Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMCUP 13-06; Verizon Wireless Calavera Hills; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (2)~ .. -' ... ·~ C I l Y ll f CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION P-1 Development Services Planning Department 1635 Faraday Avenue (760) 602-4610 www.carlsbadca.gov APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) Development Permits D Administrative Pennit (FOR DEPT. USE ONLY) Leq/flltlve Permits 0 General Plan Amendment (FOR DEPT. USC ONLY) D Coastal Development Pennit (*) ()Minor ~ Conditional Use Permit(*) 0 Local Coastal Program Amendment (") -e Minor 0 Extension D Environmental Impact Assessment D Habitat Management Permit 0 Minor D Hillside Development Permit c·> D Planned Development Permit 0 Residential 0 Non-Residential D Planned Industrial Permit D Planning Commission Detennlnation D Site Development Plan D Special Use Permit D Tentative Tract Map D Variance 0 Administrative <'f,CUP 1~..0, 0 Master Plan 0Amendment 0 Specific Plan 0Amendment 0 Zone Change(*) 0 Zone Code Amendment D D D (*) = eligible for 25% discount NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P..ll. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ON!: APPLICATION BE FILeD IIUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00P.M. ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: 167-101-35-00 -------------------------------------------------------------------PROJECT NAME: Verizon Wireless Calvera Hills BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Installation of 4 sectors of 3 antennas each (12 total), mounted inside of a 46" diameter radome on a new 79'2" high light standard. Remove existing 79'2" high light standard and relocate existing stadium light fixture to new light standard. Install new, 11'8" x 25'2" underground concrete vault. One (1) 4' diameter microwave antenna o• BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That portion of lot "J" of Ranch Agua Hedionda, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof No. 823. LOCATION OF PROJECT: 2997 Glasgow Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008 STREET ADDRESS ON THE: South SIDE OF Carlsbad Village Drive --------~~----~~~~==~~-----------------(NORTH, SOUTH, EAST. WESn (NAME OF STREET) BElWEEN Tamarack Avenue AND Glasgow Drive (NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREET) P-1 Page 1 of 5 Revised 0111 o ... OWNER NAME (Print): City of Carlsbad APPLICANT NAME (Print): Verizon Wireless MAILING ADDRESS: 1635 Faraday Avenue MAILING ADDRESS: 15505 Sand Canyon Ave, Bldg 0, 1st Fl CITY, STATE, ZIP: Carlsbad,CA 92008 CITY, STATE, ZIP: Irvine, CA 92618 TELEPHONE: Attn: Joe Garuba TELEPHONE: 949-27 4-6961 EMAIL ADDRESS: EMAIL ADDRESS: Christal. Travers@verizonwireless.com I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE I CERnFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO TilE BEST OF MY AND THAT ALL TIE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO KNOWLEDGE. THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ~~ S~!tl!~ FFrrE DA'rf= , SIGNATURE DATE ...... APPLICANTS REPRESENTATIVE (Print): Karen Adler, Agent MAILING ADDRESS: PlanCom, Inc., 302 State Place CITY, STATE, ZIP: Escondido, CA 92029 TELEPHONE: 760-715-3416 EMAIL ADDRESS: karen.adler@plancominc.com I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE APPLICANT AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ~~ECT TO TH~'s:ti OF MY~LEDGE. ~. ~u..v (M. · vv f1/£tv-r 3 -;q-I J __ SIGNATURE I) DATE IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. IM/E CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE. NOTICE OF RESTRICTION: PROPERTY OWNER ACKNOWLEDGES AND CONSENTS TO A NOTICE OF RESTRICTION BEING RECORDED ON THE TITLE TO HIS PROPERTY IF CONDITIONED FOR THE APPLICANT. NOTICE OF RESTRICTIONS RUN WITH THE LAND AND BIND ANY SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST. ~OWNER SIGNATURE FOR CITY USE ONLY RECEIVED P-1 Page2of5 Revised 01110 . ' . . ... ~ .~ ~ .. ''\•, '<t;~<. ~· CITY OF DISCLOSURE STATEMENT P-1(A) Development Services Planning Department 1635 Faraday Avenue (760} 602-4610 www.carlsbadca.gov CARLSBAD Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information M.Y§! be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Not&: Person is d~ as •Any indiVidual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, ~. estate, trust. receiver, syndicate. in this and any other county, city and county. city munielpaltly. district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit! Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. 1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corooration or oartnership, include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A} IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corooratlon, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) 1 . Person Corp/Part 6 rl'LthJ U)t ry.{e_'l-.~ Title Title l55t 5 S£-'1d Ctt.,l'1nl dku B/p£) D l~i Fi Address Address / E 11 '111 {-"' (>A .:.z .1~1 i.._ 2. OWNER (Not the owner's agent) P-1(A) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of Abb persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e., partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a comoration or partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a oublictv-owned corooration, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) ;1 'l . j !' ' Person Corp/Part Ld f~.el 0 t ( 1([( • S LrJ.. I Title Title ltv 3 5 6u.ut tl ~)" th 0 Address Address chz rfo htu {. (i fl t:.f 1 t.l S' Page 1 of2 Revised 04109 . ' . ' " 3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit omanjzation or a trust. list the names and addresses of Atf! person serving as an officer or director of the non- profit organization or as trustee or benefiCiary of the. Non Profit/Trust Non Profit/Trust _________ _ Title. ___________ _ Title. _____________ _ Add~ss. _______________ _ Address. ___________ _ 4. Have you had more than $500 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? 0 Yes 00 No If yes, please indicate person(s):. ________________ __ NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I certify that all the above Information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. ~ ~;i'k J<a-uvWv ?W•t "> 1'!-1 }-Signa~ ~date Signature of applicant/date : ·Jo-L~~ · ~ ~~b.-i V?·ttL-tn Ulu'e.-I~S':::> Print or type name of owner Pnnt or type name of applicant P-1(A) Page2 of2 Revised 04/09 .~ .. ~ ·, ·~ . Y/ ,. CITY 0~ CARLSBAD HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT P-1(C) Development Services Planning Department 1635 Faraday Avenue (7W) 602-4610 www.ca rlsbadca.gov Consultation of Lists of Sites Related to Hazardous Wastes (Certification of Compliance with Government Code Section 65962.5) Pursuant to State of California Government Code Section 65962.5, I have consuHed the Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites Ust compiled by the California Environmental Protection Agency and hereby certify that (check one): ~ The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the State Government Code. 0 The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application !!!. contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the State Government Code. Phone Number: C/Y Cf -::2. ? '-/ -(;; l/ (. I PROPERTY OWNER Name: {!, ty ,1 £ {~ '·/s /J~• ,.[ Address: //...· 3 •j fq, tl ,l,u 1 df...·L j c~, Is btt..A.. L' A-or J. /!-(! r Phone Number: 7v~' ·· /Jc.l.-.1 J 31_ Address of Site: .J q Li 7 {~/A. 'ljt' 14 . }) 4 ', Local Agency (City and County): [1~.-r/c:;::.IJa ({ 1 <Yl, 1 Du:j" ,, . Assessor's book, page, and parcel number: /L 7-ll' 1-}~")-{' {1 Specify list(s): ___________________________ _ Regulatory Identification Number: _____________________ _ Date of list: ___________________________ _ J<tu ... !(ki,hJ ~·f ~!Mpv ~ Applicant Signature/Date .r Prop rtYefSiQflatUJ"e The Hazardws Waste and Substances Sites list (Cortese list) is used by the State, local agencies and developers to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act requirements in providing information about the location of hazardous materials release sites. P-1(C) Page 1 of2 Revised 04/09 • Photoslntulation of orooosed telecommunications site • Calavera Hills Park 2997 Glasgow Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92008 .... .._ __ Proposed replacement light standard Proposed Verizon equipment vault and CMU retaining wall with proposed surrounding landscapes Ph.otosimulation of orooosed telecommunications site Calavera Hills Park 2997 Glasgow Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92008 --- Photoslmulation of orooosed telecommunications site Calavera Hills Park 2997 Glasgow Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92008 c -· '·-Verizon Wireless Calvera Hills Photo Study Looking East from proposed equipment vault Verizon Wireless Calvera Hills Photo Study Looking West towards vault location .... • . Verizon Wireless Calvera Hills Photo Study Aerial Image of site location ' Project Description 5/17/2013 PROJECT DESCRIPTION It JUSTIFICATION PROPOSAL TO ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A NEW WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY Calavera Hills 2997 Glasgow Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 Prepared for: City of Carlsbad Planning Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92009 Prepared by: PlanCom, Inc. Contractor Representatives for Verizon Wireless 302 State Place Escondido, CA 92029 Contact: Karen Adler, Planning Consultant (760) 715-3416 May 17, 2013 Page 1 .. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/HEIGHT ]USTIFICATION Verizon Wireless is proposing to construct, operate, and maintain a wireless communication facility consisting of a total of 12 antennas, three (3) antennas each in four (4) antenna arrays, and one (1) 4-foot diameter microwave antenna mounted on a new, replacement 79-foot tall ball field light standard. The antennas will be concealed by a 46-inch diameter radome, or cover, approximately 46 feet long; no cover is proposed for the microwave antenna. The new light standard will be located at the north side of the softball field at Calavera Park on Carlsbad Village Drive. Photo simulations of the proposed ball field light standard are provided with the application for the City's review. The supporting equipment will consist of the following: equipment cabinets within an underground vault and two (2) GPS antennas. The underground vault will be located in an existing landscaped area. The specific location and design of the proposed facility is illustrated in further detail on the site plan and elevation drawings. Two additional wireless carriers, Sprint PCS and T-Mobile, have equipment and antennas on site; T-Mobile and Sprint are also located on ball field lighting standards. Verizon Wireless intends to provide wireless voice, data, video and local area network (LAN) applications with the installation of this facility. SITE CHARACTERISTICS The underlying zoning of the proposed site is PC-planned community. The current on- site use is a public park with activity fields, tennis courts and a gymnasium building with parking. The proposed use is an unmanned wireless communication facility. Sprint PCS and T-Mobile have existing antennas and equipment on the site. The surrounding land uses are as follows: North: South: East: West: Open Space (vacant) Public Park Residential Residential SITE SELECTION/PREFERRED SITES PER SECTION A.l. OF COUNCIL POLICY 64 The proposed project site is zoned PC-planned community, which is classified as a residential zone in the location guidelines adopted per Council Policy 64, Section A.l.h. As such, the project site is a "Preferred Location" and is encouraged by the Wireless Communication Facilities (WCF) guidelines. The proposed design for antennas attached Project Description 5/17/2013 Page 2 ' . to a replacement ball field light standard is designed to minimize the profile of the facility and disguise it within the existing infrastructure and landscaping of the property. The surrounding properties in the area of the proposed site are classified as residential land uses, and are not considered preferred locations for WCFs. Since the project site was already host to two additional wireless communication carriers and the surrounding area did not contain additional locations removed from residential development, consideration for alternate sites was limited to the proposed project, a traffic signal at Carlsbad Village Drive and Glasgow Drive, and a water tank on Tamarack Avenue. The proposed project is a collocation on a site with two other carriers, an option encouraged in the WCF guidelines of Council Policy 64. COUNCIL POLICY 64 SECTION A. LOCATIONAL GUIDELINES 1. Preferred Locations--The proposed project site is zoned PC-planned community which is classified as a preferred location in the location guidelines adopted per Council Policy 64, Section A.l.h. According to the policy, WCFs are encouraged on park sites in residential zones by the Wireless Communication Facilities (WCF) guidelines. 2. Discouraged Locations--The surrounding properties in the area of the proposed site are residential or open space and are not considered preferred locations for WCFs. 3. Visibility to the Public-The design chosen for the site is the replacement of an existing ball field light standard to support 12 antennas. The antennas will be located within a radome and the equipment will be located in a concrete, climate-controlled underground vault. There is considerable existing landscaping on site because of the project site's use as a public park. 4. Collocation--A letter expressing cooperation with future co-location efforts for this site is included with this application. As previously mentioned, Sprint PCS and T-Mobile have facilities on the park property. 5. Monopoles-in order to meet the coverage objectives of the area, a single ball field light standard will be used with a radome, or cover, concealing the antennas from view. B. DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. Stealth Design-the proposed ball field light standard is designed with a radome cover to conceal the antennas from views from the surrounding properties. 2. Equipment-{he indoor BTS equipment cabinets will be located within a new underground vault on Carlsbad Village Drive. Project Description 5/17/2013 Page 3 ' . 3. Collocation-there are presently two wireless carriers on the property. With the proposed installation by Verizon, there will be three carriers. Another carrier collocation is possible on the proposed 79-foot high ball field light standard. 4. Height-the new ball field light standard is proposed at a height of 79'2". Twelve antennas and a microwave antenna will be mounted on the pole of the light standard. • Setbacks-the PC-planned community zone setback requirements are not specified in the Zoning Ordinance. 6. Building or Structure Mounted WCFs--this section is not applicable to the application. 7. Ground mounted monopoles-the ball field light standard is located on the northern ball field creating the context for the light standard use. B. Lattice Towe~5--not applicable. 9. UNDERGROUNDING-all proposed utilities would be under-grounded. Also, the use of an underground vault for equipment will also be used. POUCY 64 C. PERFORMANCE GUIDEUNES 1. NOISE/ ACOUSTICAL INFORMATION Verizon is proposing to use an underground vault for equipment. The vault will be air conditioned and vented above-ground. 2. OPERATION & MAINTENANCE Once constructed and operational, the communications facility will provide 24-hour service to its users seven (7) days a week. Apart from initial construction activity, a Verizon technician will service the facility on an as-needed basis. Generally, this is likely to occur once per month during normal working hours (between 7 AM, SAM on Saturdays, and Sunset). A computer may handle much of the operational adjustments remotely. A Verizon technician in a service van or pickup truck-size vehicle will perform the routine maintenance operation. Beyond this routine maintenance service, Verizon typically requires 24-hour access to the facility to ensure that technical support is immediately available if and when warranted during an emergency. 3. MAINTENANCE HOURS Maintenance hours per Policy 64 will be followed. The site is not within 100 feet of residential property and would not be subject to the restricted hours for maintenance. Project Description 5/17/2013 Page 4 ' . 4. LIGHTING No additional lighting is proposed for the site. 5. COMPLIANCE WITH FCC RF EXPOSURE GUIDELINES All Verizon Wireless sites are designed to comply with FCC RF exposure guidelines and follow up reports will be submitted in accordance with the policy guidelines. ADDmONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE APPLICATION HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Sealed lead acid batteries are used for back-up power in the event of a power failure on most Verizon Wireless facilities. The batteries are often referred to as "gel cell" type batteries. Specifications for the batteries are provided as an attachment to this application. OPERATIONAL FREQUENCY CRITERIA The FCC has allocated a portion of the radio spectrum to Verizon for the provision of wireless service. The proposed wireless communications facility will transmit at a frequency range of 850 MHz and 1950 MHz. The power required to operate the facility typically does not exceed 200 watts per channel. By design, the Verizon facility is a low- power system. Depending upon characteristics of the site, the actual power requirements may be reduced. When operational, the transmitted signals from the site will consist of non-ionizing waves generated at less than one (1) microwatt per square centimeter, which is significantly lower than the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) standard for continuous public exposure of 900 microwatts per square centimeter. The proposed wireless communications facility will operate in full compliance with the standards for radio frequency emissions as adopted by the FCC. Project Description 5/17/2013 Page 5 • . . Aerial View of Alternate Sites 1. Water tank, Tamarack Ave. 2. Traffic signal, Carlsbad Village Drive Project Description 5/17/2013 Page 6 <_(~ ,~ CITY OF CARLSBAD EIA INFORMATION FORM P-1(0) INSTRUCTION SHEET FOR COMPLETING AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT INFORMATION FORM Development Services Planning Department 1635 Faraday Avenue (760) 602-4610 www.carlsbadca.gov This Environmental Information Form will be used to assist staff in determining what type of environmental documentation (i.e., Environmental Impact Report, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Negative Declaration or Exemption) will be required to be prepared for your application, per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Title 19 of Carlsbad's Municipal Code. The clarity and accuracy of the information you provide is critical for purposes of quickly determining the specific environmental effects of your project. Any environmental studies (i.e., biological, cultural resource, traffic, noise) that are necessary to substantiate a "no impact" or "yes impact" determination should be submitted as an attachment to this Environmental Information Form. This is especially important when a Negative Declaration is being sought. The more information provided in this form, the easier and quicker it will be for staff to complete the Environmental Impact Assessment Form -Initial Study. P-1(0) Page 1 of 4 Revised 04/09 ,• ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To be Completed by Applicant) Date Filed: -----------(To be completed by City) Application Number(s): ...:.N....:.!....:C-Lf:.... • ..:....J?loL..-1_;"3:::...---=o::......l.!G __________________ _ General Information 1. 2. 3. 4. Name of project: (},pA l)J;rt-Lr ~~ / { ~ Name of developer or project sponsor: Vtr I VO n W 1 r·~ { f c._. 5 Address: 155o 5 Srn L dan y() (1 ,Aile City, State, Zip Code: .kr"lll v1< C£ A q 21# I~ Phone Number: q lft( -& 7 L/-{/t & I Name of person to be contacted concerning this project: Xa r .01 Att Ltv, t\:i<-n ·r Address: ?tan r!&-m J:-;1c,.) 3£7 :J. Srd{,, P/ttcv/ City, State, Zip Code: E-$CtJV7dtle Q/1 CJ d-0 d.-'J Phone Number: /ltd~ 715-3'11& AddressofProject: ;;;qq1 G/tL5t}t,~u) lJf'JVU c:> Assessor's Parcel Number: _....f../....~.~w<::....7..!...---!./..::0.....:./_-....:.3::....5=-~-~-iJ....:.O ___________ _ 5. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: 'Budd 'rlj J?lrrn 1/-ECC.. LturJ'lt;V 6. Existing General Plan Land Use Designation: --------------- 7. Existing zoning district: f-c_ ( P!tL n nul (1,11 r11tt n 1 hi) ,, 8. Existing land use(s): e, ''1 P4 r /<- 9. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): r1o CvULi·t(JU \An Ma 1111 u. adi... ,:Sf:<./ Project Description 10. Site size: _ ...... 3.::....3~/+-, ..:..:'J.;...J.I.f-"'l.e'--"'-'~l-...:::~:..:...J· .Pu._=____;/~ . ....:....i__:_fi..f..::....r.:.....::t:....·S=-· ---------- 11. 12: 14. P-1(0) Proposed Building square footage: _ _.::::J_=-q-L...flf__::,{,S..!.., +..:....,_---"U:::I..!...!nd!<3.£&.cr;~y+· ufo:.::.!:~..:.L< fl~t~\"---"tL~a~uuf-L.t: __ Number of floors of construction: __ _:(1...!..+-Cv=-=---------------- Associated projects: _____ --!.,!.n....,~_ _______________ _ Page 2 of 4 Revised 04/09 15. If residential, include the number of units and schedule of unit sizes: -----'D-4-/-=-{L.-=------- 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities: -~t'\'-1{:-"tlv=------------------ 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities: _____ _ 18. f\lD--- If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shi , estimated occupancy;, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project: Vi tta · d..;.A: .t... 46--~1/JW-tv fttrl<.. llL~I'S .... SurrOL(Yid.JrltJ ar~~s. J 19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or rezoning applications, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required: -------------------- P-1(0) Page 3 of4 Revised 04/09 Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). Yes ~ 20. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, or hills, or substantial D alteration of ground contours. 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or D ~ roads. 22. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project. D ~ 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. D ~ 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. D [E( 25. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or D ~ alteration of existing drainage patterns. 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. D liY' 27. Site on filled land or on slope of 1 0 percent or more. D li6"' 28. Use of disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, D U6" flammables or explosives. 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, D ~ etc.). 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). D [)?' 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. D ~ Environmental Setting Attach sheets that include a response to the following questions: 32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. Certification I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signature: _· ?sj-"-· -~:~:..:::.....;;_-----4{,..=U=-~,;;:_;1 ~· --"{k:........c....,:pJ...,;,:,_;_ __ VLft 'ttl n uitt/ le )S (/ For: P-1(0) Page 4 of4 Revised 04/09 • Verizon Wireless Site I D -Calvera Hills Site Name -Calvera Hills Site Compliance Report 2997 Glasgow Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 San Diego County Site visit date: AprilS, 2012 Site survey by: Mohamed Frej Latitude: N33-1 0-02.21 Longitude: Wlll-17-58.70 Structure Type: Tower/light pole Report generated date: April 9, 2012 Report by: John Lee Customer Contact: Arlet Vargas Verizon Wireless will be Compliant based on FCC Rules and Regulations. The site is not compliant for other carriers. © 2012 Sitesafe, Inc. Arlington, VA David Charles Cotton, Jr. Registered Professional Engineer (Electrical) State of California, 18838, Expires 2013-Jun-30 Date: 2012-Apr-10 rf compl1once expercs Verizon Wireless Calvera Hills Radio Frequency (RF) Site Compliance Report 2997 Glasgow Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1 000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.27 6.11 00 • info@sitesafe.com rf compliance experts Table of Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................... 2 2 REGULATORY BASIS ........................................................................................... 3 2.1 FCC RULES AND REGULATIONS ............................................................................ 3 2.2 OSHA STATEMENT .............................................................................................. 4 3 SITE COMPLIANCE ............................................................................................. 5 3.1 SITE COMPLIANCE STATEMENT .............................................................................. 5 3.2 ACTIONS FOR SITE COMPLIANCE ................•....•..••...........•..••..............••..............•. 5 4 SAFETY PLAN AND PROCEDURES ...................................................................... 7 4.1 SPECIFIC TO THIS SITE ....••..•............•...................•..••..••..............••............•...••........ 7 4.2 GENERAL··········································································································· 7 5 SITE AUDIT .......................................................................................................... 9 5.1 SITE ACCESS PROCEDURES ................................................................................... 9 6 NIR ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION ....................................................... lO 6.1 NIR ANALYSIS RESULTS ...................................................................................... 10 6.2 SITE MEASUREMENTS COLLECTED ........................................................................ 10 6.3 RF EMISSION DIAGRAM ..................................................................................... 18 7 PREDICTED RF ENERGY DENSITY CALCULATIONS .......................................... 22 8 FIELD TECHNICIAN CERTIFICATION ................................................................ 47 9 ENGINEER CERTIFICATION .............................................................................. 48 APPENDIX A-STATEMENT OF LIMITING CONDITIONS ......................................... 50 APPENDIX B-ASSUMPTIONS AND DEFINITIONS .................................................. 51 GENERAL MODEL ASSUMPTIONS ................................................................................... 51 USE OF GENERIC ANTENNAS ......................................................................................... 51 DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................. 52 APPENDIX C-RULES & REGULATIONS ................................................................... 54 EXPLANATION OF APPLICABLE RULES AND REGULATIONS .................................................. 54 OCCUPATIONAL ENVIRONMENT EXPLAINED .................................................................... 54 APPENDIX D-GENERAL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................... 55 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ........................................................................................... 56 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203·3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com 1 Executive Summary Verizon Wireless has contracted with Sitesafe, Inc. (Sitesafe), an independent Radio Frequency (RF) regulatory and engineering consulting firm, to determine whether the proposed communications site, Calvera Hills, located at 2997 Glasgow Drive, Carlsbad, CA, is in compliance with Federal Communication Commission (FCC) Rules and Regulations for RF emissions. Sitesafe's field personnel visited Calvera Hills on AprilS, 2012. This report contains a detailed summary of the RF environment at the site including: • site compliance determination; • photographs of the site; • diagram of the site; • inventory of the make I model of all transmitting antennas found on the site (where possible); • record of any Maximum Permissible Exposure ("MPE") measurements taken on the site, as applicable; and • theoretical MPE based on modeling. This report addresses exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields in accordance with the FCC Rules and Regulations for all individuals, classified in two groups, "Occupational or Controlled" and "General Public or Uncontrolled." Verizon Wireless will be complaint. Verizon Wireless will be compliant. The site is not compliant with the FCC rules and regulations for other carriers, as described in OET Bulletin 65. During our field visit, Sitesafe documented the presence and location of signs and barriers. This document specifically addresses compliance of Verizon Wireless's transmitting facilities independently and in relation to all collocated transmitting facilities, which together constitute the RF environment at the site. If you have any questions regarding RF safety and regulatory compliance, please do not hesitate to contact Sitesafe's Customer Support Department at (703) 276- 1100. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1 000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.27 6.11 00 • lnfo@sHesafe.com Page2 2 Regulatory Basis 2.1 FCC Rules and Regulations In 1996, the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) adopted regulations for the evaluating of the effects of RF emissions in 47 CFR § 1.1307 and 1 .131 0. The guideline from the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology is Bulletin 65 ("OET Bulletin 65"), Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, Edition 97-01, published August 1997. Since 1996 the FCC periodically reviews these rules and regulations as per their congressional mandate. FCC regulations define two separate tiers of exposure limits: Occupational or "Controlled environment" and General Public or "Uncontrolled environment". The General Public limits are generally five times more conservative or restrictive than the Occupational limit. These limits apply to accessible areas where workers or the general public may be exposed to Radio Frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields. Occupational or Controlled limits apply in situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and where those persons exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. An area is considered a Controlled environment when access is limited to these aware personnel. Typical criteria are restricted access (i.e. locked or alarmed doors, barriers, etc.) to the areas where antennas are located coupled with proper RF warning signage. A site with Controlled environments is evaluated with Occupational limits. All other areas are considered Uncontrolled environments. If a site has no access controls or no RF warning signage it is evaluated with General Public limits. The theoretical modeling of the RF electromagnetic fields has been performed in accordance with OET Bulletin 65. The Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits utilized in this analysis are outlined in the following diagram: FCC Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Plane-wave Equivalent P.,_r Density ~ u ~ §. ~ II) c "' c ... ; 0 0.. 1000 ~------;::=====::;- 1·-0ccupational I 1--General Public I 100 \\ 10 \\ ~ \ / / '----/ 0.1 0.01 0 10 100 1,000 10,000 Frequency (MHz) 200 N. Glebe Road • SuHe 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.27 6.1100 • info@sHesafe.com Page3 Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Electric Magnetic Power Averaging Time IEI2, Range Field Field Density IHI2 or S (minutes) (MHz) Strength (E) Strength (S) ~V/m) ~H)~Nm) ~mW/cm2) 0.3-3.0 614 1.63 (100)* 6 3.0-30 1842/f 4.89/f (900/f)* 6 30-300 61.4 0.163 1.0 6 300-1500 f/300 6 1500-5 6 100,000 Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Electric Magnetic Power Averaging Time IEI2, Range Field Field Density IHI2 or S (minutes) (MHz) Strength (E) Strength (S) 0.3-1.34 1.34-30 30-300 300-1500 1500- 100,000 (V/m) (H) (Nm) (mW/cm2) 614 1.63 (100)* 824/f 2.19/f (180/f)* 27.5 0.073 0.2 f/1500 1.0 30 30 30 30 30 f= frequency in MHz *Plane-wave equivalent power density 2.2 OSHA Statement The General Duty clause of the OSHA Act (Section 5) outlines the occupational safety and health responsibilities of the employer and employee. The General Duty clause in Section 5 states: (a) Each employer- ( 1) shall furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees; (2) shall comply with occupational safety and health standards promulgated under this Act. (b) Each employee shall comply with occupational safety and health standards and all rules, regulations. and orders issued pursuant to this Act which are applicable to his own actions and conduct. OSHA has defined Radiofrequency and Microwave Radiation safety standards for workers who may enter hazardous RF areas. Regulation Standards 29 CFR § 191 0.147 identify a generic Lock Out Tag Out procedure aimed to control the unexpected energization or start up of machines when maintenance or service is being performed. 200 N. Glebe Road • SuHe 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.27 6.1100 • info@sHesafe.com Page4 3 Site Compliance 3.1 Site Compliance Statement Upon evaluation of the cumulative RF emission levels from all operators at this site, and a thorough review of site access procedures, RF hazard signage and visible antenna locations, Sitesafe has determined that: Verlzon Wireless will be compliant. The site is not compliant with the FCC rules and regulations for other carriers, as described in OET Bulletin 65. Verizon Wireless is predicted to contribute less than 5% of the maximum permissible exposure (MPE) based on theoretical modeling using parameters supplied by the client; therefore, Verizon Wireless has no responsibility for bringing the site into compliance with FCC guidelines. See Appendix C. A detailed explanation of the 5% rule can be found in the Definition section of Appendix B. The compliance determination is based on General Public MPE levels due to theoretical modeling and/or physical measurements, RF signage placement, proposed antenna inventory and the level of restricted access to the antennas at the site. Any deviation from the Verizon Wireless's proposed deployment plan could result in the site being rendered non-compliant. Measurements have also been performed to validate the assumptions used in out theoretical modeling of this site. Modeling is used for determining compliance and the percentage of MPE contribution. Measurements provide a view of MPE percentage levels at the site at the time of Sitesafe's visit and are used to validate modeling results. 3.2 Actions for Site Compliance Based on common industry practice and our understanding of FCC and OSHA requirements, this section provides a statement of recommendations for site compliance. RF alert signage recommendations have been proposed based on existing measurements and theoretical analysis of MPE levels. Sitesafe has documented the locations of any RF signs and barriers that are required for compliance. Barriers can consist of locked doors, fencing, railing, rope, chain, paint striping or tape, combined with RF alert signage. Verizon Wireless will be compliant. The site is not compliant with the FCC rules and regulations for other carriers on light pole #2 and light pole #3 Sitesafe found one or more issues that led to our determination. The site will be made compliant if the following changes are implemented: • Posting RF signs that a person could read and understand the signs prior to accessing the site; 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1 000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 •info@sffesafe.com PageS Verizon Wireless light pole #1 location Yellow caution sign near the antennas at light pole # 1. Sprint Nextellight pole #2 location Have Sprint Nextel post a Yellow caution sign near the antennas at light pole #2. T -Mobile light pole #3 location Have T-Mobile post a Yellow caution sign near the antennas at light pole #3. • Implementing a safety procedure for lighting maintenance workers as described in section 4 below. 200 N. Glebe Road • SuHe 1000 • Arlington. VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page6 4 Safety Plan and Procedures 4.1 Specific to this site ---------------------------, Lighting Maintenance Work: Personnel required to work on the light fixtures near or above the antennas should have RF Health and Safety training. Workers should be certified by their employer to work in an RF environment. Maintenance workers should contact the carrier(s) Network Operations Center (NOC) prior to working near antennas. The NOC should be able to power down the site during maintenance access. Instructions, Contact information and Site ID's should be posted at the base of the support. Transmitting equipment should be deactivated and lock-out I tag-out or other procedures used to ensure that the antennas are not active while maintenance personnel are working or transiting in front of antennas. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in the form of an RF Monitor should be used to ensure antennas are off and workers are not exposed to RF levels above occupational limits. Worker attention should be greatest while working or transiting in front of antennas. The following items are general safety recommendations that should be administered on a site by site basis as needed by the carrier. The following items are general safety recommendations that should be administered on a site by site basis as needed by the carrier. 4.2 General The following items are general safety recommendations that should be administered on a site by site basis as needed by the carrier. General Maintenance Work: Any maintenance personnel required to work immediately in front of antennas and I or in areas indicated as above 1 00% of the Occupational MPE limits should coordinate with the wireless operators to disable transmitters during their work activities. Training and Qualification Verification: All personnel accessing areas indicated as exceeding the General Population MPE limits should have a basic understanding of EME awareness and RF Safety procedures when working around transmitting antennas. Awareness training increases a workers understanding to potential RF exposure scenarios. Awareness can be achieved in a number of ways (e.g. videos, formal classroom lecture or internet based courses). Phvsical Access Control: Access restrictions to transmitting antennas locations is the primary element in a site safety plan. Examples of access restrictions are as follows: • Locked Gate • Restricted Ladder 200 N. Glebe Road • SuHe 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 •lnfo@sHesafe.com Page 7 RF Signage: Everyone should obey all posted signs at all times. RF signs play an important role in properly warning a worker prior to entering into a potential RF Exposure area. Assume all antennas are active: Due to the nature of telecommunications transmissions, an antenna transmits intermittently. Always assume an antenna is transmitting. Never stop in front of an antenna. If you have to pass by an antenna, move through as quickly and safely as possible thereby reducing any exposure to a minimum. Maintain a 3 foot clearance from all antennas: There is a direct correlation between the strength of an EME field and the distance from the transmitting antenna. The further away from an antenna, the lower the corresponding EME field is. Site RF Emissions Diagram: Section 6 of this report contains an RF Diagram that outlines various theoretical Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) areas at the site. The modeling is a worst case scenario assuming a duty cycle of 1 00% for each transmitting antenna at full power. This analysis is based on one of two access control criteria: General Public criteria means the access to the site is uncontrolled and anyone can gain access. Occupational criteria means the access is restricted and only properly trained individuals can gain access to the antenna locations. 200 N. Glebe Road • SuHe 1 000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 •lnfo@sHesafe.com Page 8 5 Site Audit 5.1 Site Access Procedures A site visit was conducted on April 5, 2012 at approximately 2:00PM. The weather conditions were Sunny with a temperature of 75 degrees. At that time, a diagram of the site was verified, obtained or produced containing the locations of all visible antennas, RF signs and access points on site. These antennas were recorded and photographed. The antenna make(s)/model(s) and centerlines were verified where possible. The following information was gathered regarding site access at the facility. Site access was unlocked/unrestricted at the time of the site visit. There was no RF Advisory signage posted at any site access point. Figure 1: Light pole #1 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 •lnfo@sitesafe.com Page 9 6 NIR Analysis and Recommendation 6.1 NIR Analysis Results When applying the General Public environment standards, the predicted energy density from the Verizon Wireless operation is no more than 3.21 %of the Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limiting any accessible location on the ground. A presentation of this predicted analysis is attached in Section 7. Additionally, measurements were taken on the ground in the vicinity of the site. Measurements show the cumulative RF energy density from all carriers. Given that Verizon Wireless's predicted contribution is below 5% on the ground, Veriz.on Wireless meets the 5% exclusion from corrective action should it be necessary in the future. 6.2 Site Measurements Collected This section provides a summary of the measurements collected at the site. Actual measurements locations at which these data points were collected are included in the RF Emission Diagram provided in Section 6.3 of this report. Measurements collected include both maximum and spatial average values. The spatial average measurement consists of a collection of at least ten ( 1 0) measurements within a ten (10) second time interval taken from zero (0) to six (6) feet. The purpose of this measurement technique is to identify the average power density over the dimensions of a typical human body. The measurements below were obtained from accessible areas located at the site at the time of Sitesafe's visit. Because of the antenna configuration at this site, specific emissions could not be discerned from nearby facilities, and no attempt was made to determine power density levels from a specific transmitting antenna. Highest Measurement of Occupational MPE Limit: <1 %. Highest Measurement of General Public MPE Limit: <5% Table 1: S atlal Avera e and Maximum Me asurements Measurements Spatial Maximum Measurements Spatial Maximum Points M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 Ml M8 M9 MlO Avera e Points Average <1% <1% M11 <1% <1% <1% <1% M12 <1% <1% <1% <1% M13 <1% <1% <1% <1% M14 <1% <1% <1% <1% M15 <1% <1% <1% <1% M16 <1% <1% <1% <1% M17 <1% <1% <1% <1% M18 <1% <1% <1% <1% M19 <1% <1% <1% <1% RF meters and probes have been calibrated and used according to the manufacturer's specifications. Measurements provide a view of MPE percentage levels at the site at the time of Sitesafe's visit and are used to validate modeling results. Theoretical modeling is used for determining compliance and the percentage of MPE contribution. A separate diagram has been included in section 6.3 of this document. Spatial average measurements are displayed in this diagram. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1 000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 •lnfo@sltesafe.com Page 10 Figure 3: Verizon Wireless Proposed Equipment Location 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 •lnfo@sltesafe.com Page 11 Figure 4: Light pole #1 overview Figure 5: Sprint Nextel Antenna #8 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • lnfo@sitesafe.com Page 12 Figure 6: Sprint Nextel Antenna #9 Figure 7: Sprint Nextel Antenna #10 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • lnfo@sltesale.com Page 13 Figure 8: Sprint Nextel Equipment Figure 9: Light pole #2 overview 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 •info@sitesafe.com Page 14 Figure 10: T-Mobile Antennas #11 and #12 Figure 11: T -Mobile Antennas #13 and #14 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 •lnfo@sltesafe.com Page 15 • • Figure 12: T -Mobile Antennas #15 and #16 Figure 13: T -Mobile Antennas #13 and #14 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 16 • • Figure 14: Light pole #3 overview Figure 15: Ground level overview 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 •info@sitesafe.com Page 17 • • 6.3 RF Emission Diagram The diagram below displays RF spatial average measurement locations. Measurement values are referenced from the table above. Predicted Maximum Permissible Exposure levels calculations provided in tabular form in Section 7 below. See the engineering statement for more information on these calculations. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.27 6.11 00 • lnfo@sltesafe.com Page 18 . . Type Notice Caution Warning Info Siqn • • A bbreviations used in the RF Emissions Dia rams IP I M## Measurement## taken durin a site visit A s discussed in Section 6, site measurement locations for spatial average e b measurements collected at the time of Sitesafe's visit have been added to the RF missions diagram. While the theoretical modeling represents worst case MPE levels ased on the assumption(s) detailed above, the measurement data is a snapshot 0 f MPE levels at the time of our visit, and dependent on transmitter duty cycle, ystem implementation and emissions from other RF sources at nearby antenna s si tes. A dditionallnformation in the RF Emissions Diagrams Key T he RF Emission Diagram provides indications of RF signage and locked access oints. The table below lists the abbreviations used to indicate locked access oints and signs: p p .Rf Sl Existing Location NE CE WE IE Recommended Location NR CR WR e and lamer Ke Type Iamers Existing Location LE Recommended Location LR A s discussed in Section 6, site measurements collected at the time of Sitesafe's visit ave been added to the RF Emission diagrams. While the software modeling epresents theoretical MPE levels based on the assumptions detailed above, the te measurement data is a snapshot of MPE levels, and dependent on transmitter uty cycle, system implementation and emissions from other RF sources at nearby ntenna sites. h r si d a 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1 000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 •lnfo@sltesafe.com Page 21 www.sitesafe.com Sitesafe ID# 80660 Site Name: Calavera Hills • • M13 M12 ·.·.··!·~· ~L.· .. · .... ~T; POLE 3 ]16 13 M11 15 •. •. M1ol4 M18 BUIU)ING %of FCC Public Exposure Limit Average from 0 feet above to 6 feet above origin • lOO<=X D 20<=X<100 • 5<=X<20 IIJ X <=5 ' ··.··- M17· M19 Feet ~ 50 0 50 100 Grid Size is 10.0 ~site www.sitesafe.com Sitesafe ID# 80660 Site Name: Calavera Hills • • RF Emissions Diagram for: Calavera Hills Elevation View %of FCC Public Exposure Limit Individual Points • 100 <=X D 20 <=X < 100 • D 5 <=X <20 X <=5 Feet 40 0 40 80 Grid Size is 10.0 • 7 Predicted RF Energy Density Calculations Verizon Wireless Calvera Hills Site Summary • Carrier Area Maximum Percentage MPE Sprint Nextel T-Mobile Verizon Wireless Composite Site MPE: 1.659% 0.509% 3.214% 5.381% 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1 000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.27 6.11 00 • lnfo@sltesafe.com Page 22 • Frequency: Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Maximum power density at ground level: Sprint Nextel Calvera Hills Carrier Summary 1900 MHz • 1 000 1JW/cm"2 8.43663 1JW/cm"2 Highest percentage of Maximum Permissible Exposure: 0.84366 % Antenna Make ANDREW ANDREW Model UMWD-06516-2DH UMWD-06516-2DH 56 Orientation 180 300 2000 On Axis 3.433114 0.343311 0.343311 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1 000 • Arlington. VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 •info@sitesafe.com Page 23 Area 8.149553 Percent of MPE 0.814955 0.814955 • Frequency: Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Maximum power density at ground level: T-Mobile Calvera Hills Carrier Summary 1900 MHz • 1 000 jJW/cmA2 5.0879 jJW/cmA2 Highest percentage of Maximum Permissible Exposure: 0.50879 % Antenna Make ANDREW ANDREW ANDREW ANDREW ANDREW ANDREW On Axis Max Power Height Orientation ERP Density Percent of Model (feet) (degrees true) (Watts) (pW/cmA2) MPE TMBXX-6516-R2M 56 0 500 0.935578 0.093558 TMBXX-6516-R2M 56 0 500 0.935578 0.093558 TMBXX-6516-R2M 56 150 500 0.935578 0.093558 TMBXX-6516-R2M 56 150 500 0.935578 0.093558 TMBXX-6516-R2M 56 240 500 0.935578 0.093558 TMBXX-6516-R2M 56 240 500 0.935578 0.093558 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1 000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.27 6.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page24 Area Max Power Density Percent of (pW/cmA2) MPE 2.083034 0.208303 2.083034 0.208303 2.083034 0.208303 2.083034 0.208303 2.083034 0.208303 2.083034 0.208303 • Frequency: Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Maximum power density at ground level: Sprint Nextel Calvera Hills Carrier Summary 1900 MHz • 1 000 1JW/cmA2 8.14955 1JWfcmA2 Highest percentage of Maximum Permissible Exposure: 0.81496 % Antenna Make ANDREW On Axis Model UMWD-06516-2DH 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 •lnfo@sitesafe.com Page 25 Area Percent of MPE 0.814955 • Frequency: Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Maximum power density at ground level: Verizon Wireless Calvera Hills Carrier Summary 1900 MHz • 1 000 1JW/cm"2 13.81555 1JW/cm"2 Highest percentage of Maximum Permissible Exposure: 1.38155 % Antenna Make ANDREW ANDREW ANDREW On Axis Model DBXNH-6565A-VTM 67 80 0.920727 DBXNH-6565A-VTM 67 210 3044 9.167468 0.916747 DBXNH-6565A-VTM 67 340 3044 9.167468 0.916747 200 N. Glebe Road • SuHe 1 000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.27 6.11 00 • lnfo@sltesafe.com Page26 Area Percent of MPE 1.236716 12.367158 1.236716 12.367158 1.236716 • Frequency: Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Maximum power density at ground level: Verizon Wireless Calvera Hills Carrier Summary Highest percentage of Maximum Permissible Exposure: 850 566.67 7.16832 1.265 Antenna Make ANDREW ANDREW ANDREW Model DBXNH-6565A-VTM DBXNH-6565A-VTM DBXNH-6565A-VTM 67 67 80 210 340 2034 2034 • MHz 1JW/cmA2 1JW/cmA2 % On Axis 6.871102 6.871102 1.218744 1.212547 1.212547 200 N. Glebe Road • SuHe 1 000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sHesafe.com Page 27 Area 7.138773 7.138773 Percent of MPE 1.259783 1.259784 1.259784 ~--------------------------------------------------------_j ----------------------------------------......, • Frequency: Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Maximum power density at ground level: Verizon Wireless Calvera Hills Carrier Summary 751 MHz • 500.67 1JW/cm"2 2.83802 1JW/cm"2 Highest percentage of Maximum Permissible Exposure: 0.56685 % Antenna Make Model Ante I BXA-70063-4CF Ante I BXA-70063-4CF Antel BXA-70063-4CF Carrier Verizon Wireless On Axis 61 210 634 2.341577 61 340 634 2.341577 Calvera Hills Microwave Antenna Summary Antenna Make/Model Generic Microwave Percent of MPE 0.467096 0.467692 0.467692 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1 000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sHesafe.com Page 28 Area Percent of MPE 0.529995 2.653508 0.529995 2.653508 0.529995 Height (feet) 44 • • ANDREW:UMWD-06516-2DH Antenna Worksheet (180 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 ERP (Watts): 2000 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB 0.1 -1.21 1.0 -0.40 2.0 0.00 3.0 -0.10 4.0 -0.80 5.0 -2.00 6.0 -3.80 7.0 -6.60 8.0 -10.40 9.0 -16.20 10.0 -23.10 12.0 -16.90 14.0 -16.80 16.0 -20.50 18.0 -21.70 20.0 -21.70 22.0 -24.00 24.0 -25.20 26.0 -26.30 28.0 -29.50 30.0 -22.40 32.0 -17.80 34.0 -16.20 36.0 -16.90 38.0 -19.50 40.0 -24.70 42.0 -35.20 44.0 -39.70 46.0 -33.00 48.0 -33.50 50.0 -36.50 52.0 -38.60 54.0 -36.80 56.0 -35.50 58.0 -33.90 60.0 -32.40 62.0 -30.90 64.0 -30.30 66.0 -30.50 68.0 -32.10 70.0 -35.10 72.0 -38.70 74.0 -40.00 76.0 -40.00 78.0 -40.00 80.0 -40.00 82.0 -38.30 84.0 -36.60 86.0 -37.10 88.0 -39.10 90.0 -40.00 Height Frequency (feet): 56 (MHz): 1900 Slant Dlst From Relative Distance Structure Power Density Gain (meters) (meters) (j!W/cmA21 0.7568 10554.82 10554.81 0.000599 0.9120 1055.48 1055.38 0.059862 1.0000 527.74 527.53 0.239449 0.9772 351.83 351.51 0.538757 0.8318 263.87 263.44 0.957785 0.6310 211.10 210.56 1.204672 0.4169 175.92 175.27 1.447229 0.2188 150.79 150.03 1.690678 0.0912 131.94 131.08 1.935172 0.0240 117.28 116.31 2.180869 0.0049 105.56 104.47 2.427929 0.0204 87.97 86.67 2.926791 0.0209 75.41 73.89 3.433114 0.0089 65.99 64.24 1.248934 0.0068 58.66 56.70 0.577828 0.0068 52.81 50.61 0.712844 0.0040 48.02 45.60 0.828829 0.0030 44.03 41.38 0.631260 0.0023 40.66 37.77 0.406725 0.0011 37.78 34.65 0.448182 0.0058 35.29 31.91 0.460200 0.0166 33.11 29.48 0.864868 0.0240 31.19 27.31 1.723352 0.0204 29.50 25.36 2.243328 0.0112 27.98 23.58 2.482406 0.0034 26.63 21.95 2.732121 0.0003 25.41 20.46 2.988422 0.0001 24.31 19.08 3.251650 0.0005 23.31 17.79 3.323404 0.0004 22.41 16.59 2.399000 0.0002 21.59 15.46 1.032362 0.0001 20.84 14.39 0.218962 0.0002 20.15 13.38 0.122573 0.0003 19.53 12.43 0.129696 0.0004 18.96 11.51 0.125939 0.0006 18.44 10.64 0.132123 0.0008 17.97 9.79 0.201846 0.0009 17.54 8.98 0.274047 0.0009 17.16 8.20 0.284326 0.0006 16.81 7.44 0.293674 0.0003 16.49 6.70 0.302413 0.0001 16.21 5.99 0.309907 0.0001 15.97 5.28 0.306818 0.0001 15.75 4.59 0.214256 0.0001 15.57 3.92 0.098625 0.0001 15.41 3.25 0.056885 0.0001 15.29 2.59 0.083948 0.0002 15.19 1.94 0.084126 0.0002 15.12 1.29 0.084030 0.0001 15.08 0.64 0.083483 0.0001 15.07 0.00 0.079118 200 N. Glebe Road • SuHe 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203·3728 703.27 6.11 00 • info@sHesafe.com Page 29 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000060 0.005986 0.023945 0.053876 0.095778 0.120467 0.144723 0.169068 0.193517 0.218087 0.242793 0.292679 0.343311 0.124893 0.057783 0.071284 0.082883 0.063126 0.040672 0.044818 0.046020 0.086487 0.172335 0.224333 0.248241 0.273212 0.298842 0.325165 0.332340 0.239900 0.103236 0.021896 0.012257 0.012970 0.012594 0.013212 0.020185 0.027405 0.028433 0.029367 0.030241 0.030991 0.030682 0.021426 0.009863 0.005688 0.008395 0.008413 0.008403 0.008348 0.007912 0.0 Times BelowMPE 1670498 16705 4176 1856 1044 830 690 591 516 458 411 341 291 800 1730 1402 1206 1584 2458 2231 2172 1156 580 445 402 366 334 307 300 416 968 4566 8158 7710 7940 7568 4954 3649 3517 3405 3306 3226 3259 4667 10139 17579 11912 11886 11900 11978 12639 • • ANDREW:UMWD-06516-2DH Antenna Worksheet (300 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 ERP (Watts): 2000 Depression Angle {degrees) Relative dB 0.1 -1.21 1.0 -0.40 2.0 0.00 3.0 -0.10 4.0 -0.80 5.0 -2.00 6.0 -3.80 7.0 -6.60 8.0 -10.40 9.0 -16.20 10.0 -23.10 12.0 -16.90 14.0 -16.80 16.0 -20.50 18.0 -21.70 20.0 -21.70 22.0 -24.00 24.0 -25.20 26.0 -26.30 28.0 -29.50 30.0 -22.40 32.0 -17.80 34.0 -16.20 36.0 -16.90 38.0 -19.50 40.0 -24.70 42.0 -35.20 44.0 -39.70 46.0 -33.00 48.0 -33.50 50.0 -36.50 52.0 -38.60 54.0 -36.80 56.0 -35.50 58.0 -33.90 60.0 -32.40 62.0 -30.90 64.0 -30.30 66.0 -30.50 68.0 -32.10 70.0 -35.10 72.0 -38.70 74.0 -40.00 76.0 -40.00 78.0 -40.00 80.0 -40.00 82.0 -38.30 84.0 -36.60 86.0 -37.10 88.0 -39.10 90.0 -40.00 Height Frequency (feet): 56 (MHz): 1900 Slant Dlst From Relative Distance Structure Power Density Gain {meters) {meters) {!,!W/cmA2l 0.7568 10554.82 10554.81 0.000599 0.9120 1055.48 1055.38 0.059862 1.0000 527.74 527.53 0.239449 0.9772 351.83 351.51 0.538757 0.8318 263.87 263.44 0.957785 0.6310 211.10 210.56 1.204672 0.4169 175.92 175.27 1.447229 0.2188 150.79 150.03 1.690678 0.0912 131.94 131.08 1.935172 0.0240 117.28 116.31 2.180869 0.0049 105.56 104.47 2.427929 0.0204 87.97 86.67 2.926791 0.0209 75.41 73.89 3.433114 0.0089 65.99 64.24 1.248934 0.0068 58.66 56.70 0.577828 0.0068 52.81 50.81 0.711029 0.0040 48.02 45.60 0.826720 0.0030 44.03 41.38 0.628860 0.0023 40.66 37.77 0.406725 0.0011 37.78 34.85 0.448182 0.0058 35.29 31.91 0.460200 0.0166 33.11 29.48 0.860551 0.0240 31.19 27.31 1.723352 0.0204 29.50 25.36 2.229866 0.0112 27.98 23.58 2.482406 0.0034 26.63 21.95 2.732121 0.0003 25.41 20.46 2.988422 0.0001 24.31 19.08 3.226883 0.0005 23.31 17.79 3.298090 0.0004 22.41 16.59 2.399000 0.0002 21.59 15.46 1.032362 0.0001 20.84 14.39 0.218962 0.0002 20.15 13.38 0.121640 0.0003 19.53 12.43 0.128544 0.0004 18.96 11.51 0.124821 0.0006 18.44 10.64 0.132123 0.0008 17.97 9.79 0.201846 0.0009 17.54 8.98 0.274047 0.0009 17.16 8.20 0.282161 0.0006 16.81 7.44 0.291437 0.0003 16.49 6.70 0.302413 0.0001 16.21 5.99 0.309907 0.0001 15.97 5.28 0.306818 0.0001 15.75 4.59 0.214256 0.0001 15.57 3.92 0.098625 0.0001 15.41 3.25 0.056885 0.0001 15.29 2.59 0.083628 0.0002 15.19 1.94 0.084126 0.0002 15.12 1.29 0.083615 0.0001 15.08 0.64 0.083483 0.0001 15.07 0.00 0.079118 200 N. Glebe Road • SuHe 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.27 6.1100 • lnfo@sHesafe.com Page 30 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000060 0.005986 0.023945 0.053876 0.095778 0.120467 0.144723 0.169068 0.193517 0.218087 0.242793 0.292679 0.343311 0.124893 0.057783 0.071103 0.082672 0.062886 0.040672 0.044818 0.046020 0.086055 0.172335 0.222987 0.248241 0.273212 0.298842 0.322688 0.329809 0.239900 0.103236 0.021896 0.012164 0.012854 0.012482 0.013212 0.020185 0.027405 0.028216 0.029144 0.030241 0.030991 0.030682 0.021426 0.009863 0.005688 0.008363 0.008413 0.008362 0.008348 0.007912 0.0 Times BelowMPE 1670498 16705 4176 1856 1044 830 690 591 516 458 411 341 291 800 1730 1406 1209 1590 2458 2231 2172 1162 580 448 402 366 334 309 303 416 968 4566 8220 7779 8011 7568 4954 3649 3544 3431 3306 3226 3259 4667 10139 17579 11957 11886 11959 11978 12639 • • ANDREW:TMBXX-6516-R2M Antenna Worksheet (0 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 ERP (Watts): 500 Depression Angle (degrees} Relative dB 0.1 0.00 1.0 0.00 2.0 -0.50 3.0 -1.60 4.0 -3.20 5.0 -5.50 6.0 -8.90 7.0 -13.90 8.0 -25.00 9.0 -27.00 10.0 -18.40 12.0 -16.60 14.0 -22.70 16.0 -30.40 18.0 -21.00 20.0 -22.00 22.0 -30.90 24.0 -30.70 26.0 -26.80 28.0 -34.90 30.0 -27.30 32.0 -19.30 34.0 -16.30 36.0 -15.90 38.0 -17.60 40.0 -21.50 42.0 -28.50 44.0 -40.00 46.0 -36.50 48.0 -35.50 50.0 -40.00 52.0 -40.00 54.0 -34.40 56.0 -32.10 58.0 -32.10 60.0 -33.80 62.0 -36.60 64.0 -39.90 66.0 -39.60 68.0 -35.20 70.0 -32.00 72.0 -30.40 74.0 -30.10 76.0 -31.10 78.0 -33.20 80.0 -36.40 82.0 -40.00 84.0 -40.00 86.0 -40.00 88.0 -40.00 90.0 -39.20 Height Frequency (feet): 56 (MHz): 1900 Slant Dist From Relative Distance Structure Power Density Gain (meters} (meters} (I!W/cm"2} 1.0000 10554.82 10554.81 0.000150 1.0000 1055.48 1055.38 0.014966 0.8913 527.74 527.53 0.059862 0.6918 351.83 351.51 0.134689 0.4786 263.87 263.44 0.239446 0.2818 211.10 210.56 0.340626 0.1288 175.92 175.27 0.409210 0.0407 150.79 150.03 0.478046 0.0032 131.94 131.08 0.547178 0.0020 117.28 116.31 0.616650 0.0145 105.56 104.47 0.686507 0.0219 87.97 86.67 0.699583 0.0054 75.41 73.89 0.240162 0.0009 65.99 64.24 0.109155 0.0079 58.66 56.70 0.137944 0.0063 52.81 50.61 0.165642 0.0008 48.02 45.60 0.111572 0.0009 44.03 41.38 0.095859 0.0021 40.66 37.77 0.112116 0.0003 37.78 34.65 0.129548 0.0019 35.29 31.91 0.092579 0.0117 33.11 29.48 0.124415 0.0234 31.19 27.31 0.368115 0.0257 29.50 25.36 0.581253 0.0174 27.98 23.58 0.659657 0.0071 26.63 21.95 0.725520 0.0014 25.41 20.46 0.794124 0.0001 24.31 19.08 0.864075 0.0002 23.31 17.79 0.935578 0.0003 22.41 16.59 0.833059 0.0001 21.59 15.46 0.461314 0.0001 20.84 14.39 0.139742 0.0004 20.15 13.38 0.020838 0.0006 19.53 12.43 0.027722 0.0006 18.96 11.51 0.042274 0.0004 18.44 10.64 0.045451 0.0002 17.97 9.79 0.047543 0.0001 17.54 8.98 0.049503 0.0001 17.16 8.20 0.051358 0.0003 16.81 7.44 0.044622 0.0006 16.49 6.70 0.052502 0.0009 16.21 5.99 0.077764 0.0010 15.97 5.28 0.082993 0.0008 15.75 4.59 0.084590 0.0005 15.57 3.92 0.085765 0.0002 15.41 3.25 0.086758 0.0001 15.29 2.59 0.078755 0.0001 15.19 1.94 0.048941 0.0001 15.12 1.29 0.021148 0.0001 15.08 0.64 0.012898 0.0001 15.07 0.00 0.013050 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1 000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sltesafe.com Page 31 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000015 0.001497 0.005986 0.013469 0.023945 0.034063 0.040921 0.047805 0.054718 0.061665 0.068651 0.069958 0.024016 0.010916 0.013794 0.016564 0.011157 0.009586 0.011212 0.012955 0.009258 0.012442 0.036811 0.058125 0.065966 0.072552 0.079412 0.086407 0.093558 0.083306 0.046131 0.013974 0.002084 0.002772 0.004227 0.004545 0.004754 0.004950 0.005136 0.004462 0.005250 0.007776 0.008299 0.008459 0.008577 0.008676 0.007875 0.004894 0.002115 0.001290 0.001305 0.0 Times BelowMPE 6681994 66820 16705 7424 4176 2935 2443 2091 1827 1621 1456 1429 4163 9161 7249 6037 8962 10431 8919 7719 10801 8037 2716 1720 1515 1378 1259 1157 1068 1200 2167 7156 47989 36072 23655 22001 21033 20200 19471 22410 19047 12859 12049 11821 11659 11526 12697 20432 47286 77529 76627 • • ANDREW:TMBXX-6516-R2M Antenna Worksheet (0 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 ERP (Watts): 500 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB 0.1 0.00 1.0 0.00 2.0 -0.50 3.0 -1.60 4.0 -3.20 5.0 -5.50 6.0 -8.90 7.0 -13.90 8.0 -25.00 9.0 -27.00 10.0 -18.40 12.0 -16.60 14.0 -22.70 16.0 -30.40 18.0 -21.00 20.0 -22.00 22.0 -30.90 24.0 -30.70 26.0 -26.80 28.0 -34.90 30.0 -27.30 32.0 -19.30 34.0 -16.30 36.0 -15.90 38.0 -17.60 40.0 -21.50 42.0 -28.50 44.0 -40.00 46.0 -36.50 48.0 -35.50 50.0 -40.00 52.0 -40.00 54.0 -34.40 56.0 -32.10 58.0 -32.10 60.0 -33.80 62.0 -36.60 64.0 -39.90 66.0 -39.60 68.0 -35.20 70.0 -32.00 72.0 -30.40 74.0 -30.10 76.0 -31.10 78.0 -33.20 80.0 -36.40 82.0 -40.00 84.0 -40.00 86.0 -40.00 88.0 -40.00 90.0 -39.20 Height Frequency (feet): 56 (MHz): 1900 Slant Distfrom Relative Distance Structure Power Density Gain (meters) (meters) (j!W/cmA2l 1.0000 10554.82 10554.81 0.000150 1.0000 1055.48 1055.38 0.014966 0.8913 527.74 527.53 0.059862 0.6918 351.83 351.51 0.134689 0.4786 263.87 263.44 0.239446 0.2818 211.10 210.56 0.340626 0.1288 175.92 175.27 0.409210 0.0407 150.79 150.03 0.478046 0.0032 131.94 131.08 0.547178 0.0020 117.28 116.31 0.616650 0.0145 105.56 104.47 0.686507 0.0219 87.97 86.67 0.699583 0.0054 75.41 73.89 0.240162 0.0009 65.99 64.24 0.109155 0.0079 58.66 56.70 0.137944 0.0063 52.81 50.61 0.165642 0.0008 48.02 45.60 0.111572 0.0009 44.03 41.38 0.095859 0.0021 40.66 37.77 0.112116 0.0003 37.78 34.65 0.129548 0.0019 35.29 31.91 0.092579 0.0117 33.11 29.48 0.124415 0.0234 31.19 27.31 0.368115 0.0257 29.50 25.36 0.581253 0.0174 27.98 23.58 0.659657 0.0071 26.63 21.95 0.725520 0.0014 25.41 20.46 0.794124 0.0001 24.31 19.08 0.864075 0.0002 23.31 17.79 0.935578 0.0003 22.41 16.59 0.833059 0.0001 21.59 15.46 0.461314 0.0001 20.84 14.39 0.139742 0.0004 20.15 13.38 0.020838 0.0006 19.53 12.43 0.027722 0.0006 18.96 11.51 0.042274 0.0004 18.44 10.64 0.045451 0.0002 17.97 9.79 0.047543 0.0001 17.54 8.98 0.049503 0.0001 17.16 8.20 0.051358 0.0003 16.81 7.44 0.044622 0.0006 16.49 6.70 0.052502 0.0009 16.21 5.99 0.077764 0.0010 15.97 5.28 0.082993 0.0008 15.75 4.59 0.084590 0.0005 15.57 3.92 0.085765 0.0002 15.41 3.25 0.086758 0.0001 15.29 2.59 0.078755 0.0001 15.19 1.94 0.048941 0.0001 15.12 1.29 0.021148 0.0001 15.08 0.64 0.012898 0.0001 15.07 0.00 0.013050 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1 000 • Arlington. VA 22203-3728 703.27 6.1100 • lnfo@sltesafe.com Page 32 Downtllt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000015 0.001497 0.005986 0.013469 0.023945 0.034063 0.040921 0.047805 0.054718 0.061665 0.068651 0.069958 0.024016 0.010916 0.013794 0.016564 0.011157 0.009586 0.011212 0.012955 0.009258 0.012442 0.036811 0.058125 0.065966 0.072552 0.079412 0.086407 0.093558 0.083306 0.046131 0.013974 0.002084 0.002772 0.004227 0.004545 0.004754 0.004950 0.005136 0.004462 0.005250 0.007776 0.008299 0.008459 0.008577 0.008676 0.007875 0.004894 0.002115 0.001290 0.001305 0.0 Times BelowMPE 6681994 66820 16705 7424 4176 2935 2443 2091 1827 1621 1456 1429 4163 9161 7249 6037 8962 10431 8919 7719 10801 8037 2716 1720 1515 1378 1259 1157 1068 1200 2167 7156 47989 36072 23655 22001 21033 20200 19471 22410 19047 12859 12049 11821 11659 11526 12697 20432 47286 77529 76627 ANDREW:TMBXX-6516-R2M Antenna Worksheet (150 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 ERP (Watts): 500 Depression Angle {degrees) Relative dB 0.1 0.00 1.0 0.00 2.0 -0.50 3.0 -1.60 4.0 -3.20 5.0 -5.50 6.0 -8.90 7.0 -13.90 8.0 -25.00 9.0 -27.00 10.0 -18.40 12.0 -16.60 14.0 -22.70 16.0 -30.40 18.0 -21.00 20.0 -22.00 22.0 -30.90 24.0 -30.70 26.0 -26.80 28.0 -34.90 30.0 -27.30 32.0 -19.30 34.0 -16.30 36.0 -15.90 38.0 -17.60 40.0 -21.50 42.0 -28.50 44.0 -40.00 46.0 -36.50 48.0 -35.50 50.0 -40.00 52.0 -40.00 54.0 -34.40 56.0 -32.10 58.0 -32.10 60.0 -33.80 62.0 -36.60 64.0 -39.90 66.0 -39.60 68.0 -35.20 70.0 -32.00 72.0 -30.40 74.0 -30.10 76.0 -31.10 78.0 -33.20 80.0 -36.40 82.0 -40.00 84.0 -40.00 86.0 -40.00 88.0 -40.00 90.0 -39.20 Height Frequency (feet): 56 (MHz): 1900 Slant Dist From Relative Distance Structure Power Density Gain {meters) {meters) {I!Wicm"2l 1.0000 10554.82 10554.81 0.000150 1.0000 1055.48 1055.38 0.014966 0.8913 527.74 527.53 0.059862 0.6918 351.83 351.51 0.134689 0.4786 263.87 263.44 0.239446 0.2818 211.10 210.56 0.340626 0.1288 175.92 175.27 0.409210 0.0407 150.79 150.03 0.478046 0.0032 131.94 131.08 0.547178 0.0020 117.28 116.31 0.616650 0.0145 105.56 104.47 0.686507 0.0219 87.97 86.67 0.699583 0.0054 75.41 73.89 0.240774 0.0009 65.99 64.24 0.109462 0.0079 58.66 56.70 0.138316 0.0063 52.81 50.61 0.165642 0.0008 48.02 45.60 0.111572 0.0009 44.03 41.38 0.095859 0.0021 40.66 37.77 0.112546 0.0003 37.78 34.65 0.129960 0.0019 35.29 31.91 0.092815 0.0117 33.11 29.48 0.124415 0.0234 31.19 27.31 0.368637 0.0257 29.50 25.36 0.581253 0.0174 27.98 23.58 0.659657 0.0071 26.63 21.95 0.725520 0.0014 25.41 20.46 0.793489 0.0001 24.31 19.08 0.864075 0.0002 23.31 17.79 0.935578 0.0003 22.41 16.59 0.830938 0.0001 21.59 15.46 0.460139 0.0001 20.84 14.39 0.139387 0.0004 20.15 13.38 0.020838 0.0006 19.53 12.43 0.027722 0.0006 18.96 11.51 0.042274 0.0004 18.44 10.64 0.045323 0.0002 17.97 9.79 0.047364 0.0001 17.54 8.98 0.049365 0.0001 17.16 8.20 0.051358 0.0003 16.81 7.44 0.044622 0.0006 16.49 6.70 0.052368 0.0009 16.21 5.99 0.077566 0.0010 15.97 5.28 0.082816 0.0008 15.75 4.59 0.084374 0.0005 15.57 3.92 0.085547 0.0002 15.41 3.25 0.086427 0.0001 15.29 2.59 0.078755 0.0001 15.19 1.94 0.048713 0.0001 15.12 1.29 0.021148 0.0001 15.08 0.64 0.012849 0.0001 15.07 0.00 0.013050 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1 000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.27 6.11 00 • info@sltesafe.com Page 33 Downtllt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000015 0.001497 0.005986 0.013469 0.023945 0.034063 0.040921 0.047805 0.054718 0.061665 0.068651 0.069958 0.024077 0.010946 0.013832 0.016564 0.011157 0.009586 0.011255 0.012996 0.009282 0.012442 0.036864 0.058125 0.065966 0.072552 0.079349 0.086407 0.093558 0.083094 0.046014 0.013939 0.002084 0.002772 0.004227 0.004532 0.004736 0.004936 0.005136 0.004462 0.005237 0.007757 0.008282 0.008437 0.008555 0.008643 0.007875 0.004871 0.002115 0.001285 0.001305 0.0 Times BelowMPE 6681995 66820 16705 7424 4176 2935 2443 2091 1827 1621 1456 1429 4153 9135 7229 6037 8962 10431 8885 7694 10774 8037 2712 1720 1515 1378 1260 1157 1068 1203 2173 7174 47989 36072 23655 22063 21113 20257 19471 22410 19095 12892 12075 11851 11689 11570 12697 20528 47286 77826 76627 • ANDREW:TMBXX-6516-R2M Antenna Worksheet (150 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 ERP (Watts): 500 Depression Angle {degrees} Relative dB 0.1 0.00 1.0 0.00 2.0 -0.50 3.0 -1.60 4.0 -3.20 5.0 -5.50 6.0 -8.90 7.0 -13.90 8.0 -25.00 9.0 -27.00 10.0 -18.40 12.0 -16.60 14.0 -22.70 16.0 -30.40 18.0 -21.00 20.0 -22.00 22.0 -30.90 24.0 -30.70 26.0 -26.80 28.0 -34.90 30.0 -27.30 32.0 -19.30 34.0 -16.30 36.0 -15.90 38.0 -17.60 40.0 -21.50 42.0 -28.50 44.0 -40.00 46.0 -36.50 48.0 -35.50 50.0 -40.00 52.0 -40.00 54.0 -34.40 56.0 -32.10 58.0 -32.10 60.0 -33.80 62.0 -36.60 64.0 -39.90 66.0 -39.60 68.0 -35.20 70.0 -32.00 72.0 -30.40 74.0 -30.10 76.0 -31.10 78.0 -33.20 80.0 -36.40 82.0 -40.00 84.0 -40.00 86.0 -40.00 88.0 -40.00 90.0 -39.20 Height Frequency (feet): 56 (MHz): 1900 Slant Dist From Relative Distance Structure Power Density Gain {meters} {meters} {~W/cmA2} 1.0000 10554.82 10554.81 0.000150 1.0000 1055.48 1055.38 0.014966 0.8913 527.74 527.53 0.059862 0.6918 351.83 351.51 0.134689 0.4786 263.87 263.44 0.239446 0.2818 211.10 210.56 0.340626 0.1288 175.92 175.27 0.409210 0.0407 150.79 150.03 0.478046 0.0032 131.94 131.08 0.547178 0.0020 117.28 116.31 0.616650 0.0145 105.56 104.47 0.686507 0.0219 87.97 86.67 0.699583 0.0054 75.41 73.89 0.240774 0.0009 65.99 64.24 0.109462 0.0079 58.66 56.70 0.138316 0.0063 52.81 50.61 0.165642 0.0008 48.02 45.60 0.111572 0.0009 44.03 41.38 0.095859 0.0021 40.66 37.77 0.112546 0.0003 37.78 34.65 0.129960 0.0019 35.29 31.91 0.092815 0.0117 33.11 29.48 0.124415 0.0234 31.19 27.31 0.368637 0.0257 29.50 25.36 0.581253 0.0174 27.98 23.58 0.659657 0.0071 26.63 21.95 0.725520 0.0014 25.41 20.46 0.793489 0.0001 24.31 19.08 0.864075 0.0002 23.31 17.79 0.935578 0.0003 22.41 16.59 0.830938 0.0001 21.59 15.46 0.460139 0.0001 20.84 14.39 0.139387 0.0004 20.15 13.38 0.020838 0.0006 19.53 12.43 0.027722 0.0006 18.96 11.51 0.042274 0.0004 18.44 10.64 0.045323 0.0002 17.97 9.79 0.047364 0.0001 17.54 8.98 0.049365 0.0001 17.16 8.20 0.051358 0.0003 16.81 7.44 0.044622 0.0006 16.49 6.70 0.052368 0.0009 16.21 5.99 0.077566 0.0010 15.97 5.28 0.082816 0.0008 15.75 4.59 0.084374 0.0005 15.57 3.92 0.085547 0.0002 15.41 3.25 0.086427 0.0001 15.29 2.59 0.078755 0.0001 15.19 1.94 0.048713 0.0001 15.12 1.29 0.021148 0.0001 15.08 0.64 0.012849 0.0001 15.07 0.00 0.013050 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 •lnfo@sitesafe.com Page 34 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000015 0.001497 0.005986 0.013469 0.023945 0.034063 0.040921 0.047805 0.054718 0.061665 0.068651 0.069958 0.024077 0.010946 0.013832 0.016564 0.011157 0.009586 0.011255 0.012996 0.009282 0.012442 0.036864 0.058125 0.065966 0.072552 0.079349 0.086407 0.093558 0.083094 0.046014 0.013939 0.002084 0.002772 0.004227 0.004532 0.004736 0.004936 0.005136 0.004462 0.005237 0.007757 0.008282 0.008437 0.008555 0.008643 0.007875 0.004871 0.002115 0.001285 0.001305 0.0 Times BelowMPE 6681995 66820 16705 7424 4176 2935 2443 2091 1827 1621 1456 1429 4153 9135 7229 6037 8962 10431 8885 7694 10774 8037 2712 1720 1515 1378 1260 1157 1068 1203 2173 7174 47989 36072 23655 22063 21113 20257 19471 22410 19095 12892 12075 11851 11689 11570 12697 20528 47286 77826 76627 ANDREW:TMBXX-6516-R2M Antenna Worksheet (240 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 ERP (Watts): 500 Depression Angle {degrees) Relative dB 0.1 0.00 1.0 0.00 2.0 -0.50 3.0 -1.60 4.0 -3.20 5.0 -5.50 6.0 -8.90 7.0 -13.90 8.0 -25.00 9.0 -27.00 10.0 -18.40 12.0 -16.60 14.0 -22.70 16.0 -30.40 18.0 -21.00 20.0 -22.00 22.0 -30.90 24.0 -30.70 26.0 -26.80 28.0 -34.90 30.0 -27.30 32.0 -19.30 34.0 -16.30 36.0 -15.90 38.0 -17.60 40.0 -21.50 42.0 -28.50 44.0 -40.00 46.0 -36.50 48.0 -35.50 50.0 -40.00 52.0 -40.00 54.0 -34.40 56.0 -32.10 58.0 -32.10 60.0 -33.80 62.0 -36.60 64.0 -39.90 66.0 -39.60 68.0 -35.20 70.0 -32.00 72.0 -30.40 74.0 -30.10 76.0 -31.10 78.0 -33.20 80.0 -36.40 82.0 -40.00 84.0 -40.00 86.0 -40.00 88.0 -40.00 90.0 -39.20 Height Frequency (feet): 56 (MHz): 1900 Slant Dist From Relative Distance Structure Power Density Gain {meters) {meters) {!:!W/cmA2l 1.0000 10554.82 10554.81 0.000150 1.0000 1055.48 1055.38 0.014966 0.8913 527.74 527.53 0.059862 0.6918 351.83 351.51 0.134689 0.4786 263.87 263.44 0.239446 0.2818 211.10 210.56 0.340626 0.1288 175.92 175.27 0.409210 0.0407 150.79 150.03 0.478046 0.0032 131.94 131.08 0.547178 0.0020 117.28 116.31 0.616650 0.0145 105.56 104.47 0.686507 0.0219 87.97 86.67 0.699583 0.0054 75.41 73.89 0.240774 0.0009 65.99 64.24 0.109462 0.0079 58.66 56.70 0.138316 0.0063 52.81 50.61 0.165642 0.0008 48.02 45.60 0.111572 0.0009 44.03 41.38 0.095859 0.0021 40.66 37.77 0.112546 0.0003 37.78 34.65 0.129960 0.0019 35.29 31.91 0.092815 0.0117 33.11 29.48 0.124415 0.0234 31.19 27.31 0.368637 0.0257 29.50 25.36 0.581253 0.0174 27.98 23.58 0.659657 0.0071 26.63 21.95 0.725520 0.0014 25.41 20.46 0.793489 0.0001 24.31 19.08 0.864075 0.0002 23.31 17.79 0.935578 0.0003 22.41 16.59 0.830938 0.0001 21.59 15.46 0.460139 0.0001 20.84 14.39 0.139387 0.0004 20.15 13.38 0.020838 0.0006 19.53 12.43 0.027722 0.0006 18.96 11.51 0.042274 0.0004 18.44 10.64 0.045323 0.0002 17.97 9.79 0.047364 0.0001 17.54 8.98 0.049365 0.0001 17.16 8.20 0.051358 0.0003 16.81 7.44 0.044622 0.0006 16.49 6.70 0.052368 0.0009 16.21 5.99 0.077566 0.0010 15.97 5.28 0.082816 0.0008 15.75 4.59 0.084374 0.0005 15.57 3.92 0.085547 0.0002 15.41 3.25 0.086427 0.0001 15.29 2.59 0.078755 0.0001 15.19 1.94 0.048713 0.0001 15.12 1.29 0.021148 0.0001 15.08 0.64 0.012849 0.0001 15.07 0.00 0.013000 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1 000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.27 6.11 00 • info@sltesafe.com Page 35 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000015 0.001497 0.005986 0.013469 0.023945 0.034063 0.040921 0.047805 0.054718 0.061665 0.068651 0.069958 0.024077 0.010946 0.013832 0.016564 0.011157 0.009586 0.011255 0.012996 0.009282 0.012442 0.036864 0.058125 0.065966 0.072552 0.079349 0.086407 0.093558 0.083094 0.046014 0.013939 0.002084 0.002772 0.004227 0.004532 0.004736 0.004936 0.005136 0.004462 0.005237 0.007757 0.008282 0.008437 0.008555 0.008643 0.007875 0.004871 0.002115 0.001285 0.001300 0.0 Times BelowMPE 6681995 66820 16705 7424 4176 2935 2443 2091 1827 1621 1456 1429 4153 9135 7229 6037 8962 10431 8885 7694 10774 8037 2712 1720 1515 1378 1260 1157 1068 1203 2173 7174 47989 36072 23655 22063 21113 20257 19471 22410 19095 12892 12075 11851 11689 11570 12697 20528 47286 77826 76921 ANDREW:TMBXX-6516-R2M Antenna Worksheet (240 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 ERP (Watts): 500 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB 0.1 0.00 1.0 0.00 2.0 -0.50 3.0 -1.60 4.0 -3.20 5.0 -5.50 6.0 -8.90 7.0 -13.90 8.0 -25.00 9.0 -27.00 10.0 -18.40 12.0 -16.60 14.0 -22.70 16.0 -30.40 18.0 -21.00 20.0 -22.00 22.0 -30.90 24.0 -30.70 26.0 -26.80 28.0 -34.90 30.0 -27.30 32.0 -19.30 34.0 -16.30 36.0 -15.90 38.0 -17.60 40.0 -21.50 42.0 -28.50 44.0 -40.00 46.0 -36.50 48.0 -35.50 50.0 -40.00 52.0 -40.00 54.0 -34.40 56.0 -32.10 58.0 -32.10 60.0 -33.80 62.0 -36.60 64.0 -39.90 66.0 -39.60 68.0 -35.20 70.0 -32.00 72.0 -30.40 74.0 -30.10 76.0 -31.10 78.0 -33.20 80.0 -36.40 82.0 -40.00 84.0 -40.00 86.0 -40.00 88.0 -40.00 90.0 -39.20 Height Frequency (feet): 56 (MHz): 1900 Slant Dist From Relative Distance Structure Power Density Gain (meters) (meters) jj!W/cmA21 1.0000 10554.82 10554.81 0.000150 1.0000 1055.48 1055.38 0.014966 0.8913 527.74 527.53 0.059862 0.6918 351.83 351.51 0.134689 0.4786 263.87 263.44 0.239446 0.2818 211.10 210.56 0.340626 0.1288 175.92 175.27 0.409210 0.0407 150.79 150.03 0.478046 0.0032 131.94 131.08 0.547178 0.0020 117.28 116.31 0.616650 0.0145 105.56 104.47 0.686507 0.0219 87.97 86.67 0.699583 0.0054 75.41 73.89 0.240774 0.0009 65.99 64.24 0.109462 0.0079 58.66 56.70 0.138316 0.0063 52.81 50.61 0.165642 0.0008 48.02 45.60 0.111572 0.0009 44.03 41.38 0.095859 0.0021 40.66 37.77 0.112546 0.0003 37.78 34.65 0.129960 0.0019 35.29 31.91 0.092815 0.0117 33.11 29.48 0.124415 0.0234 31.19 27.31 0.368637 0.0257 29.50 25.36 0.581253 0.0174 27.98 23.58 0.659657 0.0071 26.63 21.95 0.725520 0.0014 25.41 20.46 0.793489 0.0001 24.31 19.08 0.864075 0.0002 23.31 17.79 0.935578 0.0003 22.41 16.59 0.830938 0.0001 21.59 15.46 0.460139 0.0001 20.84 14.39 0.139387 0.0004 20.15 13.38 0.020838 0.0006 19.53 12.43 0.027722 0.0006 18.96 11.51 0.042274 0.0004 18.44 10.64 0.045323 0.0002 17.97 9.79 0.047364 0.0001 17.54 8.98 0.049365 0.0001 17.16 8.20 0.051358 0.0003 16.81 7.44 0.044622 0.0006 16.49 6.70 0.052368 0.0009 16.21 5.99 0.077566 0.0010 15.97 5.28 0.082816 0.0008 15.75 4.59 0.084374 0.0005 15.57 3.92 0.085547 0.0002 15.41 3.25 0.086427 0.0001 15.29 2.59 0.078755 0.0001 15.19 1.94 0.048713 0.0001 15.12 1.29 0.021148 0.0001 15.08 0.64 0.012849 0.0001 15.07 0.00 0.013000 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1 000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 •lnfo@sHesafe.com Page 36 Downtllt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000015 0.001497 0.005986 0.013469 0.023945 0.034063 0.040921 0.047805 0.054718 0.061665 0.068651 0.069958 0.024077 0.010946 0.013832 0.016564 0.011157 0.009586 0.011255 0.012996 0.009282 0.012442 0.036864 0.058125 0.065966 0.072552 0.079349 0.086407 0.093558 0.083094 0.046014 0.013939 0.002084 0.002772 0.004227 0.004532 0.004736 0.004936 0.005136 0.004462 0.005237 0.007757 0.008282 0.008437 0.008555 0.008643 0.007875 0.004871 0.002115 0.001285 0.001300 0.0 Times BelowMPE 6681995 66820 16705 7424 4176 2935 2443 2091 1827 1621 1456 1429 4153 9135 7229 6037 8962 10431 8885 7694 10774 8037 2712 1720 1515 1378 1260 1157 1068 1203 2173 7174 47989 36072 23655 22063 21113 20257 19471 22410 19095 12892 12075 11851 11689 11570 12697 20528 47286 77826 76921 ANDREW:UMWD-06516-2DH Antenna Worksheet (45 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 ERP (Watts): 2000 Depression Angle {degrees) Relative dB 0.1 -1.21 1.0 -0.40 2.0 0.00 3.0 -0.10 4.0 -0.80 5.0 -2.00 6.0 -3.80 7.0 -6.60 8.0 -10.40 9.0 -16.20 10.0 -23.10 12.0 -16.90 14.0 -16.80 16.0 -20.50 18.0 -21.70 20.0 -21.70 22.0 -24.00 24.0 -25.20 26.0 -26.30 28.0 -29.50 30.0 -22.40 32.0 -17.80 34.0 -16.20 36.0 -16.90 38.0 -19.50 40.0 -24.70 42.0 -35.20 44.0 -39.70 46.0 -33.00 48.0 -33.50 50.0 -36.50 52.0 -38.60 54.0 -36.80 56.0 -35.50 58.0 -33.90 60.0 -32.40 62.0 -30.90 64.0 -30.30 66.0 -30.50 68.0 -32.10 70.0 -35.10 72.0 -38.70 74.0 -40.00 76.0 -40.00 78.0 -40.00 80.0 -40.00 82.0 -38.30 84.0 -36.60 86.0 -37.10 88.0 -39.10 90.0 -40.00 Height Frequency (feet): 56 (MHz): 1900 Slant DistFrom Relative Distance Structure Power Density Gain {meters) {meters) {~W/cm"21 0.7568 10554.82 10554.81 0.000599 0.9120 1055.48 1055.38 0.059862 1.0000 527.74 527.53 0.239449 0.9772 351.83 351.51 0.538757 0.8318 263.87 263.44 0.957785 0.6310 211.10 210.56 1.204672 0.4169 175.92 175.27 1.447229 0.2188 150.79 150.03 1.690678 0.0912 131.94 131.08 1.935173 0.0240 117.28 116.31 2.180869 0.0049 105.56 104.47 2.427929 0.0204 87.97 86.67 2.926791 0.0209 75.41 73.89 3.433114 0.0089 65.99 64.24 1.248935 0.0068 58.66 56.70 0.577828 0.0068 52.81 50.61 0.712844 0.0040 48.02 45.60 0.828830 0.0030 44.03 41.38 0.631260 0.0023 40.66 37.77 0.406725 0.0011 37.78 34.65 0.448182 0.0058 35.29 31.91 0.460200 0.0166 33.11 29.48 0.864868 0.0240 31.19 27.31 1.723353 0.0204 29.50 25.36 2.243328 0.0112 27.98 23.58 2.482406 0.0034 26.63 21.95 2.732121 0.0003 25.41 20.46 2.988422 0.0001 24.31 19.08 3.251650 0.0005 23.31 17.79 3.323404 0.0004 22.41 16.59 2.399004 0.0002 21.59 15.46 1.032362 0.0001 20.84 14.39 0.218962 0.0002 20.15 13.38 0.122573 0.0003 19.53 12.43 0.129696 0.0004 18.96 11.51 0.125939 0.0006 18.44 10.64 0.132123 0.0008 17.97 9.79 0.201846 0.0009 17.54 8.98 0.274047 0.0009 17.16 8.20 0.284326 0.0006 16.81 7.44 0.293674 0.0003 16.49 6.70 0.302413 0.0001 16.21 5.99 0.309907 0.0001 15.97 5.28 0.306818 0.0001 15.75 4.59 0.214256 0.0001 15.57 3.92 0.098625 0.0001 15.41 3.25 0.056885 0.0001 15.29 2.59 0.083948 0.0002 15.19 1.94 0.084126 0.0002 15.12 1.29 0.084030 0.0001 15.08 0.64 0.083483 0.0001 15.07 0.00 0.078916 200 N. Glebe Road • SuHe 1 000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 •lnfo@sltesafe.com Page 37 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000060 0.005986 0.023945 0.053876 0.095778 0.120467 0.144723 0.169068 0.193517 0.218087 0.242793 0.292679 0.343311 0.124894 0.057783 0.071284 0.082883 0.063126 0.040672 0.044818 0.046020 0.086487 0.172335 0.224333 0.248241 0.273212 0.298842 0.325165 0.332340 0.239900 0.103236 0.021896 0.012257 0.012970 0.012594 0.013212 0.020185 0.027405 0.028433 0.029367 0.030241 0.030991 0.030682 0.021426 0.009863 0.005688 0.008395 0.008413 0.008403 0.008348 0.007892 0.0 Times BelowMPE 1670498 16705 4176 1856 1044 830 690 591 516 458 411 341 291 800 1730 1402 1206 1584 2458 2231 2172 1156 580 445 402 366 334 307 300 416 968 4566 8158 7710 7940 7568 4954 3649 3517 3405 3306 3226 3259 4667 10139 17579 11912 11886 11900 11978 12671 ANDREW:DBXNH-6565A-VTM Antenna Worksheet (80 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 ERP (Watts): 3044 Depression Angle (degrees! Relative dB 0.1 -0.03 1.0 0.00 2.0 -0.44 3.0 -1.37 4.0 -2.88 5.0 -5.02 6.0 -8.07 7.0 -12.50 8.0 -19.97 9.0 -31.38 10.0 -22.65 12.0 -19.43 14.0 -28.88 16.0 -23.47 18.0 -17.09 20.0 -16.51 22.0 -19.35 24.0 -26.11 26.0 -42.25 28.0 -31.19 30.0 -21.90 32.0 -16.52 34.0 -13.58 36.0 -12.24 38.0 -12.18 40.0 -13.20 42.0 -15.14 44.0 -17.89 46.0 -20.94 48.0 -23.66 50.0 -26.11 52.0 -29.24 54.0 -34.31 56.0 -40.99 58.0 -34.57 60.0 -29.74 62.0 -28.94 64.0 -25.25 66.0 -24.22 68.0 -23.75 70.0 -23.84 72.0 -24.45 74.0 -25.48 76.0 -26.85 78.0 -28.30 80.0 -29.75 82.0 -31.06 84.0 -32.26 86.0 -33.49 88.0 -34.52 90.0 -35.20 Height Frequency (feet): 67 (MHz): 1900 Slant DistFrom Relative Distance Structure Power Density Gain (meters I {meters! (~W/cm"21 0.9938 10554.83 10554.81 0.000911 1.0000 1055.54 1055.38 0.091101 0.9036 527.85 527.53 0.364294 0.7295 351.99 351.51 0.819246 0.5152 264.09 263.44 1.452054 0.3148 211.36 210.56 2.235628 0.1560 176.24 175.27 2.685765 0.0562 151.16 150.03 3.137557 0.0101 132.36 131.08 3.591289 0.0007 117.76 116.31 3.917380 0.0054 106.09 104.47 3.034477 0.0114 88.60 86.67 0.860583 0.0013 76.15 73.89 0.430417 0.0045 66.83 64.24 0.654358 0.0195 59.61 56.70 0.822969 0.0223 53.86 50.61 1.001846 0.0116 49.18 45.60 1.197660 0.0024 45.29 41.38 1.412537 0.0001 42.02 37.77 1.262757 0.0008 39.24 34.65 1.786789 0.0065 36.84 31.91 3.815915 0.0223 34.76 29.48 5.730434 0.0439 32.94 27.31 6.553977 0.0597 31.34 25.36 7.202199 0.0605 29.92 23.58 7.855758 0.0479 28.66 21.95 8.549467 0.0306 27.53 20.46 9.207274 0.0163 26.52 19.08 8.863518 0.0081 25.61 17.79 6.818143 0.0043 24.79 16.59 4.282912 0.0024 24.05 15.46 2.367337 0.0012 23.38 14.39 1.318932 0.0004 22.77 13.38 0.796938 0.0001 22.22 12.43 0.468188 0.0003 21.72 11.51 0.553915 0.0011 21.27 10.64 0.828020 0.0020 20.86 9.79 1.068641 0.0030 20.50 8.98 1.211720 0.0038 20.16 8.20 1.250690 0.0042 19.87 7.44 1.284867 0.0041 19.60 6.70 1.303930 0.0036 19.37 5.99 1.331161 0.0028 19.16 5.28 1.348806 0.0021 18.99 4.59 1.260356 0.0015 18.83 3.92 1.054783 0.0011 18.71 3.25 0.815349 0.0008 18.60 2.59 0.597657 0.0006 18.52 1.94 0.434277 0.0004 18.47 1.29 0.320442 0.0004 18.43 0.64 0.243389 0.0003 18.42 0.00 0.186441 200 N. Glebe Road • SuHe 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.27 6.1100 • lnfo@sHesafe.com Page 38 Downtllt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000091 0.009110 0.036429 0.081925 0.145205 0.223563 0.268577 0.313756 0.359129 0.391738 0.303448 0.086058 0.043042 0.065436 0.082297 0.100185 0.119766 0.141254 0.126276 0.178679 0.381591 0.573043 0.655398 0.720220 0.785576 0.854947 0.920727 0.886352 0.681814 0.428291 0.236734 0.131893 0.079694 0.048817 0.055391 0.082802 0.106864 0.121172 0.125069 0.128487 0.130393 0.133116 0.134881 0.126036 0.105478 0.081535 0.059766 0.043428 0.032044 0.024339 0.018644 0.0 Times BelowMPE 1097569 10976 2745 1220 688 447 372 318 278 255 329 1162 2323 1528 1215 998 834 707 791 559 262 174 152 138 127 116 108 112 146 233 422 758 1254 2135 1805 1207 935 825 799 778 766 751 741 793 948 1226 1673 2302 3120 4108 5363 ANDREW:DBXNH-6565A-VTM Antenna Worksheet (210 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 ERP (Watts): 3044 Depression Angle (degrees} Relative dB 0.1 -0.03 1.0 0.00 2.0 -0.44 3.0 -1.37 4.0 -2.88 5.0 -5.02 6.0 -8.07 7.0 -12.50 8.0 -19.97 9.0 -31.38 10.0 -22.65 12.0 -19.43 14.0 -28.88 16.0 -23.47 18.0 -17.09 20.0 -16.51 22.0 -19.35 24.0 -26.11 26.0 -42.25 28.0 -31.19 30.0 -21.90 32.0 -16.52 34.0 -13.58 36.0 -12.24 38.0 -12.18 40.0 -13.20 42.0 -15.14 44.0 -17.89 46.0 -20.94 48.0 -23.66 50.0 -26.11 52.0 -29.24 54.0 -34.31 56.0 -40.99 58.0 -34.57 60.0 -29.74 62.0 -26.94 64.0 -25.25 66.0 -24.22 68.0 -23.75 70.0 -23.84 72.0 -24.45 74.0 -25.48 76.0 -26.85 78.0 -28.30 80.0 -29.75 82.0 -31.06 84.0 -32.26 86.0 -33.49 88.0 -34.52 90.0 -35.20 Height Frequency (feet): 67 (MHz): 1900 Slant Dist From Relative Distance Structure Power Density Gain (meters} (meters} I!!WicmA2} 0.9938 10554.83 10554.81 0.000911 1.0000 1055.54 1055.38 0.091101 0.9036 527.85 527.53 0.364294 0.7295 351.99 351.51 0.819246 0.5152 264.09 263.44 1.455401 0.3148 211.36 210.56 2.235628 0.1560 176.24 175.27 2.685765 0.0562 151.16 150.03 3.137557 0.0101 132.36 131.08 3.591289 0.0007 117.76 116.31 3.917380 0.0054 106.09 104.47 3.038347 0.0114 88.60 86.67 0.860583 0.0013 76.15 73.89 0.429431 0.0045 66.83 64.24 0.654358 0.0195 59.61 56.70 0.820247 0.0223 53.86 50.61 1.005427 0.0116 49.18 45.60 1.202401 0.0024 45.29 41.38 1.412537 0.0001 42.02 37.77 1.262757 0.0008 39.24 34.65 1.786789 0.0065 36.84 31.91 3.815915 0.0223 34.76 29.48 5.730434 0.0439 32.94 27.31 6.553977 0.0597 31.34 25.36 7.235316 0.0605 29.92 23.58 7.855759 0.0479 28.66 21.95 8.512505 0.0306 27.53 20.46 9.167468 0.0163 26.52 19.08 8.863518 0.0081 25.61 17.79 6.818142 0.0043 24.79 16.59 4.266026 0.0024 24.05 15.46 2.367337 0.0012 23.38 14.39 1.313732 0.0004 22.77 13.38 0.800194 0.0001 22.22 12.43 0.468168 0.0003 21.72 11.51 0.553915 0.0011 21.27 10.64 0.824125 0.0020 20.86 9.79 1.063614 0.0030 20.50 8.98 1.211720 0.0038 20.16 8.20 1.256761 0.0042 19.87 7.44 1.284867 0.0041 19.60 6.70 1.303930 0.0036 19.37 5.99 1.325574 0.0028 19.16 5.28 1.343659 0.0021 18.99 4.59 1.255867 0.0015 18.83 3.92 1.054783 0.0011 18.71 3.25 0.813377 0.0008 18.60 2.59 0.598801 0.0006 18.52 1.94 0.434277 0.0004 18.47 1.29 0.320401 0.0004 18.43 0.64 0.243793 0.0003 18.42 0.00 0.186441 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1 000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.27 6.11 00 • info@sHesafe.com Page 39 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000091 0.009110 0.036429 0.081925 0.145540 0.223563 0.268577 0.313756 0.359129 0.391738 0.303835 0.086058 0.042943 0.065436 0.082025 0.100543 0.120240 0.141254 0.126276 0.178679 0.381591 0.573043 0.655398 0.723532 0.785576 0.851250 0.916747 0.886352 0.681814 0.426603 0.236734 0.131373 0.080019 0.046817 0.055391 0.082413 0.106361 0.121172 0.125676 0.128487 0.130393 0.132557 0.134366 0.125587 0.105478 0.081338 0.059880 0.043428 0.032040 0.024379 0.018644 0.0 Times BelowMPE 1097569 10976 2745 1220 687 447 372 318 278 255 329 1162 2328 1528 1219 994 831 707 791 559 262 174 152 138 127 117 109 112 146 234 422 761 1249 2135 1805 1213 940 825 795 778 766 754 744 796 948 1229 1670 2302 3121 4101 5363 ANDREW:DBXNH-6565A-VTM Antenna Worksheet (340 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 ERP (Watts): 3044 Depression Angle {degrees) Relative dB 0.1 -0.03 1.0 0.00 2.0 -0.44 3.0 -1.37 4.0 -2.88 5.0 -5.02 6.0 -8.Q7 7.0 -12.50 8.0 -19.97 9.0 -31.38 10.0 -22.65 12.0 -19.43 14.0 -28.88 16.0 -23.47 18.0 -17.09 20.0 -16.51 22.0 -19.35 24.0 -26.11 26.0 -42.25 28.0 -31.19 30.0 -21.90 32.0 -16.52 34.0 -13.58 36.0 -12.24 38.0 -12.18 40.0 -13.20 42.0 -15.14 44.0 -17.89 46.0 -20.94 48.0 -23.66 50.0 -26.11 52.0 -29.24 54.0 -34.31 56.0 -40.99 58.0 -34.57 60.0 -29.74 62.0 -26.94 64.0 -25.25 66.0 -24.22 68.0 -23.75 70.0 -23.84 72.0 -24.45 74.0 -25.48 76.0 -26.85 78.0 -28.30 80.0 -29.75 82.0 -31.06 84.0 -32.26 86.0 -33.49 88.0 -34.52 90.0 -35.20 Height Frequency (feet): 67 (MHz): 1900 Slant Dist From Relative Distance Structure Power Density Gain {meters) {meters) I~W/cmA21 0.9938 10554.83 10554.81 0.000911 1.0000 1055.54 1055.38 0.091101 0.9036 527.85 527.53 0.364294 0.7295 351.99 351.51 0.819246 0.5152 264.09 263.44 1.452054 0.3148 211.36 210.56 2.235628 0.1560 176.24 175.27 2.685765 0.0562 151.16 150.03 3.137557 0.0101 132.36 131.08 3.591289 0.0007 117.76 116.31 3.917379 0.0054 106.09 104.47 3.038345 0.0114 88.60 86.67 0.860582 0.0013 76.15 73.89 0.429431 0.0045 66.83 64.24 0.654358 0.0195 59.61 56.70 0.820247 0.0223 53.86 50.61 1.005427 0.0116 49.18 45.60 1.197661 0.0024 45.29 41.38 1.406609 0.0001 42.02 37.77 1.262757 0.0008 39.24 34.65 1.795232 0.0065 36.84 31.91 3.833950 0.0223 34.76 29.48 5.703478 0.0439 32.94 27.31 6.585791 0.0597 31.34 25.36 7.202199 0.0605 29.92 23.58 7.855759 0.0479 28.66 21.95 8.549467 0.0306 27.53 20.46 9.167468 0.0163 26.52 19.08 8.863512 0.0081 25.61 17.79 6.789536 0.0043 24.79 16.59 4.282911 0.0024 24.05 15.46 2.376707 0.0012 23.38 14.39 1.318932 0.0004 22.77 13.38 0.796938 0.0001 22.22 12.43 0.468168 0.0003 21.72 11.51 0.553915 0.0011 21.27 10.64 0.828020 0.0020 20.86 9.79 1.068641 0.0030 20.50 8.98 1.217447 0.0038 20.16 8.20 1.256761 0.0042 19.87 7.44 1.284867 0.0041 19.60 6.70 1.303930 0.0036 19.37 5.99 1.325574 0.0028 19.16 5.28 1.348806 0.0021 18.99 4.59 1.260356 0.0015 18.83 3.92 1.054783 0.0011 18.71 3.25 0.815349 0.0008 18.60 2.59 0.597657 0.0006 18.52 1.94 0.434277 0.0004 18.47 1.29 0.320442 0.0004 18.43 0.64 0.243389 0.0003 18.42 0.00 0.187156 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1 000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 40 Downtllt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000091 0.009110 0.036429 0.081925 0.145205 0.223563 0.268577 0.313756 0.359129 0.391738 0.303834 0.086058 0.042943 0.065436 0.082025 0.100543 0.119766 0.140661 0.126276 0.179523 0.383395 0.570348 0.658579 0.720220 0.785576 0.854947 0.916747 0.886351 0.678954 0.428291 0.237671 0.131893 0.079694 0.046817 0.055391 0.082802 0.106864 0.121745 0.125676 0.128487 0.130393 0.132557 0.134881 0.126036 0.105478 0.081535 0.059766 0.043428 0.032044 0.024339 0.018716 0.0 Times BelowMPE 1097569 10976 2745 1220 688 447 372 318 278 255 329 1162 2328 1528 1219 994 834 710 791 557 260 175 151 138 127 116 109 112 147 233 420 758 1254 2135 1805 1207 935 821 795 778 766 754 741 793 948 1226 1673 2302 3120 4108 5343 ANDREW:DBXNH-6565A-VTM Antenna Worksheet (80 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 566.67 ERP (Watts): 2034 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB 0.1 -0.08 1.0 -0.01 2.0 0.00 3.0 -0.08 4.0 -0.24 5.0 -0.50 6.0 -0.84 7.0 -1.27 8.0 -1.80 9.0 -2.43 10.0 -3.20 12.0 -5.06 14.0 -7.54 16.0 -10.79 18.0 -14.89 20.0 -18.55 22.0 -18.14 24.0 -15.98 26.0 -14.56 28.0 -13.97 30.0 -14.09 32.0 -14.83 34.0 -16.15 36.0 -18.06 38.0 -20.62 40.0 -23.98 42.0 -28.47 44.0 -34.43 46.0 -36.11 48.0 -31.82 50.0 -28.92 52.0 -27.16 54.0 -26.14 56.0 -25.60 58.0 -25.44 60.0 -25.59 62.0 -25.96 64.0 -26.51 66.0 -27.19 68.0 -27.92 70.0 -28.58 72.0 -29.11 74.0 -29.55 76.0 -29.88 78.0 -30.12 80.0 -30.37 82.0 -30.52 84.0 -30.68 86.0 -30.90 88.0 -31.13 90.0 -31.40 Height Frequency (feet): 67 (MHz): 850 Slant Distfrom Relative Distance Structure Power Density Gain (meters) (meters) (pW/cmA2) 0.9813 10554.83 10554.81 0.000606 0.9977 1055.54 1055.38 0.060874 1.0000 527.85 527.53 0.243421 0.9817 351.99 351.51 0.546161 0.9462 264.09 263.44 0.968030 0.8913 211.36 210.56 1.518141 0.8241 176.24 175.27 2.183681 0.7464 151.16 150.03 2.968308 0.6607 132.36 131.08 3.799223 0.5715 117.76 116.31 4.634182 0.4786 106.09 104.47 5.279064 0.3119 88.60 86.67 6.363742 0.1762 76.15 73.89 6.906217 0.0834 66.83 64.24 6.254194 0.0324 59.61 56.70 4.959902 0.0140 53.86 50.61 3.249279 0.0153 49.18 45.60 1.750494 0.0252 45.29 41.38 1.590414 0.0350 42.02 37.77 1.827234 0.0401 39.24 34.65 2.087593 0.0390 36.84 31.91 2.358119 0.0329 34.76 29.48 2.681149 0.0243 32.94 27.31 2.922395 0.0156 31.34 25.36 2.926077 0.0087 29.92 23.58 2.554024 0.0040 28.66 21.95 1.985817 0.0014 27.53 20.46 1.320067 0.0004 26.52 19.08 0.752812 0.0002 25.61 17.79 0.345118 0.0007 24.79 16.59 0.289035 0.0013 24.05 15.46 0.370799 0.0019 23.38 14.39 0.450389 0.0024 22.77 13.38 0.474235 0.0028 22.22 12.43 0.509322 0.0029 21.72 11.51 0.529197 0.0028 21.27 10.64 0.547927 0.0025 20.86 9.79 0.565204 0.0022 20.50 8.98 0.555922 0.0019 20.16 8.20 0.536530 0.0016 19.87 7.44 0.514802 0.0014 19.60 6.70 0.438969 0.0012 19.37 5.99 0.397713 0.0011 19.16 5.28 0.345054 0.0010 18.99 4.59 0.305656 0.0010 18.83 3.92 0.263999 0.0009 18.71 3.25 0.255433 0.0009 18.60 2.59 0.228701 0.0009 18.52 1.94 0.216470 0.0008 18.47 1.29 0.205343 0.0008 18.43 0.64 0.208681 0.0007 18.42 0.00 0.197189 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.27 6.1100 • lnfo@sltesafe.com Page 41 Downtllt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000107 0.010742 0.042957 0.096381 0.170829 0.267907 0.385355 0.523819 0.670451 0.817797 0.931599 1.123013 1.218744 1.103681 0.875277 0.573402 0.308911 0.280661 0.322453 0.368399 0.416139 0.473144 0.515717 0.516367 0.450710 0.350438 0.232953 0.132849 0.060903 0.051006 0.065435 0.079480 0.083689 0.089880 0.093388 0.096693 0.099742 0.098104 0.094682 0.090847 0.077465 0.070185 0.060892 0.053939 0.046588 0.045076 0.040359 0.038201 0.036237 0.036826 0.034798 0.0 Times Below MPE 934874 9308 2327 1037 585 373 259 190 149 122 107 89 82 90 114 174 323 356 310 271 240 211 193 193 221 285 429 752 1641 1960 1528 1258 1194 1112 1070 1034 1002 1019 1056 1100 1290 1424 1642 1853 2146 2218 2477 2617 2759 2715 2873 ANDREW:DBXNH-6565A-VTM Antenna Worksheet (210 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 566.67 ERP (Watts): 2034 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB 0.1 -0.08 1.0 -0.01 2.0 0.00 3.0 -0.08 4.0 -0.24 5.0 -0.50 6.0 -0.84 7.0 -1.27 8.0 -1.80 9.0 -2.43 10.0 -3.20 12.0 -5.06 14.0 -7.54 16.0 -10.79 18.0 -14.89 20.0 -18.55 22.0 -18.14 24.0 -15.98 26.0 -14.56 28.0 -13.97 30.0 -14.09 32.0 -14.83 34.0 -16.15 36.0 -18.06 38.0 -20.62 40.0 -23.98 42.0 -28.47 44.0 -34.43 46.0 -36.11 48.0 -31.82 50.0 -28.92 52.0 -27.16 54.0 -26.14 56.0 -25.60 58.0 -25.44 60.0 -25.59 62.0 -25.96 64.0 -26.51 66.0 -27.19 68.0 -27.92 70.0 -28.58 72.0 -29.11 74.0 -29.55 76.0 -29.88 78.0 -30.12 80.0 -30.37 82.0 -30.52 84.0 -30.68 86.0 -30.90 88.0 -31.13 90.0 -31.40 Height Frequency (feet): 67 (MHz): 850 Slant DistFrom Relative Distance Structure Power Density Gain (meters) (meters) (!JW/cm"2) 0.9813 10554.83 10554.81 0.000609 0.9977 1055.54 1055.38 0.060874 1.0000 527.85 527.53 0.243421 0.9817 351.99 351.51 0.546161 0.9462 264.09 263.44 0.972499 0.8913 211.36 210.56 1.518141 0.8241 176.24 175.27 2.183681 0.7464 151.16 150.03 2.968308 0.6607 132.36 131.08 3.804552 0.5715 117.76 116.31 4.634182 0.4786 106.09 104.47 5.279064 0.3119 88.60 86.67 6.363742 0.1762 76.15 73.89 6.871102 0.0834 66.83 64.24 6.254194 0.0324 59.61 56.70 4.920869 0.0140 53.86 50.61 3.278811 0.0153 49.18 45.60 1.768656 0.0252 45.29 41.38 1.590413 0.0350 42.02 37.77 1.827234 0.0401 39.24 34.65 2.087593 0.0390 36.84 31.91 2.358119 0.0329 34.76 29.48 2.681149 0.0243 32.94 27.31 2.922395 0.0156 31.34 25.36 2.982548 0.0087 29.92 23.58 2.554025 0.0040 28.66 21.95 1.944003 0.0014 27.53 20.46 1.290789 0.0004 26.52 19.08 0.752811 0.0002 25.61 17.79 0.345118 0.0007 24.79 16.59 0.281654 0.0013 24.05 15.46 0.370799 0.0019 23.38 14.39 0.437993 0.0024 22.77 13.38 0.488278 0.0028 22.22 12.43 0.509322 0.0029 21.72 11.51 0.529197 0.0028 21.27 10.64 0.530205 0.0025 20.86 9.79 0.546227 0.0022 20.50 8.98 0.555922 0.0019 20.16 8.20 0.556871 0.0016 19.87 7.44 0.514802 0.0014 19.60 6.70 0.438969 0.0012 19.37 5.99 0.381286 0.0011 19.16 5.28 0.330170 0.0010 18.99 4.59 0.291839 0.0010 18.83 3.92 0.263999 0.0009 18.71 3.25 0.242831 0.0009 18.60 2.59 0.240968 0.0009 18.52 1.94 0.216470 0.0008 18.47 1.29 0.217352 0.0008 18.43 0.64 0.196825 0.0007 18.42 0.00 0.197189 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1 000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.27 6.1100 • lnfo@sHesafe.com Page 42 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000107 0.010742 0.042957 0.096381 0.171617 0.267907 0.385355 0.523819 0.671392 0.817797 0.931599 1.123013 1.212547 1.103681 0.868389 0.578614· 0.312116 0.280661 0.322453 0.368399 0.416139 0.473144 0.515717 0.526332 0.450710 0.343059 0.227786 0.132849 0.060903 0.049704 0.065435 0.077293 0.086167 0.089880 0.093388 0.093566 0.096393 0.098104 0.098271 0.090847 0.077465 0.067286 0.058265 0.051501 0.046588 0.042853 0.042524 0.038201 0.038356 0.034734 0.034798 0.0 Times Below MPE 930793 9308 2327 1037 582 373 259 190 148 122 107 89 82 90 115 172 320 356 310 271 240 211 193 189 221 291 439 752 1641 2011 1528 1293 1160 1112 1070 1068 1037 1019 1017 1100 1290 1486 1716 1941 2146 2333 2351 2617 2607 2879 2873 ANDREW:DBXNH-6565A-VTM Antenna Worksheet (340 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 566.67 ERP (Watts): 2034 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB 0.1 -0.08 1.0 -0.01 2.0 0.00 3.0 -0.08 4.0 -0.24 5.0 -0.50 6.0 -0.84 7.0 -1.27 8.0 -1.80 9.0 -2.43 10.0 -3.20 12.0 -5.06 14.0 -7.54 16.0 -10.79 18.0 -14.89 20.0 -18.55 22.0 -18.14 24.0 -15.98 26.0 -14.56 28.0 -13.97 30.0 -14.09 32.0 -14.83 34.0 -16.15 36.0 -18.06 38.0 -20.62 40.0 -23.98 42.0 -28.47 44.0 -34.43 46.0 -36.11 48.0 -31.82 50.0 -28.92 52.0 -27.16 54.0 -26.14 56.0 -25.60 58.0 -25.44 60.0 -25.59 62.0 -25.96 64.0 -26.51 66.0 -27.19 68.0 -27.92 70.0 -28.58 72.0 -29.11 74.0 -29.55 76.0 -29.88 78.0 -30.12 80.0 -30.37 82.0 -30.52 84.0 -30.68 86.0 -30.90 88.0 -31.13 90.0 -31.40 Height Frequency (feet): 67 (MHz): 850 Slant DistFrom Relative Distance Structure Power Density Gain (meters) (meters) (!JW/cmA2) 0.9813 10554.83 10554.81 0.000609 0.9977 1055.54 1055.38 0.060874 1.0000 527.85 527.53 0.243421 0.9817 351.99 351.51 0.547420 0.9462 264.09 263.44 0.968031 0.8913 211.36 210.56 1.518141 0.8241 176.24 175.27 2.183681 0.7464 151.16 150.03 2.968308 0.6607 132.36 131.08 3.799223 0.5715 117.76 116.31 4.634182 0.4786 106.09 104.47 5.279064 0.3119 88.60 86.67 6.363743 0.1762 76.15 73.89 6.871102 0.0834 66.83 64.24 6.254194 0.0324 59.61 56.70 4.920869 0.0140 53.86 50.61 3.278812 0.0153 49.18 45.60 1.750493 0.0252 45.29 41.38 1.571877 0.0350 42.02 37.77 1.827235 0.0401 39.24 34.65 2.117601 0.0390 36.84 31.91 2.394762 0.0329 34.76 29.48 2.636761 0.0243 32.94 27.31 2.974622 0.0156 31.34 25.36 2.926077 0.0087 29.92 23.58 2.554024 0.0040 28.66 21.95 1.985817 0.0014 27.53 20.46 1.290789 0.0004 26.52 19.08 0.752811 0.0002 25.61 17.79 0.336734 0.0007 24.79 16.59 0.289035 0.0013 24.05 15.46 0.380905 0.0019 23.38 14.39 0.450389 0.0024 22.77 13.38 0.474235 0.0028 22.22 12.43 0.509322 0.0029 21.72 11.51 0.529197 0.0028 21.27 10.64 0.547927 0.0025 20.86 9.79 0.565204 0.0022 20.50 8.98 0.576190 0.0019 20.16 8.20 0.556871 0.0016 19.87 7.44 0.514802 0.0014 19.60 6.70 0.438969 0.0012 19.37 5.99 0.381286 0.0011 19.16 5.28 0.345054 0.0010 18.99 4.59 0.305656 0.0010 18.83 3.92 0.263999 0.0009 18.71 3.25 0.255433 0.0009 18.60 2.59 0.228701 0.0009 18.52 1.94 0.216470 0.0008 18.47 1.29 0.205343 0.0008 18.43 0.64 0.208681 0.0007 18.42 0.00 0.185654 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.27 6.11 00 • info@sitesafe.com Page43 Downtllt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000107 0.010742 0.042957 0.096603 0.170829 0.267907 0.385355 0.523819 0.670451 0.817797 0.931599 1.123013 1.212547 1.103681 0.868389 0.578614 0.308911 0.277390 0.322453 0.373694 0.422605 0.465311 0.524933 0.516367 0.450710 0.350438 0.227786 0.132849 0.059424 0.051006 0.067218 0.079480 0.083689 0.089880 0.093388 0.096693 0.099742 0.101681 0.098271 0.090847 0.077465 0.067286 0.060892 0.053939 0.046588 0.045076 0.040359 0.038201 0.036237 0.036826 0.032763 0.0 Times Below MPE 930793 9308 2327 1035 585 373 259 190 149 122 107 89 82 90 115 172 323 360 310 267 236 214 190 193 221 285 439 752 1682 1960 1487 1258 1194 1112 1070 1034 1002 983 1017 1100 1290 1486 1642 1853 2146 2218 2477 2617 2759 2715 3052 Antei:BXA-70063-4CF Antenna Worksheet (80 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 500.67 ERP (Watts): 634 Depression Angle (degrees} Relative dB 0.1 0.00 1.0 0.00 2.0 -0.10 3.0 -0.20 4.0 -0.50 5.0 -0.80 6.0 -1.20 7.0 -1.70 8.0 -2.20 9.0 -2.90 10.0 -3.70 12.0 -5.70 14.0 -8.30 16.0 -12.10 18.0 -18.10 20.0 -31.50 22.0 -21.40 24.0 -16.30 26.0 -14.10 28.0 -13.00 30.0 -12.80 32.0 -13.10 34.0 -14.00 36.0 -15.50 38.0 -17.40 40.0 -20.00 42.0 -23.80 44.0 -29.00 46.0 -38.20 48.0 -33.20 50.0 -27.90 52.0 -25.20 54.0 -23.70 56.0 -23.10 58.0 -23.20 60.0 -24.00 62.0 -25.40 64.0 -27.50 66.0 -30.50 68.0 -34.70 70.0 -38.40 72.0 -38.60 74.0 -37.30 76.0 -36.80 78.0 -36.50 80.0 -36.30 82.0 -35.20 84.0 -33.40 86.0 -31.50 88.0 -30.20 90.0 -29.10 Height Frequency (feet): 62 (MHz): 751 Slant Dist From Relative Distance Structure Power Density Gain (meters} (meters} (j!W/cm"2} 1.0000 10554.82 10554.81 0.000190 1.0000 1055.51 1055.38 0.018975 0.9772 527.79 527.53 0.075891 0.9550 351.90 351.51 0.170713 0.8913 263.97 263.44 0.303385 0.8318 211.23 210.56 0.473831 0.7586 176.07 175.27 0.681950 0.6761 150.96 150.03 0.920242 0.6026 132.14 131.08 1.177152 0.5129 117.51 116.31 1.445986 0.4266 105.81 104.47 1.670805 0.2692 88.27 86.67 2.014102 0.1479 75.76 73.89 2.338594 0.0617 66.39 64.24 2.294550 0.0155 59.12 56.70 1.993001 0.0007 53.31 50.61 1.509708 0.0072 48.57 45.60 0.926977 0.0234 44.64 41.38 0.496933 0.0389 41.32 37.77 0.725619 0.0501 38.48 34.65 0.877022 0.0525 36.03 31.91 0.997452 0.0490 33.90 29.48 1.123644 0.0398 32.04 27.31 1.251080 0.0282 30.39 25.36 1.384191 0.0182 28.92 23.58 1.509303 0.0100 27.61 21.95 1.516607 0.0042 26.44 20.46 1.331410 0.0013 25.38 19.08 1.028535 0.0002 24.43 17.79 0.719705 0.0005 23.57 16.59 0.424139 0.0016 22.79 15.46 0.199228 0.0030 22.08 14.39 0.216266 0.0043 21.44 13.38 0.274622 0.0049 20.85 12.43 0.304025 0.0048 20.32 11.51 0.317841 0.0040 19.84 10.64 0.330852 0.0029 19.40 9.79 0.343270 0.0018 19.00 8.98 0.353983 0.0009 18.65 8.20 0.328930 0.0003 18.32 7.44 0.263522 0.0001 18.04 6.70 0.177607 0.0001 17.78 5.99 0.095584 0.0002 17.56 5.28 0.039535 0.0002 17.36 4.59 0.021796 0.0002 17.20 3.92 0.022359 0.0002 17.06 3.25 0.036111 0.0003 16.94 2.59 0.058148 0.0005 16.86 1.94 0.078209 0.0007 16.79 1.29 0.104853 0.0010 16.76 0.64 0.123110 0.0012 16.75 0.00 0.128965 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.27 6.11 00 • lnfo@sltesafe.com Page 44 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000038 0.003790 0.015158 0.034097 0.060596 0.094640 0.136208 0.183803 0.235117 0.288812 0.333716 0.402284 0.467096 0.458299 0.398069 0.301540 0.185148 0.099254 0.144931 0.175171 0.199225 0.224430 0.249883 0.276470 0.301459 0.302917 0.265927 0.205433 0.143749 0.084715 0.039793 0.043196 0.054851 0.060724 0.063483 0.066082 0.068563 0.070702 0.065698 0.052634 0.035474 0.019091 0.007896 0.004353 0.004466 0.007213 0.011614 0.015621 0.020943 0.024589 0.025759 0.0 Times BelowMPE 2638370 26384 6597 2932 1650 1056 734 544 425 346 299 248 214 218 251 331 540 1007 689 570 501 445 400 361 331 330 376 486 695 1180 2513 2315 1823 1646 1575 1513 1458 1414 1522 1899 2818 5237 12664 22970 22392 13864 8610 6401 4774 4066 3882 Antei:BXA-70063-4CF Antenna Worksheet (210 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 500.67 ERP (Watts): 634 Depression Angle {degrees) Relative dB 0.1 0.00 1.0 0.00 2.0 -0.10 3.0 -0.20 4.0 -0.50 5.0 -0.80 6.0 -1.20 7.0 -1.70 . 8.0 -2.20 9.0 -2.90 10.0 -3.70 12.0 -5.70 14.0 -8.30 16.0 -12.10 18.0 -18.10 20.0 -31.50 22.0 -21.40 24.0 -16.30 26.0 -14.10 28.0 -13.00 30.0 -12.80 32.0 -13.10 34.0 -14.00 36.0 -15.50 38.0 -17.40 40.0 -20.00 42.0 -23.80 44.0 -29.00 46.0 -38.20 48.0 -33.20 50.0 -27.90 52.0 -25.20 54.0 -23.70 56.0 -23.10 58.0 -23.20 60.0 -24.00 62.0 -25.40 64.0 -27.50 66.0 -30.50 68.0 -34.70 70.0 -38.40 72.0 -38.60 74.0 -37.30 76.0 -36.80 78.0 -36.50 80.0 -36.30 82.0 -35.20 84.0 -33.40 86.0 -31.50 88.0 -30.20 90.0 -29.10 Height Frequency (feet): 62 (MHz): 751 Slant Dist From Relative Distance Structure Power Density Gain (meters) (meters) (~W/cmA2l 1.0000 10554.82 10554.81 0.000190 1.0000 1055.51 1055.38 0.018975 0.9772 527.79 527.53 0.075891 0.9550 351.90 351.51 0.170713 0.8913 263.97 263.44 0.303385 0.8318 211.23 210.56 0.473831 0.7586 176.07 175.27 0.681950 0.6761 150.96 150.03 0.920243 0.6026 132.14 131.08 1.177152 0.5129 117.51 116.31 1.445986 0.4266 105.81 104.47 1.670805 0.2692 88.27 86.67 2.014102 0.1479 75.76 73.89 2.341577 0.0617 66.39 64.24 2.294550 0.0155 59.12 56.70 1.994386 0.0007 53.31 50.61 1.511042 0.0072 48.57 45.60 0.926780 0.0234 44.64 41.38 0.496933 0.0389 41.32 37.77 0.725619 0.0501 38.48 34.65 0.877022 0.0525 36.03 31.91 0.997452 0.0490 33.90 29.48 1.123644 0.0398 32.04 27.31 1.251080 0.0282 30.39 25.36 1.387724 0.0182 28.92 23.58 1.509303 0.0100 27.61 21.95 1.510820 0.0042 26.44 20.46 1.328021 0.0013 25.38 19.08 1.028536 0.0002 24.43 17.79 0.719705 0.0005 23.57 16.59 0.422913 0.0016 22.79 15.46 0.199228 0.0030 22.08 14.39 0.215353 0.0043 21.44 13.38 0.275674 0.0049 20.85 12.43 0.304025 0.0048 20.32 11.51 0.317841 0.0040 19.84 10.64 0.329898 0.0029 19.40 9.79 0.342102 0.0018 19.00 8.98 0.353983 0.0009 18.65 8.20 0.329770 0.0003 18.32 7.44 0.263522 0.0001 18.04 6.70 0.177607 0.0001 17.78 5.99 0.094654 0.0002 17.56 5.28 0.039159 0.0002 17.36 4.59 0.021484 0.0002 17.20 3.92 0.022359 0.0002 17.06 3.25 0.035655 0.0003 16.94 2.59 0.058583 0.0005 16.86 1.94 0.078209 0.0007 16.79 1.29 0.105712 0.0010 16.76 0.64 0.121675 0.0012 16.75 0.00 0.128965 200 N. Glebe Road • SuHe 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sHesafe.com Page 45 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000038 0.003790 0.015158 0.034097 0.060596 0.094640 0.136208 0.183803 0.235117 0.288812 0.333716 0.402284 0.467692 0.458299 0.398346 0.301806 0.185109 0.099254 0.144931 0.175171 0.199225 0.224430 0.249883 0.277175 0.301459 0.301762 0.265250 0.205433 0.143749 0.084470 0.039793 0.043013 0.055061 0.060724 0.063483 0.065892 0.068329 0.070702 0.065866 0.052634 0.035474 0.018906 0.007821 0.004291 0.004466 0.007121 0.011701 0.015621 0.021114 0.024303 0.025759 0.0 Times BelowMPE 2638370 26384 6597 2932 1650 1056 734 544 425 346 299 248 213 218 251 331 540 1007 689 570 501 445 400 360 331 331 377 486 695 1183 2513 2324 1816 1646 1575 1517 1463 1414 1518 1899 2818 5289 12785 23304 22392 14042 8546 6401 4736 4114 3882 Antei:BXA-70063-4CF Antenna Worksheet (340 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 500.67 ERP (Watts): 634 Depression Angle jdegreesl Relative dB 0.1 0.00 1.0 0.00 2.0 -0.10 3.0 -0.20 4.0 -0.50 5.0 -0.80 6.0 -1.20 7.0 -1.70 8.0 -2.20 9.0 -2.90 10.0 -3.70 12.0 -5.70 14.0 -8.30 16.0 -12.10 18.0 -18.10 20.0 -31.50 22.0 -21.40 24.0 -16.30 26.0 -14.10 28.0 -13.00 30.0 -12.80 32.0 -13.10 34.0 -14.00 36.0 -15.50 38.0 -17.40 40.0 -20.00 42.0 -23.80 44.0 -29.00 46.0 -38.20 48.0 -33.20 50.0 -27.90 52.0 -25.20 54.0 -23.70 56.0 -23.10 58.0 -23.20 60.0 -24.00 62.0 -25.40 64.0 -27.50 66.0 -30.50 68.0 -34.70 70.0 -38.40 72.0 -38.60 74.0 -37.30 76.0 -36.80 78.0 -36.50 80.0 -36.30 82.0 -35.20 84.0 -33.40 86.0 -31.50 88.0 -30.20 90.0 -29.10 Height Frequency (feet): 62 (MHz): 751 Slant Distfrom Relative Distance Structure Power Density Gain jmetersl jmetersl fi!W/cm"2l 1.0000 10554.82 10554.81 0.000190 1.0000 1055.51 1055.38 0.018975 0.9772 527.79 527.53 0.075891 0.9550 351.90 351.51 0.170713 0.8913 263.97 263.44 0.303385 0.8318 211.23 210.56 0.473831 0.7586 176.07 175.27 0.681950 0.6761 150.96 150.03 0.920242 0.6026 132.14 131.08 1.177152 0.5129 117.51 116.31 1.445986 0.4266 105.81 104.47 1.670805 0.2692 88.27 86.67 2.014102 0.1479 75.76 73.89 2.341577 0.0617 66.39 64.24 2.294550 0.0155 59.12 56.70 1.994386 0.0007 53.31 50.61 1.511042 0.0072 48.57 45.60 0.926977 0.0234 44.64 41.38 0.497524 0.0389 41.32 37.77 0.725619 0.0501 38.48 34.65 0.878140 0.0525 36.03 31.91 0.998724 0.0490 33.90 29.48 1.121360 0.0398 32.04 27.31 1.253496 0.0282 30.39 25.36 1.384191 0.0182 28.92 23.58 1.509303 0.0100 27.61 21.95 1.516607 0.0042 26.44 20.46 1.328020 0.0013 25.38 19.08 1.028535 0.0002 24.43 17.79 0.716959 0.0005 23.57 16.59 0.424139 0.0016 22.79 15.46 0.199917 0.0030 22.08 14.39 0.216266 0.0043 21.44 13.38 0.274622 0.0049 20.85 12.43 0.304025 0.0048 20.32 11.51 0.317841 0.0040 19.84 10.64 0.330852 0.0029 19.40 9.79 0.343270 0.0018 19.00 8.98 0.354789 0.0009 18.65 8.20 0.329769 0.0003 18.32 7.44 0.263522 0.0001 18.04 6.70 0.177607 0.0001 17.78 5.99 0.094654 0.0002 17.56 5.28 0.039535 0.0002 17.36 4.59 0.021796 0.0002 17.20 3.92 0.022359 0.0002 17.06 3.25 0.036111 0.0003 16.94 2.59 0.058148 0.0005 16.86 1.94 0.078209 0.0007 16.79 1.29 0.104853 0.0010 16.76 0.64 0.123110 0.0012 16.75 0.00 0.126685 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1 000 • Arlington, VA 22203·3728 703.27 6.11 00 • info@sitesafe.com Page46 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000038 0.003790 0.015158 0.034097 0.060596 0.094640 0.136208 0.183803 0.235117 0.288812 0.333716 0.402284 0.467692 0.458299 0.398346 0.301806 0.185148 0.099372 0.144930 0.175394 0.199479 0.223973 0.250365 0.276470 0.301459 0.302917 0.265250 0.205433 0.143201 0.084715 0.039930 0.043196 0.054851 0.060724 0.063483 0.066082 0.068563 0.070863 0.065866 0.052634 0.035474 0.018906 0.007896 0.004353 0.004466 0.007213 0.011614 0.015621 0.020943 0.024589 0.025303 0.0 Times BelowMPE 2638370 26384 6597 2932 1650 1056 734 544 425 346 299 248 213 218 251 331 540 1006 689 570 501 446 399 361 331 330 377 486 698 1180 2504 2315 1823 1646 1575 1513 1458 1411 1518 1899 2818 5289 12664 22970 22392 13864 8610 6401 4774 4066 3952 8 Field Technician Certification I, Mohamed Frej, state: That I am an employee of Sitesafe, Inc., in Arlington, Virginia, which provides RF compliance services to clients in the wireless communications industry; and That I have successfully completed RF Safety Awareness training, am aware of the hazards and, therefore, can be exposed to RF fields classified for "Occupational" exposure; That I am familiar with the Rules and Regulations of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as well as the regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), both in general and specifically as they apply to the FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio-frequency Radiation; and That I have been trained in the proper use of measurement equipment, and have successfully completed Sitesafe training in policy, procedure and proper site measurement and modeling; and That I performed survey measurements of the RF environment at the site identified as Calvera Hills -Calvera Hills on April 5, 2012 at 2:00 PM in order to determine where there might be electromagnetic energy that is in excess of both the Controlled Environment and Uncontrolled Environment levels; and That the survey measurements were performed with measurement equipment, model Narda 8718B-10 field intensity meter (serial number 01425) and model A8722D field intensity probe, (serial number 02012) calibrated on 2/14/2011; and That I have prepared this Site Compliance Report and believe it to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and based on data gathered. By: Mohamed Frej 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 47 9 Engineer Certification The engineering indicated on the cover of this report hereby certifies and affirm that: That I am registered as a Professional Engineer in the jurisdiction indicated; and That I have extensive professional experience in the wireless communications engineering industry; and That I am an employee of Sitesafe, Inc. in Arlington, Virginia; and That I am thoroughly familiar with the Rules and Regulations of the Federal Communications Commission ("the FCC" and "the FCC Rules") both in general and specifically as they apply to the FCC's Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields; and That the technical information serving as the basis for this report was supplied by Verizon Wireless (See attached Site Summary and Carrier documents), and that Verizon Wireless's installations involve communications equipment, antennas and associated technical equipment at a location referred to as the "Calvera Hills-Calvera Hills" ("the site"); and That Verizon Wireless proposes to operate at the site with transmit antennas listed in the carrier summary and with a maximum effective radiated power as specified by Verizon Wireless and shown on the worksheet, and that worst-case 100% duty cycle have been assumed; and That in addition to the emitters specified in the worksheet, there are additional collocated point-to-point microwave facilities on this structure and, the antennas used are highly directional oriented at angles at or just below the horizontal and, that the energy present at ground level is typically so low as to be considered insignificant and have not been included in this analysis; and That this analysis has been performed with the assumption that the ground immediately surrounding the tower is primarily flat or falling; and That at this time, the FCC requires that certain licensees address specific levels of radio-frequency energy to which workers or members of the public might possibly be exposed (at § 1. 1307 (b) of the FCC Rules); and That such consideration of possible exposure of humans to radio-frequency radiation must utilize the standards set by the FCC, which is the Federal Agency having jurisdiction over communications facilities; and That the FCC rules define two tiers of permissible exposure guidelines: 1) "uncontrolled environments," defined as situations in which persons may not be aware of (the "general public"), or may not be able to control their exposure to a transmission facility; and (2) "controlled environments," which defines situations in which persons are aware of their potential for exposure (industry personnel); and That this statement specifically addresses the uncontrolled environment (which is more conservative than the controlled environment) and the limit set forth in the FCC rules 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.27 6.11 00 • info@sitesafe.com Page48 for licensees of Verizon Wireless's operating frequency as shown on the attached antenna worksheet; and That when applying the uncontrolled environment standards, the predicted Maximum Power Density at two meters above ground level from the proposed Verizon Wireless operation is no more than 3.21 %of the maximum in any accessible area on the ground and That it is understood per FCC Guidelines and OET Bulletin 65 Appendix A, that regardless of the existent radio-frequency environment, only those licenses whose contributions exceed five percent of the exposure limit pertinent to their operation(s) bear any responsibility for bringing any non-compliant area(s) into compliance; and That when applying the uncontrolled environment standards, the cumulative predicted energy density from the proposed operation is no more than 5.381% of the maximum in any accessible area up to two meters above the ground per OET Bulletin 65; and That the calculations provided in this report are based on data provided by the client and antenna pattern data supplied by the antenna manufacturer, in accordance with FCC guidelines listed in OET Bulletin 65. Horizontal and vertical antenna patterns are combined for modeling purposes to accurately reflect the energy two meters above ground level where on-axis energy refers to maximum energy two meters above the ground along the azimuth of the antenna and where area energy refers to the maximum energy anywhere two meters above the ground regardless of the antenna azimuth, accounting for cumulative energy from multiple antennas for the carrier and frequency range indicated; and That the Occupational Safety and Health Administration has policies in place which address worker safety in and around communications sites, thus individual companies will be responsible for their employees' training regarding Radio Frequency Safety. In summary, it is stated here that the proposed operation at the site would not result in exposure of the Public to excessive levels of radio-frequency energy as defined in the FCC Rules and Regulations, specifically 47 CFR 1.1307 and that Verizon Wireless's proposed operation is completely compliant. Finally, it is stated that access to the tower should be restricted to communication industry professionals, and approved contractor personnel trained in radio-frequency safety; and that the instant analysis addresses exposure levels at two meters above ground level and does not address exposure levels on the tower, or in the immediate proximity of the antennas. April9. 2012 200 N. Glebe Road • SuHe 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.27 6.1100 • lnfo@sHesafe.com Page49 Appendix A -Statement of Limiting Conditions Sitesafe field personnel visited the site and collected data with regard to the RF environment. Sitesafe will not be responsible for matters of a legal nature that affect the site or property. The property was visited under the premise that it is under responsible ownership and management and our client has the legal right to conduct business at this facility. Due to the complexity of some wireless sites, Sitesafe performed this visit and created this report utilizing best industry practices and due diligence. Sitesafe cannot be held accountable or responsible for anomalies or discrepancies due to actual site conditions (i.e., mislabeling of antennas or equipment, inaccessible cable runs, inaccessible antennas or equipment, etc.) or information or data supplied by Verizon Wireless, the site manager, or their affiliates, subcontractors or assigns. Sitesafe has provided computer generated model(s) in this Site Compliance Report to show approximate dimensions of the site, and the model is included to assist the reader of the compliance report to visualize the site area, and to provide supporting documentation for Sitesafe's recommendations. Sitesafe may note in the Site Compliance Report any adverse physical conditions, such as needed repairs, observed during the survey of the subject property or that Sitesafe became aware of during the normal research involved in performing this survey. Sitesafe will not be responsible for any such conditions that do exist or for any engineering or testing that might be required to discover whether such conditions exist. Because Sitesafe is not an expert in the field of mechanical engineering or building maintenance, the Site Compliance Report must not be considered a structural or physical engineering report. Sitesafe obtained information used in this Site Compliance Report from sources that Sitesafe considers reliable and believes them to be true and correct. Sitesafe does not assume any responsibility for the accuracy of such items that were furnished by other parties. When conflicts in information occur between data provided by a second party and physical data collected by Sitesafe, the physical data will be used. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203·3728 703.27 6.11 00 • lnfo@sitesafe.com Page 50 Appendix 8 -Assumptions and Definitions General Model Assumptions In this site compliance report, it is assumed that all antennas are operating at full power at all times. Software modeling was performed for all transmitting antennas located on the site. Sitesafe has further assumed a 100% duty cycle and maximum radiated power. The site has been modeled with these assumptions to show the maximum RF energy density. Sitesafe believes this to be a worst-case analysis, based on best available data. Areas modeled to predict emissions greater than 1 00% of the applicable MPE level may not actually occur, but are shown as a worst-case prediction that could be realized real time. Sitesafe believes these areas to be safe for entry by occupationally trained personnel utilizing appropriate personal protective equipment (in most cases, a personal monitor). Thus, at any time, if power density measurements were made, we believe the real- time measurements would indicate levels below those depicted in the RF emission diagram(s) in this report. By modeling in this way, Sitesafe has conservatively shown exclusion areas-areas that should not be entered without the use of a personal monitor, carriers reducing power, or performing real-time measurements to indicate real-time exposure levels. Use of Generic Antennas For the purposes of this report, the use of "Generic" as an antenna model, or "Unknown" for an operator means the information about a carrier, their FCC license and/or antenna information was not provided and could not be obtained while on site. In the event of unknown information, Sitesafe will use our industry specific knowledge of equipment, antenna models, and transmit power to model the site. If more specific information can be obtained for the unknown measurement criteria, Sitesafe recommends remodeling of the site utilizing the more complete and accurate data. Information about similar facilities is used when the service is identified and associated with a particular antenna. If no information is available regarding the transmitting service associated with an unidentified antenna, using the antenna manufacturer's published data regarding the antenna's physical characteristics makes more conservative assumptions. Where the frequency is unknown, Sitesafe uses the closest frequency in the antenna's range that corresponds to the highest Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE), resulting in a conservative analysis. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1 000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.27 6.11 00 • info@sHesafe.com Page 51 Definitions 5% Rule-The rules adopted by the FCC specify that, in general, at multiple transmitter sites actions necessary to bring the area into compliance with the guidelines are the shared responsibility of all licensees whose transmitters produce field strengths or power density levels at the area in question in excess of 5% of the exposure limits. In other words, any wireless operator that contributes 5% or greater of the MPE limit in an area that is identified to be greater than 100% of the MPE limit is responsible taking corrective actions to bring the site into compliance. Compliance -The determination of whether a site is safe or not with regards to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation from transmitting antennas. Decibel (dB) -A unit for measuring power or strength of a signal. Duty Cycle -The percent of pulse duration to the pulse period of a periodic pulse train. Also, may be a measure of the temporal transmission characteristic of an intermittently transmitting RF source such as a paging antenna by dividing average transmission duration by the average period for transmission. A duty cycle of 100% corresponds to continuous operation. Effective (or Equivalent) Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP) -The product of the power supplied to the antenna and the antenna gain in a given direction relative to an isotropic antenna. Effective Radiated Power (ERP) -In a given direction, the relative gain of a transmitting antenna with respect to the maximum directivity of a half wave dipole multiplied by the net power accepted by the antenna from the connecting transmitter. Gain (of an antenna) -The ratio of the maximum intensity in a given direction to the maximum radiation in the same direction from an isotropic radiator. Gain is a measure of the relative efficiency of a directional antennas as compared to an omnidirectional antenna. General Population/Uncontrolled Environment-Defined by the FCC, as an area where RFR exposure may occur to persons who are unaware of the potential for exposure and who have no control of their exposure. General Population is also referenced as General Public. Generic Antenna-For the purposes of this report, the use of "Generic" as an antenna model means the antenna information was not provided and could not be obtained while on site. In the event of unknown information, Sitesafe will use our industry specific knowledge of antenna models to select a worst case scenario antenna to model the site. Isotropic Antenna-An antenna that is completely non-directional. In other words, an antenna that radiates energy equally in all directions. Maximum Measurement-This measurement represents the single largest measurement recorded when performing a spatial average measurement. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.27 6.1100 • info@sltesafe.com Page 52 • Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) -The rms and peak electric and magnetic field strength, their squares, or the plane-wave equivalent power densities associated with these fields to which a person may be exposed without harmful effect and with acceptable safety factor. Occupational/Controlled Environment-Defined by the FCC, as an area where Radio Frequency Radiation (RFR) exposure may occur to persons who are aware of the potential for exposure as a condition of employment or specific activity and can exercise control over their exposure. OET Bulletin 65-Technical guideline developed by the FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology to determine the impact of Radio Frequency radiation on Humans. The guideline was published in August 1997. OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration)-Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for providing a safe and healthy workplace for their employees. OSHA's role is to promote the safety and health of America's working men and women by setting and enforcing standards; providing training, outreach and education; establishing partnerships; and encouraging continual process improvement in workplace safety and health. For more information, visit www.osha.gov. Radio Frequency Radiation -Electromagnetic waves that are propagated from antennas through space. Spatial Average Measurement-A technique used to average a minimum of ten (10) measurements taken in a ten (10) second interval from zero (OJ to six (6) feet. This measurement is intended to model the average energy an average sized human body will absorb while present in an electromagnetic field of energy. Transmitter Power Output (TPO) -The radio frequency output power of a transmitter's final radio frequency stage as measured at the output terminal while connected to a load. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 53 Appendix C -Rules & Regulations Explanation of Applicable Rules and Regulations The FCC has set forth guidelines in OET Bulletin 65 for human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields. Specific regulations regarding this topic are listed in Part 1, Subpart I, of Title 47 in the Code of Federal Regulations. Currently, there are two different levels of MPE -General Public MPE and Occupational MPE. An individual classified as Occupational can be defined as an individual who has received appropriate RF training and meets the conditions outlined below. General Public is defined as anyone who does not meet the conditions of being Occupational. FCC and OSHA Rules and Regulations define compliance in terms of total exposure to total RF energy, regardless of location of or proximity to the sources of energy. It is the responsibility of all licensees to ensure these guidelines are maintained at all times. It is the ongoing responsibility of all licensees composing the site to maintain ongoing compliance with FCC rules and regulations. Individual licensees that contribute less than 5% MPE to any total area out of compliance are not responsible for corrective actions. OSHA has adopted and enforces the FCC's exposure guidelines. A building owner or site manager can use this report as part of an overall RF Health and Safety Policy. It is important for building owners/site managers to identify areas in excess of the General Population MPE and ensure that only persons qualified as Occupational are granted access to those areas. Occupational Environment Explained The FCC definition of Occupational exposure limits apply to persons who: • are exposed to RF energy as a consequence of their employment; • have been made aware of the possibility of exposure; and • can exercise control over their exposure. OSHA guidelines go further to state that persons must complete RF Safety Awareness training and must be trained in the use of appropriate personal protective equipment. In order to consider this site an Occupational Environment, the site must be controlled to prevent access by any individuals classified as the General Public. Compliance is also maintained when any non-occupational individuals (the General Public) are prevented from accessing areas indicated as Red or Yellow in the attached RF Emissions diagram. In addition, a person must be aware of the RF environment into which they are entering. This can be accomplished by an RF Safety Awareness class, and by appropriate written documentation such as this Site Compliance Report. All Verizon Wireless employees who require access to this site must complete RF Safety Awareness training and must be trained in the use of appropriate personal protective equipment. 200 N. Glebe Road • SuHe 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.27 6.11 00 • lnfo@sHesafe.com Page 54 Appendix D -General Safety Recommendations The following are general recommendations appropriate for any site with accessible areas in excess of 100% General Public MPE. These recommendations are not specific to this site. These are safety recommendations appropriate for typical site management, building management, and other tenant operations. 1. All individuals needing access to the main site (or the area indicated to be in excess of General Public MPE) should wear a personal RF Exposure monitor, successfully complete proper RF Safety Awareness training, and have and be trained in the use of appropriate personal protective equipment. 2. All individuals needing access to the main site should be instructed to read and obey all posted placards and signs. 3. The site should be routinely inspected and this or similar report updated with the addition of any antennas or upon any changes to the RF environment including: • adding new antennas that may have been located on the site • removing of any existing antennas • changes in the radiating power or number of RF emitters 4. Post the appropriate NOTICE, CAUTION, or WARNING sign at the main site access point(s) and other locations as required. Note: Please refer to RF Exposure Diagrams in Section 6, to inform evervone who has access to this site that beyond posted signs there may be levels in excess of the limits prescribed by the FCC. The signs below are examples of signs meeting FCC guidelines. NOTICE ..... ......., ..... ..,_ .... """"' __ ... nc ...... IIUIIIc ..,..__ ..., .. ____ _ ... _ .. _._. -~--.--..... ~­------<- A CAUTION £ ltyoool!lllto.....,., ~""_,.....,.d_ ... --Fcc.-,__ ·--...... ,........., ..... ., ... ,..... ........ ... ~ ..... .........., ... , .... ...... Rtf ... ......,.. , .. ··~' • '"'* '"~ __ , ... , ..... i-.-.. ..,., ... _Jiil"'ll', R-~-aii!IIIO>­•~QIIifCi Ulo R:G ll'lo• W "'-"'•" -r.-..,.. .. ......, • ....,......,.. ... .,... ~'*''II!Wil!!fll)41'1!1 ... ........... .-.-..r ............ ...._ .... il ... .._,._,.,,-.r ... -····-,., ••• "'"''' -' - 5. Ensure that the site door remains locked (or appropriately controlled) to deny access to the general public if deemed as policy by the building/site owner. 6. For a General Public environment the four color levels identified in this analysis can be interpreted in the following manner: • Areas indicated as Gray are at 5% of the General Public MPE limits or below. This level is safe for a worker to be in at any time. • Green represents areas predicted to be between 5% and 20% of the General Public MPE limits. This level is safe for a worker to be in at any time. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • lnfo@sitesafe.com Page 55 I • Yellow represents areas predicted to be between 20% and 100% of the General Public MPE limits. This level is safe for a worker to be in at any time. • Red areas indicated predicted levels greater than 1 00% of the General Public MPE limits. This level is not safe for the General Public to be in. 7. For an Occupational environment the four color levels identified in this analysis can be interpreted in the following manner: • Areas indicated as Gray are at 5% of the Occupational MPE limits or below. This level is safe for a worker to be in at any time. • Green represents areas predicted to be between 5% and 20% of the Occupational MPE limits. This level is safe for a worker to be in at any time. • Yellow represents areas predicted to be between 20% and 100% of the Occupational MPE limits. Only individuals that have been properly trained in RF Health and Safety should be allowed to work in this area. This is not an area that is suitable for the General Public to be in. • Red areas indicated predicted levels greater than 1 00% of the Occupational MPE limits. This level is not safe for the Occupational worker to be in for prolonged periods of time. Special procedures must be adhered to such as lock out tag out procedures to minimize the workers exposure to EME. 8. Use of a Personal Protective Monitor: When working around antennas, Sitesafe strong recommends the use of a Personal Protective Monitor (PPM). Wearing a PPM will properly forewarn the individual prior to entering an RF exposure area. Keep a copy of this report available for all persons who must access the site. They should read this report and be aware of the potential hazards with regards to RF and MPE limits. Additional Information Additional RF information is available by visiting both www.Sitesafe.com and www.fcc.gov/oet/rfsafety. OSHA has additional information available at: http://www .osha-slc.gov /SLTC/radiofrequencyradiation. 200 N. Glebe Road • SuHe 1000 • Arlington. VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 •lnfo@sHesafe.com Page 56 IS ~rsTitie· Plancom, Inc. Brent Helming 302 State Place Escondido, CA 92029 Your Reference No: Calavera Hills Property Address: , Carlsbad, California Lawyers Title Company Our File No: 11804970-10 Title Officer: Chris Maziar Phone: (949) 724-3170 Fax: (949) 258-5740 e-mail: unit10@ltic.com Phone: PRELIMINARY REPORT -v2 Dated as of September 8, 2011 at 7:30 a.m. In response to the above referenced application for a policy of title insurance, Lawyers Title Company hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a Policy or Policies of Title Insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an Exception below or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations of said policy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage and Limitations on Covered Risks of said Policy or Policies are set forth in Exhibit B attached. The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less than that set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. Limitations on Covered Risks applicable to the CLTA and ALTA Homeowner's Policies of Title Insurance which establish a Deductible Amount and a Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability for certain coverages are also set forth in Exhibit B. Copies of the Policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which issued this report. Please read the exceptions shown or referred to below and the exceptions and exclusions set forth in Exhibit B of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be carefully considered. It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of title and may not list all liens, defects, and encumbrances affecting title to the land. This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested. CLTA Preliminary Report (Revised 11-17-06) Page 1 •· File No: 11804970 SCHEDULE A The form of policy of title insurance contemplated by this report is: Preliminary Report Only The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this report is: A FEE Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in: The City of Carlsbad, a municipal corporation The land referred to herein is situated in the County of San Diego, State of California, and is described as follows: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF Page 2 File No: 11804970 EXHIBIT "A" All that certain real property situated in the County of San Diego, State of California, described as follows: That portion of Lot "J" of Ranch Agua Hedionda, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof no. 823, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, November 16, 1896, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the most northeasterly corner of Carlsbad Tract No. 81-47 in said City of and State, according to map thereof no. 10565, filed I the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on January 17, 1983; thence south 69°28'42" West 754.99 feet (record 754.89 feet per map no. 10565), along the northerly boundary of said tract no. 81-47, to the most northwesterly corner of said tract 81-47, said point being on the centerline of Glasgow Drive as dedicated to the public per map no. 10565; thence continuing South 69°28'42" west, 30.02 feet to the westerly line of Glasgow Drive and the true point of beginning; thence continuing south 69°28'42" west, 623.26 feet to a point on the easterly line of an easement for public purposes for document no. 85-263533, recorded July 24, 1985, said point being on a curve concave westerly and having a radius of 1042.00 feet, a radial line to said point bears south 85°33'46" east; thence northwesterly, along said easterly line of Tamarack Avenue, along the arc of said curve, through a central angle of 23°03'26" 419.33 feet; thence north 18°37'13" west, 197.62 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave southeasterly and having a radius of 25.00 feet; thence northwesterly, northerly and northeasterly, along the arc of said curve, through a central angle of 90°00'00" 39.27 feet; thence along the southerly line of an easement for public roadway purposes per document no. 86-075424, recorded February 26, 1986, north 71°22'48" east, 384.68 feet; thence leaving said southerly line south, 18°37'12" east, 150.00 feet; thence north 71°22'48" east, 130.00 feet to the westerly line of an easement for public roadway purposes per document no. 86-075424, recorded February 26, 1986; thence along said northerly line, south 18°37'12" east, 460.04 feet to the true point of beginning. Assessor's Parcel Number: 167-101-35 Page 3 File No: 11804970 SCHEDULE B -Section A The following exceptions will appear in policies when providing standard coverage as outlined below: 1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims that are not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the Public Records. Page 4 File No: 11804970 SCHEDULE 8-Section 8 At the date hereof Exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed exceptions and exclusions in said policy form would be as follows: A. No taxes are due or payable at this time. Said Property is currently owned by a Governmental Agency. 1. Water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not shown by the public records. 2. Covenants, conditions and restrictions as set forth in the document Recorded: April 1, 1958 as Instrument No. 51674, in Book 7016, Page 536 of Official Records. This exception omits any covenant, condition or restriction based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin, unless and only to the extent that the covenant, condition or restriction (a) is not in violation of state or federal law, (b) is exempt under 42 U.S.C. Section 3607 or (c) relates to a handicap but does not discriminate against handicapped people. 3. Covenants, conditions and restrictions as set forth in the document 4. 5. 6. Recorded: January 5, 1959 as Instrument No. 1070 in Book 7427, Page 358 of Official Records. This exception omits any covenant, condition or restriction based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin, unless and only to the extent that the covenant, condition or restriction (a) is not in violation of state or federal law, (b) is exempt under 42 U.S.C. Section 3607 or (c) relates to a handicap but does not discriminate against handicapped people. An easement for the purpose shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document Purpose: The right to spill water in presently existing natural drainage channels Recorded: January 9, 1967, as Instrument No. 2638 of Official Records Affects: a portion of said land An easement for the purpose shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document Purpose: Pipelines Recorded: January 9, 1967, as Instrument No. 2641 of Official Records Affects: a portion of said land An easement for the purpose shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document Purpose: pipelines Recorded: January 9, 1967, as Instrument No. 2643 of Official Records Affects: a portion of said land Page 5 File No: 11804970 7. An easement for the purpose shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document Purpose: Recorded: Affects: right of way for pipelines January 9, 1967, as Instrument No. 2644 of Official Records a portion of said land 8. An easement for the purpose shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document Purpose: Recorded: Affects: pipelines January 9, 1967, as Instrument No. 2646 of Official Records a portion of said land 9. The matters contained in a document entitled "Payment of a Public Facilities Fee" recorded May 19, 1980 as Instrument No. 80-164050 of Official Records. Reference is made to said document for full particulars. 10. An easement for the purpose shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document Purpose: Recorded: Affects: public utilities October 8, 1981 as Instrument No. 81-320410 of Official Records a portion of said land 11. An easement for the purpose shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document Purpose: Recorded: Affects: pipeline November 23, 1982 as Instrument No. 82-362089 of Official Records. a portion of said land 12. An easement for the purpose shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document Purpose: Recorded: Affects: pipelines April 25, 1983 as Instrument No. 83-131591 of Official Records. a portion of said land 13. An easement for the purpose shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document Purpose: Recorded: Affects: public street February 13, 1984 as Instrument No. 84-053117 of Official Records a portion of said land Page 6 File No: 11804970 14. An easement for the purpose shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document Purpose: Recorded: Affects: slopes for drainage control February 26, 1986 as Instrument No. 86-075425 of Official Records a portion of said land 15. The matters contained in a document entitled "License Agreement for Grading on Village E-2 in Calavera Hills" recorded February 26, 1987 as Instrument No. 87-103169 of Official Records. Reference is made to said document for full particulars. 16. The matters contained in a document entitled "Notice of Restriction on Real Property" recorded May 13, 2004 as Instrument No. 2004-00434781 of Official Records. Reference is made to said document for full particulars. 17. An easement for the purpose shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document Purpose: Recorded: Affects: public utilities June 6, 2008 as Instrument No. 2008-0305207 of Official Records a portion of said land 18. Title to, and easements in, any portion of the land lying within any highways, roads, streets, or other ways. 19. Any rights, interests or claims of the parties in possession of said land, including but not limited to those based on an unrecorded agreement, contract or lease. END OF SCHEDULE 8 EXCEPTIONS PLEASE REFER TO THE "NOTES AND REQUIREMENTS SECTION" WHICH FOLLOWS FOR INFORMATION NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THIS TRANSACTION Page 7 File No: 11804970 REQUIREMENTS SECTION: NONE Page 8 File No: 11804970 INFORMATIONAL NOTES SECTION NOTE NO. 1: The information on the attached plat is provided for your convenience as a guide to the general location of the subject property. The accuracy of this plat is not guaranteed, nor is it a part of any policy, report or guarantee to which it may be attached. NOTE NO. 2: This report is being issued at the request of the client and is not in response to a request for title insurance. Therefore, all references to title insurance in the printed matter of this report or attached hereto are hereby cancelled. All liability assumed hereby is strictly limited to the amount of the fee paid by the client named herein. Any other parties using the information contained herein do so at their own risk. Typist: rm6 Date Typed: February 16, 2010 Page 9 Exhibit B (Revised 11-17-06) CAUFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY-1990 EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building or zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien, or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage or for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with the applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate of interest insured by this policy or the transaction creating the interest of the insured lender, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency or similar creditors' rights laws. EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE -SCHEDULE B, PART I This policy does not insure against Joss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the public records. CLTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (10/22/03) ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POUCY OF TITLE INSURANCE EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, You are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from: 1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law or government regulation. This includes ordinances, laws and regulations concerning: a. building b. zoning c. Land use d. improvements on the Land e. Land division f. environmental protection This Exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of these matters if notice of the violation or enforcement appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14, 15, 16, 17 or 24. File No: 11804970 2. The failure of Your existing structures, or any part of them, to be constructed in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exclusion does not apply to violations of building codes if notice of the violation appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date. 3. The right to take the Land by condemning it, unless: a. a notice of exercising the right appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date; or b. the taking happened before the Policy Date and is binding on You if You bought the Land without Knowing of the taking. 4. Risks: a. that are created, allowed, or agreed to by You, whether or not they appear in the Public Records; b. that are Known to You at the Policy Date, but not to Us, unless they appear in the Public Records at the Policy Date; c. that result in no loss to You; or d. that first occur after the Policy Date-this does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 7, 8.d, 22, 23, 24 or 25. 5. Failure to pay value for Your Title. 6. Lack of a right: a. to any Land outside the area specifically described and referred to in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and b. in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 11 or 18. LIMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS Your insurance for the following Covered Risks is limited on the Owner's Coverage Statement as follows: For Covered Risk 14, 15, 16 and 18, Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A. The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limits shown on Schedule A are as follows: Covered Risk 14: Covered Risk 15: Covered Risk 16: Covered Risk 18: Your Deductible Amount 1% of Policy Amount or $2,500 (whichever is less) 1% of Policy Amount or $5,000 (whichever is less) 1% of Policy Amount or $5,000 (whichever is less) 1% of Policy Amount or $2,500 (whichever is less) Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability $10,000 $25,000 $25,000 $5,000 AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION RESIDENTIAL TITLE INSURANCE POLICY (6-1-87) EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, you are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from: 1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law or government regulation. This includes building and zoning ordinances and also laws and regulations concerning: land use improvements on the land land division environmental protection This exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of these matters which appear in the public records at Policy Date. This exclusion does not limit the zoning coverage described in Items 12 and 13 of Covered Title Risks. 2. The right to take the land by condemning it, unless: a notice of exercising the right appears in the public records on the Policy Date the taking happened prior to the Policy Date and is binding on you if you bought the land without knowing of the taking 3. Title Risks: that are created, allowed, or agreed to by you that are known to you, but not to us, on the Policy Date --unless they appeared in the public records that result in no loss to you that first affect your title after the Policy Date --this does not limit the labor and material lien coverage in Item 8 of Covered Title Risks 4. Failure to pay value for your title. 5. Lack of a right: • to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in Item 3 of Schedule A OR in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch your land This exclusion does not limit the access coverage in Item 5 of Covered Title Risks. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY (10-17-92) WITH ALTA ENDORSEMENT-FORM 1 COVERAGE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the File No: 11804970 character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services, labor or material or to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for street improvements under construction or completed at Date of Policy); or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or the claim of priority of any statutory lien for services, labor or materials over the lien of the insured mortgage) arising from an improvement or work related to the land which is contracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance. 7.Any claim, which arises out of the transaction creating the interest of the mortgagee insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (i) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (ii) the subordination of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a result of the application of the doctrine or equitable subordination; or (iii)the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following General Exceptions: EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary Jines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the public records. 2006 ALTA LOAN POLICY (06-17-06) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion l(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. File No: 11804970 (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion l(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11, 13, or 14); or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the inability or failure of an Insured to comply with applicable doing-business laws of the state where the Land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability in whole or in part of the lien of the Insured Mortgage that arises out of the transaction evidenced by the Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth-in-lending law. 6. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights Jaws, that the transaction creating the lien of the Insured Mortgage, is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 13(b) of this policy. 7. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the Insured Mortgage in the Public Records. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk ll(b). The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage: EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) that arise by reason of: 1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the Public Records. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POUCY (10-17-92) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. {b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate or interest insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (i) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or File No: 11804970 (ii) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage Policy will also include the following General Exceptions: EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the public records. 2006 ALTA OWNER'S POLICY (06-17-06) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion l(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion l(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 and 10); or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Title. 4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A, is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9 of this policy. 5. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage: EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) that arise by reason of: 1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the Public Records. • • (~~CITY OF ~¥~CARLSBAD Community & Economic Development www.carlsbadca.gov NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR A MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Notice is hereby given that a Minor Conditional Use Permit (MCUP) has been applied for to allow a Wireless Communication Facility on property generally located at, 2997 Glasgow Drive, Carlsbad, California (Calavera Hills Park), and more particularly described as: That portion of Lot ''J" of Ranch Agua Hedionda , in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof no. 823, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, November 16, 1896. If you have any objections to the granting of this MCUP or wish to have an informal hearing to discuss the requested MCUP, please notify the Planning Division, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008, in writing within 10 days of the date of this notice. If you have any questions, please call Austin Silva in the Planning Division at (760) 602-4631. CASE NO.: MCUP 13-06 CASE NAME: VERIZON WIRELESS CALAVERA HILLS DATE: June 11, 2013 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION · · .. ; Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 .. - 300' RADIUS MAP GC MAPPING SERVICE, INC. 3055 WEST VALLEY BOULEVARD ALHAMBRA CA 91803 (626) 441-1080, FAX (626) 441-8850 gcmapping@radiusmaps.com 92 @) 19.59 AC 'j 4~ 1_~ "Jt·IF<U Q~) 6 ,.. 9.3 AC 3.., Ill.· 22~ Ji CASE NO. LEGEND DATE: 06-06-2013 OWNERSHIP NO. SCALE: 1" = 100' __,.....__ OWNERSHIP HOOK OWNERSHIP MAP • • ATTACHMENT "1" I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS LIST AND LABELS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ON THIS DATE REPRESENT THE LATEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION FROM THE EQUALIZED ASSESSOR'S ROLES. APPLICATION NAME AND NUMBER lC191 GLASGOw Jg.. BY: RLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE ~ 0 {)f(l_-( f.. (. \..lf U..-Pil- DATE: 5/?J/ud I P-21 Page 3 of 6 Revised 07/10 r-----.----- CITY OF CARLSBAD • REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO PROJECT TITLE: VERIZON WIRELESS CALAVERA HILLS APPLICANT: PLAN COM TO: 0 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 Land Development Engineering Police Department-J. Sasway Fire Department-Greg Ryan Building Division -Will Foss Parks & Recreation (Parks/Trails)-Liz Ketabian Parks & Recreation (Trees & Medians)-Mike Bliss Public Works Department (Streets)-Nick Roque Public Works Department (Traffic)-John Kim Public Works Department (Design)-Bill Plummer *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DIVISION 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 Public Works (Storm Drain)-Clayton Dobbs Public Works (Wastewater)-Don Wasko Public Works (Water)-Jase Warner ________ Water/Sewer District Landscape Plancheck Consultant-PELA _________ School District North County Transit District-Planning Dept. Sempra Energy-Land Management Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) ~!~~·sl!~J<~-•t,,~--\1111111111111111""""'"'"''''_,.,... h • '<l>'>M''l~J€\t Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the PLANNING TRACKING DESK in the Planning Division at 1635 Faraday Avenue, ~vSS(i(l!t ifvo~fiav?r~J';·e:~=;,'~~"'p~~~te. If you determine that there are items that need to e submitted to deem the application "complete" for processing, please immediately contact the applicant and/or their representatives (via phone or e-mail) to Jet them know. Review & Comment 03/13 AS • PLAN cow! Telecommunications Project Management April 16, 2013 Austin Silva Project Planner City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: CUP 12-03 Verizon Wireless at Calavera Hills Dear Mr. Silva: • In response to your comment letters dated March 5 and March 11,2013, we are submitting the following information for your review: March 5 letter: Planning: 1. Height of the retaining wall has been reduced to 6 feet. 2-5. The landscape plans have been changed to address these comments. March llletter: Parks and Recreation: 1. The color and style of the block for the wall enclosure have been chosen to match the nearby bus stop materials. A color materials sample board is being provided for review by the Parks and Recreation Department. 2-4: Comments have been addressed on the plans. 5: A traffic control plan will be prepared and submitted during the building permit process. 6: No relocation of any signage is proposed. • Four new full size sets, and one 11x17 set of the revised drawings are included for your review. • Revised Photo Simulations are submitted for review. Please let me know if you need any additional information. We look forward to receiving notification of a hearing date. Thank you for your help with this project. Sincerely, -41/l/uJ (]_jk) Karen Adler Planner Contract Representative for Verizon Wireless · Enclosures 302 State Place Escondido, CA 92029 760-715-3416 mobile 760-735-4913 fax • • April 25, 2013 TO: Austin Silva, Assistant Planner Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner Bridget Desmarais, Administrative Secretary Sabrina Michelson, Senior Office Specialist FROM: Michael Elliott, City of Carlsbad's Contract Landscape Architect RE: Landscape Architectural Review-Conceptual Review-3rd Review Verizon Wireless Calavera Hills, CUP 12-03 Glasgow Drive @ Carlsbad Village Drive PELA file: 452 -V erizon Wireless Calavera Hills-Con3 Contact: Booth & Suarez Architecture, Inc., Phone: (760) 434-8474 Please advise the applicant to make the following revisions to the plans so that they will meet the requirements of the City of Carlsbad's Landscape Manual. Numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of the comment concern. REPEAT COMMENTS 1-6 Completed. 7. Include a statement on the landscape plans signed by the qualified professional that states: "I am familiar vvith the requirements for landscape and irrigation plans contained in the city of Carlsbad's landscape manual and vvater efficient landscape regulations. I have prepared this plan in compliance vvith those regulations and the landscape manual and agree to comply with all requirements ·.vhen submitting construction documents. I certify that the plan implements those regulations to provide efficient use of'.vater." r Review: Please wet sign and date the statement See Sheet L-2. 8. Completed. 9. RETURN REDLINES and provide 2 copies of all plans for the next review. I A. Please show the Myoporum ground cover symbol (Gl) belovv the proposed tree and shrubs. 3rd Review: Please show Myoporum ground covers to remain or to be installed new above the underground vault See Sheet L-1. 2A-4A Completed. • • City of Carlsbad PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT PLAN CHECK REVIEW MEMORANDOM March 7, 2013 TO: Planning Tracking Desk Austin Silva, Associate Planner FROM: Liz Ketabian, Park Planning Manager SUBJECT: CUP 12-03 VERIZON WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY CALAVERA HILLS COMMUNITY PARK Parks and Recreation staff have reviewed the plans for the proposed Verizon Wireless Communication Facility (VWCF), and provides the following comments and items to be forwarded to the applicant and addressed with the next plan review submittal. 1. VWCF Vault and Enclosure at Carlsbad Village Dr.-Vaulting all equipment underground as requested previously has been incorporated in the design. However the visual impacts of the wall enclosure are still a concern as well as for security purposes having the new facility so close to the bus stop. Coordination with NCTD re: the design is strongly encouraged. Sheet A-2-The block for the retaining walls should match the park slump block or blend in more with the landscaping. Please provide a sample to Parks and Recreation prior to ordering for approval on the selected block for the retaining walls. 2. Landscape Slope along Carlsbad Village Dr.-Add 2 additional Bouganvilla spectabilis at the top of the slope above the south side of the retaining wall. See also redlines on Sheet L-2. 3. New Ballfield Light Pole-Placement of antennas and microwave dishes attached to the light standards, sports field lighting, are acceptable as shown in the current submittal. 4. Chain Link Fencing Reconfiguration and Replacement-The proposed reconfiguration of the fencing indicates the gate to allow for maintenance access for the new light standard and ball field lighting and the two 6' gate panels swing in towards the ball field and match the existing ball flield fence height so this is acceptable. 5. Traffic Control Plan-The plans indicate that new utility trenching will be done for the VWCF on the slope along Carlsbad Village Dr. as well as in the right, eastbound lane of Carlsbad Village Dr. and trenching across Glasgow Dr. near the intersection of Carlsbad • • Village Dr., a signalized intersection. Please contact Traffic Engineering to verify the necessary right of way permits and traffic control plans required by traffic engineering for the construction operations for the WCF. 6. Bus Stop Location and Street signage-If relocations are required for signage along the parkway in the vicinity of the VWCF, please coordinate with the proper agency for the relocations and show those relocations on the plans. Please provide the comments for this plan check to the applicant, Plancom, Inc. Questions regarding the Plan check items above can be directed to Liz Ketabian, Park Planner at 760-434-2978. cc: Parks and Recreation Director Park Development Manager Parks Superintendent Recreation Services Manager Recreation Manager, Calavera Hills Community Park Project File (~\ CITY OF ~·cARLSBAD • • Memorandum February 11, 2013 To: Austin Silva, Project Planner From: David Rick, Project Engineer Via: Glen Van Peski, Senior Civil Engineer Re: SUBJECT: CUP 12-03 VERIZON WIRELESS CALAVERA HILLS CONDITIONS Land Development Engineering has completed its review of the above referenced project for application completeness and has determined that the application and plans submitted for this project are complete and suitable for continued review. Engineering staff does not have any comments to add to the project. Please add the following conditions to the approving resolution/letter: 1. Developer shall comply with the City's Stormwater Regulations, latest version, and shall implement best management practices at all times. Best management practices include but are not limited to pollution treatment practices or devices, erosion control to prevent silt runoff during construction, general housekeeping practices, pollution prevention and educational practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices or devices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to stormwater, receiving water or stormwater conveyance system to the maximum extent practicable. Developer shall notify prospective owners and tenants of the above requirements. Code Reminder 2. The applicant shall comply with Chapter 11.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code for any encroachment or work proposed within the public right-of-way. The applicant shall obtain all permits prior to commencing work. If you or the applicant has any questions regarding the above, please either see or call me at extension 2781. Associate Engineer-Land Development Engineering Community & Economic Development 1635 Faraday Ave. I Carlsbad, CA 92008 I 760-602-2710 I 760-602-8560 fax I www.carlsbadca.gov • • February 8, 20 13 TO: Austin Silva, Assistant Planner Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner Bridget Desmarais, Administrative Secretary Sabrina Michelson, Senior Office Specialist FROM: Michael Elliott, City of Carlsbad's Contract Landscape Architect RE: Landscape Architectural Review -Conceptual Review -2nd Review Verizon Wireless Calavera Hills, CUP 12-03 Glasgow Drive @ Carlsbad Village Drive PELA file: 452 -V erizon Wireless Calavera Hills-Cone Contact: Booth & Suarez Architecture, Inc., Phone: (760) 434-8474 Please advise the applicant to make the following revisions to the plans so that they will meet the requirements of the City of Carlsbad's Landscape Manual. Numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of the comment concern. REPEAT COMMENTS 1-6 Completed. 'l-: Include a statement on the landscape plans signed by the qualified professional-that states:- "I am familiar \Vith the requirements for landscape and irrigation plans contained in the city of Carlsbad's landscape manual and water efficient landscape regulations. I have prepared this plan in compliance v1ith those regulations and the landscape manual and agree to comply ·•vith all requirements vi-hen submitting construction documents. I certify that the plan implements those regulations to provide efficient use of ·.vater. " 2nd Review: Please wet sign and date the statement. 8. Completed. 9. RETURN RED LINES and provide 2 copies of all plans for the next review. NEW COMMENTS 1A. Please show the Myoporum ground cover symbol (G 1) below the proposed tree and shrubs. 2A. The Landscape Manual requires that plantings feature ground cover, shrubs, and trees to screen elements of unsightliness and screen/soften new improvements. Screening of the inside of the retaining wall is needed. Please coordinate lowering ofthe rear top ofwall to no more than 3" above finish grade and provide Rosmarinus Prostratus at the outside back ofthe proposed retaining wall (1 gallon at 3' on center) to grow over and cascade down the face of the wall to help soften the structure. Please also install a wall vine (i.e. Ficus pumila, Boston Ivy, etc.) on each end of the wall (I gallon size) to grow on the inside wall surfaces. • Verizon Wireless Calavera Hills Conceptual Plan Review • February 8, 2013 Page2 3A. Please address planting and irrigation repairs/replacement along the trench. Specify new ground cover to match adjacent existing ground covers along with appropriate notes to repair irrigation. 4A. Please address replacement of plantings and irrigation between the sidewalk and the enclosure. ·~ <(~./)\ C I T Y 0 F ¥CARLSBAD • • Memorandum April 23, 2012 To: Dan Halverson, Project Planner From: David Rick, Project Engineer Via: Glen Van Peski, Engineering Manager Re: CUP 12-03 VERIZON WIRELESS CALAVERA HILLS COMPLETENESS AND ISSUES REVIEW Land Development Engineering has completed a review of the above-referenced project for completeness and engineering issues of concern. All items needed for engineering review are provided for determining the application as complete. Engineering issues which need to be resolved or adequately addressed prior to staff making a determination on the proposed project are as follows: 1. List grading quantities in cubic yards on the site plan. 2. Please clarify the design and purpose of the proposed sump pump. Is the sump pump proposed within the underground controlled environment vault? Is it designed with sealant to prevent water leakage into the vault and therefore the pump is intended for discharging leaked flood water or is it anticipated that the underground vault will continuously accept water that will need to continuously be discharged? What type of equipment will be placed in the underground vault? Identify any hazardous or toxic components from the stored equipment (lead, oil, mercury, etc.) that could leach into the water. If you or the applicant has any questions, please either see or contact me at 602-2781. <::::Q~ DAVID RICK Associate Engineer Land Development Engineering Community & Economic Development 1635 Faraday Ave. I Carlsbad, CA 92008 I 760-602-2710 I 760-602-8560 fax I www.carlsbadca.gov • • CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: APRIL 11, 2012 PROJECT NO(S): CUP 12-03 REVIEW NO: 1 -----------------------------------------~ PROJECT TITLE: VERIZON WIRELESS CALAVERA HILLS APPLICANT: PLANCOM, INC./KAREN ADLER TO: Land Development Engineering-Terie Rowley Police Department-J. Sa sway Fire Department-Greg Ryan Building Department-Will Foss Recreation -Mark Steyaert Public Works Department (Streets)-Nick Roque _____________ Water/Sewer District Landscape Plancheck Consultant -PELA _____________ School District North County Transit District-Planning Department Sempra Energy-Land Management Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) Parks/Trails-Lori Swenck (Calavera Hills) *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the tif"&Mi4 m the Plannmg Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by 5/1/12. If ave · o o men s, please so state. If you determine that there are items that need to be submitted to deem the application "complete" for processing, please immediately contact the applicant and/or their representatives (via phone or e-mail) to let them know. Thank you 1 N"'t 1 ~~~A /JJ, COMMENTS: fVV vq fVC''C:::VVr)- Signature Date PLANS ATTACHED Review & Comment 03/10 t>" ' • • April 12, 2012 TO: FROM: RE: Dan Halverson, Assistant Planner Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner Bridget Desmarais, Administrative Secretary Sabrina Michelson, Senior Office Specialist Michael Elliott, City of Carlsbad's Contract Landscape Architect Landscape Architectural Review -Conceptual Review -1st Review Verizon Wireless Calavera Hills, CUP 12-03 Glasgow Drive @ Carlsbad Village Drive PELA file: 452 -V erizon Wireless Calavera Hills -Coni Contact: Booth & Suarez Architecture, Inc., Phone: (760) 434-8474 Please advise the applicant to make the following corrections to the plans so that they will meet the requirements of the City of Carlsbad's Landscape Manual. Numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of the comment concern. 1. Generally identify all existing woody plant material to be removed or retained. Trees over 12" in caliper diameter shall be identified on the plan individually as to caliper size and type and labeled to be retained or removed. 2. Please identify the proposed tree (scientific and common names along with proposed size to be planted). 3. Landscaping consisting of ground cover, shrubs, and trees shall be used to screen elements ofunsightliness and screen/soften new improvements. Please provide evergreen screen shrubs on the east and west sides of the retaining wall enclosure. 4. Please address planting of the vault area. It is assumed that landscaping will be removed/damaged and will need to be replaced. Please specify ground covers and shrubs to be used and indicate spacing of ground covers and quantities of shrubs. Please note that landscaping shall be compatible with adjacent landscape. Please also address replacement/repairs to the existing irrigation systems. 5. Planting on slopes shall meet the slope re-vegetation requirements ofthe Landscape Manual. Please add the following notes to the plans and address how these requirements will be met: Slopes 6:1 or steeper requiring erosion control measures as specified herein shall be treated with one or more of the following planting standards: a. Standard 1 -Cover Crop/Reinforced Straw Matting: Cover crop shall be a seed mix typically made up of quick germinating and fast covering grasses, clovers, and/or wild flowers. Submit the specific seed mix for City approval prior to application. The cover crop shall be applied at a rate and manner sufficient to provide 90% coverage within thirty (30) days. Type of reinforced straw matting shall be as approved by the city and staked to the slope as recommended by the manufacturer. t • • Verizon Wireless Calavera Hills Conceptual Plan Review April 12, 2012 Page 2 Reinforced straw matting shall be required when planting occurs between August 15 and April15. The cover crop and/or reinforced straw mat shall be used the remainder of the year. b. Standard #2-Ground Cover One hundred (100%) percent of the area shall be planted with a ground cover known to have excellent soil binding characteristics (planted from a minimum size of flatted material and spaced to provide full coverage within one year). c. Standard #3 -Low Shrubs Low spreading woody shrubs (planted from a minimum of2-3/4 inch liners) shall cover a minimum of seventy (70%) percent ofthe slope face (at mature size). d. Standard #4-Trees and/or Large Shrubs Trees and/or large shrubs shall be (planted from a minimum of 1 gallon containers) at a minimum rate of one (1) per two hundred (200) square feet. Slopes-6:1 or steeper and: a. 3' or less in vertical height and are adjacent to public walks or streets require at minimum Standard #1. b. 3' to 8' in vertical height require Standards #1, #2 and #3. c. In excess of8' in vertical height require Standards #1, #2, #3, and #4. Areas graded flatter than 6: 1 require Standard # 1 (cover crop) with temporary irrigation when they have one or more of the following conditions: a. Sheet graded pads not scheduled for improvements within 6 months of completion of rough grading. b. A potential erosion problem as determined by the City. c. Identified by the City as highly visible areas to the public or have special conditions that warrant immediate treatment. 6. Provide a plant palette list indicating the following: a. Tree types and quantities b. Shrub types and quantities (approximate) c. Ground cover types d. Proposed plant sizes (either by number or% of total quantity) 7. Include a statement on the landscape plans signed by the qualified professional that states: "I am familiar with the requirements for landscape and irrigation plans contained in the city of Carlsbad's landscape manual and water efficient landscape regulations. I have prepared this plan in compliance with those regulations and the landscape manual and agree to comply with all requirements when submitting construction documents. I certify that the plan implements those regulations to provide efficient use of water." Verizon Wireless Calavera Hills Conceptual Plan Review April 12, 2012 Page 3 8. Outline the areas of landscape maintenance responsibilities (private, common area/homeowners' association, City, etc.). 9. RETURN RED LINES and provide 2 copies of all plans for the next review. • • CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: APRIL 11, 2012 PROJECT NO(S): CUP 12-03 REVIEW NO: 1 ~~--~---------------------------------~ PROJECT TITLE: VERIZON WIRELESS CALAVERA HILLS APPLICANT: PLANCOM, INC./KAREN ADLER TO: ~ Land Development Engineering-Terie Rowley till Police Department-J. Sa sway ~ Fire Department-Greg Ryan ~ Building Department-Will Foss 0 Recreation-Mark Steyaert 0 Public Works Department (Streets)-Nick Roque 0 Water/Sewer District [gl Landscape Plancheck Consultant -PELA 0 School District 0 North County Transit District-Planning Department 0 Sempra Energy -land Management 0 Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) [gl Parks/Trails-Lori Swenck (Calavera Hills) *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to th in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by 5/1/12. please so state. If you determine that there are items that need to be submitted to deem the application "complete" for processing, please immediately contact the applicant and/or their representatives (via phone or e-mail) to let them know. Thank you l r COMMENTS: I~ 0 cQ~V\ V'V\ (.AI\-\-----~----~------~~~~------------------------------ Signature Date PLANS ATTACHED Review & Comment 03/10 • • CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: APRIL 11, 2012 PROJECT NO(S): CUP 12-03 REVIEW NO: 1 -----------------------------------------~ PROJECT TITLE: VERIZON WIRELESS CALAVERA HILLS APPLICANT: PLANCOM, INC./KAREN ADLER TO: IZI Land Development Engineering-Terie Rowley ~ Police Department-J. Sa sway • Fire Department-Greg Ryan IZI Building Department-Will Foss 0 Recreation -Mark Steyaert 0 Public Works Department (Streets)-Nick Roque 0 Water/Sewer District IZI Landscape Plancheck Consultant -PELA 0 School District 0 North County Transit District-Planning Department 0 Sempra Energy-Land Management 0 Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) IZI Parks/Trails-Lori Swenck (Calavera Hills) *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by 5/1/12. If please so state. If you determine that there are items that need to be submitted to deem the application 11Complete" for processing. please immediately contact the applicant and/or their representatives (via phone or e-mail) to let them know. Thank you coMMENTS: A~~ -JJo ~w-"eM_+s Date PLANS ATTACHED Review & Comment ·r .. ' . J\ \ 03/10 • • CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU Discretionary Review Checklist PROJECT NUMBER: ......:C::...:U:..:.P_1..:...:2:.....-0::....:3:...__ ________________ _ BUILDING ADDRESS: --=2=-=9-=-97.:........:=:G=LA:....:;S::...:G::...:O::...W~D:...:..R-=---------------- PROJECT DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCTION OF TELECOMM EQUIP VAULT IN ROW ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 167-101-35 FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore, any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. By: fi 1<t-Date: 4-11-2012 ATTACHMENTS By: DENIAL Please see the attached report of deficiencies marked with liD. Make necessary corrections to plans or specifications for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. Date: By: --------Date: By: --------Date: FIRE DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSON NAME: GREGORY RYAN DEPUTY FIRE MARSHAL ADDRESS: 1635 Faraday Ave Carlsbad, CA 92008 PHONE: (760) 602-4665 • • CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: APRIL 11, 2012 PROJECT NO(S): _C.:...:U:....:P_1.:...:2=---0.:..:3=---------------REVIEW NO: _1 __ -l PROJECT TITLE: VERIZON WIRELESS CALAVERA HILLS APPLICANT: PLANCOM, INC./KAREN ADLER TO: ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 i Land Development Engineering-Terie Rowley Police Department-J. Sa sway Fire Department-Greg Ryan Bui.lding Department-Will Foss Recreation -Mark Steyaert Public Works Department (Streets)-Nick Roque _____________ Water/Sewer District Landscape Plancheck Consultant -PELA _____________ School District North County Transit District -Planning Department Sempra Energy-Land Management Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5} Parks/Trails-Lori Swenck (Calavera Hills) *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to th ;tiiJ~~-~-.~~­ in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by 5/1/12. please so state. If you determine that there are items that need to be submitted to deem the application "complete" for processing, please immediately contact the applicant and/or their representatives (via phone or e-mail) to let them know. Thank you COMM ENTS:._...L:::,~~___.co=:::=o~~04.I.oiii~=-~-.J.:t:;;;..~-=;:;..,_~==-....::;;_w=-::..::r;;__---- d~~ Signature Date PLANS AD ACHED Review & Comment 03/10 "Dh EBI Consulting environmental! engineering I due diligence March 21,2014 City of Carlsbad Planning Department 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Tel: 7 60-602-4600 plannin~carlsbadca.goy Subject: Invitation to Comment Ensite #17990 I Calvera Hills 2997 Glasgow Drive, Carlsbad, San Diego County, CA 92008 EBI Project#61141516 To Whom It May Concern: 11445 East Via Linda, Suite 2, #472 Scottsdale, AZ 85259 Tel: (781) 273-2500 Fax: (781) 425-5142 www.ebiconsulting.com City of Carlsbad MAR 2 7 2014 Planning Division Pursuant to Section I 06 of the National Historic Preservation Act, the regulations promulgated thereunder and interagency agreements developed thereto, EBI Consulting, Inc. on behalf of Cellco Partnership and its controlled affiliates doing business as Verizon Wireless (Verizon Wireless) provides this notice of a proposed telecommunications facility installation at the address listed above. EBI would like to inquire if you would be interested in commenting on this proposed project. Verizon Wireless is proposing to replace an existing light-pole standard with a new 80-foot light pole standard at 2997 Glasgow Drive in Carlsbad, CA. Associated support equipment will be installed inside a proposed underground vault to the northeast of the pole. Please refer to the attached project plans for complete details regarding this proposed project. Please note that we are requesting your review of the attached information as part of the Section 106 process only and not as part of the local zoning process. We are only seeking comments related to the proposed project's potential effect to historic properties. Please submit your comments regarding the proposed project's potential effect on historic properties to EBI Consulting, to my attention at the above noted address or contact me via telephone at the number listed below. Please reference the EBI project number. We would appreciate your comments as soon as possible within the next 30 days. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns about the proposed project. Respectfully Submitted, ?%~~ EBI Architectural Historian 781-418-2325 mtaylor@ebiconsulting.com Attachments -Figures and Maps ENVIROBUSINESS,INC. LOCATIONS I ATLANTA, GA I BALTIMORE, MD I BURLINGTON, MA ) CHICAGO,IL I CRANSTON, Rl I DALLAS, TX I DENVER, CO I EXETER, NH I HOUSTON, TX I LOS ANGELES, CA I NEW YORK, NY I PHOENIX, AZ ) PORTLAND. OR I SAN FRANCISCO, CA I SEATTLE. WA I YORK. PA • Community & Economic Development July 2, 2013 Plancom, Inc. Attn: Karen Adler, Agent 302 State Place Escondido, CA 92029 • a FILE www.carlsbadca.gov SUBJECT: MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. MCUP 13-06-VERIZON WIRELESS CALAVERA HILLS-Request for approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit (MCUP 13-06) to allow the operation of a wireless communication facility at 2997 Glasgow Drive (Calavera Hills Park), in the Planned Community (P-C) Zone and Local Facilities Management Zone 7. Dear Ms. Adler, The City Planner has completed a review of your application for a Minor Conditional Use Permit MCUP 13-06 for the installation of a new wireless communication facility consisting of the removal of an existing light standard, the installation of 12 antennas, a microwave dish, and two GPS antennas mounted to a new light standard, the installation of a an underground equipment vault within a sloped landscaped area along Carlsbad Village Drive and additional landscaping to visually screen the underground vault and supporting retaining wall at 2997 Glasgow Drive (Calavera Hills Park). A notice was sent to property owners within a 300' radius of the subject property requesting comments regarding the above request. No comments were received within the ten day notice period (ending on June 21, 2013). After careful consideration of the circumstances surrounding this request, the City Planner has determined that the four findings required for granting a Minor Conditional Use Permit can be made and therefore, APPROVES this request based on the following findings and conditions. Findings: 1. That the requested use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community, and is in harmony with the various elements and objectives of the general plan, including, if applicable, the certified local coastal program, specific plan or master plan in that (a) the use is necessary and desirable for the development of the community because of the benefit and demand for digital communications and data transmissions for businesses, individuals, public agencies and emergency service systems in this part of the City; (b) the proposed use is consistent with the General Plan in that the Open Space· (OS} Land Use designation does not preclude the provision of Wireless Communication Facility (WCF} uses. The WCF plan has been found to be consistent with City Council Policy No. 64, Wireless Communication Facilities, in that it is in a preferred location (within an existing public park) and has a stealth design as discussed in finding number five. The project's location and stealth design comply with General Plan objectives that seek to maintain and enhance Carlsbad's appearance. Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 • MS"liP·lp-06 -.VERIZON WIRELESS CALAVERA HILLS ... ...J~Ix. 2, w~3 Page 2 · • 2. That the requested use is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located in that the proposed WCF is located within a preferred location (within an existing public park) as listed in Location Guideline A.l.h. of City Council Policy Statement No. 64, and all aspects of the WCF exhibit stealth design in that the panel antennas are mounted inside a radome on a new light standard that will be detailed and painted to match the existing surrounding light standards and the equipment is located in an underground vault within a sloped landscaped area along Carlsbad Village Drive. The WCF use is not precluded by the project's Planned Community zoning or Open Space General Plan Land Use designation. Furthermore, the antennas on the proposed light pole do not visually impact the existing site, do not interfere with nor are readily visible to other surrounding uses and will not result in any additional building coverage. The project has been conditioned to comply with FCC RF Exposure Guidelines. 3. That the site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, parking, loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping and other development features prescribed in this code and required by the City Planner in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood in that the proposed antennas are located within a radome on a proposed light standard that will be detailed and painted to match the existing surrounding light standards. In addition, the equipment enclosure is located in an underground vault within a sloped landscaped area along Carlsbad Village Drive and thereby exhibits stealth design techniques. 4. That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all traffic generated by the proposed use in that the proposed unmanned WCF use would require, on average, only monthly maintenance visits and occasional visits in response to operational problems. 5. That the proposed WCF is consistent with City Council Policy No. 64 in that it is located in a · preferred location (within an existing public park) as listed in Location Guideline A.l.h. of City Council Policy Statement No. 64 and exhibits stealth design, as the antennas are located within a radome on a proposed light standard that will be detailed and painted to match the existing surrounding light standards. The equipment enclosure will be located in an underground vault within a sloped landscaped area along Carlsbad Village Drive. 6. That the City Planner has determined that the project belongs to a class of projects that the State Secretary for Resources has found do not have a significant impact on the environment, and it is therefore categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents pursuant to Section 15303 (New Construction of Small Structures) of the state CEQA Guidelines. In making this determination, the City Planner has found that the exceptions listed in Section 15300.2 of the state CEQA Guidelines do not apply to this project. 7. The City Planner has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project. • • MCUP 13-06-VERIZON WIRELESS CALAVERA HILLS July 2, 2013 Page 3 Conditions: 1. Approval is granted for MCUP 13-06 as shown on Exhibits "A"-"K" dated July 2, 2013 on file in the Planning Division and incorporated herein by reference. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions. 2. If any of the following conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits; deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Minor Conditional Use Permit. 3. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections and modifications to the MCUP 13-06 documents, as necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development different from this approval shall require an amendment to this approval. 4. The Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectly, from {a) City's approval and issuance of this Minor Conditional Use Permit, {b) City's approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or non-discretionary, in connection · with the use contemplated herein, and {c) Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby, including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. 5. The Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local ordinances in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 6. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures, which are required as part of the Zone 7 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits. 7. MCUP 13-06 shall be reviewed by the City Planner on a yearly basis to determine if all conditions of this permit have been met and that the use does not have a substantial negative effect on surrounding properties or the public health, safety and general welfare. If the City Planner determines that: 1) the minor conditional use permit was obtained by fraud or misrepresentation; or 2) the use for which such approval is granted is not being exercised; or 3) the conditions of approval have not been met; or 4) the minor conditional use permit is being or recently has been exercised contrary to any of the terms or conditions of approval; or 5) the use for which such approval was granted has ceased to exist or has been suspended for one year or more; or 6) the use is in violation of any statute, ordinance, law or regulation; or 7) the use e • MCUP 13-06-VERIZON WIRELESS CALAVERA HILLS July 2, 2013 Page 4 permitted by the minor conditional use permit is being or has been so exercised as to be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or so as to constitute a nuisance, the City Planner shall hold an informal public hearing and after providing the permittee the opportunity to be heard, the City Planner may revoke and terminate the minor conditional use permit in whole or in part, reaffirm the minor conditional use permit, modify the conditions or impose new conditions. 8. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of 10 years from July 2, 2013 through July 1, 2023. This permit may be revoked at any time after a public hearing, if it is found that the use has a substantial detrimental effect on surrounding land uses and the public's health and welfare, or the conditions imposed herein have not been met. This permit may be extended for a reasonable period of time not to exceed ten {10) years upon written application of the permittee made no less than 90 days prior to the expiration date. The Planning Commission may not grant such extension, unless it finds that there are no substantial negative effects on surrounding land uses or the public's health and welfare. If a substantial negative effect on surrounding land uses or the public's health and welfare is found, the extension shall be denied or granted with conditions which will eliminate or substantially reduce such effects. There is no limit to the number of extensions the Planning Commission may grant. 9. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, owner/applicant shall submit to the City a Notice of Restriction to be filed in the office of the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the City Planner, notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued a Minor Conditional Use Permit on the real property owned by the owner/applicant. Said Notice of Restriction shall note the property description, location of the file containing complete project details and all conditions of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of Restriction. The City Planner has the authority to execute and record an amendment to the notice, which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of good cause by the owner/applicant or successor in interest. 10. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within 18 months from the date of project approval. 11. Developer shall report, in writing, to the City Planner within 30 days, any address change from that which is shown on the permit application. 12. Developer/Operator shall comply with the Federal Communication Commission's guidelines on limits for human exposure to radio frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields. Within six (6) months after the issuance of occupancy, and with any time extension or amendment request, the Developer/Operator shall submit to the City Planner either (1) verification that the project is categorically excluded from having to determine compliance with the RF exposure guidelines per 47 CFR §1.1307(b)(l); or (2) a project implementation report which provides cumulative field measurements of RF emissions of all antennas installed at the subject site. The report shall quantify the RF emissions and compare the results with the exposure limits established by the FCC guidelines. Said report shall be subject to review and approval by the City Planner for consistency with the Project's preliminary report on RF exposure submitted with the initial project application and for consistency with the FCC guidelines. If, on review, the City finds that the Project does not meet the FCC guidelines, the City may revoke or modify this conditional use permit. II .. • • MCUP 13-06-VERIZON WIRELESS CALAVERA HILLS July 2, 2013 Page 5 13. Developer shall submit and obtain City Planner approval of a Final Landscape and Irrigation Plan showing conformance with the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan and the City's Landscape Manual. Developer shall construct and install all landscaping and irrigation as shown on the approved Final Plans. All landscaping shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. All irrigation systems shall be maintained to provide the optimum amount of water to the landscape for plant growth without causing soil erosion and runoff. Engineering: 14. Developer shall comply with the City's Stormwater Regulations, latest version, and shall implement best management practices at all times. Best management practices include but are not limited to pollution treatment practices or devices, erosion control to prevent silt runoff during construction, general housekeeping practices, pollution prevention and educational practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices or devices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to stormwater, receiving water or stormwater conveyance system to the maximum extent practicable. Developer shall notify prospective owners and tenants of the above requirements. Code Reminders: 15. The applicant shall comply with Chapter 11.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code for any encroachment or work proposed within the public right-of-way. The applicant shall obtain all permits prior to commencing work. 16. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein. 17. Premise identification (addresses) shall be provided consistent with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.04.320. NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. • MCUP 13-06-VERIZON WIRELESS CALAVERA HILLS July 2, 2013 Page 6 This decision may be appealed by you or any other member of the public to the Planning Commission within ten days of the date of this letter. Appeals must be submitted in writing to the Planning Division at 1635 Faraday Avenue in Carlsbad, along with a payment of $638.00. The filing of such appeal within such time limit shall stay the effective date of the order of the City Planner until such time as a final decision on the appeal is reached. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact Austin Silva at (760) 602-4631. Sincerely, CHRIS DeCERBO Principal Planner CD:AS:sm c: Don Neu, City Planner Michele Masterson, Senior Management Analyst liz Ketabian, Parks & Recreation Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner David Rick, Project Engineer File Copy DMS/Data Entry .. _.if~_A. C I T Y 0 F VcARLSBAD • • Community & Economic Development www.carlsbadca.gov June 27, 2013 Plancom, Inc. Karen Adler, Agent 302 State Place Escondido, CA 92029 SUBJECT: MCUP 13-06 -VERIZON WIRELESS CALAVERA HILLS-CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) APPLICABILITY/PROCESS DETERMINATION AND TARGET DECISION DATE CEQA Determination: This is to advise you that after reviewing the application for the project referenced above, the City has determined that the following environmental review process (pursuant to CEQA) will be required for the project: The project is exempt from the provisions of CEQA, pursuant to CEQA Categorical Exemption Section 15303-New Construction of Small Structures. No environmental review is required for the project. A Notice of Exemption will be filed after approval of the project with the San Diego County Clerk's Office which involves a filing fee. Please submit a check to the project planner in the amount of $50.00 made out to the San Diego County Clerk. The check should be submitted approximately one week prior to the City Planner decision date. Target Decision Date: In the interest of expeditiously processing your application consistent with the State Permit Streamlining Act (California Government Code Section 65950), an administrative decision to approve or deny the project should be determined by August 27,2013. Therefore, in the interest of achieving that decision date, all remaining project issues must be addressed by August 13, 2013. If all project issues are not resolved by the date listed above, you may formally request a one-time 90 day application extension. Otherwise, you will need to withdraw the application. For additional information related to this CEQA applicability/process determination or should you have any questions regarding an application extension or withdrawal, please contact Austin Silva at 760-602-4631 or by email at Austin.silva@carlsbadca.gov. Sincerely, DON NEU, AICP City Planner DN:AS:fn c: Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner David Rick, Project Engineer File Copy Planning Dl~iffitrv 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 ® _.if~A,. CITY OF VcARLSBAD • Community & Economic Development June 27, 2013 Plancom, Inc. Karen Adler, Agent 302 State Place Escondido, CA 92029 • SUBJECT: 1st REVIEW FOR MCUP 13-06-VERIZON WIRELESS CALAVERA HILLS www.carlsbadca.gov Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Division has reviewed your Minor Conditional Use Permit, application no. MCUP 13-06, as to its completeness for processing. The application is complete, as submitted. Although the initial processing of your application may have already begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by the date of this communication. The City may, in the course of processing the application, request that you clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the basic information required for the application. The Planning Division will begin processing your application as of the date of this communication. Sincerely, CHRIS DeCERBO Principal Planner CD:AS:fn c: Don Neu, City Planner David Rick, Project Engineer Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner File Copy Data Entry Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 (~~CITY Of ~~)!/CARLSBAD • Community & Economic Development May 16,2013 Pia ncom, Inc. Karen Adler, Agent 302 State Place Escondido, CA 92029 SUBJECT: CUP 12.03-VERIZON WIRELESS CALAVERA HILLS Dear Ms. Adler, FILE COFY www.carlsbadca.gov Your project was deemed complete on March 5, 2013. There are issues of concern with the project that remain to be resolved. The issues are listed on the attached page. All issues will need to be resolved prior to scheduling the project for a public hearing. Please contact me at {760) 602-4631, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, 1/d{.( Assistant Planner AS:bd c: City of Carlsbad, Joe Garuba, Municipal Property Manager Chris DeCerbo, Team Leader David Rick, Project Engineer File Copy Data Entry Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 CUP 12-03-VERIZON WIESS CALAVERA HILLS May 16,2013 Page 2 ISSUES OF CONCERN Parks and Recreation: 1. Please provide a copy of latest photo simulations. • 2. Please add a note to the plans that the City of Carlsbad Parks Maintenance Division is to be given 48 hours advance notice for any coordination on irrigation or other park related items or activities associated with construction. 3. Please incorporate the red lined changes in the plans regarding tree species replacement, and upsizing container sizes for shrubs and ground cover replacement. 4. Please revise the color of the access hatch so that it is a closer match to the slump stone. landscape: 1. Please wet sign and date the following statement on sheet L-2: "I am familiar with the requirements for landscape and irrigation plans contained in the city of Carlsbad's landscape manual and water efficient landscape regulations. I have prepared this plan in compliance with those regulations and the landscape manual and agree to comply with all requirements when submitting construction documents. I certify that the plan implements those regulations to provide efficient use of water." 2. Please show Myoporum ground covers to remain or to be installed new above the underground vault. See Sheet L-1. 3. RETURN REDLINES and provide 2 copies of all plans for the next review. • PLAN cow! Telecommunications Project Management April16, 2013 Austin Silva Project Planner City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: CUP 12-03 Verizon Wireless at Calavera Hills Dear Mr. Silva: • In response to your comment letters dated March 5 and March 11, 2013, we are submitting the following information for your review: March 5 letter: Planning: 1. Height of the retaining wall has been reduced to 6 feet. 2 -5. The landscape plans have been changed to address these comments. March llletter: Parks and Recreation: 1. The color and style of the block for the wall enclosure have been chosen to match the nearby bus stop materials. A color materials sample board is being provided for review by the Parks and Recreation Department. 2-4: Comments have been addressed on the plans. 5: A traffic control plan will be prepared and submitted during the building permit process. 6: No relocation of any signage is proposed. • Four new full size sets, and one 11x17 set of the revised drawings are included for your review. • Revised Photo Simulations are submitted for review. Please let me know if you need any additional information. We look forward to receiving notification of a hearing date. Thank you for your help with this project. Sincerely, -J11UUJ ajbJ Karen Adler Planner Contract Representative for Verizon Wireless Enclosures 302 State Place Escondido, CA 92029 760-715-3416 mobile 760-735-4913 fax . . -• , "'cu~ ~§-_V.ERIZON WCF CALAVERA HILlS ... MaKti S;jo13 Page2 ISSUES OF CONCERN Plan nina: 1. The maximum height of a retaining wall is six (6) feet. Please reduce the height of the retaining wall so that It complies with the standard. If increased wall height is to protect from fallins into vauJt area, consider addin1 fencing on top of wall. Are any access ptes proposed to ~P . people out ofthe vault area? do ~ ~ f"tU!t'J/S) · IIET61!T ~ TlJ ~ _.,., Landscape: 2. Please s~w the Myoporum ground cover symbof (Gl) below the proposed tree and shrubs. NJI{SitJ strr 4 . . . 3. The landscape Manual-~ that planting$ feature ground cover, shrubs, and trees to screen elements of unsightliness and screen/soften new improvements. Screening of the inside of the retainina wall is needed. Please coordinate Iowen I'li of the rear top of walt to no more than 3" above finish pade and provide . Rosmarlnus Prostratus ·at the outside back of the p~$ed retaining waif (1 pllon at 3' ·oh center) to grow over and cascade down the face of the waH to help soften the structure. Please also Install a wall vine (i.e. FiCus pumila, Boston Ivy, etc.) on each end of the wall {1 gallon size) to grow on the Inside wall surfaces. fJAW!t' $/IT'"' 4. Please address planting and irrigation repairs/replacement along the trench. Spedfy new ground cover to match adjacent existing ground covers along wtth appropriate 'notes to repair irrigation. fl 6/4 ~ t./ · 5. Please address replacement of plantings and irrigation between the sidewalk and the enclosure. I' r/td st-1 L. I Parb and Recreation: Comments from the Parks anct Reaeation Department are forthcomtns and wilt be sent t.mder a separate letter. · .. • CUP 12..()3-VERIZON WIRELESS CALAVERA HILLS March 11, 2013 Page2 ISSUES OF CONCERN This Jetter is a follow-up to my previous letter to you, dated March 5, 2013, In which Issues for the Conditional Use Permit application were identified. In addition to the items listed in my previous letter, Parks and Recreation Department's comments on your proposed project are as follows: Parks and Recreation: 1. Vault and Enclosure at carlsbad Vil!a&e prive -Vaultiilg all equipment underground as requested previously has been incorporated in the design. However, the visual Impacts of the wan endosure are so close to the bus -l>lli:JrT to a¥JtiPI'~· Sheet A·2 -The block for the retaining watfs should match the park stump tJ!ock or blend In more with the landscaping. Please provide a sample to Parks and Recreation prior to orderina for approval on the selected block for the retainins walls. tV(f. rtmJE' c~ tJ(/1 fHtF c~ ~ 7ffl' f'/JN.S ~ po "'e IJef!() n (>I!I.NDt T1tf$ 4LIIIt ~pl.e. ? 2. landscaP' sfope along cadsbld vrnase Drive -Add two additional bouealnvillea spectabllis at the top of the slope above the south side of the retatnin& wart. See also redlines on Sheet l-2. ~snr {...( 3. New ball field light ool!l -Placement of antennas and microwave dishes attached to the light standards and sports field lighting are acceptable as shown in the current submittal. Ot::- 4. Chain link fendng reconfiguration and replacement -The proposed reconf~guration of the fencing indicates the gate to allow for maintenance access for the new light standard and baH field lighting and the two 6' gate panels swing in towards the ball field and match the existing batf field fence height, so this is acceptable. Ojc:: 5. T@ffic Control Plan -The plans indicate that new utility trenchins will be done for the wireless communiCation facility on the slope alon& Carlsbad Village Drive as well as In the right, eastbound lane of carlsbad Village Drive and trenching across Glasgow Drive near the intersection of Carlsbad Village Drive, a silnalized intersectiOn. Please contact Traffic Engineering to verify the necessary right of way permits and trafflc control plans required by Traffic EngineerirlJ for the construction operations for the wireless communication facility. \K ~'~ ~ ftf. IQilVI~. 6. Bus stog location lnd street silnJse -If relocations are required for signage along the parkway In the vicinity of the wireless communication facility, please coordinate with the proper agency for relocations and show those relocations on the plans. fJC ('€l.alff"£~ IF ~bll5. • -------------------------------. _J~_A CITY OF ~'CARLSBAD • Community & Economic Development March 11, 2013 Plancom, Inc. Karen Adler, Agent 302 State Place Escondido, CA 92029 • SUBJECT: 2nd REVIEW FOR CUP 12-03-VERIZON WIRELESS CALAVERA HILLS www.carlsbadca.gov Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Division has reviewed your Conditional Use Permit, application no. CUP 12-03, as to its completeness for processing. The application is complete, as submitted. Although the initial processing of your application may have already begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by the date of this communication. The City may, in the course of processing the application, request that you clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the basic information required for the application. In addition, you should also be aware that various design issues may exist. These issues must be addressed before this application can be scheduled for a hearing. The Planning Division will begin processing your application as of the date of this communication. At this time, the City asks that you provide 4 complete sets of the development plans so that the project can continue to be reviewed. The Citv will complete the review of your resubmittal within 25 days. In order to expedite the processing of your application, you are strongly encouraged to contact your Staff Planner, Austin Silva, at (760) 602-4631, to discuss or to schedule a meeting to discuss your application and to completely understand this letter. You may also contact each commenting department individually as follows: • Parks and Recreation: Liz Ketabain, Park Planning Manager, at (760) 434-2978. Sincerely, CHRIS DeCERBO Principal Planner CD:AS:bd c: Joe Garuba, Municipal Property Manager Don Neu, City Planner David Rick, Project Engineer Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner File Copy Data Entry Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 • • CUP 12-03-VERIZON WIRELESS CALAVERA HILLS March 11, 2013 Page 2 ISSUES OF CONCERN This letter is a follow-up to my previous letter to you, dated March 5, 2013, in which issues for the Conditional Use Permit application were identified. In addition to the items listed in my previous letter, Parks and Recreation Department's comments on your proposed project are as follows: Parks and Recreation: 1. Vault and Enclosure at Carlsbad Village Drive -Vaulting all equipment underground as requested previously has been incorporated in the design. However, the visual impacts of the wall enclosure are still a concern as well as for security purposes having the new facility so close to the bus stop. Coordination with North County Transit District regarding the design is .strongly encouraged. Sheet A-2 -The block for the retaining walls should match the park slump block or blend in more with the landscaping. Please provide a sample to Parks and Recreation prior to ordering for approval on the selected block for the retaining walls. 2. Landscape slope along Carlsbad Village Drive -Add two additional bougainvillea spectabilis at the top of the slope above the south side of the retaining wall. See also red lines on Sheet L-2. 3. New ball field light pole -Placement of antennas and microwave dishes attached to the light standards and sports field lighting are acceptable as shown in the current submittal. 4. Chain link fencing reconfiguration and replacement -The proposed reconfiguration of the fencing indicates the gate to allow for maintenance access for the new light standard and ball field lighting and the two 6' gate panels swing in towards the ball field and match the existing ball field fence height, so this is acceptable. 5. Traffic Control Plan -The plans indicate that new utility trenching will be done for the wireless communication facility on the slope along Carlsbad Village Drive as well as in the right, eastbound lane of Carlsbad Village Drive and trenching across Glasgow Drive near the intersection of Carlsbad Village Drive, a signalized intersection. Please contact Traffic Engineering to verify the necessary right of way permits and traffic control plans required by Traffic Engineering for the construction operations for the wireless communication facility. 6. Bus stop location and street signage -If relocations are required for signage along the parkway in the vicinity of the wireless communication facility, please coordinate with the proper agency for relocations and show those relocations on the plans. • ,--------• ~cu__W~ ?> j 0) ~ J~A._ CITY OF VcARLSBAD • a FILE Community & Economic Development March 5, 2013 Plancom, Inc. Karen Adler, Agent 302 State Place Escondido, CA 92029 SUBJECT: 2nd REVIEW FOR CUP 12-03-VERIZON WIRELESS CALAVERA HILLS www.carlsbadca.gov Thank you for applying for land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Division has reviewed your Conditional Use Permit, application no. CUP 12-03, as to its completeness for processing. The items requested from you earlier to make your Conditionai"Use Permit, application no. CUP 12-03 complete have been received and reviewed by the Planning Division. It has been determined that the application is now complete for processing. Although the initial processing of your application may have already begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by the date of this communication. Please note that although the application is now considered complete, there may be issues that could be discovered during project review and/or environmental review. Any issues should be resolved prior to scheduling the project for public hearing. In addition, the City may request, in the course of processing the application, that you clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the basic information required for the application. At this time, the City asks that you provide 4 complete sets of the development plans so that the project can continue to be reviewed. The Citv will complete the review of your resubmittal within 25 days. In order to expedite the processing of your application, you are strongly encouraged to contact your Staff Planner, Austin Silva, at (760) 602-4631, to discuss or to schedule a meeting to discuss your application and to completely understand this letter. Sincerely, CHRIS DeCERBO Principal Planner CD:AS:bd c: Joe Garuba, Municipal Property Manager Don Neu, City Planner David Rick, Project Engineer Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner File Copy Data Entry Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 • • CUP 12-03-VERIZON WCF CALAVERA HILLS March 5, 2013 Page 2 ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. The maximum height of a retaining wall is six (6) feet. Please reduce the height of the retaining wall so that it complies with the standard. If increased wall height is to protect from falling into vault area, consider adding fencing on top of wall. Are any access gates proposed to keep people out of the vault area? Landscape: 2. Please show the Myoporum ground cover symbol (G1) below the proposed tree and shrubs. 3. The Landscape Manual requires that plantings feature ground cover, shrubs, and trees to screen elements of unsightliness and screen/soften new improvements. Screening of the inside of the retaining wall is needed. Please coordinate lowering of the rear top of wall to no more than 3" above finish grade and provide Rosmarinus Prostratus at the outside back of the proposed retaining wall (1 gallon at 3' on center) to grow over and cascade down the face of the wall to help soften the structure. Please also install a wall vine (i.e. Ficus pumila, Boston Ivy, etc.) on each end of the wall (1 gallon size) to grow on the inside wall surfaces. 4. Please address planting and irrigation repairs/replacement along the trench. Specify new ground cover to match adjacent existing ground covers along with appropriate notes to repair irrigation. 5. Please address replacement of plantings and irrigation between the sidewalk and the enclosure. Parks and Recreation: Comments from the Parks and Recreation Department are forthcoming and will be sent under a separate letter. • • PLAN cow! Telecommunications Project Management February 1, 2013 City of Carlsbad Planning Division Attn: Austin Silva 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 RECEIVED FEB 0 5 2013 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION RE: Review of CUP 12-03 Verizon WCF Calavera Hills Dear Mr. Silva: In response to the City's comment letter dated May 9, 2012, Verizon will be able to comply with the majority of the comments provided in the initial review letter; however, the comments pose significant issues. Planning Comment #1: Verizon spent a considerable amount of time working with Joe Gamba and the Parks Department in finding a location and design that was acceptable. The current design of an underground vault, along with the location in the landscaping along Carlsbad Village Drive. was determined primarily at the request of the City. Verizon has tried several times to move the equipment up onto the field away from Carlsbad Village Drive, but the Parks Department has denied this request each time. The City further commented that they would like the vault hatch moved away from Carlsbad Village Drive and that they would also want a reduction in the size of the retaining wall. However, as mentioned above, Verizon's only option is to do an underground equipment vault in this location. Verizon could possibly move the vault location further up the embankment and away from Carlsbad Village Drive. However, this would require an increase in the size and height of the retaining wall. The current retaining wall is required to protect the vault hatches and to keep water from draining down the hill into the vault. This is a common problem that occurs with Vaults that are not protected by walls. Verizon loses millions of dollars of equipment during heavy rains. Park Department #1: The Parks Department was instrumental in Verizon's design and location. The Parks Department was provided with Photo Sims and plans to review before Verizon formally submitted to Planning. The current design does not have any above ground equipment. The only above ground elements are the vault hatch and the retaining wall. Verizon was very clear with the Parks 302 State Place Escondido, CA 92029 760-715-3416 mobile 760-735-4913 fax • PLAN cow! Telecommunications Project Management Department regarding the above ground aspects of the vault hatch and required retaining wall. The design presented in the plans is the most minimalistic footprint that Verizon can accommodate. Engineering Comment #2: All underground vaults will take on some amount of ground water over time despite best installation efforts. The sump pump is in place to discharge this ground water. The vault contains radio equipment necessary to operate the antennas in order to transmit and receive signals. The vault equipment contains sealed gel-type batteries that are designed not to leak fluid or leach into the water. New plans reflecting responses to other comments in the letter are included with this submittal, along with a response letter from the architect. Please let us know if you have any additional comments. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, ~fbkJ Karen Adler Planner Contract Representative for Verizon Wireless Enclosures 302 State Place Escondido, CA 92029 760-715-3416 mobile 760-735-4913 fax Planning Division May9, 2012 Plancom, Inc. Karen Adler, Agent 302 State Place Escondido, CA 92029 • SUBJECT: 1ST REVIEW FOR CUP 12-03-VERIZON WCF CALAVERA HILLS PARIC www.carlsbadca.gov Thank you for applyif1B for land use Permits in the City of carlsbad. The Planning Division has reviewed your Conditional Use Permit. application no. CUP 12-03, as to its completeness for processing. The application is compiete, as submitted. Although the initial processing of your application may have alrea4y begun, the technical acceptance date is ac:knowledged by the date of this communication. lbe City may, in the course of processing the application, request that you clarify, amplify, correct or otherwise supplement the basic infonnation required for the application. In addition, you should also be aware that various design issues may exist. These issues must be addressed before this application can be scheduled for a hearing. The PlanninS Division will begin processing your application as of the date of this communication. At this time, the City asks that you provide four (4) complete sets of the development plarr.; so that the project can continue to be reviewed. The atv wiU COmPlete tbe review of your re5Ubmlttal within 25 !IDh In order to expedite the processing of your application, you are strongly encouraged to contact your Staff Planner, Dan Halverson, at (760) 602-4631, to discuss or to schedule a meeting to discuss your application and to mmpletely understand this letter. You may also contact each commenting department lndividuaUy as folows: • Land Development E~neering Division: David Rick, Associate Engineer, at (760) 602-2781 • Parks and Recreation, Parks Department: Uz Ketabian, Park Planner, at (760) 434-2978 Sincerely, "' ., c~ li.Gt1 atRIS DeCERBO Principal Planner CO:DH:bd c: Joe G•ruba, Municipal Property Man.pr Don Neu. City Planner David Rk:lr. Project EnaJneer Chris DI!Cerbo, Principal Planner FHeCopy Data Entry 1635 Faraday Avenue, carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 CUP 12.03-VERIZON WCF CALAVERA HILLS PARK May9,2012 Page2 ISSUES OF CONCERN Planntnc: 1. Staff does not support the equipment cabinet being located adjacent to carlsbad VHiase Drive. tf the equipment Is to be vaulted and undersroundedl a superior design would be to locate the vault further away from Carlsbad VIllage Drive. Please redesign and minimize the amount of retaining walls viewed from the public streets with landscapinS and work with the slope and not ontopofit. JtleT Afft-'C4\a&£ .S.f.G.. tc.6fo"'~ ~ ~ 2. On the ·plans. please describe the materials and colors of the equipment enclosure. The type of materials and colors should match other existing buildings and similar structures on site. $£e. SI4£ET A .. , NoTE# tS -tca.oR~~ o., st~Ens Jt-o;tlt·l E~t~ineerina: Land Development Engineering has completed a review of the above-referenced project for completeness and enSineering issues of concern. All Items needed for engineering review are provided for detennlnlng the application as complete. Engineering issues which need to be resolved or adequately addressed prior to staff making a determination on the proposed project are as follows: 1. Ust sradins quantities in cubic yard$ on the site plan. SEE ~IWMtiG ~..mTIES .SHEET A-o.) 2. 3. Please clarify the design and purpose of the proposed sump pump. Is the sump pump proposed within the undersround controlled environment vault? Is It designed with sealant to prevent water leakase into the vault and therefore the pump is intended for discharging leaked flood water or is it anticipated that the underground vault will cootinuously accept water that will need to continuously be discharged? What type of equipment will be placed In the underground vault? Identify any hazardous or toxic components from the stored equipment (lead, oil, mercury, etc.) that could leach into the water. ~ f~,.._,h i., ~lf..e.r /~ Retum all red-line prints with resubmittal. Lanclscapina cormMtnts: Please make the following corrections to the plans so that they will meet the requirem~nts of the City of carlsbad's Landscape Manual. The numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of the comment concern. 1. Generaly Identify all eldsting woody plant material to be removed or retained. Trees over u• in caliper diameter shaH be Identified on the plan Individually as to caliper size and type and labeled to be retained or removed. .see -'HE&t.S &..-t +L-~ 2. Please Identify the proposed tree (scientifiC and common names alons with proposed size to be planted). 5EE $t!£E'l.S t..-1 -1 L-;> 3. landscaping consisting of ground cover, shNbs, and trees shall be used to screen elements of unstshtliness and screen/soften new Improvements. Please provide evergreen saeen shrubs on the east and west sides of the retaining wall enclosure. .SCe .5H6£r L--1 • CUP 12-03-VERIZON WCF CALAVERA HILLS PARK May9,2012 Page3 4. Please address planting of the vault area. It is assumed that landscaplns wfiJ be removed/damaged and will need to be replaced. Please specify ground covers and shrubs to be used and indicate spacing of ground covers and quantities of shrubs. Please note that landscaping shall be compatible with adjacent landscape. Please also address replacement/repalrstotheexistlnsirriptionsystem.s. S'e. $H!fT.S. t.·I'IJ ,_ .. ~. •e! ~R ~tUtUIWIWt.ot-1 t(clf&:.;fi'Jo.. 5. Planting on slopes shall meet the slope re-vegetation requirements of the Landscape Manual. Please add the foJJowing notes to the plans and address how these requirements will be met: .SIE A&.Gf~E. ~\llrt:E'P\llo..C ~E«ul~ NGI"E".S llf»IU) ~-'IIU.Tt.-3> lopes 6:1 or steeper requiring erosion control measures as specified herein shaD be treated with one or more of the following planting standards: a. Standard 1-Cover Crop/Reinforced Straw Matting: Cover crop shall be a seed mix typically made up of quick germinating and fast covering grasses, dovers, and/or wild flowers. Submit the specific seed mix for CJty approval prior to application. The cover crop shall be applied at a rate and manner sufficient to provide~ cove~ within thirty (30) days. l\tpe of reinforced straw mattlng shall be as approved bV the City and staked to the slope as recommended by the manufacturer. Reinforced straw rnatti,. shaD be required when planting occurs between August 15 and AprillS. The cover crop and/or reinforced straw mat shall be used the remainder of the year. b. Standard #2-Ground Cover One hundred (100%) percent of the area shall be planted with a ground cover known to have exceltent soil binding characteristics (planted from a minimum size of flatted material and spaced to provide full coverage within one year). c. Standard 113-Low Shrubs Low spreading woody shrubs (planted from a minimum of 2-3/4 inch liners) shall cover a minimum of seventy (7m6) percent of the slope face (at mature size). d. Standard #4-Trees and/or Large Shrubs Trees and/or large shrubs shal be (planted from a minimum of 1 gallon containers) at a minimum rate of one {1) per two hundred (200) square feet. Slopes-6:1 or steeper and: a. 3' or less in vertical height and are adjacent to public walks or streets require at minimum Standard #1. b. 3' to 8' in vertical height requke Standards #1, #2 and #3. c. In excess of 8' In vertical height require Standards #1. #2, #3, and #4. Areas graded flatter than 6:1 require Standard #1 (cover aop) with temporary Irrigation when they have one or more of the following conditions: a. Sheet graded pads not scbeduled for improvements within 6 months of completion of rough grading. b. A potential erosion problem as detennined by the City. c. Identified by the City as highly visible areas to the public or have special conditions that warrant Immediate treatment. • • CUP 12-03 -VERIZON WCF CALAVERA HILLS PARK May9, 2012 Page4 6. PnMde a plant palette list indicating the following: a. Tree types and quantities b. Shrub types and quantities (approximate) c. Ground cover types d. Proposed plant sizes (either by number or" of total quantity) $£E. Pt'Wtt~ t.E'Utlb $fiiJEl" ,. .. ~ 7. Include a statement on the landscape plans signed by the qualified professional that states: "I am famiHar with the requirements for landscape and Irrigation plans contained in the dty of CorlsiJafrs landscape manual and water efficient landscape regulations. I have prepared this plan In compliance with those regulations and the landscape manual and agree to comply with all requlrmrents when submitting construction documents. I r:ertify that the pion implements thmeregulationstoprovideeflldentuseofwater.• R~ Hit£ lb.SH££7 t.~• 8. Outline the areas of landscape maintenance responsibilities (private, common area/homeowners' association, City, etc.). ;Sf:E Be,. MOT~ ,.r ISofr~ oF SHE£T ~-I 9. R!TURN REDUNES and prmrlde 2 copies of aJI plans for the next review •. Parks Department Comments: Partes and Recreation staff has reviewed the plans for the proposed Verizon WCF at calavera Hills Park and has the following concerns which should be addressed with following resubmittals: 1. As designed, the proposed structure along Carlsbad Village Drive wUI distract from the enhanced visual enjoyment of the parkway and perimeter park landscaping. Therefore, vaulting all equipment undersround will be required in the design to allow for the continuation of the intended character of the parkway and the preseMition of the existing landscaping improvements to the greatest extent possible. Cutting into the stope and creating more of an underground vault Is a preferred alternative to above ground walls to crea~ a better vJsual enhancement. tc•1 f\lft,.lct.e.&£ Above ground equipment enclosures (i.e. the proposed retalnJng walt) shall be of the smallest dimension possible that technology allows. A maximum size of 100 square feet will only be considered if the equipment endosure is appropriately and completely screened subject to approval by the Partes and Recreation Department. folclr API'&.I~ i'L£ · 2. The building materials and colors for the enclosure shall match the existing architecture of the park and an attempts shall be made to blend the enclosure into the parkway and parte setting. All conaete split-face block materials shall be approved by Parks and Recreation Department and shall receive a graffiti coatins. Provide a note on the plans that •a sample of the proposed block is to be submitted to Parks and Recreation Department for apprDVBI, prior to ordering all remaining materials for the retaining wall: ~ ~ sf'Ec, ,.,di'F.S t>l'l.C~IJ ~~-:l 3. LandscaPing of the sloDe. In addition to mature trees, the existing landscaped slope areas are covered with shrubs and sroundcover. The current plans indicate replacing one tree to be removed. per sheet A-1, while the note on sheet A-0.1, Enlarged Site Plan, indicates that two new trees are being proposed. Please Indicate with resubmittal where the other tree Is proposed for planting as well as replacements for shrubbery and groundcover that will be «f"5Eb tcol'£ o,.r sttliET A-o.f. ot&L~ otlt:. ~iS. fl.po5eJ) To ~fPLAGE ~,«afol& Tkf.1fiAT'.PIW..i!E ~~"e1>· • CUP 12-Q3-VERIZON WCF CALAVERA HILLS PARK May9,2012 PaReS 4. 5. 6. 7. distributed In the 3' zone around the vault area. The areas of slope where trenching for a new cable (from vault to new rflht polet wiH also require plant material replacement. Indicate the quantity, sizes, and species for the replacement plantings. Provide a note on the plans •that all plant materials shall be inspected and approved by Parks and Recreation Department prior to final planting on the slope". "£ .stfUTS ,c.. .. J +Lw~. RE fi.Jt..tnfllti J(Olt: 'II-Q -" ~lt!!'t L-;). The proposed reconfisuration of the chain link fence requires a gate to allow for maintenance access for the new light standard and baH field lighting. Indicate on the plans (see red-lines on sheet A-1 for preferred gate location) and provide a 12' wide (2 six foot gate panels to swing towards the ball field) chain link gates to match the existing ball field fence height. ~ :U~Dr A-1 ltlo'fE 'II, Tl"llfftc Control Plans -The plans indicate that a new utility trerK:h will be done for the WCF on the slope and along carlsbad Vilage Drive eastbound lane, as well as trenching across Glasgow Drive near the signalized Intersection. Please contact Traffic Engineering to verify the necessary riSht of way permits and traffic oontrol ~lans required for the construction. TilMf:'t< ~ tt.MS wfi.L. 11£.Su~~ Wtnl ~Ruc.Ttofl bft,.wtNG.S Pfl*of:TfJI'bU.r#ft;~rt. Bus 5too Location and street slgnage-Please Indicate the nearest bus stop location on the plans along with associated signage. If a relocation Is required for the sisnage and bus stop due to the J»roximlty of the WCF vault please coordinate with NCTD for relocation and show on the plans. ~" ~!! . ._dno" ~F :ra:nro~G-.u$ ~-n'E S\6folS of'l.sf«E&T A-o.r. SEE "'GTb ~touTE' "q if ~.,: .Stl51&1'. .(,. ' itionaf Notes requir on 'the plans -Please add these notes on sheet A-Q.1 "Sidewalks, povements, landscaping, and other eJdstlng parkway and pork Improvements damaged 01' disturbed during installation, maintfmance tx remaval of the WCF shaH be restored to original condition by the provider and shaN receive appi'CNDI by the City and/or Parks and Recreation Department prior to occupancy of the WCF tx prior to termination of the lease. • "'When removal of exlsffng plant material is required {or installation of an approved WCF, the Provider .shall be responsible for replacing any damaged plant material with the largest practical or available size of the same species. Replacement plant material shall be approved by the City and/or Porks and ReaeOtlon Department prior to occupancy of the WCF or prior to termination of the lease." "WCF Provider fs responsible for all utility and any other lnddental costs a55oclated with the installation, operation, mointenanc:e, and/or removal of the WCF." .S££ PAtrK ~~•.aT fofot£S ,U,L\EJ) ro.5-~t~a A-o.l Austin Silva From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Hi Austin, • Karen Adler < karen.adler@plancominc.com > Wednesday, September 26, 2012 10:09 AM Austin Silva 'Brent-Plancom Inc' RE: CUP 12-03 Calvera Hills Park • If you'd like to check with Joe Garuba about the status of his review, he would be able to give you a better time line for when we would have the OK to resubmit. Thanks, karen -----Original Message----- From: Karen Adler [mailto:karen.adler@plancominc.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 9:27AM To: 'Austin Silva' Cc: 'Brent -Plancom Inc' Subject: RE: CUP 12-03 Calvera Hills Park Hi Austin, This is the project at the Calvera Hills Park. Yes, the project is still active. We met with the City on site last week, and are redesigning the equipment area. Photosims have been submitted to the Parks Department for review and approval prior to resubmittal to the City. I hope to have something back to you in a couple of weeks. Sorry for the delay. Karen Adler PlanCom, Inc. 302 State Place Escondido, CA 92029 760-715-3416 760-735-4913 fax -----Original Message----- From: Austin Silva [mailto:Austin.Silva@carlsbadca.gov] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 8:37AM To: 'Karen Adler (karen.adler@plancominc.com)' Subject: CUP 12-03 Karen, 1 have another project of yours that hasn't had any movement in a quite a while. It's CUP 12-03, proposal from Verizon to construct a light pole with a new WCF at 2997 Glasgow Drive. Can you let me know if they are going forward with this application, or will it be withdrawn? Thank you, 1 Austin Silva, AICP Assistant Planner City of Carlsbad P: 760-602-4631 • • 2 .. "· I' --------------------------------;:----------, NH~c\ Cj I 10 l '1'1- _4~.A,. C I T Y 0 F VcARLSBAD • FlLE COPY • Planning Division May9,2012 www.carlsbadca.gov Plancom, Inc. Karen Adler, Agent 302 State Place Escondido, CA 92029 SUBJECT: 1ST REVIEW FOR CUP 12-03-VERIZON WCF CALAVERA HILLS PARK Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Division has reviewed your Conditional Use Permit, application no. CUP 12-03, as to its completeness for processing. The application is compiete, as submitted. Although the initial processing of your application may have already begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by the date of this communication. The City may, in the course of processing the application, request that you clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the basic information required for the application. In addition, you should also be aware that various design issues may exist. These issues must be addressed before this application can be scheduled for a hearing. The Planning Division will begin processing your application as of the date of this communication. At this time, the City asks that you provide four (4) complete sets of the development plans so that the project can continue to be reviewed. The Citv will complete the review of your resubmittal within 25 days. In order to expedite the processing of your application, you are strongly encouraged to contact your Staff Planner, Dan Halverson, at (760) 602-4631, to discuss or to schedule a meeting to discuss your application and to completely understand this letter. You may also contact each commenting department individually as follows: • Land Development Engineering Division: David Rick, Associate Engineer, at (760) 602-2781 • Parks and Recreation, Parks Department: Liz Ketabian, Park Planner, at (760) 434-2978 Sincerely, ~11~ CHRIS DeCERBO Principal Planner CD:DH:bd c: Joe Garuba, Municipal Property Manager Don Neu, City Planner David Rick, Project Engineer Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner File Copy Data Entry 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 ® • • CUP 12-03-VERIZON WCF CALAVERA HILLS PARK May9,2012 Page 2 ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. Staff does not support the equipment cabinet being located adjacent to Carlsbad Village Drive. If the equipment is to be vaulted and undergrounded, a superior design would be to locate the vault further away from Carlsbad Village Drive. Please redesign and minimize the amount of retaining walls viewed from the public streets with landscaping and work with the slope and not on top of it. 2. On the plans, please describe the materials and colors of the equipment enclosure. The type of materials and colors should match other existing buildings and similar structures on site. Engineering: Land Development Engineering has completed a review of the above-referenced project for completeness and engineering issues of concern. All items needed for engineering review are provided for determining the application as complete. Engineering issues which need to be resolved or adequately addressed prior to staff making a determination on the proposed project are as follows: 1. List grading quantities in cubic yards on the site plan. 2. Please clarify the design and purpose of the proposed sump pump. Is the sump pump proposed within the underground controlled environment vault? Is it designed with sealant to prevent water leakage into the vault and therefore the pump is intended for discharging leaked flood water or is it anticipated that the underground vault will continuously accept water that will need to continuously be discharged? What type of equipment will be placed in the underground vault? Identify any hazardous or toxic components from the stored equipment (lead, oil, mercury, etc.) that could leach into the water. 3. Return all red-line prints with resubmittal. Landscaping comments: Please make the following corrections to the plans so that they will meet the requirements of the City of Carlsbad's Landscape Manual. The numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of the comment concern. 1. Generally identify all existing woody plant material to be removed or retained. Trees over 12" in caliper diameter shall be identified on the plan individually as to caliper size and type and labeled to be retained or removed. 2. Please identify the proposed tree (scientific and common names along with proposed size to be planted). 3. Landscaping consisting of ground cover, shrubs, and trees shall be used to screen elements of unsightliness and screen/soften new improvements. Please provide evergreen screen shrubs on the east and west sides of the retaining wall enclosure. '" . .1 ,---------------------------------------------------------------, • • CUP 12-03-VERIZON WCF CALAVERA HILLS PARK May 9, 2012 Page 3 4. Please address planting of the vault area. It is assumed that landscaping will be removed/damaged and will need to be replaced. Please specify ground covers and shrubs to be used and indicate spacing of ground covers and quantities of shrubs. Please note that landscaping shall be compatible with adjacent landscape. Please also address replacement/repairs to the existing irrigation systems. 5. Planting on slopes shall meet the slope re-vegetation requirements of the Landscape Manual. Please add the following notes to the plans and address how these requirements will be met: Slopes 6:1 or steeper requiring erosion control measures as specified herein shall be treated with one or more of the following planting standards: a. Standard 1-Cover Crop/Reinforced Straw Matting: Cover crop shall be a seed mix typically made up of quick germinating and fast covering grasses, clovers, and/or wild flowers. Submit the specific seed mix for City approval prior to application. The cover crop shall be applied at a rate and manner sufficient to provide 90% coverage within thirty (30) days. Type of reinforced straw matting shall be as approved by the city and staked to the slope as recommended by the manufacturer. Reinforced straw matting shall be required when planting occurs between August 15 and April 15. The cover crop and/or reinforced straw mat shall be used the remainder of the year. b. Standard #2-Ground Cover One hundred (100%) percent of the area shall be planted with a ground cover known to have excellent soil binding characteristics (planted from a minimum size of flatted material and spaced to provide full coverage within one year). c. Standard #3 -low Shrubs low spreading woody shrubs (planted from a minimum of 2-3/4 inch liners) shall cover a minimum of seventy (70%) percent of the slope face (at mature size). d. Standard #4-Trees and/or Large Shrubs Trees and/or large shrubs shall be (planted from a minimum of 1 gallon containers) at a minimum rate of one (1) per two hundred (200) square feet. Slopes-6:1 or steeper and: a. 3' or less in vertical height and are adjacent to public walks or streets require at minimum Standard #1. b. 3' to 8' in vertical height require Standards #1, #2 and #3. c. In excess of 8' in vertical height require Standards #1, #2, #3, and #4. Areas graded flatter than 6:1 require Standard #1 (cover crop) with temporary irrigation when they have one or more of the following conditions: a. Sheet graded pads not scheduled for improvements within 6 months of completion of rough grading. b. A potential erosion problem as determined by the City. c. Identified by the City as highly visible areas to the public or have special conditions that warrant immediate treatment. • • CUP 12-03-VERIZON WCF CALAVERA HILLS PARK May 9, 2012 Page4 6. Provide a plant palette list indicating the following: a. Tree types and quantities b. Shrub types and quantities (approximate) c. Ground cover types d. Proposed plant sizes (either by number or% oftotal quantity) 7. Include a statement on the landscape plans signed by the qualified professional that states: "/ am familiar with the requirements for landscape and irrigation plans contained in the city of Carlsbad's landscape manual and water efficient landscape regulations. I have prepared this plan in compliance with those regulations and the landscape manual and agree to comply with all requirements when submitting construction documents. I certify that the plan implements those regulations to provide efficient use of water." 8. Outline the areas of landscape maintenance responsibilities (private, common area/homeowners' association, City, etc.). 9. RETURN REDLINES and provide 2 copies of all plans for the next review. Parks Department Comments: Parks and Recreation staff has reviewed the plans for the proposed Verizon WCF at Calavera Hills Park and has the following concerns which should be addressed with following resubmittals: 1. As designed, the proposed structure along Carlsbad Village Drive will distract from the enhanced visual enjoyment of the parkway and perimeter park landscaping. Therefore, vaulting all equipment underground will be required in the design to allow for the continuation of the intended character of the parkway and the preservation of the existing landscaping improvements to the greatest extent possible. Cutting into the slope and creating more of an underground vault is a preferred alternative to above ground walls to create a better visual enhancement. Above ground equipment enclosures (i.e. the proposed retaining wall) shall be of the smallest dimension possible that technology allows. A maximum size of 100 square feet will only be considered if the equipment enclosure is appropriately and completely screened subject to approval by the Parks and Recreation Department. 2. The building materials and colors for the enclosure shall match the existing architecture of the park and all attempts shall be made to blend the enclosure into the parkway and park setting. All concrete split-face block materials shall be approved by Parks and Recreation Department and shall receive a graffiti coating. Provide a note on the plans that "a sample of the proposed block is to be submitted to Parks and Recreation Department for approval, prior to ordering all remaining materials for the retaining wall." 3. landscaping of the slope. In addition to mature trees, the existing landscaped slope areas are covered with shrubs and groundcover. The current plans indicate replacing one tree to be removed, per sheet A-1, while the note on sheet A-0.1, Enlarged Site Plan, indicates that two new trees are being proposed. Please indicate with resubmittal where the other tree is proposed for planting as well as replacements for shrubbery and groundcover that will be .I • • CUP 12-03-VERIZON WCF CALAVERA HILLS PARK May 9, 2012 Page 5 distributed in the 3' zone around the vault area. The areas of slope where trenching for a new cable (from vault to new light pole) will also require plant material replacement. Indicate the quantity, sizes, and species for the replacement plantings. Provide a note on the plans "that all plant materials shall be inspected and approved by Parks and Recreation Department prior to final planting on the slope". 4. The proposed reconfiguration of the chain link fence requires a gate to allow for maintenance access for the new light standard and ball field lighting. Indicate on the plans (see red-lines on sheet A-1 for preferred gate location) and provide a 12' wide (2 six foot gate panels to swing towards the ball field) chain link gates to match the existing ball field fence height. 5. Traffic Control Plans -The plans indicate that a new utility trench will be done for the WCF on the slope and along Carlsbad Village Drive eastbound lane, as well as trenching across Glasgow Drive near the signalized intersection. Please contact Traffic Engineering to verify the necessary right of way permits and traffic control plans required for the construction. 6. Bus Stop Location and street signage-Please indicate the nearest bus stop location on the plans along with associated signage. If a relocation is required for the signage and bus stop due to the proximity of the WCF vault please coordinate with NCTD for relocation and show on the plans. 7. Additional Notes required on the plans -Please add these notes on sheet A-0.1 "Sidewalks, pavements, landscaping, and other existing parkway and park improvements damaged or disturbed during installation, maintenance or removal of the WCF shall· be restored to original condition by the provider and shall receive approval by the City and/or Parks and Recreation Department prior to occupancy of the WCF or prior to termination of the lease." "When removal of existing plant material is required for installation of an approved WCF, the Provider shall be responsible for replacing any damaged plant material with the largest practical or available size of the same species. Replacement plant material shall be approved by the City and/or Parks and Recreation Department prior to occupancy of the WCF or prior to termination of the lease." "WCF Provider is responsible for all utility and any other incidental costs associated with the installation, operation, maintenance, and/or removal of the WCF." • • PLAN cow! Telecommunications Project Management February 1, 2013 City of Carlsbad Planning Division Attn: Austin Silva 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 RECEIVED FEB 0 5 2013 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION RE: Review of CUP 12-03 Verizon WCF Calavera Hills Dear Mr. Silva: In response to the City's comment letter dated May 9, 2012, Verizon will be able to comply with the majority of the comments provided in the initial review letter; however, the comments pose significant issues. Planning Comment #1: Verizon spent a considerable amount of time working with Joe Gamba and the Parks Department in finding a location and design that was acceptable. The current design of an underground vault, along with the location in the landscaping along Carlsbad Village Drive. was determined primarily at the request of the City. Verizon has tried several times to move the equipment up onto the field away from Carlsbad Village Drive, but the Parks Department has denied this request each time. The City further commented that they would like the vault hatch moved away from Carlsbad Village Drive and that they would also want a reduction in the size of the retaining wall. However, as mentioned above, Verizon's only option is to do an underground equipment vault in this location. Verizon could possibly move the vault location further up the embankment and away from Carlsbad Village Drive. However, this would require an increase in the size and height of the retaining wall. The current retaining wall is required to protect the vault hatches and to keep water from draining down the hill into the vault. This is a common problem that occurs with Vaults that are not protected by walls. Verizon loses millions of dollars of equipment during heavy rains. Park Department #1: The Parks Department was instrumental in Verizon's design and location. The Parks Department was provided with Photo Sims and plans to review before Verizon formally submitted to Planning. The current design does not have any above ground equipment. The only above ground elements are the vault hatch and the retaining wall. Verizon was very clear with the Parks 302 State Place Escondido, CA 92029 760-715-3416 mobile 760-735-4913 fax ... • • PLAN co~! Telecommunications Project Management Department regarding the above ground aspects of the vault hatch and required retaining wall. The design presented in the plans is the most minimalistic footprint that Verizon can accommodate. Engineering Comment #2: All underground vaults will take on some amount of ground water over time despite best installation efforts. The sump pump is in place to discharge this ground water. The vault contains radio equipment necessary to operate the antennas in order to transmit and receive signals. The vault equipment contains sealed gel-type batteries that are designed not to leak fluid or leach into the water. New plans reflecting responses to other comments in the letter are included with this submittal, along with a response letter from the architect. Please let us know if you have any additional comments. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, ~ilJLJ Karen Adler Planner Contract Representative for Verizon Wireless Enclosures 302 State Place Escondido, CA 92029 760-715-3416 mobile 760-735-4913 fax .. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ~CARLSBAD Planning Division May9,2012 Plancom, Inc. Karen Adler, Agent 302 State PIKe Escondido, CA 92029 SUBJECT: 1ST REVIEW FOR CUP 12-CB-VERIZON WCF CALAVERA HILLS PARK www.carlsbadca.gov Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Car1sbad. The Planning Division has reviewed your Conditional Use Permit. application no. CUP 12-03, as to its completeness for processing. The application Is complete, as submitted. Atthough the Initial processing of your application may have alreac,iy begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by the date of this communication. Tbe City may, in the course of processing the appfication, request that you clarify, amplify, correct or otherwise supplement the basic information required for the application. In addition, you should also be aware that various design issues may exist. These issues must be addressed before this application can be scheduled for a hearing. The Planning Division will begin processing your application as of the date ofthiscommunicatlon. At this time, the City asks that you provide four (4) complete sets of the development plans so that the project can continue to be reviewed. The Oty w1U c;omplete the review of your resubmlttal within Z5 !lint In order to expedite the processing of your application, you are strongly encouraged to contact your Staff Planner, Dan Halverson, at (760) 602-4631, to discuss or to schedule a meeting to discuss your application and to completely understand this letter. You may also contact each commenting department Individually as follows: • Land Development Engineering Division: David Rick, Associate Engineer, at (760) 602-2781 • Parks and Recreation, Parks Department: Uz Ketabian. Park Planner, at (760) 434-2978 Sincerely, ~})~ OIRIS DeCERBO Principal Planner CD:OH:bd c: Joe Giiruba, hb!lc:lpal Property Manapr Don Neu. City PIN!ner David Rick, Project EnsJneer Chris DI!Cerbo, Prtnclpal Planner File Copy Data Entry 1635 Faraday Avenue, carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 ----~ • • CUP 12.03-VERIZON WCF CALAVERA HI US PARK May9,2012 Page2 ISSUES OF CONCERN Plannlnc: 1. Staff does not support the equipment cabinet being located adjacent to Carlsbad Village Drive. If the equipment Is to be vaulted and undergrounded, a superior design would be to locate the vault further away from Carlsbad VIllage Drive. Please redesign and minimize the amount of retaining walls viewed from the public streets with landscaping and work with the slope and not ontopofit. tJoT Affl-''"~ 5LC,... ~ft~~-1~ ~IIV' Jc,.tttr 2. On the·plans. please describe the materials and colors of the equipment enclosure. The type of materials and colors :should match other existing buildings and similar structures on site. $££. St4£ET A~ I NoTE # IS 't Cce.ofl..s;.ltt:c$ 0~ .Sffe&TS 11~-; #ll·l. Ert~ineerins: Land Development Engineering has completed a review of the above-referenced project for completeness and engineering Issues of concern. All Items needed for engineering review are provided for determining the application as complete. Engineering issues which need to be resolved or adequately addressed prior to staff maklns a determination on the proposed project are as follows: 1. List grading quantities in cubic yards on the site plan. sn GIW:wtiG Qo.lfl..mTIES SHEer A-o.) 2. Please clarify the design and purpose of the proposed sump pump. Is the sump pump proposed within the undersround controlled environment vault? Is It designed with sealant to prevent water leakage into the vault and therefore the pump is intended for discharging leaked flood water or is it anticipated that the underground vault will continuously accept water that will need to continuously be discharged? What type of equipment will be placed in the underground vault? Identify any hazardous or toxic components from the stored equipment (lead, oil, mercury, etc.) that could leach into the water. ~ fV~r4flh ;, ~ll.c.r /~ 3. Retum all red-line prints with resubmlttal. Please make the following corrections to the plans so that they will meet the requirements of the City of Carlsbad's Landscape Manual. The numbers below are referenced on the red Hne plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of the comment concern. 1. Generaly Identify all eldsting woody plant material to be removed or retained. Trees over 12" in caliper diameter shall be Identified on the plan Individually as to caliper size and type and labeled to be retained or removed. SE'e ~ HEE.l.S &.~t+ L ~a.. 2. Please ldenttfY the proposed tree (scientifiC and common names along with proposed size to be planted). SEE &ti£E~ /..-1-lt..~~ 1. landscaping consisting of ground cover, shNbs, and trees shall be used to screen elements of unsightliness and screen/soften new Improvements. Please provide evergreen screen shrubs on the east and west sides of the retaining wall enclosure. $Ce .SiiE.£r Lo-1 • • CUP 12-o3-VERIZON WCF CALAVERA HILLS PARK May 9,2012 Pue3 4. Please address planting of the vault area. It Is assumed that landscapln£ wtlt be removed/damaged and will need to be replaced. Please specify ground covers and shrubs to be used and Indicate spacing of ground covers and quantities of shrubs. Please note that landscaping shall be compatible with adjacent landscape. Please also address replacement/repairs to the existi111 irription systetN. $61!. $1'f!fTS t.-1 t1 t. .... see ~R e...csee,Arlotl tCoT&:.:ftl.,.. 5. Planting on slopes shall meet the slope re-vegetation requirements of the Landscape Manual. Please add the following notes to the plans and address how these requirements will be met: SEE 5&.clfE. t£"ECE'f1'llo..C ~£«urlt£~ Ntra llDI>&b "TOStiU.rt.--'1- pes 6:1 or steeper requiring erosion control measures as specified herein shaH be treated with one or more of the following planting standards: a. Standard 1-Cover Crop/Reinforced Straw Matting: Cover crop shall be a seed mix typically made up of quick germinating and fast covering grasses, clovers, and/or wild flowers. Submit the specific seed mix for City approval prior to application. The cover aop shall be applied at a rate and manner sufficient to provide 9096 covera-within thirty (30) days. TYpe of reinforced straw matting shall be as approved by the City and staked to the slope as recommended by the manufacturer. Reinforced straw matting shall be required when planting occurs between August 15 and April 15. The cover crop and/or reinforced straw mat shall be used the remainder of the year. b. Standard #2-Ground Cover c. d. One hundred (100%) percent of the area shall be planted with a ground cover known to have exceilem soil binding characteristics (planted from a minimum size of flatted material and spaced to provide full coverage within one year). Standard #3-Low Shrubs Low spreading woody shrubs (planted from a minimum of 2-3/4 inch liners) shall cover a minimum of seventy (7m6) percent of the slope face (at mature size). Standard #4-Trees and/or Large Shrubs Trees and/or large shrubs shal be (planted from a minimum of 1 gallon containers) at a minimum rate of one (1) per two hundred (200) square feet. Slopes-6:1 or steeper and: a. 3' or less in vertical heisht and are adjacent to public walks or streets require at minimum Standard #1. b. 3' to 8' in vertical height require Standards #1, #2 and #3. c. In excess of 8' \n vertical height require Standards #1, #2, #3, and 1M. Areas graded flatter than 6:1 require Standard #1 (cover aop) with temporary Irrigation when they have one or more of the following conditions: a. Sheet graded pads not scheduled for Improvements within 6 months of completion of rough grading. b. A potential erosion problem as determined by the City. c. Identified by the City as highly visible areas to the public or have special conditions that warrant Immediate treatment. . . . ' • • CUP 12-03 -VERIZON WCF CALAVERA HILLS PARK May9, 2012 Page4 6. Provide a plant palette list Indicating the following: a. Tree types and quantities b. Shrub types and quantities (approximate) c. Ground cover types d. Proposed plant sizes (either by number or% of total quantity) 'EE. Pt.At..altt.IG t.e"4Etlb $fiJ'El" ,_ .. ~ 7. Include a statement on the landscape plans signed by the qualified professional that states: "' am familiar with the requirements for landscape and irrigation plans contained in the city of Corlsbacfs landscape manual and water efflde,t landscape regulations. I have prepared this plan in compliance with those regulations and the landscape manual and agree to comply with all requlremt!nts when submitting construction documents. I certify that the pion implements those regulations to provide efficient use of water. • lfl:»eb Htl'£ Tb 5HE£T L. -~ 8. Outline the areas of landscape maintenance responsibilities (private, common area/homeowners' association, City, etc.). $f:E. Be,. MOTE Ar 15ofT~ oF $HEET J.--1 9. RnURN REDUNES and pro~~lde 2 copies of all plans for the next review •. Parks Department Comments: Paries and Recreation staff has reviewed the plans for the proposed Verizon WCF at calavera Hills Park and has the following concerns which should be addressed with following resubmittals: 1. As. designed, the proposed structure along Carlsbad Villase Drive will distract from the enhanced visual enjoyment of the parkway and perimeter park landscaping. Therefore, vaultt,. all equipment underground will be required In the design to allow for the continuation of the intended character of the parkway and the preservation of the existing landscaping improvements to the greatest extent possible. Cutting into the stope and creating more of an underground vault Is a preferred alternative to above ground walls to crea~ a better visual enhancement. tc•1 flffc.IG,..&I£ Above ground equipment enclosures (I.e. the proposed retaining wall) shaD be of the smallest dimension possible that technology allows. A maximum size of 100 square feet will only be considered if the equipment enclosure is appropriately and completely screened subject to approval by the Parks and Recreation Department. tlcfr AP'L.ICJ\ ilL£ · 2. The building materials and colors for the enclosure shall match the existing architecture of the park and all attempts shall be made to blend the enclosure Into the parkway and parte setting. All conaete split-face block materials shall be approved by Parks and Recreation Department and shall receive a sraffitl coating. Provide a note on the plans that •a sample of the proposed block is to be submitted to Parks and Recreation Department for approval, prior to ordering all remaining materials for the retaining watt: sq. eoc.,J! SPE(. l•ltil'ES t>l'lJZNE'tts ~~~-:? 3. LanclscaPinR of the slope. In addition to mature trees, the existing landscaped slope areas are covered with shrubs and groundcover. The current plans indicate replacing one tree to be removed, per sheet A-1, while the note on sheet A.O.l, Enlarged Site Plan, indicates that two new trees are being proposed. Please indicate with resubmlttal where the other tree Is proposed for planting as well as replacements for shrubbery and groundcover that will be «f" .. d> r-coTE. orJ stt&ET A-c.f, o"'~~ otlf. T~ t~ flaposeJ) To ~fPI.AGE ~,«c~ ~E. 1'tllltV'IIW..i!e ~f~"e1>· • CUP 12-03-VERIZON WCF CALAVERA HILLS PARK May9,2012 Pases 4. 5. 6. 7. distributed In the 3' zone around the vault area. The areas of slope where trenching for a new cable (from vault to new r'lht pole) wiH also requi~ plant material replacement. Indicate the quantity, sizes, and species for the replacement plantings. Provide a note on the plans •that all plant materials shall be inspected and approved by Parks and Recreation Department prior to final planting on the slope•. S!=£ .:stll!rT5o t.. ~I +L-~ • .SEE 9£Atlrl,JG r'OTE # S 01J ~HE!i L-~ . The proposed reconflsuration of the chain link fence requires a sate to allow for maintenance access for the new light standard and baH field liSflting. Indicate on the plans (see red-lines on sheet A-1 for preferred gate location) and provide a 12' wide (2 six foot gate panels to swing towards the ball field) chain link gates to match the existing ball field fence hejght. s~ SHEEt A--1 1/o?E 'II~ TraffiC Control Plans -The plans indicate that a new utility trench will be done for the WCF on the slope and along carlsbad Vilase Drive eastbound lane, as weD as trenching across Glasgow Drive near the sisflaUzed intersection. Please contact Traffic Engineering to verify the necessary right of way permits and traffic control plans required for the construction. T~f'l< ~ tc.lltl$ Vlfi.L. iE.Su~~n Wtnl ~RCIC.Ttoll J)ftftwtNa ~o~ Wi'bLLltlC~lt. Bus Stoo Location and street slgnage-Please Indicate the nearest bus stop location on the plans along with associated signage. If a relocation is required for the sisnage and bus stop due to the proximity of the WCF vault please coordinate with NCTD for relocation and show on the plans. ZE . ._GCJ\Tiofl C>F E:r.:nNG lou$Jl11Ull; S\6foiS o,., MfEET A-o.t. SEE CICGTb J"!Sbul'E tiE if ~GF Stl£1iT. .c,. ' itional Notes requir on tbe plans -Please add these notes on sheet A..O.l "Sidewalks, po11~ments, landscaping, and other existing parkway and park Improvements damaged or disturbed during installation, maintenonce or removol of the WCF shaH be restored to origino/ condition by the provider and shon receive apptCNOI by the City and/or Parks and Recreation Department prior to occupancy of the WCF or prior to termination of the leose." "When removal 0/ existing plant material is required for installation of on approved WCF, the Provider shall be responsible for replacing any damaged plant moteriol with the largest practical or ovai/oble size of the same species. Replacement plant material shall be approved by the City ond/or Porks and Recreation Department prior to occupancy of the WCF or prior to termination of the lease." "WCF Provider fs responsible for all utility and any other lnddental costs associated with the installation, operation, maintenance, tmd/or removal of the WCF . ., .Sf.£ Pfttrl( [)E~IltiT NoTES ll.bL\EJ) To.W~ET A .. o.l