Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LFMP 11B; LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 11B; Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP)
CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (C I 1 Administrative Permit - 2nd Dwelling Unit [~l Administrative Variance Q Coastal Development Permit Q] Conditional Use Permit | | Condominium Permit |_J Environmental Impact Assessment £(J General Plan Amendment | j Hillside Development Permit Q Local Coastal Plan Amendment 0C Master Plan y Q ( ] Non-Residential Planned Development |~] Planned Development Permit HECK BOXES) (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) MPkmfg) TB-oi 1 J Planned Industrial Permit O Planning Commission Determination I | Precise Development Plan [~| Redevelopment Permit [~[ Site Development Plan O Special Use Permit O Specific Plan [~] Tentative Parcel Map Obtain from Engineering Department O Tentative Tract Map f~i Variance £3 Zone Change XX List other applications not specified (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) ^®-oi LFMP-zonelO LFMPA-zonellf 2) 3) 4) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: PROJECT NAME: MP7;amend-149(A) Villages of La Costa BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:General Plan Amendment and related approvals to implement HCP/IA 5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type) Real Estate Collateral Management Attn: Jim Jackson MAILING ADDRESS 450 "B" Street, Ste 620 CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE San Diego, CA 92101 619-515-5653 1 CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL OWNER AN» THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT /O THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE^ - - / <M}. st'faiW ti#fi SIGN/TU^ *-;- // DATE 6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type) Morrow Development Attn: Fred Arbuckle MAILING ADDRESS P. 0. Box 9000-685 ! • CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE 760 Carlsbad, CA 92018-9000 929-2700 1 CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CQ_RR££T>revTHE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. "4— 1/U// I1 l/Vll/ l. • - r\ In r~fiOniji N 'z.ii%-°/o SIGNATURE Ptefilp«V\<". DATE 7) BRIEF LEGAL bESCRIPTION See attached copies of PTR legal NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M. Form 1 6 Dlf PAGE 1 OF 2 8) LOCATION OF PROJECT:La Costa Master Plan Area ON THE BETWEEN East STREET ADDRESS SIDE OF (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) Camino Vida Roble AND (NAME OF STREET) El Camino Real (NAME OF STREET) Southern City Limit (NAME OF STREET) 9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE Zone 10 & 11 * SEE ATTACHED APPLICATION SUPPLEMENT*** 10) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS 1 3) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION 1 6) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE 1 9) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 22) EXISTING ZONING 11) NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNITS 14) PROPOSED IND OFFICE/ SQUARE FOOTAGE 17) PROPOSED INCREASE IN ADT 20) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN 23) PROPOSED ZONING 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS 15) PROPOSED COMM SQUARE FOOTAGE 18) PROPOSED SEWER USAGE IN EDU 21) PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION 24)IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMEBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT 3R THIS PURPOSE FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION APPLICATION TYPE FEE REQUIRED LFhf> 10 TOTAL FEE REQUIRED At 3 / -3-5 RECEIVED FEB 1 3 1998 CITY OF CARLSBAD PUNNING DEFT DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED RECEIVED BY: DATE FEE PAID 9-113 o b RECEIPT NO. Form 16 PAGE 2 OF 2 APPLICATION SUPPLEMENT 10. PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS 11. NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNITS 12. PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS 13. TYPE OF SUBDIVISION 14. PROPOSED IND OFFICE / SQUARE FOOTAGE 15. PROPOSED COMM SQUARE FOOTAGE 16. PRECENTANGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE 17. PROPOSED INCREASE IN ADT 18. PROPOSED SEWER USAGE IN EDU 19. GROSS SITE ACREAGE 20. EXISITNG GENERAL PLAN 21. PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION 22. EXISTING ZONING 23. PROPOSED ZONING TBA 0 2236 TBA 128,000 121,500 43% (808.4 AC) 37,880 2375 1866 RL/RLM N, PI, OS, RL, RLM, RMH,RM PC R-l.RD-M PM, C1,OS 01/28/98 CITY QFCARLSBAD 1200 CARLSBAD .LLAGE DRIVE CARLSBAD, v LIFORNIA 92008 434-2867 > REC'D FROM ACCOUNT NO.DESCRIPTION W6? 02/12/98 0001 01 02 HP*"* i " v *r i 35, 4<b£MP Q^-Oi \/ 1o RECEIPT M 17225 © Printed on recycled paper. NOT VALID UNLESS VALIDATED BY CASH REGISTER TOTAL .. ^ *<* i^t ^L^ tesXtt JJQ^Li^. ^ AJt,*W*, ^ CITY OF 1200 CARLSBAD ULLAGE DRIVE CAR 434-2867 REC'D FROM , .LIFORNIA 92008 DATE ACCOUNT NO. O'PM-rnjk RECEIPT 86: 47243 @ printed on recycled paper. DESCRIPTION 'Pff- f}ohOL. £ / £. f'nP />/4^j ,Q W4 02/13/98 x- "^ ''• ".'•-•• NOT VALID UNLESS VALIDATED BY TOTAL CASH REGISTER .«i^'*JM£aMtSj*i*3t*^**-*Ji^i-jt*L^^ AMOUNT ','". ^\ f^\ ' .^^pi— n--^^ M ^^ r\ /TjO «*^^SNKK_ / c/ ' y Xj ^*yy **-*(^pN^TV-/ v^ 0001 01 02 t-HWT 77<0.00 i 7900:) A PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION PROJECT NAME: Villages of La Costa - Master Plan APPLICANT NAME: Morrow Development Please describe fully the proposed project. Include any details necessary to adequately explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. Description/Explanation. The approval of the Arroyo La Costa Plan in 1990 established the process for updating the La Costa Master Plan by creating new master plan documents for vacant areas and removing those areas from the original master plan via"a master plan amendment so that the original provisions would only apply to already developed areas. The Arroyo La Cosia Master Plan was the first area to be removed from the old master plan. This application will remove the remaining portions of the original holding or those areas referred to as the northwest and southeast as envisioned in the Arroyo La Costa approval. The 1994 Implementation Agreement for the Habitat Conservation Plan envisioned that the La Costa Master Plan and General Plan designations on the affected property would be revised to delineate the areas of habitat slated for perservation. The proposed project will result in a reconfiguration of land uses in a manner that formalizes the areas to be perserved by applying Master Plan and General Plan Open Space designations while clearly delineating areas available for development and establishing related development intensities. Approximately 43% of the area or 808 acres is proposed as Open Space. All development proposed is consistent with that permiued under the provisions of the existing La Costa Master Plan and the provisions of the City's Growth Management Program. The proposed Master Plan divides the ownership into 3 Villages: the Oaks, the Ridge (formerly the southeast) and the Greens (formerly northwest). These areas are addressed in a single Villages of La Costa Master Plan. Master Plan provisions common to all three Villages are addressed as Master Plan Development Standards and Guidelines with separate sections addressing matters unique to each Village. In addition to overall Village development standards each Neighborhood has unique development standards related to product type and physical character. The Greens (formerly northwest) is divided in 17 separate Neighborhoods. Two of the Neighborhoods are proposed for non residential uses and three are proposed for higher intensity residential use in the 8-15 dwelling unit per acre range. One Neighborhood is designated as a school site. The area is currently planned^for 1038 residential units, 15 acres of commercial/planned industrial, a 5 acre school site, a 22 acre community parks site and 206 acres of open space. The former southeast area is now made up of two Villages. The La Costa Ridge Village (formerly the northern portion of the southeast, or Rancheros) is divided into 6 separate Neighborhoods and the La Costa Oaks Village (formerly the southern portion of the southeast) is divided into 15 individual Neighborhoods. These two Villages are anticipated to accommodate 2236 dwelling units, 5 acres of commercial and 602 acres of open space. Facilities needs associated with these new land use configurations will be established through the requested amendment to the Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan and the requested approval of the Zone 10 Local Facilities Plan. In order to implement the new Villages of La Costa Master Plan, the applicant is requesting the following discretionary approvals: 1. Master Plan Amendment to the existing La Costa Master Plan to delete all reference to the areas previously known as La Costa Northwest and La Costa Southeast 2. A new Master Plan, in compliance with all current ordignances and standards for the areas previously known as La Costa Northwest and La Costa Southeast 3. A General Plan Amendment to revise land use designations within the Villages of La Costa Plan Area 4. Zone Changes as necessary to implement the Master Plan and General Plan Amendment 5. Environmental certification STATEMENT OF AGREEMENT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP CITY OF CARLSBAD The Subdivision Map Act and the Carlsbad Municipal Code sets a fifty (50) day time restriction on Planning Commission processing of Tentative Maps and a thirty (30) day time limit for City Council action. These time limits can only be extended by the mutual concurrence of the applicant and the City. By accepting applications for Tentative Maps concurrently with applications for other approvals which are prerequisites to the map; i.e., Environmental Assessment, Environmental Impact Report, Condominium Plan, PlanneciUJnit Development, etc., the fifty (50) day time limits and the thirty (30) day time limits are often exceeded. If you wish to have your application processed concurrently, this agreement must be signed by the applicant or his agent. If you choose not to sign the statement, the City will not accept your application for the Tentative Map until all prior necessary entitlements have been processed and approved. The undersigned understands that the processing time required by the City may exceed the time limits, therefore the undersigned agrees to extend the time limits for Planning Commission and City Council action and fully concurs with any extensions of time up to one year from the date the application was accepted as complete to properly review all of the applications. Date Name (Print) Relationship to Application (Property Owner-Agent) FRM0037 2/96 Zone 11 Page Comment Response VI-4 through VI-8 XV- 16 XV-13 XVI I-9 XVII-14 1-13 1-16 11-1 111-1 III-3 III-5 III-7 111-11 111-12 1-13 1-14 FINANCE DEPARTMENT Changes to dollar amounts, funding sources and timing for City Admin. Facilities. Clarify financing of LCWD sewer facilities Include financing for Phase E water facilities Text revisions Include CFD No. 1 funding for Rancho Santa Fe Road ENGINEERING PLANNING AND PROGRAMS Wastewater must be adequate for more than the current year Parks standard applies to entire quadrant Numbering problem Text changes Add exhibit number Typos and text changes Provide further detail on approved land uses Address MAG parcel Provide justification for proposed dwelling unit transfer from Zone 1 0 to Zone 1 1 Wastewater treatment must be adequate beyond the current year Provide additional justification for proposed dwelling unit transfer from Zone 10 to Zone 1 1 Completed Completed No specific facilities are being proposed in Phase E Completed Corrected Updated Corrected Corrected Corrected Completed Corrected Updated MAG is addressed under the current land use assumptions for evaluation in this LFMP. Dwelling unit transfer from Zone 10 was unnecessary and was deleted. Zone 1 1 transfer from Zone 12 was a result of the City Council Resolution that is included in the appendices. Corrected Dwelling unit transfer from Zone 10 was unnecessary and was deleted. Zone 1 1 transfer from Zone 12 was a result of the City Council Resolution that is included in the IV-1 IV2-5 VIII-1 VIII-2 VIII-3 VIII-4 VIII-5 VIII-6 VIII-7 thru VIII-10 Section XI XII-1 and 2 XV-2 ii iii iv I-7 Clarify additional 457 dwelling units Citywide and quadrant Phasing tables need to include projected Zone 17 phasing. A non- residential phasing table must be provided addressing MAG development. Text revisions Exhibit numbering problem Update sewer flow data Update sewer facilities and capacity data Text changes Various changes Printing problem. Also, revise Adequacy Findings to evaluate with LCWD and VWD Comments on Circulation section not provided at this time Text and map revisions Listed facilities do not match Fig. 46 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Add Engineering staff Wastewater Treatment Facilities Add References, Appendices and Full-size constraints map to table of contents Significant riparian or woodland habitats. Also, reference previous Zone 1 1 LFMP appendices. The 457 dwelling units are from areas outside of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan area within Zone 1 1 . Zone 17 does not have an adopted LFMP and therefore not included as stated in the text on page IV-2. Corrected Corrected Completed Completed Completed Completed. Table illustrating service area population projections is being updated and will be available shortly. The information is not readily available and must be recalculated. The boundaries have been sent to SANDAG and the information is being processed. Findings are evaluated on missing page. Section was updated with new traffic report provided by LLG. Completed Corrected Added Added Added Added 1-8 1-13 1-15 1-16 1-17 1-18 1-19 1-21 I-22 Exhibits 8 &9 111-1 Exhibit 10 III-5 III-7 III-9 111-12 111-13 111-14 111-15 IV-2 IV-5 Text changes Various revisions Title 21 Various revisions to Special Conditions Revisions to condition for Rancho Santa Fe/Melrose Reference HCP exclusion for open space Zones 10 and 1 1 should use consistent format for schools. Also see other school comments Text changes and typo Typo Revise General Plan and zoning maps as noted Various text changes Various comments noted Section describing HCP should also be included in Zone 10 LFMP Clarify existing Dus Zones 10 and 1 1 should use consistent format for Developing Land Uses. Also see other comments. Clarify Affordable Housing reference on Exhibit 14 Various formatting revisions Provide justification for proposed dwelling unit transfer from Zone 10 to Zone 1 1 Comments on Exhibit 16 Exhibit 17 Revise phasing as noted Corrected Corrected Corrected Updated Updated per new traffic report Inserted Updated Corrected Corrected Updated per Master Plan Corrected Corrected Incorporated Completed Completed Updated Corrected Dwelling unit transfer from Zone 10 was unnecessary and was deleted. Zone 1 1 transfer from Zone 12 was a result of the City Council Resolution that is included in the appendices. Completed Completed Phasing effects other studies that were completed in conjunction with this plan and would invalidate them if VI-4 VI-5 and VI-6 VI 1-6 VI 11-4 VIII-5 VI 11-6 and VI 11-7 VIII-10 VIII-11 IX-3 IX-4 IX-6 IX-7 IX-8 IX-9 X-5 Exhibit 34 X-8 XI-1 Traffic Exhibits XI-9 Table 4 Exhibit 35 Table 10 Refer to 1 999-2000 CIP Do not delete reference to Public Facilities Fee Check dates Check Encina capacity Why is discussion of Carlsbad Sewer Service District included? Same as above comments Show existing as of 1/1/2000 Make consistent with Zone 10 LFMP Comments noted Make consistent with Zone 10 LFMP El Camino Creek Elementary School is existing Park financing question Make consistent with Zone 10 LFMP Check against park agreement Text changes Minor revisions Question re: Batiquitos Lagoon enhancement plan Text change Numbering of all figures and tables in this section must be changed to fit into LFMP sequence. Text changes Question about park noted in trip generation table Change street name When are commercial uses added to trip generation? modified. Updated Not necessary to include because it is not part of the financing. Completed Completed Deleted Deleted Updated Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed, included in appendix Completed Completed Deleted Completed Completed Updated with new traffic report from LLG Updated with new traffic report from LLG Updated with new traffic report from LLG Updated with new traffic report from LLG XI-36 XI-37 Exhibit 39 XI 11-4 XIV-1 XIV-2 thru XIV-9 XIV-1 0 XV-1 XV-3 and XV-8 XV-1 2 XV-1 4 XV-1 7 XVI-5 and XVI-8 XVI-10 XVI-1 1 XVI-13 XVI- 15 XVI I-4 XVI I-6 XVI 1-1 2 XVII-36 XVII-43 Questions re: traffic mitigation Address intersections outside Carlsbad analyzed by LLG Exhibit formatting problems Address HCP open space Clarify school district boundaries Various text changes Clarify dates Sewer district boundary issue Typos Reconcile text with exhibits Make unit count consistent with Master Plan Septic systems are not acceptable Typos Include appendices Make consistent with page XVI-5 Typos Changes to water financing table Typos Formatting question Clarify funding for parks Clarify school financing for each district Clarify water facilities ENGINEERING LAND USE See Attached FIRE DEPARTMENT See Attached Updated with new traffic report from LLG Updated with new traffic report from LLG Corrected Corrected Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Included all referenced appendices. Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed LIBRARY See Attached SAN DIEGUITO HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT See attached ENCINITAS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT See attached Completed Completed Completed VILLAGES OF LA COSTA PROJECT STATUS/ISSUES MEETING June 12, 2001, 9:00 a.m. Room 174 I. Project Status 1. Environmental Impact Report a. First Draft of Candidate Findings of Fact & Statement of Overriding Considerations was submitted on May 2,2001. Status: Planning Department review completed and comments sent on June 4, 2001. Revisions need to be submitted for Planning Department and Assistant City Attorney Review and approval. No change in status since the June 6,2001 meeting. b. Revised Responses to Comments, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Changed EIR and Technical Appendices pages were submitted on May 15, 2001. Status: Planning Department review completed and comments faxed on May 31, 2001. Final documents containing the requested revisions should be submitted. Responses must be sent to all who submitted comments on the draft EIR. Distribution to the Planning Commission of the Final EIR including the responses to comments and the MMRP needs to occur as soon as possible so that they can begin their review. No change in status since the June 6, 2001 meeting. 2. Master Plan a. Copies of the Master Plan were received on May 16, 2001 for distribution. Status: Requested comments/conditions on the Master Plan by June 7, 2001. Final approval from Michael Holzmiller and others regarding the Chapter 4 Development Standards is still required. Tables prepared to compare the existing Planned Development Ordinance, R-l Zone standards, and the Small Lot Guidelines to the proposed Master Plan Standards. A comparison to the proposed ordinance may also be necessary. As soon as Michael Holzmiller approves Chapter 4 the Master Plan must be distributed to the Planning Commission. Planning Department staff meetings to review the comparison tables on June 11 and 14, 2001. Meeting with Planning Management and Fred Arbuckle scheduled for June 19, 2001. Other master plan revisions/comments received from the Fire Department, Landscape Plancheck Consultant, Carlsbad Unified School District and Parks and Recreation. 3. ZonelQLFMP a. Fourth draft received on June 11,2001. Status: Review for requested revisions is not complete. 4. ZonellLFMP a. Third Draft received on June 7, 2001. Status: Review for requested revisions is not complete. 5. Ridge & Oaks Master Tentative Map and Related Permits a. Fourth submittal received on June 8,2001 at 4:40 p.m. Status: Review for requested revisions is not complete. b. Preliminary Landscape Plan submitted on May 16, 2001. Status: Review comments from Larry Black returned on June 12, 2001. Planning review completed and redlined plan set provided on June 4, 2001. Submittal of a revised plan is required. 6. Greens Master Tentative Map and Related Permits a. Fourth submittal received on June 8, 2001 at 4:55 p.m. Status: Review of the revised plans has not been completed. b. Preliminary Landscape Plan submitted on May 16, 2001. Status: Review comments from Larry Black returned on June 12, 2001. Planning review completed and redlined plan set provided on June 4, 2001. Submittal of a revised plan is required. NOTE: The Planning Commission must receive all documents and plans a minimum of 4 to 6 weeks prior to the scheduled hearing date. II. Master Plan Revisions III. Items Not Listed on the Agenda Next Scheduled Meeting - June 20,2001 at 9:00 a.m. PROJECT PLANNER DON RIDEQJ.1T 2000 NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m., on Tuesday, February 08,2000, to consider (1) a request to prepare the Zone 10 Local Facilities Management Plan and (2) a request to amend the Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan. Both zones are located in the southeast quadrant of the City of Carlsbad as shown on the attached map. The proposed action only authorizes the preparation of the plan and does not approve the plans. Subsequent public hearings will be held to approve the plans. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on and after February 04, 2000. If you have any questions, please call Don Rideout in the planning Department at (760) 438-1161 extension 4212. If you challenge the authorization to prepare the Local Facilities Management Plan in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad City Clerks' Office at or prior to the hearing. CASE FILE: LFMP 87-10 AND LFMP 87-11 (B) CASE NAME: ZONE 10 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AND ZONE 11 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT. PUBLISH: JANUARY 28, 2000 CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL ZONES 10 & 11 LFMP 87-10/LRMP 87-11 (B) 10/06/1999 16:38 7604380981 HENTHORN PAGE 04 VILLAGES OFCOSTA July 31,1998 Daniel Shelley PO Box 230895 Encinitas, CA 92023 Subject: Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment Dear Dan: ! The.Villages of La Costa has been ir Plan Amendment for Zone 11 in con unction Master Plan. In 1995, the predeces with federal, state and local govemn sensitive land within Zone 11, This Plan necessitated changes to the or ginal plan to accommodate these change a local facilities management plan approval can be granted to any prop the process of preparing a Local Facilities Management with the preparation of the Villages of La Costa or to the Villages of La Costa entered into an agreement ental agencies for the conservation of environmentally greement and the corresponding Habitat Conservation La Costa Master Plan. In order to amend the master , the Carlsbad Municipal Code requires the preparation of Amendment for Zone 11 before any additional development srty owner. The local facilities management plan the phasing of public and community projected development within the Cit Municipal Code allows ail property o management zone to jointly prepare upon existing City approved land us modifications to those approvals. Since your property is located is requested, and wili benefit you by Please execute the attached form si If you have any questions regarding (760)929-2701. Sincere MORROW DEVELOPMENT, INC. Fred Arbuckle President attch FMA:dlc P. O, Box 9000-033 • CMUSHAO. CAUFOH serves to manage growth within the zone by ensuring that facilities will be adequate to meet the needs of the i and the zone. Section 21.90.120 c of the Carlsbad i/ners whose properties are located within a local facilities a local facilities management plan. The plan will be based designations for your property and will not propose within |Zone 11, your concurrence with the preparation of the plan •emovjng one of the obstacles to future development, nifying your concurrence and return by August 15th, his process, please feel free to contact me at 920I8-9000 • TEUTHONE 17601 929-2701 • FACSIMILE I7&0! 929-2705 10/06/1999 16:38 7604380981 HENTHORN PAGE 05 VILLAGES OFA COSTA July 31,1998 MAG Properties 5075 Federal Blvd. San Diego, CA 92102 Subject: Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment Gentlemen: The Villages of La Costa has been ir Plan Amendment for Zone 11 in conj Master Plan, in 1995, the predecessor with federal, state and local governrr sensitive land within Zone 11. This E Plan necessitated changes to the ori plan to accommodate these change? a local facilities management plan approval can be granted to any prop< the process of preparing a Local Facilities Management jnction with the preparation of the Villages of La Costa to the Villages of La Costa entered into an agreement sntal agencies for the conservation of environmentally greement and the corresponding Habitat Conservation jinal La Costa Master Plan. In order to amend the master , the Carlsbad Municipal Code requires the preparation of At) lendment for Zone 11 before any additional development srty owner. The local facilities management plan the phasing of public and community projected development within the Cit Municipal Code allows all property owners management zone to jointly prepare upon existing City approved land us* modifications to those approvals. serves to manage growth within the zone by ensuring that facilities will be adequate to meet the needs of the and the zone. Section 21,90.120 c of the Carlsbad whose properties are located within a local facilities a local facilities management plan. The plan will be based designations for your property and will not propose Since your property is located within Zone 11,'your concurrence with the preparation of the plan is requested, and will benefit you by Please execute the attached form sij If you have any questions regarding (760)929-2701. Sincerely, emoving one of the obstacles to future development, nifying your concurrence and return by August 15th. his process, please feel free to contact me at MORROW DEVELOPMENT, INC. Fred Arbuckle President attch FMA:dlc P. O. Box 9000-685 • CARLSBAD.92018-9000 • TUSTHONE 17601 929-2701 • FACSIMILE (7601 929-270S 7682 • SPulle 209 ia, 92OO9 436-4665 436-2244 8-10-98 Don Neu City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, Ca. 92009 Re: PREPARATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONE 11 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN Dear Don: Our signature on this letter signifies that as property owners in Local Facilities Management Zone 11 we agree to allow Morrow Development, Inc. to prepare the amendment to Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan. However, our signature on this letter does not waive any rights we have to comment on or protest the Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment when it is heard at a public hearing. We also understand that Morrow Development, Inc. will pay all costs associated with the proposed amendment. Sincerely, Properties Date City of Carlsbad Planning Department December 27, 1999 Mr. Jack Henthorn Jack Henthorn & Associates 5375 Avenida Encinas Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Jack: This letter transmits the Planning Department's comments on the draft Local Facilities Management Plans for Zones 10 and 11. The marked-up documents are being provided to you to address typos and similar corrections. No Engineering comments are provided at this time. The following general Planning comments are offered at this time. 1. Executive Summary. The formatting of the Executive Summaries for the two LFMPs is not at all similar. Because these two plans will be reviewed by the public and decision makers at the same time, they should follow the same formatting as much as possible. 2. General Conditions. The General Conditions for the two LFMPs are not the same, and some conditions are missing from each one. Please refer to the adopted Zone 13 LFMP for the correct General Conditions. 3. Buildout Projections. Please ensure that the tables of acreages and dwelling units matches the draft Master Plan exactly. Because the LFMPs and the Master Plan will be reviewed at the same time, it is important that they be fully consistent with each other. The Zone 11 plan includes estimates for non-residential development but does not include any discussion of the anticipated non-residential uses. 4. Dwelling Unit Transfer. This topic has the potential to generate a lot of confusion in the public. An expanded discussion is needed describing how this was anticipated in the earlier Zone 11/12 LFMPs, and explaining why it is still necessary. Provide references to pages in the other plans, including the old Zone 11 and 12 plans. The role of affordable housing and the HCP in the transfer should be described. 5. Phasing. The phasing tables need to be updated to Jan. 1, 2000. The "Existing" line needs to reflect all building permits issued in Zones 1 through 16 and 18 through 24. The proposed phasing for Zone 11 is presently shown as beginning in 1998. This needs to be made more realistic, perhaps showing development beginning in 2001 as in the Zone 10 plan. 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, California 92009-1576 (760)438-1161 6. City Administrative Facilities. Existing Demand needs to be updated to 1/1/00. Existing and Planned facilities need to be updated to add Faraday Building and delete Las Palmas building and City Hall modulars. The future City Hall cannot be counted toward meeting the standard at this time because its construction is more than five years away. 7. Library. Existing Demand needs to be updated to 1/1/00. Existing and Planned facilities need to be updated to reflect the opening of the new South Carlsbad Library. All discussion of the La Costa branch must be deleted. The appendices relating to site selection and design of the South Carlsbad Library can be deleted. The status of the warehouse on Corte de Nogal needs to be clarified. 8. Wastewater. The two LFMPs have very different formatting for this section. It should be exactly the same for both plans. 9. Parks. Existing Demand needs to be updated to 1/1/00. Carrillo Park should be included in the Existing Supply of parkland because it will be available to the public within 5 years. Veterans Memorial Park cannot be included in the Existing Supply because the timing of its construction is well beyond 5 years. Veterans Memorial Park needs to be shown on the map of park locations. The appendices should include the 1996 Park Agreement, not thel 988 version. 10. Drainage. Again, the formatting for the two LFMPs is very different. Although the two plans should not be identical for drainage, they should be sufficiently similar to allow the reader to compare the two readily. For example, the Zone 11 plan includes a map (Exhibit 38) of Sewer District boundaries, which does not belong in the drainage section. 11. Circulation. Same as for Drainage. For example, the Zone 10 plan includes 3 graphics showing trip distribution percentages. The Zone 11 plan includes none. The Circulation section will be particularly important for the public and decision makers, and a special effort should be made to ensure that the discussion is accurate, consistent, and understandable. NOTE: The Engineering Department may have additional comments on this section. 12. Fire. The Zone 11 plan needs to discuss the relocation of Fire Station #6 from its current temporary location to a permanent location. 13. Open Space. Minor comments noted in the documents. 14. Schools. Same as Circulation in regard to formatting. Again, this is an important facility to the community. Extra care should be taken with this section so that people in different districts can compare the two plans. The Mitigation for both plans needs to be the City's standard conditions for schools. It is not acceptable to state, as is stated in Zone 10, that no mitigation is required. In Zone 11, Exhibits 50 and 51 appear to show very different lines for the boundary between SMUSD and EUESD. Also in Zone 11, some tables have been left blank (Pages XIV-7 and XIV-11). These sections need to be in good shape before they can be sent to the respective districts for comment. 15. Schools - Zone 10. The school condition on Page 1-12 states that if CUSD does not need a school site, the area reserved for the school will become open space. However, on Page III-6 it states that dwelling units could be placed on the school site if it is not needed for a school. This inconsistency needs to be clarified and addressed in both this section and the Buildout section. 16. Sewer and Water. The next version of the documents will be 'given to CMWD for their comments. At this time, we would note that the Water sections in the two plans are formatted very differently. For example, Zone 11 has a very minimal discussion of the use of reclaimed water, while Zone 10 has a fairly complete discussion. In Zone 1.1 on Pages XVI-5 and XVI-6, the tables showing yearly projections for OMWD and VCWD have been left blank. 17. Financing. The next version of the Zone 10 plan should include a draft Financing Section for review. The Zone 11 plan should include the already adopted Zone 11/12 Financing Plan. The next submittal of these documents should be done in highlight/strikeout format so Planning staff can ensure that all necessary changes have been made. If that submittal appears to be complete, it will be sent to the other departments and districts for their review. Thank you. Sincerely; Don Rideout c: Don Neu City of Carlsbad Planning Department RECEIVED OCT 2 5 2000 SDUHSD October 23, 2000 Superintendent San Dieguito Union High School District 710EncinitasBlvd. Encinitas, CA 92024 RE: DRAFT LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLANS - SCHOOL FACILITIES Carlsbad's Growth Management Plan divides the City into 25 Local Facilities Management Zones and requires preparation of a Zone Plan prior to development within the Zones. At this time, development applications are being considered for the area known as Villages of La Costa, which consists of Zones 10 and 11. In the past, a Zone Plan was approved for Zone 11, and that plan is being updated at this time. A new plan is being prepared for Zone 10. Enclosed are the Schools Facilities sections from the two plans. These two Zones involve four school districts, and the same material is being sent to all four. The documents were prepared by the developer and are being reviewed by City staff at this time. Thus, the contents of these sections reflects the developers proposal and does not yet include any City input. Your review and written comments on these sections is requested so that we can ensure adequate school facilities to serve the new population. Please send your comments to me by November 10, 2000. When the documents have been revised, we will send you the new Schools sections so that you can verify that your comments have been addressed. Please send your comments to me at the address below. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 602-4602. Enclosure 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 6O2-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 XIV. SCHOOLS A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD School capacity to meet projected enrollment within the zone as determined by the appropriate school district must be provided prior to projected occupancy. B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS As shown on Exhibit 37, two school districts will serve students in Zone 10: San Marcos Unified School District (SMUSD) and Carlsbad Unified School District (CUSD). Since Zone 10 is served by two different school districts, analysis of school facility adequacy shall be addressed on an individual district basis. 1. CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT a. Inventory A majority of Zone 10 is within the Carlsbad Unified School District. There are currently seven elementary schools, one junior high school, one continuation high school and one high school within the Carlsbad Unified School District. The majority of the existing schools in CUSD are located within the Northwest Quadrant. According to CUSD all of the existing schools are operating at capacity. b. Build Out Assumptions Existing and Build Out Population: Existing Build Out SFD Units 0 366 Multi Units 0 -J.— I Total 0 687 Rate 2.3178 o -5178 Population 0 1 59°510 1 OjI O' c. Phasing The CUSD recently adopted a new school location plan and is also in the process of developing a finance plan based on the Mello- Roos financing mechanism. The new school location plan projected build out demand based on LFMP development expectations. It was determined that approximately 341 existing January 19. 1999June. 2000 XIV-1 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 and future students in CUSD east of El Camino Real would benefit from a school site in Zone 10. Build out numbers for Zones 6, 10 and 17 equate to approximately 1/2 the demand for an elementary school site. However, since the demand for affordable housing is not known at this time, CUSD will reserve the need for a school site to a later date. d. Adequacy Findings For the purposes of long range planning, CUSD considers all existing facilities at capacity. The smallest increment of demand area used by the District for facility analysis is the quadrant. One additional school site has been identified in the southeast quadrant to be located within Zone 10. K-5 students generated from Zone 10 will initially attend Aviara Oaks Middle School. If a school site is warranted in Zone 10, than all K-5 students will attend the new school. Students in the grades 6-8 generated from Zone 10 will attend Aviara Oaks Middle School. Grades 9-12 students will attend Carlsbad High School. e. Mitigation i. Conformance with the adopted school performance standard will be a prerequisite of any development within the zone. All development within Zone 10 will be conditioned to pay school fees in accordance with the requirements of the State of California and the Carlsbad Unified School District. ii. Prior to the issuance of building permits for any development within Zone 10, the developers and the Carlsbad Unified School District will enter into an agreement which will exchange parcel tax and developer fee credit for the land valuation, site preparation costs, and certain offsite improvements for the potential elementary school site, if a school site is determined to be needed. If a school site is determined unnecessary by the Carlsbad Unified School District, then the area reserved for the school site shall have a land use designated consistent with the surrounding General Plan Land Use Designation and mitigation will then be payment of school fees. f. Financing The Carlsbad Unified School District has adopted an alternative method to provide funding for school facilities in the form of a "Facility Financing Plan". The plan is a Mello-Roos based program. If the District elects to initiate the strategy outlined in the January 19, 1999June, 2000 XIV-2 Local Facilitiv.o Management Plan • Zone 10 Facility Financing Plan, existing school collection fees will be discontinued and replaced with a new financing system. January 19. 1999June, 2000 XIV-3 CityofOceanside City of Vista C i t y o f E n c i n i t a s City of San Marcos Legend Existing Proposed • O Elementary Middle School Junior High High School C i t y o f E n c i n i t a s ft School Locations Zone 10 Local Facilities Management Plan Exhibit 37 Local Faciliti<_ Management Plan • Zone 10 2. SAN MARCOS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT a. Inventory A portion of Zone 10 is located within the San Marcos Unified School District. Currently there is one existing elementary school within the City of Carlsbad. The San Marcos Unified School District has proposed two elementary school sites to be located within the City of Carlsbad. Additionally, Woodlands Junior High School and San Marcos High School will serve a portion of Zone 10. b. Build Out Assumptions Existing and Build Out Population: Existing Build Out SFD Units 0 -300 "^ " ' Multi Units 0 n Total 0 1QO~s S ±* Rate 2.3178 ") -51 7R Population 0 908388 1 0 c. Phasing The San Marcos Unified School District has developed a long range master plan. Within the master plan, student growth is by grade level to the year 2000 with the need and timing of future schools based on these forecasts. The master plan indicates that there may be a need for two additional elementary school sites within the City of Carlsbad. However, neither of these sites are projected to be located within Zone 10. Since Zone 10 is located within two school districts, the build out projection for the area within the SMUSD is incorporated in Exhibit 38. January 19, 1999June, 2000 XIV-5 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 EXHIBIT 38 School Facility Demand Table - San Marcos School District General Plan Una UK Sub- area RLM-6 RLM-7 RLM-8 TOTALS Residential Dwelling Units Build Out Existing Approved Futurt Projections 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 259 38 91 III 259 38 91 111 Student Generation Rates Existing Approved Future K-S 6-7 8-9 10-12 K-5 1-7 1-8 10-12 K-5 6-7 8-9 10-12 K-5 6-7 1-9 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 971 236 259 0.4 O.t 0.1 0.2 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 00 00 00 0.0 143 3.5 38 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 00 0.0 25.0 65 47 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1364 33.5 34.4 January 19, 1999June, 2000 XIV-6 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 d. Adequacy Findings San Marcos Unified School District considers all existing facilities are operating at capacity. Temporary classrooms and relocatables are being used by the district to provide capacity. Based on the requirements of the SMUSD long rangelong-range master plan, the school district believes it will be able to provide capacity to build out. e. Mitigation No special conditions.Conformance with the adopted school performance standards will be a prerequisite if any development within the zone. All development within Zone 10 will be conditioned to pay school fees in accordance with the requirement of the Carlsbad School District. f. Financing No financing is required for school facilities other than school fees. January 19. 1999June, 2000 XIV-7 Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 XIV. SCHOOLS A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD School capacity to meet projected enrollment within the zone as determined by the appropriate school district must be provided prior to projected occupancy. B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS As shown on Exhibit 41, three school districts will serve students in Zone 11: Encinitas Union Elementary School District, San Dieguito High School District and the San Marcos Unified School District. Exhibit 42 provides a detailed map of the school district service areas in Zone 11. The San Dieguito High School District and Encinitas Union School District have jurisdiction south of San Marcos Creek within Zone 11. San Dieguito High School District serves the secondary students (7-12) and Encinitas Union School District serves the primary or elementary students (K-6). The San Marcos Unified School District serves both the elementary and secondary students north of San Marcos Creek. Since Zone 11 is served by three different school districts, analysis of school facility adequacy shall be addressed on an individual district basis. 1. ENCINITAS UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT Most schools within the Encinitas Union School District are currently on a year round track system. Students at schools with a track enrollment system attend school on a cycle of nine weeks in school followed by three weeks vacation. This system significantly increases the regular school capacity and can be further augmented by portable (temporary) classrooms. In this analysis, it is assumed that a track enrollment system will occur when enrollment exceeds regular capacity. a. Inventory A majority of Zone 11 is within the Encinitas Unified School District. There are currently five elementary schools within the district. The following table shows enrollment and regular capacity for each school: Hebruan 9. IWSJune, 2000 XIV-1 Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 School Enrollment La Costa Heights 718 La Costa Canyon Mission Estancia 725 Olivenhain Pioneer 854 La Costa Valley Future b. Build Out Assumptions Existing and Build Out Population: SFD Multi Units Units Total Existing 1,607 278 1,885 Build Out 2,827 278 3,105 Regular Capacity 612 546 641 Future Rate Population 2.3178 4.369 2.3178 7,197 c. Phasing The Encinitas Union School District has entered into an agreement with RECM, the major land holder of this area, that provides for the dedication of school sites in exchange for school availability letters. This agreement has been in force for the last several years and has resulted in the dedication of the La Costa Heights Elementary School site, Mission Estancia School, and the La Costa Valley site. d. Adequacy Findings The Encinitas Union Elementary School District currently exceeds capacity at all school locations. e. Mitigation Special Conditions for Zone 11: No special conditions apply to Zone 11 regarding school facilities that would require any mitigation at this time. Encinitas Union Elementary School District has indicated that existing and future school facilities will meet the student demand created by Zone 11. f. Financing No special financing is necessary at this time. woJune. 2000 XIV-2 CityofOceanside City of 1 Vista San "Marcos Unifiec .^Unified Elem chool Dieguito High \ jT 11 ' District A JF—^ A C i t y o f E n c i n i t a s City of San Marcos Legend Existing Proposed Elementary Middle School Junior High A A High School C i t y o f E n c i n i t a s r4 School Locations Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan Exhibit 41 >••** f *. A V \ SAN MARCOS : .UNIFIED SCHOOL] , DISTRICT j I I . / ENCINITAS UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT • •• ^m mm mmmm SAN DIEGUITO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ••^ School District Boundaries within Zone 11 "-" Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 Exhibit 42 Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 2. SAN DIEGUITO HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT a. Inventory . c. /iractu. J tyf-Qfif *-" i ffs Diegueno/Jtmiui High School and Gail DimuUg/tHign School of the San Dieguito High School District serve the secondary students from Zone 11 within the Encinitas Union Elementary School District. These two schools also serve the surrounding areas with school enrollment depending on development within the region. Therefore, it is difficult to accurately determine the i«nte&k4gfegrid high school student impact based solely on Zone 11 projections.^ b. Build Out Assumptions ^lf Existing and Build Out Population: Existing Build Out SFD Units 1,607 2,827 Multi Units 278 278 Total 1,885 3,105 Rate 2.3178 2.3178 Population 4,369 7,197 The San Dieguito High School District's juBier"htgh and high school boundaries overlap several management zones within the City of Carlsbad and extend into the City of Encinitas. Therefore, an accurate yearly phasing schedule for the entire district is difficult to project. This LFMP provides the Zone 11 yearly student generation projection that can be used to more accurately assess the number of students generated from this area. Exhibit 43 shows the yearly number of junior hirch students generated from Zone 11 and the total capacity provided by San Dieguito High School District. Exhibit 43 indicates the high school students generated by Zone 11 and the total capacity provided by the existing high school and projected high school. , 2000 XIV-5 Local Facilitiva Management Plan Zone 11 Exhibit 43 School Facility Demand Table — San Dieguito High School District General Plan Land Use Sub- area RL-1 RL-2 RLM-3 RLM-4 RLM-5 RLM-6 RLM-7 RLM-8 RM-2 RM-3 RMH-2 RMH-3 TOTALS Rei. In DU's and Non-res in Sq. ft Exist Approved Future Buildout 55.00 55.00 174.00 174.00 51100 511.00 82.00 8200 73.00 73.00 815.00 815.00 19600 284.00 48000 000 0.00 131.00 131.00 35.00 35.00 49600 496.00 1.00 1.00 1,885.00 319.00 849.00 2,863 Student Generated Rates E JH HS 0.39 012 0.25 0.39 0.12 0.25 0.20 0.84 018 0.20 0.84 0.18 020 084 018 0.20 0.84 0.18 0.20 084 018 0.20 0.84 018 0.20 0.84 0.18 0.20 0.84 0.18 0.20 0.84 0.18 0.20 0.84 0.18 Existing E JH HS 0.00 0.00 0.00 67.86 20.88 67.86 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 1460 61.32 1460 16300 684.60 16300 39.20 16464 39.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.20 110.04 26.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.20 416.64 99.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 410 1,468 410 Approved E JH HS 0.00 000 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 56.80 238.56 4970 000 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 000 700 29.40 6.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 «4 26S 66 Future E JH HS 2145 6.60 1375 0.00 000 0.00 102.20 429.24 8943 1640 68.88 14.35 0.00 000 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 140 505 118 Buildout Projections E JH HS 2145 660 1375 67 86 20 88 43 50 102.20 429.24 8943 1640 6888 1435 1460 6132 1278 16300 684.60 14263 96.00 403.20 8400 0.00 000 0.00 26.20 110.04 22.93 7.00 2940 6.13 99.20 416.64 86.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 614 2,231 516 February 9. IWJune, 2000 XIV-6 Local Facility Management Plan Zone 11 JuMerffigrT^chool: The phasing schedule for the junior high school to be located in Zone 12 is not known at this time. As future development within Zone 11 and the City of Encinitas occurs, two options are available to mitigate overcrowded conditions at Dje^uencrJunfoF-Hrgh School: i. Temporary classrooms will continue to be added to Diegueno Jiigb-ScKool to accommodate additional students. d. Adequacy Findings San Dieguito High School District is currently exceeding its fixed capacity however it is mitifiatinff-^tkjs shortafie—by__utilizin£, jelocatable units ./Future school demands will require a new semoT high and junior high school. e. Mitigation Special Conditions For Zone 11: No special conditions apply to Zone 11 regarding school facilities that would require any mitigation at this time. f Financing No financing is required for school facilities other than school fees. February 9. IQ99June, 2000 XIV-7 Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 3. SAN MARCOS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT The southwest section of the San Marcos Unified School District crosses the City of Carlsbad's boundary to overlap with portions of Zones 6. 10, and 18 as well as Zone 11. Within Zone 11, the San Marcos School District has jurisdiction over the general area north of San Marcos Creek. a. Inventory Within Zone 11, development has not yet begun in the area north of San Marcos Creek which is under the jurisdiction of the San Marcos Unified School District. Therefore, the San Marcos Unified School District is not yet impacted by Zone 11 students. As development occurs in the area of Zone 11 under the jurisdiction of San Marcos Unified School District, students will attend La Costa Elementary School, San Marcos Junior High and San Marcos High School. b. Build Out Assumptions Existing and Build Out Population: Existing Build Out SFD Units 0 45 Multi Units 0 171 Total 0 216 Rate 2.3178 2.3178 Population 0 501 c. Phasing The preliminary school master plan for SMUSD has indicated a need for an additional elementary school site within the City of Carlsbad. The timing of this school has not be determined, however, the school district is in the process of locating and acquiring the school site. d. Adequacy Findings All of SMUSD facilities are currently at capacity. Temporary classrooms and re-locatables are being used by the district to provide capacity. The school district believes it will be able to provide capacity at build out, although SMUSD feels it is premature to indicate adequacy because it is contingent upon the development and implementation of a successful financing plan. 1999June, 2000 XIV-8 Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 e. Mitigation Special Conditions For Zone 11: Prior to the approval of a final map for any projects within the San Marcos Unified School District, the developer shall comply with all applicable statutory requirements. f Financing Exhibit 44 shows a facility financing matrix for this facility. This matrix summarizes the individual facility to be financed, its estimated cost and timing of construction, the existing-budgeted CIP moneys available for the facility and the future funding options. Kehruan, 9. IggqJune, 2000 XIV-9 Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 EXHIBIT 44 School Facility Financing Matrix Facility Funding Options Amount Estimated Cost Timing | First Second Third | Notes School Facilities 1. Encinitas -Elem. No. 3 2. San Dieguito -Junior High 3. San Marcos -Elem. School $ 3,500,000 1997+ State N/A State School Fees School Fees $ 3,500,000 1989 State/School Fees February 9. I999june, 2000 XIV- 10 'on Ridequt- Zones 10 & 11 Fire Static^najysis From: Brian Watson To: Don Rideout Date: 11/15/00 3:44PM Subject: Zones 10 & 11 Fire Station Analysis While I believe the standard is being met in these zones, it's difficult to really determine without having the boundaries of the zones designeted on the maps. Brian Watson Division Chief (760)931-2137 email: bwats@ci.carlsbad.ca.us UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT ...'Together Helping Children to Reach for the Stars... December 6, 2000 DEC 2000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT City Of Carlsbad Mr. Don Rideout City of Carlsbad Planning Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 Re: DRAFT LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLANS - SCHOOL FACILITIES Dear Mr. Rideout: In accordance with your request, I have reviewed and made written comments on the Draft Local Facilities Management Plans. I hope that they are helpful to you. I am sorry that they did not reach you by the deadline you established. However, if you have any questions, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, Sharo? Chief Financial Officer SRS/sg Enclosure Board of Trustees Shannon Kuder William Parker Cathy Regan Carol Skiljan Maria Strich 101 S. Rancho Santa Fe Road, Encinitas, CA 92024-4349 Phone (760) 944-4300 FAX (760) 942-7094 www.eusd.k12.ca.us Superintendent Douglas P. DeVore, Ed.D. Assistant Superintendents Bonita Drolet, Ed.D. Danniel Grider, Ed.D. Educational Services Administrative Services Chief Financial Officer Sharon R. South Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 XIV. SCHOOLS \s// %$A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD ft School capacity to meet projected enrollment within the zone as determined the appropriate school district must be provided prior to projected occupancy. B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS As shown on Exhibit 37, two school districts will serve students in Zone 10: San Marcos Unified School District (SMUSD) and Carlsbad Unified School District (CUSD). Since Zone 10 is served by two different school districts, analysis of school facility adequacy shall be addressed on an individual district basis. 1. CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT a. Inventory A majority of Zone 10 is within the Carlsbad Unified School District. There are currently seven elementary schools, one junior high school, one continuation high school and one high school within the Carlsbad Unified School District. The majority of the existing schools in CUSD are located within the Northwest Quadrant. According to CUSD all of the existing schools are operating at capacity. b. Build Out Assumptions Existing and Build Out Population: Existing Build Out SFD Units 0 166 Multi Units 0 1-71 Total 0 687 Rate 2.3178 "* 11 7R*• •-' * * <j Population 0 -^ — *s * **18 c. Phasing The CUSD recently adopted a new school location plan and is also in the process of developing a finance plan based on the Mello- Roos financing mechanism. The new school location plan projected build out demand based on LFMP development expectations. It was determined that approximately 341 existing January 19, 1999June, 2000 XIV-1 Local Facil: > Management Plan Zone 1 XIV. SCHOOLS A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD School capacity to meet projected enrollment within the zone as determined by the appropriate school district must be provided prior to projected occupancy. B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS As shown on Exhibit 41, three school districts will serve students in Zone 11: Encinitas Union Elementary School District, San Dieguito High School District and the San Marcos Unified School District. Exhibit 42 provides a detailed map of the school district service areas in Zone 11. The San Dieguito High School District and Encinitas Union School District have jurisdiction south of San Marcos Creek within Zone 11. San Dieguito High School District serves the secondary students (7-12) and Encinitas Union School District serves the primary or elementary students (K-6). The San Marcos Unified School District serves both the elementary and secondary students north of San Marcos Creek. Since Zone 11 is served by three different school districts, analysis of school facility adequacy shall be addressed on an individual district basis. 1. ENCINITAS UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT Mtrst schoolliiiJfriA the. Encinitas Union School DJsHiC^re currently on a year round ftaeJt^^^^W Students at scja^Swith a track enrollment system attend school oiriREi&le j^Lia^veeks in school followed by three weeks vacation. This syste^Hj^njgantly increases the regular school capacity and canbg^urther auSBHduby portable (temporary) classrooms. Ti^lfr^malysis, it is assumed^JBltfr]Kk enrollment system—~•^^^^e- "~~\"^ will occu^nen enrollment exceeds regular capacr a. Inventory A majority of Zone 11 is within the Encinitas Unified School "—^-^ District. There are currently "fiaSS^ementary schools within the district. The following table shows enrollment and rej capacity for each school: . 2000 XIV-1 Local Facili ""^ Management Plan Zone 1 School Enrollment Riuuk* Capacity La Costa Heights 7-J-8- 612 La£*staCanvon fli Mission Estancia "725- SS^ 546 Olivenhain Pioneer "SS^^C^, 641 -La-Coata-UaUey "Ftrtute Paturjr b. Build Out Assumptions Existing and Build Out Population: SFD Multi Units Units Total Rate, Population *?8&52gte!2.3178\ 4.369 3Hft5gQfcc>\2.3178 j 7J 97 c. Phasing The Encinitas Union School District has entered into an agreement with RECM, the major land holder of this area, that provides for the dedication of school sites in exchange for school availability letters. This agreement has been in force for the last several years and has resulted in the dedication of the La Costa Heights Elementary School site, Mission Estancia School, and the fea-Costa Volley sito.* d. Adequacy Findings The Encinitas Union Elementary School District currently exceeds capacity at all school locations. e. Mitigation Special Conditions for Zone 11: No special conditions apply to Zone 11 regarding school facilities that would require anyvmfaga1ibn at this time. Ensinita^LInion mqtrtary^chool District has ji school facilitie^iwlLneetfl&dent demarld-createdyone 11. f _ Financing * (,. No special financing is necessary at this time./> •"* - -...., t? _.__- --- -• ------ "'/«U , °rr' , 2000 XIV-2 CityofOceanside I City of Vista C i t y o f E n c i n i t a s Dieguito Sdhool District City of San Marcos Legend Existing Proposed Elementary Middle School Junior High A ^ High School C i t y o f E n c i n i t a s IF4 School Locations Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan Exhibit 41 :•>r Xxx. -. _.._ SAN MARCOS • .UNIFIED SCHOOL! jDISTRICT •• • »wmm mm mmumm ENCINITAS UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT SAN DIEGUITO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT j \_ School District Boundaries within Zone 11 "-" Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 Exhibit 42 Local Facilit Management Plan Zone 11 2. SAN DIEGUITO HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT a. Inventory Diegueno Junior High School and San Dieguito High School of the San Dieguito High School District serve the secondary students from Zone 11 within the Encinitas Union Elementary School District. These two schools also serve the surrounding areas with school enrollment depending on development within the region. Therefore, it is difficult to accurately determine the junior high and high school student impact based solely on Zone 11 projections. b. Build Out Assumptions Existing and Build Out Population: Existing Build Out SFD Units 1,607 2,827 Multi Units 278 278 Total 1,885 3,105 Rate 2.3178 2.3178 Population 4.369 7,197 c. Phasing The San Dieguito High School District's junior high and high school boundaries overlap several management zones within the City of Carlsbad and extend into the City of Encinitas. Therefore, an accurate yearly phasing schedule for the entire district is difficult to project. This LFMP provides the Zone 11 yearly student generation projection that can be used to more accurately assess the number of students generated from this area. Exhibit 43 shows the yearly number of junior high students generated from Zone 11 and the total capacity provided by San Dieguito High School District. Exhibit 43 indicates the high school students generated by Zone 11 and the total capacity provided by the existing high school and projected high school. February 9. IWQjune, 2000 XIV-5 Local Facili , Management Plan Zone 1 Exhibit 43 School Facility Demand Table — San Dieguito High School District General Plan Land Use Sub- area RL-1 RL-2 RLM-3 RLM-4 RLM-5 RLM-6 RLM-7 RLM-8 RM-2 RM-3 RMH-2 RMH-3 TOTALS Res. In OU's and Non-res in Sq. Ft. Exist Approved Future Bulldout 55.00 55.00 174.00 174.00 511.00 511.00 8200 82.00 73.00 7300 815.00 81500 19600 284.00 48000 000 0.00 131.00 131.00 3500 3500 49600 496.00 1.00 1.00 1,885.00 319.00 649.00 2,853 Student Generated Rates E JH HS 039 0.12 0.25 0.39 0.12 0.25 0.20 0.84 0.18 0.20 0.84 0.18 0.20 084 018 0.20 0.84 0.18 0.20 0.84 018 0.20 0.84 018 0.20 084 0.18 0.20 084 018 0.20 0.84 0.18 0.20 0.84 0.18 Existing E JH HS 0.00 000 0.00 67.86 2088 6786 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1460 61.32 14.60 163.00 684.60 16300 39.20 16464 39.20 0.00 0.00 000 26.20 110.04 26.20 000 0.00 0.00 99.20 416.64 99.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 410 1,451 410 Approved E JH HS 0.00 000 000 0.00 0.00 000 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 000 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 56.80 238 56 49.70 000 000 000 0.00 000 000 7.00 29.40 6.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 «4 268 56 Future E JH HS 2145 6.60 1375 000 000 000 102.20 429.24 8943 1640 68.88 1435 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 000 000 000 0.00 000 000 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 000 000 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 140 SOS 118 Bulldout Projections E JH HS 21 45 6.60 13 75 6786 2088 4350 10220 42924 8943 1640 6888 1435 1460 6132 1278 163.00 68460 14263 96 00 403.20 84 00 000 000 000 26.20 110.04 2293 7.00 2940 613 99.20 416.64 8680 000 0.00 0.00 614 2,231 S16 v February 9. IWJune, 2000 XIV-6 Local Facilit Management Plan Zone 11 Junior High School: The phasing schedule for the junior high school to be located in Zone 12 is not known at this time. As future development within Zone 11 and the City of Encinitas occurs, two options are available to mitigate overcrowded conditions at Diegueno Junior High School: i. Temporary classrooms will continue to be added to Diegueno High School to accommodate additional students. d. Adequacy Findings San Dieguito High School District is currently exceeding its fixed capacity however; it is mitigating this shortage by utilizing relocatable units. Future school demands will require a new senior high and junior high school. e. Mitigation Special Conditions For Zone 11: No special conditions apply to Zone 11 regarding school facilities that would require any mitigation at this time. f Financing No financing is required for school facilities other than school fees. February^). IQWJune, 2000 XIV-7 Local Facili Management Plan Zone 11 3. SAN MARCOS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT The southwest section of the San Marcos Unified School District crosses the City of Carlsbad's boundary to overlap with portions of Zones 6, 10. and 18 as well as Zone 11. Within Zone 11, the San Marcos School District has jurisdiction over the general area north of San Marcos Creek. a. Inventory Within Zone 11, development has not yet begun in the area north of San Marcos Creek which is under the jurisdiction of the San Marcos Unified School District. Therefore, the San Marcos Unified School District is not yet impacted by Zone 11 students. As development occurs in the area of Zone 11 under the jurisdiction of San Marcos Unified School District, students will attend La Costa Elementary School, San Marcos Junior High and San Marcos High School. b. Build Out Assumptions Existing and Build Out Population: Existing Build Out SFD Units 0 45 Multi Units 0 171 Total 0 216 Rate 2.3178 2.3178 Population 0 501 c. Phasing The preliminary school master plan for SMUSD has indicated a need for an additional elementary school site within the City of Carlsbad. The timing of this school has not be determined, however, the school district is in the process of locating and acquiring the school site. d. Adequacy Findings All of SMUSD facilities are currently at capacity. Temporary classrooms and re-locatables are being used by the district to provide capacity. The school district believes it will be able to provide capacity at build out, although SMUSD feels it is premature to indicate adequacy because it is contingent upon the development and implementation of a successful financing plan. February'.). !999June, 2000 XIV-8 Local Facilit Management Plan Zone 11 e. Mitigation Special Conditions For Zone 11: Prior to the approval of a final map for any projects within the San Marcos Unified School District, the developer shall comply with all applicable statutory requirements. f. Financing Exhibit 44 shows a facility financing matrix for this facility. This matrix summarizes the individual facility to be financed, its estimated cost and timing of construction, the existing-budgeted CIP moneys available for the facility and the future funding options. hshruarv s>. imtoie, 2000 XIV-9 Local Facili Management Plan Zone 11 EXHIBIT 44 School Facility Financing Matrix Funding Options Facility Amount Estimated Cost Timing | First Second Third | Notes School Facilities 1. Encinitas -Elem. No. 3 $ 3,500.000 1997+ State School Fees 2. San Dieguito -Junior High N/A State School Fees 3. San Marcos -Elem. School $ 3.500,000 1989 State/School ^ Fees I UIAL SUMUUL UUS15 > ytUvU,UUU H^.^™•»»BWBB=M^« February 9. I OWjune, 2000 XIV-10 City of Carlsbad Planning Department December 8, 2000 Jack Henthorn 5375 Avenida Encinas Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: Consolidated Departmental Comments of Draft Local Facilities Management Plans for Zones 10 and 11 Attached are comments from the Planning, Engineering, Finance, Library, and Fire Departments. Additional Parks comments will be submitted separately. The format of these comments is primarily marginal notes in various copies of the documents. Please note that some comments are noted by more than one reviewer. All marked copies are being returned to you for your use in making the revisions. In addition, a summary is attached which identifies each comment by page number or section. The summary includes a column for you to indicate your response to each item. Please return this summary with the response column fully completed when you resubmit the revised documents. Many of the comments are minor in nature and will involve minimal efforts to correct. However, some issues involve major policy issues or will require discussion with staff before you can make the necessary revisions. These items are listed below: 1. Dwelling Unit Transfer from Zone 10 to Zone 11 - In the Planning Department's previous comments dated December 27, 1999, it was indicated that this proposal requires further justification and explanation. In the current draft, it is still unclear why this transfer is being proposed and what effects it may have. A meeting needs to be scheduled to go over the buildout numbers and resolve whether or not this transfer is needed. 2. Consistency between the two LFMPs and with the draft Master Plan and EIR - All documents must use the same base information regarding acreage and number of units, with the understanding that the LFMPs address other properties in addition to the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. 3. Citywide and Quadrant phasing projections - Dwelling unit projections for Zone 17 (Bressi Ranch) must be included in the phasing tables. This will affect related sections of the plan, such as Parks. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 6O2-4600 • FAX (76O) 6O2-8559 4. School Adequacy - Written comments have been received from the San Dieguito High School District and Encinitas Union School District. These comments are included with this letter. Other districts have indicated that their comments are forthcoming. It is recommended that you meet with each of the school districts to discuss their comments regarding the school section of the LFMP. 5. Sewer District Boundaries and Adjustments - Sewer service as proposed may require LAFCO approval of boundary adjustments and/or inter- agency agreements. The sewer section will need to include a special condition requiring that these approvals be obtained prior final map, grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first. Be advised that septic systems will not be allowed under any circumstances (Zone 11 pg. XV-17). 6. Drainage and NPDES - Drainage facilities must be described in more detail and not deferred to later design. Required NPDES facilities must be identified. 7. MAG Properties - Are the assumptions used in the LFMP for development of this property consistent with the MAG developers current proposal? 8. Traffic Study - Additional comments on traffic will be provided separately. 9. Notice to other property owners - After these revisions have been made and a new draft produced, the LFMPs will need to be provided to the other owners of undeveloped property in the zones for their review and comment. Staff is available to meet with you to discuss any of the issues identified above. We look forward to working with you on the completion and adoption of these Local Facilities Management Plans. Sincerely; Don Rideout Principal Planner DR:cs c: Assistant Planning Director LFMP Review Team February 5, 2001 TO: CLYDE WICKHAM HELGA STOVER SKIPP HAMMANN STEVE JANTZ FROM: DON RIDEOUT LFMP SUBMITTALS Attached are three LFMPs for your review. 1. Resubmitted Zone 10 and Zone 11 LFMPs for Villages of La Costa. Included with the LFMPs is a matrix of our comments with Henthorn's response to each item so you can see how your comments were addressed. I need to hear from you regarding whether your comments have been satisfactorily addressed. Please respond by Feb. 27, or let me know if you need more time. 2. First submittal of Zone 16 LFMP amendment for Carlsbad Oaks North. Note that this submittal is not a complete LFMP. Rather, what has been submitted is only the sections that appeared to the applicants to need changing. This can be an acceptable approach because there have not been any major changes since the original LFMP was approved. The major change is more open space and updated traffic information. However, this submittal may still be incomplete in some respects. I would like to get your comments by March 13, if possible. Thanks for your continuing cooperation. c: Don Neu Anne Hysong City of Carlsbad Planning Department February 15, 2001 Carlsbad Unified School District 801 PineAve Carlsbad CA 92009 RE: LOCAL FACILITIES ZONE 10 AND 11 Thank you for your previous review and comments on the Local Facilities Management Plans for Zones 10 and 11 (Villages of La Costa). The applicant, Morrow Development, has made revisions to the School section of the plan based on your comments. We would appreciate your review of the revised text. If all of your comments have been satisfactorily addressed, you do not need to respond further. If some of your comments have not been addressed, or if you have additional comments, please let us know. We would appreciate receiving your comments, if any, by March 23. You may also wish to compare the LFMP material with the relevant sections of the Villages of La Costa Environmental Impact Report which has been provided to you separately. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely; DON RIDEOUT Principal Planner DR:cs Enclosures 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us City of Carlsbad Planning Department February 15, 2001 San Dieguito Union High School District 710 Encinitas Blvd Encinitas CA 92024 RE: LOCAL FACILITIES ZONE 10 AND 11 Thank you for your previous review and comments on the Local Facilities Management Plans for Zones 10 and 11 (Villages of La Costa). The applicant, Morrow Development, has made revisions to the School section of the plan based on your comments. We would appreciate your review of the revised text. If all of your comments have been satisfactorily addressed, you do not need to respond further. If some of your comments have not been addressed, or if you have additional comments, please let us know. We would appreciate receiving your comments, if any, by March 23. You may also wish to compare the LFMP material with the relevant sections of the Villages of La Costa Environmental Impact Report which has been provided to you separately. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely; DON RIDEOUT Principal Planner DR:cs Enclosures 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us City of Carlsbad Planning Department February 15,2001 Encinitas Unified School District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd Encinitas CA 92024 RE: LOCAL FACILITIES ZONE 10 AND 11 Thank you for your previous review and comments on the Local Facilities Management Plans for Zones 10 and 11 (Villages of La Costa). The applicant, Morrow Development, has made revisions to the School section of the plan based on your comments. We would appreciate your review of the revised text. If all of your comments have been satisfactorily addressed, you do not need to respond further. If some of your comments have not been addressed, or if you have additional comments, please let us know. We would appreciate receiving your comments, if any, by March 23. You may also wish to compare the LFMP material with the relevant sections of the Villages of La Costa Environmental Impact Report which has been provided to you separately. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely; DON RIDEOUT Principal Planner DR:cs Enclosures 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us City of Carlsbad Planning Department February 15,2001 San Marcos Unified School District 215Mata Way San Marcos CA 92069 RE: LOCAL FACILITIES ZONE 10 AND 11 Thank you for your previous review and comments on the Local Facilities Management Plans for Zones 10 and 11 (Villages of La Costa). The applicant, Morrow Development, has made revisions to the School section of the plan based on your comments. We would appreciate your review of the revised text. If all of your comments have been satisfactorily addressed, you do not need to respond further. If some of your comments have not been addressed, or if you have additional comments, please let us know. We would appreciate receiving your comments, if any, by March 23. You may also wish to compare the LFMP material with the relevant sections of the Villages of La Costa Environmental Impact Report which has been provided to you separately. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely; )ON RIDEOUT Principal Planner DR:cs Enclosures 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us Jack Henthorn & Associates 5365 Avenida Enemas, Suite A Carlsbad, CA 92008 (760) 438-4090 Fax (760) 438-0981 Memorandum J^N 0 ^ 2001 - — CKSD FROM: BRYAN D. BENNETT SUBJECT: LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 11 DATE: JUNE 6, 2001 The attached six copies of the Zone 11 LFMP are revised per the comments we received from the City of Carlsbad's Planning and Engineering Departments. All the comments were addressed in the revised plan except for the following: - The comments received for the fire station by Glen Van Peski were not addressed per the resolution of the meeting with Mike Smith on 5/28/01. It was stated and later confirmed by Mike Smith that the Fire Facility section for the Zone 11 LFMP meets the standards of the Growth Management Ordinance and does not warrant any modification. The financing for the land cost of the permanent location of Fire Station No. 6, outside of the money set aside in the City's CIP for construction, is currently being worked out between the City and the developer in an amendment to the existing Fire Station Agreement with the owner. Therefore, no changes are necessary to this section as it relates to the Growth Management Ordinance. - The comment in regards to the dwelling unit transfer by Steve Jantz was not addressed. After a teleconference with Steve Jantz and Jack Henthorn it was understood that the transfer was adopted by the City Council and available for future developments within Zone 11 outside of the Villages of La Costa area. Therefore it was agreed upon that the language is appropriate to leave in the document. - Recently it was brought to our attention that the Constraints Map contained slivers of residential land uses associated with Rancho Santa Fe Rd. Due to the time constraint, the insignificance of these slivers and the difficulty in revising the map, it was determined to leave them on the map. The majority of the acreage within the land use slivers is under Rancho Santa Fe Rd and is subsequently constrained. However, the RMH sliver did generate a density of one dwelling unit that was carried forward throughout this document, Zone 10 LFMP, the VLC Master Plan and the associated EIR for the project. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please feel free to call our office at (760) 438-4090. Page 1 of 1 March 15,2001 TO: PRINCIPAL PLANNER DON RIDEOUT FROM: Associate Engineer Steven Jantz LFMP REVIEW COMMENTS FOR ZONE 11 The following comments are submitted for your consideration and transmittal to the project applicant: • -Pa Page HI 11: Tho LFMT piupuses lu Uam.fu uouio dwelling units not built with Zone 12 into -Zone 11 (179 du's). I understand this is a yiupusal aud has yel Lu be approved. Thia iocuo will be- -addresaed through the procectiing of the Villages of La Coata Master Plan and subsequent EIR. If this- .proposal JG not approved, certain chart/tablo Tensions should be incorporated into the final document Exhibit 17: City wide residential phasing projections do not include an assumption for Zone 17. Based on future development projections used by the City is this years budget preparation, it is suggested that the applicant assume the following development potential: * 500 SFR units spread over an 10-year period beginning in 2005 »> 100 MF Affordable units in 2008 * 2,170,000 square feet of Industrial land uses beginning hi 2003 > 10 acres of neighborhood commercial *• 10 acres of community facility uses The above development assumptions also necessitate revisions to the Total Citywide DU's and Total Citywide Population projections on Exhibits 17 and 18. Most importantly, the status of the facility/capacity analysis in the LFMP for Zone 11 is questionable since no development in Zone 17 was assumed. The specific facility sections in the LFMP and facility adequacy must be re-analyzed assuming the increase in demands from adjacent areas. • Page Vin-4: EWA Sewer Service Area Population projections are considerably out-of-date. Please provide updated projections through 2020. • Parks adequacy is dependent of the construction of Alga Norte Park. However, the mitigation condition should indicate that a facilities deficit would occur if Alga Norte Park were not built. -If this • OCCUTG, development in Zono 11 will have to make up the different in order to inert the proposed development phasing. • Circulation: > Refer to comments provided by the Engineering Land Use Division. It is my understanding that the City's third party traffic consultant has not reviewed the final traffic study. In addition, the mitigation requirements are inconsistent with the provisions in the Village of La Costa Master Plan and EIR. *• The circulation section indicates that there are no street segments with an unacceptable level of service hi the year 2005. However, the EIR indicates failures in 2005 at Rancho Santa Fe Road/Linda Vista intersection, and the segment of Rancho Santa Fe Road between Melrose and La Costa. May 14, 2001 TO: PRINCIPAL PLANNER, DON RIDEOUT FROM: CONSULTANT PROJECT ENGINEER, GLEN VAN PESKI RE: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MP 98-01 COMMENTS ZONE 11 LFMP I have completed my second review of the June 2000 amendment of the Zone 11 LFMP. My review primarily was for conformance to the engineering aspects of the Master Plan. General comments are below. I have attached marked-up pages with specific comments. Table of Contents Will serve letters not included. Circulation Exhibits indicate that existing geometry is shaded, but it does not appear to be. Fire Facilities Coordinate with Mike Smith. The temporary station no. 6 is at the end of it's service life and needs to be replaced as soon as possible. The CIP funds for the permanent station no. 6 aren't scheduled until 2003-4. The existing city-owned site for the permanent station no. 6 is inadequate and an new site needs to be provided. The CIP funds do not include anything for the purchase of land. Exhibit 65 shows the wrong location for permanent station no. 6. School SMUSD did not indicate that existing facilities were adequate. Sewer Meetings scheduled with Leucadia and Vallecitos to discuss this section. Mitigation language is unclear... it says that the sewer will be financed by developers, then the next sentence says LCWD will finance the facilities recommended in the Planning Study through the collection of sewer fees. It is unclear if two different sets of improvements are being discussed. Water Meeting scheduled with Leucadia County Water District to discuss this section. Financing Comments as noted on attached pages. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this LFMP. If you have any questions, please contact me at 720-0500. Glen K. Van Peski, P.E. Consultant Project Engineer May 17, 2001 TO: DON NEU FROM: SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST ADDITIONAL COMMENTS - PRELIMINARY PROJECT REVIEW / VILLAGES OF LA COSTA (VOL) MASTER PLAN At the request of the Park Development Manager (who is currently on vacation), I have been asked to relay an additional comment with respect to the preliminary project review statements for VOL Master Plan that were previously submitted to you by him. As a result of discussions between Mark Steyaert and Don Rideout, it has been recommended that the conveyance of any parkland dedication required by VOL be conditioned as part of the Master Plan approval, in addition, language relating to the sale and conveyance of that portion of the remaining 32.9-acre park site should also be included as a condition of the Master Plan approval. Conditions should indicate that the sale and transfer of title for the entire 32.9-acre park site should conclude not later than 45 days after approval of the Master Plan. A final condition should guarantee the right for City staff or its' authorized representatives to enter the site for future planning purposes. Thank you for your attention to this matter. If I can be of assistance to you with any questions you may have, please contact me at ext. 2827. KEITH BEVERLY C: Assistant City Manager Planning Director Park Development Manager Recreation Director Principal Planner - Don Rideout Jack Henthorn & Associates 5365 Avenida Enemas, Suite A Carlsbad, CA 92008 (760)438-4090 RFPPIX/CnFax (760) 438-0981 KbUtlVED Memorandum -^^ 0 ' 200t TO: DONRIDEOUT PUNNING DEFT" FROM: BRYAN D. BENNETT SUBJECT: LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 11 DATE: JUNE 6, 2001 The attached six copies of the Zone 11 LFMP are revised per the comments we received from the City of Carlsbad's Planning and Engineering Departments. All the comments were addressed in the revised plan except for the following: - The comments received for the fire station by Glen Van Peski were not addressed per the resolution of the meeting with Mike Smith on 5/28/01. It was stated and later confirmed by Mike Smith that the Fire Facility section for the Zone 11 LFMP meets the standards of the Growth Management Ordinance and does not warrant any modification. The financing for the land cost of the permanent location of Fire Station No. 6, outside of the money set aside in the City's CIP for construction, is currently being worked out between the City and the developer in an amendment to the existing Fire Station Agreement with the owner. Therefore, no changes are necessary to this section as it relates to the Growth Management Ordinance. - The comment in regards to the dwelling unit transfer by Steve Jantz was not addressed. After a teleconference with Steve Jantz and Jack Henthorn it was understood that the transfer was adopted b|y the City Council and available for future developments within Zone 11 outside of the Villages of La Costa area. Therefore it was agreed upon that the language is appropriate to leave in the document. - Recently it was brought to our attention that the Constraints Map contained slivers of residential larid uses associated with Rancho Santa Fe Rd. Due to the time constraint, the insignificance of these slivers and the difficulty in revising the map, it was determined to leave them orj the map. The majority of the acreage within the land use slivers is under Rancho Santa] Fe Rd and is subsequently constrained. However, the RMH sliver did generate a density of one dwelling unit that was carried forward throughout this document, Zone 10 LFMP, the VLC Master Plan and the associated EIR for the project. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please feel free to call our office at (760) 438-4090. Page 1 of 1 June 15, 2001 TO: PRINCIPAL PLANNER DON RIDEOUT FROM: Senior Planner ZONE 11 LFMP FOURTH CHECK REVIEW COMMENTS Transmitted are my comments on the revised June 2000 Draft Zone 11 LFMP received on June 7, 2001. I have only two very minor corrections that are noted on the attached pages. Once these two revisions are made, I can support the applicant printing copies of the LFMP for distribution to the Planning Commission. DONNEU DN:mh Attachments LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN Zone 11 2nd Amendment RECEIVED JtlN 0 7 2001 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPT. June 2000 H CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 11 Amendment #2 Prepared For: City of Carlsbad Growth Management Division 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Prepared By: Document Preparation: Jack Henthorn & Associates Engineering: Hunsaker & Associates Traffic: Linscott Law & Greenspan Amendment #2 June52000 Revised(Mardi> 2001 Amendment #1 December 14,1993 Original Approval May 19,1992 Local Faci. .^es Management Plan Zone 11 4. ANALYSIS OF BUILDOUT (2020) CONDITIONS a. Buildout Traffic Volumes and Capacity The circulation element planned for 2020 is shown in Exhibi Trip generation for Zone 11 is^shpwn in Exhibit 58. Zone 11 is calculated to generate about(6^98iJADT (33,945 in and 33,945 out), with 3,395 inbound and 2,835 outbound trips during the AM Peak Hour and 3,675 inbound and 3,325 outbound trips during the PM Peak Hour. Two intersections within the 20% criteria area were calculated to operate at unacceptable LOS as shown in Exhibit 59, which are listed below. With the recommended mitigation shown in Exhibit 64, these intersections are calculated to operate with acceptable Levels of Service. The 2020 peak hour volumes are shown in Exhibit 60. • Rancho Santa Fe Road/Questhaven Road (LOS E AM peak hour) • Rancho Santa Fe Road/Olivenhain Road (LOS E, AM peak hour, LOS F PM peak hour) No street segments within the 20% criteria area were calculated to operate at unacceptable LOS as shown in Exhibit 61. The ADT volumes for 2020 are shown in Exhibit 62. June, 2000 XI-28 City of Carlsbad Planning Department August 3, 2001 Carlsbad Unified School District 801 PineAv Carlsbad Ca 92008 RE: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA Thank you for your previous review and comments on the Local Facilities Management Plans for Zone 10 and 11 (Villages of La Costa). The documents have been finalized, and enclosed are copies of the final school sections. We believe these documents reflect all of the comments you have made and include all necessary mitigation for impacts to school facilities. The project has been scheduled for a Planning Commission public hearing on August 29, 2001. Your assistance in reviewing this plan is appreciated. Sincerely, Don Rideout Principal Planner DR:cs 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us City of Carlsbad Planning Department August 3, 2001 San Marcos School District 1 Civic Center Dr San Marcos CA 92069 RE: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA Thank you for your previous review and comments on the Local Facilities Management Plans for Zone 10 and 11 (Villages of La Costa). The documents have been finalized, and enclosed are copies of the final school sections. We believe these documents reflect all of the comments you have made and include all necessary mitigation for impacts to school facilities. The project has been scheduled for a Planning Commission public hearing on August 29, 2001. Your assistance in reviewing this plan is appreciated. Sincerely, Don Rideout Principal Planner DR:cs 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us City of Carlsbad Planning Department August 3, 2001 Encinitas Union School District 101 S Rancho Santa Fe Rd Encinitas CA 92024 RE: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA Thank you for your previous review and comments on the Local Facilities Management Plans for Zone 10 and 11 (Villages of La Costa). The documents have been finalized, and enclosed are copies of the final school sections. We believe these documents reflect all of the comments you have made and include all necessary mitigation for impacts to school facilities. The project has been scheduled for a Planning Commission public hearing on August 29, 2001. Your assistance in reviewing this plan is appreciated. Sincerely, Don Rideout Principal Planner DR:cs 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us ® City of Carlsbad Planning Department August 3, 2001 San Dieguito Union School District 701 Encinitas Bl EncinitasCA 92024 RE: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA Thank you for your previous review and comments on the Local Facilities Management Plans for Zone 10 and 11 (Villages of La Costa). The documents have been finalized, and enclosed are copies of the final school sections. We believe these documents reflect all of the comments you have made and include all necessary mitigation for impacts to school facilities. The project has been scheduled for a Planning Commission public hearing on August 29, 2001. Your assistance in reviewing this plan is appreciated. Sincerely, Don Rideout Principal Planner DR:cs 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us \m