The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLCPA 05-08; HMP Hardline Preserve Areas; Local Coastal Program Amendment (LCPA)IJ I , 1) 0 CITY OF CARLSBAD . LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) (FOR • '(FOR DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) .·USE ONLY) Administrative Permit D ;-'llanned Industrial Permit 0 Administrative Variance D Planning Commission Determination 0 Coastal Development Permit D Precise Development Plan 0 Conditional Use Permit D Redevelopment Permit - 0 Condominium Permit D Site Development Plan 0 Environmental Impact Assessment D Special Use Permit M--General Plan Amendment [?),.,, 2----D s'pecific Plan g Hillside Development Permit D +eRtati,,ce ~aFsel Map Obtain from Engineering Department Local Coastal Program Amendment ())~ D Tentative Tract Map D Master Plan D Variance D Non-Residential Planned Development ..0=--Zone Change OJ-I( ; D Planned Development Permit { I D List other applications not specified 2) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: ~~~~ I .N "f5?1 p:1"ce{s) 3) PROJECT NAME: lf{Vt() tfovJiv~ ~~./ ~ 4) 11\0~ ~\t\~~f..... ~A te~P ~/c,;;e p,c_{')e.,Le--o/W-9 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: G v v ~~~~ I fo~~ ~ ~ 5) OW~ME (Print or Type) / 6)APPLIC~) 011 .· . MAILING ADDR'/ MAILING ADDRESS /{73~ hx-b.y 1/v. CITYANDST~ ~ELEPHONE ~:w~ ZIP fw JELEPHONE ~DB 6ot-%oo EMAIL ADDRESS: -.......__ EMAIL ADDRESS: I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND KNOWLEDGE. CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ...-...-- SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATURE DATE 7) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS BE FILEO, MUST 91: SUBMITTED-PRIOR TO 3:30 P;M. J A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMI,TTED PRIOR T() 4:00. P;JI,t ~ . .e:) LOCATION OF PROJECT: STREET ADDRESS ON THE SIDE OF (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) (NAME OF STREET) BETWEEN AND (NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREET) 9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 1 0) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS 011) NUMBER OF EXISTING 012) PROPOSED NUMBER D RESIDENTIAL UNITS OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS 13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION 014) PROPOSED IND OFFICE/ D 15) PROPOSED COMM D SQUARE FOOT AGE SQUARE FOOTAGE 16) PERCENT AGE OF PROPOSED 017) PROPOSED INCREASE 018) PROPOSED SEWER D PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE INADT USAGE IN EDU 19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 020) EXISTING GENERAL 021) PROPOSED GENERAL D PLAN PLAN DESIGNATION 22) EXISTING ZONING 023) PROPOSED ZONING 024) HABITAT IMPACTS B IF YES, ASSIGN HMP # 25) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS-APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION .. 1/WE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE SIGNATURE FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION TOTAL FEE REQUIRED Form 14 Rev. 12/04 RECEIVED ~~uG 2 3 2oos CITY OF CARLSBAD DATE P'l_~~ffil@ ECEIVED RECEIVED BY: PAGE 2 OF 5 HARDLINE PRESERVES WITHOUT OPEN SPACE GP DESIGNATIONS Property/ Area Summit Calavera Heights Carlsbad Highlands Zone 5 area CRC Cost co Emerald Ridge Cobblestone Palomar Oaks Way Ocean Bluff Roesch DeJong Poinsettia Hill Lohf Current GP (Zoning) RM (C-2) RLM (P-C) RLM (R-A-1 0) PI (P-M) PI (C-M) R (C-2-Q) RLM (R-1-Q and R-1-10-Q) RLM (R-1 and 0-S) PI (P-M) RLM (R-1-Q) RLM (0-S) RLM (R-1-Q) RM (RD-M-Q) RLM (R-1-Q) APN 167-030-79 167-521-60 168-050-02,-29,-30,-31,-32 212-050-45' -46 212-130-35 and portions of 212-130-27, -28, -29, -30, -31, -52 and portions of 212-120-07, -08, -09 portion of 211-040-36, -32 (? HMP mapping accurate?) 212-212-22; 214-543-29 (portion?); 214-544-05 (portion?), 214-544-07; 212-223-16 212-192-01' -03; 212-201-70 Portions of 213-091-01, -02, -05, -06, -15; remaining portions of 213-092-25 215-072-42 215-074-22 Remaining portion of 215-083-09 215-880-01' -11 215-920-42 HARDLINE PRESERVES WITHOUT OPEN SPACE GP DESIGNATIONS Paqe 2 Aviara (PA 32) (PA 21) (PA 18) Aviara (PA 7) (PA 23) (PA 26N) (PA 30) (PA 26S) (PA 28) (PA 27) Seascape Mitsui/Murphy area Green Valley Arroyo La Costa Las Olas Ct Rice(?) Rancho Verde LC Canyon HS LC Oaks 3.14, 3.15 Xana Way area RM (P-C) RLM (P-C) RLM (P-C) RM (P-C) RM (P-C) RLM (P-C) RLM (P-C) RLM (P-C) RLM (P-C) RLM (P-C) RM (P-C) Multiple RLM (P-C) RLM (R-1-1 0) RLIOS (0-S) RLM (R-1-10) RL (P-C) H (P-C) RLM (P-C) RLM (P-C) Portion of 215-841-07 215-910-33; 215-900-29, -28, -52; portion of 215-042-03 215-891-10; 215-890-32, -47 215-670-13; portion of 215-671-03 215-960-18, -19 215-850-19, -20 215-860-30; 215-801-27 215-644-09, -1 0; 215-690-14 215-790-15; 215-780-12 215-710-36 214-353-08 Portions of 216-121-15, -17, -18, :.19, -20 (see mapping); portion of 215-051-04 Remaining portions of 255-012-03, -04, -10 255-273-02; 255-253-28 255-040-57 264-010-38 264-460-16 264-482-02, -03, -04, -05; 264-500-15 223-332-04 223-681-19; 223-693-21 222-470-23; 222-151-80; portion of 223-021-12 89 The Coa~~-News Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County. Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to The Coast News, P.O. Box 232-550, Encinitas, CA 92023 (760) 436-9737 Proof of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am principal clerk of the printer of The Coast News, a newspaper printed and published weekly and which news- paper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation for the cities of Del Mar, Solana Beach, Encinitas/Cardiff, Carlsbad, Oceanside, San MarcosNista and the County Judicial District by the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego (8/4/94, #677114, B2393, P396); and that the notice, of which the annexed is a print- ed copy, has been published in, each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: September 2. 2005 I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of ~on the 2nd day of September 2005. -~~UxS'~ Clerk of the Printer PlANNING DEPARlMOO City Of brlsba\1 Space above for County Clerk's Filing Stamp <I . . . I PUBLIC NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES: 'Please be advised that the City of Carisbad is considering text amendments to its Local Coastal Program (LCP) as summarized below. This amendment is being proposed by the City of Carlsbad and is currently under review. This notice hereby opens a six-week review-period after which the City Council will consider all comments and act on the proposed amendment. The Planning Commission hearing is expected to take place in October 2005,. and will be duly noticed. The City Council hearing is expected to take place in October or November 2005, and will be duly noticed. A list of the: affected parcels, with their current and proposed designations, are ava1lable for review at the following 'locations: (1) Carlsbad Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue; (2) City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive; (3) Carlsbad Main Library, 1775 Dove Lane; (4) Georgina Cole Library, 1250 Carlsbad Village Drive; and (5) the California Coastal Commission, 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, CA 92108-4402 PROPOSED LCP AMENDMENT SUMMARY LCPA 05-08 • HMP HARDLINE PRESERVE AREAS The City's Zoning Ordinance is the implementing ordinance for the City's Local Coastal Program. Accordingly, this Local Coastal Program Amendment is nec- essary to ensure consistency between its proposed amended Zoning Ord1nance and 1ts Local Coastal· Program. This specific General Plan Amendment and Zone Change is as follows: A change in the land use and zoning designations to Open Space for those existing Habitat Management Plan hardline preserve areas throughout the City that are not already designated as Open Space in conformance with the Habitat Management Plan Implementing Agreement, approved on November 9, 2004. If you have q_ny questions, please c8JI M!chae! Grim !n the P~anning ·Department at (760) 602-4623. Written comments should be sent to the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue1 Carlsbad. California 92008. PJBUS1-~ DATE: Septenber 2, 200.5 PUBUSi-l DATE ~=OR NO RTf-: COUNTY TlfV!ES: Septembei-2, 2005 PUBLISH DATE FOR COAST NEWS:: September 2, 2005. CN 2440, Sept. 2, 2005 PROOF OF PUBLIC TION (2010 & 2011 C.C.P.) This space is_,. the County Clerk's Filing Stamp STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of 2005 Pl.ANNINC DEPAmMEIY City Of £arlsbaf Proof of Publication of Formerly known as tht Times-Advocate and wh TO INTERESTED PARTIES: adjudicated newspapers the Superior Court of tl Please be advised .that the City of parisbad is cor:-tsidering text ~mef1dments to its Coastal Program (LCP) as summanzed below. Th1s amenament 1s bemg proposed b State of California, for t City of Carlsbad and 1s currently under review. This notice hereby opens a six- th C.ty f E d"d rev1ew period after which the City Council will consider all comments and act on the e 1 o scon I o g_osed amendment. The Plannmg Commission hearing is expected to take pia 171349 for the County ~ctob!3r 2005, and will be duly no1iced. 1he Ci):y Cour:-tcil hearing is expected to . 'f place 111 October or November 2005, and w1ll be duly not1ced. notice o which the ann · . in type not small th list of the affected parcels; with their current and Qroposed designations, are avail . 1775 Dove Lane; (4) Georgma Cole Library, 1250 "Carlsbad VlllaQe Dnve; and (5 published in each regula . ve.nue) (2·.) C1ty C.lerk s.Offu?e, 1200 C.arlsbad Vlllag_.ee Dnve; (3). Carlsb~d Ma1n L1b er ~r review at t.he follovying l9cations: (1) Carlsba9 Plannif!g Department, 1639 F~r newspaper and not m a California Coastal Commission, 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite -103, San Diego the following dates, to-wi 92108-4402 . . . . . . September oznd, 200S LCPA 05-08 -HMP HARDLINE PRESERVE AREAS , ~ PROPOSED LCP AMENDMENT SUMMARY . he City's Zoning Ordinance is the implementing ordinance for the City's Local Co • 1 Program. Accoraingly, this Local Coastal Prograrry Amen9ment is neqessary to en I certify (or declare) und consistency between 1ts proposed amended Zomng Ordmance and 1ts Local Co the foregoing is true and c.IProgram. This specific General Plan Amendment ana Zone Change is as follows: ~ chanQe in the land use and zoning designations to Open Space for those exi .. "' ..... ,.... I Habitat~anagement Plan hardline preserve areas throughout the City that are n Dated at SA1 ~ MAKLOS 1ready designated as Open Space in conformance with the· Habitat Management Implementing Agreement, appreved on November 9, 2004. · This 02nd If d:ou have any questions, please call Michael Grim in the Planning Department at Day of Sept [~e~:~~~~~~~~~!!~i~r~~~f~r~~o~k~g~~~.~nt t~~~e Plann,ing D~p~~:ent-~t 1635 ~ Signature · Jane Allshouse NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising (J.. City of Carlsbad I@ fl II II I ;t~ I •l§ ·til II; .t§ II I PUBLIC NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES: Please be advised that the City of Carlsbad is considering text amendments to its Local Coastal Program (LCP) as summarized below. This amendment is being proposed by the City of Carlsbad and is currently under review. This notice hereby opens a six-week review period after which the City Council will consider all comments and act on the proposed amendment. The Planning Commission hearing is expected to take place in October 2005, and will be duly noticed. The City Council hearing is expected to take place in October or November 2005, and will be duly noticed. A list of the affected parcels, with their current and proposed designations, are available for review at the following locations: (1) Carlsbad Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue; (2) City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive; (3) Carlsbad Main Library, 1775 Dove Lane; (4) Georgina Cole Library, 1250 Carlsbad Village Drive; and (5) the California Coastal Commission, 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, CA 92108-4402 PROPOSED LCP AMENDMENT SUMMARY LCPA 05-08-HMP HARDLINE PRESERVE AREAS The City's Zoning Ordinance is the implementing ordinance for the City's Local Coastal Program. Accordingly, this Local Coastal Program Amendment is necessary to ensure consistency between its proposed amended Zoning Ordinance and its Local Coastal Program. This specific General Plan Amendment and Zone Change is as follows: A change in the land use and zoning designations to Open Space for those existing Habitat Management Plan hardline preserve areas throughout the City that are not already designated as Open Space in conformance with the Habitat Management Plan Implementing Agreement, approved on November 9, 2004. If you have any questions, please call Michael Grim in the Planning Department at (760) 602- 4623. Written comments should be sent to the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008. PUBLISH DATE: September 2, 2005 PUBLISH DATE FOR NORTH COUNTY TIMES: September 2, 2005 PUBLISH DATE FOR COAST NEWS: September 2, 2005 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @ EXISTING HMP HARDLINE PRESERVE PROPERTIES WITHOUT OPEN SPACE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATIONS (GPA 05-12/LCPA 05-08/ZC 05-11) LFMP Zone Assessor's Parcel Number Current General Plan Proposed General Plan and Zoning and Zoning Zone 1 167-030-79 RM and C-2 OS and 0-S Zone4 214-353-08 RM and P-C OS and P-C Zone 5 212-050-45, -46 PI and P-M OS and 0-S 212-130-35 PI and C-M OS and 0-S portions of 212-130-27,-28, -29, -30, PI and C-M OS and 0-S -31, and -52 portions of 212-120-07, 08, -09 PI and C-M OS and 0-S portions of 213-091-01,-02,-05,-06, PI and P-M OS and 0-S and -15 portion of 213-092-25 PI and P-M OS and 0-S portions of 211-040-32, -36 Rand C-2-Q OS and 0-S Zone 6 223-681-19 RLM and P-C OS and P-C 223-693-21 RLM and P-C OS and P-C Zone 7 167-521-60 RLM and P-C OS and P-C Zone 11 222-470-23 RLM and P-C OS and P-C 222-151-80 RLM and P-C OS and P-C portion of 223-021-12 RLM and P-C OS and P-C 223-332-04 Hand P-C OS and P-C 255-040-57 RLM and R-1-10 OS and 0-S 264-010-38 RL/OS and 0-S OS and 0-S 264-460-16 RLM and R-1-10 OS and 0-S 264-482-02, -03, -04, -05 RL and P-C OS and P-C 264-500-15 RL and P-C OS and P-C Zone 12 255-273-02 RLM and P-C OS and P-C 255-253-28 RLM and P-C OS and P-C Zone 15 168-050-02, -29, -30, -31' -32 RLM and R-A-10 OS and 0-S Zone 19 215-644-09, -10 RLM and P-C OS and P-C 215-690-14 RLM and P-C OS and P-C 215-670-13 RM and P-C OS and P-C portion of 215-671-03 RM and P-C OS and P-C 215-710-36 RLM and P-C OS and P-C EXISTING HMP HARDLINE PRESERVE PROPERTIES WITHOUT OPEN SPACE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATIONS (GPA 05-12/LCPA 05-08/ZC 05-11) LFMP Zone Assessor's Parcel Number Current General Plan Proposed General Plan and Zoning and Zoning Zone 19 portion of 215-841-07 RM and P-C OS and P-C 215-790-15 RLM and P-C OS and P-C 215-780-12 RLM and P-C OS and P-C 215-850-19, -20 RLM and P-C OS and P-C 215-860-30 RLM and P-C OS and P-C 215-801-27 RLM and P-C OS and P-C 215-891-10 RLM and P-C OS and P-C 215-890-32, -47 RLM and P-C OS and P-C 215-910-33 RLM and P-C OS and P-C 215-900-28, -29, -52 RLM and P-C OS and P-C portion of 215-042-03 RLM and P-C OS and P-C 215-960-18, -19 RLM and P-C OS and P-C portions of 216-121-15, -17, -18, -19, RM and P-C OS and P-C and -20 portion of 215-051-04 RM and P-C OS and P-C Zone 20 212-192-01' -03 RM and R-1/0-S OS and 0-S 212-201-70 RM and R-1 /O-S OS and 0-S 212-212-22 RLM and R-1-Q OS and 0-S 212-223-16 RLM and R-1-Q OS and 0-S portion of 214-543-29 RLM and R-1-Q OS and 0-S portion of 214-544-05 RLM and R-1-Q OS and 0-S 214-544-07 RLM and R-1-Q OS and 0-S 215-072-42 RLM and R-1-Q OS and 0-S 215-074-22 RLM and 0-S OS and 0-S portion of 215-083-09 RLM and R-1-Q OS and 0-S Zone 21 215-880-01' -11 RM and RD-M-Q OS and 0-S 21-920-42 RLM and R-1-Q OS and 0-S Zone 23 portions of 255-012-03, -04, -10 C/0/RMH and P-C OS and P-C General Plan designation abbreviations: C/0/RMH H OS PI R RL RLM RM Commercial/Office/Residential Medium High Density High School Open Space Planned Industrial Recreational Commercial Residential Low Density Residential Low Medium Density Residential Medium Density Zoning designation abbreviations: C-2 C-M 0-S P-C P-M R-A-10 R-1-10 R-1-Q RD-M-Q General Commercial Heavy Commercial/Light Industrial Open Space Planned Community Planned Industrial Residential Agriculture with 10,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size One Family Residential with 10,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size One Family Residential with a Qualified Development Overlay Residential Density-Multiple with a Qualified Development Overlay City May 15, 2007 Deborah Lee District Manager, San Diego Area California Coastal Commission Suite 103 7575 Metropolitan Dr San Diego CA 921 08-4421 of Carlsbad •:aE""""~•·z§·t•a•;.tga• SUBJECT: CITY OF CARLSBAD LCP AMENDMENT #1-06 A AND B-HMP IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AND HMP HARDLINE GPA Dear Deborah: Thank you for your comments and question related to the HMP implementation LPCAs. Enclosed are the items requested in relation to the above referenced applications. These items are: LCPA #1-06A-HMP Implementation Plan: 1. Three (3) copies of the City's First HMP Annual Report; 2. Three (3) copies of the Preserve Management Plan, Annual Report and Work Plan for the Kelly Ranch preserve area; 3. Three (3) copies of the a status on all City projects within the Coastal Zone that rely on the Lake Calavera Mitigation area, as listed Appendix B-3 of the approved HMP. LCPA #1-068-HMP Hardline GPA 1. Three (3) copies of a list of Coastal Zone properties proposed for land use and zoning changes. As shown on this list, a total of 52 Coastal Zone properties are proposed for land use changes and 18 of those also include zoning changes. (Three copies of the City LCPA resolution with map attachments are also enclosed for reference-this resolution was included in the original application). 2. A marked up copy of the HMP map (also known as Figure 28) indicating the location of all of the 52 parcels included in the LCPA. The numbers on the map correspond to the number reference on the list of properties identified in item #1 above. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA Q;2008-7314'" (760) 602-4600 .. FAX (760) 602-8559 .. www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us CITY OF CARLSBAD LCP AMENDMENT #1-06 A AND B May 15, 2007 Page 2 Please feel free to contact me at (760) 602-4623 or mgrim@ci.carlsbad.ca.us if you have any questions. I am available to meet at your convenience if you would like to discuss the submitted items and/or the HMP LCPA application. Thank you for assisting us in the effectuation of the City's HMP implementation plan. Senior Planner Enclosures C: Planning Director Principal Planner DeCerbo Senior Planner Jesser File Copy - City of Carlsbad I #JFI II II I ;t. I •X§ ·fl II 1·14 ,II April 3, 2006 California Coastal Commission San Diego District Ste 103 7575 Metropolitan Dr San Diego CA 92108-4402 APPLICATION FOR LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT I. JURISDICTION CITY OF CARLSBAD -LCPA 05-08-HMP Hardline GPA SEGMENT? All II. TYPE OF AMENDMENT SUBMITTAL (check) Ill. A) LUP D B) ZONING D C) LCP (Land Use & Zoning) ~ LCP STATUS A) LUP CERTIFIED B) ZONING CERTIFIED C) ZONING OF COMM. ACTION ON SUGGESTED MODIFICATIONS D) PRIOR COMMISSION ACTION ON THIS SUBMITTAL? IV. SUMMARY OF AMENDMENT PROPOSAL Y/N, DATE y -1980 y -1996 None None /. General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to change the land use and zoning desig- nations of the remaining existing Habitat Management Plan hardline preserve areas throughout the City to Open Space. V. COMMISSION OFFICE USE ONLY: AMENDMENT# DATE RECEIVED DATE FILED COMM. HEARING AGENDA ----------- COMMISSION ACTION: A: , AWM __ , D __ , Date....:------ VI. PROJECT PLANNER For information regarding this application, please contact Michael Grim, Planner at (760) 602-4623. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us ® LCPA SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS--CHECKLIST 10 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Council Resolution -signed and dated indicating City intends to administer LCP consistent with the Coastal Act and indicating date LCPA will take ef- fect. NOTE: All amendments take effect immediately upon Coastal Commission approval unless otherwise stated. A reproducible copy of Council adopted LCPA D If new text indicates where it fits into certified text. If revised text clearly indicates using strike- outs and/or underlines showing modifications. If map change, submit replacement map. A discussion of amendments relationship to and effect on other sections of the previously certified LCP. Zoning measures that will implement the LCPA. Affect on public access (only for area between first public road and the Coast). An analysis of potentially significant adverse cumu- lative impacts on coastal resources. 7. Copies of environmental review documents. 8. 9. Summary of measures to ensure both public and agency participation. ~ List of public hearing dates ~ Notice of interested parties ~ Mailing list D Comments D Responses to comments All staff reports plus attachments. X (copy enclosed) X (copy enclosed) X (see attached) X (see attached) X (see attached) X (see attached) X (see attached) X (see attached & copies enclosed) X (see attached) X (see attached) X (co~y enclosed) il' 3. AMENDMENT'S RELATIONSHIP TO AND EFFECT ON OTHER SECTIONS OF THE PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED LCP /. The proposed LCPA involves revisions to the Zoning Ordinance by way of rev.isions.·tL the Zoning Map; the Zoning Ordinance is the implementing ordinance for all segments of the LCP. 4. ZONING MEASURES THAT WILL IMPLEMENT THE LCPA The proposed LCPA is a change of designation to Open Space, therefore Chapter 21.33 of the Zoning Ordinance will implement the proposed amendments. · 5. AFFECT ON PUBLIC ACCESS The proposed LCPA involves map designation changes and does not directly apply to coastal access. It does not involve development nor does it propose any regulations that would impact public access to coastal resources. Therefore, the proposed LCPA does not preclude the provision of public access. 6. ANALYSIS OF POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ON COASTAL RESOURCES The proposed LCPA is only map change and does not involve any physical development nor does it impact any regulations pertaining to coastal resources. Therefore, the pro- posed LCPA will have no significant adverse cumulative impacts on coastal resources. 8. SUMMARY OF MEASURES TO ENSURE BOTH PUBLIC AND AGENCY PARTICIPA- TION The Local Coastal Program Amendment was duly noticed for over the six-week period, from September 2, 2005 to October 13, 2005. Public comments were received from three interested parties in response to the LCPA notice. The proposed amendment was also reviewed through the duly noticed public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council, as listed below: PLANNING COMMISSION: CITY COUNCIL December 21, 2005 February 7, 2006 STATE OF CAUFORNIA --THE NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY ARNOLD CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SAN DIEGO AREA 7575 METROPOLITAN DRIVE, SUITE 103 SAN DIEGO, CA 92108-4421 (619) 767-2370 Mr. Mike Grim City of Carlsbad Planning Department 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, Ca 92008 Re: Certification of City of Carlsbad LCP Amendment No. 1-06B (HMP General Plan Amendment) Dear Mr. Grim: On August 7, 20081the California Coastal Commission approved the above referenced amendment to the City of Carlsbad Local Coastal Program (LCP). The amendment involves changes to the land use designation and zoning to reflect the changes made to 51 parcels all within the Hardline Preserve area of the City's Habitat Management Plan area. These lots were already protected by an Open Space Deed Restriction and/or Conservation Easement; however, all of the proposed parcels were designated for residential and/or commercial uses and thus could have potentially allowed additional development. This amendment modified either or both of the land use and zoning designations for these parcels to Open Space. The Commission approved the LCP amendment with suggested modifications. Specifically, the suggested modifications removed two parcels from the land use and zoning re-designations within the City's Habitat Management Plan. These two parcels will need to be brought back to the Commission for a comprehensive review including additional parcels located directly adjacent from these parcels, which were not included in the original submittal. The attached modifications contain the specific changes adopted by the Commission. Before the amendment request can become effectively certified, the Executive Director must determine that implementation ofthe approved amendment will be consistent with the Commission's certification order. This is necessary because the amendment was certified with suggested modifications. In order for the Executive Director to make this determination, the local government must formally acknowledge receipt ofthe Commission's resolution of certification, including any terms or suggested modifications; and take any formal action which is required to satisfy them, such as rezonings or other ordinance revisions. This certification must also include production of new LCP maps demonstrating that the amendment, as approved by the Commission and accepted by the City, will be incorporated into the City's certified Local Coastal Program immediately upon concurrence by the Commission of the Executive Director's determination. As soon as the necessary documentation is received in this office and accepted, the Executive . Director will report his/her determination to the Commission at its next regularly scheduled public hearing. If you have any questions about the Commission's action or this final August 11, 2009 Page2 certification procedure, please contact our office. Once again, thank you and the other staff members who worked on this planning effort. We remain available to assist you and your staff in any way possible to continue the successful implementation of the local coastal program. cc: Toni Ross Jennifer Jesser ~erely, " f) jJ 0~(mA~ftl({ltL- Deborah Lee District Manager August 11, 2009 Page 3 CITY OF CARLSBAD LCP AMENDMENT #1-06B HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN-GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT SUGGESTED MODIFICATIONS ADOPTED BY COASTAL COMMISSION (August 7, 2008) 1. Remove Parcel #214-543-29 from the proposed amendment for both land use designation and rezoning. 2. Remove Parcel #214-544-05 from the proposed amendment for both land use designation and zoning. STATE OF CALIFORNIA --THE RESOURCES AGENCY ARNOLD SCHW.~ZENEGGER, Governor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SAN DIEGO AREA 7575 HETROPOLITAN DRIVE, SUITE 103 SAN DIEGO, CA 92108-4421 (619) 767-2370 July 24, 2008 Th32b TO: COMMISSIONERS AND INTERESTED PERSONS FROM: SHERIL YN SARB, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, SAN DIEGO COAST DISTRICT DEBORAH LEE, DISTRICT MANAGER, SAN DIEGO COAST DISTRICT TONI ROSS, COASTAL PROGRAM ANALYST, SAN DIEGO COAST DISTRICT SUBJECT: STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON CITY OF CARLSBAD MAJOR AMENDMENT 1-06B (HMP/GPA Revisions) for Commission Meeting of August 6-8,2008 SYNOPSIS The subject LCP land use plan and implementation plan amendment was submitted and filed as complete on May 22, 2007. A one-year time extension was granted on August 9, 2007. As such, the last date for Commission action on this item is August 8, 2008. This report addresses one of four components to the City of Carlsbad amendment request #1- 06. This staff report addresses the second component: (B) General Plan Amendment. The first component (A) Habitat Management Plan Implementation Plan is also scheduled for the August 2008 hearing. The third component (C) CUP Code revisions was approved on January 12, 2007 and the fomih component; (D) Density Bonus Revisions was approved on March 6, 2008. SUMMARY OF AMENDMENT REQUEST The City is proposing to amend its Land Use (LUP) and Implementation (IP or Zoning) Plans to reflect the changes made to 51 parcels all within the Hardline Preserve area of the City's Habitat Management Plan (HMP) area. These lots have already been protected by an Open Space Deed Restriction and/or a Conservation Easement; however, both the land use designation and the zoning still identifies that these parcels may be available for future development. For example, numerous of these preserved areas are still designated for residential and/or commercial uses. This amendment would modify either or both of the land use and zoning designations to Open Space. In Master Plan areas, the zoning would remain as Planned Community (PC) but the land use designation would be modified to Open Space. The intent of this LCP amendment is to further protect these preserved lands from future development. The modification of all preserve areas to Open Space for both land use and zoning designations was a requirement included in the initial approval of the HMP by the Commission. This is the first amendment to modify such designations; however, additional amendments for other preserved lands are anticipated, as the proposed modifications do not represent all of the HMP preserve. City of Carlsbad LCP A 1-06B HMP\General Plan Amendment (GPA) Page 2 SUMMARY OF STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff is first recommending denial ofboth the LCP amendments as submitted and then the approval with two suggested modifications. Two of the parcels (APN 214-543-29 and 214-544-05) proposed to be changed to open space are directly adjacent to other large parcels also located in the habitat preserve area but not proposed in this amendment to be redesignated open space. As explained by the City, one of the remaining parcels was not redesignated because there is an existing residence on that parcel. However, looking at only two parcels of a larger site in isolation could prejudice the establishment ofthe preserve areas. It is unclear at this time what the habitat value is of all four parcels in question, so the Commission is unable to find that an amendment that looks at two of these parcels in isolation is consistent with the intent of the HMP, or the City's certified LCP. Such an action \vould be premature and unnecessary. Those two parcels (APN #s 214-543-29, 214-544-05) could be brought back at a later date, and be reviewed at the same time as the remaining two parcels that are also situated within the habitat preserve area. The appropriate resolutions and motions begin on Page 5. The suggested modifications begin on Page 7. The findings for denial of the Land Use Plan Amendment as submitted begin on Page 8. The findings for approval of the plan, if modified, begin on Page 10. The findings for denial of the Implementation Plan Amendment as submitted begin on page 11. The findings for approval of the plan, if modified, begin on Page 13. BACKGROUND The Carlsbad HMP was prepared to satisfy the requirements of a federal Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP), and as a subarea plan of the regional Multiple Habitat Conservation Plan (MHCP). The MHCP study area involves approximately 186 square miles in northwestern San Diego County. This area includes the coastal cities of Carlsbad, Encinitas, Solana Beach and Oceanside, as well as the inland cities ofVista and San Marcos and several independent special districts. The participating local governments and other entities will implement their pmiions of the MHCP through individual subarea plans such as the Carlsbad HMP. Once approved, the MHCP and its subarea plans replace interim restrictions placed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the California Department ofFish and Game (CDFG) on impacts to coastal sage scrub and gnatcatchers within that geographical area, and allow the incidental take of the gnatcatcher and other covered species as specified in the plan. In its action on City of Carlsbad LCP Amendment No. 1-03B in July 2003, the Commission certified the HMP as part of the LCP and found it to meet the requirements of Sections 30240 and 30250 of the Coastal Act despite some impacts to environmentally sensitive habitat area (ESHA). The Commission found that, pursuant to Sections 30007.5 and 30200(b), certification of the HMP with suggested modifications was, on balance, the alternative that was most protective of significant coastal resources. Since certification ofthe HMP/LCP Amendment, the Commission has approved several LCP amendments similar to that proposed which would modify the residential and open space boundaries City of Carlsbad LCP A l-06B HMP\General Plan Amendment (GP A) Page 3 and to rezone parcels from the Limited Control (LC) Zone to Residential Density Multiple (RD-M) and Open Space (OS). Some of the earlier developments were zoned for residential and/or commercial uses and were part of the hardline preserve system. This represented a disparity between the goals of the Habitat Management Plan (HMP) and the adopted land use designation and zoning. The City was aware these parcels would need to be updated to reflect their current and future allowable uses. This amendment represents the City's attempt at updating the HMP preserved boundaries to reflect their desired land uses. ADDITIONAL INFOR!\1ATION Further information on the City of Carlsbad LCP amendment l-06B may be obtained from Toni Ross, Coastal Planner, at (619) 767-2370. PART I. OVERVIE\V A. LCP HISTORY City of Carlsbad LCP A 1-06B HMP\General Plan Amendment (GPA) Page 4 The City of Carlsbad certified LCP contains six geographic segments as follows: Agua Hedionda, Mello I, Mello II, West Batiquitos Lagoon/Sammis Properties, East Batiquitos Lagoon/Hunt Properties and Village Redevelopment. Pursuant to Sections 30170(f) and 30171 of the Public Resources Code, the Coastal Commission prepared and approved two portions ofthe LCP, the Mello I and II segments in 1980 and 1981, respectively. The West Batiquitos Lagoon/ Sammis Properties segment was ce1iified in 1985. The East Batiquitos Lagoon/Hunt Properties segment was ce1iified in 1988. The Village Redevelopment Area LCP was certified in 1988; the City has been issuing coastal development pem1its there since that time. On October 21, 1997, the City assumed permit jurisdiction and has been issuing coastal development pe1mits for all segments except Agua Hedionda. The Agua Hedionda Lagoon LCP segment is a deferred certification area until an implementation plan for that segment is certified. The subject amendment request affects all the LCP segments, except the Village Redevelopment Area. B. STANDARD OF REVIE\V The standard of review for land use plans, or their amendments, is found in Section 30512 of the Coastal Act. This section requires the Commission to certify an LUP or LUP amendment if it finds that it meets the requirements of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act. Specifically, it states: Section 30512 (c) The Commission shall certify a land use plan, or any amendments thereto, if it finds that a land use plan meets the requirements of, and is in conformity with, the policies of Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 30200). Except as provided in paragraph (1) of subdivision (a), a decision to certify shall require a majority vote of the appointed membership of the Commission. Pursuant to Section 30513 of the Coastal Act, the Commission may only reject zoning ordinances or other implementing actions, as well as their amendments, on the grounds that they do not confonn with, or are inadequate to can·y out, the provisions of the certified land use plan. The Commission shall take action by a majority vote of the Commissioners present. C. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION The City has held Planning Commission and City Council meetings with regard to the subject amendment request. All of those local hearings were duly noticed to the public. Notice of the subject amendment has been distributed to all known interested parties. City of Carlsbad LCP A 1-06B HMP\Gcneral Plan Amendment (GPA) Page 5 PART II. LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM SUBMITTAL-RESOLUTIONS Following a public hearing, staff recommends the Commission adopt the following resolutions and findings. The appropriate motion to introduce the resolution and a staff recommendation are provided just prior to each resolution. I. MOTION 1: I move that the Commission certify the Land Use Plan Amendment l-06B for the City of Carlsbad as submitted. STAFF RECOMMENDATION OF DENIAL OF CERTIFICATION: Staffrecommends a NO vote on the motion. Failure of this motion will result in denial of the land use plan amendment as resubmitted and adoption of the following resolution and findings. The motion passes only by an affirmative vote of a majority of the appointed Commissioners. RESOLUTION TO DENY CERTIFICATION OF LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT AS SUBMITTED: The Commission hereby denies certification of the Land Use Plan Amendment for the City of Carlsbad as submitted and finds for the reasons discussed below that the submitted Land Use Plan Amendment fails to meet the requirements of and does not conform to the policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. Certification ofthe plan would not comply with the California Environmental Quality Act because there are feasible alternatives or mitigation measures that would substantially lessen any significant adverse impact which the Land Use Plan Amendment may have on the environment. II. MOTION: I move that the Commission certify the Land Use Plan Amendment l-06B for the City of Carlsbad if modified in accordance with the suggested changes setfortlz in the staff report. STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR CERTIFICATION IF MODIFIED. Staff recommends a YES vote on the motion. Passage of the motion will result in certification with suggested modifications of the submitted land use plan amendment and the adoption of the following resolution and findings. The motion passes only by an affirmative vote of a majority of the appointed Commissioners. City of Carlsbad LCPA l-06B HMP\General Plan Amendment (GPA) Page 6 RESOLUTION TO CERTIFY SUBMITTED LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT IF MODIFIED AS SUGGESTED: Subject to the following modifications, the Commission hereby cetiifies the Land Use Plan Amendment for the City of Carlsbad as submitted and finds for the reasons discussed herein that, if modified as suggested below, the submitted Land Use Plan Amendment will meet the requirements of and conform to the policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. Certification of the plan if modified as suggested below complies with the California Environmental Quality Act because either 1) feasible mitigation measures and/or alternatives have been incorporated to substantially lessen any significant adverse effects of the plan on the environment, or 2) there are no further feasible alternatives or mitigation measures which could substantially lessen any significant adverse impact which the Land Use Plan Amendment may have on the environment. III. MOTION: I move tlzat tlze Commission reject tlze Implementation Program Amendment I-06B for tlze City of Carlsbad as submitted. STAFF RECOJ\1l\1El\:DATION OF REJECTION: Staff recommends a YES vote. Passage of this motion will result in rejection of Implementation Program Amendment and the adoption of the following resolution and findings. The motion passes only by an affirmative vote of a majority of the Commissioners present. RESOLUTION TO DENY CERTIFICATION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM AMENDMENT AS SUBMITTED: The Commission hereby denies certification of the Implementation Program Amendment submitted for the City of Carlsbad and adopts the findings set forth below on grounds that the Implementation Program Amendment as submitted does not meet the requirements of and is not in conforn1ity with the policies of Chapter 3 ofthe Coastal Act Certification of the Implementation Program Amendment would not meet the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act as there are feasible alternatives and mitigation measures that would substantially lessen the significant adverse impacts on the environment that will result from certification of the Implementation Program Amendment as submitted IV. MOTION: I move tlzat the Commission certifj1 tlte Implementation Program Amendment l-06B for tlte City of Carlsbad if it is modified as suggested in tit is staff report. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City of Carlsbad LCPA 1-06B HMP\General Plan Amendment (GPA) Page 7 Staff recommends a YES vote. Passage of this motion will result in certification of the Implementation Program Amendment with suggested modifications and the adoption of the following resolution and findings. The motion passes only by an affinnative vote of a majority of the Commissioners present. RESOLUTION TO CERTIFY THE IMPLEJ\1ENTATION PROGRAM AMENDMENT \VITH SUGGESTED MODIFICATIONS: The Commission hereby certifies the Implementation Program Amendment for the City of Carlsbad if modified as suggested and adopts the findings set forth below on grounds that the Implementation Program Amendment with the suggested modifications will meet the requirements of and be in conformity with the policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act. Certification ofthc Implementation Program Amendment if modified as suggested complies with the California Environmental Quality Act, because either 1) feasible mitigation measures ami/or alternatives han~ been incorporated to substantially lessen any significant adverse effects of the Implementation Program Amendment on the environment, or 2) there are no further feasible alternatives and mitigation measures that would substantially lessen any significant adverse impacts on the environment. PART III. SUGGESTED I\IODIFICATIONS Staff recommends the following suggested revisions to the proposed LCP be adopted. The underlined sections represent directions to the City as to what modifications it should make to its LUP and IP as originally submitted. 1. Remove Parcel #214-543-29 from the proposed amendment for both land use designation and rezoning. 2. Remove Parcel #214-544-05 from the proposed amendment for both land use designation and zoning. PART IV. FINDINGS FOR DENIAL OF CERTIFICATION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT 1-06B, AS SUBMITTED A. AMENDMENT DESCRIPTION The City is proposing to amend their Land Use (LUP) and Implementation (IP or Zoning) Plans to reflect the changes made to 51 parcels all within the Hardline Preserve area of the City's Habitat Management Plan area. These lots have already been protected by an Open Space Deed Restriction and/or Conservation Easement; however, both the Land Use designation and the zoning for these parcels allow development. All of the proposed parcels are cunently designated for residential and/or commercial uses. This amendment would modify either or both of the land use and zoning designations for these parcels to City of Carlsbad LCPA 1-06B HMP\Gencral Plan Amendment (GPA) Page 8 Open Space. In Master Plan areas, the zoning would remain as Planned Community (PC) but the land use designation would be modified to Open Space. The intent of this LCP amendment is to fmiher protect these preserve properties from future development. The modification of all preserve sites to Open Space for both land use and zoning designations was a requirement included in the initial approval of the HMP by the Commission. This is the first amendment to modify such designations; however, additional amendments for other preserve sites are anticipated, as the proposed changes do not represent all of the preserve propetiies. B. NONCONFORl\liTY OF THE CARLSBAD LCPA 1-06A WITH CHAPTER3 1. Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas. The Coastal Act provides: Section 30240. (a) Environmentally sensitive habitat areas shall be protected against any significant disruption of habitat values, and only uses dependent on those resources shall be allowed within those areas. (b) Development in areas adjacent to environmentally sensitive habitat areas and parks and recreation areas shall be sited and designed to prevent impacts which would significantly degrade those areas, and shall be compatible with the continuance ofthose habitat and recreation areas. In 2003 the Commission approved an LCP amendment certifying the City's Habitat Management Plan (HMP) as part of the LCP. The City initially developed the HMP in response to the coastal California gnatcatcher being listed as threatened under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA), 16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq. In order to proceed with development, areas with gnatcatchers would have had to completely avoid a "take" of this species or else receive federal authorization for such an impact. The HMP was developed to receive federal authorization for management of gnatcatcher habitat on a City-wide basis, as opposed to each proposed development seeking its own authorization. Because the HMP included areas in the Coastal Zone, the City proposed its inclusion in the LCP as well. When the HMP was first proposed, the City's LCP did not protect any native habitat on slopes less than 25% grade. It was understood when the HMP was first certified that implementation ofthe HMP would result in some loss of native habitat and listed species throughout the region, inconsistent with Section 30240 of the Coastal Act. Additionally, greater benefit would be obtained from preserving large contiguous areas of the most environmentally sensitive vegetation and wildlife areas rather than preserving all fragmented pieces of habitat in place. Further, the approved mitigation requirements assured that there would be no net loss of ESHA within the coastal zone. In order to find the Habitat Management Plan consistent with the Coastal Act, the Commission had to City of Carlsbad LCPA l-06B HiVIP\Gcncral Plan Amendment (GPA) Page 9 find that the approval of the HMP represented the most protective option for coastal resources. A component of this is the need to update the land usc and zoning on parcels within the HMP preserve to Open Space, to provide for better protection of the existing coastal resources. The proposed LCP amendment includes revised land use designations on 51 parcels to reflect their inclusion in the HMP preserve and the intent of their use. The parcels are currently being utilized as though they were open space; however, their land use and/or zoning designations do not reflect such use. Presently, all 51 parcels have land use designations for residential and/or commercial uses. These designations are inconsistent with the Chapter 3 policies regarding Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas (ESHA). The above stated Coastal Act policy protects ESHA and specifies that "development. .. shall be compatible with the continuance of those habitat and recreational areas." As currently designated, these parcels would not require an amendment to the LCP if development was to be proposed, as the current designations allow for such uses. The City has indicated that it would not authorize development on these parcels and that currently these parcels arc functioning as preserved habitat areas. However, by modifying the designation ofthe preserve parcels to Open Space, any future development proposals would need to change the land use and/or zoning designations, thereby triggering an LCP amendment. Because these areas are currently being counted as part of the required preserve acreage, if such a request was to be brought forward to the Commission, not only would an LCP amendment be required for changes to the land use and zoning designations, but an HMP amendment would also be required. For the most part, these land use re-designations are acceptable, conform to the adopted HMP and.represent added security for the long-term conservation of the preserve. However, two ofthe proposed parcels (APN #s 214-543-29/214-544-05) included in this proposed amendment raise concerns. These two parcels (ref. Exhibit #1 ), are located contiguously with two additional parcels also within the HMP preserve areas. However, the adjoining two parcels were not included in the proposed amendment. This limited inclusion of only two of the four contiguous parcels may lead to impacts to the habitat areas for two different reasons. The primary concern is that by protecting only two of the four contiguous parcels in the area, the entire preserve site is not being considered as a whole thereby possibly prejudicing the delineation of the least sensitive development footprint. It is possible that all four parcels are owned or could be purchased by a single entity, in which case they could be developed, if at all, in a comprehensive manner. At this point it is unclear what portions of these four parcels contain the most valuable and sensitive habitat. By preserving only two of the four parcels the Commission is being asked to prematurely establish the development/open space boundaries when it could be more beneficial for some combination of the four parcels to be preserved as open space. As such, the Commission has modified the proposed amendment to remove these two parcels, and recommends the City subsequently bring forward an amendment including either the proposal for the remaining two lots to be included in Open Space, or detailed biological data as to the merits for including only (APN #s 214-543-29, 214-544-05) and how these two parcels having open space designations would be most consistent with the Chapter 3 policies petiaining to the protection of ESHA. City of Carlsbad LCP A l-06B HMP\Gcneral Plan Amendment (GP A) Page 10 The second concern is that in speaking with the City, it was indicated that one of the parcels that is not included in this amendment has existing development on the parcel and the property owner had no interest in preserving the rest of the land as Open Space. As such, the cun·ent hardline drawn for the preserved habitat within the HMP is incorrect, as this parcel is cunently included within the hardline preserve area but it is developed. The City is aware that rectifying this type of discrepancy would require an LCP amendment for modifying the HMP preserve area. This should be addressed with a future LCP amendment. The Commission finds that the desired use of this parcel be determined and folded into the comprehensive review of all four parcels, and then brought forward to the Commission as a proposed amendment allowing for any desired changes to land use, zoning, or HMP hardline preserve areas. PART IV. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE PLAN, IF 1\IODIFIED The Commission finds, for the specific reasons detailed below, that the land use plan, if modified as suggested, conforms with Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act. The certified City of Carlsbad LCP land use plan (LUP) has been amended to incorporate the City's Habitat Management Plan (HMP). The HMP ·was developed to meet the requirements of the Coastal Act, the Endangered Species Act and the Natural Communities Conservation Planning (NCCP) process. The certified LUP includes Coastal Act Sections 30233 and 30240 as applicable standards of review for development within and adjacent to wetlands and other environmentally sensitive habitat areas. As a component of the HMP certification, future modifications to both land use and zoning designations were discussed. It was determined that to be consistent with the ESHA policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act, the City would need to update the land use and zoning designations of multiple properties to reflect the allowable uses within the HMP preserve. As discussed previously, many ofthe parcels included in the HMP preserve retained land use and zoning designations that still reflect the potential for development at these locations. Because these areas have been set aside as part of the HMP preserve system, development on these parcels would be inconsistent with the intent ofthe adopted HMP. As such, it was detern1ined that in order to make these areas more consistent with Chapter 3 and the certified HMP, the City would retum with an amendment request modifying these inappropriate land use/zoning designations. The proposed amendment would result in 51 parcels being updated to reflect Open Space land use and zoning designations. The result would be 51 parcels gaining more protective standards, and the intent to prohibit future development on those properties would be better represented by such designations. Two suggested modifications have been included in the approval ofthis amendment removing two parcels from the proposed update. As discussed above, designating these two parcels as Open Space without a comprehensive review of the surrounding property would be premature and may result in prejudicing decisions regarding the location of any future development on City of Carlsbad LCPA 1-06B HMP\General Plan Amendment (GP A) Page 11 these parcels. The remaining 49 parcels will be modified to Open Space and will therefore better reflect the intent of the presen·e system. Some ofthe parcels (16) have only a portion ofproperty within the hardline preserve area. These properties typically contain natural habitat areas that are covered by an open space easement and/or deed restriction. The proposed land use and zoning designation change would only include that p011ion of the parcel within the open space easement and, therefore, follow the existing hardline preserve boundary, consistent with the LUP. In conclusion, the overall result of this proposed amendment would be update 49 parcels to reflect an Open Space land usc designation. This land use/zoning designation will further protect these parcels from development in the future and, as such, can be found consistent with the ccrti fled land use plan, as modified above. PART V. FINDINGS FOR REJECTION OF TI-lE CITY OF CARLSBAD IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AlVIENDIVIENT 1-06B. AS SUBMITTED A. Al\IENDMENT DESCRIPTION The City is proposing to amend their Land Usc (LUP) and Implementation (IP or Zoning) Plans to reflect the changes made to 51 parcels all within the Harclline Preserve area of the City's Habitat Management Plan area. These Jots have already been protected by an Open Space Deed Restriction and/or a Conservation Easement; however, both the current land use designation and the zoning reflects that these parcels are available for future development. For example, numerous of these preserve sites are still designated for residential and/or commercial uses. This amendment would modify either or both of the land use and zoning designations to Open Space. In Master Plan areas, the zoning would remain as Planned Community (PC) but the land usc designation would be modified to Open Space. The intent of this LCP amendment is to further protect these preserve parcels from future development. The modification to all preserve sites to Open Space for both land use and zoning designations was a requirement included in the initial approval of the HMP by the Commission. This is the first amendment to modify such designations; however, additional amendments for other preserve sites are anticipated, as the proposed modifications do not represent all of the HMP preserve. B. SPECIFIC FINDINGS FOR REJECTION The standard of review for LCP implementation submittals or amendments is their consistency with and ability to carry out the provisions of the cet1ified LUP. a) Purpose and Intent of the Ordinance. Open Space Zone. To provide for open space and recreational uses which have been deemed necessary for the aesthetically attractive and orderly growth of the community. It is used in conjunction with publicly owned property such as parks, open space, recreational areas, civic centers and other public facilities of similar City of Carlsbad LCPA 1-0GB HMP\General Plan Amendment (GP A) Page 12 nature. The zone also designates high priority resource areas at time of development that, when combined, would create a logical open space system for the community. b) Major Provisions of the Ordinance. Open Space Zone. The open space zone allows the following uses and structures: beaches and shoreline recreation, bicycle paths, horse trails, open space easements, public parks, City picnic areas and playgrounds, public access easements, scenic and slope easements, transportation rights-of-way, vista points, agricultural uses (field and seed crops, truck crops, horticultural crops, orchards and vineyards, pasture and rangeland, tree farms and fallow lands). Permitted accessory uses and structures include public restrooms, clubhouses, parking areas, barbecue and fire pits, playground equipment, stairways, patios, changing rooms, pool filtering equipment, fencing and other accessory uses required for the conduct of the permitted uses. Uses allowed by conditional use permit include group or organized camps, marinas, playfields and athletic fields, public facilities, recreational campgrounds, public stables and riding academies, golf courses, swimming pools, tennis courts, private playgrounds and picnic areas, other related cultural, entertainment and recreational activities and facilities and stands for the display and sale of aquaculture products grown on the premises. There is no minimum lot area established for the open space zone. No building or structure in the zone shall exceed thirty-five feet in height unless a higher elevation is approved as a conditional use permit by the Planning Commission. c) Adequacy of the Ordinance to Implement the Certified LUP Segments. As previously discussed, in 2003, the Commission certified the City of Carlsbad's Habitat Management Plan and it was included in the City's Land Use Plan. As such, the regulations and policies included in the HMP were included in the standard ofreview when addressing HMP lands within the Coastal Zone. As a component of the HMP certification, it was determined that in order for the lands within the preserve system to be consistent with the intent of the HMP and thus the LCP, an LCP amendment would be required to modify all land use and zoning designations within the preserve to Open Space to better protect the sensitive habitat. This amendment is the City's response to that requirement. As proposed, the City has included 51 parcels to be rezoned to Open Space. The Commission recognizes that this amendment would increase the lands designated for preservation; and, as such, it promotes protection of these lands. However, two ofthe parcels proposed for modification raise concerns. Parcel numbers (APN #s 214-543-29, 214-544-05) arc adjoined by two other parcels that are shown as preserve sites, but are not included in the proposed amendment. The concerns for modifying the zoning to Open Space are identical to the concerns for modifying the land use to Open Space. City of Carlsbad LCPA 1-06B HMP\General Plan Amendment (GPA) Page 13 As previously discussed, the I-IMP is a comprehensive large-scale system promoting the preservation of the most valuable habitat, but still allowing for some development and economic growth by the City. The intent of the HMP was to establish a large scale vision for protection of habitat as opposed to piecemealing the sensitive habitat based on proposed individual developments. The same concerns are raised by the inclusion of these two parcels. Again, APN #s 214-543-29 & 214-544-05 are located contiguous with two other parcels included in the hardline preserve of the HMP; as such, these parcels should be zoned as Open Space. It is possible that all four parcels are owned or could be purchased by a single entity, in which case they could be developed, if at all, in a comprehensive manner. At this point it is unclear what portions of these four parcels contain the best existing or potential habitat value. By preserving only two of the four parcels, the Commission may prejudice the future evaluations of these parcels and ultimately the determination of the most appropriate development preserve boundary. The IP Amendment as proposed is therefore inconsistent with the certified LUP and must be denied. PART VI. FINDll'GS FOR APPROVAL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD Il\IPLEI\IENTATION PLAN A!\IENDMENT 1-06B, IF MODIFIED The provisions for interim and long-term management of the preserve system were to be incorporated into the Implementation Plan of the LCP through an LCP amendment within one year of Commission certification of the HMP as part of the certified LCP. Unfortunately, the one-year goal has not been met as the HMP was certified by the Commission in August 2003. The City has submitted LCP Amendment #1-06A (HMP Implementation Plan) and action by the Coastal Commission on this amendment is also scheduled for the August 2008 hearing. However, the recommendation is for denial due to the deficiencies in the proposed HMP Implementation Plan. Another one of the major goals of the HMP Implementation Plan will be to establish an open space conservation mechanism that will ensure protection of coastal resources in perpetuity. It was anticipated this mechanism would include a conservation oriented open space zone or overlay that would restrict uses within the habitat preserve to resource dependent uses which arc more restrictive and protective of coastal resources than the current open space zone certified in the LCP. The provision of a suitable open space zone should be included as a part of any HMP Implementation Plan proposed by the City of Carlsbad. The updated Open Space zone used for areas within the HMP preserve, as proposed, are more restrictive and better implement the intent of the HMP and therefore the LUP. In response to this, the City included in the submitted HMP Implementation Plan amendment proposal of an updated Open Space zone used for areas within the HMP preserve to provide regulatory guidance as to the treatment of Open Space parcels identified for habitat preservation. By changing the land use and zone designations of parcels to Open Space, these HMP related policies and regulations would apply to all City of Carlsbad LCPA 1-06B HMP\Gcncral Plan Amendment (GP A) Page 14 properties within the existing hardline preserve area. The updated regulations, as proposed, are more restrictive and better implement the intent of the HMP and therefore the LUP. However, to dat.e, the implementation plan component ofthe HMP has not been certified, thus the allowed uses for Open Space within the preserve habitat have not been included in the LCP. Some of the parcels (32) would only include modification to their land use designation, as the current zoning is Planned Community (PC). The PC zoning designation indicates that the parcel is located in a Master Planned community. Each Master Plmmed community has specific zoning ordinances intended to carry out the intent of the Master Plan. These Master Plan areas, if located in the Coastal Zone, have been approved previously through an LCP amendment. As such, maintaining those parcels zoned as PC would better implement the certified uses of that master planned area. Again, these areas would still function as Open Space, but would direct an interested party to the Master Plan rather than the general Zoning Ordinance. On areas outside Master Planned communities, the change in zoning also reduces any potential confusion for prospective property owners as to the development potential of a parcel. During the review of the proposed land use and zoning changes for the parcels in question, it became apparent that other parcels may need to be brought forward at a later date, as there was some confusion as to which parcels were to be included in the hardline preserve area, such as the parcels surrounding the two removed from this amendment by Suggested Modifications 1 and 2. The City has hired a biological fim1 to survey the hardline preserve lands for any inconsistencies between habitat/development lines and the boundaries of the hardline preserve. It is understood that upon completion of this survey, an additional LCP amendment will be proposed by the City to modify any inaccuracies between what is on the ground, and what has been certified by the LCP. The Commission has suggested to the City that the parcels removed from this proposed amendment through suggested modifications also be included in this future amendment. It will then be the City's responsibility to demonstrate which preserve parcels warrant the rezoning. The hardline boundaries and preserve sites will then not only be accurately located, but accurately zoned, both of which are consistent with the certified land use plan. Only as modified can the Commission find the proposed IP Amendment to be consistent with the certified LUP. Furthermore, the certification of the HMP IP will only provide additional protection to the Open Space zoned areas within the preserved habitat, as the updated regulations are more restrictive. In the interim, modifying the land use and zoning designations will provide some additional protection to these preserve sites. In conclusion, the City, in response to certification of the HMP LUP, has proposed the modification of 51 parcels from land use and zoning designations of Residential and Commercial to Open Space. This modification will result in additional protection to these preserved areas, and will reduce any potential confusion for prospective property owners as to the development potential of a parcel. The Commission has recommended removal of two of the proposed parcels as there is some confusion as to the boundary of City of Carlsbad LCP A 1-0GB HMP\General Plan Amendment (GP A) Page 15 the hardline preserve and the two adjacent parcels. However, this amendment represents a step in the process of protecting a large-scale habitat preserve and, as modified, can be found consistent with the City's certified LUP. PART VII. CONSISTENCY \VITI-I THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) Section 21080.5 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) exempts local government from the requirement of preparing an environmental impact report (EIR) in connection with its local coastal program. The Commission's LCP review and approval program has been found by the Resources Agency to be functionally equivalent to the EIR process. Thus, under CEQA Section 21080.5, the Commission is relieved of the responsibility to prepare an EIR for each LCP. Nevertheless, the Commission is required in an LCP submittal or, as in this case, an LCP amendment submittal, to find that the LCP, or LCP, as amended, does conform with CEQA provisions. The proposed land usc and zoning amendments, as modified, will not result in adverse impacts on coastal resources or public access. The Commission finds that there are no feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures available which would substantially lessen any significant achTrse e1Tect which the LCP amendment may have on the environment. Therefore, in terms of CEQA review, the Commission finds that approval ofthe LCP amendment will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. ( G:\San Diego\Reports·LCI's CarbbaJ l. \[( LCI'.-\ l-11Gl3 (GI'A).uoc) 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 MAY -2 2 ZO-G7 CALIFORNIA - COASTAL COMMISSION PLAN1\TJNG COM1\1ISSION RESOLUTION N0.5~&tJGo COAST DISTRICT A RESOLUTION OF THE PLA1\TNING COMMISSION OF THE / CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING-· APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CARLSBAD LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM TO BRING THE DESIGNATIONS ON THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM, GENERAL PLAN, AND ZONING 1v1..A.P INTO CONFOR.~1ANCE FOR EXISTING HABITAT Tvi.Au~AGEMENT PLAN HARDLINE PRESERVE AREAS. CASE NAME: HMP HARDLINE GPA CASE NO: LCP A 05-08 WHEREAS, California State law reqmres that the Local Coastal Program, General Plan, and Zoning designations for properties in the Coastal Zone be in conformance; and \\TBEREAS, City of Carlsbad, has filed a verified application for an amendment to the Local Coastal Program designations regarding various property throughout the City, described as ("the Property"); and \VHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request fo~ a Local Coastal Program Amendment as sho·wn on Exhibit "LCP A 05-08" dated November 16, 2005, attached hereto, as provided in Public Resources Code Section 30574 and Article 15 of Subchapter 8, Chapter 2, Division 5.5 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations of the California Coastal Commission Administrative Regulations; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 16th day of November 2005, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and \VHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors ; 25 relating to the Local Coastal Program Amendment; and 26 \VHEREAS, State Coastal Guidelines re~"~ ... .,<' !I c:iv '"'P~'k nnhlic review period 27 28 for any amendment to the Local Coastal Program. EXHIBIT#1 Resolution of Approval NO\V, THEREFORE, BE IT HER r----.;;::;-;::)ii--:;:;-:;--;:;r:;::~~~-:::---:-:---1 LCPA #1-068 HMP/GPA Revisions 1 2 .., j 4 5 6 A) B) C) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. At the end of the State mandated six \Veek review period, starting OJ:}. September 2, 2005, and ending on October 13, 2005, staff shall present to the.City Go~ncil a summary of the comments received. · -~ That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of Hl\1P HARDLINE GPA -LCPA 05-08 based on the following findings, and subject to the follo\ving conditions: 7 ' Findings: 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. 2. That the proposed Local Coastal Program .A.mendment meets the requirements of, and is in conformity \Vith, the policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act and all applicable policies of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program not being amended by this amendment, in that the properties proposed for land use designation revision are identified in the City's Habitat M.anagement Plan and the City's Local Coastal Program as hardline preserve areas; no development shall occur on these properties, thus no geologic instability or impacts to agricultural lands or scenic resources will occur, no shoreline access is offered by the subject properties, and implementation of-the HI\1P will assist in the preservation of environmentally scenic resources. That the proposed amendment to the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program is required to bring it into consistency with General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. Conditions: 1. LCPA 05-08 is approved subject to the approval of GPA 05-12 and ZC 05-11 as described in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5999 and 6001. I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting to the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, held en the 21st day of December 2005, by the fqlloyving vote, to \Vit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAI\': Chairperson Segall, Commissioners Dominguez, Heineman, Montgomery, and \Vhitton JEFFRE ~.SEGALL, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLA~'NING COMMISSION ATTEST: ~>t DON1\TEU 18 Assistant Planning Director 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 / LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM \, ---\ \ i '._), ! ,.---, I ! "--' --.c r-,, -.._S; ~~ ' ', ', ~-,,"· 1---'-,./\ "C X E r-<0 :2 IJ) g c c ro r; IJ) li -e IJ) '52 ~ \, \ Property A. POR 211-040-32 B. POR 211-040-36 C. D. --:: __ ,, ..... _,,, ________________ LJ u LCPA Map Designation Change From: To: R OS R OS GPA 05-12/LCPA 05-08/ZC 05-11 I ' \ \ \ Zoning Map Designation Change From: To: C-2-Q 0-S C-2-Q o-s LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM LCPA Map Designation Change Property From: To: A. 212-050-45 PI OS B. 212-050-46 PI OS C. D. -~,--,·~-- GPA 05-12/LCPA 05-08/ZC 05-11 II F . .. f F SALKAV Zoning Map Designation Change From: To: P-M 0-S P-M 0-S LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM December 21. 2005 I_; i 1CIJ I lw i /C!J i /3/ ! -.J i J 0. u\ Property A. 212-192-01 B. 212-192-03 c. D. LCPA Map Designation Change From: To: RM OS RM OS GPA 05-12/LCPA 05-08/ZC 05-11 Zoning Map Designation Change From: To: R-1/0-S 0-S R-1/0-S 0-S ., .. ,~ .. ~~-~ ........ --~--~--~---~"~.-.. LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM G PA 05-12/LCPA 05-08/ZC 05-11 _ December 21. 2005 LCPA Map Designation Change Zoning Map Designation Change Property From: To: From: To: A. 212-201-70 RM OS R-1/0-S OS B. 212-212-22 RLM OS R-1-Q OS C.212-223-16 RLM OS R-1-Q OS D. .--·-····~·~·--. ·-... ·~·o-0• ""~"'"-" •-··~·~c.-•~••» LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM December 21. 2005 i \ i \ " ! \ \ \\ i i \ I\ \ \ ~ \ \ \ ~. \ 0\ .. 0 \ i \ p \ I \ ...,. ! \ \ i \ Property \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ A. 214-353-08 B. c. D. LCPA Map Designation Change From: To: RM OS GPA-12/LCPA 05-08/ZC 05-11 i i ! I ! . Zoning Map Designation Change From: To: LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM GPA 05-12/LCPA 05-08/ZC 05-11 December 21. 2005 : : \ i \\~ 1--~----·/ TlJRJ..;STC~E R:J PC.Utvi "TREE RD i \ \\~---- "'0 X 0 0: > i ;. i ._ ~ i \ ~I ! \ \ L-----1\ ~ ~ 8 ·, \ \ \ ~ ~ \ \ ~.. \ ~ i \ \ l ; \ \.... \__---J\ 5 \ \ \ ~~--------------~~~------------------~~~----------~--~~~----------------~ ::2 Cl c ·c: c ro c._ til 12 -o e c.. til "5 .D ~ Property A. POR 214-543-29 B. POR 214-544-05 c. D. LCPA Map Designation Change From: To: RLM OS RLM OS ·--- I Zoning Map Designation Change From: To: R-1-Q 0-S R-1-Q 0-S -~···,·~~_.,,.., ........ LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM GPA 05-12/LCPA 05-08/ZC 05-11 December 21. 2005 LCPA Map Designation Change Zoning Map Designation Change Property From: To: From: To: A. 215-072-42 RLM OS R-1-Q 0-S B. POR 215-083-09 RLM OS R-1-Q 0-S C.214-544-07 RLM OS R-1-Q 0-S D.214-074-22 RLM OS R-1-Q 0-S "··<~"-·~···•''"~'"~--·,.,·--'"' LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM GPA 05-12/LCPA 05-08/ZC 05-11 December 21. 2005 ,. LCPA Map Designation Change Zoning Map Designation Change Property From: To: . From: To: A 215-644-09 RLM OS B. 215-644-10 RLM OS C. 215-690-14 RLM OS n LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM December 21. 2005 -o X E c.; <0 :E ~·'·.i > ~ ' \ r-' \ /';~\ f--J \ ·~--~ \ ' \~·~--; ., \ \ \ \ \ \i \ \ \ ~\ \ \ \. ~\ "·, ',"'·· i \ \ " "'·. I , • '0, ,, L--~--~\ ~~ "-... ·-~ .... --,· \ 1 ·, ~' ~-\ / '·~~ \ '·"--~ J 11 ~/'~)--. j · .'•' I / I _.---........... ) ! / / / ~ f / I ! ----.} ! ;r-.......,,f f I / / . J I / 'I ! .. >-...... I ! I --..., I ,I ;· ./ ~I 'I I I f I r---J I I I ..-I I / ~ . l-J ~ \ -f I l'/~~~,/ ~(~.,. ro :E 0, c ·c: c ro LCPA Map Designation Change a. IIi u ~ 0 c. ~ Cl .D .9 Property A. 215-670-13 B. POR215-671-03 C. D. From: To: RM OS RM OS GPA 05-12/LCPA 05-08/ZC 05-11 _ Zoning Map Designation Change From: To: ····• "C X E LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM December 21. 2005 LCPA Map Designation Change Property From: To: A. 215-710-36 RLM OS B. c. D. ~ "~·-.. GPA 05-12/LCPA 05-08/ZC 05-11 ; / ,/ \ \ \ l 1 \ ~\~ •. \ \ \ ~,\ \\_ \\ \ --------' \ \~ \\ \ \ ,z "--.. /~:;· i / r-----._· ' / / I, ·'------~ ! ,' I i ! f---__j j I IL___j ! i r-----J ! ! r----J f ! r---1 I I ,i--____j i I n f L Zoning Map Designation Change From: To: LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM December 21. 2005 LCPA Map Designation Change Property From: To: A. 215-790-15 RLM OS B. 215-780-12 RLM OS c. D. GPA 05-12/LCPA 05-08/ZC 05-11 \ \ \ \ \ Zoning Map Designation Change From: To: -c ,_ ~, ___ ...,....._.,_,.,_,_,_...,., \ LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM December 21. 2005 POINSETTIA LN \ \ LCPA Map Designation Change Property From: To: A. POR 215-841-07 RM OS B. c. ., 0 GPA 05-12/LCPA 05-08/ZC 05a11 /. ··v >":-.. _ Zoning Map Designation Change From: To: < -·--"-' ~-·----, •• ______ ,_ '"'_,..,.~- LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM December 21. 2005 Property A. 215-850-19 B. 215-850-20 C. D. \, \ \ \ LCPA Map Designation Change From: ·To: RLM OS RLM OS GPA 05-12/LCPA 05-08/ZC 05-11 _ 0 //) (~ // ~~'\ / / )/'~(' / ! r ~I(/ !!_____ 7/ / !'-----_,) \ ,1 ; ; I i \ ( ~~~/ ~ \ ~~ ~/ \ \ \ I :----J/ '\ \ I i i 1 \ i-___f I \ J I I { \ \ ! ! \,\ I \ \ ~\ \ \ \ 1 \ \---\ \ \ \ \ \ ~\\ ' ' \ Zoning Map Designation Change From: To: .. --· . .................. ___ LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM ~ \ ~ \ ~· \ ~ .,.,_ \ ~ \ ~ \ GPA 05-12/LCPA 05-08/ZC 05-11 \ ' \ I \ \ 5 \ ~L-------------~--------------------------------------~----------,----------------------~ :2 "6l c: ·c: c: ro 0.. <li n :::l -c 0 0. <li "5l .Q .9 Property A. 215-860-30 B. 215-801-27 C. D. LCPA Map Designation Change Zoning Map Designation Change From: To: From: To: RLM OS RLM OS _, -·· ~~'" -. ~-· ""'""""""'__,.,.,,.....,..,"'"" LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM December 21. 2005 / GPA 05-12/LCPA 05-08/ZC 05-11 - / I ll 1\ li ~----------------~-------- /1 i \ ! I \ l I. \~: ------------~---------1 ;:; CONOSA WY \I (\ r--\ I 1 1 I · 1 II 1------i \ i \ ·\. \-----\ \ !3 ! ·ED~ I • I 8 fl I i ! cr: il I : .. i~ U < \ ~ ~ . ) \ \ ) I \'\ ( I ·\ \ \ )/ r~. \ 'H \ . /\ \ ·~ \( \ r ~. / -, LCPA Map Designation Change Zoning Map Designation Change Property From: To: From: To: A 215-891-10 RLM OS B. 215-890-32 RLM OS C. 215-890-47 RLM OS . D. • • ,--••;M~"'"""' LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM December 21. 2005 I~ ~ I ' ~;~ i ,.-~OUGB!RD f..V c; .::: ..J :;;: 0:: ·~ LCPA Map Designation Change Property From: To: A. 215-900-28 RLM OS B. 215-900-29 RLM OS c. 215-900-52 RLM OS D. POR 215-042-03 RLM OS GPA 05-12/LCPA 05-08/ZC 05-11 . -·· ' \ I ' \ \ I \ / \ I \\(~ \ i ! : J \ ~ ; I Zoning Map Designation Change From: To: ------·-<~- LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM December 21. 2005 I'~ I I ' • I >-------' ·~ rl..Q_C£ 18\ EB/____j_ ( I ! i: H ~"'-----;-, ----,---:-' ~ , . is'-._! I ' i : I ! W\ ' ' -"----'--../ :> SONGBIRD AV '---j ~H ( ;Uji I l ~ ' l :I(! ' l! \! ! :-y--j .I . . . . i \/ i i LJ! y OCE~N b;~TAJ ~ r '"" 1 lf1 I I ' i 1 I i I I i ~! ~ I ; ! ' \ \ \ \ \ \ ! LCPA Map Designation Change Property From: To: A. 215-910-33 RLM OS B. 215-960-18 RLM OS c. 0 GPA 05-12/LCPA 05-08/ZC 05-11 _ \ \ \ Zoning Map Designation Change From: To: , LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM GPA 05-12/LCPA 05-08/ZC 05-11 - December 21, 2005 I ! i ! I ! [--------i I 1 /'----------! /--------_/ ;'-------J /L_ _____ j . ·.:.· ! ! ; 1; i L I j f ! / ;-----/ I i ,'-------J ; ,: /!________j I i ~~ l'--------7 i--------1 : 22 ~/ i_l 1 .f f / I-~ :~ ---~ 1U \ 1~ l ;~ (l. ( \ \ I I ~ ,0. :~~ \ !' ;CiS; 1\\ :~< ~ \ \ ~ \ \ " '~~):: \. \\\~~ /I' /I I ) / ~"" ~" //1~ ~ ~~· /; ·~ ~A I . \ I.~ ~~~ ~! ~ / !' !' i ~\;~l.l ~ (!) . I I \ . • I 11 ~ I 1r------.,, 1 I . \, ~L_______; ~~ ~ ~ ;I I / N/ /--\ \ \ ~ (~~ --~ I ~ ..n . I I ---------; \\ \\\ ( /"--J I 0 ~ ! ! \ \ / \ \ . -~ /! !_<ll '"~;i \ I ~t-:( \ v /\ \ v (/"(<) ~ ... /. 1,1 II -~ l-----i\ ' \ ?.\ (N i I -o::l: / i ( f l \ \ \ \\\ ) / l_, ( I ;---..; !---__ ! i \ \ \ . I r--.1 ' I If C. I 1/ -----.J \ \ \./\ '' "1 tf i I ro~~------~--~~--~~~------~--~~~~~--~~~--~~--~~ ~ , '& c ·c: c ro a. "iii ~ "0 e c. "iii '5J .0 .9 Property A. 215-960-19 B. c. D. LCPA Map Designation Change Zoning Map Designation Change From: To: -From: To: RLM OS LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM December 21. 2005 LCPA Map Designation Change Property From: To: A. 215-920-42 RLM OS B. 215-880-11 RM OS C. 215-880-01 RM OS D. GPA 05-12/LCPA 05-08/ZC 05-11 _ .J \ \ I I \ \ Zoning Map Designation Change From: To: R-1-Q 0-S RD-M-Q 0-S RD-M-Q O-S "-'-e--'-··-- LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM GPA 05-12/LCPA 05-08/ZC 05-11 December 21. 2005 i .' i i '-... ' ---..__ _____ /, / / ~ 1/ ......, j I / / ~----------------------~LUL6~~LU~~~~~~~~~~~~~~! i /1 ~ IV/) \ ~''-(' . e \ , i \ \ \ \\ \ _/ \ \\~ \ \ =~~--------------------------------------~\ ~·~------------~----1 ......... ,......._ \ ·r, -o ''<::::~,c \ \:: E ;1\'---. I ·-,..__ '··-~~"' /. \ \ I . \ !"!--;·, ·· .. , . _.....-( : \ ' ~ "<t j \ I I > .,__ .... _ ./ I ; ~ ,,..,_--~-v ~ L:5(/l;' /'!"~' ., ·,-----~----~/-------\_/I \ I i \\ ~~ .\-// /rr·:~/ 1/ ~~\ \ ~ ·1 J t r,' · z. "··.. ' ·;:o--<( . , r .... \' ; i .," \ \ :§ '~ / ~/~. I i' t \ \_.,...;- 9aJ /--, I ! I ( ~ . , ~"/ i \. \, ,,_\_,_ ...... ---+-__, it.~~=============~=====·~=~~r-t===:=~===·=)=·======~j=========/=/============r=============~~~'=·=\==\=·=/= ··==================~ =5. LCPA Map Designation Change Zoning Map Designation Change m·~---------------4~--------~--~~~--~~~--~--------~--~--r=--------~----~ ~ Property From: To: From: To: -~ A. POR 216-121-15 RM OS c -3_ B. POR 216-121-19 RM Ui <3 C. POR 216-121-20 RM ~~--------------~---------------+-------------}--------------~----------------~ ~~~--·~~.o~r~:~~~~~~~-~~~~;~-.~~~~~--~~~~~----------+-o_s~--------~~------~------~-----------------1 OS OS IJS ······--------.:---L-----------i \cbg is\producls\planning\MapUpdate\GPA 05-12 __ sh148. mxd ~ I / -/"/l 'V I -----/ ""j! -----~~---::;=:~~--~--IL Uf f({f~~-~ -------:-till ~:&~0 Is ~\ ------·--. -----------·-_::....._ --:~ ';C : 1--,~---------------1 I 1 ----------':_ cg): . ~-r·---- 0 () OJ ?> -u ..., 0 -u -u -u -o <ll 0 0 0 ~ ::0 ::0 ::0 N N N U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 I I I 0 0 0 _.. _.. -" N N N I I I _.. 0 0 0 ~ w ············'···-···---l .................... . () () () 11 0 0 --..., 0 0 r ::0 ::0 --~ () ::0 s s s -u I I I p s ru -o 0 <ll ~ / ""'~ // -~:c~l' ~-(() I. ~ ::I 0 0 0 ru .-+ (f) (f) (f) 6" ::I () ::r ru \ .... ---.Jt~ --~y ~ . \ -----------~-~-:: .. ::I (() <ll 11 ..., 0 ~ N 0 ::I s· (() s ru -o J 0 <ll (f) ~ (()" ::I ru \ d; 0 ::I () ::r ru ::I (() <ll --c--~-::~~Nl\3 --6--------. . ...... \ /.... \ /.j .. -<,;~~;~\--. I -l\ -/ /// .... --/--:~:5~)~~,:.----,/ ~I S~-,\ \ \ /" / .... ------·--.----:· 'J·J}} c~-· -~---_! / ~..:<~} ---~ -r~-=::: __ ------;,7 --:;----~ .. Y ·c·\~ __ ,;::"'~-~Oc I:::::::J ------------------____ // . //_/·:;;,,,,,,",,. \-,..\---:::::::\·.::;_):::>-----"'-·:::~.~-<_-r\\\\s-%~< j'~ .,._____ ----------. .-· /""-!(-------------1" /; --·--sJ;;.; '~:::"t.:j~=: -~=· t-=~:...-=t_t_ . ./ ~/-/ ~:>__../·:·.-\-·t\·-::_~{(::~-:~ ___ \:::~5 \~:::3_ t:::/\: ') ·----. ------J / / \ ... ·,{\'·, I ..... \(_ .... _. ~---:\ / ,y /> J 1 .. / / ..-7 . \) v-'---J~--__ , 1 -··· . .. ...... I // '• / I ----------:::....--------·· /;/ _ _..-·· ). •• --~ .-·: • .\--\ \.-·· ·:.. __.. ""j )-.."-./ ' -·-----··--------· ---~--------__ ........ ___ ,/'~--") ·{.'-. (_ -) .. -.----"-:\\'::\-.. :.:: ->< '\" ------~~L c~~-~-JL __ :=~::_ ______ .... -·-···---····--------------·\\e ,. . )\IIff'~'\~1;~~ t 3~ \;·f\T/1:1 t':z~i< )~ ~1£··rf;;;rtir[L0_(: ~J~;~v1~r~~l~1\f%~-~~'> ~~~~\~t{~~~5JT,_c~~ l ,/·· 1 ~~--c../1~ ~--1\ .. -~L) ~---~·-· \---{ .... ~ '" ·--. \ %~\~A0) > ~--~~~-...... \--.. -\ .. Jt\\JJ}LJ·~-----__.. -...:r ~ . <. -. ---" " ) \ .\. J , ... -' . ..... . ·rl / ·-········ --1 • -------/ I ff!t-lf:?,L:I~ I\~~~•. :_:_~1\I;:_;:·£ i1-J-::: (:> "--::::::: ~::::-::--_~_"''J} ,~'?y;::-::~:_::::_. :::~ ··: J\Y: =. r:_•_:-~~f;_~:'J.:~ ~:3;: . :_:-: ! LIT.t>'t_..-v ~~,~--(~ \} ---· --TtL .. t h ;I "I -..- --~ "' l T ~ ~~ . _____ l\ l I L /v 0. . , _ <'' __ _ ... . ___ __ .... ___ .. ___ \ l . '\ ... ~~~''"""'_____ I .. "\. J ,..-. . -: ....... ----l -·· ·: . -~ / _ ·----\'o , '>, . , ~----.. . -c. ·:.. ..... ..-\ , ..... '>---... -----():'.""_J ... _ -:--~ t f?:?)--~\ f:~~f1 ~~~ -~ :: ~: ... ~j~) t~{l:~]t~= --------\\ . '%~-~~~\--:~_ ~(~/f/;.':i}~rJ :: --/1-Tf > (tl ;:~f~ ::~ · --.. -\, ~:\!\\\\/(/!· .. · .. /,,.\..-\ .. \\.-,-·rr·r·r·r\/,, r 0 0 )> r 0 0 )> (f) ~ r IJ :::0 0 G) :::0 )> s G) '"U ~ 0 U1 I -.l. N -r () "U )> 0 U1 I 0 ro -N () 0 U1 I -.l. -.l.