The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLCPA 04-04; Lohf Subdivision GPA; Local Coastal Program Amendment (LCPA)CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLYI USE OM^ • Administrative Permit - 2nd Dwelling Unit • Planned Industrial Permit • Administrative Variance • Planning Commission Determination • Coastal Development Permit • Precise Development Plan • Conditional Use Permit • Redevetopment Permit • Condominium Permit • Site Development Plan • Environmental Impact Assessment • Special Use Permit General Plan Amendment • Specific Plan • Hillside Development Permit • Tontativo Porcol IVlap Obtain from Engineering Depanment Local Coastal Plan Amendment • Tentative Tract Map • Master Plan • Variance • Non-Residential Planned Development • Zone Change • Planned Development Permit • List other applications not specified 2) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: _ 3) PROJECT NAME: _ 4) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 5) OVyNER^AME (Print or Type) 1 \/ ' ' W 6) AP^C^T ^^^^"^T^^^J^J MAILING AD^R^S MAILING ADDRESSL, ' ^ CITY AND STATE \s,^^ZIP^ TELEPHONE CITY AND STATE ^ ZIP TELEPHONE 1 CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL OWNER ANbS INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO KNOWLEDGE. [HAT ALL THE ABOVE THE BEST OF MY 1 CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. • K 3(^/o^ SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATURE DATE 7) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATtONS BE FILED. MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M. Form 16 Rev. 05/03 PAGE 1 OF 2 8) LOCATION OF PROJECT ON THE BETWEEN (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) STREET ADDRESS SIDE OF ^ f%/l4m-) (NAME OF STREET AND (NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREET) 9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 10) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS 2^ 1 3) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION 16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE 1 9) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 22) EXISTiNG ZONING V/Vi 11) NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNITS 14) PROPOSED IND OFFICE/ SQUARE FOOTAGE 17) PROPOSED INCREASE IN ADT 20) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN 23) PROPOSED ZONING KM 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS 15) PROPOSED COMM SQUARE FOOTAGE 18) PROPOSED SEWER USAGE IN EDU 21) PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION ^ j 24) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE =QR 1 SIGNATURE FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION APPLICATION TYPE TOTAL FEE REQUIRED DATE FEE PAID FEE REOUIRED 2 RECEIVED 0 : 2004 CITY OF CARLSBAD DATE ^^^J»fftg^gAO)lgp^CEIVED RECEIPT NO. Form 16 Reu. 05/0.'? The Coasi News Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County. Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to The Coast News, P.O. Box 232-550, Encinitas, CA 92023 (760) 436-9737 Proof of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. 1 am principal clerk of the printer of The Coast News, a newspaper printed and published weekly and which news- paper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation for the cities of Del Mar, Solana Beach, Encinitas/Cardiff, Carlsbad, Oceanside, San Marcos/Vista and the County Judicial District by the Superior Court of the State of Califomia, County of San Diego (8/4/94, #677114, B2393, P396); and that the notice, of which the annexed is a print- ed copy, has been published in, each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: March 25. 2004 I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of Califomia on ihe 18th day of March, 2004. Clerk of the Printer •• ^ IIMNING Dih <i City 0^ Cirisbad unWrGlerk's Filing Stamp PUBLIC NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES: Please be advised that the City of Carlsbad Is considering text amendments to its Local Coastal Program (LCP) as summarized below. This amendment is being proposed by the City of Carlsbad Planning Department and is currently under review. This notice hereby opens a six week review period after which the Planning Commission and City Council will consider all comments and act on the proposed amendment. The Planning Commission hearing is expected to take place in May 2004, and will be duly noticed. The City Council hearing is expect- ed to take place in June 2004, and will be duly noticed. Copies of the LCP amendment are available for review at the following locations: (1) Carlsbad Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue: (2) City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive; (3) Carlsbad Main Library, 1775 Dove Lane; (4) Georgina Cole Library, 1250 Carlsbad Village Drive; and (5) the California Coastal Commission, 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Dlego, CA 92108- 4402 PROPOSED LCP AMENDMENT SUMMARY LCPA 04-04 - LOHF SUBDIVISION GPA The City's Local Coastal Program includes a general Land Use Map that indi- cates the planned land use for properties within the Coastal Zone. This specific Land Use Map Amendment is proposed as follows: Relocate the boundary between Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM) and Residential Medium Density (RM) eastward to the northern and eastern edges of the Lohf Subdivision and Steiner Subdivision boundary, resulting in the changing of approximately 4.47 from RM to RLM on property generally located west of El Camino Real, north and south of Poinsettia Lane. If you have any questions, please call Michael Grim in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4623. Written comments should be sent to the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008. PUBLISH DATE: PUBLISH DATE FOR NORTH COUNTY TIMES: PUBLISH DATE FOR COAST NEWS: March 25, 2004 March 25, 2004 March 25, 2004 CN 7846 Mar 25, 2004 fi r K ^ 3 ^ 0 3 City of Carlsbad Tt Planning Department PUBLIC NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES: Please be advised that the City of Carlsbad is considering text amendments to its Local Coastal Program (LCP) as summarized below. This amendment is being proposed by the City of Carlsbad Planning Department and is currently under review. This notice hereby opens a six week review period after which the Planning Commission and City Council will consider all comments and act on the proposed amendment. The Planning Commission hearing is expected to take place in May 2004, and will be duly noticed. The City Council hearing is expected to take place in June 2004, and will be duly noticed. Copies of the LCP amendment are available for review at the following locations: (1) Carlsbad Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue; (2) City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive; (3) Carlsbad Main Library, 1775 Dove Lane; (4) Georgina Cole Library, 1250 Carlsbad Village Drive; and (5) the Califomia Coastal Commission, 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, CA 92108-4402 PROPOSED LCP AMENDMENT SUMMARY LCPA 04-04 - LOHF SUBDIVISION GPA The City's Local Coastal Program includes a general Land Use Map that indicates the planned land use for properties within the Coastal Zone. This specific Land Use Map Amendment is proposed as follows: Relocate the boundary between Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM) and Residential Medium Density (RM) eastward to the northem and eastem edges of the Lohf Subdivision and Steiner Subdivision boundary, resulting in the changing of approximately 4.47 from RM to RLM on property generally located west of El Camino Real, north and south of Poinsettia Lane. If you have any questions, please call Michael Grim in the Plarming Department at (760) 602- 4623. Written comments should be sent to the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carisbad, Califomia 92008. PUBLISH DATE: March 25, 2004 PUBLISH DATE FOR NORTH COUNTY TIMES: March 25, 2004 PUBLISH DATE FOR COAST NEWS: March 25, 2004 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us EXISTING PROPOSED srre LOHF SUBDIVISION GPA LCPA 04-04 Smooth Feed Sheets TM Use temolate for CALTRANS DISTRICT 11 BILL FIGGE MAIL ST 50 P O BOX 85406 SANDIEGO CA 92186-5406 REG WATER QUALITY CONTROL BD STE 100 9174 SKY PARK CT SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMIN BARRY BRAYER, AWP-8 PO BOX 92007 LOSANGELES CA 90009 WESTERN REG BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS RONALD M JAEGER 2800 COTTAGE WAY SACRAMENTO CA 95825 BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION & HSG AGENCY PATRICIA W NEAL DEPUTY SEC HOUSING STE 2450 980 NINTH ST SACRAMENTO CA 95814 CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK SUPERINTENDENT 1901 SPINNAKER DR SAN BUENA VENTURA CA 93001 COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CHAIRMAN 722 JACKSON PL NW WASHINGTON DC 20006 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE LOS ANGELES DIST ENGINEER PO BOX 2711 LOSANGELES CA 90053 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY STE 400 611 RYAN PLAZA DR ARLINGTON TX 76011-4005 ^ AVERY® Shipping Labels DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY CLIFFORD EMMERLING, DIR STE 350 901 MARKET ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103 A notice has been mailed to all property owners/occupants listed herein. • not.- ignature Laser 5163'^ Smooth Feed Sheets™ DEPARTMENT OF FISH & GAME ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIV P O BOX 944246 SACRAMENTO CA 94244-2460 Use template for 5165 - DEPARTMENT OF FOOD & AGRICULTURE STEVE SHAFFER, AGRICULTURE RESOURCES RM 100 1220 N ST SACRAMENTO CA 95814 DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY DOUG WICKIZER, ENVIR COORD P O BOX 944246 SACRAMENTO CA 94244-2460 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVE DUNCAN LENT HOWARD, REG ADMIN 450 GOLDEN GATE AV SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL RM 700 110 WEST A ST SAN DIEGO CA 92101 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RM 5504 1120 N ST SACRAMENTO CA 95814 MARINE RESOURCES REGION, DR & G ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, SPR 350 GOLDEN SHORE LONG BEACH CA 90802 OFFICE OF PLANNING & RESEARCH OFFICE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS PO BOX 3044 SACRAMENTO CA 93044 NATIONAL OCEANIC & ATMOSPHERIC ADMIN OCRM,55MC4 WORM - 3 1305 EAST-WEST HWY SILVER SPRING MD 20910 SAN FRANCISCO BAY CONSERVATION & DEVMT COMMISSION BILL TRAVIS STE 2600 50 CALIFORNIA ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111-4704 AVERY® Shipping Labels Laser 5163® Smooth Feed Sheets™ Use temolate fcr Slr-'^'- STATE LANDS COMMISSION DWIGHT SANDERS STE 1005 100 HOWE AV SACRAMENTO CA 95825-8202 U S BUREAU OF LAND MGMT STE RM W1834 2800 COTTAGE WAY SACRAMENTO CA 95825 U S BUREAU OF RECLAMATION MID-PACIFIC REGION 2800 COTTAGE WAY SACRAMENTO CA 95825 U S FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE STE W-2605 2800 COTTAGE WAY SACRAMENTO CA 95825-1888 U S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS LILY ALYEA STE 702 333 MARKET ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105-2197 USDA - RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPT 4169 430 "G" ST DAVIS CA 95616 WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BD PO BOX 100 SACRAMENTO CA 95801 CALIFORNIA RESOURCES AGENCIES STE 1311 1416 9TH ST SACRAMENTO CA 95814 SANDAG-LAND USE COMMISS NAN VALERIC STE 800 401 "B" STREET SAN DIEGO CA 92101 1 AVERY® Shipping Labels Laser 5163® Smooth Feed Sheets^^*^ RANCHO CARLSBAD HOA RUSS KOHL 5200 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92008 Use template for 516 CARLSBAD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TED OWEN 5934 PRIESTLY DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 ANTHONY & DICKY BONS 25709 HILLCREST AV ESCONDIDO CA 92026-8650 REG WATER QUALITY CONTROL BD STE 100 9174 SKY PARK CT SANDIEGO CA 92123-4340 U S FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE JOHN MARTIN 6010 HIDDEN VALLEY ROAD CARLSBAD CA 92009- CITY OF ENCINITAS COM DEV DEPT 505 S VULCAN AV ENCINITAS CA 92024 TABATA FARMS PO BOX 1338 CARLSBAD CA 92018-1338 SANDAG-EXEC DIRECTOR GARY GALLEGOS STE 800 1ST INT'L PLAZA 401 "B" ST SAN DIEGO CA 92101 LESLIE ESPOSITO 1893 AMELFI DR ENCINITAS CA 92024 CYRIUMARY GIBSON 12142 ARGYLE DR LOS ALAMITOS CA 90702 ^ AVERY® Shipping Labels Laser 5163® Smooth Feed Sheets™ LAKESHORE GARDENS TOM BENSON 7201 AVENIDA ENCINAS CARLSBAD CA 92009 UsetemDiSteforS- LANIKAI LANE PARK SHARP SPACE 3 6550 PONTO DRIVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 JOHN LAMB 1446 DEVLIN DR LOSANGELES CA 90069 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC KIM BLESSANT 101 ASH STREET SANDIEGO CA 92101- STATE LANDS COMMISSION MARY GRIGGS STE 100 S 100 HOWE AV SACRAMENTO CA 95825-8202 COUNTY OF SD SUPERVISOR BILL HORN ART DANELL RM 335 1600 PACIFIC HIGHWAY SANDIEGO CA 92101 PERRY A LAMB 890 MERE POINT RD BRUNSWICK ME 04011 S D CO PLANNING & LAND USE DEPT JAON VOKAC STE B-5 5201 RUFFIN ROAD SAN DIEGO CA 92123 COASTAL CONSERVANCY RICHARD RETECKI STE 1100 1330 BROADWAY OAKLAND CA 94612 FLOYD ASHBY 416 LA COSTA AV ENCINITAS CA 92024 ^ AVERY® Shipping Labels Laser 5163® Smooth Feed Sheets TIM Use tsmolsts fo^ 5 DALE/DONNA SCHREIBER 7163 ARGONAUTA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 GEORGE BOLTON 6583 BLACKRAIL RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 LENNAR HOMES CHRISTINE ZORTMAN STE 320 5780 FLEET ST CARLSBAD CA 92008-4702 BATIQUITOS LAGOON FOUNDATION JOHN BURNS PO BOX 130491 CARLSBAD CA 92009- rMAVERY® ShiDDine Labels La fier «516^® Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department October 22, 2004 California Coastal Commission San Dlego District Ste 103 7575 Metropolitan Dr San Dlego CA 92108-4402 APPLICATION FOR LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT I. JURiSDiCTION CITY OF CARLSBAD - LCPA 04-04 SEGMENT? Mello II TYPE OF AMENDMENT SUBMITTAL (check) 111. A) LUP K B) ZONING [Z C) LCP (Land Use & Zoning) LCP STATUS A) LUP CERTIFIED B) ZONING CERTIFIED C) ZONING OF COMM. ACTION ON SUGGESTED MODIFICATIONS D) PRIOR COMMISSION ACTION ON THIS SUBMITTAL? Y/N, DATE Y- 1980 Y-1996 None None IV. SUMMARY OF AMENDMENT PROPOSAL Adjustment to the boundary between the Residential Low Medium Density (RLM) and Residential Medium Density (RM) land use designations over approximately 4.47 acres on property generally located west of El Camino Real, north and south of Poinsettia Lane. V. COMMISSION OFFICE USE ONLY: AMENDMENT# DATE RECEIVED DATE FILED COMM. HEARING AGENDA ' COMMISSION ACTION: A: , AWM D , Date VI. PROJECT PLANNER For information regarding this application, please contact Michael Grim, Planner at (760) 602-4623. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us LCPA SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS -- CHECKLIST Council Resolution - signed and dated indicat- ing City Intends to administer LCP consistent with the Coastal Act and indicating date LCPA will take effect. NOTE: All amendments take effect immedi- ately upon Coastal Commission ap- proval unless otherwise stated. A reproducible copy of Council adopted LCPA I I If new text indicates where It fits Into certi- fied text. I I If revised text clearly indicates using strikeouts and/or underlines showing modifications. ^ If map change, submit replacement map. X (copy enclosed) 3. A discussion of amendments relationship to and effect on other sections of the previously certified LCP. 4. Zoning measures that will implement the LCPA. 5. Affect on public access (only for area between first public road and the Coast). 6. An analysis of potentially significant adverse cumulative impacts on coastal resources. 7. Copies of environmental review documents. 8. Summary of measures to ensure both public and agency participation. ^\ List of public hearing dates Notice of interested parties X Mailing list Comments Responses to comments X (copv enclosed) X (see attached) X (see attached) X (see attached) X (see attached) X (see attached) X (see attached & copies enclosed) N/A - none received N/A - none received All staff reports plus attachments. X (copy enclosed) 10. AMENDMENT'S RELATIONSHIP TO AND EFFECT ON OTHER SECTIONS OF THE PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED LCP The proposed LCP amendment involves only a redesignatlon of the subject property in the Mello II segment This redesignatlon would bring the land use of the property into conformance with the existing zoning of the property by making the zoning and land use boundary lines coincident. Given the focused nature of the proposed amendment, the action will have no effect on other sections of the previously certified LCP. 11. ZONING MEASURES THAT WILL IMPLEMENT THE LCPA The Implementing zoning will include the One Family Residential (R-1) zone (Chapter 21.10 ofthe Carlsbad Municipal Code) and the Qualified Development Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.06 of the C.M.C). 12. AFFECT ON PUBLIC ACCESS The Lohf Subdivision project site is located 2.65 miles from the Pacific Ocean and 0.85 miles from the Batiquitos Lagoon and is surrounded by improved public streets and sidewalks. No shoreline access provisions apply to the project and adequate public access exists around the site. 13. ANALYSIS OF POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ON COASTAL RESOURCES The Lohf Subdivision site has been and continues to be designated for residen- tial development in the Mello II Land Use Plan. The site is currently fully devel- oped and occupied and there is no development proposed with this LCP amendment. All existing open space and resource areas will remain undisturbed In accordance with the approved development plan. Therefore, the proposed LCP amendment will have no significant adverse cumulative impacts on coastal resources. 14. SUMMARY OF MEASURES TO ENSURE BOTH PUBLIC AND AGENCY PARTICIPATION The Local Coastal Program Amendment was duly noticed for over the six-week period, from March 25, 2004 to September 21, 2004, 2004 and no comments were received. The proposed amendment was also reviewed through the duly noticed public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council, as listed below: PLANNING COMMISSION: August 18, 2004 CITY COUNCIL September 21, 2004 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2004-303 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A NEGATIVE 3 DECLARATION, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, AND LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT FOR THE LOHF 4 SUBDIVISION GPA LAND USE DESIGNATION BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED WEST 5 OF EL CAMINO REAL, NORTH AND SOUTH OF POINSETTIA LANE, IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 21. 6 CASE NAME: LOHF SUBDIVISION GPA CASE NO.: GPA 04-04/LCPA 04-04 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 J ^ Negative Declaration and/or GPA 04-04/LCPA 04-04; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad as follows: 19 1. That all recitations are true and correct. 20 2. That the City Council approves City Council Resolution No. 2004-303 and that the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission as set forth in Planning 21 Commission Resolutions No. 5679, 5680, and 5681, on file with the City Clerk and made a part- hereof by reference, are the findings and conditions of the City Council. 22 3. That the application for a Negative Declaration and Local Coastal 23 Program Amendment on property generally located west of El Camino Real, north and south of Poinsettia Lane, is approved as shown in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5679 and 24 5681. 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning Commission did, on August 18, 2004, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider a Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment, and Local Coastal Program Amendment; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the 2ist day of September . 2004, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider said Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment, and Local Coastal Program Amendment and at that time received recommendations, objections, protests, comments of all persons interested in or opposed to the 1 4. That the application for a General Plan Amendment from Residential Medium Density (RM) to Residential Low Medium Density (RLM) on property generally located 2 west of El Camino Real, north and south of Poinsettia Lane, as shown In Planning Commission Resolution No. 5680, is hereby accepted, approved in concept, and shall be formally approved 3 with GPA Batch No. 2 comprised of GPA 02-05, GPA 03-05, GPA 03-08, GPA 03-13, GPA 04- 01, GPA 04-04, GPA 04-07, GPA 04-08, GPA 04-11, and GPA 04-13. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 2ist day of September 2004. by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members Lewis, Finilla, Kulchin, Hall and Packard. NOES: None ABSENT: None. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor 13 ATTEST: 14 15 16 17 (SEAL) 18 19 20. 21 22 23 .24 25 26 27 28 LOftRAlNElM. WOOD, City Clerk -2- ' ^ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5680 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 3 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATION OF APPROXIMATELY 4.47 ACRES FROM RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY (RM) TO RESIDENTLAL 6 LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY (RLM) ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF EL CAMINO RE.AL, 7 NORTH AND SOUTH OF POINSETTIA LANE, IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 21. CASE NAME: LOHF SUBDIVISION GPA 9 CASE NO: GPA 04-04 8 11 ("the Property"); and 10 WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad, has filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as 12 Lots 1 through 9 of Carlsbad Tract CT 99-13, Steiner 13 Property, according to Map No. 14039, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on September 19, 2000; 14 and Lots 1 through 13 and 49 through 51 of Carlsbad Tract CT 97-15, Lohf Subdivision, according to Map No.l3839, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on 16 August 23, 1999, all in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California 17 " 18 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a General Plan 20 Amendment as shown on Exhibit "GPA 04-04" dated August 4, 2004, attached hereto and on 21 , file in the Carlsbad Planning Department LOHF SUBDIVISION GPA - GPA 04-04 as 22 provided in Govemment Code Section 65350 et. seq. and Section 21.52.160 of the Carlsbad 23 Municipal Code; and 24 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 18th day of August 2004, hold ^3 2g. a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony ^ and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the General Plan Amendment. 12 26 27 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission ofthe City of Carlsbad, as follows: A) That the above recitations are true and correct. 1 2 3 4 - B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of LOHF SUBDIVISION GPA - GPA 04-04, 6 based on the following findings: 7 Findings: ^ 1. The proposed change in General Plan land use designation from RM to RLM is g consistent with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance, and the existing subdivisions, in that the proposed designation reflects the existing single family 10 development with densities from 2.2 to 3.0 dwelling units per acre; no property within the area proposed for change could be further subdivided; the proposed 11 General Plan designation is implemented by the existing R-l-Q zoning on the property; both existing subdivisions have provided for their fair share of housing affordable to lower income households; and the adjustment of the boundary 13 between RLM and RM will result in no property being located within two General Plan designations. 14 " 15 Commission of the City of Carlsbad, Califomia, held on the 18th day of August 2004, by the 17 following vote, to wit: 18 AYES: Chairperson Whitton, Commissioners Baker, Dominguez, Heineman, Montgomery, and Segall 20 NOES: 21 ABSENT: 22 ABSTAIN: PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning 23 24 'tRANK H. WHITTON, Chairperson 25 CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ...4: ^6jz:^ ATTEST: 28 MICHAEL J. HOLZMILL Planning Director PC RESO NO. 5680 -2- GENERAL PLAN MAP CHANGE GPA: 04-04 draft 1^ final O August 4, 2004 EXISTING PROPOSED I Related Case File Ho{^ Project Name: Property/Legal Description(s): Lots 1 - 9 of Steiner Property, CT 99-13, according to Map No. 14039, filed on September 19, 2000; and Lots 1 - 13 and 49-51 of Lohf Subdivision, CT 97-15, according to Map No.13839, filed on August 23,1999, in the City of LCPA 04-04 G.P. Map Designation Change Approvals Property From: To: Counci! Approval Date: A. see attached RM RLM Resolution No: B. Effective Date: C. Signature: D. Signature: Attach a dditional pages if n^ bessary Signature: List of Affected Parcels - Lohf Subdivision GPA 215-920-01 215-920-02 215-920-03 215-920-04 215-920-05 215-920-41 215-921-01 215-921-02 215-921-03 215-921-04 215-921-05 215-921-06 215-921-07 215-921-08 215-921-09 215-921-10 215-921-35 215-921-36 215-921-37 215-921-38 215-921-39 215-921-40 215-921-41 215-921-42 215-921-43 215-921-45 215-921-46 5 ^ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5681 ^ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 3 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CARLSBAD 4 LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATION OF APPROXIMATELY 4.47 ACRES FROM RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY (RM) TO RESIDENTIAL 6 LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY (RLM) ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF EL CAMINO REAL, 7 NORTH AND SOUTH OF POINSETTIA LANE, IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 21. 8 CASE NAME: LOHF SUBDIVISION GPA ^ CASE NO: LCPA 04-04 9 10 WHEREAS, California State law requires that the Local Coastal Program, 11 General Plan, and Zoning designations for properties in the Coastal Zone be in conformance; and WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad, has filed a verified application for an amendment to the Local Coastal Program designations regarding property described as 12 13 14 15 Lots 1 through 9 of Carlsbad Tract CT 99-13, Steiner Property, according to Map No. 14039, filed in the Office of the 2g County Recorder of San Diego County on September 19, 2000; and Lots 1 through 13 and 49 through 51 of Carlsbad Tract 17 CT 97-15, Lohf Subdivision, according to Map No. 13839, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on 18 August 23, 1999, all in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California 20 ("the Property"); and 21 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Local Coastal Program Amendment as shown on Exhibit "LCPA 04-04" dated August 4, 2004, attached hereto, as provided in Public Resources Code Section 30574 and Article 15 of Subchapter 8, Chapter 2, Division 5.5 of Title 14 of the Caiifomia Code of Regulations of the Califomia Coastal Commission Administrative Regulations; and 22 23 24 25 26 27 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 18th day of August 2004, hold 28 a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Conmiission considered all factors relating to the Local Coastal Program Amendment; and WHEREAS, State Coastal Guidelines requires a six week public review period 6 for any amendment to the Local Coastal Program. 7 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission ofthe City ofCarlsbad, as follows: 9 A) That the foregoing recitations are tme and correct. 10 B) At the end of the State mandated six week review period, starting on March 25, 2004 and ending on May 7, 2004, staff shall present to the City Council a ^2 summary ofthe comments received. 13 C) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of LOHF SUBDIVISION GPA - LCPA 04-04 14 based on the following findings and subject to the condition: 19 Findings: 15 16 That the proposed Local Coastal Program Amendment meets the requirements of, and is 17 in conformity with, the policies of Chapter 3 ofthe Coastal Act and all applicable policies of the Mello II segment of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program not being amended by 1^ this amendment, in that the project area has already been developed in accordance with the Mello II segment of the Local Coastal Program and no impact to environmentally sensitive lands, agricultural lands, scenic resources, or geologic 20 stability will occur as a result of the proposed change in the land use designation. 21 2. That the proposed amendment to the Mello II segment of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program is required to bring it into consistency with City's General Plan Land Use Map. Condition: 22 23 24 „ 1. This approval is granted subject to the approval ofthe Negative Declaration and GPA 04- 25 04, as specified in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5679 and 5680 for those other approvals. 27 28 PC RESO NO. 5681 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting to the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, held on the 18th day of August 2004, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Whitton, Commissioners Baker, Dominguez, Heineman, Montgomery, and Segall NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: .-^^^ / --^'/': *• /FRANK H. WHIITON, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: MICHAEL J. HOLZ: Planning Director PC RESO NO. 5681 -3- LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM LCPA: 04-04 draft ^ final O august H, 2004 PROPOSED Project Name: I Related Case File No(s): Property/Legal Description(s): Lots 1 - 9 of Steiner Property, CT 99-13, according to Map No. 14039, filed on September 19, 2000; and Lots 1-13 and 49-51 of Lohf Subdivision, CT 97-15, according to Map No.l 3839, filed on August 23,1999, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California. GPA 04-04 LCPA Map Designation C hange Approvals Property From: To: Council Approval Date: A. see attached RM RLM Resolution No: B. Effective Date: C. Signature: D. Signature: Attach a dditional pages if n^ jcessary Signature: List of Affected Parcels - LOHF SUBDIVISION LC> A 215-920-01 215-920-02 215-920-03 215-920-04 215-920-05 215-920-41 215-921-01 215-921-02 215-921-03 215-921-04 215-921-05 215-921-06 215-921-07 215-921-08 215-921-09 215-921-10 215-921-35 215-921-36 215-921-37 215-921-38 215-921-39 215-921-40 215-921-41 215-921-42 215-921-43 215-921-45 215-921-46 LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM LCPA: 04-04 draft ^ final O august 4, 2004 \ iRLwR^^^ ! • 1 %\ iRLwR^^^ ! • 1 %\ iRLwR^^^ ! • 1 %\ ! • 1 %\ EXISTING PROPOSED I Related Case File No(s)!' Project Name: Property/Legal Description (s): Lots 1 - 9 of Steiner Property, CT 99-13, according to Map No. 14039, filed on September 19, 2000; and Lots 1-13 and 49-51 of Lohf Subdivision, CT 97-15, according to Map No.l 3839, filed on August 23,1999, in the City of GPA 04-04 LCPA Map Designation C hange Approvals Property From: To: Council Approval Date: A. see attached RM RLM Resolution No: B. Effective Date: C. Signature: D. Signature: Attach £ dditional pages if ni icessary Signature: 1 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5679 5 8 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 3 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR AN 4 AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN AND THE MELLO H SEGMENT OF THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM TO CHANGE THE 6 DESIGNATION OF APPROXIMATELY 4.47 ACRES FROM RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY (RM) TO RESIDENTIAL 7 LOW-MEDRJM DENSITY (RLM) ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF EL CAMINO REAL, NORTH AND SOUTH OF POINSETTIA LANE, EN LOCAL 9 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 21. CASE NAME: LOHF SUBDP/ISION GPA 10 CASE NO: GPA 04-04/LCPA 04-04 WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad, has filed a verified application with the City 12 of Carlsbad regarding property described as 13 Lots 1 through 9 of Carlsbad Tract CT 99-13, Steiner 14 Property, according to Map No. 14039, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on September 19, 2000; and Lots 1 through 13 and 49 through 51 of Carlsbad Tract 16 CT 97-15, Lohf Subdivision, according to Map No. 13839, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on 17 August 23, 1999, all in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California 18 ^ ("the Property"); and 20 WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was prepared in conjunction with said 21 .. project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 18th day of August 2004, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider'said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering ali testimony 25 26 and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and 27 considering any wiitten comments received, the Planning Commission considered all factors 28 relating to the Negative Declaration. 22 23 1 2 3 4 8 9 10 11 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are trae and correct. 2 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby RECOMMENDS ADOPTION of the Negative Declaration, 6 Exhibit "ND" according to Exhibits "NOI" dated June 29, 2004, and "PH" dated June 22, 2004, attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following 7 findings: Findings: 1. The Planning Commission ofthe City of Carlsbad does hereby find: a. it has reviewed, analyzed and considered the Negative Declaration and the environmental impacts therein identified for this project and any comments ^ 2 thereon prior to RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the proj ect; and 13 b. the Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with requirements oif the Califomia Environmental Quality Act, the State Guidelines and the 14 Environmental Protection Procedures of the City of Carlsbad; and " it reflects the independent judgment ofthe Planning Commission of fhe City of 16 Carlsbad; and 17 d. based on the EIA Part E and conmients thereon, there is no substantial evidence the project will have a significant effect on the environment. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PC RESO NO. 5679 1 2 3 4 13 14 15 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, Cahfomia, held on the 18th day of August 2004, by the following vote, to wit: ^ AYES: Chairperson Whitton, Commissioners Baker, Dominguez, Heineman, Montgomery, and Segall NOES: ABSENT: 6 7 8 9 ABSTAIN: 10 11 -^^4^"^^ J2 / FRANK H. WHITTON, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: 16 MICHAEL J. HOtZMILLi Planning Director 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PC RESO NO. 5679 -3- Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department NEGATIVE DECLARATION CASE NAME: Lohf Subdivision GPA CASE NO: GPA 04-04/LCPA 04-04 PROJECT LOCATION: West of El Camino Real north and south of Poinsettia Lane. Citv of Carlsbad, Countv of San Diego PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Request for a General Plan Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment to change the land use designation of approximately 4.47 acres firom Residential Medium Density to Residential Low Medium Density. DETERMINATION: The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the Califomia Environmental Quahty Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, the initial study (EIA Part 2) did not identify any potentially significant impacts on the environment, and the City of Carlsbad finds as follows: ^ The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the enviroimient. I I The proposed project MAY have "potentially significant impact(s)" on the environment, but at least one potentially significant impact 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. (Negative Declaration applies only to the effects that remained to be addressed). I I Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earher ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, nothing further is required. A copy of the initial study (EIA Part 2) documenting reasons to support the Negative Declaration is on file in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, Califomia 92008. ADOPTED: ATTEST: MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION CASE NAME: CASE NO: PROJECT LOCATION: Lohf Subdivision GPA 04-Q4/LCPA 04-04 West of El Camino Real north and south of Poinsettia Lane, Citv of Carlsbad, Countv of San Diego PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Request for a General Plan Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment to change the land use designation of approximately 4.47 acres firom Residential Medium Density to Residential Low Medium Density. PROPOSED DETERMINATION: The City of Carisbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance ofthe City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, the initial study (EIA Part 2) did not identify any potentially significant impacts on the environment. Therefore, a Negative Declaration will be recommended for adoption by the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission. A copy of the initial study (EIA Part 2) documenting reasons to support the proposed Negative Declaration are on file in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, Califomia 92008. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 20 days ofthe date of this notice. The proposed project and Negative Declaration are subject to review and approval/adoption by the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission and City Coimcil. Additional public notices will be issued when those public hearings are scheduled. If you have any questions, please call Michael Grim in the Plarming Department at (760) 602-4623. PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD June 29. 2004 to Julv 19, 2004 PUBLISH DATE June 29, 2004 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO: GPA 04-04/LCPA 04-04 DATE: June 22. 2004 BACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME: Lohf Subdivision GPA 2. LEAD AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS: CityofCarlsbad 3. CONTACT PERSON AND PHONE NUMBER: Michael Grim 760-602-4623 4. PROJECT LOCATION: West of El Camino Real, north and south of Poinsettia Lane. Citv of Carlsbad. Countv of San Diego 5. PROJECT SPONSOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS: Citv of Carlsbad. 1635 Faradav Av. Carlsbad. CA 92008 , 6. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential Medium Densitv (RM) 7. ZONING: One Familv Residential with a Qualified Development Overlav (R-l-O) 8. OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL IS REQUIRED (i.e., permits, financing approval or participation agreements): Califomia Coastal Commission 9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND SURROUNDING LAND USES: Request for a Negative Declaration. General Plan Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment to change ttie land use designation of approximately 4.47 acres from Residential Medium Densitv CRM) to Residential Low-Medium Densitv (RLM) over existing subdivided and developed single familv residential properties within the Lohf and Steiner subdivisions. Rev. 07/03/02 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. I I Aesthetics I I Agricultural Resources I I Air Quality I I Biological Resources I I Cultural Resources I I Geology/Soils Q Noise • Hazards/Hazardous Materials D Population and Housing j I Hydrology/Water Quality Public Services I I Land Use and Planning I I Mineral Resources I I Mandatory Findings of Significance I I Recreation I I Transportation/Circulation I I Utilities & Service Systems Rev. 07/03/02 DETERMINATION. (To be completed by the Lead Agency) • I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I fmd that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to fhe project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. • I I I fmd that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have "potentially significant impact(s)" on the environment, but at least one potentially significant impact 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. A Negative Declaration is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I I I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon fhe proposed project. Therefore, nothing fiirther is required. Planner Signature \^^^^^^ Date Planning Director's Sl^ature {J Date ' Rev. 07/03/02 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the foim of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration. • A brief explanation is requii"ed for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by an infomiation source cited in the parentlieses following each question. A "No Impacf answer is adequately supported if the referenced infonnation sources show that fhe impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A "No Impacf answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. • "Less Than Significant Impacf applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not significantly adverse, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies. • "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measiures has reduced an effect firom "Potentially Significant Impacf to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The developer must agi-ee to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. • "Potentially Significant Impacf is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significantly adverse. • Based on an "EIA-Part II", if a proposed project could have a potentially significant adverse effect on the enviromnent, but all potentially significant adverse effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earher EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and none ofthe circumstances requiring a supplement to or supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by tiie prior environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional environmental document is required. • When "Potentially Significant Impacf is checked the project is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR if the significant adverse effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to apphcable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" has been made pursuant to that earUer EIR. • A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant adverse effect on the envii^onment. • If there are one or more potentially significant adverse effects, tiie City may avoid preparing an EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce adverse impacts to less than sigmficant, and those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. • In this case, the appropriate "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incoiporated" may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared. Rev. 07/03/02 • An EIR must be prepared if "Potentially Significant Impacf is checked, and including but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant adverse effect has not been discussed or mitigated in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the adverse impact to less than significant; (2) a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" for the significant adverse impact has not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the adverse impact to less than sigruficant; or (4) through the EIA-Part II analysis it is not possible to detennine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to below a level of significance. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measiures appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts, which would otherwise be determined significant. Rev. 07/03/02 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). I. AESTHETICS - Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quahty ofthe site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light and glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES - (In deteiTnining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to fhe Califomia Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model-1997 prepared by the Califomia Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland.) Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contiact? c) Involve other changes in the existuig environment, which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use? III. AIR QUALITY - (Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution contiol district may be relied upon to make the following determinations.) Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of tiie applicable aii- quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contiibute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Potentially Potentially Significant Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Impact • • • • • • • • Less Than -No Significant Impact Impact • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • s • M • K iXl Rev. 07/03/02 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). c) d) e) IV. a) b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concenti-ations? Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES project: Would tiie Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by Califomia Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian, aquatic or wetland habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by Califomia Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than No Significant Impact Impact • • • Kl • • • • • S • • • S • m • • • K c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defmed by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including but not limited to marsh, vemal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filing, hydrological intermption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local poUcies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a ttee preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natiiral Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? g) Impact tiibutary areas that are environmentally sensitive? • • • S • • • K • • • m • • • H • • • s Rev. 07/03/02 Issues (and Supporting Infonnation Sources). IV. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would tiie project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defmed in §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? c) Directly or mdirectiy destioy a unique paieontological resource or site or imique geologic featiure? Potentially Potentially Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated D D D m • • • s • • • a d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of fonnal cemeteries? • • • K IV. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would tiie project: a) Expose people or stractures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii. Stiong seismic ground shaking? iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv. Landslides? a) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? b) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is imstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? c) Be located on expansive soils, as defmed in Table 18 - 1-B of the Unifonn Buflding Code (1997), creating substantial risks to life or property? • • • • • • • n • • • • • • S • • • • • • • Kl d) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or altemative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? • • • K Rev. 07/03/02 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). IV. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine tiansport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the pubUc or envnonment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the envii-onment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Govemment Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or environment? e) For a project within an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airsttip, would tiie project result ui a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or stractures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Potentially Significant Impact • • • • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than No Significant Impact Impact • • • • • • • • • • • • • M • M • • • H • S • • ^ VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY - Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? • • U Rev. 07/03/02 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially Potentially Significant Significant b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with ground water recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local ground water table level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Impacts to groimdwater quality? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattem of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stieam or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off- site? e) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stieam or river, or substantially increase the flow rate or amoimt (volume) of surface ranoff in a maimer, which would result in flooding on- or off- site? f) Create or contiibute ranoff water, which would exceed the capacity of existing or plarmed stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? g) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? h) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood delineation map? i) Place within 100-year flood hazard area stracttires, which would impede or redirect flood flows? j) Expose people or stractures to a significant risk of loss injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result ofthe failure of a levee or dam? k) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? 1) Increased erosion (sediment) into receiving surface waters. Impact • • • • • • • • Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than No Significant Impact Impact D n D E • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • K • K • m • • • K Kl K K K 10 Rev. 07/03/02 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). m) Increased pollutant discharges (e.g., heavy metals, pathogens, peti"oleum derivatives, synthetic organics, nutiients, oxygen-demanding substances and tiash) into receiving surface waters or other alteration of receiving surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? Potentially Significant Impact • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated • Less Than Significant Impact No Impact • M n) Changes to receiving water quality (marine, fresh or wetland waters) during qr following constraction? o) Increase in any pollutant to an already impaired water body as listed on the Clean Water Act Section 303(d) list? p) The exceedance of applicable surface or groundwater receiving water quality objectives or degradation of beneficial uses? IX. LANDUSE AND PLANNING - Would tiie proj ect: a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoiung ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project: X. X. a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of futiire value to the region and the residents ofthe State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important — mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use pian? NOISE - Would tiie project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance or appUcable standards of other agencies? b) Exposm"e of persons to or generation of excessive groimdboume vibration or groundboume noise levels? • • • • • • • • • n • • n n • • • • • • • n • • • s K K n Kl K • • • K • M 11 Rev. 07/03/02 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). c) A substantial pennanent uicrease in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without fhe project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project viciiuty above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located witiiin an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, witiiin 2 miles of a public aiiport or public use aiiport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airsttip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Potentially Potentially Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated • • • K • • • • • S • K • • • K X. POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would tiie project: a) Induce substantial growth in an area eitiier directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or induectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastracttire)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the constraction of replacement housing elsewhere? • • • K • • • K c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the constraction of replacement housing elsewhere? • • • K XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical unpacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities, a need for new or physically altered govemment facilities, the constraction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i) Fire protection? • • • X ii) Police protection? • • • iii) Schools? • • • X iv) Parks? • • • X v) Other public facilities? • • • X XIV. RECREATION 12 Rev. 07/03/02 Issues (and Supporting Infonnation Sources). a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Potentially Significant Impact • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated • Less Than Significant Impact No Impact • m XV. b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the constraction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC - Would the project: a) Cause an increase in tiaffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing tiaffic load and capacity ofthe stieet system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle teips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air tiaffic pattems, including either an increase in tiaffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? • • • S • • n • outs, bicycle racks)? XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS - Would tiie project: a) Exceed wastewater tieatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Contiol Board? b) Require or result in the constiuction of new water or wastewater freatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental effects? • • • • • • • ^ • • n K • s • s e) Result in inadequate emergency access? • • • X 0 Result in insufficient parking capacity? n • n X g) Conflict with adopted poUcies, plans, or programs supporting altemative fransportation (e.g., bus tum-• • • X • K • m 13 Rev. 07/03/02 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). c) Require or result in the constraction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities,, the constraction qf which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Potentially Significant Impact • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated • Less Than Significant Impact No Impact • K • • • S e) Result in a determination by the wastewater freatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statiites and regulations related to solid waste? XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or resfrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in cormection with the effects of past • projects, the effects of other cunent projects, and the effects of probable futtire projects?) c) Does tiie project have environmental effects, which will cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? D D n m • • • • • Kl • m • • • S • • • K • • • K XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earUer EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within tiie 14 Rev. 07/03/02 scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earUer analysis. c) Mitigation measures. For effects tiiat are "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 15 Rev. 07/03/02 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION The project involves a General Plan Amendment, and Local Coastal Program Amendment to adjust the boundary between the Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM) and Residential Medium Density (RM) General Plan designations over approximately 4.47 acres within the Lohf and Steiner residential subdivisions, generally located east of El Camino Real, north and south of Poinsettia Lane. The existing General Plan land use designation boundary does not follow the existing property lines within the single-family subdivision, resulting in some lots containing two land use designations. It also results in the existing One Family Residential (R-l-Q) zoning implementing two different General Plan designations within the same subdivision. The proposed General Plan land use boundary would foUow tiie project boundary for the single-family subdivision, witii the R-l-Q zoning implementing only the RLM land use designation. The property covered by the proposed land use designation change is already subdivided and constracted and has no potential of fiirther subdivision, therefore no impacts to the yield of the properties will occur. Since all of the affected properties are already subdivided and no additional development is proposed with this project, no impacts to any physical features, such as scenic resources, envfronmentally sensitive areas, or geologic features, will occur. The adjustment of the land use boundary over the developed properties does not preclude the continued conformance with the Mello II segment poUcies. The proposal is consistent with all applicable policies and regulations and staff has no issues with the proposed land use designation change. AESTHETICS: No Impact. The proposed legislative actions do not impact the existuig or fiiture development of the residential subdivision. No development is proposed with the actions and no adjustments to the existing development are proposed. Therefore no impacts to aesthetics will result. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES: No Impact. The project site is an existing residential subdivision. No agricultiural resources exist on the property and the proposed land use designation boundary adjustment will not increase or reduce the amount of agricultural land. Therefore, no impacts to agricultural resources will occur. AIR QUALITY: No Impact. No additional development is proposed with the land use designation boundary adjustment. Therefore no increases in emissions, sources of dust, or objectionable odors will occur. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCE: No Impact. All natural open space areas preserved with the existing residential subdivision will remain and no development or alteration of any areas with biological resources is proposed. Therefore, the proposed land use and zoning designation boundary adjustment will not have an adverse impact on biological resources. CULTURAL RESOURCES: No Impact. No additional grading is proposed with this land use designation boundary adjustment. The site is already developed in accordance with the approved subdivision map and, therefore, no impacts to cultiiral resources would result. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: No impact. No grading is proposed with the land use designation boundary adjustment and no adjustment to the existing, approved grading plan would result from the proposed boundary adjustment. Therefore, no adverse impacts due to geology or soils will result. 16 Rev. 07/03/02 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS No Impact. No constraction or alteration to the cunently approved development is proposed with the land use designation boundary adjustment and no additional hazards or hazardous materials will result due to the proposal. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: No Impact;- No constraction or alteration to the existing residential subdivision is proposed with the land use designation boundary adjustment. Therefore no impacts to hydrology or water quality will result. LAND USE AND PLANNING: No Impact. The proposed land use and zoiung designation boundary adjustment will bring the zoning. General Plan, and Local Coastal Program designations into confomiance and will eliminate the potential for individual lots to have more than one designation. Since the subject property is already subdivided and has no potential for fiirther subdivision, no impact to the residential yield of the property will result. Therefore, no adverse impacts to land use and planning will occur due to the proposal. MINERAL RESOURCES: No Impact. No grading is proposed with the land use designation boundary adjustment and no adjustment to the existing, approved grading plan would- result from the proposed boundary adjustment. Therefore, no adverse impacts to mineral resources will result. NOISE: No Impact. No constraction or adjustment to approved constraction documents is proposed with the land use designation boimdary adjustment. No new sources of noise will occur with the land use adjustments. Therefore, no adverse impacts due to noise will result fi-om the proposed actions. POPULATION AND HOUSING: No Impact. The subject property is already subdivided and has no potential for further subdivision, therefore no impact to the residential yield of the property wiU result from the land use and zoning designation boundary adjustment. There is no alteration of the project's provision of housing affordable to lower income households. Given the above, the proposal would not cause any adverse iiiqjacts to population and housing. PUBLIC SERVICES: No Impact. The proposal involves no constiruction and therefore no uicrease in public service demand would occur •with the land use designation boundary adjustment. Given the above, no adverse impacts to public services would occur. RECREATION: No Impact. No constraction is proposed with the land use designation boundary adjustment and no increase in recreational demand -will occur. Therefore, no adverse impacts to recreation will result from the proposal. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: No Impact. No additional development is proposed with the land use designation boundary adjustment therefore no increases tiaffic generation will occur. No fiulher subdivision of the subject property is allowed by virtue of the land use boundary adjustment. Given the above, no adverse impacts to fr-ansportation or traffic -will occiu:. UTILITY AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: No Impact. The proposal involves no constiuction and therefore no increase in utility and service system demand would occur with the land use designation boundary adjustment. Therefore, no adverse impacts to said services would occur. 17 Rev. 07/03/02 EARLIER ANALYSIS USED AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES The following documents were used in the analysis of this project and are on file in the City of Carlsbad Planning Department located at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, Califomia, 92008. 1. Final Master Environmental Impact Report for the City of Carlsbad General Plan Update (MEIR 93-01). City of Carlsbad Planning Department. March 1994. 18 Rev. 07/03/02 PROOF OF PUBLIGjp:iON (2010 & 2011 CCP.) This space the County Clerk's Fihng Stamp STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen ofthe United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of Califomia, for the City of Oceanside and the City of Escondido, Court Decree number 171349, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at SAN MARCOS, Califomia This Proof of Publication of CtTY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES: Please be advised that the City Of Caristiad is consider-ing text amendments to its Local Coastal Program (LCP) as summarized below. This amendment is being pro-posedby the City of Carlsbad and is currently under re-view. This notice nereby opens a six week review period after which the Planning Commission and Cily Council will consider all comments and act on the proposed amendment. The Planning Commission hearing is ex-pected to take place in May, 2004, and will be duly no-ticed. The CiW Council Hearing is expected to take place in June, 2004, and will be duly notteed. Copies of the LCP amendment are available for review at the followinglocations: (1) Carlsbad Planning Depart-ment, 1635 Faraday Avenue-(2) City Clerics Offlce, 1200 Carisbad Village Drive; (3) Carisbad Mam Ubrary, 1775 Dove Lane; (4) Georgina Cole Library, 1250 Carisbad Vil-lage Dnve; and (5) Bie California Coastal Commission, 7575-Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, CA 92106-4402 PROPOSED LCP AH^ENDIWENT SUMMARV LCPA 04-04 - LOHF SUBDIVISION GW The city's Local Coastal Program includes a general Land Use Map that indicates the planned land use for properties within the Coastal zone. This specific Land Use Map Amendment is proposed as follows: Relocate the boundary between Resklential Low-Medi-um Densihr (RLM) and Residential Medium Density (RM) eastward fo the northem and eastem edges of the Lohf Subdivision and Steiner Subdivision boundary, resulting in the changing of approximately 4.47 from RM to RLM on property generally located west of El Camino Real, north and south of Poinsettia Lane. If you have any questions, please call Michael Grimm in the Planning tJepartment at (760) 602-4623. Written comments stiould be sent to the Planning Department at 1635 t^radavAvenue, Carisbad, CaHfomla, 92008. PUBLISH OAfE: March 25,2004 NCT1620207 .Day of April, 2004 Signature NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising PROOF OF PUBLAATION (2010 & 2011 CC.P.) This spacQ^for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen, of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the " printer of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of Califomia, for the City of Oceanside and the City of Escondido, Court Decree number 171349, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is tme and correct. Dated at SAN MARCOS, Califomia Proof of Publication of NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Plahning Cbihmisr sion of the Cfty of Carisbad will hold; a 'publicliearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, August 4,2004, to consider a request for a Negative Declarawn, General Plan Amendment and Locar Coastal Program Amendment to change the land use designation of ap-proximatsjy 4.47 acres from Residential Medium Density (RM) to Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM), on property generally located west of El Camino Real, north and soutn of Poinsettia Lane, in Local Facilities Manage-ment Zone 21 and-more particularly described as: ' Lots 1 through 9 of Carisbad Tract CT 99-13, Steiner PnDperty, according to Map No. 14039, flled in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on Sep-tember 19, 2000; and Lots 1 through 13 and 49 through 51 of Carlsbad Tract CT 97-15, Loht Subdivision, accord-ing to Map No. 13839, flled in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on August 23;>,1999, all in the City of Carisbad, County of. San Diego; State of California Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal areicordially in- ^ vited to attend the oublic hearing—.. Copies of the staff report will be .' I available on and after July 29,. 2004. If you have any questions, •lease call Mike Grim in the Planning Department at (760). 602-4623. ; : If you challenge the General Plan Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising only those Issues you or someone else raised at the pub-iic hearing described in this no-tice or in written correspon-dence delivered to the City of®"-Carisbad at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: GPA 04-04/LCPA 04-04 CASE NAME: LOHF SUBDIVISION GPA P.JTV nc nADl ODAO This .Day of July, 2004 signature NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, August 4, 2004, to consider a request for a Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment to change the land use designation of approximately 4.47 acres from Residential Medium Density (RM) to Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM), on property generally located west of El Camino Real, north and south of Poinsettia Lane, in Local Facilities Management Zone 21 and more particularly described as: Lots 1 through 9 of Carlsbad Tract CT 99-13, Steiner Property, according to Map No. 14039, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on September 19, 2000; and Lots 1 through 13 and 49 through 51 of Carlsbad Tract CT 97-15, Lohf Subdivision, according to Map No. 13839, filed in the Office ofthe County Recorder of San Diego County on August 23, 1999, all in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after July 29, 2004. If you have any questions, please call Mike Grim in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4623. If you challenge the General Plan Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: GPA 04-04/LCPA 04-04 CASE NAME: LOHF SUBDIVISION GPA PUBLISH: JULY 22, 2004 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www/.ci.carlsbad.ca.us s/r£ LOHF SUBDIVISION GPA GPA 04-04/LCPA 04-04 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2010 & 2011 CCP.) This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of Proof of Pubhcation of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of Califomia, for the City of Oceanside and the City of Escondido, Court Decree number 171349, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: September 2004 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at SAN MARCOS California HOnCE OF p^miC HEABIMQ ^iStteai^}or^^a\^ Negattye Oedgra- M?K^Geniiff>taS^/Sen& ^<^^S^^'% aBsoulfiof Pcmseltia Lan&InlocalFadlHes Manage-SeiYtZoneZI snd more paSeularty described as; '13, Steiner theOIAce Ofl Sen-through k?te 1 *~U9»Li£^PaM Tr^ CT to15i^"No.' 'ipMiyjls^Jnm'e ihfSro^ ^<^&. &''Sf'§»;°b1?8orSure of Calltomla • Subdivision, agcoi* Qifieed*™ County 1U8L23,1999, all hi. Those persons wishing to i iSreKllyinvited to attefld thi the age'nda bill will be availi speak oi>th^ ,..j'put)lic heaiM....-^.—,- availabfe qn_a_nd jhw S^Mf the aaenaa Din ww ne avaimum "N »'~ s" his proDosfl are {^her Sepfember )8se can Mike scrlbedTn Site notice pr in written conespondence deliv- ered to the '•'Ky . , Cleric's ^artebad Village Drive, Cans-, bad^XA ^8,at,or prior to the public healing. NCT 1693560. ^ September 11,2004 This 1B'^ Dav of September. 2004 Signature Jane Olson NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, Califomia, at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 21, 2004, to consider a request for approval of a Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment to change the land use designation of approximately 4.47 acres from Residential Medium Density (RM) to Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM), on property generally located west of El Camino Real, north and south of Poinsettia Lane, in Local Facilities Management Zone 21 and more particularly described as: Lots 1 through 9 of Carlsbad Tract CT 99-13, Steiner Property, according to Map No. 14039, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on September 19, 2000; and Lots 1 through 13 and 49 through 51 of Carlsbad Tract CT 97-15, Lohf Subdivision, according to Map No. 13839, filed in the Office ofthe County Recorder of San Diego County on August 23, 1999, all in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on and after September 17, 2004. If you have any questions, please call Mike Grim in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4623. If you challenge the Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment and/or Local Coastal Program Amendment in couil, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carisbad, City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008,at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: GPA 04-04/LCPA 04-04 CASE NAME: LOHF SUBDIVISION GPA PUBLISH: September 11, 2004 CITY OF CARLSBAD CITYCOUNCIL S;T£ LOHF SUBDIVISION GPA GPA 04-04/LCPA 04-04 MILLER BRETT C 1764 SKIMMER CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 ZIEN HWA MING&CHERRY C 1756 SKIMMER CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 BRANN ROBERT E&JUDITH A 1760 SKIMMER CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 KIM TAE-WON&SUN-HEE 1752 SKIMMER CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 TANNER MARK&DEBBIE 14950 TERRENO DE FLORES LN LOS GATOS CA 95032 WEXLER KEVIN S&SHERRI E 1773 SKIMMER CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 PETROU CHRISTINE 1769 SKIMMER CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 CHANG LONG FEI&TOMMIE 4751 TOW PATH LN SYLVANIA OH 43560 HACKNEY DOUGLAS K&STEPHANIEM 6814 MOORHEN PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 FUN TRUST 08-15-00 C/O SEYMOUR P KERN 7040 AVENIDA ENCINAS #104 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CAPOZZA ANTHONY M&ANN L 1757 SKIMMER CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 NUSSBAUM TAI T 6823 MOORHEN PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 WATKINS REVOCABLE TRUST 03-19-01 POBOX 131417 CARLSBAD CA 92013 MCCONNELL STEPHEN J&GINA C 1766 ORIOLE CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 SHEN MORGAN C TRUST 04-10- 02 6822 MOORHEN PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 JACKSON JOHN A&MARCL\ N 6827 MOORHEN PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 BRANDENBURG FAMILY LPVING TRUST 03-04-00 1770 ORIOLE CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 VARNUM DUANE T&SANDRA J 6826 MOORHEN PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 MOSQUERA DAVID M 6831 MOORHEN PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 HULL ELIZABETH W 1767 ORIOLE CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 WOOD WILLIAM Y&HAUCK- WOOD WHITNEY 6830 MOORHEN PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 LAMPE GREGORY W&GINA G 6835 MOORHEN PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 REDDICK THOMAS M&MARIBEL 6839 MOORHEN PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 RICE WILLIAM L 6834 MOORHEN PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 ROZANSKY JON&JULIE 1772 DOVE LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 RADCLIFF RONALD&SCHREIBMAN PATRICIA 6838 MOORHEN PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD UNIF SCHOOL DIST 6225 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92009 SAN MARCOS SCHOOL DIST 1 CIVIC CENTER DR SAN MARCOS CA 92069 ENCINITAS SCHOOL DIST 101 RANCHO SANTA FE RD ENCINITAS CA 92024 SAN DIEGUITO SCHOOL DIST 701 ENCINITAS BLVD ENCINITAS CA 92024 LEUCADIA WASTE WATER DIST TIM JOCHEN 1960 LA COSTA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92009 OLIVENHAIN WATER DIST 1966 OLIVENHAIN RD ENCINITAS CA 92024 CITYOF ENCINITAS 505 S VULCAN AVE ENCINITAS CA 92024 CITY OF SAN MARCOS 1 CIVIC CENTER DR SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949 CITY OF OCEANSIDE 300 NORTH COAST HWY OCEANSIDE CA 92054 CITY OF VISTA PO BOX 1988 VISTA CA 92085 VALLECITOS WATER DIST 201 VALLECITOS DE ORO SAN MARCOS CA 92069 I.P.U.A. SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND URBAN STUDIES SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505 CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME 4949 VIEWRIDGE AVE SAN DIEGO CA 92123 REGIONAL WATER QUALITY STE 100 9174 SKYPARK CT SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340 SD COUNTY PLANNING STE B 5201 RUFFIN RD SAN DIEGO CA 92123 LAFCO 1600 PACIFIC HWY SAN DIEGO CA 92101 U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE 6010 HIDDEN VALLEY RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DIST 9150 CHESAPEAKE DR SAN DIEGO CA 92123 CA COASTAL COMMISSION STE 103 7575 METROPOLITAN DR SANDIEGO CA 92108-4402 SANDAG STE 800 401 B STREET SAN DIEGO CA 92101 ATTN TEDANASIS SAN DIEGO COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY PO BOX 82776 SAN DIEGO CA 92138-2776 CITY OF CARLSBAD COMMUNITY SERVICES CITY OF CARLSBAD PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DEPT- PROJECT ENGINEER CITY OF CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT CITY OF CARLSBAD PROJECT PLANNER 07/20/2004 CALTRANS DISTRICT 11 BILL FIGGE MAIL ST 50 P 0 BOX 85406 SANDIEGO CA 92186-5406 REG WATER QUALITY CONTROL BD STE 100 9174 SKYPARK CT SANDIEGO CA 92123-4340 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMIN WESTERN REG BARRY BRAYER, AWP-8 PO BOX 92007 LOSANGELES CA 90009 BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS RONALD M JAEGER 2800 COTTAGE WAY SACRAMENTO CA 95825 BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION & HSG AGENCY PATRICIA W NEAL DEPUTY SEC HOUSING STE 2450 980 NINTH ST SACRAMENTO CA 95814 CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK SUPERINTENDENT 1901 SPINNAKER DR SAN BUENAVENTURA CA 93001 COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CHAIRMAN 722 JACKSON PL NW WASHINGTON DC 20006 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE LOS ANGELES DIST ENGINEER PO BOX 2711 LOSANGELES CA 90053 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY STE 400 611 RYAN PLAZA DR ARLINGTON TX 76011-4005 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY CLIFFORD EMMERLING, DIR STE 350 901 MARKET ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103 DEPARTMENT OF FISH & GAME ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIV P 0 BOX 944246 SACRAMENTO CA 94244-2460 DEPARTMENT OF FOOD & AGRICULTURE STEVE SHAFFER, AGRICULTURE RESOURCES RM 100 1220 N ST SACRAMENTO CA 95814 DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY DOUG WICKIZER, ENVIR COORD P O BOX 944246 SACRAMENTO CA 94244-2460 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVE DUNCAN LENT HOWARD, REG ADMIN 450 GOLDEN GATE AV SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL RM 700 110 WEST A ST SAN DIEGO CA 92101 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RM 5504 1120 N ST SACRAMENTO CA 95814 MARINE RESOURCES REGION, DR & G ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, SPR STEJ 4665 LAMPSON AVE LOS ALAMITOS CA 90720-5139 OFFICE OF PLANNING & RESEARCH OFFICE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS PO BOX 3044 SACRAMENTO CA 93044 SAN FRANCISCO BAY CONSERVATION & DEVMT COMMISSION BILL TRAVIS STE 2600 50 CALIFORNIA ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111-4704 STATE LANDS COMMISSION DWIGHT SANDERS STE 1005 100 HOWE AV SACRAMENTO CA 95825-8202 U S BUREAU OF LAND MGMT STE RM W1834 2800 COTTAGE WAY SACRAMENTO CA 95825 U S FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE STE W-2605 2800 COTTAGE WAY SACRAMENTO CA 95825-1888 USDA - RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPT 4169 430 "G" ST DAVIS CA 95616 CALIFORNIA RESOURCES AGENCIES STE 1311 1416 9TH ST SACRAMENTO CA 95814 U S BUREAU OF RECLAMATION MID-PACIFIC REGION 2800 COTTAGE WAY SACRAMENTO CA 95825 U S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS LILY ALYEA STE 702 333 MARKET ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105-2197 WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BD PO BOX 100 SACRAMENTO CA 95801 SANDAG-LAND USE COMMISS NAN VALERIO STE 800 401 "B" STREET SANDIEGO CA 92101 RANCHO CARLSBAD HOA RUSS KOHL 5200 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TED OWEN 5934 PRIESTLY DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 ANTHONY & DICKY BONS 25709 HILLCREST AV ESCONDIDO CA 92026-8650 REG WATER QUALITY CONTROL BD STE 100 9174 SKY PARK CT SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340 U S FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE LEE ANN CARRANZA 6010 HIDDEN VALLEY ROAD CARLSBAD CA 92009- CITYOF ENCINITAS COM DEV DEPT 505 S VULCAN AV ENCINITAS CA 92024 TABATA FARMS PO BOX 1338 CARLSBAD CA 92018-1338 SANDAG-EXEC DIRECTOR GARY GALLEGOS STE 800 1ST INT'L PLAZA 401 "B" ST SAN DIEGO CA 92101 LESLIE ESPOSITO 1893 AMELFI DR ENCINITAS CA 92024 CYRIL/MARY GIBSON 12142 ARGYLE DR LOS ALAMITOS CA 90702 LAKESHORE GARDENS TOM BENSON 7201 AVENIDA ENCINAS CARLSBAD CA 92009 LANIKAI LANE PARK SHARP SPACE 3 6550 PONTO DRIVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 JOHN LAMB 1446 DEVLIN DR LOSANGELES CA 90069 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC KIM BLESSANT 101 ASH STREET SAN DIEGO CA 92101- STATE LANDS COMMISSION MARY GRIGGS STE 100 S 100 HOWE AV SACRAMENTO CA 95825-8202 COUNTY OF SD SUPERVISOR BILL HORN ART DANELL RM 335 1600 PACIFIC HIGHWAY SAN DIEGO CA 92101 PERRY A LAMB 890 MERE POINT RD BRUNSWICK ME 04011 S D CO PLANNING & LAND USE DEPT JAON VOKAC STE B-5 5201 RUFFIN ROAD SANDIEGO CA 92123 COASTAL CONSERVANCY RICHARD RETECKI STE 1100 1330 BROADWAY OAKLAND CA 94612 FLOYD ASHBY P O BOX 232580 ENCINITAS CA 92023-2580 DALE/DONNA SCHREIBER 7163 ARGONAUTA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 GEORGE BOLTON 6583 BLACKRAIL RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 LENNAR HOMES CHRISTINE ZORTMAN STE 320 5780 FLEET ST CARLSBAD CA 92008-4702 BATIQUITOS LAGOON FOUNDATION JOHN BURNS PO BOX 130491 CARLSBAD CA 92009- . iiotice has been rriailed to 'li! property owners/occupants listed hereitv Date: y/^^/ Signatuf: CITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL AB# 17.799 MTG. 9/21/04 DEPT. PLN TITLE: LOHF SUBDIVISION GPA GPA 04-04/LCPA 04-04 O o < o z o u RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the Council ADOPT Resolution No. 2004-303 APPROVING the Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment GPA 04-04, and Local Coastal Program Amendment LCPA 04-04, for the Lohf Subdivision GPA land use change. ITEM EXPLANATION: On August 18, 2004, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and recommended approval (6-0) of a Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment to adjust the boundary of the land use designations within the Lohf and Steiner subdivisions. The City-initiated proposal is part of the General Plan/Zoning Consistency program; one aspect of which is attempting to provide consistency between the General Plan land use and Zoning designations. Since the project site is located in the City's Coastal Zone, a Local Coastal Program Amendment is also needed to ensure consistency between the City's General Plan and the Local Coastal Program. The proposed land use revision would relocate the boundary between the Residential Low Medium Density (RLM) and Residential Medium Density (RM) designations, changing the designation of approximately 4.47 acres. The new boundary would be coincident with the subdivision boundaries and the existing R-l-Q zoning designation boundary. It would also eliminate the existing situation where some individual lots have two land use designations. The property covered by the proposed land use designation change is already subdivided and has no potential of further subdivision, therefore no impacts to the yield of the property would occur. The proposal is consistent with all applicable regulations and staff and the Planning Commission are recommending approval of the Lohf Subdivision GPA. ENVIRONMENTAL: The proposed Lohf Subdivision GPA project was reviewed for any potential adverse impact to the environment pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). No construction or revisions to the approved development are proposed. The boundary adjustments bring the General Plan, Zoning, and Local Coastal Program into conformance with each other. Therefore, the proposal would not create any significant adverse environmental impacts. The Planning Director issued a Negative Declaration on June 29, 2004 for public review and no comments were received. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impacts to the City are negligible in that the proposed action merely revises the land use designations and regulations on the property. /// /// /// PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. 17,799 EXHIBITS: 1. City Council Resolution No. 2004-303 2. Location Map 3. Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5679, 5680, and 5681 4. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated August 18, 2004 5. Draft Excerpt of Planning Commission Minutes, dated August 18, 2004. DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Michael Grim, (760) 602-4623, mgrim@ci.carlsbad.ca.us The City of Carlsbad Planning Department A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Item No. (3) Application complete date: N/A P.C. AGENDA OF: August 18, 2004 Project Planner: Michael Grim Project Engineer: N/A SUBJECT: I. GPA 04-04/LCPA 04-04 - LOHF SUBDIVISION GPA - Request for a Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment to change the land use designation of approximately 4.47 acres from Residential Medium Density (RM) to Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM), on property generally located west of El Camino Real, north and south of Poinsettia Lane, in Local Facilities Management Zone 21. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 5679, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION of the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5680 and 5681, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of GPA 04-04 and LCPA 04-04, based upon the findings contained therein. IL EXPLANATION This item was scheduled to be heard at the August 4, 2004 meeting, which was canceled due to lack of a quomm. The dates on the staff report and plans have not been changed. The dates on the resolutions have been changed to reflect the meeting and adoption date of August 18, 2004. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5679, 5680 and 5681 2. Staff Report dated August 4, 2004, with attachments The City of Carlsbad Planning Department A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Item No. (3) Application complete date: N/A P.C. AGENDA OF: August 4, 2004 Project Planner: Michael Grim Project Engineer: N/A SUBJECT: GPA 04-04/LCPA 04-04 - LOHF SUBDIVISION GPA - Request for a Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment to change the land use designation of approximately 4.47 acres from Residential Medium Density (RM) to Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM), on property generally located west of EI Camino Real, north and south of Poinsettia Lane, in Local Facilities Management Zone 21. RECOMMENDATION That the Plaiming Conmiission ADOPT Plaiming Commission Resolution No. 5679, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION ofthe Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and ADOPT Planning Conunission Resolutions No. 5680 and 5681, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of GPA 04-04 and LCPA 04-04, based upon the findings contained therein. II. INTRODUCTION The project involves a City-initiated action that would change the General Plan and Local Coastal Program land use designations for properties within the Lohf and Steiner subdivisions to correct an existing General Plan/Zoning inconsistency. The existing General Plan land use and zoning designation boundaries are not coincident and do not completely follow the property lines created by the subdivision, resulting in some lots having two General Plan designations and forcing the existing R-l-Q zoning to implement two General Plan designations within the same residential subdivision. The proposal would relocate the General Plan land use designation boundary to the subdivision boundary, resulting in a change from Residential Medium Density (RM) to Residential Low Medium Density (RLM) over approximately 4.47 acres. All of the property covered by the proposed land use designation change is already developed and has no potential of further subdivision, therefore no impacts to the yield of the properties will occur. The proposal is consistent with all applicable policies and regulations and staff has no issues with the proposed land use designation change. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The City of Carlsbad is proposing a General Plan Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment to adjust the General Plan land use designation boundary within the Lohf and Steiner subdivisions. The proposal would adjust the boundary between the RLM and RM land use designation boundary over approximately 4.47 acres, relocating the land use boimdary to be coincident with the subdivision boundaries and the existing R-l-Q zoning designation boundary. GPA 04-04/LCPA 04-04 - LOHF SUBDP/ISION GPA August 4, 2004 Page 2 The land use designation of the Local Coastal Program would be adjusted through the accompanying Local Coastal Program Amendment. The subject properties are located west of El Camino Real, north and south of Poinsettia Lane and are all developed with single-family homes. The properties were subdivided through the Lohf Subdivision (CT 97-15) and the Steiner Subdivision (CT 99-13). Both subdivisions have been constracted and occupied. No adjustments to the approved development are necessary to implement the proposed General Plan and Local Coastal Program Amendments. No ftirther subdivision of land is possible within the area proposed for boundary adjustment and all exactions, including public facilities and affordable housing, have occurred and will not be impacted by the proposed actions. The adjustment of the boundaries is part of a Citywide effort to bring the General Plan and Zoning into conformity. Areas within the City where the General Plan and Zoning Maps are not in conformity have been identified and targeted for actions to bring the designations into consistency. Currently, the General Plan boundary crosses through the Lohf and Steiner subdivisions, resulting in several parcels having two General Plan designations and the existing One Family Residential with Qualified Development Overlay (R-l-Q) zoning designation implementing two different General Plan designations within the same subdivisions. The proposed boundary would follow the subdivision boundaries to the east and north, as well as the existing R-l-Q zoning designation boundary. The Lohf Subdivision GPA is subject to the following regulations: A. General Plan; B. Local Coastal Program; C. Zoning Ordinance and Existing Subdivisions; D. Growth Management Ordinance (Chapter 21.90 ofthe Zoning Ordinance); and E. Zone 21 Local Facilities Management Plan. IV. ANALYSIS The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency with the applicable policies and regulations listed above. The following analysis section discusses comphance with each of these regulations/policies utilizing both text and tables. A. General Plan The Lohf Subdivision GPA is consistent with the applicable policies and programs of the General Plan. Particularly relevant to the land use designation amendment request are the Land Use, Housing, and Open Space and Conservation Elements. Table 1 below indicates how the project comphes with these particular elements ofthe General Plan. GPA 04-04/LCPA 04-04 - LOHF SUBDIVISION GPA August 4, 2004 Page 3 TABLE 1 - GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE Element Use Classification, Goal, Objective or Program Proposed Use and Improvements Compliance Land Use The RLM and RM designations would be divided by the existing subdivision boundaries. The Lohf Subdivision was constmcted at a density of 2.2 du/ac and the Steiner Subdivision at 3.0 du/ac, both consistent with the RLM land use designation. Yes Housing Provide sufficient, new affordable housing to meet the needs of groups with special requirements. The proposed land use boundary adjustment does not affect the ability of the project to provide its proportionate share of affordable housing in that the developers already purchased affordable housing credits in the Villa Loma apartment project. Yes Open Space and Conservation Preserve open spaces in as natural a state as possible. The proposed land use boundary adjustment does not alter the approved development, thereby continuing to preserve the approved natural open space within the subdivision boundaries. Yes As shown by the above table, the project would ensure conformance with the General Plan. B. Local Coastal Program The subject properties are located in the Mello n segment of the City's Local Coastal Program (LCP). The LCP consists of two parts - the Land Use Plan and the implementing ordinances. For this portion of the Mello II segment, the implementing ordinances consist of the applicable portions of the Zoning Ordinance. This section addresses only compliance with the Land Use Plan since Zoning Ordinance compliance is discussed in Section C below. The policies of the Mello- II Land Use Plan emphasize topics such as preservation of agricultural and scenic resources, protection of environmentally sensitive resources, provision of shoreline access, and prevention of geologic instability and erosion. The proposed land use designation change from RM to RLM is consistent with the policies contained in the Land Use Plan for the Mello n segment of the LCP. Since all of the affected properties are already developed and no additional development is proposed with this project, no impacts to any physical features, such as scenic resources, environmentally sensitive areas, or geologic features, will occur. The change from RM to RLM over the developed properties does not preclude the continued conformance with the Mello II segment policies. The land use change represents the relocation of an existing boundary between the RM and RLM designations; therefore no new land use is being added to the plan. Given the above, the proposed Lohf Subdivision GPA is consistent with the Mello II Land Use Plan ofthe LCP. GPA 04-04/LCPA 04-04 - LOHF SUBDIVISION GPA August 4, 2004 Page 4 C. Zoning Ordinance/Existing Subdivisions The proposed Lohf Subdivision. GPA must be consistent with the existing Zoning and the existing, developed subdivisions. The subject area of the proposed land use change is zoned One Family Residential with a Qualified Development Overlay (R-l-Q), as is the remainder of the Lohf Subdivision. The R-l zone is the preferred zoning designation to implement the RLM General Plan land use designation. As stated above, the area proposed for the land use change covers a portion of the existing Lohf Subdivision and the entire existing Steiner Subdivision. The Lohf Subdivision was constracted at a net density of 2.2 dwelling units per developable acre and the Steiner Subdivision was constracted at a net density of 3.0 dwellings per acre. Both of these existing densities are within the range ofthe RLM designation (0.0 - 4.0 dwellings per acre) and below the Growth Control Point (3.2 dwelling units per acre); therefore the proposed land use designation is appropriate for the existing land use. There are no lots within the area that could be fiirther subdivided; therefore the proposed land use change does not affect any fiiture development in the area. Given the above, the proposed Lohf Subdivision land use change is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and the existing subdivisions. D. Growth Management Ordinance Any request to change the land use of a property must be consistent with the City's Growth Management Plan. Since the area proposed for the land use change is fully developed, all public facilities necessary to serve the Lohf Subdivision and Steiner Subdivision developments are already in place. Therefore, the proposed land use change would not have any impacts on pubhc facilities or services. In addition, all excess dwelling units resulting from the development of the property at a lower density than the Growth Management Control Point for the RM designation have been extracted. The proposed land use change would therefore not result in any additional dwelling units being deposited in the excess dwelling unit bank. Given the above, the proposed land use change is consistent with the Growth Management Ordinance. V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The potential environmental impacts due to the proposed land use and zoning boundary adjustment was reviewed for potentially significant adverse impacts to the enviroiunent pursuant to the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). No constraction or revisions to the existing residential subdivisions are proposed with the boundary revisions, therefore no impacts to physical features would occur. The boundary adjustments bring the General Plan, Zoning and Local Coastal Program into conformance with each other and do not impact the existing approved subdivision. No land within the area of the boundary adjustments could be further subdivided and the proposed land use and zoning changes do not affect the ability of the project to provide its proportionate share of housing affordable to lower income households. Given the above, the proposed land use and zoning designation boundary adjustment would not produce any sigmficant adverse impacts to the environment. The Planning Director issued a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration on June 29, 2004 for a 20-day pubhc review and no comments were received. GPA 04-04/LCPA 04-04 - LOHF SUBDIVISION GPA August 4, 2004 Page 5 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5679 (Neg. Dec.) 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5680 (GPA) 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5681 (LCPA) 4. Location Map 5. Background Data Sheet (with attached list of affected parcels) s/r£ LOHF SUBDIVISION GPA GPA 04-04/LCPA 04-04 CASE NO: BACKGROUND DATA SHEET GPA 04-04/LCPA 04-04 CASE NAME: Lohf Subdivision GPA APPLICANT: Citv ofCarlsbad REQUEST AND LOCATION: Request for a Negative Declaration. General Plan Amendment, and Local Coastal Program Amendment to change the land use designation of approximately 4.47 acres from Residential Medium Densitv (RM) to Residential Low-Medium Densitv (RLM) on propertv generallv located west of El Camino Real, north and south of Poinsettia Lane. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1 through 9 of Carlsbad Tract CT 99-13, Steiner Property, according to Map No. 14039, filed in the Office of the Countv Recorder of San Diego Countv on September 19. 2000; and Lots 1 through 13 and 49 through 51 of Carlsbad Tract CT 97-15. Lohf Subdivision, according to Map No. 13839. filed in the Office of the Countv Recorder of San Diego Countv on August 23, 1999, all in the Citv of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of Califomia APN: see attached Acres: 4.47 Proposed No. of Lots/Units: N/A GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation: RM (proposed to change to RLM) Density Allowed: 4.0 - 8.0 du/ac Existing Zone: R-l-O Density Proposed: 0.0 - 4.0 du/ac Proposed Zone: R-l-O Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use: Zoning General Plan Current Land Use Site R-l-Q RM Single family residential North RD-M-Q RM Open space South R-l-Q RLM Single family residential East, L-C RLM Vacant/Open space West R-l-Q RLM Single family residential PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: Carlsbad Unified Water District: Carlsbad Municipal Sewer District: Carlsbad Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): N/A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Negative Declaration, issued I I Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated_ List of Affected Parcels Lohf Subdivision General Plan Amendment Assessor's Parcel Number Address 215-920-01 1772 Dove Lane 215-920-02 6838 Moorhen Place 215-920-03 6834 Moorhen Place 215-920-04 6835 Moorhen Place 215-920-05 6839 Moorhen Place 215-920-41 1767 Oriole Court 215-921-01 6830 Moorhen Place 215-921-02 6826 Moorhen Place 215-921-03 6822 Moorhen Place 215-921-04 6818 Moorhen Place 215-921-05 6814 Moorhen Place 215-921-06 6823 Moorhen Place 215-921-07 6827 Moorhen Place 215-921-08 6831 Moorhen Place 215-921-09 1770 Oriole Court 215-921-10 1760 Oriole Court 215-921-35 1756 Skimmer Court 215-921-36 1760 Skimmer Court 215-921-37 1764 Skimmer Court 215-921-38 1777 Skimmer Court 215-921-39 1773 Skimmer Court 215-921-40 1769 Skimmer Court 215-921-41 1765 Skimmer Court 215-921-42 (partially) 1761 Skimmer Court 215-921-43 (partially) 1757 Skimmer Court 215-921-45 1752 Skimmer Court Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department January 6, 2005 Bill Ponder California Coastal Commission Suite 103 7575 Metropolitan Dr San Diego CA 92108-4421 SUBJECT: LCPA #3-04F (LOHF) AND LCPA #3-04H (THOMPSON/TABATA) Dear Bill: This correspondence is in response to your letter, dated December 8, 2004 regarding Carlsbad's third major LCP amendment package. Please find enclosed four (4) copies of the submittal items requested for the above-referenced LCPA applications. The items submitted are as follows: LCPA #3-04F (Lohf): 1. Planning Commission and City Council meeting minutes. No persons requested to speak, therefore there are no speaker slips. 2. 11" X 17" copies of the existing zoning and land use designations;'for the site and its surroundings. 3. The open space portion of the Lohf residential development is located within the HMP hardline conservation area. City staff is currently processing a comprehensive Zone Change, General Plan Amendment, and Local Coastal Program Amendment (where necessary) to change the designations of all project-created open space lots to Open Space. This action will be submitted to the Coastal Commission for an LCPA once processed through the City Planning Commission and City Council. Should the Commission staff prefer that the current LCPA be postponed until such time that the Open Space designation project is submitted, the City would have no objection. LCPA #3-04H (Thompson/Tabata): 1. Planning Commission and City Council meeting minutes. No persons requested to speak, therefore there are no speaker slips. 2. 11" x 17" copies of the existing zoning and land use designations for the site and its surroundings. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-73f4 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us 3. 24" x 36" copies of the original projects tentative map slope analysis. Also included is the LCPA that approved the original project development, including the open space delineation (LCPA 1-2002D - Thompson/Tabata). As required by the attached Coastal Commission staff report, the onsite areas of native vegetated habitat and southern willow scrub were to be secured through recordation of an open space conservation easement in favor of the City. This was accomplished through the Final Subdivision Map and, since no development is proposed with this minor boundary line adjustment to the designations, no alteration of the previously required open space securities is proposed. Please feel free to contact me at (760) 602-4623 if you have any questions or would like additional information. Thank you. Sincerely, MICHAEL GRI Senior Planner Enclosures C: Dennis Turner Eric Munoz File Copy The City of Carlsbad Planning Department A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Item No. ® Application complete date: N/A P.C. AGENDA OF: August 18, 2004 Project Planner: Michael Grim Project Engineer: N/A SUBJECT: 1. GPA 04-04/LCPA 04-04 - LOHF SUBDIVISION GPA - Request for a Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment to change the land use designation of approximately 4.47 acres from Residential Medium Density (RM) to Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM), on property generally located west of El Camino Real, north and south of Poinsettia Lane, in Local Facilities Management Zone 21. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 5679, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION ofthe Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5680 and 5681, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of GPA 04-04 and LCPA 04-04, based upon the findings contained therein. IL EXPLANATION This item was scheduled to be heard at the August 4, 2004 meeting, which was canceled due to lack of a quoram. The dates on the staff report and plans have not been changed. The dates on the resolutions have been changed to reflect the meeting and adoption date of August 18, 2004. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5679, 5680 and 5681 2. Staff Report dated August 4, 2004, with attachments The City of Carlsbad Planning; Department A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Item No, ® Application complete date: N/A P.C. AGENDA OF: August 4, 2004 Project Planner: Michael Grim Project Engineer: N/A SUBJECT: GPA 04-04/LCPA 04-04 - LOHF SUBDIVISION GPA - Request for a Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment to change the land use designation of approximately 4.47 acres from Residential Medium Density (RM) to Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM), on property generally located west of El Camino Real, north and south of Poinsettia Lane, in Local Facilities Management Zone 21. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 5679, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION ofthe Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and ADOPT Plamiing Commission Resolutions No. 5680 and 5681, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of GPA 04-04 and LCPA 04-04, based upon the findings contained therein. II. INTRODUCTION The project involves a City-initiated action that would change the General Plan and Local Coastal Program land use designations for properties within the Lohf and Steiner subdivisions to correct an existing General Plan/Zoning inconsistency. The existing General Plan land use and zoning designation boundaries are not coincident and do not completely follow the property lines created by the subdivision, resulting in some lots having two General Plan designations and forcing the existing R-l-Q zoning to implement two General Plan designations within the same residential subdivision. The proposal would relocate the General Plan land use designation boundary to the subdivision boundary, resulting in a change from Residential Medium Density (RM) to Residential Low Medium Density (RLM) over approximately 4.47 acres. All of the property covered by the proposed land use designation change is already developed and has no potential of further subdivision, therefore no impacts to the yield of the properties will occur. The proposal is consistent with all applicable policies and regulations and staff has no issues with the proposed land use designation change. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The City of Carlsbad is proposing a General Plan Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment to adjust the General Plan land use designation boundary within the Lohf and Steiner subdivisions. The proposal would adjust the boundary between the RLM and RM land use designation boundary over approximately 4.47 acres, relocating the land use boundary to be coincident with the subdivision boundaries and the existing R-l-Q zoning designation boundary. Q GPA 04-04/LCPA 04-04 - LOHF SUBDP/ISION GPA August 4, 2004 Page 2 The land use designation of the Local Coastal Program would be adjusted through the accompanying Local Coastal Program Amendment. The subject properties are located west of El Camino Real, north and south of Poinsettia Lane and are all developed with single-family homes. The properties were subdivided through the Lohf Subdivision (CT 97-15) and the Steiner Subdivision (CT 99-13). Both subdivisions have been constracted and occupied. No adjustments to the approved development are necessary to implement the proposed General Plan and Local Coastal Program Amendments. No further subdivision of land is possible within the area proposed for boundary adjustment and all exactions, including public facilities and affordable housing, have occurred and will not be impacted by the proposed actions. The adjustment of the boundaries is part of a Citywide effort to bring the General Plan and Zoning into conformity. Areas within the City where the General Plan and Zoning Maps are not in conformity have been identified and targeted for actions to bring the designations into consistency. Currently, the General Plan boundary crosses through the Lohf and Steiner subdivisions, resulting in several parcels having two General Plan designations and the existing One Family Residential with Qualified Development Overlay (R-l-Q) zoning designation implementing two different General Plan designations within the same subdivisions. The proposed boundary would follow the subdivision boundaries to the east and north, as well as the existing R-l-Q zoning designation boundary. The Lohf Subdivision GPA is subject to the following regulations: A. General Plan; B. Local Coastal Program; C. Zoning Ordinance and Existing Subdivisions; D. Growth Management Ordinance (Chapter 21.90 of the Zoning Ordinance); and E. Zone 21 Local Facihties Management Plan. IV. ANALYSIS The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency with the applicable policies and regulations listed above. The following analysis section discusses compliance with each of these regulations/policies utilizing both text and tables. A. General Plan The Lohf Subdivision GPA is consistent with the applicable policies and programs of the General Plan. Particularly relevant to the land use designation amendment request are the Land Use, Housing, and Open Space and Conservation Elements. Table 1 below indicates how the project complies with these particular elements ofthe General Plan. GPA 04-04/LCPA 04-04 August 4, 2004 Page 3 LOHF SUBDP/ISION GPA TABLE 1 - GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE Element Use Classification, Goal, Objective or Program Proposed Use and Improvements Compliance Land Use The RLM and RM designations would be divided by the existing subdivision boundaries. The Lohf Subdivision was constructed at a density of 2.2 du/ac and the Steiner Subdivision at 3.0 du/ac, both consistent with the RLM land use designation. Yes Housing Provide sufficient, new affordable housing to meet the needs of groups with special requirements. The proposed land use boundary adjustment does not affect the ability of the project to provide its proportionate share of affordable housing in that the developers already purchased affordable housing credits in the Villa Loma apartment project. Yes Open Space and Conservation Preserve open spaces in as natural a state as possible. The proposed land use boundary adjustment does not alter the approved development, thereby continuing to preserve the approved natural open space within the subdivision boundaries. Yes As shown by the above table, the project would ensure conformance with the General Plan. B. Local Coastal Program The subject properties are located in the Mello II segment of the City's Local Coastal Program (LCP). The LCP consists of two parts - the Land Use Plan and the implementing ordinances. For this portion of the Mello II segment, the implementing ordinances consist of the applicable portions of the Zoning Ordinance. This section addresses only compliance with the Land Use Plan since Zoning Ordinance compliance is discussed in Section C below. The policies of the Mello II Land Use Plan emphasize topics such as preservation of agricultural and scenic resources, protection of environmentally sensitive resources, provision of shoreline access, and prevention of geologic instability and erosion. The proposed land use designation change from RM to RLM is consistent with the policies contained in the Land Use Plan for the Mello II segment of the LCP. Since all of the affected properties are already developed and no additional development is proposed with this project, no impacts to any physical features, such as scenic resources, environmentally sensitive areas, or geologic features, will occur. The change from RM to RLM over the developed properties does not preclude the continued conformance with the Mello II segment policies. The land use change represents the relocation of an existing boundary between the RM and RLM designations; therefore no new land use is being added to the plan. Given the above, the proposed Lohf Subdivision GPA is consistent with the Mello II Land Use Plan ofthe LCP. GPA 04-04/LCPA 04-04 - LOHF SUBDIVISION GPA August 4, 2004 Page 4 C. Zoning Ordinance/Existing Subdivisions The proposed Lohf Subdivision GPA must be consistent with the existing Zoning and the existing, developed subdivisions. The subject area of the proposed land use change is zoned One Family Residential with a Qualified Development Overlay (R-l-Q), as is the remainder of the Lohf Subdivision. The R-l zone is the preferred zoning designation to implement the RLM General Plan land use designation. As stated above, the area proposed for the land use change covers a portion of the existing Lohf Subdivision and the entire existing Steiner Subdivision. The Lohf Subdivision was constracted at a net density of 2.2 dwelling units per developable acre and the Steiner Subdivision was constracted at a net density of 3.0 dwellings per acre. Both of these existing densities are within the range of the RLM designation (0.0 - 4.0 dwellings per acre) and below the Growth Control Point (3.2 dwelling units per acre); therefore the proposed land use designation is appropriate for the existing land use. There are no lots within the area that could be further subdivided; therefore the proposed land use change does not affect any future development in the area. Given the above, the proposed Lohf Subdivision land use change is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and the existing subdivisions. D. Growth Management Ordinance Any request to change the land use of a property must be consistent with the City's Growth Management Plan. Since the area proposed for the land use change is fully developed, all public facilities necessary to serve the Lohf Subdivision and Steiner Subdivision developments are already in place. Therefore, the proposed land use change would not have any impacts on public facilities or services. In addition, all excess dwelling units resulting from the development ofthe property at a lower density than the Growth Management Control Point for the RM designation have been extracted. The proposed land use change would therefore not result in any additional dwelling units being deposited in the excess dwelling unit bank. Given the above, the proposed land use change is consistent with the Growth Management Ordinance. V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The potential environmental impacts due to the proposed land use and zoning boundary adjustment was reviewed for potentially significant adverse impacts to the environment pursuant to the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). No constraction or revisions to the existing residential subdivisions are proposed with the boundary revisions, therefore no impacts to physical features would occur. The boundary adjustments bring the General Plan, Zoning and Local Coastal Program into conformance with each other and do not impact the existing approved subdivision. No land within the area of the boundary adjustments could be fiirther subdivided and the proposed land use and zoning changes do not affect the ability of the project to provide its proportionate share of housing affordable to lower income households. Given the above, the proposed land use and zoning designation boundary adjustment would not produce any significant adverse impacts to the environment. The Planning Director issued a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration on June 29, 2004 for a 20-day public review and no comments were received. GPA 04-04/LCPA 04-04 - LOHF SUBDP/ISION GPA August 4, 2004 Page 5 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5679 (Neg. Dec.) 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5680 (GPA) 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5681 (LCPA) 4. Location Map 5. Background Data Sheet (with attached list of affected parcels) SITE LOHF SUBDIVISION GPA GPA 04-04/LCPA 04-04 CASE NO: BACKGROUND DATA SHEET GPA 04-04/LCPA 04-04 CASE NAME: Lohf Subdivision GPA APPLICANT: Citv of Carisbad REQUEST AND LOCATION: Request for a Negative Declaration. General Plan Amendment, and Local Coastal Program Amendment to change the land use designation of approximatelv 4.47 acres from Residential Medium Densitv (RM) to Residential Low-Medium Densitv (RLM) on propertv generallv located west of El Camino Real, north and south of Poinsettia Lane. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1 through 9 of Carisbad Tract CT 99-13. Steiner Propertv. according to Map No. 14039, filed in the Office of the Countv Recorder of San Diego Countv on September 19. 2000: and Lots 1 through 13 and 49 through 51 of Carisbad Tract CT 97-15. Lohf Subdivision, according to Map No. 13839, filed in the Office of the Countv Recorder of San Diego Countv on August 23, 1999, all in the City of Carlsbad, Countv of San Diego, State of Califomia APN: see attached Acres: 4.47 Proposed No. of Lots/Units: N/A GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation: RM (proposed to change to RLM) Density Allowed: 4.0 - 8.0 du/ac Existing Zone: R-l-O Density Proposed: 0.0 - 4.0 du/ac Proposed Zone: R-l-O Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use Zoning General Plan Current Land Use Site R-l-Q RM Single family residential North RD-M-Q RM Open space South R-l-Q RLM Single family residential East L-C RLM Vacant/Open space West R-l-Q RLM Single family residential PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: Carlsbad Unified Water District: Carlsbad Municipal Sewer District: Carlsbad Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): N/A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Negative Declaration, issued I I Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated_ List of Affected Parcels Lohf Subdivision General Plan Amendment Assessor's Parcel Number Address 215-920-01 1772 Dove Lane 215-920-02 6838 Moorhen Place 215-920-03 6834 Moorhen Place 215-920-04 6835 Moorhen Place 215-920-05 6839 Moorhen Place 215-920-41 1767 Oriole Court 215-921-01 6830 Moorhen Place 215-921-02 6826 Moorhen Place 215-921-03 6822 Moorhen Place 215-921-04 6818 Moorhen Place 215-921-05 6814 Moorhen Place 215-921-06 6823 Moorhen Place 215-921-07 6827 Moorhen Place 215-921-08 6831 Moorhen Place 215-921-09 1770 Oriole Court 215-921-10 1760 Oriole Court 215-921-35 1756 Skimmer Court 215-921-36 1760 Skimmer Court 215-921-37 1764 Skimmer Court 215-921-38 1777 Skimmer Court 215-921-39 1773 Skimmer Court 215-921-40 1769 Skimmer Court 215-921-41 1765 Skimmer Court 215-921-42 (partially) 1761 Skimmer Court 215-921-43 (partially) 1757 Skimmer Court 215-921-45 1752 Skimmer Court