Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMP 139A; Rancho Carrillo Master Plan; Master Plan (MP) (27)MEMORANDUM DATE: September 15, 1981 TO: Joyce Crosthwaite, Planning Department FROM: Richard Allen, Engineering Department SUBJECT: CHANGES TO REVISED RANCHO CARRILLO TRAFFIC REPORT DATED AUGUST 21, 1981 The following changes include those requested in my memo of September 8, 1981 and a few additional. All of the changes below were discussed with Wes Pringle today by telephone and will be included in a revised report. (Paragraph numbers refer to Joyce Crosthwaite's letter to Wes Pringle, dated September 9, 1981.) 1. Land use quantities: Must be addressed by client. 2. Palomar Airport Road widening: Full widening will occur with con- struction in the Purple phase. 3o§ 4. Apparent gap in text: : Resolved. Pages were out of order. 5. Table 4: Will be corrected. 6. Dual left turn lanes: Not required by ICU analysis but they will be left in. Wes Pringle feels this good traffic design due to large num- ber of turns being made. 7. Palomar Airport Road widening: A mitigation measure will be added to evaluate Palomar Airport Road when tentative maps are submitted and require additional widening when warranted. Additional comments on Melrose Avenue phasing: The report says this street will become a through street when 1500 units are constructed. One additional comment and one mitigation measure will be added to make this statement acceptable. The text will be revised to say that no phase shall contain more than 500 units without a second access. The mitigation measure will say that the phasing of Melrose Avenue will be evaluated when tentative maps are submitted and constructed as a through street when warranted. With the above comments incorporated as outlined above, the traffic report is acceptable to the Engineering Department. In the event that the land area listed for development must be increased, the traffic generated will in- crease and this change should be incorporated in the traffic report. It is not expected that any increase will have a significant effect or alter any conclusion stated in the report, however. RHA:ls 9/15/81 c: Pat Tessier