HomeMy WebLinkAboutLFMP 10; LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 10; Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP)CITY OF CARLSBAD
LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION
1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (C
I I Administrative Permit - 2nd
Dwelling Unit
I | Administrative Variance
[~] Coastal Development Permit
O Conditional Use Permit
I I Condominium Permit
| | Environmental Impact
Assessment
Ffc General Plan Amendment
I | Hillside Development Permit
I j Local Coastal Plan Amendment
0t Master Plan u 0
Q Non-Residential Planned
Development
[~] Planned Development Permit
:HECK BOXES)
(FOR DEPARTMENT
USE ONLY)
hp&mf|p
"TB-oi
I | Planned Industrial Permit
I | Planning Commission
Determination
Q Precise Development Plan
Q| Redevelopment Permit
[~] Site Development Plan
[~l Special Use Permit
I I Specific Plan
I | Tentative Parcel Map
Obtain from Engineering Department
O Tentative Tract Map
I | Variance
£fl Zone Change
XX- List other applications not
specified
(FOR DEPARTMENT
USE ONLY)
*?&-&/
LFMP-zonelO
LFMPA-zonellf
2)
3)
4)
ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).:
PROJECT NAME:
MPramend-149(/$()
Villages of La Costa
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:General Plan Amendment and related approvals
to implement HCP/IA
5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type)
Real Estate Collateral Management
Attn: Jim Jackson
MAILING ADDRESS
450 "B" Street, Ste 620
CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE
San Diego, CA 92101 619-515-5653
1 CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE
INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT /O THE BEST OF MY
KNOWLEDGE^ /
^^./1^/J^ •' \>j i^:; jjrf ^\\^'H
SIG^/TU^E *•*'" // DATE
6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type)
Morrow Development
Attn: Fred Arbuckle
MAILING ADDRESS
P. 0. Box 9000-685
CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE760
Carlsbad, CA 92018-9000 929-2700
1 CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND
GQRBffVrevTHE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
7W(/ 11 i ujl w Q-.'\2~° vo
SIGNATURE ^fOSlP^Vlt"' DATE
7) BRIEF LEGAL^ESCRIPTION
i/
See attached copies of PTR legal
NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M.
A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M.
Form 16
DlLi
PAGE 1 OF 2
8) LOCATION OF PROJECT:
ON THE
La Costa Master Plan Area
East
STREET ADDRESS
SIDE OF
(NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST)
BETWEEN Camino Vida Roble AND
(NAME OF STREET)
El Camino Real
(NAME OF STREET)
Southern City Limit
(NAME OF STREET)
9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE Zone 10 & 11
* SEE ATTACHED APPLICATION SUPPLEMENT***
10) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS
1 3) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION
16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED
PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE
1 9) GROSS SITE ACREAGE
22) EXISTING ZONING
11) NUMBER OF EXISTING
RESIDENTIAL UNITS
14) PROPOSED IND OFFICE/
SQUARE FOOTAGE
17) PROPOSED INCREASE IN
ADT
20) EXISTING GENERAL
PLAN
23) PROPOSED ZONING
e e.
12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF
RESIDENTIAL UNITS
15) PROPOSED COMM
SQUARE FOOTAGE
18) PROPOSED SEWER
USAGE IN EDU
21) PROPOSED GENERAL
PLAN DESIGNATION
24)IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY
STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMEBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT
3R THIS PURPOSE
FOR CITY USE ONLY
FEE COMPUTATION
APPLICATION TYPE
n
LFnP 10
TOTAL FEE REQUIRED
FEE REQUIRED
\Oc?0 -
lOiOo
RECEIVED
FEB 1 3 1998
CITY OF CARLSBAn
PLANNING DEPT
DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED
RECEIVED BY:
DATE FEE PAID 9-B RECEIPT NO.
Form 16 PAGE 2 OF 2
APPLICATION SUPPLEMENT
10. PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS
11. NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNITS
12. PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS
13. TYPE OF SUBDIVISION
14. PROPOSED IND OFFICE / SQUARE FOOTAGE
15. PROPOSED COMM SQUARE FOOTAGE
16. PRECENTANGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
IN OPEN SPACE
17. PROPOSED INCREASE IN ADT
18. PROPOSED SEWER USAGE IN EDU
19. GROSS SITE ACREAGE
20. EXISITNG GENERAL PLAN
21. PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
22. EXISTING ZONING
23. PROPOSED ZONING
TBA
0
2236
TBA
128,000
121,500
43% (808.4 AC)
37,880
2375
1866
RL/RLM
N, PI, OS, RL, RLM,
RMH, RM
PC
R-l.RD-M
PM, Cl.OS
01/28/98
CITY
1200 CARLSBAD LLAGE DRIVE CARLSBAD,^ LIP
434-2867
92008
REC'D FROM , l/M/». DATE,
ACCOUNT NO.DESCRIPTION
01 02
0 ft*
35,
\/
ris
ro
RECEIPTNt). 47225
Printed on recycled paper.
NOT VALID UNLESS VALIDATED BY
CASH REGISTER
TOTAL
1200 CARLSBAD LLAGE DRIVE CARLSBAD, \ L1FORNIA 92008
434-2867
REC'D FROM.DATE /3
ACCOUNT NO.
P'PM.nuJb
RECEIPT^*: 47243
DESCRIPTION
'Pff-
f}ohoL.
-^- - -•* r
fnp />)4*} (Q *094 02/13/98
' • • • '-'.-.'
NOT VALID UNLESS VALIDATED BY TOTAL
AMOUNT
•5<9 -
^i /ff\ -• *^^•>*^_V C^ f , *
^r^)- ^
0001.01 02
U-PRffi 77-0.00
:-• • . ..'
7700
Printed on recycled paper.CASH REGISTER
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION
PROJECT NAME; Villages of La Costa - Master Plan
APPLICANT NAME: Morrow Development
Please describe fully the proposed project. Include any details necessary to adequately
explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any
background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or
appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary.
Description/Explanation.
The approval of the Arroyo La Cosia Plan in 1990 established the process for updating the La Costa Master
Plan by creating new master plan documents for vacant areas and removing those areas from the original
master plan via a master plan amendment so that the original provisions would only apply to already
developed areas.
The Arroyo La Costa Master Plan was the first area to be removed from the old master plan. This
application will remove the remaining portions of the original holding or those areas referred to as the
northwest and southeast as envisioned in the Arroyo La Costa approval.
The 1994 Implementation Agreement for the Habitat Conservation Plan envisioned that the La Costa
Master Plan and General Plan designations on the affected property would be revised to delineate the areas
of habitat slated for perservation.
The proposed project will result in a reconfiguration of land uses in a manner that formalizes the areas to
be perserved by applying Master Plan and General Plan Open Space designations while clearly delineating
areas available for development and establishing related development intensities. Approximately 43% of
the area or 808 acres is proposed as Open Space. All development proposed is consistent with that
permitted under the provisions of the existing La Costa Master Plan and the provisions of the City's
Growth Management Program.
The proposed Master Plan divides the ownership into 3 Villages: the Oaks, the Ridge (formerly the
southeast) and the Greens (formerly northwest). These areas are addressed in a single Villages of La Costa
Master Plan. Master Plan provisions common to all three Villages are addressed as Master Plan
Development Standards and Guidelines with separate sections addressing matters unique to each Village.
In addition to overall Village development standards each Neighborhood has unique development
standards related to product type and physical character.
The Greens (formerly northwest) is divided in 17 separate Neighborhoods. Two of the Neighborhoods are
proposed for non residential uses and three are proposed for higher intensity residential use in the 8-15
dwelling unit per acre range. One Neighborhood is designated as a school site. The area is currently
planned for 1038 residential units, 15 acres of commercial/planned industrial, a 5 acre school site, a 22 acre
community parks site and 206 acres of open space.
The former southeast area is now made up of two Villages. The La Costa Ridge Village (formerly the
northern portion of the southeast, or Rancheros) is divided into 6 separate Neighborhoods and the La
Costa Oaks Village (formerly the southern portion of the southeast) is divided into 15 individual
Neighborhoods. These two Villages are anticipated to accommodate 2236 dwelling units, 5 acres of
commercial and 602 acres of open space.
Facilities needs associated with these new land use configurations will be established through the requested
amendment to the Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan and the requested approval of the Zone 10
Local Facilities Plan.
In order to implement the new Villages of La Costa Master Plan, the applicant is requesting the following
discretionary approvals:
1. Master Plan Amendment to the existing La Costa Master Plan to delete all reference to the areas
previously known as La Costa Northwest and La Costa Southeast.
2. A new Master Plan, in compliance with all current ordignances and standards for the areas previously
known as La Costa Northwest and La Costa Southeast
3. A General Plan Amendment to revise land use designations within the Villages of La Costa Plan Area
4. Zone Changes as necessary to implement the Master Plan and General Plan Amendment
5. Environmental certification
STATEMENT OF AGREEMENT
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
CITY OF CARLSBAD
The Subdivision Map Act and the Carlsbad Municipal Code sets a fifty (50) day time restriction
on Planning Commission processing of Tentative Maps and a thirty (30) day time limit for City
Council action. These time limits can only be extended by the mutual concurrence of the
applicant and the City. By accepting applications for Tentative Maps concurrently with
applications for other approvals which are prerequisites to the map; i.e., Environmental
Assessment, Environmental Impact Report, Condominium Plan, PlannedJUnit Development, etc.,
the fifty (50) day time limits and the thirty (30) day time limits are often exceeded. If you wish
to have your application processed concurrently, this agreement must be signed by the applicant
or his agent. If you choose not to sign the statement, the City will not accept your application
for the Tentative Map until all prior necessary entitlements have been processed and approved.
The undersigned understands that the processing time required by the City may exceed the time
limits, therefore the undersigned agrees to extend the time limits for Planning Commission and
City Council action and fully concurs with any extensions of time up to one year from the date
the application was accepted as complete to properly review all of the applications.
Date
Name (Print) Relationship to Application
(Property Owner-Agent)
FRM0037 2/96
10/06/1999 16:38 7604380981 HENTHORN PAGE 06
VILLAGES OFA COSTA
July 31, 1998
Alfonsa Paziura
1248 Heatherview Drive
Agoura, CA 91301
Subject: Zone 10 Local Facilities lyianagement Plan
Dear Alfonsa:
The Villages of La Costa has been in
Plan for Zone 10 in conjunction with \
1995, the predecessor to the Villages
and local governmental agencies for
Zone 10. This agreement and the cc
changes to the original La (iosta Mas
accommodate these changes, the C<
facilities management plan for Zone
granted to any property owner.
he process of preparing a Local Facilities Management
ie preparation of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. In
of La Costa entered into an agreement with federal, state
he conservation of environmentally sensitive land within
responding Habitat Conservation Plan necessitated
er Plan. In order to amend the master plan to
rlsbad Municipal Code requires the preparation of a local
0 before any additional development approvals can be
The local facilities management plan
the phasing of public and community
development within the City and the;
allows all property owners whose pro
zone to jointly prepare a local faciiitie
City approved land use designations
those approvals.
Since your property is located within
is requested, and will benefit you by
Please execute the attached form
MORROWTJEVELOPMENt, INC.
Fred Arbuckle
President
attch
FMA:dlc
P. O. Box 9000-685 • CAIUSBAO. CAUFOKN
serves to manage growth within the zone by ensuring that
acilities will be adequate to meet the needs of projected
one. Section 21.90.120 c of the Carlsbad Municipal Code
erties are located within a local facilities management
management plan. The plan will be based upon existing
or your property and will not propose modifications to
Jone 10, your concurrence with the preparation of the plan
emoving one of the obstacles to future development,
sic nifying your concurrence and return by August 15th.
If you have any questions regarding fiis process, please fell free to contact me at
(760)929-2701.
Sincerely
92013-9000 • Tum-HONt 17601 929-2701 • FACSIMILE 1760) 929-2705
Villages of La Costa, LFMP Zones 10 & 11 - Property Owners
First Name
Alfonsa
Anthony
Ruth
Daniel
Last Name
Paziura
Bons -7^
Budlon^
Shelley
Company/Ownership
Mary E. Bressi Trust
Mag Properties
Address
1248HeatherviewDr.
25709 HtlkrestAve.
P.O. BOK 1666
PO Box 230895
5075 Federal Blvd.
City
Agoura
Escondido
Carlsbad
Encinitas
San Diego
Las Vegas
State
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
-~WJ~
ZIP Code
91301
92026
920 18
92023
92102
89U9
Zone
10
50
10
It
(I
11
Amendment
~
—
—
Amendment
Amendment
*Note: Also, Mary Persic and Elizabeth Wiegand, Co-Trustees of the Mary E. Bressi Trust
Updated 4/6/99
Jack Hcrrthorn & Associates
04/08/99
D:\VLaCosla\Memos\LFMP Owners.doc
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
December 27, 1999
Mr. Jack Henthorn
Jack Henthorn & Associates
5375 Avenida Encinas
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Jack:
This letter transmits the Planning Department's comments on the draft Local Facilities
Management Plans for Zones 10 and 11. The marked-up documents are being provided to you
to address typos and similar corrections. No Engineering comments are provided at this time.
The following general Planning comments are offered at this time.
1. Executive Summary. The formatting of the Executive Summaries for the two LFMPs is
not at all similar. Because these two plans will be reviewed by the public and decision
makers at the same time, they should follow the same formatting as much as possible.
2. General Conditions. The General Conditions for the two LFMPs are not the same, and
some conditions are missing from each one. Please refer to the adopted Zone 13 LFMP
for the correct General Conditions.
3. Buiidout Projections. Please ensure that the tables of acreages and dwelling units
matches the draft Master Plan exactly. Because the LFMPs and the Master Plan will be
reviewed at the same time, it is important that they be fully consistent with each other.
The Zone 11 plan includes estimates for non-residential development but does not
include any discussion of the anticipated non-residential uses.
4. Dwelling Unit Transfer. This topic has the potential to generate a lot of confusion in the
public. An expanded discussion is needed describing how this was anticipated in the
earlier Zone 11/12 LFMPs, and explaining why it is still necessary. Provide references to
pages in the other plans, including the old Zone 11 and 12 plans. The role of affordable
housing and the HCP in the transfer should be described.
5. Phasing. The phasing tables need to be updated to Jan. 1, 2000. The "Existing" line
needs to reflect all building permits issued in Zones 1 through 16 and 18 through 24. The
proposed phasing for Zone 11 is presently shown as beginning in 1998. This needs to be
made more realistic, perhaps showing development beginning in 2001 as in the Zone 10
plan.
2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, California 92009-1576 *:*(760)438-1161
6. City Administrative Facilities. Existing Demand needs to be updated to
1/1/00. Existing and Planned facilities need to be updated to add Faraday
Building and delete Las Palmas building and City Hall modulars. The
future City Hall cannot be counted toward meeting the standard at this
time because its construction is more than five years away.
7. Library. Existing Demand needs to be updated to 1/1/00. Existing and
Planned facilities need to be updated to reflect the opening of the new
South Carlsbad Library. All discussion of the La Costa branch must be
deleted. The appendices relating to site selection and design of the South
Carlsbad Library can be deleted. The status of the warehouse on Corte de
Nogal needs to be clarified.
8. Wastewater. The two LFMPs have very different formatting for this
section. It should be exactly the same for both plans.
9. Parks. Existing Demand needs to be updated to 1/1/00. Carrillo Park
should be included in the Existing Supply of parkland because it will be
available to the public within 5 years. Veterans Memorial Park cannot be
included in the Existing Supply because the timing of its construction is
well beyond 5 years. Veterans Memorial Park needs to be shown on the
map of park locations. The appendices should include the 1996 Park
Agreement, not thel 988 version.
10. Drainage. Again, the formatting for the two LFMPs is very different.
Although the two plans should not be identical for drainage, they should
be sufficiently similar to allow the reader to compare the two readily. For
example, the Zone 11 plan includes a map (Exhibit 38) of Sewer District
boundaries, which does not belong in the drainage section.
11. Circulation. Same as for Drainage. For example, the Zone 10 plan
includes 3 graphics showing trip distribution percentages. The Zone 11
plan includes none. The Circulation section will be particularly important
for the public and decision makers, and a special effort should be made to
ensure that the discussion is accurate, consistent, and understandable.
NOTE: The Engineering Department may have additional comments on
this section.
12. Fire. The Zone 11 plan needs to discuss the relocation of Fire Station #6
from its current temporary location to a permanent location.
13. Open Space. Minor comments noted in the documents.
14. Schools. Same as Circulation in regard to formatting. Again, this is an
important facility to the community. Extra care should be taken with this
section so that people in different districts can compare the two plans. The
Mitigation for both plans needs to be the City's standard conditions for
schools. It is not acceptable to state, as is stated in Zone 10, that no
mitigation is required. In Zone 11, Exhibits 50 and 51 appear to show very
different lines for the boundary between SMUSD and EUESD. Also in
Zone 11, some tables have been left blank (Pages XIV-7 and XIV-11).
These sections need to be in good shape before they can be sent to the
respective districts for comment.
15. Schools - Zone 10. The school condition on Page 1-12 states that if
CUSD does not need a school site, the area reserved for the school will
become open space. However, on Page III-6 it states that dwelling units
could be placed on the school site if it is not needed for a school. This
inconsistency needs to be clarified and addressed in both this section and
the Buildout section.
16. Sewer and Water. The next version of the documents will be 'given to
CMWD for their comments. At this time, we would note that the Water
sections in the two plans are formatted very differently. For example, Zone
11 has a very minimal discussion of the use of reclaimed water, while
Zone 10 has a fairly complete discussion. In Zone 1.1 on Pages XVI-5 and
XVI-6, the tables showing yearly projections for OMWD and VCWD have
been left blank.
17. Financing. The next version of the Zone 10 plan should include a draft
Financing Section for review. The Zone 11 plan should include the already
adopted Zone 11/12 Financing Plan.
The next submittal of these documents should be done in highlight/strikeout
format so Planning staff can ensure that all necessary changes have been
made. If that submittal appears to be complete, it will be sent to the other
departments and districts for their review. Thank you.
Sincerely;
Don Rideout
c: Don Neu
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
December 8, 2000
Jack Henthorn
5375 Avenida Encinas
Carlsbad, CA 92008
RE: Consolidated Departmental Comments of Draft Local Facilities
Management Plans for Zones 10 and 11
Attached are comments from the Planning, Engineering, Finance, Library, and
Fire Departments. Additional Parks comments will be submitted separately. The
format of these comments is primarily marginal notes in various copies of the
documents. Please note that some comments are noted by more than one
reviewer. All marked copies are being returned to you for your use in making the
revisions. In addition, a summary is attached which identifies each comment by
page number or section. The summary includes a column for you to indicate
your response to each item. Please return this summary with the response
column fully completed when you resubmit the revised documents.
Many of the comments are minor in nature and will involve minimal efforts to
correct. However, some issues involve major policy issues or will require
discussion with staff before you can make the necessary revisions. These items
are listed below:
1. Dwelling Unit Transfer from Zone 10 to Zone 11 - In the Planning
Department's previous comments dated December 27, 1999, it was
indicated that this proposal requires further justification and explanation. In
the current draft, it is still unclear why this transfer is being proposed and
what effects it may have. A meeting needs to be scheduled to go over the
buildout numbers and resolve whether or not this transfer is needed.
2. Consistency between the two LFMPs and with the draft Master Plan and
EIR - All documents must use the same base information regarding
acreage and number of units, with the understanding that the LFMPs
address other properties in addition to the Villages of La Costa Master
Plan.
3. Citywide and Quadrant phasing projections - Dwelling unit projections for
Zone 17 (Bressi Ranch) must be included in the phasing tables. This will
affect related sections of the plan, such as Parks.
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (76O) 6O2-4600 • FAX (760) 6O2-8559
4. School Adequacy - Written comments have been received from the San
Dieguito High School District and Encinitas Union School District. These
comments are included with this letter. Other districts have indicated that
their comments are forthcoming. It is recommended that you meet with
each of the school districts to discuss their comments regarding the school
section of the LFMP.
5. Sewer District Boundaries and Adjustments - Sewer service as proposed
may require LAFCO approval of boundary adjustments and/or inter-
agency agreements. The sewer section will need to include a special
condition requiring that these approvals be obtained prior final map,
grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first. Be advised that
septic systems will not be allowed under any circumstances (Zone 11 pg.
XV-17).
6. Drainage and NPDES - Drainage facilities must be described in more
detail and not deferred to later design. Required NPDES facilities must be
identified.
7. MAG Properties - Are the assumptions used in the LFMP for development
of this property consistent with the MAG developers current proposal?
8. Traffic Study - Additional comments on traffic will be provided separately.
9. Notice to other property owners - After these revisions have been made
and a new draft produced, the LFMPs will need to be provided to the other
owners of undeveloped property in the zones for their review and
comment.
Staff is available to meet with you to discuss any of the issues identified above.
We look forward to working with you on the completion and adoption of these
Local Facilities Management Plans.
Sincerely;
Don Rideout
Principal Planner
DR:cs
c: Assistant Planning Director
LFMP Review Team
Zone 10 and 11 Consolidated Comments
Zone 11
Page Comment Response
VI-4
through
VI-8
XV-16
XV-19
XV-13
XVI I-9
XVII-14
1-13
1-16
11-1
111-1
III-3
III-5
III-7
111-11
111-12
1-13
1-14
IV-1
IV2-5
VIII-1
VIII-2
VIII-3
VIII-4
VIII-5
VIII-6
VIII-7 thru
VIII-10
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Changes to dollar amounts, funding sources
and timing for City Admin. Facilities.
Clarify financing of LCWD sewer facilities
Include Phase F sewer facilities
Include financing for Phase E water facilities
Text revisions
Include CFD No. 1 funding for Rancho Santa
Fe Road
ENGINEERING PLANNING AND PROGRAMS
Wastewater must be adequate for more than
the current year
Parks standard applies to entire quadrant
Numbering problem
Text changes
Add exhibit number
Typos and text changes
Provide further detail on approved land uses
Address MAG parcel
Provide justification for proposed dwelling unit
transfer from Zone 1 0 to Zone 1 1
Wastewater treatment must be adequate
beyond the current year
Provide additional justification for proposed
dwelling unit transfer from Zone 10 to Zone 1 1
Clarify additional 457 dwelling units
Citywide and quadrant Phasing tables need to
include projected Zone 17 phasing. A non-
residential phasing table must be provided
addressing MAG development.
Text revisions
Exhibit numbering problem
Update sewer flow data
Update sewer facilities and capacity data
Text changes
Various changes
Printing problem. Also, revise Adequacy
Findings to evaluate with LCWD and VWD
X-8
Section XI
XII-1 and
2
XV-2
ii
in
iv
I-7
I-8
1-13
1-15
1-16
1-17
1-18
1-19
1-21
I-22
Exhibits 8
&9
111-1
Exhibit 10
III-5
III-7
III-9
111-12
111-13
111-14
111-15
IV-2
IV-5
VI-4
Include Financing Matrix for drainage facilities.
Comments on Circulation section not provided
at this time
Text and map revisions
Listed facilities do not match Fig. 46
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Add Engineering staff
Wastewater Treatment Facilities
Add References, Appendices and Full-size
constraints map to table of contents
Significant riparian or woodland habitats. Also,
reference previous Zone 11 LFMP
Text changes
Various revisions
Title 21
Various revisions to Special Conditions
Revisions to condition for Rancho Santa
Fe/Melrose
Reference HCP exclusion for open space
Zones 10 and 11 should use consistent format
for schools. Also see other school comments
Text changes and typo
Typo
Revise General Plan and zoning maps as
noted
Various text changes
Various comments noted
Section describing HCP should also be
included in Zone 10 LFMP
Clarify existing Dus
Zones 1 0 and 1 1 should use consistent format
for Developing Land Uses. Also see other
comments.
Clarify Affordable Housing reference on Exhibit
14
Various formatting revisions
Provide justification for proposed dwelling unit
transfer from Zone 1 0 to Zone 1 1
Comments on Exhibit 1 6
Exhibit 17
Revise phasing as noted
Refer to 1 999-2000 CIP
VI-5 and
Vl-6
VII-6
VI 11-4
VIII-5
VIII-6 and
VI 11-7
Vlll-10
VIII-11
IX-3
IX-4
IX-6
IX-7
IX-8
IX-9
X-5
Exhibit 34
X-8
XI-1
Traffic
Exhibits
XI-9
Table 4
Exhibit 35
Table 10
XI-36
XI-37
Exhibit 39
XIII-4
XIV-1
XIV-2 thru
XIV-9
XIV-1 0
XV-1
XV-3 and
XV-8
XV-1 2
XV-1 4
Do not delete reference to Public Facilities Fee
Check dates
Check Encina capacity
Why is discussion of Carlsbad Sewer Service
District included?
Same as above comments
Show existing as of 1/1/2000
Make consistent with Zone 10 LFMP
Comments noted
Make consistent with Zone 10 LFMP
El Camino Creek Elementary School is existing
Park financing question
Make consistent with Zone 10 LFMP
Check against park agreement
Text changes
Minor revisions
Question re: Batiquitos Lagoon enhancement
plan
Text change
Numbering of all figures and tables in this
section must be changed to fit into LFMP
sequence.
Text changes
Question about park noted in trip generation
table
Change street name
When are commercial uses added to trip
generation?
Questions re: traffic mitigation
Address intersections outside Carlsbad
analyzed by LLG
Exhibit formatting problems
Address HCP open space
Clarify school district boundaries
Various text changes
Clarify dates
Sewer district boundary issue
Typos
Reconcile text with exhibits
Make unit count consistent with Master Plan
- -
XV-17
XVI-5 and
XVI-8
XVI-10
XVI-1 1
XVI-13
XVI-1 5
XVI I-4
XVI I-6
XVII-12
XVII-36
XVII-43
Septic systems are not acceptable
Typos
Include appendices
Make consistent with page XVI-5
Typos
Changes to water financing table
Typos
Formatting question
Clarify funding for parks
Clarify school financing for each district
Clarify water facilities
ENGINEERING LAND USE
See Attached
FIRE DEPARTMENT
See Attached
LIBRARY
See Attached
SAN DIEGUITO HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT
See attached
ENCINITAS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
See attached
Zone 10
Page
li
lii
Iv
1-1
I-2
I-9
1-10
1-11
1-12
1-13
II-2
Exhibit 6
Exhibit 7
Exhibit 8
111-1
III-6
III-7
III-8
Exhibit 13
IV-5
VII-1 and 5
VII-7
VIII-1
IX-1
IX-3
IX-8 and 9
IX-1 0 and 11
XI-1
Circulation
XI-10
XI-38
Exhibit 36
XIV-1
XIV-2
Exhibit 37
XIV-5
XIV-7
Comments
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Add Engineering staff
Wastewater Treatment Facilities
Add References, Appendices and Full-size constraints map to
table of contents
Significant riparian or woodland habitats
Address zone buildout per submitted Master Plan
Title 21
Add text as indicated
Clarifications needed
Text changes
Text change
Text change
Acreage correction
Map revisions per Master Plan
Map revisions
Text changes
Clarification of buildout total
Comments on buildout calculations
Comments on buildout calculations
Check accuracy of existing DU numbers
Clarification of buildout total
Formatting problem
Text change
Include discussion of LCWD
Formatting problem
Text changes
Text changes
Provide analysis of Parks supply/demand as noted
Text change
Numbering of all figures and tables in this section must be
changed to fit into LFMP sequence. Other changes also noted.
Text formatting problem
Question regarding Alga/ECR intersection
Problem with formatting of legend
Text change
Provide demand for affordable housing based on Master Plan
Several problems with school map. Check with appropriate
school district for accurate information.
Text change
Address SMUSD Mello-Roos
XV-1
XV-5
XV-10
XVI-1 and 3
XVI-5 and 8
and 12
XVI-1 3
XVII-1
XVI I-4
XVI I-5
XVII-1 2
XVII-23
XVII-24
XVII-30
Sewer clarification needed
Address park site and industrial acreage
Check accuracy of EDU figures
Text changes
Make land uses and buildout assumptions consistent with Master
Plan
Text change
Clarify financing sub-areas
Text changes
Various comments
Clarify funding for parks
Text changes
Include a separate section for CUSD and SMUSD. Address
required financing, fee or CFD.
Typo
ENGINEERING LAND USE
See Attached
FIRE DEPARTMENT
See Attached
LIBRARY
See Attached
SAN DIEGUITO HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT
See attached
ENCINITAS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
See attached
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
December 12, 2000
Jack Henthorn
5375 Avenida Encinas
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Attached are comments from the Recreation Department regarding the Parks
section of the LFMPs for Zones 10 and 11. The comments are self-explanatory,
but if you have any questions please call me or Ken Price.
Sincerely;
Don Rideout
Prinicipal Planner
Assistant Planning Director
LFMP Review Team
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us
December 11, 2000
TO: PRINCIPAL PLANNER, DON RIDEOUT
FROM: RECREATION DIRECTOR
PARK ANALYSIS FOR ZONE 10 & 11 LFMPS
As per your request, Recreation staff has reviewed the Parks sections for the Local
Facilities Management Plans for Zones 10 and 11 (Villages of La Costa). The attached
documents include our comments and are identified in red.
In review of this information, I would be interested in knowing who prepared this
document? If you could let me know I sure would appreciate it.
If you have any questions regarding our comments, please feel free and let me know.
Thankyou,
KEN PRICE
Attachment
c: Park Development Coordinator
Senior Management Analyst - Recreation
Local Facil s Management Plan Zone 1
IX. PARK FACILITIES
PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Three acres of Community Park or Special Use Area per 1000 population within
the park district must be scheduled for construction within a five vcarfive-year
period.
B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
Park facilities are addressed on a Park District basis. There are four park districts
which correspond to the four quadrants of the City. Zone 11 is located in Park
District 4 as shown on Exhibit 5430.
INVENTORY
a. Existing and Build Out Park Demand:
The projected population for Park District 4 comes from Exhibit
17.
Existing (1/1/98)
Park District 1—
Projected
Population
26.750
Zone 11
Park District 4
4.35213.06(1/1/00)
30,226
Zone 11 4.369
Build Out
Park District 4 (2020)
Zone 11 (2020)8.562
Performance
Standard
Demand (acre)
90.68
13.11
133.02
25.69
uJune. 2000 IX-1
CityofOceanside
City of
1 Vista
C i t y o f
E n c i n i t a sLegend
3 District Designation
District Boundary C i t y o f
E n c i n i t a s
City of
San
Marcos
IF4 Park Districts * I!
Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan Exhibit 30
Local Faci. :s Management Plan Zone 11
Inventory of Existing Park Facilities In Park District 4:
The inventory of existing parks listed below was approved on
September 1991 by the Parks and Recreation Commission. The
location of these parks are shown on Exhibit 5-?r3_l_. These are the
following:
Community Parks
La Costa Canyon
Stagecoach
*arir-
Type
Active
Active
Act./Passive
Ownership
City
City
-Gw^
Acres
12.34
28.0
Subtotal
Active
>^4Leo
Citv 26.9
Subtotal 67.24
Special Use Areas Type Ownership
Cadencia Active City
El Fuerte Active City
La Costa Heights
Elementary"
(Levante Elem.) Active EUESD
La Costa Meadows
Elementary13
(Fuerte Elem.) Active SMUSD
Subtotal
Acres
2.0
3.6
5.4
2.0
13.0
TOTAL EXISTING PARK FACILITIES 3&O480.24
In addition, the adopted 1996 Parks
Collateral .Management and the City ._ „
P f* (^ T^ fitelrV-bti. 0v- dedication ^32.9 acres of parkland for Alga Norte Park located
within Zone 10. This dedication/6f land will allow the park supply
to conform with the adopted performance standard.
"An existing joint use agreement between the City of Carlsbad and the Encinitas Union
Elementary School District (EUESD) is contained in Appendix A-4.
i:An existing joint use agreement between the City of Carlsbad and the San Marcos Unified
School District (SMUSD) is contained in Appendix A-4.
lauoJune. 2000 IX-3
Local Fac. .es Management Plan Zone 11
c. Inventory of Approved Future Park Facilities
An inventory of projected park facilities was approved by the Parks
and Recreation Commissionton October 16. 1Q9Q. The location of
these parks are shown on Exhibit 54r31.
The following parks are listed in the inventor.' but are scheduled
for construction within five years in the adopted Capital
J^ Improvements Plan:
— i^_ Future Community Parks
\ ^ Alga Norte Park
"^N. I en Tarrilln PnH-
" \^f* 1 '^^'X \ f 1 T» 1^T^jX) — y Memorial Park.v\)«/ y *
Type
Active
Do c1 m ^ 7£*
rr\ •Act./Passive
Ownership
City
Citv
Acres
32.9
25.0
TOTAL FUTURE PARK FACILITIES
d. Projected Build Out Adequacy/Inadequacy of Park Facilities:
78. 3480.24 acres of existing park facilities can be applied toward
meeting the adopted parks performance standard. The acres of
projected future park facilities are proposed as part of the 1997-
Assuming these proposed facilities are scheduled and funded for
construction prior to build out, the projected build out
adequacy/inadequacy of park facilities in Park District 4 is as
follows:
Existing Facilities
Proposed Future Facilities
Total Build Out Park Facilities
Park District 4 Build Out Demand
7^480.24 acres
57.90 acres
138.14 acres
-125.21-133.76 acres
Projected Park District 4 Adequacy-foimJiquacy) + 12.904.38 acres
Ftfhruiin u. luuuJune. 2000 IX-4
CityofOceanside
City of
San
Marcos
C i t y o f
E n c i n i t a sLegend
B Community Park (Existing)
Community Park (Future)
• Special Use Area
O Future Special Use Area
C i t y o f
E n c i n i t a,s
IF4 District 4 Park Locations
Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan Exhibit 31
Local Fac les Management Plan Zone 1
PHASING
Exhibit ^632 shows Park District 4 supply and demand based on Park
District 4 population projections. Exhibit ^732 shows that existing park
facilities conform to the performance standard in Park District 4 until build
out with the proposed mitigation.
ADEQUACY FINDINGS
Park District 4 conforms with the adopted performance standard through
build out with the proposed mitigation.
C. MITIGATION
1. SPECIAL CONDITIONS
If at any time the parks performance standard is not complied with within
Park District 4, no further residential development will be allowed in Park
District 4 or Zone 11 unless actions have been taken by the City to provide
additional park facilities.
D. POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL SOURCES OF PARK ACREAGE:
In addition to the community parks and special use areas listed in the existing and
projected inventory, the following schools could possibly enter into joint use
agreements with the City of Carlsbad when the schools are constructed:
• r
*^ J Potential Special Use Areas Type Ownership Acres
^ Elementary School No. 3 Active EUESD 2.5
Camino De Los Coches
Elementary Active EUESD 2.5
La Costa High Active SDHSD 10.0
La Costa J. H. Active SDHSD 7.0
TOTAL 22.0
It is not proposed that these schools be used towards fulfilling the parks
requirement in the southeast quadrant. It is however, acknowledged that these
schools, when operational, could become^ special use areas upon written joint use
agreements between the respective school district and the City of Carlsbad.
.A
Local Faci ;s Management Plan Zone 1
FINANCING - o
The City's approved Capital Improvements Program for the 1007 Qg4 000-3090
fiscal year contains the following funding for park facilities in Park District 4:
Park Project
Aloa N
] 997 9% ^001 ''00"' ^002 ''OO?
(19 acres)-S4M nnn 4Sr4-nnn
Maa None
Si 6"? OOP
Alga Norte
Communitv Center S3.535.000
Leo Carrillo Park S700.000 $•1.300.000
(18.78 acres) 1999-2000 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-09 2009+
Alga Norte ;
(Land Dedication)
Alea None S250.000 S250.000 S3.742.000
(Phase I)
Alga None $5.300.000
(Phase II)
Leo Carrillo S375.000 S3.389.000
Park (Phase II)
Leo Carrillo SI.622.000
Park (Phase III)
The 19 acres od acres of Phase I for the Alga Norte Park scheduled for 2002-
20072001-2002 can be used to meet the adopted performance staqdard because it
is scheduled within five years in the adopted 1997 98 CIP. Theset999-200(£ciP.
The above improvements will be financed by means of a combination of the
existing Parks Agreement for the_Alga Norte Park and the_Public Facilities Fees
for the Leo Carrillo Park. The Parks Agreement was first entered into between
the City and RECM's predecessor in 1982, prior to the initiation of the Growth
Management Program. The agreement was amended in 1988 to ensure that Park
District 4 would meet the adopted Parks Performance Standard (C.C. Resolution
No. 88-52). The current version of the agreement was entered into in 1996. The
park site shown on the constraints map is the adopted and approved Alga Norte
site pursuant to the current 1996 RECM/City Carlsbad Parks Agreement.
uar, u. mugJune. 2000 IX-7
Local Faci. .es Manasement Plan Zone 1
.The agreement guarantees the dedication of 32.9 acres of park land. This
dedication of land will allow the park supply to conform with the adopted
performance standard.
The parks agreement defines the specific park-in-lieu credij^nd other, if any.
reimbursements to be received by RECM. The 4£9?-08t99Q 2000 CIP
$400,000 to be paid between 2002 and 2007 for reimbursement to RECM. and the
remaining $2,145,000 to be paid in full after 2007+. V
The following table shows a facility financing matrix for this facility. This matrix
summarizes the individual facility to be financed, its estimated cost and timing of
construction, the existing budgeted CIP moneys available for the facility and the
future funding options.
EXHIBIT 3632 Phasing of Park Facilities for District 4
Status Year
Existing 2000
Proposed 2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Build Out 2020
TOTAL
Local Facilities Management Zones
6(SE) 10 11
8.144
36
50
50
113
113
133
93
93
93
73
73
73
73
46
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9,256
0
0
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
28
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,07t
1.885
80
210
210
210
.209
166
166
166
166
168
16
15
15
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,694
12
2.266
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,266
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1«
746
123
123
123
123
123
123
123
123
123
123
123
123
123
123
123
123
122
0
0
0
0
2,136
Total! of Adopted LFMP's
Total Total Yearly
Adopted Adopted Adopted
Phased Projected Population
DU's DU's Increase
13.041 13.041 30.226
239 13.280 554
533 13.813 1.235
533 14.346 1.235
596 14.942 1.381
595 15.537 1.379
572 16.109 1.326
532 16.641 1.233
532 17.173 1.233
410 17.583 950
364 17.947 844
212 18.159 491
211 18.370 489
211 18.581 489
181 18.762 420
123 18.885 285
123 19.008 285
122 19.130 283
0 19.130 0
0 19.130 0
0 19.130 0
0 19.130 0
19.130 19,130 0
Total
Adopted
Population
30.226
30.780
32.016
33.251
34633
36.012
37.337
38.571
39.804
40.754
41.598
42.089
42.578
43.067
43.487
43,772
44,057
44.340
44.340
44.340
44.340
44.340
44,340
Adequacy Analysis
SE Parks SE Parks Adequacy/
Demand Supply (Inadequacy)
(Arces) (Acres) (Acres)
9068
92.34
9605
9975
10390
108.03
112.01
11571
11941
122.26
12479
126.27
12773
12920
13046
131.31
13217
13302
13302
133.02
13302
13302
133.02
80.24
8024
13814
13814
13814
13614
13814
13814
13814
13814
13614
13814
13814
13814
13814
13814
13814
13814
13814
13814
13814
13814
138.14
•1044
-1210
42.09
3839
34.24 VT»
3011
2613
2243
1873
1588
13.35
11.87
1041
894
768
6.83
597
512
512
512
512
5.12
5.12
iwoJune, 2000
Local Fac. Jes Management Plan Zone 11
EXHIBIT Jg33 Park District 4 Financing Matrix
Facility
Park Facilities -
Park Restoration
Alga Norte Park -
Alga None Park
Leo Carrillo Park
Amount Estimated Cost Timing
Park District 4
$565.000 2010+
Land Acquisition -_ »i. 698,098- 2000-2001
<2'130ac ' $4.242.000 2001-2004
N $5.300.000 2004-2009
/ \rV<**e 31 26.9
? »r\A*G iTC.
TOTAL PARKS COSTS
Notes:
(1) Al credits and futu
(2) The TOTAL PARC
re rembursemene are pan ol foe Parks agreement win th
>.S COSTS does not ndude the S2 241.265 to be pad by F
l
fti fft (wi jfflin^ i
1
REC
10\6 - 2.0
UH,§!l,uufl —
t. ^^
91 -7^-2.
Funding Options
First Second Third Notes
PIL-SE
PIL-SE
City - PFF
PFF
RECM w/ future
reimbursement
X>»City-PFF
City -PFF (1)
>es ndude foe S2.241.265 c be rembursed to FeBstone
Mjune. 2000 IX-9
Local Facilit: Management Plan • Zone 10
IX. PARK FACILITIES
A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Three acres of Community Park or Special Use Area per 1000 population within
the park district must be scheduled for construction within a five ycarfive-year |
period.
Z?
l^
B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
Park facilities are addressed on a Park District basis. There are four park districts
which correspond to the four quadrants of the City. Zone 10 is located in Park
District 4 as shown on Exhibit 26.
1. INVENTORY
a. Existing and Build Out Park Demand:
The projected population for Park District 4 comes from Exhibit
14.
Existing (1/1/98X1/1/00)
Park District 4
Zone 10
Build Out
Park District 4 (2020)
Zone 10 (2020)
Projected
Population
26.750
0
41.710
Performance
Standard
Demand (acre)
-80^30.226
0
125.2114,3401:
90.
3.02
7.5
January 19. IQQQJune. 2000 IX-1
Local Facil s Management Plan • Zone 10
b. Inventory' of Existing Park Facilities In Park District 4:
»
The inventory of existing parks listed below was approved on
September 1991 by the Parks and Recreation Commission. The
location of these parks are shown on Exhibit 27. These are the
following:
Communitv Parks
La Costa Canyon
Stagecoach
Subtotal
Type
Active
Active
Active
Ownership
Citv
City
City
6^ vILeo
Citv
Acres
12.34
28.0
->v Q
Carillo
26.9
Subtotal 67.24
Special Use Areas
Cadencia
El Fuerte
La Costa Heights
Elementary10
(Levante Elem.)
La Costa Meadows
Elementary1 '
(Fuerte Elem.)
Subtotal
TOTAL EXISTING
Type
Active
Active
Active
Active
PARK FACILITIES
Ownership
City
City
EUESD
SMUSD
Acres
2.0
3.6
5.4
2.0
13.0
^4480.24
In addition, the adopted 1996 Parks Agreement Real Estate
Collateral Management and the City of Carlsbad guarantees the
dedication of 32.9 acres of parkland for Alga Norte Park located
within Zone 10. This dedication of land will allow the park supply
to conform with the adopted performance standard.
'"An existing joint use agreement between the City of Carlsbad and the Encinitas Union
Elementary School District (EUESD) is contained in Appendix A-4.
"An existing joint use agreement between the City of Carlsbad and the San Marcos Unified
School District (SMUSD) is contained in Appendix A-4.
ig. |999June. 2000 IX-3
Local Facil: ; Management Plan • Zone 10
c. Inventory of Approved Future Park Facilities
An inventory of projected park facilities was approved by the Parks
and Recreation Commission on October 16. 1990. The location of
these parks are shown on Exhibit 27.
The following parks are listed in the inventory but are scheduled
for construction within five years in the adopted Capital
Improvements Plan:
Future Communitv Parks
Alga Norte Park
I en Cirrilln PirV
Memorial Park
Type
Active
Act./Passive
Ownership
City
Cir ~>f
Citv
Acres
32.9
w-QVpt pran^
25.0
TOTAL FUTURE PARK FACILITIES
d. Projected Build Out Adequacy /Inadequacy of Park Facilities:
78.3-180.24 acres of existing park facilities can be applied toward
meeting the adopted parks performance standard. The acres of
projected future park facilities are proposed as part of the 1997-
1 999-2000 CIP.
Assuming these proposed facilities are scheduled and funded for
construction prior to build out, the projected build out
adequacy/inadequacy of park facilities in Park District 4 is as
follows:
Existing Facilities 3&e480.24 acres
Proposed Future Facilities ±$QM+57.90 acres
Total Build Out Park Facilities 138.14 acres
Park District 4 Build Out Demand - 1 25 .24 acres
Projected Park District 4 Adequacy (inadequacy) + 12.90 acres
January 19. 1999June. 2000 IX-4
Local Facil s Management Plan • Zone 10
EXHIBIT 27 District 1 Park Locations
January 10. 1999June. 2000 IX-5
Local Facili -> Management Plan • Zone 10
PHASING
Exhibit 28 shows Park District 4 supply and demand based on Park
District 4 population projections. Exhibit 28 shows that existing park
facilities conform to the performance standard in Park District 4 until build
out with the proposed mitigation.
3. ADEQUACY FINDINGS
Park District 4 conforms with the adopted performance standard through
build out with the proposed mitigation.
iUune. 2000 IX-6
CityofOceanside
City of
Vista
C i t y o f
E n c i n i t a s
City of
San
Marcos
Legend
• Community Park (Existing)
C Community Park (Future)
Special Use Area
Future Special Use Area
tageco|ch
ark
C i t y o f
E n c i n i t a s
IF4 District 4 Park Locations
Zone 10 Local Facilities Management Plan Exhibit 27
Local Facili Management Plan • Zone 10
C. MITIGATION
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
If at any time the parks performance standard is not complied with within
Park District 4, no further residential development will be allowed in Park
District 4 or Zone 10 unless actions have been taken by the City to provide
additional park facilities.
D. POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL SOURCES OF PARK ACREAGE:
In addition to the community parks and special use areas listed in the existing and
projected inventory, the following schools could possibly enter into joint use
agreements with the City of Carlsbad when the schools are constructed:
Potential Special Use Areas Type Ownership Acres
Elementary School No. 3 Active EUESD 2.5
Camino De Los Coches
Elementary Active EUESD 2.5
La Costa High Active SDHSD 10.0
La Costa J. H. Active SDHSD 7.0
TOTAL 22.0
It is not proposed that these schools be used towards fulfilling the parks
requirement in the southeast quadrant. It is however, acknowledged that these
schools, when operational, could become special use areas upon written joint .use
agreements between the respective school district and the City of Carlsbad.
E. FINANCING
The City's approved Capital Improvements Program for the 4-W-9S 1999-2000
fiscal year contains the following funding for park facilities in Park District 4:
Park Project 1997 9g _ ^QQl -">QQ') ^QO^-^OO? _ 2007+
Alga Norte
(19 acres) - $100.000 - S2.H 5.000
Alga Norte
(15. 52 acres) - SI. 697.000
Alga Norte
January 19. 1 990June. 2000 IX-8
Local Faci .'S Management Plan • Zone 10
Community Center S3.535.000
Leo Carrillo Park S700 OOP SI 300 OOP ^ 1 "^00 OOP
(18.78 acres)1999-2000 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-09 2009-
Alga None 52.800.000
(Land Dedication)
Alga None S250.000 S2SO.OOO S3.742.000
(Phase I)
Alga None S5.300.000
(Phase II)
Park Project 1999-2000 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-09 2009*
Leo Carrillo S375.000 S3.389.000
Park (Phase II)
Leo Carriilo SI.622,000
Park (Phase III)
The 4-9 acres of3Q acres of Phase I for the Alga Norte Park scheduled for 2002
SQQ72001-2002 can be used to meet the adopted performance standard because it
is scheduled within five years in the adopted 1997 98 CIP. These 1999-2000 CIP.
The above improvements will be financed by means of a combination of the
existing Parks Agreement for the_Alga Norte Park and theJPublic Facilities Fees
for the Leo Carriilo Park. The Parks Agreement was first entered into between
the City and RECM's predecessor in 1982, prior to the initiation of the Growth
Management Program. The agreement was amended in 1988 to ensure that Park
District 4 would meet the adopted Parks Performance Standard (C.C. Resolution
No. 88-52). The current version of the agreement was entered into in 1996. The
park site shown on the constraints map is the adopted and approved Alga Norte
site pursuant to the current 1996 RECM/City Carlsbad Parks Agreement.
The agreement guarantees the dedication of 32.9 acres of park land. This
dedication of land will allow the park supply to conform with the adopted
performance standard.
The parks agreement defines the specific park-in-lieu credits and other, if any,
reimbursements to be received by RECM. The 4g»?-9S 1999-2000 CIP identifies
$400,000 to be paid between 2002 and 2007 for reimbursement to RECM, and the
remaining $2,145,000 to be paid in full after 2007+.
The following table shows a facility financing matrix for this facility. This matrix
summarizes the individual facility to be financed, its estimated cost and timing of
construction, the existing budgeted CIP moneys available for the facility and the
future funding options.
January 19. 1999June. 2000 IX-9
Local Facili ., Manaaement Plan • Zone 10
EXHIBIT 28 Phasing of Park Facilities for District 4
Local Facilities Management Zones Totals of Adopted Lf HP's Adequacy Analysis
Status Year
Extsung 2000
Proposes 2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2016
2019
Build Out 2020
TOTAL
6(SE)
6144
36
SO
50
113
113
133
93
93
93
73
73
73
73
46
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9.256
Total Total Yearly
Adopted Adopted Adopted Total SE Parks SE Paru Adequacy
Phaaed Projected Population Adopted Demand Supply (Inadequacy)
10 11 12 17 11 DU'a DU's Increaa* Population (Areas) lAcres) (Acres)
0 1.885 2.266 0 746 13.041 13.041 30.226 30.226 9066 BC24 .1044
0 80 0 0 123 239 13.260 554 30780 9234 8024 .1; 10
150 210 0 0 123 533 13.813 1.235 32 016 96 05 138 14 42 09
150 210 0 0 123 533 14346 1.235 33.251 9975 13814 3839
150 210 0 0 123 596 14842 1.381 34633 10390 13814 342'
150 209 0 0 123 595 15.537 1.379 36.012 10803 13814 30 11
150 166 0 0 123 572 16.109 1.326 37.337 11201 138 14 2613
150 166 0 0 123 532 16.641 1.233 38.571 11571 13814 1243
150 166 0 0 123 532 17.173 1.233 39804 11941 13814 1873
28 166 0 0 123 410 17.583 950 40.754 122.26 138 14 15 86
0 168 0 0 123 364 17,947 844 41.598 12479 13814 1335
0 16 0 0 123 212 18.159 491 42.089 12627 13814 118"
0 15 0 0 123 211 18.370 489 42.578 12773 13814 1041
0 15 0 0 123 211 18.581 489 43067 12920 13814 894
0 12 0 0 123 181 18.762 420 43487 13046 13814 768
0 0 0 0 123 123 18.885 285 43 772 131 31 136 14 6 83
0 0 0 0 123 123 19.008 285 44 057 132 17 138 14 5 97
0 0 0 0 122 122 19.130 283 44.340 133 02 138 14 5 12
00000 0 19.130 0 44.340 13302 13814 512
00000 0 19.130 0 44.340 133 02 138 14 5 12
00000 0 19.130 0 44 340 133 .02 138 14 5 12
00000 0 19.130 0 44.340 13302 13814 512
1,071 3,694 2,266 0 2,836 19,130 19.130 0 44.340 133.02 138.14 5.12
January 19. IPQOJune. 2000 IX-10
Local Facili. Management Plan • Zone 10
EXHIBIT 29 Park District 4 Financing Matrix
Facility Amount
park Faculties - Pant District 4
Park Restoration
Alga None Park - Land Acquisition
Alga None Park - Phase 1 30.0 ac
Alga None Park - Phase II (50 Meter Pool)
Alga None Community Center 1 5.000 sf
Leo Carrillo Park 26.9
Estimated Cost
S565000
S2.800.000
S4.242.000
S5.300.000
S3.535.000
S3.764.000
$1.622,000
Timing
2010+
2000-2001
2001-2004
2004-2009
2007+
2010+
2010+
1 U 1 AL KAKIS5 UUS> 1 5 kZl,B20,UUU
Mjnamg uptons
First Second Third
PIL-SE
PIL-SE
City - PFF
PFF
RECM w/ future
reimbursement
City - PFF
City - PFF
Notes
,„.,„
Notes:
(1) Ml credits and future reimbursements are part at the Parks agreement with the RECM.
(2) The TOTAL PARKS COSTS does not include the $2.241.265 to be paid by Fietdstm: however, the TOTAL PARKS COSTS does include me S2.241.265 to be reimbursed to Feldstone
January 19. 1999June. 2000 IX-11
JACK HENTHORN & ASSOCIATES
5431 Avenida Encinas • Suite J
Carlsbad, California 92008
Fax (760) 438-0981
(760) 438-4090
RECEIVED
May 1, 1998 MAY 0 1 1998
CITY OF CARLSBAD
DonNeu PLANNING DEPT
City of Carlsbad
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92009
Subject: Villages of La Costa Master Plan Resubmittal
Dear Don:
Enclosed are the revised Villages of La Costa Master Plan, Zones 10 and 11 Local
Facilities Master Plans, and related materials in response to your comments on March 25,
1998. For your convenience, we have enclosed a matrix responding to each item on your
comment letter. We will be contacting you in order to set up a meeting early next week
to review our re-submittal documents. If you have any question or concerns, please
contact us at (760) 438-4090.
F:\Documents\LaCosta\resubmittal.doc
-1-
Villages of La Costa
May 1, 1998
Page 1 of 3
1.
2.
3.
4.
Please submit three copies of the Preliminary Title Report
which is current within the last six months.
Submit a reproducible 1" = 500' scale map of the subject
property showing requested General Plan designations with
the acreage involved and the surrounding General Plan,
zoning and land use.
Provide a location map at a scale of 1"= 200' on 8tt" x 11"
size paper.
The following information from the Master Plan application
checklist is needed to evaluate the proposed land use plan:
a. Approximate contours at 5' intervals for slopes over
10% (both' existing and proposed). Existing and
proposed topographic contours within 100' perimeter of
the boundaries of the site. Existing on-site trees; ;those
to be removed and those to be saved.
b. Earthwork volumes; cut, fill, import and export.
c. Clearly show and label the 100-year flood line for the
before and after conditions for the FEMA flood plain.
5.
6.
7.
A constraints map is needed for the entire Master Plan area.
The map should include the information listed on the Master
Plan application checklist for a constraints map.
A circulation impact analysis is required for the proposed
project as noted on the application checklist. This analysis is
also needed for the Local Facilities Management Plans and
the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) which will be
prepared for the proposal. A single analysis will be utilized
for each of these documents to avoid inconsistencies. It is
most efficient to meet with City staff to agree on the report
methodology prior to its preparation. City staff can review
and comment on the report so that a City- approved
circulation impact analysis is available for use hi the Local
Facilities Management Plans and can also be given to the
environment consultant for inclusion in the EIR.
A noise study is listed on the application as a required item to
be submitted for the Master Plan. This item can be prepared
as a part of the environmental impact report and does not
need to be submitted at this time.
Response:
Per meetings with staff, this requirement will be included hi the
June 26* revised plan submittal.
Response:
A 500' scale map reproducible is included in the enclosed submittal
package.
Response:
Exhibit 1-3 of the Master Plan satisfies this requirement.
Response:
Conceptual Grading Plans for the three villages are now included in
Appendix B of the Master Plan.
Response:
Earthwork volumes are now described for each village in Section
4.2 of the Master Plan.
Response:
The 100-year flood lines for the before condition are shown on the
project constraint maps. The 100-year flood lines for the after
condition are shown on the Conceptual Drainage Plans of the
individual Village Public Facilities Plans, Exhibits 5-6, 6-6 and 7-6
of the Master Plan.
Response:
Constraint Maps were included with the Local Facilities
Management Plans.
Response:
The Circulation Impact Analysis is currently being prepared,
in accordance with the Staff comments regarding appropriate
methodology. This item should be treated in the same manner as
Item 7.
Response:
Per city comments, a noise study will be prepared at a mutually
agreeable later date.
879/05.000
O:\CUENTS\MORROWUUP-APP2. WPD
Villages of La Costa
May 1, 1998
Page 2 of 3
Replacement text and exhibits showing the proposed changes
to the existing La Costa Master Plan using a strikeout and
highlighted system to not revisions is required to be
submitted. Please refer to Zoning Ordinance Section
21.38.120.
Response:
The La Costa Master Plan replacements were previously submitted
by Jack Henthom & Assoc.
Section 21.38.020 of the Zoning Ordinance requires that the
Master Plan area for a child day care center of reasonable
size for a period of five years from the date of issuance of the
first building permit. Other community use sites are also
required pursuant to Policy C.12 on page 31 of the General
Plan Land Use Element.
Response:
Day care and RV storage site locations have been added to the
Village Development Plans for La Costa Greens and La Costa
Oaks. Language addressing the 5-year reservation requirement for
day care centers has been added hi Section 2.5.9, General
Provisions, of the Master Plan.
10. Section 21.38.080 of the Zoning Ordinance contains a listing
of the required contents of a Master Plan. Graphic plans of
the proposed development are required that include the
following:
A map and legal description of the property with a north
point scale not less than one inch equals two hundred
feet, showing the date of preparation and the name and
address of the plan's preparer.
Response:
Complete legal descriptions of the Master Plan area will be
included in the Master Plan as Appendix A. Encumbrance maps
will be individually submitted.
b. Location of the various land uses indicated by the use of
zoning designations.
Response:
Master Plan proposed zoning is shown on Master Plan Exhibit 2-2.
c. The location of public and quasi-public facilities such as
schools, fire stations, transmission lines and booster
stations.
Response:
Public and quasi-public facilities are shown on the individual
Village Public Facilities Plans, Master Plan Exhibits 5-6, 6-6 and
7-6. School and park locations are shown on Master Plan Exhibits
2-1, 2-2 and 5-1.
The locations of major circulation systems and collector
streets and their relationship to the circulation element
shall be indicated. Bike ways, pedestrian paths,
interconnecting open space areas and other special
access means shall also be shown.
Response:
The classification of each roadway is indicated on the Village
Circulation Plans, Master Plan Exhibits 5-4, 6-4 and 7-4. Trail
locations and relationships of trails to open space areas are shown
on the Village Trails and Recreation Plans, Master Plan Exhibits 5-
5, 6-5 and 7-5. Trail locations are also shown on individual
Neighborhood Plans. Bicycle routes have been added to the Village
Circulation Plans.
e. Facilities for water supply and sewerage disposal,
including sewer and water trunk lines, fire station sites,
storm drainage and flood control structures and any
other public facility needed to properly service the
proposed community shall be indicated.
Response:
These facilities are all shown on the Village Public Facilities Plans,
Master Plan Exhibits 5-6, 6-6 and 7-6.
Phasing of development shall be indicated. Adequate
pubic facilities, open space, recreation areas and street
systems shall be provided for each phase.
Response:
Village Phasing Plans are shown on Master Plan Exhibits 5-46, 6-
22 and 7-36. The phasing of public facilities is now shown in
color on the Village Public Facilities Plans, Master Plan Exhibits 5-
6, 6-6 and 7-6.
879/05.000
G:\CUENTS\MORROW\LUP-APP2.WPD
Villages of La Costa
May 1, 1998
Page 3 of 3
A map showing topographical contours at no less than
twenty-five foot intervals. Existing trees and other
natural features shall be indicated on such map.
Response:
Topographic contours, existing vegetation and other natural features
are shown on the project Constraint Maps.
h. Proposed development shall be consistent with the
topography to reduce the amount of grading. The
graphic is to indicate where significant grading is
anticipated and for what reasons it is necessary.
Response:
These requirements are addressed by the new Conceptual Grading
Plans located in Appendix B of the Master Plan.
i. Section 21.38.060 (2) lists the required information to be
included in the Master Plan text. The land use and
public facility economic impact report listed hi this
section will need to be prepared. It is advisable to delay
preparing this report until all major Master Plan issues
have been resolved and the proposed land uses are set.
Response:
Per city's advisement, the economic impact report will be prepared
at a later date with the Environmental Impact Report.
11. The proposed zone change application is not necessary and
should be withdrawn. Please submit a letter requesting that
the application be withdrawn and that the fees paid for that
application be refunded.
Response:
Per discussions with staff, the zone change requirement is still
under consideration by the applicants. It is premature to withdraw
at this time. This should not be an incomplete item.
12. Density calculations are required based on constraints
mapping using the existing General Plan Land Use
Designations. This will allow a base number of units to be
established. Density calculations are also required based on
constraints mapping and the proposed General Plan Land Use
Designations. The purpose of this analysis is to establish
how the number of units requested compares to the total
number that could be permitted without amending the
General Plan. Required constraints mapping must comply
with the City's application checklist requirements and contain
the required stamp and signed statement of the engineer of
work.
Response:
Density calculations were previously provided to the City by Jack
Henthom & Assoc, under separate cover.
13. Affordable housing provisions must be identified for the
entire Master Plan. The proposal on page 2-8 of the Draft
Master Plan is not acceptable as it does not identify a method
of providing the required inclusionary housing.
Response:
Affordable housing requirements will be satisfied through
participation in the Carlsbad Housing Assistance Program (CHAP).
Affordable housing is now addressed in the Master Plan in Section
2.4.1.3 and on Pages 5-6, 6-5 and 7-6 of the individual Village
Development Plan chapters of the Master Plan.
14. Please provide exhibits and justification for the required
findings in the Open Space Element of the General Plan to
allow for the adjustment of existing General Plan Open
Space.
Response:
In addition to the HCP/OMSP areas, open space areas are identified
hi the Open Space sections of each Village Development Plan
chapter (Sections 5.2.2, 6.2.2 and 7.2.2).
879/Oi.OOO
G:\CUENTS\MORROW\UUP-APP2.WPD
MARY E. BRESSI TRUST
P.O. BOX 1666
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92018
Don Rideout
Senior Management Analyst
Community Development
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, California 92009-4859
RE: Zone 10 - Mary E. Bressi Trust Ownership
Dear Don,
Thank you for discussing the planning status of Zone 10 with me when I stopped by the Planning
Department last Thursday.
Following your suggestion, I am enclosing a copy of the legal description of the 3.31 acre parcel which was
incorrectly identified in the Draft Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 10. This acreage was part of
an Option by Aviara that was assigned to the City of Carlsbad and purchased for the purpose of building
the inclusionary housing, the Villas, in Zone 21. According to the Agreement of Sale, the City was to have
returned the portion in Zone 10 at the close of escrow (1993) to the Mary E. Bressi Trust. The transfer was
finally accomplished in April 1998.
I understood you to say that you would advise Jack Henthorn of this change in ownership and that he would
forward all information related to the planning of Zone 10 to the Trust at the above address.
Thank you very much for your assistance in making this change. If you have any questions, please do not
hesitate to call me at (949) 675-3510.
Sincerely,
^U^Z^L
Ruth B. Budlong, Co-Trustee
Enclosure
cc: Mary B. Persic, Co-Trustee
Elizabeth B. Wiegand, Co-Trustee
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
M.S. 93-07
All that portion of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 1188, recorded: December 20, 1972, as
File No. 340334, being a portion of Fractional Section 23, Township 12 South, Range 4
West, San Bernardino Meridian, being within the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego,
State of California, being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the southeast corner of the above described Parcel 2; thence northerly
along the easterly line of said Parcel 2, North 0°33'08" East, 685.23 feet (record: North
0°33'17" East, PM 1188), to an intersection with a line being 45.00 feet easterly and
parallel to the centertine of El Camino Real, as shown on Road Survey 1800-1; thence
southerly along said sideline, South 37°03'37" West, 171.99 feet, to the beginning of a
tangent 1455.00 foot radius curve, concave southeasterly, thence southwesterly along
the arc of said curve, through a central angle of 23°52'5r, a distance of 606.44 feet, to
an intersection with the southerly line of said Parcel 2; thence easterly along said
southerly line, South 89°32'2r East, 352.64 feet, (record: South 89°32'01" East,
PM 1188), to the southeast comer of said Parcel 2, also being the point of beginning.
This parcel contains: 3.31 acres
March 8, 2001
TO: PRINCIPAL PLANNER, DON RIDEOUT
FROM: ASSOCIATE ENGINEER, CLYDE WICKHAI
Consultant Project Engineer, Glen Van Pes!
RE: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MP
COMMENTS ZONE 10 LFMP
We have completed our second review of the June 2000 amendment of the Zone 10 LFMP.
Many of the comments apply to Zone 11 LFMP as well for format and context. Our review was
for corrections and for compliance with the engineering aspects of the Master Plan. We have
noted general comments below. We can provide redlined pages with specific comments on
request.
Cover
Update "June 2000" to a current date
Responsible Individuals
Glen VanPeski is miss-spelled delete the "y"
Morrow Development, Fred Arbuckle is missing from the list of responsibility
Table of Contents
Please provide a complete, and approved copy of Append ice A-4. Page XIX-6 is blank
and the section in my LFMP contained (ICU) intersection work sheets without text.
Executive Summary
There are inconsistencies in formatting of text. (This comment is a repeat from last
review) No mention is made of required LAFCO approvals for out-of-basin sewer. The
text exhibits are difficult to distinguish from the LFMP text. There is duplication and
inconsistencies in wording. Examplo: Pago I 3 io ouppoood to bo a liot ef public facilities-
lu seive Zone 10-. What park faiililieb die lequiied, what drainage faoil
required, what Circulation facilitioa oro roquiroch-This is the type of "inconoiotencioo ond •
-formatting that we have requested correction of. The statements we want to see are: Ar
Acre park is required rpfpr tn Pnrlr Agr»»m»rrf attao.h^ri nn nvhihit _ A harldaARg-
fjitainago system \Q required (as shown on exhibitj, Tho intorooctiono of: La Cocta & El
ramiiin Pi .il, T ,ln IIi IV Mill Fl "imiiim Pi il fl Taminn Virln Rnhlf thp rnrarl link nf-
^omGottia Lane from D-Camino Roal to Mel rose Drive, is required, Traffic Signoh and
Innn rftnnnntnirtinn nf Fl flnminn Rpnl. (see exhibit ) Spnnifir pnhli'- fninilitir"' thfflt nr°
fequired should be listed.
On exhibit 3, Wastewater the year identified is 2000 (and probably wrong). Drainage
Facilities are vague, Circulation facilities are vague, Fire "planned" facilities are not
identified, open space CFIP information is confusing, Sewer collection facilities and
"proposed mitigation" is vague. Again, this comment is a repeat from last review.
Exhibit 1 should show Alicante and should correct Faraday Ave. (not Safety Center Dr.).
On the same exhibit, the Bressi MP road configuration should be shown from El Camino
Real to El Fuerte.
9. Approval of this plan does not constitute prior discretionary review for projects within Zone
15. All future projects shall undergo review per Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The plan establishes the maximum allowable number of residential units for facilities
planning purposes only. The plan does not guarantee any specific residential density.
'\ 0. Approval of any discretionary permit within Zone 15 shall be contingent upon the provision
of adequate public facilities to satisfy the Public Facilities Element of the General Plan. At
this time a Community Facilities District (CFD) has been formed to finance the construction
of several Citywide facilities necessary to serve new development. If the subject Zone 15
property is not a participant within that district, the required General Plan consistency finding
cannot be made. Therefore, no discretionary approvals, building permits, grading permits,
final maps or other development permits will be issued or approved unless the subject
property annexes into the CFD or an alternate financing mechanism is provided by the
developer and approved by the City Council to finance the facilities legally applicable to
Zone 15 that are included in the Community Facilities District. The following activities are
exempt from this: grading, minor planning entitlements or minor construction as a part of
ongoing agricultural operations, minor subdivisions and lot line adjustments for financing
purposes or a Planned Community Master Plan or a Specific Plan. Any exemption is solely
at the City's discretion.
Zone 15 LFMP Amendment 8 June 10, 1998
General conditions, exhibit 4, condition #10 discusses a Mellow-Roos district. This
reference may not be accurate or should be clarified to what district is being discussed
(ifCFD#1).
Special Conditions
Specific conditions that address sewer; water, circulation, drainage and all other
facilities should be addressed. Compliance with Parks Agreement, Exhibit should be
included. Drainage Condition needs to be specific. I believe a backbone system is
required and is included in the Master Plan for this project. A piece-by-piece storm drain
construction plan has not been presented. The Master Storm Drainage plan only
identifies a few facilities and is only a small portion of Zone 10's obligation to construct.
Poinsettia Lane from El Camino Real to Melrose Drive is projected and modeled to be in
place by 2005. A Lesser road link in the 2005-year was never modeled nor agreed to.
Poinsettia Lane & Alicante intersection improvements are also different than EIR Traffic
report, figure 30 (#39, 40 & 16). Figure 16 of the EIR Traffic Report also shows the
project influence on Melrose, El Fuerte and Poinsettia.
The next intersections in the circulation section are almost correct. El Fuerte, delete
from "with the number two.... Approach leg." Under 2010 include discussion about
closing the Alga Road Estrella De Mar Median similar (exactly as) to the EIR wording.
El Fuerte should already be constructed as modeled and included in traffic study for the
2005 scenario.
Alga Rd. / El Camino Real signal phasing needs clarification for overlap phasing, i.e.
Northbound ECR to eastbound Alga left turn.
Sewer section should include changing boundaries, cost of Carrillo pump station, Trunk
Line construction, Stub to adjacent properties (Bressi), and timing issues for facilities
(prior to final map).
Phasing
There is specific and additional information regarding phasing of Zone 10. Adjacent
development and facility phasing should be included in this section. Zone 17 (exhibit 3)
is not a 0 residential LFMP Zone. Check with Hoffman Planning or the Bressi
Development team for specific phasing information. Certain threshold years have been
studied (traffic) with specific roadways in place, alternative phasing appears to be
altering the planned roadway links. The proposed phasing must also accommodate
adjacent development or City Wide phasing. Sewer, water, drainage, and circulation is
all a part of the phasing plan. It appears that there are improvements required within
Zone 10 that is proposed to be constructed "by others". This should be clarified and
could be a serious issue.
Wastewater Facilities
Exhibit 23 should provide a more accurate boundary and location of districts. Existing
and proposed streets could be included to better delineate limits of service.
Drainage
No exhibit of proposed master facilities. I have enclosed sections of the City Master
Drainage Plan. Only a few facilities are identified on the City's plan with the
understanding that the Villages Master Plan and the LFMP will provide the necessary
detail. There is a minimal PLDA fee of $34.007 acre. I have also enclosed a copy of the
section that explains the low fee and it should be reiterated in the LFMP for clarity.
Water quality and pollutant basins are not adequately addressed per the new permit
(NPDES). The proposed build out facilities within Zone 10 should include planning areas
for which the facility is part of for reference and clarity. Please refer to comments on text
sections that should be addressed
Circulation
The LFMP is missing the traffic report appendix. Certain roadway links were studied and
modeled to provide a base for all projects to rely on and to develop with a certain
guarantee of consistency. The partial construction of Poinsettia Lane in 2005 is a
contradiction to that guarantee and is inconsistent with EIR and previous traffic reports
approved to date. Inconsistencies between proposed mitigation in EIR and this
document must be addressed.
La Costa Ave / El Camino Real (SB ECR additional right turn lane)
El Camino Real / Camino Vida Roble (NB ECR dual left turn lane - by City)
Alga Road (signal modification)
Estreila De Mar (close median in 2010)
Poinsettia Lane Arterial link to Melrose Drive (in place by 2005)
Other vital circulation elements must be consistent.
Figures, text and mitigation summary are in need of correction. We have stopped 3rd
party traffic review with Susan O'Rourke because of lack of funds from developer.
Fire Facilities
^Exhibit 3, Zone "rQ~DTlTlci out hrublic"~Facililies Sunuiidiy Clidil indicates "planned-
I facilities". If they exist-they-should bo described in this section. If Exhibit 3 is-wTSngir
^ .gpniilH hp rnrrarted
Sewer
This section should discuss sewer service out-of-basin more completely. Again, this
comment is a repeat from last review. The proposal to sewer out of basin is a developer
request that will require City, District and LAFCO approval. La Golindrina sewer pump
station is supposed to drain (gravity sewer) thru Zone 10. This plan (LFMP) should
address the La Golindrina sewer issue. The sewer mains to serve this project are similar
to storm drains in that upstream service needs to be considered. Development or
phasing plans, stub mains at boundary lines, capacity, pipe sizing, and a skeletal or
backbone system needs to be considered.
Water
Show streets/ownerships/district boundaries as appropriate for reference on Phase
Boundaries exhibit. Again, this comment is a repeat from last review. The recent
schematic of water service prepared by Dexter Wilson indicates a detailed transmission
system from Palomar Airport Road, El Fuerte, Poinsettia Lane and El Camino Real. This
section should address this system and
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on these LFMPs. If you have any questions, please
contact us.
Clyde Wickham, P.L.S. Glen K. Van Peski, P.E.
Associate Engineer Consultant Project Engineer
March 15,2001
TO: SENIOR PLANNER DON RIDEOUT
FROM: Associate Engineer Steven Jantz
LFMP REVIEW COMMENTS FOR ZONE 10
The following comments are submitted for your consideration and transmittal to the project applicant:
• Exhibit 13 - City wide residential phasing projections do not include an assumption for Zone 17.
Based on future development projections used by the City is this years budget preparation, it is
suggested that the applicant assume the following development potential:
> 500 SFR units spread over an 10-year period beginning in 2005
> 100 MF Affordable units in 2008
* 2,170,000 square feet of Industrial land uses beginning in 2003
* 10 acres of neighborhood commercial
> 10 acres of community facility uses
The above development assumptions also necessitate revisions to the Total Citywide DU's and Total
Citywide Population projections on Exhibits 17 and 18.
Most importantly, the status of the facility/capacity analysis in the LFMP for Zone 11 is
questionable since no development in Zone 17 was assumed. The specific facility sections in the
LFMP and facility adequacy must be re-analyzed assuming the increase in demands from
adjacent areas.
Wastewater Treatment - There are inconsistencies with text and references. Specifically, Existing
Demand identified on Page VTfl-2 and data on Exhibit 24 is inconsistent with Exhibit 22.
• Circulation - Refer to comments provided by the Engineering Land Use Division. It is my
understanding that the City's third party traffic consultant has not reviewed the final traffic study, hi
addition, the mitigation requirements are inconsistent with the provisions in the Village of La Costa
Master Plan and EIR. At issue are the future mitigation requirements at La Costa and El Camino
Real, El Camino Real and Camino Vida Roble, Alga at Estrella del Mar, and the timing of
construction for the Poinsettia Lane connection between El Camino Real and Melrose. Further
review will be required.
Sewer Facilities - This sections states that the sewer service providers are expected to adjust their
boundary or enter into service contracts to serve the zone in accordance with this plan. The applicant
must submit a letter of acknowledgement from the affected sewer districts, preferably then- Board of
Directors, which expressly indicates their commitment to processing and adoption of the necessary
boundary adjustment. The letter should also indicate the timing of such action in order to
accommodate the affected development areas.
The sewer section should also indicate a trunk line extension to accommodate property within Zone
17.
> As indicated in the comment above, Rancho Santa Fe Road is project to fail the performance
standard after 2005, therefore requiring to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes. The financing section
indicates that these improvements are funded by CFD#3 which include for the construction of 4
lanes only. It is my understanding that the outside two lanes are not included in CFD#3 and
would be funded by private development. A mitigation condition and financing requirement
must be included in the LFMP.
There appears to be a missing exhibit in the drainage section. The text refers to an exhibit showing
existing facilities, but the exhibit doesn't call out which facilities shown are existing and which are
proposed. The facilities shown on the exhibit need revised so that the LFMP, Master Tentative Map,
Preliminary Hydrology Calculations and the EIR are consistent.
The fire section indicates that all future development in the zone is within a five-minute response
time. It needs to reflect that current Station No. 6 is temporary. The site originally planned for the
permanent Station No. 6 is no longer acceptable due to the realignment of Rancho Santa Fe Road. A
new site for the permanent Station No. 6 is required. Mike Smith indicated that Zone 11 is not
entirely within the 5-minute response time of current stations.
Exhibit 76 Existing and Proposed Water Facilities is missing. I understand from Dexter Wilson that
he is going to get authorization from Tun O'Grady to prepare an exhibit similar to the one he
prepared for the Greens Zone 10.
Page XFV-7 indicates there are two options available to mitigate overcrowded conditions at Dieguito
Middle School, but only describes one. Developer should provide a letter from the School Districts
verifying that they have the school capacity to meet projected enrollment within the zone, and how
they project meeting that demand within available budgets.
Sewer Collection:
> VWD - the text indicates that all major sewer lines are hi place and VWD does not foresee a
need for any additional major sewer lines to serve this area. Developer must submit a letter
from VWD confirmmg this assessment.
»• LCWD - This section indicates that future master plan sewer facilities will be required and will
be constructed by the district. Developer must submit a letter from LCWD identifying the
master plan facilities needed to accommodate future demand from VLC and further indicate
when and who will be responsible for the construction of the future sewer infrastructure.
Water Distribution:
* Develop shall submit a letter from each water district serving VLC indication the adequacy of
the water system, and also identifying the timing of construction of any upgrades in the water
system as required.
May 25, 2001
TO: PRINCIPAL PLANNER, DON RIDEOUT
FROM: ASSOCIATE ENGINEER, CLYDE WICKHAM
Consultant Project Engineer, Glen Van Peski
RE: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MP
COMMENTS ZONE 10 LFMP
We have completed our second review of (June 2000) amendment of the Zone 10 LFMP. Many
of the comments apply to Zone 11 LFMP as well for format and context. Our review was for
corrections and for compliance with the engineering aspects of the Master Plan. We have
noted general comments below. We can provide redlined pages with specific comments on
request.
Table of Contents
A-4 Traffic append ice needs correction and is inconsistent with approved report.
A-5 Will Serve letters and conceptual approval (City of Carlsbad, Leucadia County
Water District, Vallecitos Water district), of proposed district boundary adjustment(s) has
not been provided.
Traffic
(The traffic comment is a continuation from last 2 reviews) The Traffic section is not
consistent with previous traffic reports (EIR & Project), as approved by City's 3rd Party
Review Team and needs correction. This comment was raised a few weeks ago. LL&G
& RBF have addressed issue, correction needs to be submitted.
Alga Road Estrella De Mar Mitigation (median closure) needs to be identified in text.
Executive Summary
I-3 Sewer. Add discussion about mitigation of offsite sewer trunk line provided by
developer with reimbursement from (LCWD) district or by district, funded by connection
fees.
1-11 Circulation Add: in addition to median and frontage improvements of Alga Road
and El Camino Real: (for 2005)
• Poinsettia Lane to western terminus (west of Melrose Drive) not to "El
Fuerte".
• Alicante from Alga Road to Northern boundary not to "school site".
• El Camino Real / Poinsettia intersection - Add to end: Re-construct traffic
signal mast arms, controllers, detection and interconnect in the ultimate /
build-out location.
1-12 Estrella De Mar, Add: Turn restriction / closure of median at intersection Estrella
De Mar and Alga Road.
1-13 Sewer remove "certification of occupancy" insert approval of any final map.
Remove "request adjustments" insert, receive LAFCO approval of adjustments. The
sentence will read: Prior to approval of any final map within the boundary adjustment
area, as shown on exhibit 72, the developer will receive LAFCO approval of adjustments
to the sewer service boundaries or as an alternative, ...(no change).
LCWD add B. Discuss specific mitigation of trunk sewer, when it is needed, and
financing mechanism.
(A majority of t|\e;comments above are a repeat from last review)
The Executive summary of the LFMP should answer questions like: How many acres of
Park is provided?
What is the issue with capacity in LCWD trunk line? What is the size of the upgrade vs.
size of existing pipe?
Who will construct and when will the NPDES / desiltation basins be constructed?
The intersections of: La Costa & El Camino Real, Alga Road & Estrella De Mar, El
Camino Real & Camino Vida Roble, the road link of Poinsettia Lane from El Camino
Real to Melrose Drive. I believe are required to be mitigated. Traffic Signals and lane
reconstruction of El Camino Real & Poinsettia Lane of Alicante Road & Alga Road, (see
exhibit ) Specific public facilities that are required should be listed.
Again, many of these comments are continued from last review.
Exhibit 1 should correct Faraday Ave. (not Safety Center Dr.).
Exhibit 8 should show the existing & future Flood Plain (north of Poinsettia Lane, across
park site) or clarify developed condition.
X-1 Drainage Facilities B. Add wording directly from City's Master Drainage Plan
(another copy is provided) This explanation sets up exactly what is expected and what
should be accomplished.
X-3 g. Storm Drain in Alicante is necessary to prevent flooding of School and Park.
Tentative Map shows a storm drain, Master Plan shows a 84" storm drain, the LFMP
shows a 72" storm drain crossed out and no mention of any facility. A storm drain is
required concurrent with development of the roadway, grading and school or park.
g. New section (LFMP) says a 78" storm drain under Poinsettia Lane, exhibit 34
shows a 72", Tentative Map indicates a storm drain, but no size is provided, and the
master plan shows (2) 3'X6' culverts. Please check the Hydrology Report and again, be
consistent.
X-5 I. Storm drain K is shown as (4) 8'X 12' culverts, Exhibit 34 indicates () no
number, 8'X12' culvert and the master plan shows box (3) 6'X 12'culverts.
n. Exhibit 34 shows 48" storm drain. Looks like a larger pipe would be flowing
into a smaller pipe if you change it to 36" as shown.
When you correct and resubmit this section, I will read the Master Plan, the TM, and the
Hydrology report they should all be consistent.
X-8 Use an exhibit to demonstrate the systems proposed. Include desiltation / NPDES
basins and who or when they will be constructed. Identify the Alicante Road storm drain.
X-10 Check storm drain size (consistency) and include cost estimate and capacity for
de-silt basins associated with each facility.
X-11 ""
X-12 "" Add Storm Drain in Alicante Road.
XI-1 Circulation
The LFMP I reviewed had the old version of traffic report with inconsistent data as was
resolved last week with Susan O'Rourke / RBF. I understand the concerns and will
review the revised report when available. Comments from last review are repeated for
your attention, please go over them again.
La Costa Ave / El Camino Real (SB ECR additional right turn lane)
El Camino Real / Camino Vida Roble (NB ECR dual left turn lane - by City)
Alga Road (signal modification)
Estrella De Mar (close median in 2010)
Poinsettia Lane Arterial link to Melrose Drive (in place by 2005)
Other vital circulation elements must be consistent.
Figures, text and mitigation summary are in need of correction.
Sewer Facilities
XV-1 Revise sewer section to reflect recent discussion on LAFCO issues. This is a
responsibility of the developer, not subsequent or merchant developers. Prior to approval of any
final map in the area to be adjusted... see section 1-13 for consistent wording.
Remove discussion about processing accordingly.
XV-2 Are there sewer improvements in El Camino Real to serve the western portion of Zone
10?
Exhibit 69 Add LCWD pump station to be removed and diverted through this project.
XV-5 Include discussion about the LCWD pump station (name?) that will sewer through this
project. PDC Engineering Consultants is also working on the La Golindrina pump station issue.
It appears that draining through this project is less of an impact and a better design than to run
further, across more open space and under the creek (siphon) adjacent to Poinsettia Lane.
Again coordinate efforts to resolve this issue.
XV-5 How does the (existing) La Costa Golf Course sewer? Might as well say it here.
Exhibit 70 add sewer pump stations, correct Alga Road sewer, add sewer mains south of Alga
Road. Any sewer systems in El Camino Real adjacent to Zone 10?
XV-6 No comment Page is blank.
Exhibit 72 add Trunk Line (south of Alga Road), add pump stations, correct sewer line in Alga
Road, not continuous, show south of Alga Road alignments.
XV-9 f. Carlsbad phasing is OK. No comment
XV-10 b. Revise wording there is a capacity issue now. LCWD is working on a design and
construction program, anticipates completion March 2003.
XV-11 f. Revise section on phasing to address how sewer capacity can be provided. H.
Mitigation can be developer designed and constructed with reimbursement from District, or
monitor flows to permit a small number of units and wait until capacity is available (March
2003).
XV-12 Revise to reflect issues. Reimbursement from LCWD for trunk line, from City for La
Golindrina conversion and again from LCWD for LCWD pump station conversion.
Water
The water section has been revised and appears to be correct. The recent work of
Dexter Wilson appears to be included in this plan.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on these LFMPs. If you have any questions, please
contact us.
Clyde Wickham, P.L.S. Glen K. Van Peski, P.E.
Associate Engineer Consultant Project Engineer
Zone 10
I Page Comments I
li
lii
Iv
1-1
I-2
I-9
1-10
1-11
1-12
1-13
II-2
Exhibit 6
Exhibit 7
Exhibit 8
111-1
III-6
III-7
III-8
Exhibit 13
IV-5
VII-1 and
5
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Add Engineering staff
Wastewater Treatment Facilities
Add References, Appendices and Full-size
constraints map to table of contents
Significant riparian or woodland habitats
Address zone buildout per submitted Master
Plan
Title 21
Add text as indicated
Clarifications needed
Text changes
Text change
Text change
Acreage correction
Map revisions per Master Plan
Map revisions
Text changes
Clarification of buildout total
Comments on buildout calculations
Comments on buildout calculations
Check accuracy of existing DU numbers
Clarification of buildout total
Formatting problem
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Addressed in IV-1
Completed
Completed
Corrected per new traffic study
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Corrected per revised constraints map
Corrected per revised constraints map
Numbers were generated per building permit counts in
conjunction with Dennis Turner's reports during the last
revision of the LFMPs. Unit counts were agreed upon and
used throughout supporting documents for LFMP and VLC
Master Plan.
Completed
Completed
VI 1-7
VIII-1
IX-1
IX-3
IX-8 and 9
IX-1 0 and
11
XI-1
Circulation
XI-10
XI-38
Exhibit 36
XIV-1
XIV-2
Exhibit 37
XIV-5
XIV-7
XV-1
XV-5
XV- 10
XVI-1 and
3
XVI-5 and
8 and 12
XVI- 13
XVI 1-1
XVI I-4
Text change
Include discussion of LCWD
Formatting problem
Text changes
Text changes
Provide analysis of Parks supply/demand as
noted
Text change
Numbering of all figures and tables in this
section must be changed to fit into LFMP
sequence. Other changes also noted.
Text formatting problem
Question regarding Alga/ECR intersection
Problem with formatting of legend
Text change
Provide demand for affordable housing based
on Master Plan
Several problems with school map. Check with
appropriate school district for accurate
information.
Text change
Address SMUSD Mello-Roos
Sewer clarification needed
Address park site and industrial acreage
Check accuracy of EDU figures
Text changes
Make land uses and buildout assumptions
consistent with Master Plan
Text change
Clarify financing sub-areas
Text changes
Completed
Updated
Completed
Completed
Completed
LFMP analysis for parks are evaluated by district
Completed
Corrected per new traffic report
Corrected per new traffic report
Corrected per new traffic report
Corrected
Completed
Completed
Corrected
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
XVI 1-5
XVI 1-1 2
XVII-23
XVII-24
XVII-30
Various comments
Clarify funding for parks
Text changes
Include a separate section for CUSD and
SMUSD. Address required financing, fee or
CFD.
Typo
ENGINEERING LAND USE
See Attached
FIRE DEPARTMENT
See Attached
LIBRARY
See Attached
SAN DIEGUITO HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT
See attached
ENCINITAS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
See attached
Completed
Over and above the scope of requirements for LFMP analysis
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed on basis of relevance to LFMP scope of analysis.
Detail information and breaking from format of LFMP was not
addressed. Clarification of comments were discussed with
Clyde Wickham and Jack Henthorn.
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
June 18, 2001
TO: PRINCIPAL PLANNER DON RIDEOUT
FROM: Senior Planner
ZONE 10 LFMP FOURTH CHECK REVIEW COMMENTS
Transmitted are my comments on the revised June 2000 Draft Zone 10 LFMP received on June
11, 2001. I have only a few very minor corrections that are noted on the attached pages. In
addition, a will serve letter from the Leucadia County Water District is needed for the Greens.
The copy provided in the appendices is for the Ridge and Oaks. Once these revisions are made, I
can support the applicant printing copies of the LFMP for distribution to the Planning
Commission.
DONNEU
DN:mh
Attachments
LOCAL FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT PLAN
Zone 10
June 2000
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
ZONE 10
Prepared For:
City of Carlsbad
Growth Management Division
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
Prepared By:
Document Preparation:
Jack Henthorn & Associates
Engineering:
O'Day Consultants
Traffic:
Linscott Law & Greenspan
June, 2000
LIN SCOTT
LAW&
GREENSPAN
ENGINEERS
REV. 04/12/01 SOURCE: SANDAG (3/22/00)
- Indicates Zone 10 Area
NOTE: - ADT's are shown midblock
Total
if*)-13
NO SCALE
I
LG723U5.DWG
F4 2005 Zone 10 ADT's
Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 10 Exhibit 50
LINSCOTT
LAW&
GREENSPAN
ENGINEERS
REV. 04/12/01 SOURCE: SANDAG (3/22/00)
- Indicotes Zone 10 Area
NOTE: - ADT's are shown midblock
C ^Total = 121,100, ADT
^ ' /Co^
^NO SCALE
.LG723U5.DWGJ.LG7
k 2010 Zone 10 ADT's
Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 10 Exhibit 56
LINSCOTT
LAW&
GREENSPAN
ENGINEERS
REV. 04/12/01 SOURCE: SANDAG (3/22/00)
- Indicates Zone 10 Area
NOTE: - ADT's are shown midblock
Total = V21,10QJ'ADT
NO SCALE
t
LG723U5.DWG of
fi 2020 Zone 10 ADT's
'o/
Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 10 Exhibit 62
Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10
EXHIBIT 67 School Facility Demand Table — Carlsbad Unified School District
General Plan
Land Use Sub-
area
RLM-3
RLM-4
RLM-9
RLM-10
RLM-11
RLM-12
RM-1C
RMH-5
Totals
Residential Dwelling Units
Existing
SF MF
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Approved
SF MF
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Future
SF MF
223 0
107 0
8 0
9 0
15 0
8 0
44 0
96 180
510 180
Bulldout
Projections
SF MF
223 0
107 0
8 0
9 0
15 0
8 0
44 0
96 180
510 180
Student Generation Rates
K-5
SF MF
0.244 0.214
0.244 0.214
0.244 0.214
0.244 0.214
0.244 0.214
0.244 0.214
0.244 0.214
0.244 0.214
6-8
SF MF
0.120 0.093
0.120 0.093
0.120 0.093
0.120 0.093
0.120 0.093
0.120 0.093
0.120 0.093
0.120 0.093
9-12
SF MF
0.148 0.153
0.148 0.153
0.148 0.153
0.148 0.153
0.148 0.153
0.148 0.153
0.148 0.153
0.148 0.153
Student Generation Totals
Existing
K-5 6-8 9-12
000
000
0 00
000
000
000
000
000
000
Approved
K-5 6-8 9-12
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
Future
K-5
SF MF
54.4 0.0
26.1 0.0
2.0 0.0
2.2 0.0
3.7 0.0
2.0 0.0
10.7 0.0
23.4 38.5
124.4 38.5
6-8
SF MF
26.8 0.0
12.8 0.0
1.0 0.0
1.1 0.0
1.8 0.0
1.0 0.0
5.3 0.0
11.5 16.7
61.2 16.7
9-
SF
33.0
15.8
1.2
1.3
2.2
1.2
6.5
14.2
75.5
•la.
If\
June, 2000 XIV-5
October 31,2000
TO: KEN PRICE, RECREATION DIRECTOR
FROM: DON RIDEOUT, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
PARKS ANALYSIS FOR ZONE 10 & 11 LFMPS
Attached are the Parks sections for the Local Facilities Management Plans for Zones
10 and 11 (Villages of La Costa). These LFMPs are now being reviewed by City staff
and other affected agencies. Your assistance is requested in reviewing and
commenting on the Parks sections. Your comments will be transmitted to the developer,
and the revised documents will be sent to you so that you can verify that appropriate
revisions have been made. I would appreciate receiving you comments by November
17. If you have any questions, please call me at extension 4602.
October 31,2000
TO; CLIFF LANGE, LIBRARY DIRECTOR
FROM: DON RIDEOUT, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
LIBRARY ANALYSIS FOR ZONE 10 & 11 LFMPS
Attached are the Library sections for the Local Facilities Management Plans for Zones
10 and 11 (Villages of La Costa). These LFMPs are now being reviewed by City staff
and other affected agencies. Your assistance is requested in reviewing and commenting
on the Library sections. Your comments will be transmitted to the developer, and the
revised documents will be sent to you so that you can verify that appropriate revisions
have been made. I would appreciate receiving you comments by November 17. If you
have any questions, please call me at extension 4602.
October 31,2000
TO: DENNIS VANDERMAATEN, FIRE CHIEF
FROM: DON RIDEOUT, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
FIRE STATION ANALYSIS FOR ZONE 10 & 11 LFMPS
Attached are the Fire sections for the Local Facilities Management Plans for Zones 10
and 11 (Villages of La Costa). These LFMPs are now being reviewed by City staff and
other affected agencies. Your assistance is requested in reviewing and commenting on
the Fire sections. Your comments will be transmitted to the developer, and the revised
documents will be sent to you so that you can verify that appropriate revisions have
been made. I would appreciate receiving you comments by November 17. If you have
any questions, please call me at extension 4602.
September 12,2000
TO: SKIP HAMMANN
CLYDE WICKHAM
STEVE JANTZ
CARRIE LOYA
HELGA STOVER
FROM: DON RIDEOUT
DISTRIBUTION OF LFMPS FOR ZONES 10 AND 11
As part of the review of the Villages of La Costa project, the applicant has submitted
draft LFMPs for Zones 10 and 11. The Zone 10 is a new LFMP because there was
never one approved previously. The Zone 11 LFMP is a revision of a previously
approved LFMP.
In accordance with our new procedure, I am distributing these documents to the LFMP
Review Team to begin the process. We are going directly into the review process
because there is no need for a Preliminary Review phase in this case. A project planner
(Don Neu) and project engineer (Clyde Wickham) have been working on the project for
some time, and it is now the appropriate time to begin integrating the LFMP review into
the rest of the project review. Within the next couple of weeks, I will set up the Work
Plan meeting so that we can develop a schedule for the completion of processing.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please call me at x4602.
c: Don Neu
Dee Landers
Dave Mauser
Gary Wayne
Jack Henthorn & Associates
5365 Avenida Enemas, Suite A
Carlsbad, CA 92008
(760) 438-4090
Fax (760) 438-0981 R F r PIVED
Memorandum
To: DON RIDEOUT CITY 0 ;•" C ARLSBAD
PLANNING DEPT.FROM: BRYAN D. BENNETT
SUBJECT.- LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 10
DATE: JUNE 11, 2001
The attached six copies of the Zone 10 LFMP are revised per the comments we received from the
City of Carlsbad's Planning and Engineering Departments. All the comments were addressed in
the revised plan except for the following:
- Comments received for the traffic section in relation to additional intersections and special
conditions from planning and engineering were not addressed. It was determined at the
meeting on 6/08/01 that the document should be consistent with the traffic report for the
LFMP and the additional intersections need not be addressed. The special conditions were
modified per S. Jantz's comments to include the improvements of intersections into the
overall roadway improvement condition. Also note that additional language, such as the
median closure at Estrella De Mar and the extension of Alicante Road, was added at the
request of C. Wickham but is not in the traffic impact analysis that was approved by the third
party review.
- The comment in regards to the storm drain in Alicante from the school site to Poinsettia Lane
was not addressed for consistency with the EIR for the project. It was determined on 6/8/01
in a meeting with Hammann, Wickham, Neu and Henthorn that the LFMP needs to be
consistent with the EIR for the project and the open drainage channel is acceptable.
- C. Wickham's comment regarding the inclusion of the basins into the cost estimates was not
included because the cost estimate only deals with those systems that included large facilities
(Storm Drains G, H and L). The additional language throughout this section that was
requested for the basins was included per his comments.
- The comment that referred to the executive summary from C. Wickham was not addressed
per the meeting on 6/8/01. It was found that Zone 10 and 11 LFMP would need to be
consistent with the format of one another and previous adopted LFMPs. Therefore S. Jantz's
comments were addressed in relation to the executive summary.
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please feel free to call our office at
(760) 438-4090.
Page 1 of',
arlsbad Unified School District
801 Pine Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008
(760) 729-9291 • FAX (760)729-9685 ...a world class district
March 23, 2001
Mr. Don Rideout
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
RE: Local Facilities Zone 10 Document Review
Dear Mr. Rideout:
The District has reviewed the provided information in the Local Facilities
Management Plan for Zone 10. The District will be required to provide a
Elementary School Site Facility in this area as stated in the Plan. The
acreage requirements for an Elementary School Site Facility is 10 net acres.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment.
Sincerely
CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Gaylen Freeman
Assistant Superintendent, Business Services
PROJECT PLANNER
DON RIDEO'-'v
NOTICE OF HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbacrwnmold a
hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at
6:00 p.m., on Tuesday, February 08,2000, to consider (1) a request to prepare the
Zone 10 Local Facilities Management Plan and (2) a request to amend the Zone 11
Local Facilities Management Plan. Both zones are located in the southeast quadrant of
the City of Carlsbad as shown on the attached map. The proposed action only
authorizes the preparation of the plan and does not approve the plans. Subsequent
public hearings will be held to approve the plans.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the
hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on and after February 04, 2000. If
you have any questions, please call Don Rideout in the planning Department at (760)
438-1161 extension 4212.
If you challenge the authorization to prepare the Local Facilities Management Plan in
court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of
Carlsbad City Clerks' Office at or prior to the hearing.
CASE FILE:
CASE NAME:
PUBLISH:
LFMP 87-10 AND LFMP 87-11 (B)
ZONE 10 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AND ZONE
11 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT.
JANUARY 28, 2000
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CITY COUNCIL
ZONES 10 & 11
LFMP 87-10/LFMP 87-11 (B)