Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLCPA 04-10; Thompson/Tabata; Local Coastal Program Amendment (LCPA)CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION 1) APPUCATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECKBOXES) • • • • • • • • • • (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) Administrative Permit Administrative Variance Coastal Development Permit Conditional Use Permit Condominium Permit Environmental Impact Assessment General Plan Amendment Hillside Development Permit Local Coastal Program Amendment Master Plan Non-Residential Planned Development Planned Development Permit cH-io I I Planned Industrial Permit I I Planning Commission Determination I I Precise Development Plan I I Redevelopment Permit I I Site Development Plan I I Special Use Permit I I Specific Plan I I Tentativo Parcol Map Obtain from Engineering Department I I Tentative Tract Map I I Variance Zone Change I ] List other applications not specified IFOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) 2) 3) 4) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S) PROJECT NAME BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: •Tr 5) OWNER NAME (Print or TypeJ r 6) APPLICANT ^ AME (Print or Type) MAILING ADDRESS MAILING XDDRESS CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE 1 CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. X 1 CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. X SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATURE DATE 7) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M. Form 16 Rev. 04/04 PAGE 1 OF 2 / f I I I • 8) LOCATION OF PROJECT ON THE <JK. \ V U LLC* STREET ADDRESS SIDE OF (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) (NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREET) (KlAME OF OF STREET) 9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 10) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS 13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION 16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE 19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 22) EXISTING ZONING 1^ Ak 11) NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNITS 14) PROPOSED IND OFFICE/ SQUARE FOOTAGE 1 7) PROPOSED INCREASE IN ADT 20) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN 1^ 1^ 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS 15) PROPOSED COMM SOUARE FOOTAGE 18) PROPOSED SEWER USAGE IN EDU 21) PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION PROPOSED ZONING _gP^CL €ai^ 24) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS* TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE SIGNATURE FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION 0 UPA TOTAL FEE REQUIRED RECEIVED APR 3 0 20M CITY OF CARLSBAD DAT^isAM|l^lN=©.D8p3r>. RECEIVED RECEIVED BY: DATE FEE PAID RECEIPT NO. PAGE 2 OF 2 The Coast News Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County. Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to The Coast News, P.O. Box 232-550, Encinitas, CA 92023 (760) 436-9737 Proof of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; 1 am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. 1 am principal clerk of the printer of The Coast News, a newspaper printed and published weekly and which news- paper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation for the cities of Del Mar, Solana Beach, Encinitas/Cardiff, Carlsbad, Oceanside, San Marcos/Vista and the County Judicial District by the Superior Court of the State of Califomia, County of San Diego (8/4/94, #677114, B2393, P396); and that the notice, of which the annexed is a print- ed copy, has been published in, each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: June 10. 2004 I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of Califomia on the 10th day of June, 2004. Clerk of the Printer Space above for County Clerk's Filing Stamp PUBLIC NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES: Please be advised that the City of Carlsbad is considering text amendments to its Local Coastal Program (LCP) as summarized below. This amendment Is being proposed by the City of Carlsbad Planning Department and is currently under review. This notice hereby opens a six week review period after which the Planning Commission and City Council will consider all comments and act on the proposed amendment. The Planning Commission hearing is expected to take place in July, 2004, and will be duly noticed. The City Council hearing is expected to take place in August, 2004, and will be duly noticed. Copies of the LCP amendment are available for review at the following locations: (1) Carlsbad Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue; (2) City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive; (3) Carlsbad Main Library, 1775 Dove Lane; (4) Georgina Cole Library, 1250 Carlsbad Village Drive; and (5) the California Coastal Commission, 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, CA 92108-4402 PROPOSED LCP AMENDMENT SUMMARY LCPA 04-10 - THOMPSON/TABATA GPA2C The City's Local Coastal Program Includes a general Land Use Map and Zoning Map that Indicate the planned land use for properties within the Coastal Zone. This specific Land Use Map and Zoning Map Amendments are proposed as fol- lows: Adjust the boundary between the Residential Low-Medium Density (RLiVI) and Residential Medium Density (RM) land use designations and the boundary between the One Family Residential (R-l-Q) and Residential Multiple-Density (RD-M) zoning designations to follow the approved road alignment within the Thompson/Tabata subdivision on property generally located west of Aviara Parkway Real, north and south of Poinsettia Lane. If you have any questions, please call Michael Grim in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4623. Written comments should be sent to the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008. PUBLISH DATE: PUBLISH DATE FOR NORTH COUNTY TIMES: PUBLISH DATE FOR COAST NEWS: CN 8185 Jun. 10, 2004. JUNE 10, 2004 JUNE 10, 2004 JUNE 10, 2004 THOMPSON/TABATA GPA/ZC GPA 04-11/ZC 04-07/LCPA 04-10 PROOF OF PUBLIC TION (2010 i& 2011 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of This space is f "^^he County Clerk's Filing Stamp Of C3rhb3(i Proof of Publication of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of Califomia, for the City of Oceanside and the City of Escondido, Court Decree number 171349, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at SAN MARCOS Califomia CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES: Piease be advised that the City of Carlsbad is considering text : amendments to its Local Coastal Program (LCP) as summa-rized below. This amendment is being proposed by the City of Carlsbad Planninq Department and is currently under review. This notice hereby opens a six-week review period afler which the Planning Commission and City Council will consid-er all comments and act on the proposed amendment. The Planning Commission hearing is expected to take place in July, 2004, and will be duly noticed. Copies of the LCP amendment are available for review at the following locations: (1)_Carlsbad Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue; (2) City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Vil-lage Dnve* (3) Carlsbad Main Library 1775 Dove Lane- (4) Georgina Cole Library 1250 Carlsbad Village Drive; and (5) the Califomia Coastal Commission, 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103^San Diego, CA 92108-4402 P^IOPOSED LCP AMENDMENT SUMMARY LCPA 04-10 - THOMPSON/TABATA GPA/ZC The City's Local Coastal Program includes a general Land Use Map and Zoning Map that indicate the planned land use for properties within The Coastal Zone. This specific Land Use Map and Zoning Map Amendments are proposed as follows: Adjust the boundary between the Residential Low-Medium Density (RM) land use designations and the boundary be-tween the One Family Residential (R-l-Q) and Residential Multiple-Density (RD-M) zoning designations to follow the ap-proved road alignment within fhe Thompson/Tabata subdivi-sion on property generaljy located west of Aviara Parkway Real, north and south of Poinsettia Lane. If you have any questions, please call Michael Grim in the Planning Department at 760-602-4623. Written comments should be sent to the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad. Califomia 92008. PUBLISH DATE: JUNE 10, 2004 THOMPSON/TABATA GPA/ZC GPA 04-11/ZC 04-07/LCPA 04-10 NCT 1650212 June 10, 2004 This iil Day of June, 2004 i^ NOR( Signature PH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising City of Carlsbad Planning Department PUBLIC NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES: Please be advised that the City of Carlsbad is considering text amendments to its Local Coastal Program (LCP) as summarized below. This amendment is being proposed by the City of Carlsbad Planning Department and is currently under review. This notice hereby opens a six week review period after which the Planning Commission and City Council will consider all comments and act on the proposed amendment. The Planning Commission hearing is expected to take place in July, 2004, and will be duly noticed. The City Council hearing is expected to take place in August, 2004, and will be duly noticed. Copies ofthe LCP amendment are available for review at the following locations: (1) Carlsbad Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue; (2) City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive; (3) Carlsbad Main Library, 1775 Dove Lane; (4) Georgina Cole Library, 1250 Carlsbad Village Drive; and (5) the Califomia Coastal Commission, 7575 Metropohtan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, CA 92108-4402 PROPOSED LCP AMENDMENT SUMMARY LCPA 04-10 - THOMPSON/TABATA GPA/ZC The City's Local Coastal Program includes a general Land Use Map and Zoning Map that indicate the planned land use for properties within the Coastal Zone. This specific Land Use Map and Zoning Map Amendments are proposed as follows: Adjust the boundary between the Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM) and Residential Medium Density (RM) land use designations and the boundary between the One Family Residential (R-l-Q) and Residential Multiple-Density (RD-M) zoning designations to follow the approved road alignment within the Thompson/Tabata subdivision on property generally located west of Aviara Parkway Real, north and south of Poinsettia Lane. If you have any questions, please call Michael Grim in the Planning Department at (760) 602- 4623. Written comments should be sent to the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carisbad, Cahfomia 92008. PUBLISH DATE: JUNE 10, 2004 PUBLISH DATE FOR NORTH COUNTY TIMES: JUNE 10, 2004 PUBLISH DATE FOR COAST NEWS: JUNE 10, 2004 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.cl.carlsbad.ca.us SITE THOMPSON/TABATA GPA/ZC GPA 04-11/ZC 04-07/LCPA 04-10 WENDYWESTBERG STE 370 26440 LA ALAMEDA MISSION VIEJO CA 92691 CALTRANS DISTRICT 11 BILL FIGGE MAIL ST 50 P O BOX 85406 SAN DIEGO CA 92186-5406 REG WATER QUALITY CONTROL BD STE 100 9174 SKYPARK CT SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMIN BARRY BRAYER, AWP-8 PO BOX 92007 LOSANGELES CA 90009 WESTERN REG BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS RONALD M JAEGER 2800 COTTAGE WAY SACRAMENTO CA 95825 BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION & HSG AGENCY PATRICIA W NEAL DEPUTY SEC HOUSING STE 2450 980 NINTH ST SACRAMENTO CA 95814 CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK SUPERINTENDENT 1901 SPINNAKER DR SAN BUENAVENTURA CA 93001 COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CHAIRMAN 722 JACKSON PL NW WASHINGTON DC 20006 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE LOS ANGELES DIST ENGINEER PO BOX 2711 LOSANGELES CA 90053 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY STE 400 611 RYAN PLAZA DR ARLINGTON TX 76011-4005 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY CLIFFORD EMMERLING, DIR STE 350 901 MARKET ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103 DEPARTMENT OF FISH & GAME ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIV P O BOX 944246 SACRAMENTO CA 94244-2460 DEPARTMENT OF FOOD & AGRICULTURE STEVE SHAFFER, AGRICULTURE RESOURCES RM 100 1220 NST SACRAMENTO CA 95814 DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY DOUG WICKIZER, ENVIR COORD P O BOX 944246 SACRAMENTO CA 94244-2460 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVE DUNCAN LENT HOWARD, REG ADMIN 450 GOLDEN GATE AV SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL RM 700 110 WEST A ST SAN DIEGO CA 92101 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RM 5504 1120 N ST SACRAMENTO CA 95814 MARINE RESOURCES REGION, DR & G ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, SPR STEJ 4665 LAMPSON AVE LOS ALAMITOS CA 90720-5139 OFFICE OF PLANNING & RESEARCH OFFICE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS PO BOX 3044 SACRAMENTO CA 93044 NATIONAL OCEANIC & ATMOSPHERIC ADMIN OCRM,55MC4 N/ORM - 3 1305 EAST-WEST HWY SILVER SPRING MD 20910 SAN FRANCISCO BAY CONSERVATION & DEVMT COMMISSION BILL TRAVIS STE 2600 50 CALIFORNIA ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111-4704 STATE LANDS COMMISSION DWIGHT SANDERS STE 1005 100 HOWE AV SACRAMENTO CA 95825-8202 U S BUREAU OF LAND MGMT STE RM W1834 2800 COTTAGE WAY SACRAMENTO CA 95825 U S BUREAU OF RECLAMATION MID-PACIFIC REGION 2800 COTTAGE WAY SACRAMENTO CA 95825 U S FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE STE W-2605 2800 COTTAGE WAY SACRAMENTO CA 95825-1888 U S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS LILY ALYEA STE 702 333 MARKET ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105-2197 USDA - RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPT 4169 430 "G" ST DAVIS CA 95616 WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BD PO BOX 100 SACRAMENTO CA 95801 CALIFORNIA RESOURCES AGENCIES STE 1311 1416 9TH ST SACRAMENTO CA 95814 SANDAG-LAND USE COMMISS NAN VALERIO STE 800 401 "B" STREET SANDIEGO CA 92101 RANCHO CARLSBAD HOA RUSS KOHL 5200 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TED OWEN 5934 PRIESTLY DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 ANTHONY & DICKY BONS 25709 HILLCREST AV ESCONDIDO CA 92026-8650 REG WATER QUALITY CONTROL BD STE 100 9174 SKY PARK CT SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340 U S FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE LEE ANN CARRANZA 6010 HIDDEN VALLEY ROAD CARLSBAD CA 92009- CITYOF ENCINITAS COMDEV DEPT 505 S VULCAN AV ENCINITAS CA 92024 TABATA FARMS PO BOX 1338 CARLSBAD CA 92018-1338 SANDAG-EXEC DIRECTOR GARY GALLEGOS STE 800 1ST INT'L PLAZA 401 "B" ST SAN DIEGO CA 92101 LESLIE ESPOSITO 1893 AMELFI DR ENCINITAS CA 92024 CYRIL/MARY GIBSON 12142 ARGYLE DR LOS ALAMITOS CA 90702 LAKESHORE GARDENS TOM BENSON 7201 AVENIDA ENCINAS CARLSBAD CA 92009 LANIKAI LANE PARK SHARP SPACES 6550 PONTO DRIVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 JOHN LAMB 1446 DEVLIN DR LOSANGELES CA 90069 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC KIM BLESSANT 101 ASH STREET SAN DIEGO CA 92101- STATE LANDS COMMISSION MARY GRIGGS STE 100S 100 HOWE AV SACRAMENTO CA 95825-8202 COUNTY OF SD SUPERVISOR BILL HORN ART DANELL RM 335 1600 PACIFIC HIGHWAY SAN DIEGO CA 92101 PERRY A LAMB 890 MERE POINT RD BRUNSWICK ME 04011 S D CO PLANNING & LAND USE DEPT JAON VOKAC STE B-5 5201 RUFFIN ROAD SAN DIEGO CA 92123 COASTAL CONSERVANCY RICHARD RETECKI STE 1100 1330 BROADWAY OAKLAND CA 94612 FLOYD ASHBY P O BOX 232580 ENCINITAS CA 92023-2580 DALE/DONNA SCHREIBER 7163 ARGONAUTA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 GEORGE BOLTON 6583 BLACKRAIL RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 LENNAR HOMES CHRISTINE ZORTMAN STE 320 5780 FLEET ST CARLSBAD CA 92008-4702 BATIQUITOS LAGOON FOUNDATION JOHN BURNS PO BOX 130491 CARLSBAD CA 92009- notice has been mailed to all property owners/occupants listed herein/ / , Date._^/V^/y- ^ignntiir^^^ ^^/^^ ^- Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department January 6, 2005 Bill Ponder California Coastal Commission Suite 103 7575 Metropolitan Dr San Diego CA 92108-4421 SUBJECT: LCPA #3-04F (LOHF) AND LCPA #3-04H (THOMPSON/TABATA) Dear Bill: This correspondence is in response to your letter, dated December 8, 2004 regarding Carlsbad's third major LCP amendment package. Please find enclosed four (4) copies of the submittal items requested for the above-referenced LCPA applications. The items submitted are as follows: LCPA #3-04F (Lohf): 1. Planning Commission and City Council meeting minutes. No persons requested to speak, therefore there are no speaker slips. 2. 11" x 17" copies of the existing zoning and land use designations'for the site and its surroundings. 3. The open space portion of the Lohf residential development is located within the HMP hardline conservation area. City staff is currently processing a comprehensive Zone Change, General Plan Amendment, and Local Coastal Program Amendment (where necessary) to change the designations of all project-created open space lots to Open Space. This action will be submitted to the Coastal Commission for an LCPA once processed through the City Planning Commission and City Council. Should the Commission staff prefer that the current LCPA be postponed until such time that the Open Space designation project is submitted, the City would have no objection. LCPA #3-04H (Thompson/Tabata): 1. Planning Commission and City Council meeting minutes. No persons requested to speak, therefore there are no speaker slips. 2. 11" x 17" copies of the existing zoning and land use designations for the site and its surroundings. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.cl.carlsbad.ca.us 3. 24" X 36" copies of the original project's tentative map slope analysis. Also included is the LCPA that approved the original project development, including the open space delineation (LCPA 1-2002D - Thompson/Tabata). As required by the attached Coastal Commission staff report, the onsite areas of native vegetated habitat and southern willow scrub were to be secured through recordation of an open space conservation easement in favor of the City. This was accomplished through the Final Subdivision Map and, since no development is proposed with this minor boundary line adjustment to the designations, no alteration of the previously required open space securities is proposed. Please feel free to contact me at (760) 602-4623 if you have any questions or would like additional information. Thank you. Sincerely, MICHAEL GRII Senior Planner Enclosures C: Dennis Turner Eric Munoz File Copy Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department October 22, 2004 California Coastal Commission San Diego District Ste 103 7575 Metropolitan Dr San Diego CA 92108-4402 APPLICATION FOR LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT I. JURISDICTION CITY OF CARLSBAD - LCPA 04-10 SEGMENT? Mello II IL TYPE OF AMENDMENT SUBMITTAL (check) A) LUP K B) ZONING [Z C) LCP (Land Use & Zoning) [Z III. LCP STATUS Y/N, DATE A) LUP CERTIFIED Y-1980 B) ZONING CERTIFIED Y-1996 C) ZONING OF COMM. ACTION ON None SUGGESTED MODIFICATIONS D) PRIORCOMMISSION ACTION ON THIS None SUBMITTAL? IV. SUMMARY OF AMENDMENT PROPOSAL Adjustment to the boundary between the Residential Low Medium Density (RLM) and Residential Medium Density (RM) land use designations over approximately 7.9 acres on property generally located west of Aviara Parkway, south of Poin- settia Lane. V. COMMISSION OFFICE USE ONLY: AMENDMENT* _ DATE RECEIVED _ DATE FILED _ COMM. HEARING AGENDA COMMISSION ACTION: A: , AWM , D , Date VI. PROJECT PLANNER For information regarding this application, please contact Michael Grim, Planner at (760) 602-4623. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.cl.carlsbad.ca.us LCPA SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS -- CHECKLIST Council Resolution - signed and dated indicat- ing City intends to administer LCP consistent with the Coastal Act and indicating date LCPA will take effect. NOTE: All amendments take effect immedi- ately upon Coastal Commission ap- proval unless otherwise stated. A reproducible copy of Council adopted LCPA I I If new text indicates where it fits into certi- fied text. I I If revised text cleariy indicates using strikeouts and/or underiines showing modifications. If map change, submit replacement map. X (copy enclosed) 3. A discussion of amendments relationship to and effect on other sections of the previously certified LCP. 4. Zoning measures that will implement the LCPA. 5. Affect on public access (only for area between first public road and the Coast). 6. An analysis of potentially significant adverse cumulative impacts on coastal resources. 7. Copies of environmental review documents. 8. Summary of measures to ensure both public and agency participation. A List of public hearing dates ^ Notice of interested parties ^ Mailing list I Comments I Responses to comments X (copv enclosed) X (see attached) X (see attached) X (see attached) X (see attached) X (see attached) X (see attached & copies enclosed) N/A - none received N/A - none received All staff reports plus attachments. X (copy enclosed) 10. AMENDMENT'S RELATIONSHIP TO AND EFFECT ON OTHER SECTIONS OF THE PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED LCP The proposed LCP amendment involves only a redesignatlon of the subject property in the Mello II segmenL This redesignatlon would bring the land use of the property into conformance with the existing zoning of the property by making the zoning and land use boundary lines coincident. Given the focused nature of the proposed amendment, the action will have no effect on other sections of the previously certified LCP. 11. ZONING MEASURES THAT WILL IMPLEMENT THE LCPA The implementing zoning will include the Residential Multiple-Density (RD-M) and the One Family Residential (R-1) zones (Chapter 21.10 and 21.24 of the Carisbad Municipal Code, respectively), as well as the Qualified Development Overiay Zone (Chapter 21.06 of the C.M.C). 12. AFFECT ON PUBLIC ACCESS The Thompson/Tabata project site is located 1.1 miles from the Pacific Ocean and 0.67 miles from the Batiquitos Lagoon and is surrounded by improved public streets and sidewalks. No shoreline access provisions apply to the project and adequate public access exists around the site. 13. ANALYSIS OF POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ON COASTAL RESOURCES The Thompson/Tabata site has been and continues to be designated for resi- dential development in the Mello II Land Use Plan. The site is currently being developed in accordance with the subdivision map (CT 98-14), approved in eariy 2002 and there is no development proposed with this LCP amendment. All exist- ing open space and resource areas will remain undisturbed in accordance with the approved development plan. Therefore, the proposed LCP amendment will have no significant adverse cumulative impacts on coastal resources. 14. SUMMARY OF MEASURES TO ENSURE BOTH PUBLIC AND AGENCY PARTICIPATION The Local Coastal Program Amendment was duly noticed for over the six-week period, from June 10, 2004 to September 14, 2004 and no comments were re- ceived. The proposed amendment was also reviewed through the duly noticed public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council, as listed be- low: PLANNING COMMISSION: July 21, 2004 CITYCOUNCIL September 14, 2004 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2004-294 2 . A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A NEGATIVE 3 DECLARATION, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, AND LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT FOR THE 4 THOMPSON/TABATA GPA LAND USE DESIGNATION BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY 5 LOCATED WEST OF AVIARA PARKWAY, SOUTH OF POINSETTIA LANE. IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 6 ZONE 20. CASE NAME: THOMPSON/TABATA GPA 7 CASE NO.: GPA 04-11/LCPA 04-10 8 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning 9 Commission did, on July 21, 2004, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to 10 consider a Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment, and Local Coastal Program 11 Amendment; and ^2 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of CaHsbad, on the i4th day of September 2004, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider said Negative Declaration. General Plan Amendment, and Local Coastal Program Amendment and at that time received recommendations, objections, protests, comments of all persons interested in or opposed to the Negative Declaration and/or GPA 04-11/LCPA 04-10; and NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council ofthe City of Carisbad as follows: 1. That all recitations are true and correct. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2. That the City Council approves City Council Resolution No. 2004-294 21 and that the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission as set forth in Planning- Commission Resolutions No. 5675, 5676, and 5677, on file with the City Clerk and made a part 22 hereof by reference, are the findings and conditions of the City Council. 23 3. That the application for a Negative Declaration and Local Coastal Program Amendment on property generally located west of Aviara Parkway, south of Poinsettia 24 Lane, is approved as shown in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5675 and 5677. 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4. That the application for a General Plan Amendment from Residential Medium Density (RM) to Residential Low Medium Density (RLM) on property generally located west of Aviara Parkway, south of Poinsettia Lane, as shown in Planning Commission Resolution No. 5676, is hereby accepted, approved in concept, and shall be formally approved with GPA Batch No. 2 comprised of GPA 02-05, GPA 03-05, GPA 03-08, GPA 03-13, GPA 04- 01. GPA 04-04. GPA 04-07. GPA 04-08. GPA 04-11. and GPA 04-13. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the I4th day of September 2004, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members Lewis, Finilla, Kulchin, Hall and Packard. NOES: None ABSENT: None ATTEST: V-O^RAINE 1^. WOOD, City Clerk (SEAL) -2-4 ^ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5676 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 3 CITY OF. CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE 4 ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN TO ADJUST THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN THE RESIDENTLAL LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY (RLM) AND THE RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM 6 DENSITY (RM) LAND USE DESIGNATIONS OVER APPROXIMATELY 7.9 ACRES ON PROPERTY GENERALLY 7 LOCATED WEST OF AVIARA PARKWAY, SOUTH OF POINSETTIA LANE, IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 20. CASE NAME: THOMPSON/TABATA GPA CASE NO: GPA 04-11 5 8 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, City of Carlsbad, has filed a verified application with the City of 10 11 12 Carlsbad regarding property described as 13 A portion of the eastern half of the northeastern half and a portion of the southwestern quarter of Section 28, Township 12 South, Range 4 West in the San Bernardino Quadrant, in the City ofCarlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California 14 15 16 ("the Property"); and 17 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a General Plan Amendment as shown on Exhibit "GPA 04-11" dated July 21, 2004, attached hereto and on file 19 in the Carlsbad Plamiing Department THOMPSON/TABATA GPA - GPA 04-11 as provided 20 in Govemment Code Section 65350 et. seq. and Section 21.52.160 of the Carlsbad Municipal 21 22 Code; and 23 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 21st day of July 2004, hold a 24 duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the General Plan Amendment. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 .23 24 2^' 26 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, as follows: A) That the above recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of THOMPSON/TABATA GPA - GPA 04- 11, based on the following findings: Findings: 1. The proposed change in General Plan land use designation from RM to RLM is consistent with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance, and the existing subdivisions, in that the proposed designation reflects the existing approved single family development with densities from 2.56 to 3.89 dwelling units per acre; no property within the area proposed for change could be further subdivided beyond that approved through Carlsbad Tract CT 98-14; the proposed General Plan designation would be implemented by the R-l-Q and RD-M-Q zoning on the property; the existing approved subdivision has provided for its fair share of housing affordable to lower income households; and the adjustment of the boundary between RLM and RM will result in no individual lots being located within two General Plan designations. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, Cahfomia, held on the 21st day of July 2004, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Whitton, Commissioners Baker, Dominguez, Heineman, Montgomery and Segall NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ./FRANK H.' WHITTON, Chairpersor" • CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLI Planning Director PC RESO NO. 5676 GENERAL PLAN MAP CHANGE GPA: 04-11 draft final I I EXISTING PROPOSED Project Name: Thompson/Tabata GPA 1 Related Case File No(s): LCPA 04-10 Property/Legal Description(s): A portion ofthe eastem half of the northeastem half and a portion of the southwestem quarter of Section 28, Township 12 South, Range 4 West inn the San Bernardino Quadrant, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of Califomia G.P. Map Designation Change Approvals Property From: To: Council Approval Date: A. 214-170-80 See map for iine Resolution No: B. 214-170-81 adjustment Effective Date: C. 214-170-84 Signature: D. 214-170-85 E. 214-170-89 Attach additional pages if necessary 5 8 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5677 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF. CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE MELLO E SEGMENT OF THE CARLSBAD LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM TO ADJUST THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN THE RESIDENTIAL LOW MEDIUM DENSITY (RLM) AND 6 RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY (RM) LAND USE DESIGNATIONS OVER APPROXIMATELY 7.9 ACRES ON V PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF AVIARA PARKWAY, SOUTH OF POINSETTIA LANE, IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 20. 9 CASE NAME: THOMPSON/TABATA GPA CASE NO: LCPA 04-10 10 " 11 ^2 General Plan, and Zoning designations for properties in the Coastal Zone be in conformance; and 13 WHEREAS, City of Carlsbad, has filed a verified apphcation for an amendment 14 to the Local Coastal Program designations regarding property described as 15 A portion of the eastern half of the northeastern half and a 15 portion of the southwestern quarter of Section 28, Township 12 South, Range 4 West in the San Bernardino Quadrant, in the 17 City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, Cahfomia State law requires that the Local Coastal Program, ("the Property"); and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Local Coastal Program Amendment as shown on Exhibit "LCPA 04-10" dated July 21, 2004, attached hereto, 18 19 20 21 22 as provided in Pubhc Resources Code Section 30574 and Article 15 of Subchapter 8, Chapter 2, 23 Division 5.5 of Title 14 of the Cahfomia Code of Regulations of the Cahfomia Coastal 24 Commission Administrative Regulations; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 21st day of July 2004, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and 18 19 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Local Coastal Program Amendment; and 1 2 3 4 ^ WHEREAS, State Coastal Guidelines requires a six week public review period 6 for any amendment to the Local Coastal Program. 7 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning o Commission ofthe City ofCarlsbad, as follows: 9 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 10 B) At the end of the State mandated six week review period, starting on June 10, 2004 and ending on July 22, 2004, staff shall present to the City Council a jl^2 summary of the comments received. 13 C) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of THOMPSON/TABATA GPA - LCPA 04- 14 10 based on the following findings: Findings: 16 1. That the proposed Local Coastal Program Amendment meets the requirements of, and is 17 in conformity with, the policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act and all applicable policies of the Mello II segment of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program not being amended by this amendment, in that the project area has already been subdivided and graded in accordance with the Mello II segment of the Local Coastal Program and no impact to environmentally sensitive lands, agricultural lands, scenic resources, or geologic 20 stability will occur as a result of the proposed change in the land use designation. 21 ... 2. That the proposed amendment to the Mello II segment of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program is required to bring it into consistency with City's General Plan Land Use Map and Zoning Map. Conditions: 22 23 24 1. This approval is granted subject to the approval of GPA 04-11 and is subject to all 25 conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 5676 for that other approval incorporated herein by reference. 26 27 28 PC RESO NO. 5677 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting to the Planning Commission ofthe City of Carlsbad, held on the 21st day of July 2004, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: Chairperson Whitton, Commissioners Baker, Dominguez, Heineman, Montgomery and Segall None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ^RANK H. WHITTON, Chahperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director PC RESO NO. 5677 LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM LCPA: 04-10 draft 13 final • EXISTING PROPOSED i Related Case File No(s): GPA 04-77 Project Name: Thompson/Tabata GPA Property/Legal Description(s): A portion ofthe eastem half of the northeastem half and a portion ofthe southwestem quarter of Section 28, Township 12 South, Range 4 West inn the San Bernardino Quadrant, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of Califomia LCPA Map Designation C hange Approvals Property From: To: Council Approval Date: A. 214-170-80 See map for line Resolution No: B. 214-170-81 adjustment Effective Date: C. 214-170-84 Signature: D. 214-170-85 Signature: E. 214-170-89 Signature: Attach additional pages if necessary Signature: LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM LCPA: 04-10 draft IE! final • EXISTING PROPOSED I Related Case File No(s): GPA 04-1" Project Name: Thompson/Tabata GPA Property/Legal Description(s): A portion ofthe eastem half of the northeastem half and a portion ofthe southwestem quarter of Section 28, Township 12 South, Range 4 West inn the San Bernardino Quadrant, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of Califomia LCPA Map Designation C hange Approvals Property From: To: Council Approval Date: A. 214-170-80 See map for line Resolution No: B. 214-170-81 adjustment Effective Date: C. 214-170-84 Signature; D, 214-170-85 Signature; E. 214-170-89 Signature; Attach additional pages if necessary Signature; 5 ^ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5675 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 3 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO AMEND 4 THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN AND THE MELLO H SEGMENT OF THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM TO ADJUST THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN THE 6 RESIDENTIAL LOW MEDIUM DENSITY (RLM) AND RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY (RM) LAND USE 7 DESIGNATIONS OVER APPROXIMATELY 7.9 ACRES ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF AVIARA PARKWAY, SOUTH OF POINSETTL\ LANE, IN LOCAL 9 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 20. CASE NAME: THOMPSON/TABATA GPA 10 CASE NO.: GPA 04-11/LCPA 04-10 WHEREAS, City of Carlsbad, has filed a verified apphcation with the City of 12 Carlsbad regarding property described as 13 A portion of the eastern half of the northeastern half and a 14 portion of the southwestern quarter of Section 28, Township 12 South, Range 4 West in the San Bernardino Quadrant, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California ("the Property"); and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was prepared in conjunction with said 15 16 17 18 29 project; and 20 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 21st day of July, 2004, hold a 21 .. duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and 22 23 24 25 26 relating to the Negative Declaration. 27 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as follows: WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission considered all factors 28 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 1 2 .. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning 3 Commission hereby RECOMMENDS ADOPTION of the Negative Declaration, Exhibit "ND," according to Exhibits "NOT' dated June 18, 2004, aud "PH" dated June 11, 2004, attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following fmdings: 4 5 6 Findings: 7 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad does hereby fmd: g a. it has reviewed, analyzed and considered the Negative Declaration and the 9 environmental impacts therein identified for this project and any comments thereon prior to RECOMMENDING APPROVAL ofthe project; and 10 •• 11 b. the Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with requirements of the Califomia Environmental Quahty Act, the State Guidelines and the d. based on the EIA Part II and comments thereon, there is no substantial evidence the project will have a significant effect on the environment. 22 Environmental Protection Procedures ofthe City of Carlsbad; and 13 c. it reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission ofthe City of Carlsbad; and 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PC RESO NO. 5675 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 \7 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, Cahfomia, held on the 21st day of July 2004, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: Chairperson Whitton, Commissioners Baker, Dominguez, Heineman, Montgomery and Segall None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None /FRANK H. WHITTON, Chairperson ^ CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director PC RESO NO. 5675 Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION CASE NAME: CASE NO: PROJECT LOCATION: Thompson/Tabata GPA/ZC GPA 04-11/ZC 04-07/LCPA 04-10 West of Aviara Parkway, south of Poinsettia Lane, City of Carlsbad, Countv of San Die.go PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Request for a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Local Coastal Program Amendment to adjust the boundary between the Residential Low Medium Density (RLM) and Residential Medium Density (RM) General Plan designations over approximately 7.9 acres and to adjust the boundary between the One Family Residential with a Qualified Development Overlay and Residential Density-Multiple with a Qualified Development Overlay zoning designations over approximately 1.5 acres within the Thompson/Tabata residential subdivision. PROPOSED DETERMINATION: The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, the initial study (EIA Part 2) did not identify any potentially significant impacts on the environment. Therefore, a Negative Declaration will be recommended for adoption by the City of Carlsbad City Council. A copy of the initial study (EIA Part 2) documenting reasons to support the proposed Negative Declaration are on file in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, Califomia 92008. Comments from the pubhc are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 30 days of the date of this notice. The proposed project and Negative Declaration are subject to review and approval/adoption by the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission and City Council. Additional pubhc notices will be issued when those public hearings are scheduled. If you have any questions, please call Michael Grim in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4623. PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD JUNE 18, 2004 TO JULY 18. 2004 PUBLISH DATE JUNE 18, 2004 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • wwvi/.cj^car\s^i^^.us Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department NEGATIVE DECLARATION CASE NAME: CASE NO: PROJECT LOCATION: Countv of San Diego Thompson/Tabata GPA . GPA 04-11/LCPA 04-10 West of Aviara Parkway, south of Poinsettia Lane, Citv of Carlsbad, PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Request for a General Plan Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment to adjust the boundary between the Residential Low Medium Density (RLM) and Residential Medium Density (RM) General Plan designations over approximately 7.9 acres within the Thompson/Tabata residential subdivision. DETERMINATION: The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, the initial study (EIA Part 2) did not identify any potentially significant impacts on the environment, and the City of Carlsbad finds as follows: ^ The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. I I The proposed project MAY have "potentially significant impact(s)" on the environment, but at least one potentially significant impact 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. (Negative Declaration applies only to the effects that remained to be addressed). I I Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, nothing further is required. A copy of the initial study (EIA Part 2) documenting reasons to support the Negative Declaration is on file in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, Califomia 92008. ADOPTED: pursuant to Citv Council Resolution No. ATTEST: MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO: GPA 04-11//ZC 04-07/LCPA 04-10 DATE: June 11.2004 BACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME: Thompson/Tabata GPA/ZC 2. LEAD AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS: Citv of Carisbad 3. CONTACT PERSON AND PHONE NUMBER: Michael Grim 760-602-4623 4. PROJECT LOCATION: West of Aviara Parlwav. south of Poinsettia Lane. Citv of Carisbad, County of San Diego 5. PROJECT SPONSOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS: Citv of Carisbad. 1635 Faradav Av. Carisbad, CA 92008 6. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential Low-Medium Densitv (RLM) and Residential Medium Densitv (RM) 7. ZONING: One Familv Residential with a Qualified Development Overlav (R-l-O) and Residential Multiple Density with a Qualified Development Overlav (RD-M-Q). 8. QTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL IS REQUIRED (i.e., permits, financing approval or participation agreements): Califomia Coastal Commission 9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND SURROUNDING LAND USES: Request for a Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment. Zone Change, and Local Coastal Program Amendment to adjust the boundary between the Residential Low-Medium Densitv (RLM") and Residential Medium Densitv (RM) General Plan designations over approximatelv 7.9 acres and adjust the boundary between the One Familv Residential with a Qualified Development Overlav (R-l-O) and Residential Density-Multiple with a Quahfied Development Overlav (RD-M-Q) zoning designations over approximatelv 1.5 acres, within the Thompson/Tabata residential subdivision. Rev. 07/03/02 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTLU^LY AFFECTED: The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. I I Aesthetics I I Agricultural Resources I I Air Quality I I Biological Resources I I Cultural Resources I I Geology/Soils Q Noise • Hazards/Hazardous Materials D Population and Housing I I Hydrology/Water Quality \Z} Public Services I I Land Use and Planning I I Mineral Resources I I Mandatory Findings of Significance I I Recreation I I Transportation/Circulation [^Utilities & Service Systems Rev. 07/03/02 DETERMINATION. (To be completed by the Lead Agency) I fmd that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I I I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on tlie environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I I I fmd that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I I I find that the proposed project MAY have "potentially significant impact(s)" on the envhronment, but at least one potentially significant unpact 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. A Negative Declaration is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I I I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately m an earher ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earher ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, mcluding revisions or mitigation measures thaty&re imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, nothing fiirther is required. Planner Signature V,/ Date 0/1 Planning Director's Sigilattire L) Date Rev. 07/03/02 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to detemiine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. Tliis checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City witli information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration. • A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impacf answer is adequately supported if tlie referenced infoiTaation sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A 'TSfo Impacf answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or it is based on proj ect-specific factors as well as general standards. • "Less Than Significant Impact" applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not significantly adverse, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies. • "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impacf to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measiures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less tlian significant level. • "Potentially Significant Impacf is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significantly adverse. • Based on an "EIA-Part II", if a proposed project could have a potentially significant adverse effect on the environment, but all potentially significant adverse effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and none ofthe circumstances requiring a supplement to or supplemental EIR are present and all fhe mitigation measures required by fhe prior environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional environmental document is required. • When "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked the project is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR if the significant adverse effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and tlie effect will be mitigated, or a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" has been made pursuant to that earlier EIR. • A Negative Declaration may be prepared if tlie City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant adverse effect on the envhonment. • If tiiere are one or more potentially significant adverse effects, the City may avoid preparing an EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce adverse impacts to less than significant, and those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to pubhc review. In this case, the appropriate "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared. Rev. 07/03/02 • An EIR must be prepared if "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked, and mcluding but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant adverse effect has not been discussed or mitigated in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the adverse impact to less than significant; (2) a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" for the significant adverse impact has not been made pvu-suant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the adverse impact to less than significant; or (4) through the EIA-Part II analysis it is not possible to detennine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to below a level of significance. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts, which would otherwise be determined significant. Issues (and Supporting Infomiation Sources). AESTHETICS - Would tlie project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light and glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Potentially Potentially Significant Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Impact • • • • • • • • Less Than No Significant Impact Impact • M • M • m • m II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES - (In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the Califomia Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model-1997 prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland.) Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Familand, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Faimland Mappuig and Monitoring Program of the Califomia Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agriculttnal use, or a | | Williamson Act contract? • • • H • m Rev. 07/03/02 Issues (and Supporting Infomiation Sources). c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Familand to non-agricultural use? Potentially Potentially Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation • Incorporated • • m III. AIR QUALITY - (Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control disteict may be relied upon to make the following determinations.) Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? • • • B • • • K c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concenti-ations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? IV. a) b) c) BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES project: Would the Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by Califomia Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian, aquatic or wetland habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by Califomia Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (includmg but not limited to marsh, vemal pool, coastal, etc.) tln-ough direct removal, filing, hydi-ological intermption, or other means? • • • K • • • • • m • m • • • K • • • K • • • s Rev. 07/03/02 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildhfe corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Potentially Potentially Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated • • • S e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a ti-ee preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? g) Impact tiibutary areas that are environmentally sensitive? • • • S • • • S • n • K rv. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would tiie project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destioy a unique paieontological resoiu'ce or site or uruque geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including tiiose interred outside of formal cemeteries? • • • ^ • • • • • • • S • S • m IV. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would tiie project: a) Expose people or stmctures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by fhe State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii. Sti-ong seismic ground shaking? iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv. Landshdes? • • • • • • • M • • D n a m Rev. 07/03/02 Issues (and Supporting Infomiation Sources). a) Result m substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? b) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, hquefaction, or collapse? c) Be located on expansive soils, as defined in Table 18 - 1-B of tiie Unifonn Building Code (1997), creating substantial risks to life or property? Potentially Significant Impact • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated • Less Than Significant Impact • • No Impact • S • • • S • m d) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or altemative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? IV. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment tiirough the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving tiie release of hazardous materials uito flie environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Govermnent Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or environment? e) For a project within an au-port land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for peopie residing or working in tiie project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private ahstiip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? • • • K • • • • • • • • • S • m • • • K • s • m • • • a Rev. 07/03/02 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or stiiictiires to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Potentially Significant Impact • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated • Less Than Significant Impact No Impact • M a a a m VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY - Would tiie project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? • • • M b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with ground water recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groimd water table level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existuig nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Impacts to groundwater quahty? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of tiie site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a sti-eam or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off- site? e) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the flow rate or amoimt (volume) of surface ranoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off- site? • • • K • n • • • • • K n K • M f) Create or contiibute runoff water, which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? g) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? h) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood delineation raap? • • • K • • • • • m • m Rev. 07/03./02 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). i) Place within 100-year flood hazard area stmctures, which would impede or redirect flood flows? j) Expose people or stmctures to a significant risk of loss injmy or death involving flooding, includmg flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? k) Inimdation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? 1) Increased erosion (sediment) into receiving surface waters. m) Increased pollutant discharges (e.g., heavy metals, pathogens, petioleum derivatives, synthetic organics, nutiients, oxygen-demanding substances and trash) into receiving surface waters or other alteration of receiving surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? Potentially Potentially Significant Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated • • • • • • • • • • Less Than No Significant Impact Impact • S • m • • • n) Changes to receiving water quality (marine, fresh or wetland waters) during or follo-wing constraction? o) Increase in any pollutant to an akeady impaired water body as listed on the Clean Water Act Section 303(d) list? p) The exceedance of appUcable surface or groundwater receiving water quality objectives or degradation of beneficial uses? IX. LANDUSE AND PLANNING - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency witii jurisdiction over the project (including but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for tiie purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict wifli any apphcable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X. MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of fiitiire value to the region and the residents ofthe State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recoveiy site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? n • • • • • • • • Kl • m • • • • H D n D m • • n s • ^ • • • K 10 Rev. 07/03/02 Issues (and Supporting Infonnation Soiu-ces). X. NOISE - Would the project result m: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundboume vibration or groundboume noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in fhe project vicuiity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located wdthin an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working ui the project ai-ea to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within flie vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X. POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would tiie project: a) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastracture)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the constiTiction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the constiuction of replacement housing elsewhere? xm. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered govemment facilities, a need for new or physically altered govemment facilities, tiie construction of wliich could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable sei-vice ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any ofthe public services: Potentially Significant Impact • • • • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than No Significant Impact Impact • • • S • • • • • • • • • m • m • m • s • • • s • • • H • s • m 11 Rev. 07/03/02 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). i) Fire protection? ii) Police protection? iii) Schools? iv) Parks? v) Other public facilities? XIV. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of tiie facility would occur or be accelerated? Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than No Significant Impact Impact • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • K b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the constraction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC - Would tiie proj ect: a) Cause an increase in tiaffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing tiaffic load and capacity of the sti-eet system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the nuniber of vehicle ti-ips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard estabhshed by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air ti'affic patterns, including either an increase in ti-affic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design featiire (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., fami equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? fj Result in insufficient parking capacity? g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting altemative transportation (e.g., bus tiirn- outs, bicycle racks)? • • • S • • • m • • • H • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X 12 Rev. 07/03/02 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS project: Would the a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Contiol Board? b) Require or result in the constraction of new water or wastewater tieatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the constiruction of which would cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the constraction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the constraction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project fiom existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Potentially Significant Impact • • Potentially Less Than No Significant Significant Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated • • • • • H • m • s • • • s e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? XVn. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce tiie habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, tin-eaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce fhe number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Califomia history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually lirnited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumula- tively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable futiire projects?) • • • m • • n n • • • n • • S • H n m 13 Rev. 07/03/02 Issues (and Supporting Infonnation Sources). c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVin. EARLIER ANALYSES Potentially Significant Impact • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated • Less Than No Significant Impact Impact n s Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed m an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures, which were iacoi-porated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 14 Rev. 07/03/02 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION The project involves a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Local Coastal Program Amendment to adjust the boundary between the Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM) and Residential Medium Density (RM) General Plan designations over approximately 7.9 acres and adjust the boundaiy between the One Family Residential with a Qualified Development Overlay (R-l-Q) and Residential Density-Multiple with a Qualified Development Overlay (RD-M-Q) zoning designations over approximately 1.5 acres within the Thompson/Tabata residential subdivision, generally located west of Aviara Parkway, south of Poinsettia Lane. The subject property was recently subdivided tiirough the Thompson/Tabata residential subdivision map (CT 98-14) and is currently under constiuction. The existing General Plan land use and zoning designation boundaries are not coincident and do not follow the newly created property lines within the subdivision, resulting in some lots containing two land use and/or zoning designations. The proposed General Plan land use and zoning designation boundaries would follow the approved stieet pattem for the subdivision and would be coincident, with the RLM area being implemented by the R-l-Q zoning and the RM areas being implemented by the RD-M-Q zoning. The property covered by tiie proposed land use designation change is aheady subdivided and has no potential of further subdivision, therefore no impacts to the yield ofthe properties will occur. Since all ofthe affected properties are already subdivided and no additional development is proposed with this project, no impacts to any physical features, such as scenic resources, envuronmentally sensitive areas, or geologic features, will occur. The adjustment of the zoning and land use boundaries over the developing properties does not preclude the continued conformance with the Mello II segment policies. The proposal is consistent -with all applicable policies and regulations and staff has no issues with the proposed land use designation change. AESTHETICS: No Impact. The proposed legislative actions do not impact the existing or fiiture development of the residential subdivision. No development is proposed with the actions and no adjustments to the existing development are proposed. Therefore no impacts to aesthetics will result. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES: No Impact. The project site is cunently under development for a residential subdivision. No agricultural resources exist on the property and the proposed land use and zoning designation boimdary adjustment will not increase or reduce the amount of agricultural land. Therefore, no impacts to agricultiural resources will occur. AIR QUALITY: No Impact. No additional development is proposed with the land use and zoning designation boundary adjustment. Therefore no increases in emissions, sources of dust, or objectionable odors will occur. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCE: No Impact. All natural open space areas preserved witii the Thompson/Tabata residential subdivision will remain and no development or alteration of any areas with biological resources is proposed. Therefore, the proposed land use and zoning designation boundary adjustinent will not have an adverse impact on biological resources. CULTURAL RESOURCES: No Impact, No additional grading is proposed with this land use and zoning designation boundary adjustment. The site is already being developed in accordance with the approved subdivision map and, therefore, no impacts to cifltural resources would result. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: No impact. No grading is proposed with the land use and zoning designation boundary adjustment and no adjustment to the existmg, approved grading plan would result from the proposed boundary adjustment. Therefore, no adverse impacts due to geology or soils will result. 15 Rev. 07/03/02 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS No Impact. No constraction or alteration to the ciuxently approved development is proposed with the land use and zoning designation boundary adjustinent and no additional hazards or hazardous materials will result due to the proposal. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: No Impact. No consti-uction or aheration to the cunently approved development is proposed with the land use and zoning designation boundary adjustment. Therefore no impacts to hydi-ology or water quality will result. LAND USE AND PLANNING: No Impact. The proposed land use and zoning designation boundary adjustment will bring the zoning. General Plan, and Local Coastal Program designations into confonnance and will eliminate the potential for individual lots to have more than one designation. Since the subject property is already subdivided and has no potential for fiirther subdivision, no unpact to the residential yield of flie property will result. Therefore, no adverse impacts to land use and planning will occur due to the proposal. MINERAL RESOURCES: No Impact. No grading is proposed with the land use and zoning designation boundary adjustment and no adjustment to the existmg, approved grading plan would result from the proposed boundary adjustinent. Therefore, no adverse impacts to mineral resources will result. NOISE: No Impact. No constiTiction or adjustment to approved constraction documents is proposed with the land use and zoning designation boundary adjustment. No new sources of noise will occur with the land use adjustments. Therefore, no adverse impacts due to noise will result from the proposed actions. POPULATION AND HOUSING: No Impact. The subject property is already subdivided and has no potential for further subdivision, therefore no impact to the residential yield of the property will result from the land use and zoning designation boundary adjustment. There is no alteration of the project's provision of housing affordable to lower income households. Given the above, the proposal would not cause any adverse impacts to population and housing. PUBLIC SERVICES: No Impact. The proposal involves no constraction and therefore no increase in public service demand would occur with the land use and zoning designation boundary adjustment. Given the above, no adverse impacts to pubhc services would occur. RECREATION: No Impact. No constraction is proposed with tiie land use and zoning designation boundary adjustment and no increase in recreational demand will occur. Therefore, no adverse impacts to recreation will resuh from the proposal. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: No Impact. No additional development is proposed with the land use and zoning designation boimdary adjustment therefore no increases traffic generation will occin. No further subdivision of the subject property is allowed by virtue of the land use boundary adjustment. Given the above, no adverse impacts to tiansportation or tiaffic will occur. 16 Rev. 07/03/02 UTILITY AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: No Impact. The proposal involves no constraction and therefore no increase in utility and service system demand would occur with the land use and zoning designation boundary adjustment. Therefore, no adverse impacts to said sei-vices would occur. EARLIER ANALYSIS USED AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES The followmg documents were used in tiie analysis of this project and are on file in the City of Carlsbad Plamiing Department located at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, Califomia, 92008. 1. Final Master Envhonmeiital Impact Report for the City of Carlsbad General Plan Update (MEIR 93-01). City ofCarlsbad Planning Department. March 1994. 17 Rpv 07/07/09 PROOF OF PUBLIC^ION (2010 & 2011 C.C.P.) This space is if^hc County Clerk's Filing Stamp STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen ofthe United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of Proof of Publication of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of Califomia, for the City of Oceanside and the City of Escondido, Court Decree number 171349, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: une.lo,7.a>] I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at SAN MARCOS Califomia crrv OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBUC NOTICE i TO INTERESTED PARTIES: j Please be advised that the Ctty of Carlsbad is considering text I amendments to Its Local Coastal Program (LCP) as summa-i rized below. This amendment is beino proposed by the City of i Carisbad Planning Department and is currently under review, i This notice hereby opens a six-weel( review period after which the Planning Commission and City Council will consid-er ail comments and act on the proposed amendment. The Planning Commission hearing is expected to take place in July, 2004, and will be duly ncAiced. ' Copies of the LCP amendment are available for review at the following locations: (1)Carisbad Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue; (2) City Clari<'s Office, 1200 Carisbad Vil-lage Dnve: (3) Carisbad Main Ubrary, 1775 Dove Lane: (4) Georgina Cole Library. 1250 Cartsbad Village Drive; and (5) the Califomia Coastal Commission, 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Dieno, CA 92108-4402 PiNOPOSED LCP AMENDMENT SUMMARY LCPA 04-10 - THOMPSON/TABATA GPtJZC : The City's Local Coastal Program includes a general Land Use Map and Zoning Map that indicate the planned land use for properties withinthe Coastal Zone. This specific Land Use Map and Zoning Map Amendments are proposed as follows: Adjust the boundary between the Residentiai Low-Medium Density (RM) land use designations and the boundary be-tween the One Family Residential (R-l-Q) and Residential Multiple-Density (RD-M) .zoning designations to follow the ap-proved road alignment within me -Thompson/Tabata subdivi-sion on properqi generally located west of Aviara Parkway Real, north and south of Poinsettia Lane. If you have any questions, please call Michael Grim' in the Planning Department at 760-602-4623. Written comments shouki be sent to the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carisbad, Califomia 82008. PUBLISH DATE: JUNE IO, 2004 THOMPSON/TABATA GPA/ZC OPA 04-11/ZC (M-07/1.CPA 04-tO NCT 1650212 June 10,2004 This lil Day of June, 2004 Signature H COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising The Coast News Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County. Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to The Coast News, P.O. Box 232-550, Encinitas, CA 92023 (760) 436-9737 Proof of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am principal clerk of the printer of The Coast News, a newspaper printed and published weekly and which news- paper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation for the cities of Del Mar, Solana Beach, Encinitas/Cardiff, Carlsbad, Oceanside, San MarcosA^ista and the County Judicial District by the Superior Court of the State of Califomia, County of San Diego (8/4/94, #677114, B2393, P396); and that the notice, of which the annexed is a print- ed copy, has been pubhshed in, each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: June 10, 2004 I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of Califomia on the 10th day of June, 2004. IS Carina* Space above for Cdtin^^Ierk's Filing Stamp PUBLIC NO-nCE TO INTERESTED PARTIES: Please be advised that the City of Carlsbad is considering text amendments to its Local Coastal Program (LCP) as sumntiarized below. This amendment is being proposed by the City of Carlsbad Planning Department and is cun-ently under review. This notice hereby opens a six week review period after which the Planning Commission and City Council wlirconsider all comments and act on the proposed amendment. -The Planning Commission hearing is expected to take place in July, 2004, and will be duly noticed. The City Council hearing is expected to take place in August, 2004, and will be duly noticed. Copies of the LCP amendment are available for review at the following locations: (1) Carlsbad Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue; (2) City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carisbad Village Drive; (3) Carisbad Main Library, 1775 Dove Lane; (4) Georgina Cole Library, 1250 Carlsbad Village Drive; and (5) the California Coastal Commission, 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, CA 92108-4402 PROPOSED LCP AMENDMENT SUMMARY LCPA 04-10 - THOMPSON/TABATA GPMZC The City's Local Coastal Program includes a general Land Use Map and Zoning Map that indicate the planned land use for properties within tfie Coastal Zone. This specific Land Use Map and Zoning Map Amendments are proposed as fol- lows: Adjust the boundary between the Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM) and Residential Medium Density (RM) land use designations and the boundary between the One Family Residential (R-l-Q) and Residential Multiple-Density (RD-M) zoning designations to follow the approved road alignment within the -rhompson/Tabata subdivision on property generally located west of Aviara Parkway Real, north and south of Poinsettia Lane. If you have any questions, please call Michael Grim in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4623. Written commenfs should be sent to the Plannirig Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carisbad, Califomia 92008. PUBLISH DATE: PUBLISH DATE FOR NORTH COUNTY TIMES: PUBLISH DATE FOR COAST NEWS: CN 8185 Jun. 10, 2004. JUNE 10, 2004 JUNE 10, 2004 JUNE ID, 2004 7^ Clerk of the Printer THOMPSON/TABATA GPA/ZC GPA 04-11/ZC 04-07/LCPA 04-10 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2010 & 2011 CCP.) This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen ofthe United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of Proof of Publication of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of Califomia, for the City of Oceanside and the City of Escondido, Court Decree number 171349, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: September 03'*^ ,2004 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is tme and correct. Dated at SAN MARCOS Califomia NOTICE OF PUBUC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Citv Council of the City of Carts-bad will ho^d a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Cartsbad o. R nn^T- T V'"SB8 P"ve, Carlsbad, Califomia, at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 14,2&04, to con-sider a reoyest to adopt a Negative Declaration, and approve a General Plan Amendment and Local Coast-al Program Amendment to adjust the boundary be-l'I!5®S'^S Low-Medium Density (RLM) and Residenlial Medium Density (RM) General Plan designations over approximately 7.9 acres on proper-l<«a'.»d west of Ayiara Parkway, soulfi of Pomsettia Lane, in Local Facilities Management Zone ZO and more particulariy descrit>ed as- A portion of the eastern half ol the northeastern halt and a portion of the B southwestern quarter of» Section 28, Township 12"* South, Range 4 We^inn the San Bernardino Quadrant. In the Citv of Cartsbad, Coun^ ol San Diego, State of Califomia Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially Invited to at-tend the public hearing. Copies of the aoenda bnl will be available on and afler September 10,2004. If you have any questions, piease call Mike Grim In the Planning Department at (760) 602P4623. If you challenge the Neg--itjvs Declaration, General 'lan Amendment and/or Local Coastal Program Amendment in court, you may be limited to raislno onhr those issues you or someone else raised at the public heanng described in this notice or in written —..... , Carisbad Jrive, Carls-hearing. CASE FILE: GPA 04-11/LCPA 04-10 sf^^or'MgifD"^'^'^^*'^* ^f"* CITY COUNCIL NCT 16783318 •September 03,2004 This __03l__Day of September, 2004 Signature Jane Olson NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Councii of the City of Carlsbad wiil hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 14, 2004, to consider a request to adopt a Negative Declaration, and approve a General Plan Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment to adjust the boundary between the Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM) and Residential Medium Density (RM) General Plan designations over approximately 7.9 acres on property generally located west of Aviara Parkway, south of Poinsettia Lane, in Local Facilities Management Zone 20 and more particularly described as: A portion of the eastern half of the northeastern half and a portion of the southwestern quarter of Section 28, Township 12 South, Range 4 West inn the San Bernardino Quadrant, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on and after September 10, 2004. If you have any questions, please call Mike Grim in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4623. If you challenge the Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment and/or Local Coastal Program Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, Attn: City Clerk, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: GPA 04-11/LCPA 04-10 CASE NAME: THOMPSON/TABATA GPA PUBLISH: September 3, 2004 CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL SITE THOMPSON/TABATA GPA GPA 04-11/LCPA 04-10 PROOF OF PUBLIC HON (2010 & 2011 C.C.P.) This space is f the County Clerk's Filing Stamp STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of Proof of Publication of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of Califomia, for the City of Oceanside and the City of Escondido, Court Decree number 171349, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN thatthe Planning Commis-sion of the Cfty of Carisbad will hold a publlcliearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Dnve, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, July 21, 2004, to consider a request for a Negative Declara-tion, Genaral Plan Amendment and Local Coastal Pro-gram Amendment to adjust the boundary between the Residential Low-Medium DensitytRLM) and Residential Medium Density (RM) General. Plan assignations over approximately 7.9 acres on property generally located west of Aviara Parioway, south of Poinsettia Lane, in Lo-cal Facilities Management Zone 20 and more particulariy described as: A portion of the eastem lialf of fhe northeastem half and a portion of the southwestem quarter of Section 28, Toumshlp 12 South, Range 4 West inn the San Bernar-dino Quadrant, in the Ciw of Carisbad, County of San Diego, State of Califomia Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially Invited to attend the public hearinq. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after July 15, . ...... ilease call Mike Grim 2004* If you have any in the Planning Depair ) 602-4623. If you challenge the General Plan Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment in court, you may be limit-ed to raising only those Issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written con-espondence delivered to the City of Carisbad at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE:GPA04-11/LCPA 04-10 ^ CASE NAME: THOMPSON/TABATA GPA -CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPAR-TMENT • NCT 161119-July 8, 2004 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is tme and correct. Dated at SAN MARCOS Califomia This Day of July, 2004 Signature NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising - i ... Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, July 21, 2004, to consider a request for a Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment to adjust the boundary between the Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM) and Residential Medium Density (RM) General Plan designations over approximately 7.9 acres on property generally located west of Aviara Parkway, south of Poinsettia Lane, in Local Facilities Management Zone 20 and more particularly described as: A portion of the eastern half of the northeastern half and a portion of the southwestern quarter of Section 28, Township 12 South, Range 4 West inn the San Bernardino Quadrant, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of Califomia Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after July 15, 2004. If you have any questions, please call Mike Grim in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4623. If you challenge the General Plan Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carisbad at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: GPA 04-11/LCPA 04-10 CASE NAME: THOMPSON/TABATA GPA PUBLISH: JULY 8, 2004 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us ^ SITE THOMPSON/TABATA GPA GPA 04-11/LCPA 04-10 WENDY WESTBERG STE 370 26440 LA ALAMEDA MISSION VIEJO CA 92691 CALTRANS DISTRICT 11 BILL FIGGE MAIL ST 50 P O BOX 85406 SANDIEGO CA 92186-5406 REG WATER QUALITY CONTROL BD STE 100 9174 SKY PARK CT SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMIN BARRY BRAYER, AWP-8 PO BOX 92007 LOSANGELES CA 90009 WESTERN REG BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS RONALD M JAEGER 2800 COTTAGE WAY SACRAMENTO CA 95825 BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION & HSG AGENCY PATRICIA W NEAL DEPUTY SEC HOUSING STE 2450 980 NINTH ST SACRAMENTO CA 95814 CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK SUPERINTENDENT 1901 SPINNAKER DR SAN BUENAVENTURA CA 93001 COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CHAIRMAN 722 JACKSON PL NW WASHINGTON DC 20006 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE LOS ANGELES DIST ENGINEER PO BOX 2711 LOSANGELES CA 90053 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY STE 400 611 RYAN PLAZA DR ARLINGTON TX 76011-4005 A notice has been mailed to ail property owners/occjpants 'listed he/eii). - / D^\e.J^l6/0f DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY CLIFFORD EMMERLING, DIR STE 350 901 MARKET ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103 DEPARTMENT OF FISH & GAME ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIV P O BOX 944246 SACRAMENTO CA 94244-2460 DEPARTMENT OF FOOD & AGRICULTURE STEVE SHAFFER, AGRICULTURE RESOURCES RM 100 1220 N ST SACRAMENTO CA 95814 DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY DOUG WICKIZER, ENVIR COORD P O BOX 944246 SACRAMENTO CA 94244-2460 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVE DUNCAN LENT HOWARD, REG ADMIN 450 GOLDEN GATE AV SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL RM 700 110 WEST A ST SANDIEGO CA 92101 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RM 5504 1120 N ST SACRAMENTO CA 95814 MARINE RESOURCES REGION, DR & G ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, SPR STEJ 4665 LAMPSON AVE LOS ALAMITOS CA 90720-5139 OFFICE OF PLANNING & RESEARCH OFFICE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS PO BOX 3044 SACRAMENTO CA 93044 NATIONAL OCEANIC & ATMOSPHERIC ADMIN OCRM,55MC4 N/ORM - 3 1305 EAST-WEST HWY SILVER SPRING MD 20910 SAN FRANCISCO BAY CONSERVATION & DEVMT COMMISSION BILL TRAVIS STE 2600 50 CALIFORNIA ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111-4704 STATE LANDS COMMISSION DWIGHT SANDERS STE 1005 100 HOWE AV SACRAMENTO CA 95825-8202 U S BUREAU OF LAND MGMT STE RM W1834 2800 COTTAGE WAY SACRAMENTO CA 95825 U S BUREAU OF RECLAMATION MID-PACIFIC REGION 2800 COTTAGE WAY SACRAMENTO CA 95825 U S FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE STE W-2605 2800 COTTAGE WAY SACRAMENTO CA 95825-1888 U S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS LILY ALYEA STE 702 333 MARKET ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105-2197 USDA - RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPT 4169 430 "G" ST DAVIS CA 95616 WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BD PO BOX 100 SACRAMENTO CA 95801 CALIFORNIA RESOURCES AGENCIES STE 1311 1416 9TH ST SACRAMENTO CA 95814 SANDAG-LAND USE COMMISS NAN VALERIO STE 800 401 "B" STREET SANDIEGO CA 92101 RANCHO CARLSBAD HOA RUSS KOHL 5200 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TED OWEN 5934 PRIESTLY DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 ANTHONY & DICKY BONS 25709 HILLCREST AV ESCONDIDO CA 92026-8650 REG WATER QUALITY CONTROL BD STE 100 9174 SKYPARK CT SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340 U S FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE LEE ANN CARRANZA 6010 HIDDEN VALLEY ROAD CARLSBAD CA 92009- CITY OF ENCINITAS COM DEV DEPT 505 S VULCAN AV ENCINITAS CA 92024 TABATA FARMS PO BOX 1338 CARLSBAD CA 92018-1338 SANDAG-EXEC DIRECTOR GARY GALLEGOS STE 800 1ST INTL PLAZA 401 "B" ST SAN DIEGO CA 92101 LESLIE ESPOSITO 1893 AMELFI DR ENCINITAS CA 92024 CYRIUMARY GIBSON 12142 ARGYLE DR LOS ALAMITOS CA 90702 LAKESHORE GARDENS TOM BENSON 7201 AVENIDA ENCINAS CARLSBAD CA 92009 LANIKAI LANE PARK SHARP SPACE 3 6550 PONTO DRIVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 JOHN LAMB 1446 DEVLIN DR LOSANGELES CA 90069 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC KIM BLESSANT 101 ASH STREET SANDIEGO CA 92101- STATE LANDS COMMISSION MARY GRIGGS STE 100S 100 HOWE AV SACRAMENTO CA 95825-8202 COUNTY OF SD SUPERVISOR BILL HORN ART DANELL RM 335 1600 PACIFIC HIGHWAY SAN DIEGO CA 92101 PERRY A LAMB 890 MERE POINT RD BRUNSWICK ME 04011 S D CO PLANNING & LAND USE DEPT JAON VOKAC STE B-5 5201 RUFFIN ROAD SANDIEGO CA 92123 COASTAL CONSERVANCY RICHARD RETECKI STE 1100 1330 BROADWAY OAKLAND CA 94612 FLOYD ASHBY P O BOX 232580 ENCINITAS CA 92023-2580 DALE/DONNA SCHREIBER 7163 ARGONAUTA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 LENNAR HOMES CHRISTINE ZORTMAN STE 320 5780 FLEET ST CARLSBAD CA 92008-4702 GEORGE BOLTON 6583 BLACKRAIL RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 BATIQUITOS LAGOON FOUNDATION JOHN BURNS PO BOX 130491 CARLSBAD CA 92009- CARLSBAD UNIF SCHOOL DIST 6225 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92009 SAN MARCOS SCHOOL DIST 1 CIVIC CENTER DR SAN MARCOS CA 92069 ENCINITAS SCHOOL DIST 101 RANCHO SANTA FE RD ENCINITAS CA 92024 SAN DIEGUITO SCHOOL DIST 701 ENCINITAS BLVD ENCINITAS CA 92024 LEUCADIA WASTE WATER DIST TIM JOCHEN 1960 LA COSTA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92009 OLIVENHAIN WATER DIST 1966 OLIVENHAIN RD ENCINITAS CA 92024 CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S VULCAN AVE ENCINITAS CA 92024 CITY OF SAN MARCOS 1 CIVIC CENTER DR SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949 CITY OF OCEANSIDE 300 NORTH COAST HWY OCEANSIDE CA 92054 CITY OF VISTA PO BOX 1988 VISTA CA 92085 VALLECITOS WATER DIST 201 VALLECITOS DE ORO SAN MARCOS CA 92069 I.P.U.A. SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND URBAN STUDIES SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505 CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME 4949 VIEWRIDGE AVE SAN DIEGO CA 92123 REGIONAL WAT^R-QfOALlTY STE 100 9174 SKYPARK CT SAffDlEGO CA 92123-4340 SD COUNTY PLANNING STE B 5201 RUFFIN RD SAN DIEGO CA 92123 LAFCO 1600 PACIFIC HWY SAN DIEGO CA 92101 U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE 6010 HIDDEN VALLEY RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DIST 9150 CHESAPEAKE DR SAN DIEGO CA 92123 CA COASTAL COMMISSION STE 103 7575 METROPOLITAN DR SAN DIEGO CA 92108-4402 SANDAG STE 800 401 B STIREET SAN DIEGO CA 92101 ATTN TEDANASIS SAN DIEGO COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY PO BOX 82776 SANDIEGO CA 92138-2776 CITY OF CARLSBAD COMMUNITY SERVICES CITY OF CARLSBAD PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DEPT- PROJECT ENGINEER CITY OF CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT CITY OF CARLSBAD PROJECT PLANNER D6/30/2004 a § cc Q. O. < z o p o < o z o o AB# 17.786 MTG. 9/14/04 DEPT. PLN ^ TITLE: CITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL DEPT.HD. yV\>fc THOMPSON/TABATA GPA GPA 04-11/LCPA 04-10 CiTY AT CITY MGR RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the Council ADOPT Resolution No. 2004-294 APPROVING the Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment GPA 04-11, and Local Coastal Program Amendment LCPA 04-10, forthe Thompson/Tabata GPA land use change. ITEM EXPLANATION: On July 21, 2004, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and recommended approval of a Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment to adjust the boundary of the land use designations within the Thompson/Tabata subdivision. The City-initiated proposal is part of the General Plan/Zoning Consistency program; one aspect of which is attempting to provide consistency between the General Plan land use and Zoning designations. Since the Thompson/Tabata site is located in the City's Coastal Zone, a Local Coastal Program Amendment is also needed to ensure consistency between the City's General Plan and the Local Coastal Program. The proposed land use revision would relocate the boundary between the Residential Low Medium Density (RLM) and Residential Medium Density (RM) designations, changing the designation of approximately 7.9 acres. The new boundary would follow the internal street system and would eliminate the potential for one lot to have two land use designations. The alignment of the new General Plan land use boundary would be coincident with the existing zoning designation boundary between One Family Residential (R-1-Q) and Residential Density Multiple (RD-M-Q). The property covered by the proposed land use designation change is already subdivided and has no potential of further subdivision, therefore no impacts to the yield of the property would occur. The proposal is consistent with all applicable regulations and staff and the Planning Commission are recommending approval of the Thompson/Tabata GPA. ENVIRONMENTAL: The proposed Thompson/Tabata GPA project was reviewed for any potential adverse impact to the environment pursuant to the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). No construction or revisions to the approved development are proposed. The boundary adjustments bring the General Plan, Zoning, and Local Coastal Program into conformance with each other. Therefore, the proposal would not create any significant adverse environmental impacts. The Planning Director issued a Negative Declaration on June 18, 2004 for public review and no comments were received. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impacts to the City are negligible In that the proposed action merely revises the land use designations and regulations on the property. /// /// /// PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. 17,786 EXHIBITS: 1. Council Resolution No. 2004-294 2. Location Map 3. Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5675, 5676, and 5677 4. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated July 21, 2004 5. Draft Excerpt of Planning Commission Minutes, dated July 21,2004. DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Michael Grim, (760) 602-4623, mgrim(gci.carisbad.ca.us c3 The City of Carlsbad Planning Department A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Item No. (3) Application complete date: N/A P.C. AGENDA OF: July 21, 2004 Project Planner: Michael Grim Project Engineer: N/A SUBJECT: GPA 04-11/LCPA 04-10 - THOMPSON/TABATA GPA - Request for a Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment to adjust the boundary between the Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM) and Residential Medium Density (RM) General Plan designations over approximately 7.9 acres on property generally located west of Aviara Parkway, south of Poinsettia Lane, in Local Facilities Management Zone 20. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Conunission Resolution No. 5675, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION of the Negative Declaration, and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5676 and 5677, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of GPA 04-11 and LCPA 04-10, based upon the fmdings contained therein. II. INTRODUCTION The project involves a City-initiated action that would adjust the boundaries ofthe General Plan and Local Coastal Program land use designations for properties within the Thompson/Tabata subdivision to correct an existing General Plan/Zoning inconsistency. The existing General Plan land use and zoning designation boundaries are not coincident and the General Plan botmdaries do not follow the newly created property lines within the subdivision, resulting in some lots containing two land use designations. The proposal would revise the boundary between the RLM and RM General Plan designations over approximately 7.9 acres for properties recently subdivided by the Thompson/Tabata residential subdivision. The property covered by the proposed land use designation change is already subdivided and has no potential of fiirther subdivision, therefore no impacts to the yield of the properties will occur. The proposed General Plan boundaries would follow the aliginnent of two streets within the development and would eliminate the potential for one lot to have two land use designations. The proposal is consistent with all applicable policies and regulations and staff has no issues with the proposed land use designation change. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The City of Carlsbad is proposing a General Plan Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment to adjust the General Plan land use designation boundaries within the Thompson/Tabata residential subdivision. The proposal would adjust the boundary between the RLM and RM General Plan designations over approximately 7.9 acres. The land use designations of the Local Coastal Program would be adjusted through an accompanying Local Coastal Program Amendment. o GPA 04-11/LCPA 04-10 - THOMPSON/TABATA GPA July 21,2004 Page 2 The subject property is located south of Poinsettia Lane, between Aviara Parkway and Snapdragon Drive. The property was subdivided through the Thompson/Tabata residential subdivision (CT 98-14) and contains standard lot single family, small lot single family, and affordable multifamily uses. The development was approved in early 2002 and is currently under constmction. No adjustments to the approved development are necessary to implement the proposed General Plan and Local Coastal Program Amendments. No further subdivision of land is possible within the area proposed for boundary adjustments and all exactions, including pubhc facilities and affordable housing, have occurred and will not be impacted by the proposed actions. The adjustment of the boundaries is part of a Citywide effort to bring the General Plan and Zoning into conformity. Areas within the City where the General Plan and Zoning Maps are not in conformity have been identified and targeted for actions to bring the designations into consistency. Cturently, the General Plan and zoning boundaries within the Thompson/Tabata subdivision are not in conformity. Instead of the existing non-congment alignment of the General Plan land use boundary, the proposed boundary would follow Crystalhne Drive southward from Poinsettia Lane, then follow Rose Drive southward to the subdivision boundary. This alignment separates the two product types within the subdivision and precludes the potential for a single lot to contain more than one land use designation. The Thompson/Tabata GPA is subject to the following regulations: A. General Plan; B. Local Coastal Program; C. Zoning Ordinance and Existing Subdivision; and D. Growth Management Ordinance (Chapter 21.90 of the Zoning Ordinance). IV. ANALYSIS The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency with the applicable policies and regulations listed above. The following analysis section discusses compliance with each of these regulations/policies utilizing both text and tables. A. General Plan The Thompson/Tabata GPA is consistent with the applicable policies and programs of the General Plan. Particularly relevant to the land use designation amendment request are the Land Use, Housing, and Open Space and Conservation Elements. Table 1 below indicates how the project complies with these particular elements of the General Plan. GPA 04-11/LCPA 04-10 - THOMPSON/TABATA GPA July 21,2004 Page 3 TABLE 1 - GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE Element Use Classification, Goal, Objective or Program Proposed Use and Improvements Compliance Land Use The RLM and KM designations would be divided by Crystalline Drive and Rose Drive. Those properties east of the dividing line are constructed at RLM densities and those properties west ofthe di-viding line are constructed at RM densities. Yes Housing Provide sufficient, new affordable housing to meet the needs of groups with special requirements. The proposed land use boundary adjustment does not affect the ability ofthe project to construct the approved affordable housing project. Yes Open Space and Conservation Preserve open spaces in as natural a state as possible. The proposed land use boundary adjustment does not alter the approved development, thereby continuing to preserve the approved natural open space to the east ofthe development site. Yes As shown by the above table, the project would ensure conformance with the General Plan. B. Local Coastal Program The subject properties are located in the Mello 11 segment ofthe City's Local Coastal Program (LCP). The LCP consists of two parts - the Land Use Plan and the implementing ordinances. For this portion of the Mello n segment, the implementing ordinances consist of the apphcable portions of the Zoning Ordinance. This section addresses only compliance with the Land Use Plan since Zoning Ordinance compliance is discussed in Section C below. The policies of the Mello II Land Use Plan emphasize topics such as preservation of agricultural and scenic resources, protection of environmentally sensitive resources, provision of shoreline access, and prevention of geologic instability and erosion. The proposed adjustments to the boundaries between the RLM and RM land use designations are consistent with the policies contained in the Land Use Plan for the Mello 11 segment ofthe LCP. Since all of the affected properties are already subdivided and no additional development is proposed with this project, no impacts to any physical features, such as scenic resources, enviroimientally sensitive areas, or geologic features, will occur. The adjustment of the land use boimdaries over the developing properties does not preclude the continued conformance with the Mello II segment policies. The land use changes represent the relocation of an existing boundary; therefore no new land use is being added to the plan. Given the above, the proposed Thompson/Tabata GPA is consistent with the Mello n Land Use Plan ofthe LCP. GPA 04-11/LCPA 04-10 - THOMPSON/TABATA GPA July 21,2004 Page 4 C. Zoning Ordinance/Existing Subdivision The proposed Thompson/Tabata GPA must be consistent with the existing Zoning and the existing, developed subdivision. The proposed actions would make coincident the boundaries of the R-l-Q and RLM designations, as well as the boundaries of the RD-M-Q and RM designations. The R-l zone implements the RLM designation by allowing single-family development with a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. The RD-M zone implements the RM designation by allowing the development of small lot single-family development and multifamily condominiums. As stated above, the area proposed for the land use changes covers the southem portion of the existing Thompson/Tabata residential subdivision. The subdivision has two components: that portion within the proposed RLM area was approved at a net density of 2.56 dwelling units per developable acre and that portion within the proposed RM area was approved at a net density of 3.89 dwellings per acre. Both of these existing densities are close to or within their respective range of the RLM and RM designations. Therefore the adjusted land use designations are appropriate for the existing, approved land use. There are no lots within the area that could be further subdivided; therefore the proposed land use change does not affect any future development in the area. Given the above, the proposed Thompson/Tabata land use change is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and the existing subdivisions. D. Growth Management Ordinance Any request to change the land use of a property must be consistent with the City's Growth Management Plan. Since the area proposed for the land use change is under development, all public facihties necessary to serve the Thompson/Tabata development are already in place or are being constracted concurrent with development. Therefore, the proposed land use boundary adjustment would not have any impacts on public facilities or services. In addition, all excess dwelling units resulting from the development of the property at a lower density than the Growth Management Control Point for the RLM and RM designations have been extracted. The proposed land use change would therefore not result in any additional dwelling units being deposited in the excess dwelling unit banJc. Given the above, the proposed zoning and land use designation adjustment is consistent with the Growth Management Ordinance. V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The potential enviromnental impacts due to the proposed land use adjustment was reviewed for potentially significant adverse impacts to the environment pursuant to the Califomia Enviromnental Quality Act (CEQA). No constraction or revisions to the approved development plan are proposed with the boundary revisions, therefore no impacts to physical features would occur. The boundary adjustments bring the General Plan, Zoning and Local Coastal Program into conformance with each other and do not impact the existing approved subdivision. No land within the area of the boundary adjustments could be further subdivided and the proposed land use changes do not affect the ability of the project to provide its proportionate share of housing affordable to lower income households. Given the above, the proposed land use designation boundary adjustment would not produce any significant adverse impacts to the environment. The GPA 04-11/LCPA 04-10 - THOMPSON/TABATA GPA July 21,2004 Page 5 Plarming Director issued a Negative Declaration on June 18, 2004 for a 30-day public review and no comments were received. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Plarming Commission Resolution No. 5675 (Neg Dec) 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5676 (GPA) 3. Plaiming Commission Resolution No. 5677 (LCPA) 4. Location Map 5. Background Data Sheet S/T£ THOMPSON/TABATA GPA GPA 04-11/LCPA 04-10 CASE NO: BACKGROUND DATA SHEET GPA 04-11/LCPA 04-10 CASE NAME: Thompson/Tabata GPA APPLICANT: City ofCarlsbad REQUEST AND LOCATION: Request for a Negative Declaration. General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Local Coastal Program Amendment to adjust the boundary between the Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM) and Residential Medium Density (RM) General Plan designations over approximatelv 7.9 acres on property generally located west of Aviara Parkway, south of Poinsettia Lane, in Local Facilities Management Zone 20. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of the eastem half of the northeastem half and a portion of the southwestem quarter of Section 28. Township 12 South, Range 4 West inn the San Bemardino Quadrant, in the City of Carlsbad. Countv of San Diego, State of Califomia APN: 214-170-80, -81. -84. -85. -89 Acres: 8^ Proposed No. of Lots/Units: n/a GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation: RLM and RM Density Allowed: 0.0 - 8.0 du/ac Density Proposed: n/a Existing Zone: R-l-O and RD-M-Q Proposed Zone: Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use: Zoning General Plan Current Land Use Site R-l-Q and RD-M-Q RLM and RM Under constraction North R-l, RD-M-Q, and L-C RLM and RM Single family homes South R-l RLM Single family homes East P-C OS Natural open space West RD-M RM Single family homes PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: Carlsbad Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): n/a ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Negative Declaration, issued June 18. 2004 I I Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated_ •raf City of Carlsbad Planning Department A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Item No ® P.C. AGENDA OF: July 21, 2004 Application complete date: N/A Project Planner: Michael Grim Project Engineer: N/A SUBJECT: GPA 04-11/LCPA 04-10 - THOMPSON/TABATA GPA - Request for a Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment to adjust the boundary between the Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM) and Residential Medium Density (RM) General Plan designations over approximately 7.9 acres on property generally located west of Aviara Parkway, south of Poinsettia Lane, in Local Facilities Management Zone 20. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Plarming Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 5675, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION of the Negative Declaration, and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5676 and 5677, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of GPA 04-11 and LCPA 04-10, based upon the findings contained therein. II. INTRODUCTION The project involves a City-initiated action that would adjust the boundaries ofthe General Plan and Local Coastal Program land use designations for properties within the Thompson/Tabata subdivision to correct an existing General Plan/Zoning inconsistency. The existing General Plan land use and zoning designation boundaries are not coincident and the General Plan boundaries do not follow the newly created property lines within the subdivision, resulting in some lots containing two land use designations. The proposal would revise the boundary between the RLM and RM General Plan designations over approximately 7.9 acres for properties recently subdivided by the Thompson/Tabata residential subdivision. The property covered by the proposed land use designation change is already subdivided and has no potential of further subdivision, therefore no impacts to the yield of the properties will occur. The proposed General Plan boundaries would follow the alignment of two streets within the development and would eliminate the potential for one lot to have two land use designations. The proposal is consistent with all apphcable pohcies and regulations and staff has no issues with the proposed land use designation change. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The City of Carlsbad is proposing a General Plan Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment to adjust the General Plan land use designation boundaries within the Thompson/Tabata residential subdivision. The proposal would adjust the boundary between the RLM and RM General Plan designations over approximately 7.9 acres. The land use designations of the Local Coastal Program would be adjusted through an accompanying Local Coastal Program Amendment. GPA 04-11/LCPA 04-10 - Tht)MPSON/TABATA GPA July 21, 2004 Page 2 The subject property is located south of Poinsettia Lane, between Aviara Parkway and Snapdragon Drive. The property was subdivided through the Thompson/Tabata residential subdivision (CT 98-14) and contains standard lot single family, small lot single family, and affordable multifamily uses. The development was approved in early 2002 and is currently under constraction. No adjustments to the approved development are necessary to implement the proposed General Plan and Local Coastal Program Amendments. No further subdivision of land is possible within the area proposed for boundary adjustments and all exactions, including public facilities and affordable housing, have occurred and will not be impacted by the proposed actions. The adjustment of the boundaries is part of a Citywide effort to bring the General Plan and Zoning into conformity. Areas within the City where the General Plan and Zoning Maps are not in conformity have been identified and targeted for actions to bring the designations into consistency. Currently, the General Plan and zoning boundaries within the Thompson/Tabata subdivision are not in conformity. Instead of the existing non-congraent alignment of the General Plan land use boundary, the proposed boundary would follow Crystalhne Drive southward from Poinsettia Lane, then follow Rose Drive southward to the subdivision boundary. This alignment separates the two product types within the subdivision and precludes the potential for a single lot to contain more than one land use designation. The Thompson/Tabata GPA is subject to the following regulations: A. General Plan; B. Local Coastal Program; C. Zoning Ordinance and Existing Subdivision; and D. Growth Management Ordinance (Chapter 21.90 of the Zoning Ordinance). IV. ANALYSIS The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency with the applicable policies and regulations listed above. The following analysis section discusses compliance with each of these regulations/policies utilizing both text and tables. A. General Plan The Thompson/Tabata GPA is consistent with the applicable policies and programs of the General Plan. Particularly relevant to the land use designation amendment request are the Land Use, Housing, and Open Space and Conservation Elements. Table 1 below indicates how the project complies with these particular elements ofthe General Plan. GPA 04-11/LCPA 04-10 - ThdMPSON/TABATA GPA July 21, 2004 Page 3 TABLE 1 - GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE Element Use Classification, Goal, Objective or Program Proposed Use and Improvements Compliance Land Use The RLM and RM designations would be divided by Crystalline Drive and Rose Drive. Those properties east of the dividing line are constructed at RLM densities and those properties west of the dividing line are constructed at RM densities. Yes Housing Provide sufficient, new affordable housing to meet the needs of groups with special requirements. The proposed land use boundary adjustment does not affect the ability ofthe project to construct the approved affordable housing project. Yes Open Space and Conservation Preserve open spaces in as natural a state as possible. The proposed land use boundary adjustment does not alter the approved development, thereby continuing to preserve the approved natural open space to the east of the development site. Yes As shown by the above table, the project would ensure conformance with the General Plan. B. Local Coastal Program The subject properties are located in the Mello II segment of the City's Local Coastal Program (LCP). The LCP consists of two parts - the Land Use Plan and the implementing ordinances. For this portion of the Mello II segment, the implementing ordinances consist of the applicable portions of the Zoning Ordinance. This section addresses only compliance with the Land Use Plan since Zoning Ordinance comphance is discussed in Section C below. The policies of the Mello II Land Use Plan emphasize topics such as preservation of agricultural and scenic resources, protection of environmentally sensitive resources, provision of shoreline access, and prevention of geologic instability and erosion. The proposed adjustments to the boundaries between the RLM and RM land use designations are consistent with the policies contained in the Land Use Plan for the Mello II segment of the LCP. Since all of the affected properties are already subdivided and no additional development is proposed with this project, no impacts to any physical features, such as scenic resources, environmentally sensitive areas, or geologic features, will occur. The adjustment of the land use boundaries over the developing properties does not preclude the continued confonnance with the Mello II segment policies. The land use changes represent the relocation of an existing boundary; therefore no new land use is being added to the plan. Given the above, the proposed Thompson/Tabata GPA is consistent with the Mello n Land Use Plan of the LCP. GPA 04-11/LCPA 04-10 - TTOMPSON/TABATA GPA July 21, 2004 Page 4 C. Zoning Ordinance/Existing Subdivision The proposed Thompson/Tabata GPA must be consistent with the existing Zoning and the existing, developed subdivision. The proposed actions would make coincident the boundaries of the R-l-Q and RLM designations, as well as the boundaries of the RD-M-Q and RM designations. The R-l zone implements the RLM designation by allowing single-family development with a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. The RD-M zone implements the RM designation by allowing the development of small lot single-family development and multifamily condominiums. As stated above, the area proposed for the land use changes covers the southem portion of the existing Thompson/Tabata residential subdivision. The subdivision has two components: that portion within the proposed RLM area was approved at a net density of 2.56 dwelling units per developable acre and that portion within the proposed RM area was approved at a net density of 3.89 dwellings per acre. Both of these existing densities are close to or within their respective range of the RLM and RM designations. Therefore the adjusted land use designations are appropriate for the existing, approved land use. There are no lots within the area that could be further subdivided; therefore the proposed land use change does not affect any future development in the area. Given the above, the proposed Thompson/Tabata land use change is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and the existing subdivisions. D. Growth Management Ordinance Any request to change the land use of a property must be consistent with the City's Growth Management Plan. Since the area proposed for the land use change is under development, all public facilities necessary to serve the Thompson/Tabata development are already in place or are being constracted concurrent with development. Therefore, the proposed land use boundary adjustment would not have any impacts on public facilities or services. In addition, all excess dwelling units resulting from the development of the property at a lower density than the Growth Management Control Point for the RLM and RM designations have been extracted. The proposed land use change would therefore not result in any additional dwelling units being deposited in the excess dwelling unit bank. Given the above, the proposed zoning and land use designation adjustment is consistent with the Growth Management Ordinance. V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The potential environmental impacts due to the proposed land use adjustment was reviewed for potentially significant adverse impacts to the environment pursuant to the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). No construction or revisions to the approved development plan are proposed with the boundary revisions, therefore no impacts to physical features would occur. The boundary adjustments bring the General Plan, Zoning and Local Coastal Program. into conformance with each other and do not impact the existing approved subdivision. No land within the area of the boundary adjustments could be further subdivided and the proposed land use changes do not affect the ability of the project to provide its proportionate share of housing affordable to lower income households. Given the above, the proposed land use designation boundary adjustment would not produce any significant adverse impacts to the environment. The GPA 04-11/LCPA 04-10 - TfWMPSON/TABATA GPA July 21, 2004 Page 5 Planning Director issued a Negative Declaration on June 18, 2004 for a 30-day public review and no comments were received. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5675 (Neg Dec) 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5676 (GPA) 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5677 (LCPA) 4. Location Map 5. B ackground D ata Sheet SITE THOMPSON/TABATA GPA GPA 04-11/LCPA 04-10 CASE NO: SSACKGROUND DATA SHEET GPA 04-11/LCPA 04-10 CASE NAME: Thompson/Tabata GPA APPLICANT: Citv of Carisbad REQUEST AND LOCATION: Request for a Negative Declaration. General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Local Coastal Program Amendment to adjust the boundary between the Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM) and Residential Medium Densitv (RM) General Plan designations over approximatelv 7.9 acres on property generallv located west of Aviara Parkway, south of Poinsettia Lane, in Local Facilities Management Zone 20. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of the eastem half of the northeastem half and a portion of the southwestem quarter of Section 28. Township 12 South, Range 4 West inn the San Bemardino Quadrant, in the City of Carlsbad, Countv of San Diego, State of Califomia APN: 214-170-80. -81. -84. -85. -89 Acres: M. Proposed No. of Lots/Units: n/a GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation: RLM and RM Density Allowed: 0.0 - 8.0 du/ac Density Proposed: n/a_ Existing Zone: R-l-O and RD-M-Q Proposed Zone: Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use: Zoning General Plan Current Land Use Site R-l-Q and RD-M-Q RLM and RM Under construction North R-l, RD-M-Q, and L-C RLM and RM Single family homes South R-l RLM Single family homes East P-C OS Natural open space West RD-M RM Single family homes PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: Carlsbad Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): n/a ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Negative Declaration, issued June 18. 2004 I I Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated_