HomeMy WebLinkAboutMCUP 09-07; SD02436A T-MOBILE BRESSI RANCH; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (7)ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
(To be Completed by Applicant)
Date Filed: 4' -e (To be completed by City)
Application Number(s): 14C41f 01, .10 1 /
General Information
1. Name of project: T-Ntotoi le SbCraLt5to# 8Re5s 's AtifiCiot_
2. Name of developer or project sponsor: ill 010.1 le.
Address: tot o Telesis La LLA(.1- 4" 333
City, State, Zip Code: S :D., 1194D-1
Phone Number: 752.- 1 17 - —Tame
Name of person to be contacted concerning this project: rBe.
Address: r7 1-1 -7 V; c-4.biej k2-
City, State, Zip Code: 5an fraz_e_zs, CA q .O (,GI
i (<0 tiJ5
Phone Number:
SPS-3" -cat-13 - 00
c5-0 0.,euenPb e ti PtkeiL,
4. Address of Project:
Assessor's Parcel Number: a --„ata t - 0 5 b O
5. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including
those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies:
Pe-le-kt"-‘±‘
6. Existing General Plan Land Use Designation: 19 1.-
7. Existing zoning district: Pr..1P.v
8. Existing land use(s): TIIGLA -5416 S-fts Pet cirvild
9. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): tuirteless 1t e. YlIYA14.41,1C4:414:11(.5
S 1 fen
Project Description
10. Site size: 15319
11. Proposed Building square footage: 141/1
12: Number of floors of construction:
13. Amount of off-street parking provided: iJitt
2
02/22/06
rg
14. Associated projects:
15. If residential, include the number of units and schedule of unit sizes: PIA
16. If commercial, indicate the type, yyhether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales
area, and loading facilities:
17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities: 11/41 A-
18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment perd .4estimated occupancy, loading
facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project:
19. If the project involves a variance conditional use or rezoning applications, state this and indicate clearly
why the application is required: M I AOR- — Lai Lek ss Le ell ryintLk.".....eguitalts
5 i-fts 12944-zee_ et_e_u_49 e go cLL44.
Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss all items checked yes (attach additional
sheets as necessary).
Yes
20. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, or hills, or
substantial alteration of ground contours.
El
21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public
lands or roads.
D
22. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project. D
23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. D
24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. El
25. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or
alteration of existing drainage patterns.
D
26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity.
3
02/22/06
•
ti/ A
• Date: .i1,93/snoct Signature:
For: .1-211(1 019;
26. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more.
28. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic
substances, flammables or explosives.
29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.).
30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas,
etc.).
31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects.
Yes No
O El
• gi
D
E
Environmental Setting
Attach sheets that include a response to the following questions:
32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability,
plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the
site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be
accepted.
33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural,
historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land
use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height,
frontage, set-back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will
be accepted.
Certification
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information
required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented
are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
02/22/06
4
Environmental Information Form
32. Description of project site: The project site consists of a newly built storage facility,
Bressi Ranch Storage. This storage facility consists of 3 separate buildings. Two of the
buildings create a horseshoe configuration. The third building is located in the center of
the horseshoe. The south facing building is a one-story, the west, north and east facing
building is a two-story. The inner building is a 3-story. Please see site plan on drawings
for clarification.
33. Description of surrounding properties: This storage facility is located within a Master
Plan Community — Bressi Ranch. There are other buildings in the process of being
constructed within the nearby vicinity. There is open space land directly south and
adjacent to the storage facility. Future use is unknown. Directly east exists a commercial
building. Palomar Airport is diagonally located from the site. To the west and across the
street is Olympic Resort — in the process of being torn down. To the north and across the
street is more open space land. Future use is unknown.
ANTENNA SYSTEM 1 GSM CELL: SD02436A_B
ANTENNA SYSTEM 2 UMTS CELL:
• THIS CELL IS NOT CATEGORICALLY EXCLUDED FROM THE REQUIREMENT FOR AN MPE ANALYSIS
• FAIL: GENERAL POPULATION/UNCONTROLLED EXPOSURE LIMITS
• PASS: OCCUPATIONAL/CONTROLLED EXPOSURE LIMITS
ANTENNA SYSTEM 2 UMTS CELL:
• THIS CELL IS NOT CATEGORICALLY EXCLUDED FROM THE REQUIREMENT FOR AN MPE ANALYSIS
• FAIL: GENERAL POPULATION/UNCONTROLLED EXPOSURE LIMITS
ANTENNA SYSTEM 1 GSM CELL: SD02436A_D
• THIS CELL IS NOT CATEGORICALLY EXCLUDED FROM THE REQUIREMENT FOR AN MPE ANALYSIS
• FAIL: GENERAL POPULATION/UNCONTROLLED EXPOSURE LIMITS
• PASS: OCCUPATIONAL/CONTROLLED EXPOSURE LIMITS
ANTENNA SYSTEM 1 GSM CELL: SD02436A_C
• THIS CELL IS NOT CATEGORICALLY EXCLUDED FROM THE REQUIREMENT FOR AN MPE ANALYSIS
• FAIL: GENERAL POPULATION/UNCONTROLLED EXPOSURE LIMITS
• PASS: OCCUPATIONAL/CONTROLLED EXPOSURE LIMITS
ANTENNA SYSTEM 1 GSM CELL: SD02436A_A
• THIS CELL IS NOT CATEGORICALLY EXCLUDED FROM THE REQUIREMENT FOR AN MPE ANALYSIS • FAIL: GENERAL POPULATION/UNCONTROLLED EXPOSURE LIMITS
• PASS: OCCUPATIONAL/CONTROLLED EXPOSURE LIMITS
• THIS CELL IS NOT CATEGORICALLY EXCLUDED FROM THE REQUIREMENT FOR AN MPE ANALYSIS
• FAIL: GENERAL POPULATION/UNCONTROLLED EXPOSURE LIMITS
• PASS: OCCUPATIONAL/CONTROLLED EXPOSURE LIMITS
MPE Site Analysis Page 1 of 13
Home I MPE Home I New Analysis I Print I Save to Word I search I Edit
T Tttobi1ea. • •
SITE ANALYSIS
OF
RADIO FREQUENCY ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS
For Base Station: SD02436A
MPE Analysis Tool v2.6.07
http://sys.eng.t-mobile.com/westregion/hotrod/mpe_result.asp 3/27/2009
MPE Site Analysis Page 2 of 13
• PASS: OCCUPATIONAL/CONTROLLED EXPOSURE LIMITS
ANTENNA SYSTEM 2 UMTS CELL:
• THIS CELL IS NOT CATEGORICALLY EXCLUDED FROM THE REQUIREMENT FOR AN MPE ANALYSIS
• FAIL: GENERAL POPULATION/UNCONTROLLED EXPOSURE LIMITS
• PASS: OCCUPATIONAL/CONTROLLED EXPOSURE LIMITS
ANTENNA SYSTEM 2 UMTS CELL:
• THIS CELL IS NOT CATEGORICALLY EXCLUDED FROM THE REQUIREMENT FOR AN MPE ANALYSIS
• FAIL: GENERAL POPULATION/UNCONTROLLED EXPOSURE LIMITS
• PASS: OCCUPATIONAL/CONTROLLED EXPOSURE LIMITS
Name:
Region: Unknown, Market: Unknown, Site: SD02436A
Site Address:
BRESSI RANCH STORAGE ON EL CAMINO REAL
Submitted By:
SOMNATH KAR
Date:
Friday, March 27, 2009
FCC:
Does NOT meet Sok FCC limit for uncontrolled access. Further analysis required.
REPORT SUMMARY
- FURTHER ANALYSIS REQUIRED -
This report was generated based on Engineering and Design data provided by SOMNATH KAR, on
behalf of T-Mobile, USA, for the cell site located at BRESSI RANCH STORAGE ON EL CAMINO
REAL. The report's technical data was derived in part by the FCC OET68B FCC Exposure Guidelines
for measuring Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) on PCS Networks.
Based on the output power, number of radios and antenna height for this site:
Sector 'A' Antenna System(s):
• Meets 100% of the FCC general population/uncontrolled exposure limit at a horz distance of 1 ft (0.3 m) from the nearest access
point.
• Does NOT meet 100% of the FCC occupational/controlled exposure limit at a horz distance of 1 ft (0.3 m) from the nearest
access point.
Sector 'B' Antenna System(s):
• Meets 100% of the FCC general population/uncontrolled exposure limit at a horz distance of 1 ft (0.3 m) from the nearest access
point.
• Does NOT meet 100% of the FCC occupational/controlled exposure limit at a horz distance of 1 ft (0.3 m) from the nearest
access point.
http://sys.eng.t-mobile.com/westregion/hotrod/mperesult.asp 3/27/2009
MPE Site Analysis Page 3 of 13
Sector 'C' Antenna System(s):
• Meets 100% of the FCC general population/uncontrolled exposure limit at a horz distance of 1 ft (0.3 m) from the nearest access
point.
• Does NOT meet 100% of the FCC occupational/controlled exposure limit at a horz distance of 1 ft (0.3 m) from the nearest
access point.
Sector 'D' Antenna System(s):
• Meets 100% of the FCC general population/uncontrolled exposure limit at a horz distance of 1 ft (0.3 m) from the nearest access
point.
• Does NOT meet 100% of the FCC occupational/controlled exposure limit at a horz distance of 1 ft (0.3 m) from the nearest
access point.
For Occupational/Controlled personnel who may come in closer proximity to the antenna than 1 ft
(0.3 m) precautions must be exercised. For example, all personnel should have appropriate
training on exposure limits. All T-Mobile personnel should wear exposure detecting equipment.
Proper signage must be posted. For General population personnel, it is a must that access closer
than 1 ft be restricted and proper signage be posted at this site.
• RF warning signs should be posted at the entrance of this site or at the entrance of the antenna locations.
Analysis Overview
T-Mobile, USA has conducted an analysis for determining the MPE compliance for the cell site
located at BRESSI RANCH STORAGE ON EL CAMINO REAL (Latitude: 33.12900, Longitude: -
117.26545). This analysis consists of the actual site design parameters, the number of radios
transmitting and the resulting calculation of the estimated RF field strength from the antennas. The
output is then compared to the FCC recommended guidelines for human exposure to RF
electromagnetic fields (OET65b).
Site Description
Based on the Engineering and Design Data provided by SOMNATH KAR, the proposed site will
have the following parameters:
Site Type:
Rooftop (antenna face is accessible, roof access elevation: 29 ft AGL)
Collocation:
NO
Controlled/Uncontrolled Access to Antenna Face:
YES
Antenna Make:
System 1 (GSM), Sector A: Andrew-HBXX-6513DS-R2M; Sector B: no make given; Sector C: no
make given; Sector D: no make given
System 2 (UMTS), Sector A: [Unknown]; Sector B: [Unknown]; Sector C: [Unknown]; Sector D:
[Unknown]
Antenna Model:
http://sys.eng.t-mobile.com/westregion/hotrod/mperesult.asp 3/27/2009
MPE Site Analysis Page 4 of 13
System 1 (GSM), Sector A: HBXX_6513DS_01D; Sector B: HBXX_6513DS_01D; Sector C:
HBXX_6513DS_01D; Sector D: HBXX_6513DS_OlD
System 2 (UMTS), Sector A: HBXX_6513DS_01D; Sector B: HBXX_6513DS_O1D; Sector C:
HBXX_6513DS_01D; Sector D: HBXX_6513DS_01D
Frequency:
System 1 (GSM), Sector A: 1920 MHz; Sector B: 1920 MHz; Sector C: 1920 MHz; Sector D: 1920
MHz
System 2 (UMTS), Sector A: 2110 MHz; Sector B: 2110 MHz; Sector C: 2110 MHz; Sector D: 2110
MHz
Max Antenna Gain:
System 1 (GSM), Sector A: 14.6 dBi; Sector B: 14.6 dBi; Sector C: 14.6 dBi; Sector D: 14.6 dBi
System 2 (UMTS), Sector A: 14.6 dBi; Sector B: 14.6 dBi; Sector C: 14.6 dBi; Sector D: 14.6 dBi
Max ERP Chan into Ant:
System 1 (GSM), Sector A: 16 Watts; Sector B: 16 Watts; Sector C: 16 Watts; Sector D: 16 Watts
System 2 (UMTS), Sector A: 16 Watts; Sector B: 16 Watts; Sector C: 16 Watts; Sector D: 16
Watts
Max ERP Dian:
System 1 (GSM), Sector A: 19.282 Watts; Sector B: 19.282 Watts; Sector C: 19.282 Watts;
Sector D: 19.282 Watts
System 2 (UMTS), Sector A: 19.282 Watts; Sector B: 19.282 Watts; Sector C: 19.282 Watts;
Sector D: 19.282 Watts
Total EIRP (ERP*1.64*Channels*Activity_factor):
(activity factor equals .65 for GSM and .95 for UMTS)
Sector A: 71.151 Watts; Sector B: 71.151 Watts; Sector C: 71.151 Watts; Sector D: 71.151
Watts;
No. of Channels:
System 1 (GSM), Sector A: 2, Sector B: 2, Sector C: 2, Sector D: 2
System 2 (UMTS), Sector A: 1, Sector B: 1, Sector C: 1, Sector D: 1
Antenna Mounting:
[Unknown]
Distributed Antenna System (DAS):
NO
Radiation Centerline:
32.5 ft (9.9 m) AGL
Sector Orientation:
System 1, Sector A: 340°, Sector B: 70°, Sector C: 150°, Sector D: 240°
System 2 (UMTS), Sector A: 340°, Sector B: 70°, Sector C: 150°, Sector D: 240°
Additional comments:
SYSTEM 1: Calculation based on design, not actula measurement SYSTEM 2 (UMTS): Calculation is
based on Design, not actual measurement
http://sys.eng.t-mobile.com/westregion/hotrod/mperesult.asp 3/27/2009
1000 0 01 10 100 100 0 01 10 100 100 0 1000 0
10000 0
1000 0
100 0
100
10
01
001
0 0010
SD02436A_D - null
1000 0 01 10 100 100 0 1000 0 01 10 100 100 0
Reset Print Help Major Axis Minor Axis
Distance (ft)
5% of UnCtrl Limit 100% of UnCtrl Lime a 100% of Ctrl Limit
nn•• Sys 1 Power Denser.. Sys 2 Power Density 44.4 Combined PD
Distance (ft)
5% of UnCtrl LinI 100 % of UnCtrl Limo • 100% of Ctrl Limit
4.4 Sys 1 Power Densit, Sys 2 Power Density dm Combined PD
Distance (ft) Distance (ft) •5% of UnCtrl Limo 100% of UnCtri Limit 100% of Col Limit • 5% of UnCtrl Lim* = 100% of UnCtrl Limit .4 100 % of Ctrl Limit
.4 Sys 1 Power Densit, Sys 2 Power Density .44 Combined PD arm Sys 1 Power Dense, Sys 2 Power Density . Combined PD
10000 0
1000 0
100 0
100
01
001
0 0010 rurnir I II 111Th I I 1111111 1 r flint I I I unit 0 0010
SD02436A_A - null SD02436A_B - null
10000 0
1000 0
100 0
00
10
01
0 01
MPE Site Analysis Page 5 of 13
GSM Cell: SD02436A_A Power Density @ Horz Dist
Maximum Power Density: 2198.908 pW/cm2 219.891 % of limit 0.656 ft (0.2 m)
0.4548 times lower than the MPE limit for an uncontrolled environment
Power: 25.067 Watts (ERP), 41.109 Watts (EiRP)
@ Hon z Dist UMTS Cell: Power Density
Maximum Power Density: 1099.454 11W/cm 2 109.945 % of limit 0.656 ft (0.2 m)
0.9095 times lower than the MPE limit for an uncontrolled environment
Power: 18.318 Watts (ERP), 30.041 Watts (EiRP)
GSM Cell: SD02436A_B Power Density @ Horz Dist
Maximum Power Density: 2198.908 pW/cm2 219.891 % of limit 0.656 ft (0.2 m)
0.4548 times lower than the MPE limit for an uncontrolled environment
Power:
UMTS Cell:
25.067 Watts (ERP), 41.109 Watts
Power Density
(EiRP)
@ Horz Dist
Maximum Power Density: 1099.454 pW/cm 2 109.945 % of limit 0.656 ft (0.2 m)
0.9095 times lower than the MPE limit for an uncontrolled environment
Power: 18.318 Watts (ERP), 30.041 Watts (EiRP)
http://sys.eng.t-mobile.com/westregion/hotrod/mpe_resultasp 3/27/2009
MPE Site Analysis Page 6 of 13
GSM Cell: SD02436A_C Power Density @ Horz Dist
Maximum Power Density:
I
2198.908 pW/cm2 I 219.891 % of limit
1
0.656 ft (0.2 m)
0.4548 times lower than the MPE limit for an uncontrolled environment
Power: -
UMTS Cell:
25.067 Watts (ERP), 41.109 Watts (EiRP)
Power Density @ Horz Dist
Maximum Power Density:
1._
1099.454 pW/cm 2 1 109.945 % of limit 0.656 ft (0.2 m)
0.9095 times lower than the MPE limit for an uncontrolled environment
Power: 18.318 Watts (ERP), 30.041 Watts (EiRP)
GSM Cell: SD02436A_D
_
Power Density @ Horz Dist
Maximum Power Density:
1..
2198.908 pW/cm2 1 219.891 % of limit 0.656 ft (0.2 m)
0.4548 times lower than the MPE limit for an uncontrolled environment
Power:
UMTS Cell:
25.067 Watts (ERP), 41.109 Watts (EiRP) _
Power Density @ Horz Dist
Maximum Power Density: 1099.454 pW/cm 2 I 109.945 0/0 of limit 0.656 ft (0.2 m)
1
0.9095 times lower than the MPE limit for an uncontrolled environment
Power: 18.318 Watts (ERP), 30.041 Watts (EiRP)
RF Field Strength Calculation Methodology
A generally accepted method is used to calculate the expected RF field strength. The method uses
the FCC's recommended equation (Reference Federal Communication Commission Office of
Engineering Technology Bulletin 65) which predicts field strength on a worst case basis by doubling
the predicted field strength.
The power density at any distance from an isotropic antenna is simply the transmitter power P t
divided by the surface area of a sphere (4 x PI x R2) at that distance. The surface area of the
sphere increases by the square of the radius, therefore the power density, P D (watts/square
meter), decreases by the square of the radius. For a directional antenna with a gain G (max
radiation intensity of directional antenna / radiation intensity of isotropic antenna with same power
input), the power density at a distant point is the gain of the antenna multiplied by the power
density of an isotropic radiator, P D = (Pt x Gt) / (4 x PI x R2). This is the basis of the far-field
and near-field power density equations used in this report.
The far-field power density equation used here is:
= 2.56 x N X 1.64 x ERPEichan x 106
S
Where:
S = power density
2.56 = reflection coefficient
N = number of RF channels
1.64 x ERP0 khan = EIRP per channel at the angle for the calculation point
4 x 71X R2
http://sys.eng.t-mobile.com/westregion/hotroci/mpe_resultasp 3/27/2009
MPE Site Analysis Page 7 of 13
R = horizontal distance to the center of radiation
The far-field power density is then adjusted for any miscellaneous attenuation specified by the
engineer.
The near-field power density equation used is:
N x PIN/chan x 106
2x7rxRxhxcd360
Where:
S = power density
N = number of RF channels
PIN/chan = Max power input to the antenna per channel = Max_ERP th / 10(Max_Gain / 10)
R = horizontal distance to the center of radiation
h = vertical aperture of the antenna
alpha/360 = 3 dB horizontal beamwidth of the antenna pattern divided by 360
If the antenna aperture is less than 6.56 feet, the near-field power density is multiplied by the
aperture height and divided by 6.56. The near-field power density is then multiplied by the cosine
of the angle from the horizon to the calculation point. Finally, the power density is adjusted for any
miscellaneous attenuation.
Whether the near-field or far-field equation is used depends on the distance formula d = 1.28 x
(1.64 x Antenna Gain) x Height of Antenna Aperture x (3d8 Beamwidth/360), note: EIRP = 1.64
x ERP. If the distance from the face of the antenna is greater than d then the lesser result of the
near-field and far-field equations is used. If the vertical distance from calculation point to bottom
(or top) of the antenna is greater than 0.25 times the aperture height, then the lesser of the near-
field / far-field equations is used. Otherwise the near-field value is used. Note: All lengths are
converted from feet to centimeters during calculations.
Final analysis for Antenna System 1, Cell SD02436A A
Using 2 channels and a maximum effective radiated power (ERP) of 19.28 Watts (42.85 dBm),
and a downtilt of 10, the calculated power density for this site at the nearest controlled access
point of 1 ft (0.3 m) is 2069.86 pW/cm 2 . The calculated power density for the site at the
nearest uncontrolled access point of 1 ft (0.3 m) is 2069.86 pW/cm 2. Using this result, the
maximum calculated field strength at the nearest accessible point is 206.99% of the applicable
public limit for uncontrolled exposure.
• The 100% FCC general population/uncontrolled exposure minimum distance is 4 ft (1.22 m).
• The 100% FCC occupational/controlled exposure minimum distance is 0 ft (0 m).
Final analysis for Antenna System 1, Cell SD02436A B
Using 2 channels and a maximum effective radiated power (ERP) of 19.28 Watts (42.85 dBm),
and a downtilt of 10, the calculated power density for this site at the nearest controlled access
point of 1 ft (0.3 m) is 2069.86 pW/cm 2 . The calculated power density for the site at the
nearest uncontrolled access point of 1 ft (0.3 m) is 2069.86 pW/cm 2 . Using this result, the
maximum calculated field strength at the nearest accessible point is 206.99% of the applicable
public limit for uncontrolled exposure.
http://sys.eng.t-mobile.com/westregion/hotrod/mperesult.asp 3/27/2009
MPE Site Analysis Page 8 of 13
• The 100% FCC general population/uncontrolled exposure minimum distance is 4 ft (1.22 m).
• The 100% FCC occupational/controlled exposure minimum distance is 0 ft (0 m).
Final analysis for Antenna System 1, Cell SD02436A C
Using 2 channels and a maximum effective radiated power (ERP) of 19.28 Watts (42.85 dBm),
and a downtilt of 10, the calculated power density for this site at the nearest controlled access
point of 1 ft (0.3 m) is 2069.86 pW/cm2 . The calculated power density for the site at the
nearest uncontrolled access point of 1 ft (0.3 m) is 2069.86 pW/cm2. Using this result, the
maximum calculated field strength at the nearest accessible point is 206.99% of the applicable
public limit for uncontrolled exposure.
• The 100% FCC general population/uncontrolled exposure minimum distance is 4 ft (1.22 m).
• The 100% FCC occupational/controlled exposure minimum distance is 0 ft (0 m).
Final analysis for Antenna System 1, Cell SD02436A_ D
Using 2 channels and a maximum effective radiated power (ERP) of 19.28 Watts (42.85 dBm),
and a downtilt of 10, the calculated power density for this site at the nearest controlled access
point of 1 ft (0.3 m) is 2069.86 pW/cm 2 . The calculated power density for the site at the
nearest uncontrolled access point of 1 ft (0.3 m) is 2069.86 pW/cm 2. Using this result, the
maximum calculated field strength at the nearest accessible point is 206.99% of the applicable
public limit for uncontrolled exposure.
• The 100% FCC general population/uncontrolled exposure minimum distance is 4 ft (1.22 m).
• The 100% FCC occupational/controlled exposure minimum distance is 0 ft (0 m).
Final analysis for Antenna System 2 (UMTS), Cell
Using 1 channels and a maximum effective radiated power (ERP) of 19.28 Watts (42.85 dBm),
and a downtilt of 10, the calculated power density for this site at the nearest controlled access
point of 1 ft (0.3 m) is 1034.93 pW/cm2 . The calculated power density for the site at the
nearest uncontrolled access point of 1 ft (0.3 m) is 1034.93 1.1W/cm2. Using this result, the
maximum calculated field strength at the nearest accessible point is 103.49% of the applicable
public limit for uncontrolled exposure.
• The 100% FCC general population/uncontrolled exposure minimum distance is 2 ft (0.61 m).
• The 100% FCC occupational/controlled exposure minimum distance is 0 ft (0 m).
Final analysis for Antenna System 2 (UMTS), Cell
Using 1 channels and a maximum effective radiated power (ERP) of 19.28 Watts (42.85 dBm),
and a downtilt of 10, the calculated power density for this site at the nearest controlled access
point of 1 ft (0.3 m) is 1034.93 pW/cm 2 . The calculated power density for the site at the
nearest uncontrolled access point of 1 ft (0.3 m) is 1034.93 pW/cm2. Using this result, the
maximum calculated field strength at the nearest accessible point is 103.49% of the applicable
public limit for uncontrolled exposure.
• The 100% FCC general population/uncontrolled exposure minimum distance is 2 ft (0.61 m).
• The 100% FCC occupational/controlled exposure minimum distance is 0 ft (0 m).
Final analysis for Antenna System 2 (UMTS), Cell
Using 1 channels and a maximum effective radiated power (ERP) of 19.28 Watts (42.85 dBm),
and a downtilt of 10, the calculated power density for this site at the nearest controlled access
point of 1 ft (0.3 m) is 1034.93 pW/cm2 . The calculated power density for the site at the
nearest uncontrolled access point of 1 ft (0.3 m) is 1034.93 pW/cm2. Using this result, the
maximum calculated field strength at the nearest accessible point is 103.49% of the applicable
public limit for uncontrolled exposure.
http://sys.eng.t-mobile.com/westregion/hotrod/mperesult.asp 3/27/2009
NOTICE
GUIOELNIES FOR WORKING IN
RA010FREOLIENCY ENVIRONIMEWI'S
• Al (Arson/14 shaJd nine toecto>nesnese went
ItalieI awareraas from-.
• 041 W5Ornat eneeringves see ,n,si tie autionom
obey all parted =gra.
• Assume vl anterdais we 1.111v*
balms worlanger wiserwaa, nab., owners and dal obla
agcroprtatt VinSlailars
• Wertien sent num 3 foot claw wive drool se ariarspaa
Do no* flap In ?tar& anlannaf
• Use ps F reolloes Nsfile woo nfq new
annortimg
• Hers ,c.peraie trirdiffeitars without sheicis owing
nervnal aparahon
• DC, n operVe Due Pali on witennas in *Qv pow 4
I
Rdlo frequency fields beyond
this point May exceed the FCC
general public exposure limit.
Obey ell posted myna ended. quideiines
Inc working In radio frequency
enteirennewies
ae.00.06 •nnnn•
411111•0.• 4.4. • i/C4.2.
NOTICE
Beyond this point:
Real° frequency flak
may exceed FCC rule
exposure.
For retie sallety. se pc
Pie guidelines Mt *While
fraquancy ainviroomente
10111... • •
Posted at or near the site entrance or
rooftop access
Posted at or near the site entrance or rooftop Posted at or near the loc
access spot
MPE Site Analysis Page 9 of 13
• The 100% FCC general population/uncontrolled exposure minimum distance is 2 ft (0.61 m).
• The 100% FCC occupational/controlled exposure minimum distance is 0 ft (0 m).
Final analysis for Antenna System 2 (UMTS), Cell
Using 1 channels and a maximum effective radiated power (ERP) of 19.28 Watts (42.85 dBm),
and a downtilt of 1 0, the calculated power density for this site at the nearest controlled access
point of 1 ft (0.3 m) is 1034.93 pW/cm 2 . The calculated power density for the site at the
nearest uncontrolled access point of 1 ft (0.3 m) is 1034.93 pW/cm 2 . Using this result, the
maximum calculated field strength at the nearest accessible point is 103.49% of the applicable
public limit for uncontrolled exposure.
• The 100% FCC general population/uncontrolled exposure minimum distance is 2 ft (0.61 m).
• The 100% FCC occupational/controlled exposure minimum distance is 0 ft (0 m).
See Table 1 for the FCC's guidelines on Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE). Note that the RF
range referenced for this analysis is the range of 1500 - 100,000 MHz shown in Table 1, which is
included in Appendix A.
Signage Guidelines
Analysis shows the public or occupational limit has been exceeded for the given access. The
following signage is required:
In some locations, the standard sign may create problems with landowners or the public. The
intent of the signage policy is to provide reasonable notice to the public of the presence of RF
emissions in a non-secure location. Other signage alternatives that provide notice of emissions - at
a point which a person approaching the antennas can see the sign before entering within 3' of an
antenna - can be used. Please contact T-Mobile Regulatory Compliance (http://sys.eng.t-
mobile.conn/regcom/toc.html) to discuss the content and placement of alternative signs.
http://sys.eng.t-mobile.com/westregion/hotrod/mpe_resultasp 3/27/2009
MPE Site Analysis Page 10 of 13
Current RF Signs Posted & Narda Survey Status
• Notice sign posted: NO
• Caution sign posted: NO
• Warning sign posted: NO
• Employee Notice sign posted: NO
• Narda Survey Completed: NO
Exposure Environments
The FCC guidelines incorporate two separate tiers of exposure limits that are dependant on the
situation in which the exposure takes place and/or the status of the individuals who are subject to
exposure. The decision as to which tier applies in a given situation should be based on the
application of the following definitions.
Occupational/controlled exposure limits apply to situations in which persons are exposed as a
consequence of their employment and in which those persons who are exposed have been made
fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure.
Occupational/controlled exposure limits also apply where exposure is of a transient nature as a
result of incidental passage through a location where exposure levels may be above general
population/uncontrolled limits (see below) as long as the exposed person has been made fully
aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over his/her exposure by leaving the
area or by some other appropriate means.
General population/uncontrolled exposure limits apply to situations in which the general public
may be exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may
not be made fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their
exposure. Therefore, members of the general public always fall under this category when exposure
is not employment-related.
For purposes of applying these definitions, awareness of the potential for RF exposure in a
workplace or similar environment can be provided through specific training as part of a RF safety
program. Warning signs and labels can also be used to establish such awareness as long as they
provide information, in a prominent manner, on risk of potential exposure and instructions on
methods to minimize such exposure risk.
For example, a sign warning of RF exposure risk and indicating that individuals should not remain
in the area for more than a certain period of time could be acceptable.
Another important point to remember concerning the FCC's exposure guidelines is that they
constitute exposure limits (not emission limits), and they are relevant only to locations that are
accessible to workers or members of the public. Such access can be restricted or controlled by
appropriate means such as the use of fences, warning signs, etc., as noted above. For the case of
occupational/controlled exposure, procedures can be instituted for working in the vicinity of RF
sources that will prevent exposures in excess of the guidelines. An example of such procedures
would be restricting the time an individual could be near an RF source or requiring that work on or
near such sources be performed while the transmitter is turned off or while power is appropriately
reduced.
Signed:
http://sys.eng.t-mobile.com/westregion/hotrod/mpe_result.asp 3/27/2009
MPE Site Analysis Page 11 of 13
Date: Friday, March 27, 2009
Appendix A
Term Definitions
GSM — Global System for Mobile communications is the most popular standard for mobile phones
in the world. Its promoter, the GSM Association, estimates that 82% of the global mobile market
uses the standard. GSM is used by over 2 billion people across more than 212 countries and
territories. Its ubiquity makes international roaming very common between mobile phone
operators, enabling subscribers to use their phones in many parts of the world. GSM differs from its
predecessors in that both signaling and speech channels are digital call quality, and so is
considered a second generation (2G) mobile phone system. This has also meant that data
communication were built into the system using the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP).
UMTS — Universal Mobile Telecommunications System is one of the third-generation (3G) cell
phone technologies. Currently, the most common form of UMTS uses W-CDMA as the underlying air
interface. It is standardized by the 3GPP, and is the European answer to the ITU IMT-2000
requirements for 3G cellular radio systems.
Isotropic Antenna — a theoretical point source of waves which exhibits the same magnitude or
properties when measured in all directions. It has no preferred direction of radiation. It radiates
uniformly in all directions over a sphere centred on the source. It is a reference radiator with which
other sources are compared.
Exposure — Exposure occurs whenever and wherever a person is subjected to electric, magnetic or
electromagnetic fields other than those originating from physiological processes in the body and
other natural phenomena.
Exposure, partial body - Partial-body exposure results when RF fields are substantially non-
uniform over the body. Fields that are non-uniform over volumes comparable to the human body
may occur due to highly directional sources, standing-waves, re-radiating sources or in the near
field.
General population/uncontrolled exposure — For FCC purposes, applies to human exposure RF
fields when the general public is exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of
their employment may not be made fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise
control over their exposure. Therefore, members of the general public always fall under this
category when exposure is not employment-related.
Maximum permissible exposure (MPE) — The rnns and peak electric and magnetic field
strength, their squares, or the plane-wave equivalent power densities associated with these fields
to which a person may be exposed without harmful effect and with an acceptable safety factor.
Occupational/controlled exposure — For FCC purposes, applies to human exposure to RF fields
when persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and in which those persons who
are exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control
over their exposure. Occupational/controlled exposure limits also apply where exposure is of a
transient nature as a result of incidental passage through a location where exposure levels may be
above general population/uncontrolled limits (see definition above), as long as the exposed person
has been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over his/her
exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate means.
http://sys.eng.t-mobile.com/westregion/hotrod/mperesultasp 3/27/2009
MPE Site Analysis Page 12 of 13
Appendix B
Collocation Sites
Special rules apply at sites with multiple transmitters on buildings. Regardless of the categorical
exemption rules detailed about for single carriers, if a 1-Mobile, USA site's emissions:
1. are more than 5% above the emissions limits in an "accessible area;" and
2. contribute at least 5% of all the emissions at any site which together result in an overall
effect of more than 100% of the emission limits then we, and each carrier meeting this
definition, are individually and collectively responsible for compliance. The FCC expects each
carrier to make a good faith effort to consider emissions from other carriers and make the
determination.
That said, the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology has supported the following exception:
• Within a controlled environment at a multi-transmitter site, if a carrier can physically elevate its
antenna so that, as a practical matter, the volume of space where the RF field exceeds 5 percent of
the controlled environments limits in Table of Section 1.1310 is 2 meters or more above any
rooftop walkways (i.e., the volume where the fields exceed 5 percent of the limit are practically
inaccessible), that carriers would be relieved of any responsibility for ensuring compliance of all
transmitters at the site. This assumes, of course, that the carrier does not exceed 5 percent of the
general public exposure limit in any uncontrolled areas.
Regulatory Compliance recommends conducting the routine environmental analysis whenever
collocating on a rooftop. Although the need for analysis usually arises when we are first installing
equipment or upgrading a site, we are responsible for total emissions at the site even when a new
carrier collocates at our existing site. If after the analysis, the total emissions exceed 100% of the
limit, all carriers on the site should be contacted to work out a joint solution to the problem
[however, if the last carrier pushes the site over the limit, there is support in the rules that the last
carrier should bear the burden of addressing compliance].
Professionally Managed Sites
As noted above, the carrier is always responsible for the RF compliance of its equipment. The FCC
OET, however, does realize that some site managers undertake the responsibility for RF compliance
(and that carriers likewise may rely on consultants to document compliance. The OET has stated
that:
• As with other licensee responsibilities, while ultimate responsibility for compliance rests with the
licensee, compliance with the RF exposure regulations can be delegated to specialized consultants,
site managers, or specific individuals within a company, and, as long as the delegation itself is
reasonable a licensee may certify compliance on the basis of the delegate's report.
In either case, a copy of the site manager or RF consultant's report should be maintained in the
site file.
Table 1. LIMITS FOR MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE EXPOSURE (MPE)
http://sys.eng.t-mobile.com/westregion/hotrod/mperesultasp 3/27/2009
MPE Site Analysis Page 13 of 13
(A) Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure
Frequency
Range
(MHz)
Electric Field
Strength (E)
(Wm)
Magnetic Field Strength
(H)
(A/m)
Power Density
(5)
(mW/cm2 )
Averaging Time
1E12,11112 or S
(minutes)
0.3-3.0 614 1.63 (100)* 6
3.0-30 1842/f 4.89/f (900/S)* 6
30-300 61.4 0.163 1.0 6
300-1500 -- -- f/300 6
1500-100,000 -- -- 5 6
(B) Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure
Frequency
Range
(MHz)
Electric Field
Strength (E)
(V/m)
Magnetic Field Strength
(H)
(A/m)
Power Density
(5)
(mW/cm2)
Averaging Time
1E12, 1H12 or S
(minutes)
0.3-1.34 614 1.63 (100)* 30
1.34-30 824/f 2.19/f (180/F)* 30
30-300 27.5 0.073 0.2 30
300-1500 -- -- f/1500 30
1500-100,000 -- -- 1.0 30
f= frequency in MHz *Plane-wave equivalent power density
NOTE 1: Occupational/controlled limits apply in situations in which persons are exposed as a
consequence of their employment provided those persons are fully aware of the potential for
exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Limits for occupational/controlled exposure
also apply in situations when an individual is transient through a location where
occupational/controlled limits apply provided he/she is made aware of the potential for exposure.
NOTE 2: General population/uncontrolled exposures apply in situations in which the general
public may be exposed, or in which persons that are exposed as a consequence of their
employment may not be fully aware of the potential for exposure or can not exercise control over
their exposure.
Home I T bile e lato Co liance FCC Office of Engineering & Technology
Home I MPE Home I New Analysis I I Salo_N•kol I Search I ELt
http://sys.eng.t-mobile.com/westregion/hotrod/mperesult.asp 3/27/2009
Site Selection Process
T-Mobile currently has an existing site at the Olympic Resort, across the street and
directly west of the proposed site at Bressi Ranch Storage. The Olympic Resort is no
longer in business. The new ownership has decided to demolish the existing building and
surroundings, which include the T-Mobile cell site. In response to the impending
demolition, it is with urgency that T-Mobile find a new home.
Bressi Ranch Storage was the first choice for a replacement site. It is within the search
ring and will meet the coverage objective. In addition, the requirements of a wireless
telecommunications facility dictated by Council Policy 64 will be adhered to. Bressi
Ranch Storage is located in a preferred location. All antennas/equipment will be
completely concealed from public view.
Bressi Ranch Storage is the obvious choice. The other three corners of El Camino Real
and Palomar Airport Road cannot accommodate a T-Mobile (or any other carrier) cell
site at this time. To the north and south of the storage facility is open space. This land is
more than likely designated for commercial use. However, there is nothing that indicates
immediate construction start of a project. There is no grading or prepping of the sites and
of course no tower will be considered. Diagonal from the storage facility is Palomar
Airport. Again, no cell site will be considered at this location.
Proposed Wireless System
Cellular system — consumer features include simultaneous voice and data transmissions.
SECTION 1
NEW DEVELOPMENT
PRIORITY PROJECT TYPE
Does you project meet one or more of the following criteria: YES
,
NO
1. Home subdivision of 100 units or more
)( Includes SFD, MFD, Condominium and Apartments
2. Residential development of 10 units or more.
X Includes SFD, MFD, Condominium and Apartments
3. Commercial and industrial development greater Than 100,000 square feet including parking areas.
)e
Any development on private land that is not for heavy industrial or residential uses. Example: Hospitals,
Hotels, Recreational Facilities, Shopping Malls, etc.
4. Heavy Industrial/Industry greater Than 1 acre (NEED SIC CODES FOR PERMIT BUSINESS TYPES)
)( SIC codes 5013, 5014, 5541, 7532-7534, and 7536-7539
5. Automotive repair shoo. V SIC codes 5013, 5014, 5541, 7532-7534, and 7536-7539
6. A New Restaurant where the land area of development is 5.000 square feet or more including parking
X areas.
SIC code 5812
7. Hillside development >e (1) greater than 5,000 square feet of impervious surface area and (2) development will grade on any
natural slope that is 25% or greater
8. Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA).
/)‹.. Impervious surface of 2,500 square feet or more located within, "directly adjacent"2 to (within 200 feet),
or "discharging directly to"3 receiving water within the ESA1
9. Parking lot.
Area of 5,000 square feet or more, or with 15 or more parking spaces, and potentially exposed to urban
runoff
10, Retail Gasoline Outlets — serving more than 100 vehicles Der day
X. Serving more than 100 vehicles per day and greater than 5,000 square feet
11, Streets, roads. driveways, hiahways. and freeways.
X Project would create a new paved surface that is 5,000 square feet or greater.
12. Coastal Development Zone.
X Within 200 feet of the Pacific Ocean and (1) creates more than 2500 square feet of impermeable
surface or (2) increases impermeable surface on property by more than 10%.
1 Environmentally Sensitive Areas include but are not limited to all Clean Water Act Section 303(d) impaired water bodies;
areas designated as Areas of Special Biological Significance by the State Water Resources Control Board (Water Quality
Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (1994) and amendments); water bodies designated with the RARE beneficial use by
the State Water Resources Control Board (Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (1994) and amendments);
areas designated as preserves or their equivalent under the Multi Species Conservation Program within the Cities and Count
of San Diego; and any other equivalent environmentally sensitive areas which have been identified by the Copermittees.
2 "Directly adjacent" means situated within 200 feet of the environmentally sensitive area.
3 "Discharging directly to" means outflow from a drainage conveyance system that is composed entirely of flows from the
subject development or redevelopment site, and not commingled with flow from adjacent lands.
Section 1 Results:
If you answered YES to ANY of the questions above you have a PRIORITY project and PRIORITY project requirements DO
apply. A Storm Water Management Plan, prepared in accordance with City Storm Water Standards, must be submitted at
time of application. Please check the "MEETS PRIORITY REQUIREMENTS" box in Section 3.
If you answered NO to ALL of the questions above, then you are a NON-PRIORITY project and STANDARD requirements
apply. Please check the "DOES NOT MEET PRIORITY Requirements" box in Section 3.
SWMP Rev 6/4/08
City Concurrence: NO
MEM
By:
Date:
Project ID:
This Box for City Use Only
SECTION 2
SIGNIFICANT REDEVELOPMENT: YES NO
1. Is the project redeveloping an existing priority project type? (Priority projects
are defined in Section 1)
If you answered YES, please proceed to question 2.
If you answered NO, then you ARE NOT a significant redevelopment and you ARE NOT subject to
PRIORITY project requirements, only STANDARD requirements. Please check the "DOES NOT MEET
PRIORITY Requirements" box in Section 3 below.
2. Is the project solely limited to one of the following:
a. Trenching and resurfacing associated with utility work?
b. Resurfacing and reconfiguring existing surface parking lots?
c. New sidewalk construction, pedestrian ramps, or bike lane on public
and/or private existing roads?
d. Replacement of existing damaged pavement?
If you answered NO to ALL of the questions, then proceed to Question 3.
If you answered YES to ONE OR MORE of the questions then you ARE NOT a significant redevelopment
and you ARE NOT subject to PRIORITY project requirements, only STANDARD requirements. Please
check
the "DOES NOT MEET PRIORITY Requirements" box in Section 3 below.
3. Will the development create, replace, or add at least 5,000 square feet of
impervious surfaces on an existing development or, be located within 200
feet of the Pacific Ocean and (1)create more than 2500 square feet of
impermeable surface or (2) increases impermeable surface on property by
more than 10%?
X°
If you answered YES, you ARE a significant redevelopment, and you ARE subject to PRIORITY project
requirements. Please check the "MEETS PRIORITY REQUIREMENTS" box in Section 3 below.
If you answered NO, you ARE NOT a significant redevelopment, and you ARE NOT subject to
PRIORITY project requirements, only STANDARD requirements. Please check the "DOES NOT MEET
PRIORITY Requirements" box in Section 3 below.
SECTION 3
Questionnaire Results:
MY PROJECT MEETS PRIORITY REQUIREMENTS, MUST COMPLY VVITH PRIORITY
PROJECT STANDARDS AND MUST PREPARE A STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR
SUBMITTAL AT TIME OF APPLICATION.
MY PROJECT DOES NOT MEET PRIORITY REQUIREMENTS AND MUST ONLY COMPLY
WITH STANDARD STORM WATER REQUIREMENTS.
Applicant Information and Signature Box
Address: 3.rn• , Assessors Parcel Number(s):
17117 Vicr -0414 LJA-Lif 9ablect Q1.5—ace (-05-40
As slicant Name: .
11" S i SkZ4t05k4
Applicant Title:
LaJACt U.Se._ Pia
Appl icant S,diejos , i ,
C 1.4-
Date:
442,3 /65
SWMP Rev 6/4/08
• • T •Mobileg Coverage with Existing SD06436
O -76.0 <=x dBm In-home
- 84 . 0 < =x<-76.0 dBm In-Vehicle
• -91.0<=x<-84.0 dBm Outdoor
• • T • •Mobile• Coverage without Existing SD436
▪ -76.0 <=x dBm In-home
O -84,0< =x<-76.0 dBm In•Vehicle
O -91.0<=x<-84.0 dBm Outdoor
• 76.0 <=x dBm In-home
• -84.0< =x< -76.0 d8m In-Vehicle
O -91.0<=x< -84.0 dBm Outdoor
• • T • "Mobile' Coverage with New SD02436