HomeMy WebLinkAboutLCPA 02-10; Habitat Management Plan; Local Coastal Program Amendment (LCPA) (43)STATE OF CALIFORNIA - THE RESOURCES AGL GRAY DAVIS, Governor
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
SAN DIEGO AREA
7575 METROPOLITAN DRIVE, SUITE 103
SAN DIEGO, CA 92108-4421
(619) 767-2370
DATE: July 17,2003
TO: COMMISSIONERS AND INTERESTED PERS
FROM: PETER DOUGLAS, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S DETERMINATION that the City of
Carlsbad’s actions, certifying Local Coastal Program Amendment No.
1 -03B (Habitat Management Plan), approved with suggested
modifications, are legally adequate (for Commission review at its meeting
of August 4-8,2003)
BACKGROUND
At its June 12,2003 meeting, the California Coastal Commission certified, with
suggested modifications, the City of Carlsbad Local Coastal Program Amendment No.
1-03B. The amendment incorporates the City of Carlsbad Habitat Management Plan
(HMP) into the City’s local coastal program (LCP), and revises the City’s certified Mello
I, Mello II and Agua Hedionda land use plans to achieve consistency with the approved
HMP.
The purpose of the proposed additions and revisions to these land use plan segments is to
provide additional habitat protection requirements and conservation standards for the
remaining undeveloped properties within the Carlsbad coastal zone, concentrate future
development adjacent to already-developed areas, and to reconcile differences between
the certified LCP’s provisions regarding encroachment and preservation of dual-criteria
slopes and the provisions of the approved HMP. The final HMP meets all relevant LCP,
Cozstal.4ct and federal Czastal Zone Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 9 1451, ~t seq.,
(CZMA) requirements, is consistent with the goals of the regional Multiple Habitat
Conservation Plan (MHCP) for San Diego County, and provides adequate protection for
environmentally sensitive habitat areas (ESHA) in the coastal zone.
In review of the submitted LCP amendment, the Commission found that based upon more
comprehensive surveys of individual properties through staff field’investigation, and
supplemental information received during the review period, several clarifications were
necessary to the proposed standards in the Mello I1 segment of the LCP and the
associated sections of the HMP for Zone 21 properties, to address existing onsite habitat
types, location of preserve areas, and appropriate development limitations. The changes
also addressed development constraints associated with future construction of the
Poinsettia Lane extension through Zone 21 and the habitat corridor, revised wildlife
undercrossing requirements for Poinsettia Lane and added policy language prohibiting
the use of invasive plant species. Additionally, more specific findings and conditions for
Executive Director’s Determination
Carlsbad LCPA 1 -03B
July 17,2003
Page 2
kvelopment of a preserve management plan and submittal of an amendment to the
cefiified Implementation Plan (IP) were included.
tQ Bytheir action adopting Resolutions 2003-154 and 2003-155 on June 17,2003, the City
Cohcil acknowledged and accepted all the Commission’s suggested modifications. As
provided for in Section 13544 of the California Code of Regulations, the Executive
Director must determine if the action of the City of Carlsbad is legally sufficient to
finalize Commission review of the LCP amendment. The City’s actions have been
reviewed and determined to be adequate by the Executive Director. Section 13544 of the
California Code of Regulations then requires that this determination be reported to the
Commission for its concurrence.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Commission CONCUR with the Executive Director’s
determination as set forth in the attached letter (to be sent after Commission
endorsement).
(G:\San Diego\ReportsLCP’s\Carlsbad\CAR LCPA 1-036. HMP ED chkoff stfrpt.doc)
’ STATE OF CALIFORNIA -- THE RESOURCES AGENCY GRAY DAVIS. Governor
. CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
SAN DIEGO AREA
7575 METROPOLITAN DRIVE, SUITE 103
SAN DIEGO. CA 92108-4402
(619) 767-2370
[DATE AFTER HEARING]
The Hon. Claude A. Lewis
Mayor, City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92008
RE: Certification of the City of Carlsbad Local Coastal Program Amendment
#1-03B (Habitat Management Plan)
Dear Mayor Lewis:
The California Coastal Commission has reviewed the City’s Resolution Nos. 2003-154 and
2003-155, together with the Commission’s action of June 12,2003 certifying City of
Carlsbad Local Coastal Program Amendment #1-03B pertaining to the City’s Habitat
Management Plan (HMP). In accordance with Section 13544 of the Commission’s Code of
Regulations, I have made the determination that the City’s actions are legally adequate, and
the Commission has concurred at its meeting of August 8,2003.
By its action on June 17,2003, the City has formally acknowledged and accepted the
Commission’s certification of the Local Coastal Program Amendment, including all suggested
modifications. The modifications addressed revised development limitations on specific
properties, included additional requirements for development of the preserve management
plan and an amendment to the Implementation Plan (IP) of the certified LCP, revised wildlife
undercrossing requirements for Poinsettia Lane, and added policy language prohibiting the
use of invasive plants in landscaping. The City is already issuing coastal development
permits in conformance with the certified local coastal program for this area.
In conclusion, I would like to congratulate you and all other elected or appointed officials,
staff and concerned citizens for continuing to work towards full implementation of the Coastal
Act. We remain available to assist you and your staff in any way possible as you continue to
develop and implement the City’s local coastal program.
Sincerely,
Peter Douglas
Executive Director
(E:\Reports\LCP’s\Carlsbad\CAR LCPA 1-038 ED checkoff mayorletter.doc)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-155
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO
THE SECOND ADDENDUM TO THE CARLSBAD HABITAT
MANAGEMENT PLAN TO INCORPORATE MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION.
CASE NAME: HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN
CASE NO.:
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, on the 4th day of
HMP ADDENDUM #2 AMENDMENT
February, 2003 approved a Local Coastal Program Amendment (CLPA 02-10) to apply
additional habitat conservation standards in the coastal zone and an Addendum to the Habitat
Management Plan (HMP Addendum #2) to incorporate the additional standards into the HMP;
and
WHEREAS, LCPA 02-1 0 was subsequently approved by the California Coastal
Commission with suggested modifications; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved those suggested modifications; and
WHEREAS, it is now necessary to amend HMP Addendum #2 to incorporate the
Coastal Commission’s modifications.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does
hereby resolve as follows:
1, That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the amendments to the Second Addendum (HMP Addendum #2) are
approved as shown in Attachment “B”.
That staff is directed to amend HMP Addendum #2 and is authorized to
make any other necessary minor, non-substantive revisions, and !o submit it to the Wildlife Agencies for final approval of the Carlsbad Habitat Management Plan along with the proposed
3.
Implementation Agreement.
...
...
...
*..
...
EXHIBITNO. 1
APPLICATION NO.
CAR LCPA
I -03B
ED Checkoff
Carlsbad City Counci
Resolutions
Xalifornia Coastal Commission
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad on the 17th day of June, 2003, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Finnila, Kulchin, Hall, Packard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
LORRAINE M. WOOD, City Clerk
(SEAL)
Resolution No. 2003-155 -2- 9
-
4achment “B”
HMP ADDENDUM #2
AMENDMENTS TO ADDENDUM #2 AS REQUIRED BY COASTAL COMMISSION
FOR CONSISTENCY WITH LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM
(underlined sections represent language to be added -
&&ee&-sections represent language to be deleted)
1. The following changes should be made to policy 7-14 of the Second Addendum to
the HMP, beginning on page 8:
The following standards apply to those parcels in Zones 20 and 21 shown on Exhibit
A to this Addendum, which are located within the biological core and linkage areas
designated in the MHCP. They are in addition to the applicable, general
conservation standards contained in 7-1 through 7-1 1 and the HMP. The standards
are intended to direct development to existing disturbed areas to the maximum
extent feasible, limit impacts to native vegetation, and establish viable core and
linkage areas as designated in the HMP. In general, each property shall be allowed
to develop at least 25% of the site with appropriate mitigation as specified in 7-8
through 7-1 1. When individual properties area proposed for rezoning or
development, detailed biological information will be required to determine whether
the proposal is consistent with the HMP, subsection 7 and the standards below,
based upon the actual type, location and condition of onsite resources, and the
appropriate locations of development and preservation area. One or more wildlife
crossinqs under Poinsettia Lane of a sufficient size for larqer species shall be
provided if recommended by the wildlife resource aqencies.
- A. €A Assessor’s Parcel No. 212-120-33 (Hieatt) - No impact to vernal pools.
Minimize impact to vernal pool watersheds.
B. 6. Assessor’s Parcel No. 212-010-3 (Kirgis) - Preserve 75% of property with
development clustered immediately adjacent to Kelly Ranch.
- C. €L Assessor’s Parcel No. 215-070-35 (Fernandez) - Cluster development on
disturbed areas to the maximum extent feasible. Maximum 10% impact on CSS and
SMC for access purposed.
- D. & Assessor’s Parcel No. 215-040-03 (Muroya) - Cluster development on
disturbed areas to the maximum extent feasible. Maximum 10% impact on CSS and
SMC for access purposed.
1
.-
- E. k Assessor’s Parcel No. 212-040-50 (Emerald Point) - Development limited to
disturbed non-native grassland areas. No impacts to native habitat allowed.
- F. & Assessor’s Parcel No. 215-020-06 (RWSB) - Development shall be limited to a
maximum of 25% of the property, not including Poinsettia Lane construction, and
shall be clustered to the maximum extent feasible alonq 4tmkd-b disturbed portions
of the property adjacent to Cassia &me Road and the future Poinsettia Lane
extension. 4
~GXSS A wildlife corridor linkaqe oriented qenerallv north-south shall be provided
on the eastern ilortion of the property and desiqned to connect to neiqhborinq
properties with existinq or potential wildlife corridor linkaqes. Impacts to native
habitat shall require onsite mitiqation throuqh restoration and/or creation of habitat
within the desiqnated corridor linkaqe, in addition to any other required mitiqation.
..
0 ..
- G. IC Assessor’s Parcel No. 215-020-07 (Maldonado) - Development shall be
concentrated alonq the Poinsettia Lane extension and shall be limited to the western
half of the property. !srnllth\nnSt cf
exknsicn. No impacts to the coast oak woodland and riparian area except for
~ The eastern half
Poinsettia Lane extension. k cf P-
of the propertv is recommended for offsite mitiqation for other properties in Zone 21;
however, at minimum, a wildlife corridor linkaqe oriented qenerally north-south shall
be provided on the eastern half of the property and desiqned to connect to
neiqhborinq properties with existinq or potential wildlife corridor linkages. The
corridor linkaqe shall include any onsite c0as.t oak woodland area.
.. .. .
- H. L Assessor’s Parcel No. 2150050-21 (Namikas) - Development shall be limited
to a maximum of 25% of the property, not including Poinsettia Lane construction,
and shall be clustered on the western portion of the property. No impacts to coast
oak woodland, riparian areas or wetlands except for Poinsettia Lane extension. A
wildlife corridor linkaqe oriented qenerallv north-south shall be provided on the
eastern Dortion of the property, includinq the onsite coast oak woodland area, and be
desiqned to connect to neiqhborinq properties with existinq or potential wildlife
corridor linkaqes. Impacts to native habitat shall require onsite mitiqation throuqh
restoration and/or creation of habitat within the desiqnated corridor linkaqe. in
addition to any other required mitiqation.
- 1.4% Assessor’s Parcel No. 215-050-22 (Sudduth) - Development shall be limited to
a maximum of 25% of the property, not including Poinsettia Lane construction, and
shall be clustered on the western portion of the property. No impacts to coast oak
woodland, riparian areas or wetlands except for Poinsettia Lane extension. A wildlife
corridor linkaqe oriented qenerally north-south shall be provided on the eastern
portion of the property includinq the onsite coast oak woodland area and be
desiqned to connect to neiqhborinq properties with existinq or potential wildlife
2
corridor linkaqes. Impacts to native habitat shall require onsite mitiqation throuqh
restoration and/or creation of habitat within the desiqnated corridor linkaqe, in
addition to any other required mitiqation.
- J. PI: Assessor’s Parcel No. 215-050-44, 45, 46, 47 (Kevane) - Development shall
be limited to a maximum of 25% of the property, fl
amstw&& and shall be clustered on the western portion of the property. No
impacts to coast oak woodland, riparian areas or wetlands shall be allowed. exwpt 4 A wildlife corridor linkaqe oriented qenerallv north-
south shall be provided on the eastern portion of the property, includinq the coast
oak woodland, and be desiqned to connect to neiqhborinq properties with existinq or
potential wildlife corridor linkaqes. Impacts to native habitat shall require onsite mitiqation throuqh restoration and/or creation of habitat within the desiqnated
corridor linkaqe, in addition to any other required mitiqation.
- K. 8: Assessor’s Parcel No. 21 5-050-1 2 (Reiter) - Development shall be limited to
a maximum of 25% of the property, A , and
shall be clustered on the western portion of the property. No impacts to coast oak
woodland, riparian areas or wetlands shall be allowed
nv)dnc;r\n. A wildlife corridor linkaqe oriented qenerallv north-south shall be
provided on the eastern portion of the property, includinq the coast oak woodland,
and be desiqned to connect to neiqhborinq properties with existinq or potential
wildlife corridor linkaqes. Impacts to native habitat shall require onsite mitiqation
throuqh restoration and/or creation of habitat within the desiqnated corridor linkaqe,
in addition to any other required mitiqation.
- L. 4% Assessor’s Parcel No. 215-050-73 (Levantino) - Maximum 25% development
clustered on the southern portion of the property. Buffer widths may be reduced
and/or additional impacts may be allowed to the extent necessary to obtain site
access, and/or to accommodate Circulation Road improvements identified in the
certified LCP.
2. New hardline maps shall be added for the following properties: Aura Circle (Figure
36), Roesch Property (Figure 37), Carlsbad Promenade (Figure 38)’ Redeemer by
the Sea (Figure 39), and Thompson-Tabata (Figure 40).
3. Text conditions for the Aura Circle hardline should be added to the second HMP
addendum at the end of page IO:
For Aura Circle (Fiqure 36), development shall be clustered on the south portion of
the property. ,Gradins shall be kept entirely off the larqest area of CSS in the north
part of the site. Created slopes shall be reveqetated with coastal saqe scrub, and
existinq disturbed areas of the proiect site that are not identified for development on
the hardline map shall be used for onsite mitiqation throuqh restorationhecreation of
coastal saqe scrub. Post-develoDment habitat area and open space shall be placed
into the HMP preserve.
4. Revised hardline preserve maps shall be added for the following properties: HUB
Park/SDG&E Property (Figure 17 - revised) and Kelly Ranch (Figure 12 - revised).
3
5. The existing Hardline Preserve map for the Kevane property (Figure 25) shall be
removed.
6. Revise Policy 7.13(e) on Page 8 of the Second HMP Addendum as follows:
e. The area shown as “Veterans Memorial Park Development Area” is designated
for public recreational use. It is the intent of this policy that the public park area
be developed so as to maximize public access and provide a variety of
recreational opportunities. Development within steep slopes and/or native
veqetation shall be limited to passive recreational facilities, such as recreational
trails and picnic areas. Within the proposed development areas, qradinq of
Ssteep slopes with native vegetation shall be limited
allow such uses.
.. nf to the minimum amount necessary to
7. Revise Tables 3, 6, 7 and 8 and Figures 6, 26 and 27 of the 1999 Draft HMP to
reflect the changes to proposed habitat impacts and preserve areas, standards
properties and hardlined properties.
8. Revise Policy 7-9 on Page 5 of the Second HMP Addendum as follows:
h. All mitigations areas, onsite and offsite, shall be secured with a conservation
easement in favor of the wildlife agencies. In addition, a preserve management
plan shall be prepared for the mitigation areas, to the satisfaction of the City, the
wildlife agencies, and the Coastal Commission. Phase I of the preserve
manasement plan shall be incorporated into the Implementation Proqram of the
LCP throuqh an LCP amendment within one year of Commission certification of
the HMP as part of the certified LCP. Phase 2 of the preserve manaqement plan
shall be incorporated into the Implementation Proqram in the same manner within
three years of Commission certification of the HMP as part of the certified LCP.
The preserve management plan shall ensure adequate funding to protect the
preserve as open space and to maintain the biological values of the mitigation
areas in perpetuity. Management provisions and funding for mitiqation required
to address habitat impacts shall be in place prior to afy the impacts for which the
mitiqation is required te4ah-M ’ . At a minimum, monitoring reports shall be
required as a condition of development approval after the first and third year of
habitat mitigation efforts. %
I rn ..
9. Add to the Planning Standards for Zone 8 on page D-65 of the HMP regarding
the Callaghan property (Planning Area L of Kelly Ranch) the following wording:
Development of the Callaqhan property shall be required to preserve Open
SDace as shown on the certified Open Space Map for Plannina Area L approved
by the California Coastal Commission as part of it’s action on LCP Amendment
No. 2 - 99D (Kelly Ranch).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2o03-154
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A LOCAL COASTAL
PROGRAM AMENDMENT, TO ACKNOWLEDGE AND ADOPT
THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SUGGESTED
CASE NAME:
MODIFICATIONS FOR LCPA 02-10.
CASE NO.: LCPA 02-1 0 CARLSBAD HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on January 22, 2003 hold a duly
noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider Local Coastal Program Amendment 02-
10 and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 5361 recommending to the City Council
that it be approved; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 4th day of February, 2003 hold a duly
noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider an amendment to the Local Coastal
Program and acted to approve the amendment; and
WHEREAS, the California Coastal Commission did on the 12th day of June,
2003 hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider an amendment to the
Local Coastal Program and acted to certify the amendment with suggested modifications; and
WHEREAS, on the 17th day of June, 2003 the Carlsbad City Council formally
acknowledged receipt of the Coastal Commission's resolution of certification, including the
suggested modifications.
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California does hereby resolve as
follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the suggested modifications will meet the requirements of and
conform with the policies of Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 30200) of the California
Coastal Act to the extent necessary to achieve the basic state goals specified in Section
30001.5 of the Coastal Act.
3. That the suggested modifications to Local Coastal Program Amendment
That staff is directed to initiate all actions required to satisfy and
LCPA 02-1 0, are approved as shown in Attachment "A."
4. implement the suggested modifications to LCPA 02-10
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad on the 17th day of June, 2003, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Finnila, Kulchin, Hall, Packard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
LORRAINE M. WOOD, City Clerk
(SEAL)
-2- Resolution No. 2003-154 4
-.
Attachment “A”
LCPA 02-1 0
COASTAL COMMISSION SUGGESTED MODIFICATIONS
(underlined sections represent language to be added -
6Mewt-sections represent language to be deleted)
1. The following change should be made to the Mello I LUP segment revisions in
the LCP amendment, on page 17:
j. If any conflict should arise between these Policies of the LCP and the provisions of the HMP, the LCP shall take precedence. If any conflict should
arise between the policies of the certified Mello I LUP and the certified Implementation Plan. the policies of the certified Mello I LUP shall take
precedence.
2. The following change should be made to the Mello I1 LUP segment revisions in
the LCP amendment, on page 42:
i. If any conflict should arise between these Policies of the LCP and the
provisions of the HMP, the LCP shall take precedence. If anv conflict should
arise between the Policies of the certified Mello II LUP and the certified
lmdementation Plan. the policies of the certified Mello It LUP shall take precedence.
3. The following changes should be made to the Mello II LUP segment revisions in
the LCP amendment, beginning on page number 51:
- 3-8.1 3432 Assessor’s Parcel No. 212-120-33 (Hieatt) - No impact to vernal
pools. Minimize impact to vernal pool watersheds.
3-8.2 3-83 Assessor’s Parcel No. 212-010-3 (Kirgis) - Preserve 75% of
property with development clustered immediately adjacent to Kelly
Ranch.
- 3-8.3 3-84 Assessor’s Parcel No. 215-070-35 (Fernandez) - Cluster
development on disturbed areas to the maximum extent feasible.
Maximum 10% impact on CSS and SMC for access purposes.
3-8.4- Assessor’s Parcel No. 215-040-03 (Muroya) - Cluster development on disturbed areas to the maximum extent feasible.
Maximum 10% impact on CSS and SMC for access purposes.
1
3-8.5 3-84 Assessor’s Parcel No. 212-040-50 (Emerald Point) - Development
limited to disturbed and non-native grassland areas. No impacts to native habitat allowed.
- 3-8.6 3-8-44 Assessor’s Parcel No. 215-020-06 (RWSB) - Development shall
be limited to a maximum of 25% of the property, not including Poinsettia Lane
construction, and shall be clustered to the maximum extent feasible along I;mi(arl te disturbed portions of the property adjacent to Cassia Lane and the future Poinsettia Lane extension. Impacts to SMC habitat shall be minimized. limited
m. A wildlife corridor linkaqe oriented qenerallv north-south shall be
provided on the eastern half of the propertv and desianed to connect to
neiqhborina properties with existina or potential wildlife corridor linkaqes. ImPacts to native habitat shall require onsite mitisation throuqh restoration andlor
creation of habitat within the desianed corridor linaae, in addition to any other required mitiaation.
- 3-8.7 3-844 Assessor‘s Parcel No. 21 5-020-07 (Maldonado) - DeveloDment
shall be concentrated alona the Poinsettia Lane extension and shall be limited to
the western half of the propertv. 4 -No impacts to the coast oak woodland and riparian
area except for Poinsettia Lane extension. a ..
-. The eastern half of the propertv is recommended for offsite mitisation for other DroDerties in Zone 21: however, at minimum a wildlife corridor linkaqe oriented aenerallv north-south shall be provided on the eastern
half of the Dropertv and desianed to connect to neiahborina wooerties with existina or potential wildlife corridor linkaaes. The corridor linkaqe shall include
any onsite coast oak woodland area.
..
- 3-8.8 3-842 Assessor’s Parcel No. 215-CEO-21 (Namikas) - Development shall
be limited to a maximum of 25% of the property, not including Poinsettia Lane construction, and shall be clustered on the western portion of the property. No
impacts to coast oak woodland, riparian areas or wetlands except for Poinsettia Lane extension. A wildlife corridor linkaqe oriented Qenerallv north-south shall be
provided on the eastern Portion of the propertv, include the onsite coast oak woodland area. and be desianed to connect to neiahborina properties with existina or potential wildlife corridor linkaqes. trnpacts to native habitat shall require onsite mitiqation throuah restoration andlor creation of habitat within the
desianated corridor linkaae. in addition to any other reauired mitiaation.
3-8.9 34K3 Assessor’s Parcel No. 215-050-22 (Sudduth) - Development shall
be limited to a maximum of 25% of the property, not including Poinsettia Lane
2
construction, and shall be clustered on the western portion of the property. No impact to coast oak woodland, riparian areas or wetlands except for Poinsettia
Lane extension. A wildlife corridor linkaae oriented qenerally north-south shall be provided on the eastern portion of the proDertv. include the onsite coast oak
woodland area. and be desiqned to connect to neiahborina properties with existinq or potential wildlife corridor linkaaes. Impacts to native habitat shall require onsite mitiqation throush restoration and/or creation of habitat within the
designated corridor linkaqe, in addition to any other required mitioation.
3-8.10 &EM4 Assessor's Parcel No. 215-05044, 45, 46. 47 (Kevane) -
Development shall be limited to a maximum of 25% of the property, txMxA&q
and shall be clustered on the western portion of the
property. No impacts to coast oak woodland, riparian areas or wetlands shall be allowed ' . A wildlife corridor linkaae oriented
generally north-south shall be provided on the eastern portion of the Dropert&
includinq the coast oak woodland, and be desiqned to ccnnect to neiahboring
properties with existino or potential wildlife corridor linkaqes. Impacts to native
habitat shall require onsite mitiaation throuqh restoration and/or creation of
habitat within the desianated corridor linkaqe, in addition to any other required
mit iq a t ion.
3-8.1 1 3-844 Assessor's Parcel No. 21 5-050-1 23 (Reiter) - Development shall
be limited to a maximum of 25% of the property, em&&ia+and shall be clustered on the western portion of the property. No impacts to coast oak woodland, riparian areas or wetlands shall be allowed 1, A wildlife corridor linkaae oriented generally north-south shall be provided on the eastern portion of the moDertv,
includina the coast oak woodland. and be desioned to connect to neiqhboring proDerties with existina or potential wildlife corridor linkaaes. Impacts to native
habitat shall require onsite mitiqation throuah restoration andlor creation of
habitat within the desianated corridor linkaqe, in addition to any other required
mitiqation.
3-8.12 &€M€i Assessor's Parcel No. 215-050-73 (Levatino) - Maximum 25%
development clustered on the southern portion of the property. Buffer widths
may be reduced and/or additional impacts may be allowed to the extent
necessary to obtain site access. andlor to accommodate Circulation Road
imDrovements identified in the certified LCP.
4. Policy 3-7(e) on Page 52 of the Mello II LUP revisions shall be revised as follows:
e. The area shown as "Veterans Memorial Park Development Area" is designated for public recreational use. It is the intent of this policy that
the public park area be developed so as to maximize public access and provide a variety of recreational opportunities. Development within steep slopes and/or native veaetation shall be limited to passive recreational
facilities, such as recreational trails and picnic areas. Within the
proposed develoDment areas, Qradina of Weep slopes with native vecaqetation shall be limited ~
to the minimum amount necessary to allow such uses.
..
3
5. Add a new policy to the Mello I LUP segment revisions on Page 19 of LCPA 02-
10 to read as follows: 7-1.1 5 Invasive Plants
The use of invasive Dlant species in the landscapina for developments such as those identified in Table 12 of the HMP shall be prohibited.
6. Add a new policy to the Mello II LUP segment revisions on Page 43 of LCPA 02-
10 to read as follows:
3-1.13 Invasive Plants The use of invasive dant species in the landscapina for developments such as
those identified in Table 12 of the HMP shall be prohibited.
7. Add a new policy to the Agua Hedionda LUP segment revisions on Page 31 of
LCPA 02-10 to read as follows:
3-13-1.14 Invasive Plants
The use of invasive Dlanl sDecies in the landscapinn for develoDments such as
those identified in Table 12 of the HMP shall be prohibited.
4
June 30,2003
Keri Akers Nancy Frost
California Coastal Commission
7575 Metropolitan Drive
Suite 103
San Diego, CA 92108
California Department of Fish and Game
4949 Viewridge Avenue
San Diego, CA 92123
John Martin JUL 0 I 2003
SUBJECT: REVISED MAPS AND TABLES FOR HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN (HMP)
Enclosed are maps and tables from the HMP that reflect recent changes as the plan progressed
through approval by the Coastal Commission. The following specific changes have been made:
0 The Callaghan property has been clarified on the Kelly Hillman Property map (Fig. 12) to
indicate that it is a Standards Area.
The proposed Hardline for Hub Park and SDG&E Property has been revised (Fig. 17).
The KevanelKrasnow property has been removed from the Proposed Hardline map and
added to the Standards Areas map (Fig. 26).
Two new Existing Hardline Conservation Areas have been added - Redeemer by the Sea
(Fig. 39) and Thompson-Tabata (Fig. 40).
Two new Proposed Hardline Conservation Areas have been added to the maps - Aura
Circle (Fig. 36) and Promenade (Fig. 38).
Tables 4, 6, 7, and 8 have been revised to reflect the above map changes.
0
0
0
0
0
Also enclosed for the Department of Fish and Game and the Fish and Wildlife Service are copies of
the most recent City Council Resolutions showing acceptance of the Coastal Commission's
suggested modifications. This information should be helpful to you in completing your processing of
the HMP.
If you need any additional information, please call me at (760) 602-4602. Thank you.
Sincerely, % Don Rideout
Principal Planner
Attachments
C: Planning Director
EXHIBITNO. 2
APPLICATION NO.
CAR LCPA
I-03B
ED Checkoff
Revised Maps and
Tables
1
kP 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 (760) 602-4600 FAX (760) 602-8559 www.ci.c;arisDaa.ca.us
Figure 6
Proposed Hardline Conservation
Areas
0 05 MILES 10 15 2.0 1 m I_. +. 5
~ca~g~s2/pmducts/hmo/r61.97lfiquresdir/newfiq6.aml 06/25/03
~~~~ I <? 2003 City of Carlsbad GIs .____
Figure 17
Hub Park and SDG&E Property
S
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 20
MIUS
5
5,2003 Ci of Carlobad GIs /cargis2/pmductr/hmp/ffil.S7/fiau~~ir/p~p~a~l 06/24/03
1 Figure 27
Conservation Components Map
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
MILES
w+E s
@ 2003 Cii of Carkbad GIs /cergie2/pladu~/hmp/~l.97/figum~ir/mncmmpaml 06/24/03
Figure 36
Aura Circle w+E
S
I /
Promenade A /
Figure 38
Promenade PV+E
S
MARITIME DR
Redeemer
400
@Ad !PBP ' fi?R Pnnted 15 May 2003 lcargisVproduaShmprl79 03/redewnerpiot mxd
I Figure 40
Thompson - Tabata
N
w
S
A in
0
u) a
2
9
3
0 C J in .- a
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
Nod hl(vc\
VI
Y -
t