The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLFMP 15; Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 15; Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP)PTOCATION SUBMITTAL DATE ^N I 11 W 1 f\ f «h J*k«% ^^ A JULY 10. 1989 STAFF REPORT DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 1990 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION SUBJECT: LFMP 15-LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 15 I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Resolution No. 2971 recommending APPROVAL of the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and ADOPT Resolution 2972 recommending APPROVAL of Local Facilities Management Plan 15. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND As shown on Exhibit "A" Zone 15 is located in the northeastern quadrant of the City adjacent to the southern edge of the City of Oceanside. As shown on Exhibit "B" Zone 15 is primarily residential. Of the Plan's 1548 total acres 1,226 are residential. General Plan residential densities range from low (0-1.5 du/ac) to high (15-23 du/ac). Nonresidential General Plan land uses include 234 acres of Open Space, 47 acres of mixed use residential/ commercial/office, 19 acres of commercial, and 14 acres of industrial.i III. ANALYSIS 1. Does the proposed Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15 fulfill the purpose, intent, and specific requirements of Section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Growth Management Program)? 2. Is the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15 consistent with and does it implement the 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvement Plan? DISCUSSION The Growth Management Program requires that a Local Facilities Management Plan be prepared for each Management Zone in order to show how compliance will be maintained with the City's adopted public facility performance standards as development occurs. LFMP 15 - HOFMAN FLA^NG FEBRUARY 7, 1990 ^ Page 2 The first step In this process requires determining the buildout development potential in the zone. The buildout projection for this zone is consistent with the methodology contained in the 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan and the provisions of Proposition E which was approved by the citizens of Carlsbad on November 4, 1986. The plan phases the buildout development of the zone based on estimates of yearly development activity. The phasing estimate is consistent with generalized phasing assumptions used in the 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvement Plan. From these buildout and phased development projections, yearly phased demands for public facilities may be projected and buildout demands identified. The plan analyzes eleven (11) public facilities. This analysis compares the projected public facility demands with the available and planned supply of public facilities to ensure compliance with the adopted performance standards. Where demands for facilities exceed supply, the plan proposes the necessary mitigation to maintain conformance with the standard. This analysis is consistent with both the 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvement Plan and the Growth Management Program. The following chart provides a brief summary of the eleven public facilities analyzed in the plan. LFMP 15 - HOFMAN PLAIJB^G FEBRUARY 7, 1990 Paqe 3 ZONE 15 BUILDOUT PUBLIC FACILITIES SUMMARY SHEET LFMP 15 FACILITY City Administrative Facilities Library Wastewater Treatment Capacity Parks Drainage Circulation Fire Open Space Schools Sewer Collection Water Distribution CONFORHANCE WITH ADOPTED PERFORMANCE STANDARD Existing and planned facilities will meet the adopted performance standard through buildout. Existing and planned facilities will meet the adopted performance standard through buildout. Existing facilities meet the adopted performance standard until 2000. Park District 2 (northeast quadrant) meets the adopted performance standard until 1993. Drainage facilities meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation through buildout. Circulation facilities meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation through buildout. Fire facilities meet the adopted performance standard through buildout. Existing open space meets the adopted performance standard for existing and approved projects. An ongoing work program will assure the open space performance standard through buildout. Existing and planned school facilities meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation through buildout. Sewer facilities meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation through buildout. Water facilities meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation through buildout. o oLFMP 15 - HOFMAN PLANNING FEBRUARY 7, 1990 Page 4 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15 is a public facilities planning document. The plan establishes parameters that ensure Carlsbad's public facility performance standards are met and public facilities inadequacies mitigated to accomplish this goal. The plan for informational purposes occasionally estimates locations and costs of public facility improvements. The plan fully recognizes that complete environmental review will be necessary once specific public facility improvements are established. Therefore, the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15 will not cause any significant environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director on December 6, 1989. ATTACHMENTS 1. Planning Commission Resolutions No. 2971 and 2972 2. Exhibits - "A" - Citywide Map of Local Facility Management Zones "B" - Local Facilities Management Plan - 15 General Plan Land Use Map "C" - Local Facilities Management Plan - 15 Zoning Map BH:af 1/11/90 Exhibit "ND" Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: East of El Camino Real, south of Lake Calavera, west of the City of Vista, north of Faraday Avenue. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 15 which guarantees the adequacy of public facilities concurrent with development to adopted performance standards. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within ten (10) days of date of issuance. DATED: December 6, 1989 MICHAEL J. HOLZMILtER CASE NO: LFMP-15 Planning Director APPLICANT: Hofman Planning Associates PUBLISH DATE: December 6, 1989 BH:af ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO. LFMP 15 DATE : November 30. 1989 BACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME: Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 15 _ 2. APPLICANT: Hofman Planning Associates _ 3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 2386 Faradav. Suite 120 _ Carlsbad. CA 92008 _ 1 438-1465 _ 4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: July 10. 1989 5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Local Facilities Management Plan ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration. * A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. On the checklist, "NO" will be checked to indicate this determination. * An EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the project may cause a significant effect on the environment. The project may qualify for a Negative Declaration however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects can be deemed insignificant. These findings are shown in the checklist under the headings "YES-sig" and "YES-insig" respectively. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO(s1g) (insig) Result in unstable earth conditions or increase the exposure of people or property to geologic hazards? X. Appreciably change the topography or any unique physical features? X_ 10. Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy? Result in or be affected by erosion of soils either on or off the site? X_ Result in changes in the deposition of beach sands, or modification of the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X Result in substantial adverse effects on ambient air quality? X_ Result in substantial changes in air movement, odor, moisture, or temperature? X_ Substantially change the course or flow of water (marine, fresh or flood waters)? X_ Affect the quantity or quality of surface water, ground water or public water supply? X_ Substantially increase usage or cause depletion of any natural resources? X_ 11. Alter a significant archeological, paleontological or historical site, structure or object? X_ -2- BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO(sig) (insig) 12. Affect the diversity of species, habitat or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, microflora and aquatic plants)? X_ 13. Introduce new species of plants into an area, or a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X_ 18. Substantially affect public utilities, schools, police, fire, emergency or other public services? 19. Result in the need for new or modified sewer systems, solid waste or hazardous waste control systems? 20. Increase existing noise levels? 14. Reduce the amount of acreage of any agricultural crop or affect prime, unique or other farmland of state or local importance? X. 15. Affect the diversity of species, habitat or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals, all water dwelling organisms and insects? X 16. Introduce new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X_ HUMAN ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES, YES , NO(sig) (insig) 17. Alter the present or planned land use of an area? X 21. Produce new light or glare? X_ -3- HUMAN ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO(sig) (insig) 22. Involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? X_ 28. Alter waterborne, rail or air traffic? 29. Increase traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 32. Affect the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 23. Substantially alter the density of the human population of an area? X_ 24. Affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X_ 25. Generate substantial additional traffic? X_ 26. Affect existing parking facilities, or create a large demand for new parking? X_ 27. Impact existing transportation systems or alter present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X_ 30. Interfere with emergency response plans or emergency evacuation plans? }(_ 31. Obstruct any scenic vista or create an aesthetically offensive public view? X. -4- MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE « YES, YES NO(sig) (insig) 33. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wild- life species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or en- dangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. X_ 34. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) X. 35. Does the project have the possible environmental effects which are in- dividually limited but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively con- siderable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) X_ 36. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? K. -5- DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION • The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15 is a facilities planning document. The intent of the Plan is to establish parameters and thresholds that assure public facilities are available when needed as determined by the City's adopted performance standards. To accomplish this purpose, occasionally locations and costs of public facility improvements are estimated for informational purposes. These estimates may result in increased development fees. Traditionally, the developer in maximizing their capital return passes such fees on to the home buyer or tenant. This results in higher priced housing which affects the availability of low and moderate income housing. However, as real estate value is determined primarily by location, without other market incentives, it is unreasonable to assume the subject property would be developed with either low or moderate income housing. It is not the development fee that will force low and moderate income families into other communities, but the existing nature of the market place. It is recognized that CEQA review for these public facilities estimates is general, and does not satisfy CEQA requirements for the specific project. The Zone 15 Local Facilities Management Plan requires complete CEQA review prior to initialization of any public or private project discussed in the Local Facilities Management Plan. -6- ANALYSIS OF VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS; a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs, c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site, e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alter- nate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative. a) The project is a public facility information and planning study. Phased planning will not efficiently or adequately address the need for public facilities. b) The project is a public facility information and planning study. c) The project is a public facility information and planning study. d) Uses for the area covered by the plan are based on the existing General Plan. e) The plan considers phased development. f) The project is a public facility information and planning study. g) As the project is a public facility information and planning study, the no project alternative would not assure adequate public facilities to meet demand. The no project alternative would therefore cause the most detriment. -7- DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department) * On the basis of this initial evaluation: X I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date Planning Director LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE) -8- APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES ' THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. Date Signature BHraf EXHIBIT RLM RM RL OS RLM RH/C/O PI LEGEND RESIDENTIAL RL Low Density (0-1.5 du/ac) RLM Low-Medium Density (0-4 du/ac) RM Mectfum Density(4'8 du/ac} RH tf/gft Oe/wtty f T5-23 Zone 15 WOAH?£SJD£W7IAi OS Open $MC« RH/C/O H/g/i Density / C Community Commercial Community Commercial / O Profession* S Related Professional & PI Planned Industrial Related Local Facilities Management Plan A City of Carlsbad General Plan 1/90 o o EXHIBIT mC" i I R-A- LEGEND RESDEWTIAl ft-A Residential AgrlaAml R-E Rifal Residential Estat* Ft-1 One-Fam*yfl«ttMtW RMHP Residential MobOe Home Park L-C UmMd Control* ZONE 15 C-2 O Oflte* £ B*rm*ary School MQ hdustrM/OuaOfhd Ocvcfopntent Overlay Zone OS Open Sp«c« Local Facilities Management Plan * Ultimata Zoning to ba consistent with General Plan City of Carlsbad I==5== Zoning 1/90 Notice of Dewmination To: _ Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 JC County Clerk County of San Diego A~ »* M T-k rJ-nAttn: Mail Drop C-ll 220 West Broadway San Diego, CA 92101 From City Of Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbajl, CA 92009 (619) 43&1161 ™n TProject No.: LFMP l— • " — - - ^^ * _ j^- Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Reso Code. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 15 Project Title State Clearinghouse Number (If submitted to Clearinghouse) Lead Agency Contact Person Area Code/Telephone/Extension South and West of the City of Oceanside. East of El Camino Real North of Faraday Avenue, in San Diego County _ Project Location (include county) Project Description: A public facilities plannin document that establishes parameters that ensure public facility performance standards are met and public facilities inadequacies mitigated. This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad has approved the above described project on April 10, 1990 and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project. .!._,. The project will not_ have a significant.erfect on_ the environment. . _ 2. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA 3. Mitigation measures were not made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations was not adopted for this project 5. Findings were made pursuant to the revisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the General Public at THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. k -PLANNING DIRECTOR MICHAEL J.H Date , TITLE" Date received for filing at OPR: * » RT-T-trlDfl.KU Revised October 1989 o o PILED IV TEX OF7IOB OF. FYOJT .SAH DIBGO CAPOSTFJ) COUNTY CLERK, 1990 HAY 10 RETUKITfiD TO AOB1TCY 0» vS // 7/<7 ^ DEPUTY ffiffit-^n^-ty / T City of Carlsbad Planning Department I I IRrttrt 0 Zumwait, Cterd 1 6 1990NEGATIVE DECLARATION i PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: -East-of El Camino Real, south of Lake Calavera," west of the City of Vista, north of Faraday Avenue. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 15 which guarantees the adequacy of public facilities concurrent with development to adopted performance standards. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within ten (10) days of date of issuance. DATED: - December 6, 1989 CASE NO: LFMP-15 APPLICANT: Hofman Planning Associates PUBLISH DATE: December 6, 1989 BH:af MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director 2O75 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92OO9-4859 • (619) 438-1161 o o FILBD IS THE OFFIOB OF Carlsbad Journal Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County Mail a/I correspondence regarding public notice advertising to North Coast Publishers, Inc corporate offices P O Box 878, Encmitas, CA 92024 (619) 753-6543 Proof of Publication \\ STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid, I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal a newspaper of general circulation, published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the said City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, fora period exceeding one year next preceding the date of publication of the notice hereinafter referred to, and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Hie Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a publicHearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, Cali- fornia, at 6 00 p m on Wednesday, February 7, 1990, to consider approval of a Local Facilities Man- agement Plan on property general- ly located south and west of the City ed to attend the public hearing f you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 438- 1161 If you challenge the Local Facili- ties Management Plan in court, you may be limited to raising only those Issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspon- dence delivered to the City of Carls- bad at or prior to the public hear- ing ^ Case File LFMP Zone 15 of Oceanside, east of El Camino Applicant* Hofman Planning teal, and north of Faraday Avenue Associates Those persons wishing to speak CITY OF CARLSBAD n this proposal are cordially invit- PLANNING COMMISSION January 26 90 #202-2 19 19 19 19 19 I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct Executed at Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California on the 26th day of Clerk of the Printer feocafc Eacjlities,' Management > Bouadajjes Carlsbad Journal Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to North Coast Publishers, Inc corporate offices P O Box 878, Encmitas, CA 92024 (619) 753-6543 Proof of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid, I a mover the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested m the above entitled matter I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal a newspaper of general circulation, published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the said City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next preceding the date of publication of the notice hereinafter referred to, and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit - NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCA- TION East of El Camino Real, south of Lake Calavera, west of the City of Vtsta north of Faraday Avenue PROJECT DESCRIPTION Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 15 which guarantees the adequacy of public facilities concurrent with development,to adopted perform- ance standards , The City of Carlsbad has conduct- ed an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementa- tion of the California Environmen- tal Quality Act and the Environ- mental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad As' a result of said December 6 19 89 _ rthe subject project Justification for this action is on file in the Plan- ning Department A copy of the Negative Declara- tion with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, 2075 LasJ>almas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009 Comments from the public are invited Please sub- mit comments in writing to the Planning Department within ten (10) days of date of issuance Dated December 6,1989 Case No|EFMP>15¥ Applicant Hofman Planning AssociatesMICHAEL J HOLZMILLER Planning DirectorCJ 4797 December 6,1989 19 19 19 19 I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California on the 6th day of December, 1989 Clerk of the Printer #202-2M-12/87 TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS for CARLSBAD FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 15 Prepared for BUIE CORPORATION, RANCHO DEL CERRO, SYCAMORE CREEK COMPANY August 9, 1989 URBAN SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING Consultants to Business and Government 4540 Kearny Villa Road, Suite 106 San Diego, California 92123 (619) 560-4911 TABLE OF CONTENTS! SUBJECT PAGE Introduction 1 Existing Conditions 2 Proposed Projects Within F.M.Z. 15 4 Trip Generation, Distribution and Assignment ... 5 Future Short-Term Impact and Mitigation Analysis . 6 Transportation Improvements Phasing 13 SANDAG/Carlsbad Buildout Traffic Forecast 14 Conclusions and Recommendations 16 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE NUMBER Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Figure 9 Figure 10 Figure 11 Figure 12 Figure 13 Figure 14 Figure 15 Figure 16 Figure 17 Figure 18 Figure 19 Figure 20 Figure 21 SUBJECT PAGE Project Location 2A Traffic Flow Map 3A City of Carlsbad Local Facility Management Zones (F.M.Z.) ... 4A F.M.Z. 15 Land Use Categories 4B 1990 - Phase I Land Use 4C 1991 - Phase II Land Use 4D 1992 - Phase III Land Use 4E 1993 - Phase IV Land Use 4F 1994 - Phase V Land Use 4G 1995 - Phase VI Land Use 4H 1996 - Phase VII Land Use 41 1997 - Phase VIII Land Use 4J 1998 - Phase IX Land Use 4K 1990 - Phase I Trip Distribution Percentages and ADT 5C 1991 - Phase II Trip Distribution Percentages and ADT 5D 1992 - Phase III Trip Distribution Percentages and ADT 5E 1993 - Phase IV Trip Distribution Percentages and ADT 5F 1994 - Phase V Trip Distribution Percentages and ADT 5G 1995 - Phase VI Trip Distribution Percentages and ADT 5H 1996 - Phase VII Trip Distribution Percentages and ADT 51 1997 - Phase VIII Trip Distribution Percentages and ADT • 5J CONTINUED LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE NUMBER SUBJECT PAGE Figure 22 Figure 23 Figure 24 Figure 25 Figure 26 Figure 27 Figure 28 Figure 29 Figure 30 Figure 31 Figure 32 Figure 33 Figure 34 Figure 35 Figure 36 Figure 37 1998 - Phase IX Trip Distribution Percentages and ADT 5K 1987 - 1988 ADT 6A 1989 ADT SB 1990 ADT - Phase I + Existing + Background Traffic 6C 1991 ADT - Phase II + Existing + Background Traffic 6D 1993 ADT - Phase V + Existing + Background Traffic 6E 1995 ADT - Phase VII + Existing + Background Traffic 6F 2000 ADT - All Phases + Existing + Background Traffic Existing 6G Existing 1989 Impacted Intersections Lane Configurations 9A 1991 Impacted Intersections Lane Configurations 9B 1995 Impacted Intersections Lane Configurations 9C 2000 Impacted Intersections Lane Configurations 9D Buildout Impacted Intersections Lane Configurations 9E Carlsbad Traffic Analysis Zones Within F.M.Z. 15 14A Future Traffic Volumes (Unadjusted) Buildout Constrained General Plan 14E Recommended Street classifications Buildout/ Fully Constrained General Plan 14F iii LIST OF TABLES TABLE NUMBER Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 Table 6 Table 7 Table 8 Table 9 / Table 10 Table 11 SUBJECT PAGE 5ADaily and Peak Hour Trip Generation Peak Hour Trip Generation ......... 5B Impacted Street Segment LOS - Method #1 (Without Mitigation) ....... ..... 7A Impacted Street Segment LOS - Method #1 (With Mitigation) .............. 7B Impacted Intersections LOS (Without Mitigation) ............ 7C Impacted Intersections LOS (With Mitigation) . ............. 9F Transportation Improvements Phasing 13A SANDAG/ Carlsbad Traffic Study Cumulative Trip Generation Rates ...... 14B SANDAG/ Carlsbad Traffic Study F.M.Z. 15 TAZ Trip Generation. . ...... 14C SANDAG Trip Ends for F.M.Z. 15 TAZ's Impacted Street Segments at Buildout .14D . 14G APPENDICES APPENDIX Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E SUBJECT SANDAG Trip Generation Rates. PAGE * 18 City of San Diego Trip Generation Rates 19-21 Arterial Segment Capacities 22 Existing Through 2000 ICU Calculations. . . 23-51 ICU Calculations For Impacted Intersections at Buildout 52-65 iv Facilities Management Zone 15 Transportation Analysis INTRODUCTION Urban Systems Associates, Inc. (Urban Systems) was retained by the Buie Corporation to address potential transportation related impacts for theii project and additional projects within the City of Carlsbad Facilities / Management Zone (F.M.Z.) 15. Once potential traffic impacts were identified, a transportation system improvements phasing plan was developec which will mitigate off-site traffic impacts in accordance with the City of Carlsbad's Growth Management Program circulation system performance standard. In order to determine the transportation related impacts which are likely to result from land uses within F.M.Z. 15 and to develop the off-site transportation improvements phasing plan, Urban Systems obtained anc evaluated existing traffic flow data for the area, future short-terr traffic, and projections for future long-term traffic flow as provided bi the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) in their City of Carlsbac Constrained General Plan Use Traffic Forecast of August 29,1986. This Urban Systems report, addressing potential transportation impacts fo: the Buie Corporation project and other uses within F.M.Z. 15, is dividec into the following sections: * Existing Conditions * Proposed Projects Within F.M.Z. 15 * Trip Generation, Distribution, and Assignment * Future Short-Term Impact and Mitigation Analysis * Transportation Improvements Phasing * SANDAG/Carlsbad Buildout Traffic Forecast * Conclusions and Recommendations F.M.2. 15 Urban Systems Associates, Inc.August 9,1989 EXISTING CONDITIONS The F.M.Z. 15 area shown in Figure 1, is essentially undeveloped. There are existing mobile homes with access to El Caraino Real by Rancho Carlsbac Drive, and there are some scattered dwellings in the zone with access tc public streets by way of private driveways and easements. El Camino Real along the westerly portion of F.M.Z. 15 is currently ar interim four lane primary arterial that will be improved to six lane primary arterial standards as abutting properties develop. Palomar Airport Road, currently a partially improved primary arterial street, extends from El Camino Real to Interstate 5 (1-5) southwest o: F.M.Z. 15 and provides the nearest freeway access to the site location Palomar Airport Road is currently undergoing improvement to six lam primary arterial standards for portions of its length between Camino Vide Robles and El Camino Real. The largest portion of this street west o Camino Vida Robles is currently only two lanes, however, the remainde. between Paseo del Norte and Camino Vida Robles is to be improved by Paloma. Airport Road Assessment District funds. Improvements are unde construction, and should be completed in 1989 or early 1990. Interstate 5 to the west of F.M.Z. 15 is an eight lane freeway tha* provides for major north-south regional traffic flow through the Carlsba area. Cannon Road currently passes under 1-5 directly west of the project area Although Cannon Road currently extends only approximately 1,600 feet eas of 1-5 it will eventually extend easterly from 1-5, through F.M.Z. 8 to E Camino Real, and extend through F.M.Z. 15 to the easterly city limits. , t ! 003387 - 2 - Buie/18; Management Zone 15 City of Sin Umreos City of Oe««/f«/d» City of Encinltts FIGURE 1 ZONE 15 LOCATION MAP 2/88 CARLSBAD F.M.2. 16 - U.S.A. INC. - (2-A) 003387 F.M.Z. 15 Urban Systems Associates, Inc. August 9,1989 PROPOSED PROJECTS WITHIN F.M.Z. 15 Figure 3 shows the general boundaries of the City of Carlsbad Local Facilities Management Zones. Figure 4 shows more specific F.M.Z. 15 boundaries and land use categories, and uses within F.M.Z. 15. Projects within F.M.Z. 15 include the Rancho Del Cerro Master Plan (C.T. 85-25), Carlsbad Highlands (C.T. 82-12), the Sunny Creek commercial/office complex, and several individually owned parcels yet to be subdivided. The proposed uses within F.M.Z. 15 include 502 existing mobile homes, 18 existing single family homes, an additional 2,488 single family homes, a 10,000 square foot tennis club, a 122 room hotel, 442,897 square feet of office space, 230,898 square feet of community commercial uses, and 106,634 square feet of planned industrial uses. The land uses are proposed to be phased over 9 years beginning in 1990 and extending through 1998. Figures 5 through 13 show the land uses proposed by each year and phase. 003387 - 4 - Buie/18C ±1 HO SCALE SOURCE: City of C*ri«tad Grow* MtnagMMit Prop-am Septmtar 16. 1986 FIGURE 3 CITY OF CARLSBAD LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONES CARLSBAD F.M.Z. 15 — U.S.A. INC. - 3/88 (4-A) 003387 F.M.Z. 15 Urban Systems Associates, Inc. August 9,1989 College Boulevard is currently constructed as a secondary arterial through F.M.Z. 5 between Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real, and will / eventually extend northerly through F.M.Z. 15 and extend to State Route 7S at an existing interchange. Tamarack Avenue, which varies from a two tc four lane collector street, extends from 1-5 to El Camino Real northwest of F.M.Z. 15. Existing traffic flows on these streets and other existing streets in the vicinity are shown in Figure 2, SANDAG's 1988 Average Weekday Traffic Volumes. 003387 - 3 - Buie/18' me AVERAGE WECKD1Y VOLUMES SAN DIEGO METROPOLITAN AREA or MAT ItM BMOWN OM MAP IN TMOUf AMDt (MO 6/89 FIGURE 2 TRAFFIC FLOW MAP CARLSBAD F.M.Z. 15 U.S.A. INC. (3-A) 003387 I CD NO SCALE * INC. FIGURE 4 F.M.Z. 15 LAND USE CATEGORIES CARLSBAD F.M.Z. IS 0* ••••••••••« RH/C/O-I 37.5 KSF OFFICE LEGEND: • •• = Project Boundary 6/89 FIGURE 6 1990 - PHASE I LAND USE CARLSBAD F.U.Z. 16 U.S.A. INC. (4-C) 003307 LEGEND: • •• =PROJECT BOUNDARY FIGURE 6 1991 - PHASE B LAND USE CARLSBAD F.U.Z. 16 U.S.A. INC. (4-D) NO SCALE 00338 7Ci ••••999999999999999 ^••••999999 LEGEND: • •• ^PROJECT BOUNDARY T NO SCALE FIGURE? 1992 - PHASE IH LAND USE CARLSBAD F.M.2. 16 U.S.A. INC. (4-EO 0033B7C LEGEND: »•• "PROJECT BOUNDARY e/si FIGURE 8 1993 - PHASE IV LAND USE CARLSBAD F.U.2. 16 U.S.A. INC. (4-r) NO SCALE 00336 7C .••99999999999Q99999 •••••••••••••••• LEGEND: • •• ePROJECT BOUNDARY e/es» FIGURE 9 1994 - PHASE V LAND USE CARLSBAD F.M.Z. 16 : U.S.A. INC. ' (4-G) NO SCALE 00330 7C TABLE 2 CUMULATIVE PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION YEAR 1990 1991 1992 1993 1995 2000 & BUILDOUT PEAK HOUR AOT 9,880 15,760 21,096 25,984 38,094 46,118 AM 'i 691 1,134 1,530 1,974 2,970 3,770 IN 284 457 583 759 • 1,187 1,722 OUT 407 677 947 1,215 1,783 2,048 PM H 991 1,581 2,095 2,610 3,858 4,749 IN 555 900 1,228 1,531 2,235 2,600 OUT 436 681 867 1,079 1,623 2,149 8/89 FMZ1511.PC CARLSBAD F.U.Z. 16 - U.S.A. INC. - (5-6) 003387 661 992 LEGEND: ••• = FMZ 15 Boundary XXX " Zom I 5 Only ACT Trip Distribution Ptrctntagu MO •CALC FIGURE 14 990 - PHASE I TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES AND ADT 6/89 CARLSBAD F.M.Z. 16 - U.S.A. INC. - (5-C) 003387 F.M.Z. 15 ' 'Urban Systems Associates, Inc August 9,1989 TRIP GENERATION DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT , I Table 1 includes a tabulation of vehicle trip ends based on SANDAG tri generation rates (Appendix A) and cumulative trip generation rates fc commercial and office sites developed by the City of San Diego (Append! i B). Table 1 lists the land use by year and includes the A.M. and P.M. peak hoi- trip generation as well. [ Table 2 lists the cumulative daily and peak hour trip generation for tl- buildout of the F.M.Z. 15 land uses. The F.M.Z. 15 trip end distribution and assignment and §ubseque"nt analysi of traffic impacts conforms to the "Guidelines and Instructions -for tl- Preparation of Local Facilities Management Plan Transportation Impac Studies" prepared by the City of Carlsbad Engineering Department. These guidelines require a yearly phase distribution of trip ends as shov in Figures 14 through 22. These figures also show the daily trip er assignment from F.M.Z. 15 which is used in the following section of thi report, the F.M.Z. project plus existing plus background traffic analysis. The trip end distribution considered the surrounding street system, freewa access and location, employment and shopping centers as attractors, ar engineering judgment. The street network assumed was in conformance to the City guidelines fc the years 1990, 1995, 2000, and buildout, with intermediate years shown s needed to conform to the City's performance standard. 003387 - 5 - Buie/l£l TABLE 1 DAILY AND PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION TUP TEAI lAXD USE lUlfNllll «AIf 1988 Ml t Ml 10/MI MM 4 t Ml 10/MIMN 7 t Ml W/MI MM a 2 Ml 10/OU MN 10 1 Ml tO/MIMN 12 7 Ml 10/OUM/C/0 1 t Ml 10/MI OS 1 2 Ml 10/MI OS 2 t Ml 10/MIIN (Hoeiit news) 502 MI 5/ou IOIAI 1990 MN 1 78 Ml 10/MIMN 2 60 Ml 10/00 MN 1 122 Ml 10/MIIH/C/0 1 (OfflCE) 17 S (SF 16/(Sf C t (CONN ) 100 0 (Sf 40/(Sf IOIAI CUNUCAIln IOIAI 1991 MN 1 110 Ml 10/MI MN 2 IS Ml 10/MIMN 1 17 Ml 10/MI UN J» 11 Ml 10/OUUN 4 12 Ml 10/MI MN 4A 91 Ml 10/MIM/C/0 1 (OfflCE) 17 S (Sf !6/(SfC t (Com ) tO 0 (Sf 40/(Sf IOIAI CUNUIAIIVE 101 At 1992 MN 1 110 HI 10/OU MN 2 OS Ml tO/MIMN 4A m Ml 10/OU IH/C/0 1 (OfflCE) 10 0 (Sf !6/»fIH/C/0 1 (CONN ) 1 0 (SI 40/KSI M/C/0 1 (1ENHIS C106) 10 0 (SF <0/t$fM/C/0 1 (HOIE1I 122 IOON a/IOCN IOIAI CUHUIAIIVE IOIAI 1991 MM 1 119 Ml 10/MI MN 2 91 Ml 10/MIMN 4A 04 Ml 10/MI MM S 15 Ml 10/MIMN 6 It Ml 10/MI MN a 20 Mi 10/Mi•IN 8A t Ml 10/MI MM 10 11 Ml 10/00 M/C/0 1 (OFFICE) 95 S til I6/(SF IOIAI CUNUIAIIVE IOIAI HIPENO< 10 10to 2010 701020 102.SIO 2.610 780 6001.220 6004.000 7,200 9.880 1.100aso 170110 120910 6001.600 5.880 15.760 1.100aso1.710 160120 400 976 I.U6 21,096 1.190 910ato ISO140 20040 110saa 4.888 25.984 PEAK noun AN 1* ( 1 t 2 6 2 1 226 219 624898 14 844 160 452 691 88 601025to74 14 044 64 442 ,114 oa68IJ8 1 22 S16 59 I 196 jl.510 957467 20 27MS 14 12t 444 1,974 IK/OUI IAIIO III OUI 0 22 02 0 I 60 158 1V 169 2 12 SO2 10 10 2 20 709 76 a64 96 64 21 21 1 219 * 408 18 7014 54 6 24t 202 aIS 6076 a38 26 17 4S 1 270 7 677 18 7014 5428 til 20 2 1 210 6 64 15 a ' ii 58 7 270 1 947 20 19 762 a 15 602 a 13 54 2 a 6 222 a s 222 a i u 20 1 128 2 7 9 1 112 12 17 75 t 268 9 1,215 fM *• to10 10 10tototo10 10It 1010totl 1010to10 10to11 10 10to11 99a 10 1010 1010to10 1011 1 276 291 7060 12278 360 698 991 110as17 »12 9178144 590 1.581 110as 17121II16 78 SU 2,095 11991 15It 204 It 115 515 2,610 IK/OUI IAIIO in 7 7 7.7 7 777 6 7 77 S t 7 1 7 17.12 as s64 S S 166 170 5542as16ISO I7a 555 77 5926 22 65 1672 145 900 7759 1214 S22 19 .228 ai65 592424 14 a 21 303 1.531 OUI a 00 t 02 10 110 116 2318 1762180 120 416 11 25tl 428 6272 245 681 1125 5217 S14 19 IB 867 1628 251010 6 1 92 212 1.07V URBAN SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC. IIIPUAI uu> USE musm IAIC* 1994 MM 1 119 Ml 10/MIMN 2 91 Ml 10/MI MN 7 a Ml 10/MI MN II 04 Ml 10/MIMM 12 81 Ml 10/MI Ml a Ml 10/MIM/C/0 1 (COMH ) 10 0 (Sf 40/KSfc i (com > is o (SF to/nsi 101 AI- CUUIA1IVE IOIAI 1995 MM 1 116 Ml 10/MIMN 2 27 Ml 10/MI MN 2A 61 Ml 10/MIMM 9A 41 Ml 10/MI M-1 SI Ml 10/MIM 2 as Ml tO/OUM/C/0 1 (OfflCE) 105 0 (Sf 16/(SFPI 19 a (si a/($FM/C/0 2 tOIIICll 10 4 til 16/ICIf M/C/0 2 (COW! I 10 4 (SF 40/ISf IOIAI CUM&AIIVt IOIAI 1996 MM 1 88 OU 10/OUMN 2A 78 OU 10/MI M 2 07 Ml 10/MI M/C/0 2 26 Ml 10/OU M/C/0 1 24 Ml 10/MI M/C/0 1 (OfflCE) 78 0 (SF 16/(SFPI 19 0 «f a/«F M/C/0 2 (OfflCE) 10 4 UI 16/»lM/C/0 2 (Com > 10 4 (SF 40/KtfM/C/0 1 (Off ICE) 0 6 (If 16/(SF M/C/0 1 (COMI > a 6 Ml 40/ttF IOIAI CUM AIIVE IOIAI 1997 M/C/0- 1 (Off ICE) SO 5 (SF 16/(SfM/C/0 1 (COM ) S 0 tSf 40/Uf M/C/0 1 (Office ) a 6 Kf I6/«F M/C/0 1 {COM ) a 6 (Sf 40/KSfPI u 6 «F e/«si 101 At CUMUUIIVt IOIAI 1998 M/C/0 1 (OfflCE) 11 0 (Sf 16/(Sf PI 11 6 til a/«Sf IOIAI UAW IOIAI M Z 16 impENDS 1,1909)0 80 840aio80 4001,400 5.800 11.7B4 1,160 270610410 550aso1.680 158 166 416 6,110 38,094 880780 870 260 240 1,240 ISO166 416iia 144 5,500 41.594 808 200 1JS 144269 1.758 45.15! 496269 765 46 118 f AH X* aa aaa14 1114 4 a aa 14It 144 14 U4 144 11 1«II f 9574 6 6766 616 56 192 2.366 9122 SO1444 60 215 17 21 17 604 2.970 70 6270 2119 ITS17 2117 1914 SOS 1.478 111a 1914 30 104 1,661 79 10 109 1.770 IH/OUIMHO 2 a2 a2 a 782 a2 a 6 46 4 a aaa ttt 6 4 2 a2 a28 28 11 14 t64 9 1 6 4 9.1 6 49 t 9 19 1 1* 19IS t 11 11 10 14 107 0(6 19 107 14 212 1621 10 121 1,107 14 1214 44 15716 2110 17a 27a 1.465 102 17 27 159 1.624 71 27 90 1,722 PCAC 1 OUI 7660 5 5451 S6 22 205 1,500 7417 4020IS 5424 2 7 261 I.7U 56 SO 56 17- IS 172 726 210 2.013 11 1 61 25 2.038 a 11 2.049 tout PM »• 10toto 1010 109 9 10 101010 1010 111211 9 10totototo 1112 12 II 11 11 912 tl 12 25 f 11991a 04aia36 126 562 1,172 11627 614! SSas218 19 22 17 685 1.858 as7887 2624 16219 2017 1811 591 4.448 105 18 1811 12 204 4,652 6412 97 4,749 IH/OU IAIIO 7 171 7 17 17 1 7 1 28 282 as s 71 71 7.1 717 1 282 a2 tSS28S S 2 aSS 28 S S2 a 2 a2 a in ai65 6 59sa 6ia 63 161 1,892 0119 44M 1059 44 4 4 19 141 2.215 6255 61ta17 124 4 19415 29. Z.S25 21 9 4 IS6 56 i.SOl 11 6 19 2 600 OUI 1628 25 25 18 61 201 1.280 ISa1911 1625 ITSIS 1719 141 1,621 2421 26 7 110IS 16 1914IS 100 1,921 04 *14 IS26 149 2,072 52 26 77 2.149 J J (S-A)00330?! LEGEND: • ••^PROJECT BOUNDARY FIGURE 12 1997 - PHASE Vffl LAND USE CARLSBAD F.U.I. 75 1/.S..A. INC. (4-J) NO SCALE 003387C ^^^ \ 1 £ Z 3 \> u o2 1u 1l_ LEGEND: • •• 'PROJECT BOUNDARY C/8S> FIGURE 13 1998 - PHASE \X LAND USE CARLSBAD F.U.Z. 16 U.S.A. INC. (4-K) NO SCALE i 003387C •• • • • ••*•••••••• • NO SCALE LEGEND: ••• »PROJECT BOUNDARY FIGURE 10 1995 - PHASE VI LAND USE CARLSBAD F.U.I. 15 U.S.A. INC. —— (4-H) J 003387C • 9 9 9 9 6 » 0 9 9 » » © Q $ ©« LEGEND: »•• "PROJECT BOUNDARY FIGURE 1 1 1996 - PHASE VD LAND USE CARLSBAD P.M.2. 16 U.S.A. INC. — (4-I) T NO SCALE 003387C 874 4f64° PHASE III 2.49QADT 3.123 2.248 3% ALGA 15% LEGEND: ••• = FM2 I 5 Bowdary XXX - Zone I 5 Only ACT XXXs Trip Dletrlbution Percentages NO tCAtt 6/89 FIGURE 15 991 - PHASE II TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES AND ADT CARLSBAD F.M.Z. 16 U.S.A. INC. ————— (5-D) 00338. 4,457 3.208 ALGA 115% LEGEND: ••»• = FMZ I 5 Boundary XXX * Zone 15 Only AOT X X X = Trip Distribution Percentages NO ICACC FIGURE 16 1992 - PHASE III TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES AND ADT 6/89 CARLSBAD F.M.2. 16 ~ U.S.A. INC. - (5-E) 003387 1,817 w •3 ill •{^CONNECTION !«CflUADE IN 1993 LEGEND: •••• = FMZ I 5 Boundary XXX s Zone 15 Only AOT XXXs Trip Distribution Percentages NO iCALC 0)6/89 FIGURE 17 1993 - PHASE IV TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES AND ADT CAUL SB AD F.M.2. IB • U.S.A. INC. ————— (5-F) 003387 PHASE V2 8.5 I 4 ACT LEGEND: ••»• ' FMZ 15 Bomtory XXX =29»» I & 0»ly ADT XXX »Tr*p OJstrfbutJoo Perccofagea 6/89 FIGURE 18 1994 - PHASE V TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES AND ADT CARLSBAD F.U.Z. 16 J U.S.A. INC. ————— (5-G) 0053 A TC 1,045 3,830 CHESTNUT AVE. ± *1* *&* CANNON LEGEND: •••• s FMZ 15 Bomdtry XXX = ZOP« I 5 Ooly AOT Ptrceotages HO SCALC Sfe 6/89 FIGURE 19 1995 - PHASE VI TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES AND ADT CARLSBAD F.M.2. 16 -———-————— U.S.A. INC. ——— (5-10 ^/ 003387 10% PHASE VII 40,324 AOT • ' 8,87 I 7,258! 3%ALGA (15% LEGEND: ••»• = FM2 I 5 Bomtery XXX s 2oot I 5 Oply ADT XXX = Tr»p O'str'tut/oo PereeotageS NO •CAtC FIGURE 20 1996 - PHASE VII TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES AND ADT CARLSBAD F.H.Z. 16 ^ U.S.A. INC. ————— (5-I)6/89 003387 3.367 5,89 9.258 7,575 3% ALGA 15% LEGEND: • •»• s FMZ ISBotntary XXX =Zoo« I 5 Ooly. AOT XXX=Tr/p O'fttr'butlop P»rc«otages HO tCALC FIGURE 21 1997 - PHASE VIII TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES AND ADT 6/89- CARLSBAD F.M.2. 16 - U.S.A. INC. - CS-J)00330 4,285 CHESTNUT AVE. PHASE IX If42.847 ADT • 9.426 7.712 3%J ALGA LEGEND: ••»• * FMZ 15 Bowfery XXX = Zeoe I 5 Only ACT XXX=7>'P D/»tr»but>oo Perceotages HO iCAtt FIGURE 22 s 1998 - PHASE IX TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES AND ADT CARLSBAD FM.Z. 16 U.S.A. INC. ————— (5-K) 6/89 00338 F.M.Z. 15 Urban Systems Associates, Inc. August 9,1989 FUTURE SHORT-TERM IMPACT AND MITIGATION ANALYSIS The following analysis is an analysis of the projected traffic impacts froir F.M.Z. 15 plus existing traffic volumes on the existing streets, plus ar increase in traffic due to regional development outside F.M.Z. 15. In order to load traffic in the first phase, 1990, an estimation of that year's traffic was made by increasing existing 1987 or 1988 link volume counts by 3 percent each year through 1989. Subsequent yearly volumes were increased by 3 percent each year through 1998, plus the addition of the yearly increase in traffic from each phase of development for F.M.Z. 15. Traffic from F.M.Z. 7, 8, and 14 was distributed yearly and was included as background traffic if greater than the 3 percent growth rate. Figure 23 shows the average daily traffic volumes (ADT) from available counts conducted by the City of Carlsbad. At locations where no daili counts were available, an estimate af daily volumes was made by using peal hour counts conducted by Urban Systems in 1989 at adjacent intersections. Figure 24 shows the existing 1987 or 1988 ADT factored upwards each year bj 3 percent, or the latest 1989 available count data. Figures 25 through 29 show the years 1990, 1991, 1993, 1995 and 2000 witl existing traffic compounded by the greatest of a yearly growth of 3 perceni each year plus cumulative traffic from F.M.Z. 15 or the phased traffic increase from F.M.Z.'s 7, 8, and 14. The City Guidelines require analyzinc street segments and intersections impacted by 20 percent or more of th< zone traffic. The trip distribution percentages shown in Figures 1 I through 22 provide the locations impacted by 20 percent or more of the Zon«j 15 traffic each year. j iii 003387 - 6 - Buie/18! NO SCALE VOLUMES SHOWN IN THOUSANDS LEGEND: ••»• « FMZ 15 Bountery XXX « 1988 Count* XXX « I 987 Counts XXX = Estimate ALGA 25.2 FIGURE 23 1987 - 1988 ADT 6/89 CARLSBAD F.U.Z. 16 - U.S.A. INC. - (6-A)003387 MO SCALE LEGEND: ••• = FMZ 15 Bowfery SOURCE: *CITY OF CARLSBAD I 989 TRAFFIC COUNTS * DURBAN SYSTEMS I 969 PEAK HOUR COUNTS (PEAK HOUR = I 0% ADD - 1 987- I 988 DATA FACTORED 3%/YEAR 6/89 FIGURE 24 1989ADT CARLSBAD F.U.Z. 16 - U.S.A. INC. - (6-B) 00336 NO SCALE VOLUMES SHOWN IN THOUSANDS LEGEND: ••»• B FMZ I 5 8Mi*ryXXX = FMZ ISCMyAOT XXX 'PMZI3-E,Baekgrowd Trmfffe ( Note: B«ekgrawl Trmffte C«wm »f FMZ't 7. 8. I 4 or 3% Growth. WWctavM Larger ) FIGURE 25 6/89 1990 ADT PHASE I + EXISTING + BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CARLSBAD F.M.Z. 16 U.S.A. INC. ———— (6-C)003367 LEGEND: • •»• s FMZ ISBomtery XXX *FMZ (3 Only ACT XXX* PMZ 15 » Exiiti* »Background Trmffle XXX « *••<""•• 5.O KAOT Olwtrt to C«MM«I Rtf. ( NOTE: BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CONSISTS OF FMZ't 7, 8. I4.0R3-* GROWTH.WHCHEVER IS LARGER ) FIGURE 26 1991 ADT PHASE 8 + EXJSTNG + BACKGROUND TRAFFIC 8/89 CARLSBAD F.M.Z. 16 - U.S.A. INC. - (6-D) 00330; I 5 CONNECTION * MADE IN 199: LEGEND: ••»• = FMZ 15 Bomdary XXX ' FMZ 15 Only ACT XXX * ?MZ 15 +£xlfthi| +8ackgr«Md Trtffte ( NOTE: BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CONSISTS OF FMZ'i?, 8. I 4, 0* 3% GROWTH. WHICHEVER IS LARGER ) FIGURE 27 1993 ADT PHASE V + EXISTING •»• BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CARLSBAD F.U.Z. 16 U.S.A. INC. t- (6-E) MO SCALC 8/89 00338 LEGEND: ••»• =FMZ 15 XXX -FMZ 15 Only ACT X X X B *MZ 191 fixlrtliig + Background Traffic ( NOTE:6ACKGROUNO TRAFFIC CONSISTS OF FMZ'i 7, 8, 1-4, OR 3% GROWTH. WHICHEVER IS LARGER ) FIGURE 28 NO iCALC PHASE VII 1995 ADT EXISTING * BACKGROUND TRAFFIC 8/89 CARLSBAD F.H.Z. 16 - U.S.A. INC. - (6-F) 003387 LEGEND: ••• = FM2 15 B«i*ry XXX « FMZ 15 Only ACT XXX B ?MZ 19+£«1ftlni* Background Traffic ( NOTE: BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CONSISTS OF FMZ'tt. 8. 14, OR 3% GROWTH, WHICHEVER IS LARGER ) FIGURE 29 YEAR 2000 ADT ALL PHASES + EXISTING * BACKGROUND TRAFFIC NO tCALC 8/89 CARLSBAD F.U.2. 16 - U.S.A. INC. - (6-G) 003387 F.M.Z. 15 Urban Systems Associates, Inc. August 9,1989 Table 3 lists the impacted street segments and shows a computation of level of service (LOS) without mitigation at each location. The street classifications assumed in Table 3 for each year analyzed are taken fror the City's Guidelines. Appendix C shows arterial segment capacities used tc determine street segment LOS. The Cannon Road extension to 1-5 is assumed as four lanes constructed ir 1991 in accordance with the City Engineering Department's preliminary construction schedule. The Cannon Road extension into Oceanside is assumec in 1993. The Palomar Airport Road/I-5 interchange overpass widening is assumed to be under construction in 1993 and "in place" in 1994. Table 4 lists the impacted street segments with assumed mitigation by the addition of traffic lanes, and shows the street segment LOS computation a.<. a result of mitigation. Table 5 lists the impacted intersections and shows the calculated LOS wit.' assumed mitigation at the intersections. In no case does the assumec mitigation require additional right-of-way beyond that assumed by th< street classifications established by the City's General Plan Circulatioi Element. However, widening at intersections for additional left or righ- turn lanes may be necessary at some locations. Impacted Street Segment Analysis; 1989— As shown in Table 3, existing 1989 volumes on segments impacted by F.M.Z 15 traffic meet the City's Guidelines for LOS with the exception of the tw -lane segment of Palomar Airport Road between College Boulevard and Pase Del Norte. However, this segment of Palomar Airport Road is currently bein 003387 - 7 - Buie/18 TABLE 3 IMPACTED STREET SEGMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE WITHOUT MITIGATION (METHOD *1) lOUim 11 CAHIW MAI IU *«« • OiMlnut An Oitltnul An • tworoct An Imtrtft. An - «•!!» Or. C.llr Or • Cotmon M Curnn Id - Ullw II*. toilt*i ll«i rwxtor An Imrtiti An • f.lo»r Alrfort U. COUICf tl«D ttlatft Airport Id - f 1 Caolre lul II Coalno Inl • $«••«•• Cntt Id IrtMort Crnk Id • Cwnon Id otu AIIMII n> toll** llrt • r»to Otl Horn •oito O.I Horn - 1-5 CAraat u City llsll • Count llvd II Cwlno Inl - Ullrn llvd II C«lno lul - larodty An foredoy An - Potoo Otl Horn run Ml "orn • l-i UISIIW 19*9 CUM. WHIM CWACII1 V/C IDS t M (!) M.2 U 5 O.S4 A * m ID 11 .J 14 % o 41 A 4 HA ID a 2 u.s O.JO A 4 m ID a.t u » o.so * I M (II 22 I u 5 O.JO A < M <•) 22 2 MS 0 10 A * M (It B f M.S 0 SI A Ml OKI 101 Will «oi mill 1 M III it 9 12.2 09* I « M <•> 21 r US 0*4 ( ,ma win not win mi win «oi win * M <•) 11.6 US 0 24 * 1*90 CUII WHIM CATACIII V/C 10» t M III 27.J MS • 42 1 « M III 2J 1 US O.SF A « HA III 2T.2 US 0 61 1 * MA III IT I U.S 0.41 1 < M II) 29 t US 0.44 1 t M III 2S.1 U.S O.S7 A t M (II 24 7 U.S 0.40 A 4 MA III 7 0 U.S 0 16 A t M (II 4.4 a.t (.11 A HI Will 4 M III 2t.t 44 1 O.J7 A 4 HA III J1.4 U.S 0.71 C I HA II) 2.0 22.2 0 09 A 2 MA II) 2.0 22.2 0 09 A HOI Will 101 Will 4 m III 12.4 U.S t It A tm ClAIS. MUM CWttJII v/c IDS 101 IIMCTiO MI W>ACin 4 M Ml 21.1 U.S 0.41 1 4 M (!) U.I US 0.41 1 4 HA W) 10 t US 0.49 1 4 M (!) 21 1 US 041 1 4 M W) 29.4 U.S 0 47 1 101 M»ACTD - — 2 M II) 7 9 at 0.14 A t M III 1 1 22.2 0 OJ A m iMPAcno — 101 INMCTD I M (!) 4.9 » 2 0 09 A 2 DA (I) 4 4 a 2 • 21 A 4 M II) 12 * U.S • t* A 4 M (II 12 9 US 0.29 A 4 M CD 24 S US 0 SJ 0 199J CUIt MUM UMCI1I V/C tot HI IHFACID HI IHPACID 4 M II) 29 4 US 0.47 1 4 M ID 29 4 US 0 47 I 4MIDS44 US OK C 4 M ID U.I U.S 0.49 1 4 M CD U 1 U.I OH C HI IHMCltD 2 m ID is I a i o.4i i 2 M ID J.I 22.2 0 24 A —;• HI INTACIO HI IHMC1B 4 HA ID 0 4 U.S 0 19 A 4 HI ID II 9 U.S 0.27 A 4 M CD IS.I U.S 0 14 A « HA ID 17.1 U.S 0 St A 4 M ID 2».7 US 0 44 1 I99J CUIt MUM UMCIU V/C Itt HI IHPAClfB HI WACKO 4 m CD S2.S U.S 0.71 C 4 m CD S2.1 us on c 4 M CD S9.1 U S O.U 0 4 M |l> 14 4 US 017 C 4 H II) 14 2 U.S 0.11 0 m IMMCIID 4 HA CD a.t « S O.SS A 4 M CD 1I.» US 0 27 A HI INMC1CD HI INTACIO 4 M CD U.S U.S O.n A 4 M CD 11.1 44 S 0.41 A 4 M II) 20 1 US 044 A 4 M CD IS.I US 0 S4 A 4 M CD M.7 44.S 0.12 0 2000 CUtt MUM UMCIII V/C lOt Ml INMCIfO Ml IITUIUI 4 M II) M 4 U.S I.M 0 4 M (I) U t US OC4 0 4 « II) 44 J US IM r 4 M CD 40.1 US OH 0 4 M Ml 42 4 US 0 «S ( Ml INMCIIO 4MCD12S us on c 4 HA CD 14.1 U S 0.17 A MI umciD Ml IHTACIO) 4 M III II 4 US 0 42 A 4 M ID a 1 US 0 SI A 4 M ID a s us o si A 4 HA CD 17 4 US 0.42 1 4 M ID M.S U.S 0 12 0 WIUOUI CUIt MUM CAMCI1I V/C Ut nr WACKO HI IHMCID 4 M CD » 7 US 0.47 1 4 HA CD 29.7 U S 0.47 0 4 HA CD 29 9 U.S 0.47 1 4 HA CD 11 4 U.S 0.17 0 4 HA CD 49 S U.S l.tl 1 HI IHPACII* 4 HA CD 17 1 44.7 0.14 A 4 HA ID 24.9 U.I 0 S4 A ..... m IHMCID HI WACKO 4 m ID IS 7 U.S 0.11 A 4 HA CD 14 4 US 0 12 A 4 HA CD 11 S US 0.10 A HA CD U 7 U.S 0.42 A 4 M ID 10 1 U.S 0 M 1 tiaw. LOSAIICIIAI CUMIMCAIIO* ACCUS 4 FA 11} 4 Lont VrlMory Aritrlol HO 0 U 0 604 M CD 4 loot >rlo» Anerlil (OK 0 41 0 70 ( M l» « loot H»|or Arttrlil n 0 M 0 10 < U * torn fMandory Arlirlol tent 0 61 0 U» C <»» 4 tint Col ltd J nt o 91 , M2 C CD I lm Collider m m MMittuut It * t*m tocol «fsnt i CXrHSflAO F.«./. |5 J ,,77; • — • — • • URBAN SYSTEMS < - ami*/ FMZIS04 PC r ' \ ~> TABLE 4 IMPACTED STREET SEGMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH MITIGATION (METHOD *1) 1 OUIIOI U CMIM MAI lloi 4«« diootnul Ave Chettrojl AM. • looorock AM lowock AM lolly Dr lolly Or Comon M Comon M Collet* IIW Collooo live; roredoy Avo foredoy AM relooor Airport U co.au iiw eeioBor Airport 44 II Coolno loot II Coalno loot tycooore Crook M lyceoore Crook 44. . Comn M •AlOMI AI**C«I U Collet* llvtf • Poieo 0*1 lorto CAwao n Cltr limit • Collooo llxl II Cwlm loot • Colloio llxl II Caojlno loot lorodoy 4»o 7oroa*y Av* Feteo Ool lorto roioa Ool "or 10 - I S UISIIM 1949 UAM VOIIM CAOACIII V/C 101 * H4 III U I US 0 H 4 i M II) 21 1 US 0404 4 W III 11 t US 0 SO 4 4 M II) 11 1 US 0 SO 4 4HMII2I1 US OSOA 4 M |l| 22 t US 0 SO A 4 M III a 7 US 0 SI A •• Ml CM! - '• .... m am . ... -- • Ml Will 1 M III 11 9 11 1 0 99 1 I M II) M 7 US OMO — Ml Will • ••• Ml Will - -• -• Ml Will - • — Ml Will • •- 4 W ID II 4 US 0 24 4 1990 CLASS WHIM CAMCIII V/C Iff 4 HA IW 17 S US 0 42 1 4 HA III IS I U.S 0 57 A 4 M III 17 1 US 0 41 0 4 HA III 17 1 U.S 0 41 1 4MIII294 US 044 1 t M III IS 1 US 0 57 4 t M II) 24 7 US 040 4 t M III 7 0 US 0 14 4 1 HA III t 4 11 t 0 11 4 MI Wilt 4 n III 14 0 44 7 0 17 4 4 M III II 4 US 0 71 C 1 HA III 2 0 11.1 0 09 A t HA 101 1 0 21.1 0 09 4 Ml Wilt Ml Will — • 4 H4 III 11.4 US 0 10 A 1991 CLASS VOUM CAPACIII V/C LOS -••- Ml MPACIU - - — Ml IHMCIID • • • t W II) 24 1 US 041 1 1 M III 24 I US 041 | 4RAIIIIOO Ul 049 | t HA |l) 24 1 US 041 1 <RAII)294 US 047 0 Ml IWACttO • - - 2 « III f.9 22 I 0 14 4 1 H4 III 1 1 21 t 0 OS 4 - — Ml IHMCIO 1 HA III 1 » 221 00* A 1 HA III 4 4 22 I 0 11 4 «« III 12 9 US 02* 4 t HA III 11 9 US 0 29 A t HA III 24 S US 0 SS 0 1OTI ClASS VOLUII CAfACIIT V/C IOS Ml IIVACIU Ml IIMCia (HAIII194 US 047 1 «HAII)!94 US 047 0 t M II) U 4 US 070 C «HA(I|MI US 04* 0 4R4III121 us on c Ml IKMCliO 2 IM III IS 1 21 1 0 44 1 1H4IIISO 211 024 4 Ml IfACIIO MI ivAcita « HA III 0 4 US 01* 4 « M II) It 9 U I 0.17 4 4 M 101 II 1 US 0 M 4 4 R4 III 17 1 US 0 U 1 « H4 III 21 7 U.S 0 44 0 1995 ClASS WHIM CAOACIIf V/C LOS • Ml IHMCIU --• - -•• Ml IHMCIfO • HAiiiui us on c tHAiiim us on c 4 M III 19 I 44 7 OS* A 4HAIHH1 US 077 C_ 4 HA III 14 2 US 0 01 g- •• • Ml IICACIfO •-- t HA III 21 0 US 0 SI A 4 HA III II 9 US 0 27 1 — Ml MPACIIO • — 4 M III 14 S US 0 II A 4 H4 III 10 I US 0 4t 4 4 M III 10 1 U S' 0 44 4 IHAIIItSI US 0 54 4 SHAWM? soo on c 2000 CLASS HUM CAr-ACIII V/C 105 • Ml IHPACIU • • Ml IHPACICO • , <«M*itt4 US 0(4 i 4HAIIIH4 US 044 ( 4 H III <4 S 44 7 0 70 1 I M III 40 I 44 7 0 40 I t »A III 42 4 44 7 0 M 0 — • Ml IHPACIfO — • 4 HA III 12 S 44 S 0 71 C 4 M III 14 I US 0 17 A •• • Ml WACKO - -• — • Ml INMCIIO 4 14 III II 4 US 0 42 A 4 M H) U 0 US 0 SI 4 4 M III 22 S US O.SI 4 4 14 Ml 27 4 US 0 42 0 5 M ID 14 5 soo on c •UIIOOUI ClASS VOLIM CATACIIT V/C in Ml IHFACIIO ----- . •• Ml IMMCItO'1 * m III 29 7 U.I 0 47 0 '« HA III 29 7 US 0 47 0 4 M III 19 * 44 7 0 45 4 4 M 111 U 4 44 7 0 SO A 4 M ill 19 S 44 7 0 74 C -- - Ml MPACIIO •• -- 4 HA III 17 1 44 7 0 54 A 4 HA III 24 ( US 0 54 4 •- Ml MPACIIO -•• • •• Ml IHMCttO 4 HA III IS 7 US J II 4 4 HA III 14 4 US O.Ji 4 4 HA III II S US 0 M 4 4 HA III U 7 US 0 41 A 5 M II) SO I SO 0 0 41 0 icaoOi (D x( UCCM HEIMO or uicuuin v KCMII ilvii or scivia 41111141 CIASSKICAIIC01 ACCItS AIAIISII IICUOtB II APMkOII C 4 FA III 4 lono OrlMry Ariorlol M 0 00 0 40 4 M III 4 lorn Prloe Artorlol KM 0 41 0 70 4 M III « lorn «o|or Ariorlol M 0 71 0 (0 4 M 4 lono Secondlry Ariorlol lore 0 01 0 W 4 C 111 • lono Collector III 0 »l 1 00 2 C III 1 lono Collector M Ml ntuiKfca 11 1 lono locol III I f.H I. IS SYSTEMS 003387 TABLE 5 IMPACTED INTERSECTIONS LEVEL OF SERVICE WITHOUT MITIGATION LOCATION II CANINO REAl/ELM AVENUE El CANINO REAl/CNESTNUI AVENUE EL CANINO REAl/IAMMC* AVENUE El CAM 1 NO RIAl/miT DRIVE El CANINO REAl/llSA SIREIT EL CANINO MEAL/CANNON ROAD El CAHINO REAL/COLLEGE KULEVARD EL CAHIHO REAl/FARADAT AVENUE El CANINO REAI/PAIONAR AIIPO1I KMO MLOMAI AIRPORT IQAO/COllECC MU.EVAM MLCNAR AIRPORT ROAO/PASEO DEL NMIE PAIGNA* AIRPORT ROAD/1 -S NORTWOUND Off RAN? PAIONM AIRPORT ROAD/I-S SOUTHBOUND Off RAM? CANNON ROAD/FARAOAV AVENUE CANNON ROAD/KELLY DRIVE CANNON ROAD/PASEO OEl NQRIE CANNON ROAD/1 -J NaRINMUNO Off RAH> CANNON ROAD/I -S SOUTHRON) Off RANP EXISTING 1989f A.M. P.N. IOS 10* A C A A • A A A A A , A A • I • 0 A A A 0 (I) 0 (SI 0 (f) 0 IS) 0 (S) A ($> A (SI C <S> C (S) C (S) C 1990 A N. P.M. LOS LOS A C A I • I A A A A •• * A A A A • C A A • 0 (S) 0 (SI 0 (S) D (S) 0 (S) A (S) A (S) C (S) C (SI C <$) C 1991 A.M. P.M. LOt LOS A C A I • I A A A A •• • A A A A I I N.I. N.I. N.I. N.I. t»\ • JCft AC»l A C*| A tm\ A fCl A111 * \»9 M c c P 0 0 0 199} A.M. P.N. LOS LOS N.I. C S 0 C • A A A C £It I • 0 E E 1 N.I. N.I. N.I. N.I. «AM A A E E E E E E 2000 A.N. P.N. LOS LOS N.I. C E E 0 A A A A £ £ C C r t t r N.I. H.I. N.I. 1.1. A C A A f F f f f t MIUMUf A.M. P.H. LOS LOS N.I. 0 • C C A * A • § g C C E 1 E E N.I. N.I. n.i. - N.I. A C A A f 1 r r » r Io LEGEND: N.I. • Nat tipKtcii ty 201 or «or«. ($1 • Stop Sign Only. Nat U.S.A. INC.CARLSBAD F.M.Z. 15 F.M.Z. 15 Urban Systems Associates, Inc August 9,1989 improved to six lanes. Therefore, mitigation is assured for traffic addec in the year 1990. 1990— All impacted street segments are shown to operate within City Guidelines i 1990. 1991— Cannon Road is assumed as a four lane major arterial extending easterl from the existing intersection of Cannon Road and Paseo Del Norte to withi F.M.Z. 15, without a connection beyond the easterly City limit, in the yea 1991. All impacted street segments are shown to operate within cit Guidelines in 1991. 1993 — The year 1993 is included in Table 3 to show the effects of diverte traffic from Palomar Airport Road to Cannon Road before the improvements t the interchange at I-5/Palomar Airport Road are in place. The Cannon Roa extension through to Oceanside to the east is assumed in this year also, s that the effect of through traffic from Oceanside is also shown. As shown all impacted street segments are projected to operate within City Guidelin standards in 199i. 1995— There are two impacted locations on El Camino Real that fail to meet cit Guidelines in 1995. However, as shown in Table 4, the completion of si lanes on El Camino Real would mitigate cumulative 1995 traffic impacts t acceptable levels of service. If the six lanes are not completed in 1995 003387 - 8 - Buie/18 F.M.Z. 15 Urban Systems Associates, Inc. August 9,1989 ; then intersection improvements will allow operation of these segments at acceptable levels of service during the peak hours. One segment of Cannon Road, between 1-5 and Paseo Del Norte, will fail tc meet City LOS guidelines in 1995. However, constructing this segment a five lanes (an additional westbound lane approaching 1-5) will mitigat traffic impacts to acceptable levels. 2000— All impacted street segments are projected to operate at acceptable level: of service in the year 2000 if the street system assumed in the Cit; Guidelines is completed. Buildout— ( According to the SANDAG/City of Carlsbad traffic forecast volumes, al impacted street segments will operate at acceptable levels of service a- buildout of the community if the street systems assumed in the Cif Guidelines is completed and the Carlsbad Fully Constrained General Pla. land uses are assumed. Impacted Intersection Analysis: Figures 30 through 34 show the impacted intersections lane configuration for the years 1989, 1991, 1995, 2000 and at buildout of the community These lane configurations mitigate cumulative traffic impacts to the LOS a each location. Table 5 lists the impacted intersection LOS withou mitigation, while Table 6 lists the LOS with assumed mitigation. Appendi D includes intersection LOS calculations for the years 1988 through 2000 The following analysis describes the mitigation improvements at eac 003387 - 9 - Buie/18 LEGEND: —••- s Future Strict FIGURE 30 NO SCALE EXISTING 1989 IMPACTED INTERSECTIONS LANE CONFIGURATIONS 6/89 CARLSBAD F.M.Z. 15 - U.S.A. INC. - (9-A) 003387 LEGEND: —— * Fotur* Strttt FIGURE 31 JL NO SCALE 1991 IMPACTED INTERSECTIONS LANE CONFIGURATIONS 6/89 CARLSBAD F.M.Z. 75 - U.S.A. INC. - (9-B)003367 LEGEND: ——• B Futurt Stritt FIGURE 32 NO SCALE 1995 IMPACTED INTERSECTIONS LANE CONFIGURATIONS 6/89 CARLSBAD F.M.Z. 15 - U.S.A. INC. - (9-C) 003367 LEGEND: —— B Future Strut FIGURE 33 MO SCALC 2000 IMPACTED INTERSECTIONS LANE CONFIGURATIONS 6/89 C A PL SB AD F.M.Z. 1C - U.S.A. WC. - (9-D)003361 CHESTNUT AVf. 1Uu t_ LEGEND: —•-• • Futurt Strttt FIGURE 34 BUILO.OUT IMPACTED INTERSECTIONS LANE CONFIGURATIONS NO SCALl 6/89 f.M.7. .>*. (9-E)00336'. TABLE 6 IMPACTED INTERSECTIONS LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH MITIGATION LOCATION IL CMIM KAl/ELN AVENUE EL CMIM IEAL/CUS1MIT AVENUE EL CANim tEAL/IAWUUOC AVENUE El CANIW lEAl/ailr OIIVE EL CANINO HAL/USA STIEET C| Cmim NTFAI /fAHHflM IIUACL LXinllBU RCAL/LWnHM RUNI EL CAHIM lEAL/COLLEGE BOULEVARD El CAHIMO IEAI/FAMDAT AVENUE EL CANIW IEAI/PAIGMM AUPOM MAD PAKMAI AIRPORT ROAD/COLLEGE BOULEVARD PALONM AIRPORT ROAD/PASEO DEL NOME PALMAR AIRPORT ROAD/I -S NORTHBOUND Off (AMP MLOWUI AIRPOJU tOAO/l-i SOUTHBOUND OH IANP fAHWIM NWUiWCABUtAV AWFMiCUUWUI KOpW/rMiWAf AVCNUC CAMtON tOAD/ailf OIIVE CANNON (OAO/PASCO DEL NWrE LABKON ROAD/ 1-5 WRINBaUNO OFF RAMP CANNON ROAD/I •$ SOUTHBOUND OIF Ml* CXIITIM 1989 A.M. P N. LOS LOS A C A A B A A A A A A A B B B 0 A A A 0 (S) 0 (S) D (S) D <S> 0 NOf BUILT (SI A (S) A (SI C (S) C (SI C (S) C 1990 A N. P.M. LOS LOS A C A B B B A A A A B A A A A A B C A A B D (S) 0 ($> B (S) 0 (S) D "••••MO? SUILI*""* NOT BUIll (SI A (S> A (S) C (S) C (S) C ($) C 1991 A.M. P N. LOS LOS A C A B B B A A A A B B A A A A B B N.I. K.I. N.I. N.I. (S) A (S) A (S) A (S) A A A A A A A 1991 A.M. P N. LOS LOB N.I. B 0 0 C B A A A C fC B B A I C C N.I. M.I. N.I. N.I. A AII A A B C B A A A 2000 A.M. P.M. LOS LOS B.I. B B C C A A A A C f •* C C • C B • B.I. B.I. B.I. B.I. «ff« A A C 0 C A B A BUIUWUT A.N. P.*. LOB LOB •.1. A * I • * * A B •f% C C D C C C • .1. ~ H.I. •.1. •.1. *£ I* A A C ft • ^ B * • • I. • Not l«p*ctcd by 2m or «or«. (SI • stop Sign Only. Not Signiliud. U.S.A. INC.CARLSBAD F.M.I. 15 F.M.Z. 15 Urban Systems Associates, Inc August 9,1989 location that fails to comply with the City's Guidelines performanc standard. Figure 30 - 1989 Figure 30 shows the lane configurations at the impacted intersections fc existing conditions in 1988. Table 5, ' for 1989, shows that al intersections comply with the performance standards without improvements In 1990, the first phase of F.M.Z. 15 traffic will be added during th construction of Cannon Road between 1-5 and El Camino Real. Therefore, thi first year traffic impact to the Palomar Airport Road/1-5 ramps will b mitigated with the completion of this Cannon Road link. Figure 31 - 1991 In the year 1991, shown in Figure 31, the existing intersection lar. configurations can accommodate cumulative traffic impacts at impacte locations without additional improvements. The intersections at El Camir Real and Cannon Road and at College Boulevard are recommended to t constructed to full width during initial construction for economy. Futur needs for dual left turn lanes and separate right turn lanes should k accommodated during this initial construction, although the extra lanes ar not needed in 1991. Figure 32 - 1995 In the year 1995 the following impacted intersections are recommended fc improvements: 1. El Camino Real/Palomar Airport Road — Add a left turn lane at a] intersection legs, and add a third through lane on the north ar south legs. -, j 003387 - 10 - Buie/lf F.M.Z. 15 Urban Systems Associates, Inc. August 9,1989 2. El Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue — Add a third northbound through lane at the intersection only; the street segment north and south of the intersection accommodates peak hour traffic in the four lane cross-section. 3. Cannon Road/I-5 northbound off-ramp — Provide an optiona. left-or-right turn lane on the off-ramp leg. V 4. Cannon Road/I-5 southbound off-ramp — Add a southbound left turr lane, and add a left turn lane on the east leg. Figure 33- Year 2000 El Camino Real in the year 2000 is shown as six lanes in the City's Guidelines, therefore the impacted intersections along El Camino Real ar< assumed to be improved to three through lanes in the northbound aru southbound directions. In addition the following improvements art recommended: 1. El Camino Real/Tamarack Avenue — Modify westbound through lane to a: optional-through-left-turn lane. 2. El Camino Real/Faraday Avenue — Add a separate right-turn-only Ian- on the north leg. 3. El Camino Real/Palomar Airport Road — Add a separate right-turn-onl lane on the north leg. 4. Palomar Airport Road is assumed to be six lanes in the year 2000 therefore three lanes are assumed for the east-west through lanes a the intersection. 003387 - 11 - Buie/18 F.M.Z. 15 Urban Systems Associates, Inc. August 9,1989 5. Cannon Road/I-5 northbound off-ramp ~ Add a right-turn-only lane for the westbound to northbound on ramp turn. 6. Cannon Road/I-5 southbound off-ramp — Add a right-turn-only lane for the eastbound to southbound on ramp turn. Figure 34 - Buildout No additional intersection improvements are recommended at buildout of the community. The cumulative improvements recommended through the year 20oc should provide adequate intersection capacity to accommodate buildout traffic. The full street network is assumed completed at buildout and will serve to disperse traffic throughout the community. 003387 - 12 - Buie/18 F.M.Z. 15 Urban Systems Associates, Inc. August 9,1989 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PHASING Based on the conceptual phasing plan shown in Table l and on the future short-term impact and mitigation analysis in the preceeding section of this report, the recommended transportation system improvements and phasing a; shown in Table 7 mitigate traffic impacts likely from proposed land use. within F.M.Z. 15. 003387 - 13 - Buie/18 TABLE 7 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PHASING YEAR IMPROVEMENT 1990 1. Construct Cannon Road as a two lane major arterial street between Carlsbad Highlands easterly subdivision boundary and El Camino Real. Install traffic signal at Cannon Road/El Cammo Real The approach legs are recommended to be built initially to accommodate the ultimate width. 2 Construct College Boulevard as a two lane major arterial east of El Camino Real to provide access to Sycamore Creek area Install traffic signal at College Avenue/El Camino Real The approach legs are recommended to be built initially to accommodate the ultimate width 1991 1 Construct Cannon Road as a four lane major arterial street between El Camino Real and Paseo Del Norte. Install traffic signals at Cannon Road/l-S northbound off ramp, Cannon Road/l-5 southbound off ramp, and Cannon Road/Paseo Del Norte. The intersection of Cannon/El Camino Real is recommended to be constructed full width on ail legs and to accommodate dual left turns and separate right turn lanes. 2 Construct College Boulevard as a two lane major arterial between El Camino Real and Cannon Road 1993 1 Complete the construction of Cannon Road as a four lane major arterial street between El Camino Real and existing Cannon Road to the east in Oceanside. 2 Install traffic signals at Cannon Road/College Boulevard and at Cannon Road/Faraday Avenue 1995 1 El Camino Real/Palomar Airport Road - Add a left turn lane at all intersection legs, and add a third through lane on the north and south legs. 2 El Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue - Add a third northbound through lane at the intersection only; the street segment north and south of the intersection accommodates peak hour traffic in the four lane cross section 3 Cannon Road/l-5 northbound off ramp - Provide an optional left or right turn lane on the off ramp leg 4 Cannon Road/i-5 southbound off ramp - Add a southbound left turn lane, and add a left turn lane on the east leg 5 Widen El Camino Real between Cannon Road and College Boulevard to six lanes 6 Widen El Camino Real between Faraday and Palomar Airport Road to six lanes 2000 1 El Camino Real/Tamarack Avenue - Modify westbound through lane to an optional through or left turn lane. 2 El Camino Real/Faraday Avenue - Add a separate right turn only lane on the north leg 3 El Camino Real/Palomar Airport Road - Add a separate nght turn only lane on the north leg 4 Palomar Airport Road is assumed to be six lanes in the year 2000. therefore three lanes are assumed for the east/west through lanes at the intersection at El Camino Real 5 Cannon Road/l-5 northbound on ramp - Add a nght turn onry lane for the westbound to northbound on ramp turn 8 Cannon Road/l-5 southbound on ramp - Add a right turn only lane for the eastbound to southoound on ramp turn CARLSBAD F.M.Z. 15 - U.S.A. INC. —*,oa 0033876/89 fi-3 I>L\FMZI506.PC C13-A; F.M.Z. 15 Urban Systems Associates, Inc August 9,1989 SANDAG/CARLSBAD BUILDOUT TRAFFIC FORECAST SANDAG has provided projections of future long-term traffic volumes a- buildout of the City in their "City of Carlsbad Fully Constrained Genera Plan Land Use Traffic Forecast" of August 29, 1986. In order to show tha the land uses in F.M.Z. 15 were included in the forecast, the land us inputs for the forecast were verified. Figure 35 shows the SANDAG/Carlsbad traffic analysis zones (taz) within th< F.M.Z. 15 boundary. As shown, taz's 333, 334, 335 (a portion), 347, 348 and 349 are within F.M.Z. 15. Table 8 is SANDAG's trip generation rates fo their Carlsbad forecast, while Table 9 shows the land uses for the F.M.Z 15 taz's. Also included is the land use and trip rate multiplication tha produces the trip ends within SANDAG's forecast for those taz's withi F.M.Z. 15. Table 10 shows the SANDAG trip ends assumed in their forecas for F.M.Z. 15 to be 47,240 trip ends, while Table 1 shows a total of 46,11 trip ends for the proposed land uses. This comparison verifies that correct approximate amount of land uses were assumed in SANDAG's forecas and that cumulative traffic impacts for F.M.Z. 15 are included in a analysis of the forecast. Figure 36-shows the future traffic volumes from SANDAG's Carlsbad Forecast while Figure 37 shows the recommended street classifications needed t accommodate the buildout forecast volumes. Table 11 shows the street segments impacted by F.M.Z. 15 traffic a buildout and the LOS for the street segments. Table 5, included in a previous section of this report, shows th intersections impacted by F.M.Z. 15 traffic at buildout and the calculate 003387 - - 14 - Buie/18 371 LEGEND? XXX • Traffic Anlyait Zm <TAZ) MB s F.M.Z. 15 Boundary tiOURCEl SANDAG/CARLSBAD Traffic StuJy FIGURE 35 CARLSBAD TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZONES WITHIN FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 15 2/86 CARLSBAD F.M.Z. 16 - U.S.A. INC. - (14-A)003387 08/18/86 CAAL8BAO STUDY - TRIP GENERATION - FUU.Y CONSTRAINED OCNKHAL PLAN LAND UK, LAND UNC TRIP GENERATION DATA ——— — -u^nu \ravDESCRIPTIONRAILROAD ROWFREEWAY ROWnAuoR ROWMINOR ROWCOLLECTR ROWconn scCBDCOW/OFFRMH-C-OELEn SCHOOLGOVERNMENTSHI OH SCHOOLCONT SCHOOLJHICH SCHOOLNEIGH SCNRES RESERVEPR IV SCHOOLSPACED RESIDSINGLE RESIDSINGLE RESIDMOBILE HOMES PWWTO,OFFICEMULT I RESIDMULT I RES IDconn RECRCHREC/OFFICETRANSIENTHOTELRHRH-ORH-C-0RLRLM RMRMH RMH-0Rn-oHVY INDUSTRYEXT RETAILLHT INDUSTRYINT RETAILEXT INDUSTRYREG SERVICESRVHOFFICEOPEN SPACETRVL SERVICETRVL/OFFICETS-O-OSUTILTIESTRANSPORTGA AIRPORTFWY AND EXWVAUTO PARK I NOconn AND UTLUHLSL TRADESHOP CENTERNEIGH SCOTHER RETAILconn scOFFICEHEALTH CAREMILITARYEDUCATIONOTR SERVICESconn RECRGOLF COURSEPARKSBEACHESORCHAR08-DEVINTENSE A6-DFIELD CROP-0STEEP FIELDSFORESTRYVACANT-OEVSTEEP VACANTOPEN SPACEFORESTSINLAND WATERBAYS AND OCERES CONSTRNRES CONSTRCONSTRAINED CODE 334 91O202927 3O40 906O69709O9910O1O1110120121129127 130 131 13213914014114919019916017018019O 199197 200 20921021122O22111! 24O 290260269 270 41041149Oag9109209299309406OO 69O67968069O72O721769766800810820821B3O910911919 920932933931992 TRIP MATE 0OO00900 2OO 4OO2992O3002O2O20900 02O10to10 302O9179668194 20010114 207 309 10 32 48 81 19O174404OOSO9OO 3021030004OOii§292O4o-023293OO9OO.20O900300200120SO 899 6OO933 01 300100303OOONOTE: RtaMwttalTrtp Rate. Arab TWPS/ACRET CON8T"*I"a> *" ° SOURCE: SANOAG DM* By n«H<«ittol Dmlty CwM PMM T« OkMn TWPS/DOJ. RESIDENTIAL DENSTTY CONTROL PONTS RL - I.OOU/AC RLM - 3.20U/AC RM - 6.0DU/AC RMH - I 1 .5 OU/AC RH - 1 9.0 OU/AC TABLE 8 SANDAG/CARLSBAD TRAFFIC STUDY CUMULATIVE VEHICLE TRP GENERATION RATES CARLSBAD F.M.Z. 16 U.S.A. INC... »«.96/89 003387 (14-B) CARLSBAD STUDY - TRIP GENERATION - FULLY CONSTRAINED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE LAND USE DATA FOR SUBAREA SUBZONES SUB AREA SUB ZONE 333 333333333 333 334334 339333 339 336 336336 337337 337 337 338 339339 339 347347347347 348 ' 348 348 349 349 SUB ZONE TYPE PRIMARYPRIMARYPRIMARYPRIMARY PRIMARY PRIMARYPRIMARY PRIMARY PRIMARYPRIMARY PRIMARYPRIMARYPRIMARY PRIMARY PRIMARY PRIMARY PRIMARY FRINGE PRIMARYPRIMARY PRIMARY PRIMARYPRIMARY PRIMARYPRIMARY PRIMARY PRIMARYPRIMARY PRIMARY PRIMARY s DESCRIPTION ELEM SCHOOLRLRLM OPEN SPACE CONSTRAINED RH-C-0CONSTRAINED PL INDUSTRYRLMCONSTRAINED PL INDUSTRYOPEN SPACECONSTRAINED GOVERNMENTPL INDUSTRYOPEN SPACE CONSTRAINED OFFICE PL INDUSTRYOFFICE CONSTRAINED ELEM SCHOOLSHIGH SCHOOL RLMCONSTRAINED COMM SC RLM CONSTRAINED RM CONSTRAINED -LAND USE- CODE 3016O17024O999 193999 12117O999 12124O999 40121240999 127 121127 999 309O170 999 10 170999 180 999 UNITS 9.219.329. 66. 262. 22. 28. 139.4. 33. 211.87.72. 39. 269.77 86. 1. 93.99. 31. 7. 39. 311.99. 2082. 36. TRIP RATE X 20 * 180 I X 10 = 2.150 > 12,730 X 32=10.400_J X 30S = 6,710~"\ 6,710 X 50=6.750 { X 32 = 128 ) 6-878 X 20 -140 I X 20 =740 > 10.872X 32 =9,952 _ | X S««=10.000"lX 32 =2.624 _ r TABLE 9 SANDAG/CARLSBAD TRAFFIC STUDY F.MZ. 15 TAZ TRIP GENERATION CARLSBAD F.M.Z. IS - U.S.A. INC. - 6/89 003387 (14-C) TABLE 10 SANDAG TRIP ENDS FOR F.M.Z. 15 TAZ'S TAZ 333 334 335(PORTION) 347 348 349 TOTAL: * From Table 9 TRIP ENDS* 12,730 6,710 6,878 (128 WITHIN FMZ 15) 10,872 12,624 4,176 53,990 (47,240 WITHIN FMZ 15) 6/89 FMZI 5.PC CARLSBAD F.U.Z. 16 - U.S.A. INC. - (14-D) 003387 SOURCE! SANOAG/Cartabad Traffic Forecast Fully Comtratod Gmral Plan 6/29/86 LEGEND: «•»•<• * FMZ IS Boundary FIGURE 36 FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES (UNADJUSTED) BULD-OUT CONSTRAINED GENERAL PLAN (ADT IN THOUSANDS) CARLSBAD F.M.Z. 16 NO SCALE 8/89 U.S.A. INC. (14-E)003387 LEGEND: JKJF a 6 Urn Primary Artarial(40,000 or More ADT) • •••• m 4LamMcjor Arterial (20,000-40,000 AOT) - 4 Lam Seortary Aortal (20.000 ADT) » 2 Lane Controlled Collector (I 0,000 ADT)........ • 2 Lam Cotlector (5,000 ADT) OOOOO - Local (500 ADT) FIGURE 37 RECOMMENDED STREET CLASSIFICATIONS BUILD-OUT/FULLY CONSTRAINED GENERAL PLAN CARLSBAD F.M.Z. 16 — U.S.A. INC. - 3/88 (14-F)003387 TABLE 11 IMPACTED STREET SEGMENTS AT BUILDOUT LOCATION EXISTING 1988 CLASS. VOLUME CAPACITY EL CAMINO REAL Elm Ave. - Chestnut Ave. 6 PA (N) Chestnut Ave. - Tamarack Ave. 6 PA (N) Tamarack Ave. • Kelly Dr. 6 PA (N) Kelly Dr. • Cannon Rd. 6 PA (N) Cannon Rd. - College Blvd. 6 PA (M) College Blvd. - Faraday Ave. 6 PA (N) Faraday Ave. • Palomar Airport Rd. 6 PA (N) COLLEGE BLVD. Cannon Rd. - Sycamore Creek Rd. 4 MA (N) El Corn no Real - Sycamore Creek Rd. 6 MA (N) CANNON RD. City Limit - College Blvd. El Camino Real • College Blvd. El Camino Real - Faraday Ave. Faraday Av«. - Paseo Del Norte Paseo Del Norte • I-5 LEGEND: ARTERIAL 6 PA (N) 6 PA (N) 4 MA (N) 4 SA 4 C (Y) 2 C (N) 2 L CLASSIFICATION = 6 Lane Primary Arterial = 6 Lane Prime Arterial « 4 Lane Major Arterial * 4 Lane Secondary Arterial » 4 Lane Collector = 2 Lane Collector = 2 Lane Local 4 MA (N) 4 MA (N) 4 MA (N) 4 MA (M) 4 MA (N) ACCESS NO SOME NO SOME YES NO YES 25.1 22.8 29.4 29.7 29.9 38.6 49.5 24.9 37.3 15.7 14.4 13.5 18.7 30.3 8/89 FMZ1508.PC CARLSBAD P.M.2. IS - U.S.A. INC. - (14-G) 66.7 66.7 66.7 66.7 66.7 66.7 66.7 44.5 66.7 44.5 44.5 44.5 44.5 44.5 V/C L.O.S. 0.38 A 0.34 A 0.44 A 0.45 A 0.45 A 0.58 A 0.74 C 0.56 A 0.56 A 0.35 A 0.32 A 0.30 A 0.42 A 0.68 B LOS A 0.00 - 0.60 B 0.61 - 0.70 C 0.71 - 0.80 0 0.81 - 0.80 E 0.91 - 1.00 F NOT MEANINGFUL F.M.Z. 15 Urban Systems Associates, Inc. August 9,1989 LOS. Appendix E includes the ICU calculations for the impacted intersections at buildout of the Community. 003387 - 15 - Buie/18 F.M.Z. 15 Urban Systems Associates, incAugust 9,1989 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS This study was initiated to identify traffic impacts which are likely t result from the phased development of the City of Carlsbad Facilitie Management Zone 15 and to determine what street system improvement mitigate the traffic impacts. This study also evaluated F.M.Z. 15 traffic generation with regard to th City of Carlsbad Growth Management Program circulation element performanc standard. Based on this analysis the following conclusions have been determined: 1. The phased development, with a project buildout year of 1998, withi F.M.Z. 15 plus an area wide yearly growth rate of three percent, ca be accommodated by the phased street improvements listed in Table of this report. 2. The cumulative average daily traffic projected at buildout of th Carlsbad Fully Constrained General Land Use Plan can be accommodated adjacent to F.M.Z. 15, by the recommended street classification shown in Figure 37. 3. The projected traffic impacts from the buildout of F.M.Z. 15 to th adjacent street system can be mitigated so that the LOS at impacts intersections and street sections conform to the City's Growt Management Program performance standard for the circulation element. 4. It is recommended that Table 7 be adopted as part of the City1 Facilities and Improvements Plan for Facilities Management Zone 1 and that the street classifications recommended in Figure 37 k 003387 - 16 - Buie/l£ F.M.Z. 15 Urban Systems Associates, Inc. August 9,1989 adopted at part of the City's General Plan Circulation Element foi those streets adjacent to F.M.Z. 15. 003387 - 17 - Buie/18 APPENDIX A Sun IMciiu \ss(K III If IN Ol (.mi.KVMIArS I. .. i»4 Vn^ I. *•> IK >.4i4 1JDC tn •(.<•••'• BRIEF QUIDS OF VEHICULAR TRAFFIC GENERATION RATES FOR THE SAN DIEQO REGION UMWf IIIMAII B Ml I DAY VlNiCll NIC MI If HAH HQUI % (*u III OUT i**! i_^ Co •• Urn"WI04KII llouUwlOOOOOn In*l« llu|l» IIImui HDuo lOOOOOtu UMllMMil •DO/uoi MOW"' 10(1000 N li 4M>oin IM '000 M • 1000 4C tX* lOOOig » IJOO 4t>4 M 1000Ml WO KlfIMMom «4»i/»«« KOIII* ItllOOOM n 40'ocn* 4k IIIIIk IIII Ik II 41 Ik II41toil Ii1% «* II II •k IIII II» IIII10k 14 II I0« !> IIIMItll Ik II II K*n O*to loft iMflOfU •••CO OcH* 01 •*• ••Otll L4ft« HfOIft OJ4HII IOilOOOi« II in. 1000 U) Ii l>OB>Kra* 40/1000 M ll 400W4* 100/IOOOfo h IIOOWI MWIOOOHI If*WIOOOM ll IOOI404 'I/IOOOM <| I00/oi<4"10 1000 in ll 2UO/«.>" MHOooia ii UO'ot'i"Muiooora ii !»/«•••• 1 »U.O«I I Mfw«f»l IO/MI** I IdlwdtM M'M*«* *>»»j«itaiuHuiii> CMIM«> Co».n OtfOdl'oftlll'M •JooiMniial IMIOJI 4OU/OII4I •» II II C •«•***« *<* i /•» ; »oi Nf «• r — o> f »*.MT rn JH » lO'iooon u >oo(K»' An O 'M.i.l Ik ii iiMM 414k M 4!Ik II 41Ik II41 Ik II 41 10% II IIIlk II II10% II II14k II II»kl!4l IkllllIk *i* (kl Ih Ii n\» Ik li IIIO% IIIIMil IIIk It II•%!»»(lOkllll •XIIIIIk II llI4k II llIk II IIIk II ll ilk 11 nIk IO<Mfl i|r IK > ' CM .ll 0. ,„• .1 .,. C« lot «(i« inuiii l«miiv low!(.••> Ml PUIOII4I lOI OAK "*Mllt llni.lv MMIII MiMot CmM Ticnul !lM.on I MClwOBdl 14 lOOBM M MO/wi* 4. HMO M • M.K'4 WIOMM • <»•€••4/iOOOxi n 40'oiu 1(1000 n it lOVoix* 1/1000 M k 0 !/•»-• IIIOOOM li MUotn*IIIOOOw It lOO/KH" 4OIIOOON li 400(oin* I0(fo»n. iOII'fttr* I((OM« 100 ot*« t imHiurt I Itnlloi Mrwiuiil* M/IOOON ll MO/oci** II/IOOOM ii •oa/oi<«- JO/1000 « II" IWIOOOM li •*110/1000 M h MOoiii"W/IOOOM I. oOWKH' 11% ll VI•4%ll>t19% IIII ilk <• iiIk il llIlk IIIIIlk IIII Ik IIII •S144I 4k II41 •kll II14k II llIlk II (I Wk«M •%N4I 14k W II Ilk ll ll •kll IIIk ll li 4k II 11 WkOII 14% a ii Ilk II li•kll li lt»M«ltokil ti !(«"•• 1 »/«•••• I 1011000 ll iM-oU<4 lloto*KUUM 100ut>4** I/OCI* lOOfCOMfM**4(t»MK*40'iaaan ii loooo 40/<«u>i* MncK aionflOOcx 0 IIMM*40(01'* 01 •••!• •0(iooa4a ii >l>mr lOO'ioouw ii loooio* • WO/1000 H ll I100/4C4'NXWIOOON ii iaoa.oti4> nnoooM n**lO'lOOOM ll IOioi»*llOWnin I1J4CX"MOVocr!-- 4kIk IlllIk4» 14414k Ik i] n Ikllli Ik ll li •kll li ik 4 41Ik IIII4k II 41 ilk M«i lOkMIl•k •kUIIilk It II*kM4lilk ll U 10% II ll Mk it li iik il li Ilk M 4i •kll li•%M4I •kll li kll li ill n Mm»t ».*(• J*n iWfe limit* 0f<M(»lo<* ln> OonoiHW "4101IMKO' OJOK'MI M»*y4 »»"O»C I CM TUMI 4 U.S.A.FM.2. IS 003387 APPENDIX B City of San Ul.go Engineering and Development D*pertswnt Tr•importation and Traffic Engineering Division July 29. Ivs6 (Mev 2-2-17) ^1 REVISED UOMUMDID VKEKDAV TRIP GENERATION BATES SUMMARY (Vehicle Trips) lAiin |Bf Besidemtlel Multi-Family Unit (over 30 D.U./acre) Hultl -fully Unit (under 10 D.U./acre) Single family Duellings (suburban area) Single fcally Dwellings (urban lied area) Retirement /Sen lor Cltlcen Housing HoblU Homes Commercial Bag Ion* 1 Shopping Centeri Over 1.250.000 sq ft. 1.000.000 to 1,2*9.999 sq. ft. 500.000 to 999.999 so,, ft. 225.000 to 499.999 sq. ft. Community Shopping Center Neighborhood Shopping Center Grocery Store Convenience Store Free* tend Ing Betsll/Strlp Coonerclel Discount Store Luaber/Hoae Improvement Store Furniture 'Star* eVutetirente Quality Beeteurent (low turnover) Sit-down •estsurent (nedluM turnover) Sit-down leeteurent (high turnover) feat -food leeteurent Office* Large Cneairciel Office „ (over 100.000 eq. ft.)* Setell CoeMrcUl Office .„ (under 100.000 eq ft.)'" Coverne«nt Office (other than DMV/Poet Office) OUVBUY HATES' All Caeewnltlea 1 6 trtps/D.U.' • trlps/O.U ' 10 trlpa/D.U.^ 9 trlps/O.U 1 4.5 trlps/D.U ., S.S trlps/O.U. 4 c 30 trips/1000 sq. ft.?'' 3i trips/1000 sq. ft.*'* 38 trips/1000 sq. ft.' 60 trips/ 1000 sq. ft.f 70 trips/1000 sq. ft. (700 trips/acre)3 , 120 tripe/1000 sq. ft.J (1200 trlps/ecre)J ISO trips/1000 sq. ft.'* 430 trips/1000 sq. ft, (3600 trips/sere)' 40 trips/1000 sq. ft. (400 trips/sere)1 , 70 trips/ 1000 sq. ft.' 30 trips/ 1000 sq. ft" 6 trips/1000 sq. ft. 1 A 1 ) 100 trips/ 1000 sq. ft.,J,:U 200 trips/1000 sq. ft-,'! ,, 370 trips/1000 sq. ft.,**'!* 770 trips/1000 sq. ft. ' ' ^_- 16 trips/1000 sq ft.3 (600 trips/sere)1 . 20 trips/1000 sq. ft. (300 trlpn/acre)1 40 trips/1000 sq. ft. Library 46 tripe/1000 eq. ft. D«|iertaent of Holor Vehicles 170 trip*/ 1000 sq. ft. Po»t Office 1*0 trips/1000 sq. ft. Medical Office 90 trips/1000 sq. ft. (BOO trips/acre) OMJUmVB DtfACT BATES1 Older Urbenlc«4 CojenunUlM2 J Suburbea CoBsunltiee2 T Sane as drivewsy rates. 1 24 trips/1000 sq. ft. 2B trips/ 1000 sq. ft. 30 trips/1000 sq. ft. 48 trips/1000 sq. ft. 35 trips/1000 sq. ft. OiO trips/acre) 60 trips/1000 sq. ft. (600 trips/sere) ~~1 — ' 40 trips/ 1000 sq. ft. (400 trips/sera) Sane as driveway rates. — i- • | '^ T 40 trips/1000 sq. ft. (400 trips/acre) _L T 16 trips/ 1000 sq. ft. for uses>IOO.OOO sq. ft. 20 trips/1000 sq. ft. for usas<!00.000 sq. ft. 1 J T Soae as driveway rates. _L 25 trips/1000 sq. ft. 30 trips/ 1000 sq. ft. 32 trips/ 1000 sq. ft. 51 trips/1000 sq. ft. 49 trips/1000 sq. ft. (490 trips/acre) 60 trips/ 1000 sq ft. (600 trips/acre) T 40 trips/1000 sq. ft. (400 trips/acre) Sasw as driveway rates._i_ — •• ' H^ 40 tripe/1000 sq. ft. (400 trips/acre) _l_ 7 16 trips/ 1000 eq. ft. for uses>IOO.OOO sq. ft. 20 trips/1000 sq. ft. for uses<IOO.OOO 04. ft. 1 g-^ wee CARLSBAD F.M.Z. 15 003387 UV1SID (Vehicle Tripe) Page 2 of ) nir CBMQIATICM urn sunun July 29. 1916 (Bev. 2-2-B6) UNO US! DBIVIMAY BATBS All It lea CIMUU.TTVB IMPACT BATBSr Oldar Urbanlaad It lea Suburt UU» VUltor Hotel/Motel Tour let CoaMrclal/Coaaerclal Bacreatlon Car Dealer Ceaoltne Service Station Financial JMtltUtlona Saving* and Loan Bank (excluding drlwa-thru lanaa) Bank (drtwa-thru lanaa only) Cee»tenr alrporta General aviation Airport loduatclai Large Induatrlal Satall Industrial10 Larga Induatrlal/Bualneaa Induatrlal/Biialnaaa Park Scientific Beaearch and Development warehousing Corporate Headquarters Bantal Storage Truck Terminal laatttutloael 10 Houae of Worship (Church or Synagogue) Military Baaa Hospital Convalescent Hospital educational four-year University or College Two-year Collage (Junior College) High School (Secondary School) Junior High School (Hldd)e School) ei«e*ntary School (Grade School) U.S.A. INC. B trips/room3'5'6'11 150-500 trips/acre ' SB trlpa/IOOO aq. ft.3 (400 trlpa/acra) , 130 trlpa/IOOO aq. ft. (750 trlpa/acra) 74 trlpa/IOOO aquara ft^'^'J, 200 trips/1000 aauar* ftJ>B>" 260 tripe/ laneJ<" S trlpa/acr* 2 trips/average dally fit. B trlpa/IOOO aq. ft.3 (100 trlpa/acra) , 14 trlpa/IOOO aq. ft. (130 trips/acres) , 12 trlpa/IOOO aq. ft., IB trlpa/IOOO aq. ft. (200 trips/acre) , B trips/1000 aq. ft. (BS trlpa/acra) , S trlpa/IOOO aq. ft. (BO trlpa/acra) , 9 trlpa/IOOO aq. ft. (149 trlpa/acra) 2 trlpa/100 aq. ft. -, (0.2 trlps/storsge vault), 60 trlpa/acra 60 trlpa/acre , (300 trlpa/eech)0 2.S trlpa/eillltery/- clvlllen uployaa 20 trips/bed' 3 trips/bed* 2.B trips/student? I.S trips/student^ I.S trips/student:, I 0 trips/student'' 1.4 ,-> — •-*- --«—-J drlvi 40 trlpa/IOOO aq. ft, (400 trlpa/acre)" SBM aa driveway rataa. II II aa driveway rataa. Sane aa driveway rataa. 40 trlpa/IOOO aq ft. (400 trlpa/acr«) Saaa aa drlvaway rataa. T irlvewi _L Sane aa driveway rataa. Saaw aa drlvawey rataa. . J_ Saaw aa driveway rataa. _L 40 trlpa/IOOO aq. ft,11 (400 trlpa/acra)" -0- 40 trlpa/IOOO aq. ft. (400 trlpa/acra) II Saaw aa drlvaway rataa. Sea* aa drlvaway rataa. Sea* aa drlvaway rataa. Saaa aa dr vaway rataa. T aa drlvaway rataa. O03387 UVISD UOMUMDBD MUKDAY TMf CIMJUUT10M BATES SIBMABY (Vehicle Trips)p«ge 3 of J July 29. I486 (Bev. 2-Z-8I) LAUD USE •ecreallonal Park (undeveloped) Park (developed) Golf Court* Bay and Ocean Beaches/ Park Uka (with boating) Zoo or Saa Ufa Park Harlna Sporta ractilty Bacquetball/Tennla/Heallh Club Theaters DBIVIMAY RATES' All CoMMunlttaa S trlpa/screi: 40 trips/sere* 6 trips/sere 1000 trips/ 1000 faat1ahor«J (70 trips/acre)* , 50 trip*/ 1000 feat ahora4 (6 trips/acre)' 100 trlpa/acra - 4 trips/berth * 1 trip/attendee . (42 trlps/acra)J 40 trlpa/court , (4S trip*/ 1000 aq. ft.) l.l trlpa/aaat (BOO trlpa/acra) CUflJLATTVE IMPACT BATES1 Older Urbanised CoeBunltlea Sane aa driveway rates. SUM aa driveway rate*. Suburban CoeBunltlea —i • SaaM •• driveway rates. -1 S«UM *• driveway ratus. NOTES. "Driveway ratal" apply whan the effect of paaaerby trip* la Irrelevant auch aa wh«n the project entrances (and any distance beyond per the Transportation and Traffic Engineering Dlvlalon) are being analysed. Thta e*y reault with either a Bsnusl. non-cooputerlxad study or a computerised study (see DI ). Use of the driveway rates for project specific laipscts near Its entrances does not necessarily preclude the uae of the cumulative trip rataa for analysing the affects on the coaswnlty street systea. Culdsnce can be obtained fro* the Transportation and Traffic Engineering Division ataff In each situation. Saa "Liat of Older Urbanised Coenunltles and Suburban Comunltlaa for Trip Generation Responses." Also see "figure of Suburban Conjeunltles for Trip Generallona. 'sANDAC/CALTKANS. San Diego Traffic Generators (1971-1986. Including atudlea not yet published). Arliona Department of Transportation. Trip Generation Intensity factors (1/1/79 varalon). 5I.T.B.. Trip Generation (|9g2). 6CALTBANS District 4. Trip Ends Generation Besesrch Counts (1975-1982). 'cOMSIS. Quick Basponse Urban Travel gitlmatlon Tachnlauea and Tranaferabla Parametara. HCHBP Report 1187 (1978). A range la ahown due to the wide variety of land uaaa aaaoclated with thla category. See the "Definitions of Land Uae Categories for Trip Generation Purposee" for additional Interaction. (a 9..'Large" Is applicable where buildings sre over 100,000 sq. ft. or where psrcels are over 8 acres In alse. 10, 11 "Sawill" la applicable where buildings are under 100.000 sq. ft..where parcels sre under 8 seres In slse. Included In Itotel/Botal trip generation ratee la a City-wide vacancy rate of 24.6 percent. restaurants snd f Inane Ul Institutions rstea ahown apply to freestanding facilities only. If any of theae usaa are part of a larger project . an office building or a shopping center) they would have the ••*» rate aa the larger project ha*./. _ . ..* CARLSBAD F.M.Z. IS _ ___^ _— — U.S.A. INC. v p r^ f fg -003387 APPENDIX C ARTERIAL SEGMENT CAPACITIES ARTERIAL SEGMENT CAPACITIES* CITY OF CARLSBAD ARTERIAL CLASSIflCATICM Aj 6 LANE PRIME ARTERIAL 6 LANE PRIME ARTERIAL 4 LANE MAJOR ARTERIAL 4 LANE SECONDARY ARTERIAL 4 LANE COLLECTOR 2 LANE COLLECTOR 2 LANE COLLECTOR 2 LANE LOCAL * M>— J.. 2CS5 NO SOME NO SOME YES NO YES YES ******* fcH^^^lhfcMfc. MEDIAN YES YES YES YES NO NO NO NO »4fe*wft> Wi*»«^4 OTBMa LINK ADT (LOS A) 40,000 33,340 26,670 20,000 16,670 13,340 10,000 6,675 **•***-**+.**• t 4— • m *» 1 1 ~*m LINK ADT (LOS Bl 46,670 38,890 31,120 23,240 19,450 15,560 11,670 7,785 «^a *_.«. A.WA i_a^. LINK ADT (LOS C) 53,340 44,450 35.560 26,670 22,220 17,780 13,340 8,900 ,J_ I ft -^Jl » 1 A LINK ADT (LOS D\ 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 UNK ADT fLOS El•* «Tm£,_ KM. 66,670 55,560 44,450 33,340 27,780 22,230 16,670 11,120 ) AP. JDIX D P«|a 29 o i u •4 W y 1° K K TT V h >] ~^1•u § (481 1 C.U- f\ ff^ * \^^ ILM AVENUE — 200 -4PD 10 y ID I ICU AM A ICU All C Move Capacity ICU -'6 Move Capacity ICU Mo«a Capacity ICU tot .-. MM, ,.,,.«•*»'•• •'« 1.0 • MHlAVIIon ICU All. A ICU Alt ICU AM C Mova «- tV' =^ r Capacity isoo 14JO 1400 4S 1«™. ICU .u .54 .10 H>" ..' .TO Mo«a Capacity ICU Mova Capacity ICU i i.o.t N. MM....U. f ° •••••••allM l.O.t MlllgtllftH _y ICU All. A ICU All. •ICU All. C »vt ot flUO T0TAL- '$4 ICU .10 ICU Me**ICU l.O.ft *»-JUS A)- Pap 2 of 29 '«•••«* IFUt «/ t«c».r»t« *•• »>** ICU All. A ICU All. •ICU All. C Mo*«ICU Capacity ICU I/ova Capacity ICU u • Ir TrTAU 1.0.•. JUS A)- CL CA«-'W«***'-/T«»>»hftc* »"* >*gt T»»»».C ec-'Tt; r>«\ *•> tuCIIAlt ••*• <* I r\j •» *>- ICU All. A ICU All. ft ICU All. C c ICU •IP .10 Ctpaclly ICU Me**Ccpiclly ICU 4.0.ft. "• l.O.ft. M 3 of 29 •>(t T»»«r>tc«»'*t »••! « V. >* mti n.t 4V. ICU HII. A ICU All. ft ICU All. C Mo.. *1 11/' r rr; Capacity -iHr ]4»0 S TToo ToTfiL ICU .,e ,l«< 1* *• -.0 .51 Mo«*Ctpaclly ICU M««r«CapscMy ICU t.o.t.l.O.ft. ICU All A ICU AM B ICU All C Mo»t 1 A\ _j - C*»*clly tif iffo in. »' 3400 j»1 »5«« ToT^L ICU • to to B A* •ID f * .45 Uovt Capacity ICU Mow*Capacity ICU tot<1 i 0 •Miuiatlaii t o • Mitigation Pajt 4 af 29 ICO All A ICU All C Move Opacity ICO Vo«i Ccpaclly ICU Move Capacity ICU ' L O.»A ' 1 0 •tO* 9 tf 29 ICU All. A ICU All. ft ICU Alt. C He**ICU ICU ICU 1 4ou |0• ***' •jl I.O.I V M*K t o.i.t.O.ft. AA99RT I K) 00 ICU ICU All •ICU All. C 'W C*»»clly IPIO 5100 ISOO ICU Cftpcclly ICU ICU 1.0.• M»UllMlUn 9«|« 6 of 2» ICU All A ICU All •ICU All. C ICU ICU ICU .11 .1°• .51 l.O.t M» Paga f 29 ICU All. A ICU All •ICU All. C Mava Capacity Sloo Jflt. ICU .6Z Mava Capacity ICU Mova Capacity ICU i.o. a. N« Ulllftllcn B t°MlMllan URBAN L.O.S Mlllgillan Pm ft.* Q £1 GMI. REAL t.15-5 (5*1 ICU All. A NOaCALC ICU All. C Mova tt Capacity ISoo ICU .17 .21 Meva Capacity ICU Mo««Capacity ICU L.O.I. Na Mlllaallan B L.O.i.L.O.t. Mlllgatlaa URBAN SYSTEMS 6/89 «!• 8 af 29 10 O ICU Kit. *ICU All ft MO KM ICU All. C Mvva Capacity 1S90 3SL I5oo ICU .23 .(OlMW Hava Capacity ICU Me«a Capacity ICU l.O.t Ma A fc Illfailan C4fftSa4O URBAN SYSTEMS L.O.ft. Mlllaatlan filoHW All-pot* ICU All. A ICU AM. •tCU Alt. C Mava iT" =5 ^ If Capacity -I& & _3li- ISoa E22.t3ft aioo Totl ICU .IZ .11 .Zl .2S .10 Mo**Capacity ICU Mav*Capacity ICU l.O.S. Na Mliliatlaii V L O.CMMIgallon CMISBAO HCSeUHCH PAH* URBAN SYSTEMS " 1.0.9. Mllliallaa Pag* 9 of 29 PAIOMA* A»rOIT BOAD ICU All. *ICU All •ICU AM. C i.o.m.A >.M *>-*-n-ltipall¥ Mava =» ,-'L Capacity JUfi. \too -ttrr^ ICU .14 •'ft- .M> Mav*Capacity ICU M...Capacity ICU ICU All. A ICU All. • ICU Alt. C Mava 1^ _> ./U Capacity 3400 700 ' troo IS 1500 TIM- ICU .IB .13 .,0^ .SI Mava Capacity ICU Mava Capacity ICU 1.0.15. — M» MMIpatlaa A t O.K.Hltallaii ~ ~(PP)- ICU All. A ICU All ICU All. C K... ^ /' = V. Capacity avf Iffee S3 ^ If 00 TOTAL ICU -It •to 14 *u ,1>D Movt Capacity ICU H0t«Capacity ICU J i.O.i. Ho HMIaallon .O.«.t.O.». -lUSA). Pap I Oof 29 1 A.»H«T M /ntl* Mi ••• •Mt r*»»»-ic c»«vt n»t t\ IMC«««( »»«»•>• 1 «»••« 4V. 10 HautV. ICU All. A ICU All. •ICU All. C Capaclly ICU M»*«Capacity ICU Mov*Capacity ICU JMoe l.O.t.i.o.t. IUJUl I n IT Kl TH if si if »»*•«T o if» nit ri M» IfMI rn W» »f ICU .... ~.]!29 n nmnsKnoi cmcm wnuunoi MU.TIH MMumr i.MO /A \1\GA~TloW t 1500 34P»^ ISbo•SjIT! Jd£ A.M. Ibo 1 ^ Critical .17 Wo _*_jj 15 140 irm or son-ict r.N. riAt Volw. V/C 370 Critical 55 H H AT>Ti£b LEFT H/ft *. ^too 3AOO !«• V/C 160 qptf Critical JOMIW, •75 -I—!- !••» ! V/C ! Critic..' 3-70 •f=H H—h ICU AM A Me««Opacity O IB i 1997 •*»ic (..wii rwi 4 ). X»C*f*I( '»« ^ (7 fl»< » \ X^ AmroRT BOAD ?!gj-ZZTK__ F IP ICU AM To S /!» ICU AM. C ICU t,.)£- ,.,3t Mo««C«p«cMy ICU n .55 MOV*Capacity ICU l.O.ft M* MMIaatlaa A i.o.i. Paaa 12 *f 29 r •««»»» rut </. AmroataoAD ea o rALOMAI / ^f i u> ICU All. A r»* AmroiT aoAD ICU All. •ICU All. C Mov* u — Capacity JU» ISOO *%- T««^ ICU .Ifc .T-\ .47 Mov*Capacity ICU Mov*Capacity ICU A i.O.i. Mlll»all*» °a|« 1 3 *f 29 Oa otlTHP ALOMAR *>« lMf*f»«F *•! <V. \^ AOIPOMT IOAO ICU All. A ICU Alt. •ICU AH. C Mav* L — .*. l.O.t. M* Mill Capacity lii1900 :£L ^ LoS aallaa ICU .1* .11 — • .A 1 A Mov* u;. Capacity llaa ICU Mov* l.O.i. Mlllai Capacity llpii ICU o> I U*»\t/f*tt V t>»l- M«»TC «•»«.! i*«»Pt n»i « ' CANNON ••*• A M.. ICU All A ICU All B ICU All C Mevt MO <;•» STof S Capacity FL.fTS C»j pkOMt- ICU «J uoATMec Mova UM0 1IU '• Capacity ^^•«- ICU Mov«Capacity ICU - i.o.a Ma MMla»il»i> V P«|t 14 af 29 lMC««I>«( CANNON BOAD ICU All A ICU All ft ICU Alt. C M»»« NOC»> «Tof>a Capacity FUieTS u r^cuic* ICU <2> ihift^Hfe M«v«Capacity SPPlC ICU - - Mev»Capacity ICU t.o.s Ma Mltlatilan V A i.o • CAMNON ICU All A I | S 1600 Ifo T^TTH. ICU •10 •10 .30 "~ *\ C«.uT| »., • OAO ICU All. C ICU Move Capacity ICU i.o.a. Ma MIHa*lla» A 1.0.•.l.O.t. Mlllpatlan ~1 P«|i I S it 29 CANNON ICU All. A ICU All. •OAD ICU All. C Move -J ±- ~\ Capacity Jtg Ifoo ice> + J">Vt 3UOO _«L.l&oo Tl'T'/tL ICU •n .»«*•.» • to f M .3T Mftva Capacity ICU Me**Capacity ICU - t.o.a. ^ f/°-g i.o.t. N» MMIatlUn **'"»*"•» MllliHU* > I • oo o CANNON S/ 3D I ICU All. A ICU All. • "Ml BOAD ICU All. C Mev* r -? u C«»«cMr n !£•• l*1*l«/l aw«» «HI ,S-o» TcTAL ICU •10 ••tvl .10 «»• •^T •Vf UO*«C*p*cl1y ICU Mov«Capacity ICU I.O.* *»• * l.O.t. Mlll§alla« 16 «f 29 £e CANNON ICU All. A -8 Ut »»»-* , i«fi n.< «/. ICU All. •ICU All. C Move r ==? u Capacity Mfc \Seo ant 4-j»/i. ~« s°* TtfTkL ICU •lo •to JUtfc. •>1 -3? Mo«a Capacity ICU «•»• , Capacity ICU I.O.*. Ma MlHtallan -o.a.i.o.i. ^/ •1<kl• / 1*1lo-l lHJ Ifcl * ~f 1*1 UJ %v||^» 1toltal tt fA».«.P«At/c-<-.^^ T" " "r ]'*",'t ^^ A-PfAM •»<•>•" k AVENUE I JVO I ICU Alt. A ICU All. •ICU AM. C Ma«a Capacity •Jooo 900 . ICOO ICU .26 .H .U Cspaclly ICU ICU ».€>.».illlaallaii 1.0. ft. »a|a 17 of 29 ICU Alt. A ICU Alt. »ICU All. C M... L1- ttl =^ r Capacity T555- »w_J/oo 3*>**i3400 11 ISoO ICU .11 .17 .11 .••Wi .«(, Mava Capacity ICU Mava • Capacity ICU l.O.ft..O.A.l.O.t. PSA). 18 tf 29 ICU All. A ICU All. •ICU AH. C Mo**ICU «!•*•Captclly ICU •(•*•ICV tioo IfoO .70 l.O.t. •J •I / I" 1IIL! I*! V, IV I 1^ I fL. tA~-*0 «fHl/T».MMr« *.l y««* i~.in*F'.<. r^iU'tr T<**"'t L AVCNUE ICU ICU All. C M»«r» /'Jll ~l _— -* 'P Capacity IfcST Cioo .!>*• Soo X4C IS»o ?u«ir? ItXH- Tol».l- ICU .•s> .'°M»»» .11 .18 .7-7 MO«I Capacity ICU Mev*Capacity ICU t.o.t. ^ ».€>.». -JUSA). Pa|a 19 af 29, Mft«* U lit/' " « 3r= Capacity 77 ISOO 'y^.Sioo ii-»o pA41JS looa TfTT«M_ ICU .(DMUI .\1 .il .Ji .11 M««a Capacity ICU Move Capacity ICU i.O.i Ma C tiO.e.l.O.t. •JUSA). IM I ICU All A ico AII e ICU All C MO** /ill ~ "• ~) C*»*cily iu>n rioo i»l ISoo ISOO TCHAU ICU .12 M •«°MW Tt Mo«*Ccpcclly ICU Mow*Capacity ICU I 0.«to*Miiiaaila* Paaa ZO af 29 ICU All A ICU All B ICU All C Mow*Capacity ICU Movt Capacity ICU Mov*Capacity ICU , is \Soo fit ti^O 5100 .Si 1.0.•. Mo » O •I 0.». ICU All. A ICU All. ft ICU All. C •Uv* 114 icu .11 Capacity ICU Mov*Ccpaclly ICU A.O.ft. M* MlllaMlo*^- tVlllMlltn SKA)- i.e.*. Pat* 2 I «f 29 ICU All. A ICU All. ft ICU All. C ICU ICU Mov*Capacity ICU HI/Stoo .38 .0 .It .IS i.O.ft.-O.t.I .€>.•. IUSA). *••• 22 «f 29 ICU All. A ICU All. • VOLUME MTEH»ECTK>» ICU All. C Mev* m^ LL <r= "**> C*»«clly /<f^ T/OO tilya>o <u*> •»€»• •*•»» 3*0 TrfTM- ICU ,33 .ti ,\\ .(4 • 11 Uo«t 5*.«« ft*** ^•»* ^* Utcu kauiMrptaw AA-IB*C»p«cll|r «tn Jooo ?4ot? ^i£ 14«» 4|T. 4X0 Toti^U ICU .« .11 .It .11- .7T Mttv*Ccpacllir ICU i.O.t. N» l.O.t. {USA)- ICU AH. A ICU All. ft ICU All. C M n» Tcoo ICU .65 !*•«•Capacity ICU Capaclly ICU l.ft.i. Ma MMIa*il»n i.o.a. Pa|a 23 af 29 ICU AH. A icu AH. •ICU AH. C M... t Ht/ (5* — * Capacity •Japo 3IOO /<1 ^T- TriT* ICU .10 HIM .40 ./*„,. .«r .75: H...Capacity ICU Mava Capacity ICU • Ma i.e.*. IUSA). ICU All. A ICU All. K ICU All. C M***M ICED ICU .12- Ciptclly ICU Ca^aclly ICU i.O.t. M»"g- tin.I.O.ft. IUSA). P«M 24 •' ICU All. A J /fn-^-H-> <fi> ICU All. t ICU All. C Mov*ICU Capacity ICU !*•*•Capacity ICU 3000 HOP 5/PO .14 .H t.O.t M»Mllf«||»»> i.o.t. CANNON BOAD ICU Alt A ICU All B ICU All C Mov* s=. -1 Capacity HiJV»» tan •5»» 7>r«t ICU •at .!•*»• • 3^ Mov*Capacity ICU Mova Capacity ICU i.O.t Ma MiHa»tla« (.0 •Vlllaallan i.o.a. Mltlpalleit -MS- >••• 29 af 29 CANNON aOAD ICU All. A ICU All ICU All C Movt ^r 1 C*p«clly l*l»4'l>/| 3V»« ^£<'•» 111>t»» TOTAL ICU •if .10 •ilk '20 •76 Mov*Capacity ICU Move Capacity ICU | f I O.» Me C (.0 •Mlllaallan l.O.t. MHlaatU* CAMMON MOAO oo I ICU All A ICU All B ICU All C Uova ^ "I Capacity »J$ Jv.. *t IJ-»» \ T7»T-<«<. ICU • J7 • I* J0«^ -S7 Mo«*Capacity ICU Move Capacity ICU 1.0 • Ma Mlll|*ll»n 10*Mlllgailan l.D.B '•|a 26 af 29 f*> CANNON ROAD ICU All. A ICU All B ICU All C Mo*a ^r •) Capacity lijff*^ *«•* -Xt-if** TO If.o TfTtkL ICU •3V •10fiia • IP .sv Mov«Capacity ICU Mova Capaclly - ICU t.O.B Na V A 109 l.O.t. •fUSAl- ICU All. A ICU All. fe ICU All. C 190* »S»o ICU • It • as •31 ^t Maw*Capacity ICU Mate Capacity ICU t.o.t.<m'a»'i!»ft (USA)- 1.0.». 27 af 29 ICU All. A IC11 AM. •ICU Alt. C ICU Ctpaclly ICU Capacity ICU Hoi • JO •JLS TcTAL • 81 i.o.t M» i.e.*. USA). CANNON HO«O I O I ICU All A ICU All B ICU All C Mo««C*P*clly ICU .41 •Tl M««*C*p*clly ICU Mov*Cipcclly ICU I O • Mo tot Mlll0«|lon ••• 28 *f 29 CANNON MOJtO MtO ICU All. A ICU All C Mov* ^>lv -IX C*p*cliv .ygJfloO iojv3£» "><«<x> »4H^-^s»~ •CiT».U ICU .1^ on.«> ,!(. •54 MOV*Cap*cll|r ICU Mov*Capacity ICU tot Mo i O •Mlllatilon IDS MlllgoHoit CMMON «0*D Ien ICU Alt A r-s S-G.CFF ICU AM •ICU All C .,... JlV r~r /r C.P..M, not •so* ?S> •iooo TbTAU ICU .37 .«4 .M ifs Meva Capacity ICU Mo«a Capacity ICU Paga 29 of 29 > CANNON MOAO ICU All A ICU All B ICU All. C Meva ;LC /r !HZ Capacity JOB. ^^^SJ -TollM. ICU .a-7 .It .«T ,feo Meva Capacity ICU Meva Capacity ICU 1.0 ft. Ne Mltlaalleit f 0.» •"••••II.1. I O • MlllcaiUi. APPENDIX E ICU ICU All. C Move vx nv _-/ j^ Cipsclly 3*' 3cco |-i3^»l^'l 5" i«u a or • Sec ;T--I?«» 2 H»' TOTAL ICU .10 ^ f • at, • m •it t>i Mo*f Ccptclly ICU Move C*p«clly ICU l.O.B N* t.o.a. fi tl.»-. kiMf t. \^_ AVCIIUC i-lf-f- ICU All. A ICU All. t ICU All. C Me** UL ttv- ~J £= C*ptclly t£b 3oov ~£*C*V~ IMT \SO"> 2 'yr u nrtM ICU ii .« .u ••a n Mo«*Ciptclly ICU Ve*«ICU t.o.* M*L-O-t IH«»|I»A (USA)- l.O.t. 3/88 003387 fi c~f I I fell Lf No US" fcu,lL)<-,/T fCfA Tt»i?M tftflnAi'I i *<ir ICU All. A ICU All. •ICU All. C M«*« L »1K ^ J5^ C*»*cliir _£L ICiX> W10+ «''C Ale. Itt • Sri- ni «• >>V» IT'. TrT-At ICU 4»»»- •21 .IP V * .1C f* " 51 M»*«Ctpiclly ICU Mov«Capacity ICU t.O.t Ma illlaaiUit (USA")- i.o.s. Ml|l«atl*n PM« 2 *r 14 3915 ICU All. A ICU All. •ICU All. C MB«« ^ -iW _> A_ Capacity m*i -ISoo i»7«<-i«Vt i loo *fIS Co »<i * <J/inn- ni/u ICU .10 **l* •22 • |0 ay •* • to^ * •53 Mov«Capacity ICU Mov*Capacity ICU l.O.t. N* JUSA)- TAMARACK zz, r\ 737 -b. ICU All. A ICU All. C •«••• « 1 Ml r -^v Capacity -rrTT 'tis*- Jf/i £ lew -T^r ~~ I* « 0 TrT/t ICU .10 s • n .t» ^ M««« ( Capacity ICU Mc»«Capacity ICU .O.I l.O.«. Mill.. II. « 3 «f 14 ICU All. A ICU All. ft ICU All. C Move ^ ^11 r ^v-- Capacity •jOripvy + '*«/i Stoo '"o TT^ TpT/vL ICU ^ •23 -lo .I*..- <S Me*a Capacity ICU M.v.Capacity ICU t.O.ft ¥> 1.0. •l.O.ft. -(USA]- I U1 l/i ICU All A ICU All B ICU All C Movt «t t All -> CcpacUy 30 \3ra f*J*'Vj Sin _££-ir<»? ToTXi ICU .to r*.« •31 • 10«« » •r/ Move Capacity ICU Move C*p*clly ICU I O • No Mlllaailon I O • -(SB- I O • Mitigation Pig* 4 af 14 ICU All A Move ICU Move C*P*cily ICU Move Capacity ICU lot. • le fcUi I O.i No Mitigation * iot .(USA)- I O •. MMI«atl*n •' t—'.toi.. Mffufc T^fi N ^«L«*<r; 351 ,1, ICU All. A ICU All. •ICU All. C Me** I Iff -* Jw Ctpccllv ^J0_ T£- 7^r<» ^^ ToTAL ICU • 14 •32 •10 .(0 .6* Me«*Cipiclly ICU Me**C.p.«,,r ICU l.O.t Me -0 •i.O.t. ICU All. A ICU All. ft ICU All. C MAD* -in f>«» loco TOTAL .70 ICU .^^ ICU Me**C«p*clly ICU i.O.ft. *• £• 1.0*.t.O.ft. -|USA)- K«g« to 91 I •» ta *f , CANNON ^S R|jjj rfT D o•* =yci« T- K r791.y Cv. Cfci^feC Kf «.i./C<-> I k.i-14 u<-«<iu ace t l-l K *-k- Mfru*1*>»-" Jpu.cl **.^U*6. i >S^ «AOO Jl.JN W- ^UOaT WOI-***« »•-«.' ICU All. A ICU All. ft Hov* U rtv r— ^ C«»sclly _fO_Iftfo /vy<*«ws 5I<» 1*°1500*n -»>-<L>0 To TA i~ ICU •\* 4*r(T •jfi •" |H» .IS .77 Mo»*Captclly ICU MOV*Capacity ICU i.O.ft. M* l.O.ft. -|USA")- Paga T af 14 rllQH VOLUME INTERSECTION »«n-l>.' OAL AU< « c ICU All. A ICU All. •ICU All. C Capacity ICU .n 14 Movt Capacity ICU Capacity ICU t.O.t \ Ma MiilaalUn i.o.t. ICU All. A ICU All. t ICU AM. C Mova I'- ll!/' ^=7 (r Capacity «115tc«. \OT> It*,, "405, ylfo 3t0C* TiJT*.U ICU J% .16 .11 .It i>7' Ua«a Capacity ICU Ma*a • Capacity ICU t.O.t). M* .0»l.O.t. Pap a af 14 ICU AM. A ICU All. • Man VOLUME INTER8ECTIO*) TUftill XfcJMtlttO . g<U.AWf 1 b «l-lk. C^Ct.CC.« AN^. TMtt*«i ICU All. C Mava M ^=£ ±zr" Capacity «ti"5Sl U>OC -&- Itt-C >o*>> T^u ICU .11 ..1 .I°M.M .2t 0,«5 Mava Capacity ICU Ma..Capacity ICU t.O.i. M* ttlllaatUftV -it) 4 y * 0. ft.l.0.». HIGH VOLUME INTER8ECTIO* 3<»6 ICU All. A ICU All. t ICU All. C Mova .-!UI ^=? (r Capacity ISi* fcOoO W.Ttoo I0fc« 40UO qt )tt>0 TOTAL. ICU .25 10rv* .11 .i"«'U .77. M»«t Capacity ICU Va«a Capacity ICU I.O.t Ma .ft • llISA)- !.€>.». Mltlpallait TUlil 3042 4VJI ICU All. A ICU All. • HIGH VOLUME INTERSECTION ICU All. C ft**** U: til '*frooo ICU .11 Mot*ICU C«p<tlly ICU i.ft.t C L° • -JUSA)- 9 «r V/XJ ICU All. A ICU All. » MOH VOLUME WTCMCECTIOK ICU All. C Capacity ICU ICU ICU tU til ' 10 taoo Jb .10 IT l.O.S M» (AMMO, li.tl /*»«*,.,, »,, fx ffAy He ft T-«M»,I,,».| CANNON *OAO JTfV lift ICU AM A ICU All 6 ICU Alt C Mo«* 1 Capacity i«V* HOP ToT*sW ICU ••"MM. .1* ill Mov*Capacity ICU Mova Capacity ICU I O.I. ft* Mill.. II. A .O •l.O.t. .(M«B. IO of 14' f 0*1 />«!,< !,* , «0 »f « CANNON »OAD ICU All A ICU All B ICU All C Mov* ^r -i Capacity Afl*2«S 1*00 IfOP •^ ToTM. ICU .10 •»•*«, ..»^ 40 Mov*Capacity ICU Mo«a Capacity 1 ICU i.o. ».A i.o. •i.o.t. CANNON aOAD ICO All A ICU All B ICU All C Ma** ==? r~ n Capacity <VC>g 1400 1* ISOO Jllloo TetfcL ICU .15 •'•..- .'«•«« .4T Meva Capacity ICU Mo*«Capacity ICU t.o.t i.O •Mitiaatlart I 0.» MHIaallan I I of 14 CANNON IOAO ICU All A ICU All B ICU All. C Mo«« ^r ••'r Capacity nu»f^ 3400 41 u«» 7«f-<* IfdO -r<n«o- ICU .34 J°M.U. .!<>„., • S4 Mo**Capacity ICU Mo»«Capacity ICU Ma Mltlpallan Mlltallan l.O.B. ftilllaalU* ICU Hit. A ICU All. ft ICU All. C -4J Ccptclly IS>0 ICU M«*«Capiclly ICU ICU l.O.ft. PM« 12 or 14 ICU All. A ICU AM. •ICU AM. C Move C«MCtly ICU Ctpiclly ICU Me*«ICU •?7 lo .ijoo llrr .8*)ft* »<in»*ll»n •"llMIUftIUSA). t.o.s. ICU All A ICU AM. • VI«TD ICU All C Mov* d=- _J ~1 C*p*cl|y 7^ -^ ~7tZo "TtftAU ICU .^1 .It 10 .te Mov*C*p*clly ICU Mov*Cipcclly ICU ^ o •to* .gg). •it 13 «r AD. ICU All A ICU All • f IA MAM i V£- ICU All C Mov* ir ~j *i C*p«cMy ,^1*"* J±L IffOO _A1-ICoa ICU .44 .IS .««» HiVIJ .t,f Mov*C*p*clly ICU M*v*C*p*clly ICU i.o.s M* Will*. II. i.fa'llB«H0> fws-MIM,.||». I o>en i ICU All A ICU All • V, p\^ [jjt ICU All C Jl Captclly lie." ICU .11- .u Me** TitAl. ICU .1.1 Jl .B1 Mov*C*p*clly ICU I.O.».A »•••• AM. •buAi uen ^/ie P«t« 14 «f 14 VI CAM»UM ••/«:-« S-» «A«*f»\ ICU AM A ICU AH 1 ICU Alt C Mev* ^r A C«P*tlly v<y -g& illISoc. -U-T^ ICU .-** .ia .at .ei Me«t •^ r .;LU Cipacliy •»**• •££ J^l -WTXU ICU .511 .18 .16 .i« Mo«« • Clpcclly ICU I.O.* N» 1 *>•• "P ^ *>••*« »-«MIMII..V~S /O' CURB- T$ « UJ"PC" o M Vj ^ •a- '5 • «MI ^•»«M CM t>/?/w CUPB I IH 51' I I I\I2\12'\IO mini i, I ! 4f'\ 5' I I 10' 10 •CUB 8 <s» ss ^ M^H a ! 5! -FT Sp?s 81 \/:• \ \JL Q 12'12' # \4I' C\NI 1 /. • \ 3 ••• t id i 'O? \ 12 \ r // 1 4' "I'M (t » — LyW ^T -CUPB PROPOSED BUILDOUT CONDITIONS IO' maniTOU engine civil »mi««»f»*»% iwrvvyifi^ A «*• 9?0?S350 w company laonixf .U»k««» 1*1*1 ZONE 15 LOCAL FACILITIES PLAN ' \ 110 ^%^%• f r ^ IO* 'f* ^l«. ?' *• —**. M( 1 T »»>% •K/ IPm •#/w CUX& PROPOSED BUILDOUT CONDITIONS maniTOUengln««rlrtg company civil •nfln««rm( «wr««*M«f A planning ISO w ».h *«••«• I<f*n4i4* C»lil»««.« »>075 I»I«»K.«. Ml*) r ZONE 15 LOCAL FACILITIES PLAN PROPOSED BUILOOUT CONDITIONS fill maniTOU «ngln««rfng company ci»il ««fin*«fi>t(, ivrvcymf ft •lanniRf 31O w »>K *•.•««• Ii< ZONE 15 LOCAL FACILITIES PLAN 51 fi/w~1 O ff/W CUP8- \\ /— , ?- ^ M « ! //' IZ \\ r! \35 43' 12' \ 1 Iff 6' irt /2' 4 4, f 12' 1' 3' / r — -ff/w •cuffd PASEO DEL NORTE PROPOSED BUILDOUT CONDITIONS mi maniTOU engineering company r«*v>«f A •(••Mnw^ r<»V »7O7$ I.(.•(.«.•- <»l«t Ml ZONE 15 LOCAL FACILITIES PLAN PROPOSED BUILDOUT CONDITIONS CANNON ROAD fill maniTOU engineering company civil •f*«i«i««finf, tMfvvytfif 4 JJO W »»»i ««••>»• ZONE 15 LOCAL FACILITIES PLAN PROPOSED BUILDOUT CONDITIONS CANNON ROAD mi maniTOU engineering connp«nry <i«ll *f<(ln««ri>if iur**Tinf A •lonnmf 559 w »t». «.••»• IK^.^I^. C«l>l»xl« tJOJi t«l>*»i»«« l»l«l T«l **?! ZONE 15 LOCAL FACILITIES PLAN ATTnCHMEjNT oz » l/» SCHEMATIC OF SEGMENT BUILDOUT PM PEAK HOUR •aoo FT.- •1.66B VPH 2.010 VPH / COLLEGE • LVD. 37.300 APT X .086 PEAK HOUR % 3,678 VPH CARLSBAD F U.I. ffi — U.S.A. IHC. —003387C i/*a t\ RANDOM INTERSECTION STOPPED DELAY EQUATION 11-3 PACE 11-10. 1886 HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL Cek.t-tc«- ftt.e a^puccti EL Tkc r*ndoai inuntciioa ncppoj d«U) ^uttioo u - V •but ^ - ncr«{« tiofpad dch) pir ttbuk foi ibc iwbjcct bat group, in »«/>(b. f - Jjrck kapt.. m toe. l/C - |»«n niio for ibc tutijci bnt fiouf. ibc ratio of (fern* frcta luot la r>;U kofib. Jt - »A nlio for Ibc uibjcci Uac group, and < - c*p«nl) at ibc lhiou|b Unc gtoup ASSUMPTIONS C* ItOcfc. C : »7»e to CARLSBAD F.M.I. 15 — l/.s.>i. /we. — URBAN SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC. transportation planning & traffic engineering consultants to business and government i A * < oon 4S4° Ke0™? Vllla Roadi Suite January 16, 1990 _ ^W C4 P2J2J-7575 "«N I , 03U (,579; 560^911 telephone (619) 560-9734 facsimile Ms. Lisa Thomas, Project Planner Hofman Planning Associates 2386 Faraday Avenue, Suite 120 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Lisa: : As you requested, we have evaluated the street segment level of service (LOS) at buildout for the segment of College Boulevard between El Camino Real and "Sycamore Creek Road". i Assuming a four lane secondary arterial street classification for this segment, we used the Highway Capacity Manual Chapter 11 methodology to compute the arterial level of service, as required by the City's Guidelines for transportation impact studies. As shown in the attached worksheets, we computed a LOS "D" for the buildout P.M. peak hour. Only the P.M. was calculated since this hour is expected to have a greater volume than the A.M. peak. Since the City's Guidelines regard LOS "0" as acceptable for arterials during the peak hours, widening of this segment to six lanes should not be needed in order to mitigate the projected arterial level of service. However, the westbound approach at the El Camino Real intersection should be designed with dual left turns, two through lanes, and a separate right turn lane to provide an acceptable LOS at this intersection at buildout. If you have any questions regarding our arterial LOS evaluation, please give me a call. Sincerely, Sam P. Kab II Senior Project Manager Attachments cc: Wally McCloskey Mike O'Hara 003387C thomas2/18B 10 II 11 1) II IS AfcllBltl*|| )| ARTERIAl SUMMARY Of INTERSECTION DELAY ESTIMATES , , Co4.L(£<i£ aLvp/ircfl.- SyfAMoM c«u*w R.^ .Hml r.u»r^^ P M PttXlt-UUJUtoar ^ Pvtpftnd UM Cydr %/c Croup C |/C X < no .so .s«| i4<x> Ktndam |60 Am..! ^ fngmuan h Etlinulrd DrU> |D O UX Etiunttrd Afpiotch DtU>- lti.0 •I.W. II-* •M.IBJJ, MOIU »rl4^M«ll 1 . Immtlf THtt fc k*M; •fflMIMV i*>ll» l>ltO> K N K (j/Cl CAfftSA>IO f.M.Z. IS — O.S.>I. IWC. — it ii (nun t 10 II U 1) 14 IS COMPUTATION Of ARTERIAl EEVEl Of SERVICE WORKSHEET a .co.-i.eM au/p4=cA-SY<x*««*c**« ^_f p rt **< -•B.UU.OOXf „.„ rK> . MPIIunifLmcikl tm Ufflh Annul f)a» (mi) CUu (mph) .15 2 ^? StctlOT l^nnii^ lnlcn« O\tci Turn* Apfmwti M>t XO 0 C* 0 MA (ua.il (yn>sl Anmd Annul TUM|) Ui^ikb) WO UXbt Wruan (cvuan (ai{4i) Wctxn •33 O ,|S jl.4 ID Cnnd tun of Tuw -o •».• •»D»b||JHMli>l»> t~ qrr ^klaran W •• 1«Mr <• •• OOJJA7C >/»«OOJJ0/C EXISTING DWELLING UNITS OUTSIDE> FIVE MINUTE RESPONSE TIME OF FIRE STATION NO. 3 AND 5 Management General Plan Dwelling Zone Land Use Units 7 RLM 126 8 RM 1 127 *Y PHASE I 1AGE 3ITI 1"= 200' C.T. 82-12 CARLSBAD HIGHLANC « 1.67 AC. 1 =200' RANCHO CARLSBAf MOBILE HOME PAR 1.45 AC. = 200 C.T. 82-12 CARLSBAD HIGHLANC = 200 C.T. 82-12 CARLSBAD HIGHLANC C.T. 82-12 CARLSBAD HIGHLANC 'C.T. 82-12 CARLSBAD HIGHLAND -l ! - " T-<*,s »1 i i ,'*+' «T~ \ U• «* 4 1 ! I 1^=100' C.T. 82-12 CARLSBAD HIGHLANC C.T.82-12 CARLSBAD HIGHLANI - C.T.82-12 CARLSBAD HIGHLAN[ .10 AC. ' C.T. 82-12 4 CARLSBAD HIGHLANDS 14 33 *= 100' C.T. 82-12 CARLSBAD HIGHLANC 2660.58*QLAjrtl U "-=* C.T.82-12 CARLSBAD HIGHLANC Vs 100' C.T. 82-12 CARLSBAD HIGHLANC =100' 82-12 CARLSBAD HIGHLANC C.T.82-12 CARLSBAD HIGHLANC Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor Improvements* Reach vc 13 VC 14 VC15 Size (inches) 54 54 54 Length (feet) 3520 5080 1760 Total Cost $1,320,000 $1,905,000 $660,000 Year Needed 2000+ 1997 2000+ * Per the "Carlsbad Sewer Master Plan,* Wilson Engineering, December, 1987. COST ESTIMATE ZONE 15 Cost Estimate* for Improvements to South Agua Hedionda Sewerage Drainage Basin IMPROVEMENTS TO NEW TRUNK SEWER REACH SAHT1D SAHT1E SAHT1F SAHT1G SAHT2A SAHT2C LOCATION Sunny Creek Road Rancho Carlsbad Sunny Creek Future College Boulevard El Camino Real Future Cannon Road Future Cannon Road SIZE (IN.) 15 15 8 18 10 15 LENGTH (FT.) 3,500 4,540 2,000 2,500 6,300 3,500 COST $367,500 $476,700 $130,000 $300,000 $472,000 $367,500 IMPROVEMENTS TO NEW INTERCEPTORS REACH SAH 1 SAH 2 SAH 3 SAH 4 LOCATION Hidden Valley Road Hidden Valley Road Future Cannon Road to Hidden Valley Road Future Cannon Road SIZE (IN.) 21 21 24 21 LENGTH (FT.) 2,320 2,200 2,400 3,500 COST $313,200 $297,000 $336,000 $472,500 LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENTS South Agua Hedionda Lift Station Stage 1 $514,000 * Costs taken from "Carlsbad Master Plan," prepared by Wilson Eng. --•'X '- ^^•- ' LEGEND: CRMWD Boundary Management Zone 15 Boundary _ ^ ,_ , V' D' A 1—I No Scale ^ORTION OF GRID MAP FROM COSTA REAL MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT MASTER PLAN FOR PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM October 1983 & February 1985 ZONE 15 WATER COST ESTIMATES* FA< A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. L. M. N. 0. P. Q. R. S. T. U. :ILITY Squires II 42" line 36-20" line Pressure Reducing Station 10" line 16" line 10" line Pressure Reducing Station Pressure Reducing Station 16" line 12" line Pressure Reducing Station 10" line 14" line Pressure Reducing/ Cogen . Station Pressure Reducing/ Meter Station ; Pressure Reducing Station 10" line 14" line** ; 10" line 10" line AMOUNT/ LENGTH N/A 8,700 LF 7,800 LF 1 EA. 8,800 LF 3,900 LF 3,400 LF 1 EA. 1 EA. 10,200 LF 7,200 LF 1 EA. 9,500 LF 2,400 LF 1 EA. 'l EA. 1 EA. 2,700 LF 6,000 LF 300 LF 30 LF UNIT COST N/A $379/LF $220/LF N/A $25/LF $128/LF $25/LF N/A N/A $29/LF $27/LF N/A $15/LF $50/LF N/A N/A N/A $38/LF $41/LF $38/LF $38/LF TOTAL COST $10,000,000 $3,300,000 $1,700,000 $50,000 $220,000 $500, dOO $85,000 $80,000 $80,000 $300,000 $195,000 $50,000 $150,000 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $225,000 $102,600 $246,000 $11,400 $1,140 =======!===S=S= TOTAL ZONE 15 $17,596,140 * From CMWD Master Plan and developer cost estimates. ** denotes 5,400 LF recycled, 600 LF new. City of Carlsbad Planning Department June 11,1998 CERTIFIED MAIL Holly Springs LTD ; c/o Lucia Sipple 1287 Vera Cruz Oceanside, CA 92056 CITY OF CARLSBAD, ZONE 15 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AND FINANCE PLAN Dear Property Owner: The purpose of this letter is to inform you of a hearing regarding a petition to the City Council to allow for the preparation of a Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment and Finance Plan for Zone 15 in the City of Carlsbad. The Russell Grosse Development Company, on behalf of CanAm Properties, LLC., is petitioning the City Council, under Section 21.90.121(d) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, to allow for the preparation of the previously mentioned LFMP amendment and finance plan. The petition is being requested due to a less than 100 percent concurrence from all property owners within Zone 15 regarding the processing of a LFMP amendment and finance plan. The request will be heard on Tuesday, June 23, 1998, at 6:00 p.m. at the City Council Chambers located at 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008. If you have any questions regarding the petition or the hearing, please feel free to contact the Brian Hunter hi the Planning Department at (760) 438-1161, extension 4457. 2075 La Palmas Dr • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-O894 City of Carlsbad Planning Department June 11,1998 CERTIFIED MAIL Mrs. Ida Kato 3250 Sunny Creek Road Carlsbad, CA 92008 CITY OF CARLSBAD, ZONE 15 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AND FINANCE PLAN Dear Property Owner: The purpose of this letter is to inform you of a hearing regarding a petition to the City Council to allow for the preparation of a Local Facilities Management Plan, Amendment and Finance Plan for Zone 15 in the City of Carlsbad. The Russell Grosse Development Company, on behalf of CanAm Properties, LLC., is petitioning the City Council, under Section 21.90.121(d) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, to allow for the preparation of the previously mentioned LFMP amendment and finance plan. The petition is being requested due to a less than 100 percent concurrence from all property owners within Zone 15 regarding the processing of a LFMP amendment and finance plan. The request will be heard on Tuesday, June 23, 1998, at 6:00 p.m. at the City Council Chambers tocated at 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008. If you have any questions regarding the petition or the hearing, please feel free to contact the Brian Hunter in the Planning Department at (760) 438-1161, extension 4457. 2075 La Palmas Dr • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-O894 City of Carlsbad^ f—^^mmmmmfnnfnf^mfm^^^mm^^mmmmmmPlanning Department June 11,1998 CERTIFIED MAIL Timothy & Betty Barlow 3004 Sunny Creek Road Carlsbad, CA 92008 CITY OF CARLSBAD, ZONE 15 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AND FINANCE PLAN Dear Property Owner: The purpose of this letter is to inform you of a hearing regarding a petition to the City Council to allow for the preparation of a Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment and Finance Plan for Zone 15 in the City of Carlsbad. The Russell Grosse Development Company, on behalf of CanAm Properties, LLC., is petitioning the City Council, under Section 21.90.121(d) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, to allow for the preparation of the previously mentioned LFMP amendment and finance plan. The petition is being requested due to a less than 100 percent concurrence from all property owners within Zone 15 regarding the processing of a LFMP amendment and finance plan. The request will be heard on Tuesday, June 23, 1998, at 6:00 p.m. at the City Council Chambers located at 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008. If you have any questions regarding the petition or the hearing, please feel free to contact the Brian Hunter in the Planning Department at (760) 438-1161, extension 4457. 2O75 La Palmas Dr. • CarJsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-O894 City of Carlsbad Planning Department June 11,1998 CERTIFIED MAIL Banning Cantarini PO Box 587 Carlsbad, CA 92008 CITY OF CARLSBAD, ZONE 15 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AND FINANCE PLAN Dear Property Owner: The purpose of this letter is to inform you of a hearing regarding a petition to the City Council to allow for the preparation of a Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment and Finance Plan for Zone 15 in the City of Carlsbad. The Russell Grosse Development Company, on behalf of CanAm Properties, LLC., is petitioning the City Council, under Section 21.90.121(d) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, to allow for the preparation of the previously mentioned LFMP amendment and finance plan. The petition is being requested due to a less than 100 percent concurrence from all property owners within Zone 15 regarding the processing of a LFMP amendment and finance plan. The request will be heard on Tuesday, June 23, 1998, at 6:00 p.m. at the City Council Chambers located at 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008. If you have any questions regarding the petition or the hearing, please feel free to contact the Brian Hunter in the Planning Department at (760) 438-1161, extension 4457. 2O75 La Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92OO9-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-O894 City of Carlsbad Planning Department June 11,1998 CERTIFIED MAIL Rancho Carlsbad Partners Attention: Michael Churchill SlOOElCaminoReal Carlsbad, CA 92008 CITY OF CARLSBAD, ZONE 15 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AND FINANCE PLAN Dear Property Owner: The purpose of this letter is to inform you of a hearing regarding a petition to the City Council to allow for the preparation of a Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment and Finance Plan for Zone 15 in the City of Carlsbad. The Russell Grosse Development Company, on behalf of CanAm Properties, LLC., is petitioning the City Council, under Section 21.90.121(d) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, to allow for the preparation of the previously mentioned LFMP amendment and finance plan. The petition is being requested due to a less than 100 percent concurrence from all property owners within Zone 15 regarding the processing of a LFMP amendment and finance plan. The request will be heard on Tuesday, June 23, 1998, at 6:00 p.m. at the City Council Chambers located at 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008. If you have any questions regarding the petition or the hearing, please feel free to contact the Brian Hunter in the Planning Department at (760) 438-1161, extension 4457. 2O75 La Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 438-O894 City of Carlsbad^ ^^^^j^^^^^^^^^^^!^^^^(B^^BBilBi^^^^B^iMH^BlBBPlanning Department June 11,1998 CERTIFIED MAIL Paul Tchang PO Box 80036 San Diego, CA 92138 CITY OF CARLSBAD, ZONE 15 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AND FINANCE PLAN Dear Property Owner: The purpose of this letter is to inform you of a hearing regarding a petition to the City Council to allow for the preparation of a Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment and Finance Plan for Zone 15 in the City of Carlsbad. The Russell Grosse Development Company, on behalf of CanAm Properties, LLC., is petitioning the City Council, under Section 21.90.121(d) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, to allow for the preparation of the previously mentioned LFMP amendment and finance plan. The petition is being requested due to a less than 100 percent concurrence from all property owners within Zone 15 regarding the processing of a LFMP amendment and finance plan. The request will be heard on Tuesday, June 23, 1998, at 6:00 p.m. at the City Council Chambers located at 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008. If you have any questions regarding the petition or the hearing, please feel free to contact the Brian Hunter in the Planning Department at (760) 438-1161, extension 4457. 2075 La Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-O894 City of Carlsbad Planning Department June 11,1998 CERTIFIED MAIL Dorothy K. Ebright c/o Chase Coman 5855 Sunny Creek Road Carlsbad, CA 92008 CITY OF CARLSBAD, ZONE 15 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AND FINANCE PLAN Dear Property Owner: The purpose of this letter is to inform you of a hearing regarding a petition to the City Council to allow for the preparation of a Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment and Finance Plan for Zone 15 in the City of Carlsbad. The Russell Grosse Development Company, on behalf of CanAm Properties, LLC., is petitioning the City Council, under Section 21.90.121(d) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, to allow for the preparation of the previously mentioned LFMP amendment and finance plan. The petition is being requested due to a less than 100 percent concurrence from all property owners within Zone 15 regarding the processing of a LFMP amendment and finance plan. The request will be heard on Tuesday, June 23, 1998, at 6:00 p.m. at the City Council Chambers located at 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008. If you have any questions regarding the petition or the hearing, please feel free to contact the Brian Hunter in the Planning Department at (760) 438-1161, extension 4457. 2075 La Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-O894 City of Carlsbad Planning Department June 11, 1998 CERTIFIED MAIL H.E. & Pearl Gribble 3130 Sunny Creek Road Carlsbad, CA 92008 CITY OF CARLSBAD, ZONE 15 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AND FINANCE PLAN Dear Property Owner: The purpose of this letter is to inform you of a hearing regarding a petition to the City Council to allow for the preparation of a Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment and Finance Plan for Zone 15 in the City of Carlsbad. The Russell Grosse Development Company, on behalf of CanAm Properties, LLC., is petitioning the City Council, under Section 21.90.121(d) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, to allow for the preparation of the previously mentioned LFMP amendment and finance plan. The petition is being requested due to a less than 100 percent concurrence from all property owners within Zone 15 regarding the processing of a LFMP amendment and finance plan. The request will be heard on Tuesday, June 23, 1998, at 6:00 p.m. at the City Council Chambers located at 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008. If you have any questions regarding the petition or the hearing, please feel free to contact the Brian Hunter in the Planning Department at (760) 438-1161, extension 4457. 2075 La Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92OO9-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-O894 City of Carlsbad Planning Department June 11,1998 CERTIFIED MAIL Hagaman Family Trust 5320 El Camino Real Carlsbad, CA 92008 CITY OF CARLSBAD, ZONE 15 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AND FINANCE PLAN Dear Property Owner: The purpose of this letter is to inform you of a hearing regarding a petition to the City Council to allow for the preparation of a Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment and Finance Plan for Zone 15 in the City of Carlsbad. The Russell Grosse Development Company, on behalf of CanAm Properties, LLC., is petitioning the City Council, under Section 21.90.121(d) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, to allow for the preparation of the previously mentioned LFMP amendment and finance plan. The petition is being requested due to a less than 100 percent concurrence from all property owners.within Zone 15 regarding the processing of a LFMP amendment and finance plan. The request will be heard on Tuesday, June 23, 1998, at 6:00 p.m. at the City Council Chambers located at 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008. If you have any questions regarding the petition or the hearing, please feel free to contact the Brian Hunter in the Planning Department at (760) 438-1161, extension 4457. 2O75 La Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 438-O894 City of Carlsbad Planning Department June 11,1998 CERTIFIED MAIL Robert & Robin Kelly 2770 Sunny Creek Road Carlsbad, CA 92008 CITY OF CARLSBAD, ZONE 15 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AND FINANCE PLAN Dear Property Owner: The purpose of this letter is to inform you of a hearing regarding a petition to the City Council to allow for the preparation of a Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment and Finance Plan for Zone 15 in the City of Carlsbad. The Russell Grosse Development Company, on behalf of CanAm Properties, LLC., is petitioning the City Council, under Section 21.90.121(d) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, to allow for the preparation of the previously mentioned LFMP amendment and finance plan. The petition is being requested due to a less than 100 percent concurrence from all property owners within Zone 15 regarding the processing of a LFMP amendment and finance plan. The request will be heard on Tuesday, June 23, 1998, at 6:00 p.m. at the City Council Chambers located at 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008. If you have any questions regarding the petition or the hearing, please feel free to contact the Brian Hunter in the Planning Department at (760) 438-1161, extension 4457. 2075 La Palmas Dr • Carlsbad, CA 92OO9-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 438-O894 City of Carlsbad Planning Department June 11,1998 CERTIFIED MAIL Mandana Cal Co PO Box 18197 Irvine, CA 92623 CITY OF CARLSBAD, ZONE 15 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AND FINANCE PLAN Dear Property Owner: The purpose of this letter is to inform you of a hearing regarding a petition to the City Council to allow for the preparation of a Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment and Finance Plan for Zone 15 in the City of Carlsbad. The Russell Grosse Development Company, on behalf of CanAm Properties, LLC., is petitioning the City Council, under Section 21.90.121(d) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, to allow for the preparation of the previously mentioned LFMP amendment and finance plan. The petition is being requested due to a less than 100 percent concurrence from all property owners within Zone 15 regarding the processing of a LFMP amendment and finance plan. The request will be heard on Tuesday, June 23, 1998, at 6:00 p.m. at the City Council Chambers located at 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008. If you have any questions regarding the petition or the hearing, please feel free to contact the Brian Hunter in the Planning Department at (760) 438-1161, extension 4457. 2O75 La Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92OO9-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-0894 City of Carlsbad Planning Department June 11,1998 CERTIFIED MAIL Wrisley 1990 Family Trust 2080 Basswood Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 CITY OF CARLSBAD, ZONE 15 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AND FINANCE PLAN Dear Property Owner: The purpose of this letter is to inform you of a hearing regarding a petition to the City Council to allow for the preparation of a Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment and Finance Plan for Zone 15 in the City of Carlsbad. The Russell Grosse Development Company, on behalf of CanAm Properties, LLC., is petitioning the City Council, under Section 21.90.121(d) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, to allow for the preparation of the previously mentioned LFMP amendment and finance plan. The petition is being requested due to a less than 100 percent concurrence from all property owners within Zone 15 regarding the processing of a LFMP amendment and finance plan. The request will be heard on Tuesday, June 23, 1998, at 6:00 p.m. at the City Council Chambers located at 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008. If you have any questions regarding the petition or the hearing, please feel free to contact the Brian Hunter in the Planning Department at (760) 438-1161, extension 4457. 2O75 La Palmas Dr • Carlsbad, CA 92OO9-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 438-0894 City of Carlsbad Planning Department June 11,1998 CERTIFIED MAIL Office of Treasurer University of California PO Box 24000 Oakland, CA 94623-1000 CITY OF CARLSBAD, ZONE 15 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AND FINANCE PLAN Dear Property Owner: The purpose of this letter is to inform you of a hearing regarding a petition to the City Council to allow for the preparation of a Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment and Finance Plan for Zone 15 in the City of Carlsbad. The Russell Grosse Development Company, on behalf of CanAm Properties, LLC., is petitioning the City Council, under Section 21.90.121(d) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, to allow for the preparation of the previously mentioned LFMP amendment and finance plan. The petition is being requested due to a less than 100 percent concurrence from all property owners within Zone 15 regarding the processing of a LFMP amendment and finance plan. The request will be heard on Tuesday, June 23, 1998, at 6:00 p.m. at the City Council Chambers located at 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008. If you have any questions regarding the petition or the hearing, please feel free to contact the Brian Hunter in the Planning Department at (760) 438-1161, extension 4457. 2075 La Palmas Dr • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-O894 City of Carlsbad Planning Department June 11,1998 CERTIFIED MAIL Abigail Lubiner Trust PO Box 30 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 CITY OF CARLSBAD, ZONE 15 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AND FINANCE PLAN Dear Property Owner: The purpose of this letter is to inform you of a hearing regarding a petition to the City Council to allow for the preparation of a Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment and Finance Plan for Zone 15 in the City of Carlsbad. The Russell Grosse Development Company, on behalf of CanAm Properties, LLC., is petitioning the City Council, under Section 21.90.121(d) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, to allow for the preparation of the previously mentioned LFMP amendment and finance plan. The petition is being requested due to a less than 100 percent concurrence from all property owners within Zone 15 regarding the processing of a LFMP amendment and finance plan. The request will be heard on Tuesday, June 23, 1998, at 6:00 p.m. at the City Council Chambers located at 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008. If you have any questions regarding the petition or the hearing, please feel free to contact the Brian Hunter in the Planning Department at (760) 438-1161, extension 4457. 2075 La Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-O894 ' City of Carlsbad Planning Department June 11, 1998 CERTIFIED MAIL Barber Trust 2416SonoraCourt Carlsbad, CA 92008 CITY OF CARLSBAD, ZONE 15 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AND FINANCE PLAN Dear Property Owner: The purpose of this letter is to inform you of a hearing regarding a petition to the City Council to allow for the preparation of a Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment and Finance Plan for Zone 15 in the City of Carlsbad. The Russell Grosse Development Company, on behalf of CanAm Properties, LLC., is petitioning the City Council, under Section 21.90.121(d) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, to allow for the preparation of the previously mentioned LFMP amendment and finance plan. The petition is being requested due to a less than 100 percent concurrence from all property owners within Zone 15 regarding the processing of a LFMP amendment and finance plan. The request will be heard on Tuesday, June 23, 1998, at 6:00 p.m. at the City Council Chambers located at 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008. If you have any questions regarding the petition or the hearing, please feel free to contact the Brian Hunter in the Planning Department at (760) 438-1161, extension 4457. 2O75 La Palmas Dr • Carlsbad, CA 92OO9-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-O894 City of Carlsbad Planning Department June 11,1998 CERTIFIED MAIL Wetland Family Trust 5380 El Camino Real Carlsbad, CA 92008 CITY OF CARLSBAD, ZONE 15 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AND FINANCE PLAN Dear Property Owner: The purpose of this letter is to inform you of a hearing regarding a petition to the City Council to allow for the preparation of a Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment and Finance Plan for Zone 15 in the City of Carlsbad. The Russell Grosse Development Company, on behalf of CanAm Properties, LLC., is petitioning the City Council, under Section 21.90.121(d) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, to allow for the preparation of the previously mentioned LFMP amendment and finance plan. The petition is being requested due to a less than 100 percent concurrence from all property owners within Zone 15 regarding the processing of a LFMP amendment and finance plan. The request will be heard on Tuesday, June 23, 1998, at 6:00 p.m. at the City Council Chambers located at 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008. If you have any questions regarding the petition or the hearing, please feel free to contact the Brian Hunter in the Planning Department at (760) 438-1161, extension 4457. 2O75 La Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92OO9-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-O894 City of Carlsbad Planning Department June 11,1998 CERTIFIED MAIL State of California Wildlife Conservation Board 801 K Street, Suite 806 Sacramento, CA 95814 CITY OF CARLSBAD, ZONE 15 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AND FINANCE PLAN Dear Property Owner: The purpose of this letter is to inform you of a hearing regarding a petition to the City Council to allow for the preparation of a Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment and Finance Plan for Zone 15 in the City of Carlsbad. The Russell Grosse Development Company, on behalf of CanAm Properties, LLC, is petitioning the City Council, under Section 21.90.121(d) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, to allow for the preparation of the previously mentioned LFMP amendment and finance plan. The petition is being requested due to a less than 100 percent concurrence from all property owners within Zone 15 regarding the processing of a LFMP amendment and finance plan. The request will be heard on Tuesday, June 23, 1998, at 6:00 p.m. at the City Council Chambers located at 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008. If you have any questions regarding the petition or the hearing, please feel free to contact the Brian Hunter in the Planning Department at (760) 438-1161, extension 4457. 2075 La Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92OO9-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-O894 City of Carlsbad Planning Department June 11,1998 CERTIFIED MAIL Marjess Evans 5040 CliffPlace San Diego, CA 92116 CITY OF CARLSBAD, ZONE 15 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AND FINANCE PLAN Dear Property Owner: The purpose of this letter is to inform you of a hearing regarding a petition to the City Council to allow for the preparation of a Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment and Finance Plan for Zone 15 in the City of Carlsbad. The Russell Grosse Development Company, on behalf of CanAm Properties, LLC., is petitioning the City Council, under Section 21.90.121(d) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, to allow for the preparation of the previously mentioned LFMP amendment and finance plan. The petition is being requested due to a less than 100 percent concurrence from all property owners within Zone 15 regarding the processing of a LFMP amendment and finance plan. The request will be heard on Tuesday, June 23, 1998, at 6:00 p.m. at the City Council Chambers located at 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008. If you have any questions regarding the petition or the hearing, please feel free to contact the Brian Hunter in the Planning Department at (760) 438-1161, extension 4457. 2075 La Palmas Dr • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-O894 City of Carlsbad Planning Department June 11,1998 CERTIFIED MAIL Richard C. Kelley 1748 Via Monserate Fallbrook, CA 92028 CITY OF CARLSBAD, ZONE 15 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AND FINANCE PLAN Dear Property Owner: The purpose of this letter is to inform you of a hearing regarding a petition to the City Council to allow for the preparation of a Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment and Finance Plan for Zone 15 in the City of Carlsbad. The Russell Grosse Development Company, on behalf of CanAm Properties, LLC., is petitioning the City Council, under Section 21.90.121(d) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, to allow for the preparation of the previously mentioned LFMP amendment and finance plan. The petition is being requested due to a less than 100 percent concurrence from all property owners within Zone 15 regarding the processing of a LFMP amendment and finance plan. The request will be heard on Tuesday, June 23, 1998, at 6:00 p.m. at the City Council Chambers located at 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008. If you have any questions regarding the petition or the hearing, please feel free to contact the Brian Hunter in the Planning Department at (760) 438-1161, extension 4457. 2075 La Palmas Dr • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-O894 City of Carlsbad Planning Department June 11,1998 CERTIFIED MAIL Rusty W. Grosse Development Company 5850 Avenida Encinas, Suite A Carlsbad, CA 92008 CITY OF CARLSBAD, ZONE 15 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AND FINANCE PLAN Dear Property Owner: The purpose of this letter is to inform you of a hearing regarding a petition to the City Council to allow for the preparation of a Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment and Finance Plan for Zone 15 in the City of Carlsbad. The Russell Grosse Development Company, on behalf of CanAm Properties, LLC., is petitioning the City Council, under Section 21.90.121 (d) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, to allow for the preparation of the previously mentioned LFMP amendment and finance plan. The petition is being requested due to a less than 100 percent concurrence from all property owners within Zone 15 regarding the processing of a LFMP amendment and finance plan. The request will be heard on Tuesday, June 23, 1998, at 6:00 p.m. at the City Council Chambers located at 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008. If you have any questions regarding the petition or the hearing, please feel free to contact the Brian Hunter in the Planning Department at (760) 438-1161, extension 4457. 2075 La Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA*92OO9-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-O894 RUSSELL W. GROSSE DEVELOPMENT CO., INC. 5850 Avenida Enemas, Suite A June 5,1998 Carlsbad, California 92008 Phone 760/438-3141 FAX 760/438-7615 Ray Patchett, City Manager 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: Dear Ray: Petition to City Council to Prepare the Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) for Zone 15 This letter is to formally petition the City Council to allow Russell W. Orosse Development Co., Inc. to prepare a Finance Plan and an amendment to the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15. The Finance Plan and LFMP Amendment are required for the processing of our 40-acre development project (The Terraces at Sunny Cieek). This project is currently under consideration hy the Planning QmnissJflp The amendment addresses itself to tf"s 40-acre project; however, die ^"yre plan affects the entire 1,500 acre Zone 15 area, It should be noted that a Local Facility Management Plan for this zone was previously approved in 1990 with the concurrence of all the property owners. A finance plan was not approved at flat time but instead a condition of the LFMP was placed mat one needed to be approved prior to any development within the zone. At this time, we are not able to obtain 100% concurrence from all the property owners within Zone 15 for the preparation of the LFMP Amendment and Finance Plan as required by Section 21.90 of the Municipal Code. If 100% property owner concurrence cannot be obtained, Section 21.90.120(d) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code provides for the sponsoring property owners to petition the City Council to allow for the preparation of the LFMP Amendment and Finance Plan. Accompanying this letter are mailing labels and a property owners list for all property owners within Zone 15. Please accept this letter as a formal petition to the City Council. We are requesting that this hem be placed on the June 16 City Council Agenda. Our office amj Hofinan Planning Associates are available to provide any additional information or assistance to facilitate the processing of the petition. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office or Bill Hofinan of HP A. Si ly yours, Russell W. Crosse cc: Marty Orenyak Gary Wayne DonRideout Brian Hunter Contractors LH No J7Hl«li DATE: APRIL 11, 1990 TO: RICHARD ALLEN, ASSESSMENT ENGINEER FROM: Brian Hunter, Senior Planner, Growth Management RE: CANNON ROAD, REACHS 3 AND 4 ROAD ALIGNMENT At the City Council meeting of April 10, 1990 the noise impact of traffic from the proposed alignment of Cannon Road on existing development was questioned during the Zone 15 Local facilities Management Plan Public Hearing. Council's concern was whether your design incorporated their recently ratified noise policy (see attached). Staffs response was that the environmental review of the project would address this concern. BH:kd attachment c: %ay Patchett - City Manager f Marty Orenyak - Community Development Director Lloyd Hubbs - City Engineer -fife- ~2^ CS City of Carlsbad ComrnLitiity Development March 26, 1990 Michael Blessing Planning Director City of Oceanside 300 North Hill Oceanside, CA 92054 Dear Mr. Blessing: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the City of Carlsbad's Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15. This Plan is being provided to you because Zone 15 borders the City of Oceanside, and some facilities required of Zone 15 may involve coordination with your City. If you have any questions regarding this Plan, please contact me. Sincerely, DON RIDEOUT Senior Management Analyst DR:bjn 2O75 Las Palmas Drive •Carlsbad, California 92OO9-4859»(619) 438-1161 rrr/7 HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES Planning • Project Management • Rscat Analysis January 29, 1990 Don Rideout City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: Zone 15 LFMP - Submittal of 25 copies for Planning Commission. Dear Don: Enclosed per your request, please find twentyfive copies of the final draft of the Zone 15 Local Facilities Management Plan. We are pleased to present this plan for Planning Commission Review. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Lisa Thomas cc: Phil Carter Brian Hunter Steven C. Jantz Zone 15 Property Owners Bill Hofrnan 2386 Faraday, Suite 120 • Carlsbad • CA 92008 • [619)438-1465 HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES Planning • Project Management • Fiscal Analysis January 24, 1990 Don Rideout City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: Zone 15 LFMP - Submittal of 7 copies for Planning Commission. Dear Don: Enclosed per your request, please find seven copies of the final draft of the Zone 15 Local Facilities Management Plan. We are pleased to present this plan for Planning Commission Review. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Lisa Thomas cc: Phil Carter Brian Hunter Steven C. Jantz Zone 15 Property Owners Bill Hofman 2386 Faraday, Suite 120 • Carlsbad • CA 92008 • (619] 438-1465 City of Carlsbad Community Development December 29, 1989 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 15 Dear Property Owner: Our records indicate that you are an owner, or represent an owner, of property located in the area known as Zone 15 of the City of Carlsbad. In accordance, with the City's Growth Management Program, a Local Facilities Management Plan has been prepared for Zone 15. The Plan is scheduled for a public hearing before the Planning Commission on Wednesday, January 17, 1990. The City wishes to give all property owners in the Zone an opportunity to discuss the Plan with City staff prior to the Planning Commission hearing. Therefore, a meeting has been set for Wednesday, January; 10, 1990, at 6:00 p.m. in the Carlsbad Safety Center Room 3, 2560 Orion Way. Growth Management staff will be present to discuss the Zone 15 Local Facilities Management Plan, and to answer your questions regarding the Plan. If you cannot attend this meeting, but have questions or concerns regarding the Plan, please call me at 438-1161. Sincerely, DON RIDEOUT Senior Management Analyst DR:bjn 2O75 Las Palmas Drive •Carlsbad, California 92OO9-4859»(619) 438-1161 rrr/7 HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES Planning • Project Management • Fiscal Analysis Received DEC 211989 CITY OF CARLSBAD DEVEimRRQC.SERY.DIV; December 19, 1989 Don Rideout City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: Zone 15 LFMP - Request for 90-Day Extension. Dear Don: On behalf of the Zone 15 property owners, we are respectfully requesting an extension of 90 days to complete the processing of the Zone 15 - Local Facilities Management Plan. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Lisa Thomas cc: Brian Hunter Steve Jantz Zone 15 Property Owners 2386 Faraday. Suite 1 SO Carlsbad CA 9S008 [619] 438-1465 DECEMBER 12, 1989 TO: DEPARTMENT HEADS FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION ZONE 14 AND ZONE 15 DEPARTMENT HEAD REVIEW MEETINGS The following arrangements have been made for Department Head Review meetings: Zone 14 DATE: Friday, December 15th TIME: 2:00 P.M. LOCATION: Planning Conference Room Zone 15 DATE: Thursday, December 21st TIME: 9:00 AM LOCATION: Planning Conference Room If you are unable to attend these meetings, please call one of the Growth Management staff members listed below to make alternate arrangements for transmitting your comments. If you have no comments on these plans, please let us know as well. Thank you. Brian Hunter x4441 Steven Jantz x4354 Don Rideout x4212 DON RIDEOUT Senior Management Analyst DR:b]n DECEMBER 7, 1989 TO: DEPARTMENT HEADS FROM: Growth Management Division DEPARTMENT HEAD REVIEW - ZONE 15 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN This Zone Plan was submitted for Department Head review very shortly after Zone 14, which you have just recently received. Growth Management staff wishes to avoid overloading you with zone plans while at the same time keeping these plans moving along towards adoption. Because Zones 7, 14 and 15 have many facilities in common, review of Zone 15 may be somewhat easier. Growth Management staff proposes to complete the Department Head review of Zone 15 on Thursday, December 21, 1989. It is anticipated that this schedule would allow sufficient time to complete your review of both plans. However, if you need more time to review Zone 15, please let us know. We are presently shooting for a Planning Commission date of January 3 for Zone 14 and January 17 for Zone 15. Thank you for your assistance and support in this process. DON RIDEOUT Senior Management Analyst DR:bjn HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES Planning • Project Management • Fiscal Analysis December 6, 1989 Don Rideout City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: Zone 15 LFMP - Submittal for Department Head Review. Dear Don: We are pleased to present the Zone 15 Local Facilities Management Plan for Department Head review. Enclosed per your request, please find seven (7) complete copies. If you have any questions or need additional information, please give me a call. Sincerely, Lisa Thomas enclosures cc: Phil Carter Brian Hunter Steve Jantz Zone 15 Property Owners 2386 Faraday, Suite 120 • Carlsbad • CA 92008 • [619)438-1465 P . I U V — S X — Carlsbad Unified School District Mailing Address: 801 Pine Avenue. Carlsbad. California 92008-2439 6350 Yarrow Drive. Suite A, Carlsbad. California 92009-1544 (619) 729-9291 f-AX* (619) 4384798 "All Students Can Learn" BOARD OF TRUST EtS 3, EDWARD SWITZER, JR,President DONALD M. JOHNSON Vice Premdem JOE ANGEL Clerk JAMES McCORMICK Member JUL1ANNC L. NYCAARD Member DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION THOMAS K. BRIERLEY. Ed.D. Superintendent SUSAN-HARUM1 8ENTLEY, Ed.D. Assistant Supenmendem Instructional Services JOHN H. BLAIR Assistant Supenmendem Business Services GERALD C. TARMANAssistant SupenmendemPersonnel Services CHERYLERNST Director Elementary Education 3EWAYNEL.FEASCL Manager ^utilities/ Maimenance/ Operations November 21, 1989 Lisa Thomas Hofman Planning Associates 2386 Faraday Avenue, Suite 120 Carlsbad, CA 92008 SCHOOLS SECTION - ZONE 15 LFMP Lisa, Here are the changes and/comments I have for the Zone 15 LFMP, Schools section. Page 135 - I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD - fine II, FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS A, Eliminate reference to Exhibit 55 and eliminate Exhibit 55 altogether. The City and I have discussed this and have agreed this 1s not necessary. B. INVENTORY 1. Existing Inventory: Zone 15 1s totally within the boundaries of Carlsbad Unified School District. There are no schools located within Zone 15. The northwest quadrant of the city contains most of the existing schools within the District. At this time, there are 5 elementary schools, 1 junior high, I continuation high school and 1 high school, all of which are at capacity. 2. Build Out Projections - eliminate entire section 3. Phasing The Carlsbad Unified School District recently adopted a new school location plan. The location plan Indicates that 3 elementary school sites will be needed 1n the northeast quadrant 1n the future. One site has been Identified In LFMP Zone 7 and two sites in LFMP Zone 14. The CHy of Carlsbad 1s 1n the process of revising the City's General Plan to reflect the new school locations selected by CUSD. (ELIMINATE PARAGRAPHS 2 AND 3 OF PHASING SECTION) rv..:__..:.u,.j o-u^^i n- i MOV — 21 — © -9 U S S 9 P . C, ADEQUACY For the purposes of long range planning. Carlsbad Unified School District considers all existing facilities at capacity. The smallest Increment of demand area used by the District for facility analysis 1s the quadrant. Although additional sites have been Identified 1n the northeast quadrant, any additional demand generated from Zone 15 development prior to the construction of new schools will necessitate the use of temporary classrooms and relocatables on existing sites. III. MITIGATION A. Special Conditions 1. Conformance with the adopted school performance standard will be a prerequisite of any development within the zone. All development within Zone 15 will be conditioned to pay school fees In accordance with the requirements of the Carlsbad Unified School District. 2. If Carlsbad Unified School District determines development In Zone 15 will generate student demand prior to construction of new school faclHtles^flnandal provision for temporary facilities on existing school sites will be required. IV. FINANCING Financial requirements for school facilities 1n Zone 15 are comprised T PIT"ANYWAfc— of school fee payment and those costs of providing temporary facilities for student demand generated 1n advance of permanent accommodations 1f necessary. If you have any questions, I will be 1n the office again Monday, November 27. Sincerely, on ^TGeorglana K1rby Information Systems Manager c: Tom Hageman, Planning Systems City of Carlsbad Community Development November 6, 1989 Lisa Thomas Hofman Planning Associates 2386 Faraday Avenue, Suite 120 Carlsbad, CA 92008 DRAFT LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 15 Dear Lisa: This letter is provided to confirm the discussion at our meeting of October 27, 1989 regarding the draft Zone 15 Local Facilities Management Plan. The following points were discussed at the meeting: 1. No changes are required at this time in the Citywide Facilities sections. 2. Drainage - Exhibit 37 must be re-drawn on a more legible and updated base map. Page 90 - add introductory paragraph and heading. Exhibit 38 - provide more legible labeling. Provide discussion of current status of Carlsbad Highlands facilities. 3. Circulation - Page 118 - show peak hour analysis more clearly. Show yearly analysis of level of service for El Cam/no Real to pinpoint the year in which it is projected to fall below the standard. Exhibit 41 must be re- drawn on a more legible and updated base map. 4. Sewer and Water - these sections have been sent to the appropriate districts for comment. Delete discussion of reclaimed water from sewer section. 2O75 Las Palmas Drive •Carlsbad, California 92OO9-4859»(619) 438-1161 Lisa Thomas Novembers, 1989 Page Two 5. Schools - a condition must be added to indicate that Zone 15 will be responsible for providing the school site in Zone 14 if development in Zone 15 goes first. Also, use Zone 7 as a guide for the most current preferred wording of this section. 6. Library - show only the new Corte Del Nogal warehouse space per attached Agenda Bill. When these changes have been made and verified by staff, the plan will be ready for Department Head review. Sincerely, DON RIDEOUT Senior Management Analyst DR:bjn c: Assistant to the City Manger Senior Planner Associate Civil Engineer HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES Manning • Proiect Management • Fiscal Analysis September 19, 1989 Brian Hunter City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: Zone 15 - Local Facilities Management Plan Submittal. Dear Brian: Enclosed please find four draft copies of the revised Zone 15 - Local Facilities Management Plan. Revisions to this plan include addressing applicable comments from the Zone 7 plan review, a revised Circulation section, and revisions to the Drainage section per the recent hydrologic study. A copy of the revised traffic report is included for Engineering review. Per your request, the approved Zone 12 build out is shown in the phasing tables. The Zone 12 Amendment build out will not be shown in Zone 15 until the amendment has been adopted. Please note that all references to San Marcos County Water District have been changed to "Vallecitos County Water District." We understand that "County" should be deleted from this title, however, this information was received after printing of the revised text. The correct title will appear in subsequent drafts of the Zone 15 plan. Based on recent conversations with the Growth Management staff, it is my understanding that after your review of this submittal, only one additional review is required before the plan can proceed to Department Head Review. If you have any questions or need additional information, please give me a call. Thank you for your continued cooperation in the processing of the Zone 15 - Local Facilities Management Plan. Sincerely, Lisa Thomas cc: Phil Carter, Don Rideout, Steve Jantz Zone 15 Property Owners 2386 Faraday, Suite 120 • Carlsbad » CA 92008 • (619)438-1465 RCU BY:XEROX TELECOPIER 7010 ; 8-10-89 li:27ftM , -- CCITT Q3^ 24069,14 2 / , ,. 0S/10/89 jmi • 26 S fc.19 720 9461 ^fcflTV OF CflRLSBfiD P.02 1200 HUM AVENUE WE'fwJr/m TELEPHONE CARlS&AD, CA Office of toe City July 24, 1989 Mr, Robert F. Buie President THE BUIE CORPORATION 16935 West Bernardo Drive Suite 200 San Diego, California 92127-1696 Dear Mr, Buie: The purpose of this letter Is to respond to request for the City to toll CT 82-12, Carlsbad Highlands. Your letter suggests that CT 82-12 should be tolled because of the City's inability to approve the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15. Iru contention 1s based upon Government Code Section 66452.6(f). Your letter a suggests that the City instituted a development moratorium by the enactment the Growth Management Program. First, the City did not Impose a two year development moratorium as a ^;sult of the adoption of the Growth Management Program. This statement is not correct. The Growth Management Program created a two year period from the adoption of the Citywlde Facilities and Improvements Plan for property owners to prepare their local plan without have time elapse on approved projects. In your case, CT 82-12 Carlsbad Highlands, had the ability to process And receive final approvals before the Local Facilities Management Plan had to be adopted by the City Council However, this plan was not prepared and adoeted within two years from the adoption of the CUywide Plan. Therefore, the exempt ion contained in the Growth Management Program expired on September 23, 1988. Secondly, the City has not delayed "taking the necessary action" to complete or adopt the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15. The Zone 15 Plan has not been completed because of the failure of the property owners within the zone to complete the plan. It is now being process through technical review by staff. The consideration to toll CT 82-12 is not a result of the failure to finish this plan in compliance with the Growth Management Program, but is a consequence of the City's decision to pause on the processing of projects while it completes the necessary financing program to guarantee needed infrastructure as identified by the Growth Management Plan. The CHy has taken the lead to create a comprehensive financing program which can be implemented consistently throughout the City. RCU BY:XEROX TELECOPIER 7010 ; B-10-89 11"28(HM J CCITT 63^ 24069;8 3 0 3 / 1 0 / 8 9 gfL :27 26197209461 ^feITV OF CflRLSEflD P.03 July 18, 1989 Mr, Robert Bu1ePage 2 This financing requirement imposed by the City makes it impractical to process CT 82-12 until the City Council has adopted its comprehensive financing plan. Due to this situation, the City has decided to toll CT 82-12 from January 10, 1989 when the City Council took action to prepare a comprehensive financing program. Tolling will continue until the City Council approves a comprehensive dtywlde financing approach or January 1, 1990, whichever occurs first. At that time CT 82-12 will have 256 days remaining to process this map. The processing of CT 82-12 will be stopped until this action is taken or January 1, 1990, In the meantime, the completion of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15 should be your utmost concern. Until this plan is adopted by the City Council and the specific conditions met, CT 82-12 will not be finaled. If you have any question, please call me at 434-2819. Sincerely, Philip 0. Carter Assistant to the City Manager c: City Manager City AttorneyCommunity Development Director City Engineer Planning Director HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES Planning • Project Management • Fiscal Analysis July 10, 1989 Brian Hunter City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: Zone 15 - Resubmittal of Zone 15 Local Facilities Management Plan. Dear Brian: Per our meeting on April 27, 1989, we are resubmitting the requested revisions to the Zone 15 - LFMP. These revisions include the following: Begin phasing in 1990 not 1989. Discussion of approved specific plans included in Executive Summary in overview section. Explanation of apparent differences between acreages on Exhibit 6 and Exhibit 11 acreages for individual properties noted in Build Out section. Deleted comparison of citywide facilities (administration and libraries) to 1986 CFIP. Water District offices added to existing City Administrative Facilities analysis (18,000 s.f.). Proposed wording for Park Facilities mitigation has been submitted to the Growth Management staff for review and comment. The same wording is included in this plan. Fire Station No. 5 included in analysis of existing facility adequacy. Revised circulation section format leaving blanks for pertinent information to be inserted upon completion of the Zone 15 revised traffic analysis. The revised traffic report is anticipated to be complete within two weeks. The adequacy, mitigation, and financing for circulation will be updated at that time. 9386 Faraday, Suite 120 • Carlsbad • CA 92008 • [619)438-1485 Revised water section per comments received from the district (attached for your review) . Revised sewer section format to . include existing demand. Exhibit 30 (Wastewater section) and text based on Exhibit 30 will be updated by the City in future revisions. The Drainage section will be revised pending the results of the Northeast Quadrant Drainage Study being prepared by Dr. Howard Chang. Adequacy, mitigation, and financing will be determined when the study is complete. It is our understanding that site, cost, maintenance, and financing of the drainage facilities are the only requirements for the zone plan. \ We believe that all the city's comments have been addressed with this submittal. If you have any questions or need additional information, please give me a call. Thank you for your continued cooperation . Sincerely, Lisa Thomas cc: Phil Carter teve Jantz Zone 15 Property Owners TheBuieCorporation i< -. _00 S- ?E3O ~ ,6' ' -c' 3050 RECEIVEDBuildinaDepartment May 11, 1989 Mr. Philip o. Carter Assistant to the City Manager City of Carlsbad 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 Re: CT 82-12, Carlsbad Highlands Dear Phil: I wish to thank you, Marty Orenyak, Michael Holzmiller and Lloyd Hubbs for meeting with us on April 19th to discuss at length the circumstances of the Carlsbad Highlands tentative map. It was clear that you and the others were well acquainted with the extensive history behind Carlsbad Highlands. Both the City and The Buie Corporation have expended a tremendous amount of time and effort toward the successful development of this project. To that end, The Buie Corporation respectfully requests that the City give consideration to the tolling of this map, as well as other maps in similar circumstances. We feel that Government Code Section 66452.6(f) is applicable in this situation. It states: "A development moratorium is deemed to exist for purposes of this section for any period of time during which a condition imposed by the City or County could not be satisfied because the condition was one which, by its nature, necessitated action by the City or County, and the City or County either did not take the necessary action or by its own action or inaction was prevented or delayed in taking the necessary action prior to expiration of the tentative map." The City has long recognized that the imposition of the Local Facilities Management Plan requirement necessitated action by the City. The City, therefore, enacted a development moratorium which was designed to last up to two years after the approval of the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan. Because of the complex nature of the LFMPs and the extensive analysis and review required, in those two years, the City was only able to approve ten (10) zone plans. These included Zones 1-6 which were prepared by the City and which precluded the approval of developer initiated zone plans in the first year. The above cited Government Code provides that a moratorium exists for any period of time (not to exceed five (5) years) during which a condition imposed by the City could not be satisfied... Despite the best intentions of both the City and The Buie Corporation, the Carlsbad City Council has been delayed in "taking the necessary action," which in this case is approving the LFMP for Zone 15. He believe that the tolling of CT 82-12 is consistent with the intent of the Growth Management Ordinance and the applicable State and City provisions. We appreciate the time, effort and professionalism exhibited by you and other members of the City staff. We recognize that the implementation of the City's Growth Management Ordinance is difficult and complex. We fully intend to continue to work with staff and other property owners in an effort to complete the LFMP for Zone 15 and to create a financing mechanism for Cannon Road. We look forward to a favorable response to this request. Should you have any questions or desire to discuss this • matter, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, BUIE CORPORATION Robert F. Buie President cc: Marty Orenyak, Michael Holzmiller, Lloyd Hubbs HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES Rannmg • Project Management • Fiscal Analysis May 8, 1989 Don Rideout City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive 92009 — SUBJECT: Dear Don: Request for Withdrawal of the Zone 15 - Local Facilities Management Plan. As per the request in your letter dated May 5, 1989, on behalf of the property owners in Zone 15, we are respectfully requesting a withdrawal of the Zone 15 - Local Facilities Management Plan. Although we are withdrawing the Zone 15 - LFMP at this time, it is our understanding that with resubmittal of our application, no processing time will be lost. Sincerely, Lisa Thomas ~ec:—Phi~t-Carter Brian Hunter Steve Jantz Zone 15 Property Owners 2386 Faraday. Suite 120 • Carlsbad • CA 92008 • [819)438-1465 City of Carlsbad Planninci Department May 3, 1989 Mr. John Blair, Superintendent Carlsbad Unified School District 6350 Yarrow Drive, Suite A Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: ZONE 15 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN Dear Mr. Blair: The City of Carlsbad is currently undertaking the second phase of its Growth Management Program. This phase includes the preparation and review of Local Facilities Management Plans for each of the 25 Local Facilities Management Zones within the City. As part of the formal preparation and review process, your district is being asked to review the buildout and phasing assumptions of the plans to determine whether the information is consistent with your district's planning and programming of school facilities. Specifically, the City's Growth Management Program requires the adopted performance standard for school facilities be continually met as growth occurs in Carlsbad. Attached, you will find your review: 1. The adopted performance standard for school facilities 2. Draft buildout assumptions for Zone 15 3. Draft phasing assumptions for Zone 15 Could you please review this information to determine three things. First, is the information correct? Second, can your district provide school facilities according to the phasing assumptions presented in the plan and consistent with Carlsbad's adopted performance standard? And third, what means of monitoring demand for and supply of school facilities would be appropriate to establish between your district and the City of Carlsbad? We would appreciate a letter indicating your findings and any comments regarding the processing of Local Facilities Management Plans. 2O75 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92OO9-4859 • (619) 438-1161 Mr. John Blair May 5, 1989 Page Two Your review and comments are part of an overall plan preparation which needs to be completed by May 31, 1989. If you need further information or assistance, please call me at 438-1161. Thank you very much for your assistance. Sincerely, BRIAN HUNTER Senior Planner BH:af Enclosure c: Don Rideout - Senior Management Analyst HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES Planning • Project Management • Fiscal Analysis April 12, 1989 Don Rideout City of Carlsbad 2075 Las-Palmas Avenue __.--, Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: Zone 15 - LFMP 200' Scale Constraints Maps. Dear Don: Attached please find three copies of the Zone 15 - LFMP constraints maps for inclusion in the draft Zone 15 plan currently under review. If you have any questions or need additional information, please give me a call. Sincerely, Lisa Thomas c: Bill Hofman 2386 Faraday, Suite 120 • Carlsbad • CA 92008 • [619)438-1465 HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES Planning • Project Management • Fiscal Analysis March 24, 1989 Phil Carter City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: Zone 15 LFMP - Submittal of Revisions. Dear Phil: Enclosed please find the revised Zone 15 Local Facilities Management Plan. As per your request, the plan has been updated to 1989. In response to your most recent letter, dated March 7, 1989, we have addressed both points you mentioned for inclusion in the draft plan. These have been addressed in the following manner: 1. Riparian Area: From a recent conversation with Ron Schwab, owner of the Rancho Carlsbad Property in question, the RV parking area was built and permitted concurrently with the mobile home park in the very early 70's. This property was within the county jurisdiction at that time. Therefore, we do not believe that this site creates any potential revisions to the Zone 15 plan. 2. Arterials: Acreage amounts for properties abutting El Camino Real have been added to the constraints analysis. The original constraints analysis did not include the land that is dedicated as El Camino Real. 2386 Faraday, Suite 120 • Carlsbad • CA 92008 • [619] 438-1465 Per our recent phone conversation, the Circulation Chapter has not been updated at this time. We will submit the revised Circulation Chapter and corresponding traffic report upon receipt of your comments on this draft Zone 15 Local Facilities Management Plan. Thank you for your continued cooperation. If you have any questions or need additional information, please give me a call. Sincerely, Lisa Thomas c: Don Rideout Brian Hunter Steve Jantz Zone 15 Property Owners 1200 ELM AVENUE mJrWJim TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989 W^WJrW (619) 434-2821 Office of the City Manager UJito of (Earlsbab March 22, 1989 Ually McCloskey The Buie Corporation 6935 West Bernardo Drive Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92128 Dear Mr. McCloskey: This letter is in response to your correspondence of March 6, 1989 concerning the requirement to have a completed Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15 prior to receiving a final map for CT 82-12, Carlsbad Highlands. Based upon the City's Growth Management Program you cannot final the map for CT 82-12 until Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15 has been prepared and adopted. You should also be aware that once the Zone Plan is adopted it may also specify additional requirements which will have to be complied with prior to receiving a final map. Your contention that the map may be finaled prior to the completion of the Local Facilities Management Plan is not correct. The Growth Management Ordinance allowed you up to two years after the adoption of the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan to final this map. The Citywide Local Facilities and Improvements Plan was adopted on September 23, 1986, therefore, you would have needed to final your map prior to September 23, 1988. This did not occur. Before this map can be finaled the Local Plan for Zone 15 must be adopted and all specific conditions met. You should also be aware that the processing of the plan check for this map will not be given any special priority. It will fall under the City's regular plan check processing procedures. If you have any questions regarding processing, you should contact David Mauser, Assistant City Engineer at 438-1161. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at 434-2819. Sincerely, PHILIP Of CARTER Assistant to the City Manager c: Community Development Director City Engineer Assistant City Engineer Planning Director: Assistant Planning Director TheBuieCorporation 16935 WEST BERNARDO DRIVE SUITE 200 SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA 92127 1696 (619) 487 3050 March 6, 1989 David Mauser Assistant City Engineer 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: CARLSBAD HIGHLANDS, CT 82-12 Dear Dave: Thank you very much for your prompt response to my letter regarding the expiration date of the Carlsbad Highlands tentative map. With May fast approaching, it is a relief to know that our expiration date is September 23, 1989. The Buie Corporation would like to record the final map by September and is anxious to work with the City to that end. At this time, I have two concerns about the status of our tentative tract map. The Tentative Tract Map Status Report dated February 9, 1989, indicates footnote #5 is applicable to our map. Specifically footnote #5 states: "Local Facilities Management Plan not adopted. Time clock on expiration resumed as of September 23, 1988. Map can not final until LFMP is adopted." It is our understanding that approval of the Zone 15 LFMP is not required prior to recordation of the final map, but is required prior to issuance of building permits. In support of this assertion I am enclosing several City documents: Minutes of the December 16, 1987 Planning Commission meeting. When commissioner McFadden asked about the 'next step' for the project, Mike Howes indicated that "the final map would be next..." Agenda bill 9335, dated March 15, 1988. This agenda bill specifically addresses this issue on page two under the section headed "Growth management". It readsiy- "A Local Facilities management Plan has not been completed for Zone 15 in which this project is located. No building permits may be issued for this project until this plan is approved. ..." Exhibit Z, Carlsbad Highlands Revised Conditions. No condition requires the approval of the LFMP prior to recordation of the final map. The only condition which could be remotely interpreted as requiring the LFMP is condition no. 29 which requires the map to comply with the recommendations of the Citizen's General Plan Land Use Element Review Committee. Staff, Planning Commission and City council have already found that the revised project complies with this condition (see AB 9335). I would appreciate it if you could review these materials and hopefully confirm my understanding. This brings me to my second concern. Our plans were submitted to the City for second plan check in December. According to telephone conversations with Walter Brown,- projects in zones without an approved LFMP are not giveh priority. It is my understanding that our map does not require an approved LFMP prior to recordation. If this is true then it would be our position that the Carlsbad Highlands plans should receive priority because 1) we do not need a LFMP to final our map 2) we have already been through first plan check. As I mentioned earlier, we are very ^anxious to record the map by September. I would like to resolve these concerns as expeditiously as possible. I know that your time is limited, therefore if you concur with my understanding please confirm in writing. If you do not concur, I would appreciate a brief meeting with you to discuss these issues. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. I look forward to hearing from you shortly. Wally tccioskey Project Manager WM:wh Enclosures 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE m ffW^ffl TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 Wr4f iJrJi (619)438-1161 (Eito of PLANNING DEPARTMENT March 7, 1989 Bill Hofman Hofman Planning Associates 2386 Faraday, Suite 120 Carlsbad, Ca 92008 Dear Mr. Hofman: We are in receipt of your extension request for Zone 15, dated February 27, 1989. Comments for inclusion into your draft plan's constraints analysis include: (1) Riparian area: Please provide copy of public agency action, including environmental work, that allowed destruction of riparian area. (2) Arterials: If double counting of existing arterials occurred in Subareas RH/C/0-1 and C-l, where are acreage amounts for other properties abutting El Camino Real? If you have any questions regarding these comments do not hesitate to contact Don Rideout at 438-1161. Sincerely, PHILIP 0. 'CARTER Assistant to the City Manager POC:BH/af c: Property Owners - Zone 15 Ray Patchett - City Manager Marty Orenyak - Community Development Director Don Rideout - Senior Management Analyst Brian Hunter - Senior Planner Seven C. Jantz - Associate Civil Engineer MARCH 2, 1989 TO: FROM: CITY ENGINEER PLANNING DIRECTOR SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST, GROWTH MANAGEMENT ATTACHED LETTER FROM UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Please review the attached letter from the UCSD Natural Reserve System. The letter is requesting consideration of a number of issues but primarily exemption from the Growth Management Ordinance. Since the University of California is a State Agency, it appears that they may qualify for exemption under Section 21.90.160. I would appreciate your reaction to this request, and your recommendation as to how to proceed. Thank you. DON RIDEOUT c: Philip 0. Carter fch^ TKUM iM* UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO BERKELEY • DAVIS • IRVINE • LOS ANGELES • RIVERSIDE • SAN DIEGO • SAN FRANCISCO !lSK/fl|3£2!!R13li SANTA BARBARA • SANTA CRUZ 2 4 February 1989 Natural Reserve System, A-001 ^ JOLLA CALIFORNIA 92093 Scripps Institution of Oceanography Mr. Donald Rideout Senior Management Analyst City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 Dear Mr. Rideout: The University of California's Natural Reserve System is a program whose objective is to preserve and maintain an array of California's natural areas reflective of the state's great ecological diversity. The primary objective for this preservation and management of these habitats is to meet the University of California's teaching and research needs in disciplines that require field work. This is done in concert with meeting a range of conservation objectives. The Natural Reserve System is a University-wide program administered under the auspices of the President of the University of California. Individual reserves are assigned to one of the University's campuses for day-to-day administration, maintenance, and management. Locally, the University of California, San Diego, administers four such reserves: Kendall-Frost Mission Bay Marsh, Scripps Coastal, Elliott Chaparral, and Dawson-Los Monos Canyon. I have enclosed two brochures on the Natural Reserve System for your information. The tan brochure is fairly old and does not reflect some of the recent changes in the system (reserve additions for esample) but it does provide a good background on the system (formerly known as the Natural Land and Water Reserves System). The color brochure was prepared to commerate the 20th anniversary of the Natural Reserve System in 1985- The Dawson-Los Monos Canyon Reserve is located in both the Cities of Vista and Carlsbad within Township 11 South, Range 4 West. It is found on the San Luis Rey and San Marcos 7.5 minute US Geological Survey topographic quadrangles (see enclosure). It countains a portion of Agua Hedionda Creek (a perennial coastal stream), as well as riparian woodland, southern oak woodland, coastal sage scrub, chaparral, and annual grassland communities. The riparian woodland onsite provides habitat for the state and federally listed endangered bird, the least Bell's vireo, as well as a diversity of raptor species which are also considered to be sensitive. The reserve represents an example of the type of young stream-cut valley within a coastal terrace; landforms which are becoming extremely scarce due to development pressures in San Diego County. San Diego, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, San Diego State University, and various junior colleges. Additional use is also made by the Audubon Society, the California Native Plant Society, and the San Diego Museum of Natural History. Use levels are generally short-term in nature, although several masters students have conducted their thesis research within the reserve. Recently, we have had significant problems with trespass and illegal camps within the reserve, largely due to the proximity of the reserve to development projects which use migrant laborers in construction. One company, Pacific Scene, has been helpful in removing illegal camps in the past, but the University desires to take a more active role in the management of its property by providing a permanent onsite presence in the form of a caretaker. The Natural Reserve System is attempting to site a 12' X 60' trailer at the Dawson Reserve for the prupose of providing a caretaker residence. The location which best suits our primary objective is on Mt. Hinton. The site at Mt. Hinton is ideal for the siting of tne caretaker residence as it affords a sweeping view of the majority of the reserve and also would make trespassers aware that there is an onsite observer of their activities. Hopefully, this will tend to discourage all but the most bold! It has long been the wish of our benefactor, Mrs. Idal Dawson, that there be University caretakers onsite to relieve her f orement of the task of watching over the reserve and dealing with the trespass problems. We have encountered several stumbling blocks to our siting of the trailer on Mt. Hinton. As the reserve was once part of the Rancho Agua Hedionda y Los Monos, a land grant, it is not part of any real water or sewer district. It is within the Buena Colorado Municipal Water District, however this district has no real facilities or users. It functions primarily to represent Vista Irrigation District at the San Diego Water Authority meetings. Mrs Dawson's home, and those of her son and foremen, are located in the valley and served by wells and septic systems. The City of Vista has agreed to provide us with sewer service, but we are currently negotiating with the Vista Irrigation District to annex us into their district and provide us with water. They are reluctant to do this, thinking that we should deal with the Costa Real Municipal Water District. This is not practical for us, as Costa Real facilities are some distance from the trailer. Vista's water connection is located within the White Birch cul-de-sac, not more than 500 feet from the trailer site. In order to annex to the Vista Irrigation District (VID), we must have a legal parcel and pay their annexation fee of $3,060 per acre, plus a water development fee. The trailer site is located within APN 169-230-23, a parcel of 4.22 acres. In order to reduce our annexation fee, we are attempting to boundary adjust parcel 23 to as close to 10,000 square feet as possible. This would comply with City of Carlsbad General Plan zoning for the area which is R-A-10. Unfortunately, it appears that we are in the City of Carlsbad's Growth Management Plan Zone 15, which does not have an approved plan at this time. This, as you know, prohibits the City from processing any land entitlement permits (of which the boundary adjustment, or adjustment plat, is an example). In addition, we must prove that our parcels were legally created. If they are not, we must go through the Certificate of Compliance process to legalize them. In principle, this would be easily enough accomplished, but currently it remains a moot point pending the approval of the Growth Management Plan for the zone. It was suggested to me that I should write to you and formally request that we be issued an exemption from the Growth Management Plan ordinance. The environmental impacts which could potentially result from our placement of this trailer are minimal, and would actually impact the City of Vista much more than the City of Carlsbad. We will take our access through the City of Vista's Chateau del Norte project (with whom we have an easement), and use City of Vista sewer capacity, and, hopefully, VID water. The only impact which would be within the City of Carlbad is the actual siting of the trailer within City boundaries, and resultant views from the east across Los Monos Canyon. Very limited grading will occur; likely less than 500 cubic feet of earthwork. The trailer would be used as a residence by a maximum of two persons and there will be very limited landscaping. It is the goal of the Natural Reserve System to keep improvements on their reserves to a minimum and be as consistent with the natural environment as possible. Trenches for the water and sewer lines will be dug along an existing dirt road. The project will have a very limited impact on chaparral vegetation. The cumulative impacts of grading, and to visual/aesthetics and biology would, I'm sure, be considered insignificant under CEQA. For all of the reason discussed above, I hereby formally request, from the City Council of Carlsbad in concurrence with the City Engineer's Office, a waiver from the Growth Management ordinance to allow the University of California's Natural Reserve System to proceed with an adjustment plat and a Certificate of Compliance (as necessary) for APN 169-230-23. I would very much appreciate receiving the necessary information on how to follow up on this request and whether or not any public hearings are required. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 534-2077. Thank you very much for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Julie M. Vanderwier Academic Coordinator Natural Reserve System, UCSD enclosures cc (w/o end): Susan Taylor, Government & Community Relations, UCSD Paul K. Dayton, Chairman, NRS UCSD Ted Case, Faculty Manager, Dawson Reserve, UCSD Mrs. Ida Dawson, Rancho Agua Hedionda y Los Monos Mr. Jeff Kennedy, Senior Planner, UCNRS Systemwide 30" <73 San Luis Rey INTERIOH-•75 ft CAU SURVEY RESTON VIRGINIA— '978 - , _ l 7AS 8 Ml 47gOOOni £ ll/o, J 30000 FEET RANCHO SANTA F£ 11 MI {j( tSAN DIEGO 35 Ml 12'30" ROAD CLASSIFICATION tapped, edited, and published by the"Geological Survey 'ontrol bv USGS NOS/NOAA. and USCE HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES Rannmg • Proiect Management • Fiscal Analysis February 27, 1989 Mr. Phil Carter Growth Management Manager 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad,_CA 92009 SUBJECT: Request for 90 Day Extension For Completion of the Zone 15 - LFMP. Dear Phil: On behalf of the property owners in Zone 15 we are respectfully requesting an extension of 90 days to complete the processing of the Zone 15 - Local Facilities Management Plan. Brian Hunter's letter of February 16 , 1989 indicated that the constraints analysis for Zone 15 has not been resolved. just to clarify this issue, on Wednesday, January 4, 1989, we met with Don Rideout, Steve Jantz, and Brian Hunter to review the proposed revisions to the constraints map. Revisions were made and copies of the revised constraints analysis were sent to the jv^-ian, s*Eaver and Don for final consensus on January 11. 1989. We are waiting for comments for inclusion into the final draft. _. It is our understanding that major concerns of this issue have been resolved. Per Brian Hunter's letter of February 16, although we feel that there may be the possibility of withdrawal and resubmittal of the zone plan required at a later date, we will are respectfully requesting a 90-day extension for processing the Zone 15-LFMP. 2386 Faraday, Suite 120 " Carlsbad • CA 9200B • (619)438-1465 Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Please give me a call if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Bill Hofman BH:LT c: Don Rideout Brian Hunter Steve Jantz _. _ Zone 15 Property— Owners City of Carlsbad Community •^^........^..i February 16, 1989 Bill Hofman Hofman Planning Associates 2386 Faraday, Suite 120 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Bill: The purpose of this letter is to make it clear to all parties that the LFMP for Zone 15 probably cannot be completed within the State mandated time limit and should be withdrawn. The primary issue is the proposed modification of the constraint analysis. As a result, buildout numbers have not been determined. As you know, the establishment of the buildout of the zone is typically one of the first tasks that is completed in preparing a zone plan. Without buildout numbers, no meaningful review could occur. Therefore, it is recommended that you withdraw the Plan and resubmit after the buildout issue has been resolved. Your letter of withdrawal must be received by the City no later than Friday, March 24, 1989 or staff will have no choice but to schedule the plan for public hearing with a recommendation of denial. Sincerely, BRIAN HUNTER Senior Planner bjn c: Property Owners - Zone 15 2O75 Las Palmas Drive •Carlsbad, California 92OO9-4859»(619) -438-1161 HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES Planning • Project Management • Rscal Analysis January 11, 1989 Don Rideout City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: Zone 15 - LFMP Revised Constraints Analysis. Dear Don: During our meeting on Wednesday, January 4, 1989, we discussed recent revisions to the Local Facilities Management Zone 15 Constraints Map. Enclosed please find the revised constraints table and a copy of the revised map. The areas of most significant change are highlighted and a copy of the old constraints table is attached for your convenience. In addition, enclosed please find the College Blvd. alignment which was used in this analysis. If you have any questions or need additional information, please give me a call. Sincerely, Lisa Thomas c: Brian Hunter, City of Carlsbad Steve Jantz, City of Carlsbad Zone 15 property owners 2386 Faraday. Suite 120 • Carlsbad • CA 93008 • [619)438-1465 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE MorwJfl TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 WPwJW (619)438-1161 (Eitg nf PLANNING DEPARTMENT October 12, 1988 William Hofman Hofman Planning Associates 6994 El Camino Real, Suite 208 Carlsbad, CA 92009 Dear Mr. Hofman: Staff has completed the content review of the Zone 15 Local Facilities Management Plan. When the $10,000 processing fee is received the technical review will begin and initiate the formal acceptance of the Plan. Sincerely. BRIAN HUNTER Senior Planner c: Zone 15 Property Owners Philip 0. Carter, Assistant to the City Manager Steven C. Jantz, Associate Civil Engineer BHraf zone!5\process.ltr ^3^5^ HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES £A <?#, .^y Planning • Project Management • Environmental /<V I00 P ?4 Y& fi OCF 1988 LMlMIMr nrn«."iivmiiiib OtrAit i fit- Cm Of CARLSBAD .vP.September 30, 1988 Brian Hunter — City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: Public Facility Analysis Requirement for Assessor Parcel No. 209-090-11 (SP-190A) . Dear Brian: Per our conversation on September 22, 1988, the following is a summary of our telephone conversation regarding Public Facility Analysis Requirement for Assessor Parcel No. 209- 090-11 (SP-190A) . The City determined in their letter of August 16, that the application for a Specific Plan Amendment is incomplete and enclosed a list of information to be provided. Item No. 7 on the list states that a detailed public facilities analysis must be provided for the property. In response to this item, I understand that analysis contained in the Zone 15 - Local Facilities Management Plan will fulfill the requirement and therefore no further analysis is required at this time. This is provided so long as the LFMP addresses this property for comparable use and intensity. If the above understanding is not correct, please let me know. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, <?•; w, S1/ <^/ Lisa Thomas cc: Chris DeCerbo 6994 El Cammo Real, Suite 208 • Carlsbad • CA 92009 • [619] 438-1465 Robert & Karen Kelly 2770 S'linny Creek Rd Carlsbad, CA 92008 619-438-3890 SEP 1988September 23, 1988 Michael Holzmiller Planning Director, City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009-4859 Dear Mr. Holzmiller: This letter is to acknowledge our meeting of September 22, 1988. At this meeting you verified that my parcel #209-060-48 at 2770 Sunny Creek Road is presently zoned L-C, a holding zone, and that it is not impacted by the neighboring open space designation which is limited to the existing golf course that abuts my property. Please confirm the above with your signature and date. Sincerely, Robert Mt Kelly Michael Holzmffler Zone 15" La Costa Ranch House PO Box 9000-266 Carlsbad CA 92009 FAX 619/931/1946 619/931/1677 September 21, 1988 Mr. Mike O'Hara SYCAMORE CREEK COMPANY, Suite A 6361 Yarrow Drive Carlsbad, California 92009 Dear Mike/ Thank you for your phone call today regarding the matter of concurrent processing in the City of Carlsbad. I was glad to see the City Council send the proposal to the Planning Commission for consideration. On its face value, the concept of reviewing a Master Plan at the same time of reviewing a Public Facilities Plan, makes a lot of sense. I certainly agree that the matter will not be decided until after the November election. Also, I appreciate your sensitivity in agreeing that we should now move ahead with Zone 15 Public Facilities Plan using the existing General Plan. I believe we should now be able to move ahead more quickly which should help all of the property owners. As the City was involved in our original discussions on this matter, I will let them know of our decision by sending Phil Carter a copy of this letter. Also, I will notify the Buie Corporation. I would ask that you notify the other property owners yourself, if you haven't already. Again, thank you for your sincere cooperation in this matter, BENCHMARKPACIFIC Best regards, uglas M. Avis cc: Wally McCloskey BUIE CORPORATION Phil Carter CITY OF CARLSBAD NNING ASSOCIATES Pr^ct Management fojA}/ Environmental DRAFT August 12, 1988 I Michael Holzmiller, Planning Director City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: Summary of Understanding of the Sycamore Creek II Proj ect. Dear Michael: Thank you for meeting with Mike O'Hara, his investors, and me regarding the Sycamore Creek II project. This letter is written to summarize the Planning Departments understanding of the project and its processing requirements. This letter will be used to inform other parties who have an interest in this property regarding the staff's viewpoint. As you know, the project involves the development of a resort hotel/golf course, related commercial facilities and lower density residential units. The project will require a General Plan Amendment, master plan, amendment to the Local Facility Management Plan, tentative map and Planned Development Permit. Currently, a Local Facility Management Plan for Zone 15 is being processed based on the existing General Plan. Under current regulations, this plan must be approved prior to the submittal of any new applications within the quadrant except for those that have been previously exempted. The staff's position on the proposed Master Plan for Sycamore Creek II is that conceptually it does support the plan. No detailed review of the plan has taken place, so exact unit counts and other potential issues have not been determined. Staff will not state that the plan as specifically proposed can be supported since no detailed review has taken place. We understand that all city policies must be adhered to in finalizing the plan. 6994 El Cammo Real, Suite 208 • Carlsbad • CA 92009 • (619] 438-1465 You indicated two problems with the development of the Sycamore Creek II property: 1. Growth Management Ordinance - No applications can be filed within this Management Zone (Zone 15) until a Local Facilities Management Plan based on the existing General Plan has been approved. Staff is proposing a concurrent processing ordinance ;that may allow the processing of a General Plan/Master Plan concurrent with an amended Local Facility Management Plan. 2. Open Space Moratorium - The City has recently instituted a 6 month moratorium for any applications that would change Open Space boundaries as defined by the City's General Plan and Open Space map. During this 6 months, a committee will be formed and make recommendations on the existing open space provisions. This may effect Sycamore Creek II if substantial open space boundary changes are proposed. Open Space boundaries can be changed if there is not a decrease in the total amount of open space and if no environmentally constrained areas are eliminated. As proposed, the Sycamore Creek II project will actually provide more open space without any decrease in environmentally constrained areas, therefore, we should not have a problem. You indicated, however, that the committee may recommend changes to the existing Open Space regulations of the city. Although unlikely, we should be aware of this possibility. Hopefully, this letter summarizes the City's position on the Sycamore Creek II project. If you find any errors or omissions, please call me as soon as possible and I will make any necessary corrections. Sincerely, Bill Hofman bricin F moonep planning, design & environmental studies 1 August 4, 1988 Mr. Bill Hofman Hofman Planning Associates 6994 El Camino Real, Suite 208 Carlsbad, California 92009 Dear Mr. Hofman: This letter clarifies the purpose of the 125 foot wide riparian buffer for the Rancho Del Cerro property. The information in this report is based on the original biological inventory and report (Wier Biological, 1984) and supplement (Sward, 1985), and a July 25,1988 field visit conducted by William L Sward. Riparian woodlands are considered a sensitive habitat in San Diego County because they are very limited in distribution, they support a relatively large number of wildlife species, and they often support sensitive species. A buffer, as explained below, is usually necessary to preserve the wildlife values of a woodland. In addition, in areas where sensitive species occur in the habitat adjacent to woodlands, the buffer may also include these species for their preservation. In general, woodland buffers are comprised of biological and planning components. The biological component of a woodland buffer precludes direct impacts to species that use more than the woodland as habitat. For example, certain bird species may nest in woodlands, but forage in adjacent brushlands. The planning component of a woodland buffer, as explained here, does not include significant biological resources and is intended to prevent indirect impacts which result from placing urban development adjacent to natural areas. These impacts would otherwise create disruptions to wildlife due to noise, activity, pets, etc. The width of a woodland buffer is primarily a function of the width of the woodland, the sensitivity of the woodland species, and the nature and intensity of the proposed development In general, the greater any one of these factors are the larger the buffer should be. 9903-B businesspark avenue san diego, ca 92131 (619)578-8964 Mr. Bill HofmanHofrnan Planning Associates August 4,1988 Page 2 At Rancho Del Cerro, the biological component of the buffer is estimated to be approximately 50 feet in width over most of the site. This biological buffer should be slightly wider in areas where sensitive species occur adjacent to the woodland.This applies to one area, in particular, in the center of the project where ««. ••* _V _ __l _!_•_•_ / A J _ I l_! _ I. !•* • » 1 - —I _ _l *«_•__• •!_California adolphia (Adolphia californica) and mesa clubmoss (Selaainellacinerascens) occur on the north side of the woodland (Figure 11, Rancho Del Cerro The biological portion of the buffer in this area should be about 100 feet wide and extend for 300 feet The planning component of the buffer would make up the remainder of the 125 foot wide buffer, mis would be approximately 75 feet in width over most of the site. This relatively large planning buffer is due to the highintensity of the 1985 development proposal. Please contact us if you have any questions or comments regarding this letter. Respectfully A William L Sward Senior Biologist WLS:cp HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES Planning • Project Management • Environmental July 6, 1988 City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: Request for Environmental Information in Zone 15. To Whom it May Concern: In response to submittal of the Zone 15 Local Facilities Management Plan, the City has requested that we provide a copy of two environmental impact reports on the property. The reports are for the Tootsie K Ranch Pre Zone Annexation (EIR 352) and for Del Mar Financial. This letter is a formal request to check out these documents from the City Planning Department. A representative from our office will pick up the documents, have them copied, and return them to the Planning Department. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Lisa Thomas 6994 El Cammo Real, Suite 208 • Carlsbad • CA 92009 • [619] 438-1465 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE • JW.jH TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 WWT/«#Jr (619)438-1161 of PLANNING DEPARTMENT July 1, 1988 William Hofman Hofman Planning Associates 6994 El Camino Real, Suite 208 Carlsbad, CA 92009 Dear Mr. Hofman: This letter is to serve as a synopsis of our meeting yesterday regarding the Zone 15 Local Facilities Management Plan. Attending, besides City staff, were yourself, Lisa Thomas, and Peter Martz. Items discussed focused on clarification of previous correspondence. Those issues included: 1. Definition of the Zone 5/Zone 15 boundary. 2. Definition of "buffer" as environmental constraint. This has been referred to the biologist responsible for the environmental impact report by your staff. 3. Clarification of the Sunnycreek Specific Plan with the explanation that the General Plan controls the maximum dwelling unit number by General Plan area (i.e., RLM = 3.2, RL = 1) with the understanding that the specific plan controls the maximum dwelling unit number overall. 4. The circulation format for text and maps is similar to Zones 11 and 12. If there is anything I may have missed or you need further clarification, do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, BRIAN HUNTER Associate Planner BH:af c: Phil Carter, Assistant to the City Manager Steven Jantz, Associate Civil Engineer Zone 15 Property Owners 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 TELEPHONE (619)438-1161 OUtB 0f (Earlabafc PLANNING DEPARTMENT June 22, 1988 Bill Hofman Hofman Planning Associates 6994 El Camino Real, Suite 208 Carlsbad, California 92009 RE: LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 15 Dear Mr. Hofman: Enclosed are staff's comments regarding the Zone 15 Local Facilities Management Plan, submitted May 23, 1988. It is important to understand that these are initial comments and are not intended to be a complete technical review of the plan. The following comments will be useful in preparing a plan for the City to accept. Listed below are items which were not included in the plan as submitted and which made it unacceptable for technical review. 1. The plan is required to cover the entire zone. Properties with Assessor Parcel Numbers 209-060-56, 209-060-57, 209-040-23, and 209-040-24 have been omitted. 2. A complete Environmental Impact Assessment Form, Part I is required to assess the necessity for an Environmental Impact Report. This was not submitted for review. 3. Buildout is determined by gross acreage minus constrained acreage. As we discussed .on June 10, 1988, without all environmental documents having been reviewed and their findings incorporated into your analysis, no accurate determination of buildout is possible. Please review and provide to the City the existing Environmental Impact Reports for Del Mar Financial and the Tootsie K Ranch Pre Zone Annexation. Significant environmental features as determined by the Environmental Review process are full constraints (i.e., Rancho Del Cerro EIR indicates retention of 9.65 acres of scrub/grassland ecotone and minimum 125 foot buffer of coastal Page 2 sage and scrub adjacent to riparian woodland) and must be shown on your constraints map. Until agreement is reached on buildout projections, review of the specific facilities analysis is non-productive. All charts, numbers, etc. will change throughout the plan, and no attempt has been made to list every correction necessary. These corrections must be made before the plan is re-submitted. 4. Zoning Map, Exhibit 9; The Open Space adjacent to Del Mar Financial is omitted. No OS on legend. City zoning map shows Ebright property as R-A-10. 4. Overall density for Sunnycreek Specific Plan is two dwelling units per net acre. Please adjust your buildout projections. 5. Circulation - We require map of existing and proposed streets, 200' scale vertical/horizontal cross sections, and table of buildout capacity volumes/service levels. The remainder of the plan appears acceptable as far as format and technical assumptions. However, these may be modified when the technical review is undertaken. To expedite and enhance your ability to prepare a plan suitable for acceptance it is suggested that you contact me at your earliest convenience to set up a meeting to clarify the zone boundary and environmental concerns. Sincerely, BRIAN HUNTER Associate Planner cc: Phil Carter, Assistant to the City Manager Steven Jantz, Associate Civil Engineer Zone 15 Property Owners BH:dm TheBuieCorporation 16536 BERNARDO CENTER DRIVE SUITE 200 SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA 92128 (619) 487 3050/578 1541 June 9, 1988 Mr. Philip O. Carter Growth Management Manager CITY OF CARLSBAD Planning Dept. 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009-4859 RE: ZONE 15 MEETING Dear Phil: I would like to compliment you on the professional manner in which you led the Zone 15 property owners meeting last Thursday. The zone plan preparation and acceptance is vital to the City's growth management plan. We are encouraged by your strong leadership in this area. Sincerely, WALLACE J. McCLOSKEY Project Manager WJM:cf cc: Douglas E. Buie William Hofman 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 <£itg of PLANNING DEPARTMENT June 6, 1988 TELEPHONE (619)438-1161 TO: Zone 15 Property Owners The purpose of this letter is to follow up from our meeting held on June 2, 1988 dealing with the preparation of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15. The following people were present at the meeting: Staff: Attendees: Marty Orenyak, Michael Holzmiller, Phil Carter, Brian Hunter Ronald Schwab, Bill Hofman, Chase Coman, Dorothy Ebright, Hap L'Heureux, Bebe & Rusty Grosse, Jim Gaiser, Douglas Buie, Doug Avis, Wally McCloskey, Banning Cantarini, Mike O'Hara, Ted Gribble During this meeting it was confirmed that the three property owners who were originally given permission to prepare the Local Facilities Management Plan by the City Council were still in agreement in pursuing the preparation of this plan. These property owners include Bieri/Avis, Mandana Cal Company, and the Buie Corporation (previously Alex Land Corporation). There was some discussion concerning whether or not an alternative land use plan could be presented with the Local Facilities Management Plan being submitted for review by the City. Staff indicated that the Local Facilities Management Plan must address the current General Plan and that the ordinance did not allow the property owners to submit an alternative within the plan. Staff's recommendation to the property owners was to continue to prepare the plan under the existing General Plan and immediately following the adoption of this plan by the City Council to submit an application for a General Plan Amendment and Master Plan if that was their desire. The preparation of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15 with the existing General Plan will in no way prejudice staff's views concerning the potential General Plan Amendment to Zone 15 Property Owners June 6, 1988 Page Two be proposed following the adoption of this plan. Again, the Local Facilities Management Plan's purpose is to show how the zone will develop and how public facilities will be provided in conformance with the City's eleven public facility performance standards . There was also a concern raised during this meeting that there is a potential residential dwelling unit problem within the northeast quadrant. At the present time staff has not been able to confirm that there is a problem with the dwelling unit counts within this quadrant. Currently the City is in the process of reviewing the constraints maps presented for Local Facilities Management Zones 14 and 15. Once these constraints maps have been reviewed and confirmed to be accurate, if there is a problem with the residential dwelling unit count within this quadrant, staff will be scheduling another meeting with the property owners from Zone 15 and the remainder of the quadrant to discuss potential ways to alleviate the problem. Two potential solutions we discussed were: 1) going back to a vote to move units from one quadrant to another or increasing the northeast quadrant cap; and 2) reducing the growth control point in the quadrant. It is important to point out that the adoption of the Local Facilities Management Plan along with the confirmation of the maximum number of residential units which may be built in that zone in no way guarantee that those units will ever be built. The plan does not specifically provide property owners with development approvals it only estimates the demands on public facilities and presents mechanisms to ensure that the standards are maintained at all times as growth occurs within that area of the City. Once the Local Facilities Management Plan is adopted individual development projects may be processed and in turn will have to comply with all City standards in order to determine how many residential dwelling units may be allowed. I hope this letter adequately summarizes the actions taken at our June 2nd meeting. If you have any questions or believe that additional information should be added to this summary, please contact me at 438*1161. Sincerely, - L*- "K- PHILIP O. CARTER Growth Management Manager POC:af MEMORANDUM JUNE 2, 1988 TO: RAY PATCHETT, CITY MANAGER VINCE BIONDO, CITY ATTORNEY VIA: MARTY ORENYAK, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DI FROM: PHILIP O. CARTERTGROWTH MANAGEMENT MANAi SUBJECT: LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE is A meeting was held today with the property owners listed below from Local Facility Management Zone 15: Staff: Phil Carter, Marty Orenyak, Michael Holzmiller, Brian Hunter Attendees: Ronald Schwab, Bill Hofman, Chase Coman, Dorothy Ebright, Hap L'Hevreux, Bibi & Rusty Grosse, Jim Gaiser, Douglas Buie, Doug Avis, Wally McCloskey, Banning Cantaruii, Mike O'Hara, Ted Gribble The purpose of this meeting was to confirm that the property owners who were authorized to prepare the Local Facilities Management Plan by Council in July of 1987 were still in agreement to prepare the Plan. Following a lengthy discussion, it was discovered that a concern had arisen dealing with the ability of a group of owners within a portion of the zone to propose a General Plan Amendment along with the Local Facilities Management Plan. In essence to propose an alternative land use plan. The property owners were told concurrent processing was not allowed under the Growth Management Ordinance. They were also informed that staff has spent a great deal of time to determine if there was a way this could be possible and again they were told that the Growth Management Ordinance did not allow for concurrent processing. They were advised to prepare a Local Facilities Management Plan with the existing General Plan Land Use categories and following the approval of the plan by the City Council to submit an application for a General Plan Amendment along with their Master Plan proposal. The property owners were told that the Zone 15 Plan was submitted last week to the City and that it would be approximately 2-1/2 weeks before they would know if it met the guidelines and would be accepted for technical review. The meeting concluded with all property owners agreeing to prepare the plan with the existing General Plan Land Use categories and to seek options open to them which could allow for an alternative to be included in the plan. If you have any questions concerning this meeting, please call me at extension 4212. , HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES Planning • Project Management • Environmental May 23, 1988 Phil Carter, Growth Management Manager City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: Transmittal of Local Facilities Management Plan for Management Zone 15. Dear Phil: Per your letter of May 19, 1988, we are submitting 6 copies of the Zone 15 Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) . We are pleased to present this LFMP as the official submittal. Please let me know if there is anything I can do for you or provide to you to facilitate your review. Sincerely, Bill Hofman cc: Ray Patchett Mike Holzmiller Brian Hunter Lloyd Hubbs Steve Jantz Buie Corporation Doug Avis Russell Grosse Mike O'Hara 6994 El Cammo Real, Suite 208 Carlsbad CA 92009 [619] 438-1465 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE m&WJM TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 ^SSUPJi (619)438-1161 ^Ctttr of PLANNING DEPARTMENT May 19, 1988 Mr. Bill Hofman Hofman Planning Associates 6994 El Camino Real, Suite 208 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Mr. Hofman: The purpose of this letter is to confirm our meeting held today concerning the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15. Based upon the new information presented by you it is staff's evaluation that the plan may be accepted for its 30 day review. However, staff does have some concern dealing with the authorization for the preparation of this plan. The City Council authorized the following property owners to prepare the plan: 1. Alex Land Corporation 2. Bieri/Avis , 3. Mandana Cal Company The Alex Land Corporation has since sold its land holdings in Zone 15 to the Buie Corporation who in turn has maintained and provided specific authorization to continue in the preparation of the Local Facilities Management Plan. There has been no change concerning the Bieri/Avis authorization to prepare this plan. As to the Mandana Cal Company, staff is unable to ascertain the desire on their part to continue to proceed with the processing of this zone plan. This item will need to be clarified before the zone plan can be officially accepted. I would like to arrange a meeting as soon as practical with yourself and the property owners representing the Bouie Corporation, Bieri/Avis and Mandana Cal Company to do two things: (1) to reassure that the three property owners wish to continue to process the Local Facilities Management Plan; and (2) to have these property owners specifically identified you as their Bill Hofman May 19, 1988 Page Two _ consultant and lead representative in the preparation of this plan. Please contact me as soon as you can so that we may arrange a time for all of us to meet. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me. Sincerely, PHILIP O.CARTER Growth Management Manager POC:af c: Brian Hunter Steve Jantz o 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE MJWj M TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 9200^4859 ICT-^ (619) 438°161 ^"" ortttf of May 18, 1988 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Bill Hofman Hofman Planning Associates 6994 El Camino Real, Suite 208 Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE 15 Dear Bill: The purpose of this letter is to explain why staff was unable to accept the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15 today. As you are aware, the City Council previously was petitioned and authorized the preparation of the plan by Bieri/Avis, the Mandan Cal Corporation in the Alex Land Corporation which has since been bought out by the Bowie Corporation. As we previously discussed I indicated that in order for those property owners to shift their authorization from Jack Henthorn of DCC to yourself that authorization letters would need to be sent to the City. To date, I have received authorization letters from both the Bowie Corporation and Bieri/Avis, however, have not received authorization from the Mandan Cal Corporation stating their authorization of Hofman Planning Associates to prepare the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15. Again, as we discussed today I believe that we can resolve this issue within the next few days although the zone plan cannot be accepted until all three property owners have provided authorization for you to do the zone plan. If you have any questions regarding this letter or the procedure to be followed in order to obtain authorization to do the plan, please contact me. Sincerely, PHILIP O. CARTER Growth Management Manager POC:af c: Brian Hunter Steve Jantz 5200 EL C AMI NO REAL May 12, 1988 CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA 92008-3899 teoe&5 (619)438-0333 Elena Michel Alcoholic Beverage Control 1350 Front St. Rm. 5056 San Diego, Ca. 92101 Re: Stuart E. Dawes application for Rancho Carlsbad Golf Coarse Dear Mrs. Michel: This is to request an extension of time,for ninety (90) days to finalize the building improvements and put into use the new license. Our original plan was to construct a mobile (manufactured) unit to replace the existing building. And a contract was entered November 10, 1987 with Grove Homes to have the unit built by Golden West Homes. 'However, Golden West does not build commercial type structures. We then inquired with Scotsman Builders for them to build according to our requirements. However, their overall cost per square foot was prohibitive, as we could site build a unit for as much or less than Scotsman wanted to charge. In inquiring further with the City of Carlsbad we were informed of the Cities zone planning involving our property. According to the city they were not accepting special use permit applications for new construction at the present time. However, we were informed by the City that we could apply for building permit to remodel the existing building. Ihis resulted in our hiring Mark Hoffmann to proceed with building plans to submit to the city for a permit and to arrange a building contractor. I will forward you a copy of contractors agreement as soon as it is finalized and a copy of the building permit as soon as it is issued. Enclosed are the following: 1.) Copy of floor plan for remodel of existing building be Mark Hofmann. 2.) Copy of letter, dated April 13,1988 to Lance Shulte at the City of Carlsbad. 3.) Copy of letter, dated May 4, 1988. from Mark Hofmann Design Group. Progress is being made and we should be able to complete all necessary work within the ninety day extension period. pg 1 of 2 We appreciate all your assistance and patience in owe project and request your acknowledgenent and approval of the extension period. Please call me if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, Stuart E. Dawes SED/ejr cc: Mark ffofmann Lance -Shulte ends pg 2 of 2 > Garfebed 5200 EL CAM I NO REAL • CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA 92008-3899 • (619) 438 0333 April 13, 1988 Lance Shulte Planning Dept. City o£ Carlsbad 2075 La Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 Re: Rancho Carlsbad Golf Course Dear Mr. Shulte: Pursuant to our conversations regarding the existing Snack and Pro Shop Building, attached is a diagram of proposed changes. This will enable us to expand our service to the golf public, including mixed drinks vand food service. I am agreeable to paying the appropriate fees in ance with the improvements. The improvements are the enclosure of 20' x 22' patio room and covered patio dining, 16' x 16', as shown. Also, I would be install- ing a B-BQ grill, refrigerated unit and sink in the food service area. I appreciate your assistance in obtaining these approvals. / Please let me know if you have any questions. "'*' nj^\ Thank you. Sincerely, Ted Dawes TD/jh encl.at-' THE HOFMANN DESIGN GROUP ™ Architecture • Planning • Interiors 729 Summersong Lane • Enamtas, California 92024 • (619) 944-2833 May 4, 1988 Mr. Ted Dawes Rancho Carlsbad, 5200 El Camino Real Carlsbad, CA 92008 Regarding: Expansion of Pro Shop Dear Mr. Dawes: This letter is in response to our phone conversation regarding the design and construction drawings for the Pro Shop expansion, Enclosed please find a copy of the floor plan you requested. The construction drawings are being finalized for permits with the City of Carlsbad and we expect construction to begin on/or before May 20th, with June 25th being the estimated date of completion. The original cost estimates are accurate and we do not anticipate any surprises. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to call, Thank you, -ft Mark A. Hofmann MAH:yr Enclosures STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL DIAGRAM OF LICENSED PREMISE! APPLIC ANTISI PREMISES ADDRESS (Street)(City)TYPE OF LICENSE t ,LICENSEs*lff The Diagram below is a true and correct description of the entrances, exits, interior walls and exterior boundaries of the premises to be licensed, including dimensions. DIAGRAM: ~~ ~~~~ It is hereby declared that the above-described bomdaries, entrances and planned operation (as indicated on the rever side), will not be changed without first notifying and securing prior written, approval of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Oonjrol. I declare under_penalty of perjury that the foregoing iSlnue and.correct, Date Place SIGNATURE SIGNATURE Spec/a/ Instructions for Applicants for Public Premises Type Licenses Your signature above acknowledges that you are aware that in premises operated as a Public Premises no persons under years of age are to be allowed. A sign at least 7" x 11" stating "No Person Under 21 Allowed" must be posted near each entran and at o prominent place in the interior of the premises. DEPARTMENT use only. ABC-257-A (12-84) Inspected on .Certified correct:—. > Garfsbed 5200 EL CAMINO REAL • CARLSBAD CALIFORNIA 92008-3899 • (619) 438-0333 April 13, 1988 Lance Shulte Planning Dept. City of Carlsbad 2075 La Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 Re: Rancho Carlsbad Golf Course Dear Mr. Shulte: Pursuant to our conversations regarding the existing Snack and Pro Shop Building, attached is a diagram of proposed changes. This will enable us to expand our service to the golf public, including mixed drinks and food service. I am agreeable to paying the appropriate fees in ance with the improvements. The improvements are the enclosure of 20* x 22' patio room and covered patio dining, 16' x 16', as shown. Also, I would be install- ing a B-BQ grill, refrigerated unit and sink in the food service area. I appreciate your assistance in obtaining these approvals. / Please let me know if you have any questions. **N? Thank you. Sincerely, <?^< *S - r Ted Dawes TD/jh encl. J of-' I ATE OF CALIFORNIA CP*R*TMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BE GE CONTROL DIGRAM OF LICENSED PREMIS . I'UICANTtSI "Stiiart F_ ftawps:. FMists ADOHE.SS tsitrut) _ fTiiK) ^200 FT Haim'Tlp Rpal si Cflrlsharj Talif. Q7008 ' 1- TYPE On , " '^.. ^ OF LICEN&E , The diagram below is a true and correct description of the entrances and boundaries of the premises to be licensed, or 01 ly area where alcoholic beverages will be sold, served, consumed, possessed or stored. (Show general, overall dimens it-el.) 'Jf only a portion of the floor plan is to be licensed, please outline in red the area where alcoholic beverages wi 'd, served, consumed, possessed 01 stored.) It is hereby declared that the above-described boundaries and entrances will not be changed without first notifying at unrig prior approval of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing i (id correct. 'aiel January 12, 1984 SIGNATURE Carlsbad, Ca. SIGNATURE Special Instructions far Applicants for Public Premises Type Licenses " ~ "'- ' ' Your signature above acknowledges that you are aware that in premises operated as a Public Premises no persons un > ois of age are to be allowed. A sign at least 7" x 11" stating "No Person Under 21 Allowed" must be posted near each en (id ot a prominent place in the interior of the premises. - « ' use on/y. Intpocted on;.. Coniiiad corrocl:_. TheBuieCorporation 16536 BERNARDO CENTER DRIVE SUITE 200 SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA 92128 (619) 487 3050/578 1541 April 13, 1988 Phil Carter Growth-Management Manager - - - — — CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Phil: Alex Land Corporation, the previous owner of the Carlsbad Highlands property, was given the authority along with several other land owners by the City to prepare the local Facility Management Plan for Zone 15. As Alex Land Corporation's successor in interest in Carlsbad Highlands, The Buie Corporation authorizes Hofman Planning Associates to prepare the Zone 15 Plan. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, WALLACE J. McCLOSKEY Project Manager WJMrcf cc: Bill Hofman, Hofman Planning Associates Benchmark Pacific April 13, 1988 Mr. Phil Carter Planning Department CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad,' California 92008 Dear Phil, Please accept this letter as my authorization of The William N. Hofman Company of Carlsbad to represent us in the processing of the Public Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15. As you know, we are processing and have control of 246JI acres within Zone 15, commonly known as Rancho del Cerro. Please contact me with any questions you may have. Sine M. Avis DMA/jsp 11300 Sorrento Valley Road • Suite 101 • San Diego, CA 92121 • (619) 457-0777 HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES Planning • Project Management • Environmental April 13, 1988 Phil Carter City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: Zone 15 - Authorization to Prepare the Local Facility Management Plan. Dear Phil: This letter follows up our discussions regarding the authorization to prepare the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15. As you know, the City Council has previously been petitioned and has authorized the preparation of the plan by Bieri/Avis, the Mandana Cal Company and the Alex Land Corporation (since bought out by the Buie Corporation). Attached for your review is the Agenda Bill for this action. The consultant selected by the landowners at that time was Jack Henthorn of DCC. Since that time, the same landowners who were given this authorization have elected to change consultants and have chosen Hofman Planning Associates to be the lead consultant in the preparation of the plan. Mr. Henthorn has acknowledged this change and has not objected to it (see attached letter from Hofman Planning Associates with signature of Mr. Henthorn). So at this time, there is agreement from all parties regarding the selection of Hofman Planning Associates to prepare this plan. Forthcoming to your office are letters from the Buie Corporation, Bieri/Avis and the Mandana Cal Corporation stating their choice of Hofman Planning Associates to prepare the Zone 15 plan. This letter and subsequent information is passed on for your information regarding the Zone 15 plan. Please call me if you need any additional information. Sincerely, Bill Hofman Attachments 6994 El Camino Real, Suite 208 • Carlsbad • CA 92009 • [619] 438-1465 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859 (619)438-1161 Citp of Carlsbab April 12, 1988 William Hofman Hofman Planning Associates 6994 El Camino Real, Suite 208 Carlsbad, CA 92009 Dear Mr. Hofman: Your firm has requested a meeting with city staff regarding the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15. The meeting will be scheduled when we are provided with the property owners' authorization designating your firm as the empowered consultant for the preparation of the plan. Sincerel PHILIP O. CARTER Growth Management Manager POC:BH/af c: Ray Patchett Marty Orenyak Brian Hunter Steve Jantz March 28, 1983 To: Bill Hofman From: Jack Henthorn DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS CONSORTIUM Subject: Preparation of Zone 15 Facilities Management Plan Three property owners from within Zone 15 were paying the costs < preparation of the Zone 15 Plan. In the fall of last year they elected to terminate their agreement with my firm. Upon payment their outstanding account balance, the Zone 15 files were turned to Buie1 Corporation as designated representative for the group. of over It is my understanding that your firm has been retained by the same three property owner interests to proceed with preparation of the Zone 15 Plan. 2892 JEFFERSON • P O BOX 2143 • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 • (619) 434-3135 HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES Planning •« Proje^n Management a Environmental March 16, 1988 Jack Henthorn D.C.C. P.O. Box 2143 Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: Confirmation that Hofman Planning Associates Prepare the Local Facilities Management PLan for Zone 15. will Dear Jack: This letter is to confirm the understanding between you, Wallace McClosky of the Buie Corporation, and Hofman Planning associates that Hofman Planning Associates will prepare the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15. This confirmation infers that -you have transferred all files regarding this project and that no other status of the project has changed. The City of Carlsbad has requested this confirmation in order to verify the preparers of the plan. Please sign on the space provided below demonstrating your concurrence with the understandings stated herein. If you have any questions, please give me or Bill Hofman a call. Sincerely , Lisa Thomas I, the undersigned, as representative for Development Consultants tructiuii, concur with all of the understandings rack Henthorn, Development and-Construction V\ltlTE IT - DON'T SAY jft n Reply Wanted DNo Reply Necessary OS 4t> AIGNERFORMNO 55-032 PRINTED IN USA TheBuieCorporatiori 16536 BERNARDO CENTER DRIVE SUITE 200 SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA 92128 (619) 487 3050/578 1541 March 2, 1988 City of Carlsbad Planning Commission 1200 Elm Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: ZONE 15 Gentlemen: In representing the Zone 15 owners, this letter is to inform you that we have asked Hofman Planning Associates to take over the preparation of the zone plan from Jack Henthorn, and as such have given Hofman Planning Associates full authority to prepare the local plan. Sincerely, ZONE 15 OWNERS By: Wallace J. McCloskey Director of Land Acquisition WJM:cf HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES Planning • Project Management • Environmental February 17, 1988 Phil Carter f City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: ZONE 15 - Submittal of Constraints Analysis and Build Out Projections. Dear Phil: Enclosed please find a copy of the constraints analysis and build out projections for Local Facilities Management Zone 15. Also enclosed is a copy of the constraints map upon which the build out numbers are based. Please review the constraints map and the build out numbers as soon as possible. We would like City confirmation of these numbers to continue with our analysis of this zone. If you have any questions please give me or Bill Hofman a call. Sincerely, Lisa Thomas 6994 El Camino Real, Suite 208 • Carlsbad • CA 99009 • [619] 438-1465 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM CITY OF CARLSBAD ZONE 15 ACREAGE SUMMARY Prepared Sept. 1986 by: Research/Analysis Group(619) 438-5618 GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION GROSS 100% 25%-40% / CONSTRAINED SLOPE COMMERCIAL: CBD Central Bus. District C Community N Neighborhood RC Recreation TS Travel Services O Professional & Related RRE Extensive Reg'l Retail RRI Intensive Reg'l Retail RS Regional Service INDUSTRIAL: , PI Planned Industrial 1,204.8 30.7 29.9 151.9 4.2 11.9 60.6 4.0 16.0 1.3 106.1 NET RESIDENTIAL: : - RL RLM RM RMH RH Low Density (0-1.5) Low-Med Density (0-4) Medium Density (4-8) Med-Hi Density (8-15) High Density (15-23) 254.2 859.1 91.5 - — 27.0 120.1 4.8, - 24.5 81.6 0.0 -- , 215.0 , 698.2 : 86.7 *. \\ — /(•' - 999.9 ' !*i , 26.5 I 18.1 44.6 2.7 OTHER: E J H HC P G U NRR OS RR FW MAJ MIN COL TOTAL Elementary School Junior High School High School Continuation School Private School Governmental Facility Public Utilities Non-Resid'l Reserve Open Space Railroad Freeway Major Arterial Minor Arterial Collector Street 19.9 0.8 l 160.8 27.9 51.7 260.3 =====:==:=: 1,529.7 71.8 - \ 27.9 51.7 152 . 2 321.4 89.0 0.0 0.0 108.1 1,155.3 ASSUMPTIONS *1) 100% constrained acres include Riparian areas, transmission lineeasements, slopes greater than 40%, and major roadways. 2) Residential: Net acres - assumes City Council adopts Hillside Ord.(Net = Gross - 100% Constrained - 1/2 of 25-40% Slope). 3) Non-Residential: Net acres = Gross acres - 100% Constrained. EXHIBIT — ZONE 15 - LFMP RESIDENTIAL BUILD OUT PROJECTIONS (AS OF 1/1/88) GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION RL-1 RL-2 RL TOTAL RLM-1 RLM-2 RLM-2A RLM-3 RLM-3A RLM-4 RLM-4A RLM-5 RLM-6 RLM-7 RLM-8 RLM-8A RLM-9 RLM-9A RLM-10 RLM-11 RLM-1 2 RLM TOTAL RM-1 RM TOTAL TOTAL RES RH/C/0-1 OS-1 OS-2 NET ACRES 63.53 160.20 223.73 231.27 134.14 50.30 42.07 8.00 5.65 107.02 0.73 3.52 2.21 0.00 0.00 1.10 14.23 3.90 23.02 30.15 657.31 88.41 88.41 969.45 25.60 11.40 61.60 GMCP (1) 1.00 1.00 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 6.00 BASE RESIDENTIAL BUILD OUT PROJECTIONS 64 160 224 740 429 161 135 26 18 342 2 11 7 0 0 4 46 12 74 96 2,103 530 530 2,858 TOTAL DWELLING UNITS 2,858 EXIST. DU'S (2) 1 1 1 1 2 1 7 12 502 502 515 1 2 1 519 APP. DU'S 740 740 0 740 740 1 FUTURE DU'S 63 160 223 0 429 161 135 26 18 341 2 11 6 (2) 0 4 46 11 74 89 1,351 28 28 1,603 1,599 NOTES: (1) GROWTH MANAGEMENT CONTROL POINT EXHIBIT -- ZONE 15 - LFHP BUILD OUT PROJECTIONS - CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS (AS OF 1\1\88) GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION RL-1 RL-2 RL TOTAL RLN-1 RLM-2 RLH-2A RLH-3 RLN-3A RLH-4 RLM-4A RLH-5 RLM-6 RLM-7 RLM-8 RLM-8A RLM-9 RLM-9A RLM-10 RLH-11 RLM-12 RLM TOTAL RM-1 RH TOTAL GROSS ACRES 73.1 190.5 263.6 263.1 195.2 51.4 58.5 9.0 8.5 133.1 14.7 4.3 3.6 10.0 3.0 3.2 19.1 5.0 39.7 41.9 863.3 88.4 88.4 TOTAL RES | 1,215. 3 RH/C/0-1 RH/C/0-2 36.3 7.6 RH/C/0 TOTAL] 43.9 C-1 OS-1 OS-2 OS -3 OS TOTAL EXIST MAJOR ARTERIAL (3) EXIST LOCAL ARTERIAL (3) TOTAL ZONE 18.8 25.0 158.0 58.8 241.7 2.4 2.6 :=====£==: 1,524.7 ACRES OF DEVELOPMENTAL CONSTRAINTS (1) FULL ABCD EFGHI TOTAL 4.2 4.2 9.1 1.1 7.3 17.5 13.3 1.1 7.3 21.7 5.3 7.8 1.5 4.7 8.1 16.3 0.1 0.1 5.5 0.6 8.8 0.1 1.5 0.5 6.2 0.2 13.4 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.0 9.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 1.7 1.5 0.4 0.3 2.6 11.3 4.1 5.0 19.0 32.8 26.6 45.4 0.1 14.6 29.2 0.1 14.9 0.1 2.0 6.2 13.6 0.2 1.1 10.0 3.0 2.0 3.2 0.7 13.9 9.1 123.9 19.0 46.1 27.7 52.7 0.1 3.8 2.9 0.8 2.5 3.8 5.4 0.8 1.2 5.7 0.9 12.2 46.9 9.5 16.8 0.2 48.0 21.7 16.8 2.4 2.6 r===========:=«=:=:========s================s==========. 29.0 99.5 27.7 80.9 16.9 145.6 7.5 2.5 10.0 6.9 13.1 73.2 0.2 86.5 2.4 2.6 254.0 PARTIAL J J/2 10.7 5.4 25.6 12.8 36.3 18.2 34.5 17.3 43.7 21.9 2.0 1.0 3.1 1.6 1.8 0.9 1.7 0.9 19.8 9.9 0.8 0.4 1.1 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 3.3 1.7 0.8 0.4 5.5 2.8 5.3 2.7 124.1 62.1 160.4 80.2 6.5 3.3 1.0 0.5 7.5 3.8 0.2 0.1 0.9 0.5 46.2 23.1 0.7 0.4 47.8 23.9 SSSS=5S=SSS!SS=== 215.9 108.0 SCHOOLS 1C NET DEVELOPABLE ACRES 63.5 160.2 223.7 10.0 10.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 231.3 134.1 50.3 42.1 8.0 5.7 107.0 0.7 3.5 2.2 0.0 0.0 1.1 14.2 3.9 23.0 30.2 657.3 88.4 88.4 969.5 25.6 4.6 30.2 11.8 11.4 61.6 58.2 131.3 0.0 0.0 1,142.7 NOTES: (1) CONSTRAINTS: A - MAJOR POUERLINE EASEMENT B - CIRCULATION C - RAILROAD ROW D - SLOPES > 40% E - RIPARION f • WETLANDS G - FLOODPLAIN H - PERMANENT BODY OF WATER I - OTHER ENVIR. FEATURE J - SLOPES 25% TO 40% K - SCHOOL SITE OVERLAY (2) FUTURE SCHOOL DEDICATION TO COME FROM UNCONSTRAINED LAND WITHIN UNDERLYING GP CATEGORY (SEE COLUMN K). 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859 PLANNING DEPARTMENT tPf&BJrM (619)438-1161 City of Cartefcab January 28, 1988 Lisa Thomas The William N. Hofman Company 6994 El Camino Real, Suite 208G Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Ms. Thomas: You are correct that it makes good planning sense to locate parcel 209-040-33 within Zone 15. A review of our 1" = 500' scale maps for Zone 5, as well as the accepted parcel number list for Zone 5, indicates parcel 209-040-33 is presently entirely within Zone 15. No boundary change is required. Sincerely, BRIAN HUNTER Associate Planner BH:af c: Phil Carter THE WILLIAM N, HOFMAN COMPANY Planning Project Management Environmental January 22, 1988 Phil Garter City of Carlsbad 2075" Las Palmas Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: Zone 15 - request for boundary definition. Dear Phil: In preparing^ the Zone 15 Local Facilities Management Plan, we are updating the constraints map and a boundary discrepancy has been found. Attached for your ^review is an exhibit showing the southern portion of Zone 15 where it abuts Zone 5. The shaded area -^indicates a portion of parcel 209-04-33 located in Zone 5 and the un-shaded portion lies within Zone 15. Because this parcel is owned by one owner, we believe it makes good planning sense to locate the entire property within one zone. Therefore we propose to locate the-entire parcel within Zone 15. Since this boundary change will affect the build out projections for the zone, your early response is appreciated. Sincerely, "Lisa Thomas cc: Manitou Engineering Company Zone 15 Property Owners 6994 El Cammo Real • Suite 208-G • Carlsbad • CA 92009 • (619) 438-1465 ^ . feu. , d TO I. V cjj» djmj,. _..j2'U*x€&L^__-'>u^ ^^^y^^i^e^yu^^-^u T>OiO fO CACC / — ~^2M^L^=^^J^ 'L^Us^ ^ ^^^^.e^L^M^^^^u^^ '*/2L&/&£&3& The following table lists the road segments which are impacted by traffic generated from Zone 11. The Level of Service results were derived using the daily capacity method. ZONE 11: ROAD SEGMENTS - LEVELS OF SERVICE - OFF PEAK (Exist- ing A. El Camino Real From Olivenhain Rd to La Costa Ave. A B. Olivenhain Rd. From El Canrino Real to Rancho Santa Fe B C. Rancho Santa Fe From Olivenhain Rd. to Mel rose Ave. (N) 0. La Costa Avenue From 1-5 to El Camino Real E. La Costa Ave. From El Camino Real to Rancho Santa Fe (2) B 0 (1) A I Bv 1990 | Bv 1995 I By 2000 |Btd' Proj'd|u/Improv.|Proj'd |w/Improv.|Proj'd |w/Improv. B 0 D 0 * A > B B 0 D D 0 A B B C 0 B C B C A C A C C B (1) Peak hour analysis completed - See following section for details. (2) See "Zone 11 Issues" for discussion. The analysis shown in the chart above indicates that one road segment, La Costa Avenue from El Camino Real to 1-5 is- currently operating below the acceptable Level of Service. As a result, a Peak Hour Volume Analysis was conducted by Barton Aschman and Associated and presented in the Citywide Traffic Study. This analysis, as discussed below, more accurately assessed peak hour operating levels for this intersection. La Costa Avenue East of 1-5 Using data contained in the Highway capacity Manual. the maximum capacity of a two lane arterial with similar geometries and conditions as La Costa Avenue is approximately 1,750 vehicles per hour per lane in each direction. Using this information and the peak- hour traffic counts on La Costa Avenue, the levels of service are estimated as follows: 118 (Existing Intersections El Camino Real a Catle Barcelona El Camino Real 3 La Costa Ave. El Camino Real 3 Levante St. El Camino Real a Olivenhain Rd. La Costa Ave. 3 1-5 Northbound La Costa Ave. a 1-5 Southbound Rancho Santa Fe Rd. a Calle Barcelona Rancho Santa Fe Rd. a Calle Lomas Verde Rancho Santa Fe Rd a La Costa Ave. Rancho Santa Fe Rd a Mel rose Ave. (N) Rancho Santa Fe. Rd. 8 Nelrose Ave (S) Rancho Santa Fe Rd. a Olivenhain Rd. AN PH Peak Peak (1) (D B C A A B C D D E D (1) (1) A A A A B A (1) (1) A A V/lmprov. AN PH Peak Peak B A B A - 1990 Projected AN PN Peak Peak A B D D A A F D C B C C B B B C D E E F (1) CD C D V/lnorov. AN PN Peak Peak D D C C A A 1995 Prelected AN PN Peak Peak A C F F A A F B D C C C B 0 C E F F A B A B F F U/lmorov. AN PN Peak Peak C D B D B C A D B D 2000 Projected AN PN Peak Peak A A B D A A B D D C C C C D D F A D B C A B B C U/Imorov. AN PN Peak Peak A D Buildout Projected AN PN Peak Peak A A D D F C D D B D B C A A A A B C D 0 B C D D U/fmproy. AN PH Peak Peak D C (1) Currently not constructed. ^2^^>_r ^^^ flTv CITY OF CARLSBAD 1200 ELM1WENUE CARLSBAD, CALIF 438-5621 NIA 92008 FROM ACCOUNT NO.DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ( ill '/ i J TV-^L f X >OOI OJhctsso RECEIPT NO.TOTAL TT >*fe*i V rfnwi CITY OF CARLSBAD 1200 ELNTXVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 438-5621 :o™ REC'D FROM:/L / J / ACCOUNT NO.DESCRIPTION AMOUNT <"( f fl_ 2465 0001 01 01- Art.fcRft C RECEIPT NO.TOTAL fe^i^Li-i r//?' f y ....'.^ii^vk^tJid