HomeMy WebLinkAboutLCPA 95-09; Ocean Bluff; Local Coastal Program Amendment (LCPA) (9)EVON GARDENS
6525 El Camino Real
carisbad, Cabrnia 9200%
(619) 931-8487
DATE: December 20, 1995
MEMO TO: Planning Commission, City of Carlsbad, CAlifornia
FROM: Evelyn E. McKinney, Evon Gardens
SUBJECT: Statement pertaining to Public Hearing on Ocean Bluff
I plead with you to disapprove this plan as it is presented. - MUST be made to rectify the INJUSTICE MAT HAS BEEN DONE and will increase at
an alarming rate unless you REQUIRE this developer to complete his plans
appropriately to mitigate thmems already created by this body and the
City Council and now proposed to be magnified by the plans of this developer.
Corrections
You have already set the alignment of Poinsettia Lane through our property,
on December 1, 1993 (Attached)'and the final approval of the City Council was
granted on the 8th of February 1994, (Attached)lYlover our objections.
At that time you were informed by Mr. Hauser (Page 3 and 4 of the minutes of
that meeting) (Attached)' that plans for a financing mechanism would require
developers to pay fees for property acquisition and construction of the basic
roadways and it would include the entire length of Poinsettia Lane to El Camino
Real to Algo. He said (recorded on Page 4 of Minutes of the same meeting)
(Attached)q "The developer must acquire the property for the right-of-way and
build the road.
lending it's powers of condemnation."
If the developer can't get it done, the city would consider
I again refer you to page 8 of the minutes of your meeting on December 1, 1993.
(Attached)< Mr. Hauser replied, ". . . Aviara is not going to build a road
across the McKinney property. . . . It will be the next project that will
PUNCH it through.
of the right-of-way, and it has to go to condemnation, the condemnation will
pay compensation for the land taken and for the lost business use of the property
as well. '*
On Page 8, bottom and page 9 top (Attached)b Commissioner Bets"inquired if Aviara is only going to Blackrail Court, and will not affect the McKinney property at
this time, is there some way that particular alignment can be separate from
what is being considered tonight." Mr. Hauser "replied that it cannot be
separated because it is part of the Tentative Map.
any maneuvering of the alignment between Blackrail and Alga Road."
If the McKinney's are not willing to negotiate for the sale
There would be no room for
Commissioner Betz "If the alignment which would force the road through the McKinney
property is still negotiable after Aviara Phase I11 is approved tonight.
replied "that it is not, only the method of purchase would be negotiable."
Mr. Hauser
I now refer you to Page 9, paragraph 5 ofthe same minutes. stated,"he is sorry this hasn't been addressed earlier.
making this issue for a long time.
is their livelihood. it is a matter of Dublic record.
Commissioner Erwin The McKinneys have been
They have made it abundantly clear that this
It represents an enormous financial interest to them and
If their oroperty is taken,I think they have
made it very clear that they will expect more
(Attached)?
The time is here! The NEXT DEVELOPER . Ocean
than- adequate remuneration, "
Bluff, has submitted his plans,
by-passing our property, and not "PUNCHING IT THROUGH" as Mr. Hauser told you earlier. If you approve his plans as submitted, you will have Poinsettia Lane
approved for completion from Highway 5 to El Camino Real with the exception of approximately 1,000 feet, where our greenhouses set. road for you? Ile certainly l!ILL NOT. of developing. in the minutes of December 1, 1993 Page 5, paragraph 7 (Attached) .s
llho will complete the Ik are NOT developers and have no intent - So, Poinsettia will set --- piecemealed, as I've said before
Please make this developer, Ocen Bluff fulfill the expectations and plans that
Mr. Hauser laid out to this body in previous sessions.
Poinsettia Lane through so the road can-be completed and - _- STOP-disfroying our
land, our business and our financial potential.
Make him "PUNCH"
Thank You,