJEa NO{S): PROJECTTITLE: APPLICANT: TO: Land Development Engineering-Jeremy Riddle • Public Works (Storm Drain) - Clayton Dobbs Police Department-J. Sasway • Public Works (Wastewater) - Don Wasko Fire Department - Greg Ryan • Public Works (Water) - Jase Warner Building Division - Will Foss • Water/Sewer District • Parks & Recreation (Parks/Trails) - Liz Ketabian Landscape Plancheck Consultant - PELA • Parks & Recreation (Trees & Medians) - Mike Bliss • School District • Public Works Department (Streets) - Nick Roque • North County Transit District - Planning Dept. • Public Works Department (Traffic) - John Kim • Sempra Energy-Land Management • Public Works Department (Design) - Bill Plummer • Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) *ALWAYSSEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DIVISION Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the PLANNING TRACKING DESK in the Planning Division at 1635 Faraday Avenue, bv 6/26/13. If you have "No Comments," please so state. If vou determine that there are items that need to be submitted to deem the application "complete" for processing, please immediatelv contact the applicant and/or their representatives (via phone or e-mail) to let them know. Thank you COMMENTS: L Signature Jate PLANS ATTACHED Review & Comment 03/13 CARLSBAD "LE COPY Community & Economic Development www.carisbadca.gov PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF DECISION February 6, 2014 Paul Klukas Suite 100 1530 Faraday Ave Carlsbad CA 92008 SUBJECT: GPA 13-02/MP 02-03(E)/CT 13-03/PUD 13-06/HDP 13-01/SUP 13-02 - ROBERTSON RANCH WEST VILLAGE At the February 5, 2014 Planning Commission meeting, your application was considered. The Commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval of your request. The decision of the Planning Commission is advisory and will be forwarded to the City Council. If you have any questions regarding the final dispositions of your application, please contact your project planner Christer Westman at.(760) 602-4614 or christer.westman@carlsbadca.Rov. Sincerely, a.7t DON NEU, AlCP City Planner DN:CW:bd c: Data Entry File enc: Planning Commission Resolutions No. 7034 and 7035 Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 © <^^";;rcnAr^ QFILE V CARLSBAD Community & Economic Development www.carlsbadca.gov January 14, 2014 PaulJ. Klukas 1530 Faraday Ave. #100 Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: GPA 13-02/MP 02-03(E)/CT 13-03/PUD 13-06/HDP 13-01/SUP 13-02 - ROBERTSON RANCH WEST VILLAGE The preliminary staff report for the above referenced project will be sent to you via email on Wednesday, January 22, 2014, after 8:00 a.m. This preliminary report will be discussed by staff at the Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) meeting which will be held on January 27, 2014. A twenty (20) minute appointment has been set aside for you at 9:00 a.m. If you have any questions concerning your project you should attend the DCC meeting. It is necessary that you bring the following required information with you to this meeting or provide it to your planner prior to the meeting in order for your project to go forward to the Planning Commission: 1. Unmounted colored exhibit(s) of your site plan and elevations. For residential projects of 2 or more homes a typical street scene of the elevations shall be provided. The corresponding rear elevations for the homes shown for the typical street scene shall also be provided; and 2. A PDF of your colored site plan and elevations. The colored exhibits must be submitted at this time to ensure review by the Planning Commission at their briefings. If the colored exhibits are not available for their review, vour proiect could be rescheduled to a later time. The PDF of your colored site plan and elevations will be used in the presentation to the Planning Commission and the public at the Planning Commission Hearing. If you do not plan to attend this meeting, please make arrangements to have your colored exhibit(s) and the PDF here by the scheduled time above. Should you wish to use visual materials in your presentation to the Planning Commission, they should be submitted to the Planning Division no later than 12:00 p.m. on the day of a Regular Planning Commission Meeting. Digital materials will be placed on a computer in Council Chambers for public presentations. Please label all materials with the agenda item number you are representing. Items submitted for viewing, including presentations/digital materials, will be included in the time limit maximum for speakers. All materials exhibited to the Planning Commission during the meeting (slides, maps, photos, etc.) are part of the public record and must be kept by the Planning Division for at least 60 days after final action on the matter. Your materials will be returned upon written request. If you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact your Planner, Christer Westman at (760) 602-4614 or at christer.westman(S)carlsbadca.gov. Sincerely, 2LX« DON NEU, AlCP City Planner DN:CW:bd c: File Copy Project Engineer Data Entry Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad. CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 © SHAPELL INDUSTRIES January 13,2014 Ms. Debbie Fountain Housing and Neighborhood Services Director CITY OF CARLSBAD 1200 Carlsbad Village Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: ROBERTSON RANCH WEST VILLAGE AFFORDABLE HOUSING AGREEMENT Dear Ms. Fountain: Thank you for your first draft of the Affordable Housing Agreement (AHA) for the Robertson Ranch West Village. We have reviewed the draft and offer the following comments. 1. Section 2.3 Moderate Income Affordability Requirements. We are aware that the Carlsbad Inclusionary Housing Ordinance defines the Low Income rental units as those made available to households with incomes not exceeding 70% of median income (CMI). But we are not aware of any requirement to reduce Moderate Income units from the 120% CMI cap to 110% CMI. We therefore request that the Moderate Income Affordability rental rate figure be changed to be capped at 119.99% CMI. We conclude that this cap is within the required Moderate Income levels (80% to 120%). 2. Section 2.4 Schedule for Developing Low and Moderate Income Affordable Multifamily Units. We are very concerned over the schedule for construction proposed in the draft AHA. We have no problem with the early development ofthe 101 Low Income senior rental units. However, our 56 Moderate Income units are intended to be interspersed within a 264 unit multifamily rental project so as to avoid the social stigma of an isolated affordable section. Thus, it is necessary that this 264 unit rental project be constructed largely in a single coordinated construction program. Thus, with the schedule provided in the draft AHA, only multi-family rental units could be constructed on the project during the first three thresholds; and no single family building pennits could be issued until all building foundations are complete for all multi-family development. The only available option allowing for single family development would be to segment the Moderate affordable units into a single segment ofthe large apartment project. We need the option of developing some single family development in the earlier phases. To this end, we propose the following phasing program which will allow for early development of the Low Income units, but also allows integration of the Moderate units 8383 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 700 Beverly Hills, CA 9021! Telephone 323.655.7330 » Shapeil.com in with the Market Rate rental apartments. While this schedule allows for earlier development of a greater number of Market Rate units, it continues to maintain a hold on a number of Market units while the Affordable units are under construction. Action Level required Building Permits Issued Affordable Building Permits Issued Market Building Permits Issued Total Units Cumulative Market Total Cumulative Market % Execute and record AHA Final Map approved for CT 13-03 N/A N/A N/A N/A Approval of SDP for Low and Moderate Income units 157(100%) 170 327 170 33% of Market Rate units All building permits issued and foundations complete 101 affordable units N/A 210 210 380 74% of Market Rate units All building permits issued and foundations complete for 56 affordable apartments N/A 70 70 450 87% of Market Rate units C/O for 101 Low Income units N/A 40 40 490 95% of Market Rate units C/O for 56 Moderate units N/A 25 25 515 100% of Market Rate units The balance of the draft AHA appears to be acceptable to us. Please consider the above changes and let us know if they are acceptable. As always, thank you for your assistance with this project. We look forward to processing and finalizing an AHA through your department. Sincerely, Matthew Fausett Shapell Properties mm cc: Christer Westman Paul Klukas ^ W • MRIM nfai(l3 VIcARLSBAD LJriLc: Community & Economic Development www.carlsbadca.gov November 21, 2013 Paul Klukas Planning Systems 1530 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: GPA 13-02/MP 02-03(E)/CT 13-03/PUD 13-06/HDP 13-01/SUP 13-02 - ROBERTSON RANCH WEST VILUGE - CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) APPLICABILITY/PROCESS DETERMINATION This is to advise you that after reviewing the application for the project amendment referenced above, the City has determined that the project is subject to the provisions of CEQA; however, the potential environmental effects of the project were adequately analyzed by the previously Certified Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Robertson Ranch West Village GPA 11-07/MP 02-03{C)/a 11-01/HDP 11- 01/SUP 11-02/HMP 11-03 on October 17,2012. No additional environmental review is required. A Notice of Determination will be filed after approval of the project amendment with the San Diego County Clerk's Office which involves a filing fee. Please submit a check to the project planner in the amount of $50.00 made out to the San Diego County Clerk. The check should be submitted approximately one week prior to the City Council hearing date. For additional information related to this CEQA applicability/process determination, please contact the project planner, Christer Westman, at (760) 602-4614 orchrister.westman@carlsbadca.gov. Sincerely, DON NEU, AlCP City Planner DN:CW:fn Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner Jeremy Riddle, Project Engineer File Copy Data Entry Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 ^"^^CARLSBAD FILE COPY Community & Economic Development www.carlsbadca.gov November 21, 2013 Paul Klukas Planning Systems 1530 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: GPA 13-02/MP 02-03(E)/CT 13-03/PUD 13-06/HDP 13-01/SUP 13-02 - ROBERTSON RANCH WEST VILLAGE Your application has been tentatively scheduled for a hearing by the Planning Commission on February 5, 2014. However, for this to occur, you must submit the additional items listed below. If the required items are not received by January 14, 2014, your project will be rescheduled for a later hearing. In the event the scheduled hearing date is the last available date for the City to comply with the Permit Streamlining Act, and the required items listed below have not been submitted, the project will be scheduled for denial. 1. Please submit the following plans: A) 10 copies of your (tentative map and landscape plans) on 24" x 36" sheets of paper, stapled in complete sets folded into 9" x 12" size. B) One 8%" x 11" copy and a PDF version of your reduced plans. These copies must be of a quality which is photographically reproducible. Only essential data should be included on plans. 2. As required by Section 65091 of the California Government Code, please submit the following information needed for noticing and sign the enclosed form: A) 600' Owners List - a typewritten list of names and addresses of all property owners, including all forms of interval ownership, within a 600 foot radius of the subject property, including the applicant and/or owner. The list shall include the San Diego County Assessor's parcel number from the latest equalized assessment rolls. B) Mailing Labels - If the number of owners within the 600 foot radius is 1,000 or greater, a display advertisement in two papers of general circulation will be placed in lieu of direct mailing and labels will not be required to be submitted. If the number of owners within the 600 foot radius is less than 1,000, please submit two (2) separate sets of mailing labels of the property owners within a 600 foot radius of the subject property. For any address other than a single-family residence, an apartment or suite number must be included. DO NOT provide addressed envelopes - PROVIDE LABELS ONLY. Labels should be prepared in ALL CAPS using block or sans serif typeface. A sample label is as follows: Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 ift/PUD 13-06/HDP 13-01/SUP 13-02 - ROB^ GPA 13-02/MP 02-03(E)/CT 13^3/PUD 13-06/HDP 13-01/SUP 13-02 - ROBERTSON RANCH WEST VILLAGE 013 ACCEPTABLE MRS JANE SMITH APT 3 123 MAGNOLIA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 D) Radius Map - a map to scale, not less than 1" = 200', showing all lots entirely and partially within 600 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property. Each of these lots should be consecutively numbered and correspond with the property owner's list. The scale ofthe map may be reduced to a scale acceptable to the City Planner if the required scale is impractical. E) Fee - a fee shall be paid for covering the cost of mailing notices. Such fee shall equal the current postage rate times the total number of labels. In the case of ownership list that is 1,000 or greater, the fee is equal to the current cost of publishing an 1/8 page ad in two newspapers of general circulation. Cash, check (payable to the City of Carlsbad) and credit cards are accepted. Sincerely, CHRISTER WESTMAN Senior Planner CW:fn Attachment c: File Data Entry PLANNING SYSTEMS • LAND USE/COASTAL PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • LA3900 POLICY AND PROCESSING ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION October 28,2013 Mr. Christer Westman CITY OF CARLSBAD Planning Department 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: SECOND (2"'') RE-SUBMITTAL CT 13-03/PUD 13-06/HDP 13-01/SUP 13-02 ROBERTSON RANCH WEST VILLAGE - B MAP Dear Mr. Westman: Per your letter dated October 11, 2013, identifying Staff items and issues with the submittal package of the above-referenced application package and plans, Shapell Homes has commissioned modifications to the documents and plans as requested. To this end, attached with this cover letter please find the following: Check for $5,849.00 for GPA and MPA Applications Sections and photosimulations from existing lots at Gateshead Rd. Photosimulations of two views of retaining wall at El Camino Real Memo from Liz Ketabian, dated 9/4/13 Email from Jeremy Riddle dated 7/19/13 Four (4) copies of the revised Vesting Tentative Map Four (4) copies of the revised Conceptual Landscape Plan Redlined plans (retum) Below are responses and methods that we are addressing the City comments, in the order of comments listed in the July 15 letter. ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning; 1. In reviewing the Robertson Ranch Master Plan language, the Planning Division has determined that relocation of Planning Area 4 will require a General Plan Amendment and a Minor Master Plan Amendment. Both actions will be processed concurrently with the other discretionary permits which also require a recommendation from the Planning Commission and approval by the City Council Please submit the fees: General Plan Amendment $ 4,206.00 and Minor Master Plan Amendment $ 1,643.00. Response: A check for the application amounts (total $5,849.00) is included with this application package, as requested. 2. The interface with the existing residential lots on Gateshead Rd. should be clearly illustrated through photo simulation and sections that include walls and anticipated 1530 FARADAY AVENUE • SUITE 100 • CARLSBAD, CA 92008 • (760) 931-0780 • FAX (760) 931-5744 • info@planningsystems.net mature vegetation. Response: Sections and photosimulations for three cross-section areas along the rear of the lots on Gateshead Road are included with this application package, as requested. Photosimulation photos were taken from existing ground elevation (+ 5.5 ft.) on Rancho Costera property immediately adjacent to existing fence behind existing Gateshead lots. 3. The project will be conditioned to process Planned Development Permit (PUD) amendments for Villages 3, 5, 6, and 9/10 for architecture prior to the issuance of a building permit within each ofthe individual villages. Response: This fact is acknowledged by the applicant. 4. The Tentative Map will be conditioned to enter into an affordable housing agreement to satisfy the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance requirements for the entire West Village in either Planning Area 7 or 8 prior to recordation of the final map, issuance of a grading permit, or issuance of a residential building permit whichever occurs first. Response: This fact is acknowledged by the applicant. 5. The Tentative Map will be conditioned to process and obtain approval of a Site Development Plan for a housing project that satisfies the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance requirements for the entire West Village prior to the issuance of a residential building permit. Response: This fact is acknowledged by the applicant. 6. Front, rear, and side yard building setbacks should be defined on the tentative and final map for panhandle Lots #42 and 43. Response: The referenced setbacks (20' front, 20' rear and 10' side) have been added to panhandle lots #42 and #43 on the TM. 7. There is a retaining wall symbol along the rear property lines of Lots #286-289. Retaining walls should not be proposed at the top of slopes. Response: The retaining wall has been removed from the top of slope to an intermediate point on the slope, as requested. The project no longer contains retaining walls at the top of slope. 8. The retaining wall adjacent to the sidewalk at Lot # 324 should be redesigned to achieve maximum wall heights of 42 inches adjacent to a sidewalk. Response: The retaining wall adjacent to the sidewalk at Lot #324 has been reduced to 42" in height and a second wall has been added. 9. Photo simulation and/or actual photographs of the proposed retaining wall treatment for El Camino Real as well as the possible mature vegetation condition along this segment of roadway should be provided. Response: Photosimulations of the proposed retaining walls along Camino Si PLANNING SYSTEMS • provided with this resubmittal package. Engineering: GENERAL 1. Provide written documentation from SDG&E stating they have reviewed the TM and do not object to this subdivision. Since they are easement holders the city requires written documentation this project does not impact the use of their facilities. Response: Although we have received verbal approval from SDG&E, we are still waiting for written documentation of this approval. TENTATIVE MAP 2. Revise the Tentative Map (TM) to remove the term 'pad' from all bioretention lots and use the term 'EL' (elevation) to avoid confusion with a potential building pad being developed. Refer to redlines. Response: The term "PAD" has been changed to "EL" for all bioretention lots. 3. On sheet 4, add street names to the exhibit. Refer to redlines. Response: The street names have been added to the exhibit on Sheet 4. 4. On sheet 4, remove the callout for the 50-ft access opening along Tamarack Avenue since the development of PA 2 has been scaled back. Response: The callout for the 50-foot access opening along Tamarack Avenue has been removed, as requested. 5. On sheet 6, clarify if pedestrian access will be permitted through the proposed sewer access road or will it be fenced off for pedestrian use. An HOA pedestrian easement was previously called out (which staff supports), but is now removed. If pedestrian access is permitted over the sewer, revise the TM to callout an HOA pedestrian access easement; however, add a note the DG access road will be maintained by the HOA. Response: Pedestrian access will be permitted through the proposed sewer access road. A pedestrian access easement intended to be maintained by the HOA has been called out. 6. On sheet 7, callout the proposed HOA landscape easement. Response: A HOA landscape easement has been called out on Sheet 7. 7. On sheet 8, II and 12, callout the size, type and HGL of the proposed potable wateriines in the street. They were previously callout but have since been removed. Response: The size, type and HGL of the water lines have been called out on the referenced sheets. 8. On sheet 9, callout the top and bottom of wall elevations for the ritainingjvalls ^ •> J PLANNING SYSTEMS 286-288. Response: The top and bottom of wall elevations have been added for the retaining walls on Sheet 9. 9. On sheet 9 provide a cross-section between the lots with multiple retaining walls to demonstrate changes in grades. Response: Cross-sections have been added to show the design for the slope retaining walls with multiple retaining walls. 10. On sheet 9, callout the slope of the SDG&E access road. Response: The grade of the SDG&E access road has been called out on Sheet 9, as requested. 11. On sheet 11 provide a cross-section between the lots with multiple retaining walls to demonstrate changes in grades. Response: A cross-section between lots with multiple retaining walls has been added to the revised TM. 12. On sheet 11, callout the top and bottom of wall elevations for the retaining wall on lots 151. Response: The top and bottom of wall elevations has been added for the retaining wall on Sheet 11. 13. On sheet 11, 12, and 16 clarify the pedestrian easement is dedicated to the city and the landscape easement is to the HOA. Refer to redlines. Response: Modified easement callouts to clarify that the pedestrian easement is intended to be dedicated to the City and the landscape easement is to be dedicated to the HOA, have been provided. 14. On sheets 11, 12, and 16 revise the TM so the waterline in Street 7 is located 7-feet off the face of curb per city standards. Refer to redlines. Response: The water line in Street Z has been relocated to be 7-feet from the face of the curb, as requested. 75. On sheet 12, the storm drain under Street E was previously approved with an open- bottom arch culvert. The design now proposes a solid wall pipe partially filled with soil. Filling in the lower portion of a solid-wall pipe with soil may not qualify as a soft-bottom pipe as previously approved under CT 11-01. Natural channels fluctuate each season by rainfall intensity, duration, vegetative cover changes, channel geometry, sedimentation transport, etc. These changes expose the bottom of the pipe resulting in a hard bottom crossing. Wildlife agencies and/or preserve groups may raise this as an issue. Please consider using the previously approved arch culvert or address how channel bottom (through the pipe) can be stabilized to avoid exposure. PLANNING SYSTEMS Response: The detail for the wildlife crossing has been modified to callout stabilized D.G. for fill in the pipe and Type A concrete mowing strips (SDRSD L-3) to prevent erosion. 16. On sheet 13, clarify whether the slopes surrounding PA2 will be re-vegetated and turned over to the conservancy agency. If so add Note C per the sheet callout. Refer to rediine comments. Response: The slopes surrounding PA 2 will be re-vegetated with native habitat vegetation and ultimately turned over to the conservancy for long-term maintenance. 17. On sheet 13, callout 'community' so it is not confused with commercial. Response: The word "community" has been called out in full. 18. On sheet 14, provide a cross-section along J Street and lot 92 where 3 retaining walls are proposed to demonstrate changes in grade (repeat comment). Response: A cross-section has been added along J Street and Lot 92, as requested. 19. On sheet 14 through 17, clarify whether the slopes along El Camino Real corridor will be revegetated and turned over to the conservancy agency. Response: The slopes along El Camino Real will be re-vegetated and turned over to the conservancy agency after grow-in. Note C has been added accordingly. 20. On sheet 15, callout the storm drain as private (HOA) maintained (repeat comment). Response: The storm drain on Sheet 15 has been called out as private. 21. On sheet 19, add the resulting property line dimensions once the adjustment plat (ADJ 13-01) is approved. Verify the lot areas show the ultimate lot area based on the adjusted subdivision boundary. Refer to the redlines. Response: Property line dimensions and lot areas have been updated based on the adjusted subdivision boundary once adjustment plant (ADJ 13-01 is approved. 22. For additional comments, refer to the redlines. Response: Rediine comments have been addressed. Landscaping; REPEAT COMMENTS 1. Plans are too conceptual to provide an appropriate review. One symbol is used for many trees, shrubs and ground covers which may be very different in size and character. Please provide a separate symbol for each type of tree and shrub (le. large evergreen tree or shrub, medium size tree or shrub, small flowering accent shrub, etc.) and ground covers. Final comments are reserved pending receipt of more complete plans. T"^ Review: Plans are still too conceptual. As an example the plans show only ground cover with trees along streets E, J and Z. Fire suppression zones A2, A3 a ^^^^^^^^'S""^" SYSTEMS ground covers. Additional interest is needed. Please provide typical sketches details showing the design intent for different areas so that conceptual thoughts can he reviewed. Response: Per discussions between Mike Elliott and Greg Evans, we have revised the plans to provide typical enlargements in order to provide improved level of detail to the plans. Please see Sheet 29 for Typical Enlargements. See Sheet 24 for expansion of planting plan symbols. 2. Please clearly show and label the following items on the landscape plans. Check all sheets. a. Property lines, right-of-ways, existing and proposed easements. Insure no trees are located within public utility easements. b. Drainage elements and utilities. Insure no conflicts with plantings. Response: All drawing sheets have been revised to ensure proper labeling of easements and utilities, as requested. 3. Please relocate trees outside of easements. Check all sheets. Response: Trees have been located outside of all easements on all sheets. 4. Completed. 5. Please address landscaping of all graded areas. Check all sheets. Response: The plans have been revised to show landscaping of all graded areas on all sheets. 6. Please address how the homeowner is to access these landscape areas to maintain them when there is a 6' retaining wall (some higher) in between. 2°" Review: Civil plans show an HOA easement in this location. Please resolve with comment. Response: The retaining walls have been lowered in many cases by the civil engineer. Additionally, more interior slopes are now identified as under HOA maintenance. See Sheet 27 for revised maintenance responsibility areas. 7-8 Completed. 9. Please define the public entities that will maintain street frontages for El Camino Real, Tamarack Avenue and Cannon Road. 2°c' Review: Although the City of Carlsbad typically maintains public street medians, parkways are generally maintained by a private HOA or adjacent private property owner. Per the Master Flat; page 11-37 - II- 38, Homeowner's Association, a,) Master Homeowner's Association paragraph 3: "The Master HOA or Sub-Association(s) shall control the operation and maintenance of the entry features, common slopes, arterial parkways and other common features identified in the Master Plan. Please revise notes to indicate that the HOA will maintain the El Camino, Cannon Road and Tamarack Avenue arterial parkways. Response: This change has been made throughout. 10-12 Completed. PLANNING SYSTEMS • 13. Please show the 25' corner vehicular sight triangles. Response: The 25-foot comer vehicular sight triangles have been provided on the revised plans. 14-16 Completed. 17. Please provide conceptual details for the gated entries. 2"^ Review: Please revise to be compatible with the neighborhood entry monument per Figure III-34 West Village. Response: The gated entry details have been revised to mimic the Master Plan figure, as requested. 18-19 Completed. 20. Please provide conceptual detailing and elevations of the neighborhood entry monument consistent with the Master Plan figures III-33 and III-34. Insure that vehicular sight lines are maintained. 2"'' Review: The detail is not consistent with the Figure III-34 West Village sketch. Please resolve. Please modify the plan to show the adjacent property line and the tree per figure III—33. The monument and tree need to be located within the HOA maintained area. Response: The neighborhood entry details have been revised to mimic the Master Plan figure, as requested. A tree has been added. Sheet 27 has been revised to show HOA maintenance responsibility of these areas. 21-22 Completed. 23. Please provide conceptual detailing and elevations of the village core identity monuments. 2"'' Review: Please revise to I monument per figure 7/7-5 4 West Village. monuments. 2"'' Review: Please revise to be compatible with the neighborhood entry Response: The revised plans show changes to the village core identity monuments in accordance with the Master Plan figure. 24. Please provide enhanced paving and meandering sidewalks per the Master Plan figures 7/7-55 and III-39 to provide more interest. Insure all enhanced paving is shown and labeled on the civil plans. Response: Changes have been made to add enhanced paving and meandering sidewalks per the Master Plan figure on both the civil and the landscape sheets. 25. Completed. 26. The planting palette shall include: a. Completed. b. Shrub types and spacing with general layout. c. Ground cover types and spacing. Please address. Response: The plant legend on Sheet 24 has been revised to address thi;" comment.-PLANNING SYSTEMS 27. Completed. 28. Please provide fire suppression zone widths per the Landscape Manual and Master Plan or provide documentation from the Fire Marshall indicating approval of a modifiedfire suppression zone (A-1 shows 10' versus 20' and zone A-2 shows 30' versus 20 ). Check all sheets. Response: The fire suppression zone widths are per the Master Plan inasmuch as the Master Plan allows that 'West Village development fuel modification zones may begin up to 10-feet onto the residential lot and cover 50 feet within the open space area, subject to approval of the Carlsbad Fire Marshal."' The Carlsbad Fire Marshal has indicated agreement with this 10 feet/50 feet program for the West Village development on a number of occasions. Planner Christer Westman has confirmed this program and indicates that it is acceptable to the Planning Department also. Please note that at Planning Area 5 interface with the open space, the 60 feet zone is wholly located outside of the residential lot. The plans have been revised to reflect this program (See Sheet 22). 29. Please indicate when the preserved open space and biological resource area plans will be provided. 2"'' Review: The applicant has indicated that plans will he provided in the last quarter of 2013. Final comments are reserved pending receipt of these plans. Response: Provision of revegetation plans was a condition of approval for the A Map. It was not required prior to approval of the conceptual-level landscape plans. Further, these revegetation plans will likely need review by the USFWS, which could take some time. Most of the revegetation of the West Village is presently in grow-in. Planner Christer Westman is in agreement that the review of the revegetation plans should be dealt with in the same manner as it was on the A Map, as a condition of approval. 30. Completed. 31. Please select plantings (street trees and parkway plantings) to match the fire station plans. Response: We have received the fire station landscape design plans and have modified our submittal to conform with those plans. 32. Street trees shall be selectedfrom the approved tree replacement list identified in Chapter 6 of the Carlsbad Community Forest Management Plan, unless approved otherwise. Please address. Response: Appropriate changes have been made to the design per the Community Forest Management Plan. 33-36 Completed. 37. Please provide a symbol for all plantings so that it is clear where they are used. Response: This change to the plant legend has been made, as requested. 38-39 Completed. PLANNING SYSTEMS 40. Please clearly indicate which plants are not to be used in fire suppression zones (those with high fuel characteristics). Final comments are reserved pending completion of this item. 2"'' Review: High fuel species are listed in the categories for use in fire suppression zones. Please check all species and resolve. Response: High fuel species have been removed from the fire suppression zone list. 41-47 Completed. 48. Please address fire suppression requirements. Check all sheets. 2°" Review: Please show required plantings with irrigation in zones A-2 and A-3. Response: This comment has been addressed in the revised plan set. 49. Completed. 50. The Master Plan figure IV-1 shows this street as a 60' right-of-way, local street. The Master Plan clarifies that the "Tamarack Connection " street will be designed with a 28' curb to curb width with sidewalk on 1 side only. The Master Plan indicates that local streets shall be provided with a 5' sidewalk and 7 '-6" wide landscaped parkway adjacent to the curb. Please revise providing the 7 '-6 " curb adjacent landscaped parkway on both sides of the street and 5' walk on 1 side. Response: The cross-section of Street J has been revised per consultations with the City Engineering Department, the City Traffic Engineer and Liz Ketabian, the City Trails Planner. The original email and rediine is included with this resubmittal package. 51-55 Completed. 56 Please show where each of the trail markers and trail node structures will be located per the Master Plan figure III-54. Response: All trail markers and node structures have been located per the requirements of the Master Plan, as requested. 57. The Master Plan figure 111-54 show's an east to west trail cutting across PA-23C. Please show this trail on the plans. Coordinate with the civil plans and provide a copy of updated qivil plans with the next submittal for cross checking. 2"'^ Review: Please identify this line on the plans. Is this the trail? Response: The referenced trail across PA 23C has been shown and identified on the civil and the landscape plans. 5S. Completed. 59. Please distinguish on the plans where the lodge pole trail fence versus the wire trail fence is proposed. Please note that fences located within 60' of native habitat shall be noncombustible. Review: Please obtain review and approval of trailfencing layout from Liz Ketabian in the Parks Division. Provide documentation of review and approval PLANNING SYSTEMS Response: Documentation from Liz Ketabian is provided with this resubmittah 60. What is this access road usedfor? Is turfcrete or other load bearing surfacing needed in the parkways? Please resolve. Response: The access road is intended to be used for sewer service and maintenance. It is noted in the plan. 61-63 Completed. 64. Please provide a neighborhood entry monument consistent with the Master Plan figure III-27. Response: A neighborhood entry monument consistent with the Master Plan is provided on Sheet 20. 65-67 Completed. 68. RETURN REDLINES and provide 2 copies of all plans (concept, water conservation, fire protection, and colored water use plan) for the next submittal. Please provide a written response to all comments clearly indicating where and how each comment was addressed. NEW COMMENTS lA. Please revise to show that irrigation is required in zone C-3 per the Robertson Ranch Master Plan figure III-46 on page III-161. Response: This change has been made. See Sheet 29. 2A. Please match landscape plans with civil plans and address all landscape areas. Response: The civil plans were used as the base for the landscape plans. All landscape areas have been addressed. 3A. Please revise call-out. This should be a view fence. Response: This callout has been revised 4A. Please verify the view fence location. If correct, please add landscaping to the HOA area outside the fence and resolve with sheet 27. Response: The view fence location has been revised. 5A. Please address landscaping of all HOA areas. Response: Landscaping of all HOA areas has been addressed. 6A. The Master Plan provides for a 5 '-0 " width walk for collector streets. Please resolve. Clarify what the 18 " dimension is to. PLANNING SYSTEMS Response: The sidewalk is always 5'0" in width. When curb-adjacent, the dimension is 5'6". The 18" dimension identifies the location of the fire hydrant or street light distance behind the curb per the civil plans and City Standards. 7A. Please confirm that private lot water meters will be located behind the walk outside of recycled water use areas. If private water meters are located within the parkways (between curb and walk), the parkways may need to be revised to potable water use. Response: Per the City Engineering Department, private potable water meters may be located in a recycled water parkway area provided that the meter is located adjacent to the sidewalk edge. This configuration is in accordance with the implementation used at Robertson Ranch East Village. We are hopeful that the plans are now ready for public hearing. Sincerely, Paul J. Klukas Director of Planning cc: Teresa Sousa Darius Fatakia Enclosures PLANNING SYSTEMS <%ARLSBAD FILE COPY Community & Economic Development www.carlsbadca.gov October 11, 2013 Paul Klukas Planning Systems 1530 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: 2nd REVIEW FOR CT 13-03/PUD 13-06/HDP 13-01/SUP 13-02 - ROBERTSON RANCH WEST VILLAGE Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Division has reviewed your Tract Map, Planned Development Permit, Hillside Development Permit, and Special Use Permit, application no. CT 13-03/PUD 13-06/HDP 13-01/SUP 13-02, as to its completeness for processing. The items requested from you earlier to make your Tract Map, Planned Development Permit, Hillside Development Permit, and Special Use Permit, application no. CT 13-03/PUD 13-06/HDP 13-01/SUP 13-02 complete have been received and reviewed by the Planning Division. It has been determined that the application is now complete for processing. Although the initial processing of your application may have already begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by the date of this communication. Please note that although the application is now considered complete, there may be issues that could be discovered during project review and/or environmental review. Any issues should be resolved prior to scheduling the project for public hearing. In addition, the City may request, in the course of processing the application, that you clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the basic information required forthe application. At this time, the City asks that you provide 4 complete sets of the development plans so that the project can continue to be reviewed. The Citv will complete the review of vour resubmittal within 25 davs. In order to expedite the processing of your application, you are strongly encouraged to contact your Staff Planner, Christer Westman, at (760) 602-4614, to discuss or to schedule a meeting to discuss your application and to completely understand this letter. You may also contact each commenting department individually as follows: Land Development Engineering Division: Jeremy Riddle, Associate Engineer, at (760) 602-2737. Fire Department: Gregory Ryan, Fire Inspections, at (760) 602-4661. Sincerely, CHRIS DeCERBO Principal Planner CD:CW:fn c: Rancho Costera LLC, 8383 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 700, Beverly Hills, CA 90211 Don Neu, City Planner Jeremy Riddle, Project Engineer Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner File Copy Data Entry Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue. Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 0 CT 13-03/PUD 13-06/HDP 13-01/SUP 13-02 - ROBERTSON RANCH WEST VILLAGE Oetober41, 2013 Page 2 ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. In reviewing the Robertson Ranch Master Plan language, the Planning Division has determined that relocation of Planning Area 4 will require a General Plan Amendment and a Minor Master Plan Amendment. Both actions will be processed concurrently with the other discretionary permits which also require a recommendation from the Planning Commission and approval by the City Council. Please submit the fees: General Plan Amendment $ 4,206.00 and Minor Master Plan Amendment $ 1,643.00. 2. The interface with the existing residential lots on Gateshead Rd. should be clearly illustrated through photo simulation and sections that include walls and anticipated mature vegetation. 3. The project will be conditioned to process Planned Development Permit (PUD) amendments for Villages 3, 5, 6, and 9/10 for architecture prior to the issuance of a building permit within each ofthe individual villages. 4. The Tentative Map will be conditioned to enter into an affordable housing agreement to satisfy the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance requirements for the entire west village in either Planning Area 7 or 8 prior to recordation ofthe final map, issuance of a grading permit, or issuance of a residential building permit whichever occurs first. 5. The Tentative Map will be conditioned to process and obtain approval of a Site Development Plan for a housing project that satisfies the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance requirements for the entire west village priorto the issuance of a residential building permit. 6. Front, rear, and side yard building setbacks should be defined on the tentative and final map for panhandle Lots # 42 and 43. 7. There is a retaining wall symbol along the rear property lines of Lots # 286-289. Retaining walls should not be proposed at the top of slopes. 8. The retaining wall adjacent to the sidewalk at Lot # 324 should be redesigned to achieve maximum wall heights of 42 inches adjacent to a sidewalk. 9. Photo simulation and/or actual photographs of the proposed retaining wall treatment for El Camino Real as well as the possible mature vegetation condition along this segment of roadway should be provided. Engineering: General 1. Provide written documentation from SDG&E stating they have reviewed the TM and do not object to this subdivision. Since they are easement holders the city requires written documentation this project does not impact the use of their facilities. CT 13-03/PUD 13-06/HDP 13-01/SUP 13-02 - ROBERTSON RANCH WEST VILLAGE October 11, 2013 Page 3 Tentative Map 2. Revise the Tentative Map (TM) to remove the term 'pad' from all bioretention lots and use the term 'EL' (elevation) to avoid confusion with a potential building pad being developed. Refer to redlines. 3. On sheet 4, add street names to the exhibit. Refer to redlines. 4. On sheet 4, remove the callout for the 50-ft access opening along Tamarack Avenue since the development of PA 2 has been scaled back. 5. On sheet 6, clarify if pedestrian access will be permitted through the proposed sewer access road or will it be fenced off for pedestrian use. An HOA pedestrian easement was previously called out (which staff supports), but is now removed. If pedestrian access is permitted over the sewer, revise the TM to callout an HOA pedestrian access easement, however, add a note the DG access road will be maintained by the HOA. 6. On sheet 7, callout the proposed HOA landscape easement. 7. On sheet 8,11 and 12, callout the size, type and HGL of the proposed potable wateriines in the street. They were previously callout but have since been removed. 8. On sheet 9, callout the top and bottom of wall elevations for the retaining walls on lots 286-288. 9. On sheet 9 provide a cross-section between the lots with multiple retaining walls to demonstrate changes in grades. 10. On sheet 9, callout the slope of the SDG&E access road. 11. On sheet 11 provide a cross-section between the lots with multiple retaining walls to demonstrate changes in grades. 12. On sheet 11, callout the top and bottom of wall elevations for the retaining wall on lots 151. 13. On sheet 11, 12, and 16 clarify the pedestrian easement is dedicated to the city and the landscape easement is to the HOA. Refer to redlines. 14. On sheets 11,12, and 16 revise the TM so the waterline in Street Z is located 7-feet off the face of curb per city standards. Refer to redlines. 15. On sheet 12, the storm drain under Street E was previously approved with an open-bottom arch culvert. The design now proposes a solid wall pipe partially filled with soil. Filling in the lower portion of a solid-wall pipe with soil may not qualify as a soft-bottom pipe as previously approved under CT 11-01. Natural channels fluctuate each season by rainfall intensity, duration, vegetative cover changes, channel geometry, sedimentation transport, etc. These changes may expose the bottom of the pipe resulting in a hard bottom crossing. Wildlife agencies and/or preserve groups may raise this as an issue. Please consider using the previously approved arch culvert or address how channel bottom (through the pipe) can be stabilized to avoid exposure. CT 13-03/PUD 13-06/HDP 13-01/SUP 13-02 - ROBERTSON RANCH WEST VILLAGE October 11, 2013 Page 4 16. On sheet 13, clarify whether the slopes surrounding PA2 will be re-vegetated and turned over to the conservancy agency. If so add Note C per the sheet callout. Refer to rediine comments. 17. On sheet 13, callout 'community' so it is not confused with commercial. 18. On sheet 14, provide a cross-section along J Street and lot 92 where 3 retaining walls are proposed to demonstrate changes in grade (repeat comment). 19. On sheet 14 through 17, clarify whether the slopes along El Camino Real corridor will be re- vegetated and turned over to the conservancy agency. 20. On sheet 15, callout the storm drain as private (HOA) maintained (repeat comment). 21. On sheet 19, add the resulting property line dimensions once the adjustment plat (ADJ 13-01) is approved. Verify the lot areas show the ultimate lot area based on the adjusted subdivision boundary. Refer to the redlines. 22. For additional comments, refer to the redlines. PLANNING SYSTEMS n • LAND USE/COASTAL PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • LA3900 POLICY AND PROCESSING ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION August 27, 2013 Mr. Christer Westman RECEIVED AUG 2 8 2013 CITY OF CARLSBAD Z-VADI QRAD Planning Department PITY OF CAKLODrv - PLANNING DIVISION 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: FIRST (1 RESUBMITTAL CT 13-03/PUD 13-06/HDP 13-01/SUP 13-02 ROBERTSON RANCH WEST VILLAGE - B MAP Dear Mr. Westman: Per your letter dated July 15, 2013, identifying Staff items and issues with the submittal package of the above-referenced application package and plans, Shapell Homes has commissioned modifications to the documents and plans as requested. To this end, attached with this cover letter please find the following: • Five (5) copies of the revised Vesting Tentative Map • Five (5) copies of the revised Conceptual Landscape Plan • Three (3) copies of the Revised Storm Water Management Plan • Redlined plans (retum) Below are responses and methods that we are addressing the City comments, in the order of comments listed in the July 15 letter. LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICA TION Planning: 1. Please provide a complete fencing plan for the community that includes type, materials, heights, and locations. Response: A Fencing Plan has been included in the resubmittal package, as requested. Engineering: 1. Per the original Master Plan conditions, this project is required to build facilities that will allow for the decommissioning of the existing Gateshead Rd. sewer lift station. Revise the Tentative Map (TM) to show/callout the sewer improvements required in Edinburgh Drive and Gateshead Rd. that will allow for the lift station to be taken off-line. Response: A call-out note has been added to Sheet 6 of the TM which indicates how the sewer improvements in Edinburgh Drive will be connected to the existing sewer servicing the residences on Gateshead Road (and beyond) and the existing lift station may be taken off-line. 2. Provide written documentation from SDG&E stating they have reviewed the TM and do not object to this subdivision. Clarijy how their service roads will be removed and/or relocated with the proposed project 1 1530 FARADAY AVENUE • SUITE 100 • CARLSBAD, CA 92008 • (760) 931-0780 • FAX (760) 931-5744 • info@pIanningsystems.net Response: This project and existing service roads were discussed with SDG&E and no objections were raised. These access routes have been discussed with them several times, including during the previous mass grading MTM. No substantive changes have been made to the alignments that SDG&E has concurred with. 3. Revise the preliminary Storm Wafer Management Plan to address the discrepancies with water quality treatment area sizing. Ensure any changes of the SWMP are reflected on the revised TM. Update the list for impaired water bodies. Refer to redlines. Response: The SWMP and TM water quality treatment area sizing has been reconciled, as requested. 4. A supplemental water quality (hydromodification screening) study was submitted to the city after formal submittal of this application and staff has not completed a review. We will forward comments when they are available. Until this study is reviewed by staff, the reduced sizes listed in the preliminary SWMP are subject to change. Response: We are awaiting any comments on this study. 5. The 'lot summary' on sheet 1 of the TM is incomplete. Verify the total number of lots proposed as part of this subdivision. Consider the commercial lot and multifamily lots this map will create. Will the private streets be separate lots under HOA (common) ownership? If so, revise the TM sheets to callout lot numbers and revise the lot summary. Response: The Lot Summary on Sheet 1 of the TM has been revised. The private streets were made into separate lots and labeled accordingly. 6. Some of the TM sheets do not show fire hydrants. Revise the TM sheets to show the location of proposed fire hydrants so they meet city standards and coordinate with Fire Prevention staff on the proposed layout Response: We have conferred with the Fire Department (Greg Ryan) and have located in accordance with his direction. All sheets of the TM have been updated accordingly. 7. Provide a letter from the Robertson Ranch East Village HOA lot acknowledging support for allowing a portion of lot 19 from the adjacent development to be acquired so lot 1 will have access to Glen Avenue. This offsite acquisition should be provided prior to approval of the TM so the lot configurations can be approved. Response: The application for the lot line adjustment is pending. Fire: /. All lots that abut or are impacted by Fire Suppression Zones (FSZ) as those identified in the Fire Protection Plan shall be identified by Lot Number in all disclosures and vesting documents. The purpose is to identify all those lots which will have specific restrictions placed upon them for future construction and amenity projects. Specifically, the construction of combustible structures within 100 feet of any FSZ or construction of an outdoor fire place or fire ring within 60 feet of any FSZ. Response: All residential lots subject to fire suppression zone overlay (10') have beeil identified on the TM with a (*) symbol and referenced as "Denotes lot subject to Zone 1 Fire Suppression Requirements". PLANNING SYSTEMS ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. Slope retaining with walls greater than six feet in height should be redesigned to use two or shorter terraced walls with intervening landscaping where ever possible. Response: Retaining walls higher than six visible feet have been redesigned to use two or more walls except along El Camino Real at Sheet 15 of the TM, where taller walls have been used in portions in order to minimize earthwork excavation and landform alteration. 2. Planning Area 4 has been moved from its location identified in the Master Plan. The appropriate process for making that change is yet to be determined. The process is unclear since there is a statement in the Master Plan description for Planning Area 4 that the exact location will be determined through the first tentative map for the West Village yet no other reference to relocation of Planning Area 4 in the Master Plan. Response: As a result of the fact that the Master Plan allows that the exact location of Planning Area 4 be determined at the first TM, the applicant is requesting that the location be chosen as per this proposed TM. 3. Planning Area 4 must be 1.0 net acre of fully usable lot area. Response: A note has been added on Sheet 16 of the TM indicating that "Per Master Plan the final design [of PA 4] requires 1 acre of usable area." 4. All lots within any planning area must meet the minimum lot size requirement for that planning area. See lots: 74, 97, and 170. Response: The referenced lots have been redesigned to comply with the minimum lot area requirement. 5. How does Lot 11 gain access to Glen Avenue? Response: The I.O.D. over Lot 18 of Map No. 15780 will be accepted by the City, and the Glen Avenue right of way will then extend to the Lot 11. 6. Lots 13, 60, 68, 132, 256, 287, 302 do not meet the minimum 35 foot lot width requirement Response: These lots have been redesigned to meet the lot width requirement. 7. Lots 159 and 160 do not meet the minimum 50 foot lot width requirement. Response: These lots have been redesigned to meet the lot width requirement. 8. Pan Handle lots are not encouraged but may be approved upon the adoption of the findings listed in CMC Section 21.10.100(B); (1) The property cannot be served adequately with a public street without panhandle lots due to unfavorable conditions resulting from unusual topography, surrounding land development, or lot configuration; and (2) Subdivision with panhandle lots will not preclude or adversely affect the ability to provide full public street access to other properties within the same block of the subject property. Response: Two panhandle lots are proposed on PA 5 and three are proposed at PA 13. These lots are necessary due to the fact that, in the case of PA 5, the developable area is very narrow, and butts up against a hardline preserve, and the only way this area can be fully utilized for siqt}le family liuiuKS is lu 3 allow for panhandle lots. In the case of PA 13, sufficient land exists for the three lots, but insufficient road frontage exists, and therefore in this case also, the lot configuration dictates the panhandle lot design. In both cases, the panhandle lots do not preclude or adversely affect the ability to provide full public street access to other properties within the same block. 9. The Hillside Grading Volume as shown on the Vesting Tentative Map is potentially acceptable (9,274 cy/ac). Applications proposing grading volumes which are potentially acceptable (eight thousand to ten thousand cubic yards/acre of cut or fill) shall, on the preliminary grading plan, submit for review specific written findings justifying the reasons for the amount of grading, subject to the approval of the City Planner and City Engineer. Response: Findings of justification for Hillside Grading Volume at 9,274 cubic yards per acre are as follows: • All hillside conditions have been properly identified and grading will not occur in the undevelopable portion of the site pursuant to Section 21.53.230 with the exception of areas that are exempt from the hillside regulations because they were previously graded, or because the slopes have less than 15 feet in elevation difference and an area of less than 10,000 square feet. • The development is consistent with the intent, purpose, and requu-ements of the Hillside Ordinance, Chapter 21.95 in that the hillside conditions are property identified and are incorporated into the design; the project is designed to relate to the slope of the land, highly visible slopes will be contour graded; the alteration of the natural hillsides will be accomplished in an environmentally sensitive manner to preserve wildlife habitats; and the project will implement NPDES measures to reduce mnoff and avoid erosion. • Justification for the 9,274 cubic yards per acre grading quantity stems from the predominantly single family residential nature of the development. The TM calls for the creation of larger areas of development through which the intemal street access system is provided. The amount of slope between cul-de-sacs is limited by the intemal street system which is limited to less than 6.5% slope grade. The elevation differences between the highest point of the subdivision and the lowest point is approximately 119 vertical feet (184 ft. to 65 ft. MSL). Greater grading quantities are required to reduce the grade differences between lots which in turn reduce the road grades throughout the subdivision; and all manufactured slopes will be m accordance with the City's Landscape Guidelines Manual. • The proposed project design and lot configuration minimizes disturbance of hillside lands, in that the significant slope and sensitive habitat areas are being preserved in open space. 10. Details of how the proposed development at Planning Area 9/10 interfaces with the existing lots along Gateshead Road must be provided. Response: Sheet 6 of the TM shows how the PA 9/10 development interfaces with the Colony lots on Gateshead Road. The proposed lots are typically some 2 5-feet or more below the elevation of the Gateshead lots. The intervening slope is wholly located on the PA 9/10 property and will be maintained by the Rancho Costera HOA. Engineering: 1. In the upper right hand corner of the TM, revise the exhibits to list the application numbers for this project. Refer to redlines. Response: The application numbers for the project have been added to all sheets ofthe TM. 2. Revise the legend and TM sheets to show and callout private street lights on all proposed private streets (typical). Refer to redlines. Response: The private street lights have been differentiated from the public street lights through use of call-out "PVT" for private lights. All others are public. PLANNING SYSTEMS • 3. Revise the TM and concept landscape plans to provide detail on the proposed bio-retention basins throughout the project. Response: A detail has been added on both the TM (Sheet 3) and the Landscape Plan (Sheet ) to show design of the bio-retention basins, as requested. 4. Revise the TM and concept landscape plans to clarijy the purpose of the HOA lots provided in various locations (refer to redlines). Are these lots provided for increased landscape areas along certain roads? Revise the concept landscape plans to show these lots being landscaped. Some of the HOA lots appear to be extensions of the adjacent residential lots. These could cause confusion with adjacent homeowners assuming they are part of their lot. Will they be fenced off when adjacent to residential lots? Refer to redlines. Response: The sliver HOA lots adjacent to the roads have been rmoved. 5. On all applicable TM sheets, the main potable waterline being relocated from Glasgow Drive through the project shall be 16-inches (per the previous potable water study) versus .12-inches. Please address this discrepancy. Response: The water line size has been revised from 12-inches to 16-inches. 8. Coordinate with the Transportation staff (Bryan Jones) regarding the types and layout of traffic control measures throughout the project. Response: We have coordinated with Bryan Jones regarding the traffic confrol measures and decided upon designs as shown on Sheets 2 and 3 of the TM. 6. Coordinate with the city trails manager (Liz Ketabian at 760-434-2978) regarding the design, alignment, layout, and maintenance responsibility of the proposed trails in this project Ensure the trails satisjy city trail requirements and the Robertson Ranch Master Plan requirements. Response: We have coordinated with the City Trails Manager and added sections and notes shown on Sheet 3 ofthe TM. 7. On the TM sheets, revise the pedestrian ramps to minimize the amount of unnecessary pavement needed in order to reduce impervious area. Refer to redlines (typical). Response: The designs of the pedestrian ramps have been revised to reduce the amount of pavement surrounding these ramps. 8. On all the TM sheets, show and callout the sight distance corridors per city standards. Refer to redlines. Response: Notes have been added to denote sight distance corridors per the Landscape Manual. 9. On all applicable TM sheets, callout proposed easements for public utility and access purposes over private streets (typical). Response: Notes have been added to denote easements for public utility and access purposes over the private sfreets, as requested. 10. Clarify if the final map for PA 13 will be phased so that it records later than the rest of the project. If so, the lot numbering sequence should not begin with PA 13, but rather be the last in the sequence of numbers. Please address this issue and renumber the lots as necessary. PLANNING SYSTEMS Response: It is the applicant's intent to record the final map before recordation of the remainder of the property. Lot numbering has been changed so that the first lot numbers are at PA 13. 11. On sheet 1, update the note for map phasing to clarijy which planning areas are associated with the 'rest of the site'. Response: The note for map phasing on Sheet 1 has been revised to clarify which planning areas are included in.this section, as requested. 12. On sheet 1, clarijy the discrepancy with the Assessor's Parcel Number. Refer to redlines. Response: The APN's have been reconciled. 13. On sheet 2, the details on the traffic circles, explain whether they will be controlled with stop signs for approaching vehicles. If so, relocate the proposed pedestrian ramps so they do not confiict with cars stopping. Response: The traffic circles will be uncontrolled (no stop signs). 14. On sheet 2, revise the traffic circle details or add another sheet to demonstrate how fire trucks will navigate through the intersection. Response: Truck turning movements around traffic circles have been added to Sheet 21 of the TM. 15. On sheet 4, callout the planning areas for the proposed open space (habitat areas) that will be created as part of this map. Coordinate planning areas with Master Plan. Refer to redlines. Response: Open space planning areas have been labeled on Sheet 4. 16. On sheet 4, add the lot numbers on the map. Response: The lot numbers have been added on Sheet 4, as requested. 17. On sheet 5, clarijy how slope drainage behind the common retaining wall on lot 145-169 will be collected and discharged to the street. Show swales, inlets and private drainage systems as necessary. Although the slopes are proposed as individually maintained per the concept landscape plan, staff is concerned that individual lots will not properly maintain cross-lot drainage conditions. Provide either an HOA lot or HOA maintenance easement so this slope and drainage is HOA-maintained. Revise the TM and conceptual landscape plan as necessary. Response: An HOA maintenance easement has been added for the slopes behind Lots 145-169 so resolve the issue identified. Brow ditches have been added to the slope design to accommodate drainage. 18. On sheet 5, clarijy if the all-weather access roadfor the public sewer (on Lot 337) will also be usedfor local pedestrian movement. This access road would rarely be used by city crews. If pedestrians would be using this, the maintenance of this road should be HOA-maintained as majority of use would be from pedestrians. Clarijy this on the TM. Response: The sewer alignment has been revised and the referenced section of the access road has been removed from the design. 19. On sheet 5 and 6, show and callout the public right-of-way for Glasgow Drive where it abuts the private street (separate HOA lot?). Refer to redlines. Response: The limits of the Glasgow Drive and Edinburgh Drive street dedications have been added to the plan. PLANNING SYSTEMS • 20. On sheet 5 and 6, show and callout the proposed gates. Response: The proposed gates on the private streets have been called out on Sheets 5 and 6 of the TM. 21. On sheet 6, show the preliminary improvements necessary to decommission the Gateshead sewer lift station per Master Plan conditions of approval Update the old note that was used on the Master Tentative map since this will not be deferred on this map. Refer to redlines. Response: The sewer note has been updated as requested and the sewer improvements in Edinburgh Drive have been included and shown. 22. On sheet 7 and 8, the location of the mid-block raised median may raise concerns with on-street parking, placement of driveways for the adjacent lots; curb transitions, and fire truck access. Revise the design to address these issues. These worked well in the Robertson ranch East Village because they were placed along landscape linkages and not along residential frontages. Coordinate with Transportation staff on design/layout of traffic calming measures prior to resubmittal. Response: The raised medians have been removed as suggested by the Transportation Department. 23. On sheet 8, the retaining wall on lot 199 is about 12-foot high. Once a fence is installed for the rear lot, this will appear as an 18-foot high wall. Coordinate with planning on maximum wall heights. Response: The high retaining walls, including the subject wall, have been replaced with two separate walls, no higher than six feet in height, each. 24. On sheet 8, review the wateriines so they are a minimum of 5-feet from each other. This layout will need input from the utilities department. Response: A proposed configuration for the double water lines (see attached) was submitted to Bill Plummer on July 15. Once the design is finalized and approved, we will incorporate the changes into the TM. 25. On sheet 8 and 11, callout the storm drains on lot 341 as 'private' since they carrying slope runoff. Response: The referenced storm drains have been labeled as "Private". 26. On sheet 9, the retaining wall for lot 298 appears to be 9-ft high. Clarify whether a safety fence will be installed since the sidewalk is nearby. Coordinate with planning on maximum wall height. Response: The retaining wall design has been revised to use two walls with a maximum height of six feet each. 27. On sheet 9, the retaining wall on lot 297 appears to exceed 6-feet Coordinate with planning on maximum wall height requirements. Response: The retaining wall design has been revised to use two walls with a maximum height of six feet each. 28. On sheet 10, clarify if storm runoff on Street 'G' will be able to turn the corner. If runoffpushes to the south side of Street 'M', clarify whether another cross-gutter would be provided to ensure runoff is treated by the bioretention basin on lot 322. Response: The civil engineers have verified that the 100-year storm event will be contained within the gutter as it makes the turn at the NE comer of Sfreet 'G' and Sfreet 'M'. Howpvei. in die unforeseen PLANNING SYSTEMS event that the mnoff does cross the street, it will be directed to the treatment area on Lot 151 prior to entering the storm drain system. 29. On sheet 10, clarijy why Street 'J' does not have any proposed fire hydrants or street lights. Revise the TM so the facilities meet city standards. Response: Sfreet lights have been added to Sfreet 'J'. Fire hydrant locations have been specifically determined by Greg Ryan and have been added to all sheets. 30. On sheet 10, provide detail where Street 'J meets Tamarack Avenue. Clarify how pedestrian ramps will be provided. Refer to redlines. Response: Pedesfrian ramps have been added to the design at the intersection of Tamarack Avenue and street 'J'. Greater detail of this intersection, including the proposed median curb on Tamarack, has been added on Sheet 10. 31. On sheet 10, revise the TM to provide detail on the preliminary median improvements required to ensure this driveway will be a right-in right-out driveway per the Master Plan and EIR. Response: A median has been added to Tamarack Avenue to prevent left turns being made from Sfreet 'J'. This is shown on Sheet 10. 32. On sheet 10, provide a D-41 outlet for the storm drain discharging to the open space since there is no maintenance access provided. Response: A D-41 outlet for the storm drain discharging into the open space has been added on Sheet 10. 33. On sheet 10, clarify how many of the HOA lots adjacent to residential lots will be delineated. For example, on lots 41, 60, 64, 65 and 79, the HOA lots seem like they are part of the private SFD lot Since the HOA lots will be separately maintained by the HOA and will they be fenced or delineated in some other way? Response: The HOA lots adjacent to residential lots have been eliminated. 34. On sheet 10, 11 and 12, show and callout the proposed gates. Response: The gates have been called out on the private sfreets in the appropriate locations at PA 5 and PA 9/10. 55. On sheet 12, coordinate with planning on whether this culvert meets the wildlife crossing elements. Response: A note has been added to the detail to clarify that the 12' x 12' wildlife crossing is a minimum requirement and that the 18' pipe complies with this minimum requirement. 36. On sheet 13, and 15 thru 18, screen back the southbound improvements for El Camino Real as they are covered by CDP 11-10. Response: The southbound improvements for El Camino Real have been screened back, as requested. 37. On sheet 14, the raised traffic circle on Street 'J' does not conform to the typical details on sheet 3. Revise the sheet or add a separate detail to show inside and outside tire tracks for a fire truck (figure 404.5F) on how it maneuvers through the circle. Response: The raised traffic circle on Street 'J' has been revised to conform 8 lu llie typical detail or PLANNING SYSTEMS • Sheet 3. A detail showing how a fire fruck will be able to maneuver around this fraffic circle has been added to Sheet 21. 38. On sheet 14, relocate the waterline in Street 'J' so that it not located in the raised landscaped median. Refer to redlines. Response: The water line in Street 'J' has been revised to a location outside of the landscaped median, as requested. 39. On sheet 14, the retaining wall on lot 89 appears to be 11-foot high. Coordinate with planning on maximum wall heights. Callout a safety railing as this wall supports the pedestrian trail. Response: The subject retaining wall has been replaced with two separate walls no higher than six- feet in height each. 40. On sheet 14, at the westerly end of Street 'O', provide a connection from the cul-de-sac to the trail. Response: A connecting trail has been provided from the cul-de-sac at the end of Street 'O' to the westerly trail, as requested. 41. On sheet 15, callout the storm drains on lot 347 as 'private' since they carrying slope runoff. Response: The storm drains have been labeled "Private". 42. On sheet 15 through 18, show and callout relinquishment of access rights along El Camino Real per the legend symbol Response: Relinquishment of access rights along El Camino Real have been shown and called out. 43. On sheet 19, add the name for Street 'V. Response: The name for Street 'V has been added on Sheet 19. 44. On sheet 19, remove the note for a lot line adjustment with the city. When right-of-way for Street 'V is provided, there will be no need to adjust property lines. Response: The note for a lot line adjustment for Street 'V has been eliminated, as requested. 45. On sheet 19, the road and utility improvements for Street 'V have not been constructed. Therefore, this project may be responsible to construct this street as required to serve Planning Area 13. Add a note to this sheet explaining this. Response: A note has been added on Sheet 19 to explain that the shared cost for improvement of Street 'V is to be determined. 46. On sheet 19, remove the conceptual layout and parking lot for the city park. This layout is still subject to further discretionary review and approval Response: The conceptual layout and parking lot for the city park has been removed, as requested. 47. On sheet 19, the retaining wall supporting lot 12 and 13 appears to be 6-feet; however with a 6-foot fence at the top (for safety) this could be a 12-foot wall as viewed from El Camino Real. Coordinate with planning on maximum wall heights. Response: The retaining wall will be 5-feet in height. PLANNING SYSTEMS 48. On sheet 19, provide a cross-section along the rear lot or lot 13 showing the retaining wall and trad along the rear portion of the lot Response: A cross-section (Section J-J) across Lot 13 has been added at Sheet 19. 49. On sheet 19, show the proposed subdivision boundary to ensure public street frontage is provided for lot 1. Response: The proposed subdivision boundary after the lot line adjustment is shown to ensure public sfreet frontage for Lot 1. 50. For additional comments, refer to the redlines. Response: The rediine comments have been addressed. Police: /. Please refer to Plan Review Recommendations dated June 18, 2013 prepared by J. Sasway, Police Landscaping: 7. Plans are too conceptual to provide an appropriate review. One symbol is usedfor many trees, shrubs and ground covers which may be very different in size and character. Please provide a separate symbol for each type of tree and shrub (i.e. large evergreen tree or shrub, medium size tree or shrub, small flowering accent shrub, etc.) and ground covers. Final comments are reserved pending receipt of more complete plans. Response: Additional detail has been provided in all areas of the plans, as requested. 2. Please clearly show and label the following items on the landscape plans. Check all sheets. a. Property lines, right-of-ways, existing and proposed easements. Insure no trees are located within public utility easements. b. Drainage elements and utilities. Insure no conflicts with plantings. Response: The property lines, right-of-ways, existing and proposed easements and other plan elements have been provided and observed to ensure no conflicts with plantings. 3. Please relocate trees outside of easements. Check all sheets. Response: Trees have been adjusted through the landscape plan to avoid easements. A General Note has been added to avoid easements on Sheet L-l. 4. Please use the latest civil plans for the base. Lot numbers and other information are not coordinated. Please resolve. Check all sheets. Final comments are reserved pending coordinated plans. Response: The updated civil engineer plans have been incorporated into the Landscape Plan background. 5. Please address landscaping of all graded areas. Check all sheets. Response: All graded areas have been addressed for landscaping on all plan sheets, as requested. 6. Please address how the homeowner is to access these landscape areas to maintain them when there is a 6' retaining wad (some higher) in between. Response: The maintenance responsibility for this area has been revised p{i HOA iiiainl| PLANNING SYSTEMS 10 OM] Please see the Maintenance Responsibility Map, Sheet L-26. 7. Please indicate the plan project identification number to see for the right-of-way and median landscape improvements. Response: The referenced drawings have been annotated on multiple Landscaping Plan sheets. 8. It appears that some slopes between lots may be higher than 3' thus requiring slope revegetation landscaping. Please address. Check all sheets. Response: The Landscape Plans have been revised to show that landscaping has been provided for all slopes over 3 feet in height. 9. Please define the public entities that will maintain street frontages f El Camino Real, Tamarack Avenue and Cannon Road. Response: The maintenance of this area will be provided by the City. See the Maintenance Responsibility Map, Sheet L-26. 10. Please clarify who is responsible for the maintenance of all of the open space areas. Response: The maintenance of the natural open space areas to be conserved will be provided by CNLM, the conservancy manager. See the Maintenance Responsibility Map, Sheet L-26. 11. Please relocate trees outside of the vehicular sight lines or provide appropriate notes indicating that the canopies will be maintained at a minimum 10' height above the sight lines (this will require box size trees that will have a canopy this high). Response: The trees have been adjusted throughout to avoid the sight lines. A General Note is now provided on Sheet L-l. 12. Please provide conceptual elevations and details for all entry monumentation and insure they are not in confiict with vehicular sight lines (provide both Cal Trans and City required 25' triangular sight lines). Response: The conceptual elevations and details are shown on Landscape Plan Sheet L-20. 13. Please show the 25' corner vehicular sight triangles. Response: The comer vehicular sight triangles are now shown on all sheets. 14. Please provide a bar scale on all plan sheets. Response: The bar scale has been provided on all plan sheets. 75. Please add picnic tables and a BBQ to the PA-6 Park. Response: Picnic tables and a BBQ have been added to the PA-6 Park, as requested. 16. Please draw in the primary entry monument on the plan so that it is clear how it works with walls and walks. Please provide meandering walks per the Master Plan which will provide more interest than the straight walks currently shown. Please provide additional landscape planting detail so that the end result is better clarified. Indicate wall heights. See Master Plan figure 111-32). Response: The entry monument has been shown on the plan. The meandering walk is also provided on the revised plans. 11 PLANNING SYSTEMS 17. Please provide conceptual details for the gated entries. Response: Gated entries conceptual details are provided on Sheet L-20. 18. Coordinate the view fence symbol on the plan and legend. Response: The fence symbol has been coordinated on the revised set. 19. I do not find the sections. Please clarify if this means to see the Landscape Manual or Master Plan sections? Please indicate the specific sections to see providing page/figure numbers. Response: Sections have been added to the Landscape Plan set on new Sheet L-22. 20. Please provide conceptual detailing and elevations of the neighborhood entry monument consistent with the Master Plan figures 111-33 and 111-34. Insure that vehicular sight lines are maintained. Response: Conceptual detailing and elevations of the neighborhood entry monuments are shown on Sheet 20. 21. Please show and label the Cal Trans sight lines and insure no conflicts. Response: CalTrans sight lines are shown on Landscape Sheets L-6, L-9, L-10, L-11, L-l2 and L- 13. 22. Please provide conceptual detailing and elevations of the identity monument Response: Conceptual detailing and elevations of identity monuments are provided on Sheet L-13. 23. Please provide conceptual detailing and elevations of the village core identify monuments. Response: Conceptual detailing and elevations of Village Core identity monuments are provided on Sheet L-20. 24. Please provide enhanced paving and meandering sidewalks per the Master Plan figures 111-35 and III- 39 to provide more interest. Insure all enhanced paving is shown and labeled on the civil plans. Response: Enhanced paving and meandering sidewalks per the Master Plan is provided on various sheets of the Landscape Plans. 25. Please sign and date the declaration. Response: The declaration is signed and dated. 26. The planting palette shall include: a. Tree types and quantities. b. Shrub types and spacing with general layout. c. Ground cover types and spacing. Please address. Response: The planting palettes have been revised to include the referenced landscape information. 27. Please add the street name. Response: The sfreet names have been added to the plan set. 28. Please provide fire suppression zone widths per the Landscape Manual and Master Plan or provide documentation from the Fire Marshall indicating approval of a modifiedfire .mpprer^im zone (7t=t 12 PLANNING SYSTEMS • 10' versus 20' and zone A-2 shows 30' versus 20'). Check all sheets. Response: The fire suppression zones were confirmed by Greg Ryan, Carlsbad Fire Department in a meeting with Christer Westman, George O'Day and me, on July 17, 2013. These zones are to be 60-feet wide, with an allowance of 10-feet overlap onto the rear of the individual private lots. This is done in consideration of preservation of additional habitat, and the inclusion of resfrictions of flammable materials, etc., subject to the approval of the Fire Marshal. In some cases we have elected to design with the entire 60-feet fire suppression zones outside of the individual lots. 29. Please indicate when the preserved open space and biological resource area plans will be provided. Response: The preserved open space and biological resource area plans will be provided and approved prior to recordation of the final map. 30. Please provide finalized direction on the coastal sage scrub revegetation. Response: We are in the process of preparing the CSS Revegetation Plan and will provide that for City and resource agency review prior to recordation ofthe final map. 31. Please select plantings (street trees and parkway plantings) to match the fire station plans. Response: Notwithstanding the fact that we have requested the fire station landscape plans from both LDE and the Capital Improvement Departments, we have not been provided a set. In light of this fact, we have provided landscaping as best we can in this area. 32. Street trees shall be selected from the approved tree replacement list identified in Chapter 6 of the Carlsbad Community Forest Management Plan, unless approved otherwise. Please address. Response: The plan legends have been revised to omit the trees that are not shown on the Carlsbad Forest Management Plan. 33. Please revise the water use calculations using an Eto of 47. Response: The water use calculations have been revised, as requested. This is shown on Sheet L-25. 34. Please provide calculations on the forms found in the City Landscape Manual (appendix E). Response: The calculations are provided on Sheet L-25. 35. Areas gradedflatter than 6:1 require a cover crop per Standard #1 when they have one or more of the following conditions: a. Sheet graded pads not scheduledfor improvements within six (6) months of completion of rough grading, b. A potential erosion problem as determined by the City. c. Identified by the City as highly visible areas to the public or have special conditions that warrant immediate treatment If these areas are not to be scheduledfor improvements within 6 months of completion of rough grading, they will be required to be hydroseeded and will require temporary irrigation to insure germination and establishment. If this is the case, please include these areas in the water use calculations. Response: The plans have been graphically revised to show the referenced areas, and included in the water calculations. 36. The water use plan has been forwarded to CMWD for review'. Any comments will he returned to the applicant. 13 PLANNING SYSTEMS Response: No comments have been received from CMWD. 57. Please provide a symbol for all plantings so that it is clear where they are used. Response: The Landscape Plan has been revised so that symbols have been provided for all plantings. 38. Although title sheet notes indicate appropriate plantings and requirements, the plan symbols do not appear to show appropriate slope revegetation requirements. Many slopes in excess of 8' height do not show all required standards being met. Please resolve, insuring all appropriate requirements are shown for all slopes. Check all slopes, all sheets. Response: Additional information has been provided for all slopes, as requested. 39. The Fire Suppression Plan shall consist of a written and graphic plan and sections illustrating the following: a. Emergency/maintenance access (Maintenance access shall be provided to all fire protection areas. All maintenance access points shall be identified on the drawings.) b. Maintenance responsibility and schedule of frequency. Please address. Response: The Fire Suppression Plan has been revised as indicated. Emergency and maintenance access is identified on the drawings. The maintenance responsibility and schedule of frequency is addressed. 40. Please clearly indicate which plants are not to be used in fire suppression zones (those with high fuel characteristics). Final comments are reserved pending completion of this item. Response: The plan shows which high fuel species plants are not to be used in fire suppression zones. 41. Please remove trees from fire suppression zone 2. Check all sheets. Response: Trees have been removed from fire suppression zone 2 on all affected sheets. 42. Please address removal of high fuel species and 50% of the volume of moderate fuel species in fire suppression zones B per the Landscape Manual Check all sheets. Please add all appropriate notes to plans. Response: Notes have been provided reflecting this comment on all affected sheets. 43. Please indicate the cultivars to be used so that fire suppression requirements may be checked. Response: This revision has been made. 44. Please show all fire suppression zones (fire suppression zone I is not shown). Check all sheets. Response: All fire suppression zones have now been provided, on all sheets. 45. If Zone A-2 or B-2 crosses over a fence line, a six (6) foot wide strip of modified landscaping shall be provided parallel to the fence line in order to provide access for firefighters. Plants located within the six (6) foot access area shall not exceed a height of 18 inches at maturity. Please address. Check all sheets. Response: This information has been provided. Please see the Fuel Management Sections. 46. Debris and trimmings produced by maintenance and thinning shall be removedfrom the site or shall be converted to mulch by a chipping machine and evenly dispersed over the area to iv mnrlmi/m df.piJi 14 PLANNING SYSTEMS • four (4) inches. Please address. Response: This information has been provided. Please see Fuel Management Sections and Notes. 47. Please review all fire suppression requirements and insure all requirements are met and addressed on the plans. Response: We believe we have complied with all fire suppression requirements on this revised set. 48. Please address fire suppression requirements. Check all sheets. Response: We believe we have complied with all fire suppression requirements on this revised set. 49. Please show the minimum 10' landscape buffer per the Master Plan figure 111-39. Response: The minimum 10' landscape buffer has been noted on the applicable plan sheets. 50. The Master Plan figure IV- I shows this street as a 60' right-of-way local street. The Master Plan clarifies that the "Tamarack Connection " street will be designed with a 28' curb to curb width with sidewalk on 1 side only. The Master Plan indicates that local streets shall be provided with a 5' sidewalk and 7-6" wide landscaped parkway adjacent to the curb. Please revise providing the T-6" curb adjacent landscaped parkway on both sides of the street and 5' walk on 1 side. Response: Detail E/21 on the Landscape Plans has been updated to match the civil engineer plans design for the Tamarack Connection street. See Detail C/21 for the local street. 57. Please label the street cross sections to be consistent with the Master Plan. Response: The sfreet cross sections labels have been revised to be consistent with the master Plan on Sheet L-21. 52. Please provide for the stamped roadway surface at the point where the trail crosses the street per the Master Plan (page lV-5). Response: The plan has been revised to provide for the stamped roadway surface, as requested on Sheet L-10. 55. The Master Plan, figure IV-1 shows E and J Streets as collector streets. There is to be a 5 '-6" walk within a 10' parkway and a minimum 5' landscape buffer where adjacent to walls or fences and landscape buffers per the Master Plan in other areas. Please resolve in the section and show appropriately on the plans indicating landscaping of all buffer areas. Response: This information is provided on the revised plans. The easement is shown on the detail (Sheet L-21) and in the plans (Sheets L-8 and L-l2). 54. 1 do not find a reference to a decomposed granite trail along local streets where adjacent to open space in the Master Plan. Please resolve with the Master Plan. Response: The decomposed granite call-out reference has been removed. 55. It is recommended that a fence be added along the trail where adjacent to concrete swales to prevent users from going off the edge. Response: A fence has been added along the frail where adjacent to concrete swales, as suggested. 56. Please show where each of the trail markers and trail node structures will be loMieti per Ihe Mr. PLANNING SYSTEMS 15 ' Plan figure 111-54. Response: The trail markers and trail node structures have been added to the applicable plan sheets, as requested. 57. The Master Plan figure 111-54 shows an east to west trail cutting across PA-23C. Please show this trail on the plans. Coordinate with the civU plans and provide a copy of updated civil plans with the next submittal for cross checking. Response: The trail is indicated on Sheet L-5. This is an existing dirt road which will be maintained as a trail. 58. The Master Plan figure 111-54 shows a north to south trail cutting across the east side of PA-11. Please show this trad on the plans and coordinate with civdplans. Response: This trail is provided on Sheet L-8 and L-13, as requested. It will be consfructed as part of future PA 11 development. 59. Please distinguish on the plans where the lodge pole trail fence versus the wire trail fence is proposed. Please note that fences located within 60' of native habitat shall be noncombustible. Response: The locations for fencing are called out. It is acknowledged that fences located within 60-feet of native habitat shall be noncombustible. 60. What is this access road usedfor? Is turfcrete or other load bearing surfacing needed in the parkways? Please resolve. Response: The utility easement access has been revised per the TM civil engineering plans. The Landscape Plans reflect the civil design. 61. The theme wall looks the same as the project boundary (crosses the street). Please resolve clearly showing the beginning and end of the theme walls. Response: The wall has been revised an annotated, on Sheet L-l and L-2. 62. Please show/identify the wall or fence. Response: The fence is identified. See Sheet L-6. 63. Please address the view fence or black vinyl coated chain-link fence at PA-23C per the Master Plan figure 111-57. Provide detailing as appropriate. Response: Detailing of the fencing at PA 23C is provided, as requested. 64. Please provide a neighborhood entry monument consistent with the Master Plan figure 111-27. Response: The conceptual neighborhood entry monument design is provided on Sheet L-l2 and Sheet L-20. 65. Please provide a detail of the traffic circle showing enhanced paving per the Master Plan figure 111-41. Response: A detail of the traffic circle is shown on revised Sheet L-l 9. 66. Please provide irrigation to all planted areas to insure germination of seed and plant establishment (see comment #3 5). 16 PLANNING SYSTEMS Response: The revised design provides irrigation to all planted areas. See the plant legends. 67. The Master Plan allows for either a view fence or solid block wall in this location adjacent to the city park. A solid block wall may be more desirable with a parking lot in close proximity. Please review. Response: This stmcture has been revised to a solid block wall, as requested. Please see Sheet L-l7. 68. RETURN REDLINES and provide 2 copies of all plans (concept, water conservation, fire protection, and colored water use plan) for the next submittal. Response: Redlines are being retumed with this revised plans resubmittal package. Please let us know if you wish to meet to discuss any of the items in this resubmittal package. J. Klukas Paul Director of Planning cc: Teresa Sousa Darius Fatakia Enclosures 17 PLANNING SYSTEMS • <%c,TvoF RLECOPY VCARLSBAD "^"-^ Community & Economic Development www.carisbadca.gov July 15, 2013 Paul Klukas Planning Systems 1530 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 SUBJECT: 1st REVIEW FOR CT 13-03/PUD 13-06/HDP 13-01/SUP 13-02 - ROBERTSON RANCH WEST VILLAGE - B MAP Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Division has reviewed your Tract Map, Planned Development Permit, Hillside Development Permit, and Special Use Permit, application no. CT 13- 03/PUD 13-06/HDP 13-01/SUP 13-02, as to its completeness for processing. The application is incomplete, as submitted. Attached are two lists. The first list is information which must be submitted to complete your application. The second list is project issues of concern to staff. In order to expedite the processing of your application, the "incomplete" items and your response to the project issues of concern to Staff must be submitted directly to your staff planner; therefore, please contact your staff planner directly to schedule a re-submittal appointment. As part of your re-submittal package, please prepare and include with your re-submittal: (1) a copy of these lists, (2) a detailed letter summarizing how all identified incomplete items and/or project issues have been addressed; and (3) five (5) sets of revised plans. No processing of your application can occur until the application is determined to be complete. When all required materials are submitted, the City has 30 days to make a determination of completeness. If the application is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the application will be initiated. In addition, please note that you have six months from the date the application was initially filed, June 5, 2013, to either resubmit the application or submit the required information. Failure to resubmit the application or to submit the materials necessary to determine your application complete shall be deemed to constitute withdrawal of the application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new application must be submitted. In order to expedite the processing of your application, you are strongly encouraged to contact your Staff Planner, Christer Westman, at (760) 602-4614, to discuss or to schedule a meeting to discuss your application and to completely understand this letter. You may also contact each commenting department individually as follows: • Land Development Engineering Division: Jeremy Riddle, Associate Engineer, at (760) 602-2737. • Fire Department: Gregory Ryan, Fire Inspections, at (760) 602-4661. Sincerely, (jju./vy \ CHRIS DeCERBO Principal Planner CD:CW:fn c: Rancho Costera LLC, 8383 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 700 Beverly Hills CA 90211 Don Neu, City Planner Jeremy Riddle, Project Engineer Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner File copy Data Entry Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 Cl 13-05/PUD 13-06/HDP llfe/SUP 13-02 - ROBERTSON RANCH WES^^LLAGE - B MAP July 15, 2013 Page 2 LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION Planning: 1. Please provide a complete fencing plan for the community that includes type, materials, heights, and locations. Engmeering: 1. Per the original Master Plan conditions, this project is required to build facilities that will allow for the decommissioning of the existing Gateshead Rd. sewer lift station. Revise the Tentative Map (TM) to show/callout the sewer improvements required in Edinburgh Drive and Gateshead Rd. that will alfow for the lift station to be taken off-line. 2. Provide written documentation from SDG&E stating they have reviewed the TM and do not object to this subdivision. Clarify how their service roads will be removed and/or relocated with the proposed project. 3. Revise the preliminary Storm Water Management Plan to address the discrepancies with water quality treatment area sizing. Ensure any changes of the SWMP are reflected on the revised TM. Update the list for impaired water bodies. Refer to redlines. 4. A supplemental water quality (hydromodification screening) study was submitted to the city after formal submittal of this application and staff has not completed a review. We will forward comments when they are available. Until this study is reviewed by staff, the reduced sizes listed in the preliminary SWMP are subject to change. 5. The 'lot summary' on sheet 1 of the TM is incomplete. Verify the total number of lots proposed as part of this subdivision. Consider the commercial lot and multifamily lots this map will create. Will the private streets be separate lots under HOA (common) ownership? If so, revise the TM sheets to callout lot numbers and revise the lot summary. 6. Some of the TM sheets do not show fire hydrants. Revise the TM sheets to show the location of proposed fire hydrants so they meet city standards and coordinate with Fire Prevention staff on the proposed layout. 7. Provide a letter from the Robertson Ranch East Village HOA lot acknowledging support for allowing a portion of lot 19 from the adjacent development to be acquired so lot 1 will have access to Glen Avenue. This offsite acquisition should be provided prior to approval of the TM so the lot configurations can be approved. Fire: 1. All lots that abut or are impacted by Fire Suppression Zones (FSZ) as those identified in the Fire Protection Plan shall be identified by Lot Number in all disclosures and vesting documents. The purpose is to identify all those lots which will have specific restrictions placed upon them for future construction and amenity projects. Specifically, the construction of combustible structures within 100 feet of any FSZ or construction of an outdoor fire place or fire ring within 60 feet of any FSZ. CT 13-03/PUD 13-06/HDP 13-01/SUP 13-02 - ROBERTSON RANCH WEST VILLAGE - B MAP July 15, 2013 Page 3 ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. Slope retaining with walls greater than six feet in height should be redesigned to use two or more, shorter terraced walls with intervening landscaping wherever possible. 2. Planning Area 4 has been moved from its location identified in the Master Plan. The appropriate process for making that change is yet to be determined. The process is unclear since there is a statement in the Master Plan description for Planning Area 4 that the exact location will be determined through the first tentative map for the West Village yet there is no other reference to relocation of Planning Area 4 in the Master Plan. 3. Planning Area 4 must be 1.0 net acre of fully usable lot area. 4. All lots within any planning area must meet the minimum lot area requirement for that planning area. See lots: 74, 97, and 170. 5. How does Lot 11 gain access to Glen Avenue. 6. Lots 13, 60, 68,132, 256, 287, 302 do not meet the minimum 35 foot lot width requirement. 7. Lots 159 and 160 do not meet the minimum 50 foot lot width requirement. 8. Pan Handle lots are not encouraged but may be approved upon the adoption ofthe findings listed in CMC Section 21.10.100(B) 1) The property cannot be served adequately with a public street without panhandle lots due to unfavorable conditions resulting from unusual topography, surrounding land development, or lot configuration; and 2) Subdivision with panhandle lots will not preclude or adversely affect the ability to provide full public street access to other properties within the same block ofthe subject property. 9. The Hillside Grading Volume as shown on the Vesting Tentative Map is potentially acceptable (9,274 cy/ac). Applications proposing grading volumes which are potentially acceptable (eight thousand to ten thousand cubic yards/acre of cut or fill) shall, on the preliminary grading plan, submit for review specific written findings justifying the reasons for the amount of grading, subject to the approval of the City Planner and City Engineer. 10. Details of how the proposed development at Planning Area 9/10 interfaces with the existing lots along Gateshead Road must be provided. Engineering: 1. In the upper right hand corner of the TM, revise the exhibits to list the application numbers for this project. Refer to redlines. 2. Revise the legend and TM sheets to show and callout private street lights on all proposed private streets (typical). Refer to redlines. 3. Revise the TM and concept landscape plans to provide detail on the proposed bio-retention basins throughout the project. 4. Revise the TM and concept landscape plans to clarify the purpose of the HOA lots provided in various locations (refer to redlines). Are these lots provided for increased landscape areas along certain roads? Revise the concept landscape plans to show these lots being landscaped. Some of the HOA lots appear to be extensions of the adjacent residential lots. These could cause confusion with adjacent homeowners assuming they are part of their lot. Will they be fenced off when adjacent to residential lots? Refer to redlines. CT 13-03/PUD 13-06/HDP 13-01/SUP 13-02 - ROBERTSON RANCH WEST VILLAGE - B MAP July 15, 2013 Page 4 5. On all applicable TM sheets, the main potable waterline being relocated from Glasgow Drive through the project shall be 16-inches (per the previous potable water study) versus 12-inches. Please address this discrepancy. 8. Coordinate with the Transportation staff (Bryan Jones) regarding the types and layout of traffic control measures throughout the project. 6. Coordinate with the city trails manager (Liz Ketabian at 760-434-2978) regarding the design, alignment, layout, and maintenance responsibility of the proposed trails in this project. Ensure the trails satisfy city trail requirements and the Robertson Ranch Master Plan requirements. 7. On the TM sheets, revise the pedestrian ramps to minimize the amount of unnecessary pavement needed in order to reduce impervious area. Refer to redlines (typical). 8. On all the TM sheets, show and callout the sight distance corridors per city standards. Refer to redlines. 9. On all applicable TM sheets, callout proposed easements for public utility and access purposes over private streets (typical). 10. Clarify if the final map for PA 13 will be phased so that it records later than the rest of the project. If so, the lot numbering sequence should not begin with PA 13, but rather be the last in the sequence of numbers. Please address this issue and renumber the lots as necessary. 11. On sheet 1, update the note for map phasing to clarify which planning areas are associated with the 'rest of the site'. 12. On sheet 1, clarify the discrepancy with the Assessor's Parcel Number. Refer to redlines. 13. On sheet 2, the details on the traffic circles, explain whether they will be controlled with stop signs for approaching vehicles. If so, relocate the proposed pedestrian ramps so they do not conflict with cars stopping. 14. On sheet 2, revise the traffic circle details or add another sheet to demonstrate how fire trucks will navigate through the intersection. 15. On sheet 4, callout the planning areas for the proposed open space (habitat areas) that will be created as part of this map. Coordinate planning areas with Master Plan. Refer to redlines. 16. On sheet 4, add the lot numbers on the map. 17. On sheet 5, clarify how slope drainage behind the common retaining wall on lot 145-169 will be collected and discharged to the street. Show swales, inlets and private drainage systems as necessary. Although the slopes are proposed as individually maintained per the concept landscape plan, staff is concerned that individual lots will not properly maintain cross-lot drainage conditions. Provide either an HOA lot or HOA maintenance easement so this slope and drainage is HOA- maintained. Revise the TM and conceptual landscape plan as necessary. 18. On sheet 5, clarify if the all-weather access road for the public sewer (on Lot 337) will also be used for local pedestrian movement. This access road would rarely be used by city crews. If pedestrians would be using this, the maintenance of this road should be HOA-maintained as majority of use would be from pedestrians. Clarify this on the TM. 19. On sheet 5 and 6, show and callout the public right-of-way for Glasgow Drive where it abuts the private street (separate HOA lot?). Refer to redlines. 20. On sheet 5 and 6, show and callout the proposed gates. 21. On sheet 6, show the preliminary improvements necessary to decommission the Gateshead sewer lift station per Master Plan conditions of approval. Update the old note that was used on the Master CT 13-03/PUD 13-06/HDP 13-01/SUP 13-02 - ROBERTSON RANCH WEST VILLAGE - B MAP July 15, 2013 Page 5 Tentative map since this will not be deferred on this map. Refer to redlines. 22. On sheet 7 and 8, the location of the mid-block raised median may raise concerns with on-street parking, placement of driveways for the adjacent lots, curb transitions, and fire truck access. Revise the design to address these issues. These worked well in the Robertson ranch East Village because they were placed along landscape linkages and not along residential frontages. Coordinate with Transportation staff on design/layout of traffic calming measures prior to resubmittal. 23. On sheet 8, the retaining wall on lot 199 is about 12-foot high. Once a fence is installed for the rear lot, this will appear as a 18-foot high wall. Coordinate with planning on maximum wall heights. 24. On sheet 8, review the wateriines so they are a minimum of 5-feet from each other. This layout will need input from the utilities department. 25. On sheet 8 and 11, callout the storm drains on lot 341 as 'private' since they carrying slope runoff. 26. On sheet 9, the retaining wall for lot 298 appears to be 9-ft high. Clarify whether a safety fence will be installed since the sidewalk is nearby. Coordinate with planning on maximum wall height. 27. On sheet 9, the retaining wall on lot 297 appears to exceed 6-feet. Coordinate with planning on maximum wall height requirements. 28. On sheet 10, clarify if storm runoff on Street 'G' will be able to turn the corner. If runoff pushes to the south side of Street 'M', clarify whether another cross-gutter would be provided to ensure runoff is treated by the bioretention basin on lot 322. 29. On sheet 10, clarify why Street 'J' does not have any proposed fire hydrants or street lights. Revise the TM so the facilities meet city standards. 30. On sheet 10, provide detail where Street 'J meets Tamarack Avenue. Clarify how pedestrian ramps will be provided. Refer to redlines. 31. On sheet 10, revise the TM to provide detail on the preliminary median improvements required to ensure this driveway will be a right-in right-out driveway per the Master Plan and EIR. 32. On sheet 10, provide a D-41 outlet for the storm drain discharging to the open space since there is no maintenance access provided. 33. On sheet 10, clarify how many of the HOA lots adjacent to residential lots will be delineated. For example, on lots 41, 60, 64, 65 and 79, the HOA lots seem like they are part of the private SFD lot. Since the HOA lots will be separately maintained by the HOA and will they be fenced or delineated in some other way? 34. On sheet 10,11 and 12, show and callout the proposed gates. 35. On sheet 12, coordinate with planning on whether this culvert meets the wildlife crossing elements. 36. On sheet 13, and 15 thru 18, screen back the southbound improvements for El Camino Real as they are covered by CDP 11-10. 37. On sheet 14, the raised traffic circle on Street 'J' does not conform to the typical details on sheet 3. Revise the sheet or add a separate detail to show inside and outside tire tracks for a fire truck (figure 404.5F) on how it maneuvers through the circle. 38. On sheet 14, relocate the waterline in Street 'J' so that it not located in the raised landscaped median. Refer to redlines. 39. On sheet 14, the retaining wall on lot 89 appears to be 11-foot high. Coordinate with planning on maximum wall heights. Callout a safety railing as this wall supports the pedestrian trail. 40. On sheet 14, at the westerly end of Street '0', provide a connection from the cul-de-sac to the trail. CT 13-03/PUD 13-06/HDP 13^1/SUP 13-02 - ROBERTSON RANCH WEST VILLAGE - B MAP July 15, 2013 Page 6 41. On sheet 15, callout the storm drains on lot 347 as 'private' since they carrying slope runoff. 42. On sheet 15 through 18, show and callout relinquishment of access rights along El Camino Real per the legend symbol. 43. On sheet 19, add the name for Street 'V. 44. On sheet 19, remove the note for a lot line adjustment with the city. When right-of-way for Street 'V is provided, there will be no need to adjust property lines. 45. On sheet 19, the road and utility improvements for Street 'V have not been constructed. Therefore, this project may be responsible to construct this street as required to serve Planning Area 13. Add a note to this sheet explaining this. 46. On sheet 19, remove the conceptual layout and parking lot for the city park. This layout is still subject to further discretionary review and approval. 47. On sheet 19, the retaining wall supporting lot 12 and 13 appears to be 6-feet, however with a 6-foot fence at the top (for safety), this could be a 12-foot wall as viewed from El Camino Real. Coordinate with planning on maximum wall heights. 48. On sheet 19, provide a cross-section along the rear lot or lot 13 showing the retaining wall and trail along the rear portion ofthe lot. 49. On sheet 19, show the proposed subdivision boundary to ensure public street frontage is provided for lot 1. 50. For additional comments, refer to the redlines. Attached are redlined SWMP and TM check prints ofthe project submittal. Please return this redlines check print with the revised plans and studies to facilitate continued staff review. Police: 1. Please refer to Plan Review Recommendations dated June 18, 2013 prepared by J. Sasway, Police. Landscaping: 1. Please refer to Landscape Comments dated June 14, 2013 prepared by Michael Elliott, City of Carlsbad's Contract Landscape Architect. PLAN VIEW BLOCK 8PACINQ DETAIL 1 11 ^ .JJ 1 1 I—12-—i nVBV VERDURA 40 BLOCK DETAIL lUPE KB CIVIL DfiM v-am see OPTiaJAL MITCH AT HON-CONNCECTIin INTERFACE avPJ Gantm LAYER TYPKALFBKCEPOSr DBTAIL w KM cocsivc nm. UP mTCAL LEVEL TOP DBTAO. QEOQRIP CONNECTION DETAIL TOP OF WALL DETAILS -VEBDURA WftLL tf/ BATTER CASE C END OF WALL TRANSITION DETAILS FRONT WALL PRORLE GEOGRID FREE ZONE CTGP LAYER DF GEOGRID NO CLOSER THAN 3 BLOCKS AND ND FURTHER THAN 5 BLOCKS FROM WALL CREST) COHCSrVE SOIL CAP AREA TO BE PLANTED •R COVERED y/ IMPERVIOUS MATERIAL ^ 3- X OlANULAR FILL REQUIRED BETWEEN - VFRTICALLY Al TFRNn'E CEn*;VNTHC TIC REINFDRCE>IENT f« •. « »«EINFDRCEE K CHECK VITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CORRECT •RIENTATim OF TtC (EnSYTfTHETIC REINFIRCEMENT TD DBTAIM PROPER •STRENGTH. RETAINED SOIL MASS LEGEND GEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCEMENT OVERALL WALL HEIGHT EXPOSED WALL HEItWT WALL EMBEDMENT FINISHED GRADE TOP DF WALL BQITDM DF WALL TYPICAL DETAIL QEOQRIP PLACEMENT ON CURVES WORK CONTAINED WnHIN THGE PLANS SHALL NOT CDMMD4CE UNTIL AN ENCROACHUENT PERMfT AND/OR GRADIHG PERUFT HAS BEEN ISSUED. SIM. H IK »DII OF aSCSEMMXS ItFIEIt COuif rm. DUmw C0NS1WIC1KM. 1HE PIBVAIE ENOMOI) »ULL BC __FCNSei£ FOR DCnRUMHC AK ACtXPTABlC SOUIKM MD REM9NC DC PUWS FCK AFPROVAL BY THE COMTY. I CERTIFY THAT THESE PLANS HAVt BEEN PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVSON. ENGINEER VERoumfkeomnu. Wilu. PUNS xxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxx. xxxxx, xxxx TVPICAL DETSILS TS Fat Rancho Costera Photo Simulation Locations NORTH October 25, 2013 PLANNING SYSTEMS Oi- Location A Location A Location B Location B Location C Location C (5 / Map ' Satellite Lat: 33.162921 Lon:-117.303203 J lermsofUse i 1 t ROBERTSON RANCH WEST VILLAGE - "RANCHO COSTERA" PHOTOGRAPHS (6-5-13) View west onto Rancho Costera from Robertson Ranch East Village (Glen Ave.) View southwest onto Rancho Costera from Robertson Ranch East Village (Buck Ridge Ave.) r View southwest onto Rancho Costera from near north property line (near Glasgow Dr. stub) View east onto Rancho Costera from near north property line (near Glasgow Dr. stub) View south onto Rancho Costera from near north property line (near Edinburgh Dr. stub) View southwest onto Rancho Costera from near north property line (near Edinburgh Dr. stub) # View east onto Rancho Costera (Tamarack Ave.) View north onto Rancho Costera (El Camino Real at Lisa St.) PA 13 3 Single Family TM/PD PD(A) Arch. & Plotting B Map Design Robertson Ranch - West Village RANCHO COSTERA Carlsbad, California September 11, 2013 View Analysis Gateshead Road Residences and Future Planning Area 9/10 - Developed Conditions 6ATESHEAD RD. EXISTING HOMES (THE COLONY) I iMO i 7.5 U^2 iSS.5 3i.i /<U/ 181.7 1797 —\ \ I' .1 SECTIONS KEY MAP Scale: 1" = 160' (A) [II Existing Fence Existing Slope 4741 Gateshead Rd. THE COLONY CALAVERA HILLS CD CD H.O.A. maintained 2:1 slope Line of Sight 56' PORPOSED ROBERTSON RANCH - PA 9/10 SECTION A-A (A) Lot! line C\\hl \ 1 1 Co 0 5 10 October 2, 2012 Scale: 1- = 20' HI.,\NNIN(; i'Y.STEM'-' View Analysis Gateshead Road Residences and Future Planning Area 9/10 - Developed Conditions (D I CD m M ffl Existing Fence Existing Slope 4753 Gateshead Rd. THE COLONY 7^ -7^ CALAVERA HILLS ' GATESHEAD RD. EXISTING HOMES (THE COLONY) SECTIONS KEY MAP Une of Sight 75' PORPOSED ROBERTSON RANCH - PA 9/10 SECTION B-B I 3 o b Scale: 1" = 160' 0 5 10 October 2.2012 Scale: I" = 20' r I, \ N M N!: View Analysis Gateshead Road Residences and Future Planning Area 9/10 - Developed Conditions GATESHEAD RD. EXISTING HOMES (THE COLONY) SECTIONS KEY MAP © 7^ • ffl r: Line of Sight Existing Wall 4769 Gateshead Rd. — THE COLONY - CALAVERA HILLS H.O.A. maintained 2:1 slope 180.0- 177.5' 72' PORPOSED ROBERTSON RANCH - PA 9/10 SECTION C-C Scale: 1" = 160' 0 5 10 October 2. 2012 Scale: 1" = 20' I. ANMNC jYSILMS