The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLFMP 07; LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 07; Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP)CITY OF CARLSBAD 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 438-5621 REC'D FROM. ffi 111 If, .DATE.77 ACCOUNT NO. "' . / • '.. »'• ' :'••' RECEIPT NO. 81027 DESCRIPTION Lffap <?^m/ 7 ^•":~.;'V'.' .". - ," •', -• •• TOTAL AMOUNT 10. ooo oc ! O'^Oi '-Y {0 ,400 00 THE WILLIAM N. HOFMAN COMPANY Planning Project Management Environmental November 7, 1986 Michael J. Holzmiller Planning Director City of Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: Management Zone 7 - Growth Projections. Dear Michael: Thanks to you and your staff for meeting with us to discuss the growth projections for this Management Zone yesterday. As we discussed at this meeting, the Calavera Hills Master Plan and the city's General Plan do not correspond well with each other with regard to the gross acreage of residential land use categories. I believe that the discrepancies are partly due to the fact that the General Plan was amended several months after the Calavera Hills Master Plan amendment took place. The Master Plan, in determining the maximum units per village, counted the open space contained within village boundary lines in the calculation. A good example where this occurred is Village U which has a maximum unit count of 249 units on 62.2 acres. This provides for a maximum of 4 units per acre (RLM designation) . This Village also had a requirement that the units were to be clustered in the flatter, more usable portions of the site. The remaining land was to remain open space but it was intended to be counted in the density calculations. When the General Plan was later amended, the flatter, more usable land on this Village was designated RLM and the remaining portion was designated as open space. This created an inconsistency between the Master Plan and the General Plan. You asked us to recalculate our growth projections for this zone based on the Master Plan criteria. We did this and would now like you to review our findings and the assump- tions used in making these findings. Assumptions For gross residential acreage, we used the gross acreages of each residential village as contained in the Calavera 6994 El Camino Real • Suite 208-G • Carlsbad • CA 92008 • (619) 438-1465 Hills Master Plan. From these acreages, we will subtract out the environmental constraints (both 100% and 50% constraints per the Growth Management Plan) . The net acreage that results will be multiplied by the Control Point for each residential land use category and a total unit count for the entire zone will be obtained. From this number, we will subtract out the existing and approved units within' the zone which leaves the remaining unit count for the Management Zone. We are in the process of revising our maps to reflect this methodology, but we would first like your concurrence on our assumptions. If you agree with our methodolgy, we would like to set up a meeting with you and your staff to review the new exhibits and projections. Because we would rather not proceed too far on our exhibits without the city's concurrence, we would greatly appreciate a response by next Wednaesday. Again, thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Bill Ho f man cc: Phil Carter Christensen & Associates THE WILLIAM N. HOFMAN COMPANY Planning Project Management Environmental June 19, 1987 jy|N 1 g *-v -—I w dsCITY Or CARL. Michael G. Howes DEVELOP. FROC SERVCity of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: Local Facilities Management Plan, Zone 7- Submittal of the Constraints Map. Dear Mike: Attached please find the revised constraints map for Management Zone 7. This constraints map was prepared by Tony Lawson, ADL Planning Associates,and reviewed and verified by me. The map and the attached build out projection numbers correspond to the methodology adopted as part of the Citywide Facilities Management Plan. Since some time has passed since our last meeting on this subject, I would like to briefly summarize the approach we took in the preparation of this plan as agreed to by the Planning staff. A verification letter written to the staff is included which summarizes our past understanding. As you know, the Master Plan was amended by Ordinance 9708, February 21, 1984 to reflect some major land use changes. After the Master Plan was amended, the City amended the General Plan to reflect the changes. This General Plan amendment was a clean up amendment intended to bring the General Plan and Master Plan into conformity. The re- sulting General Plan amendment, however, did not accurately reflect the Master Plan amendments that occurred. I won't go into detail here, but the attached letter uses Village U as an example where the Master Plan contemplated more units then would be allowed under the General Plan. Village U was intended to be a clustered development in the flatter more usable areas. The entire Village was intended to be counted towards density. The General Plan amendment, however, designated the remainder of Village U as Open Space, which cannot be counted for density. This resulted in a greatly reduced unit count than could be permitted by the Master Plan. 6904 Ei Cammo Real • Suite 208-G • Carlsbad • CA 92009 • (619) 438-1465 The Planning staff indicted that it could support an overall Zone 7 unit count based on the Master Plan villages instead of the General Plan. The staff indicated that they anticipated potential conflicts with existing Master Plans and that the population and unit limits of the Growth Management Ordinance and Proposition E reflect allowances for existing Master Plans. Please review the constraints map and the corresponding build out table. We need confirmation as soon as possible so we can complete the Local Facility Management Plan for Zone 7. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Bill Hofman cc: Michael Holzmiller Phil Carter Christensen and Associates Bramalea Development Don Agatep LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859 PLANNING DEPARTMENT WHOW (619)438-1161\y^ Cttp of Cartebab Duly 1*, 1987 Bill Hofman The William N. Hofman Company 699* El Camino Real, Suite 208-G Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: BUILDOUT NUMBERS FOR ZONE 7 Dear Bill, The purpose of this letter is to confirm your buildout numbers for Zone 7. Your projections show the following: \ Total units allowed in Zone 7 - 2,337 Existing/approved units - 1,834 Potential remaining units - 503 The above mentioned numbers include the approved 653 units of villages Q + T within the 1,83* existing/approved category. When these two projects are redesigned to conform with Growth Management Control Points, the Hillside Ordinance and the revised Planned Development Ordinance the units that are reduced from these two areas may be retained within Zone 7. If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please contact Nancy Rollman. Sincerely, MIKE HOWES Senior Planner MH:af cc: Michael Holzmiller Charlie Grimm Phil Carter Nancy Rollman PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859 (619)438-1161 Citp of Cartebab September 2, 1987 Bill Hofman WILLIAM N. HOFMAN CO. 6694 El Camino Real, Suite 208"GM Carlsbad, CA 92009 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN - ZONE 7 Dear Mr. Hofman: The City Attorney has determined that the Local Facilities Management Plans are projects under CEQA and, therefore, will be required to address all of the appropriate requirements. As a result, the Environmental Impact Assessment Form - Part I will be required to be made a part of the official Local Facilities Management Plan submittal. The guidelines for preparing a Local Facilities Management Plan will be updated to include this requirement. All CEQA guidelines are a part of the application processing requirements. If you have any questions, please call me at (619) 438-1161. Sincerely, PHILIP O. CARTER Senior Management Analyst POC:bjn c: Michael J. Holzmiller Charlie Grimm Mike Howes Gary Wayne Nancy Rollman M & A CAPITAL. INC. LA JOLLA GATEWAY 9191 TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE. SUITE 28O SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92122 (619) 535-O3O3 January 27, 1988 Mr. Phil Carter City of Carlsbad Community Development 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 Dear Mr. Carter: RE: CALAVERA HILLS Further to our telephone conversation yesterday, I am putting my queries in writing. As you know, the Federal Assets Disposition Association (FADA) of Dallas, Texas is accepting bids for 517.48 acres in Calavera Hills, formerly owned by Cesco Development and acquired by Vernon Savings & Loan under foreclosure procedures. I understand that Zone 7 includes all of Calavera Hills which includes 280 acres owned and developed by Pacific Scene, as well as the 517.48 acres now under consideration. In order to make an intelligent bid we need to know the status of the project in the planning process and the allowable densities. Specifically, here are my questions: (1) For the 517.48 acres of Calavera Hills formerly owned by Cesco Development, how many dwelling units and of what type will be allowed in total and how many have been allowed for in villages T and U which are ready for final mapping? Have tentative maps been approved for any of the other villages? (2) Is the project exempted from the building moratorium and can building permits be pulled upon final mapping and satisfaction of the local Facilities Management Plan? (3) What is a good estimate of the time required fro the Facilities Management Plan for Zone 7 to be developed and approved? I would appreciate receiving the information as soon as possible. Yours truly, George W. Rutledge PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859 (619)438-1161 Citp of Cartebab February 4, 1988 George W Rut ledge M & A Capital, Inc. La Jolla Gateway 9191 Town Centre Drive, Suite 280 San Diego, CA 92122 Dear Mr. Rutledge: I have enclosed a copy of the Calavera Hills Master Plan which should answer in part your query regarding how many dwelling units and of what type will be allowed in total. Please remember these are maximum possible, not guaranteed, numbers. Village T has 466 units. Village U does not have a tentative map. Perhaps you should be referring to Village Q which has 204 units and is nearing the final map stage. The only other tentative map is L- 1. There is no building moratorium. If you have a final map and a fully mitigated City Council approved Local Facilities Management Plan, you are eligible to receive building permits. There is no good estimate as to when the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 7 will be approved as it has yet to be submitted. I would suggest you contact the consultant preparing the plan, Mr. William N. Hofman, at (619) 438-1465, if you have any further questions regarding this zone plan. Sincerely, PHILIP O. CARTER Senior Management Analyst BH:POC/af Encl. 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE E^O/^M \ U /-^TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 ^^SP \ /^ (619) 438-1161 ^0f PLANNING DEPARTMENT May 5, 1988 Hofman Planning Associates 6994 El Camino Real, Suite 208 Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 7 Dear Mr. Hofman: Enclosed are staff's comments regarding the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 7, submitted April 12, 1988. It is important to understand these are initial comments and are not intended to be a complete review of the plan. The following comments will be useful in preparing a plan for the City to accept for technical review. Listed below are items that were not included in the plan as submitted and which make it unacceptable for technical review by the City. These items include: 1. 200 scale vertical/horizontal cross sections of circulation element roadways. 2. An accurate general plan map. 3. All environmental documentation performed in zone to date. 4. A downstream analysis of drainage. 5. Map and name of service agency for water distribution, along with a cost estimate for specific funding analysis. 6. An analysis of Elm between 1-5 and El Camino Real and at the 1-5 Interchange Hofman Planning '^"sociates May 5, 1988 Page Two Listed below are comments of a more minor nature, but they will still have to be addressed in the final text. 1. Provide methodology documentation and specific finding analysis for circulation. 2. Show how open space meets performance standard via constraints overlay. 3. School phasing and specific funding will need to be mitigated. 4. Provide a discussion of water reclamation. 5. Provide consultant's phone number and address on title page. Again, these comments are not meant to be a complete critique, but are intended to enable you to prepare an acceptable Local Facilities Management Plan. Please call me if you require clarification of staff's comments. Sincerely, BRIAN HUNTER Associate Planner BH:af Enclosure c: Phil Carter Steve Jantz 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 TELEPHONE (619)438-1161 (Ettg of Ototabafc PLANNING DEPARTMENT June 21, 1988 Bill Hofman Hofman Planning Associates 6994 El Camino Real, Suite 208 Carlsbad, California 92009 Dear Mr. Hofman: The City is pleased to accept the Zone 7 Local Facility Management Plan for technical review upon acceptance of the $10,000 processing fee required by Resolution No. 8799. A schedule for Planning Commission public hearing will be provided for you within sixty (60) days of the acceptance of your processing fee. Staff will then contact you to begin the technical review. Sincerely, BRIAN HUNTER Associate Planner BH:dm cc: Philip O. Carter, Assistant City Manager Steve Jantz, Engineer INC. July 12, 1988 Mr. John Doe Doe Development Company 1234 Main Street San Diego, CA 92101 Re: Calavera Hills Villages "T" - "Q" 486 Dwelling Lots Dear Mr. Doe: This is to advise you of our intentions to solicit and accept a purchase contract from the list of buyers that have expressed an interest in this project. Following our acquisition in April, we were overwhelmed by the interest shown by buyers/users/brokers which caused us to take some additional time to consider the various sales opportunities. We have now determined that it is in the best interest of the project, the project owner, and for the City of Carlsbad, California, to proceed with the sale of Villages "T" and "Q" subject to the terms of the Purchase Agreement and Escrow Instructions and the Site Development Agreement included herewith. We realize that the housing product developed on Villages "T" and "Q" is critical to the success of those villages and to our subsequent development of all the remaining tracts in Calavera Hills Zone 7. Therefore, we are interested in selling to a builder/developer that helps us to maintain a high degree of value and city/community confidence in this and all subsequent villages developed. We consider our good working relationship with the City of Carlsbad imperative to the overall success of this development. We, therefore, specifically prohibit any inquiries of any nature for any reason to the City from any and all potential purchasers. Once we have totally executed a formal contract with a purchaser, we will allow for that party to discuss this project with the City in our or our engineers'/lawyers'/Planners' 701 Palomar Airport Road, 3rd Floor • Carlsbad, CA 92009 - (619)931-4757 July 12, 1988 Page Two presence. We are advising the City officials of our intentions and requesting that they not discuss this project with anyone without our written permission. We feel that this requirement is necessary to keep the City from being inundated with inquiries from parties that may not be the eventual purchaser. We are including herewith documents and drawings relative to the parcels as follows: Cover Letter Purchase and Escrow Instructions Site Development Agreement Tentative Map "Q" Tentative Map "T" Composite Map Constraints Map Survey North Half Topographical Map Title Report Alternative Concept Plan (For Information Only) Alternative Development Summary (For Information Only) We have, in our office, soils investigative information that you may peruse and copy, and we are also willing to share our own preliminary cost estimates with you, if requested. To facilitate the "due diligence" that may be required in connection with the purchase of "T", "Q", we will, upon notice in writing by the potential purchasers, arrange for our engineers and planners to discuss the project with you and make information that they have about the project available. We know that the project development scope is significant, so we encourage you to put the time and effort into your analysis to allow you to respond to this request for purchase contract on or before 5:00 p.m. Wednesday, July 27, 1988. If you have any questions, please call me. Yours very truly, Lawrence M. Whittington Vice President INC. July 14, 1988 Mr. Michael Holzmiller Planning Director City of Carlsbad 1075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009-4859 Dear Mr. Hotzmiller: Please find attached a John Doe copy of a letter which went out yesterday to 15 prospective purchasers of Villages "T" and "Q" of the Calavera Hills project. As you can see, we have attempted to make it very clear that the prospective purchasers are not to contact any of the City's staff personnel. We feel we must protect against the City staff being deluged with questions and requests for information. Should any call or contacts slip through, we would appreciate your referring those persons back to us for guidance. ThaQk__yj3u for your help in this matter, truly, jc Enclosure cc: Phil Carter, Assistant to the City Manager Wilma Diepersloot, Assistant Planner Charlie Grimm, Assitant Planning Director Bill Hofmann, Consultant Mike Howes, Senior Planner Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer Bryan Hunter, Associate Planner Marty Orenyak, Community Development Director Ray Pachet, City Manager Ronald W. Rouse, Esquire 701 Palomar Airport Road, 3rd Floor • Carlsbad, CA 92009 • (619)931-4757 I I ' . 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD. CA 92009-4859 TELEPHONE (619)438-1161 (Etta of PLANNING DEPARTMENT July 14, 1988 William Hofman Hofman Planning Associates 699,4 El Camino Real, Suite 208 Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 7 Dear Mr. Hofman: Enclosed are staff's comments upon the primary technical review of the Zone 7 plan. A date specific response to our input will ensure a timely processing of the zone plan. Please address the following comments. 1. Exhibit 2; add "Facilities" after "City Administrative", add "quadrant" after "northeast". 2. Add General Condition No. 9, page 12; approval of this plan does not constitute prior discretionary review for projects within Zone 7. All future projects shall undergo review per Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The plan establishes the maximum allowable number of residential units for facilities planning purposes only. The plan does not guarantee any specific residential density. 3. Page 11, item 4; change 1987 to 1986. 4. Exhibit 4; NE corner, identify OS. 5. Exhibit 14; footnote parentheses for future du's. 6. Exhibit 11; riparian (spelling). 7. Update all sections to 1/1/88 numbers. 8. Once buildout is confirmed, include Zones 14 and 15 phasing in parks, Exhibit 35. William Hofman July 14, 1988 Page 2 9. Exhibit 49; show performance versus constrained open space. 10. Schools are a district wide concern. If schools do not meet the standard in this zone, then no other zones in the district meet the standard. 11. Sewer; A. Use the accepted performance standard that has been adopted in the previous zone plans word for word. B. Propose to have a section describing the Calavera Hills Reclamation Plan. Provide the information such as date built, MGD capacity, and the type of treatment, necessary upgrades and reclaiming capabilities. This should almost be a specific section within itself within the plan. C. Under the same scenario there should be a separate section describing the Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor. This section should deal with percent capacities of the two cities, the upgrades that are necessary and when those upgrades are required. This zone does impact the capacity of this interceptor. D. Under mitigation, this plan proposes a pump station in Phase 7(C) but the mitigation section does not include the requirement to construct this pump station and the estimated cost. Please provide this information. E. Combine charts. 12. Water; A. Use the adopted performance standard used in the previous zone plans. B. Performance standards also include an analysis of the ten day storage capacity. This analysis was not in this plan. C. Exhibit 60 - Some of the designations using the legends are quite similar and hard to decipher. Review the graphic and consider other legend designations. D. Combine some of these charts. William Hofman July 14, 1988 Page 3 E. Include estimated costs for all water facilities and itemized in the mitigation section. 13. Circulation; A. The analysis indicates that construction of Cannon road west of El Camino Real is assumed in 1990. If this section is not built or not funded, this zone therefore impacts El Camino Real to Palomar Airport Road and possibly Palomar Airport Road to 1-5. Does this zone propose to build Cannon Road west? If not, provide analysis for El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road to 1-5. B. The mitigation does not include a portion of Cannon Road from College Boulevard to El Camino Real. Please provide. C. This zone also assumes Cannon Road from College to El Camino Real is a two-lane collector in 1995. Currently this is not funded and should be included in proposed mitigation. Staff expects response to our comments within 10 days. A follow up meeting is scheduled for July 28, 1988 at 10:00 a.m. in this office. At that time, draft conditions will be provided. Sincerely, BRIAN HUNTER Associate Planner BH:af c: fPhil Carter "* Steven Jantz Zone 7 Property Owners 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE mJPmJ M TELEPHONE CARLSBAD. CA 92009-4859 WW-TM <619) 438'1161 of PLANNING DEPARTMENT July 26, 1988 William Ho f man Ho f man Planning Associates 6994 El Camino Real, Suite 208 Carlsbad, CA 92009 Dear Mr. Ho f man: On July 14, 1988 City staff met with you regarding initial comments on Local Facilities Management Plans for Zones 7. At that time, a follow-up meeting was scheduled for July 28, 1988 with the understanding that a complete resubmittal addressing our requirements would be made on July 25, 1988; thereby, allowing review time prior to our July 28 meeting. No such resubmittal has occurred. Staff's ability to respond in a timely and concise manner, to allow the plan to proceed forward in an expeditious fashion, is predicated upon all parties maintaining agreed upon schedules. Due to the intricate and complex nature inherent to these plans, logic dictates a time specific focused approach to processing. Your failure to resubmit in a timely fashion, agreed upon by all parties, essentially adds another meeting date to our schedule and delays the ultimate adoption of the plan. If our timetable is unreasonably demanding upon your ability to respond or unforeseeable contingencies have effected your response time, then please communicate with this office your present processing desires. Sincerely, BRIAN HUNTER Associate Planner c: Phil Carter, Assistant to the City Manager Steven Jantz, Associate Civil Engineer Zone 7 Property Owners HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES Planning • Project Management • Environmental July 28, 1988 Brian Hunter City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: Zone 7 - Local Facility Management Plan. Dear Mr. Hunter: This letter is written in response to your letter of July 26, 1988 regarding the processing of the Zone 7 Local Facilities Management Plan. First of all, the statements made in this letter regarding scheduling are incorrect and need to be clarified. As you know, Sheila Donovan, Mark Rael of Christensen and Associates and I were all in attendance at the meeting of July 14, 1988. At no time during or after this meeting was a July 25, 1988 submittal deadline stated. In fact, the resubmittal date given to us was July 28, 1988. We have met this deadline by recently submitting the Zone 7 revisions. Had we been aware of a July 25, 1988 submittal deadline, we would have responded accordingly. Secondly, the tone of your letter is very disappointing and discouraging to us. We have worked diligently with your staff to prepare the best Local Facility Management Plan possible. We believe that a good working relationship has been developed between our staffs and we wish to maintain this. Letters such as the one you have written, especially when based on inaccurate information, are not conducive to a good overall working relationship. I would suggest that a phone call at the time you believe a deadline is missed would be more helpful and would allow earlier resolution of any problem that may arise. 6994 B Camino Real, Suite 208 • Carlsbad • CA 92009 • [619) 438-1465 We are mainly interested in maintaining our good working relationship with you throughout this process. Please call me if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, Bill Hofman cc: Zone 7 Property Owners Phil Carter, Assistant to the City Manager Steven Jantz, Associate Civil Engineer August 5, 1988 William Hof man Hofman Planning Associates 6994 El Camino Real, Suite 208 Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 7 Dear Mr. Hofman: Enclosed are staff's comments upon the second technical review of the Zone 7 Plan. 1. City Administrative Facilities meet the adopted performance standard until 2006 (Exhibit 2, Page 9). 2. Exhibit 2, page 9 - Park standard is not met. 3. Exhibit 3, page 10 - City Administrative 2006. Schools, yes with proposed mitigation. Parks, yes with proposed mitigation. 4. Exhibit 11 - RLM-9 partial constraints 8.75 therefore net developable 43.25. Therefore RLM partial constraints 14.95 and net developable 420.85. RM-3 (L-2) partial constraints .15, therefore, net developable 19.95. Therefore RM partial constraints .15 and net developable 64.45. RMH-2 (L-l) partial constraints .45. Therefore net developable 6.15. RMH partial constraints 2.35 and net developable 42.35. Total residential partial constraints 43.05 and net developable 643.45. Total zone partial constraints 43.05 and net developable 705.65. 5. Exhibit 14 - RLM-9(U) net acres 43.25, RLM net acres 420.85. RM-3(L-2) net acres 19.95, base residential 119. RM net acres 64.45, base residential 386, future du's 76. RMH-2(L- 1) net acres 6.15, base residential 70, future du's (10). RMH net acres 42.35, base residential 486, future du's 406. total net acres 643.45, base residential 2335, future du's 668. William Hofman August 5, 1988 Page 2 6. Wastewater - The majority of this section is complete. Flow data and issued relating to mitigation is subject to change. The City will provide updated information prior to approval of this plan. 7. Drainage - REvise wordage and format of mitigation section. 8. Circulation A. Provide charts summarizing impacted intersections and road segments (levels of service per phased year). B. Include technical assumptions, referenced traffic data, procedures that analyzed road segments, etc. C. Revise mitigation D. Provide chart depicting intersection geometries. 9. Sewer A. Use accepted performance standard. B. Revise presentation of facilities and impacts from this zone. 10. Water - Provide analysis of 10-day storage capacity. Sincerely, PHILIP O. CARTER Assistant to the City Manager POCraf c: Steven Jantz, Associate Engineer Brian Hunter, Associate Planner Zone 7 Property Owners 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE MaJW-jB TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 W^M^W (619)438-1161 X5p7 (Ettg of (£arlabab PLANNING DEPARTMENT August 16, 1988 Mr. John Blair, Superintendent Carlsbad Unified School District 801 Pine Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: ZONE 7 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN Dear Mr. Blair: The City of Carlsbad is currently undertaking the second phase of its Growth Management Program. This phase includes the preparation and review of Local Facilities Management Plans for each of the 25 Local Facilities Management Zones within the City. As part of the formal preparation and review process, your district is being asked to review the buildout and phasing assumptions of the plans to determine whether the information is consistent with your district's planning and programming of school facilities. Specifically, the City's Growth Management Program requires the adopted performance standard for school facilities be continually met as growth occurs in Carlsbad. Attached, you will find your review: 1. The adopted performance standard for school facilities 2. Draft buildout assumptions for Zone 7 3. Draft phasing assumptions for Zone 7 Could you please review this information to determine three things. First, is the information correct? Second, can your district provide school facilities according to the phasing assumptions presented in the plan and consistent with Carlsbad's adopted performance standard? And third, what means of monitoring demand for and supply of school facilities would be appropriate to establish between your district and the City of Carlsbad? We would appreciate a letter indicating your findings and any comments regarding the processing of Local Facilities Management Plans. Mr. John Blair August 16, 1988 Page Two Your review and comments are part of an overall plan preparation which needs to be completed by August 30, 1988. If you need further information or assistance, please call me at 438-1161. Thank you very much for your assistance. Sincerely, BRIAN HUNTER Senior Planner BH:af Enclosure c: Phil Carter 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE B^W\jl • TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 WHU/M (619)438-1161 (Eftg of (Harlsbab PLANNING DEPARTMENT August 23, 1988 Wilson Engineering Dexter S. Wilson 2185 Faraday Avenue, Suite 140 Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: ZONE 7 SEWER FLOWS This letter shall serve as authorization to prepare a detailed sewer flow analysis for Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 7. The City has been requested to provide an updated computer run of projected sewer flows from Zone 7 and an analysis of the impacts of the affected sewer interceptors. Specifically, the impacts of sewer sub-basins 7A on the Vista-Carlsbad Interceptor and future trunk lines VCT1A and VCT1C. The projected buildout dwelling units within this sub-basin is as follows: Sub—basin Dwelling Units 7A 958 Please return the sewer impact analysis with an invoice of the costs incurred for the preparation of the required information. The City will request payment from the consultant preparing the Zone 7 Plan. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 438- 1161. ^^ !N C. J^TTZSTEVEN Associate Civil Engineer SCJ:af c: Lloyd Hubbs Hofman Planning Associates Phil Carter 6994 El Camino Real, Suite 208 Brian Hunter Carlsbad, CA 92009 Carlsbad Unified School District 801 Pine Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008-2439 729-9291 "Excellence In Education" BOARD OF TRUSTEES XX ANGEL President JAMES McCORMCK Vice President JUUANNE L. NYGAARD Clerk DONALD M.JOHNSON Member J. EDWARD SWITZER, JR. Member DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION THOMAS K. BRIERLEY, Ed.D. Superintendent SUSAN-HARUMI BENTLEY Assistant Superintendent . Instructional Services JOHN H. BLAIR Assistant Superintendent Business Services GERALD C. TARMAN Director Personnel Services DEWAYNE L FEASEL Manager Facilities/Maintenance/ Operations September 14, 1988 Mr. Mike Holtzmiller Planning Director City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 Dear Mike: As shown in the enclosed Board Agenda Item of Carlsbad Unified School District, the District is in the process of acquiring the Junior High School site (20.06 acres) located in Zone 7 to the west of Calaveras Lake. Eventually, this school site will front on College Boulevard on its western boundary. This property is being acquired from Alltex Inc., 701 Palomar Airport Road, Carlsbad, California 92009, through an agreement which will exchange parcel tax and developer fee credit for the land valuation, site preparation costs, and certain off-site improvements. Any remaining parcel tax and developer fees from Zone 7 will be applied to school construction on the site. Additional new funding sources for school construction will need to be addressed at a later stage in Zone Plan development. It should be noted that within Zone 7 there is currently Hope Elementary School with a capacity of 600 students up on Tamarack Avenue and the proposed Junior High School site. These two sites should adequately meet school needs within Zone 7. Sincerely, H. Blair stant Superintendent ness Services JHB:njg Enclosure c:Alltex Inc. Wm. N. Hofman Co. Distinguished School Board Award 1984, United States Department of Education ACTION CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Carlsbad, California September 28, 1988 TO: Thomas K. Brierley, Ed.D., District Superintendent FROM: John H. Blairs Assistant Superintendent, Business Services SUBJECT: Dedication Agreement - College Boulevard School Site BACKGROUND INFORMATION The School Location Plan of July, 1982 initially reflected a Carlsbad Unified School District junior high school located near the western end of Calaveras Lake on the future route of College Boulevard. Later, in the adopted City of Carlsbad Calavera Hills Project, this 20-acre school site became Village S in the Plan. Since then, Calavera Hills has become Planning Zone 7 of the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan. CURRENT CONSIDERATIONS For several months now, the District staff has been working with Lawrence Whittington of Alltex, Inc., 701 Palomar Airport Road, Carlsbad, California, regarding the dedication of the 20-acre College Boulevard school site to the District. Alltex, Inc. will be completing the Zone 7 Master Plan and completion of the Calavera Hills Project. Essentially, the proposal is for the District to provide parcel tax/developer fee credit for the value of the school site, site development work at cost, and certain improvements to College Boulevard. Generally, it is similar to other recent school site acquisition agreements within the District. A map of the school site is contained in Exhibit A. A plat map and legal description have not yet been received. Other documentation will be provided at the Board meeting. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Acquisition of a badly needed school site in the Tri-City/Calavera Hills area. More information will be presented at the Board meeting. RECOMMENDATION It is respectfully recommended that the Board of Trustees accept the dedication agreement for the College Boulevard Junior High School Site of 20 acres. SUPERINTENDENTS RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of staff recommendation. AGENDA ITEM 26 72 Xa: 1—4 CO -vl CO ', *raiL*^V':-Vv-X I'M"' General Motes / Design m^r^Fw ?-- ^Mfm^'^ %^^^pfe^P^lp^" '" \ -i-- \!;-.«£— _ »;«• ^ J TENTATIVE MAP EXHIBIT OF: Calavera Hills Typica. Cross Scc«.ons VillaQG T'north&south_ ^____ c.t. 83-19 ,p.ud.56 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 October 6, 1988 TELEPHONE (619)438-1161 (UtttJ of CTarlsbab PLANNING DEPARTMENT William Hofman Hofman Planning Associates 6994 El Camino Real, Suite 208 Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 7 Dear Mr. Hofman: Review of your most recent submittal indicates the following corrections will be required to finalize the plan. At such time as the corrections are made and reviewed by City staff a City Manager/Department Head comment meeting will be scheduled. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. The Special Conditions sections will require completion. All references to exhibits within text will include page numbers. All Exhibits will have page numbers. Exhibit 6 - Include mailing addresses for owners. Exhibit 9 - P is P-U. Page 20, footnote 6 - Which Appendix? Why 5/1/87? Exhibit 10 - Constraints include individual village nets. Exhibit 14 - Base residential buildout projections exceed GMCP for RL-3, RL-4, RLM-6, RLM-8, RLM-9 and RM-1. Effects population projections. 10?Elementary IfhQJilHQimum net Exhibit 17 - Footnote Zone 20. If in Exhibit Exhibit 17 s ng under technical review is to be included, suit (Zones 8, 9, 14, 15, and 24). William Hofman October 6, 1988 Page 2 11. Exhibit 20 - Update to 1/1/88 with following information...Zone 1 - 2,527,276, Zone 3 - 1,685,013, Zone 5 - 4,992,315, Zone 6 - 841,434. Which adjusts projection numbers as follows: Zone 1, 2013 - 57,084, Zone 3, 1989 - 94,136, Zone 5, 1997 - 712,612, and Zone 6, 1989 - 100,000. 12. Parks - Special Condition should read - No residential development shall occur after 1991 unless actions have been taken by the City to construct additional park facilities. 13. Open Space - Please note CFIP findings. 14. Schools - Provide agreement from school district as Appendix. Wastewater 15. Use section from Zone 24. City will provide up-dated flows prior to Planning Commission hearing. Drainage 16. Page 81 - Exhibit 38 - Designation #1. 17. Page 82 - Exhibit 38A not with this submittal. 18. Page 83A - Revise Special Condition II. Circulation 19. Page 98 - Transposed numbers (College Blvd.). 20. Page 101 - 1990 - Include Elm Avenue Extension. 21. Page 102 - Improvements needed by buildout - none. 22. Page 103 - Second funding options - developer. Sewer 23. Page 121 - Reword inventory - Existing Facilities. - Include Calavera Hills Treatment/Reclamation Facility. 24. Page 124 - Include existing/future flows. - Discuss Capacity of Kelly line. - Exhibit 57 missing. 25. Page 125 - Discuss each future facility separately. - Accompany with appropriate graphic. William Hofman October 6, 1988 Paoe 3 26. 129 - Year needed?? 27. Page 134 - Reword adequacy analysis. 28. Page 135 - Revise mitigation. Water 29. Staff will forward water section to CRMWD for their review. Sincerely, BRIAN HUNTER Senior Planner c: Zone 7 Property Owners Philip 0. Carter, Assistant to City Manager Steven Jantz, Associate Civil Engineer BH:af \zone7\comment2.1tr November 4, 1988 TO: PHIL CARTER FROM: JIM ELLIOTT ZONE 7 - COMMENTS P13 - SPECIAL CONDITIONS - PARKS - #1 Zone 7 is in park district #2 not district #1 as stated. Throughout the zone plan - the spelling of Glasgow Dr. is shown as Glascow. P28 - CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS There is no area listed as constrained in the category of schools. I thought Zone 7 was going to have to dedicate 20 acres for school use. Doesn't this have to be considered when calculating unconstrained land area? P82 - PARKS - MITIGATION - SECTION B Do we want to get into a discussion about the possibility of counting future school sites in order to meet performance standards? It seems to me the consideration of parks to be developed should be the primary focus of this section. P91 - FINANCING - 30" STORM DRAIN Does this section imply that the drain will be constructed by the developer to be reimbursed from zone fees in Zone 14? At this time I am not aware of any intent to use special assessment districts to pay for storm drain construction, nor is the City prepared to carry the cost of construction of this drain. P113 -EXHIBIT 46 - FINANCING MATRIX Circulation - The funding for the second and third phases of College Boulevard are shown as being the responsibility of Zone 14 or adjacent developers. Although this may be the case, where does the financing come from if Zone 14 does not develop on schedule? Would Zone 7 halt development to wait for nearby development to provide the road, or would an assessment district or Mello-Roos district be proposed to solve the problem? Are there existing agreements with Zone 14 or other property owners securing the construction of the road? I would recommend that we determine the second funding option in these cases. Exhibit 72, P4 shows the developer as the fall back funding method. We should show the same here. P148- EXHIBIT 67 - FINANCING MATRIX - SEWER Although I understand some of the uncertainty in the timing and sequence of improvements, I do not understand why we cannot specify the funding source under each alternative. These improvements appear to be pri- marily developer responsibilities. The funding option section should indicate this in the first column. The same comment applies to Exhibit 71, P5 & 6. City of Carlsbad Community Development December 7, 1988 Mr. William Hofman Hofman Planning Associates 2386 Faraday Avenue, Suite 120 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Mr. Hofman: Your request for a 90 day extension for processing of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 7 is approved. At this time it may be helpful to specify the new deadlines which apply. The 90 days will end on March 26, 1989. The latest City Council meeting date for approval of the Plan is thus March 21st. If the Plan is submitted to us for Department Head Review by January 11, 1989, it could be scheduled for Planning Commission hearing as early as February 15th. This would allow ample time to hold the City Council hearing on or before March 21st. Submittal of the Plan for Department Head Review after January llth could of course alter this schedule. In either case, City staff will endeavor to review the Plan in a timely manner, being mindful of the property owner's desire to see the Plan adopted as soon as possible. Sincerely, DON RIDEOUT Senior Management Analyst c: Zone 7 Property Owners 2075 Las Palmas Drive •Carlsbad, California 92OO9~4859»(619) 4-38-1161 HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES Ranring • Project Management • Rscal Analysis December 7, 1988 Mr. Don Rideout Senior Systems Analyst 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 Subject: Request for Meeting to Discuss the Zone 7 LFMP. Dear Phil: This letter is to request a meeting between the Growth Management Team, Alltex representatives and myself to discuss the remaining zone plan issues. Your letter of November 30, 1998, indicated that a 90-day extension request was necessary. In your letter, you indicated that the plan in its present form is not ready for presentation. The property owners of Zone 7 would like to meet to discuss the areas where the plan is not sufficient and begin work to resolve the remaining issues. We understand that you are unable to meet until the week of December 11, 1988. We will call to set up a meeting for that week. Sincerely, Bill Hofman cc: Lawrence Whittington 3386 Faraday, Suite 120 • Carlsbad • CA 92008 • [619] 438-1465 HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES Ranning • Project Management • fiscal Analysis December 7, 1988 Mr. Phil Carter Growth Management Manager 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: Request for 90 Day Extension For Completion of the Zone 7 - LFMP. Dear Phil: On behalf of the property owners in Zone 7, we are respectfully requesting an extension of 90 days to complete the processing of the Zone 7 - Local Facilities Management Plan. Please call me if you need any additional information. Sincerely, Bill Hofman BH:SD cc: Michael Holzmiller Don Rideout Brian Hunter Steve Jantz Lawrence Whittington 2386 Faraday, Suite 120 • Cartsbad • CA 92008 • (619)438-1465 -'_<-*_ HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES Planning • Project Management • Fiscal Analysis January 2, 1989 Philip O. Carter Assistant to the City Manager 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad, California 92008 RE: TOLLING OF VILLAGES Q & T - CT 83-19 and CT 83-32 Dear Phil: As you know, the Carlsbad City Council approved the Zone 7 Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) on December 5, 1989. It is my understanding that the above referenced tentative maps will begin tolling as of that date under the existing City policy being applied to tentative maps in zones with approved LFMPs. I also wish to confirm that the tolling of CT 83-19 and CT 83-32 will continue until the Zone 7 Finance Plan has been approved. The Zone 7 Finance Plan which was submitted to the City on August 16, 1989 for review addresses all special conditions contained within the approved Zone 7 LFMP. If you agree, I would appreciate a written confirmation. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Sincerely, Bill Hofman BH:GM c: Garry Tarquinio, Lyon Communities George Haviar, Lyon Communities 2386 Faraday, Suite 1 SO • Carlsbad • CA 92008 • [619)438-1465 City of Carlsbad Community Development January 3, 1989 J/l/V Sheila Donovan Hofman Planning Associates 2386 Faraday, Suite 120 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Sheila: This letter is in response to your request for a meeting to discuss the remaining issues in Zone 7. We would be happy to meet with you and representatives of William Lyon Co. However, at this time there are some questions regarding the sewer collection system that require further analysis. These questions must be resolved by City staff before the sewer section of the Plan can be finalized. In view of this, we feel that it would be premature to schedule a meeting at this time. We are cognizant of the approaching deadline and will endeavor to resolve the sewer issue as soon as possible. I can assure you that staff is desirous of seeing the Plan adopted, and everyone is working towards that end. Your patience in this matter is appreciated. In a related matter, we need letters from Alltex indicating that they are no longer involved in Zone 7 and from William Lyon Co. indicating that they assume responsibility for costs associated with City review of the Plan and that Hofman Planning Associates is representing them. Sincerely, . -n . /I / DON RIDEOUT Senior Management Analyst bjn c: Brian Hunter Steven Jantz 2OT5 Las Palmas Drive-Carlsbad, California 92OO9-4859»<619) 438-1161 HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES Raming • Project Management • Fiscal Analysis January 10, 1989 Lloyd Hubbs City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 Subject: Sewer Facilities for the Zone 7 - LFMP. Dear Lloyd: Enclosed please find a summary of the proposed sewer mitigation we are proposing for completion of the Zone 7 Local Facilities Management Plan. We are requesting a meeting with you and Steve Jantz to present our proposal in more detail, however, a summary of our proposal is provided below for your review. We feel that sewer facilities within Zone 7 are basically two separate issues that can be addressed as follows: 1) Sewer conditions as they apply to Villages Q (CT 83-32) and T (CT 83- 19) and 2) sewer facilities required as a condition of development for the remaining villages in Zone 7. Existing Facilities Within Zone 7 The Calavera Hills Water Reclamation Plant, located in Village H, was built in 1981 to provide sewer service to Calavera Hills. However, the plant has never been activated and will only become operational if there is a capacity problem at Encina WFCF. At present, the existing lift stations originally built to serve the plant, now collect and convey sewerage through North Agua Hedionda Interceptor to the Encina WFCF. Although the NAHI currently serves all existing development within Zone 7, the Sewer Master Plan shows the zone divided into three phases each to be served by a different interceptor at build out as follows (See Attached Exhibit "A"): Phase A - Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor Phase B - North Agua Hedionda Interceptor Phase C - South Agua Hedionda Interceptor 2386 Faraday. Suite 120 • Carlsbad • CA 92008 • [619)438-1465 Conditions of Approval for Q and T; Tentative tract maps and Planned Development permits were approved for Villages Q and T on September 4, 1984. The conditions of these maps relating to sewer assumed that the Calavera Hills Treatment Plan would ultimately provide sewage treatment for the developments. As designed, the western portion of Village Q would gravity flow to the existing Simsberry Lift Station which would then pump sewer flows to an existing line in Tamarack Avenue. This line flows down Tamarack to the west into the North Agua Hedionda Interceptor (NAHI). The eastern portion of Village Q and all of Village T would gravity flow southward to a new lift station located in Village W. This lift station would pump sewer flows up to Tamarack to the west which would then gravity flow westward into the NAHI. It was intended that this lift station service Q, T and other villages in southeast Calavera Hills until a gravity line to Cannon Road is ultimately built. The City has indicated that its ultimate goal is to have all projects gravity flow into ultimate interceptor lines. We concur with this objective, however, we believe that temporary lift stations as originally contemplated for Villages Q and T should be allowed until ultimate lines are put in place. There are two reasons for this: 1) The tentative maps for these projects have been previously approved and designed to accommodate a temporary system: and 2) The temporary system will not jeopardize the City's ability to ultimately have all projects within Zone 7 gravity flow at the time the major sewer lines are constructed (ie. Cannon road and the Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor). Future Facilities within Zone 7; After Q and T, we understand that the financing for a gravity line must be guaranteed prior to any final map approvals. The special conditions that we would propose to ensure that this happens are: Special Conditions for Phase A; With the exception of Villages Q and T, prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first within Phase A of Zone 7, the developers must provide a financing mechanism guaranteeing the construction of a gravity line from the existing Simsberry Lift Station north to the Zone 7 boundary. Development within Zone 7 will continue to use the existing Lift Station until a connection through Zone 25 to the Vista Carlsbad Interceptor is provided by the developers of Zone 25. Condition of Approval for Phase C; With the exception of Villages Q and T, prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first within Phase C of Zone 7, the developers must provide a financing mechanism guaranteeing the construction of a gravity line from the new pump station south to the Zone 7 boundary. Conditions of Approval for Phase B; There are no special conditions for Phase B. Existing facilities are in place to serve this area. We would like the opportunity to present our proposal to you as soon as possible. We will call you to set up this meeting at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, Bill Hofman cc: Dave Hauser, Assistant City Engineer Phil Carter, Assistant to the City Manager Steve Jantz, Associate Engineer George Haviar, William Lyon Company City of Carlsbad Community Development January 13, 1989 Shlela Donovan Hofman Planning Association .» 2386 Faraday Avenue, Suite 120 J/Wg*7 </ Carlsbad, CA 92008 '< .. DearShiela, ' *Q & t* & . Regarding Zone 7, our records indicate that Alltex, Inc. is the property owner responsible for preparing the Local Facilities Management Plan. Recently you have indicated that William Lyon Co. is now the property owner. If this is true, staff needs the following: 1. A letter from Alltex indicating that they have no further interest in the property. 2. A letter from William Lyon Co. stating that they assume responsibility for costs of city review and processing of the plan and that HPA will continue as the consultant for the plan. The following is a corrected schedule for adoption of the plan. Staff had previously indicated that we needed the plan by January llth for department head review. However, the department head review was completed several months ago. Therefore, the following timeline is recommended: Submit 4 copies of revised draft as soon as possible for final review by Growth Management staff. Submit 25 copies by January 31st for Planning Commission Public Hearing, to be held on February 15th. Submit final 25 copies by February 24th for City Council Public Hearing to be held on March 14th or March 21st. As indicated in the above schedule, this zone plan must be noticed for public hearing by February 1, 1989. Therefore, a completed plan must be submitted, or the plan must be withdrawn, before February 1st. Otherwise, staff will have no choice but to notice the plan for denial. Staff believes this schedule is realistic, but of course it is subject to delay due to unforeseen factors. In order to adhere to this schedule, it is important that all required changes be made expeditiously. Thank you for your cooperation in this effort. Sincerely, Don Rideout 2O75 Las Palmas Drive •Carlsbad, California 92OO9-4859*(619) 438-1161 INC. January 16, 1989 City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 Attn: Don Hideout Re: Local Facilities Management Plan - Zone 7 Calavera Hills Dear Mr. Rideout: This is to inform you that we have contracted to sell all the residential areas of Calavera Hills to Lyon Communities Inc. In accordance with that sale, Lyon is authorized to jointly process with us the Zone Plan and other documents relative to mapping. We understand that either Gary Tarquinio or George Haviar of Lyon Communities Inc. will be in contact with you. If you need to reach them, their number is (619) 546-1200. Please advise me if you require any information or assistance from us. Yours very truly,fe^ Lawrence M.^hittington Vice President LMW:st cc: Dan Chambers Gary Tarquinio Bill Hoffman Bill Rogers Bob Buell 701 Palomar Airport Road, 3rd Floor • Carlsbad, CA 92009 • (619) 931-4757 I ••' • t * 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE mJrmjM TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 WJ^ij/M (619> 438'1161 (Uttg of Carlsbab PLANNING DEPARTMENT January 16, 1989 Hofman Planning Associates 2386 Faraday, Suite 120 Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: Local Facilities Management Plan - Zone 7 Dear Mr. Hofman: The department head review of the Zone 7 Plan has been completed. The comments that are included here should allow the plan to move toward public hearing. These comments include: 1. Update to 1/1/89 numbers. 2. Property owners list (Exhibit 6) does not show Alltex or current speculator indicated as land owner on second page. 3. Table of Contents - "And" is not a page number. Sewer Collection System. Water Distribution System. 4. List of Exhibits - bleached mid page. 5. Page 1 - Carlsbad Unified School District. Last sentence - as. 6. Page 4 - Assessment Districts, second sentence. 7. Page 7 - "...a brief synopsis of the adequacy of facilities for..." 8. Page 9, Exhibit 2; Wastewater - "until 2000". Schools, sewer, water; change "required" to "adopted". 9. Page 10, Exhibit 3; Wastewater - "until 2000". Sewer and water "...with proposed mitigation." 10. Page 11; Number 6 - "...shall be issued unless an amendment..." 11. Page 13 - Park District 1? 12. Page 15 - Glascow? 13. Page 16 - Glascow? 14. Page 17 - Please accurately reflect school letter to include dedication plus site preparation plus offsites. Use standard introduction for condition. School district indicates no acquiescence from Post - Alltex option holder. 15. Page 21 - Please redo location description. Correct tense on nonresident!al. 16. Page 22, Exhibit 6 - Please indicate existing development, as well as, option holders. 17. Page 23 - Page number and correct City for Zone 25 (Carlsbad, not Oceanside). 18. Page 28 - GP = General Plan. Hofman Planning Assoc. January 16, 1989 Page 2 19. Page 39 - Update adopted plans. 20. Pages 41-42 - Update adopted plans. 21. Page 45 - Nonresidential, last sentence, "Facilities." 22. Pages 47-48 - Update adopted plans. 23. Page 49, Exhibit 21 - Zone 18? 24. Page 57 - Update adopted plans. 25. Page 58 - Las Palmas $2,500,000? 26. Page 60 - Existing demand = 2,177 sq. ft. 27. Page 62 - Appendix 2 is correct reference. 28. Page 65, Exhibit 27 - Update adopted zone plans. 29. Page 68 - Please correct Exhibit 30. Inventory, last sentence, both paragraphs; change "by" and "to" to "at". 30. Page 70 - City of Carlsbad should be capitalized. $360,000 per year to operate Calavera. 31. Page 71 - Existing demand 5.78 MGD. Expansion 1992. Current treatment capacity reached in 1988. 32. Page 72 - Point 4, Action Plan, last sentence should read ..."no longer feasible and Carlsbad's capacity at Encina..." Delete next two sentences. 33. Page 73; Mitigation - 3. ..."treatment capacity at Encina..." Financing, last sentence, first paragraph; Capital Improvement Funds. 34. Page 74, Exhibit 31 - Expansion 1992. 35. Page 76 - This is Park District 2. However, standard does not include specific Park District identification. 36. Page 78 - This is Park District 2. Provide appendix numbers. 37. Page 79, Exhibit 34 - Provide Citywide information. 38. Page 80, Phasing - Capitalize "Zones 14 and 15". 39. Page 80, Exhibit 35 - Include Zone 18 nonresidential. 40. Page 82; City of Carlsbad. This is the northeast quadrant. 41. Page 83 - This is Park District 2. 42. Page 85 - Proposed buildout - reword per Mr. Jantz. 43. Page 87, Exhibit 38 - Not in Master Plan. Propose connection between 2 and 3. Label 3 BH-1 and 4 BF. 44. Page 88 - Designate between Master Plan and non Master Plan facilities. Label 3 BH-1. Connect. 45. Page 80, last sentence - "...will be a condition of the approval of future development in Zone 7 so..." 46. Reword mitigation per Mr. Jantz. Appendix A-4. 47. Page 91 - Appendix A-4. Delete last sentence in reference footnote. 48. Page 93 - Include impacted intersections - Complete road classifications. 49. Page 94 - Delete years impacted - Corrections as noted 50. Page 95 - Designations (i.e. existing and proposed). 51. Page 96 - Continue Elm and Tamarack. 52. Page 102 - Change Zone 24 to Zone 7. 53. Pages 103-105 - Delete. 54. Pages 106-108 - Check capacities of roadways. Hofman Planning Assoc. January 16, 1989 Page 3 55. Pages 109-112 - Reword mitigation - Complete comments as noted. 56. Page 112 - Add issues section. 57. Page 113 - Correct financing matrix accordingly. 58. Page 114 - Delete footnote 19. 59. Page 118 - Place comma between easements and railroads. 60. Page 124, Exhibit 51 - Valley is existing. Please identify school sites in Zones 14 and 15. 61. Page 129 - Adequacy Findings, third sentence, end with "...in Zone 7." Mitigation - accurately reflect school district's conditions. Please contact school district. 62. Page 130 - Please do not abbreviate Carlsbad High School. 63. Page 131 - Corrections as noted. 64. Page 134 - Update Exhibit 56. 65. Page 135 - Correct VC 16. 66. Page 137 - Delete sentence as noted - Include all pump stations (villas). 67. Page 138 - Include VC 1. 68. Page 139 - Delete sentence as noted. 69. Page 143 - Corrections as noted. 70. Page 145 - Reword reclaimed water section. 71. Page 147 - Reword mitigation. 72. Page 148 and 149 - Correct financing matrix. 73. Page 150 - Costa Real Municipal Water District. Refer to Exhibit 68, page 151. Facility Management Plan should read Local Facilities Management Plan - 6.0 million gallon existing is described as proposed on page 154. 74. Page 151 - City of San Marcos is actually Oceanside/Vista. 75. Page 152, Exhibit 69 - Size of reservoir. 76. Page 153 - Delete footnote. Move fire flow demands to next page. 77. Page 154 - Delete second sentence under Projected Buildout Demand. 78. Page 156 - Delete footnotes. Days of storage should indicate a temporal rather than spatial relationship. . Please return your disk (WordPerfect, Version 5.0) with your next submittal. If you have any questions regarding staff's comments, do not hesitate to contact Don Rideout at 438-1161. Sincerely, 3— BRIAN HUNTER Senior Planner c: Zone 7 Property Owners Philip 0. Carter - Assistant to the City Manager Don Rideout - Senior Management Analyst Steven C. Jantz - Associate Engineer BHraf City of Carlsbad Community Development January 19, 1989 Robert J. Greaney Costa Real Municipal Water District 5950 El Camino Real Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Mr. Greaney: Attached for your review is the Zone 7 Local Facilities Management Plan Water section. Please comment on the information contained in this section and return to City staff so that the Districts conditions can be incorporated into the final Zone Plan document. Your review and comments are part of an overall plan preparation which needs to be completed by January 27, 1989. If you need further information or assistance, please call me at 438-1161. Thank you for your time and effort. STEVEN C. JANTZ Associate Civil Engineer bjn- c:Brian Hunter, Senior Planner Don Rideout, Senior Management Analyst 2075 Las Palmas Drive*Carlsbad, California 92OO9-4859»(619) 438-1161 City of Carlsbad ComrrtUnity Development January 30, 1989 Ms. Sheila Donovan Hofman Planning Associates 2386 Faraday, Suite 120 Carlsbad, CA 92008 REQUEST FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE ZONE 7 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN Dear Ms. Donovan: We are in receipt of your request for withdrawal of the Zone 7 Local Facilities Management Plan. With the resubmittal of your application, the processing of your Plan will resume where it left off. It is our intent to work toward a public hearing in a timely fashion with the understanding that the remaining issues are resolved. Sincerely, DON RIDEOUT Senior Management Analyst c: Zone 7 Property Owners Phil Carter Brian Hunter Steve Jantz 2O75 Las Palmas Drive-Carlsbad, California 92OO9-4859»(619) 438-1161 r- HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES Planning • Project Management • Rscal Analysis January 30, 1989 Mr. Phil Carter Growth Management Manager 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: Request for Withdrawal of the Zone 7 - LFMP. Dear Phil: On behalf of the property owners in Zone 7, we are respectively requesting a withdrawal of the Zone 7 - Local Facilities Management Plan. Due to negotiations on the remaining issues of Sewer and Parks facilities, we are unable to meet the mandatory one year time limit and 90-day extension granted for completion of the Zone Plan review as required by State Law. Although we are withdrawing the Zone 7 - LFMP at this time, it is our understanding that with resubmittal of our application, no processing time will be lost. Sincerely, JoffjuJi*-' tLstr-rvsr^Htt^^ Sheila Donovan cc: Michael Holzmiller Don Rideout Brian Hunter Steve Jantz William Lyon Co. Alltex, Inc. 2386 Faraday, Suite 120 • Carlsbad • CA 92008 • (619)438-1465 HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES Rarming • Project Management • Fiscal Analysts March 3, 1989 Phil Carter City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 Subject: Sewer Mitigation for the Zone 7 - LFMP. Dear Phil: This letter is in response to your telephone conversation with Bill Hofman on February 23, 1989, regarding a meeting with the City to resolve the Sewer mitigation for the Zone 7 - LFMP. Per your request, this letter indicates our recommendation for the mitigation of sewer impacts within Zone 7. We feel that the mitigation shown below is a equitable solution to the sewer issue within Zone 7. Specifically, the mitigation takes into account the property owner's rights under existing sewer agreements (Lake Calavera Hills' Associates and the City of Carlsbad, January 20, 1982 and Lake Calavera Hills Associates and Cedric E. Sanders, October 14, 1982) and the City's build out requirements per the Sewer Master Plan. We are requesting a meeting with you and Steve Jantz to discuss our proposal in more detail, however, a summary of our proposal is provided below for your review. Existing Facilities Within Zone 7 The Calavera Hills Water Reclamation Plant, located in Village H, was built in 1981 to provide sewer service to Calavera Hills. However, the plant has never been activated and the City has indicated it will only become operational if there is a capacity problem at Encina WFCF or it becomes economically feasible to operate. At present, the existing lift stations originally built to serve the plant, now collect and convey sewerage through the North Agua Hedionda Interceptor to the Encina WFCF. Presently, however, the NAHT1A located along Tamarack Avenue within Zone 7, is at capacity and will need to be replaced prior to any further development within Zone 7. In addition, the NAHT1B (Kelly Drive) is close to capacity and may need upsizing in the near future. 2386 Faraday, Suite 120 • Carlsbad • CA 92008 • (619)438-1465 Although the NAHI currently serves all existing development within Zone 7, the Sewer Master Plan shows the zone divided into three phases each to be served by a different interceptor at build out as follows: Phase A - Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor Phase B - North Agua Hedionda Interceptor Phase c - South Agua Hedionda Interceptor Phased Development Within Zone 7 As designed per the Master Plan, Village Q located within Phase A of Zone 7, would gravity flow to the existing Simsberry Lift Station which in turn, pumps sewer flows to the existing NAHT1A line at Tamarack and Elm Avenue. This line flows down Tamarack to the west into the North Agua Hedionda Interceptor (NAHI) . As previously indicated, the NAHT1A is currently at capacity and the NAHT1B may need to be upsized in the near future. The eastern portion of Village Q and all of Village T would gravity flow southward to a new lift station located in Village W. This lift station would pump sewer flows up to the existing NAHI near Tamarack and Elm. The City has indicated that its ultimate goal is to have all projects gravity flow into the V/C, SAHI and NAHI facilities. We concur with this objective, however, we believe that temporary lift stations as originally contemplated and required per the Master Plan for Villages Q and T should be allowed until build out sewer facilities are put in place. There are two reasons for this: 1) The tentative maps for these projects have been previously approved and designed to accommodate a temporary system; and 2) The temporary system will not jeopardize the City's ability to ultimately have all projects within Zone 7 gravity flow at the time the major sewer lines are constructed (ie. SAHI and the Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor). Based on the discussion above, we believe the following mitigation measures adequately address the city's needs and resolves our concerns for the Zone 7 - LFMP. Special Conditions for Zone 7; 1. Prior to occupancy for any development within Zone 7, adequate trunk line capacity must be available in the NAHT1A. 2. Prior to occupancy for any development within Zone 7, adequate trunk line capacity must be available in the NAHT1B. Financing: The cost for construction of the NAHT1A ($300,000) and the NAHT1B ($360,000) will be financed by the developers in Zone 7. However, the developers of Zone < 7 will be subject to total reimbursement for both the NAHT1A and NAHT1B by other development served by these facilities and through sewer fee credits. Special Conditions for Phase A: 1. Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first within Phase A of Zone 7, the developers must provide a financing mechanism guaranteeing the construction of a gravity line from the existing Simsberry Lift Station north to the Zone 7 boundary. -7 Development within Zone 7 may continue to use the existing lift station until a connection through Zone 25 to the Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor is provided by the developers of Zone 25. Financing; The cost of financing the gravity line to the Zone 7/25 boundary shall be reimbursed to the developers of Zone 7 in the form of sewer fee credits. Phase C; Special Conditions 1. Prior to the recordation of the final map for Villages Q and T, within Phase C of Zone 7, a financing plan shall be in place guaranteeing the construction of the following facilities: a. Pump station to be located within Village W. b. Gravity lines to pump station from proposed development. c. Force main from pump station to existing NAHT near Tamarack and Elm. 2. Except for Villages Q and T, prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, for any development within Phase C of Zone 7, a financing plan shall be in place guaranteeing the construction of the SAHT2B and SAHT2C. ,-—Financing; The financing plan for the construction of the SAHT2B and SAHT2C may be in the form of a fee program that would guarantee funding for these facilities at a future date or through the formation of an assessment district. The estimated cost for construction of all facilities is $732,000. If financing is provided by the developers of Phase C, they will be subject to reimbursement for both the SAHT2C and SAHT2B by future development in other zones that are served by these facilities. We would like the opportunity to present our proposal to you as soon as possible. We will call you to set up this meeting at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, Sheila Donovan cc: Lloyd Hubbs Steve Jantz, Associate Engineer George Haviar, William Lyon Company Dave Hammar, Hunsaker and Associates \ 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE • />$/,• TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859 m^Otf &M (619> 438~1161 Office of tf»« Cffy Engineer (Hitu of Carlnbafc March 8, 1989 Sheila Donovan Hofman Planning Associates 2386 Faraday Avenue, Suite 120 Carlsbad, CA 92008 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN - ZONE 7 This is in response to your letter dated March 3, 1989 regarding specific mitigation and proposed financing of sewer facilities impacted by development in LFMP Zone 7. Staff has reviewed your recommendations for the phasing and financing of certain sewer facilities. Even though your suggestions have some merit, the proposal does not comply with the provisions of the City's Growth Management Program. Also, your proposal is requesting that Villages Q and T be exempt from any financial obligation to the construction of certain facilities which these developments impact. However, the conditions to the tentative map extension specifically requires these future developments must comply with the provisions of the Growth Management Program. The City would like to schedule a meeting with you and representatives of the William Lyon Co. to discuss your proposal on March 13, 1989 at 3:30 p.m. at 2075 Las Palmas Drive. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 438-1161. STEVE C. JANTZ Associate Civil Engineer SCJ:rp c: Phil Carter - Assistant to the City Manager Brian Hunter - Senior Planner Don Rideout - Senior Management Analyst HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES Planning • Project Management • Fiscal Analysis March 17, 1989 Steve Jantz City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: Sewer Mitigation for the Zone 7 - Local Facilities Management Plan. Dear Steve: Attached please find a copy of the proposed sever mitigation for the Zone 7 - LFMP as we discussed at our meeting yesterday with Don Rideout, Brian Hunter and myself. I understand that approval for the sewer mitigation proposed for the NAHT1B is dependent on engineering data we will provide to you as soon as possible. Please give me a call if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, \ \vis~JL>— v.—-crv>j>-*t>»~> Sheila Donovan cc: Don Rideout Brian Hunter 2386 Faraday, Suite 120 • Carlsbad • CA 92008 • [619] 43B-1465 Special Conditions For Zone 7 1. Prior to the issuance of the building permit in Phase A of Zone 7, Reach NAHT1B shall be completed and operational to the satisfaction of the City engineer. Financing; The cost for construction of the NAHT1B will be financed by the developers in Zone 7. However, the developers of Zone 7 will be subject to reimbursement for the NAHT1B by other development served by this facility. Special Conditions for Phase A; 1. Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first for any development in Phase A of Zone 7, a financing mechanism guaranteeing the construction of the following sewer facilities shall be provided: 1. Reach VCT1A 2. Gravity flow from Village Q to Zone 7/25 boundary. 2. Reach NAHT1A Reach NAHT1A shall be completed and operational to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the occupancy of the first unit in Phase A of Zone 7. Financing The cost for construction of the NAHT1A and VCT1A will be financed by the developers in Zone 7. However, the developers of Zone 7 will be subject to reimbursement for the NAHT1A and VCT1A by other development served by these facilities. Phase B; 1. Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, for any development in Phase B of Zone 7, a financing mechanism guaranteeing the construction of the following sewer facility shall be provided: A. Reach NAHT1A Reach NAHT1A shall be completed and operational to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the occupancy of the first unit in Phase B of Zone 7. Financing The cost for construction of the NAHT1A will be financed by the developers in Zone 7. However, the developers of Zone 7 will be subject to reimbursement for the NAHT1A by other development served by this facility. Phase C; Snecial Conditions Ontion Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, for any development in Phase C of Zone 7, a financing plan shall be in place guaranteeing the construction of the following facilities: A. Reach SAHT2B B. Reach SAHT2C If the construction of the South Agua Hedionda Interceptor west of El Caminp Real is not completed, Reach SAHT2C shall connect into the existing North Agua Hedionda Interceptor. Reaches SAHT2B and SAHT2C shall be completed and operational to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the occupancy of the first unit in Phase C. Special Conditions Option #2 1. Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, for any development in Phase C of Zone 7, a financing plan shall be in place guaranteeing the construction of the following facilities: A. Reach SAHT2B B. Reach SAHT2C C. Reach NAHT1A Reach NAHT1A shall be completed and operational to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the occupancy of the first unit in Phase C of Zone 7. 2. Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, for any development in Phase C of Zone 7, a financing plan shall be in place guaranteeing the construction of the following facilities: A. Construction of a temporary pump station to service all units in Phase C that can gravity flow to the pump station. B. Construction of a force main from the temporary pump station to convey sewage to Reach NAHT1A in Tamarack Avenue. C. Yearly operational and maintenance costs for the temporary pump station. D. Removal of the temporary pump station and restoration of the pump station site upon completion of the SAHT2B and SAHT2C. Financing; The estimated cost for construction of all facilities is $ . If financing is provided by the developers of Phase C, they will be subject to reimbursement for both the SAHT2C and SAHT2B by future development in other zones that are served by these facilities. City of Carlsbad Planning Department April 19, 1989 Sheila Donovan Hofman Planning Associates 2386 Faraday, Suite 120 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Ms. Donovan: This letter is a synopsis of the major issues discussed at the Zone 7 technical review meeting of April 17, 1989. 1. Phasing - Begin construction in 1990. 2. Drainage - Add condition to comply with Master Plan revision. 3. Circulation - Revise projected ADTs using most recent counts. Provide ICU calculations for Tamarack/Elm intersection prior to College/Cannon connection. Add condition to establish College Boulevard alignment with tentative map. 4. Sewer - Update NAHT1B capacity analysis. Although there were other technical corrections made at the meeting, the aforementioned are the substantive comments. If you have any question regarding these or any other related matters, do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, BRIAN HUNTER Senior Planner BH:af c: Zone 7 Property Owners Phil Carter - Assistant to City Manager Don Rideout - Senior Management Analyst Steven C. Jantz - Associate Civil Engineer 2O75 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92OO9-4859 • (619) 438-1161 t V HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES Planning • Project Management • Fiscal Analysis May 4, 1989 Brian Hunter City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: Resubmittal of Zone 7 Local Facilities Management Plan for Final Review. Dear Brian: Per our meeting on April 17, 1989, and water district comments received on April 25, 1989, we are resubmitting all the revisions to the Zone 7 - LFMP. These revisions include the following: Begin phasing in 1990 not 1989. Revisions to drainage mitigation per the City's Master Plan. Revise circulation section to show recent traffic counts for Elm Avenue and provide ICU analysis for the Tamarack/Elm intersection in 1994. The analysis provided by Weston Pringle and Associates is included in this package. Capacity analysis for the NAHT1B (Kelly Drive). Revisions to the water section per comments received from the district (attached for your review). Delete comparison of citywide facilities (administration and libraries) to 1986 CFIP. 2386 Faraday, Suite 120 • Carlsbad • CA 92008 • [619)438-1465 We believe that all the city's concerns have been addressed with this submittal and that at our next meeting we could anticipate scheduling the LFMP for Planning Commission. Please give me a call if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Sheila Donovan cc: Phil Carter Don Rideout Steve Jantz William Lyon Co. Pacific Scene Hunsaker and Associates City of Carlsbad Planning Department June 21, 1989 Sheila Donovan Hofman Planning Associates 2386 Faraday Avenue, Suite 120 Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: LFMP ZONE 7 - TRAFFIC This is in response to your letter dated May 24, 1989 regarding the I.C.U. analysis of the College Boulevard and Elm Avenue intersection. The I.C.U. analysis of this intersection was not completed in accordance with City guidelines. The issue arose when a SANDAG traffic model computer run indicated that the stretch of College Boulevard between Elm Avenue and Lake Boulevard is projected to be running approximately 42,000 trips per day. In accordance with the City's Circulation Guidelines Manual, this road segment is anticipated to be operating at a Level of Service E which is unacceptable. A second level of analysis is required to be conducted on the entire road segment. This analysis must also take into consideration the following intersections: 1) College and Elm 2) College and Tamarack (4 leg intersection) 3) College and Tamarack ("T" intersection) As the zone plan is currently written, there exists an unacceptable L.O.S. with the College Boulevard link at buildout. The second level of analysis may determine that the proposed traffic will be accommodated within major arterial design standards. If not, then appropriate mitigation must be determined. If I can answer any further questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 438- 1161. Associate Civil Engineer SCJ:af c: Phil Carter Brian Hunter Don Rideout 2O75 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92OO9-4859 • (619) 438-1161 City of Carlsbad July 7, 1989 Sheila Donovan Hofman Planning Associates 2386 Faraday, Suite 120 Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 7 Dear Ms. Donovan: This letter is to serve as a synopsis of our meeting yesterday on the Zone 7 Local Facilities Management Plan. It also includes technical comments from Mr. Jantz on the necessary corrections to the Engineering sections. Nontechnical issues to be addressed include: 1. Please provide park threshold date on public facilities summary chart, -Staff is aware that the threshold date is based solely on developer projected phasing when compared to the performance standard. When development occurs the threshold date will be adjusted, if necessary, through monitoring. 2. On the property owners list, clarify difference between assessor information and gross acreage. Update assessor parcel number for Treetops, Ltd. 3. Buildout projections need to explain reliance on Master Plan over existing General Plan. 4. Exhibit 13 - Discretionary action for L-l is SDP 85-13. 5. Exhibit 17 - Correct number for Zone 15. Carry down existing number to total for Zones 18 and 25. 6. Exhibit 18 - Correct number for Zone 15 and Proposition E quadrant cap. 7. City Administration - Include water district square footage. 8. Parks - Please correct buildout population and demand. 9. Exhibit 34 - Locate Larwin Park in Zone 2. 2O75 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92OO9-4859 - (619) 438-1161 Shell a Donovan July 7, 1989 Page Two 10. Exhibit 35 - Please correct Zone 15 number. The technical corrections include: Drainage 1. Complete and incorporate all improvements identified in Dr. Chang's Drainage Study. 2. Develop a financing mechanism that will guarantee downstream improvements. 3. Include and identify any other hydrology studies which analyze run- off impacts due to future development. 4. Revise mitigation to include facilities identified in Dr. Chang's Study. Circulation 1. Re-format 1990, 1995, 2000 and buildout capacity analysis with a bolder heading on separate pages. 2. Include latest analysis on College Boulevard at buildout. Sewer 1. Re-organize mitigation order. 2. Briefly explain why options are proposed on S.A.H.I. 3. Format future facilities in Areas 7A, 7B and 7C on separate pages followed by graphics. Wastewater 1. Include up-dated flows. If you have any question regarding these or any other related matters, do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, BRIAN HUNTER Senior Planner BH:af c: Zone 7 Property Owners Phil Carter - Assistant to the City Manager Steven C. Jantz - Associate Civil Engineer Don Rideout - Senior Management Analyst RC" BY: XEROX TELECOPIER 7010 ; 8-10-39 H:28ftM ; CCITT G3-* £4069; 8 4 08/13/89 /"~":27 S 619 72@ 9461 -^""MTV OF CflRLSBRD P . 64 1200 6LM AVENUE WWf/X^ TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-1989 ^*£?f%i& (619> 434-2921 City Manage' „ 0f (Sarlflbafc July 24, 1989 Mr, Gary Tarquinlo William Lyon Company 4330 La Jolla Village Drive Suite 130 San Diego, Ca. 92122 Dear Mr. Tarquinlo: The purpose of this letter 1s to respond to request for the City to toll CT 83-32 and CT 83-19, Calavera Hills Villages Q and T. The consideration to toll these maps Is a result of the City's decision to pause on the processing of projects while it completes the necessary finanr^ program to guarantee needed Infrastructure as identified by the Growth Management Plan. The City has taken the lead to create a comprehensive financing program which can be Implemented consistently throughout the City. This financing requirement imposed by the City makes 1t Impractical , process CT 83-32 and CT 83-19 until the City Council has adopted Its comprehensive financing plan. Due to this situation, the City has decided to toll these maps from January 10, 1989 when the City Council took action to prepare a comprehensive financing program. Tolling will continue until the City Council approves a comprehensive dtywlde financing approach or January 1, 1990, whichever occurs first. At that time, these maps will have 256 c - remaining to be processed. The processing of CT 83-32 and CT 83-19 will be stopped until this action is taken or January 1, 1990. In the meantime, the completion of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 7 should be your utmost concern. itil this plan 1s adopted by the City Council and the specific conditions met, these maps will not be Hnaled. If you have any question, please call me at 434-2819. Sincerely, Philip . Carter Assistant to the City Manager c: City Manager City Attorney Community Development Director City Engineer Planning Director HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES Rawing • Project Management • fiscal Analysis August 1, 1989 Al/G 1 Brian Hunter " "^ S£Ry Dlv City of Carlsbad ^ 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: Submittal of Zone 7 - LFMP for Department Head Review. Dear Brian: Attached please find 8 copies of the Zone 7 - LFMP for Department Head Review. We are pleased to present this LFMP as the official submittal for City Manager and Department Head Review. This submittal addresses the comments received in your letter of July 7, 1989 as well as finalizing the drainage and circulation sections. The Circulation section incorporates the findings from the College Boulevard traffic analysis prepared by Weston Pringle and Associates. The traffic analysis can be found in the appendices. The Northeast Quadrant Hydrology study prepared by Dr. Howard Chang was submitted to Lloyd Hubbs on July 27, 1989. The findings of the report have been incorporated into the Drainage Section of the Zone 7 - LFMP. It is our understanding that we will receive final comments and a Planning Commission date upon completion of the Department Head Review. Please give me a call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Sheila Donovan cc: Phil Carter - Assistant to the City Manager Don Rideout - Senior Management Analyst Steve Jantz - Associate Civil Engineer Garry Tarquinio - William Lyon Company 2386 Faraday. Suite 120 • Carlsbad • CA 92008 • (619] 438-1465 HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES Planning • Project Management • Rscal Analysis August 10, 1989 Brian Hunter City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: Request for 90 Day Extension For Completion of the Zone 7 - LFMP. Dear Brian: On behalf of the property owners in Zone 7, we are respectfully requesting an extension of 90 days to complete the processing of the Zone 7 - Local Facilities Management Plan. Please call me if you need any additional information. Sincerely, Sheila Donovan cc: Phil Carter Don Rideout Steve Jantz Garry Tarquinio S386 Faraday, Suite 1 SO • Carlsbad • CA 92008 • [619)438-1465 Citv of Carlsbad August 31, 1989 Sheila Donovan Hofinan Planning Associates 2386 Faraday Avenue, Suite 120 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Sheila: As a result of the Department Head review of the Zone 7 Local Facilities Management Plan, the following corrections are required: yl. Exhibit 2, Page 9, show the current status of each facility based on existing supply and demand. /2. Exhibit 3, Page 10, show the status of each facility with development of the Zone, indicate duration of adequacy and where mitigation is to be provided by developers. A. Exhibit 4, Page 11, last sentence on the page should be deleted. ^4. Page 13, parks condition should be revised. See Parks section. /5. Page 14, drainage conditions should be revised. See Drainage section. y"6. Page 15, under Circulation, minor wording change. ""7. Page 18, correct as indicated. 4J. Exhibit 6, Page 25, actual owner of parcel E-l should be listed. ^9. Exhibit 12, Page 33, typographical error. 46. Exhibit 15, Page 38, address non-residential buildout for open space land. Exhibit 17, Page 44, show correct buildout number for Zone 12. Exhibit 18, Page 46, show correct Proposition E Cap, i.e., 9,042. 4-13. Exhibit 24, Page 60, footnote should indicate that Zones 14 and 15 are not yet adopted and phasing shown is for planning purposes only. Exhibit 25, Page 62, make corrections indicated. 5. Page 65, show correct agenda bill number. v*6. Exhibit 27, Page 70, same as number 13. 17. Page 72, show new name of sewer district Also, use July, 1989 flow data as provided. 18. Exhibit 29, Page 73, sewer district name change. 19. Page 74, show revised cost estimate. 20. Page 75, show correct capacity figure and new sewer district name. 21. Exhibit 31, make this exhibit Page 76 and renumber other pages accordingly. Correct any references to the exhibit Also correct headings of exhibit as indicated. 22. Page 76, delete paragraph referring to activation of Calavera Hills Treatment Plant 2O75 Las Palmas Drive •Carlsbad, California 92OO9~4859»(619) 438-1161 August 31, 1989 Page Two 23. Page 77, Use correct format 24. Exhibit 32, add footnote as indicated. 25. Page 82, show correct park acreage per new parks inventory. Reference Appendix A-3. In addition, Larwin cannot be counted as existing. Reference Page IS of operating budget. 26. Page 84, make changes as indicated. 27. Page 86, add condition stating "Prior to approval of first final map in Zone 7, a Parks Agreement shall be executed to provide a letter of credit or other secured financing acceptable to the City in the amount of $2,553,000 guaranteeing construction of 22.2 acres of park land, from a financial institution, etc." Also include conditions providing for operating expenses and reimbursements/Park-in-Lieu fee credits. Make other changes to page as indicated. 28. Page 87 and Exhibit 36, Page 88, these must be rewritten to reflect preceding changes. 29. Exhibit 37, Page 90, make changes as indicated. 30. Exhibit 38, Page 91, show Village boundaries and make changes as indicated. 31. Page 93, make changes as indicated. 32. Page 94, make changes as indicated. 33. Page 95, make changes as indicated. 34. Page 96, make changes as indicated. 35. Exhibit 39, Page 97, delete references to reimbursements. 36. Page 98, add "Avenue" as indicated. 37. Page 113, make changes as indicated. 38. Page 114, make changes as indicated. 39. Page 115, add reference to Village L-l. 40. Page 116, add "Avenue", "Drive", etc. 41. Exhibit 46, Page 119, cost estimate for Elm-Pontiac to Victoria requires further discussion. 42. Page 120, Appendix A-6 is missing. 43. Exhibit 47, Page 121, show five minute response time area for Station No. 5. 44. Page 122, make changes as indicated. 45. Exhibit 48, Page 123, show five minute response time areas for Station Nos. 1 and 5. 46. Page 135, make changes as indicated. Also, include a brief discussion of new CUSD school location study. Include site map in Appendix A-8. Note: Additional comments on this section will be forthcoming from CUSD. 47. Page 137, make changes as indicated. 48. Exhibit 55, Page 139, show village boundaries, watershed boundaries, locations of pump stations and treatment facility. 49. Exhibit 54, Page 138, make changes as indicated. 50. Page 140, make changes as indicated. 51. Page 141, make changes as indicated. 52. Page 144, section on Calavera Hills Plant requires further discussion. 53. Page 145, provide discussion of easements as indicated. 54. Page 147, add wording as indicated. 55. Page 149, make changes as indicated. 56. Exhibit 61, Page 150, show correct alignment of NAHI1. 57. Page 151 through 157, make changes as indicated. August 31, 1989 Page Three 58. Exhibit 67, Page 158, delete references to reimbursement 59. Page 159, make changes as indicated. 60. Exhibit 68, Page 162, make changes as indicated. 61. Exhibit 69, Page 163, make changes as indicated. 62. Page 165 through 167, make changes as indicated. Once these changes have been made and verified by staff, the Plan can be scheduled for public hearing. Sincerely, DON RIDEOUT Senior Management Analyst bjn HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES Planning • Project Management • Fiscal Analysis September 15, 1989 Brian Hunter City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: Zone 7 - LFMP Review for Planning Commission. Dear Brian: Attached please find three copies of the Zone 7 - LFMP that includes revisions based on the Department Head Review Process and subsequent meeting between Lyon Communities and Phil Carter regarding the Parks and Sewer issue. These copies are complete except for the Planning Commission date and page numbers on the exhibits. I can provide the final copy for you to check that will include these two items and any other changes prior to our final printing. Please give me a call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Sheila Donovan 2386 Faraday. Suite 120 • Carlsbad • CA 92008 • [619] 438-1465 €-•7 FINANCING OF SOUTH AGUA HEDIONDA INTERCEPTOR EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL FACILITY SAHI-A SAHI-B SAHI-C TOTAL EST. COST $65,000 $315,000 $388,000 $768,000 BENEFICIARIES ZONE 15 ZONES 7 & 14 ZONES 7, 14 & 15 PROPORTIONAL SHARE $65,000 $157,500 $129,333 COSTS BY ZONE ZONE 7 $286,833 ZONE 14 $286,833 ZONE 15 $194,333 TOTAL $768,000 FINANCING OF SOUTH AGUA HEDIONDA INTERCEPTOR WEST OF EL CAMINO REAL FACILITY EST. COST BENEFICIARIES PROPORTIONAL SHARE SAHI $2.78 MILLION ZONE 5 ZONE 7 ZONE 8 ZONE 13 ZONE 14 ZONE 15 ZONE 16 ZONE 18 ZONE 24 STATE OF CAUFOftNiA—OFFICE Of THE GOVEtNOR GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH 1400 TENTH STtttT SACRAMENTO, CA M814 Brian Hunter City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 September 22, 1988 Sublet: Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 7 - SCH# 88082407 r. Hunter: The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named environmental document to selected state agencies for review. The state agency review period is now closed and none of the state agencies have comments. This letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Pleas* contact Keith tee at 916/445-0613 if you have any questions regarding the environmental review process. When contacting the Clearinghouse regarding this matter, please use the eight-digit State Clearinghouse numberso that we, nay respond promptly. Sincerely, Dsvid C. Munenkanp Chief Office of Permit Assistance City of Carlsbad PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF DECISION October 31, 1989 Hofman Planning Associates 2386 Faraday, Suite 120 Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN - ZONE 7 At the Planning Commission meeting of October 18, 1989, your application was considered. The Commission voted 7-0 to approve your request. Some decisions arc final at Planning Commission, and others automatically go forward to City Council. If you have any questions regarding the final dispositions of your application, please call the Planning Department at 438-1161. MICHAEL J. HOLZM1LLER Planning Director MJH:af Enclosures: Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 2936 and 2937 2O75 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92OO9-4859 • (619) 438-1161 City of Carlsbad Community Development December 14, 1989 Michael Blessing Planning Director City of Oceanside 300 North Hill Oceanside, CA 92054 Dear Mr. Blessing: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the City of Carlsbad's Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 7. This Plan is being provided to you because Zone 7 borders the City of Oceanside, and some facilities required of Zone 7 will involve coordination with your City. Specifically, the developers of Zone 7 are required by this Plan to construct College Boulevard from the City Boundary to Lake Avenue. If you have any questions regarding this Plan, please contact me. Sincerely, DON RIDEOUT Senior Management Analyst DR:bjn c: Assistant to the City Manager Zone 7 File 2O75 Las Palmas Drive •Carlsbad. California 92OO9-4859»(619) 438-1161 EXHIBIT 4 GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 7 LFMP 89-7 1. All development within Zone 7 shall conform to the provisions of Section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and to the provisions and conditions of this Local Facilities Management Plan. 2. All development within Zone 7 shall be required to pay a public facilities fee pursuant to the standards adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1987, and as amended from time to time and all other applicable fees. Development in Zone 7 shall also be responsible for any additional fees to be incorporated into this plan that are found to be necessary to enable facilities to meet the adopted performance standard. 3. The City of Carlsbad shall monitor all facilities in Zone 7 pursuant to Subsections 21.90.130(c), (d) and (e) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 4. All development in Zone 7 shall be in conformance with the adopted Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan as adopted by City Council Resolution 8797 on September 23, 1986. 5. Periodic amendment to the Zone 7 Local Facilities Management Plan is anticipated to incorporate newly acquired data, to amend conditions and upgrade standards as determined through the required monitoring program. Amendment to this Plan may be initiated by action of the Planning Commission, City Council or property owners at any time. 6. If a public facility or service is found not to be in conformance with an adopted performance standard during the yearly monitoring, or at any other time, the matter will be immediately brought before the City Council. If the City Council determines that a non-conformance does exist then no future building or development permits shall be issued unless an amendment to the CFIP or the LFMP for this zone is approved by the City Council which addresses those facility shortfalls and brings those facilities into conformance with the adopted performance standards. 7. After adoption of this Plan by the City Council, no building permits will be allowed unless the performance standards are complied with. 8. Approval of this LFMP does not constitute prior environmental review for projects within Zone 7. All future projects within Zone 7 shall undergo environmental review per Title 19 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Any mitigation measures determined during a project's environmental review shall be complied with in their entirety unless findings of overriding consideration are made by the City Council. 9. Approval of this plan does not constitute prior discretionary review for projects within Zone 7. All future projects shall undergo review per Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The plan establishes the maximum allowable number of residential units for facilities planning purposes only. The plan does not guarantee any specific residential density. EXHIBIT 5 SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 7 LFMP 89-7 CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES No special conditions. LIBRARY No special conditions. WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY The following actions shall be pursued jointly by each sewer district to ensure adequate wastewater treatment capacity through the year 2000: A. Monitor Encina treatment plant flows on a monthly basis to determine actual flow rates and to have an early warning of capacity problems. B. Actively pursue acceleration and phasing of treatment plant Phase IV expansion to provide adequate capacity. C. The six member agencies shall form an agreement to maximize the utilization of available treatment capacity at Encina WPCF. PARKS A. All development shall pay Park-in-Lieu Fees and Public Facility Fees for Park District 2. B. No residential development shall be allowed after 1992 unless actions have been taken by the City to construct additional park facilities. DRAINAGE A. All future development in Zone 7 will be required to construct any future Zone 7 storm drain facilities identified in the current Drainage Master Plan and revised Drainage Master Plan as determined by the City Engineer. Any facilities necessary to accommodate future development must be guaranteed prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, for any development requiring future storm facilities in Zone 7. B. Prior to the recordation of the final map, issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first for any specific village within Zone 7, the developers of that project are required to: 1. Pay the required drainage area fees established in the current Drainage Master Plan and; 2. Execute an agreement to pay any drainage area fees established in the forthcoming revised Master Drainage Plan. C. WATERSHED A 1. Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first within Watershed A of Zone 7, the developers are required to financially guarantee the construction of the 36" continuation of the storm drain in College Boulevard northerly into the City of Oceanside. D. WATERSHED B 1. Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first within Watershed B of Zone 7, the developers are required to financially guarantee the construction of the following storm drain facilities: a. 30" storm drain (BF) crossing into Zone 14 from Zone 7B. b. 30" storm drain crossing College Blvd. c. 36" storm drain (BH-1) crossing into Zone 14. d. 48" and 42" storm drains (BE) adjacent to Tamarack Avenue. 2. Prior to recordation of the first final map, issuance of a grading or building permit within Watershed B of Zone 7, the developers are required to guarantee Zone 7' s proportional share of the following facilities to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: a. Sediment detention basin approximately 1-2 acres in size to be installed in Zone 14 upstream of Rancho Carlsbad Mobile Home Park. b. Restoration by dredging and lining of approximately 3,500 feet of Agua Hedionda Creek from the Calavera Lake Creek to El Camino Real bridge. c. Provide a mechanism for the maintenance of the sediment detention basin. Prior to issuance of any building permits for dwelling units draining south into Agua Hedionda Creek within Watershed B of Zone 7, the sediment detention basin and restoration of Agua Hedionda Creek shall be provided. CIRCULATION A. An on-going monitoring program shall be established to evaluate the aspects of improvements, development, and demand on circulation facilities. The required timing of improvements is based upon the projected demand of development in the zone and the surrounding region. This timing may be modified without amendment to this plan, however, any deletions or additions to the improvements will require amending this local plan. B. Prior to the approval of any tentative map for any future development within Zone 7, except for Villages Q, T and LI, the specific alignment for College Boulevard between Elm Avenue and Cannon Road must be established. This shall include the necessary environmental clearances and required public hearings so that construction of College Boulevard can accommodate future development. The funding for the construction of College Boulevard will be guaranteed as provided by Condition C below. C. Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, within Zone 7, a comprehensive financing program guaranteeing construction of the following circulation improvements shall be approved: 1. IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED NOW No improvements are needed. 2. IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED BY 1990 a. College Boulevard College Boulevard from Elm Avenue to Lake Boulevard shall be constructed to include the following improvements: 1. Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width to major arterial standards. 2. Construction of four through travel lanes including a fully landscaped median. 3. Improvement of Elm/College intersection to include the installation of a traffic signal when traffic signals warrants are met as determined by the City Engineer. Estimated Cost - $3,074,000 Completion Date — 1990 b. Elm Avenue Elm Avenue from Tamarack Avenue to Glasgow Drive shall be constructed to major arterial standards to include the following improvements: 1. Construction of two additional through travel lanes including a fully landscaped median. 2. Installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Elm Avenue and Tamarack Avenue when traffic signals warrants are met as determined by the City engineer. Estimated Cost - $160,000 Completion Date - 1990 c. Elm Avenue Elm Avenue from Glasgow Drive to College Boulevard shall be constructed to major arterial standards to include the following improvements: 1. Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width to secondary arterial standards. 2. Construction of four through travel lanes including a fully landscaped median. Estimated Cost - $535,000 Completion Date - 1990 3. IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED BY 1995 a. College Boulevard College Boulevard from Elm Avenue to Cannon Road shall be constructed to include the following improvements: 1. Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width to major arterial standards. 2. Construction of two through travel lanes including a fully landscaped median. 3. Improvement of Elm/College intersection. Estimated Cost - $3,773,000 Completion Date - 1995 b. Cannon Road; El Camino Real to College Boulevard Cannon Road from El Camino Real to College Boulevard shall be constructed to include the following improvements: 1. Grading of Cannon Road to ultimate right-of- way width to major arterial standards. 2. Construction of two through lanes including a fully landscaped median. 3. Improvement of El Camino Real/Cannon intersection. 4. Improvement of College/Cannon intersection. Estimated Cost - $3,450,000 Completion Date - 1995 4. IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED BY 2000 a. College Boulevard College Boulevard from Elm Avenue to Cannon Road shall be constructed to include the following improvements: 1. Two additional lanes necessary to complete full width improvements to maj or arterial standards. 2. Improvement of Elm/College intersection. Estimated Cost - $1,220,000 Completion Date — 2000 5. IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED BY BUILD OUT a. Elm Avenue - Pontiac Drive to Victoria Avenue Elm Avenue from Pontiac Drive to Victoria Avenue shall be constructed to include the following improvements: 1. Two additional lanes necessary to complete full width improvements to major arterial standards. Estimated Cost - $1,391,500 Completion Date — Build Out FIRE FACILITIES No special conditions. OPEN SPACE No special conditions. SCHOOL FACILITIES Prior to recordation of the first final map, issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, within Zone 7, the developers and Carlsbad Unified School District will enter into an agreement which will exchange parcel tax and developer fee credit for the land valuation, site preparation costs, and certain off-site improvements for the 20 acre site known as Village S. SEWER FACILITIES A. WATERSHED A 1. Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first for any development in Watershed A of Zone 7, a financing mechanism guaranteeing the construction of the following sewer facilities must be provided: a. Reach VCT1A from Zone 7 boundary to Marron Road. b. Gravity flow from Simsberry Pump Station to Zone 7/25 boundary. c. Reach NAHT1A along Tamarack Avenue. Reach NAHT1A shall be completed and operational to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the occupancy of the first unit in Watershed A of Zone 7. B. WATERSHED B 1. Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, for any development in Watershed B of Zone 7, a financing mechanism guaranteeing the construction of the following sewer facilities must be provided: a. Reach NAHT1A along Tamarack Avenue. Reach NAHT1A shall be completed and operational to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the occupancy of the first unit in Watershed B of Zone 7. C. WATERSHED C Two options for future development of Watershed C are provided below. SAHT2C is projected to be built concurrently with Cannon Road from College Boulevard to El Camino Real. If development within Watershed C occurs prior to construction of the SAHT2C, then the Calavera Hills Master Plan provides for temporary sewerage to pump into North Agua Hedionda Interceptor Basin as outlined in Option #2. Option #1 1. Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, for any development in Watershed C of Zone 7, a financing mechanism guaranteeing the construction of the following sewer facilities must be provided: a. Reach SAHT2B from Zone 7 to Cannon Road. b. Reach SAHT2C from College Boulevard to El Camino Real. 2. Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, for any development in Watershed C of Zone 7, a financing mechanism guaranteeing Zone 7's proportional share for the construction of the following sewer facilities must be provided: a. SAH1 adjacent to Cannon Road. b. SAH2 adjacent to Cannon Road. c. SAH3 adjacent to Cannon Road. d. SAH4 adjacent to Cannon Road. If the construction of the South Agua Hedionda Interceptor west of El Camino Real is not completed, Reach SAHT2C shall connect into the existing North Agua Hedionda Interceptor. Reaches SAHT2B and SAHT2C shall be completed and operational to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the occupancy of the first unit in Watershed C. Option *2 1. Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, for any development in Watershed C of Zone 7, a financing plan guaranteeing the construction of the following sewer facilities must be provided: a. Reach SAHT2B from Zone 7 to Cannon Road. b. Reach SAHT2C from Cannon Road to El Camino Real. c. Reach NAHT1A along Tamarack Avenue. Reach NAHT1A shall be completed and operational to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the occupancy of the first unit in Watershed C of Zone 7. 2. Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, for any development in Watershed C of Zone 7, a financing mechanism guaranteeing Zone 7' s proportional share for the construction of the following sewer facilities must be provided: a. SAH1 adjacent to Cannon Road. b. SAH2 adjacent to Cannon Road. c. SAH3 adjacent to Cannon Road. d. SAH4 adjacent to Cannon Road. 3. Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, for any development in Watershed C of Zone 7, a financing plan guaranteeing the construction of the following sewer facilities must be provided: a. Construction of a temporary pump station to service all units in Watershed c that can gravity flow to the pump station. b. Construction of a force main from the temporary pump station to convey sewage to Reach NAHT1A in Tamarack Avenue. c. Yearly operational and maintenance costs for the temporary pump station. d. Removal of the temporary pump station and restoration of the pump station site upon completion of the SAHT2B and SAHT2C. D. ALL WATERSHEDS Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first for any development in Zone 7, a financing mechanism guaranteeing construction of Reach NAHT1B shall be provided which will ensure that adequate funding is available to upgrade the NAHT1B sewer line prior to the issuance of the 590th building permit in Zone 7. WATER FACILITIES A. All future development in Zone 7 shall be required to provide any water reclamation facilities as identified in the future Water Reclamation Master Plan as determined by the City Engineer. Any water reclamation facilities necessary to accommodate future development must be guaranteed prior to the recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first for any project in Zone 7. B. SERVICE AREA A 1. Water facilities will be provided at the time of development to the satisfaction of CMWD. The existing pressure reducing and pumping station at the intersection of College Boulevard and Elm Avenue and the transmission lines from this station to the existing 6.0 MG TAP reservoir are installed. a. Transmission lines in College Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue (Facilities #3 and 9) will be granted to the district by development at ultimate final grade and right-of-way prior to any granting of occupancy. Any expenses for transmission lines installed by the district will be reimbursed by the developer. b. A portion of the easement in College Boulevard at Elm Avenue will be granted to the district prior to recordation of any final map, issuance of a building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first in Service Area A. C. SERVICE AREA B 1. Water facilities will be provided concurrent with development to the satisfaction of the CMWD. Main transmission lines (Facilities # 8 and 9) from Squires Dam I are to be installed as required by CMWD. i IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II (TO BE COMPETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO. LFMP 7 DATE:Alienist 15. 1988 I. BACKGROUND 1. APPLICANT: Hofman Planning Associates 2. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 6994 El Camino Real Suite 208. Carlsbad. CA 92009 (619} 438-1465 August 8. 19883. DATE CHECK LIST SUBMITTED: II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all Affirmative Answers are to be written under Section III - Discussion of Environmental Evaluation) YES MAYBE 1. Earth - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering of modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel or a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? NO X YES MAYBE NQ 2. Air - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 3. Water - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patters, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f . Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? _ _ _ X_ g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? _ _ _ X_ h. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? -2- YES MAYBE NO 4. Plant Life - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. Noise - Will the proposal significantly increase existing noise levels? 7. Light and Glare - Will the proposal sig- nificantly produce new light or glare? 8. Land Use - Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? -3- YES MAYBE 9. Natural Resources - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 10. Risk of Upset - Does the proposal involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 11. Population - Will the proposal signif- icantly alter the location, distribu- tion, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12 . Housing - Will the proposal signif- icantly affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 13. Transportation/Circulation - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new parking? _ _ _ X_ c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? _ _ _ X_ d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f . Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? -4- YES MAYBE NO 14. Public Services - Will the proposal have a significant effect upon, or have signif- icant results in the need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? x_ 15. Energy - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X_ b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. Utilities - Will the proposal have significant results in the need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? X_ c. Water? X. d. Sewer or septic tanks? X_ e. Storm water drainage? X_ f. Solid waste and disposal? X_ 17. Human Health - Will the proposal have significant results in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X. -5- YES MAYBE £Q 18. Aesthetics - Will the proposal have significant results in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in creation of an aesthetically offensive public view? 19. Recreation - Will the proposal have significant results in the impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X_ 20. Archeological/Historical/Paleontological - Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of a significant archeological, paleontological or historical site, structure, object or building? 21. Analyze viable alternatives to the proposed project such as: a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs, c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site, e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alter- nate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative. a) The project is a public facility information and planning study. Phased planning will not efficiently of adequately address the need for public facilities. b) The project is a public facility information and planning study. c) The project is a public facility information and planning study. d) Uses for the area covered by the plan are based on the existing General Plan. e) The plan considers phased development. f) The project is a public facility information and planning study. g) As the project is a public facility information and planning study the no project alternative would not assure adequate public facilities to meet demand. The no project alternative would therefore cause the most detriment. -6- YES MAYBE NO 22. Mandatory findings of significance — a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, or curtail the diversity in the environment? 5 b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) x c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) X d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 7 is a facilities planning document, the intent of the plan is to establish parameters and thresholds that assure public facilities are available when needed as determined by the City's adopted performance standards. To accomplish this purpose occasionally locations and costs of public facility improvements are estimated for informational purposes. These estimates may result in increased development fees. Traditionally the developer in maximizing their capital return passes such fees on to the home buyer or tenant. This results in higher priced housing which affects the availability of low and moderate income housing. However, as real estate value is determined primarily by location, without other market incentives, it is unreasonable to assume the subject property would be developed with either low or moderate income housing due to its view proximity to the Pacific Ocean. -7- DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Continued) It is not the development fee that will force low and moderate income families into other communities, but the existing nature of the market place. It is recognized that CEQA review for these public facilities estimates is general, and does not satisfy CEQA requirements for the specific project. The Zone 7 Local Facilities Management Plan requires complete CEQA review prior to initialization of any public or private project discussed in the Local Facilities Management Plan. -8- Hail to: State Clearinghouse, 1400 Tenth Street, Km. 121, Sacramento, CA 95814 -- 916/445-0613 NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT FORM | See NOTE Below: SCH ff 1. Project Title LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 7 2. Lead Agency: CITY OF CARLSBAD 3. Contact Person:BRIAN HUNTER 3a. Street Address: 2075 LAS PALMAS DR.3b. City:CARLSBAD 3c. County: SAN DIEGO 3d. Zip:92009 3e. Phone: (619) 438-1161 PROJECT LOCATION 4. County: SAN DIEGO 4a. City/Community:CARLSBAD 4b.(optional) Assessor's Parcel No. 5a. Cross Streets: COLLEGE/ELM 4c. Section:Twp.Range For Rural, Sb. Nearest Community:. 6. Within 2 miles of: a. State Hwy No.78 b. Airports PALOHAR/McCELLAN c. Waterways PACIFIC OCEAN 7. DOCUMENT TYPE CEQA 01 NOP 02 Early Cons 03 X Neg Dec 04 Draft EIR 05 Supplement/ Subsequent EIR (if so, prior SCH # 06 Notice of Intent 07 Envir. Assessment/ FONSI 08 Draft EIS OTHER 09 Information Only 10 Final Document 11 Other: • 8. LOCAL ACTION TYPE 01 General Plan Update 02 New Element 03 General Plan Amendment 04 Naster Plan 05 Annexation 06 Specific Plan 07 Redevelopment 08 Rezone 05 09 Land Division 06 Acres 10. DEVELOPMENT TYPE 01 Residential: Units 02 Office: Sq. Ft. Acres Employees _ 03 Shopping/Commercial: Sq.Ft. Acres Employees 04 Industrial: Sq. Ft. Acres Sewer: NGD Water: NGD Employees (Subdivision, Parcel Nap. Tract Map, etc.) 07 Transportation: Type 10 Use Permit 08 Mineral Extraction: Mineral 11 Cancel Ag Preserve 09 Power Generation: Wattage 12 X Other LOCAL FACILITIES Type: MANAGEMENT PLAN 10 X Other: LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN 9 TOTAL ACRES; 818.9 11. PROJECT ISSUES DISCUSSED IN DOCUMENT 01 Aesthetic/Visual 02 Agricultural Land 03 Air Quality 10 Minerals 04 Archaeological/Historical/ 11 Noise PaIeontological 12 X Public Services 05 Coastal 13 X Schools 06 Fire Hazard 14 Septic Systems 07 X Flooding/Drainage 08 Geologic/Seismic 15 X Sewer Capacity 09 Jobs/Housing Balance 16 Soil Erosion 17 Solid Waste 18 Toxic/Hazardous 22 X Water Supply 23 Wetland/Riparian 24 25 19 X Traffic/Circulation 26 20 Vegetation 27 21 Water Quality 28 Wildlife Growth Inducing Incompatible Landuse Cumulative Effects Other 12 FUNDING (approx.)Federal $-0-State $-0-Total *-0- 13 PRESENT LAND USE AND ZONING:Present land use is residential and open space. Zoning is planned community/ open space. 14 PROJECT DESCRIPTION; Project is a Local Facilities Management Plan which guarantees the adequacy of public facilities concurrent with development to adopted performance standards. Facilities include City Administration, libraries, fire, parks, open space, schools, water, sewer, drainage and circulation. -'jSD- / I/3 XI 15. SIGNATURE OF LEAD AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE: ^7"—*• rrt^ ) "" Date: O' NOTE; Clearinghouse will assign identification numbers for all new projects If a SCH Number already exists for a project (e.g. from a Notice of Preparation or previous draft document) please fill it in. REVIEWING AGENCIES .Resources Agency Air Resources Board .Conservation _Fish and Game _Ooastal Ocranission Caltrans District X Caltrans - Planning Caltrans — Aeronautics California Highway Patrol Boating and Waterways Forestry State Water Resoruces Control Board - Headquarters Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region Division of Water Rights (SWRCB) Division of Water Quality (SWRCB) Department of Water Resources Reclamation Board Solid Waste Management Board Colorado River Board CIKPA (CalTRPA) TRPA (Tahoe RPA) Bay Conservation & Dev't Conn Parks and Recreation Office of Historic Preservation Native American Heritage Comm State lands Goran Public Utilities Coran Energy Ccnm Food and Agriculture Health Services Statewide Health Planning (hospitals) Housing and Connunity Dev't Corrections General Services Office of Local Assistance Public Works Board Office of Appropriate Tech. (OPR) Local Government Unit (OPR) Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy Other Date Received at SCH_ Date Review Starts Date to Agencies Date to SCH FOR SCH USE ONLY Catalog Number Proponent Clearance Date Notes: Consultant. Contact Address Phone 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE m^WJM TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 WHM^M (619)438-1161 of <Earl0bai> PLANNING DEPARTMENT NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: College Avenue and Elm Avenue intersection and surrounding 818 acres. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 7 which guarantees the adequacy of public facilities concurrent with development to adopted performance standards. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within ten (10) days of date of issuance. DATED: August 19, 1988 MICHAEL J. HOLZHILLER CASE NO: LFMP 7 Planning Director APPLICANT: Hofman Planning Associates PUBLISH DATE: August 19, 1988 BH:af NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, October 18, 1989, to consider approval of a Local Facilities Management Plan on property generally located at Elm Avenue and Tamarack Avenue and more particularly described as: Calavera Hills Master Plan area. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 438-1161. If you challenge the Local Facilities Management Plan in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: LFMP Zone 7 APPLICANT: Hofman Planning Associates PUBLISH: October 6, 1989 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 7 RV VILLAGE PLAN CALAVERA HILLS Ciqrf Q.. 2 ••• VILAQE DESIGNATION ADDITIONAL UDTS City of Carlsbad Planning Department NOTICE OF DETERMINATION County Clerk December 15, 1989 County of San Diego Attn: Mail Drop C-ll r? I L E If220 West Broadway San Diego, CA 92101 DEC <J a £J., n. DEPIJTV This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad on December 5, 1989, approved the following project: Project Title: Local Facilities Management Plan - Zone 7 88082407 B. Hunter (619^ 438-1161 State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Telephone (If submitted to Clearinghouse) Project Address/Location: NE quadrant of City adjacent to City of Oceanside Project Description: Local Facilities Management Plan This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad has approved the above described project and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. The Negative Declaration and record of project approval may be examined at: CITY OF CARLSBAD 3. Mitigation measures were not made a condition of the approval of this project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations was npfjjdopted jbr this project.' M 1990 fcn ^IICHAE'L J. HOLZMILLER FLAKNIKG xms:::, Planning Director BH:af ' Q^-I- 2O75 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92OO9-4859 • (619) 438-1161 APPL^TION SUBMITTAL DATE FEBRlmRY 22. 1989 STAFF REPORT DATE: OCTOBER 18, 1989 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION-Q,,, SUBJECT: LFMP 7-LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 7 I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Resolution No. 2936 recommending APPROVAL of the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and ADOPT Resolution 2937 recommending APPROVAL of Local Facilities Management Plan 7. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND As shown on Exhibit "A" Zone 7 is located in the northeastern quadrant of the City adjacent to the southern edge of the City of Oceanside. As shown on Exhibit "B" Zone 7 is primarily residential. Of the Master Plan's 819 total acres 744 are residential. General Plan residential densities range from low (0-1.5 du/ac) to medium-high (8-15du/ac). Nonresident!al General Plan land uses include the 18 acre Calavera Hills Park and 11.3 acres of Commercial. III. ANALYSIS 1. . Does the proposed Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 7 fulfill the purpose, intent, and specific requirements of Section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Growth Management Program)? 2. Is the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 7 consistent with and does it implement the 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvement Plan? DISCUSSION The Growth Management Program requires that a Local Facilities Management Plan be prepared for each Management Zone in order to show how compliance will be maintained with the City's adopted public facility performance standards as development occurs. LFMP 7 - HOFMAN PLANNIP^" OCTOBER 18, 1989 Page 2 The first step in this process requires determining the buildout development potential in the zone. The buildout projection for this zone is consistent with the methodology contained in the 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan and the provisions of Proposition E which was approved by the citizens of Carlsbad on November 4, 1986. The 1984 Master Plan for Calavera Hills approved up to 3,863 dwelling units on the property. When the Growth Management Control Points are applied to the net developable acreage of the General Plan density ranges for the approved Master Plan, the maximum number of allowable units is lowered to 2,333. It is recognized that this number is being used for facilities planning purposes only and is in no way guaranteed. The plan phases the buildout development of the zone based on estimates of yearly development activity. The phasing estimate is consistent with generalized phasing assumptions used in the 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvement Plan. From these buildout and phased development projections, yearly phased demands for public facilities may be projected and buildout demands identified. The plan analyzes eleven (11) public facilities. This analysis compares the projected public facility demands with the available and planned supply of public facilities to ensure compliance with the adopted performance standards. Where demands for facilities exceed supply, the plan proposes the necessary mitigation to maintain conformance with the standard. This analysis is consistent with both the 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvement Plan and the Growth Management Program. The following chart provides a brief summary of the eleven public facilities analyzed in the plan. ' LFMP 7 - HOFMAN OCTOBER 18, 1989 Page 3 ZONE 7 BUILDOUT PUBLIC FACILITIES SUMMARY SHEET LFMP 89-7 FACILITY City Administrative Facilities Library Wastewater Treatment Capacity Parks Drainage Circulation Fire Open Space Schools Sewer Collection Water Distribution CONFORMANCE WITH ADOPTED PERFORMANCE STANDARD Existing facilities will meet the adopted performance standard until buildout. Existing facilities will meet the adopted performance standard until buildout. Existing facilities meet the adopted performance standard until 2000. Park District 2 (northeast quadrant) meets the adopted performance standard until 1993. Drainage facilities meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation until buildout. Circulation facilities meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation until buildout. Fire facilities meet the adopted performance standard until buildout. Existing open space meets the adopted performance standard until buildout. School facilities meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation until buildout. Sewer facilities meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation until buildout. Water facilities meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation until buildout. ' LFMP 7 - HOFMAN PLANNir^ OCTOBER 18, 1989 Page 4 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 7 is a public facilities planning document. The plan establishes parameters that ensure Carlsbad's public facility performance standards are met and public facilities inadequacies mitigated to accomplish this goal. The plan for informational purposes occasionally estimates locations and costs of public facility improvements. The plan fully recognizes that complete environmental review will be necessary once specific public facility improvements are established. Therefore, the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 7 will not cause any significant environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director on August 19, 1988. ATTACHMENTS 1. Planning Commission Resolutions No. 2936 and 2937 2. Exhibits - "A" - Citywide Map of Local Facility Management Zones "B" - Local Facilities Management Plan - 7 General Plan Land Use Map "C" - Local Facilities Management Plan - 7 Zoning Map BH:af 10/04/89 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE B,^W !• TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 ^SSjLfjm (619)438-1161 ^jg^ (Uttu of OLarlabaJi PLANNING DEPARTMENT NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: College Avenue and Elm Avenue intersection and surrounding 818 acres. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 7 which guarantees the adequacy of public facilities concurrent with development to adopted performance standards. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within ten (10) days of date of issuance. DATED: August 19, 1988 -^tli? ^ MICHAEL J~ HOLZfllLLERO CASE NO: LFMP 7 Planning Director APPLICANT: Hofman Planning Associates PUBLISH DATE: August 19, 1988 BH:af ENVIRON*raWTAT. IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II (TO BE COMPETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO. LFMP 7 DATE:August 15. 1988 I. BACKGROUND 1. APPLICANT: Hofman Planning Associates 2. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 6994 El Camino Real Suite 208. Carlsbad. CA 92009 (6191 438-1465 3. II. DATE CHECK LIST SUBMITTED: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS August 8. 1988 (Explanations of all Affirmative Answers are to be written under Section III - Discussion of Environmental Evaluation) YES MAYBE 1. Earth - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering of modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel or a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? NO MAYBE NO 2. Air - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 3. Water - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patters, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? -2- XES MAYBE NO 4. Plant Life - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? X_ c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. Noise - Will the proposal significantly increase existing noise levels? 7. Light and Glare - Will the proposal sig- nificantly produce new light or glare? 8. Land Use - Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? -3- YES MAYBE NO 9. Natural Resources - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 10. Risk of Upset - Does the proposal involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 11. Population - Will the proposal signif- icantly alter the location, distribu- tion, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing - Will the proposal signif- icantly affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 13. Transportation/Circulation - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new parking? c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? -4- XES MAYBE NO 14. Public Services - Will the proposal have a significant effect upon, or have signif- icant results in the need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? 15. Energy - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. Utilities - Will the proposal have significant results in the need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 17. Human Health - Will the proposal have significant results in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? -5- MAYBE NO 18. Aesthetics - Will the proposal have significant results in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in creation of an aesthetically offensive public view? 19. Recreation - Will the proposal have significant results in the impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Archeological/Historical/Paleontoloaical - Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of a significant archeological, paleontological or historical site, structure, object or building? 21. Analyze viable alternatives to the proposed project such as: a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs, c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site, e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alter- nate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative. a) The project is a public facility information and planning study. Phased planning will not efficiently of adequately address the need for public facilities. b) The project is a public facility information and planning study. c) The project is a public facility information and planning study. d) Uses for the area covered by the plan are based on the existing General Plan. e) The plan considers phased development. f) The project is a public facility information and planning study. g) As the project is a public facility information and planning study the no project alternative would not assure adequate public facilities to meet demand. The no project alternative would therefore cause the most detriment. -6- YES MAYBE NO 22. Mandatory findings of significance — a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, or curtail the diversity in the environment? 5 b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) x c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) X d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 7 is a facilities planning document, the intent of the plan is to establish parameters and thresholds that assure public facilities are available when needed as determined by the City's adopted performance standards. To accomplish this purpose occasionally locations and costs of public facility improvements are estimated for informational purposes. These estimates may result in increased development fees. Traditionally the developer in maximizing their capital return passes such fees on to the home buyer or tenant. This results in higher priced housing which affects the availability of low and moderate income housing. However, as real estate value is determined primarily by location, without other market incentives, it is unreasonable to assume the subject property would be developed with either low or moderate income housing due to its view proximity to the Pacific Ocean. -7- DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Continued) It is not the development fee that will force low and moderate income families into other communities, but the existing nature of the market place. It is recognized that CEQA review for these public facilities estimates is general, and does not satisfy CEQA requirements for the specific project. The Zone 7 Local Facilities Management Plan requires complete CEQA review prior to initialization of any public or private project discussed in the Local Facilities Management Plan. -8- IV. DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department) On the basis of this initial evaluation: .1 find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. _I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed. .1 find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date Date Planning Director V. MITIGATING MEASURES (If Applicable) -9- Exhibit "A" ZONE 7 Local Facilities Management Boundaries City of CirlsM Exhibit "B" LAND USE LEGEND RESIDENTIAL RL - Low Density (0-1.5 DU/AC.) RLM - Low-Medium Density (0-4 DU/AC.) RM - Medium Density (4-8 DU/AC.) RMH - Medium High Density (8-15 DU/AC.) NON-RESIDENTIAL C - Community Commercial E - Elementary School J - Junior High School U - Public Utility OS - Open Space Zone 7 City of Carlsbad Local Facilities Management Plan GENERAL PLAN ^xhibit "C" LEGEND ••' P-C - PLANNED COMMUNITY - PUBLIC UTILITYkZJ Zone 7 Local Facilities Management Plan City of Carlsbad ZONING Carlsbad Journal Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County- Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to North Coast Publishers, Inc. corporate offices: P O. Box 878, Encinitas, CA 92024 (619) 753-6543 Proof of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am principa cierk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal a newspaper of general circulation, published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and which newspaper at ail times herein mentioned had and sti I has a bona fide subscription ist of paying subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the said City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, fora period exceeding one year next preceding the date of publication of the notice hereinafter referred to; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCA- TION: College Avenue and Elm Avenue intersection and surround-ing 818 acres..PROJECT DESCRIPTION: LocalFacilities Management Plan Zone 7 which guarantees the adequacy of public facilities concurrent with development to adopted perform- ance standards. The City of Carlsbad has con- ducted an environmental review of the above described project pur- suant to the Guidelines for Imple- mentation of the California Envi- ronmental Quality Act and the En-vironmental Protection Ordinanceof the City of Carlsbad. As a resultof said review, a Negative Declara-tion (declaration that the projectwill not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justi- fication for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declara- tion with supportive documents ison file in the Planning Department,2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public are invited. Please sub- mit comments in writing to the Planning Department within ten (10) days of date of issuance. Dated: August 19,1988 Case No.: LFMP 7Applicant: Hofman Planning AssociatesMICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning DirectorCJ 5286: August 19,1988 August 1.9 19. 19 19 I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California on The 19th dayof__ August, H Clerk of the Printer #202-2M-12'87 Carlsbad Journal Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to North Coast Publishers, Inc. corporate offices: P.O. Box 878, Encinitas, CA 92024 (619) 753-6543 Proof of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am principa clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal a newspaper of general circu ation, published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and inte igence of a general character, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription 1st of paying subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the said City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next preceding the date of publication of the notice hereinafter referred to; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, Cali- fornia, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, October 18, 1989, to consider approval of a Local Facilities Man- agement Plan on property general- ly located at Elm Avenue and Tamarack Avenue and more parti- cularly described as: Calavera Hills Master Plan area.Those persons wishing to speakon this proposal are cordially invit- ed to attend the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 438-1161. If you challenge the Local Facili-ties Management Plan in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspon- dence delivered to the City of Carls- bad at or prior to the public hear-ing. Case File: LFMP Zone 7 Applicant: Hofman PlanningAssociates CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION .October. 6.1989 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 7 F D\U r\ U.j RV VILLAGE PLAN 19 19. . 19.... I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California on the 6th _______________________________ day of ________ October, 1-989 Clerk of the Printer