HomeMy WebLinkAboutMP 139A; Rancho Carrillo Master Plan; Master Plan (MP) (16).DEVELOPMENTAL
SERVICES
O Assistant City Mw»g«r
(714) 438499C
D Building Department
(714) 438*52*
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
Cttp of Cartefcab
(714) 438-6541
D Homing & Redevelopment Department
(714)438*611
8/nMnmQ Department
June 2, 1981
Mr. Jim Goff
Daon Corporation
1241 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
SUBJECT: CARRILLO RANCH MASTER PLAN
Dear Jim:
I would like to draw your attention to the following aspects of
the Carrillo Ranch Master Plan.
1. Processing Schedule; The processing schedule that you
forwarded to the city must be revised to correct erroneous
Planning Commission dates. I have attached a 1981 Planning
Commission meeting schedule. Also, at this time I have not
received an application sufficiently complete (graphics) to
innitiate formal staff review.
2. Graphics; In regards to master plan graphics, the
submxttals used in the La Costa Master Plan are generally
sufficient. I would, however, like to make the following
suggestions:
A) Additional Graphics; A graphic showing existing
slope, as we have previously discussed, should be
included in your submittal.
B) Format: I would like to suggest that all required
graphics should be placed within the documents at a
reduced scale (8 1/2 xll); larger fold-out graphics
(24'x36*) should be at the back of the document. I
believe that this will make the document easier to use
and review, and will reduce the staff time necessary to
reproduce larger fold-out graphics.
Mr. Jim Goff
June 2, 1981
Page 2
3* Park Site ; I have attached a copy of the minutes of March
16, 1981, Parks & Recreation Commission Meeting. At this
meeting. Peter Templeton presented the park concept proposed
in the Master Plan. The Commission, however, clearly
indicated that they would not approve this concept, and
endorsed the existing park site "K" as indicated in the
Carlsbad General Plan.
4. Revision /Amendment of Environmental Document; As indicated
in a previous meeting with the EIR consultant, all relevant
information regarding proposed changes to the circulation
aspects of the Carrillo Rancho Master Plan must be received
by the consultant, and integrated into the EIR document, by
the end of June, if you are to meet your processing
schedule.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Please contact me
if you have any questions in this regard.
Sincerely,
PATRICK W. TESSIER
Associate Planner
PWT:ar
Attachment
WON CORPORATION 1241 ELM AVENUE. CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 TELEPHONE (714) 434-4578
Our file Number:
June 2, 1981
Mr. Patrick Tessier
Planning Department
CITY OF CARLSBAD
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, Ca. 92008
Subject: Carrillo Ranch Master Plan
Dear Pat: -
I appreciate your letter of June 2, 1981, outlining a number of
matters that need to be addressed as we proceed with the process-
ing of this Master Plan.
I should indicate at the outset that it appears to me very unlikely
that we will be able to adhere to the general schedule I had
recently suggested. This is principally due to more time being
required to resolve problems than I had earlier anticipated. I
believe the delay will probably be in the neighborhood of 4 to 6
weeks.
With respect to your comments regarding graphics, I am forwarding
your letter to Peter Templeton and Susan Card of The Planning
Center so that they may be guided accordingly.
I recognize the problem yet to be resolved regarding the park in
the Carrillo Master Plan draft. It is my hope that we will have
another opportunity to present a modification of the earlier
March 16th proposal to the Parks & Recreation Commission. How-
ever, until all aspects of this alternative have been identified,
I cannot proceed with resolution of this issue. I am optimistic
that an attractive proposal can be developed which will be found
acceptable to the City and will in essence support the park pro-
posal contained in the present draft.
At the earliest opportunity the material needed by the environ-
mental consultants for their work will be made available to them.
At the moment, however, some of the information regarding proposed
changes in the circulation plan are not ready for transfer to them.
(Continued)
June 2, 1981
Mr. Patrick Tessier
Planning Department (Continued)
While it may be possible to make this material available as
you indicated by the end of June, I still feel as I mentioned
above that there will be an overall delay in processing this
project.
In the meantime, I would 'request that you continue your review
of the text draft so that when these revisions are completed,
our collective major effort may be devoted to only these latest
revisions. I would estimate that only about 20 pages out of
this 70-page document would require changes based on circulation
and park studies currently in process and even at that only one
third of the 20 pages would require significant text changes.
I am also forwarding drawings to you representing the phasing
of this Master Plan. While circulation studies may very well
result in a change in this phasing, I would particularly be
interested in your review and comment on the approach being
taken.
If I may provide any additional information at this time, please
do not hesitate to let me know.
Sincerely,
D A 0 N CORPORATION
GOFF
'reject Manager
JG/eem
End .
cc : Peter Tempi eton
Susan Card
The Planning Center