The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLFMP 16A; Carlsbad Oaks North; Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP)CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (C Q Administrative Permit - 2nd Dwelling Unit Q Administrative Variance [3 Coastal Development Permit . Q] Conditional Use" Permit Q Condominium Permit f~l . Environmental Impact Assessment Q General Plan Amendment Q Hillside Development Permit Q Local Coastal Plan Amendment Q Master Plan Q Non-Residential Planned Development Q Planned Development Permit :HECK BOXES) (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) r~t 4 - - -' - Q Planned Industrial Permit Q Planning Commission Determination O Precise Development Plan (~] Redevelopment Permit O Site Development Plan n Special Use Permit Q| Specific Plan Obtain from Engineering Department d Tentative Tract Map f~l Variance Q Zone Change 0 List other applications not specified 2ooe I6» U^WI9^) (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) LFlttP OluA 2) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: 3) PROJECT NAME: 4) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type)6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type) MAILING ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TBUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. 1 CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TOAWEBEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATURE DATE 7) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION . Loir - C Co. PKOPOSEDPROJECl^QOIRING^U^^ 1-611 Form 16 PAGE 1 OF 2 8) LOCATION OF PROJECT: ON THE BETWEEN STREET ADDRESS SIDE OF (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST)(NAME OF STREET) AND (NAME OF STREET)(NAME OF STREET) 9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 10) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS 13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION 16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE 19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 22) EXISTING ZONING 11) NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNITS 14} PROPOSED IND OFFICE/ SQUARE FOOTAGE 17) PROPOSED INCREASE IN ADT v. 20) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN 23) PROPOSED ZONING 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS ,' 1 5) PROPOSED COMM SQUARE FOOTAGE 18) PROPOSED SEWER USAGE IN EDU 21) PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION 24)IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMEBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR T#IS PURPOSE SIGNATURE FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION APPLICATION TYPE TOTAL FEE REQUIRED FEE REQUIRED RECEIVED FEB 1 5 2001 CITY OF CARLSBAD DATE RECEIVED BY: -bt DATE FEE PAID RECEIPT NO. Form 16 PAGE 2 OF 2 City of Carlsbad Planning Department DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit" Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. 1 . 2. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON- . APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person SEE EXHIBIT A _ Corp/Part l^^l^T Ct> AJ Title Title Address Address P*0- So* OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. . Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly- owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person, Title SEE EXHIBIT A Address Address f.O- feo* 2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 - FAX (76O) 438-O894 3.MOTRNIZAINON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the nonprofit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/Trust Non Profit/Trust Title Title Address Address Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff. Boards, Commissions. Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? Yes If yes, please indicate person(s):_ NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 12/14/00 By: Carlsbad Oaks North Partners, L.P. By: Sun Tech Investments Corp ^General Paul K. Tchang, President Partner Print or type name of owner /Sa 12/14/00 Signature of applicant/date Techbilt Construction Corp. Paul K. Tchang, President Print or type name of applicant /I////oo Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date . C. Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A To City of Carlsbad Disclosure Statement A) Persons with a 10% or greater ownership interest in applicant, Techbilt Construction Corp: Paul K. Tchang Rose S. Tchang Lorna Tchang Alcala Genevieve Tchang Theodore Tchang The contact address for the above individuals is P.O. Box 80036, San Diego, CA 92138. B) The property owners and persons or entities with a greater than 10% interest are as follows: 1) Escondido Serenas Development, Inc., a Nevada corporation as to an undivided 20% interest Wholly owned by Calfinco N.V., a Netherlands Antilles company The address for the above entity is 1120 Silverado St., La Jolla, CA 92037. 2) Carlsbad Oaks North Partners, L.P. a California limited partnership as to an undivided 80% interest Paul K. Tchang Rose S. Tchang Genevieve Tchang Theodore Tchang The contact address for the above individuals is P.O. Box 80036, San Diego, CA 92138. i City of Carlsbad Planning Department A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Item No. I P.C. AGENDA OF: August 21,2002 Application complete date: May 11, 1998 Project Planner: Anne Hysong Project Engineer: Clyde Wickham SUBJECT: EIR 98-08/GPA 97-05/ZC 97-05/SP 211/SP 200(BVLFMP 16(AVCT 97- 13/HDP 97-10/PIP 02-02/SUP 97-07 - CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN - Request for a recommendation of certification of a Program Environmental Impact Report, and recommendation of adoption of the Candidate Findings of Fact, Statement of Overriding Considerations, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; recommendation of approval for the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Carlsbad Oaks North Specific Plan, Carlsbad Airport Center Specific Plan Amendment and Zone 16 Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment; and approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Hillside Development Permit, Planned Industrial Permit, and Floodplain Special Use Permit for the development of an industrial park that will include 23 industrial lots, 3 open space lots, and one passive recreation lot located north of Palomar Airport Road between El Camino Real and the City's eastern boundary in the P-C Zone and Local Facilities Management Zone 16. Public Works projects that are associated with the Carlsbad Oaks North project include the extension of Faraday Avenue, the extension of El Fuerte Street, and Reaches A through D of the South Agua Hedionda Interceptor (SAHI). I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 5244 RECOMMENDING CERTIFICATION of EIR 98-08 and RECOMMENDING ADOPTION of the Candidate Findings of Fact, Statement of Overriding Considerations, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5245, 5246, 5247, 5275, and 5248 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of GPA 97.-05, ZC 97- 05, SP 211, SP 200(B) and LFMP 16(A), and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5249, 5250, 5251, and 5252 APPROVING CT 97-13, HDP 97-10, PIP 92-02, and SUP 97-07, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. INTRODUCTION The applicant is requesting a recommendation for certiiicution of the Carlsbad Oaks North Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR 98-08), a recommendation of approval of a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Local Facilities Management Plan, and Specific Plan, and approval of the necessary entitlements to allow the subdivision and grading of an industrial park including the extensions of Faraday Avenue, El Fuerte Street and Reaches A through D of the South Agua Hedionda Interceptor sewer generally located north of Palomar Airport Road between El Camino Real and the City's eastern boundary in the northeast quadrant. EIR 98-08/GPA 97-05/ZC 97-05/SP 211/SP 200(B)/LFMP 16(A)/Cv97-13/HDP 97-107 PIP 02-02/SUP 97-07 - CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN August 21,2002 Page 2 The Specific Plan area and future roadway extensions are proposed on land currently designated by the General Plan for Planned Industrial (PI) development and Open Space (OS). The proposed General Plan Amendment will adjust the PI and OS boundaries within the Specific Plan area to correspond with proposed industrial development and a Habitat Management Plan (HMP) hardline conservation area. The proposed zone change for the Specific Plan area from P- C to P-M and O-S will provide consistency with the proposed General Plan designations. The proposed Carlsbad Oaks North Specific Plan will regulate industrial and auxiliary commercial development within a 194.5 acre industrial park as well as provide for the preservation and management of 3 open space lots consisting of 219.5 acres. Subdivision of the site is proposed by a tentative tract map with 23 industrial lots, one passive recreation lot, three open space lots, and onsite and offsite public infrastructure including Faraday Avenue, El Fuerte Street, and the South Agua Hedionda Interceptor sewer. A detailed description of the proposed development and necessary discretionary actions is provided below in the Project Description section of this report. i EIR 98-08 is a joint public/private environmental document that analyzes the environmental impacts of a 414 acre private industrial development (Carlsbad Oaks North Business Park), two General Plan circulation arterial roadway extensions (Faraday Avenue and El Fuerte Street), and the SAHI sewer. The combined project area is approximately 650 acres of land. The Carlsbad Oaks North project requires the proposed infrastructure as part of its development. The construction of Faraday Avenue, El Fuerte Street and the SAHI sewer will avoid anticipated Growth Management circulation failures and sewer deficiencies. The project complies with CEQA and all applicable City policies and standards. All project issues have been resolved, and all necessary findings can be made for the requested approvals. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The Carlsbad Oaks North Specific Plan Program EIR analyzes the impacts of development over 650 acres that includes the development of a 194.5 acre industrial park and preservation of 219.5 acres of open space, the extensions of Faraday Avenue and El Fuerte Street, and a 3.4 mile long gravity flow trunk sewer to serve existing and planned industrial development within the South Agua Hedionda Basin. The Program EIR includes an analysis of potential environmental impacts associated with the following issue areas: Land Use and Planning Hazards and Hazardous Materials Transportation/Traffic Hydrology/Water Quality \ Air Quality <• Cultural Resources Noise Paleontological Resources Biological Resources Aesthetics Geology/Soils Public Services and Utilities . , Population/Housing The EIR concludes that the project will result in: (1) unavoidable significant traffic, air quality, and biological environmental impacts; EIR 98-08/GPA 97-05/zW?-05/SP 211/SP 200(B)/LFMP 16(A)/CT 97-13/HDP 97-107 PIP 02-02/SUP 97-07 - CARtSBADrO,A^& NORTH SPECIFIC, PLAN August 21,2002 " ,. ,- Paee3 (2) significant noise, biological, hazards, water quality, paleontological, and aesthetic impacts that can be mitigated or avoided; and (3) impacts considered in the EIR but found to be less than significant. (See Section V. Environmental Review, of this report for a more detailed discussion of the EIR analysis). The project necessitates the following discretionary actions: (1) General Plan Amendment (GPA 97-05) adjusts Planned Industrial (PI) and Open Space (OS) boundaries to be consistent with the City's negotiated Habitat Management Plan (HMP) hardline conservation area boundaries for a wildlife habitat corridor within the Specific Plan area. This change will reduce the acreage of PI designated land from 282 acres to 194.5 acres and increase the acreage designated as OS from 135 acres to 219.5 acres; (2) Zone Change (ZC 97-05) rezones the property from Planned Community (P-C) to the Planned Industrial (P-M) and Open Space (O-S) zoning classifications that are consistent with the proposed General Plan land use designations; (3) Zone 16 Local Facilities Management Amendment to incorporate updated facilities requirements and methods of financing for the Specific Plan area; (4) Specific Plan (SP 211) establishes zoning regulations for the proposed industrial park. To enable implementation of the Specific Plan, the proposed tentative tract map, hillside development permit, planned industrial permit, and floodplain special use permit are required to subdivide and grade the industrial park including the necessary road and sewer infrastructure; (5) Specific Plan Amendment (SP 200(B)) deletes the northern 414 acres identified by the SP 200 as Area B and now proposed as the Carlsbad Oaks North Specific Plan; (6) Tentative Tract Map (CT 97-13) subdivides the 414 acre Specific Plan area into 23 industrial lots, one passive recreation lot, and three open space lots in conformance with the Subdivision Ordinance (Title 20 of the CMC); (7) Hillside Development Permit (HDP 97-10) regulates hillside grading permitted in accordance with the Hillside Development Regulations Ordinance (Chapter 21.90 of the CMC); (8) Planned Industrial Permit (PIP 02-02) requires the industrial subdivision to be consistent with the Planned Industrial Zone (Chapter 21.34 of the CMC). A PIP will be required for the future development of each industrial lot; and (9) Floodplain Special Use Permit (SUP 97-07) requires development with any area of special flood hazard (Agua Hedionda Creek) to be in compliance with the Flood Plain Management Regulations (Chapter 21.110 of the CMC). 0EIR 98-08/GPA 97-05/ZC 97-05/SP 211/SP 200(B)/LFMP 16(A)/CV97-13/HDP 97-10/ PIP 02-02/SUP 97-07 - CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN August 21,2002 Page 4 In general, the combined 650 acre property is vacant and characterized by three different topographic areas: the north-facing hillside^slopes that extend down from the southern project area, the rocky hills that cover the central and northern portions of the project area, and the intervening east-west canyon drainage known as La Mirada Creek, a tributary to Agua Hedionda Creek. La Mirada Creek is a broad riparian drainage area with mature oak trees that traverses the southern half of the site in a roughly east-west direction and the Agua Hedionda Creek traverses the northwestern portion of the project area. Linear riparian woodlands consisting of oaks, willows and sycamore trees are the primary habitat type associated with these creeks. Many sensitive plant habitats including southern maritime chaparral/nuttall's scrub oak, southern coast live oak riparian forest, and coastal sage scrub are located throughout the project site. These vegetation communities provide nesting and foraging habitat for various sensitive and non- sensitive wildlife species. The project area is bounded by a single-family residential neighborhood and future commercial area in the City of Vista to the east; the Carlsbad Oaks East and West Business Centers to the south, vacant land owned by the County of San Diego and leased by the Coast Waste Trash Transfer Station, and the Carlsbad Safety Center to the west, and the Dawson Los Monos Canyon Reserve to the north. The 218 acre Dawson Los Monos Reserve is part of the University of California Natural Land and Water Resources system and is used by the University for scientific and educational purposes. The majority of the project area is located within the McClellan-Palomar Airport Influence Area and the southern portion of the property is located in the Flight Activity Zone. The proposed development is therefore subject to the McClellan-Palomar Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP). In 1986, the proposed 414 acre Carlsbad Oaks North Specific Plan area was approved as Area B in the Carlsbad Airport Business Center Specific Plan (SP 200). Area A of SP 200 included the Carlsbad Oaks East and West Business Parks located east of El Camino Real and directly north of Palomar Airport Road. SP 200 set forth development regulations for Area A to enable industrial development within the southern portion of the Specific Plan area along Palomar Airport Road and required that an amendment be processed in the future with development regulations for Area B. Area A is now fully developed and physically separated from Area B; therefore, a separate Specific Plan (SP 211) is proposed for the area formerly identified as Area B of SP 200. This necessitates a companion amendment to SP 200 to delete Area B from that Specific Plan. The proposed Carlsbad Oaks North Business Park Specific Plan will guide the development and operation of the Carlsbad Oaks North Business Park and ensure the preservation, maintenance and funding of open space in perpetuity. The Specific Plan provides zoning regulations for the development of a 194.5 acre industrial park consisting of 23 industrial lots, 1 passive employee recreation lot, and preservation and maintenance of 3 open space lots consisting of approximately 219.5 acres for a total of 414 acres. The proposed industrial lots, ranging in size from 2.6 acres to 20.8 acres, will accommodate a projected 1,921,000 square feet of planned industrial development in the Specific Plan area. Permitted industrial uses include manufacturing, warehouse, research and development, and offices; however, the Specific Plan restricts the use of hazardous materials on lots that are located within 1,000 feet of any EIR 98-08/GPA 97-05/zW7-05/SP 211/SP 200(B)/LFMP 16(A)/CT 97-13/HDP 97-10/ PEP 02-02/SUP 97-07 - CARLSBAD^Ap NQRJH SPECIFIC PLAN August21,2002 "" "' " "*"' PageS residential unit. Commercial land uses that directly support the industrial park are also permitted on specified lots with a conditional use permit and commercial uses are required on either Lot 1 or 2 at the intersection of El Fuerte Street and Faraday Avenue. The intent of this requirement is to provide commercial services such as eating establishments that would serve the existing and proposed industrial developments in this area. Lot 9, located near the proposed intersection of El Fuerte Street and Faraday Avenue, is reserved for passive employee recreation unless a sewer pump station is necessitated by selection of an alternative force main sewer in Faraday Avenue. This area is proposed to be developed with landscaping, 8 parking spaces, picnic tables, trellises and benches to enable employees to visually enjoy the natural open space located below El Fuerte Street to the east. Lot 9 will also act as a trailhead for the proposed Citywide Trail Segment 26 that will follow the alignment of an existing sewer easement road located south of La Mirada Creek from El Fuerte Street to the project's eastern boundary. The trail will connect to the east with the trail segment proposed along the western boundary of the recently approved Carlsbad Raceway and Palomar Forum Business Parks. Trail Segment 26 will continue north within the El Fuerte Street right-of-way and proceed west in the Faraday Avenue right-of-way to the Specific Plan boundary. A second small mini-park is proposed at the northeast comer of Faraday Avenue and El Fuerte Street that also provides a landscaped picnic area with tables, benches, and trellises. Public road access is not currently available to the Specific Plan area. Primary access to the site is proposed by Faraday Avenue, a General Plan circulation arterial roadway. This four lane secondary arterial roadway would be extended 1.3 miles from its existing terminus at Orion Way in the City of Carlsbad, across County of San Diego owned land and through the Specific Plan area, to its existing terminus in the City of Vista. An existing Settlement Agreement recorded on August 14,1997 between the County of San Diego and the City of Carlsbad requires San Diego County to make an irrevocable offer of dedication to the City of Carlsbad for the alignment of Faraday Avenue through County property. Faraday Avenue will cross the south fork of Agua Hedionda and La Mirada Creeks and will require approval of a Floodplain Special Use Permit. The proposed location of the roadway creek crossing will minimize road construction impacts to sensitive riparian habitat and also reduce the flow of the 100-year storm event by the construction of a 6' x 7' box culvert under the roadway. This design will create a detention basin during a 100-year flood event to attenuate downstream flooding of the Rancho Carlsbad Mobile Home Park and reduce stream bed erosion. Adjacent to the culvert, a large diameter (24 feet wide by 12 feet tall) arched pipe culvert is proposed to allow wildlife movement below the roadway and above the anticipated high water mark. El Fuerte Street is also proposed to provide access to the site. This four lane secondary circulation arterial roadway is proposed to be extended through the Specific Plan area 2,800 feet from north of Loker Avenue to future Faraday Avenue. The proposed South Agua Hedionda Sewer Interceptor will provide sewer service to the Carlsbad Oaks North project and the approved Carlsbad Raceway and Palomar Forum industrial projects to the east. SAHI Reaches A through D of the South Agua Hedionda Sewer Interceptor are proposed to be constructed from the southeast corner of the project area (at Melrose Drive) to the northwest connecting with the existing Agua Hedionda trunk sewer located in Sunny Creek Road. The alignment of the sewer is proposed to stay within an existing dirt road located south of La Mirada Creek until it reaches the proposed extension of El Fuerte Street. At that point, the sewer will turn north, staying within the rights of way of proposed El Fuerte Street and Faraday 0 OEIR 98-08/GPA 97-05/ZC 97-05/SP 211/SP 200(B)/LFMP 16(A)/6iy97-13/HDP 97-107 PIP 02-02/SUP 97-07 - CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN August 21,2002 Page 6 Avenue. The sewer would then exit the right of way of Faraday Avenue and continue in a northwesterly direction until it reaches Sunny Creek Road. This portion of the sewer will generally follow the contours adjacent to Agua Hedionda Creek at a minimal depth, maintaining a gravity system. A 20 foot wide easement will be required for the construction of a 12 foot wide all-weather maintenance road to be located over the sewer line for this segment of the sewer. The area proposed for development is established by the proposed HMP hardline conservation area boundary. The HMP conservation area surrounds the area proposed for development on three sides and limits the development to the northern half of the property. The proposed subdivision and grading design consists of terraced industrial lots that are consistent with the north-south descending landform of the project area to reduce grading amounts where feasible. Grading quantities for the project exceed the Hillside Ordinance "potentially acceptable" range and manufactured slopes exceed 40 feet in height at some locations due to grade alteration required for Faraday Avenue and El Fuerte Street as well as extensive cut and fill required to achieve large flat industrial building pads on the existing undulated/sloped terrain. Faraday Avenue will be intersected at two locations by a loop access road that will provide access to the majority of lots within the subdivision. Three cul-de-sac streets that intersect with the loop road will provide access to interior lots. The project is subject to the following land use plans, policies, and ordinances: A. Carlsbad General Plan 1. General Plan Amendment/Draft Habitat Management Plan 2. General Plan Consistency B. Specific Plan 211 C. Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 20 (Subdivision Ordinance) D. Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 21 (Zoning Ordinance) including: 1. . Zone Change/Planned Industrial Zone (Chapter 21.34) 2. Zone Change/Open Space Zone (Chapter 21.33) 3. Hillside Development Regulations (Chapter 21.95) 4. Floodplain Management Regulations (Chapter 21.110) E. McClellan-Palomar Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plan (CLUP) F. Draft Habitat Management Plan G. Growth Management Ordinance/Zone 16 Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment EIR 98-08/GPA 97-05/ZC^-05/SP 211/SP 200(B)/LFMP 16(A)/CT 97-13/HDP 97-107 PIP 02-02/SUP 97-07 - CARLSBAD gAKS.NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN August 21,2002 Page 7 IV. ANALYSIS The recommendation of approval for this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency with the applicable policies and regulations listed above. The following analysis section discusses compliance with each of these regulations/policies utilizing both text and tables. Al. General Plan Amendment The Specific Plan area is currently designated by the General Plan for Planned Industrial (PI) and Open Space (OS) land uses. A portion of the project site is proposed as a hardline conservation area (Core Area 5) in the City's Draft Habitat Management Plan (HMP). This hardline area is proposed to be entirely designated as OS, however, the existing boundaries of PI and OS designations do not coincide entirely with the boundaries of the negotiated hardline conservation area (see the attached "General Plan Open Space Revision" map). The proposed General Plan Amendment is, therefore, necessary to adjust the boundaries of PI and OS. Policy C.20 of the Open Space Planning and Protection Section of the General Plan Open Space and Conservation Element requires findings to adjust the boundaries of any open space shown on the "Official Open Space and Conservation Map" dated September, 1994. The necessary findings are: (1) The proposed open space is equal to or greater than the area depicted on the Official Open Space Map. The proposed adjustment in open space boundaries will increase the acreage designated as OS from 135 acres to 219.5 acres; (2) The proposed open space area is of environmental quality equal to or greater than that depicted on the Official Open Space Map. The open space adjustment will eliminate PI land use designations and preserve additional acres of open space within a wildlife habitat corridor that contains critical wetland and riparian habitat surrounding La Mirada Creek; and (3) The proposed adjustment to open space is within close proximity to the open / space presently shown on the Official Open Space Map. The proposed amendment will change and increase the acreage of open space within the project boundaries by 84.5 acres. The additional open space is contiguous with existing open space. A2. General Plan Consistency The proposed project is consistent with the applicable policies contained within each relevant element of the General Plan. The following table indicates compliance with the General Plan: GP ELEMENT/GOAL OBJECTIVE/POLICY COMPLIANCE LAND USE Overall Land Use C.3/C.5 The project requires more stringent performance standards and substantial buffers between adjacent residential development in the City of Vista and industrial lots in the development to ensure compatibility. EIR 98-08/GPA 97-05/ZC97-05/SP 211/SP 200(B)/LFMP 16(A)/C-/97-13/HDP 97-107 PIP 02-02/SUP 97-07 - CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN August 21,2002 PageS - Industrial Goal A/Objectives B.1,B.3 Objective B.4 Policy C 10/Objective C.3 Objectives C.8/C.9 Policy C. 12 Policy C.I3 Environmental Goal A Policy C.7 Provides for light industrial uses thereby developing a base of light, pollution free industries in the City with minimal impacts to surrounding land uses through landscaped buffers, restrictions on noise generation, use of hazardous materials, and lighting. The industrial park is located within the boundaries of the existing Planned Industrial (PI) corridor as shown on the General Plan. The industrial park is designed with lots that are large and level enough to accommodate industrial development including adequate parking, loading, storage, landscaped perimeter setbacks and manufactured slopes, and properly functioning internal roads with adequately spaced driveways. The Carlsbad Oaks North Specific Plan includes a requirement for one lot located at the intersection of Faraday Avenue and El Fuerte Street (secondary arterials) and provides for other lots to be developed with commercial uses designed to serve the occupants of the industrial park through issuance of a conditional use permit. The Specific Plan performance standards for the industrial project meet or exceed performance standards required by the P-M Zone and include more stringent noise, air quality and safety, and lighting standards. The industrial park provides two passive employee recreation areas with views of natural open space and trailhead access to a trail within the development unless the selection of a force main sewer requires a sewer pump station within one of these areas. The project protects and conserves natural resources and fragile ecological areas by providing 219.5 acres of open space identified within Core Area 5 of the HMP and buffers adjacent sensitive preserve areas from the development. The project's impacts to natural resources have been analyzed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act through the preparation of an EIR. CIRCULATION Streets and Traffic GoalsA.l/A.8 The project will complete the final segments of two circulation arterial roads that will meet the local and regional transportation demand and accommodate alternative modes of transportation. EIR 98-08/GPA 97-05/Z™-05/SP 211/SP 200(B)/LFMP 16(A)/CT97-13/HDP 97-10/ PIP 02-02/SUP 97-07 - CARLSBAD QAKS NORTH, SPECIFIC PLAN August 21,2002 : Page 9 Objective B.I Policies C.16/C. 18 The project will dedicate and improve all circulation facilities required by the project, including circulation arterial roadways, concurrent with demand. OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION Special Resource Protection Policy C.4 Objective B.I Policy C.6/C. 19 Trail System Policy C.3 Fire Risk Management Goal A. 1 Air Quality Preservation Policy C.3 Water Quality Objective B.2/Policy C.3 project will result in the preservation of 219.5 acres of open space lat will establish and maintain a regionally significant multi-species rildlife corridor consistent with the City's HMP, provide a citywide trail segment, and rezone the open space to the Open Space zone. project has been conditioned to require the proposed wildlife habitat areserve to be managed and financed in perpetuity consistent with an approved maintenance program. project provides a minimum 300' wide buffer to protect the adjacent )awson Los Monos Canyon Reserve natural resource area, which is atilized for educational and scientific research. The project requires an irrevocable offer of dedication for Trail Segment 26 of the Citywide Trail System. [The fire risk presented by adjacent natural open space is mitigated prough requiring fire suppression buffers within the boundaries of the development to avoid impacts to surrounding sensitive native vegetation. The Specific Plan requires the formation of a business association to :ncourage usage of buses and vanpools and to provide incentives for car- lopling, flex-time, shortened work weeks, and telecommuting. project incorporates storm water quality control measures (BMPs) :onsistent with a conceptual Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan jrepared for the project to avoid adversely impacting sensitive water ssources. OEIR 98-08/GPA 97-05/ZCV7-05/SP 211/SP 200(B)/LFMP \6(A)/(>s97-l3/HDP 97-107 PIP 02-02/SUP 97-07 - CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN August 21,2002 Page 10 NOISE Goal A.2 Noise generation and interior noise standards for future development are required by the Specific Plan in compliance with the City's Noise standard, McClellan Palomar CLUP, and P-M zone performance standards, and environmental mitigation measures as applicable. PARKS & RECREATION Payment of park-in-lieu fee PUBLIC SAFETY Flood Hazards Policies C.3/C.5 Hazardous Materials Policy C.3 Airport Hazards Policies C.2/C.3 The project is required to install properly sized drainage facilities to, handle the 100-year flood conditions and to ensure compliance with Titles 18 and 20 pertaining to drainage and flood control structures. The project reduces the risk of exposure to hazardous substances from future industrial development by restricting the use of hazardous materials within 1,000 feet of residential land use. The project conforms with the noise, height, and location requirements of the Carlsbad Airport Land Use Plan (CLUP). A. Specific Plan 211 Government Code Section 65451 governs the content of specific plans. The Carlsbad Oaks North Specific Plan contains all information required by state law. The plan consists of both text and diagrams which specify the following detail: (1) distribution and location of land uses; (2) infrastructure; (3) development standards; (4) implementation measures including financing measures; and (5) a statement of the relationship of the Specific Plan to the General Plan. The purpose of the proposed Specific Plan is to provide for the design, development, and operation of a light industrial park within an area currently designated by the General Plan for Planned Industrial (PI) land use. As indicated in the General Plan Consistency Table above, the project complies with the goals, objectives, and policies of the various elements of the General Plan pertaining to PI land uses. The proposed land use and development regulations ensure an industrial development that conforms to community goals and values and implements the City's Habitat Management Plan by preserving and protecting a wildlife habitat corridor consistent with a negotiated hardline conservation area. The Specific Plan also identifies the necessary public infrastructure to serve development within the area and provides for its installation prior to or concurrent with development in accordance with the proposed Zone 16 Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment. > t EIR 98-08/GPA 97-05/Z*-05/SP 211/SP 200(B)/LFMP 16(A)/CT97-13/HDP 97-107 PIP 02-02/SUP 97-07 - CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH^SPECIFIC PLAN August 21,2002 Page 11 The permitted uses, development standards and design guidelines provided in the Specific Plan are adequate to properly develop the project site. The proposed industrial and auxiliary commercial uses will be appropriate in area, location and overall design to the purpose intended thereby creating an environment of sustained desirability and stability. Large, industrial pads with adequate area for buildings, parking lots, setbacks and landscaping are proposed to enable campus type corporate development. Commercial uses located in proximity to the industrial uses will contribute to the balance of land use so that commercial services are available to employees of the proposed and surrounding industrial parks. The street system includes two secondary circulation arterial roadways that will provide access to the site and internal streets that provide access to each industrial lot, is designed in accordance with City standards and will ensure proper and efficient traffic circulation to the site and throughout the development. Appropriate measures are proposed to mitigate any adverse environmental impact as noted in the environmental impact report (EIR 98-08) prepared for the project. The proposed Carlsbad Oaks North Specific Plan generally sets forth Planned Industrial (P-M) zone development and performance standards in accordance with Chapter 21.34 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. More restrictive standards are required by the plan to avoid and/or mitigate land use compatibility impacts resulting from the project's proximity to existing residential development and natural open space. These standards require: (1) The provision of a 30-foot fire suppression setback inside the property line of industrial lots that are adjacent to natural open space. (2) Specific landscape standards that require naturalizing landscaping adjacent to open space boundaries that is sensitive to the surrounding natural environment and avoids the introduction of invasive species. (3) More stringent performance standards for noise and lighting in some areas to ensure compatibility with the surrounding residential and open space land uses. Noise generation standards are reduced to 55 - 60 Ldn during the evening hours for lots adjacent to residential development. A separate lighting plan is required for each lot abutting either residential development or open space to avoid negative impacts from light spillage. (4) A storm water pollution prevention plan that requires BMPs on each industrial lot after grading and after development of each lot in compliance with approved drainage and storm water pollution prevention plans. (5) Restrictions on the use of hazardous materials within 1,000 feet of any residential structure. (6) Special 75' - 150' rear building setbacks and 50' landscape buffers for lots abutting residential development. (7) Operational standards for blasting and rock crushing during the grading operation that prohibit rock crushing activities within 850 feet from the eastern and northern property lines. (8) Restrictions on locations of loading areas so that none will be visible from Faraday Avenue or El Fuerte Street, and none are allowed between the rear of buildings and rear property lines of lots adjacent to residential development. (9) Architectural and landscape guidelines intended to ensure quality development are included and will be implemented through the formation of a Carlsbad Oaks North EIR 98-08/GPA 97-05/ZC 97-05/SP 211/SP 200(B)/LFMP 16(A)A^7-13/HDP 97-10/ PIP 02-02/SUP 97-07 - CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN August 21,2002 Page 12 . owner's association that will be responsible for performing architectural review prior to submittal for City administrative approval of subsequent planned industrial permits. The Specific Plan provides for one less restrictive front yard setback standard for Lots 15-19 and 27 than is allowed by the P-M Zone. Chapter 21.34 (P-M Zone) required a 35-foot average front yard setback but not less than 25 feet, while the proposed Specific Plan allows a minimum setback of 25 feet for Lots 15-19 and 27. These lots are located along the loop road at the northern boundary of the project where a 300-foot setback from the Dawson Los Manos Canyon Reserve is required as part of the HMP hardline boundary and a 30-foot fire suppression zone is necessitated by the adjacent native vegetation. Given these additional requirements, it is appropriate to allow somewhat reduced front setbacks to enable development of the lots. Actual development of the majority of these lots will result in a greater than 25' front yard setback due to manufactured slopes in the front setback and the .7 to 1 top of slope setback required by the Specific Plan and Hillside Development Regulations. C. Subdivision Ordinance The proposed tentative tract map complies with all requirements of the City's Subdivision Ordinance (Title 20 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code). The proposed project would subdivide the project site into 23 industrial lots, 1 passive recreation lot, and 3 open space lots that surround the development on threes sides. The site is physically suited for the proposed development since the site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the industrial lots. Project grading consisting of 2,660,000 cubic yards of cut and fill to be balanced on site during a single phase of mass grading can be justified as discussed below in Section D.3. Hillside Regulations. All infrastructure improvements required by the project including Faraday Avenue, El Fuerte Street, internal industrial streets, the South Agua Hedionda Interceptor sewer, water and reclaimed water lines, and all drainage and flood control facilities will be installed concurrent with development. Potentially significant impacts resulting from the project have been identified and will by mitigated in accordance with the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the project. D1/D2. Planned Industrial Zone/Open Space Zone The project includes a zone change to rezone the Specific Plan area from the previous Planned Community (P-C) Zone to the P-M and O-S Zones. The P-C zoning was applied to the project area in 1981 as part of the former residential Valle Verde Planned Community which was never developed. The former Specific Plan (SP 200), approved in 1986, indicates that the property will be rezoned to the Planned Industrial (P-M) zone because the P-C zoning is inconsistent with the Planned Industrial (PI) and Open Space (OS) land use designations; the P-M zone is the implementing zone for PI designated areas and the O-S zone implements the OS land use designations. The proposed rezone of 194.5 acres to the P-M zone and 219.5 acres to the O-S zone will ensure consistency between the General Plan and Zoning since the proposed zone boundaries are consistent with the proposed adjustment to the PI and OS General Plan designation boundaries. The proposed subdivision in the P-M Zone is subject to Section 21.34.060 of the Zoning Ordinance requiring a Planned Industrial Permit (PIP) for all industrial subdivisions. Specific Plan 211, which establishes the zoning and development regulations for the future subdivision :<W-EIR 98-08/GPA 97-05/ZW-05/SP 211/SP 200(B)/LFMP 16(A)/CT 97-13/HDP 97-107 PIP 02-02/SUP 97-07 - CARLSBAD, OJ^SJpRTft SPECIFIC PLAN August21,2002 . ' *" "' '"' Page 13 and/or development of each lot within the Specific Plan area, specifies that subdivisions must conform to the P-M zone subdivision standards. The proposed subdivision complies with the applicable development standards and design criteria for industrial subdivisions. The proposed industrial lots exceed the minimum one acre lot size, and the proposed circulation system ensures a safe, efficient, and functional street system by providing two points of access from Faraday Avenue via Street "D" and driveways that are adequately spaced and located with the appropriate site distance. A PIP will be required for the future development of each industrial lot. The proposed wildlife habitat corridor consisting of three lots (Lots 10, 11, and 12) within the proposed subdivision will be dedicated as permanent open space in accordance with the City's Habitat Management Plan and rezoned to the O-S zone in accordance with provisions of the O-S zone. The Specific Plan requires compliance with the provisions of the O-S zone and requires a conservation easement to be dedicated that will preclude any use of the open space beyond the existing and proposed utility easements, proposed trail and passive recreation area, and permanent drainage basins. D3. Hillside Regulations A Hillside Development Permit is required for the project because the property contains slopes of 15 percent and greater with elevation differentials greater than 15 feet. The project consists of a terraced grading design to create a landform that is consistent, with some modification to the City's Hillside Development Regulations. Necessary modifications include the project's grading volume of 11,928 cubic yards/acre, which exceeds the acceptable range of 10,000 cubic yards/acre, and slopes that exceed 40' in height. Hillside regulations are intended to ensure that hillside landforms are developed in a sensitive manner and that the majority of manufactured slopes are undulated and do not exceed 40' in height. Although the Hillside Ordinance excludes industrial subdivisions from grading volume limitations and slope height restrictions, justification for exceeding the acceptable grading volume is still required. The following table provides justification for requested modifications and describes compliance with hillside development regulations: , HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS STANDARD PROPOSED PLAN COMPLIANCE Undevelopable Slopes: Natural slopes of over 40% gradient with elevation differential > 15', a minimum of 10,000 square feet, and a prominent land form feature. The Specific Plan area contains 21.2 acres of 40%+ slopes. 4.7 acres will be disturbed by industrial development, however, the 40%+ slopes located within the development area are scattered within small drainages which are not prominent land form features. Additional areas will be disturbed by the road alignments, however, Section 21.95.130(1) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code excludes those areas for circulation arterial roads provided that the alignments are environmentally preferred. Yes o nEIR 98-08/GPA 97-05/ZC 97-05/SP 211/SP 200(B)/LFMP 16(Ay(V97-13/HDP 97-107 PIP 02-02/SUP 97-07 - CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN August 21,2002 Page 14 Grading volumes > 10,000 cubic yards/acre allowed if project qualifies for an exclusion or modification 11,766 cubic yards/acre excluding Faraday Avenue and El Fuerte Street* Yes Maximum manufactured slope height: 40 feet Maximum manufactured slope height is approximately 70 feet within the Specific Plan area and approximately 50 feet along offsite Faraday Avenue. The majority of slopes comply with the standard. Higher slope heights are required to create large industrial pads that are terraced down the hillside within a reduced developable area consisting of sloping and undulating natural terrain.* Yes Contour Grading: Manufactured slopes > 20 feet in height and 200 feet in length and visible from circulation element road and/or useable public open space. Contour grading is proposed along slopes visible from Faraday Avenue to the north. Yes Slope edge building setback: 0.7 foot horizontal to 1 foot vertical imaginary diagonal plane measured from edge of slope to structure. Buildings are not proposed at this time. Slope edge setbacks are required by the Specific Plan and will be analyzed with future Planned Industrial Permits. N/A Screening manufactured slopes: Landscape manufactured slopes consistent with the City's Landscape Manual All manufactured slopes are landscaped in accordance with the City's landscape manual with the exception of perimeter slopes that will be revegetated with naturalizing species to avoid the introduction of invasive species to adjacent natural areas. Yes *Exclusions are permitted for grading volumes, slope heights and graded areas which are directly associated with circulation element roadways, provided that the proposed alignments are environmentally preferred and comply with all other City standards, and unusual geotechnical conditions. Pursuant to Section 21.95.140 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, grading in excess of 10,000 cubic yards/acre for non-residential projects is allowed. Justification for the proposed grading volume above the acceptable range is based on grading quantities necessary to create an industrial subdivision on existing sloping and undulating terrain. The area proposed for development is limited by the HMP to between the proposed Faraday Avenue alignment and a minimum of 300 feet from the property's northern boundary. This area descends from north to south from approximately 429 feet to 290 feet at the western end of the development and from approximately 540 feet to 310 feet at the eastern end. The property is undulated due to drainages across the property that generally flow in a southeasterly or southwesterly direction. The proposed grading design consists of large quantities of cut and fill necessary to create large, flat, terraced industrial lots across terrain that undulates and slopes in both directions. This design enables the preservation of significantly more open space that is part of a hardline conservation area in the City's HMP. EIR 98-08/GPA 97-05/ZcW-05/SP 211/SP 200(B)/LFMP 16(A)/CT97-13/HDP 97-107 PIP 02-02/SUP 97-07 - CARLSBAD, ,QAKSSNORTRSPECIFIC PLAN * i sw? f/V'V? f"f '•,'"' ' ') f ^ "'August 21,2002 Page 15 D4. Floodplain Regulations The project is consistent with the provisions of the Floodplain Special Use Permit. The purpose of the regulations is to promote the public health, safety and general welfare, and to minimize public and private losses due to flood conditions. The proposed Faraday Avenue crossing of La Mirada Creek is subject to the City's Floodplain Management Regulations. This area of the project site is located within an area inundated by a 100-year flood. A 100-year flood is defined as a flood which has a one percent annual probability of being equaled or exceeded. A Special Use Permit is required to be obtained in addition to any other required permits or entitlements before construction or development begins within an area inundated by a 100-year flopd. Hydrology studies have been prepared for the project and reviewed by staff. The proposed grading and drainage improvements will modify the configuration of the 100-year floodway by creating a detention basin at the Faraday Avenue crossing of La Mirada Creek. A 6' x 7' box culvert under Faraday Avenue in La Mirada Creek is proposed to detain a portion of the 100-year flood. The Faraday Avenue detention basin is part of an overall plan to reduce peak flows that impact the Rancho Carlsbad Mobile Home Park downstream. Upstream, the Carlsbad Raceway and Palomar Forum projects are incorporating a similar improvement to reduce peak 100-year flows along La Mirada Creek at Melrose Drive. With the approved and recommended basins in place at Melrose Drive and Faraday Avenue and two others adjacent to the College/Cannon roadway improvements, the peak discharge through the Rancho Carlsbad Mobile Home Park is decreased by approximately 10 to 15 percent necessary to reduce downstream flooding. E. McClellan-Palomar Airport Land Use Plan (CLUP) The project is located within the boundaries of the airport influence area and flight activity zone as indicated in the CLUP. The flight activity zone covers the southern portion of the property which is proposed as open space; therefore, no development is proposed in the flight activity zone. The proposed development is consistent with the Planned Industrial land use designation that existed at the time the CLUP was adopted; therefore, compliance with the P-M zoning regulations at the time the proposed lots are developed will ensure consistency with the CLUP. Additionally, the project is subject to Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 77 referenced by the CLUP as Appendix D, which establishes a horizontal surface or plane that is 150 feet above the established airport elevation (478 feet) for a distance of approximately 10,000 feet from the center of the primary surface of each runway. FAR part 77 recognizes that the highest natural elevation on the Carlsbad Oaks property is 548 feet and that it penetrates the 478-foot FAR Part 77 surface elevation. In 1995, the FAA indicated that structures or protrusions on any lot in a previously proposed residential subdivision would not be allowed to exceed an elevation of 548 feet, the highest natural elevation on property prior to development. The highest pad elevation proposed on the tentative tract map is 54 feet below the 548 feet maximum. The maximum building height permitted in the P-M Zone is 45'; therefore; no development will exceed the highest natural elevation on the property. The project is conditioned to require the developer to submit an airspace determination from the FAA indicating that the project is in accordance with FAR Part 77 prior to approval of a final map. EIR 98-08/GPA 97-05/ZC 97-05/SP 211/SP 200(B)/LFMP 16(A)/(>/97-13/HDP 97-107 PIP 02-02/SUP 97-07 - CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN August 21,2002 Page 16 F. Draft Habitat Management Plan The project area is identified as a proposed hardline conservation area in the City's Draft Habitat Management Plan (HMP). The project is consistent with the HMP in that the hardline conservation area is proposed as open space in accordance with the plan and mitigation ratios set forth by the HMP have been used to mitigate impacts to sensitive species proposed for disturbance within the development area. Upon completion of project grading and improvements, ownership of the conservation area will be transferred to a natural lands management entity. Simultaneous with the actual transfer of ownership of open space to a natural lands management entity, the developer will provide funding or other financial mechanism acceptable to the City to provide for management and conservation in perpetuity. G. Growth Management An amendment is proposed to the Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) for Zone 16 to reflect adjustments to the Planned Industrial and Open Space land use designations and changes to facilities requirements. The proposed zone plan covers the entire zone and analyzes the requirements of the 11 public facilities included within the growth management program. For each of the eleven public facilities, the plan lists the required performance standard, provides a facility planning and adequacy analysis, required mitigation and financing sources for any required mitigation. Special conditions of the LFMP amendment include drainage, sewer, water and circulation facilities. The zone will be in compliance with the required performance standards by satisfying the general and special conditions listed in the zone plan. The facilities impacts of the project are summarized in the following table: GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE STANDARD City Administration Library Waste Water Treatment Parks Drainage Circulation Fire Open Space Schools Sewer Collection System Water IMPACTS N/A N/A 658 EDU 1,921,000 sq.ft. Basin B 22,650 ADT Station 5 219.5 Acres N/A 658 EDU 144,760 GPD COMPLIANCE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW A Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CEQA Guidelines, and the Environmental Protection Procedures (Title 19) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The EIR addresses the environmental impacts associated with all discretionary applications for the EIR 98-08/GPA 97-05/ZC^-05/SP 211/SP 200(B)/LFMP 16(A)/CV97-13/HDP 97-107 PIP 02-02/SUP 97-07 - CARLSBAD/pAKS,,,NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN August 21,2002 Page 17 proposed project. City staff prepared an environmental impact assessment of the project to determine the areas of potential impact and issued a Notice of Preparation (NOP) on May 15, 2000. The NOP was distributed to all Responsible and Trustee Agencies, as well as other agencies and members of the public. Staff conducted a public scoping meeting on January 18, 2001, to solicit feedback from interested persons regarding potential impacts that may result from implementation of the proposed project. At the public scoping meeting, the public was presented with a project description and invited to provide written comments on the scope and content of the EIR. Written responses were received by staff and these comments were taken into consideration prior to developing a detailed scope of work for the EIR. The Carlsbad Oaks North Specific Plan EIR, which analyzes the impacts of an industrial subdivision, two circulation arterial roadways and the SAHI sewer alignment, considers the following areas of potential impact: Land Use and Planning Hazards and Hazardous Materials Transportation/Traffic Hydrology/Water Quality Air Quality Cultural Resources Noise Paleontological Resources Biological Resources Aesthetics Geology/Soils Public Services and Utilities Population/Housing Additionally, the Draft EIR includes other sections required by CEQA such as an Executive Summary, Project Description, Long Term Effects (Cumulative, Growth Inducing, Significant Irreversible and Unavoidable, and Not Significant), and Alternatives. Four alternatives are considered in the EIR. The alternatives include the no project alternative that is consistent with the General Plan, a northerly Faraday Avenue and SAHI sewer alignment, a Faraday Avenue bridge crossing over La Mirada Creek, and a reduced project that would exclude Lot 24 thereby reducing the acreage and intensity of industrial development. Notification that the Draft Program EIR was available for public review was accomplished through the publication of a Notice of Completion dated April 12, 2002. The Notice of Completion was published in the newspaper and forwarded to Responsible and Trustee agencies as well as other agencies and interested parties. This action commenced a 45-day public review and comment period that ended May 30, 2002. At the request of the Public Works Department of the County of San Diego, the review period was extended through June 14, 2002. A total of 11 comments were submitted prior to the close of the review period. Responses were prepared and mailed for each of the letters. Response letters also provided notice of the availability of the Final EIR. The analysis contained in the EIR concludes that all significant impacts would be mitigated to below a level of significance with the exception of direct project specific and cumulative impacts to air quality and transportation, and project specific impacts to biology. Direct project specific impacts, also referred to as primary effects, are those caused by the project and that occur at the same time and place. In contrast, cumulative impacts refer to two or more individual impacts that, when considered together, are considerable or that compound or increase other environmental impacts. The cumulative impacts all arise from the marginal contribution the oEIR 98-08/GPA 97-05/ZcV/-05/SP 211/SP 200(B)/LFMP 16(A)/k^97-13/HDP 97-107 PIP 02-02/SUP 97-07 - CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN August 21,2002 - Page 18 proposed project will make, when combined with the impacts from existing and other future projects, to pre-existing conditions that fail to meet applicable standards currently. Under CEQA, before a project which is determined to have significant, unmitigated environmental effects can be approved, the public agency must consider and adopt a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" pursuant to CEQA Guidelines 15043 and 15093. The primary purpose of CEQA is to fully inform the decision makers and the public of the environmental effects of a proposed project and to include feasible mitigation measures and alternatives to reduce any such adverse effects below a level of significance; however, CEQA recognizes and authorizes the approval of projects where not all adverse impacts can be fully lessened or avoided. The Lead agency must explain and justify its conclusion to approve such a project through the statement of overriding considerations setting forth the proposed project's general social, economic, policy or other public benefits which support the agency's informed conclusion to approve the project. The CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations are attached to the Planning Commission Resolution for the EIR. ATTACHMENTS; 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5244 (EIR 98-08) 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5245 (GPA 97-05) 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5246 (ZC 97-05) 4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5247 (SP 211) 5. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5248 (LFMP 16(A)) 6. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5249 (CT 97-13) 7. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5250 (HDP 97-10) 8. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5251 (PIP 92-02) 9. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5252 (SUP 97-07) 10. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5275 (SP 200(B)) 11. Location Map 12. Background Data Sheet 13. Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form 14. Disclosure Statement 15. Letters and E-mails to the Planning Commission and City Council 16. EIR 98-08 (previously distributed) 17. Specific Plan 211 (previously distributed) 18. Zone 16 Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment (previously distributed) 19. Zone 16 Executive Summary 20. Reduced Tentative Map Exhibits 21. General Plan Open Space Revision Map 22. Exhibits "A" - "UU" dated August 21,2002 (on file in the Planning Department) AH:cs:mh SITE CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN EIR 98-08/GPA 97-05/ZC 97-05/SP 211/ SP 200(B)/LFMP 16(A)/CT 97-13/HDP 97-10/ PIP 92-02/SUP 97-07 o -»* BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO: SIR 98-08/GPA 97-05/ZC 97-05/SP 211/SP 200(BVLFMP 16(AVCT 97-13/HDP 97- 10/PIP 02-02/SUP 97-07 CASE NAME: CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN APPLICANT: Techbilt Construction REQUEST AND LOCATION: The certification of a Program Environmental Impact Report. Candidate Findings of Fact. Statement of Overriding Considerations. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. General Plan Amendment. Zone Change. Carlsbad Oaks North Specific Plan. Zone 16 Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment, and approval of a Tentative Tract Map. Hillside Development Permit. Planned Industrial Permit, and Floodplain Special Use Permit for the development of an industrial park located north of Palomar Airport Road between El Camino Real and the City's eastern boundary in the P-C Zone and Local Facilities Management Zone 16 that will include 23 industrial lots. 3 open space lots, and one passive recreation lot. Public Works projects that are associated with the Carlsbad Oaks North project include the extension of Faraday Avenue, the extension of El Fuerte Street, and Reaches SAHT1 A through D of the South Agua Hedionda Sewer Interceptor. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That portion of Lot "B" of Rancho Agua Hedionda. in the County of San Diego. State of California, according to partition map thereof no. 823. filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County. November 16.1896. APN: 209-050-04: -12: -22: -23: -24 Acres: 414 Proposed No. of Lots 27 GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation: PI/OS Density Allowed: N/A Existing Zone: P-C Surrounding Zoning, General Plan Zoning Site P-C North O-S South P-M East City of Vista West O-S Density Proposed: N/A Proposed Zone: P-M/O-S and Land Use: General Plan PI/OS OS PI City of Vista PI/OS Current Land Use Vacant Vacant/Dawson Los Monos Canyon Reserve Carlsbad Oaks East and West Business Parks Residential/Vacant Vacant PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: Carlsbad Unified Water District: CMWD Sewer District: Carlsbad Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 658 D 13 D ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Negative Declaration, issued Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated August 21. 2002 Other, s CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH M^AGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM (To be Submitted with Development Application) PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO: EIR 98-08/GPA 97-05/ZC 97-05/SP 211/SP 200(B)/LFMP 16CAVCT 97-13/HDP 97-10/ PIP 02-02/SUP 97-07 - CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 16 GENERAL PLAN: PI/OS ZONING: P-M/O-S DEVELOPER'S NAME: Techbilt Construction ADDRESS: P.O. Box 80036. San Dieeo, CA 92138 PHONE NO.: (619) 223-1663 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 209-050-04: -12; -22: -23 QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT ( AC.. SO. FT.. DU): 414 ACRES ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: Unknown :-24 A. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = N/A B. Library: Demand in Square Footage = N/A C. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) 658 EDU D. Park: Demand in Acreage = N/A E. Drainage: Demand in CFS = Identify Drainage Basin = B (Identify master plan facilities on site plan) F. Circulation: Demand in ADT = 22.650 (Identify Trip Distribution on site plan) G. Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = 5 H. Open Space: Acreage Provided = 219.5 I. Schools: N/A (Demands to be determined by staff) J. Sewer: Demands in EDU 658 EDU Identify Sub Basin = 16 (Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan) K. Water: Demand in GPD= 144.760 Sent By: WILSON ENGINEERING; 7604380173; o "Aug-5-02 9~:30; O Page 4/5 City of Carlsbad Planning Department DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of tbe City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittaL Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print Nete? **$?**•'«< APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. TJCCAJT. names and addresses of ALjL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more man 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON- APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person Corp/Part Techbllt Construction Corp. Title Title Address Address 3575 Kenyon St., San Diego, CA 92110 OWNER (Not the owner's agent) . Provide the <X>MPT^TE: l^jCQAI, names and addresses of 4LL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IH THE SPACE BELOW. If a WJtiMZi owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person Paul K. Tchang Rose S. Tchang Lorna Tchang Alcala Genevieve Tchang Theodore Tchang Corp/Part Carl shad Oa'ka Nm-«-h Pa-rl-no-ro f fc. Title Address3575 Kenvon St.. San Diego. CA 92110 1635 Faraday Avenue - Carlsbad. CA 92OO8-7314 • C/6O) 6O2-4-60O • FAX (760) 6O2-SS59 u - Sent By: WILSON ENGINEERING;7604380173;- 'Aug-5-02 9:30;Page 5/5 NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonorofft or a trust list the names and addresses of AJfY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the, Nan Profit/Trust. Title NonProfit/Trust. Title Address Address Have you bad more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? Yes I No If yes, please indicate person(s):_ NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature of Carlsbad Oaks North Partners, L.P. By: Sun Tech Investments Corp, General Paul 1C.•PKRSTDKNT Print or type name of owner Signature of applicant/date Techbilt Construction Corp. Partner Bv: Theodore Tchang* VICE PRESIDENT Print or type name of applicant Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 Q ATTACHMENT 15 August 13,2002 Chairperson Trigas and Planning Commissioners \Fj_ c// ^ City of Carlsbad \V Cgf'^ "^f 1200 Carlsbad Village Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Subject: Carlsbad Oaks North Dear Chairperson and Commissioners: Preserve Calavera is a non-profit grassroots organization whose goal is the protection and preservation of the largest remaining native habitat in a coastal north county city- the Calavera area of northeastern Carlsbad. Our organization is not proposing no development, but we are proposing responsible development that minimizes the impacts to the sensitive natural resources in this area. The Carlsbad Oaks North Project would have significant adverse environmental impacts- many of which cannot be mitigated. The majority of these adverse impacts are not from the project itself, but rather from the associated public infrastructure- the extension of roads and sewer lines. Enclosed are three summaries that identify our key issues with this project, and our proposals to address these issues. Our recommendations will result in a project with greatly reduced impacts to sensitive upland and wetlands habitats, but with no impact to the industrial sites and the revenue anticipated from them. Our recommendations will cost a little more to implement, but there will be a permanent benefit to the residents of this area. We urge you to adopt these recommendations as part of your actions on this project. We would be happy to take you on a hike of the project site or provide any additional information to assist with your consideration of this request. Sincerely, Diane Nygaard on behalf of Preserve Calavera cc: Gary Wayne Anne Hysong 5020 Nighthawk Way - Ocean Hills, CA 92056 www.presetvecalavera.org Wildlife Corridors^ Carlsbad Oaks North- Issue Summary What is Proposed The Carlsbad Oaks North Industrial Park project also includes the extension of two roads- Faraday and El Fuerte, and several miles of sewer line extensions to serve this area. There are direct impacts from the destruction of habitat, but even greater impacts from opening up isolated areas to damaging off-road vehicle use. Issues • Agua Hedionda Creek and the slopes that parallel the creek are a major regional wildlife corridor from the San Marcos Hills, through Carlsbad and Oceanside and into Camp Pendleton. Protection of wildlife corridors is critical to the success of our ten year effort toward regional habitat conservation- without wildlife movement the ecosystems will all decline. • This is a "core" habitat area- and part of the largest remaining contiguous native habitat in coastal north county. These "core" areas are of sufficient size to support breeding and nesting populations of endangered species. Small, isolated habitat fragments will not ensure that these species can survive- we must preserve blocks of core habitat for the entire preserve system to work. • Much of this area is currently protected by its isolation and steep terrain. The city proposed to top the sewer line with a 20' road- and added this into their "trail system". Off-road vehicles have destroyed acres of habitat in the adjacent areas, cause siltation of the creek, and compact the soil making any future restoration projects more difficult. There is essentially no police enforcement Opening up vast new areas will just open them up for destruction. • The proposed roadway design and location will cause much more damage than is necessary. The road crossing of Agua Hedionda creek should be done with a bridge- not just a culvert. The roads are over built for the projected traffic- 4 lane divided highways in 112' wide right-of-way- a huge path of destruction with erosion, noise and air quality impacts that cannot be mitigated for the sensitive plants and animals. Preserve Calavera Proposal Our proposal is to reconfigure the roads to reduce their impacts and use a bridge crossing of the creek to reduce the road impacts. But most important is to eliminate the sewer line extension. The environmentally preferred alternative to the city's proposal is to place a new sewer line along the existing and new roads,and use a pump station instead of extending the sewer line for miles through prime quality habitat. Faraday/t juertc Extensions - Issue Sumr"^ y What is Proposed The last missing 1.3 m segment of Faraday Avenue from its existing terminus at Orion St in Carlsbad to the existing terminus in Vista at the city limit(by Brookhaven Pass)will be completed. In addition, El Fuerte St will be extended about .5m to the north from its existing terminus off of Palomar Airport Rd to connect with the extension of Faraday Avenue. Both roads are classified as Secondary Arterials in the General Plan of the city of Carlsbad which provides for an 84' right of way, with 2 lanes of travel in each direction. Issues • While the project is located within the city of Carlsbad, it will cause traffic congestion in neighboring cities- at Park Center/Mehrose, Sunset/Melrose, Sycamore/Melrose in Vista, Melrose/Rancho Sante Fe and San Marcos/Grand in San Marcos, and El Camino Real/ 78 in Oceanside. • Neither the project developer, nor the city of Carlsbad will provide any funds to improve the roadways in neighboring cities- leaving it to local residents to deal with the traffic- or pay for the improvements themselves. • The city of Carlsbad has not updated the Circulation Element of their General Plan since 1978- resulting in a roadway plan that is not properly integrated with changes made in the neighboring cities, or changes in regional population growth projections. • The long term Regional Transportation Plan will place a much greater emphasis on public transit improvements as the way to address increasing north county traffic congestion. Palomar Airport Rd is the major focus for public transit in north county- because it will carry the greatest number of work trips- yet this project has not been designed to support this regional plan and consequently will be part of the long term problem- not the solution that it could be. • Both of these proposed roads traverse sensitive native habitat in an area that serves as a regional wildlife movement corridor- a violation of the regional Multiple Habitat Conservation Plan. • The roads will impact the Agua Hedionda watershed- an area that drains directly to the impaired lagoon and our precious coast The road will directly cross Agua Hedionda Creek- but the alignment is not at the least damageing location as is required by law. Preserve Calavera Proposal Our proposal is to first update the city's Circulation Element instead of continued piecemeal transportation planning. Public transit needs to be fully integrated in project planning. All developers must pay their "fair share" toward traffic improvements- regardless of what city they fall in. Carlsad Oaks North Trees- Issue Summary What is Proposed The proposed project impacts a riparian area along Agua Hedionda Creek- an area that has remained relatively untouched for hundreds of years. The project proposes to remove and replant,some distance away, Coast Live Oak trees. The project is named for these magnificent trees- some estimated at 200 years old- trees that will not survive. Issues • Oak woodlands are one of the most biologically diverse wildlife habitats in California. The Ca Wildlife Habitat Relationship Program identifies over SO special status species that "prefer or make great use of the coast live oak woodland habitat The loss of the trees will impact many other dependent species. • Mature riparian areas support tree covers that provide shade and protection for a complex understory of riparian plants that require this shade to survive. Canopy cover data is die standard used to assess these areas- but was not done for this project • There is little evidence that transplants of mature oaks can be done successfully. Recent studies continue to report low success rates and high maintenance costs- with long term survival projected at 10-14%. The few transplanted trees that do survive are no longer self-sustaining natives, but rather high-care exotics that require intensive long-term maintenance. , • • A "habitat" does not just consist of a few .trees. Other habitat elements such as cavities, acorns, and woody debris are part of the ecology- and will take SO years to return to pre-project conditions- if they ever do. • The City of Carlsbad has adopted policies that provide for the protection of mature trees. Neighborhoods care about protecting the few remaining native mature trees left in this area and have organized to protect them from road widening, sidewalks and other public infrastructure. We are all the neighborhood for these oaks who were here before us. Preserve Calavera Proposal Our proposal is to revise the roadway alignment to eliminate impacts to mature trees. If any must be removed it should only be done as a last resort- and only with commitments for long term monitoring and care. o o From: "Patricia Bleha" <pcb@sbcglobal.net> To: <council@ci.carlsbacl.ca.us>, <gwayn@ci.carlsbad.ca.us> Date: 7/11/02 9:36PM Subject: Carlsbad Oaks North Project Here's yet another "improvement" project to reconsider, for what it's worth. (Why not make real news and really save the environment for a change!) Carlsbad Oaks North project needs changes before it should be approved- first: - update the circulation element of the General Plan before you cause more traffic nightmares - Carlsbad needs to be a good neighbor in North County- and not cause traffic congestion in Oceanside and Vista without having developers pay their fair share. - it is ludicrous to name a project after the majestic (in some cases estimated 200 years old ) coast live oak trees- and then destroy them. Mature trees do not survive uprooting and replanting a few hundred feet away- revise the roadway plan to save these trees that are irreplaceable- the proposed sewer extension will damage acres of prime high quality habitat- and subject a major regional wildlife corridor to destruction by off-road vehicles. The alternative is putting the sewer line in the roadway alignment with a pump station- approve the alternative and save the regional wildlife corridor. From, Pat Bleha, 3209 Fosca St., Carlsbad CA 92009 July 11, 2002 City Council * City of Carlsbad 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear City Council Members, I am writing in support of the Preserve Calavera organization. They have several proposed changes to the Carlsbad Oaks North development plan that will go before the Council members on August 21, 2002. One of the most important changes Preserve Calavera proposes is to revise the roadway plan to save the mature coast Live Oak trees that the development project is named after. The current plan proposes to uproot and move the trees a few hundred feet I feel this would be costly and unsuccessful. These trees are mature with extensive root systems that have been in place for years. Uprooting the trees would require cutting their roots severely and I have grave doubts that the trees would survive the operation. The trees are successful now because they are located where they can find the most natural water. Who can say whether their proposed new location would provide the same water supply they have now? It is also very expensive to move such large trees. A change to the roadway plan makes far more sense from an economic and esthetic point of view. The people who eventually live there will want the trees preserved - rather than watch the spectacle of the trees dying slow deaths from unsuccessful transplantation. Another problem addressed by the Preserve Calavera group is the sewer line extension. The proposed sewer extension will damage acres of prime high quality habitat such as coastal scrub and sage, and subject a major regional wildlife corridor to destruction by off-road vehicles. I support the alternative, which is putting the sewer line in the roadway alignment with a pump station. The people of North County need intact open spaces to take their kids on walks. Preserving the wildlife corridor will give them a chance to see animals on their walks. Please take the time to consider changing the roadway and the sewer line to provide a long-term benefit to the environment and to future generations of people using the area for the enjoyment of nature. Sincerely Julie McPherson North County Resident since 1983 cc Gary Wayne, Planning Commission Anne Hysong - Carlsbad Oaks North ____i___^_^_^____^__^ • _____ Page 1 O From: John troike <meinbenz@yahoo.com> To: <council@ci.carlsbad.ca.us> Date: 7/13/02 8:23PM Subject: Carlsbad Oaks North Dear Council Members; Carlsbad Oaks North project needs changes before it should be approved- first: - update the circulation element of the General Plan before you cause more traffic nightmares • Carlsbad needs to be a good neighbor in North County- and not cause traffic congestion in Oceanside and Vista without having developers pay their fair share. • it is ludicrous to name a project after the majestic (in some cases estimated 200 years old) coast live oak trees- and then destroy them. Mature trees do not survive uprooting and replanting a few hundred feet away- revise the roadway plan to save these trees that are irreplaceable - the proposed sewer extension will damage acres of prime high quality habitat- and subject a major regional wildlife corridor to destruction by off-road vehicles. The alternative is putting the sewer line in the roadway alignment with a pump station- approve the alternative and save the regional wildlife corridor. Sincerely, John Troike Graduate, Calsbad Citizen's Academy #2 Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes http://autos.yahoo.com JUiy ID. <:UUZ / ^ KIW 10 oary waync r-wnniny v*ummi:»Muri nwm I.WHI nwnmau /ov/^v^wuj r-agc *: ci July 15: 2002 Planning Commission Ann- Gary Wayne 1635 Fazaday Ave Cadsbad, CA 92008 Deai Honorable Planning Commission Members The Cadsbad Oaks North project needs changes before it should be approved Please assure that you will update the circulation element of the General Plan, be a good neighbor in North County - and not cause more traffic congestion m Oceanside and Vista without having developers pay their fair share, do not name a project after the majestic (m some cases estimated 200 years old) coast live oak trees - and then destroy them. save the trees that are irreplaceable (mature trees do not survive uprooting and replanting a few hundred feet away). revise the roadway plan using die alternative option of putting the sewer line in the roadway alignment with a pump station, and, ( approve the alternative option and save the regional wildlife corndor. (The proposed sewer extension will damage acres of prime high quality habitat and subject a maior regional wildlife corndor to destruction by off-road vehicles) Sincerely, Lon Homstad Homemaker 3608 CHESH'IRE AVENUE • CARLSBAD/CA • 92008 PHONE 760.720-2003 • FAX 760-720-2003 Anne Hysong -Carlsbad Oaks North Pf*N . ..., . . f*»\ s Page-1°-""-"«^—-^__ From: Joni Ciarletta <jciarlet@ece.ucsd.edu> To: <council@ci.carlsbad.ca.us>, <gwayn@ci.carlsbad.ca.us> Date: 8/5/0212:29PM Subject: Carlsbad Oaks North Project To Whom it May Concern: I have been a resident of Carlsbad for the past 10 years. In this little time, I have seen a beautiful community filled with rolling hills and oak trees, turned into an asphalt-paved nightmare. I have seen bird and animal habitats destroyed for yet more mini-malls, industrial parks, and houses. Just how much tax revenue does this city really need? Dont you understand you are destroying the very reason people moved here in the first place? Why are you bent on turning Carlsbad into another Oceanside? Is that what you really want? The latest issue is the project referred to as "Carlsbad Oaks North", an area located hear S. Melrose and Palomar Airport Road. This new project would include 22 new industrial sites. This project would cut across important wildlife corridors, which is a violation of the regional Multiple Habitat Conservation Plan. It will also destroy many mature live oak trees, which is rather ironic considering the project is being called "Carlsbad OAKS North". Further, it will causes even more traffic congestion since the project does not require the developer or the city to fund roadway improvements for adjacent streets. The currently proposed road will directly cross Agua Hedionda Creek, which will be very damaging to the area watershed; which is also unlawful. Please reconsider this plan before it is approved. Consider the impact this project will have on the environment. How it will affect current human residents (as well as animals, birds and plants). And what this continued building is doing to our once beautiful city. At a minimum, I hope you will revise the roadway alignment and sewer installation to avoid oak tree removal and watershed damage, and minimize the negative impact on the environment by complying with the Multiple Habitat Conservation Plan and other current laws in effect. Thank you for your time, Joni Ciarletta Concerned Citizen of Carlsbad ...l>.~.., Page 1 From: "Suzy" <sdenner@ix.netcom.com> ; To: <council@ci.carlsbad.ca.us>, <gwayn@ci.carlsbad.ca.us> Date: 8/7/02 2:28PM Subject: Carlsbad Oaks North To Whom it May Concern, As an appreciator of the precious natural landscape that makes our area so desirable, I urge the Council and Commission to complete the task of planning for the Carlsbad Oaks North subdivision so as not to destroy the mature oaks that need to stay rooted as they live. • update the circulation element of the General Plan before you cause more traffic nightmares - Carlsbad needs to be a good neighbor in North County- and not cause traffic congestion in Oceanside and Vista without having developers pay their fair share. - it is ludicrous to name a project after the majestic (in some cases estimated 200 years old) coast live oak trees- and then destroy them. Mature trees do not survive uprooting and replanting a few hundred feet away- revise the roadway plan to save these trees that are irreplaceable • the proposed sewer extension will damage acres of prime high quality habitat- and subject a major regional wildlife corridor to destruction by off-road vehicles. The alternative is putting the sewer line in the roadway alignment with a pump station- approve the alternative and save the regional wildlife corridor. "Climb the mountains and get their good tidings." J. Muir 1895 "Wildness is a necessity." J. Muir ....even in small areas your citizens needwildness , Thank you for your consideration. See you on August 21 at the Council hearing, Sincerely, Sue Denner 'AnneH^song-CarlsbadOaksNo^ ,. ...f*V.....' Page-1..„,,.—„«*,_„,*„ ,,™,«, _—,.. .,.,-^ ^ ... ^ From: "kmerrill" <kmerrill@cts.com> To: "Carlsbad Planning Commission" <gwayn@ci.carlsbad.ca.us>, "Carlsbad City Council" <council @ ci.carlsbad.ca. us> Date: 8/1/02 3:42PM Subject: Carlsbad Oaks North project concerns Dear Council Members and Planning Commission, I have several concerns regarding the proposed Carlsbad Oaks North industrial park project.! would sincerely appreciate your careful consideration of these issues: 1: The Circulation Element of the General Plan has not been updated since 1978. The extension of Faraday Avenue and El Fuerte will cause severe impacts to the Palomar Airport Road and neighboring cities' traffic woes because it is not current in its' assessment of traffic and growth. The Circulation Element must be updated before any more roadways or development occurs to assure the data is consistent locally and regionally. 2: Carlsbad has a Habitat Management Plan, part of the regional Multiple Habitat Conservation Plan (MHCP), with this area identified as "core" habitat. How can the fragmentation of this remaining native habitat contribute to the success of the regional conservation effort? How then can you allow the impacts to the Aqua Hedionda watershed? As I am sure you are aware, this watershed and the lagoon (coastal waters too) are already distressed. The proposed roadway across Aqua Hedionda Creek is NOT at the least damaging location as required. Furthermore, the roadway should be constructed as a bridge to lessen the impact to the watershed and provide adequate wildlife corridors. 3: It is unacceptable to destroy mature Coast Live Oak trees. Some of these could be 200 years old! It is unlikely they would survive removal and transplanting. At best, they would be high care exotics. They would no longer be part of an oak woodlands habitat; saving a 'tree' does not constitute a habitat with it's complex relationship with other plants and over 300 species (50 of which are listed as threatened or endangered) of wildlife. These Coast Live Oaks should be avoided. 4:The proposed sewer line, topped by a 20' road and then called a trail' definitely needs some re-thinking. Not only will the sewer line and road destroy healthy native vegetation, it will invite more off-road activity to the area. Off-roading has already been a major problem in the whole open space area. I have seen little or no success in curbing this destructive behavior. I do not believe you can afford to allow these impacts to what is left of our native resources. Installing the sewer line along existing and proposed roads and using a pump station would eliminate the need for this impact. 5: Are you aware that there are only 13 nesting pairs of Northern Harrier in Southern California, one of which will be impacted by this project with no mitigation? The fact that there is no suitable habitat in which to mitigate should be sending up a red flag. Instead we get an 'oh well'. This should raise the alarm of how little of our natural resources are left!!! My concerns are heartfelt and if addressed properly will greatly improve the quality of our lives, as well as the plants and animals dependant on this land. Thank you, Karen Merrill 4743 Live Oak Court Oceanside, CA ZONE 16 The purpose of this document is to provide a plan for supplying the public facilities that will be needed to accommodate development within the Zone 16 area of the City of Carlsbad, in accordance with the City's Growth Management Program. The plan has been prepared in accordance with Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan of 1986. This document is the first amendment to the Zone 1.6 LFMP. The original Zone 16 LFMP was adopted by the City of Carlsbad on February 19,1992. Since the original approval of the Zone 16 LFMP, a number of land uses, development and demographic changes have occurred. These changes resulted in inconsistencies between the desired development and the findings and special conditions for land use, drainage, sewer collection system and circulation. In order to maintain consistency between the development requirements for Zone 16 and the changing land uses, this LFMP Amendment supersedes the previously approved Zone 16 LFMP. The primary purpose of this amendment is to revise the previous Zone 16 LFMP special conditions to reflect a General Plan amendment to accommodate the proposed development of Carlsbad Oaks North, which is east of El Camino Real and north of Palomar Airport Road. The Carlsbad Oaks North project generally decreases the overall impacts to public facilities when compared to existing general plan uses previously approved for this site. This change in land use is the catalyst that warrants the revisions to the LFMP Special Conditions. The revisions also consider the reduction in development area and the increase in open space as a result of the "hard line" designation of the Carlsbad Habitat Management Plan. In addition, a finance plan has been prepared as a part of the LFMP amendment to provide additional details regarding the financing of the necessary public facilities within Zone 16. The finance plan will accompany the LFMP Amendment in a separate document. The Introduction chapter provides the details regarding the land use changes and the justification for the preparation of the amendment. . Development Assumption? The first step in developing this plan is to estimate the amount of development that will be allowed in the zone. The types of land uses assumed for the zone are those shown in the Carlsbad General Plan. Exhibit 7, on Page 18 shows the location of the General Plan land uses, Planned Industrial (PI) and Open Space (OS), within the zone. Zone 16 is entirely zoned Planned Industrial (PM) and Open Space (OS) as shown on Exhibit 8, on Page 19. There are no residential land uses proposed within the zone, so no residential density analysis has been included. For determining the nonresidential development potential, it is assumed that building coverage would be approximately 35% of the net developable pads. This method yields an ultimate nonresidential development estimate of approximately 1,921,000 square feet. This is only an o o estimate or assumption for facility planning purposes and is 53% of the square footage assumed in the 1992 Zone 16 plan. Actual nonresidential development may vary. To determine the developable acreage, the following constrained lands were deducted: Major Power Line Easements Future Right-of-way of Circulation Element Roads Railroad Right-of-way Slopes Greater than 40% Riparian Woodland Wetlands Floodways Permanent Bodies of Water Other Environmental Features including HMP corridors and open-space Future School Sites The Plan includes phasing schedules that indicate the estimated non-residential square footage development projections for each year from 2005 to 2012. The property owners are not required to adhere to this phasing, and it is intended for facility planning purposes only. The schedule is used to determine approximate threshold years for constructing or upgrading various public facilities to maintain compliance with the Performance Standards in the Growth Management Program. The threshold years arrived at hi this way are only projections for facility planning purposes. The actual thresholds must be monitored as development takes place hi this zone. Facilities may be needed sooner or later than the threshold years shown hi this plan, depending upon the actual timing of development. The development, phasing and buildout years referred to in this document are used for facility planning purposes only. The actual timing of development will depend upon many outside factors. This zone plan assumes development phasing starts at the south and proceeds north with regard to the provision of public facilities. Zone 16 Requirements for Public Facilities The development assumptions outlined above are used to estimate the demand for public facilities generated by development hi Zone 16 based on the eleven adopted Performance Standards hi the Growth Management Program. The following table (Exhibit 2 on Page 6) shows the current status of each facility with respect to the Performance Standard, given the existing amount of development hi the zone. Because there is currently no developed land hi Zone 16, the public facility demands are presently minimal. Of the eleven Performance Standards, five are currently being met (Wastewater, Parks, Drainage, Fire and Open Space). The City Administrative, Library and School Performance Standards are not impacted by development in Zone 16 as they are residentially based. There are no existing Sewer or Water facilities serving Zone 16. In order to assure compliance with the Performance Standards as development occurs in the zone, the Plan contains specific conditions of approval which are listed in Exhibit 4, on Page 8. Exhibit 4, on Page 8 contains the General Conditions which are applicable to all zones of the City. Exhibit 5, on Page 10, contains Special Conditions for Zone 16. The Special Conditions state each facility that must be provided, whether it must be financed or constructed, and when it must be provided. The following is a list of the public facilities required to serve development in Zone 16. This chart shows whether the facility would otherwise be provided as a condition of approval of a development project, whether a special funding mechanism is needed, or whether the facility is funded by the Citywide Community Facilities District. City Administrative Facilities - Combination of Public Facilities Fees (PFF) and Citywide Mello-Ross Community Facilities District (CFD). Library - Combination of Public Facilities Fees and Citywide Mello-Roos Community Facilities District. Park Facilities - Standard Public Facilities Fee is required. A special growth management park fee of 400 per square foot of non-residential development is required. Drainage Facilities - Condition of approval of development project. Circulation Facilities - Combination of condition of approval of development projects, Mello- Roos CFD, or other financing mechanisms. Fire Facilities - Standard public facilities fee is required. Wastewater Treatment Capacity - Funding provided by sewer connection fees. Open Space - No special funding required. Schools - Payment of statutory school fees is required. Sewer - Condition of approval of development project and/or Sewer Benefit Area Fees. Water - Condition of approval of development project. o o Financing for Facilities Section 21.90.110(3) of the Municipal Code requires that Local Facilities Management Plans contain a discussion of various methods of funding the facilities and improvements identified in the plan. This plan for Zone 16 provides an estimated cost for each facility and one or more possible methods of funding. General Condition No. 10 states that annexation to, and participation in, the Citywide CFD is necessary in order to find that development within the zone is consistent with the Public Facilities Element of the Carlsbad General Plan. All Facilities not funded via the CFD will be provided as part of normal development requirements. City of Oceanside City of Vista Legend City Boundary LFM Zone Boundary City of Encinitas / / 23 Amendment 2002 Exhibit 1 Location Map Uiduiig Design Group LCXSAL EACIiiT!iSr MANAGEMENT ZONE,! 6 o o EXHIBIT 2 - Zone 16 Existing Public Facilities Summary Chart LFMP 89-16A Facility City Administrative Library Parks Drainage Circulation Fire Wastewater Treatment Capacity Open Space Schools Sewer Collection Water Distribution Conformance with Adopted Performance Standard Zone 16 has no impact upon the residential based performance standard for this facility. Zone 16 has no impact upon the residential based performance standard for this facility. Yes, existing facilities meet the adopted performance standard. Yes, existing drainage facilities meet the adopted performance standard. Yes, existing circulation facilities meet the adopted performance standard. Yes, existing fire facilities meet the adopted performance standard. Yes, existing facilities meet the adopted performance standard. Yes, existing open space meets the adopted performance standard. Zone 16 has no impact upon the residential based performance standard for this facility. There are no existing sewer collection facilities serving Zone 16. There are no existing water facilities serving Zone 16. EXHIBIT 3 - Zone 16 Buildout Public Facilities Summary Sheet LFMP89-16A Facility Conformance with Adopted Performance Standard City Administrative Existing and planned facilities meet the adopted performance standard through build out. Library Existing and planned facilities meet the ^ adopted performance standard through build out. Parks Existing and planned park facilities meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation measures through build out. Drainage Existing and planned drainage facilities meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation measures through build out. Circulation Circulation facilities meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation measures through build out. Fire Existing and planned fire facilities meet the adopted performance standard through build out. Wastewater Treatment Capacity Existing facilities meet the adopted performance standard. Open Space Existing open space meets the adopted performance standard through build out. Schools Existing and planned school facilities meet the adopted performance standard. Sewer Collection Sewer facilities meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation measures through build out. Water Distribution Water facilities meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation measures through build out. o, o' EXHIBIT 4 - General Conditions for Zone 16 LFMP 89-16A 1. All development within Zone 16 shall conform to the provisions of Section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and to the provisions and conditions of this Local Facilities Management Plan. 2. All development within Zone 16 shall be required to pay a public facilities fee pursuant to the standards adopted by the City Council on July 28,1987, and as amended from time to time and all other applicable fees. Development in Zone 16 shall also be responsible for any additional fees to be incorporated into this Plan that are found to be necessary to enable facilities to meet the adopted performance standard. 3. The City of Carlsbad shall monitor all facilities in Zone 16 pursuant to Subsections 21.90.130(c), (id) and (e) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 4. All development in Zone 16 shall be in conformance with the adopted Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan as adopted by City Council Resolution 8797 on September 23, 1986. 5. Periodic amendment to the Zone 16 Local Facilities Management Plan is anticipated to incorporate newly acquired data, to add conditions and upgrade standards as determined through the required monitoring program. Amendment to this Plan may be initiated by action of the property owners, Planning Commission or City Council at any time. 6. If a public facility or service is found not to be in conformance with an adopted performance standard during the yearly monitoring, or at any other time, the matter will be immediately brought before the City Council. If the City Council determines that a non-conformance does exist, then no future building or development permits, which would impact the facility, shall be issued unless an amendment to the Citywide Facilities and Improvement Plan or the Local Facilities Improvement Plan for this zone is approved by the City Council, which addresses those facility shortfalls and brings those facilities into conformance with the adopted performance standards. 7. After adoption of this Plan by the City Council, no building permits will be allowed unless the performance standards are compiled with. This includes all projects which are exempt under Section 21.90.030(c) of the City Municipal Code. 8. Approval for this Local Facilities Management Plan does not constitute prior -> environmental review for projects within Zone 16. All future projects within Zone 16 shall undergo environmental review per Title 19 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Any mitigation measures determined during a project's environmental review shall be complied with in their entirety unless findings of overriding consideration are made by the City Council. 9. Approval of this Plan does not constitute prior discretionary review for projects within Zone 16. All future projects shall undergo review per Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 10. Approval of any discretionary permit within Zone 16 shall be contingent upon the provision of adequate public facilities to satisfy the Public Facilities element of the General Plan. At this tune, a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District has been formed to finance the construction of several Citywide facilities necessary to serve new development. If the Zone 16 property does not annex into the district, the required General Plan consistency finding cannot be made and no discretionary approvals, building permits, grading permits, final maps, or development permits would be issued or approved; therefore, the property is conditioned to annex into CFD No. 1 as a condition of the first discretionary approval. A Planned Community Master Plan or a Specific Plan for the purpose of this Condition is not the first discretionary approval. o o EXHIBIT 5 - Special Conditions for Zone 16 LFMP 89-16A The following Special Conditions apply specifically to development in Zone 16 and must be complied with in addition to the General Conditions for Zone 16. These conditions are also listed separately under the analysis discussion of each facility. CITY ADMINISTRATION No special conditions. LIBRARY No special conditions. PARKS A growth management park fee of $.40 per square foot of non-residential development will be collected at the time of building permit issuance, to be used for park facilities serving Zone 16. DRAINAGE All future development in Zone 16 will be required to construct any future Zone 16 storm drain facilities identified in the current Drainage Master Plan as determined by the City Engineer. Any facilities necessary to accommodate future development must be guaranteed prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, for any development requiring future storm drain facilities in Zone 16. As required, a storm water pollution prevention plan will also be prepared and implemented for each lot. The SWPP consists of guidelines and activities to select and carry out actions that prevent the pollution of storm water discharge. In addition to the selected BMP's for each lot, the permanent water quality basins, located downstream will serve as additional treatment in removing pollutants from storm water runoff prior to discharge into the existing natural drainage course. As each lot is developed, the temporary desilting basins will be replaced with permanent BMP measures that will be appropriate for the specific use of each lot. When each individual lot is developed, it shall provide both source control and treatment control BMP's as described in the "California Storm Water Management Proactive Handbook" for industrial and commercial projects. Prior to the recordation of a final map, grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first for any development within Zone 16, the developers of the project are required to: •\ Pay the required drainage area fees established in the current Drainage Master Plan and; Provide the drainage facilities at the time of development to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Drainage facilities will include the detention basin upstream of Faraday Avenue and a 6* x 7' box culvert under Faraday Avenue. This basin and the three other ones off-site were identified in a 1998 Rick Engineering Company report prepared for the City of Carlsbad. The report was prepared to address the existing flood-prone areas in the Rancho Carlsbad Mobile Home Park at El Camino Real and Cannon Road. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be prepared and approved prior to issuance of a grading permit. The approved SWPPP shall be implemented during the construction phase. The SWPPP will consist of the selected BMP's, guidelines and activities to carry out actions which will prevent the pollution of storm water runoff. The SWPPP will also include the monitoring and maintenance of the construction BMP's during the construction phase. CIRCULATION In order to address future Growth Management issues, the City of Carlsbad is developing alternative strategies to facilitate the construction of essential roadway circulation elements. Faraday Avenue is a significant arterial roadway element that will be needed to accommodate projected traffic volumes regardless of development within Zone 16. The City is attempting to secure the environmental clearances, financing and right-of-way necessary to construct the road in the event development within Zone 16 does not occur in a timely manner. Therefore, the City is requiring that the developer enter into a right-of-way agreement with the City within 120 days of the approval of this revision to the Zone 16 LFMP. The agreement shall require the dedication of all necessary rights-of-way for the construction of Faraday Avenue within 60 days of receiving all of the necessary Agency permits. The required rights-of-way shall include, but not be limited to, the standard secondary arterial road right-of-way, all necessary slope and drainage easements and any construction easements that may be necessary to allow the construction of Faraday Avenue and all appurtenant facilities. Prior to the recordation of a final map, grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first within Zone 16, a comprehensive financing program guaranteeing construction of the following circulation improvements shall be approved: IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED 1. Melrose Drive - Palomar Airport Road to the Vista City limits Melrose Drive shall be graded to full width standards for a six lane Prime Arterial roadway. Construction of the two inside lanes (4 lanes) and raised median shall also be o o provided. Intersection improvements to Palomar Airport Road and Melrose Drive shall provide for the buildout configuration. 2. Melrose Drive and Palomar Airport Road Intersection In addition to Condition 1 above, Melrose Drive, on the south side of Palomar Airport Road shall be constructed to include modification of existing Melrose Drive and Palomar Airport Road intersection to provide one northbound through lane and one northbound Melrose Drive to eastbound Palomar Airport Road right turn lane. 3. El Fuerte Street - Existing Northerly Terminus to Faraday Avenue El Fuerte Street from its current terminus north of Loker Avenue to Faraday Avenue shall be constructed to include: a. Complete grading and improvements to ultimate right-of-way width of a secondary arterial standard. b. Modification of the existing traffic signal on the north side of Palomar Airport Road including restriping and signage. 4. Faraday Avenue from Orion Street Easterly to Melrose Avenue. Faraday Avenue from its existing terminus at Orion Street easterly to the Vista city limit shall be constructed to include: a. Complete grading and improvements to ultimate right-of-way width of a secondary arterial standard. b. Improvements to also include two animal crossings. 5. Faraday Avenue and El Camino Real Intersection Modifications shall be made at the intersection of Faraday Avenue and El Camino Real to provide one additional westbound to northbound right turn lane. FIRE No special conditions are necessary. WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY No special conditions are necessary. However, each sewer district to ensure adequate wastewater treatment capacity through buildout shall pursue the following action jointly. Monitor Encina Treatment plant flows on a monthly basis to determine actual flow rates and to have an early warning of capacity problems. OPEN SPACE No special conditions are necessary. SCHOOLS Payment of statutory school fees is required. SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM All development within Zone 16 is required to pay the appropriate sewer connection fee prior to issuance of any building permit.\ Prior to the recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first for any development in Zone 16, a financing mechanism guaranteeing the construction of the following sewer facilities must be provided: Alternative #1: City Master Sewer Plan Alternative: The South Agua Hedionda Sewer Interceptor would serve existing and planned industrial development within the South Agua Hedionda Basin. The proposed interceptor segment is a 15- inch, gravity-flow trunk sewer and will be approximately 3.4 miles in length. Alternative #2: Project Proponent Alternative: The Environmental Impact Report for Carlsbad Oaks North (EIR 98-08), when certified will allow for application to the wildlife agencies to be completed. If for environmental reasons or agency requirements, Alternative #1 cannot be implemented, then Alternative #2 would be used for permanent sewer service for Carlsbad Oaks North Specific Plan. Sewer Alternative #2 would involve the construction of a force-main sewer rather than a gravity sewer. Under this option, the sewer would be carried in Faraday Avenue to El Camino Real and then head north and connect with the South Agua Hedionda Interceptor system near College Boulevard. If Alternative #2 is implemented, a sewer pump station would be constructed at Lot #9 in the Specific Plan area. Also, a gravity sewer would be constructed south of the La Mirada Creek to capture sewer flow from the Raceway sewer basin (LFMP Zone 18). Currently, the SAHI in El Camino Real flows out of the basin to the North Agua Hedionda Interceptor. There is limited capacity in NAH1 and cannot accommodate on a permanent basis additional out of basin flows. The Cannon Road Pump Station, force main and gravity line must be completed and operational prior to issuance of building permits. o o WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM All development within Zone 16 shall pay a major facilities fee based on E.D.U.'s to the Carlsbad Municipal Water District and a capacity charge to the San Diego County Water Authority. Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first for any development in Zone 16, a financing mechanism guaranteeing the construction of the following water facilities must be provided: Service Area A (700 Zone Water) The following water facilities will be required as a condition to the approval of future development within Service Area A to the satisfaction of the City. 1. The proposed potable 16-inch water main in Melrose Avenue from Palomar Airport Road to future Faraday Avenue, in future El Fuerte Street and in future Faraday Avenue. 2. The proposed reclaimed 8-inch main in Melrose Avenue from Palomar Airport Road to Faraday Avenue and in future Faraday Avenue. Service Area B f550 Zone Water) The following potable water facilities will be required as a condition to the approval of future development within Service Area B to the satisfaction of the City. 1. The proposed pressure reducing station in future "D" Street. 2. The proposed 16-inch water main in future "D" Street east of future El Fuerte Street, and in Faraday westerly to Orion Street. 3. The proposed 12-inch water main in the future "D" Street west of future El Fuerte Street. 4. The proposed reclaimed 8-inch main in a future street north of future Faraday Avenue. RECLAIMED SYSTEM Similar to the potable water system for Zone 16, there are two service pressure zones - Elevation 550 and 660. Elevation 550 Zone 1. A proposed 12" main in Faraday Avenue from El Camino Real east to westerly "D" Street. 2. A proposed 8" line in Faraday Avenue from westerly "D" Street to easterly "D" Street. 3. An 8" line in both "A" and "B" Streets. Elevation 660 Zone 1. A proposed 12" main in Melrose Avenue from Palomar Airport Road to Faraday Avenue. 2. A proposed 12" main in Faraday Avenue between Melrose and easterly "D" Street. 3. A proposed 12" main in "D" Street. 4. A proposed 8' line in both "C" and "D" Streets. GRADING ANALYSIS: SHEET 1 Of 18 SHEETS C.T. 97-13 TENTATIVE MAP FOR CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH BUSINESS PARK s o-fW _ N---X cur 3313.OOO Cr JT&OOD cr r&OOO cr nu. 3,313.000 cr jn>ooo cr 74000 cr f.teo.ooo cr tm AC i? tc t AC 333 MC GRADING NOTE: WX»50MZ7JMr*tUT«lCM 0UPH? OtOU W AUK MflJ MM (*nnur GUOMCigmmtiuF maaut ouo^csvturfaansu trimre i&ume luttvaxsi rar a««»w CMmum mivvAtam* mi am mcr* oner At ut w » or a* N.P.D.E.S. NOTE ectavmwma* wemattrstAti tminnaflrs _ . . ,fta/ia aue max.*>rnot X ananti at at mr or'of nua*R *trni& nun nsa /ivrjrsxH*ia ivtr Knout ft* incuts i A sunvsiwIP MFfr 0UWKT IP 4 ftVVUffT ***mt (** **s HO r**a* a rn*snc «*s turn w * « it«£S roevrrna near ins 9BV LEGAL DESCRIPTION:GENERAL NOTES: K*-O>O-(K. tt, tr 4146 1C tf tor V or IUMHO AW* tOXMH # *€ Crrror no trt rus a ft omcr v "f caormrtnvor tr MVarm cow mew « '«« uapm; ntttmium twitct *c SCWWt rtr m rnxnt* rat or fMsauo autr m »-/ifia nun IIP # if vm a mt twwrrpfa> cauffr. ENGINEER/LAND SURVEYORHUUBDt * cussnctrm or tots ?J wtsrw un r sow* *w SMnav torion cv mime sworatrtD CMLSWO UWCO 5CMKI . mtrof owner MMCR« WOO ITT AX/TM or A41OOAD OH CtttTUn/HC orviciNin MAP NDSDU couwr* \WICM ratumot1900 J«P*7* ©2002 O'Ooy Consultants, EASEMENT NOTES: /ZSy PtfllHKIf GJ soar awn * O soetf ucte O* 2MUV v" »-»M77 HOT n eoHsmxr ewsav cor OF W/ii t/t>/71 VM/a r/H nn-maaa vw r/Ktt-iriMr l/tvtt tor/ I 4 * * -±*— n-— F— w», » , f • ' „ ,-s — ITU tor a*t (K> H»'?«Inf » u ^u;«*</ tPa/ "/•« <0 ty 8 rag MS 001 (K) l, J *« 7 J*! «/< «j» » » > t/j«*»«3»*/ ^J n» ^e^ VAC MOOT *0 «ft * WILDUIT UHOnXKOSSINC(ifi &'tax SKiml .y-' ^CC JBQPW—^ I v a.nt or m&atx mr 4VSVDt9*tf» faicm/TriM/aotspttf EXISTING FARADAY *VE. (CITY OF CAffLSffAO) WILOUFt UHDWCROSSING & OUtfTJjr SKTON) •OKU ** sa man ummcmssmc SK7IONS. THG SHCCT «*>- "**'<8S arisriHC rtRunr Avr. ran or VISTA} SAEf 7" .? 0f 18 SHEETS C.T. 97-13 ^TO ^toBS^kraBS^^SSSSsACTTT'^ HM?W T n rVwa...™.? V^,i AWNUt ^~l\a> Hr ^ 4* AC MIT AC* »" 4*fiw; or 45 tfcauMxyeransoKfiox STffffTS 'A' THROUGH 'D'>0 taif ^ ffl SECTION C-C KOtOft TYPICAL SECTIONS HXIU t,r K» at** • m PROFILE - DETENTION FACILITY SfcnoH eiuticD SWALC o TOP or sLOfc CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH BUSMCSS PARK or' '4 f/n j , PLAN - FARADAY AVENUE SfwtwtD STBCTT st*w uoutMea tfHtO* HOB rur SOUTH Of n*ou# t MpffM eourtrr *t*nc*t covanx DAU*->900 30B*nwrs ifs.i QDIIMULT<niT» (7/- 18 SHEETS C.T. 97-13 !'i'.,' ,**•'' ."- "--~ YiV'il'.'i'i''". ,' ''••! - » IV - . , .•v ,.••/,::••::'• . <?/" /* 5/ffiTA5c.r. 57-/j s SETBACK- NOTE SIM.ONG MifHRCSUPPRCSSIOH'XIBACK SIGHT DISTANCE TABLE JWJTa«sr*aw mac**'*«EWI mam* astnsum 101** »*» atvmofr«r*«T ttorai utnrr CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH BUS/NESS PARK '400 tITmv tw GOWDKMT orQ C4MMO «« MO*** couvrrn-iKo xa+ 29' fS M5< SEE SHEET NO. 3 SHEET 5 OF 18 SHEETS C.T. 97-13 'ACK N/~\ ¥[ SHfFT t2 >v BUIOHC MB nOT .suppression srmjor I CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH BUS/NESS PARK ©2002 O'Doy Cwsullonlj, Inc. f«D /ZZT 5M/TW (K ._ MW o« catrmirt ora cwiw «« «O»rw CUff tVHKH COvnCV 0<M 7*7^5 U.H BDM1U1.T«OIT« ftVUsa 4L 4 "V \:ss1 llm iTMZD Off 'I Jfs; ssaJj SHEET 6 OF 18 SHEETS C.T. 97-13 SEE SHEET NO. 4 CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH BUSINESS PARK 7 Or 18 SHEETS •*• C.T. 97-13 I SETBACK NOTE SET SHtrr ifOU/LONC Mi,SUPPR[SSION\.J CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH BUSINESS PARK SECTION 'A-A' W SCHJE ©2002 O'Doy Consultants, he suuuw sntcfr 5U*vrf udHwvff **f*o* HOO nn SOUTH or AKKMM* I Atvnw co&trr tcncv «wm« a«u»- r«R) JO*J '* M'79 HS.I Afrvtvju. 4 mt BOHMULTjyMTl ^5i ST SHEET 8 OF 18 SHEETS C.T. 97-J3 *'V r-r- ^ —"i^S^-i-^-jl'^-'!;^ CARLSBAD OAKS BUSINESS PARK tS'i'iSta* \ im **rxs off ftat d <m <r*9o nt 1ar >3 w vinu' JM «7 SHEET 9 OF 18 SHEETS 331- 32( -Hi BOS' Ot ft STRUT a 2BO — 270 C.T.97-13 301 — 291 fWOSEP SfflOTT Ot OMflf -\\ ic* ma ntr - m.t fa POS& SIXER ct cwv — 260 — 250 S40 -o281 - 271- -set 230 220 25t - 241- ! e ST emu » smn a (orrsiTE) CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH BUSINESS PARK PLAN: FARADAY AVENUE ©2002 O'Doy Caraultonli. toe. SHKT 10 OF JHEETS 346 C.T.V7-13 maftewwrofp- j S, '"WsA.mtW( nan.fi - 340 306- 2B6- ~ais' asm » smn - 30:0 26* 240 — zap - 240 206— IBS— PROFILE - ^RADAY AVENGE (ON-SITE) 210 it y ssv-.w.400 360— 380 3SO -349--S4»- 310— 300— 120 300 280 280 OWflT • J7HGFT Ct U PROFILE - EL 90 40 5HMMV sner stmrr MMUKW - . MOP nrr soum or...4MAOT AW »V COflUIVNf Ofa uuianx tmmt cottar wncv connOL ot\ :ARLSBAD OA> BUSINESS NORTH SHEET 12 Or IB SHEETS C.T. 97-13 NOTCS; 1. ALL LOTS ARC SUBJCCT TO ffVflOPHCMT STMMKOS SfT FOKTH IN SP 111. 2. FRONT scrBACKS tn KOUIKD TO etme umuuu DisrtMCC spccimo on TOTOP or SLOPC, WHICHCVCR a CRCATCR. 10' WIDC Fin suprmssioH tour BUILDING AND FIRE SUPPRESSION SETBACK MAP CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH BUSINESS PARK SJXBT s&ntr 1100 1TT JW7V -• SHEET 13 Of IS SHEETS C.T. 97-13 TENTATIVE MAP FOR 'LSBAD OAKS NORTH BUSINESS PARK SEWER OPTION 1 O ©2002 O'Ofly Consullonts. hie. ,, © OPEN SPACE f(f:f—^—-^ ®Hrt*- v ^ IL *^k j^-®~t ir*Is •*J**W*«t.v.-» - ^. .f. • • •• 1 — *-. —^^^•"•-ijriy y_- — ^-^rTx. ®i /'~-'CVx~v..^ // -->xv. W /? v\ H- SHEET 14 OF 18 SHEETS C.T. 97-13 \ TENTATIVE MAP FOR %»i» CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH BUSINESS PARK SEWER OPTION 2 PHASE 1 no save fitug It tan - t*i t*.r. t 4 /a ", t» - sar snc*mrmt mur (Xs SWMV ov CMffr, SNOT *b.» /£ u i< F - «i nouna mmH #«Sf 9ix*ovrr fa SMMW on rmj.- Moaonm amnr tar srsra/ AS VOUKD gr CMKAK pout - «i newt mm fwsf gawevrt ps MCNWOV rttj. t rum. «OfflOM or S-cvr-ru • r (4(000 crM9*r - IM.OOO C.Y /5 or is SHEETS C.T. 97-13 XKJ4V * tors - t* 14 to. '* /7, r« r» snet - <«u *w rxtmn MM* mur ft* SNOW <w ru). - 9tf AW MMStW tXMttT, SHOT Ah* It, 13, I*. WMSF / PROJECT PHASING FOR CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH BUSINESS PARK His »»«*«?.}«? ?™s;i^ ©2002 OtJoy Consuttonti, he. SHEET IB Or 18 SHEETS C.T. 97-13 PHASE 3 WXXif »*r V/////A tors - JQ ti, a. M « n « *' *T, SWZT *»• //, fJt '4 AMIT , jwn» - Mt Ftcvng warn pwst govNOtrr (ts SMMH on ruf.- AotxnotHt offyir IOOP smut *s /KQIMRCD gr cuwo. from OWN - MI riouiifs mnm fmsf mx/noarr fits SMOHI OH in).- ra*o***r OfTsrrt stotu O*MH$ ryt txmnr/nfom st& frc AS *ftM*a> ffr etrr c starts ~ SHOT »; sm&r v MO woo* or sn&r - CUT - M8.000 C.fnt, - ',«?«» cr•ram * JUDOO c r fjii.oao cr r*o* PROJECT PHASING FOR CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH BUSINESS PARK HS'j-i J»{» #«SO>fr '13 <»r <t*H*jSi 5MMMW smrt suHvn uowvoa 1400 fin stumHOfO OH C0mx*€ OfO. CMOHO KM. MO*TH COUMTT \0mcM POM! U LTJTHT1 SSi SHEET 17 Or 18 SHEETS C.T. 97-13 o PROPOSED lUHMVCHOnS rOK PM.OHUI MRPOKr ROM / ft FUCPTC INTCHSfCTION a ware orrsiTE STRIPING PLAN FOR CARLSPAD OAKS NORTH BUS/NESS PARK ($2002 O'Doy Consultonts. Inc. SMADMP SJJfffT SUHTY MWUCW 1400 rEFT SOUTH Of MIOU&now OH cowm* ofa CMtNO KM MOTH COUNTY vumcM. COHTHOI O*TA*- I8OP JOB*V 297J3 M5.1 SHEET 18 OF IB SHEETS C.T. 97-13 'v-*"•>' i X^*^'"^0ji rf^i.'lf' '• ', i *** "" -" ' rfl, 'i 'f 3'-.' - ,' 3po , '- / -H -- <«» ^^',/- ;.// :i^!'&" r«WL /,- m<>^"-;«^4:jLjaLi£ei&tfc>---t -...-.-.---.'- -r^* -,. ^\ - '" • <~i'',5 S '7*'-£!«it ?'•! -!. ( ' i' -' ', > il1'.' - 'l x\ V^lfc—JnpflnM MfjAwifv <FM*B n •IOPI10N 28 W4V11V SE»Oi ici)NK[Cis49 E/ISTINC , PLAN: 8AH T1 D. E & Q - j>*'•""-- -i**" '-•!•'•"'•' ''j'<V"- "^'-"'lA^ •-="'' " 'I'.'''," ill't/l'1" "= •" ?**3> - '":., ':'>''!• T'H-VI*^'"', i-- ,"?'i . J",'','r'1 i*;!1, 7, ""*r. Y •f . lr, r V-" v ' v'1.^ -V- ?f<^«t;>-^b**- c T- .fii* ----- *5fHCT APff5 ' Mdvar ttmoffft* ami ^ - -A:r: CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH BUSINESS PARK Jsli'liS tsea*^*KSOf 4W 1 rjM »*SP flTf 'i /R»<TK&>«< n nv *»rao/i» 2 ww PLAN; 8AH T1 A. B. C & D' ^«y*ro Jt j «j ~-Jxa =3.~ssi2 — -SON ENGINEERING; 7604380173; Jul-2'4-02 8:37; Page 2/3 tadurig Design Group, Inc. July 23, 2002 AnneHysong City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: CAIOSBADOAKSNORIH^FMPAMEISIDMENT (LADWIQ DESIGN GROUP, INC. JOB NO. L-1021) Dear Anne: Yesterday I received from you a letter dated July 21" reference the need for certain exhibits to be submitted to you by July 30th for the Carlsbad Oaks North project The items you asked forwere 18 copies of the tentative map, constraints map, landscape plans, Specific Plan 211, and Zone 16LFMP Amendment. Also. I picked up from you on July 22nd a marked up copy of the Specific Plan. I will be able to submit to you before the 30th the Specific Plan with your latest changes. O'Day Consultants will be submitting the tentative map and constraints map and ADL Planning Associates will be submitting the landscape plans. I will also submit by the 30* the radius map, owner list and labels, and fee. Based on what I know today, the LFMP amendment will not be submitted on July 30th, After I sent a note to you last week with my concerns about the timing, I contacted Willdan, who is doing the LFMP traffic; report, and both Carrie Garden and Wes Pringle said that their latest round of changes identified by the City's consultant (RBF Consulting) will not be completed until this Friday, July 26th. I contacted Wes Pringle again yesterday and he reconfirmed that there is no way that they can have their work completed before that time. In addition, I talked to Clyde Wickham yesterday and he also reiterated that he needs to review the traffic report again to ensure mat the City's comments and RBFs comments have been incorporated into the report As I have indicated to you before, I have made all the changes that you had requested to the LFMP with the exception of the changes to the circulation section. These City changes were identified in a letter addressed to me from you dated June 25th. 703 Polomor flirport Rood 4 Suite 300 4- Carlsbad, California 92009 (760)438-3162 fTOC (760) 438-0173 JON ENGINEERING; 7604380173; Jul-24-Q2 8:37; Page 3/3 AaneHysong July 23,2002 Page 2 Assuming I receive in my office the Willdan amended LFMP traffic report on Monday, July 29*, I would be able to have my changes based on that report back in to the City no later than August 7*, which is about a week and a half beyond the 30*. This schedule would not allow the City time to review and comment on the traffic study prior to me making my changes. The completion of the LFMP amendment that I am doing is based on the traffic information that I have not received to date. This is information that I need that is not in my control. Would receiving the LFMP report from me on August 7° still meets the City's timing for the hearing tentatively scheduled for the 21"? If not, I would suggest that the hearing time be postponed to coincide with the completion of all the documents that the City needs to present at the public heating. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, LADWIG DESIGN GROUP, INC. Robert C? Ladwig, President RCL:mo cc: Marshall Plantz City of Carlsbad Clyde Wickham, City of Carlsbad Tim Gnibus, Cotton Bridges Association Paul Tchang, Ted Tchang and Doug Woods, Tcchbilt Construction Ron Rouse, Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps Tim Carroll, O'Day Consultants Mike McCottum, McCollum & Associates Tony Lawson, AJDL Planning Associates 703 PQlomor fllrport Rood +• Suite 300 + Carlsbad, California 92009 (760) 438-3182 FflX (760) 438-0173 City of Carlsbad Planning Department June 25, 2002 Bob Ladwig Ladwig Design Group 703 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 300 Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: REVIEW OF ZONE 16 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT Staff has reviewed the Zone 16 LFMPA submitted on June 6, 2002. Marked-up copies are provided from Clyde Wickham, Steve Jantz, Helga Stover, and myself. The following summarizes the key comments and suggestions: 1. GENERAL. The wording of conditions of approval should follow the standard for LFMPs, e.g. "Prior to final map, grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first..." 2. CIRCULATION. The traffic study from Willdan was received shortly after you submitted this draft of the LFMP, and there may be some inconsistencies between the two. The Willdan study has been sent to RBF for third party review. It is recommended that you wait to receive RBF's comments before revising the Circulation section. Also please see Clyde's comments regarding condition wording and the inclusion of Melrose. 3. SEWER AND WATER. The sewer section needs to include the two primary alternatives for the SAHI alignment so that we can go whichever way the City Council or wildlife agencies decide without having to amend the plan. 4. FINANCING. Helga Stover has a few comments on the Financing section. 5. SCHEDULING. Staff has some concern regarding timing. The targeted Planning Commission date has now been moved to August 21, which gives us another two weeks. However, there may still be a considerable amount of work to be done to revise the Circulation section and incorporate whatever comments RBF may have. It will be important to resubmit the next draft as soon as possible after receiving RBF's comments so that we can remain on the schedule for August 21. Our goal is to deliver documents to the Planning Commissioners by the first week of August. Given the time required for final reviews and printing, we will have to be very efficient over the next month. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us If you have any questions about this process, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Don Rideout Principal Planner DR:cs c: Anne Hysong Clyde Wickham Steve Jantz Glenn Pruim Memorandum TO: Principal Planner Don Rideout Associate Planner Anne Hysong Associate Engineer Steve Jantz FROM: Associate Engineer Clyde Wickham DATE: June 21, 2002 COMMENTS FOR ZONE 16 LFMP SUBMITTAL DATED JUNE 6th, 2002 I have reviewed the draft submitted by Bob Ladwig on June 6th, 2002 and have the following comments to make: 1. The Traffic Section is still incomplete, although a traffic report was submitted 2 days ago, the report nevertheless is lacking on this subject. The applicant should reread the report and include all mitigatigation identified within the City of Carlsbad 2. The Mitigation Section concerning Traffic is also in need of revision. There seems to be an error to omit Melrose Drive as required mitigation. 3 The Melrose Drive improvements need revision (lane configuration is incorrect). 4. The general conditions that use "Prior to issuance of a building permit" should say "Prior to approval of Final Map, or Grading Permit whichever occurs first. The exact wording should be cleared with Don and Steve for consistency. This statement occurs throughout * the text. 5. Page 30 refers to "this analysis". The LFMP is not considered an analysis, I believe the correct wording should be "this report", again confer with Steve or Don on correct wording. 6. The proposed inventory, # 2 on page 31 should also correspond to exhibit 13. 7. Additional comments are attached to page 35 relative to NPDES requirements (frjam the specific plan). 8. Reclaimed Water is proposed for this site (check the TM) and information is available to be included in the LFMP Refer to Tim Carrol at O'Dat or check with Bill Plummer This completes my review of the LFMP as submitted. The traffic report has been forwarded to RBF for 3rd party review and comments should be ready in a week. Uiclwig Design Group, Inc. June 6,2002 Don Rideout City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Re: ZONE 16 LFMP AMENDMENT (LADWIG DESIGN GROUP, INC. JOB NO. L-1021) Dear Don: Enclosed are three copies of the revised LFMP amendment for Zone 16, including the first draft of the finance section. I am also including the checkprints I received from Clyde Wickham, Steve Jantz, and yourself. To date, I have not received the LFMP traffic report from Willdan. Willdan' s office has been talking to City staff and to RBF and I have been told that I will be receiving copies of the traffic report from them next Wednesday, June 12th. As soon as I receive the reports, I will forward copies to you to help in your review of the attached LFMP amendment. For the traffic portion of the LFMP amendment, I did follow the large traffic report that has already been reviewed by the City staff. There are a few graphics that I need from the traffic engineer to insert into this amendment. By copy of this letter, I am asking Tim Carroll at O'Day Consultants to review all of the cost figures for facilities shown in the amendment. I have obtained most of these numbers from Tim, but I would like them to be reviewed firsthand by Tim. 703 Palomar flirport Road +• Suite 300 «• Carlsbad, California 92009 (760) 438-3182 FflX (760) 438-0173 Don Hideout June 6, 2002 Page 2 Please look the amendment over and if you feel it would be helpful to get together to go over any comments City staff might have, please give me a call. I look forward to your response. Sincerely, LADWIG DESIGN GROUP, INC. Robert C. Ladwig, President RCL:mo Enclosures cc: Anne Hysong, City of Carlsbad (w/one enclosure) Clyde Wickham, City of Carlsbad (w/one enclosure) Ted Tchang, Techbilt Construction (w/two enclosures) Tim Carroll, O'Day Consultants (w/one enclosure) 703 Polomar flirport Road 4 Suite 300 4 Carlsbad, California 92009 (760) 438-3182 FflX (760) 438-0173 Locluiig Design Group, Inc. May 21, 2002 RECEIVED MAY 2 t 2002 CITY OF CARLSBAD Faraday Avenue PLANNING DEPT. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Re: ZONE 16 LFMP AMENDMENT/CITYWIDE PHASING (LADWIG DESIGN GROUP, INC. JOB NO. L-1021) Dear Don: Enclosed is my update of the citywide phasing for the Zone 16 LFMP amendment. I ask that you please review the phasing for me and get back to me with any comments you might have. For the basis of the phasing, I have used the existing numbers for January 1, 2001 taken from the Zone 18 LFMP amendment that was approved recently. I then used the summary of growth projections provided by you from the Finance Department to complete the phasing schedule. Because the City uses the mid-year as the beginning and ending of their fiscal year, I have extrapolated the numbers from the City finance data. In addition to your above review, I did leave a message with you about a week ago about showing only the non-residential phasing in the Zone 16 LFMP amendment. Several of the non-residential zones, in the past, have only shown the non-residential phasing numbers. Because there are no residential units in Zone 16,1 would like to ask you to confirm that it would be okay to only show the non-residential phasing numbers. On the circulation section, I have received an updated traffic report from Willdan, but it did not include Melrose Avenue in the analysis. I have asked Willdan to include Melrose and I expect their updated report shortly. 703 Palomar flirport Road + Suite 300 + Carlsbad, California 92009 (760) 438-3182 FflX (760) 438-0173 Don Rideout May 21,2002 Page 2 I look forward to your review and response. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, LAD WIG DESIGN GROUP, INC. Robert C. Ladwig, President RCL:mo Enclosures cc: Anne Hysong, City of Carlsbad (w/enclosures) Ted Tchang, Techbilt Construction (w/enclosures) 703 Pcilomar flirport Road + Suite 300 + Carlsbad, California 92009 (760) 438-3182 FflX (760) 438-0173 CITY WIDE NON-RESIDENTIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE PROJECTIONS *** FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY *** STATUS Existing Projected — _ _ ... Build Out YEARS as of 1/1 NOTES 2002 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 TOTAL LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONES 1 .2 34 5 67 8 (1) 404,257 108,320 73,993 73,993 28,381 28,381 0 35,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 - 202,758 0 0 0 0 0 1,655,083 78,103 0 0 0 1,250 1,250 6,000 6,000 8,603 8,603 7,950 7,950 0 0 0 0 0 n -u 0 0 0 0 0 0 125,709 438,690 60,906 27,575 33,110 6,285 3,250 14,950 21,760 20,120 10,065 9,400 9,400 0 0 0 0 0 0~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 655,511 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25,000 25,000 0 0 nu - 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 6,383,336 504,696 271,585 275,000 275,000 275,000 275,000 275,000 275,000 211,539 74,039 0 0 0 , 0 25,384 44,653 4Q ^Q1'ta.oy i 84,116 53,994 0 0 0 0 9,352,733 127,553 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 127,553 0 . 0 0 0 5,445 16,335 10,890 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32,670 3,800 0 0 0 0 3,000 3,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0..... o 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,800 NOTES: (1) The phasing numbers contained in this spreadsheet were obtained from the existing square footages for Jan. 1, 2001 in the Dec. 2001 LFMP Amendment for LFMP Zone 18 plus the summary of growth projections for 2002-2003 (City of Carlsbad Finance Dept.) dated 3/12/02. Zone 16 LFMP Amendment May 2002 CITY WIDE NON-RESIDENTIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE PROJECTIONS *** FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY *** • • YEARS as of 1/1 NOTES 2002 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 -901R - 2019 2020 2021 2022 . 2023 2024 TOTAL LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONES 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 (D 191,761 0 0 0 0 0 37,500 75,000 75.POO 75,000 42,600 46,961 46,400 4,539 4,250 4,250 0o 0 0 0 0 0 0 603,261 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -_o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63,402 14,218 34,443 27,435 0 0 37,500 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 62,630 25,130 0 0 0 o — 0 0 0 0 0 0 639,758 11,001 0 0 0 0 0 15,000 15,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 41,001 1,732,013 50,000 111,271 61,271 0 17,250 17,250 75,319 150,638 150,638 150,638 150,638 150,638 150,638 150,636 75,317 75,317 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,269,472 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 37,500 15,690 6,380 6,380 6,380 6,380 6,380 6,380 6,380 6,380 6,379 3,189 0 0 0 338,798 0 0 0 0 331,513 144,297 144,297 313,753 381 ,832 196,836 196,836 211,636 0 0 0 0 0 0 -"- 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,921,000 0 0 0 100,000 209,000 234,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 225,000 200,000 200,000 185,000 85,000 0 0 ... o 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,438,000 NOTES: (1)The phasing numbers contained in this spreadsheet were obtained from the existing square footages for Jan. 1, 2001 in the Dec. 2001 LFMP Amendment for LFMP Zone 18 plus the summary of growth projections for 2002-2003 (City of Carlsbad Finance Dept.) dated 3/12/02. Zone 16 LFMP Amendment May 2002 CITY WIDE NON-RESIDENTIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE PROJECTIONS *** FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY *** YEARS as of 1/1 NOTES 2002 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 --- 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 TOTAL LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONES 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 4,091 0 111,000 222,000 222,000 222,000 237,000 237,000 222,000 222,000 222,000 222,000 222,500 111,500 0 0 0o _ _ . 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,477,091 (D 267,866 43,645 46,120 46,120 46,120 46,120 23,060 28,950 28,950 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 576,951 1,948 0 6,725 6,725 0 0 15,000 15,000 0 15,000 15,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,398 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 147,539 0 2,000 2,000 0 0 10,890 30,890 29,500 9,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 232,319 210,910 403,970 103,500 135,470 74,970 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 928,820 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 TOTAL CITYWIDE SQUARE FOOTAGE 10,066,270 1,185,755 788,212 983,124 1,224,964 1,040,883 1,147,337 1,503,672 1,636,643 1,331,681 1,104,153 999,965 758,548 578,187 341,266 181,331 196,350 125,771 293,254 60,373 3,189 0 0 0 25,550,928 NOTES: (1) The phasing numbers contained in this spreadsheet were obtained from the existing square footages for Jan. 1, 2001 in the Dec. 2001 LFMP Amendment for LFMP Zone 18 plus the summary of growth , projections for 2002-2003 (City of Carlsbad Finance Dept.) dated 3/12/02. Zone 16 LFMP Amendment May 2002 City of Carlsbad Planning Department April 17, 2002 Bob Ladwig Ladwig Design Group 703 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 300 Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: REVIEW OF ZONE 16 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT Staff has reviewed the Zone 16 LFMPA submitted on March 14, 2002. Although the document remains incomplete, staff has provided a thorough review of what was submitted. Marked-up copies are provided from Clyde Wickham, Steve Jantz and myself. The following summarizes the key comments and suggestions: 1. FORMATTING. This amendment will be a page-replacement version rather than a complete new document. Therefore, a number of formatting comments are provided to make the amendment fit into the old document. 2. CIRCULATION. A Circulation section was not provided in this submittal. This is one of the primary reasons for the amendment. A complete circulation analysis must be provided that is consistent with what is contained in the draft EIR. The Traffic Report from Willdan-WPA must be included as an Appendix. Please note that Melrose must be addressed in this analysis. 3. PHASING. Citywide residential and non-residential phasing must be provided consistent with the projections from the City's Finance Department, which have been provided to you previously. 4. SCHOOLS. A school section is not necessary because there is no change to the special conditions from the adopted 1992 plan. 5. OPEN SPACE. An open space section is not necessary because there is no change to the special conditions from the adopted 1992 plan. 6. FINANCING. A Financing Plan was not included in this submittal. This section must be included in the next submittal so that it can be reviewed by the Finance Department. If you have any questions about this process, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, < Don Rideout Principal Planner DR.cs c: Anne Hysong Clyde Wickham Steve Jantz 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us -Tchang)Jaasaaay.ay-y.iy ~if .... From: Don Rideout To: AnneHysong; Clyde Wickham; Steve Jantz Date: 3/15/02 9:19AM Subject: Zone 16 LFMP Amendment (Tchang) This draft was resubmitted on 3/14 and I have distributed it today. I am also returning to Steve his comments from the last draft. Please note that the document still does not include Citywide Phasing, a Circulation section or a Financing section. These are the same parts that were missing from the last submittal (Sept. 01). Therefore our review will have to be limited to what they have given us, which does not appear to be substantially different from the last draft. Please give your comments to me by April 8 and I will put together a letter back. Thanks. Don R. CC:Carrie Loya-Smalley; Glenn Pruim; Marshall Plantz Uiduiig Design Group, Inc. March 14, 2002 Don Rideout City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Re: ZONE 16 LFMP AMENDMENT M., (LADWIG DESIGN GROUP, INC. JOB NO. L-1021) M>i ' * 2002 At our last meeting about a week ago with Lloyd Hubbs, Clyde Wickham, Marshall Plantz, and Anne Hysong, Clyde asked that I submit the LFMP amendment for review as soon as possible, even if it is not complete. Attached are three copies for you to review. I am also attaching the marked up copy that Steve Jantz provided late last year. In addition, I am giving Anne Hysong a copy, along with Clyde. Thank you for giving me the summary of growth proj ections the other day. I still need to go through that information, along with completing the finance plan for your review. I look forward to your comments. I know there are some items missing, but as indicated, Clyde was anxious to look at whatever was available for his review. If you would like to get together or if you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, LADWIG DESIGN GROUP, INC. Robert C. Ladwig, President RCL:mo Enclosures cc: Anne Hysong, City of Carlsbad (w/one enclosure) Clyde Wickham, City of Carlsbad (w/one enclosure) Ted Tchang and Doug Woods, Techbilt Construction (w/two enclosures) Tim Carroll, O'Day Consultants (w/one enclosure) 703 Palomcir flirport Road + Suite 300 + Carlsbad, California 92009 (760) 438-31 82 FflX (760) 438-01 73 SUMMARY OF GROWTH PROJECTIONS 2002-2003 PRELIMINARY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT COMPARISON TO LAST YEAR'S PROJECTIONS 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 02 - 03 - 04 - 05 - 06 - 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 XX ADJUSTMENT TOTAL Residential Units 2001-2002 916 992 825 625 671 500 607 529 591 555 505 381 421 411 213 198 162 85 96 7,497 54,599 2002-2003 648 1,112 1,001 964 925 732 517 512 507 237 211 244 265 175 166 148 147 148 140 1,074 48,283 Difference n Revised ; Buildout ; Pending Council Action (268) 120 176 339 254 232 (90) (17) (84) (318) (294) (137) (156) (236) (47) (50 (15 63 , 44 (6.423 (6,316 2001 - 02 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 TOTAL 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 XX Non-Residential Sq Ft 2001-2002 586,169 1,183,482 1,215,672 1,146,040 871,000 1,834,518 1,050,000 1,138,588 1,060,500 781,505 720,000 706,823 443,000 569,600 139,522 76,000 76,000 360,677 6,000 91-.798 24,238,109 2002-2003 817,829 663,794 912,633 962,393 974,510 1,034,120 1,341,960. 1,435,538 1.373,974 f, 195,716 910,968 958,740 636,356 510,540 293,013 127,148 114,918 269,381 114,368 6,378 25,119,219 Difference 231,660 (519,688) (303,039] (183,647] 103,510 (800,398) 291,960 296,950 313,474 414,211 190,968 251,917 193,356 (59,060 153,491 51,148 38,918 (91,296 108,368 . (85,420 881,110 03/12/2002 */ " \$E$$& If&V >/f < ^jMk' Residential Projects .Zone 1 Pacific View Estates ; Zone 2 Summitt Apartments/Spy Glass II Zone 6 (SE) Meadow Woods Zone 7 Calavera Hills (360 apts) Zone 8 Kelly Ranch (includes 451 apt/units) Zone 10 La Costa Northwest Zone 12 La Costa Village (Green/Oaks/Ridge) Zone 14 Robertson Ranch ; Zone 15 Sunny Creek Zone 17 Bressi Ranch (apartments) Zone 19 Aviara (almost build out) Zone 20 Misc. Residential Zone 21 Manzanita Partners (Apts) Zone 22 Poinsettia Properties : Zone 23 Green Valley ' Misc. Misc. residential units - all zones Total Residential Units Units 133 170 85 615 571 590 561 157 170 625 30 343 157 285 143 15 4,650 Industrial and Commercial Projects Square Feet Zone 1 Assisted Living Project Mini storage/office Zone 3 King Fish (this FY) Hotel & Restaurants Zone 5 Various - Office Callaway/Taylor Made Exp. Kelly Corporate Center Zone 11 La Costa Village - Commercial Zone 13 Hotel Expansion GIA Expansion Lego Expansion Zone 15 Sunny Creek Plaza Zone 16 Tchang Properties Zone 17 Industrial Bressi Ranch Commercial Zone 18 Raceway & Professor's Capital Zone 19 Time Shares Zone 20 Redeemer Church Zone 23 Healthcare Facility Green Valley Commercial Assisted Living Project Misc. Misc. other projects Total Industrial and Commercial Square Feet 56,763 147,987 6,890 66,221 933,340 257,331 177,500 68,886 22,542 200,000 34,500 100,000 300,000 600,000 68,000 888,000 230,600 13,450 86,000 149,940 121,000 18,500 4,547,450 03/12/2002 Prior to 11/86 11/86 to 6/30/92 1992 - 93 1993 - 94 1994 - 95 1995 - ' 96 1996 - 97 1997 - 98 1998 - 99 [^99 - 2000 »0 - 2001 2001 - 2002 Remaining 2002 2002 - 03 2003 - 04 2004 - 05 2005 - 06 2006 - 07 2007 - 08 2008 - 09 2009 - 10 2010 . - 11 2011 - 12 2012 - 13 2013 - 14 m>u - 15 TC015 - 16 2016 - 17 2017 - 18 2018 - 19 2019 - 20 2020 - 21 2021 - XX Unallocated Units TOTAL FUTURE EXCESS DU ADJ. TOTAL ISSUED TOTAL BUILDOUT 8,964 1,288 7 7 17 12 13 17 57 96 200 79 11 45 20 20 20 28 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40- 40 40 40 40 40 53 - 717 - 10,757 11,474 • . 0 ' 19,236 8,898 20,600 - 251,245 - 61,752 16,398, g! 68,654 n,^ - : 147,987 V^' -iVi1^ .,-; 56,763 ''l!^. fii" • 70,000 , 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 ' 70,000 ,70,000 70,000 , 70,000 70,000 70,000 202,758 . - . - - , 1,177,508 , 446,783 1,624,291 0 , •' Mj^1'' • •, ' ___J :, - 19,236 8,898 ,- 20,600 ; 251,245 ..'.,• - ,', 61,7520 ?fl /^O 16,398 i -/^V 68,654 -~' i - 147,987 ~V -'_ $y- , 56,763 .' . i - 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 - . 70,000 70,000 70,000 - : 70,000 70,000 - f 202,758 - " - - , - - - 1,177,508 - 446,783 . r 1,624,291 | 1,993 495 6,090 - 6,090 . j . - - 4,200 - 4,200 2 - \ - 67,813 67,813 i - 1 , '< • - I - I - , - i 55 - - - i 110 5 { - 2,500 - 2,500 , 1 12,000 - 12.000 . 17,206 -, 17,206 . , 7,950 - 7,950 : - . - - , ' ':''-' . \ . . . . : ' 171 39,656. - • 39,656 (74) , - 2,491 78,103 - 78,103 2,588 117,759 - 117,759 232 3 147,922 2,900 1 116,483 5,705 14,980 3,064 "iT" "^ - . 147,922 - ' 2,900 116,483 5,705 14,980 3,064 1 . ' 60,538 I 33.832 94.370 1 - (^<?. 1 65,753^^40,779 106,532 - (^y/6,890. ^ 1 / 1,500 ;:t , 1 53,651 -v<$v< 1 12,570 '%,yr 1 6,500 V^ 1 23,400 ^; 1 - ^: : 1 20,130 ^ 1 - 1 18,800 V* 1 1 , ' . . '- ' - - - - 1 . - . 13 143,441 - 239 417,345 252 560,786 0,00 0 0 00 0 - . 6,890 1,500 53,651 12,570 . 6,500 23,400 JO.OOO 20,000 20,130 - 18,800 - - - - - - - - - - 20,000 163,441 - 74,611 491,956 34,611 655.397 / *^- •i \i V \ \ \> 0 0 ??'" Prior to 11/86 1 1/86 to 6/30/92 1992 - 93 1993 - 94 1994 - 95 1995 - 96 1996 - 97 1997 - 98 W3 - 99 Wgg - 2000 2000 - 2001 2001 - 2002 Remaining 2002 2002 - 03 2003 - 04 2004 - 05 2005 - 06 2006 - 07 2007 - 08 2008 - 09 2009 - 10 2010 - 11 (' 2011 - 12 2012 - 13 2013 - 14 2014 - 15 2015 - 16 2016 - 17 2017 - 18 2018 - 19 2019 - 20 2020 - 21 2021 - XX Unallocated Units TOTAL FUTURE EXCESS DU ADJ. TOTAL ISSUED TOTAL BUILDOUT • - - ' - "; ' ' 2,448 617 ! ' - * ' i -, ' • • w m • w If . . - . - - 50,000 - ,50,000 / 50,000 .; - 50,000 - " ,' - 3,065 - i - 3,065 50,000 ! - 50,000 59,642 59,642 234,110 234,110 287,035 287,035 489,395 489,395 1,191,299 1,191,299 207,665 1,307,721 1,515,386 138 640,033 1,090,509 1,730,542 160,671 Sj^-422,975 ^583,646 186,217 /X^f75,664*V< 661,881 149,900U^ / 32,250 J. -fX^954,486^ v^ 182,150 V^' 354,486 /»S*c-*//268I171ftV.rfi'- 268,171 z~~ '"" 275,000^^275,000 275,000 ' 275,000 275,000 275,000 275,000 275,000 275,000 275,000 275,000 275,000 275,000 ' 275,000 • 148,078 M"^ 148,078 50,768 ^S^* 50,768 38,538 V^ 38,538 60,243^°^ 60,243 1 07,988 ^ 107,988 2,953,272 - - 138 1,344,486 5,590,600 138 1,344,486 8,543,872 , ' o o ;;. o o o o o 2,953,272 - 6,935,086 9,888,358 5,901 1,403 72 4,525 76 36 17,568 23 5 43 69 124 1,284 -SV^ei 82,779 i>-'- viO - , 4,525 17,568 1,284 ^ 82,779 °\\<n$ 6 - - 39 17 ... 17 17" 17 17 17 - 17 - 17 - - - 13 . - 188 124 7,819 -1-06,156 8,131 106,156 00 0 "- ' . - 106,15 . 106,15 , 0 • . . 03/12/2002 Prior to 11/86 11/86 to 6/30/92 1992 - 93 1993 - 94 1994 - 95 1995 - 96 1996 - 97 1997 - 98 1998, - 99 Upgg - 2000 P>00 - 2001 2001 - ,2002 Remaining 2002 2002 - 03 2003 - 04 2004 - 05 2005 - 06 2006 - 07 2007, - 08 2008 - 09 2009 - 10 2010 -' 11 2011 - 12 2012 - 13 I 2013 - 14 K014 - 15 p015. - 16 2016 - 17 2017 - 18 2018 - 19 2019 - 20 2020 - 21 2021 - XX Unallocated Units TOTAL FUTURE EXCESS DU ADJ. TOTAL ISSUED TOTAL BUILDOUT . • : : - _J ' ^27 i^l^^^^^^W^''^ ^rAJ?V51££ ^l^^tttJ-^SSpi^i 8 ife 3Sil]H.^^*^lEd3&S'ti 407 - - - 92 - _ 5 - : ., 1 - , ' --,"•' 1 " . 64,070 - 64,070 ~ ~ - - ' , -'' J , j ' *" ' ' -,'-<- i . .'• - , 506 64,070 - 64,070 . 506 64,070 -i 64,070 OU»^»€SfiWB^^lK0M§^frTDi:4L 1,101 •I - - 76 ... 271 172 . 54 119 . . 155 - , - 202 10,890 ^ • 10,890 85 - - 90 , 21,780 NQf" - 21,780 -, -. 705 32,670 - 32,670 76 1,620 2,401 32,670 - 32,670 I* *-*<irfj.4 \ , > "*^^tA^1, s¥fS6Mffe'£^«^!iilj5U,§^^-^68^1L 1 - - - 3,800 - 3,800 89 54 , - - 50 125 158 165 - • - 73 - 40 6,000 - 6,000 70 - - 16 - . . -*. . 17 ,- - - - - 714 6,000 - 6,000 . 144 3,800 -- , 3,800 858 9,800 - . 9,800 ...0,0 .0, .JO 0 0 0 00 0, 0 0 r4^|ifp» ^ t&'d&tyPSi'? Prior to 11/86 11/86 to 6/30/92 1992 - 93 1993 - 94 1994 - 95 1995 - 96 1996 - 97 1997 - 98 B""98 - 99 99 - 2000 00 - 2001 2001 - 2002 Remaining 2002 2002 - 03 2003 - 04 2004 - 05 2005 - 06 2006 - 07 2007 - 08 2008 - 09 2009 - 10 2010 - 11 2011 - 12 2012 - 13 2013 - 14 •014 - 15 TOJ15 - 16 2016 , - 17 2017 - 18 2018 -.19 2019 - 20 2020 - 21 2021, - XX Unallocated Units TOTAL FUTURE EXCESS DU ADJ. TOTAL ISSUED TOTAL BUILDOUT *^i'^g,pi^ij^(|©Mivi4|%. >r i] 384- 75 - , - . - ' • 75 249 89 ,\4 36 2,132 ^'" 1 1 - 1 - - - 1 75,000 ijV'* 1 75,000 '' 75,000 75,000 10,200 ^\'a° 83,722 V-^'' 9,078 t^A . •\> 8,500 ^s - - - 1 •' - ' . - 5 411,500 • - - 909 2,132 914 413,632 !? Npu^p.*1-^' TdjAt-. . i . - • . ' - • '' . - •. - 'i- • 2,132 - - , - : ... . , - - . 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 , 10,200 83,722 9,078 ,. • • . i 8,500 - , - ! i "— ~t - ' - .-• 411,500 - ' 2,132 413,632 ^J J&< *£'A» 'if**Wtfl&* . ... . . . . - , . . " . - - 90 - - - 200 80 110 - - 110 - - 110 - - 120 - - - 130 - - 112 - - - . . 1 '. - - ' -. , . . . _ . • . . • 1,062 - - (24) . 1,038 &>,v iV'*v^*^ ^ J^'DU|| 580 343 . 44 136 41 248 196 94 2 15 30 33 120 141 150 150 150 271 100 185 185 81 - - - - , - - - - . . - 1,566 143 1,729 3,438 /^U^^/Sg' *r^«f-."j T^t^l* ^JX^oiyn-^-'-iifc.• . _ . . _ 344 14,419 M^ . 14,016 W**-, 54,870 1^')< . . 75,000 Y!c.°° 75,000 '' 75,000 " 75,000 « ~ 75,000 - 75,000 * 50,260 l''^* - 57.499 I'fc'tf' - - - - - 626,645 14,763 641,408 V" vfj y^iiv^ <%»* ,*v%r4v^ O' iQifS » ^7v ^"QtAt... . . . . ._ . 344 . - 14,419 . 14,016 54,870 _ . . 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 50,260 - 57,499 - - - - - - 626,645 14,763 641,408 0 , Prior to 11/86 11/86 to 6/30/92 1992 - 93 1993 - 94 1994 .- 95 1995 ,.- 96 1996 - 97 1997 - 98 1998 - 99 ^99 ' - 2000 BOO - 2001 2001 - 2002 Remaining 2002 2002 - 03 2003 - 04 2004 - 05 2005 - 06 2006 - 07 2007 - 08 2008 - 09 2009 - 10 2010 - 11 2011 - 12 2012 - 13 2013 - 14 K014 - 15 R015 _- 16 2016 , - 17 2017 - - 18 2018 - 19 2019 - 20 , - 2020 -.21 2021 - XX Unallocated Units TOTAL FUTURE EXCESS DU ADJ. TOTAL ISSUED TOTAL BUILDOUT '-.-'•'. ! " Vv • 589 - ' - , 244 5,"001 ; 5,001 248 6,000 - 6,000 316 ' 250 : . I — — ( _ _ . -, 30,000 - 30,000 - - ' - ' ' \ 30,000 - . 30,000 (4) 1,647 11,001 - 11,001 1,643 41,001 - 41,001 mi 229,472 229,472 214,883 34,400 249,283 637,135 477,884 1,115,019 . - 116,131 - 116,131 6,400 6,400 31,417 31,417 -, ,100,000 100,000 22,542 . 100,000 122,542 34,500 - 34,500 150,638 150,638 150,638 150,638 150,638 150,638 150,638 150,634 • 1,262,142 20 . 1,005,966 74 2,268,108 . 94 ..00 ,0 0 0 0 150,638 150,638 150,638 150,638 150,638 150,638 150,638 150,634 - 0,000 1,462,142 - 1,756 1,747,722 1,756 3,209,864 2 - - - 38 <$* 119 - - 82 - - *\ /y " QO* Ot - >' 82 1 82 v 44 109, - 142 - ;A 142 <\& 38 ' 960 . - 2 . .. . 962 - ,0 0 0 0 00 ii/-»llinn I (nit Or\r Prior to 11/86 1 1/86 to 6/30/92 1992 - 93 1993 - 94 1994 - 95 1995 - 96 1996 - 97 1997 - 98 1998 - 99 L^9 - 2000 Wo - 2001 2001 - 2002 Remaining 2002 2002 - 03 2003 - 04 2004 - 05 2005 - 06 2006 - 07 2007 - 08 2008 - 09 2009 .- 10 2010 - 11 2011 - 12 2012 - 13 2013 - 14 W14 - 15 p015 - 16 2016 - 17 2017 - 18 2018 - 19 2019 - 20 2020 - 21 2021 - XX Unallocated Units TOTAL FUTURE EXCESS DU ADJ. TOTAL ISSUED TOTAL BUILDOUT "* ) 1 1 Cfif JjJi. ^Np.' V &,*<* <*- J iV ''$*"•>; \j£*$l JJifrl w t Jpl^OMIiif f^\ * Iftf ISJ is/ 520 - - - • - . _ . . - . - 1 ^^t^l -j-fO fit' ?* t(•S^SKpSfi * Ait**t3rpt4i.. ,. ' - . . -_. , .._ , . 96 - ' 154 - 60 - 95 - - 10 50,000 5 50,000 5 50,000 - - 5 50,0005 50,000 - ; 10 25,000 17 - 6,380 13 - 6,380 13 - 6,380 35 - 6,380 47 T 6,380 47 - 6,380 47 - , 6,380 " 47 - 6.380 47 - 6,380 47 - 6,378 - ' - i 445 1,154 275,000 , 63,798 281 ! - . - - i 617 , - ; 2,052 275,000 . 63,798 - 1 - , 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 25,000 6,380 6,380 6,380 6,380 6,380 6,380 6,380 -6,380 6,380 6,378 - 338,798 - ; - ; 338,798 4*n tfc&r.v> ! '-•Jitirf uU^ *i^Q!yiic«Ji^'NDUj:H<,_ *. « -... « -~ ~ -- tjSeysfOXA^ . _ - _ . .- _ „ _ •.... , •&<xx> . . 150,000 " - - 150,000 " - - 150,000 150,000 150,000 vt$3" - - 150,000 "M.-'iw - - 150,000 •' - - 150,000 " - - 150,000 63,522 . • . - ., .., . . . B ^ '\\f\ - . 1,413,522 , . 1,413,522 • - 150,000 150,000 150,000 150.000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 63,522 - ' - - - - - - _ 1,413,522 - - 1,413,522 j&lfT* rt T /V '§6% , * 'C!l f%, ^s " i ". «&\>$ c^'(-i> ^f',^!*'^.'^"**^ *! "^jf-jJU ^ ?CQ$M ^^VlNDUS'T'i, ^tOTAL 1 - 100 150 - 200,000 150 18,000 200,000 225 50,000 200,000 50,000 200,000 50,000 200,000 50,000 200,000 50,000 200,000 - - - 200,000 200,000 200,000 170,000 , - - . . . . . 625 268,000 2,170,000 (39) -- 1 587 268,000 2,170,000 - 200,000 218,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000' 200,000 200,000 200,000 170,000 - ' - ' - . • ' 2,438,000 - - 2,438,000 0 „ «™« c nf in 03/12/2002 Prior to 11/86 11/86 to 6/30/92 1992 - 93 1993 - 94 1994 - 95 1995 - 96 1996 - 97 1997 - 98, 1998 - 99 ^99 - 2000 9° - 2001 2001 - 2002 Remaining 2002 2002 - 03 2003 - 04 2004 - 05 2005 - 06 2006 - 07 2007 - 08 2008 -- 09 2009 - 10 2010 - 11 2011 - 12 2012 - 13 2013 - 14 •014 - 15 HOIS - 16 2016 - 17 2017 - 18 2018 - 19 2019 - .20 2020 - 21 2021 - XX Unallocated Units TOTAL FUTURE EXCESS DU ADJ. TOTAL ISSUED TOTAL BUILDOUT 524 2,363 480 343 578 8,182 99 ' 41 - 222,000 222,000 222,000 222,000 - ' 30,000 222,000 222,000 222,000 222,000 . 222,000 223,000 - ^41 30,000 2,221,000 . (90) 1,681 10,888 1,632 . 40,888 2,221,000 ..0, 0 , , 0 ] I 2,363 343 8,182 i 222,000 222,000 222,000 222,000 252,000 222,000 222,000 222,000 222,000 223,000 . - 2,251,000 • , - 10,888 2,261,888 - . 0 f 2 76 - 93 - 222 251 327 58,984 333 48,730 386 79,477 71 88,211 >/v 88 180 36 41,170 17 18 46,120 iV°° 3 46,120 l( 3 46,120 3 46,120 3 46,120 -.bfrrt 3 |U'H"J 4 57,900 , " 4 6 \Hjoo 6 6 6 6 6 6 . - 6 6 8 120 288,500 - 1,885 .316,752 2,005 605,252 0 0 58,984 48,730 79,477 88,211 .180 41,170 46,120 46,120 46,120 46,120 46,120 57,900 - - - 288,500 - 316,752 605,252 0 0 , . -%J*$t ' 28 67 194 - - 376 700 , 700 306 414 - 414 135 9,862 9,862 10 176 1,668 1,668 u>^ 29 4 - - - <!',•><«•» 21 ' - 171 13,450 - 13,450 135 - - 16 21 30,000 - 30,000*$& 21 21 - - - 21 30,000 - 30,000 21 - - - 21 21 - - 21 - - 21 - 21 1 . . - 558 73,450 - 73,450 (31) 1,311 12,644 - 12,644 1,838 86,094 - , 86,094 0 0 0 . 0 Pvrocc ru«/pllinn I Inif f"5 nf 10 03/17/?0n? |;^f&}i|^y.:|^ *"' *"< t^V" Prior to 11/86 11/86 to 6/30/92 1992 - 93 1993 - 94 1994 - 95 1995 - 96 1996 - 97 1997 - 98 1998 - 99 •G99 - 2000 Irooo - 2001 2001 - 2002 Remaining 2002 2002 • 03 2003 - 04 2004 - 05 2005 - 06 2006 - 07 2007 - 08 2008 - 09 2009 - 10 2010 - - 11 2011 - 12 2012 - 13 2013 - 14 •014 - 15 fzblS -. 16 2016 - 17 2017 - 18 2018 - .19 2019 - 20 2020 - 21 2021 - XX Unallocated Units TOTAL FUTURE EXCESS DU ADJ. TOTAL ISSUED TOTAL BUILDOUT ^J \^J'^Vrf'vr^^^*'%.l^?i^v^^/^4^Pr/ 1 i£> «t '#$ ,** /^Dy^^v^lP^^ "' IN'PPS/ /CTPJTAL 5 344 - 81 - i ' ' -i 81 . - --. -! 59 • ' -: 23 , -I. "* ~ " i 50 - - 107 44 - - -; 49 - - -' 20 .- -i 20 .... 20 - . - 20 - - -i 20" - ' - 20 -' ' - -: 22 - - -i -; 392 . - 25 593 1,010 - -; /i^fesf^* 1* ""^Jlf -*sjv/ f & i' J%D^ M * r*«v %S>?PU fA^Cj^Miypsf ^PU&.J' '4TOTAL* 268 - - 560 - 560 560 - 560 7 12 106,299. - 106,299 106 167 240 240 58 - 176 - - 45 4,000 - 4,000 31 - - - 32 1 - - - 1 21,780 - 21,780 1 40,000 - 40,000 1 19,000 - 19,000 1 - - 1 - - 1 - - 1 - - 1 - - 1 1 - - 1 - - •) . . - 1 - - - 298 84,780 - 84,780 32 618 107,659 - 107,659 948 192,439 - 192,439 -.iVJJv ,v I < fg* *$y\? *' <]£$' /t^J C*» , "^-^^ -f^* < ", *££', ^tvf^/^r^'^ * "j « ^'JpU' ^ C^O(i)Mi\/l^* INDUSJ ' * \ ^PTAJ- ^^<) - 421,820 " 421,820 150,060 - 150,060 86,000 - 86,000 i'"° - 121,000 - 121,000 149,940 - 149,940 Q()0| L) — — _ • rt {) (J 0 U . - : . - 507,000 - 507,000 171 - 421,820 - 421,820 171 928,820 - 928,820 / tiV (V1/ ..0 0 0 00.0 0 00 0 0.0 runiallinn I Init Pane S nf 1fl 03/12/2002 |8 / fl^JE'df Prior to 11 786 11/86 to 6/30/92 1992 - 93 1993 - 94 1994 - 95 1995 - 96 1996 - 97 1997 - 98 1998 - 99 M999 - 2000 p)00 - - 2001 2001 - 2002 Remaining 2002 2002 - 03 2003, - 04 2004 • 05 2005 - 06 2006 - 07 2007 ,. - 08 2008 - 09 2009 -10 2010 - 11 2011 - 12 2012 : 13 2013 - 14 12014, - 15 12015 - 16 2016 - 17 2017 - 18 2018 - 19 2019 - 20 2020 - 21 2021 - XX Unallocated Units TOTAL FUTURE EXCESS DU ADJ. TOTAL ISSUED TOTAL BUILDOUT : - ' ' ] ' , / 84 31 - - 97 - , - - i 85 . - : ' ' - , _/''-i 41 - - -- - !| '• -\ i ' j ', I . " ' , • •'•':;".:' ' IQ m ™ii i 6 - - - ! 6 - 6 ... 6 - , 6 * - , - . " •" ' 30 - - , - ... 338 , - - 368 1 ... . . 51 - - . - 53 - - - 53 - .,- 53 - - - 53 - - - 263 - . 1 264 0 0 0 0 00 0 ,0 Excess Dwellina Unit Goal , . Page 9 of 10 03/12/2002 ' *'^'i ', ** * ' Prior to 11/86 11/86 to 6/30/92 1992 - 93 1993 - 94 1994 . - 95 1995 - 96 1996 - 97 1997 - 98 1998 - 99 M999 - 2000 •000 - 2001 [2001 - 2002 Remaining 2002 2002 .- 03 2003 - 04 2004 - 05 2005 - 06 2006 - 07 2007 - 08 2008 - 09 2009 - 10 2010 - 11 2011 - 12 2012 - 13 12013 - 14 2014 - 15 2015 - 16 2016 - 17 2017 - 18 2018 - 19 2019 - 20 2020 - 21 2021 - XX Unallocated Units TOTAL FUTURE EXCESS DU ADJ. TOTAL ISSUED TOTAL BUILDOUT 2002-2003 yr 23,511 4,423 79 220 761 494 872 1,414 2,241 1,840 • 1,822 434 299 648 1,112 1,001 964 925 732 517 512 507 237 211 244 265 175 166 148 147 148 161 18 445 9,582 590 38,111 ., 48,213 - - 177,773 11,798 159,411 6,265 540,092 970,108 1,141,221 266,771 816,786 274,143 156,950 295,623 315,633 265,393 127,510 187,120 494,960 568,538 526,974 475,638 332,588 379,360 , 279,976 270,638 286,633 70,000 70,000 202,758 - - - ~ . 5,306,292 - 4,364,368 9,670,660 4<Mus;?L- : - 59,642 234,110 287,035 718,867 1,225,699 1,785,605 1.124,341 422,975 516,443 32,250 354,486 368,171 597,000 697,000 847,000 847,000 847,000 867,000 847,000 , 720,078 578,380 579,380 356,380 239,902 6,380 57,148 44,918 66,623 114,368 6,378 - • 9,041,592 , - 6,406,967 15,448,559 &t$ffr&W-• 237,415 245,908 446,446 . 725,132 1,765.791 2,755,713 2,265,562 689,746 1 ,333,229 306,393 511,436 663,794 912,633 962,393 974,510 1,034,120 , 1,341,960 1,435,538 1,373,974 1,195,716 910,968 958,740 636,356 510.540 293,013 127,148 114,918 269,381 '114,368 6,378 • *" 14,347,884 , 10,771,335 25,119,219 0 0 , , 0 ; 0 Cvr>ooe n\*«allinri t Init Panf 1D nf 10 m/17/pnn? Uiduiig Design Group, Inc. December 12,2001 Clyde Wickham City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Re: CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH/PROJECT STATUS REPORT DATED DECEMBER 1, 2001 (LADWIG DESIGN GROUP, INC. JOB NO. L-1021) Dear Clyde: There are a number of items in your status report (copy attached) that I don't feel accurately reflect the current status of a number of items. I will respond to your agenda heading items as follows: Specific Plan/Tentative Map We have submitted both these items sometime ago and are anxiously waiting for comments. I'm concerned, and I have passed this concern on to Anne that the City will respond with comments and ask for a very short turnaround time to make significant changes. Environmental Impact Report We have received the first screen check from Anne on December 5th. Copies were distributed to our project team and they are currently reviewing the report. We have noticed a significant number of inaccuracies or questions in the screen check and are suggesting that we meet with City Staff on January 10th at 2:00 P.M. to go over our comments. There still is the issue as to the preferred alternative that is in the EIR. You are aware that we do not agree with the City's selection of the preferred alternative. Local Facility Management Plan Your status report says the submittal was premature. We would like to remind you that we were asked to submit the LFMP Amendment. I have now received a call 2 days ago from Don Rideout asking us now to go through the LFMP again and resubmit it. As mentioned above, there are some - in our opinion - major issues not addressed to our satisfaction in the EIR that need to be resolved before any time is spent on the LFMP Amendment. Traffic Study No further comments. 703 Palomar flirport Road 4 Suite 300 4- Carlsbad, California 92009 (760) 438-3182 FflX (760) 438-0173 Clyde Wickham December 12, 2001 Page 2 Sewer The screen check of the EIR focuses on the South Agua Hedionda system. As you are aware, we have requested that the City consider a pumping alterative for us to join in with Vista and pump out of the basin. This would be followed up by a Sewer Master Plan Amendment. The Wildlife Agencies have final permit authority on the offsite gravity sewer, and we are concerned that because of the significant habitat impacts with the offsite gravity sewer that the agencies are going to be asking for a less impactive alternative such as our pump station and force main alternative. Schedule Your status report estimates that the environmental processing is six to eight weeks behind schedule. I would suggest that this is conservative because of the status of the screen check that we are currently reviewing and the major decisions that need to be made and incorporated into all documents. Please look these comments over and if you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, LADWIG DESIGN GROUP, INC. Robert C. Ladwig, President RCL:mo Enclosure cc: Ray Patchett, City Manager, City of Carlsbad Lloyd Hubbs, Public Works Director, City of Carlsbad Michael Holzmiller, Planning Director, City of Carlsbad Bob Wojcik, Deputy City Engineer, City of Carlsbad Anne Hysong, Project Planner, City of Carlsbad Marshall Plantz, EIR Manager, City of Carlsbad Dave Hauser, Deputy City Engineer, City of Carlsbad • Don Rideout, Growth Management, City of Carlsbad Paul Tchang, Ted Tchang, and Doug Woods, Techbilt Construction Tim Carroll, O'Day Consultants 703 Palomar flirport Road 4 Suite 300 4 Carlsbad, California 92009 (760) 438-3182 FflX (760) 438-0173 PROJECT STATUS REPORT Month: December 1, 2001 To: Via: From: Ray Patchett, City Manager Lloyd Hubbs, Public Works Director Michael Holzmiller, Planning Director Carlsbad Oaks North SP 211/CT 97-13/HDP 97-107 SUP 97-07/GPA 97-05/ZCA 97-05 Bob Wojcik, Deputy City Engineer - Development Services Clyde Wickham, Project Engineer cc: Ann Hysong, Project Planner Marshall,Plantz, EIR Manager Dave Hauser, Deputy City Engineer Don Rideout, Growth Management Bob Ladwig, Ladwig Design Specific Plan/ Tentative Map Environmental Impact Report Local Facilities Management Plans Traffic Study Sewer Schedule Current This Month Adjustments Staff review of the Specific Plan and Tentative Map is continuing. The final determination of project alternatives to be included in the EIR is complete. The screen check of the Draft EIR is expected to be submitted to staff for review in December. The Zone 16 LFMP amendment was submitted on September 27. This submittal was premature based on the information available. Now that the studies for the draft EIR have been prepared, the applicant is being directed to resubmit the LFMP amendment in a complete package. The traffic study is basically complete. The project is dependent upon the So. Agua Hedionda sewer trunk line for sewer service. Several alternatives will be evaluated by the EIR. The conceptual schedule on the reverse of this memo has been updated to reflect current progress. The environmental processing is approximately 6-8 weeks behind schedule. SP/TM: Staff to complete review. EIR: EIR consultant preparing draft screen check. RECEIVED DEC 0 7 2008 LADWIG DESIGN 6R •f--. ID 1 2 3 9 26 27 28 29 30 1 31 [ 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 50 59 •71 Task Name J Q2'00 Q3-00 04 '00 Q1 '01 Q2'01 Q3'01 04 '01 Q1 '02 Q2 '02 Q3 '02 QT02 Q1 '03 Q2'03 M A|M|J J|A|S 0|N|D j|F|M A|M|J J|A|S O|N|D J|F|M A|M|J J|A|S 0|N|D J|F|M A|M|J Notice to Proceed I A 5/3 ••! • Survey /Mapping BiH : • 1 ' Reconnaissance Prel. Engr. Data EIR -Initial Screencheck City Review First Screencheck City Review Second Screencheck City Review Produce Draft EIR Public Review period Response, Final EIR Certifications Final Certification Environmental Permitting Envir. Permits Issued Final Design, 30% Final Design, 70% Final Design, 90% Construction Process mm •• ui . : B: ' 3 • tag ' : ' PI --Ml- ' '; • ; sic ¥ ; : : ! (Si jj . ; : • • ^aS • : : : ^ £iiKfliipl * * - : : 1 ' • ; : i • ' T '• f^B^J^^ : ' 1 ^ 5/10 : '- :BL'TiTr;- r.-.^^p^^^^^^HH^^^^»^^H^^I : i • ' 1 ^ 7IS '• ; 1 | ^pdiiii^p ; . '. '• \ I f^111^-. ! • : . 1 i ^MMiiiM^p ! ' 1 i : ^jj^^ Task Faraday 11 00 Wed Progress Milestone mammfmftm Rolled Up Task External Tasks Rolled Up Split ^ Rolled Up Milestone <£> Project Summary <^»"«™*^*^ Note : The 30% design may need to be accelerated at the City's direction in order to provide enough design information to complete the Environmental Permit process. EXHIBIT 17 CITY WIDE NON-RESIDENTIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE PROJECTIONS * * * FOR PUNNING PURPOSES ONLY * * * STATUS Existing Projected Build Out Notes (1) ^ • YEARS as of 1/1 2001 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 20191 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 TOTAL LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONES 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 361,731 78,103 385,424 0 5,961,350 86,163 0 3,800 25,000 0 80,763 0 749,430 0.0 0 62,500 0 15,000 0 150,000 0 0 0 62,500 , 0 10,000 . 0 9,011 00 0 68,000 10,000 8,100 0 00 00 68,000 0 40,770 0 00 0 6,000 68,000 11,000 8,100 00 0 10,000 0 68,000 10,800 8,100 0 00 10,000 0 68,000 0 8,100 0 0 0 10,000 0 68,000 0 8,100 0 00 10,000 0 68,000 0 8,100 -0 0 0 10,000 0 68,000 0 8,100 0 00 10,000,' 0 68,000 "0 8,100 0 00 10,000 0 68,000 0 8,100 0 00 10,000 0 68,000 0 8,100 22,869 0 0 10,000 0 68,000 0 8,100 0 0 0 11,227 0 68,000 0 7,466 0 00 0 0 68,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 ., . - 0 68,000 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 110,797 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 000 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 00 0000 00 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,642,528 109,903 628,523 22,869 6,869,791 86,163 101,227 9,800 NOTES: . (1) The phasing numbers contained in this spreadsheet were obtained from the City of Carlsbad Finance Department. Zone 18 LFMP Amendment December 4, 2001 EXHIBIT 17 (page 2 of 3) YEARS As of 1/1 Existing 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 - 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 TOTAL 9 (3) 190,695 0 0 0 227,750 227,750. 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 J •'_...()- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 646,195 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0~o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 : 0 0 0 11 (4) 56,192 403,801 95,396 83,635 53,579 11,761 0 6 0 0 0 0 J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 704,364 LOCAL FACILITY 12 13 11,001 0 0 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41,001 1,716,305 0 28,000 0 106,842 34,500 120,000 647,000 106,842 0 34,500 0 -- 0 106,842 0 343,600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,244,431 MANAGEMENT ZONES 14 15 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 „-- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (5) 0 0 175,000 54,997 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41,426 34,107 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 305,530 (6) 0 0 341,510 148,648 148,649 323,215 393,347 202,772 202,772 218,018 0 0o 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,978,931 17 (7) 0 0 0 . 655,117 655,117 655,117 655,116 0 0 0 0 0 - -'- - -.- 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ******** 18 (2) 0 0 740,333 740,334 740,334 0•. '.. : -'. o 0 0 0 0 0o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ******** NOTES: (1) The phasing numbers contained in this spreadsheet were obtained from the City of Carlsbad Finance Department (2) The phasing for Zone 18 is based on the information contained in this LFMP. (3) The future square feet Is based on the Pomsettla Shores Master Plan, May 12,1994 and our best guess based on HPA's conversations with vanous architects. (4) The phasing numbers are based on a conversation with Don Rldeout and the 2000 Zone 11 LFMP Amendment. (5) The phasing for Zone IS is based on the Zone 15 LFMP, June 10.1998 • , (6) The phasing for Zone 16 Is based on information from Don Rideout, Zone 16 If MP (7) The phasing for Zone 17 is based on the Bressi Ranch Master Plan and Zone 17 LFMP. Zone 18 LFMP Amendment December 4, 2001 EXHIBIT 17 (page 3 of 3) YEARS As of 1/1 Existing 2001 , 2002: 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 •2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 TOTAL 19 20 LOCAL FACILITY MANGEMENT ZONES 21 22 23 24 25 • 247,191 140,000 80,000 . '. 80,000 40,000 0 0 0 - 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 587,191 1,114 9,897 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 0_o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 11,011 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 147,419 0 60,000 60,000 54,500 54,292 50,500 14,560 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 441,271 0 70,000 32,630 , 32,631.;, 100,000 . 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 435,261 0 0 0. ,.o '. 0 0 0 0_o 0 0 0 0 0 06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 55,821 0 0 0 0 205,821 TOTAL OTYWIDE SQUARE FOOTAGE 9,246,488 1,478,891 1,780,369 1,966,873 2,212,871 1,521,405 1,416,063 961,232 395,714 304,118 120,600 127,526 120,207 192,942 ,108,969 430,927 75,466 118,000 118,000 160,797 55,821 0 0 0 0 22,913,279 Notes: (1) The phasing numbers contained in this spreadsheet were obtained from the City of Carlsbad Finance Department. Zone 18 LFMP Amendment December 4, 2001 City of Carlsbad Planning Department October 22, 2001 Bob Ladwig Ladwig Design Group 703 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 300 Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: SECOND REVIEW OF ZONE 16 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT Staff has been reviewing the Zone 1 6 LFMPA submitted on September 27, 2001 . Although a thorough review has not been completed, the following comments and suggestions are provided at this time: 1 . A Financing Plan was not included in this submittal. Because this is a key element of all LFMPs, the document must be considered incomplete. 2. A memo from the Engineering Department is attached outlining several concerns. It appears that the Circulation section is not complete, and further detailed review is not possible. Many of the comments on this submittal are repeats of comments made in March. 3. The conclusions in the sewer section seem to be premature in light of the analysis in the EIR. To address these issues, it is recommended that the following approach be used for future processing of the LFMP. First, revised Citywide phasing tables (residential and non-residential) should be submitted to serve as the basis for cumulative impact analysis of traffic and sewer. After City agreement on the phasing tables, we will jointly develop a list of issues that must be addressed in the Circulation and Sewer sections of the plan. Next, the issues will be addressed and decisions made so that we can proceed with some certainty. Having completed the preceding, a revised draft of the LFMP can be prepared and reviewed. The review will be expedited at that point because all major questions will have already been resolved. If you have any questions about this process, please feel free to contact me. Don Rideout Principal Planner DR.CS Enclosure c: Anne Hysong Clyde Wickham Steve Jantz 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us 4 October 16,2001 i TO: PRINCIPAL PLANNER DON RIDEOUT FROM: Associate Engineer Steven Jantz LFMP REVIEW COMMENTS FOR ZONE 16 Staff has reviewed the LFMP for Zone 16. Various sections in the LFMP did not fully discuss nor evaluate the specific developmental impacts to certain facilities. Therefore, based on the following comments, additional analysis and review will be required to adequately address impact to various city facilities. Generally, the Zone Plan refers directly to the 1992 adopted version. However, in the past 9 years, a considerable amount of development has occurred as well as the upgrading of various public infrastructure facilities. Furthermore, the LFMP does not identify surrounding development projections or assumptions. Therefore, in order to adequately determine the cumulative facility impacts, development assumptions for LFMP Zone 5,10,17 and 18 must be included in the analysis to address facility impacts. It is recommended that the LFMP for Zone 16 be completely updated. Wastewater Treatment Page 25 indicates that the wastewater sections remains unchanged from the original LFMP. However, the original plan is 10 years old and at least one plant expansion project has been completed. The Wastewater Treatment section should be updated. Circulation The Zone Plan should include a detailed analysis and discussion regarding the impact to existing and future circulation facilities. Page 2 and 6 states the existing Circulation facilities currently do not meet the adopted performance standard. However, there is no indication of locations nor is there a LOS analysis. The Circulation Section should discuss existing conditions and develop mitigation measures to ensure compliance with the performance standard. In addition, a condition is provided on page 11 that requires the construction of Faraday Avenue and El Fuerte. However, there is no Circulation section that justifies or defends to proposed roadway construction. I recommend that a detailed Circulation Section be prepared and included in the LFMP. Sewer Collection The conditions on page 12 propose various alternatives sewer collection systems. However, the alternatives were not adequately addressed within the sewer section. A more detailed discussion regarding the ultimate sewer line (SAHI) and the relationship of Zone 16 and 18 must be included. Additionally, there is no indication if the alternatives are permanent or interim nor is there a justification that necessitates the need for alternatives. If an alternative has the potential to ultimately become permanent, then agreements will be required with vista and the Sewer Master Plan may need to be revised accordingly. It is my understanding that the EIR for Faraday Ave will analyze the various sewer alternatives for Zone 16 and most likely conclude with the ""preferred project". I recommend that the sewer analysis should be further analyzed through the EIR process prior to the development of the LFMP Sewer Collection section. The LFMP, EIR and Master Plan should discuss the facilities that will serve future development. I have attached a copy of the draft LFMP with other text comments for your review. If you have any questions, please contact me at extension 2738. Anne tfysong - Faraday El R, M^^iiaiaiaisa. ^? ^a* .w.^.-^^»»w<^-i . r y ^•^•sgaaamig,^ From: Tim Gnibus <timg@cbaplanning.com> To: Anne Hysong <ahyso@ci.carlsbad.ca.us> Date: 7/31/01 4:50PM Subject: Faraday EIR TO: Anne Hysong FROM: Tim Gnibus SUBJECT: Faraday EIR DATE: 7/31/01 CBA Project Name and Number: Faraday Avenue EIR #1165.00 Anne- Just a quick update on the status of the Faraday/Agua Hediona Sewer/Tchang SP EIR. As you are aware, at our last meeting with representatives of Tchang we discussed the permit strategy. We decided to meet again bringing back informational items from various parties (e.g., summary of biology impacts for the Specific Plan, permit checklist, agreement on whether to classify certain vegetation on-site as southern maritime chaparal vs mixed chaparral, etc.). One purpose of our meeting on Friday is to "regroup" with this information and agree on the course to be taken with respect to permitting. With respect to the EIR, we indicated to Tchang that the EIR will need to examine a range of alternatives. These alternatives need to address biologicy impacts, but also need to address other impacts such as land use compatibility (i.e., with the adjacent residences on the east). At this stage in the EIR preparation and what we know today about potential impacts from the development, the range of alternatives would probably consist of the following: 1) an alternative that reduces the impact to biological resources; 2) an alternative that increases the setbacks from the residential uses to the east; and 3) an overall "reduced" project alternative that addresses issues such as traffic and air quality impacts. It may be that some of these benefits of an alternative are combined (i.e., a reduced biology impact alternative may also reduce the traffic and air quality). At this time we anticipate submitting the first full screencheck EIR by mid-September. As you are aware, we are at a point where we really need to have some items tied down so as to not be "backtracking" with our work efforts. These items include a final traffic report (at our last meeting we understood that more comments needed to be addressed in this report), and the LFMP (it is our understanding that the LFMP is still being reviewed by the City). We have the latest Specific Plan, but understand there may some more revisions based on City comments? One item that we got side-tracked on was the cumulative projects map. '/ We put that aside so as to focus on the wetlands map. We would still like to obtain that map (as was being prepared, or at least discussed with Karl - GIS). Please give me a call if any questions. Tim Tim Gnibus Cotton/Bridges/Associates, Inc. 6336 Greenwich Drive, Suite F San Diego, California 92122 Tel: 858-625-0056 ext. 16 Fax: 858-625-0545 Email: timg@cbaplanning.com CC:<dlandaal@kimley-horn.com>, <karina.fidler®kimley-horn.com> March 15,2001 TO:-.' PRINCIPAL PLANNER DON RIDEOUT ••;' FROM: Associate Engineer Steven Jantz LFMP REVIEW COMMENTS FOR ZONE 16 Staff has reviewed the LFMP for Zone 16. Since this is the first draft, the comments are strictly issues identification. Future analysis and review will be required to adequately address impact to various city facilities. Therefore, the following comments are submitted for your consideration relative to LFMP Zone 16: / Generally, the Zone Plan refers directly to the 1992 adopted version. However, in the past 9 years, a considerable amount of development has occurred as well as the upgrading of various public infrastructure facilities. It is recommended that the LFMP for Zone 16 be completely updated. • Page 2 - The paragraph indicates that Circulation facilities ^currently do not meet the adopted Performance Standard. The document does not adequately address or even state the location of the failure or any mitigation measure to ensure its conformance. ' • Phasing projections for facility analysis purposes - The LFMP does not indicate surrounding development projections or assumptions. Specifically, in order to adequately determine the cumulative facility impacts, development assumptions for LFMP Zone 17 and 18 must be considered in order to adequacy address facility impacts. • Page 25 - Refers strictly to the 1992 LFMP. Should be revised and brought up to date. • Circulation - A traffic study is necessary and was not submitted as part of the LFMP. Further review will be required and future comments are pending. • Sewer Collection - The proposed project Phase I alternative assume connection to the Raceway Basin Pump Station. Even though there may be capacity in the pump station, the downstream sewer trunk • system may not have adequate capacity to accommodate future sewer flows on an interim basis. The ,„ remaining capacity in the Buena Interceptor System is of concern and the City may have already reached bur contractual limits. This situation may eliminate the Phase I alternative as not viable. The city will be issuing a contract to provide sewer flow data hi the near future and staff will follow-up on the capacity issue when completed. Uiduiig Design Group, Inc. February 15,2001 Anne Hysong Planning Department City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Carlsbad, CA 92008 Reference: Carlsbad Oaks North/Local Facility Plan Amendment (LADWIG JOB NO. L-1021) Dear Anne: Enclosed per your request is Techbilt Construction Corporation's check number 5759 in the amount of $5,000 for the LFMP Amendment for Carlsbad Oaks North. I have attached a copy of the original Land Use Review Application Form signed by Mr. Tchang on June 23, 1997 and have added the LFMP Amendment to the project check list. Please accept the attached fee for the processing of the LFMP Amendment. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, LADWIG DESIGN GROUP, INC. Robert C. Ladwig, President RCL:lb.l6 Enclosures cc: Ted Tchang w/enclosure 703 Palomar fiirport Road 4- Suite 300 4- Carlsbad, California 92009 (760) 438-3182 FflX (760) 438-0173 February 5, 2001 TO: CLYDE WICKHAM HELGA STOVER SKIPP HAMMANN STEVE JANTZ FROM: DON RIDEOUT LFMP SUBMITTALS Attached are three LFMPs for your review. 1. Resubmitted Zone 10 and Zone 11 LFMPs for Villages of La Costa. Included with the LFMPs is a matrix of our comments with Henthorn's response to each item so you can see how your comments were addressed. I need to hear from you regarding whether your comments have been satisfactorily addressed. Please respond by Feb. 27, or let me know if you need more time. 2. First submittal of Zone 16 LFMP amendment for Carlsbad Oaks North. Note that this submittal is not a complete LFMP. Rather, what has been submitted is only the sections that appeared to the applicants to need changing. This can be an acceptable approach because there have not been any major changes since the original LFMP was approved. The major change is more open space and updated traffic information. However, this submittal may still be incomplete in some respects. I would like to get your comments by March 13, if possible. Thanks for your continuing cooperation. c: Don Neu Anne Hysong February 5, 2001 TO: FROM: CLYDE WICKHAM HELGA STOVER SKIPP HAMMANN STEVEJANTZ DON RIDEOUT LFMP SUBMITTALS Attached are three LFMPs for your review. 1. Resubmitted Zone 10 and Zone 11 LFMPs for Villages of La Costa. Included with the LFMPs is a matrix of our comments with Henthorn's response to each item so you can see how your comments were addressed. I need to hear from you regarding whether your comments have been satisfactorily addressed. , Please respond by Feb. 27, or let me know if you need more time. 2. First submittal of Zone 16 LFMP amendment for Carlsbad Oaks North. Note that this submittal is not a complete LFMP. Rather, what has been submitted is only the sections that appeared to the applicants to need changing. This can be an acceptable approach because there have not been any major changes since the original LFMP was approved. The major change is more open space and updated traffic information. However, this submittal may^itiUJpe incomplete in some respects. I would like to get your comments by^March 13,fr possible. Thanks for your continuing cooperation. c: Don Neu Anne Hysong Uiclwig Design Group, Inc. January 16,2001 Anne Hysong Planning Department City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE : Carlsbad Oaks North / LFMP for Zone 1 6 Amendment (LADWIG JOB NO. L-1021) Dear Anne: Enclosed per our discussion last week are five copies of my draft LFMP amendment for certain sections that are affected by the new project. In addition, I am including an exhibit prepared by Willdan showing year 2020 selected zone SANDAG projections for 20% impacted road segments and intersections. On December 1 9th, 2000, Willdan submitted to Clyde Wickham the LFMP traffic analysis that I used to prepare the traffic sections for the LFMP amendment. There are a number of items in the attached amendment that still need to be completed such as the offsite sewer costs and open space calculations along with a reduced version of the constraints analysis. I thought it would be appropriate for you and your staff to review my draft of the amendment and return your comments. If you would like to get together or have any specific questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, LADWIG DESIGN GROUP, INC. Robert C. Ladwig, President RCL:lb,3 Attachment cc: Clyde Wickham w/o copies Ted Tchang - 2 copies Tim Carroll - 1 copy 703 Polomar fiirport Road * Suite 300 + Carlsbad, California 92009 (760) 438-3182 FflX (760) 438-0173