The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLFMP 87-20; Zone 20 Specific Plan; Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP)LFMP 87-20 ZONE 20 SPECIFIC PLAN (SWQUAD. S/PAR,E/I-5,W/ECR) APNNo. None Status: APPROVED Application date: November 24,1987 APPLICAT» SUBMITTAL DATE NOVEMBER ^JL 1987 STAFF REPORT DATE: AUGUST 3, 1988 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION SUBJECT: LFMP 20-LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 20 I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Resolution No. 2762 recommending APPROVAL of the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and ADOPT Resolution 2763 recommending APPROVAL of Local Facilities Management Plan 20. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND As shown on Exhibit "A" Zone 20 is located in the southwestern quadrant of the City immediately east of Local Facilities Management Zone 4. As shown on Exhibit "B" Zone 20 is primarily residential. Of the Zone's 764.2 total acres 718 are residential. General Plan residential densities range from low (0-1.5 du/ac) to medium (4-8 du/ac). Nonresidential General Plan land uses include 16.2 acres of Open Space. III. ANALYSIS 1. Does the proposed Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20 fulfill the purpose, intent, and specific requirements of Section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Growth Management Program)? 2. Is the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20 consistent with and does it implement the 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvement Plan? STAFF REPORT LFMP 20 Page 2 DISCUSSION The Growth Management Program requires that a Local Facilities Management Plan be prepared for each Management Zone in order to show how compliance will be maintained with the City's adopted public facility performance standards as development occurs. The first step in this process requires determining the buildout development potential in the zone. The buildout projection for this zone is consistent with the methodology contained in the 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan and the provisions of Proposition E which was approved by the citizens of Carlsbad on November 4, 1986. The plan phases the buildout development of the zone based on estimates of yearly development activity. The phasing estimate is consistent with generalized phasing assumptions used in the 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvement Plan. From these buildout and phased development projections, yearly phased demands for public facilities may be projected and buildout demands identified. The plan analyzes eleven (11) public facilities. This analysis compares the projected public facility demands with the available and planned supply of public facilities to ensure compliance with the adopted performance standards. Where demands for facilities exceed supply, the plan proposes the necessary mitigation to maintain conformance with the standard. This analysis is consistent with both the 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvement Plan and the Growth Management Program. The Local Facilities Management Plan identifies one facility which currently does not conform with the adopted performance standard. Parks - A shortfall of 4.24 acres exists in Park District 3 (Southwest Quadrant). As part of this Local Facilities Management Plan an attempt has been made to bring this facility into conformance with the adopted performance standard. The following chart provides a brief summary of the eleven public facilities analyzed in the plan. STAFF REPORT LFMP 20 Page 3 ZONE 20 PUBLIC FACILITIES SUMMARY CHART As Of 8/3/88 City Administrative Facilities Library Existing facilities meet the adopted perform- mance standard until 2006. Existing facilities meet the adopted perform- ance standard until 2003. Wastewater Treatment Facilities Parks Drainage Circulation Fire Open Space Schools Sewer Collection Water Distribution Existing facilities meet the adopted perform- ance standard with—the—proposed mitiqatior Park District 3 (southwest quadrant) does not meet the adopted performance standard without mitigation measures. Drainage facilities will meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation measures. Circulation facilities will meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation measures. Fire facilities meet the adopted performance standard. Existing open space meets the adopted performance standard. An ongoing work program will assure the open space performance standard is maintained through buildout. The adopted performance standard is being met. Sewer facilities meet the adopted performance standard through buildout of the zone. Water facilities meets the adopted performance standard through buildout of the zone. STAFF REPORT LFMP 20 Page 2 DISCUSSION The Growth Management Program requires that a Local Facilities Management Plan be prepared for each Management Zone in order to show how compliance will be maintained with the City's adopted public facility performance standards as development occurs. The first step in this process requires determining the buildout development potential in the zone. The buildout projection for this zone is consistent with the methodology contained in the 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan and the provisions of Proposition E which was approved by the citizens of Carlsbad on November 4, 1986. The plan phases the buildout development of the zone based on estimates of yearly development activity. The phasing estimate is consistent with generalized phasing assumptions used in the 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvement Plan. From these buildout and phased development projections, yearly phased demands for public facilities may be projected and buildout demands identified. The plan analyzes eleven (11) public facilities. This analysis compares the projected public facility demands with the available and planned supply of public facilities to ensure compliance with the adopted performance standards. Where demands for facilities exceed supply, the plan proposes the necessary mitigation to maintain conformance with the standard. This analysis is consistent with both the 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvement Plan and the Growth Management Program. The Local Facilities Management Plan identifies one facility which currently does not conform with the adopted performance standard. Parks - A shortfall of 4.24 acres exists in Park District 3 (Southwest Quadrant). As part of this Local Facilities Management Plan an attempt has been made to bring this facility into conformance with the adopted performance standard. The following chart provides a brief summary of the eleven public facilities analyzed in the plan. STAFF REPORT LFMP 20 Page 3 ZONE 20 PUBLIC FACILITIES SUMMARY CHART As Of 8/3/88 City Administrative Facilities Library Existing facilities meet the adopted perform- mance standard until 2006. Existing facilities meet the adopted perform- ance standard until 2003. Wastewater Treatment Facilities Parks Drainage Circulation Fire Open Space Schools Sewer Collection Water Distribution Existing facilities meet the adopted perform- ance standard with—the—proposed mitiqatior Park District 3 (southwest quadrant) does not meet the adopted performance standard without mitigation measures. Drainage facilities will meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation measures. Circulation facilities will meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation measures. Fire facilities meet the adopted performance standard. Existing open space meets the adopted performance standard. An ongoing work program will assure the open space performance standard is maintained through buildout. The adopted performance standard is being met. Sewer facilities meet the adopted performance standard through buildout of the zone. Water facilities meets the adopted performance standard through buildout of the zone. STAFF REPORT LFMP 20 Page 4 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20 is a public facilities planning document. The plan establishes parameters that ensure Carlsbad's public facility performance standards are met and public facilities inadequacies mitigated to accomplish this goal. The plan for informational purposes occasionally estimates locations and costs of public facility improvements. , The plan fully recognizes that complete environmental review will be necessary once specific public facility improvements are established. Therefore, the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20 will not cause any significant environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director on May 27, 1988. ATTACHMENTS 1. Planning Commission Resolutions No. 2762 and 2763. 2. Exhibits - "A" - Citywide Map of Local Facility Management Zones "B" - Local Facilities Management Plan - 20 General Plan Land Use Map "C" - Local Facilities Management Plan - 20 Zoning Map 3. Local Facilities Management Plan 20 DatediAugust 3, 1988 BHraf J) 25 EXHIBIT "A" k= 2 ^ 13 14 0 24 PAIOMAB [20! 19 15 .»o«'. 21, 10 cos?* 23 16 • 0 17 12 OUVINHAIN! 18 11 NOT TO SCALI !© fiortfo/r /If. 0/z/e// ZONE 5 LEGEND • ZONE BOUNDARY : EXISTING CIRCULATION TOPOGRAPHY PROPOSED CIRCULATION GENERAL PLAN BOUNDARY RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY (0-1.3 du/oc) RESIDENTIAL LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY(0-4 du/oo) RESIDENTIAL MEDIUMDENSITY (4-6 du/oc) OPEN SPACE PROPOSED SCHOOL RL RLM RM OS NOT ID SSM£ m XI E H ZONE 5 LEGEND —— ZONE BOUNDARY 7TT EXISTING CIRCULATION •••"•• TOPOGRAPHY ~- PROPOSED CIRCULATION —-••» ZONE BOUNDARY c, . SINGLE FAMILY"~ ' RESIDENTIAL R_ 1— SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. 1O_Q (Q OVERLAY-1O.OO S.F. MIN RDM— RESIDENTIAL DENSITY- Q MULTIPLE (Q OVERLAY) PC PLANNED COMMUNITY L-C LIMITED CONTROL OS OPEN SPACE ZONE 19 MOTTDKAIE mxi E H zone 20 not to scale NORTH :JB 0000000000000000000000 TEL JJo .438-H0981'JJo Dec.29-88 11:43 P.01 JA< :K HEM i HORN & ASSOCIATES 5421 AienidaEnciiw • SHI'IC B Car/siW, Cah/omw 92008 {619)4-38-4090 I December 28, 1988 City of Car 1». bad 2075 Las PalriMS Dr. Carlsbad, California 92009 I _ ] ; Attn: Philip O.| Carter, Assistant to the City Manager i Subject:Fi. *ncte Pla:is for Growth Management Zones 20 and 22 - Status Report This report 1.3 provided in follow up to our recent telephone conversation regarding preparation of the financing plans required as ' onditlons of approval in Zones 20 and 22. The Zone 20 :: updated and >:. Zone 5, Zone been held an.} for sharing o inter zone pi. year. Our g., tor formal rt- Inancing Plan circulation section is being oordinatad with the major property owners in 19 and 2one 22. Preliminary discussions have work has begun to determine an equitable basis osts and guarantees. I anticipate additional operty owner meetings after the first of the al is to have a completed plan In to the City view by mid February. The Zone 22 Financing Plan initial draft will be distributed to the participating property owners this week. After making any n-nessary revisions it will be submitted for preliminary ;.taff comment. I anticipate forwarding the draft plan fur review during the second week of January. This is beinq done at the preliminary draft stage (as it was with the Zon-f 20 Financing Plan) to solicit your participation early in the process. As you are a-/are, we are anxious to proceed in cooperation with the City and surrounding property owners to resolve the issue of financing the facilities identified in the recently adopted Zone P.lans. This is exhibited by the willingness of the Zone 20 <«nd Zone 22 property owners to coordinate with surrounding Dories anci our offers to assist City efforts in any way possible. If you have -»ny questions, or need additional information, please content me at your convenience. We look forward to working with you in 1989. cerely, Pack E. Kent iorn 'Principal Consultant Zone 20/22 finance Plans December 4/ 1988 City of Carlsba 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad, California 92009 Attn: David Hauser, Assistant City Engineer Michael Jtolzmiller, Director of Planning Subject: Information relating to appeal of Conditions of Approval for MS 785 - Conditions 15 a thru e & 16 The purpose of this application was to refine the Local Facilities Management Zone 5 boundary and separate the Zone 5 property away from that in Zone 20, This is being accomplished in a two step fashion as described below. Adjustment Plat #367 was requested to effectuate a boundary adjustment between the Sudan Interior Mission and Laurel Tree Investment Company properties for the purpose of establishing a property line boundary for future College Blvd.. This action is an exception under the provisions of section 21.90.030 (10) of the Zoning Ordinance, "Growth Management". Michael Holzmlller has indicated that the resultant property lines are well within reasonable interpretation of the boundary locations established by the City under section 21,90.100 "Local Facilities Management Zones". In discussion with staff, there appears to be agreement regarding the propriety of the adjustment plat. Since the Adjustment Plat will record prior to the parcel map, the property located within Zone 20 is unaffected by the parcel map except as conditioned by the City for the granting of the easement for College. The granting of the easement does not constitute a land division, nor does it involve approval of a development c permit. The confusion appears to be over the designation of a portion of the property as"Parcel 2". This Is conventional wording and should be changed to show "Parcel 2" as a "not a part" area to clearly show that the limit of the requested division is the portion of the property located in Zone 5. This is provided for in subdivision map act section 66424.6 and reflects the intent of the applicant . This effort has been a cooperative one between the City and the involved property owners for nearly a year- The "not a part" approach appears to clearly show that no development permit is granted with the requested action, while at the same time accomplishing the mutual goal of clearly defining those portions of the property located in the respective Growth Management Zones. ___ . ... I will contact you tomarrow for a response so that revisions can be undertaken as necessary to clarify the intent ofthese actions. If you have any questions please call at your convenience. Thank you. incerely, fack E. Henthorn JEH:wpc cc: Philip 0. Carter Dwight Spiers 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 TELEPHONE (619)438-1161 of PLANNING DEPARTMENT November 14, 1988 Robert C. Ladwig Rick Engineering Company 3088 Pio Pico Street, Suite 202 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Bob: I wanted to respond to your letter regarding the possibility of changing the language in the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20. As we discussed on the phone Friday, if you wish to make any changes to the zone plan, the property owners within Zone 20 will need to officially notify the City that they wish to reopen the plan to consider possible changes. The procedure for reopening the zone plan is specified in Section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code deal ing,with the Growth Management Program. What I would suggest is for you to obtain authorization on behalf of the property owners similar to that used in receiving authorization to prepare the plan initially. Once that has been accomplished, please send a letter to me with your request to open up the zone plan to review the possibility of making changes. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at 434-2819 or 438-1161. Sincerely, PHILIP 0. CARTER Assistant to the City Manager cc: Brian Zone 20 Property Owners of Carlsbad Office of the City Manager November 14, 1988 Robert C. Ladwig Rick Engineering Company 3088 Pio Pico Street, Suite 202 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Bob: The purpose of this letter is to respond to your questions regarding how the Open Space performance standard will be addressed when projects are submitted within the Local Facilities Management Zone 20. This response applies to all projects submitted within zones with approved Local Facilities Management Plans as well. As you are aware, the preparation of Local Facilities Management Plans are required to address the City's Public Facility Performance Standard for Open Space. Specifically, this standard requires 15% additional open space to be set aside which is not environmentally constrained and is above and beyond those requirements already in place by the City. The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20 provides one scenario of how the open space performance standard could be met. Each zone plan, unless accompanied by the preparation of a master plan will be required to show how the Open Space standard can be met. Each project submittal within Zone 20 will be required to show how it meets the Open Space standard. It must show how it provides the necessary open space and does not in any way preclude future development within the zone from meeting the Open Space standard. The plan for Zone 20 utilized landscape setbacks along College Boulevard and Poinsettia Lane as well as improvements to the SDG&E easements in order to show how open space could be provide. As you mentioned in your letter, the Zone 20 Plan requires authorization from SDG&E prior to approving the use of their easements to count towards meeting the open space standard. It should also be noted that the City is in the process of reviewing its open space plan and the City Council has appointed a Citizens Committee to do so. This committee will be addressing what areas should be counted towards meeting the 15% Open Space standard. The Committee's recommendations, if implemented by the City Council could modified what areas are currently allowed towards meeting the standard. 12OO Elm Avenue • Carlsbad, California 92OO8-1989 • (619) 434-2821 Robert C. Ladwig November 14, 1988 Paae Two At this time you should be providing within these projects open space to meet the performance standard based on the guidelines established in the Growth Management Program and established in the Local Facilities Management Plan for the zone the project is within. However, the zone plan should only be used as a reference point and not as an absolute condition towards providing open space. If you have any additional questions regarding how open space will be measured as individual projects are reviewed, please contact me or Michael Holzmiller at 438-1161. Sincerely, PHILIP 0. CARTER Assistant to the City Manager cc: Zone 20 Property Owners Michael Holzmiller Brian Hunter POCraf RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY PLANNING CONSULTANTS AND CIVIL ENGINEERS 3088 PIO PICO DR . SUITE 202 . CARLSBAD, CA 92008 PO BOX 1129 . PHONE . AREA CODE 619 • 729-4987 October 27, 1988 Mr. Phil Carter CITY OF CARLSBAD Growth Management 2075_Las Palmas Drive ,, _ _ _ Carlsbad, California 92009 RE: ZONE 20 RICK ENGINEERING JOB NO. 10701 Dear Phil: Thank you again for the fine job you and your staff did on the Zone 22 Plan and your presentation to the Planning Commission. When you get back from vacation, I would like to discuss with you the possibility of changing the language in the Zone 20 Plan to agree with the change that was made at the Planning Commission on Zone 22. I am referring to the language pertaining to the limitation on final maps and building permits tied to the guarantee for the financing. The Commission was receptive to your change in language and we would like you to consider going back to the Commission with the Zone 20 Plan and asking for the same change. I know that you were reluctant to do that so soon after the Zone 20 Plan approval; however, as I mentioned, the Commission was receptive to the change for Zone 22 and they would possibly be receptive to the same change for Zone 20. Please give me a call when you return so that we can discuss this further. Sincerely, Robert C. Ladwig RCL:kd.002 cc: Mr. Don Woodward, CUSTOM LIVING HOMES Mr. Jack Henthorn, JACK HENTHORN AND ASSOCIATES RICK ENGINEERINGCOMPANY 3088 PIO PICO DRIVE, #202, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 (619) 729-4987 PLANNINGDIVISION October 31, 1988 Mr. Phil Carter CITY OF CARLSBAD Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, California 92009 RE: OPEN SPACE IN ZONE 20 RICK ENGINEERING JOB NOS. 10727, 10726, 10701, 10696 Dear Phil: We are in the process of preparing several application packages for properties located in Zone 20. Before the proposed plans can be submitted, a common concern for all the clients we represent is how the City will interpret compliance with open-space standards. As we understand the open-space requirements approved for Zone 20, the 15-percent open-space mandate will be achieved by providing landscape setbacks along College Boulevard and Poinsettia Lane as well as improvements to the SDG&E easement. In the event that a property owner adjacent to one of the above improvement areas chooses to provide open space in another fashion, equal to or in excess to what is shown in the LFMP, the Planning Director will evaluate the request on a project-by- project basis. For those properties not located adjacent to one of the identified open-space areas, they need not provide any open space other than what may be required by the zoning district the property is located within. These properties could, however, be required to help pay for the improvement and maintenance of the open-space facilities as shown in the LFMP for Zone 20. If it is determined that providing open space within the SDG&E easement is not feasible, the 23 acres of open space would need to be picked up in other areas of Zone 20. Since one of the Special Conditions for Zone 20 requires authorization from SDG&E to improve their easement, this issue will be resolved prior to the first project being approved. Mr. Phil Carter October 31, 1988 Page Two We would appreciate your response to our understanding of the open-space issue in Zone 20. Sincerely, Robert F. Gentles RFG:kd.001 cc: Mr. Don Woodward, CUSTOM LIVING HOMES Mr. Bob Wineteer, OCEAN BLUFF PARTNERSHIP Mr. Arie de Jong, HOLLANDIA DAIRY Mr. John E. Thill, GARRETT DEVELOPMENT Mr. Bill Bennett, EMERALD HOMES Mr. Don Agatep, THE AGATEP CORPORATION Mr. Bob Ladwig, RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY City of Carlsbad Office of the City Manager October 20, 1988 Don Woodward, President Custom Living Homes and Communities of Southern California, Inc. 5100 Campus Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Dear Don, Thank you for your letter of October 17, 1988. As I indicated to you in our recent meeting, City staff is in the process of developing an overall financing approach for the City. As I also indicated, the focus of this program will be to insure the timely provision of public facilities. Your request that the development community be given an opportunity to discuss this program is understandable and we intend to hold some type of a briefing within the next four to six weeks. Jim Elliott, Lloyd Hubbs, Phil Carter and our consultants are refining the various approaches to financing facilities at this time and you can expect to hear from one of them soon. If prior to that time you have any questions, please contact me at 434-2821. Sincerely, R. PATCHETT City Manager saf c: City Engineer Finance Director Assistant to the City Manager 12OO Elm Avenue • Carlsbad, California 92OO8-1989 • (619) 434-2821 CUSTOM LIVING HOMES AND COMMUNITIES October 17, 1988 Mr. Ray Patchett City Manager City Hall 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad/ California 92008 Dear Ray/ I have been in a meeting this morning lasting four hours discussing a Financing Flan for Zone IS. We are unable to make any substantive progress due to the fact wef; have no knowledge-of. the City's position on Mello Roos. I know you are having an internal review made regarding this issue and I would like to request that the development sector ha^ff- an~ opportunity^ to give, th»ie inp^e-te^yottr staff prior to- the, completion of their review,. I understand that your report will go to the Council for discussion prior to any action being taken/ but we would like to request an opportunity to have a .jHKkvb&p^•^*9n&X&»|g the*. City, consultaiifcsLwithin the-next two weeks. At the time/ we would like to have a comprehensive* discussion of the pros and cons of Mello-Roos/ Assessment Districts/ fee structures and reimbursement agreements as they relate to the developers being able to provide funding for the facilities required by the Zone Plan approvals. Yours truly/ Don E. Woodward President DEW:br Custom Living Homes & Communities of Southern California Inc 5100 Campus Drive Newport Beach California 92660 7147529009 HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES Planning • Project Management • Environmental September 20, 1988 Phil carter City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: Timing of Financing Guarantees as required by Local Facility Management Plans. Dear Phil: This letter is written to request that required financing guarantees as required by Local Facility Management Plans be timed to coincide with final map approval or building permits, whichever occurs first, instead of development permits (ie. the earliest discretionary approval). This issue surfaced out of the review of the Zone 24 plan. Staff indicated that it preferred financing guarantees to be tied to development permits. This would have precluded approval of any tentative maps or other discretionary permits until these financing guarantees were in place. This requirement is a change from the requirement placed on the Local Facility Management Plans for Zones 11, 12 and 19. As you recall, the requirement for a financing guarantee for public facilities for these plans was timed to coincide with final map approval. The only zone that the development permit requirement has been applied to is Zone 20. Requiring a financing guarantee in the form of bonding, public financing or other means prior to approval of a discretionary permit is impractical in a number of ways: 1. Lending institutions are unwilling to commit large financial expenditures without adequate security. The cost of facilities required for each zone is substantial. Without some security, it would be difficult if not impossible to implement a financing plan for any zone. While lenders are more likely to guarantee financing for a final map which has known improvements and high development 6994 El Camino Real, Suite 208 • Carlsbad • CA 92009 • [619] 438-1465 likelihood, they will ,not guarantee financing for projects with no entitlement. 2. Most comprehensive financing mechanisms such as assessment districts and Mello Roos districts are established based on a specific residential unit counts and/or commercial square footage amount. These counts are derived from approved tentative maps or other discretionary permits. Without established unit counts or square footage amounts, there is no guarantee that the developments will generate the necessary capital. The financing mechanisms, therefore, become guesses that are subject to future revisions. 3. Generally, assessment districts also require facilities to be designed prior to the resolution of intention. This would not be possible until the tentative map has been approved. City policy also requires that all discretionary permits be obtained before a district can be established. 4. The requirement of a financing plan being in place prior to discretionary approvals adds significant processing time to projects. Six months is the typical time taken to process a final map after tentative map approval. This time would be lost to a property owner waiting for the financing guarantee to be put in place. In discussions with you, it was indicated that the recent wording change from final map to development permit was due to the fact that commercial projects not requiring a final map could proceed without a financing guarantee. Of course, this was not the intent of the original wording. As an alternative, I would suggest the following: "Prior to approval of any final map or building permit, whichever occurs first, for any project located within Zone , financing shall be guaranteed for the following improvements:..." This wording ensures that neither residential nor non- residential building can take place without guaranteed financing of needed improvements and still provides for the processing of applications. Please consider this proposal as a feasible alternative to the latest wording contained in Zone 20. Call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Bill Hofman ^^p 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 0f Otarlabafc PLANNING DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF DETERMINATION TELEPHONE (619)438-1161 i t. ERobert DiZuimralt, Clerk SEP 13,1988 DEPUTY County Clerk September 8, 1988 County of San Diego Attn: Mail Drop C-ll 220 West Broadway San Diego, CA 92101 , _ _ This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad on September 6, 1988, approved the following project: Project Title: Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 20 88060106 Keith Lee (916) 445-0613 State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Telephone (If submitted to Clearinghouse) Project Address/Location: College Avenue and Poinsettia Avenue intersection and surrounding 760 acres. Project Description: Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 20 which guarantees the adequacy of public facilities concurrent with development. This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad has approved the above described project and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1. 2. 3. 4. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEOA. The EIR or Negative Declaration and record of project approval may be examined at: CITY OF CARLSBAD Mitigation measures were not made a condition of the approval of this project. A statement of Oj onsiderations was not adopted for this project. MICHAEL J. HOCZMILI Planning Director Carlsbad Journal Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to North Coast Publishers, Inc corporate offices P O Box 878, Encmitas, CA 92024 (619)753-6543 Proof of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid, I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal q newspaper of general circulation, published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the said City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next preceding the date of publication of the notice k——««,. .-« erred to, and that the notice of exed is a printed copy, has been ch regular and entire issue of said I not in any supplement thereof on Jates, to-wit NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE20 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public heading atthe City Council Cham- bers, 1200 Elm Ay4f«ie, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 6,1988, to consider afcocal Facilities Man- agement Plan von property generally located south of Palomar ' Airport Road,teast of Paseo del Norte., antflorth and west of the Pacific Ririi, Master Plan area and more particularly described as:*'<^'.viV *'V V "' "' '•*• *l'» :i£r'f:' Th°se port^nfjof Sections-21,2,2van^;28, Township, 12 South, Range 4 West, and Rancho Agua Hedionda. -,, | For convenience Uake, the area is shown on the maps below, j Those person wishing to speak o,n this proposal are cordially^ invited jta,attend Jhe'public hearing*. If you have any questions, please call the Planning .department at 438-1161. If you challenge the Local-Facilities,Management Plan in cou$, yoV mlfy be^iAi^dJtf^afsing'dllirthose Issues you or someone else raised'^at the public" hearing .described in this rittenVeo'rrelponderice delivered to the City ofnotice or in written* Carlsbad'at or prior ;|6 tt|e publie/hearing. Applicant: Development (Consultants Consortium Case: LFMP 20 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIE August 26 1988 19 19 19 19 alty of perjury that the foregoing is true and at Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of The ?6th CJ 5297: August 26,1988 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE m!>ff\nJm TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 W^HU^M (619)438-1161 0f (Earlabaii PLANNING DEPARTMENT August 23, 1988 Wallace Gavin Aitchison Elizabeth Rayhill Aitchison 6112 West 75th Place Los Angeles, CA 90045 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Aitchison: This is in response to your letter dated July 13, 1988 regarding the proposed circulation alignment of Poinsettia Lane through Zone 20. The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20 was heard by the Planning Commission on August 3, 1988 and is expected to be presented to the City Council on September 6, 1988. The Planning Commission is recommending that the plan be approved by the City Council. The plan addresses impacts of eleven public facilities affected by future development. An important element within Zone 20 is the circulation analysis. The Local Facilities Management Plan Guidelines requires a map showing proposed alignments of circulation element roadways within the zone. I would like to point out that the alignment presented within the zone plan is only a conceptual alignment for the purpose of addressing future circulation element roads. The zone plan does not set specific alignments of future roadways and in no way "locks in" the alignment as shown. The intent is to identify potential concerns or impacts relating to the proposed routes of future circulation element roadways and also to assist in computing cost estimates for the construction of the road. However, a specific alignment for Poinsettia Lane must be adopted to facilitate the construction of this roadway. This procedure would include environmental review and public meetings before the City Council and Planning Commission. As a property owner affected by the alignment of Poinsettia Lane, you will be notified by mail of the date and time of these public meetings. The City encourages impacted property owners to attend these hearings and present their concerns. This enables the City Engineer to determine an alignment which will provide a safe and efficient street system for the City as a whole. Wallace Gavin Aitchinson Elizabeth Rayhill Aitchinson August 23, 1988 j Page Two I Your letter will remain on file in the Engineering Department and, as soon as an alignment of Poinsettia Lane is ready for public input, you will be notified so that you may review this route in relation to your property. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 438- 1161. Sincerely, STEVEN Associate Civil Engineer SCJraf c: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer David Hauser, Assistant City Engineer Michael Holzmiller, Planning Director Charlie Grimm, Assistant Planning Director Philip Carter, Assistant to the City Manager Brian Hunter, Senior Planner JACK HENTHORN & ASSOCIATES 2892 Jefferson Street Carlsbad, Ca 92008 (619) 434-8416 August 4, 1988 City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, California 92009 Attn: Philip 0. Carter Subject: Financing Plan for Local Facilities Management Zone 20 The Zone 20 property owner group has begun to formulate a draft financing plan based upon the Local Facilities Management Plan as recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on August 3, 1988. I am working with P & D Technologies and David Taussig and Associates on the first draft of the plan. It is anticipated that the plan it will rely heavily on private funding of facilities. A draft plan will be available for your informal review around the middle of the month. After you recieve the plan I will contact you to arrange a convenient time to discuss the results of your review. On behalf of the property owners and consulting team we look forward to working with you on this final phase of the City's Growth Management Program. If you have any questions please contact me at your convenience at 434-8416. ck E. Henthorn JEHiwpc R. L. Roesch 690 WiUiiic FlJUX, L»ii •!tii!^»6TJC ^ A- \J *EVON GARDENS * 6525 El Camino Real Carlsbad, California 92008 *, (619) 931-8487 £^| Jul , C' City Council c/o Philip 0. Carter Assistant to the City Manager 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008-1989 Dear Councilpersons: I have just viewed a conception drawing of the proposed extension of Poinsettia Lane through Zone 20. I realize these drawings are only conception drawings, however I desire to put the city of Carlsbad on notice that I find a concern regarding my property. I hereby request an advance notice be sent to my attention at the above address regarding any meeting, any possible decision, or any other action that might involve my property, any adjacent property or the proposed extention of Poinsettia Lane through Zone 20, so that I may have an opportunity to respond in writing or in person to any possible decision to the construction of Poinsettia Lane through Zone 20. Sincerely, lonald C. McKinney cc:Philip 0. Carter, Assistant to the City Manager City Engineer City Planning Commission Jack Henthorn, Development Consultants Consortium DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS CONSORTIUM July 26, 1988 CITY OF CARLSBAD 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Subject: Planning Commission Public Hearing Zone 20 Local Facilities Management Plan - August 3, 1988 The Zone 20 Local Facilities Management Plan is scheduled for public hearing before the Planning Commission on August 3, 1988. I want to take this opportunity to thank you for your cooperation and input throughout this process. Your participation through telephone calls, attendance at property owner meetings and our individual meetings have contributed significantly to the quality of the Plan. Once the Plan is acted upon by the City Council in September you will be able to process various applications relating to your properties. This includes applications to have zoning designations applied to your properties in follow up to your annexation to the City of Carlsbad. The adoption of the Facilities Management Plan will set the stage so that you can again control the future of your property. Therefore it is very important for you to let the Planning Commission and City Council know that you support their adoption of the Zone 20 Local Facilities Management Plan. This can be done in person at the hearing on August 3, 1988, or in written form addressed to the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008. If you have any questions regarding this or any other matter related to the Zone 20 area, please contact me at your convenience. Thank you again for your interest and support over the past 18 months. Sincerely, /Jack E. Henthorn Principal Consultant /die 2892 JEFFERSON • P O BOX 2143 * CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA 920C8 • (619) 434-3135 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, August 3, 1988, to consider a Local Facilities Management Plan on property generally located south of Palomar Airport Road, east of Paseo del Norte, and north and west of the Pacific Rim Master Plan area and more particularly described as: Those portions of Sections 21, 22, and 28, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, and Rancho Agua Hedionda. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 438-1161. If you challenge the Local Facilities Management Plan in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: LFMP 20 APPLICANT: DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS CONSORTIUM PUBLISH: JULY 22, 1988 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION NOT TO SO Carlsbad Journal Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to North Coast Publishers, Inc corporate offices P O Box 878, Encmitas, CA 92024 (619) 753-6543 A'JJl Proof of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid, I am over the age of e'ghteen years, and not a party to or interested m the above entitled matter I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal a newspaper of general circulation, published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, pnnfed and published at regular intervals in the said City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next preceding the date of publication of the notice hereinafter referred to, and that the notice of" NOTICE: OF PUBLIC^EARING *--**"•- ,y, has been .__-__»_____________-______________ issue of said NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public n 11 he reof o n hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, August 3,1988, to consider a Local Facilities Management Plan on property generally located south of Palomar Airport Road, east of Paseo del Norte, and north And west of the Pacific Rim Master Plan area and more particularly described as: T " , i/ ._88 Those portions of Sections 21, 22, and 28, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, and Rancho Agua Hedionda. ' ' ' • > f f . £" Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 438-1161. \ 'x * If you challenge the Local Facilities Management Plan in court, you may be limited to raising only * those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing. Case File: LFMP 20 Applicant: DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS CONSORTIUM CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION CJ 5241: July 22,1988 19 19 19 19 ZONE 5 19 omgistrueand Diego, State of < of the Printer •• 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE •^/yW^B TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 Wr^OW (619)438-1161 X^7 COttu uf Ctolabafc PLANNING DEPARTMENT July 20, 1988 Dear Property Owner Local Facilities Management Zone 20: Enclosed is the "Notice of Public Hearing" for the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20. The Planning Commission public hearing date is August 3, 1988 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers located at 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad. The Plan is available for your review at the City library branches and the Community Development Office. Upon completion of the Planning Commission's review and recommendation, the Plan will be forwarded to the City Council for a public hearing at that level. After reviewing the Plan, if you have any questions regarding the process, do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, PHILIP O. CARTER Assistant to the City Manager BH:POC/af Enclosure .July 7, 1988 CARLSBAD CITY OF 1200 Elm Avenue CarlsbaJT, Subject: Updat DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS CONSORTIUM ZonTe-20s Local Facilities Management Plan and Notice of lew completed Flan During the past month w^f^e k£en working with the City to finalize the draft Local Facilities ManagementPLsn)that was presented at our last meeting. The Plan is now undergoing upper lev«l staff review. The Plan identifies the improvements necessary to serve the Zone through build out. The facilities that require special attention due to projected deficiencies are Parks and Circulation. In these two areas it may be necessary for developers to incur obligations beyond those normally associated with a specific project. Although mechanisms are identified in the Plan to address these items, a specific financing plan must be approved by the City Council before any development can take place within the Zone. The Zone 20 Plan is scheduled for Public Hearing before the Planning Commission on August 3, 1988, with City Council consideration scheduled to occur approximately one month later. I have scheduled a meeting for 7:00 p.m. on July 14, 1988 at the Olympic Resort located at the southwest corner,of the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real in Carlsbad. The purpose of the meeting is to explain the completed Plan. This is a very important opportunity for you to obtain information relating to proposed facility location, costs and timing. I urge you to attend if at all possible. If you are unable to attend the meeting and would like to review the Plan, a copy is available for use at our office located at 2892 Jefferson Street, Carlsbad. Please call (619) 434-3135 one day in advance to ensure that a copy will be available when you desire to review it. If you would like to purchase a copy of the Plan, they are available unbound (complete with appendices and mapping) at a cost of $125.00. I look forward to seeing you at the meeting on July 14, 1988. Sincerely, ick Henthorn 2892 JEFFERSON • P 0. BOX 2143 • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92003 • (619) 434^3135 STATE OF CALIFORNIA—OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH 1400 TENTH STREET SACRAMENTO, CA 958U Brian Hunter, City of Carlsbad 2975 Las Palmas Driye Carlsbad, CA 92009 •July 1, 1988 Subject: DearMr. Hunter; Carlsbad Local facility %mt Plan ;Zone 20 SCHI 88060106 The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named proposed Negative Declaration to selected state agencies for review^ The review period is closed and the comments of the individual agency (ies) is (are) enclosed. Also, on the enclosed Notice of Completion, the Clearinghouse has checked which agencies have commented. Please review the Notice of Completion to ensure that your comment package is complete. If the package is not in order, please notify the State Clearinghouse immediately. Your eight-digit State Clearinghouse number should be used so that we may respond promptly. Please note that recent legislation requires that a responsible agency or other public agency shall only make substantive comments on a project which are within the area of the agency's expertise or which relate to activities which that agency must carry out or approve. (AB 2583, Ch. 1514, Stats. 1984.) These comments are forwarded for your use in adopting your Negative Declaration. If you need more information~or clarification, we suggest you, contact the commenting agency at your earliest convenience. Please contact Keith Lee at 916/445-0613 if you have any questions regarding: the environmental review process. Sincerely, David C. Nunenkamp Chief Office of Permit Assistance cc: Resources Agency Enclosures •»•• Carlsbad Unified School District 801 Pine Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008-2439 729-9291 'Excellence In Education" BOARD OF TRUSTEES JOE ANGEL President JAMES McCORMICK Vice President JUUANNE L NYGAARD Clerk DONALD M JOHNSON Member J EDWARD SWITZER, JR Member DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION THOMAS K BRIERLEY.EdD Superintendent SUSAN-HARUMI BENTLEY Assistant Superintendent Instructional Services JOHN H BLAIR Assistant Superintendent Business Services GERALD C TARMAN Director Personnel Services DEWAYNE L FEASEL Manager Facilities/Maintenance/ Operations June 30, 1988 Mr. Mike Holtzmiller City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009-4859 Subject: Review of Local Facilities Management Zones Frequently, Carlsbad Unified School District is requested by the Planning Department to review individual Zone Plans to determine whether we can meet schools facilities needs, and at present, the District is holding requests concerning Zones 8, 20, and 22 for review. However, reviewing zones one by one results in a piecemeal approach towards school requirements and has not proven satisfactory, particularly in view of the way they are being evaluated one by one. We are attempting to deal with pieces of the picture, rather than the entire picture. I would suggest that, as a minimum, we must examine quadrants, rather than zones, to get a larger, more accurate picture of schools facilities needs. Looking at each zone as a single entity seems to ignore the total impact. Sincerely, H. Blair stant Superintendent iness Services JHB:njg c: Brian Hunter, Assoc. Planner/ Distinguished School Board Award 1984, United States Department of Education June 30, 1988 City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad, California 92009 Attn: Steve Jantz Subject: Poinsettia Lane line and grade study Enclosed is a print of the alternate alignment study for Poinsettia. It is overlaid on the original to show the property owners in the area that the proposed alignment has moved northerly (away from the tanks). Grading and stationing were changed to reflect the alternate alignment so that there is no misunderstanding as to what is being proposed. Please advise. encl JEH:wpc June 30, 1988 Jack Henthorn 2892 Jefferson Carlsbad, _ Calif . 108 City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad, California 92009 Attn: Steve Jantz Subject: Zone 20 circulation estimates improvement cost Enclosed is the first cut at the cost estimates and timing for the Zone 20 circulation improvements. I have used the estimates in the Barton Aschman study, the City Capital Improvement Program and discussions with Steve Sasaki as the basis for estimates. I have annotated each improvement at the left margin to assist you in your review. I will have Hofman Planning Associates produce the financing matrices as soon as I recieve your comments. Lncerely, ack E. Henthorn encl JEH:wpc June 30, 1988 Jack Henthorn 2892 Jefferson Carlsbad, Ca. City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad, California 92009 Attn: Steve Jantz Subject: Transmittal of traffic circulation Zone 20 Local Facilities Management Plan Transmitted herewith are 15 Copies of the Circulation section of the Zone 20 Plan. The cost estimates and dates of completion for the proposed improvements are not included. This information will be transmitted this afternoon for your review. Please call if you have any questions. icerely, encl JEH:wpc ack E. Henthorn 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE • orwJll TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 VHDV (619> 438-1161 a*ttu of PLANNING DEPARTMENT June 29, 1988 John Blair Carlsbad Unified School District 801 Pine Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Mr. Blair: Enclosed for your information is the Zone 20 Local Facilities Management Plan school section. As there was no response from your agency to our correspondence of May 12, 1988, the text is similar to the information sent on that date. The plan is tentatively scheduled for public hearing on August 3, 1988. You will be receiving on or about July 20, 1988 a complete copy of the plan. Sincerely, BRIAN HUNTER Associate Planner BH:af Enclosure c: Phil Carter, Assistant to the City Manager Dr. Thomas K. Brierly, Superintendent 9 Jack Henthorn 2892 Jefferson St. Carlsbad, California 92008 June 29, 1L988 City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad, California 92009 Attn: Steve Jantz Subject: Transmittal of updated traffic phasing and geometric data Wes Pringle has provided the attached data for use in preparing the traffic circulation section of the Zone 20 LFMP. I have incorporated it into the revised section along with information contained in the response to your initial questions. In addition I have incorporated information provided verbally by Steve Sasaki. The up dated version should be in your office between 10:00 and 11:00 A. M.. After your review we will construct an adddendum containing the back up information for inclusion in the appendices along with the traffic analysis. If you have any questions please call. If I am not in, you can reach me by calling my pager number, 480 - 5377. ncerely, E. Henthorn 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE • orWJtfl TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 WH * JrM (619)438-1161 PLANNING DEPARTMENT June 29, 1988 Robert J. Greaney Costa Real Municipal Water District 5950 El Camino Real Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Mr. Greaney: Enclosed for your information is the Zone 20 Local Facilities Management Plan water section which has incorporated your agency's comments. Thank you for the time and effort that has been expended upon this plan. It is tentatively scheduled for the August 3, 1988 Planning Commission meeting. Prior to that date (approximately July 20, 1988) you will receive a complete copy of the Zone 20 Plan. Sincerely, BRIAN HUNTER ASSOCIATE PLANNER BH:af c: Steven Jantz, Associate Civil Engineer 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE •^^WJlB TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 lljfMtrjB (619)438-1161 Otttg of (Earlabafc PLANNING DEPARTMENT June 28, 1988 DEAR PROPERTY OWNER LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 20: The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20 is tentatively scheduled for public hearing before the Planning Commission on August 3, 1988. A copy of the plan is available for review during regular working hours at the Community Development Building, 2075 Las Palmas Drive. Sincerely, ^/ At^far~—^Xt^JjuJO^ BRIAN HUNTER Associate Planner BH:af c: Phil Carter, Assistant to the City Manager Steven Jantz, Associate Civil Engineer DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS CONSORTIUM June 21, 1988- City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad, California 92009 Attn: Philip 0. Carter Subject: Transmittal ot revised Zone 20 Local Facilities Management Plan Transmitted herewith are 15 copies of the Zone 20 LFMP. The transmittal does not include the circulation sections of the documents. These sections will be revised and transmitted following today's review of the updated dated requested.of the project traffic consultant, Weston Pringle & Associates. If you have any questions please call me at 434 - 3135. Sincerrely, //Jack E. Henthorn encl JEH:wpc 2892 JEFFERSON • P Q. BOX 2143 • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 • (619) 434-3135 MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: RE: JUNE 27, 1988 RAY PATCHETT - CITY MANAGER VINCE BIONDO - CITY ATTORNEY MARTY ORENYAK - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR FRANK MANNEN - ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER JIM ELLIOTT - FINANCE DIRECTOR MICHAEL HOLZMILLER - PLANNING DIRECTOR LLOYD HUBBS - CITY ENGINEER CHARLIE GRIMM - ASSISTANT PLANNING DIRECTOR DAVE HAUSER - ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER PHIL CARTER - ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER LFMP ZONE 20 The Zone 20 Local Facilities Management Plan is tentatively scheduled for Planning Commission on August 3, 1988. Your review and comment upon the attached document is required by July 7, 1988, at which date a 2 p.m. meeting in the Planning Conference Room has been scheduled by the Growth Management Division to answer any questions you might have regarding the plan. The circulation section is not included and will be forwarded to you as soon as it is available. POC:BH/af Attachment June 27, 1988 Jack Hei 2892 Jef: Carlsbad, )08 city of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad, California 92009 Attn: Steve Jantz Subject: Transmittal of response to questions regarding Circulation study for Zone 20 LFMP Enclosed is the response from Pringle's office regarding your questions from last week. Please review them and let me know if they are adequate. (I have also enclosed a copy of my transcribed notes from our meeting of 6/21/88.) I have recieved the revised improvement phasing based on a combination of arterial phasing and projected demand level. My notes are being transcribed at this time and I anticipate having the information to you by @ 3:00 today. If you have any questions please call. incerely, / ?/5fe£ Jack E. Henthorn(/ encl JEH:wpc w Q L 1 ^^ Weston Pringle & Associates „ ,AftA TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERINGJune 27, 1988 Mr. Jack Henthorn Development Consultants Consortium P.O. Box 2143 . Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Mr. Henthorn: Please find below responses to the City of Carlsbad staff questions which were raised 1n your June 21, 1988 meeting. PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD (East and West) Based on discussions with Steve Jantz {City of Carlsbad) and Jack Henthorn (D.C.C.) the questions regarding Palomar Airport Road have been addressed 1n the traffic study. ALGA & EL CAMINO REAL* Based on the ICU analyses no intersection improvements at Alga/El Camino are needed unltl year 2010. If the Intersection improvements are implemented during the Intervening years (1990, 1995 and 2000) as shown in the traffic study, then the buHdout Impacts will be mitigated prior to their occurance. The over capacity condition occurs at year 2010, when the SANDAG numbers are used in the analyses. PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD & PASEO DEL NORTE* In the ICU analyses the year 1995 over capacity condition was shown to be mitigated by the year 1990 improvements. It is estimated the Palomar/ Paseo Del Norte Intersection will actually need the improvements in the year 1992. * It should be remembered that the ICU analyses are based on the roadway connections shown in the City Arterial Phasing Plan but not necessarily the given roadway widths. This approach was determined to yield City Staff with the most Information given the current analysis methodology and time constraints 2651 East Chapman Avenue • Suite HO • Fullcrion, California 92631 • (714) 871-2931 -2- PASEO DEL NORTE & PQINSETTIA The Barton Ashman study used their own mode! rather than SANDAG volumes to arrive at bulldout volumes. There are significant differences 1n the volumes. In addition, the bulldout lane geometries are different as shown below. LANES NL WP&A 2 B/A 1 VOLUMES NT 1 1 NR 1 0 SL 1 - 1 ST 1 1 SR 1 1 EL 1 1 ET 3 3 ER 1 0 ML 1 1 WT 3 3 WR 1 1 AM: WP&A 361 100 260 195 100 270 205 1566 329 145 1221 195 B/A 167 7 58 56 8 246 49 1441 107 8 2248 25 PM: WP&A 410 160 230 230 170 300 320 1500 440 270 1530 260 B/A 143 14 12 46 15 177 236 2737 187 35 1752 40 EL CAMINO REAL & PALQMAR AIRPORT ROAD Based on the ICU analyses no Intersection Improvements are required at El Camino/Palomar unit! year 2010. Year 2010 Is when the SANDAG volumes are utilized, which triggers the need for the intersection Improvements. The year 2010 intersection geometries are shown 1n the report on Table 11 and in the ICU worksheet under the column "Geometries" "2010 lanes". PQINSETTIA LANE (Pacific Rim to College) The projected buildout daily volume for Polnsettia between Pacific R1m and College 1s 33,950 vehicles per day. Therefore with a year 2010, four lane roadway, with a 44,450 vehicle per day capacity a 0.76 V/C raio results. This indicates acceptable LOS C operations. -3- POINSETTIA (College to El Camino) Based on SANDAG year 2010 project volumes the Polnsettia roadway section between College and £1 Camlno is projected to operate with a 0.37 V/C ratio at LOS A assuming a four lane roadway. If a two lane roadway is provided a 0.73 V/C ratio at LOS C will result which also indicates acceptable operations. A separate analysis of Polnsettia from College to , El Camlno has been provided 1n the traffic study. EL CAMINO REAL (Palomar Airport Road to Alga) Less than 20 percent of the project traffic is expected to utilize El Camino Real between Palomar and Alga. If College Boulevard is connected between Palomar and Poinsettia then a very limited percentage of project traffic will utilize this section of roadway. The City expressed concern that 20 percent of project traffic may use El Camlno (Palomar to Alga) prior to the connection of College between Palomar and Poinsettia, It was projected that 20 percent of the north half traffic would utilize this section of El Camino, however, only 8 percent of the south half traffic was distributed to this segment. Therefore, the resulting total project traffic impacting this segment of El Camlno is less than 20 percent. The south hlaf distribution accounted for the Caminito De Las Ondas connection to Paseo Del Norte. This route is expected to serve the majority of the south half project traffic with a destination to the north. As a safety measure this segment of El Camino Real was analyzed assuming 20 percent of project traffic Impated this segment. Year 1994 was choosen for analysis, because in 1995 the connection of College between Palomar and Poinsettia will be provided and the percentage of project traffic ultllzlng El Camino (Palomar to Alga) will be reduced significantly. The year 1994 volume is projected at 18,430 vehicles per day. The 44,450 vehicle per day capacity gives a V/C ratio of 0.41 at LOS A. -4- We hope these responses will be of assistance to you and the City of Cars! bad Staff. Sincerely, Steven S. Sasaki SSS:hld June 21, 1988 1:30 P.M to 3:00 P.M., Notes from meeting with City regarding Circulation Steve Jantz, Phil Carter Brian Hunter -PALOMAR AIRPORT East and west Does LOS reflect improvements and geometries subsequent to the Completion of the B/A study? This would increase fail date to buildout from 1997. Identify the year that "E" level is anticipated. Provide footnote that indicates the year "E" failure is reached. What are improvements that increase LOS at Build out. -ALGA & EL CAMINO REAL What is mitigation at build out? What year is level "E" reached? -PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD & PASEO DEL NORTE What is mitigation at 1995? Geometrices do not reflect additional improvements. Why does LOS improve? -PASEO DEL NORTE & POINSETTIA Why is there a variation with the Barton Aschman report designation of FF? What improvements are proposed? -POINSETTIA BRIDGE & 1-5 Footnote 3 mitigate by bridge widening in 1992. take care of in text similar to Pac. Rim & Poinsettia -EL CAMINO & PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD Identify the "E" year. Specify the mitigation proposed -PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD & 1-5 Show existing as is,, show 1990 "D", use Bouman wording on signal in issues ROAD SEGMENTS -POINSETTIA LANE (1-5 to Pacific Rim ) Assume bridge widened by 1995. NOTE should refer to issues section Page - 1 -POINSETTIA LANE (Pacific Rim to College) Check build out level ,and explain -POINSETTIA LANE (College to El Camino ) Check level of service at build out -EL CAMINO REAL (Palomar Airport Road to Alga) Why was this left out? Page - 2 DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS CONSORTIUM June 20, 1988 City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad/ California 92009 Attn: Philip 0. Carter Subject: Transmittal of Executive Summary section of Zone 20 Local Facilities Management Plan Enclosed please find the revised Executive Summary for the Zone 20 LFMP. I have cited Parks and Circulation as the facilities currently not meeting the performance standard. Please call if you have questions or need revisions. Thank You. Sincerely, JEH:wpc encl 2892 JEFFERSON • P O BOX 2143 • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 • (619) 434-3135 Siiiiirbf California Memorandum ^^unijness, Transportation and Housing Agency To . STATE CLEARINGHOUSE ATTENTION KEITH LEE Date File No June 20, 1988 ll-SD-005 '~ R046.2 (City of Carlsbad) From District 11 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Subject. LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 20, 88060106 Caltrans District 11 comments on the subject Negative Declaration are as follows: The Local Facilities Management Plan should address the need for a park-and-ride facility. If a suitable site is acquired by the City of Carlsbad, and it is made available to our agency at no cost to the State, we would be willing to recommend the development and maintenance of the park-and-ride facility at State expense. Our contact person for park-and-ride information is Manuel Demetre, Chief, Regional Ridesharing Branch, (619)237-POOL. JAMES T. CHESHIRE Chief Environmental Planning Branch M0:yg Jack E. Henthorn 2892 Jefferson Carlsbad, June 19, 1988 City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad, California 92009 Attn: Philip 0. Carter Subject: Update on status of Zone 20 Local Facilities Management Plan Enclosed is a copy of data provided to Steve Jantz. It was compiled directly from the geometries charts in the latest traffic analysis document. I am cross checking adopted zone plans and other City documents to provide cost estimates and projected completion dates. In addition, the executive summary draft will be delivered to you by noon today . If you have any questions please call at your convenience. ack E. Henthorn JEH:wpc encl Page - 1 DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS CONSORTIUM June 14, 1988 City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad, California 92009 Attn: Philip 0. Carter Subject: Transmittal of revised sections of Zone 20 Local Facilities Management Plan Enclosed please find six (6) copies of the Zone 20 Plan revised as per the comments offfered during our review of the plan on June 9, 1988. Specific standard form financing matrices are being prepared for each section in conjunction with the financing section of the plan. If you have questions, please contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, JACK E. HENTHORN Principal Consultant Zone 20 JEHrwpc encl 2892 JEFFERSON • P O BOX 2143 • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 • (619) 434-3135 DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS CONSORTIUM June 8, 1988 City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad, California 92009 Attn: Philip 0. Carter Subject: Transmittal of Traffic Analysis updated as per comments from our meeting of May 10, 1988 As requested in your letter of June 2, 1988, I am transmitting three (3) copies of the traffic analysis as completed and updated by Weston Pringle and Associates. This document contains all technical data currently being used in finalizing the Circulation/Financing sections of_ the Local Facilities Management Plan. If you have .any questions or need additional information please call me at 434-3135. Thank you. Incerely, E. HENTHORN ''Principal Consultant Zone 20 JEH:wpc c: Property Owners Brian Hunter Steve Jantz 2892 JEFFERSON • P O BOX 2143 • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 • (619) 434-3135 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE •oKW-jB TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 W'HwJrM (619)438-1161 City o! Cartebab COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT June 2, 1988 * Jack Henthorn Development Consultants Consortium 2892 Jefferson P. O. Box 2143 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Jack: I received your resubmittal at 4:00 p.m. on June 1, 1988. Again, those sections resubmitted for review did not include the resubmittal date as requested. Today, I received one date stamped section — in the future all sections should be date stamped. I need to emphasize the importance of getting your Circulation section back in for review. I would suggest while you are working on Finance that we should be reviewing the technical data from the Circulation Study. If staff does not coincur with the technical information then the section will need to be revised along with the finance portion. You as well as the Zone 20 property owners should be reminded that we are on an extremely tight schedule. Please be sure as your finance section is put together that it addresses all facilities not just circulation. If possible, please return the Circulation and Sewer sections prior to June 8th. If you have any questions, please call me at 438-1161. Sincerely, PHILIP 0. CARTER Growth Management Manager bjn c: Property Owners Brian Hunter Steve Jantz 9 »Carlsbad Journal Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to North Coast Publishers, Inc corporate offices P O Box 878, Encmitas, CA 92024 (619) 753-6543 Proof of Publication 1IFORNIA, ss COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, I am a ci'tizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid, I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal a newspaper of general circulation, published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the said City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, fora period exceeding one year next preceding the date of publication of the notice hereinafter referred to, and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCA ' newspaper and not i n any supplement thereof on TION College Xvenue and Pomset-' the following dates, tO-Wlt tia AvemiPinJersection and sur- ( NEGATIVE DECLARATION roundin LocalcaFacilities Matiagement Plan Zone clvguara'nte•--HS.-.r-Mffisp*}1™1" rl?" ione 20 which.guarantees the adequacy of public facilities concurrent with development to' adopted perfor- mance standards The City of Carlsbad has con- ducted an environmental review of the above described project pur- . suant to the Guidelines for Imple- mentation of the California Envi- ronmental Quality Act and the En- vironmental-Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad As a result of said review, a Negative Declara- tion (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment), is hereby issued for thesubject project Justi- fication for this action is on file in •opy ofith§§^^t|^^^Wa'ith sup -«v/J5*lSs IPa^mas%rive,ij|trlsbad, California 92009 Comments from the,.public are invited Please sub- ! mit comments' in writmjfito the ;. Planning Department within ten (10) days of date of issuance-;. I Dated June 1,1988 1ffl* Case No LFMP20 Applicant, Development Consul- tants Consortium ! MICHAEL J HOLZMILLER Planning Director CJ 3942 June 1,1988 June 1 1 9, 88 19 19 19 19 I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct Executed at Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California on The .1st day of Clerk of the Printer #202-2M-12/87 Mail/to state Clearinghouse, 1400 Tenth Street, em. 121, Sacramento, CA 95814 -- 916/445-0613 NOTICE Of COMPLETION AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT FORM 1 Project Title Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 20 2 Lead Agency: City of Carlsbad 1LO 3a. Street Address: 2075 Las Palmes Or. San 01ego . 3d. Zip*3c County PROJECT LOCATION 4 County: San Piano 3. Contact Person. Brian Hunter 3b. City: 92009 Carlsbad 3e. Phone: C619) 438-1161 . 4a City/Community: Carlsbad 4b (optional) Assessor's Parcel No. Sa. Cross Streets:Colleqe/Poinsettia . 4c. Section: Tup- For Rural, . 5b Nearest Communfty: . Range 6. uf_thjn 2 miles of: a._State_Hny_Np.b. Airports, Palomar/MeCellan-e. Waterways — Pacific ocean DOCUMENT TYPE 8. LOCAL ACTION TYPE 10. DEVELOPMENT TYPE CEQA 01 HOP 02 Early Cons 03 J!_ Neg Dec 04 Draft EIR 05 Supplement/ Subsequent EIR (If so, prior SCH * ) ME PA 06 Notice of Intent 07 Envlr. Assessment/ FONS1 08 Draft EIS 9.LHER 09 Information Only 10 Final Document 11 Other 01 General Plan Update 01 Residential! Units Acres 02 New Element 02 Office: Sq. ft. __________ 03 General Plan Amendment Acres Employee. , _ 04 Master Plan 05 __ Annexation 06 Specific Plan 07 __ Redevelopment 08 __ Reione 09 Land Division 03 Shopping/Commercial: Sq.ft. Acres Employees , 04 Industrial- Sq. ft. 05 _ 06 _ (Subdivision, Parcel Map Tract Map, etc ) 07 Transportation 10 Use Permit 11 Cancel Ag Preserve 09 Power Generation: 12 X Other Local facilities Type: Management Plan 08 Mineral Extract 10 X Other: Local facilities Management Plan 9 TOTAL ACRES-764.2 11. PROJECT ISSUES DISCUSSED 111 DOCUMENT 01 Aesthetic/Visual 08 Geologic/Seismic 15 _g_ Sever Capacity 02 Agricultural Lend 09 Jobs/Housing Balance 16 Soil Erosion 03 Air Quality 10 Minerals 17 Solid Waste 04 Archaeological/Historical 11 Noise 18 Toxle/Haiardous 22 X Uater Supply 23 Wetland/Riparian 2* UUdllfe 35 __ Growth Inducing 05 06 07 Coastal fire Hazard f loodlng/Oralnage 12 * Public Services 13 X Schools 14 Septic Systems 19 X Traffic/Circulation 26 Incompatible landuse 20 Vegetation 27 __ Cumulative Effects 21 Water Buality 28 Otfcw Federal »State t •0-Total •0-1? FUND I MO (approx ) 13 PRESENT LAND USE AND ZON1MG: Present land use is agricultural, open space, and single family. Zoning Is single and multiple density residential, planned community, open space, and United control. 14 PROJECT OESCHmiOlt Project ts a Local Facilities Management Plan which guarantees the adequacy of public facilities concurrent with development to adopted performance standards. Facilities Include City Adulnlstretfon, libraries, fire, parks, open space, *e^ool»iJ^*l..J|«21^'_-fctL™SSJ^--l^5-i-l*-??- __ f~ ______ ' ___ CLEARINGHOUSE CONTACT: KEITH LEE 916-115-0613 W/C N/C ResourcesX . ?Jf: jp - /.___- WSTATE REVIEW BEGAN PEFT REV TO AGENCY- AGENCY REV TO SCH' & - SCH COMPLIANCE AQMD/APCD:_22- (Resoupces: (o ly W/C N/C oRWQCQii' a Censer-vat ion • Fish & Game estry lamatiorr oParks & Rec/OKP •••Please return this fora with any oCoastal Comr Comm ,e Lands Waste !es Cntl Bd Qual (i)TH) Rts (3RD) Wcr (2ND) ier: ing & Devel Health & Ag ic Works ictlons >ral Servs (Schools) ita !*i Wtns Rvr Ed Rgl Plan tal Consv - OPR .1 - OPR DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS CONSORTIUM May 31, 1988 City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 Attn: Philip 0. Carter Subject: Transmittal of updated sections of Zone 20 Local Facilities Management Plan Transmitted herewith are six (6) copies of all sections of the Zone 20 LFMP with the exception of the following: —Executive Summary —Circulation Facilities —Sewer Facilities Please replace the existing sections with the updated sections transmitted via this cover. The entire format of the document has been changed to reflect the Zone 11/12 format. All comments recievied during our May 4, 1988 and May 12, 1988 meetings have been taken into consideration in these revised sections. In addition, all calculations and analyses have been revised to reflect the updated residential phasing data contained in your correspondence dated May 19, 1988. The graphics component of the Plan has been revised extensively. In the interest of time I am transmitting the most complete generation available at this time. I anticipate presentation quality materials for replacement purposes on June 8, 1988. Sewer information fromc£he City's consultant is now being incorporated into the sewer section. I anticipate that this section will be submitted on June 6, 1988. Circulation is proceeding with the financing analysis. A meeting is tentatively scheduled with D. Taussig, of D. Taussig and Associates, on June 3, 1988. I anticipate that this section will be submitted not later than June 8, 1988. 2892"JEFFERSON • P O BOX 2143 • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 • (619) 434-3135 I anticipate leaving the Executive Summary section until all issues have been resolved to insure that it actually reflects the content of the final version of the document. If you have any questions or need additional information please contact me at your convenience. Sincerel /Jack Henthorn Principal Consultant JEHrwpc cc: S. Jantz B. Hunter Zone 20 Property owners 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989 Office of the City Manager 1C f TELEPHONE ( ^ T6191 <19) 434-2821 Citg of Otartstrnd May 27, 1988 THE INFORMATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL/ CITY MANAGER Harrison E. Bull, Esq. Harrison E. Bull and Associates 16 West Mission Street, Suite V Santa Barbara, CA 93101 Dear Mr. Bull: This letter is in response to your letter of May 18, 1988. In your letter you expressed concerns regarding discussions by the Parks and Recreation Commission of your client, Mr. Sherman's, property in Carlsbad. At its May 16, 1988 meeting, the Parks and Recreation Commission requested an update as to progress toward acquiring park land in this area of the City. The action before the Commission at that evening was simply an informational item and nothing more. City staff has initiated action to obtain appraisal information on your client's property, and if and when a decision is made to make an offer on this property, you and your client will be notified in accordance with the requirements of State law. You will also be notified of any required hearings regarding acquisition of the property. If you have any further questions regarding the City's property acquisition procedures, please contact Mr. Vincent Biondo, our City Attorney. Thank you for your letter. Sincerely, FRANK MANNEN Assistant City Manager saf c: City Manager City Attorney Community Development Director Planning Director Parks and Recreation Director Municipal Projects Manager Y^ HARRISOM E. BULL AND ASSOCIATES ATTORNEYS AT LAW Telephone (Area Code 805) 5692223 Harrison E Bull Martin P Cohn Write or Wire 16 West Mission Street, Suite V Santa Barbara, California 93101 May 18, 1988 Mr. Ray Patchett, City Manager Mr. Frank Mannen, Asst. City Manager Mr. Vincent Biondo, City Attorney Mr. Martin Orenyak, Community Services Director Mr. Michael Holzmiller, Planning Director Mr. David Bradstreet, Parks Director City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Re: Sherman Property Assessor's Parcel No. 214-140-13 Gentlemen: This letter comes to you concerning the Park and Recre- ation Commission meeting which was held on Monday, May 16, 1988, at 5:00 p.m. in the City Council chambers in the City of Carlsbad. As I understand it, the primary agenda matter at this meeting was the above-referenced property. At that meeting, Mr. Sherman's real estate advisor, Bev Southers, was present and delivered her position statement on this particular property. What is of concern to this office is that all five members of the Commission made inquiry of Ms. Southers as to why no one had represented this property at earlier meetings of the Commission. Her response was simply that she had not been notified. Members of the Parks and Recreation Commission indicated to Ms. Southers that there had been numerous meetings on the Sherman Property and that they simply felt that the owner was not particu- larly interested with regard to how his property would be treated by the City. The fact that we have not been notified of these previous meetings is particularly puzzling to me since, on November 19, 1987, I wrote every addressee to this letter and indicated that Mr. Sherman was interested in the Park recommendation for imminent domain action, was intending to resist any such attempt and that we ^ V HARRISON E. BULL AND AOCIATES ATTORNEYS AT LAW Mr. Ray Patchett, et al May 18, 1988 Page Two were to be notified of any hearings or meetings concerning his property. Therefore, since November 19, 1987, the City has had full notice of Mr. Sherman's desire to be notified of any hearings and further, of his intent to resist imminent domain proceedings, and yet he was not notified. I believe that both due process and reasonable government- al protocol would require notice given to Mr. Sherman of any and all meetings and/or hearings concerning his property. I enclose herewith for your review a copy of my November 19, 1987 letter, and as you can see, I have carbon copied members of the Commission as well. Kindest regards, HARRISON E. BULL AND ASSOCIATES HARRISON E. BULL Attorney at Law HEBtpf encl cc David Casner Shirley Dalquist Barbara Donovan Anthony Lawson Marjorie Morrison James Popov ich Kim Welch Bev Souther s Joseph Sherman HARRISON E. BULL AND ASSOCIATES Telephone (Area Code 805) 5692223 ATTORNEYS AT LAW Harrison E Bull Martin P Cohn Write or Wire 16 West Mission Street. Suite V Sanla Barbara, California 93101 November 19, 1987 Mr. Ray Patchett, City Manager Frank Mannen, Asst. City Manager Vince Biondo, City Attorney Marty Orenyak, Community Services Director Mike Holzmiller, Planning Director City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Re: Sherman Property Assessor's Parcel No. 214-140-13 Gentlemen: This letter is to advise you that this office will be representing Mr. Joseph Sherman with regard to his ownership of the above-reterenced real property. As I understand the situation as it now exists, there is a Parks recommendation for emminent domain proceedings to be taken against Mr. Sherman's property, although the extent to which that recommendation has been acted upon is unknown at this time to us. The purpose of this letter is to introduce this firm to you and to indicate to you that we will, in fact, be representing Mr. Sherman in this matter and to advise you that he will resist any emminent domain action. I would appreciate it very much if you would advise the undersigned of any calendaring agenda concerning this matter so that Mr. Sherman may be properly represented at any future hearings, meetings, or conferences where this subject is discussed. Also, should you be sending out any notices, correspondence or service of process, I would appreciate copies being sent to our offices. * HARRISON E. BULL AND ASSOCIATES ATTORNEYS AT LAW November 19, 1987 Mr. Ray Patchett, et al Page Two Thank you very much for your courtesy and cooperation. Kindest regards, HARR/S/JN E. BULL HEB:p£ cc: Joseph Sherman Beverly Southers HARRISON E. ttbrney at CIATES HARRISON E. BULL AND ASSOCIATES Telephone (Area Code 805) 569 2223 ATTORNEYS AT LAW Harrison E Bull Martin P Cohn Write or Wire 16 West Mission Street, Suite V Santa Barbara, California 93101 November 19, 1987 Mr. David Bradstreet Parks Director Parks & Recreation Dept. City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-1989 Re: Sherman Property; APN #214-140-13 Dear Mr. Bradstreet: Please be advised that this office will be representing Mr. Joseph Sherman in regard to his ownership of the above-referenced real property and in particular with regard to the City's interest therein. As I understand the status of the situation, there is currently a recommendation of the Parks Department to the City Council to commence emminent domain process. Mr. Sherman has indicated to me that he will resist such an emminent domain process, and to that end he has asked our assistance. I am writing to you and others in City government advising them of the fact that we will be representing Mr. Sherman in this process, and I would appreciate further corres- pondence concerning this subject to be sent to this office, as well as notices of meetings and/or agenda items where this subject will be discussed. It is my understanding that within the past few days, there was a meeting with Parks concerning this particular project., I would appreciate very much if you would advise me as to what the nature of the meeting was and what determinations, if any, were made. I HARRISON E. BULL AND ASSOCIATES ATTORNEYS AT LAW November 19, 1987 Mr. David Bradstreet Page Two Thank you very much for your courtesy and cooperation. Kindest regards, HARH&36N E. BULL MS-ASSOClATES HEB:pf cc: Joseph Sherman Beverly Southers ARRISON E. BtfLL orney at iaw 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE »*£!$/ ciM TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 Wgi^m (619)438-1161 ^jg^ (Titu of Qlarlsbab PLANNING DEPARTMENT NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: .College Avenue and Poinsettia Avenue intersection and surrounding 760 acres. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 20 which guarantees the adequacy of public facilities concurrent with development to adopted performance standards. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within ten (10) days of date of issuance. DATED: May37 /, 1988 ^ MICHAElTtT. HdLfcMILLER CASE NO: LFMP 20 Planning Director APPLICANT: Development Consultants Consortium PUBLISH DATE: May .~27Jf 1988 BH:af EXHIBIT "PIP ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II (TO BE COMPETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO. LFMP 20 DATE: 5/19/88 I. 1. 2. 3. II. BACKGROUND APPLICANT:Consultants Consortium ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT:P.O. BOX 2143 Carlsbad. CA 92008 (6191 434-3135 November 24. 1987DATE CHECK LIST SUBMITTED: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all Affirmative Answers are to be written under Section III - Discussion of Environmental Evaluation) YES MAYBE NO 1. Earth - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering of modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel or a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet ot lake? X X X X MAYBE NO 2. Air. - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? X_ c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally Or regionally? X_ 3. Water - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X_ b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patters, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X_ e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X_ f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X_ -2- YES MAYBE NO 4. Plant Life - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? X_ c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? x d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X_ 5. Animal Life - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? X c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X_ d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. Noise - Will the proposal significantly increase existing noise levels? X_ 7. Light and Glare - Will the proposal sig- nificantly produce new light or glare? X_ 8. Land Use - Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X_ i -3- YES MAYBE NO 9. Natural Resources - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X b. Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X 10. Risk of Upset - Does the proposal involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X 11. Population - Will the proposal signif- icantly alter the location, distribu- tion, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X 12. Housing - Will the proposal signif- icantly affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X_ 13. Transportation/Circulation - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? X_ b. Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new parking? X_ c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? X_ d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X_ e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X_ f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X_ -4- YES MAYBE NO 14. Public Services - Will the proposal have a significant effect upon, or have signif- icant results in the need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? X_ b. Police protection? X_ c. Schools? X_ d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X_ f. Other governmental services? X_ 15. Energy - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X_ b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X_ 16. Utilities - Will the proposal have significant results in the need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? X_ b. Communications systems? X_ c. Water? X_ d. Sewer or septic tanks? X_ e. Storm water drainage? X_ f. Solid waste and disposal? X_ 17. Human Health - Will the proposal have significant results in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X_ -5- MAYBE NO 18. Aesthetics - Will the proposal have significant results in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in creation of an aesthetically offensive public view? 19. Recreation - Will the proposal have significant results in the impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Archeoloqical/Historical - Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? X 21. Analyze viable alternatives to the proposed project such as: a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs, c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site, e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alter- nate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative. a) The project is a public facility information and planning study. Phased planning will not efficiently or adequately address the need for public facilities. b) The project is a public facility information and planning study. c) The project is a public facility information and planning study. d) Uses for the area covered by the plan are based on the existing General Plan e) The plan considers phased development. f) The project is a public facility information and planning study. g) As the project is a public facility information and planning study the no project alternative would not assure adequate public facilities to meet demand. The no project alternative would therefore cause the most detriment. -6- YES MAYBE NO 22. Mandatory findings of significance - a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, or curtail the diversity in the environment? X b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) X_ c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X_ III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20 is a facilities planning document. The intent of the plan is to establish parameters and thresholds that assure public facilities are available when needed as determined by the City's adopted performance standards. To accomplish this purpose occasionally locations and costs of public facility improvements are estimated for informational purposes. These estimates may result in increased development fees. Traditionally the developer in maximizing their capital return passes such fees on to the home buyer or tenant. This results in higher priced housing which affects the availability of low and moderate income housing. However, as real estate value is determined primarily by location, without other market incentives, it is unreasonable to assume the subject property would be developed with either low or moderate income housing due to its view proximity to the Pacific Ocean. -7- DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Continued) It is not the development fee that will force low and moderate income families into other communities, but the existing nature of the market place. It is recognized that CEQA review for these public facilities estimates is general, and does not satisfy CEQA requirements for the specific project. The Zone 20 Local Facilities Management Plan requires complete CEQA review prior to initialization of any public or private project discussed in the Local Facilities Management Plan. -8- IV. DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department) On the basis of this initial evaluation: .1 find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. .1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed. _I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. May 19. 1988 Date Signature Date Planning^ Director V. MITIGATING MEASURES (If Applicable) -9- Mail to: State Clearinghouse, 14003TCnth^ff<reet, Rm. 121, Sacramento, CA 958T4 -- 916/445-0613t •587? -- 916/ NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT FORM | See NOTE Below: j I SCH f | 1. Project Title local Facilities Management Plan Zone 20 2. Lead Agency: City of Carlsbad 3a. Street Address: 2075 Las PaImas Dr. 3. Contact Person; Brian Hunter 3b. City: Carlsbad 3c. County: San Diego 3d. Zip: 92009 3e. Phone: (619) 438-1161 PROJECT LOCATION 4. County: San Diego 4a. City/Community: Carlsbad 4b.(optional) Assessor's Parcel No.4c. Section:Twp.Range For Rural, 5a. Cross Streets: College/Poinsettia 5b. Nearest Community: 6. Within 2 miles of: a. State Hwy No. 1-5 b. Airports Palomar/McCellan c. Waterways Pacific Ocean 7. DOCUMENT TYPE 8. LOCAL ACTION TYPE 10. DEVELOPMENT TYPE CEQA 01 NOP 02 Early Cons 03 X Neg Dec 04 Draft EIR 05 Supplement/ Subsequent EIR (if so, prior SCH # ) NEPA 06 Notice of Intent 07 Envir. Assessment/ FONSI 08 Draft EIS OTHER 09 Information Only 10 Final Document 11 Other: 01 General Plan Update 01 02 New Element 02 03 General Plan Amendment 04 Master Plan 03 05 Annexation 06 Specific Plan 04 07 Redevelopment 08 Rezone 05 09 Land Division 06 (Subdivision, Parcel Map. Tract Map, etc.) 07 10 Use Permit 08 11 Cancel Ag Preserve 09 12 X Other Local Facilities Management Plan Residential: Units Acres Office: Sq. Ft. Acres Employees Shopping/Commercial: Sq.Ft. Acres Employees Industrial: Sq. Ft. Acres Sewer: MGD Water: MGD Employees Transportation: Type _ Mineral Extraction: Mineral _ Power Generation: Wattage _ Type: 9 TOTAL ACRES; 764.2 10 X Other: Local Facilities Management Plan 11. PROJECT ISSUES DISCUSSED IN DOCUMENT 01 Aesthetic/Visual 02 Agricultural Land 03 04 05 06 07 08 Geologic/Seismic 15 X Sewer Capacity 22 X Water Supply 09 Jobs/Housing Balance 16 Soil Erosion 23 Air Quality Archaeological/Historical Coastal Fire Hazard Flooding/Drainage 10 Minerals 11 Noise 12 X Public Services 13 X Schools 14 Septic Systems 17 Solid Waste 24 18 Toxic/Hazardous 25 19 X Traffic/Circulation 26 20 Vegetation 27 21 Water Quality 28 Wetland/Riparian Wildlife Growth Inducing Incompatible Landuse Cumulative Effects Other 12 FUNDING (approx.)Federal $-0-State $ -0-Total $-0- 13 PRESENT LAND USE AND ZONING; Present land use is agricultural, open space, and single family. Zoning is single and multiple density residential, planned community, open space, and limited control. 14 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project is a Local Facilities Management Plan which guarantees the adequacy of public facilities concurrent with development to adopted performance standards. Facilities include City Administration, libraries, fire, parks, open space, schools, water, sewer, drainage and circulation. 15. SIGNATURE OF LEAD AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE:Date: jfe, / •• — ••f 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE M^fT^lM ' TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 %£ljfif (619) 438-1161 *^ ^GK Olftg of PLANNING DEPARTMENT May 12, 1988 Mr. John Blair, Superintendent Carlsbad Unified School District 801 Pine Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: ZONE 20 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN Dear Mr. Blair: The City of Carlsbad is currently undertaking the second phase of its Growth Management Program. This phase includes the preparation and review of Local Facilities Management Plans for each of the 25 Local Facilities Management Zones within the City. As part of the formal preparation and review process, your district is being asked to review the buildout and phasing assumptions of the plans to determine whether the information is consistent with your district's planning and programming of school facilities. Specifically, the City's Growth Management Program requires the adopted performance standard for school facilities be continually met as growth occurs in Carlsbad. Attached, you will find for your review: 1. The adopted performance standard for school facilities 2. Draft buildout assumptions for Zone 20 3. Draft phasing assumptions for Zone 20 Could you please review this information to determine three things. First, is the information correct? Second, can your district provide school facilities according to the phasing assumptions presented in the plan and consistent with Carlsbad's adopted performance standard? And third, what means of monitoring demand for and supply of school facilities would be appropriate to establish between your district and the City of Carlsbad? We would appreciate a letter indicating your findings and any comments regarding the processing of Local Facilities Management Plans. 1 •• ••r Mr. John Blair May 12, 1988 Page Two Your review and comments are part of an overall plan preparation which needs to be completed by May 31, 1988. If you need further information or assistance, please call me at 438-1161. Thank you very much for your assistance. Sincerely, BRIAN HUNTER Associate Planner BH:af Enclosure c: Phil Carter •• 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE MjjrWJH TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 mOL-si^T '(619)438-1161 PLANNING DEPARTMENT May 12, 1988 Wilson Engineering Dexter S. Wilson 2185 Faraday Avenue, Suite 140 Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: ZONE 20 SEWER FLOWS This letter shall serve as authorization to prepare a detailed sewer flow analysis for Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 20. The City has been requested to provide an updated computer run of projected sewer flows from Zone 20 and an analysis of the impacts of the affected sewer interceptors. Specifically, the impacts of sewer sub-basins 20A and 2OB on the San Marcos Interceptor and sewer sub- basin 20C on the north Batiquitos Pump Station and Interceptor System. The projected buildout dwelling units within each sub-basin are as follows: Sub-basin Dwelling Units 20A 1,524 20B 578 20C 390 Please return the sewer impact analysis with an invoice of the costs incurred for the preparation of the required information. The City will request payment from the consultant preparing the Zone 20 Plan. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call this office. STEVEN C. Associate Civil Engineer SCJtaf c: Lloyd Hubbs Jack Henthorn Phil Carter 2892 Jefferson St. Brian Hunter Carlsbad, CA 92008 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 (619) Otitg of (Earhsbaii PLANNING DEPARTMENT May 11, 1988 Development Consultants Consortium Jack E. Henthorn 2892 Jefferson Street P.O. Box 2143 Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: ZONE 20 This is meant to briefly summarize our meeting yesterday regarding the traffic study prepared by Weston Pringle and Associates for Zone 20. As you recall, we discussed all the items from the Zone 20 Traffic Study comment list with you and Steve Sasaki from Wes Pringle's office. More particularly, the discussion centered around the initial assumptions presented in the Circulation Guidelines Manual. We agreed on the assumption that circulation element roads identified in the Guidelines Manual will be assumed to be in place according to the year the proposed road segment is projected to be constructed. However, if there is currently no financing mechanism adopted for the construction of the necessary improvements, this zone will be required to propose a mitigation plan, including financing, guaranteeing the construction of the required street improvements. The road links which may need improvements are those circulation element roads which are impacted by 20% of the traffic generated from this zone. We concluded the meeting by indicating that the following documents must be submitted as a complete package: 1) Revised traffic study 2) Circulation section of the Zone 20 Plan 3) Intersection graphics 4) Proposed financing program When this section is resubmitted it should be in its final form. If you are unsure of anything, we should meet to discuss it. As I said at the meeting, it is critical to the completion of the plan that this section be finalized as soon as possible. Jack E. Henthorn May 11, 1988 Page Two Please plan to resubmit the completed circulation section by May 20, 1988 to ensure adequate time so that staff can completely review updated data. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me or Steve Jantz. PHILIP O. CARTER Growth Management Manager POC:SCJ/af c: Steven C. Jantz Brian Hunter Zone 20 Property Owners May 9, 1988 ZONE 20 - TRAFFIC STUDY 1. Figure 1 - indicates only 85% of trip distribution. 2. Page 2 - Indicates that Palomar Airport Road will be mitigated by 1990 according to City Arterial Phasing Plan. This is only an assumption to when circulation element roads should be constructed. At this time there is no guarantee that P.A.R. will be built by 1990. Therefore, if 20% of traffic from this zone utilizes P.A.R. and that segment falls below the performance standard, this zone must propose a mitigation so that the standard will be maintained. 3. Page 3 - Existing intersection geometric chart is incomplete. ^' Page 5 - Table 3 - Discrepancy with L.O.S. in Barton- Aschman Traffic Study. Alga and ECR - .89/D P.A.R. and 1-5 NB - .87/D Please discuss why different 5. Page 8 - Table 6 - Did not include traffic generation for proposed schools within zone. 6. Page 10 - Table 7 - Add trip generation for proposed schools with proposed year of development. 7 . Page 11 - Table A) This chart indicates certain improvements to .existing intersections. Were L.O.S. 's computed using these geometries with improvements. The improvements shown are not funded for construction and most likely will not be approved by 1990. Therefore, these improvements should not be assumed as in 1990. B) College Blvd. and P.A.R. is not shown to be built in 1990. How will development within this zone gain access1? 8. Page 19 - Table 12 - Indicates College Boulevard between P.A.R. and Poinsettia. (See previous comment) . , 9. Page 20 - Table 13 - Are the L.O.S. for intersections computed after assumed improvements. Zone 20 - Traffic Study (Continued) 10. Improvements Now to 1990 1990 to 1995 1995 to 2000 2000 to 2010 College Blvd. Poinsettia Lane - College Blvd. College Blvd. Poinsettia Lane - 2 lanes between P.A.R. and Poinsettia 2 additional lanes between 1-5 and College 4 lanes between College and ECR 2 additional lanes between P.A.R. and Poinsettia Increase width for increased capacity Increase width for increased capacity. 11. Page 27 - Table 19 - Indicates 1-5 and Poinsettia intersection operated at L.O.S. E. no mitigation is proposed. 12. Propose mitigation for P.A.R. between Palomar Oaks Way and 1-5. 13. I.C.U. of P.A.R. and 1-5 indicates additional WB and EB lanes. Are they being proposed by zone plan to mitigate? U/M- -the- 5»W<r) Btyf 3% *>? irtsnal -S^^c^T 14. I.C.U. of Poinsettia and 1-5 indicates additional WB and EB lanes. 15. Various other intersections in I.C.U. charts indicate some intersections fail unless improvements are installed. If impacted by 20% of traffic generated from zone, a mitigation program should be presented. SJ:af j DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS CONSORTIUM May 5, 1988 City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad, California 92009 Attn: Philip 0. Carter Subject: Request for extension of time for Zone 20 Local Facilities Management Plan review and processing In follow up to our meeting of May 4, 1988, a 90 day maximum extension of time is requested to ensure completion of the processing of the Zone 20 Local Facilities Management Plan. It is understood from our meeting that this is a maximum extension and that all parties will make every effort to establish a hearing date within the shortest possible time"frame. 2892 JEFFERSON • P. 0 BOX 2143 • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 • (619) 434-3135 Local 2D fg/f Z« nsin ~XtoT,r 3 DEVELOPMENT - _ CONSULTANTS CONSORTIUM May 1, 1988 MAY 03 1888 City of Carlsbad C1TY OE CARLSBAD Engineering Department DJEV^'OP-PROC SERV niv2075 Las Palmas i«v._Ui PROC. SERV. D1V. Carlsbad, California 92009 ATTNU Philip 0. Carter Subject:^ Request-for computer run on Zone 20 sewer,flows and assignment of flow within the Buena/San Marcos Interceptor System The 'recently completed Master Plan of Sewerage combined the Buena and San Marcos Interceptors for purposes of flow analysis. Recent comments on the Zone 20 local facilities management plan requests that the flows projected to be generated by Zone 20 be analyzed on the basis of the San Marcos Interceptor. It is my understanding that the City has the computer model necessary to conduct this analysis as a product of the Master Plan of Sewerage. An analysis of the Zone 20 impact in isolation would serve no useful purpose since we do not have the base data and assumptions used in the Master Plan for areas outside of the Zone 20 boundaries. Therefore it is requested that a computer run be made utilizing the flow projections contained in the Sewer section of the Zone 20 Local Facilities Management Plan. Any costs incurred in this effort will be paid for by the Zone 20 sponsoring property owners group. A response to this request would be appreciated at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. incerely, / /^c>6 ack E. Herithorn cc: Steve Jantz 2892 JEFFERSON • P O BOX 2143 • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 • (619) 434-3135 MEMORANDUM APRIL 27, 1988 TO: PHIL CARTER FROM: BRIAN HUNTER ZONE TWENTY Numerous typos throughout document. 1. Table of Contents A. Subdivide facility analysis sections by performance standard, adequacy analysis, mitigation, and financing. B. List appendices by title and number 2. Charts, maps, tables, exhibits A. Number all tables consecutively B. All tables should be read left to right (i.e., fire, C. Show whole City on graphics, not just part. Executive Summary A. Move Exhibit 1-1 (yaa: #) into front of this section. B. Add General Conditions #7 and #8 from Local Facilities Management Plan 11. C. Use financing overview from Local Facilities Management Plan 11. Introduction A. Use LFMP 11 format B. Show assessor parcel numbers and acreage for all properties by owner. Include General Plan designation. Buildout A. Page 14; 104.23 should read 98.63. RL unit number is 9. B. Provide constraints map. C. Incorporate 1/1/88 numbers throughout document. 6. Phasing A. Do Citywide and quadrant wide analysis (see LFMP |2) 7. Zone Requirements A. Show level of analysis (citywide, quadrant, or zone). 8. City Administration A. Redevelopment = 3,200 sq. ft (2/4/88 comment). B. Existing population/demand does not match (2/4/88 comment). 9. Open Space A. Provide scale map sowing performance standard open space. Identify as existing, approved or future. B. Page 82 - "Exhibit 01 on Page 43"? Page 82 shows demand as 89.4, page 84 shows 87.5. Page 83 shows existing approved as 76.15, page 84 shows 65.55. Page 83 shows future as 11.48, page 84 shows 56. Explain. Page 84 - last sentence incorrect. 10. Parks A. See comments in body of letter. BH:af -2- PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859 (619)438-1161 City of Cartefeab April 26, 1988 Mr. Jack Henthorn Development Consultants Consortium 2892 Jefferson Street Carlsbad, California 92008 Dear Mr. Henthorn: The purpose of this letter is to confirm our meeting for April 28th at 9 a.m. and to provide you with a general overview of our review comments. The meeting will be extremely involved and it is anticipated that it will last approximately three hours. You will need to bring along all'of the people that are working on the Zone 20 plan to this meeting. This should include all of your consultants with the exception of Wes Pringle and Associates because a separate meeting will need to be scheduled to go through the entire circulation study. We will arrange a circulation meeting on Thursday. I would also suggest that you invite any interested property owners to attend this meeting as well. I believe it is important for them to get a first hand impression of how much work is needed to complete this plan in order to schedule it for the Planning Commission. General Comments The first five section: Executive Summary, Introduction, Buildout Projections, Phasing, and Zone Requirements will need to be revised. These sections are not the most up-to-date being used by the City and in the case of Buildout Projections and Phasing, they are incomplete as written. Facility Comments City Administrative Facilities With minor revisions and the addition of the 3,200 square feet of redevelopment space, this section will be acceptable. Jack Henthorn April 26, 1988 Pace 2 Library With minor revisions, this section will also be acceptable. Wastewater Treatment Capacity This section is not acceptable as written. The analysis addresses the wrong districts and not the district which services the demands in Zone 20. It will need to be totally revised. Parks This section will need to be revised. You must begin by including the demands for the entire park district today and Zone 20 as well as projecting the buildout demands for both the district and the zone. Please be prepared to explain how Zone 20's park demand is going to be met. As a note, schools will not be counted for meeting the parks performance standard until they are built and a joint use agreement is in place between the school district and the City. Drainage With minor revisions this section will be acceptable. Circulation The text portion of the circulation section has not been resubmitted or reviewed. Consequently, the proposed phasing of construction of College Boulevard and Poinsettia Lane have not been addressed. Also, the issue of the specific alignments of these circulation element roads has not been decided. College Boulevard is to go to a public hearing and an environmental review is still necessary prior to the adoption of the zone plan. As mentioned earlier in this letter, a separate meeting will be scheduled with your traffic consultant to discuss comments within the traffic study, there exists differences of opinions with the data presented in this report. Fire With minor revisions this section will be acceptable. Jack Henthom April 26, 1988 Paae 3 Open Space The intent of this standard is to require the property owners to provide a detailed plan showing how, when, and where performance standard open space will be provided in the zone as development occurs. This section is unclear and will require extensive revisions. As a note, schools do not count for meeting the open space standard. Schools This section needs to be explained further prior to having staff send it to the district for review. Sewer Collection A specific analysis is necessary for the sewer impacts on the San Marcos Interceptor. Also, the upgrading of the sewer pump station must coincide with the proposed development phasing. Water Distribution List all proposed facilities necessary for the ultimate development of the zone. As you can see there is a great deal of work needed to be accomplished in order to move this plan forward. It appears that the plan processing schedule will be unable to meet the state mandated time frames and, therefore, you would need to request a 90 day processing extension. This letter requesting the extension should be into staff no later than May 6, 1988. If you have any questions prior to our meeting on Thursday, please give me or Brian Hunter a call. Sincere! PHILIP O. CARTER Growth Management Manager POC:af c: Brian Hunter * Steven Jantz Zone 20 Property Owners MEMORANDUM APRIL 26, 1988 TO: BRIAN HUNTER FROM: STEVEN JANTZ ZONE 20 The following is a list of comments from the Engineering Section of Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 20: 1. Wastewater A. This section did not analyze wastewater impacts from Zone 20. It seems that the wastewater sections from Zones 11 and 12 were carbon copied and used as the analysis for Zone 20. This section will need to be revised completely to analyze wastewater impacts from this zone only. B. In Exhibit W-l it should indicate the Carlsbad Sewer Service District not Costa Real Municipal Water District. C. Under Encina WPCF Capacity Analysis - Engineering staff will supply the up-dated existing flow data just prior to the adoption of the zone plan. This information will not change the wastewater analysis for this zone. 2. Drainage A. On Table D-l - Center your columns underneath all the table headings in this chart. B. Under mitigation - The proposed master drainage plan facility designation DC is indicated that the cost will be shared with development in Zone 19. Actually the development within Zone 20 is only required to construct that portion of facility within the boundaries of Zone 20 or any necessary facilities outside the boundaries to ensure positive flow. Therefore, development within the zone is not required to coordinate construction of these facilities with any development within Zone 19. C. Under mitigation - It should be described that any development within the designated sub-basin boundaries will be required to construct the facilities within those sub-basins. This was accomplished in previous zone plans which designated phase boundaries with natural drainage sub-basin boundaries. Consequently, the developments within certain phase boundaries were required to construct the drainage facilities necessary to serve those individual phases. This will allow development within a specific area of Zone 20 to identify which drainage facilities will be required of the individual phases. 3. Sewer A. Exhibit SC-1, the correct title for the sewer district within Carlsbad is Carlsbad Sewer Service District. B. Exhibit S-l, 1) extend trunk-line BSMT2 to the boundaries of sub- zone 2 OB; 2) show Batiquitos Lagoon and identify the location of the North Batiquitos Interceptor; 3) under legend, (a) change the designation of the zone boundary this designation is hard to find; (b) the portion of the North Batiquitos Interceptor (NB5) is shown as a proposed system. C. The text contains numerous amounts of typographical and textural errors. The corrections will be returned to the consultant with the checkprints and must be corrected prior to the next submittal. D. Under facility analysis, it should be mentioned that the information contained in this section was derived from the new Carlsbad Sewer Master Plan of Sewerage prepared by Wilson Engineering, December 1987. E. Table 1 - Separate the Capacity analysis for the Buena Interceptor and the San Marcos Interceptor. Essentially analyze the downstream capacity under two separate charts. F. Zone 20 is going to utilize the San Marcos Interceptor only. This report should analyze the impact to this interceptor and delete any further information of the Buena Interceptor. -2- G. Item C of this study should indicate the Zone 20 service demand. The proposed development sewer, generation rate and the total sewer generated from this zone. H. Under Adequacy Findings - This section should indicate the adequacy of the San Marcos Interceptor with relation to the proposed service demand as previously discussed. I. Table 3 - Remove all notation to any sewer line which is not impacted by sewer from Zone 20. J. Under Financing - This section makes indication that the pump station at the North Batiquitos Interceptor is to be upgraded in the City's Capital Improvement Program between the years 1992 and 1997. Therefore, it should be analyzed as to what impacts that portion of Zone 20 will have on that pump station. If there is an indication that there is not adequate capacity at this pump station to handle development, the development in that portion of the zone will not be allowed to develop until such time that the pump station is upgraded. This upgrading could either be accomplished by the City or by development, but no further development will be able to continue until the upgrading is complete. It should be noted that the Zone 19 Plan indicates this facility will be upgraded in their first phase which is projected to be done in 1989. 4. Water A. Exhibit WS-1 - Indicate the complete name of all water districts which serve the City of Carlsbad. B. Exhibit WS-2 - Use a boulder designation for the zone boundary. C. There is a section missing within this study entitled "Proposed Facilities". This section should list all proposed facilities with the appropriate sizes, estimated locations and estimated cost. D. Table WS-1 - Be consistent with heading designations, i.e., GPD and GPM. E. There is also some textural revisions which need to be done which are shown on the checkprints. SJ:af -3- DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS CONSORTIUM April 20, 1988 City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad, California 92008 Attn: Philip O. Carter Subject: Transmittal of Traffic Analysis report for Zone 20 from Weston Pringle and Associates Enclosed please find the traffic analysis for the Zone 20 Local Facilities Plan. This study has been prepared in compliance with the latest circulation manual as per the comments offered in your review of February 4, 1988. In order to accomplish this it was necessry to completely revise the analysis included as a part of the original Zone 20 L.F.M.P.. In accordance with the discussion held during our review of your comments dated February 4, 1988, I have not included a synopsis of the analysis pending City staff review and comment. However, I am familiar enough with the plan to discuss it in detail or provide a synopsis upon your request. The schematic drawings of intersection configurations required as a part of the analysis are not included pending City staff comments on the configurations as represented in the study. These documents can be made available within a day or two of your request. The Zone 20 Sub-consultants and I stand ready to meet with you at your convenience to review this section, or any other section of the Zone 20 Local Facilities Plan. encl. cc: Steve Janz JHrwpc ck E. Henthorn 2892 JEFFERSON • P O. BOX 2143 • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 • (619) 434-3135 APRIL 12, 1988 TO: LFMP 88-20 FILE FROM: PHIL CARTER/^ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW On April 11, 1988, Michael Holzmiller met with Jack Henthorn of Development Consultants Consortium and Dwight Spires, Zone 20 property owner to discuss various issues concerning development of property within Zone 20. Specific discussions centered around the amount of environmental review which would be necessary as part of the Zone Plan. Mr. Holzmiller indicated that a Negative Declaration would be issued on the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20. This would be done because under CEQA facility planning documents are exempt from the environmental review process. When future individual projects are submitted within the zone, they would be required to undergo necessary environmental review at that time. Mr. Holzmiller indicated to Mr. Henthorn and Mr. Spires that the specific environmental review required would be determined once a project was submitted for processing following the adoption of the Local Facilities Management Plan. c: Michael J. Holzmiller April i, 1988 ' -" " DEVELOPMENT City of Carlsbad CONSULTANTS 2076 Las Palmas ^ Carlsbad, California CONSORTIUM 92009 Attn: Philip O. Carter Subject: Transmittal of updated Zone 20 Local Facility Management Plan sections In follow up to our meeting of March 28, 1988, during which build out numbers, were confirmed for this zone, I am transmitting the following revised sections: —Build out —Phasing --City Administrative Facilities —Library Facilities —Parks --Open space —Schools Please remove the sections from the existing binders and replace them with the appropriate updates. In addition please find a response sheet keyed to the appropriate numbered comments as offered in your correspondence of February 4, 1988. The following revised technical sections will be submitted during the week of April 11-15: —Wastewater —Drainage —Circulation —Sewer —Water I anticipate meeting with the entire group of property owners during the week of April 25th to update them on the status of the plan and to advise them of the revisions that have been made to the plan. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have any questions or need additional information. Jack E. Henthorn 2892 JEFFERSON • P 0 BOX 2143 • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 • (619) 434-3135 DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS CONSORTIUM April 4, 1988 City of Carlsbad 2076 Las Palmas Carlsbad, California 92009 Attention: Philip 0. Carter Transmitted herewith is the updated buildout information for Local Facilities Management Zone 20. These numbers are based on the discussions we had during our meeting of March 28, 1988. I am providing these for your information and use in advance of the rest of the "non-technical" sections. The constraints map is being revised to reflect the changes in boundary location that were discussed during the above meeting. All "non-technical" sections will be in for review this week. I have taken the comments and advise offered during our meetings into account in these revisions. The traffic study should be submitted this week from Ves Pringle's office. Again, thank you for your cooperation in this matter. 2892 JEFFERSON • P O BOX 2143 • QARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 • (619) 434-3135 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 TELEPHONE (619)438-1161 City of Cartebab COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT March 23, 1988 Mr. Jack Henthorn Development Consultants Consortium 2892 Jefferson Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: CONSTRAINTS MAP AND BUILDOUT CONFIRMATION Dear Jack: The purpose of this letter is summarize our meeting on March 22, 1988, dealing with the constraints map and buildout calculations for Local Facility Management Zone 20. As we discussed, the General Plan boundary line between the RLM and RM designation should be moved to the west of the ridge line unless you can provide written documentation which indicates the planning staff made the determination that that line would be moved further to the east. It appears from your calculations that the school sites for both the Junior High and Elementary School were not deducted from that developable acreage. As a result, ten acres must be deducted from the RM designation and ten acres from the RLM designation for the Junior High School. Then for the Elementary School, ten acres must be deducted from the RLM acreage. The last item of any substance that we discussed dealt with the fact that Cobblestone was approved over the Growth Control Point. At some point in the future we will need to discuss how reductions in future development in Zone 20 will take place in order to make up for this overage. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me. Sincerely, PHILIP O. CARTER Growth Management Manager bjn c:Brian Hunter ^ Steve Jantz '^^^Mar-fch^lsVJl^Se V', ' \ ,"1.T'C'ity'l'qf .Carlsbad ^ ,\r,. Growth Management Division1 - i- ;V/:~2075^Lais' ;Pal'mas> Dr. If-. California DEVELOPMENT f*CONSULTANTS ^HH CONSORTIUM ••- V^Ajbtnt:;*'Phil"ip;iO;./-Carter ;^f ,,>.^JS\ffi3£'ct;lr rn- ^ran'smittal of updated constraint and build out data for "/ ''^i^-^'",:' -- Local "Facilities Management Zone 20, - N^r, ?,)>-'; "«» '« v.v - A/« ____ '* -'t i1'* 'V *•'. ***"• ^ "!" * '•-*** -*,J»"-,' • '. : ?j The"|',pur',ppse \p,f -'-thcis letter is to follow up on our meeting of March ;> ^t\l;4y*"1988 dealingLwith the comments offered in your letter dated March *',*iS-8|j 1:988- which addressed concerns with the constraints and build out *•*, "<T^J ^pV°73e'q£ilo"ns"a'ssociated with Zone 20. ,• -thank you for one of the most productive meetings we this zone. The meeting appeared to go a long way ,V,,'> ,towar"d, .eliminating any misconceptions that may have existed involving "' j-.-,s^the/Zpne, ,20; -effort .- , T. >Tisam .transmitting,, the following items via this letter: ,t J, --TVo-'prints^of., the revised constraints map reflecting the revisions „ */ *f'l^discussed ^ during' our meeting( i -, •* }. ;«, < "• ~i c f> ' j * „ ","* •* V»~'V -*-"'' ' , ' -' "'.,''»<K <-, •>. ,.3^ T,, % •"*- ' f> •• ' - «•>,', ^-.1^vrp]^sets "of ^revised pages 13 through 17a. These pages contain all - ." * * .Cc'a-loulat ions' necessary to evaluate the build out projections made for ' ' ' ,-g' ail qther revisions pending the review and comment on :;•-',{{ '7t"his;°sect'ioh.*>'c ^"^ \*\;| f*f]l you'" have', any questions or need additional information please , v w~4 contact: >t me at your earliest convenience.< : -%^''>^CV,-V -;;s ",. ;•-, - •" , ^ ', Sincerely, lack Henthorn Principal Consultant original only Owners iHbl zmi Her "Jarit-'z*!" ^ ', '•-. " -'f?4 'i^ f Wilma; orepersloot '!; •, ;r;f l;vf2892 JEFFERSON » P. o BOX 2143 ® CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 • (619) 434-3135 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859 (619)438-1161 Citp of Cartebab March 8, 1988 Mr. Jack Henthorn Development Consultants Consortium 2892 Jefferson Street Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN - ZONE 20 Dear Mr. Henthorn: The purpose of this letter is to follow up on our phone conversation today dealing with the constraints map resubmitted for review for the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20. As we discussed on the phone, the constraints map as resubmitted is not acceptable and needs additional work. At our meeting on February 4th we discussed numerous items dealing with the constraints map that were not properly identified and needed to be revised by your engineer. At that time we showed you the constraints map as perlimitered by staff and the discrepancies included from your map and our calculations. It was our understanding at the meeting that each of these items would be corrected and returned to staff. After reviewing the resubmitted constraints map it appears that no work was done. The school sites have not been revised to reflect their actual acreage, boundaries of certain constraints have not been defined, and the topo lines that needed to be clearly identified have not been provided. With all of these items in mind, it is impossible for staff to complete the technical review of your constraints map and, therefore, we are unable to provide you with buildout numbers for the zone. It is of the utmost importance that you have your engineer review the comments that we have made on the constraints map as well as revising the boundaries as shown on the attached map which staff has pieced together from the assessor's parcel pages. Staff has also provided on that attached map a division of the General Plan land uses as well as an indication of open space that should be included in your zone and has not been to date. Jack Henthorn March 8, 1988 Page Two After you have read this letter and reviewed the map, I believe that you and your consulting engineer should schedule a meeting with me as soon as possible so that we may discuss all of the items that need to be changed. I believe it is necessary for us to meet and discuss these issues again because apparently our directions were not clear enough at our meeting on February 4th. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please call me and we should schedule a meeting as quickly as possible. In closing let me say that until the buildout numbers are completed for the zone, we are unable to continue with the analysis needed to bring this plan to public hearing. As you are aware your Planning Commission date is tentatively scheduled for June 1st and with that in mind we need to begin to work more seriously towards completing this zone plan. Sincerely, PHILIP OS CARTER Growth Management Manager POC:af c: Marty Orenyak Michael Holzmiller Brian Hunter Steve Jantz Wilma Diepersloot Zone 20 Property Owners without attachment February 10, 1987 DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS CONSORTIUM Honorable Mayor & City Council City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO PREPARE LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN Under the provisions of the City's Growth Management Program, a Facilities Management Plan must be approved for each of the 25 Local Facilities Management Zones. There are three ways that this can be accomplished. First, the City can prepare the plan with the costs accessed to the owners within the zone. Second, ALL property owners may jointly submit a plan. Thirdly, where a "joint" submission is not possible any group of owners may petition the Council for authorization to proceed with preparation and submittal. Development Consultants Consortium (D.C.C.) has been retained by three property owners to formulate a Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20. (see attachment 1 - client list - Zone 20) An effort to obtain the support of 100% of Zone 20's 39 property owners was begun in mid December 1986. Notices were sent to all owners of record inviting attendance at a meeting held on December 15, 1986, for the purpose of explaining the program and soliciting support. (see attachment 2) Twelve owners attended the meeting representing 424.25 of the zone's 779.38 acres. At the conclusion of the meeting theing thi owners verbally agreed to support preparation of the plan date 10 of the twelve ownerships have returned signed authorization forms. To In addition, a majority of the ownerships represented at the December meeting are committed to paying a pro-rata share of costs on a private basis. Several of the larger ownerships have agreed to pick up costs where a property owner does not desire to share in costs. This option will be made available to all property owners after build out projections are approved by the staff. This eliminate^ the need for City involvement in cost apportionment. 2892 JEFFERSON • P 0 BOX 2143 • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 • (619) 434-3135 February 10, 1987 Page Two Ltr: Honorable Mayor & City Council Re : Request for Permission to Prepare Local Facilities Management Plan A follow-up letter was sent to all property owners who had not attended or returned authorization forms. (attachment 3) This letter was sent via registered mail for record keeping purposes. Registered receipts have been received from all owners. (copies are provided as attachment 4) After contacting all 39 property owners, we have received a total of 24 signed authorizations representing 668.29 acres, or 86% of the Zone's total land area. (see attachment 5 - authorization forms) In addition, 5 owners representing 70.18 acres have been contacted by telephone. Although they have stated that they do not object to the preparation of the plan, signed authorization forms have not been received from them. These owners represent an additional 9.0% of the zone's acreage. The final group of owners making up Zone 20 are those with whom there has been no direct contact other than a return receipt from the follow-up mailing. This group is made up of 4 property owners holding 32.29 acres or 4.1% of the zone's land area. Attachment 6 is a summary of the results of the efforts outlined above. Contact has been made with 100% of the zone's ownership. 95% have responded indicating no opposition to the preparation of the plan with 86% formally authorizing its preparation. Although efforts will continue to establish direct contact with the 4 remaining ownerships we are now seeking Council authoriza- tion to proceed with the Zone 20 Facilities Plan. Approval of this*«Pequ,est to proceed at your earliest convenience would be a pprec fatted^* If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS CONSORTIUM at (619) 434-3135. ry truly/yours, :k Henthorn JH:cr cc: City Manager Phi i Carter 3 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859 (619)438-1161 Citp of Cartebab February 4, 1988 Mr. Jack Henthorn Development Consultants Consortium 2892 Jefferson P.O. Box 2143 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Mr. Henthorn: This letter is to serve as a brief summary of our initial technical review meeting for Zone 20 today. I will review all nontechnical documentation, while Mr. Jantz will be responsible for engineering review. Mr. Carter will schedule all future meetings. Processing of responses to our comment summary sheet (copy enclosed) shall be in three sections; technical, nontechnical, and circulation. The first resubmittal is expected to be the constraints map as buildout is predicated on its accuracy. All existing environmental documentation shall be provided to the City in a timely fashion so that we can assess the need for further environmental review. Format is to be similar to the most recently approved zone plans with room for improvement. Our common goal is the expeditious processing of a complete and accurate Local Facilities Management Plan for approval by city Council. Keeping to the guidelines of this letter should ensure a healthy beginning. Sincerely, BRIAN HUNTER Associate Planner BH:af Encl. c: Philip O. Carter Steve Jantz Zone 20 Property Owners ZONE 20 COMMENT SUMMARY SHEET 2/4/88 RESPONSE 1. Review constraints map for accuracy, then provide engineer's seal, signa- ture, and expiration date. 2. Provide all environmental documents . 3. Table RP-1, correct last sentence (pg. 19) . 4. Exhibit A-l — Redevelopment located north of Elm. 5. Page 24 - Redevelopment 3,200 sq. ft. 6. Page 24 - Population/ required square footage don't match. 7. Page 24 - Total existing facilities - math error. 8. Page 25 - P.S.S. Phase II construction is '92- '97. 9. Table A-l - incorporate all zones approved to date. Move Note (1) to proper date. 10. Exhibit L-2, show popula- tion that creates demand. 11. Page 31 - Population/ required square footage don't match. 12. Page 32 - Show $7.1 million debt financing under '87- '92 CIP. - 13. Table L-l - incorporate all zones approved to date. Explain note (1) . 14. Parks - See Zone 19 15. Exhibit PK-4 doesn't match buildout assump- tions (Page 49) . 16. Is Sudan Interior Mission only du's? Norboru Tabata? 17. Open space - See Zone 11. IS. Exhibit S-2 shows two high schools. 19. Provide all correspondence with school district to verify "dissatisfaction" . Wastewater 1. Exhibit W-l, Page 37 a) Include Lake Calavera treatment plant b) Show sewer district boundaries (LCWD and SMCWD) 2. Include Chart (Zone 12) Indicating: a) 6 member agencies and percent ownership b) Current flow readings 3. Revised mitigation alternatives 4. Refer and coincide with revised sewer Master Plan Drainage; 1. Redo Graphic - Make it more presentable - -2- COMMENT RESPONSE ACTION Dra inaae (Cont.} 2. All proposed improvements under inventory should be re-catagorized under '•proposed buildout facilities." 3. Break out and identify proposed facilities under drainage sub-basins. List proposed facilities per sub-basin. Carry individual sub-basin facilities through to the mitigation section, then list per basin with ap- propriate cost estimates. Also under special con- ditions - All development within zone 20 shall pay or agree to pay any drain- age fees established with the current master drain- age plan at the time of issuance of a building permit. Sewer; i 1. Revise as necessary so to conform with revised Master Plan. 2. Also, terminology for sewer basins were revised in Master Plan, change accordingly. Inventory - Describe all sewer facilities from Zone 20 to the Encina WPCF, then present analy- ysis of available capacity in these lines. Include major gravity lines, pump stations and force mains (refer to Zones 5, 6 and Master Plan). -3- COMMENT RESPONSE ACTION Sewer (Cont) 4. Service Demand - Analyze proposed buildoug phasing and proposed demand. Use current generation rates. Present this information in relation to basin boundaries. This will present a total buildout demand per basin. 5. Adequacy Findings - Then analyze impacts of sewer demand on the existing facilities all the way to Encina WPCF. 6. Mitigation should now be presented per basin bound- aries. List necessary improvements and asso- ciated estimated cost. 7. Financing - * Pay appro- priate sewer hook-up fee. * Financing if major facilities need upgrading. Water t 1. Phasing - As in sewer, analyze water demand by generation rate and proposed land uses. 2. Refer to Master Plan (info derived from) 3. No reference to Table WS-1 4. Show cost and location of storage tank. 5. Mitigation - Development shall construct water facilities required by the district at the time of development. -4- RESPONSE Circulationt 1. Graphics 2. Check Traffic Splits (Exhibit C-2). Inventory - List all circulation roads and intersections within Zone 20. Then list all roads and intersections outside zone impacted by 20% traffic. 4. Revise phasing scenario (now 1990, 1995, 2000, buildout). 5. Use approaches describe in GMP circulation manual. 6. Provide more analysis in the text. Present road segments and intersections separately. Provide capacities and L.O.S. of road segments within tent. 7. Traffic study should be revised so to conform with circulation manual. 8. All improvements required should be presented under phasing scenario, include cost estimates. 9. Refer to previous zone plans for examples of charts, graphs and graphics. -5- PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859 (619) 438-1161 €itj> of Carlsbab January 20, 1988 Jack Henthorn Development Consultants Consortium 2892 Jefferson Street Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN - ZONE 20 Dear Mr. Henthorn: A recent mailing to all property owners in Zone 20 revealed a discrepancy in our mailing list. Apparently Mr. Aharon Abada has vacated the premises at 822 Muirlands Vista Way, La Jolla, California as the postal service returned our correspondence marked "Forwarding Order Expired." If you have any information regarding the present address for Mr. Abada, please contact this department at 438-1161. Sincerely, BRIAN HUNTER Associate Planner BH:af 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859 PLANNING DEPARTMENT .. ~- W^jlj/m (619)438-1161 Cttp of Cartebab January 12* -1988- Dear Property Owner: ~ A Local -Facilities Management PTan is being prepared for Management Zone 20 by Development Consultants Consortium.- To keep you informed of the progress of this, plan-as a property -- owner in-this zone,ryou will receive copies "of correspondence from the City of Carlsbad to the consultant. ~ I~f you have any questions regarding the contents of the correspondence, please -contact the consultant's representative, Clack Henthorn, at (619)434-3135. ^ : Si'ncerely ,„ BRIAN HUNTER Associate Planner BH:af ."."."- -" -_ cc: Oack Henthorn _ Phil Carter - ~ - Steve Oantz - Property Owners Zone 20 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859 PLANNING DEPARTMENT V*O/ JM (619)438-1161 Citp of Cartebab January 14, 1988 Jack Henthorn Development Consultant Consortium 2892 Jefferson Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Mr. Henthorn: I received your letter and six copies of the constraints map sent on January 6th for the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20. You indicated that someone from your office would be coming in to update our zone plans. We received a call from your office, however, no one has come in to update these plans. We are currently reviewing the constraints map which you submitted and are beginning our technical review of the Zone 20 plan. It is important to have someone update our zone plans as quickly as possible. Please contact Barbara Nedros at 438-1161 to arrange a time to have this done. Sincerely, Philip O. Carter Senior Management Analyst c: Steve Jantz / Brian Hunten/ Zone 20 Property Owners January 6, 1988 DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS CONSORTIUM City of Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad, CA 92009-4859 ATTN : Phillip" 0. Carter SUBJECT: Transmittal of updated constraints mapping In response to our telephone conversation of this date transmitting six (6) copies of the constraints mapping, updated as per-your direction. I am Carol Rushing of my office will be contacting you to arrange a convenient time to update the plans that were not returned prior to the last issuance of the last set of comments. In addition, I have enclosed a copy of the property ownership mailing list for your use in communicating as we proceed to refine the plan. This list does not include the ownerships within the 600 foot notification radius. This list, the associated mapping and the addressed envelopes are stored at our offices pending your request for them. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at your convenience. Tlrank youl . y truly yooirs ick E. Henthorn JEHrcr cc: D. Woodward, Custom Living Homes D. Spiers, Laurel Tree Investors J. Zylstra, Secure Properties 2892 JEFFERSON • P 0 BOX 2143 • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 • (619) 434-3135 SPIERS ENTERPRISES Mitchell St Irvine, CA 92714 (714) 863-1767 December 21, 1987. Mr. Phillip 0. Tarter Senior Management Analyst City of Carlsbad 2075 -Las Palms. Drive PITV HPCarlsbad, Ca. - - 92009 - - bl I T UP Building Department Dear Mr. Carter: Please accept my appreciation for accepting our Zone 20 plan appli- cation fee on Friday, December 18, 1987. After all these years, my faith in "Santa" has been restored!! „ - As you well know, we have been working on the Zone 20 plan for many months and are very excited about moving to the next phase towards ap- proval, le. the technical review of the plan. A very merry Christmas to you, "and thank you again for making ours. Sincerely, LAUREL TREE INVESTMENT CO. ! A Limited Partnership Dwight w. Spiers Managing Partner cc PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859 (619)438-1161 City of Cartefcab December 21, 1987 Faramarz Jabbari 10951 Sorrento Valley Road, Suite 'l.G.' San Diego, CA 92121 Dear Mr. Jabbari: The purpose of this letter is to respond to your request for a preliminary review of your proposed project within Local Facility Management Zone 20 which was submitted to Adrienne Landers. Staff can not review this submittal until a Local Facilities Management Zone Plan for Zone 20 has been prepared and approved by the City Council pursuant to Section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Growth Management). The City Council authorized Development Consortium Consultants to prepare this plan. Mr. Jack Henthorne is in the process of preparing the specific plan for Local Facility Management Zone 20 at this time. If you have any questions concerning the plan you should contact Mr. Henthorne at 434-3135. Should you have any questions regarding this letter, please call me at 438-1161. Sincerely, PHILIP O. CARTER Senior Management Analyst cc: Michael J. Holzmiller Adrienne Landers Jack Henthorne, D.C.C. adltr20 November 24, 1987ii i n DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS CONSORTIUM City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009-4859 ATTN:PHIL CARTER SUBJECT: TRANSMITTAL OF ZONE 20 ITEMS FOR ACCEPTANCE OF LOCAL FACILITIES PLAN In follow-up to our telephone conversation of this date, I am transmitting the following items: 1) Revised copies of the Zone 20 Local Facilities Plans 2) A completed Environmental Impact Assessment Form 3) An annotated copy of my letter of November 13, 1987 specifying where required revisions can be found I have the check for the reauired deposit and environmental _review fees in my possession awaiting your direction. We will maintain the radius map, mailing list and envelopes at our offices for safe keeping until they are needed for hearing notification. ry truly/wurs, Henthorn JH:cr cc: D. Woodward D. Spiers J. Zylstra 2892) JEFFERSON « P O BOX 2143 « CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 • (619) 434-3135 DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS CONSORTIUM October 9, 1987 City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, California 92008 Attn: Nancy Rollman -Subject: *-Res-trbmrttal of—Zone—£Q~bot:-a4—Faci-1 Hei s- Management P-l=an---- - Transmitted herewith are 6 copies of the Zone 20 Local Facilities Management Plan. Each of the comments offered in your letter of September 4, 1987, have been addressed. In addition, phasing inconsistencies have been corrected and assumptions regarding building activity have been clarified. The Kelly Drive issue will be addressed as a part of the circulation analysis update that we are advised will be required as a result of the meetings taking place between the private traffic engineers and the City Engineer; Our traffic^ engineer, Weston Pringle, advises that the reanalysis would be best done as a part of the pending update requirement. This document, in its current form, meets the City guidelines for the preparation of Local Facilities Plans as they currently exist. The environmental impact assessment form, radius map-, mailing list, stamped envelopes and $10,000.00 deposit are in my possession and will be, submitted immediately upon notification that the plan meets_ the basic guidelines as established in the _adp,pted Cityw.ide Facilities and Improvements Plan dated September 16, 1986. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact me~at your convenience. ry truly your/£, ack E. Henthorn cc: D. Woodward, B. Hillebrecht, S. Woodward, J. Zylstra D. Spiers 2892 JEFFERSON • P. O BOX 2143 • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 • (619) 434-3135 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859 PLANNING DEPARTMENT »O/ 0M (619)438-1161 dtp of Cartebab September 4, 1987 Jack Henthorne Development Consultants Consortium 2892 Jefferson Street Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN - ZONE 20 Dear Mr. Henthorne: Staff has completed its content review of the Local Facilities Management Plan as prepared and officially submitted for Zone 20 on August 5, 1987. The plan is not acceptable per the guideline items as follows (numbers refer to the requirements beginning on page 58 in the Citywide Plan): 1. Title Page - see guidelines for information to be provided. 3. Introduction - A. Missing C. Latest map missing (county islands annexed) D. Map unreadable, table missing, tentative map numbers missing 4. Buildout Assumptions - Constraints map at wrong scale (should be 1:200) and unreadable; cannot verify acreages and thus buildout numbers; biological constraints missing, i.e., riparian; Table 1 is missing unless Table B-2 is mislabelled. 6. Facilities not having Citywide Impact 1. Parks - ii. (pg. 1) Show entire quadrant on Park District map. 2. Circulation - i. For any circulation element road, provide a 200 scale graphic showing vertical and horizontal alignments. Show Kelly Dr. (or Hidden Valley Rd.) on maps and in analysis. ii. Missing from text. 3. Drainage - i. Map does not show topography or subbasins. Provide drainage calculations for Master Plan facilities. Provide specific phasing schedule for where, when, how much acreage per year, and expected runoff. Update cost estimates from 1981 dollars. 5. Open space - Map is unacceptable 6. Schools - Map should show existing schools serving the zone. 7. Sewer - Map is unacceptable - existing vs. proposed? Provide generation calculations, i.e., capacity of reaches and individual development area nodes. Provide technical assumptions per guidelines. 8. Water - Water system map is unreadable. Show phasing geographically, and if thus required, temporary systems to serve development. Phasing - Unacceptable, does not match analysis presented later, i.e., park deficiency is identified but phasing indicates continued building. That is a brief summary of the missing items identified by the guidelines section of the ordinance. These items will need to be provided before any further processing can occur. In reviewing the plan, we also found many errors and problems with the technical analysis but those comments will be the subject of a subsequent communication. In order to adequately process the Zone 20 plan, the missing information must be provided as well as addressing staff's other concerns; then the plan may be resubmitted for review. Please call me to set up a meeting (438- 1161) to discuss any questions. Sincerely, NANCY EROLLMAN Associate Planner NER:af cc: Michael J. Holzmiller Charlie Grimm Gary Wayne Phil Carter Dave Hauser Clyde Wickham PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859 (619)438-1161 dtp of Cartebab September 2, 1987 Jack Henthorne DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS CONSORTIUM 2892 Jefferson Street Carlsbad, CA 92008 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN - ZONE 20 Dear Mr. Henthorne: Although the guidelines for the preparation of a Local Facilities Management Plan did not specifically require the submittal of an Environmental Impact Assessment Form - Part I, the City Attorney has determined these plans to be projects under CEQA and, therefore, are subject to all CEQA requirements. As a result, you will be required to provide this information to the City for Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 20 as soon as possible. All CEQA guidelines are a part of the application processing requirements. If you have any questions please contact the Planner coordinating the Zone Plan review. Sincerely, PHILIP 0. CARTER Senior Management Analyst POC:bjn c: Michael J. Holzmiller Charlie Grimm Mike Howes Gary Wayne Nancy Rollman DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS August 6, 1987 - y\CONSORTIUM Phil Carter City of Carlsbad 2015 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009-4859 SUBJECT:- .FORMAL SUBMITTAL OF-ZONE 20 LOCAL FACILITIES PLAN The Zone 20 Local Facilities Plan has been underway for quite some time. On February 10, 198? a request was filed for formal per- mission to proceed to prepare the plan for this area.. _<Dn February 19 j 1987 build-out projections for the zone were forwarded for review and comment. Our request to proceed was granted by the City Council on -April 7, 1987- Since we had requested and not received any comments regarding- build-out projections, it was decided to prepare the Zone 20 plan in May °fl9QL' During the preparation of the plan we were verbally~ra?i3v±S^3^that there was a discrepancy between our acreage calculations and those done by the City. Since- we were well into preparation of the plan we suggested that the acreage disparity be resolved during the "informal" review process. On June 24, 1987 w£ transmitted the Zone 20 plan for preliminary review. On- July 22, 1987 we were advised verbally that the "informal" review process was no longer in use due to pressures from activity in other zones. Zone 20 is an important link.in the development of the Southwest quadrant of the City. The two major circulation links in the area, College Boulevard and Pol nsettia-Lane, traverse this zone before linking up with other major circulation roads. These arterials are key elements in the future circulation demands . created by development in Zones 5 and 19. In addition Zone 20 contains the-site and financing means for the expansion and improvement of the Alta Mira park site. This undeveloped site" is currently needed to^ meet demands created by recent growth as the east side of Interstate 5 at Poinsettia Lane. Zone 20's 760+-acres are held by over 39 separate owners. Thirty two of these owners have formally banded together to support the preparation and processing of the Zone 20 plan. This is important to note in a zone where the largest land owner holds less than 12$ 2892 JEFFERSON • P O BOX 2143 • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 • (619) 434-3135 August 6, 1987 Ltr: Phil Carter City of!Carlsbad Page 2 of the tlotal acreage in the zone. The committment to proceeding in the zone is no less than would be found in a single owner controlled zone. In summary, although zone 20 is not a master planned, single ownership zone, its owners play a significant role in the future development of the southwest quadrant. Therefore, this formal submittal is made klong with a request that assignments be immediately made so that f can proceed in accord with the Growth Man. :>rmal review of this plan agement Ordinance. Very truly yours, J/ack Kent horn JHrcr ec: M. Holzmiller M. Orenyak R. Pachett Attachments enclosed ottaaaeff—0— March 27,1987 Mr. Philip 0. Carter 1200 Elm Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008-1989 Dear Philip: I would just like to thank you for the time you spent with me last Wednesday regarding the Cobblestone Sea Village Project. Your explanations were very concise and will go a long way in helping me put together an accurate presentation. Thanks once again. Sincerely, figel Armstrong' NA/eml 4000 MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 6700, Newport Beach, California 92660 (714) 833-7890 June 24, 1987 DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS CONSORTIUM Phil Carter City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009-4859 SUBJECT: Hequest for preliminary review of Zone 20 plan Enclosed please find a preliminary copy of the Zone 20 Facilities Management-Plan, We are still analyzing the new sewer information as presented in the Zone 5 plan. The sewer -section of this document is based on the sewer master plan of Aprtl 1985. The plan is being made available to the Zone 20 property owners for preliminary review this week. We would appreciate the City's comments so that.they can be taken into account as the document is put into final form," If you need additional copies or have any questions please contact me at your convenience. Very truly yours, lack Henthorn JHrcr 2892 JEFFERSON • P. O BOX 2143 • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 • (619) 434-3135 DEVELOPMENT February 19. 1987 CONSULTANTS CONSORTIUM Phil Carter City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: ZONE 20 BUILD-OUT PROJECTIONS Attached for your review are the build-out projections for Growth Management Plan Zone 20. The methodology employed_in conducting the analysis and arriving at the required projection is assessed below. GROSS ACRES Gross acres were.determined for each General Plan land use . category contained within Management Zone by planimeter measurement of General Plan boundaries on a 500' scale base map. The total gross acres of Management Zone 20 is 782.74 acres and is categorized as follows: i Land Use Gross Acres Residential 729.37 Other* " 53.37 TOTAL 782.74 ! *See table 1 for list of other uses. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS Carlsbad's Growth Management Ordinance identifies several environmentally constrained land uses which may not be used in the calculation of residential density. These constraints fall into two categories: one hundred percent constrained land and fifty percent constrained land. Specifically, one hundred percent constrained land does not allow any land to be counted for residential density. Within Management Zone 20, one hundred percent constrained land includes: 1) major powerline easements, 2) General Plan designated roads and 3) slopes greater than 40%. 2892 JEFFERSON • P O BOX 2143 • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 • (619) 434-3135 February 19, 1987 Page Two Ltr: Phil Carter Fifty percent constrained land allows only one-half the land to be counted as residential density and includes land with slope gradients between 25 and 40 percent. Environmentally constrained lands were identified by aerial photographic interpretation, field investigations and review of public record,documents related to Management Zone 20. These constrained lands were mapped on a 500' scale map and then overlaid with General Plan land uses. The specific breakdown and the location oflthese lands in Management Zone 20 are displayed on Exhibip A. Environmentally constrained lands that may have existed on property that is now considered developed was not counted in the calculation of environmentally constrained lands. NET USABLE-ACRES^ (TABLE I) Once identified, the total amount of 100 percent environ- mentally constrained land was subtracted from the gross acres by General Plan land use category and one half the amount of 50 percent environmentally constrained lands was subtracted * from the gross acres by land use. Subtracting the environmentally constrained lands from the gross residential acreage yields the following: Total Gross Residential Acres 782.74 | Environmental Constraints (100% constrained) 100.79 Environmental Constraints (50% Constrained) 32.56 Total Usable Residential Acres 649.39 - * One-half the total of 50% constrained land DENSITY CONTROL POINT UNIT YIELDS (TABLE U) The Density Control Points established by the City Council and approved under Proposition E were applied to the net usable residential acreage to give the following unit yields: Land Use (Control Pt.) Units RL (1.0) """12 REM (3.2) 1110 RM (6.0) 1561 TOTAL 2683 February 19, 1987 Ltr: Phil Carter Page Three EXISTING/APPROVED UNITS (TABLE II) A total of 247 existing and approved units are located in Management Zone 20. The breakdown is as follows: Project Sudan Interior Mission Cobblestone Village TOTAL Existing Units 23 23 Approved Units -0- 224 224 = 247 The specific breakdown into General Plan land use classi- fications is given in Table II. PROJECTED FUTURE UNITS (TABLE II) The existing/approved units (247) were subtracted from the total potential units (2683) based on the'density"control ", point to yield 2436 potential future units in Management Zone 20. PROJBCTION-BUILD-OUT POPULATION (TABLE II) The buildout population projection for Management Zone 20 was determined by applying a population generation:rate of 2,471 persons/unit per the State Department of Finance to the existing, approved and potential future units. The population breakdown, therefore, is as follows: Units Existing Approved Buildout Buildout Population Projection Rate Population 23 224 2436 X X X 2.471 2.471 2.471 56.83 553.50 6019.36 6629.69 If you have any questions or desire additional information please contact me at your convenience. Thank you. Very truly yours, ick Henthorn JH:cr i-eoruary z, iya/ Amended February 1 1987 TABLE I MANAGEMENT ZONE 20 PROPERTY OWNERS ACREAGE SUMMARY GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION -_---- --3 1 00% GROSS , CONSTRAINED 25%- 40% SLOPE NET RESIDENTIAL: RL Low Density' (0-1.5). RLM Low-Med Density (0.4) RM Medium Density (4-8) RMH Med-Hi Density (8-15) RH High Density (15-23) 20.64 435.18 273.55 729.37 COMMERCIAL: CBD Central C N RC TS 0 RRE RRI RS Bus. District Community Neighborhood Recreation Travel Services Professional & Related Extensive Reg'l Retail Intensive Reg'l Retail Regional Service INDUSTRIAL: PI Planned Industrial OTHER: £ J H HC P- G U . NRR OS RR FW MAJ MIN Elementary School Junior High School High School Continuation School Private School Governmental Facility Public Utilities Non-Resid'l Reserve Open Space Railroad Freeway Major Arterial Minor Arterial Collector Street 10.0 20.0 23.37 5.33 65.23 6.76 77.32 2.85 23.10 6.61 32.56 12.46 346.85 260.18 619.49 0.1 9.9 20.0 23.37 TOTAL 782.74 100.79 32.56 649.39 ASSUMPTIONS: - ' ' . - 1) 100% constrained acres include Riparian areas, transmission line easements, slopes greater than 40%, and major roadways. 2) Parcels considered developed, i.e. with tentative map approval or existing units were not analyzed for constraints. February 2, 1987 Amended February 13, 1987 TABLE II MANAGEMENT ZONE 20 PROPERTY OWNERS BUILD-OUT PROJECTIONS GENERAL PLAN LAND USE CATEGORY > RESIDENTIAL: RL Low Density (0-1 :5) RLM Low=Med. Density (0-4) >RM Medium Density (4-8) POPULATION PROJECTION: RESIDENTIAL:'" ] v RL Low Density RLM Low-Med. Density RM Medium Density NET ACRES '12.46 346.85 260.18 619.49 PROSED EXISTING UNITS UNITS -0- -0- 224 (1) 23 (2) -0- -0- CONTROL ~ POINT 1.0 3.2 6.0 "PROJECTED'ONITS REMAINING 12 863 1561 « TOTAC UNITS 12' 1110 1561 2683 SOILD-OOT UNITS 12 1110 1561 'EXISTING?"'APPROVED/ UNITS -0- 247 -0- 247 "PROJECTED" PERSONS/ 2^471 2.471 REMAINING"' UNITS 12 863 1561 2436 ••PROJECTED POPULATION 29.65 2742.81 3857.23 224 23 2436 2683 6629.69 1) Cobblestone Sea Village 2) Sudan Interior Mission CUP 190 85.43 Acres 12.36 Acres 224 Units 224 Units DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS & CONSTRUCTION (619)434-3135 Planning • Processing • Protect Management • Construction EPPERSON STREET PO BOX 2143 CARLSBAD, CA 92008 i orum, TO 7 ATTENTION/ / PHIL CARrza ; CAT-/ aFCAffrSBAJT -2<07>5 . OA GENTLEMEN WE ARE SENDING YOU D Attached D Under separate cover via D Shop drawings D Prints D Plans D Samples D. _the following items D Specifications COPIES / Dated DATE NO I DESCRIPTION Cftpv Of- S/A/VATUR.^. PA6£- F$-&rr\ /MA^l//A/ Po£Td£- •?" r>A/£_ 5_<3 ' ' THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below D For approval D For your use D As requested D For review and comment D For Your Action D For Checking D Approved as submitted D Approved as noted D Returned for corrections D Resubmit..copies for approval D Design only, not for construction D Return corrected prints D REMARKS. /. :?/>,/<*- MQT<PI NAJILI cAuse -rag: TO TO COPY T0_ SIGNED- If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once • fj *C_^ • C t t December 15, 1986 City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 ATTN: PHILIP CARTER SUBJECT: PERMISSION TO PREPARE LOCAL FACILITIES KANPGEI-'EN PLAN ZONE 20 As the owner of property known as San Dieao County Asse P evc-e-H s~)~ n urn h-erfr) I support preparation of the Zone 20 Local Facilities MaTnageiiient Dl By signing this statement it is understood that I DO ;;O waive any righ.ts that I might otherwise be entitled to including the right to oppose the plan when it co~ies fo for adoption by the City. Signed this day of Please Print Name , 1 98 PRINT NAME HERE Please Sign Here SIGNATURE December 15, 1986 City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 ATTN: PHILIP CARTER SUBJECT: PERMISSION TO PREPARE LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMEN PLAN ZONE 20 As_jthe owjier _of property known a's San Diego County Assessor P a r c e 1 ( s ) "rfurh be" r ( s f ^'/'-f^TT^^^S - ---- >- ------------ = I support ___ _ ____ ' preparation of the Zone 20 Local Facilities Management D1an By signing this statement it is understood that I DO MOT waive any rights that I might otherwise be entitled to including the right to oppose the plan when it comes forwar for adoption by the City. Signed this #6 day of /<£? ____ , 1 98~? Please Print Name PRINT NAME HERE Please Sign Here SIGNATURE <£ a PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859 (619)438-1161 Citp of Cartetmb October 29, 1986 Jack Renthorn D.C.C. P.O. Box 2143 Carlsbad, California 92008 RE: CT 85-39/PUD 97 - LAUREL TREE Dear Jack: In response to your inquiry, staff cannot process an Environmental Impact Report for the Laurel Tree Project concurrent with the processing of the Local Facility Management Plan for Zone 20. That Local Facility Management Plan must be approved prior to the continuation of processing of the Laurel Tree Project. This determination is based on section 21.90.030 of the Growth Management Ordinance, No. 9808. Enclosed is a copy of that section for your reference. Should you have any questions, please call. Sincerely Ttours, Lance B. Schulte Assistant Planner Enclosure: 21.90.030 cc:Mike Howes Phil LBS :dm 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4.SBADCENT F BIONDOJHNEY CITY OF C| t > U I 1200 ELM AVENUE.BAD CALIFORNIA 9;vt U 12 13 14 15 16 17 18' 19 20 21 i 22 23! 24 25 meanina is 27 28 (e) This chapter replaces the temporary "loratoriur* on processing and approval of development projects imposed bv Citv Council Ordinance No. 9791. 21.90.020 Definitions. (a)Whenever thefollowing terms are used in this chapter thev shall have the meaning established by this section unless from the context it is apparent that another intended: (1) "Citywide facilities and improvements plan" means a plan prepared and approved according to Section 21.90.090 identifying those facilities and improvements required on a citywide basis to serve the projected population of the City as established by the general plan and providing an outline and budget for financing certain facilities and improvements whichwill be provided by the City. (2) "Development permit" means any permit, entitlement or approval whether discretionary or ministerial issued under Title 20 or 21 of this code and any legislative actions such as zone chanaes, general plan amendments, or master plan approval,or amendment. (3) "Development" means any use to which land is put, building or other alteration of land and construction incident thereto. (4) "Facilities" means any schools, parks, open space, or recreational areas or structures providina for fire, library, or governmental services, identified in a facilities management plan. (5) "Improvement" includes traffic controls, streets and highways, including curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, bridges, overcrossings, street interchanaes, flood control or storm drain facilities, sewer facilities, water facilities and lighting facilities. (6) "Local facilities management plan" means a facilities management plan defined by Section 21.90.120 for a local facilities .management zone which is established accordina to Section 21.90.100. 21.90.030 General prohibition, exceptions. (a)Unless exempted by the provisions of this chapter no application for any building permit or development permit shall be accepted, processed or approved until a citywide ! facilities and improvements plan has been adopted and a local i facilities management plan for the applicable local facilities j management zone has been submitted and approved according to this) chapter. i (b) No zone change, general plan amendment, master plan) amendment or specific plan amendment which would incease the ! residential density or development intensity established by the ! general plan in effect on the effective date of this chapter j shall be approved unless an amendment to the citywide facilities management plan and the applicable local facilities manaaement plan has first been approved. 3. 'IT F BIONOC:Y CITY OF u~r(LSBADELM AVENUE1, CALIFORNIA 920081 2 i 3; 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 < <> u 18 |! 19'' 20 ! 21 i;||22! 23 24 25 ii 261! il 27 ,1 i 28 il (c) The classes of projects or permits listed in this subsection shall be exempt from the provisions of subsection (a). Developme~at permits and building permits for these projects shall be subject to any fees established pursuant to the citywi-e facilities and improvement plan and any applicable local facilities management plan. (1) Redevelopment projects. (2) Projects consisting of the construction or alteration of a single dwellina structure for a family on a lot owned by the family intending to occupy the structure, or not to exceed one nonowner-occupied house per individual for one or more lots owned prior to July 20, 1986. (3) Building permits and final maps for proiects identified in Section 2(F) of Ordinance No. 9791 (projects for which construction had commenced and were designated on the ran marked Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 9791 "as developina"). (4) Puilding permits for projects for which all required development permits were issued or approved on or before January 21, 1986. If all reouired development permits were issued for a portion of the project only, the exemption shall apply to that portion. (5) Building permits for projects for which all required development permits were issued or approved before July 20, 1986 and for which building permits could .have been issued under Ordinance No. 9791. if all required development permits were issued for a portion of the project only, the exemption shall apply to that portion. (6) Commercial and industrial projects with approved development permits or with a complete application on file with the City prior to June 11, 1986 for such permits. New permits for commercial and industrial projects located within an area that has been previously approved for such uses may also be processed and approved. (7) Projects by nonprofit entities for structures youth recreational, educational or guidance programs and girls clubs or private schools. (8) Zone changes or general plan amendments necessary to accomplish consistency between the general plan and zoning, to implement the provisions of the Local Coastal Plan or which the City Council finds will not increase the public facilities or services and which are initiated by the City Council or Planning Commission. (9) Public utility facilities and improvement projects without accommodations for permanent employees are exempt from the provisions of this chapter unless the City Council determines they are of sufficient size and scale to impact public facilities. (10) Adjustment plats. (11) Development permits for minor subdivisions located in the northwest quadrant of the City as defined in Ordinance No. 9791. Building permits for commercial or industrial construction on lots in such subdivisions may be approved. Residential building permits will not be approved fcr lots in such subdivisions unless otherwise exempt under this 4. and uses for such as boys _ cr K VINCENT F BIONOY ATTORNEY CITY OF ^M|1200 ELM AVENUECARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA 9;h- u - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8,' 9 10 11 12 13 14 | 15 16 i 17 18 19 ; 20 21 : 22 23 24 I 25 26 I1 27 ! 28 chapter except one permit for a nonowner-occupied lot may be approved for each such subdivision. _(d) The provisions of this subsection apply to final maps and Other development permits for projects with a tentative map approved before July 20, 1986 which are not included in the exemptions listed in subsection (c). (1) If a tentative map or tentative parcel map was approved on or before January 21, 1986 then, after approval of the citywide facilities plan, a final map or parcel map r*ay be processed and approved before the adoption of a local facility management plan. The expiration period for those tentative maps shall be tolled until the citywide plan is adopted. The expiration of any development permits issued in conjunction with those maps shall be tolled until the applicable local facilities management plan is approved or, two years after the date the citywide plan is approved, whichever occurs first. j (2) If a tentative map or tentative parcel map was approved after January 21, 1986 and before July 20, 1986, but the approv-i of final map or parcel map was prohibited by Ordinance No. 9791 then approval of final maps and parcel maps is prohibited until after preparation of the applicable local facilities management plan. The expiration period of those tentative maps and tentative parcel maps, and any other development permits issued in conjunction with the maps shall be tolled until the local facilities management plan is approved, or two years after date the citywide facilities and improvements plan is approved, whichever occurs first. (e) The exemption for projects listed in subsection (c)j (3), (4), (5), and (6) shall expire on July 20, 1988. After thatl date all development permits for those projects shall be fully i subject to the provisions of this chapter. The exemptions for ' projects listed in subsection (c) (3), (4), (5), and (6) shall apply only so long as the facilities and improvements required a3 a condition to the issuance of final development permits have j been installed or are being installed pursuant to a secured i agreement. Any breach of such secured improvement agreement shall subject any remaining building permits for the project to the provisions of subsection (a). (f) Final or parcel maps for projects listed in subsection (c) (3), (4), (5), (6) and (7) which comply with all the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and Title 20 of this Code which were filed with the City before July 20, 1986 may be approved by the City Council, or City Engineer as appropriate, after July 20, 1986. Upon approval, those projects shall be subject to the exemption of subsection (c). (g) The City Council may authorize the processing of and decision making on building permits and development permits for a project with a master plan approved before July 20, 1986 subject to the following restrictions: (1) The City Council finds that the facilities anc improvements required by the master plan are sufficient to meet the needs created by the project and that the master plan developer has agreed to install those facilities and improvement: to the satisfaction of the City Council. 5. < 1! 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 l*\ 14 i; sSSi1 * < * is03 Q ^ 2 I 8 S 16 181| 191' 20 i!'i21 |i 22! 23 24 I 25> i 26 i 27 28 (2) The master plan developer shall agree in writing that all facilities and improvement reouirements, including but not limited to the payment of fees established by the citywide facilities and management plan and the applicable local facilities management plan shall be applicable to development within the master plan area and that the master plan developer shall comply with those plans. (3) The master plan establishes an educational park and all uses within the park comprise an integral part of the educational facility. (4) Building permits for the 129 unit residential portion of Phase I of the project may be approved provided the applicant has provided written evidence that an educational entity will occupy Phase I of the project which the City Council finds is satisfactory and consistent with the goals and intent of the approved master plan. (5) Prior to the approval of the final map for Phase I the master plan developer shall have agreed to participate in the restoration of a significant lagoon and wetland resource area and made any dedications of property necessary to accomplish the restoration. (h) After making the findings in paragraph 1 the City Council may authorize the processing of and decision making on master plans subject to the requirements of paragraph 2. After the grant of the easement required by subparagraph (h)(iv) the tentative map for Phase I of the project, the site plan for the commercial development and the local coastal plan amendment may also be processed and approved. If such approvals are granted and, subject to all other provisions of this code, grading and building permits for construction of the golf course and first phase of the commercial portions of the project may be processed and approved. The processing and approval of all other developments and building permits within the master plan shall not occur unti after the citywide facilities plan and the local facilities management plan have been adopted by the City Council. (l)(i) That the master plan will provide all necessary public facilities for the project and will cure any facilities deficits in the area affected by the project. (ii) That the approval will not prejudice the preparation of the citywide facilities plan and will improve the level of public facilities and services in the area. (iii) That by the dedication of land and the construction of public improvements the project will make a significant contribution to the public facilities needs of the city and provide for the preservation or enhancement of significant environmental resources. (2)(i) The master plan shall include all of the information required by and implementing the provisions of Sections 21.90.090 and 21.90.110 for the area covered by the master plan.(ii) The applicant shall agree in writing that al facilities and improvement requirements, including but not limited to the payment of fees established by the citywide 6. o i £ 5 i1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 i 11 12 13 14 15 h. > UJ 5 2 S S 16o S 5 a 1 I » 0 181! 19 ii 20 3ii 21 :i 22 23 24|i 25 Ii 26! 27 | 281 facilities and improvement plan and the applicable local facilities management plan shall be applicable to development within the master plan area and that the master plan developer shall comply with those requirements. (iii) The master plan applicant shall agree to participate in the restoration of a significant lagoon and wetland resource area. (iv) Prior to any processing on the paster plan the applicant shall grant an easement over the property necessary for the lagoon restoration and the right-of-way necessary for the widening of La Costa Avenue and its intersection with El Canuno Real. 21.90.031 Tolling of time for consideration of applications submitted before the effective date of this chapter. After approval of the citywide facilities and improvement plan and the applicable local facilities management plan applications for development permits which were accepted as complete before the effective date of this chapter shall have processing priority in relationship to the acceptance date. Until the approval of the plans all applicable time limits for processing the development permits shall be tolled. 21.90.032 Tolling of expiration of previously issued development permits. If a discretionary development permitf other than a development permit issued in conjunction with a subdivision map, issued prior to July 20, 1986 has an expiration period within which building permits must be issued and the issuance of building permits for the project is prohibited by this chapter then the expiration period shall be tolled until the applicable local facilities management plan is approved, or two years after the date the citywide plan is approved, whichever occurs first. 21.90.033 Extensions of prior approvals prohibited. After approval of an applicable local facilities management plan an extension of the expiration date of any development permit shall not be granted unless the extension is found to be consistent with the plan. The decision making body considering an extension may condition the extension upon compliance with the citywide plan and applicable local facilities management plan. 21.90.040 Compliance with this chapter. (a) No development permit shall be approved unless the approving authority finds that the permit is consistent with the citywide facilities and improvements plan and the applicable local facilities management plan. To ensure consistency the approving authority may impose any condition to the approval necessary to implement the plans. (b) No building permit shall be issued unless the fees required by this chapter, and any applicable local facilities management plan fees are first paid, and the permit is consister 7. DAVID TAUSSIG AND ASSOCIATES, INC. aO7Q BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE. SUITE 1 1 O IRVINE. CA 95715 C71 4) 752-1 554 FAX C71 4J 752-4058 ZONE 20 FINANCING PLAN CITY OF CARLSBAD The purpose of this plan is to assure the City of Carlsbad that financing is in place for all of the public facilities necessary to support buildout within Zone 20. I. CIRCULATION A. College Boulevard College Boulevard (from Palomar Airport Road to Poinsettia Lane) will be directly financed by several landowners within Zone 20. The landowners involved in this financing are the four landowners most directly benefiting from the construction of College Boulevard, as follows: 1. Cobblestone Sea Village (CS) 2. Laurel Tree Investors (LT) 3. KTS Nippon Inc. (KTS) 4. Woodward (W) The proposal set forth herein will allow road construction to occur in segments. As such, each of the above landowners will be responsible for the construction of a specific segment of College Boulevard (see Exhibit A) . Depending upon the development phasing of each parcel, any one landowner may be required to construct his own segment plus another landowner's segment, in order to provide motor vehicle access to his own property. In anticipation of such an occurrence, a reimbursement program will be set in place to mitigate any excessive costs incurred by any one landowner (see Exhibit B for phasing and reimbursement scenarios). In order to guarantee the construction of College Boulevard, at map recordation a landowner will provide a Letter of Credit, bond or other form of security acceptable to the City. B. Poinsettia Lane The construction of Poinsettia Lane will primarily impact the landowners in the eastern quadrant of Zone 20. Due to a lack of landowners anticipating development and the limited number of dwelling units planned in this quadrant, there are three potentially viable alternatives available for the financing of Poinsettia Lane. REAL ESTATE FINANCE AND PLANNING Page 2 1. Landowner-financed construction occurring in segments, as building activity is undertaken by the three landowners most likely to develop (see Exhibit C). Those landowners are as follows: a. Roesch (R) b. Seabluff Association (SB) o. Coast Waste (CW) As was recommended for College Boulevard, a reimbursement mechanism will also be established to compensate the three landowners who have paid more than their fair share (Exhibit D). Additionally, in the event any of the remaining landowners in the quadrant proceed with the development of their properties, in-lieu fees will be assessed at the time of building permit in order to reimburse the landowners who financed Poinsettia Lane. 2. The formation of either a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) or an Assessment District (AD) encompassing all landowners within the eastern quadrant of Zone 20. The formation of either a CFD or an AD is contingent upon the approval of the area's landowners and assumes the ability of the land to provide sufficient collateral for a bond sale. The delayed development schedule of certain landowners within the quadrant suggests the use of a CFD to finance Poinsettia Lane, as this financing mechanism will provide the flexibility to exclude these landowners from the special tax until development occurs on their properties. 3. The inclusion of the east quadrant in the AD currently being formed to encompass the HPI Property (Zone 19). This alternative assumes that HPI would be willing to cooperate in the formation of an AD which includes parcels under outside ownership. If a public financing district was not established on these eastern quadrant properties, landowners would guarantee the construction of Poinsettia Lane by providing a Letter of Credit, bond or other form of security acceptable to the district at map recordation. Page 3 II. PARKS At the time that building activity is initiated within Zone 20, a park deficiency of 5 acres will exist. This deficiency will be mitigated by developer funding, which will be required of the landowner choosing to develop first. At that time, (currently anticipated to be 1989), $1 million will be provided to the City for park acquisition and improvement, as follows: A. $500,000 cash for acquisition of 5 acres of parkland B. At map recordation, a Letter of Credit, bond or other form of security acceptable to the City in the amount of $500,000 for park improvements. The developer providing this up-front funding will be reimbursed through in-lieu park fees contributed by the remaining landowners within the Zone. ZONE 5 ROAD LEGEND MAR ZONE BOUNDARY EXISTING CIRCULATION PROPOSED CIRCULATION BCS PROGRAM L-2SUDAN INTERIOR MISSION ( CUP-190 LAUREL TRE0\ INVESTORS V COBBLESTONE SEA VILLAGE ( CT 84-32 ) SEABLUFF ASSOC.KTS NIPPON INC. 1 AITCHISON 2. BOLTON 3 ALVARAOO 4 LUJAN X33 l— I Capitcn^\ -5 ^i — ' • i • i • ^^ ^ rnFacilities ^\ -* o Project ^\i-u COLLEGE BLVD. Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 Scenario 5 Scenario 6 Scenario 7 Scenario 8 Scenario 9 Scenario 1 0 Scenario 1 1 Scenario 1 2 Scenario 1 3 Scenario 1 4 Scenario 1 5 Scenario 1 6 Scenario 1 7 Scenario 1 8 Scenario 1 9 Scenario 20 Scenario 21 Scenario 22 Scenario 23 Scenario 24 $4 M uruer ui dvlpmt "> •- e >o Hi 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 4 1 1 3 3 4 4 1 1 2 2 4 4 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 4 2 4 2 3 3 4 1 4 1 3 2 4 1 4 1 2 2 3 1 3 1 2 4 3 4 2 3 2 4 3 4 1 3 1 4 2 4 1 2 1 3 2 3 1 2 1 Construction < tn o a C7" C?i C7> Q> <U <U <I> <Uin in tn to cscs cscs cscs LT LT CS CS CS CS IT LT LT LT CS CS LT LT LT LT LT LT LI LT KTS LT KTS LT LT LT LT LT LT LT IT LT T T LT LT LT LT LT LT LT LT KTS KTS KTS KTS KTS KTS KTS KTS KTS KTS KTS KTS KTS KTS KTS KTS KTS KTS KTS KIS KTS KIS KTS KIS W W W W W W W W KTS W KTS W W W KTS W KTS W W W KTS W KTS W ?a> i5 £C 3 £(8 dvlpr Keimbursements < m o a D^ <T> O^ O> (U <U SU <1)C/) 00 LO CO NA NA NA NA NA NA Ccj- — " "T C^> NA NA NA NA C£^T v/^^-^" T ~r c^-T C5--- i" NA NA ^^il 3^LT ^"a J^*""1j J^-^LL $^\1 NA NA L^^s NA U^lcTs NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA . NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3M<fs NA 3M<fs NA NA NA 3M<TS NA . 3M<TS NA NA NA >-KTS NA 3M<fs NA X W ZONE 5 ROAD LEGEND MAR ZONE BOUNDARY EXISTING CIRCULATION PROPOSED CIRCULATION BCS PROGRAM 1-2 COBBLESTONE SEA VILLAGE ( CT 84-32 ) CITY OF CARLSBAD SEABLUFF ASSOC.KTS NIPPON INC \ /SARKARIA V 1 AITCHISON Z BOLTON 3 ALVARADO 4 LUJAN r R M w n \\ Capitol^\. -= -Mi — i M * _L * ^""-^ ^ (nFacilities \^ -5 § Project ^^\^-° POINSETTIA LN Alternative 1 Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 Scenario 5 Scenario 6 Alternative 2 Alternative3 $4 M ,FundingSourcedvplrs MR/AD AD(HPl) order of dvlpmt m ^CC LO 0 1 1 2 2 3 2 2 3 1 3 1 3 3 2 3 1 2 1 Construction < CD 0 C7» C7> Q>V d> 4> CO LO C/) R R SB CW SB CW SB CW SB CW SB CW CW CW CW CW CW CW Reimbursements < m o O> C7> C7><u a> a>c/) to co NA NA ^^B.3-^cw 3-^B 3-^cw NA SB^^cW NA S^^cw NA Cp ^ — "35^^cw NA NA NA NA NA NA <n-^c<u E oo See Note 1. See Note 2. See Note 2. X M w M H a NOTES 1. Requires two reimbursement programs, one between the three landowners and one consisting of in—lieu fees for other landowners 2 Assumes ability of land to provide sufficient collateral for bond sale and agreement by landowners to place debt on their properties