HomeMy WebLinkAboutLCPA 98-05; Carlsbad Ranch Overlay Zone; Local Coastal Program Amendment (LCPA) (4)- City of Carlsbad
May 19,1999
California Coastal Commission
San Diego Coast District
31 11 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200
San Diego CA 92108
APPLICATION FOR LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT
1.
II.
111.
IV.
JURISDICTION CITY OF CARLSBAD - LCPA 98-05 - CommercialNisitor-Serving
Overlay Zone (Related permits: ZCA 98-01/ZC 99-03)
SEGMENT? Mello I. Mello II and Aaua Hedionda Laaoon
TYPE OF AMENDMENT SUBMllTAL (check)
A) LUP w
B) ZONING 0
C) LCP (Land Use & Zoning) 0
LCP STATUS Y/N, DATE
A) LUP CERTIFIED Yes B) ZONING CERTIFIED Yes
C) ZONING OF COMM. ACTION ON No N/A
D) PRIOR COMMISSION ACTION ON THIS No N/A SUGGESTED MODIFICATIONS
SU BM IlTAL?
SUMMARY OF AMENDMENT PROPOSAL
The proposed zone code amendment, and corresponding local coastal program
amendment and zone change, was initiated by the Carlsbad City Council in 1997 and is
designed to regulate commercial/visitor-serving uses in the designated overlay zone
area (location map attached). The objective is to attract and maintain high quality de-
velopments given the presence of a major theme park in the city. The overlay zone es-
tablishes unique procedures including a conditional use permit that must be approved by
the City. Council after Planning Commission recommendation; project site notification, a
mandated pre-filing process, and rapid enforcement provisions. The overlay zone also
establishes unique development standards that reduce overall signage allowance, in-
crementally increases parking ratio requirements for certain uses, provides parking
regulations for uses not currently regulated, and provides architectural and landscape
provisions. Public workshops were held that included the City Council and affected
property owners to discuss and develop the overlay zone’s regulations. The proposed
overlay zone is intended to replace a current urgency ordinance established by the
Council last year which will expire on August 30, 1999; which requires the overlay zone
to be effective by September 1, 1999.
2075 La Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 - (760) 438-1 161 - FAX (760) 438-0894 @
V. COMMISSION OFFICE USE ONLY:
AMENDMENT #
DATE RECEIVED
DATE FILED
COMM. HEARING AGENDA
COMMISSION ACTION: A: , AWM , D , Date
VI. PROJECT PLANNER
For information regarding this application, please contact Eric Munoz, Senior Planner at
(760) 438-1 161, ext. 4441.
1
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
a.
9.
LCPA SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS -- CHECKLIST
Council Resolution - signed and dated indicating
City intends to administer LCP consistent with the
Coastal Act and indicating date LCPA will take ef-
fect.
NOTE: All amendments take effect immediately
upon Coastal Commission approval un-
less otherwise stated.
A reproducible copy of Council adopted LCPA 0 If new text indicates where it fits into certified
text. a If revised text clearly indicates using strike-
outs and/or underlines showing modifications. w If map change, submit replacement map.
A discussion of amendments relationship to and
effect on other sections of the previously certified
LCP.
Zoning measures that will implement the LCPA.
Affect on public access (only for area between first
public road and the Coast).
An analysis of potentially significant adverse cu-
mulative impacts on coastal resources.
Copies of environmental review documents.
Summary of measures to ensure both public and
agency participation. w List of public hearing dates
Notice of interested parties a Mailing list w Comments 0 Responses to comments
All staff reports plus attachments.
X (Coov enclosed)
X (Cow enclosed)
X (See attachment)
X (See attachment)
X (See attachment)
X (See attachment)
X (CORV enclosed)
X (See attachment
& enclosed cooies)
x (CODY enclosed)
3.
4.
5.
6.
8.
AMENDMENTS RELATIONSHIP TO AND EFFECT ON OTHER SECTIONS OF THE
PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED LCP
The proposed LCP amendment will reflect changes to the City’s Zoning Ordinance, the
implementing ordinance for the coastal zone properties in the City, which will involve the
addition of a new zoning ordinance chapter (21.208). The new chapter will be the
CommercialNisitor-Serving Overlay Zone and will specify the required procedures and
standards that will be superimposed over the underlying zoning designations for projects
located within the overlay zone. The effect on other sections of the City’s Zoning Ordi-
nance and coastal resource policies and objectives will be non-existent or insignificant.
ZONING MEASURES THAT WILL IMPLEMENT THE LCPA
The LCPA will be implemented via the proposed zone code amendment and zone
change which will establish the overlay zone within the zoning ordinance (ZCA 98-01) as
well as locate the overlay zone on the City’s Zoning Map (ZC 99-03)
AFFECT OF PUBLIC ACCESS
No specific development proposals are associated with this project; nor are any regula-
tions which affect the public’s coastal access. The establishment of a commer-
cial/visitor-serving overlay zone will not prevent the provision of required public access
improvements with the future development of coastal properties.
ANALYSIS OF POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ON
COASTAL RESOURCES
The establishment of a commercial/visitor-serving overlay zone will not contribute to any
cumulative impacts on coastal resources in the area or region.
SUMMARY OF MEASURES TO ENSURE PUBLIC AND AGENCY PARTICIPATION
The Local Coastal Program Amendment was duly noticed for the required six week re-
view period, from February 4 to March 18, 1999, and no written comments were re-
ceived. Concurrent with various public hearings related to the urgency ordinances es-
tablished by the City Council, the proposed amendment was developed through public
workshops as well as reviewed through duly noticed public hearings before the Planning
Commission and City Council:
URGENCY ORDINANCE PUBLIC HEARING DATES
Urgency Ordinance NS-418 adopted
NS-418 extended via NS-424
NS 424 extended via NS-454
PUBLIC WORKSHOP DATES
Public Workshop
Public Workshop
PUBLIC HEARING DATES
September 2,1997
October 15,1997
August 4,1998
March 12, 1998
December 9,1998
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY COUNCIL
March 17, 1999
May 19,1999
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCREASE IN RESTAURANT PARKING STANDARD
Carlsbad-Proposed overlay zone standard
Oceanside
The CommerciaWisitor-Serving Overlay Zone proposes to increase the restaurant parking
standard because several restaurants within the proposed overlay zone area currently experience
parking shortfalls, especially mid-day during the work week. It is anticipated that with the
numerous homes coming onto the market in the vicinity, the growing industrial and office
population combined with a renewed tourism thrust led by Lego, there will be increased demands
on restaurant sites.
1:lOO up to 2,000 SF building; then 150
150
The current city standard for restaurants is 1 space for every 100 square feet of restaurant floor
area up to a 4,000 square foot structure, beyond which the standard changes to 1 space for every
50 square feet of restaurant floor area. The proposed standard within the overlay zone is 1 space
for every 100 square feet of restaurant floor area up to a 2,000 square foot structure, beyond
which the standard changes to 1 space for every 50 square feet of floor area.
New restaurant construction, notably the new Carl’s Jr., essentially parked their use at the
proposed overlay zone ratio before it was even developed or proposed; their parking lot currently
is full during the weekday lunch period.
In researching this issue, staff has found that the proposed restaurant ratio is in-line with other
cities that may be comparable to Carlsbad in either their size, tourism elements andor coastal
location. Some cities that use the 1: 100 ratio also add required spaces for employees, indicating
that the 1 : 100 ratio alone is insufficient. A synopsis of this data is presented in the table below.
The overriding feeling is that the current restaurant standard is inadequate given: (1) current, real
examples of existing restaurants in the city; (2) the rapid growth of the city and rising worker
population within and adjacent to the overlay zone; (3) concurrent tourism growth amidst the
industrial office growth; and, (4) restaurant standards of other cities as presented.
I CITY I RESTAURANT PARKING STANDARD I ___ -
Carlsbad - Existing restaurant standard I 1 : 100 up to 4,000 SF building; then 150 I
~~ ~ I Coronado I 1 :50 plus 1 space per two employees I
RATIONALE FOR REGULATION OF EXISTING USES
The overriding direction from the City Council regarding the regulation of existing uses within
the proposed CommerciaWisitor-Serving Overlay Zone was to minimize impacts. The overlay
zone was not intended to abate any currently existing uses. The major thrust of the overlay zone
is to regulate new commercialhisitor-serving developments. However, a redevelopment of the
site whereby existing development intensity is proposed to be significantly increased, the overlay
zone is meant to apply. In determining what constitutes “significantly increased” development
intensity, staff was directed by the City Council to not create a disincentive for property
improvements and upgrades. Therefore, the overlay zone ordinance establishes the following
thresholds for overlay zone compliance: (1) invoking a higher parking standard based on
changing uses onsite; or (2) an increase of more than 200 square feet to the original building area
is proposed. The proposed overlay zone further stipulates that to be exempt, any existing onsite
non-conformities with regards to building setbacks, parking or signage cannot be increased
through the site’s redevelopment.
As an example, the recent Denny’s conversion to Islands Restaurant involves just under an
additional 200 square feet; a higher parking ratio was not required (restaurant use to restaurant
use); and no reductions were proposed for building setbacks nor increases in sign area; therefore
they could park the new Islands Restaurant at the existing Denny’s ratio and not be subject to the
new, higher ratio of the overlay zone.
Another example would be the Buffl’s Village Pie Shop at the NE comer of Pi0 Pic0 and
Tamarack within the overlay zone. That property owner has contacted staff and initially stated
concerns that if a redevelopment of that restaurant were proposed in the future, they would be
unable to achieve the same sized restaurant due to new overlay zone parking standards.
Therefore, in keeping with Council’s direction to minimize impacts to existing uses, the
previously described thresholds are now part of the overlay zone ordinance as far as the
regulation of existing uses.
COMMERCIALNISITOR-SERVING
OVERLAY ZONE
ZC 99-031ZCA 98-01 ILCPA 98-05