HomeMy WebLinkAboutLCPA 99-06; Inclusionary Housing Ordinance Amendment; Local Coastal Program Amendment (LCPA) (12)MAY-89-2000 TUE 08147 IDICOASTAL COMMISSION
I -. '. EL I 619521 9672 P:K
I
nlrm w c*ucoIIwI-Tn n#unor, lopLm
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
$AN Dl8OO *IuA
rt11 CIYllo DLL Mo ", ullll Em u)1D1oo,cA (b(Obl101 PW m- May 8,2000
i
EricMunoz
City of Cwlsbad
Planning Department
1635 Faraday Avenue C&bd, CA 92008-73 14
Re: City of Carlsbad Local Coastal Program Amendment 1-2OOO
Dear Mr. Munoz:
This lmer is warding the March 16,2000 mbmittal of the City of Carlsbad'r first LCP
amendment packago for the 2000 calmdm year, The package includes five separate
actions taken by the City to amend the City's Zoning ordinance and LCP Implementation
Plan. Section 13553 of the California Code of Regulations ststeE "[aln amendment to a certified LCP or LRDP together with all necassary attachments and exhibits shall be
deemed "submitted" after having ban received and found by the cxccutivt director of
the Commission to be in proper order and legally adequate to comply with Public
Resources Code Section 30510(b). Said miew shall bo completed within a reasonable
time, but unless there are unusual circumstances, no later than ten (IO) working days after
the date It is received in the cornmission offices during normal worlring hours f.. .I1*.
As you arc aware, staff completed the initial review of the LCP amendment package within the initial 10 day time period and through a letter doted 3/30/00 from Bill Ponder,
this offlce identified sevd items which the Izxecutivo Dircctor determines am necessary
to complete tho submittal and deem it suitable for filing. With your response lcttcr dated
4/13/00. you included several of the requested items, but asked that wa idcntify thc legal
authority for squiring the biological surveys, fire suppression plans and resource agency approvals associated with the Manzanita, Rocsch and Stcincr submittals. Section 13552'
of the Commission's achdnistrative regulations titled or LRDp states ia applicable part:
Thc u3p or LRDP amendment Irubdttai shall include:
(a) ....
(b) All policies, plane, st8ae, objectives, diegrpms, drawhp, maps,
photomhs, and supplementary data, related to the amendment in suillcient detail.
to allow review for conformity with the requirements of the Coastal Act. .. .,
(C),.. (d),.. (e) Any environmental review documents, purauant to -A, required for all or any portion of thc amendment to the LxlP or LRDP.. . ..
(f)....
M&+-09-2000 TUE 08:48 ID: COASTFIL COMMISSION
L
I
.- : 619521 9672
I
Mr. Bric Munoz May 8,2000
Pago 2
Staff ha# dete~ned the requested information is necessary in order to detennine the
adequacy of the proposed LCP Implementation Plan runenbents to carry out the policids of the certified Mello ll LCP laud UBO plan. We believe the above stated regulation gives
staff the suthodty to request this information and that this infodon is necessary in
order to find the LCP package is “in proper order and refly adequate to comply with Public Resourax Cod0 Swtlon 30SlO(b)”. That section of the statute atam:
Consistent with this chapter, a PIopOaed local coastal program may be submitted to
thc commission, if both of the foilowing am met:
(a) It is submitted pursuant to a resolution adopted by the local pvemment, after
public hearing that ctrtifia the local cOllst81 pro- is intended to be carried out in a manner fully in conformity with this divioion.
(b) It contains, in accordance with the picklints cstabIirbed by the commission, materids sufficient for thorough and complets review.
The submittal involves an amendment to the KP Implementation Plan and has been
classified a major amendment. As a major amendment, the Coastal Commission has 60
days to mviow an implcmentatiou plan modffication. ”huefore, upon receipt of the
requested infomation and completion of the subdttal, we will schedule the LCP
amendment for the appropriate Commirsion agenda. Due to workload constraints and the
fact that Commission std€ irr currently workin8 on Carlsbad LCPA m99D Kelly Ranch,
we antidpate it wiU be dimcult to process the entire submittal within the required time
period, therefore, a time extension may be necessary. Please 1st uti know if thm is any order of priority for which portions of the submittal shouId be processed first, and/or if
the City is interested in wgmtnting the rubmittal in any way. At tbir tima the entim
submittal is considered incomplete and not yet filed for purposes of the 6oaay time limit.
If you have any questions about the processing or scheduling of this amendment, please do not hesitate to call me or at this oflice.
shcrilynsmb
cc: GuyWayne
Bill Ponder