Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLCPA 98-09; Roesch Property Residential Subdivision; Local Coastal Program Amendment (LCPA)m qzsj/qp CFty of Ctirlsbad May 24,1999 Standard Pacific Corporation \ 9335 Chesapeake Drive San Diego, CA 92123 SUBJECT: LCPA 98-09/ZC 98-121CT 98-lS/HDP 98-.21/GDP 98-86/SDP 99-05 - ROESCH PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION The Planning Department has completed its review of the applicant’s second submittal of the subject project and the following issues of concern remain. These issues must be resolved prior to scheduling this project for a public hearing. Planninq: 1. The City’s draft HMP permits taking of southern maritime chaparral under specific conditions if more than 67% of the site would be retained in open space as part of a preserve system within Linkage Area F. Additional information is required to determine consistency with the HMP prior to noticing the mitigated negative declaration. Please provide the following additional biological survey information within the next two weeks to allow adequate time to noticing the mitigated negative declaration: l Please provide the location of the northern harrier nesting site. If this is located within the area of project impact, the mitigation proposed may not be adequate. l Please submit a map identifying the location and quantity of individual sensitive plant species located within the southern maritime chaparral (white coast ceanothus, western dichondra, Nuttall’s scrub oak, and ashy spike-moss. l Please include in the biological survey the impacts resulting from the fire suppression zones around the project perimeter that encroach into native habitat. The map included in the biology report does not appear to include these areas and should be redrawn to indicate the entire impacted area. Please adjust acreages of impacts to southern maritime chaparral and coastal sage scrub in the biology report. l Mitigation measure #l of the biological survey should be revised. If the biologist is concerned that sensitive plant species may be located onsite, the directed survey should be conducted now so that all sensitive species are identified. According to David Levine, the biologist performing the survey, none have been detected. This is the opportunity for identification to identify the necessary mitigation. It would be too late after the project is approved. 2. Please locate property lines at the top of slope on all lots. 3. The 28’ wide driveways are excessive. Please reduce to a maximum of 24’ within the front yard setback. 2075 La Palmas Dr. l Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 l (760) 438-l 161 l FAX (760) 438-0894 a9 - Y ---- - k 4. The 30’ fire suppression zone is not routinely allowed by the Fire Department; 60’ wide fire suppression zones are typically required. The Planning Department is reviewing the reduced fire suppression zone with the Fire Department and will advise whether staff can support. Enaineerinq: Traffic & Transoortation 1. City Standards require that driveway widths use only a maximum of 40% of a lot’s frontage. Lot’s 10, 16, and 21 seem to exceed this maximum width. Please verify and revise. 2. City Standards require that the top of the “X” of any driveway be located a minimum of 3’ away from the adjacent property line. Lot’s 6, 7, 12, 13 and 14 do not seem to meet this Standard. Please verify and revise. 3. Please reconfigure the proposed dwelling unit (D/U) on Lot 1 so that the driveway is located substantially away from the Regatta Road/Brigantine Drive intersection. (Basically, re-orientate the D/U 180”.). Please also reconfigure the proposed D/U on Lot 9 for the same reason. 4. Please plot a Caltrans Corner Sight Distance sight line of 275’ at the southwest corner of the Regatta/Brigantine intersection. Plot this siqht line on the tentative map (TM), Site Development Plan (SDP) and Conceptual Landscape Plan (CLP). Please plot a 150’ stopping Sight Distance sight line at the Regatta/Street ‘A’ intersection. Also plot this siaht line on the TM. SDP and CLP. 5. Please add the following note to the CLP: “Proposed mature landscaping and vegetation encroaching into any sight line can only have a maximum height of 30 inches and a minimum tree canopy of 8’. Any proposed monument signs or walls encroaching into any sight line can only have a maximum height of 30 inches. fl 6. Please actually show a preliminary design for the off-site transition to the existing half-street improvements on Brigantine Drive. 7. Please indicate where the Fernandez parcel, located to the south of this proposed project, might gain future site access. Additionally, since there is only a minimal distance to complete the full Brigantine Drive improvements to Poinsettia Lane, please contact Fernandez to see if they would be willing to participate in completing the street at this time through a joint funding and/or construction effort. 8. In accordance with City Standards, please show a 50’ tangent section on Regatta Road, from the prolongation of the Brigantine Drive curb line. 9. 10. Please be advised, the City Council (CC), at the Tuesday, April 27, 1999, CC meeting, enacted an Urgency Ordinance for traffic mitigation measures for Local Facility Management Plan (LFMP) Zone’s 5, 10, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20 and 21. Projects within these zones are required to sign an agreement to pay a traffic mitigation fee of $lO/ADT. This fee will be collected at issuance of any building permit for a project. This proposed project is located within LFMP Zone 20. Please be advised, this project is also located within the boundary of Bridge and Thoroughfare District (B&TD) No. 2, Aviara Parkway/Poinsettia Lane, and will be - u - -- required to pay a B&TD fee estimated at $566/ADT, prior to recording a Final Map for the project. Water Facilities 1. See the Carlsbad Municipal Water District (CMWD) comments below to determine if a “looped” waterline configuration is required. Drainaqe & Hvdroloav Report ’ 1. The Typical Lot Drainage plan view and sections indicate the potential for a 3’ rather than 5’ surface flow line around the proposed D/U’s. Submit documentation from the Soils Engineer that this design is acceptable. The proposed design seems to indicate that positive surface flow can be maintained. However, due to drainage deficiencies that have recently been occurring in the field, yard drains can be proposed with one (1) San Diego Regional Standard (SDRS) D-27 curb outlet. If the developer anticipates any yard drains, a final design must be included at the tentative map stage of the proposed project and shown on the Typical Lot Drainage plan view. Please be advised, what is approved as part of this TM and SDP is what must eventually be constructed. 2. The positive fail-safe overflow, located between Lot’s 14 and 15 is being shown as 1% in the wrong direction. Please verify and revise. 3. The proposed storm drain configuration is somewhat confusing. The TM & SDP indicate “preferred and alternative” alignments, and relocation of structures. Additionally, the TM & SDP does not match the Ocean BlufflCatellus approved grading plans (e.g., adjacent to Lot 96 on sheet 3 of 7 of DWG. 360-3A). Please revise per the Ocean Bluff plans and show the proposed confiquration. Is there some reason for alternatives? 4. In accordance with Issue No. 3 above, the Hydrology Study is also confusing and must be updated to reflect a proposed design. Again, is there some reason for alternatives? 5. Please analyze pre and post developed Q-IO in the Hydrology Study. Identify impacts and recommend mitigation measures to meet Mello II requirements (i.e., no greater developed Q than existing, exiting the site). 6. The Executive Summary of the Hydrology Study mentions “runoff from bench drain.” What is this referring to? Soils & Gradinq 1. Please setback the top of the slope along the easterly subdivision boundary line, in accordance with City Standard GS-14 (unless the slope was already constructed this way for Ocean Bluff). 2. Please clearlv show the existina Ocean Bluff/Catellus aradina and the proposed proiect qradinq on the TM & SDP. Show clearlv how these two qradinq scenarios match alonq the proiect’s easterlv boundary line. Land Title & Mapoinq 1. Where is the Lot 14/15 side property line? Also, the 20’ easement must be on one (1) lot. - - V- 2. Please relocate the side property lines for Lot’s 9, 10, 11 and 12 to the top of the proposed slope. Miscellaneous 1. Please label the top right corners of the TM & SDP as SDP 99-05. (Currently it states SDP XX.) 2. I do not believe that someone can “vacate” an Agreement. The Engineer of Work may want to re-word these statements on sheet 1 of the TM & SDP regarding PR item’s 10 & 11. Reaardina the Roesch/Catellus private slooe Aareement, supplv documentation that Catellus aqrees to relinquishino anv slope riahts. Reqardino item 11, the public sewer reimbursement Aqreement. provide documentation of the status of this Aareement reaardina Catellus’ and the Citv’s interests and obliqations. . 3. Please make sure that any revisions that are made on one plan are also made to any applicable plan sets. 4. Red-lined check prints are enclosed for the applicant’s use in making the requested revisions. These check prints must be returned with the plan revisions to facilitate continued staff review. Water District: 1. No more than 19 homes shall be served on a single potable water distribution pipeline. For those locations with more than 19 homes, a looped potable water pipeline system shall be designed or a written waiver shall be obtained-from the District. 2. The developer will be responsible for paying the “Deep Sewer Fee” in accordance with the Deep Sewer Reimbursement Agreement dated September 22, 1998 between Catellus and the City of Carlsbad upon issuance of a grading permit. The “Deep Sewer Fee” is calculated to be $66.948 based on the letter from Catellus dated January 5, 1999. If you have any questions regarding the above issues, please call me at 438-l 161, extension 4477. Sincerely, Associate Planner AH:eh Attachments ( sent to Jack Henthorn & Associates) c: Adrienne Landers Mike Shirey Melissa Allen, Jack Henthorn & Associates File